зеркало из https://github.com/github/dmca.git
80 строки
3.6 KiB
Markdown
80 строки
3.6 KiB
Markdown
|
Dear Sir / Madam,
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
I'm writing regarding a DMCA takedown of my repository
|
|||
|
https://github.com/kvitaly2005/lprobe reasons published here
|
|||
|
https://github.com/github/dmca/blob/master/2015-06-04-nProbe.md
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
I have read and understand GitHub's Guide to Filing a DMCA Counter Notice.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
I swear, under penalty of perjury, that I have a good-faith belief that the
|
|||
|
material was removed or disabled as a result of a mistake or
|
|||
|
misidentification of the material to be removed or disabled.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
In short: This code I published in the lProbe repository is a legally
|
|||
|
obtained source code of the nProbe 6 software which was distributed by the
|
|||
|
author, Luca Deri under the GPLv2 license and therefore, I now have well
|
|||
|
known rights (GPL 1,2) granted to distribute the source code of application
|
|||
|
under the same license while preserving the copyright, that I did. There is
|
|||
|
no GPL violations at my part, so my freedom to distribute and modify the
|
|||
|
software are in place.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
However, author is intentionally misinterpreting and hiding this fact in
|
|||
|
his communications because of commercial profit he want to get from the new
|
|||
|
version nProbe 7 that he is now selling at his site.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
I'm aware of another similar fraudulent take down author filed to github in
|
|||
|
2014 - https://github.com/github/dmca/blob/master/2014-12-23-nProbe.md
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
I have the following evidences that at the time of purchase nprobe 6 (April
|
|||
|
7, 2014) software was provided to me under GPLv2 license granting the users
|
|||
|
with all stated rights and freedoms
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
1) I legaly bought this software and have transaction ID, paypal receipt
|
|||
|
and confirming email. (Order (id 1396860027) completed [Amount 99.95
|
|||
|
EUR][Transaction Id: 6SG00224BG595015G] mail with all headers see ev_1.txt)
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
2) Author, Luca Deri is clearly stated on his own site that license of
|
|||
|
nprobe is GPLv2 in the time of purchase, see independent source here:
|
|||
|
http://web.archive.org/web/20140418232353/http://www.ntop.org/products/nprobe/
|
|||
|
in FAQ section:
|
|||
|
"Q: Is the nProbe™ source code available?"
|
|||
|
"A: Yes of course, it’s GPL."
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
3) Binary file installation I get contains text of license and requre that
|
|||
|
I agree to it. While it is not technically correct, but it also a clear
|
|||
|
sign that author consciously choose GPL license for the software.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
[image: Inline image 1]
|
|||
|
[image: Inline image 2]
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
The win32 executable I got after purchase you can run and see yourself:
|
|||
|
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B7otJX4PM2NlbjRPMkFGdW1TZ3c/view?usp=sharing
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
4) My request to the source code based on GPL freedoms was fulfilled and no
|
|||
|
other conditions was set in the conversation.
|
|||
|
(see ev4.txt)
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Again, according to the copyleft license author does not have rights to
|
|||
|
forbid me to distribute a legaly obtained GPL code fork under non
|
|||
|
trademarked name while I did not remove any copyright and keep the license
|
|||
|
and so is complaint to the GPL.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Therefore, while Luca Deri, as an author can set any license on
|
|||
|
distribution of nProbe 7and future versions, as the use of GPLed code is a
|
|||
|
matter of possible investigation in future, he can not revoke my freedom
|
|||
|
given by the GPL license of the nProbe 6 while the distribution of it is
|
|||
|
fully complaint to the GNU Public License.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Based on all above I ask to re enable the content to restore my rights on
|
|||
|
the software "nprobe 6" given me by the author under GPLv2 license, which
|
|||
|
is confirmed by all the mentioned evidences.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
I consent to the jurisdiction of Federal District Court for the judicial
|
|||
|
district in which my address is located (if in the United States, otherwise
|
|||
|
the Northern District of California where GitHub is located), and I will
|
|||
|
accept service of process from the person who provided the DMCA
|
|||
|
notification or an agent of such person.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Best regards,
|
|||
|
[private]
|