doc: standardize references to userland
Change occurrences of "user-land" to "userland". PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/3192 Fixes: https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/3189 Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
Родитель
66c9c61212
Коммит
f5a3f44f5c
|
@ -2975,7 +2975,7 @@ https://iojs.org/api/tls.html
|
|||
- Added async session storage events.
|
||||
- Added async SNI callback.
|
||||
- Added multi-key server support (for example, ECDSA+RSA server).
|
||||
- Added optional callback to `checkServerIdentity` for manual certificate validation in user-land.
|
||||
- Added optional callback to `checkServerIdentity` for manual certificate validation in userland.
|
||||
- Added support for ECDSA/ECDHE cipher.
|
||||
- Implemented TLS streams in C++, boosting their performance.
|
||||
- Moved `createCredentials` to `tls` and renamed it to `createSecureContext`.
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ Discussion of how we should probably just add more Buffer methods to core.
|
|||
|
||||
Bert: there’s another aspect of this. At some point Node was really modern, but we’ve fallen behind. We can’t even get HTTP/2 or web sockets, we’re in trouble.
|
||||
|
||||
Domenic: we’ve learned a lot over the last few years that pushes us to user-land code instead of in core. But we need to have some things be “official.”
|
||||
Domenic: we’ve learned a lot over the last few years that pushes us to userland code instead of in core. But we need to have some things be “official.”
|
||||
|
||||
Trevor: I would like the infrastructure for HTTP/2 to be similar to HTTP/1, with http-parser etc.
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -125,9 +125,9 @@ Ben: is there any reason HTTP/2 couldn’t be done in pure JS?
|
|||
|
||||
Discussion of http-parser and current HTTP/1 implementation strategy and speed.
|
||||
|
||||
Bert: I think as a TC what we should say is “we would like to support HTTP/2, but want to see some user-land ideas first.” We don’t need to actually start implementation progress right now.
|
||||
Bert: I think as a TC what we should say is “we would like to support HTTP/2, but want to see some userland ideas first.” We don’t need to actually start implementation progress right now.
|
||||
|
||||
Ben: does anyone on the TC want to write a user-land HTTP/2 module?
|
||||
Ben: does anyone on the TC want to write a userland HTTP/2 module?
|
||||
|
||||
Discussion of how Fedor already has a SPDY implementation.
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Загрузка…
Ссылка в новой задаче