Граф коммитов

8 Коммитов

Автор SHA1 Сообщение Дата
Stephane Delcroix c74fd02df4 [tests] Change namespace of tests (#4502)
Change the namespace of some tests, allowing me to isolate the slow
running ones and avoid running them every single time.
2018-11-21 11:39:29 +00:00
Stephane Delcroix 7cf3725e9d
[XamlG] allow x:Name on types in using: xmlns (#3395)
- fixes #3393
2018-07-26 11:22:39 +02:00
Stephane Delcroix 012d248e2a Merge branch '3.0.0' into 3.1.0 2018-05-29 10:18:13 +02:00
Jason Smith b84b35bb5f [XamlG] builds incrementally, add MSBuild integration tests (#2825)
* [XamlG] builds incrementally, add MSBuild integration tests

Context: https://github.com/xamarin/Xamarin.Forms/pull/2230

The main performance problem with the collection of MSBuild targets in
`Xamarin.Forms.targets` is they don't build incrementally. I addressed
this with `XamlC` using a "stamp" file; however, it is not quite so
easy to setup the same thing with `XamlG`.

They way "incremental" builds are setup in MSBuild, is by specifying
the `Inputs` and `Outputs` of a `<Target />`. MSBuild will partially
build a target when some outputs are not up to date, and skip it
entirely if they are all up to date.

The best docs I can find on MSBuild incremental builds:
https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms171483.aspx

Unfortunately a few things had to happen to make this work for
`XamlG`:
- Define a new target `_FindXamlGFiles` that is invoked before `XamlG`
- `_FindXamlGFiles` defines the `_XamlGInputs` and `_XamlGOutputs`
  `<ItemGroup />`'s
- `_FindXamlGFiles` must also define `<Compile />` and `<FileWrites />`,
  in case the `XamlG` target is skipped
- `XamlGTask` now needs to get passed in a list of `OutputFiles`,
  since we have computed these paths ahead of time
- `XamlGTask` should validate the lengths of `XamlFiles` and
  `OutputFiles` match, used error message from MSBuild proper:
  a691a44f0e/src/Tasks/Copy.cs (L505)

`XamlG` now builds incrementally!

To give some context on how much improvement we can see with build
times, consider the following command:

    msbuild Xamarin.Forms.ControlGallery.Android/Xamarin.Forms.ControlGallery.Android.csproj

If you run it once, it will take a while--this change will not improve
the first build. On the second build with the exact same command, it
*should* be much faster.

Before this commit, the second build on my machine takes:

    40.563s

After the change:

    23.692s

`XamlG` has cascading impact on build times when it isn't built
incrementally:
- The C# assembly always changes
- Hence, `XamlC` will always run
- Hence, `GenerateJavaStubs` will always run
- Hence, `javac.exe` and `dx.jar` will always run

I am making other improvements like this in Xamarin.Android itself,
that will further improve these times, such as:
https://github.com/xamarin/xamarin-android/pull/1693

~~ New MSBuild Integration Tests ~~

Added some basic MSBuild testing infrastructure:
- Tests write project files to `bin/Debug/temp/TestName`
- Each test has an `sdkStyle` flag for testing the new project system
  versus the old one
- `[TearDown]` deletes the entire directory, with a retry for
  `IOException` on Windows
- Used the `Microsoft.Build.Locator` NuGet package for locating
  `MSBuild.exe` on Windows
- These tests take 2-5 seconds each

So for example, the simplest test, `BuildAProject` writes to
`Xamarin.Forms.Xaml.UnitTests\bin\Debug\temp\BuildAProject(False)\test.csproj`:

    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
    <Project xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/developer/msbuild/2003">
      <PropertyGroup>
        <Configuration>Debug</Configuration>
        <Platform>AnyCPU</Platform>
        <OutputType>Library</OutputType>
        <OutputPath>bin\Debug</OutputPath>
        <TargetFrameworkVersion>v4.7</TargetFrameworkVersion>
      </PropertyGroup>
      <ItemGroup>
        <Reference Include="mscorlib" />
        <Reference Include="System" />
        <Reference Include="Xamarin.Forms.Core.dll">
          <HintPath>..\..\Xamarin.Forms.Core.dll</HintPath>
        </Reference>
        <Reference Include="Xamarin.Forms.Xaml.dll">
          <HintPath>..\..\Xamarin.Forms.Xaml.dll</HintPath>
        </Reference>
      </ItemGroup>
      <ItemGroup>
        <Compile Include="AssemblyInfo.cs" />
      </ItemGroup>
      <Import Project="$(MSBuildBinPath)\Microsoft.CSharp.targets" />
      <Import Project="..\..\..\..\..\.nuspec\Xamarin.Forms.targets" />
      <ItemGroup>
        <EmbeddedResource Include="MainPage.xaml" />
      </ItemGroup>
    </Project>

Invokes `msbuild`, and checks the intermediate output for files being
generated.

Tested scenarios:
- Build a simple project
- Build, then build again, and make sure targets were skipped
- Build, then clean, make sure files are gone
- Build, with linked files
- Design-time build
- Call `UpdateDesignTimeXaml` directly
- Build, add a new file, build again
- Build, update timestamp on a file, build again
- XAML file with random XML content
- XAML file with invalid XML content
- A general `EmbeddedResource` that shouldn't go through XamlG

Adding these tests found a bug! `IncrementalClean` was deleting
`XamlC.stamp`. I fixed this by using `<ItemGroup />`, which will be
propery evaluated even if the target is skipped.

~~ Other Changes ~~

- `FilesWrite` is actually supposed to be `FileWrites`, see canonical
  source of how `Clean` works and what `FileWrites` is here:
  https://github.com/Microsoft/msbuild/issues/2408#issuecomment-321082997
- Moved `DummyBuildEngine` into `MSBuild` directory--makes sense?
  maybe don't need to?
- Added a `XamlGDifferentInputOutputLengths` test to check the error
  message
- Expanded `DummyBuildEngine` so you can assert against log messages
- Changed a setting in `.Xamarin.Forms.Android.sln` so the unit test
  project is built
- My VS IDE monkeyed with a few files, and I kept any *good* (or
  relevant) changes: `Xamarin.Forms.UnitTests.csproj`,
  `Xamarin.Forms.Xaml.UnitTests\app.config`, etc.

There were some checks for `%(TargetPath)` being blank in the C# code
of `XamlGTask`. In that case it was using `Path.GetRandomFileName`,
but we can't do this if we are setting up inputs and outputs for
`XamlG`. I presume this is from the designer and/or design-time builds
before `DependsOnTargets="PrepareResourceNames"` was added. I tested
design-time builds in VS on Windows, and `$(TargetPath)` was set. To
be sure we don't break anything here, I exclude inputs to `XamlG` if
`%(TargetPath)` is somehow blank.

See relevant MSBuild code for `%(TargetPath)` here:

0515178090/src/Tasks/Microsoft.Common.CurrentVersion.targets (L2822)

~~ Future changes ~~

CssG needs the exact same setup, as it was patterned after `XamlG`.
This should probably be done in a future PR.

* [msbuild] improved lookup of Xamarin.Forms.targets in integration tests

Context: https://devdiv.visualstudio.com/DevDiv/_build?buildId=1717939
Context: https://devdiv.visualstudio.com/DevDiv/_build?buildId=1718306

It looks like the VSTS builds for release branches are running tests
in a staging directory. This means we can't reliably import
`Xamarin.Forms.targets` as what was working locally in the
Xamarin.Forms source tree.

So to fix this:
- Look for `.nuspec/Xamarin.Forms.targets`, at the default location
  and then using the `BUILD_SOURCESDIRECTORY` environment variable as
  a fallback
- Copy all `*.targets` files to the test directory
- Our `*.csproj` files under test can import the file from there.

We have to copy the targets files here to be sure that MSBuild can
load `Xamarin.Forms.Build.Tasks.dll`, which is also referenced by the
unit tests.

I also made the tests abort earlier if they can't find
`Xamarin.Forms.targets`.
2018-05-25 15:39:17 +01:00
Stephane Delcroix 97a21256b4
[XamlG] creates fields for x:Name on root (#2582)
- fixes #2574
2018-05-02 21:02:46 +02:00
Stephane Delcroix 550520b59b
[XamlC] Compile RDs without codebehind (#1241)
* [XamlC] generate code behind and compile RD without x:Class

* [XamlG] change Namespace and add [EditorBrowsable]
2017-11-08 11:28:40 +01:00
Stephane Delcroix 84ba9edce4 [XamlG] supports x:FieldModifier (#878)
* [XamlG] supports x:FieldModifier

* adapt test as duplicate fields are now caught at XamlG time

* [XamlG] supports UWP values in addition of WPF's for x:FieldModifier
2017-04-28 10:39:16 +02:00
Jason Smith 17fdde66d9 Initial import 2016-03-22 16:13:41 -07:00