worker: correct (de)initialization order

- Initialize `thread_exit_async_` only once the thread has been
  started. This is done since it is only triggered from the
  thread when it is exiting.
- Move the final `uv_run` to the `Worker` destructor.
  This makes sure that it is always run, regardless of whether
  the thread is actually started or not.
- Always dispose the `Isolate` before cleaning up the libuv event
  loop. This now matches the reverse order of initialization.

Fixes: https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/22736
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/22773
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>

src/node_worker.cc

@@ -71,14 +71,6 @@ Worker::Worker(Environment* env, Local<Object> wrap)
   CHECK_NE(isolate_, nullptr);
   CHECK_EQ(uv_loop_init(&loop_), 0);
 
-  thread_exit_async_.reset(new uv_async_t);
-  thread_exit_async_->data = this;
-  CHECK_EQ(uv_async_init(env->event_loop(),
-                         thread_exit_async_.get(),
-                         [](uv_async_t* handle) {
-    static_cast<Worker*>(handle->data)->OnThreadStopped();
-  }), 0);
-
   {
     // Enter an environment capable of executing code in the child Isolate
     // (and only in it).
@@ -242,9 +234,6 @@ void Worker::Run() {
 
   DisposeIsolate();
 
-  // Need to run the loop one more time to close the platform's uv_async_t
-  uv_run(&loop_, UV_RUN_ONCE);
-
   {
     Mutex::ScopedLock lock(mutex_);
     CHECK(thread_exit_async_);
@@ -256,6 +245,13 @@ void Worker::Run() {
 }
 
 void Worker::DisposeIsolate() {
+  if (env_) {
+    CHECK_NOT_NULL(isolate_);
+    Locker locker(isolate_);
+    Isolate::Scope isolate_scope(isolate_);
+    env_.reset();
+  }
+
   if (isolate_ == nullptr)
     return;
 
@@ -331,12 +327,16 @@ Worker::~Worker() {
   CHECK(stopped_);
   CHECK(thread_joined_);
   CHECK_EQ(child_port_, nullptr);
-  CheckedUvLoopClose(&loop_);
 
   // This has most likely already happened within the worker thread -- this
   // is just in case Worker creation failed early.
   DisposeIsolate();
 
+  // Need to run the loop one more time to close the platform's uv_async_t
+  uv_run(&loop_, UV_RUN_ONCE);
+
+  CheckedUvLoopClose(&loop_);
+
   Debug(this, "Worker %llu destroyed", thread_id_);
 }
 
@@ -360,10 +360,19 @@ void Worker::StartThread(const FunctionCallbackInfo<Value>& args) {
 
   w->env()->add_sub_worker_context(w);
   w->stopped_ = false;
+  w->thread_joined_ = false;
+
+  w->thread_exit_async_.reset(new uv_async_t);
+  w->thread_exit_async_->data = w;
+  CHECK_EQ(uv_async_init(w->env()->event_loop(),
+                         w->thread_exit_async_.get(),
+                         [](uv_async_t* handle) {
+    static_cast<Worker*>(handle->data)->OnThreadStopped();
+  }), 0);
+
   CHECK_EQ(uv_thread_create(&w->tid_, [](void* arg) {
     static_cast<Worker*>(arg)->Run();
   }, static_cast<void*>(w)), 0);
-  w->thread_joined_ = false;
 }
 
 void Worker::StopThread(const FunctionCallbackInfo<Value>& args) {

test/parallel/test-worker-invalid-workerdata.js

@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+// Flags: --experimental-worker
+'use strict';
+require('../common');
+const assert = require('assert');
+const { Worker } = require('worker_threads');
+
+// This tests verifies that failing to serialize workerData does not keep
+// the process alive.
+// Refs: https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/22736
+
+assert.throws(() => {
+  new Worker('./worker.js', {
+    workerData: { fn: () => {} }
+  });
+}, /DataCloneError/);