From d72ea52f68339c4f27d8711f0bf09800e6a19104 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Geoffrey White <40627776+geoffw0@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2022 16:26:26 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] C++: More accurate test tags.

---
 .../Likely Bugs/Format/WrongNumberOfFormatArguments/macros.cpp  | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/cpp/ql/test/query-tests/Likely Bugs/Format/WrongNumberOfFormatArguments/macros.cpp b/cpp/ql/test/query-tests/Likely Bugs/Format/WrongNumberOfFormatArguments/macros.cpp
index 431aa2e0913..4d8257b776b 100644
--- a/cpp/ql/test/query-tests/Likely Bugs/Format/WrongNumberOfFormatArguments/macros.cpp	
+++ b/cpp/ql/test/query-tests/Likely Bugs/Format/WrongNumberOfFormatArguments/macros.cpp	
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ void testMacros(int a, int b, int c)
 	GOODPRINTF("%i %i %i\n", a, b, c); // GOOD
 	GOODPRINTF("%i %i %i %i\n", a, b, c); // BAD: too few format arguments
 
-	BADPRINTF("%i %i\n", a, b, 0); // BAD: too many format arguments
+	BADPRINTF("%i %i\n", a, b, 0); // DUBIOUS: too many format arguments
 		// ^ here there are too many format arguments, but the design of the Macro forces the user
 		//   to do this, and the extra argument is harmlessly ignored in practice.  Reporting these
 		//   results can be extremely noisy (e.g. in openldap).