updates to reflect current status in Debian land, and added some known

differences between OpenSSL and GnuTLS (that is probably a suitable subject
for a separate document...)
This commit is contained in:
Daniel Stenberg 2005-10-27 20:51:43 +00:00
Родитель 3b9c20fe31
Коммит d49edc8e09
1 изменённых файлов: 24 добавлений и 3 удалений

Просмотреть файл

@ -1,11 +1,11 @@
Date: September 30, 2005
Date: October 27, 2005
Author: Daniel Stenberg <daniel@haxx.se>
URL: http://curl.haxx.se/legal/distro-dilemma.html
Condition
This document is written to describe the situation as it is right
now. libcurl 7.14.1 is currently the latest version available. Things may (or
now. libcurl 7.15.0 is currently the latest version available. Things may (or
perhaps will) of course change in the future.
This document reflects my view and understanding of these things. Please tell
@ -33,7 +33,10 @@ Background
tend to), you have a clash. GPL vs Original BSD.
This dilemma is not libcurl-specific nor is it specific to any particular
Linux distro.
Linux distro. (This article mentions and refers to Debian several times, but
only because Debian seems to be the only Linux distro to have faced this
issue yet since no other distro is shipping libcurl built with two SSL
libraries.)
Part of the Operating System
@ -83,6 +86,18 @@ GnuTLS vs OpenSSL
the application authors didn't want to or was unable to add an exception to
their GPL license. Alas, the license problem hit the fan again.
GnuTLS
- LGPL licensened
- supports SRP
- lacks SSLv2 support
- lacks MD2 support (used by at least some CA certs)
OpenSSL
- Original BSD licensened
- lacks SRP
- supports SSLv2
- older and more widely used
The Better License, Original BSD or LGPL?
It isn't obvious or without debate to any objective interested party that
@ -144,6 +159,12 @@ Fixing the Only Problem
The only problem is thus for distributions that want to offer libcurl
versions built with more than one SSL/TLS library.
Debian is now (since mid September 2005) providing two different devel
packages, one for libcurl built with OpenSSL and one built with GnuTLS. They
use different .so names and can this both be installed in a single system
simultaneously. This has previously been said as a transitional system not
desired to keep in the long run.
Since multiple libcurl binaries using different names are ruled out, we need
to come up with a way to have one single libcurl that someone uses different
underlying libraries. The best(?) approach currently suggested involves this: