Add missing notes on u8 literal natural type question.

meetings/2022/LDM-2022-01-26.md

@@ -62,6 +62,15 @@ trees, and future modernization efforts will consider this case well.
 
 Blocked.
 
+#### Natural type of `u8` literals
+
+Since this is a prototype, we think that the proposed `byte[]` is fine for now. We will likely want to have a deeper debate about whether string literals
+should have a natural type of a mutable array, but we don't think that debate is necessary for now.
+
+##### Conclusion
+
+The natural type of `u8` literals will be `byte[]`, for the prototype.
+
 #### Conversion depth
 
 There is some interplay here with the standard conversion rules: if the conversion is a standard conversion, then any place that takes a `byte[]` as a