docs: add release process change RFC (#199)
This commit is contained in:
Родитель
ea69dd10ba
Коммит
3edb575881
|
@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
|
|||
# RFC: Release Process Change
|
||||
|
||||
**Author:** Shelley Vohr
|
||||
|
||||
## What We Do Now
|
||||
|
||||
Right now, we create a new branch for every new minor release line. For example, there current exist branches for `4-0-x`, `4-1-x`, and as of recently, `4-2-x`.
|
||||
|
||||
Every new minor release branch supersedes the previous one, but the branches remain, both in our branching structure and in Sudowoodo.
|
||||
|
||||
## The New Process
|
||||
|
||||
Moving forward, I propose we only maintain one staging branch for every major release line. This would mean (for example) removing `4-0-x`, `4-1-x`, and `4-2-x` in favor of one unified `4-x-y`.
|
||||
|
||||
All semver-minor features, as they already are today, must be approved by the Releases WG before being backported into any given stabilization line. Then, when a new release is run from that line, it would be released as a a minor or patch depending on whether there were unreleased semver-minor commits in the branch.
|
||||
|
||||
Security releases would be released as patches on top of the latest minor version on a given branch.
|
||||
|
||||
This would remove confusion around issues in backporting and simplify and streamline the process as a whole.
|
||||
|
||||
Finally, this should in no way change the ratio of patch to minor releases or increase the frequency of minor releases: the same level of care and high bar is required for any new semver-minor commits to land on a given stabilization branch.
|
||||
|
||||
**Nota Bene:** This change would also necessitate changes to release-associated tooling to account for new branching structure, including but not necessarily limited to our version bump scripts & Sudowoodo.
|
Загрузка…
Ссылка в новой задаче