github
/
putty
зеркало из https://github.com/github/putty.git
1
0
Форкнуть 0
Код Задачи Пакеты Проекты Релизы Вики Активность
putty/mainchan.c

559 строки
17 KiB
C
Исходник Обычный вид История

Move mainchan into its own file, like agentf. This gets another big pile of logic out of ssh2connection and puts it somewhere more central. Now the only thing left in ssh2connection is the formatting and parsing of the various channel requests; the logic deciding which ones to issue and what to do about them is devolved to the Channel implementation, as it properly should be.
2018-09-30 09:16:38 +03:00
/*
* SSH main session channel handling.
*/
#include <assert.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include "putty.h"
#include "ssh.h"
#include "sshppl.h"
#include "sshchan.h"
static void mainchan_free(Channel *chan);
static void mainchan_open_confirmation(Channel *chan);
static void mainchan_open_failure(Channel *chan, const char *errtext);
Convert a lot of 'int' variables to 'bool'. My normal habit these days, in new code, is to treat int and bool as _almost_ completely separate types. I'm still willing to use C's implicit test for zero on an integer (e.g. 'if (!blob.len)' is fine, no need to spell it out as blob.len != 0), but generally, if a variable is going to be conceptually a boolean, I like to declare it bool and assign to it using 'true' or 'false' rather than 0 or 1. PuTTY is an exception, because it predates the C99 bool, and I've stuck to its existing coding style even when adding new code to it. But it's been annoying me more and more, so now that I've decided C99 bool is an acceptable thing to require from our toolchain in the first place, here's a quite thorough trawl through the source doing 'boolification'. Many variables and function parameters are now typed as bool rather than int; many assignments of 0 or 1 to those variables are now spelled 'true' or 'false'. I managed this thorough conversion with the help of a custom clang plugin that I wrote to trawl the AST and apply heuristics to point out where things might want changing. So I've even managed to do a decent job on parts of the code I haven't looked at in years! To make the plugin's work easier, I pushed platform front ends generally in the direction of using standard 'bool' in preference to platform-specific boolean types like Windows BOOL or GTK's gboolean; I've left the platform booleans in places they _have_ to be for the platform APIs to work right, but variables only used by my own code have been converted wherever I found them. In a few places there are int values that look very like booleans in _most_ of the places they're used, but have a rarely-used third value, or a distinction between different nonzero values that most users don't care about. In these cases, I've _removed_ uses of 'true' and 'false' for the return values, to emphasise that there's something more subtle going on than a simple boolean answer: - the 'multisel' field in dialog.h's list box structure, for which the GTK front end in particular recognises a difference between 1 and 2 but nearly everything else treats as boolean - the 'urgent' parameter to plug_receive, where 1 vs 2 tells you something about the specific location of the urgent pointer, but most clients only care about 0 vs 'something nonzero' - the return value of wc_match, where -1 indicates a syntax error in the wildcard. - the return values from SSH-1 RSA-key loading functions, which use -1 for 'wrong passphrase' and 0 for all other failures (so any caller which already knows it's not loading an _encrypted private_ key can treat them as boolean) - term->esc_query, and the 'query' parameter in toggle_mode in terminal.c, which _usually_ hold 0 for ESC[123h or 1 for ESC[?123h, but can also hold -1 for some other intervening character that we don't support. In a few places there's an integer that I haven't turned into a bool even though it really _can_ only take values 0 or 1 (and, as above, tried to make the call sites consistent in not calling those values true and false), on the grounds that I thought it would make it more confusing to imply that the 0 value was in some sense 'negative' or bad and the 1 positive or good: - the return value of plug_accepting uses the POSIXish convention of 0=success and nonzero=error; I think if I made it bool then I'd also want to reverse its sense, and that's a job for a separate piece of work. - the 'screen' parameter to lineptr() in terminal.c, where 0 and 1 represent the default and alternate screens. There's no obvious reason why one of those should be considered 'true' or 'positive' or 'success' - they're just indices - so I've left it as int. ssh_scp_recv had particularly confusing semantics for its previous int return value: its call sites used '<= 0' to check for error, but it never actually returned a negative number, just 0 or 1. Now the function and its call sites agree that it's a bool. In a couple of places I've renamed variables called 'ret', because I don't like that name any more - it's unclear whether it means the return value (in preparation) for the _containing_ function or the return value received from a subroutine call, and occasionally I've accidentally used the same variable for both and introduced a bug. So where one of those got in my way, I've renamed it to 'toret' or 'retd' (the latter short for 'returned') in line with my usual modern practice, but I haven't done a thorough job of finding all of them. Finally, one amusing side effect of doing this is that I've had to separate quite a few chained assignments. It used to be perfectly fine to write 'a = b = c = TRUE' when a,b,c were int and TRUE was just a the 'true' defined by stdbool.h, that idiom provokes a warning from gcc: 'suggest parentheses around assignment used as truth value'!
2018-11-02 22:23:19 +03:00
static int mainchan_send(Channel *chan, bool is_stderr, const void *, int);
Move mainchan into its own file, like agentf. This gets another big pile of logic out of ssh2connection and puts it somewhere more central. Now the only thing left in ssh2connection is the formatting and parsing of the various channel requests; the logic deciding which ones to issue and what to do about them is devolved to the Channel implementation, as it properly should be.
2018-09-30 09:16:38 +03:00
static void mainchan_send_eof(Channel *chan);
Convert a lot of 'int' variables to 'bool'. My normal habit these days, in new code, is to treat int and bool as _almost_ completely separate types. I'm still willing to use C's implicit test for zero on an integer (e.g. 'if (!blob.len)' is fine, no need to spell it out as blob.len != 0), but generally, if a variable is going to be conceptually a boolean, I like to declare it bool and assign to it using 'true' or 'false' rather than 0 or 1. PuTTY is an exception, because it predates the C99 bool, and I've stuck to its existing coding style even when adding new code to it. But it's been annoying me more and more, so now that I've decided C99 bool is an acceptable thing to require from our toolchain in the first place, here's a quite thorough trawl through the source doing 'boolification'. Many variables and function parameters are now typed as bool rather than int; many assignments of 0 or 1 to those variables are now spelled 'true' or 'false'. I managed this thorough conversion with the help of a custom clang plugin that I wrote to trawl the AST and apply heuristics to point out where things might want changing. So I've even managed to do a decent job on parts of the code I haven't looked at in years! To make the plugin's work easier, I pushed platform front ends generally in the direction of using standard 'bool' in preference to platform-specific boolean types like Windows BOOL or GTK's gboolean; I've left the platform booleans in places they _have_ to be for the platform APIs to work right, but variables only used by my own code have been converted wherever I found them. In a few places there are int values that look very like booleans in _most_ of the places they're used, but have a rarely-used third value, or a distinction between different nonzero values that most users don't care about. In these cases, I've _removed_ uses of 'true' and 'false' for the return values, to emphasise that there's something more subtle going on than a simple boolean answer: - the 'multisel' field in dialog.h's list box structure, for which the GTK front end in particular recognises a difference between 1 and 2 but nearly everything else treats as boolean - the 'urgent' parameter to plug_receive, where 1 vs 2 tells you something about the specific location of the urgent pointer, but most clients only care about 0 vs 'something nonzero' - the return value of wc_match, where -1 indicates a syntax error in the wildcard. - the return values from SSH-1 RSA-key loading functions, which use -1 for 'wrong passphrase' and 0 for all other failures (so any caller which already knows it's not loading an _encrypted private_ key can treat them as boolean) - term->esc_query, and the 'query' parameter in toggle_mode in terminal.c, which _usually_ hold 0 for ESC[123h or 1 for ESC[?123h, but can also hold -1 for some other intervening character that we don't support. In a few places there's an integer that I haven't turned into a bool even though it really _can_ only take values 0 or 1 (and, as above, tried to make the call sites consistent in not calling those values true and false), on the grounds that I thought it would make it more confusing to imply that the 0 value was in some sense 'negative' or bad and the 1 positive or good: - the return value of plug_accepting uses the POSIXish convention of 0=success and nonzero=error; I think if I made it bool then I'd also want to reverse its sense, and that's a job for a separate piece of work. - the 'screen' parameter to lineptr() in terminal.c, where 0 and 1 represent the default and alternate screens. There's no obvious reason why one of those should be considered 'true' or 'positive' or 'success' - they're just indices - so I've left it as int. ssh_scp_recv had particularly confusing semantics for its previous int return value: its call sites used '<= 0' to check for error, but it never actually returned a negative number, just 0 or 1. Now the function and its call sites agree that it's a bool. In a couple of places I've renamed variables called 'ret', because I don't like that name any more - it's unclear whether it means the return value (in preparation) for the _containing_ function or the return value received from a subroutine call, and occasionally I've accidentally used the same variable for both and introduced a bug. So where one of those got in my way, I've renamed it to 'toret' or 'retd' (the latter short for 'returned') in line with my usual modern practice, but I haven't done a thorough job of finding all of them. Finally, one amusing side effect of doing this is that I've had to separate quite a few chained assignments. It used to be perfectly fine to write 'a = b = c = TRUE' when a,b,c were int and TRUE was just a the 'true' defined by stdbool.h, that idiom provokes a warning from gcc: 'suggest parentheses around assignment used as truth value'!
2018-11-02 22:23:19 +03:00
static void mainchan_set_input_wanted(Channel *chan, bool wanted);
Move mainchan into its own file, like agentf. This gets another big pile of logic out of ssh2connection and puts it somewhere more central. Now the only thing left in ssh2connection is the formatting and parsing of the various channel requests; the logic deciding which ones to issue and what to do about them is devolved to the Channel implementation, as it properly should be.
2018-09-30 09:16:38 +03:00
static char *mainchan_log_close_msg(Channel *chan);
Convert a lot of 'int' variables to 'bool'. My normal habit these days, in new code, is to treat int and bool as _almost_ completely separate types. I'm still willing to use C's implicit test for zero on an integer (e.g. 'if (!blob.len)' is fine, no need to spell it out as blob.len != 0), but generally, if a variable is going to be conceptually a boolean, I like to declare it bool and assign to it using 'true' or 'false' rather than 0 or 1. PuTTY is an exception, because it predates the C99 bool, and I've stuck to its existing coding style even when adding new code to it. But it's been annoying me more and more, so now that I've decided C99 bool is an acceptable thing to require from our toolchain in the first place, here's a quite thorough trawl through the source doing 'boolification'. Many variables and function parameters are now typed as bool rather than int; many assignments of 0 or 1 to those variables are now spelled 'true' or 'false'. I managed this thorough conversion with the help of a custom clang plugin that I wrote to trawl the AST and apply heuristics to point out where things might want changing. So I've even managed to do a decent job on parts of the code I haven't looked at in years! To make the plugin's work easier, I pushed platform front ends generally in the direction of using standard 'bool' in preference to platform-specific boolean types like Windows BOOL or GTK's gboolean; I've left the platform booleans in places they _have_ to be for the platform APIs to work right, but variables only used by my own code have been converted wherever I found them. In a few places there are int values that look very like booleans in _most_ of the places they're used, but have a rarely-used third value, or a distinction between different nonzero values that most users don't care about. In these cases, I've _removed_ uses of 'true' and 'false' for the return values, to emphasise that there's something more subtle going on than a simple boolean answer: - the 'multisel' field in dialog.h's list box structure, for which the GTK front end in particular recognises a difference between 1 and 2 but nearly everything else treats as boolean - the 'urgent' parameter to plug_receive, where 1 vs 2 tells you something about the specific location of the urgent pointer, but most clients only care about 0 vs 'something nonzero' - the return value of wc_match, where -1 indicates a syntax error in the wildcard. - the return values from SSH-1 RSA-key loading functions, which use -1 for 'wrong passphrase' and 0 for all other failures (so any caller which already knows it's not loading an _encrypted private_ key can treat them as boolean) - term->esc_query, and the 'query' parameter in toggle_mode in terminal.c, which _usually_ hold 0 for ESC[123h or 1 for ESC[?123h, but can also hold -1 for some other intervening character that we don't support. In a few places there's an integer that I haven't turned into a bool even though it really _can_ only take values 0 or 1 (and, as above, tried to make the call sites consistent in not calling those values true and false), on the grounds that I thought it would make it more confusing to imply that the 0 value was in some sense 'negative' or bad and the 1 positive or good: - the return value of plug_accepting uses the POSIXish convention of 0=success and nonzero=error; I think if I made it bool then I'd also want to reverse its sense, and that's a job for a separate piece of work. - the 'screen' parameter to lineptr() in terminal.c, where 0 and 1 represent the default and alternate screens. There's no obvious reason why one of those should be considered 'true' or 'positive' or 'success' - they're just indices - so I've left it as int. ssh_scp_recv had particularly confusing semantics for its previous int return value: its call sites used '<= 0' to check for error, but it never actually returned a negative number, just 0 or 1. Now the function and its call sites agree that it's a bool. In a couple of places I've renamed variables called 'ret', because I don't like that name any more - it's unclear whether it means the return value (in preparation) for the _containing_ function or the return value received from a subroutine call, and occasionally I've accidentally used the same variable for both and introduced a bug. So where one of those got in my way, I've renamed it to 'toret' or 'retd' (the latter short for 'returned') in line with my usual modern practice, but I haven't done a thorough job of finding all of them. Finally, one amusing side effect of doing this is that I've had to separate quite a few chained assignments. It used to be perfectly fine to write 'a = b = c = TRUE' when a,b,c were int and TRUE was just a the 'true' defined by stdbool.h, that idiom provokes a warning from gcc: 'suggest parentheses around assignment used as truth value'!
2018-11-02 22:23:19 +03:00
static bool mainchan_rcvd_exit_status(Channel *chan, int status);
static bool mainchan_rcvd_exit_signal(
Channel *chan, ptrlen signame, bool core_dumped, ptrlen msg);
static bool mainchan_rcvd_exit_signal_numeric(
Channel *chan, int signum, bool core_dumped, ptrlen msg);
static void mainchan_request_response(Channel *chan, bool success);
Move mainchan into its own file, like agentf. This gets another big pile of logic out of ssh2connection and puts it somewhere more central. Now the only thing left in ssh2connection is the formatting and parsing of the various channel requests; the logic deciding which ones to issue and what to do about them is devolved to the Channel implementation, as it properly should be.
2018-09-30 09:16:38 +03:00
static const struct ChannelVtable mainchan_channelvt = {
mainchan_free,
mainchan_open_confirmation,
mainchan_open_failure,
mainchan_send,
mainchan_send_eof,
mainchan_set_input_wanted,
mainchan_log_close_msg,
Allow channels not to close immediately after two EOFs. Some kinds of channel, even after they've sent EOF in both directions, still have something to do before they initiate the CLOSE mechanism and wind up the channel completely. For example, a session channel with a subprocess running inside it will want to be sure to send the "exit-status" or "exit-signal" notification, even if that happens after bidirectional EOF of the data channels. Previously, the SSH-2 connection layer had the standard policy that once EOF had been both sent and received, it would start the final close procedure. There's a method chan_want_close() by which a Channel could vary this policy in one direction, by indicating that it wanted the close procedure to commence after EOF was sent in only one direction. Its parameters are a pair of booleans saying whether EOF has been sent, and whether it's been received. Now chan_want_close can vary the policy in the other direction as well: if it returns FALSE even when _both_ parameters are true, the connection layer will honour that, and not send CHANNEL_CLOSE. If it does that, the Channel is responsible for indicating when it _does_ want close later, by calling sshfwd_initiate_close.
2018-10-18 20:02:59 +03:00
chan_default_want_close,
Move mainchan into its own file, like agentf. This gets another big pile of logic out of ssh2connection and puts it somewhere more central. Now the only thing left in ssh2connection is the formatting and parsing of the various channel requests; the logic deciding which ones to issue and what to do about them is devolved to the Channel implementation, as it properly should be.
2018-09-30 09:16:38 +03:00
mainchan_rcvd_exit_status,
mainchan_rcvd_exit_signal,
mainchan_rcvd_exit_signal_numeric,
Server prep: parse a lot of new channel requests. ssh2connection.c now knows how to unmarshal the message formats for all the channel requests we'll need to handle when we're the server and a client sends them. Each one is translated into a call to a new method in the Channel vtable, which is implemented by a trivial 'always fail' routine in every channel type we know about so far.
2018-10-20 23:48:49 +03:00
chan_no_run_shell,
chan_no_run_command,
chan_no_run_subsystem,
chan_no_enable_x11_forwarding,
chan_no_enable_agent_forwarding,
chan_no_allocate_pty,
chan_no_set_env,
chan_no_send_break,
chan_no_send_signal,
chan_no_change_window_size,
Move mainchan into its own file, like agentf. This gets another big pile of logic out of ssh2connection and puts it somewhere more central. Now the only thing left in ssh2connection is the formatting and parsing of the various channel requests; the logic deciding which ones to issue and what to do about them is devolved to the Channel implementation, as it properly should be.
2018-09-30 09:16:38 +03:00
mainchan_request_response,
};
typedef enum MainChanType {
MAINCHAN_SESSION, MAINCHAN_DIRECT_TCPIP
} MainChanType;
Remove duplicate typedef for mainchan. In some compiler modes - notably the one that gtk-config selects when GTK PuTTY is built for GTK 1 - it's an error to typedef the same thing twice. 'mainchan' is defined in defs.h, so it doesn't need defining again where the structure contents are specified.
2018-11-01 21:17:41 +03:00
struct mainchan {
Move mainchan into its own file, like agentf. This gets another big pile of logic out of ssh2connection and puts it somewhere more central. Now the only thing left in ssh2connection is the formatting and parsing of the various channel requests; the logic deciding which ones to issue and what to do about them is devolved to the Channel implementation, as it properly should be.
2018-09-30 09:16:38 +03:00
SshChannel *sc;
Conf *conf;
PacketProtocolLayer *ppl;
ConnectionLayer *cl;
MainChanType type;
Convert a lot of 'int' variables to 'bool'. My normal habit these days, in new code, is to treat int and bool as _almost_ completely separate types. I'm still willing to use C's implicit test for zero on an integer (e.g. 'if (!blob.len)' is fine, no need to spell it out as blob.len != 0), but generally, if a variable is going to be conceptually a boolean, I like to declare it bool and assign to it using 'true' or 'false' rather than 0 or 1. PuTTY is an exception, because it predates the C99 bool, and I've stuck to its existing coding style even when adding new code to it. But it's been annoying me more and more, so now that I've decided C99 bool is an acceptable thing to require from our toolchain in the first place, here's a quite thorough trawl through the source doing 'boolification'. Many variables and function parameters are now typed as bool rather than int; many assignments of 0 or 1 to those variables are now spelled 'true' or 'false'. I managed this thorough conversion with the help of a custom clang plugin that I wrote to trawl the AST and apply heuristics to point out where things might want changing. So I've even managed to do a decent job on parts of the code I haven't looked at in years! To make the plugin's work easier, I pushed platform front ends generally in the direction of using standard 'bool' in preference to platform-specific boolean types like Windows BOOL or GTK's gboolean; I've left the platform booleans in places they _have_ to be for the platform APIs to work right, but variables only used by my own code have been converted wherever I found them. In a few places there are int values that look very like booleans in _most_ of the places they're used, but have a rarely-used third value, or a distinction between different nonzero values that most users don't care about. In these cases, I've _removed_ uses of 'true' and 'false' for the return values, to emphasise that there's something more subtle going on than a simple boolean answer: - the 'multisel' field in dialog.h's list box structure, for which the GTK front end in particular recognises a difference between 1 and 2 but nearly everything else treats as boolean - the 'urgent' parameter to plug_receive, where 1 vs 2 tells you something about the specific location of the urgent pointer, but most clients only care about 0 vs 'something nonzero' - the return value of wc_match, where -1 indicates a syntax error in the wildcard. - the return values from SSH-1 RSA-key loading functions, which use -1 for 'wrong passphrase' and 0 for all other failures (so any caller which already knows it's not loading an _encrypted private_ key can treat them as boolean) - term->esc_query, and the 'query' parameter in toggle_mode in terminal.c, which _usually_ hold 0 for ESC[123h or 1 for ESC[?123h, but can also hold -1 for some other intervening character that we don't support. In a few places there's an integer that I haven't turned into a bool even though it really _can_ only take values 0 or 1 (and, as above, tried to make the call sites consistent in not calling those values true and false), on the grounds that I thought it would make it more confusing to imply that the 0 value was in some sense 'negative' or bad and the 1 positive or good: - the return value of plug_accepting uses the POSIXish convention of 0=success and nonzero=error; I think if I made it bool then I'd also want to reverse its sense, and that's a job for a separate piece of work. - the 'screen' parameter to lineptr() in terminal.c, where 0 and 1 represent the default and alternate screens. There's no obvious reason why one of those should be considered 'true' or 'positive' or 'success' - they're just indices - so I've left it as int. ssh_scp_recv had particularly confusing semantics for its previous int return value: its call sites used '<= 0' to check for error, but it never actually returned a negative number, just 0 or 1. Now the function and its call sites agree that it's a bool. In a couple of places I've renamed variables called 'ret', because I don't like that name any more - it's unclear whether it means the return value (in preparation) for the _containing_ function or the return value received from a subroutine call, and occasionally I've accidentally used the same variable for both and introduced a bug. So where one of those got in my way, I've renamed it to 'toret' or 'retd' (the latter short for 'returned') in line with my usual modern practice, but I haven't done a thorough job of finding all of them. Finally, one amusing side effect of doing this is that I've had to separate quite a few chained assignments. It used to be perfectly fine to write 'a = b = c = TRUE' when a,b,c were int and TRUE was just a the 'true' defined by stdbool.h, that idiom provokes a warning from gcc: 'suggest parentheses around assignment used as truth value'!
2018-11-02 22:23:19 +03:00
bool is_simple;
Move mainchan into its own file, like agentf. This gets another big pile of logic out of ssh2connection and puts it somewhere more central. Now the only thing left in ssh2connection is the formatting and parsing of the various channel requests; the logic deciding which ones to issue and what to do about them is devolved to the Channel implementation, as it properly should be.
2018-09-30 09:16:38 +03:00
Convert a lot of 'int' variables to 'bool'. My normal habit these days, in new code, is to treat int and bool as _almost_ completely separate types. I'm still willing to use C's implicit test for zero on an integer (e.g. 'if (!blob.len)' is fine, no need to spell it out as blob.len != 0), but generally, if a variable is going to be conceptually a boolean, I like to declare it bool and assign to it using 'true' or 'false' rather than 0 or 1. PuTTY is an exception, because it predates the C99 bool, and I've stuck to its existing coding style even when adding new code to it. But it's been annoying me more and more, so now that I've decided C99 bool is an acceptable thing to require from our toolchain in the first place, here's a quite thorough trawl through the source doing 'boolification'. Many variables and function parameters are now typed as bool rather than int; many assignments of 0 or 1 to those variables are now spelled 'true' or 'false'. I managed this thorough conversion with the help of a custom clang plugin that I wrote to trawl the AST and apply heuristics to point out where things might want changing. So I've even managed to do a decent job on parts of the code I haven't looked at in years! To make the plugin's work easier, I pushed platform front ends generally in the direction of using standard 'bool' in preference to platform-specific boolean types like Windows BOOL or GTK's gboolean; I've left the platform booleans in places they _have_ to be for the platform APIs to work right, but variables only used by my own code have been converted wherever I found them. In a few places there are int values that look very like booleans in _most_ of the places they're used, but have a rarely-used third value, or a distinction between different nonzero values that most users don't care about. In these cases, I've _removed_ uses of 'true' and 'false' for the return values, to emphasise that there's something more subtle going on than a simple boolean answer: - the 'multisel' field in dialog.h's list box structure, for which the GTK front end in particular recognises a difference between 1 and 2 but nearly everything else treats as boolean - the 'urgent' parameter to plug_receive, where 1 vs 2 tells you something about the specific location of the urgent pointer, but most clients only care about 0 vs 'something nonzero' - the return value of wc_match, where -1 indicates a syntax error in the wildcard. - the return values from SSH-1 RSA-key loading functions, which use -1 for 'wrong passphrase' and 0 for all other failures (so any caller which already knows it's not loading an _encrypted private_ key can treat them as boolean) - term->esc_query, and the 'query' parameter in toggle_mode in terminal.c, which _usually_ hold 0 for ESC[123h or 1 for ESC[?123h, but can also hold -1 for some other intervening character that we don't support. In a few places there's an integer that I haven't turned into a bool even though it really _can_ only take values 0 or 1 (and, as above, tried to make the call sites consistent in not calling those values true and false), on the grounds that I thought it would make it more confusing to imply that the 0 value was in some sense 'negative' or bad and the 1 positive or good: - the return value of plug_accepting uses the POSIXish convention of 0=success and nonzero=error; I think if I made it bool then I'd also want to reverse its sense, and that's a job for a separate piece of work. - the 'screen' parameter to lineptr() in terminal.c, where 0 and 1 represent the default and alternate screens. There's no obvious reason why one of those should be considered 'true' or 'positive' or 'success' - they're just indices - so I've left it as int. ssh_scp_recv had particularly confusing semantics for its previous int return value: its call sites used '<= 0' to check for error, but it never actually returned a negative number, just 0 or 1. Now the function and its call sites agree that it's a bool. In a couple of places I've renamed variables called 'ret', because I don't like that name any more - it's unclear whether it means the return value (in preparation) for the _containing_ function or the return value received from a subroutine call, and occasionally I've accidentally used the same variable for both and introduced a bug. So where one of those got in my way, I've renamed it to 'toret' or 'retd' (the latter short for 'returned') in line with my usual modern practice, but I haven't done a thorough job of finding all of them. Finally, one amusing side effect of doing this is that I've had to separate quite a few chained assignments. It used to be perfectly fine to write 'a = b = c = TRUE' when a,b,c were int and TRUE was just a the 'true' defined by stdbool.h, that idiom provokes a warning from gcc: 'suggest parentheses around assignment used as truth value'!
2018-11-02 22:23:19 +03:00
bool req_x11, req_agent, req_pty, req_cmd_primary, req_cmd_fallback;
Move mainchan into its own file, like agentf. This gets another big pile of logic out of ssh2connection and puts it somewhere more central. Now the only thing left in ssh2connection is the formatting and parsing of the various channel requests; the logic deciding which ones to issue and what to do about them is devolved to the Channel implementation, as it properly should be.
2018-09-30 09:16:38 +03:00
int n_req_env, n_env_replies, n_env_fails;
Convert a lot of 'int' variables to 'bool'. My normal habit these days, in new code, is to treat int and bool as _almost_ completely separate types. I'm still willing to use C's implicit test for zero on an integer (e.g. 'if (!blob.len)' is fine, no need to spell it out as blob.len != 0), but generally, if a variable is going to be conceptually a boolean, I like to declare it bool and assign to it using 'true' or 'false' rather than 0 or 1. PuTTY is an exception, because it predates the C99 bool, and I've stuck to its existing coding style even when adding new code to it. But it's been annoying me more and more, so now that I've decided C99 bool is an acceptable thing to require from our toolchain in the first place, here's a quite thorough trawl through the source doing 'boolification'. Many variables and function parameters are now typed as bool rather than int; many assignments of 0 or 1 to those variables are now spelled 'true' or 'false'. I managed this thorough conversion with the help of a custom clang plugin that I wrote to trawl the AST and apply heuristics to point out where things might want changing. So I've even managed to do a decent job on parts of the code I haven't looked at in years! To make the plugin's work easier, I pushed platform front ends generally in the direction of using standard 'bool' in preference to platform-specific boolean types like Windows BOOL or GTK's gboolean; I've left the platform booleans in places they _have_ to be for the platform APIs to work right, but variables only used by my own code have been converted wherever I found them. In a few places there are int values that look very like booleans in _most_ of the places they're used, but have a rarely-used third value, or a distinction between different nonzero values that most users don't care about. In these cases, I've _removed_ uses of 'true' and 'false' for the return values, to emphasise that there's something more subtle going on than a simple boolean answer: - the 'multisel' field in dialog.h's list box structure, for which the GTK front end in particular recognises a difference between 1 and 2 but nearly everything else treats as boolean - the 'urgent' parameter to plug_receive, where 1 vs 2 tells you something about the specific location of the urgent pointer, but most clients only care about 0 vs 'something nonzero' - the return value of wc_match, where -1 indicates a syntax error in the wildcard. - the return values from SSH-1 RSA-key loading functions, which use -1 for 'wrong passphrase' and 0 for all other failures (so any caller which already knows it's not loading an _encrypted private_ key can treat them as boolean) - term->esc_query, and the 'query' parameter in toggle_mode in terminal.c, which _usually_ hold 0 for ESC[123h or 1 for ESC[?123h, but can also hold -1 for some other intervening character that we don't support. In a few places there's an integer that I haven't turned into a bool even though it really _can_ only take values 0 or 1 (and, as above, tried to make the call sites consistent in not calling those values true and false), on the grounds that I thought it would make it more confusing to imply that the 0 value was in some sense 'negative' or bad and the 1 positive or good: - the return value of plug_accepting uses the POSIXish convention of 0=success and nonzero=error; I think if I made it bool then I'd also want to reverse its sense, and that's a job for a separate piece of work. - the 'screen' parameter to lineptr() in terminal.c, where 0 and 1 represent the default and alternate screens. There's no obvious reason why one of those should be considered 'true' or 'positive' or 'success' - they're just indices - so I've left it as int. ssh_scp_recv had particularly confusing semantics for its previous int return value: its call sites used '<= 0' to check for error, but it never actually returned a negative number, just 0 or 1. Now the function and its call sites agree that it's a bool. In a couple of places I've renamed variables called 'ret', because I don't like that name any more - it's unclear whether it means the return value (in preparation) for the _containing_ function or the return value received from a subroutine call, and occasionally I've accidentally used the same variable for both and introduced a bug. So where one of those got in my way, I've renamed it to 'toret' or 'retd' (the latter short for 'returned') in line with my usual modern practice, but I haven't done a thorough job of finding all of them. Finally, one amusing side effect of doing this is that I've had to separate quite a few chained assignments. It used to be perfectly fine to write 'a = b = c = TRUE' when a,b,c were int and TRUE was just a the 'true' defined by stdbool.h, that idiom provokes a warning from gcc: 'suggest parentheses around assignment used as truth value'!
2018-11-02 22:23:19 +03:00
bool eof_pending, eof_sent, got_pty, ready;
Move mainchan into its own file, like agentf. This gets another big pile of logic out of ssh2connection and puts it somewhere more central. Now the only thing left in ssh2connection is the formatting and parsing of the various channel requests; the logic deciding which ones to issue and what to do about them is devolved to the Channel implementation, as it properly should be.
2018-09-30 09:16:38 +03:00
int term_width, term_height;
Channel chan;
Remove duplicate typedef for mainchan. In some compiler modes - notably the one that gtk-config selects when GTK PuTTY is built for GTK 1 - it's an error to typedef the same thing twice. 'mainchan' is defined in defs.h, so it doesn't need defining again where the structure contents are specified.
2018-11-01 21:17:41 +03:00
};
Move mainchan into its own file, like agentf. This gets another big pile of logic out of ssh2connection and puts it somewhere more central. Now the only thing left in ssh2connection is the formatting and parsing of the various channel requests; the logic deciding which ones to issue and what to do about them is devolved to the Channel implementation, as it properly should be.
2018-09-30 09:16:38 +03:00
mainchan *mainchan_new(
PacketProtocolLayer *ppl, ConnectionLayer *cl, Conf *conf,
Convert a lot of 'int' variables to 'bool'. My normal habit these days, in new code, is to treat int and bool as _almost_ completely separate types. I'm still willing to use C's implicit test for zero on an integer (e.g. 'if (!blob.len)' is fine, no need to spell it out as blob.len != 0), but generally, if a variable is going to be conceptually a boolean, I like to declare it bool and assign to it using 'true' or 'false' rather than 0 or 1. PuTTY is an exception, because it predates the C99 bool, and I've stuck to its existing coding style even when adding new code to it. But it's been annoying me more and more, so now that I've decided C99 bool is an acceptable thing to require from our toolchain in the first place, here's a quite thorough trawl through the source doing 'boolification'. Many variables and function parameters are now typed as bool rather than int; many assignments of 0 or 1 to those variables are now spelled 'true' or 'false'. I managed this thorough conversion with the help of a custom clang plugin that I wrote to trawl the AST and apply heuristics to point out where things might want changing. So I've even managed to do a decent job on parts of the code I haven't looked at in years! To make the plugin's work easier, I pushed platform front ends generally in the direction of using standard 'bool' in preference to platform-specific boolean types like Windows BOOL or GTK's gboolean; I've left the platform booleans in places they _have_ to be for the platform APIs to work right, but variables only used by my own code have been converted wherever I found them. In a few places there are int values that look very like booleans in _most_ of the places they're used, but have a rarely-used third value, or a distinction between different nonzero values that most users don't care about. In these cases, I've _removed_ uses of 'true' and 'false' for the return values, to emphasise that there's something more subtle going on than a simple boolean answer: - the 'multisel' field in dialog.h's list box structure, for which the GTK front end in particular recognises a difference between 1 and 2 but nearly everything else treats as boolean - the 'urgent' parameter to plug_receive, where 1 vs 2 tells you something about the specific location of the urgent pointer, but most clients only care about 0 vs 'something nonzero' - the return value of wc_match, where -1 indicates a syntax error in the wildcard. - the return values from SSH-1 RSA-key loading functions, which use -1 for 'wrong passphrase' and 0 for all other failures (so any caller which already knows it's not loading an _encrypted private_ key can treat them as boolean) - term->esc_query, and the 'query' parameter in toggle_mode in terminal.c, which _usually_ hold 0 for ESC[123h or 1 for ESC[?123h, but can also hold -1 for some other intervening character that we don't support. In a few places there's an integer that I haven't turned into a bool even though it really _can_ only take values 0 or 1 (and, as above, tried to make the call sites consistent in not calling those values true and false), on the grounds that I thought it would make it more confusing to imply that the 0 value was in some sense 'negative' or bad and the 1 positive or good: - the return value of plug_accepting uses the POSIXish convention of 0=success and nonzero=error; I think if I made it bool then I'd also want to reverse its sense, and that's a job for a separate piece of work. - the 'screen' parameter to lineptr() in terminal.c, where 0 and 1 represent the default and alternate screens. There's no obvious reason why one of those should be considered 'true' or 'positive' or 'success' - they're just indices - so I've left it as int. ssh_scp_recv had particularly confusing semantics for its previous int return value: its call sites used '<= 0' to check for error, but it never actually returned a negative number, just 0 or 1. Now the function and its call sites agree that it's a bool. In a couple of places I've renamed variables called 'ret', because I don't like that name any more - it's unclear whether it means the return value (in preparation) for the _containing_ function or the return value received from a subroutine call, and occasionally I've accidentally used the same variable for both and introduced a bug. So where one of those got in my way, I've renamed it to 'toret' or 'retd' (the latter short for 'returned') in line with my usual modern practice, but I haven't done a thorough job of finding all of them. Finally, one amusing side effect of doing this is that I've had to separate quite a few chained assignments. It used to be perfectly fine to write 'a = b = c = TRUE' when a,b,c were int and TRUE was just a the 'true' defined by stdbool.h, that idiom provokes a warning from gcc: 'suggest parentheses around assignment used as truth value'!
2018-11-02 22:23:19 +03:00
int term_width, int term_height, bool is_simple, SshChannel **sc_out)
Move mainchan into its own file, like agentf. This gets another big pile of logic out of ssh2connection and puts it somewhere more central. Now the only thing left in ssh2connection is the formatting and parsing of the various channel requests; the logic deciding which ones to issue and what to do about them is devolved to the Channel implementation, as it properly should be.
2018-09-30 09:16:38 +03:00
{
mainchan *mc;
Switch some Conf settings over to being bool. I think this is the full set of things that ought logically to be boolean. One annoyance is that quite a few radio-button controls in config.c address Conf fields that are now bool rather than int, which means that the shared handler function can't just access them all with conf_{get,set}_int. Rather than back out the rigorous separation of int and bool in conf.c itself, I've just added a similar alternative handler function for the bool-typed ones.
2018-10-29 22:57:31 +03:00
if (conf_get_bool(conf, CONF_ssh_no_shell))
Move mainchan into its own file, like agentf. This gets another big pile of logic out of ssh2connection and puts it somewhere more central. Now the only thing left in ssh2connection is the formatting and parsing of the various channel requests; the logic deciding which ones to issue and what to do about them is devolved to the Channel implementation, as it properly should be.
2018-09-30 09:16:38 +03:00
return NULL; /* no main channel at all */
mc = snew(mainchan);
memset(mc, 0, sizeof(mainchan));
mc->ppl = ppl;
mc->cl = cl;
mc->conf = conf_copy(conf);
mc->term_width = term_width;
mc->term_height = term_height;
mc->is_simple = is_simple;
mc->sc = NULL;
mc->chan.vt = &mainchan_channelvt;
mc->chan.initial_fixed_window_size = 0;
if (*conf_get_str(mc->conf, CONF_ssh_nc_host)) {
const char *host = conf_get_str(mc->conf, CONF_ssh_nc_host);
int port = conf_get_int(mc->conf, CONF_ssh_nc_port);
Improve sk_peer_info. Previously, it returned a human-readable string suitable for log files, which tried to say something useful about the remote end of a socket. Now it returns a whole SocketPeerInfo structure, of which that human-friendly log string is just one field, but also some of the same information - remote IP address and port, in particular - is provided in machine-readable form where it's available.
2018-10-18 22:06:42 +03:00
mc->sc = ssh_lportfwd_open(cl, host, port, "main channel",
NULL, &mc->chan);
Move mainchan into its own file, like agentf. This gets another big pile of logic out of ssh2connection and puts it somewhere more central. Now the only thing left in ssh2connection is the formatting and parsing of the various channel requests; the logic deciding which ones to issue and what to do about them is devolved to the Channel implementation, as it properly should be.
2018-09-30 09:16:38 +03:00
mc->type = MAINCHAN_DIRECT_TCPIP;
} else {
mc->sc = ssh_session_open(cl, &mc->chan);
mc->type = MAINCHAN_SESSION;
}
Rewrite the SSH-1 main shell session using mainchan. In SSH-1, the channel system isn't rich enough to represent the complicated main shell session, so it's all done with a separate set of custom message types. But PuTTY now abstracts away that difference, by representing both as different implementations of the SshChannel class: ssh1channel is for things that the protocol thinks are 'really' channels, and ssh1mainchan is for the shell session. All the same methods are implemented, but generate different wire messages. This means that the logic to decide _when_ to enable X forwarding, agent forwarding etc is all centralised into mainchan.c, where it doesn't have to be repeated for both protocol versions. It also simplifies the final loop in the connection protocol, which no longer has to contain the code to move data from the user input bufchain to the channel's output; that's now done by the mainchan write method, the same as it is in SSH-2 where mainchan is just like other channels.
2018-09-30 13:22:01 +03:00
if (sc_out) *sc_out = mc->sc;
Move mainchan into its own file, like agentf. This gets another big pile of logic out of ssh2connection and puts it somewhere more central. Now the only thing left in ssh2connection is the formatting and parsing of the various channel requests; the logic deciding which ones to issue and what to do about them is devolved to the Channel implementation, as it properly should be.
2018-09-30 09:16:38 +03:00
return mc;
}
static void mainchan_free(Channel *chan)
{
assert(chan->vt == &mainchan_channelvt);
mainchan *mc = container_of(chan, mainchan, chan);
conf_free(mc->conf);
sfree(mc);
}
static void mainchan_try_fallback_command(mainchan *mc);
static void mainchan_ready(mainchan *mc);
static void mainchan_open_confirmation(Channel *chan)
{
mainchan *mc = container_of(chan, mainchan, chan);
PacketProtocolLayer *ppl = mc->ppl; /* for ppl_logevent */
seat_update_specials_menu(mc->ppl->seat);
Start using C99 variadic macros. In the past, I've had a lot of macros which you call with double parentheses, along the lines of debug(("format string", params)), so that the inner parens protect the commas and permit the macro to treat the whole printf-style argument list as one macro argument. That's all very well, but it's a bit inconvenient (it doesn't leave you any way to implement such a macro by prepending another argument to the list), and now this code base's rules allow C99isms, I can switch all those macros to using a single pair of parens, using the C99 ability to say '...' in the parameter list of the #define and get at the corresponding suffix of the arguments as __VA_ARGS__. So I'm doing it. I've made the following printf-style macros variadic: bpp_logevent, ppl_logevent, ppl_printf and debug. While I'm here, I've also fixed up a collection of conditioned-out calls to debug() in the Windows front end which were clearly expecting a macro with a different calling syntax, because they had an integer parameter first. If I ever have a need to condition those back in, they should actually work now.
2018-12-08 23:32:31 +03:00
ppl_logevent("Opened main channel");
Move mainchan into its own file, like agentf. This gets another big pile of logic out of ssh2connection and puts it somewhere more central. Now the only thing left in ssh2connection is the formatting and parsing of the various channel requests; the logic deciding which ones to issue and what to do about them is devolved to the Channel implementation, as it properly should be.
2018-09-30 09:16:38 +03:00
if (mc->is_simple)
sshfwd_hint_channel_is_simple(mc->sc);
if (mc->type == MAINCHAN_SESSION) {
/*
* Send the CHANNEL_REQUESTS for the main session channel.
*/
char *key, *val, *cmd;
struct X11Display *x11disp;
struct X11FakeAuth *x11auth;
Convert a lot of 'int' variables to 'bool'. My normal habit these days, in new code, is to treat int and bool as _almost_ completely separate types. I'm still willing to use C's implicit test for zero on an integer (e.g. 'if (!blob.len)' is fine, no need to spell it out as blob.len != 0), but generally, if a variable is going to be conceptually a boolean, I like to declare it bool and assign to it using 'true' or 'false' rather than 0 or 1. PuTTY is an exception, because it predates the C99 bool, and I've stuck to its existing coding style even when adding new code to it. But it's been annoying me more and more, so now that I've decided C99 bool is an acceptable thing to require from our toolchain in the first place, here's a quite thorough trawl through the source doing 'boolification'. Many variables and function parameters are now typed as bool rather than int; many assignments of 0 or 1 to those variables are now spelled 'true' or 'false'. I managed this thorough conversion with the help of a custom clang plugin that I wrote to trawl the AST and apply heuristics to point out where things might want changing. So I've even managed to do a decent job on parts of the code I haven't looked at in years! To make the plugin's work easier, I pushed platform front ends generally in the direction of using standard 'bool' in preference to platform-specific boolean types like Windows BOOL or GTK's gboolean; I've left the platform booleans in places they _have_ to be for the platform APIs to work right, but variables only used by my own code have been converted wherever I found them. In a few places there are int values that look very like booleans in _most_ of the places they're used, but have a rarely-used third value, or a distinction between different nonzero values that most users don't care about. In these cases, I've _removed_ uses of 'true' and 'false' for the return values, to emphasise that there's something more subtle going on than a simple boolean answer: - the 'multisel' field in dialog.h's list box structure, for which the GTK front end in particular recognises a difference between 1 and 2 but nearly everything else treats as boolean - the 'urgent' parameter to plug_receive, where 1 vs 2 tells you something about the specific location of the urgent pointer, but most clients only care about 0 vs 'something nonzero' - the return value of wc_match, where -1 indicates a syntax error in the wildcard. - the return values from SSH-1 RSA-key loading functions, which use -1 for 'wrong passphrase' and 0 for all other failures (so any caller which already knows it's not loading an _encrypted private_ key can treat them as boolean) - term->esc_query, and the 'query' parameter in toggle_mode in terminal.c, which _usually_ hold 0 for ESC[123h or 1 for ESC[?123h, but can also hold -1 for some other intervening character that we don't support. In a few places there's an integer that I haven't turned into a bool even though it really _can_ only take values 0 or 1 (and, as above, tried to make the call sites consistent in not calling those values true and false), on the grounds that I thought it would make it more confusing to imply that the 0 value was in some sense 'negative' or bad and the 1 positive or good: - the return value of plug_accepting uses the POSIXish convention of 0=success and nonzero=error; I think if I made it bool then I'd also want to reverse its sense, and that's a job for a separate piece of work. - the 'screen' parameter to lineptr() in terminal.c, where 0 and 1 represent the default and alternate screens. There's no obvious reason why one of those should be considered 'true' or 'positive' or 'success' - they're just indices - so I've left it as int. ssh_scp_recv had particularly confusing semantics for its previous int return value: its call sites used '<= 0' to check for error, but it never actually returned a negative number, just 0 or 1. Now the function and its call sites agree that it's a bool. In a couple of places I've renamed variables called 'ret', because I don't like that name any more - it's unclear whether it means the return value (in preparation) for the _containing_ function or the return value received from a subroutine call, and occasionally I've accidentally used the same variable for both and introduced a bug. So where one of those got in my way, I've renamed it to 'toret' or 'retd' (the latter short for 'returned') in line with my usual modern practice, but I haven't done a thorough job of finding all of them. Finally, one amusing side effect of doing this is that I've had to separate quite a few chained assignments. It used to be perfectly fine to write 'a = b = c = TRUE' when a,b,c were int and TRUE was just a the 'true' defined by stdbool.h, that idiom provokes a warning from gcc: 'suggest parentheses around assignment used as truth value'!
2018-11-02 22:23:19 +03:00
bool retry_cmd_now = false;
Move mainchan into its own file, like agentf. This gets another big pile of logic out of ssh2connection and puts it somewhere more central. Now the only thing left in ssh2connection is the formatting and parsing of the various channel requests; the logic deciding which ones to issue and what to do about them is devolved to the Channel implementation, as it properly should be.
2018-09-30 09:16:38 +03:00
Switch some Conf settings over to being bool. I think this is the full set of things that ought logically to be boolean. One annoyance is that quite a few radio-button controls in config.c address Conf fields that are now bool rather than int, which means that the shared handler function can't just access them all with conf_{get,set}_int. Rather than back out the rigorous separation of int and bool in conf.c itself, I've just added a similar alternative handler function for the bool-typed ones.
2018-10-29 22:57:31 +03:00
if (conf_get_bool(mc->conf, CONF_x11_forward)) {;
Move mainchan into its own file, like agentf. This gets another big pile of logic out of ssh2connection and puts it somewhere more central. Now the only thing left in ssh2connection is the formatting and parsing of the various channel requests; the logic deciding which ones to issue and what to do about them is devolved to the Channel implementation, as it properly should be.
2018-09-30 09:16:38 +03:00
char *x11_setup_err;
if ((x11disp = x11_setup_display(
conf_get_str(mc->conf, CONF_x11_display),
mc->conf, &x11_setup_err)) == NULL) {
Start using C99 variadic macros. In the past, I've had a lot of macros which you call with double parentheses, along the lines of debug(("format string", params)), so that the inner parens protect the commas and permit the macro to treat the whole printf-style argument list as one macro argument. That's all very well, but it's a bit inconvenient (it doesn't leave you any way to implement such a macro by prepending another argument to the list), and now this code base's rules allow C99isms, I can switch all those macros to using a single pair of parens, using the C99 ability to say '...' in the parameter list of the #define and get at the corresponding suffix of the arguments as __VA_ARGS__. So I'm doing it. I've made the following printf-style macros variadic: bpp_logevent, ppl_logevent, ppl_printf and debug. While I'm here, I've also fixed up a collection of conditioned-out calls to debug() in the Windows front end which were clearly expecting a macro with a different calling syntax, because they had an integer parameter first. If I ever have a need to condition those back in, they should actually work now.
2018-12-08 23:32:31 +03:00
ppl_logevent("X11 forwarding not enabled: unable to"
" initialise X display: %s", x11_setup_err);
Move mainchan into its own file, like agentf. This gets another big pile of logic out of ssh2connection and puts it somewhere more central. Now the only thing left in ssh2connection is the formatting and parsing of the various channel requests; the logic deciding which ones to issue and what to do about them is devolved to the Channel implementation, as it properly should be.
2018-09-30 09:16:38 +03:00
sfree(x11_setup_err);
} else {
x11auth = ssh_add_x11_display(
mc->cl, conf_get_int(mc->conf, CONF_x11_auth), x11disp);
sshfwd_request_x11_forwarding(
Adopt C99 <stdbool.h>'s true/false. This commit includes <stdbool.h> from defs.h and deletes my traditional definitions of TRUE and FALSE, but other than that, it's a 100% mechanical search-and-replace transforming all uses of TRUE and FALSE into the C99-standardised lowercase spellings. No actual types are changed in this commit; that will come next. This is just getting the noise out of the way, so that subsequent commits can have a higher proportion of signal.
2018-10-29 22:50:29 +03:00
mc->sc, true, x11auth->protoname, x11auth->datastring,
x11disp->screennum, false);
mc->req_x11 = true;
Move mainchan into its own file, like agentf. This gets another big pile of logic out of ssh2connection and puts it somewhere more central. Now the only thing left in ssh2connection is the formatting and parsing of the various channel requests; the logic deciding which ones to issue and what to do about them is devolved to the Channel implementation, as it properly should be.
2018-09-30 09:16:38 +03:00
}
}
if (ssh_agent_forwarding_permitted(mc->cl)) {
Adopt C99 <stdbool.h>'s true/false. This commit includes <stdbool.h> from defs.h and deletes my traditional definitions of TRUE and FALSE, but other than that, it's a 100% mechanical search-and-replace transforming all uses of TRUE and FALSE into the C99-standardised lowercase spellings. No actual types are changed in this commit; that will come next. This is just getting the noise out of the way, so that subsequent commits can have a higher proportion of signal.
2018-10-29 22:50:29 +03:00
sshfwd_request_agent_forwarding(mc->sc, true);
mc->req_agent = true;
Move mainchan into its own file, like agentf. This gets another big pile of logic out of ssh2connection and puts it somewhere more central. Now the only thing left in ssh2connection is the formatting and parsing of the various channel requests; the logic deciding which ones to issue and what to do about them is devolved to the Channel implementation, as it properly should be.
2018-09-30 09:16:38 +03:00
}
Switch some Conf settings over to being bool. I think this is the full set of things that ought logically to be boolean. One annoyance is that quite a few radio-button controls in config.c address Conf fields that are now bool rather than int, which means that the shared handler function can't just access them all with conf_{get,set}_int. Rather than back out the rigorous separation of int and bool in conf.c itself, I've just added a similar alternative handler function for the bool-typed ones.
2018-10-29 22:57:31 +03:00
if (!conf_get_bool(mc->conf, CONF_nopty)) {
Move mainchan into its own file, like agentf. This gets another big pile of logic out of ssh2connection and puts it somewhere more central. Now the only thing left in ssh2connection is the formatting and parsing of the various channel requests; the logic deciding which ones to issue and what to do about them is devolved to the Channel implementation, as it properly should be.
2018-09-30 09:16:38 +03:00
sshfwd_request_pty(
Adopt C99 <stdbool.h>'s true/false. This commit includes <stdbool.h> from defs.h and deletes my traditional definitions of TRUE and FALSE, but other than that, it's a 100% mechanical search-and-replace transforming all uses of TRUE and FALSE into the C99-standardised lowercase spellings. No actual types are changed in this commit; that will come next. This is just getting the noise out of the way, so that subsequent commits can have a higher proportion of signal.
2018-10-29 22:50:29 +03:00
mc->sc, true, mc->conf, mc->term_width, mc->term_height);
mc->req_pty = true;
Move mainchan into its own file, like agentf. This gets another big pile of logic out of ssh2connection and puts it somewhere more central. Now the only thing left in ssh2connection is the formatting and parsing of the various channel requests; the logic deciding which ones to issue and what to do about them is devolved to the Channel implementation, as it properly should be.
2018-09-30 09:16:38 +03:00
}
for (val = conf_get_str_strs(mc->conf, CONF_environmt, NULL, &key);
val != NULL;
val = conf_get_str_strs(mc->conf, CONF_environmt, key, &key)) {
Adopt C99 <stdbool.h>'s true/false. This commit includes <stdbool.h> from defs.h and deletes my traditional definitions of TRUE and FALSE, but other than that, it's a 100% mechanical search-and-replace transforming all uses of TRUE and FALSE into the C99-standardised lowercase spellings. No actual types are changed in this commit; that will come next. This is just getting the noise out of the way, so that subsequent commits can have a higher proportion of signal.
2018-10-29 22:50:29 +03:00
sshfwd_send_env_var(mc->sc, true, key, val);
Move mainchan into its own file, like agentf. This gets another big pile of logic out of ssh2connection and puts it somewhere more central. Now the only thing left in ssh2connection is the formatting and parsing of the various channel requests; the logic deciding which ones to issue and what to do about them is devolved to the Channel implementation, as it properly should be.
2018-09-30 09:16:38 +03:00
mc->n_req_env++;
}
if (mc->n_req_env)
Start using C99 variadic macros. In the past, I've had a lot of macros which you call with double parentheses, along the lines of debug(("format string", params)), so that the inner parens protect the commas and permit the macro to treat the whole printf-style argument list as one macro argument. That's all very well, but it's a bit inconvenient (it doesn't leave you any way to implement such a macro by prepending another argument to the list), and now this code base's rules allow C99isms, I can switch all those macros to using a single pair of parens, using the C99 ability to say '...' in the parameter list of the #define and get at the corresponding suffix of the arguments as __VA_ARGS__. So I'm doing it. I've made the following printf-style macros variadic: bpp_logevent, ppl_logevent, ppl_printf and debug. While I'm here, I've also fixed up a collection of conditioned-out calls to debug() in the Windows front end which were clearly expecting a macro with a different calling syntax, because they had an integer parameter first. If I ever have a need to condition those back in, they should actually work now.
2018-12-08 23:32:31 +03:00
ppl_logevent("Sent %d environment variables", mc->n_req_env);
Move mainchan into its own file, like agentf. This gets another big pile of logic out of ssh2connection and puts it somewhere more central. Now the only thing left in ssh2connection is the formatting and parsing of the various channel requests; the logic deciding which ones to issue and what to do about them is devolved to the Channel implementation, as it properly should be.
2018-09-30 09:16:38 +03:00
cmd = conf_get_str(mc->conf, CONF_remote_cmd);
Switch some Conf settings over to being bool. I think this is the full set of things that ought logically to be boolean. One annoyance is that quite a few radio-button controls in config.c address Conf fields that are now bool rather than int, which means that the shared handler function can't just access them all with conf_{get,set}_int. Rather than back out the rigorous separation of int and bool in conf.c itself, I've just added a similar alternative handler function for the bool-typed ones.
2018-10-29 22:57:31 +03:00
if (conf_get_bool(mc->conf, CONF_ssh_subsys)) {
Adopt C99 <stdbool.h>'s true/false. This commit includes <stdbool.h> from defs.h and deletes my traditional definitions of TRUE and FALSE, but other than that, it's a 100% mechanical search-and-replace transforming all uses of TRUE and FALSE into the C99-standardised lowercase spellings. No actual types are changed in this commit; that will come next. This is just getting the noise out of the way, so that subsequent commits can have a higher proportion of signal.
2018-10-29 22:50:29 +03:00
retry_cmd_now = !sshfwd_start_subsystem(mc->sc, true, cmd);
Move mainchan into its own file, like agentf. This gets another big pile of logic out of ssh2connection and puts it somewhere more central. Now the only thing left in ssh2connection is the formatting and parsing of the various channel requests; the logic deciding which ones to issue and what to do about them is devolved to the Channel implementation, as it properly should be.
2018-09-30 09:16:38 +03:00
} else if (*cmd) {
Adopt C99 <stdbool.h>'s true/false. This commit includes <stdbool.h> from defs.h and deletes my traditional definitions of TRUE and FALSE, but other than that, it's a 100% mechanical search-and-replace transforming all uses of TRUE and FALSE into the C99-standardised lowercase spellings. No actual types are changed in this commit; that will come next. This is just getting the noise out of the way, so that subsequent commits can have a higher proportion of signal.
2018-10-29 22:50:29 +03:00
sshfwd_start_command(mc->sc, true, cmd);
Move mainchan into its own file, like agentf. This gets another big pile of logic out of ssh2connection and puts it somewhere more central. Now the only thing left in ssh2connection is the formatting and parsing of the various channel requests; the logic deciding which ones to issue and what to do about them is devolved to the Channel implementation, as it properly should be.
2018-09-30 09:16:38 +03:00
} else {
Adopt C99 <stdbool.h>'s true/false. This commit includes <stdbool.h> from defs.h and deletes my traditional definitions of TRUE and FALSE, but other than that, it's a 100% mechanical search-and-replace transforming all uses of TRUE and FALSE into the C99-standardised lowercase spellings. No actual types are changed in this commit; that will come next. This is just getting the noise out of the way, so that subsequent commits can have a higher proportion of signal.
2018-10-29 22:50:29 +03:00
sshfwd_start_shell(mc->sc, true);
Move mainchan into its own file, like agentf. This gets another big pile of logic out of ssh2connection and puts it somewhere more central. Now the only thing left in ssh2connection is the formatting and parsing of the various channel requests; the logic deciding which ones to issue and what to do about them is devolved to the Channel implementation, as it properly should be.
2018-09-30 09:16:38 +03:00
}
if (retry_cmd_now)
mainchan_try_fallback_command(mc);
else
Adopt C99 <stdbool.h>'s true/false. This commit includes <stdbool.h> from defs.h and deletes my traditional definitions of TRUE and FALSE, but other than that, it's a 100% mechanical search-and-replace transforming all uses of TRUE and FALSE into the C99-standardised lowercase spellings. No actual types are changed in this commit; that will come next. This is just getting the noise out of the way, so that subsequent commits can have a higher proportion of signal.
2018-10-29 22:50:29 +03:00
mc->req_cmd_primary = true;
Move mainchan into its own file, like agentf. This gets another big pile of logic out of ssh2connection and puts it somewhere more central. Now the only thing left in ssh2connection is the formatting and parsing of the various channel requests; the logic deciding which ones to issue and what to do about them is devolved to the Channel implementation, as it properly should be.
2018-09-30 09:16:38 +03:00
} else {
Adopt C99 <stdbool.h>'s true/false. This commit includes <stdbool.h> from defs.h and deletes my traditional definitions of TRUE and FALSE, but other than that, it's a 100% mechanical search-and-replace transforming all uses of TRUE and FALSE into the C99-standardised lowercase spellings. No actual types are changed in this commit; that will come next. This is just getting the noise out of the way, so that subsequent commits can have a higher proportion of signal.
2018-10-29 22:50:29 +03:00
ssh_set_ldisc_option(mc->cl, LD_ECHO, true);
ssh_set_ldisc_option(mc->cl, LD_EDIT, true);
Move mainchan into its own file, like agentf. This gets another big pile of logic out of ssh2connection and puts it somewhere more central. Now the only thing left in ssh2connection is the formatting and parsing of the various channel requests; the logic deciding which ones to issue and what to do about them is devolved to the Channel implementation, as it properly should be.
2018-09-30 09:16:38 +03:00
mainchan_ready(mc);
}
}
static void mainchan_try_fallback_command(mainchan *mc)
{
const char *cmd = conf_get_str(mc->conf, CONF_remote_cmd2);
Switch some Conf settings over to being bool. I think this is the full set of things that ought logically to be boolean. One annoyance is that quite a few radio-button controls in config.c address Conf fields that are now bool rather than int, which means that the shared handler function can't just access them all with conf_{get,set}_int. Rather than back out the rigorous separation of int and bool in conf.c itself, I've just added a similar alternative handler function for the bool-typed ones.
2018-10-29 22:57:31 +03:00
if (conf_get_bool(mc->conf, CONF_ssh_subsys2)) {
Adopt C99 <stdbool.h>'s true/false. This commit includes <stdbool.h> from defs.h and deletes my traditional definitions of TRUE and FALSE, but other than that, it's a 100% mechanical search-and-replace transforming all uses of TRUE and FALSE into the C99-standardised lowercase spellings. No actual types are changed in this commit; that will come next. This is just getting the noise out of the way, so that subsequent commits can have a higher proportion of signal.
2018-10-29 22:50:29 +03:00
sshfwd_start_subsystem(mc->sc, true, cmd);
Move mainchan into its own file, like agentf. This gets another big pile of logic out of ssh2connection and puts it somewhere more central. Now the only thing left in ssh2connection is the formatting and parsing of the various channel requests; the logic deciding which ones to issue and what to do about them is devolved to the Channel implementation, as it properly should be.
2018-09-30 09:16:38 +03:00
} else {
Adopt C99 <stdbool.h>'s true/false. This commit includes <stdbool.h> from defs.h and deletes my traditional definitions of TRUE and FALSE, but other than that, it's a 100% mechanical search-and-replace transforming all uses of TRUE and FALSE into the C99-standardised lowercase spellings. No actual types are changed in this commit; that will come next. This is just getting the noise out of the way, so that subsequent commits can have a higher proportion of signal.
2018-10-29 22:50:29 +03:00
sshfwd_start_command(mc->sc, true, cmd);
Move mainchan into its own file, like agentf. This gets another big pile of logic out of ssh2connection and puts it somewhere more central. Now the only thing left in ssh2connection is the formatting and parsing of the various channel requests; the logic deciding which ones to issue and what to do about them is devolved to the Channel implementation, as it properly should be.
2018-09-30 09:16:38 +03:00
}
Adopt C99 <stdbool.h>'s true/false. This commit includes <stdbool.h> from defs.h and deletes my traditional definitions of TRUE and FALSE, but other than that, it's a 100% mechanical search-and-replace transforming all uses of TRUE and FALSE into the C99-standardised lowercase spellings. No actual types are changed in this commit; that will come next. This is just getting the noise out of the way, so that subsequent commits can have a higher proportion of signal.
2018-10-29 22:50:29 +03:00
mc->req_cmd_fallback = true;
Move mainchan into its own file, like agentf. This gets another big pile of logic out of ssh2connection and puts it somewhere more central. Now the only thing left in ssh2connection is the formatting and parsing of the various channel requests; the logic deciding which ones to issue and what to do about them is devolved to the Channel implementation, as it properly should be.
2018-09-30 09:16:38 +03:00
}
Convert a lot of 'int' variables to 'bool'. My normal habit these days, in new code, is to treat int and bool as _almost_ completely separate types. I'm still willing to use C's implicit test for zero on an integer (e.g. 'if (!blob.len)' is fine, no need to spell it out as blob.len != 0), but generally, if a variable is going to be conceptually a boolean, I like to declare it bool and assign to it using 'true' or 'false' rather than 0 or 1. PuTTY is an exception, because it predates the C99 bool, and I've stuck to its existing coding style even when adding new code to it. But it's been annoying me more and more, so now that I've decided C99 bool is an acceptable thing to require from our toolchain in the first place, here's a quite thorough trawl through the source doing 'boolification'. Many variables and function parameters are now typed as bool rather than int; many assignments of 0 or 1 to those variables are now spelled 'true' or 'false'. I managed this thorough conversion with the help of a custom clang plugin that I wrote to trawl the AST and apply heuristics to point out where things might want changing. So I've even managed to do a decent job on parts of the code I haven't looked at in years! To make the plugin's work easier, I pushed platform front ends generally in the direction of using standard 'bool' in preference to platform-specific boolean types like Windows BOOL or GTK's gboolean; I've left the platform booleans in places they _have_ to be for the platform APIs to work right, but variables only used by my own code have been converted wherever I found them. In a few places there are int values that look very like booleans in _most_ of the places they're used, but have a rarely-used third value, or a distinction between different nonzero values that most users don't care about. In these cases, I've _removed_ uses of 'true' and 'false' for the return values, to emphasise that there's something more subtle going on than a simple boolean answer: - the 'multisel' field in dialog.h's list box structure, for which the GTK front end in particular recognises a difference between 1 and 2 but nearly everything else treats as boolean - the 'urgent' parameter to plug_receive, where 1 vs 2 tells you something about the specific location of the urgent pointer, but most clients only care about 0 vs 'something nonzero' - the return value of wc_match, where -1 indicates a syntax error in the wildcard. - the return values from SSH-1 RSA-key loading functions, which use -1 for 'wrong passphrase' and 0 for all other failures (so any caller which already knows it's not loading an _encrypted private_ key can treat them as boolean) - term->esc_query, and the 'query' parameter in toggle_mode in terminal.c, which _usually_ hold 0 for ESC[123h or 1 for ESC[?123h, but can also hold -1 for some other intervening character that we don't support. In a few places there's an integer that I haven't turned into a bool even though it really _can_ only take values 0 or 1 (and, as above, tried to make the call sites consistent in not calling those values true and false), on the grounds that I thought it would make it more confusing to imply that the 0 value was in some sense 'negative' or bad and the 1 positive or good: - the return value of plug_accepting uses the POSIXish convention of 0=success and nonzero=error; I think if I made it bool then I'd also want to reverse its sense, and that's a job for a separate piece of work. - the 'screen' parameter to lineptr() in terminal.c, where 0 and 1 represent the default and alternate screens. There's no obvious reason why one of those should be considered 'true' or 'positive' or 'success' - they're just indices - so I've left it as int. ssh_scp_recv had particularly confusing semantics for its previous int return value: its call sites used '<= 0' to check for error, but it never actually returned a negative number, just 0 or 1. Now the function and its call sites agree that it's a bool. In a couple of places I've renamed variables called 'ret', because I don't like that name any more - it's unclear whether it means the return value (in preparation) for the _containing_ function or the return value received from a subroutine call, and occasionally I've accidentally used the same variable for both and introduced a bug. So where one of those got in my way, I've renamed it to 'toret' or 'retd' (the latter short for 'returned') in line with my usual modern practice, but I haven't done a thorough job of finding all of them. Finally, one amusing side effect of doing this is that I've had to separate quite a few chained assignments. It used to be perfectly fine to write 'a = b = c = TRUE' when a,b,c were int and TRUE was just a the 'true' defined by stdbool.h, that idiom provokes a warning from gcc: 'suggest parentheses around assignment used as truth value'!
2018-11-02 22:23:19 +03:00
static void mainchan_request_response(Channel *chan, bool success)
Move mainchan into its own file, like agentf. This gets another big pile of logic out of ssh2connection and puts it somewhere more central. Now the only thing left in ssh2connection is the formatting and parsing of the various channel requests; the logic deciding which ones to issue and what to do about them is devolved to the Channel implementation, as it properly should be.
2018-09-30 09:16:38 +03:00
{
assert(chan->vt == &mainchan_channelvt);
mainchan *mc = container_of(chan, mainchan, chan);
PacketProtocolLayer *ppl = mc->ppl; /* for ppl_logevent */
if (mc->req_x11) {
Adopt C99 <stdbool.h>'s true/false. This commit includes <stdbool.h> from defs.h and deletes my traditional definitions of TRUE and FALSE, but other than that, it's a 100% mechanical search-and-replace transforming all uses of TRUE and FALSE into the C99-standardised lowercase spellings. No actual types are changed in this commit; that will come next. This is just getting the noise out of the way, so that subsequent commits can have a higher proportion of signal.
2018-10-29 22:50:29 +03:00
mc->req_x11 = false;
Move mainchan into its own file, like agentf. This gets another big pile of logic out of ssh2connection and puts it somewhere more central. Now the only thing left in ssh2connection is the formatting and parsing of the various channel requests; the logic deciding which ones to issue and what to do about them is devolved to the Channel implementation, as it properly should be.
2018-09-30 09:16:38 +03:00
if (success) {
Start using C99 variadic macros. In the past, I've had a lot of macros which you call with double parentheses, along the lines of debug(("format string", params)), so that the inner parens protect the commas and permit the macro to treat the whole printf-style argument list as one macro argument. That's all very well, but it's a bit inconvenient (it doesn't leave you any way to implement such a macro by prepending another argument to the list), and now this code base's rules allow C99isms, I can switch all those macros to using a single pair of parens, using the C99 ability to say '...' in the parameter list of the #define and get at the corresponding suffix of the arguments as __VA_ARGS__. So I'm doing it. I've made the following printf-style macros variadic: bpp_logevent, ppl_logevent, ppl_printf and debug. While I'm here, I've also fixed up a collection of conditioned-out calls to debug() in the Windows front end which were clearly expecting a macro with a different calling syntax, because they had an integer parameter first. If I ever have a need to condition those back in, they should actually work now.
2018-12-08 23:32:31 +03:00
ppl_logevent("X11 forwarding enabled");
Move mainchan into its own file, like agentf. This gets another big pile of logic out of ssh2connection and puts it somewhere more central. Now the only thing left in ssh2connection is the formatting and parsing of the various channel requests; the logic deciding which ones to issue and what to do about them is devolved to the Channel implementation, as it properly should be.
2018-09-30 09:16:38 +03:00
ssh_enable_x_fwd(mc->cl);
} else {
Start using C99 variadic macros. In the past, I've had a lot of macros which you call with double parentheses, along the lines of debug(("format string", params)), so that the inner parens protect the commas and permit the macro to treat the whole printf-style argument list as one macro argument. That's all very well, but it's a bit inconvenient (it doesn't leave you any way to implement such a macro by prepending another argument to the list), and now this code base's rules allow C99isms, I can switch all those macros to using a single pair of parens, using the C99 ability to say '...' in the parameter list of the #define and get at the corresponding suffix of the arguments as __VA_ARGS__. So I'm doing it. I've made the following printf-style macros variadic: bpp_logevent, ppl_logevent, ppl_printf and debug. While I'm here, I've also fixed up a collection of conditioned-out calls to debug() in the Windows front end which were clearly expecting a macro with a different calling syntax, because they had an integer parameter first. If I ever have a need to condition those back in, they should actually work now.
2018-12-08 23:32:31 +03:00
ppl_logevent("X11 forwarding refused");
Move mainchan into its own file, like agentf. This gets another big pile of logic out of ssh2connection and puts it somewhere more central. Now the only thing left in ssh2connection is the formatting and parsing of the various channel requests; the logic deciding which ones to issue and what to do about them is devolved to the Channel implementation, as it properly should be.
2018-09-30 09:16:38 +03:00
}
return;
}
if (mc->req_agent) {
Adopt C99 <stdbool.h>'s true/false. This commit includes <stdbool.h> from defs.h and deletes my traditional definitions of TRUE and FALSE, but other than that, it's a 100% mechanical search-and-replace transforming all uses of TRUE and FALSE into the C99-standardised lowercase spellings. No actual types are changed in this commit; that will come next. This is just getting the noise out of the way, so that subsequent commits can have a higher proportion of signal.
2018-10-29 22:50:29 +03:00
mc->req_agent = false;
Move mainchan into its own file, like agentf. This gets another big pile of logic out of ssh2connection and puts it somewhere more central. Now the only thing left in ssh2connection is the formatting and parsing of the various channel requests; the logic deciding which ones to issue and what to do about them is devolved to the Channel implementation, as it properly should be.
2018-09-30 09:16:38 +03:00
if (success) {
Start using C99 variadic macros. In the past, I've had a lot of macros which you call with double parentheses, along the lines of debug(("format string", params)), so that the inner parens protect the commas and permit the macro to treat the whole printf-style argument list as one macro argument. That's all very well, but it's a bit inconvenient (it doesn't leave you any way to implement such a macro by prepending another argument to the list), and now this code base's rules allow C99isms, I can switch all those macros to using a single pair of parens, using the C99 ability to say '...' in the parameter list of the #define and get at the corresponding suffix of the arguments as __VA_ARGS__. So I'm doing it. I've made the following printf-style macros variadic: bpp_logevent, ppl_logevent, ppl_printf and debug. While I'm here, I've also fixed up a collection of conditioned-out calls to debug() in the Windows front end which were clearly expecting a macro with a different calling syntax, because they had an integer parameter first. If I ever have a need to condition those back in, they should actually work now.
2018-12-08 23:32:31 +03:00
ppl_logevent("Agent forwarding enabled");
Move mainchan into its own file, like agentf. This gets another big pile of logic out of ssh2connection and puts it somewhere more central. Now the only thing left in ssh2connection is the formatting and parsing of the various channel requests; the logic deciding which ones to issue and what to do about them is devolved to the Channel implementation, as it properly should be.
2018-09-30 09:16:38 +03:00
ssh_enable_agent_fwd(mc->cl);
} else {
Start using C99 variadic macros. In the past, I've had a lot of macros which you call with double parentheses, along the lines of debug(("format string", params)), so that the inner parens protect the commas and permit the macro to treat the whole printf-style argument list as one macro argument. That's all very well, but it's a bit inconvenient (it doesn't leave you any way to implement such a macro by prepending another argument to the list), and now this code base's rules allow C99isms, I can switch all those macros to using a single pair of parens, using the C99 ability to say '...' in the parameter list of the #define and get at the corresponding suffix of the arguments as __VA_ARGS__. So I'm doing it. I've made the following printf-style macros variadic: bpp_logevent, ppl_logevent, ppl_printf and debug. While I'm here, I've also fixed up a collection of conditioned-out calls to debug() in the Windows front end which were clearly expecting a macro with a different calling syntax, because they had an integer parameter first. If I ever have a need to condition those back in, they should actually work now.
2018-12-08 23:32:31 +03:00
ppl_logevent("Agent forwarding refused");
Move mainchan into its own file, like agentf. This gets another big pile of logic out of ssh2connection and puts it somewhere more central. Now the only thing left in ssh2connection is the formatting and parsing of the various channel requests; the logic deciding which ones to issue and what to do about them is devolved to the Channel implementation, as it properly should be.
2018-09-30 09:16:38 +03:00
}
return;
}
if (mc->req_pty) {
Adopt C99 <stdbool.h>'s true/false. This commit includes <stdbool.h> from defs.h and deletes my traditional definitions of TRUE and FALSE, but other than that, it's a 100% mechanical search-and-replace transforming all uses of TRUE and FALSE into the C99-standardised lowercase spellings. No actual types are changed in this commit; that will come next. This is just getting the noise out of the way, so that subsequent commits can have a higher proportion of signal.
2018-10-29 22:50:29 +03:00
mc->req_pty = false;
Move mainchan into its own file, like agentf. This gets another big pile of logic out of ssh2connection and puts it somewhere more central. Now the only thing left in ssh2connection is the formatting and parsing of the various channel requests; the logic deciding which ones to issue and what to do about them is devolved to the Channel implementation, as it properly should be.
2018-09-30 09:16:38 +03:00
if (success) {
Start using C99 variadic macros. In the past, I've had a lot of macros which you call with double parentheses, along the lines of debug(("format string", params)), so that the inner parens protect the commas and permit the macro to treat the whole printf-style argument list as one macro argument. That's all very well, but it's a bit inconvenient (it doesn't leave you any way to implement such a macro by prepending another argument to the list), and now this code base's rules allow C99isms, I can switch all those macros to using a single pair of parens, using the C99 ability to say '...' in the parameter list of the #define and get at the corresponding suffix of the arguments as __VA_ARGS__. So I'm doing it. I've made the following printf-style macros variadic: bpp_logevent, ppl_logevent, ppl_printf and debug. While I'm here, I've also fixed up a collection of conditioned-out calls to debug() in the Windows front end which were clearly expecting a macro with a different calling syntax, because they had an integer parameter first. If I ever have a need to condition those back in, they should actually work now.
2018-12-08 23:32:31 +03:00
ppl_logevent("Allocated pty");
Adopt C99 <stdbool.h>'s true/false. This commit includes <stdbool.h> from defs.h and deletes my traditional definitions of TRUE and FALSE, but other than that, it's a 100% mechanical search-and-replace transforming all uses of TRUE and FALSE into the C99-standardised lowercase spellings. No actual types are changed in this commit; that will come next. This is just getting the noise out of the way, so that subsequent commits can have a higher proportion of signal.
2018-10-29 22:50:29 +03:00
mc->got_pty = true;
Move mainchan into its own file, like agentf. This gets another big pile of logic out of ssh2connection and puts it somewhere more central. Now the only thing left in ssh2connection is the formatting and parsing of the various channel requests; the logic deciding which ones to issue and what to do about them is devolved to the Channel implementation, as it properly should be.
2018-09-30 09:16:38 +03:00
} else {
Start using C99 variadic macros. In the past, I've had a lot of macros which you call with double parentheses, along the lines of debug(("format string", params)), so that the inner parens protect the commas and permit the macro to treat the whole printf-style argument list as one macro argument. That's all very well, but it's a bit inconvenient (it doesn't leave you any way to implement such a macro by prepending another argument to the list), and now this code base's rules allow C99isms, I can switch all those macros to using a single pair of parens, using the C99 ability to say '...' in the parameter list of the #define and get at the corresponding suffix of the arguments as __VA_ARGS__. So I'm doing it. I've made the following printf-style macros variadic: bpp_logevent, ppl_logevent, ppl_printf and debug. While I'm here, I've also fixed up a collection of conditioned-out calls to debug() in the Windows front end which were clearly expecting a macro with a different calling syntax, because they had an integer parameter first. If I ever have a need to condition those back in, they should actually work now.
2018-12-08 23:32:31 +03:00
ppl_logevent("Server refused to allocate pty");
ppl_printf("Server refused to allocate pty\r\n");
Adopt C99 <stdbool.h>'s true/false. This commit includes <stdbool.h> from defs.h and deletes my traditional definitions of TRUE and FALSE, but other than that, it's a 100% mechanical search-and-replace transforming all uses of TRUE and FALSE into the C99-standardised lowercase spellings. No actual types are changed in this commit; that will come next. This is just getting the noise out of the way, so that subsequent commits can have a higher proportion of signal.
2018-10-29 22:50:29 +03:00
ssh_set_ldisc_option(mc->cl, LD_ECHO, true);
ssh_set_ldisc_option(mc->cl, LD_EDIT, true);
Move mainchan into its own file, like agentf. This gets another big pile of logic out of ssh2connection and puts it somewhere more central. Now the only thing left in ssh2connection is the formatting and parsing of the various channel requests; the logic deciding which ones to issue and what to do about them is devolved to the Channel implementation, as it properly should be.
2018-09-30 09:16:38 +03:00
}
return;
}
if (mc->n_env_replies < mc->n_req_env) {
int j = mc->n_env_replies++;
if (!success) {
Start using C99 variadic macros. In the past, I've had a lot of macros which you call with double parentheses, along the lines of debug(("format string", params)), so that the inner parens protect the commas and permit the macro to treat the whole printf-style argument list as one macro argument. That's all very well, but it's a bit inconvenient (it doesn't leave you any way to implement such a macro by prepending another argument to the list), and now this code base's rules allow C99isms, I can switch all those macros to using a single pair of parens, using the C99 ability to say '...' in the parameter list of the #define and get at the corresponding suffix of the arguments as __VA_ARGS__. So I'm doing it. I've made the following printf-style macros variadic: bpp_logevent, ppl_logevent, ppl_printf and debug. While I'm here, I've also fixed up a collection of conditioned-out calls to debug() in the Windows front end which were clearly expecting a macro with a different calling syntax, because they had an integer parameter first. If I ever have a need to condition those back in, they should actually work now.
2018-12-08 23:32:31 +03:00
ppl_logevent("Server refused to set environment variable %s",
conf_get_str_nthstrkey(mc->conf,
CONF_environmt, j));
Move mainchan into its own file, like agentf. This gets another big pile of logic out of ssh2connection and puts it somewhere more central. Now the only thing left in ssh2connection is the formatting and parsing of the various channel requests; the logic deciding which ones to issue and what to do about them is devolved to the Channel implementation, as it properly should be.
2018-09-30 09:16:38 +03:00
mc->n_env_fails++;
}
if (mc->n_env_replies == mc->n_req_env) {
if (mc->n_env_fails == 0) {
Start using C99 variadic macros. In the past, I've had a lot of macros which you call with double parentheses, along the lines of debug(("format string", params)), so that the inner parens protect the commas and permit the macro to treat the whole printf-style argument list as one macro argument. That's all very well, but it's a bit inconvenient (it doesn't leave you any way to implement such a macro by prepending another argument to the list), and now this code base's rules allow C99isms, I can switch all those macros to using a single pair of parens, using the C99 ability to say '...' in the parameter list of the #define and get at the corresponding suffix of the arguments as __VA_ARGS__. So I'm doing it. I've made the following printf-style macros variadic: bpp_logevent, ppl_logevent, ppl_printf and debug. While I'm here, I've also fixed up a collection of conditioned-out calls to debug() in the Windows front end which were clearly expecting a macro with a different calling syntax, because they had an integer parameter first. If I ever have a need to condition those back in, they should actually work now.
2018-12-08 23:32:31 +03:00
ppl_logevent("All environment variables successfully set");
Move mainchan into its own file, like agentf. This gets another big pile of logic out of ssh2connection and puts it somewhere more central. Now the only thing left in ssh2connection is the formatting and parsing of the various channel requests; the logic deciding which ones to issue and what to do about them is devolved to the Channel implementation, as it properly should be.
2018-09-30 09:16:38 +03:00
} else if (mc->n_env_fails == mc->n_req_env) {
Start using C99 variadic macros. In the past, I've had a lot of macros which you call with double parentheses, along the lines of debug(("format string", params)), so that the inner parens protect the commas and permit the macro to treat the whole printf-style argument list as one macro argument. That's all very well, but it's a bit inconvenient (it doesn't leave you any way to implement such a macro by prepending another argument to the list), and now this code base's rules allow C99isms, I can switch all those macros to using a single pair of parens, using the C99 ability to say '...' in the parameter list of the #define and get at the corresponding suffix of the arguments as __VA_ARGS__. So I'm doing it. I've made the following printf-style macros variadic: bpp_logevent, ppl_logevent, ppl_printf and debug. While I'm here, I've also fixed up a collection of conditioned-out calls to debug() in the Windows front end which were clearly expecting a macro with a different calling syntax, because they had an integer parameter first. If I ever have a need to condition those back in, they should actually work now.
2018-12-08 23:32:31 +03:00
ppl_logevent("All environment variables refused");
ppl_printf("Server refused to set environment "
"variables\r\n");
Move mainchan into its own file, like agentf. This gets another big pile of logic out of ssh2connection and puts it somewhere more central. Now the only thing left in ssh2connection is the formatting and parsing of the various channel requests; the logic deciding which ones to issue and what to do about them is devolved to the Channel implementation, as it properly should be.
2018-09-30 09:16:38 +03:00
} else {
Start using C99 variadic macros. In the past, I've had a lot of macros which you call with double parentheses, along the lines of debug(("format string", params)), so that the inner parens protect the commas and permit the macro to treat the whole printf-style argument list as one macro argument. That's all very well, but it's a bit inconvenient (it doesn't leave you any way to implement such a macro by prepending another argument to the list), and now this code base's rules allow C99isms, I can switch all those macros to using a single pair of parens, using the C99 ability to say '...' in the parameter list of the #define and get at the corresponding suffix of the arguments as __VA_ARGS__. So I'm doing it. I've made the following printf-style macros variadic: bpp_logevent, ppl_logevent, ppl_printf and debug. While I'm here, I've also fixed up a collection of conditioned-out calls to debug() in the Windows front end which were clearly expecting a macro with a different calling syntax, because they had an integer parameter first. If I ever have a need to condition those back in, they should actually work now.
2018-12-08 23:32:31 +03:00
ppl_printf("Server refused to set all environment "
"variables\r\n");
Move mainchan into its own file, like agentf. This gets another big pile of logic out of ssh2connection and puts it somewhere more central. Now the only thing left in ssh2connection is the formatting and parsing of the various channel requests; the logic deciding which ones to issue and what to do about them is devolved to the Channel implementation, as it properly should be.
2018-09-30 09:16:38 +03:00
}
}
return;
}
if (mc->req_cmd_primary) {
Adopt C99 <stdbool.h>'s true/false. This commit includes <stdbool.h> from defs.h and deletes my traditional definitions of TRUE and FALSE, but other than that, it's a 100% mechanical search-and-replace transforming all uses of TRUE and FALSE into the C99-standardised lowercase spellings. No actual types are changed in this commit; that will come next. This is just getting the noise out of the way, so that subsequent commits can have a higher proportion of signal.
2018-10-29 22:50:29 +03:00
mc->req_cmd_primary = false;
Move mainchan into its own file, like agentf. This gets another big pile of logic out of ssh2connection and puts it somewhere more central. Now the only thing left in ssh2connection is the formatting and parsing of the various channel requests; the logic deciding which ones to issue and what to do about them is devolved to the Channel implementation, as it properly should be.
2018-09-30 09:16:38 +03:00
if (success) {
Start using C99 variadic macros. In the past, I've had a lot of macros which you call with double parentheses, along the lines of debug(("format string", params)), so that the inner parens protect the commas and permit the macro to treat the whole printf-style argument list as one macro argument. That's all very well, but it's a bit inconvenient (it doesn't leave you any way to implement such a macro by prepending another argument to the list), and now this code base's rules allow C99isms, I can switch all those macros to using a single pair of parens, using the C99 ability to say '...' in the parameter list of the #define and get at the corresponding suffix of the arguments as __VA_ARGS__. So I'm doing it. I've made the following printf-style macros variadic: bpp_logevent, ppl_logevent, ppl_printf and debug. While I'm here, I've also fixed up a collection of conditioned-out calls to debug() in the Windows front end which were clearly expecting a macro with a different calling syntax, because they had an integer parameter first. If I ever have a need to condition those back in, they should actually work now.
2018-12-08 23:32:31 +03:00
ppl_logevent("Started a shell/command");
Move mainchan into its own file, like agentf. This gets another big pile of logic out of ssh2connection and puts it somewhere more central. Now the only thing left in ssh2connection is the formatting and parsing of the various channel requests; the logic deciding which ones to issue and what to do about them is devolved to the Channel implementation, as it properly should be.
2018-09-30 09:16:38 +03:00
mainchan_ready(mc);
} else if (*conf_get_str(mc->conf, CONF_remote_cmd2)) {
Start using C99 variadic macros. In the past, I've had a lot of macros which you call with double parentheses, along the lines of debug(("format string", params)), so that the inner parens protect the commas and permit the macro to treat the whole printf-style argument list as one macro argument. That's all very well, but it's a bit inconvenient (it doesn't leave you any way to implement such a macro by prepending another argument to the list), and now this code base's rules allow C99isms, I can switch all those macros to using a single pair of parens, using the C99 ability to say '...' in the parameter list of the #define and get at the corresponding suffix of the arguments as __VA_ARGS__. So I'm doing it. I've made the following printf-style macros variadic: bpp_logevent, ppl_logevent, ppl_printf and debug. While I'm here, I've also fixed up a collection of conditioned-out calls to debug() in the Windows front end which were clearly expecting a macro with a different calling syntax, because they had an integer parameter first. If I ever have a need to condition those back in, they should actually work now.
2018-12-08 23:32:31 +03:00
ppl_logevent("Primary command failed; attempting fallback");
Move mainchan into its own file, like agentf. This gets another big pile of logic out of ssh2connection and puts it somewhere more central. Now the only thing left in ssh2connection is the formatting and parsing of the various channel requests; the logic deciding which ones to issue and what to do about them is devolved to the Channel implementation, as it properly should be.
2018-09-30 09:16:38 +03:00
mainchan_try_fallback_command(mc);
} else {
/*
* If there's no remote_cmd2 configured, then we have no
* fallback command, so we've run out of options.
*/
ssh_sw_abort(mc->ppl->ssh,
"Server refused to start a shell/command");
}
return;
}
if (mc->req_cmd_fallback) {
Adopt C99 <stdbool.h>'s true/false. This commit includes <stdbool.h> from defs.h and deletes my traditional definitions of TRUE and FALSE, but other than that, it's a 100% mechanical search-and-replace transforming all uses of TRUE and FALSE into the C99-standardised lowercase spellings. No actual types are changed in this commit; that will come next. This is just getting the noise out of the way, so that subsequent commits can have a higher proportion of signal.
2018-10-29 22:50:29 +03:00
mc->req_cmd_fallback = false;
Move mainchan into its own file, like agentf. This gets another big pile of logic out of ssh2connection and puts it somewhere more central. Now the only thing left in ssh2connection is the formatting and parsing of the various channel requests; the logic deciding which ones to issue and what to do about them is devolved to the Channel implementation, as it properly should be.
2018-09-30 09:16:38 +03:00
if (success) {
Start using C99 variadic macros. In the past, I've had a lot of macros which you call with double parentheses, along the lines of debug(("format string", params)), so that the inner parens protect the commas and permit the macro to treat the whole printf-style argument list as one macro argument. That's all very well, but it's a bit inconvenient (it doesn't leave you any way to implement such a macro by prepending another argument to the list), and now this code base's rules allow C99isms, I can switch all those macros to using a single pair of parens, using the C99 ability to say '...' in the parameter list of the #define and get at the corresponding suffix of the arguments as __VA_ARGS__. So I'm doing it. I've made the following printf-style macros variadic: bpp_logevent, ppl_logevent, ppl_printf and debug. While I'm here, I've also fixed up a collection of conditioned-out calls to debug() in the Windows front end which were clearly expecting a macro with a different calling syntax, because they had an integer parameter first. If I ever have a need to condition those back in, they should actually work now.
2018-12-08 23:32:31 +03:00
ppl_logevent("Started a shell/command");
Move mainchan into its own file, like agentf. This gets another big pile of logic out of ssh2connection and puts it somewhere more central. Now the only thing left in ssh2connection is the formatting and parsing of the various channel requests; the logic deciding which ones to issue and what to do about them is devolved to the Channel implementation, as it properly should be.
2018-09-30 09:16:38 +03:00
ssh_got_fallback_cmd(mc->ppl->ssh);
mainchan_ready(mc);
} else {
ssh_sw_abort(mc->ppl->ssh,
"Server refused to start a shell/command");
}
return;
}
}
static void mainchan_ready(mainchan *mc)
{
Adopt C99 <stdbool.h>'s true/false. This commit includes <stdbool.h> from defs.h and deletes my traditional definitions of TRUE and FALSE, but other than that, it's a 100% mechanical search-and-replace transforming all uses of TRUE and FALSE into the C99-standardised lowercase spellings. No actual types are changed in this commit; that will come next. This is just getting the noise out of the way, so that subsequent commits can have a higher proportion of signal.
2018-10-29 22:50:29 +03:00
mc->ready = true;
Move mainchan into its own file, like agentf. This gets another big pile of logic out of ssh2connection and puts it somewhere more central. Now the only thing left in ssh2connection is the formatting and parsing of the various channel requests; the logic deciding which ones to issue and what to do about them is devolved to the Channel implementation, as it properly should be.
2018-09-30 09:16:38 +03:00
Adopt C99 <stdbool.h>'s true/false. This commit includes <stdbool.h> from defs.h and deletes my traditional definitions of TRUE and FALSE, but other than that, it's a 100% mechanical search-and-replace transforming all uses of TRUE and FALSE into the C99-standardised lowercase spellings. No actual types are changed in this commit; that will come next. This is just getting the noise out of the way, so that subsequent commits can have a higher proportion of signal.
2018-10-29 22:50:29 +03:00
ssh_set_wants_user_input(mc->cl, true);
Move mainchan into its own file, like agentf. This gets another big pile of logic out of ssh2connection and puts it somewhere more central. Now the only thing left in ssh2connection is the formatting and parsing of the various channel requests; the logic deciding which ones to issue and what to do about them is devolved to the Channel implementation, as it properly should be.
2018-09-30 09:16:38 +03:00
ssh_ppl_got_user_input(mc->ppl); /* in case any is already queued */
/* If an EOF arrived before we were ready, handle it now. */
if (mc->eof_pending) {
Adopt C99 <stdbool.h>'s true/false. This commit includes <stdbool.h> from defs.h and deletes my traditional definitions of TRUE and FALSE, but other than that, it's a 100% mechanical search-and-replace transforming all uses of TRUE and FALSE into the C99-standardised lowercase spellings. No actual types are changed in this commit; that will come next. This is just getting the noise out of the way, so that subsequent commits can have a higher proportion of signal.
2018-10-29 22:50:29 +03:00
mc->eof_pending = false;
Move mainchan into its own file, like agentf. This gets another big pile of logic out of ssh2connection and puts it somewhere more central. Now the only thing left in ssh2connection is the formatting and parsing of the various channel requests; the logic deciding which ones to issue and what to do about them is devolved to the Channel implementation, as it properly should be.
2018-09-30 09:16:38 +03:00
mainchan_special_cmd(mc, SS_EOF, 0);
}
ssh_ldisc_update(mc->ppl->ssh);
queue_idempotent_callback(&mc->ppl->ic_process_queue);
}
struct mainchan_open_failure_abort_ctx {
Ssh *ssh;
char *abort_message;
};
static void mainchan_open_failure_abort(void *vctx)
{
struct mainchan_open_failure_abort_ctx *ctx =
(struct mainchan_open_failure_abort_ctx *)vctx;
ssh_sw_abort(
ctx->ssh, "Server refused to open main channel: %s",
ctx->abort_message);
sfree(ctx->abort_message);
sfree(ctx);
}
static void mainchan_open_failure(Channel *chan, const char *errtext)
{
assert(chan->vt == &mainchan_channelvt);
mainchan *mc = container_of(chan, mainchan, chan);
struct mainchan_open_failure_abort_ctx *ctx =
snew(struct mainchan_open_failure_abort_ctx);
ctx->ssh = mc->ppl->ssh;
ctx->abort_message = dupstr(errtext);
queue_toplevel_callback(mainchan_open_failure_abort, ctx);
}
Convert a lot of 'int' variables to 'bool'. My normal habit these days, in new code, is to treat int and bool as _almost_ completely separate types. I'm still willing to use C's implicit test for zero on an integer (e.g. 'if (!blob.len)' is fine, no need to spell it out as blob.len != 0), but generally, if a variable is going to be conceptually a boolean, I like to declare it bool and assign to it using 'true' or 'false' rather than 0 or 1. PuTTY is an exception, because it predates the C99 bool, and I've stuck to its existing coding style even when adding new code to it. But it's been annoying me more and more, so now that I've decided C99 bool is an acceptable thing to require from our toolchain in the first place, here's a quite thorough trawl through the source doing 'boolification'. Many variables and function parameters are now typed as bool rather than int; many assignments of 0 or 1 to those variables are now spelled 'true' or 'false'. I managed this thorough conversion with the help of a custom clang plugin that I wrote to trawl the AST and apply heuristics to point out where things might want changing. So I've even managed to do a decent job on parts of the code I haven't looked at in years! To make the plugin's work easier, I pushed platform front ends generally in the direction of using standard 'bool' in preference to platform-specific boolean types like Windows BOOL or GTK's gboolean; I've left the platform booleans in places they _have_ to be for the platform APIs to work right, but variables only used by my own code have been converted wherever I found them. In a few places there are int values that look very like booleans in _most_ of the places they're used, but have a rarely-used third value, or a distinction between different nonzero values that most users don't care about. In these cases, I've _removed_ uses of 'true' and 'false' for the return values, to emphasise that there's something more subtle going on than a simple boolean answer: - the 'multisel' field in dialog.h's list box structure, for which the GTK front end in particular recognises a difference between 1 and 2 but nearly everything else treats as boolean - the 'urgent' parameter to plug_receive, where 1 vs 2 tells you something about the specific location of the urgent pointer, but most clients only care about 0 vs 'something nonzero' - the return value of wc_match, where -1 indicates a syntax error in the wildcard. - the return values from SSH-1 RSA-key loading functions, which use -1 for 'wrong passphrase' and 0 for all other failures (so any caller which already knows it's not loading an _encrypted private_ key can treat them as boolean) - term->esc_query, and the 'query' parameter in toggle_mode in terminal.c, which _usually_ hold 0 for ESC[123h or 1 for ESC[?123h, but can also hold -1 for some other intervening character that we don't support. In a few places there's an integer that I haven't turned into a bool even though it really _can_ only take values 0 or 1 (and, as above, tried to make the call sites consistent in not calling those values true and false), on the grounds that I thought it would make it more confusing to imply that the 0 value was in some sense 'negative' or bad and the 1 positive or good: - the return value of plug_accepting uses the POSIXish convention of 0=success and nonzero=error; I think if I made it bool then I'd also want to reverse its sense, and that's a job for a separate piece of work. - the 'screen' parameter to lineptr() in terminal.c, where 0 and 1 represent the default and alternate screens. There's no obvious reason why one of those should be considered 'true' or 'positive' or 'success' - they're just indices - so I've left it as int. ssh_scp_recv had particularly confusing semantics for its previous int return value: its call sites used '<= 0' to check for error, but it never actually returned a negative number, just 0 or 1. Now the function and its call sites agree that it's a bool. In a couple of places I've renamed variables called 'ret', because I don't like that name any more - it's unclear whether it means the return value (in preparation) for the _containing_ function or the return value received from a subroutine call, and occasionally I've accidentally used the same variable for both and introduced a bug. So where one of those got in my way, I've renamed it to 'toret' or 'retd' (the latter short for 'returned') in line with my usual modern practice, but I haven't done a thorough job of finding all of them. Finally, one amusing side effect of doing this is that I've had to separate quite a few chained assignments. It used to be perfectly fine to write 'a = b = c = TRUE' when a,b,c were int and TRUE was just a the 'true' defined by stdbool.h, that idiom provokes a warning from gcc: 'suggest parentheses around assignment used as truth value'!
2018-11-02 22:23:19 +03:00
static int mainchan_send(Channel *chan, bool is_stderr,
Move mainchan into its own file, like agentf. This gets another big pile of logic out of ssh2connection and puts it somewhere more central. Now the only thing left in ssh2connection is the formatting and parsing of the various channel requests; the logic deciding which ones to issue and what to do about them is devolved to the Channel implementation, as it properly should be.
2018-09-30 09:16:38 +03:00
const void *data, int length)
{
assert(chan->vt == &mainchan_channelvt);
mainchan *mc = container_of(chan, mainchan, chan);
return seat_output(mc->ppl->seat, is_stderr, data, length);
}
static void mainchan_send_eof(Channel *chan)
{
assert(chan->vt == &mainchan_channelvt);
mainchan *mc = container_of(chan, mainchan, chan);
PacketProtocolLayer *ppl = mc->ppl; /* for ppl_logevent */
Remove three uses of bitwise ops on boolean values. If values are boolean, it's confusing to use & and | in place of && and ||. In two of these three cases it was simply a typo and I've used the other one; in the third, it was a deliberate avoidance of short- circuit evaluation (and commented as such), but having seen how easy it is to make the same typo by accident, I've decided it's clearer to just move the LHS and RHS evaluations outside the expression.
2018-10-30 21:09:12 +03:00
if (!mc->eof_sent && (seat_eof(mc->ppl->seat) || mc->got_pty)) {
Move mainchan into its own file, like agentf. This gets another big pile of logic out of ssh2connection and puts it somewhere more central. Now the only thing left in ssh2connection is the formatting and parsing of the various channel requests; the logic deciding which ones to issue and what to do about them is devolved to the Channel implementation, as it properly should be.
2018-09-30 09:16:38 +03:00
/*
* Either seat_eof told us that the front end wants us to
* close the outgoing side of the connection as soon as we see
* EOF from the far end, or else we've unilaterally decided to
* do that because we've allocated a remote pty and hence EOF
* isn't a particularly meaningful concept.
*/
sshfwd_write_eof(mc->sc);
Start using C99 variadic macros. In the past, I've had a lot of macros which you call with double parentheses, along the lines of debug(("format string", params)), so that the inner parens protect the commas and permit the macro to treat the whole printf-style argument list as one macro argument. That's all very well, but it's a bit inconvenient (it doesn't leave you any way to implement such a macro by prepending another argument to the list), and now this code base's rules allow C99isms, I can switch all those macros to using a single pair of parens, using the C99 ability to say '...' in the parameter list of the #define and get at the corresponding suffix of the arguments as __VA_ARGS__. So I'm doing it. I've made the following printf-style macros variadic: bpp_logevent, ppl_logevent, ppl_printf and debug. While I'm here, I've also fixed up a collection of conditioned-out calls to debug() in the Windows front end which were clearly expecting a macro with a different calling syntax, because they had an integer parameter first. If I ever have a need to condition those back in, they should actually work now.
2018-12-08 23:32:31 +03:00
ppl_logevent("Sent EOF message");
Stop setting mc->eof_sent if we haven't. Looks as if I introduced this bug in commit 431f92ade, when I moved mainchan out into its own source file: the previous version of mainchan_send_eof conditionalised the setting of mc->eof_sent in the same if statement that actually sent the EOF, but somehow, in the new version, only one of those operations was inside the if. The effect is that in plink -nc mode, if the server sends EOF first, the client stops listening to standard input at its own end, so it never knows when to send EOF back and clean things up.
2018-11-12 23:27:25 +03:00
mc->eof_sent = true;
ssh_set_wants_user_input(mc->cl, false); /* stop reading from stdin */
Move mainchan into its own file, like agentf. This gets another big pile of logic out of ssh2connection and puts it somewhere more central. Now the only thing left in ssh2connection is the formatting and parsing of the various channel requests; the logic deciding which ones to issue and what to do about them is devolved to the Channel implementation, as it properly should be.
2018-09-30 09:16:38 +03:00
}
}
Convert a lot of 'int' variables to 'bool'. My normal habit these days, in new code, is to treat int and bool as _almost_ completely separate types. I'm still willing to use C's implicit test for zero on an integer (e.g. 'if (!blob.len)' is fine, no need to spell it out as blob.len != 0), but generally, if a variable is going to be conceptually a boolean, I like to declare it bool and assign to it using 'true' or 'false' rather than 0 or 1. PuTTY is an exception, because it predates the C99 bool, and I've stuck to its existing coding style even when adding new code to it. But it's been annoying me more and more, so now that I've decided C99 bool is an acceptable thing to require from our toolchain in the first place, here's a quite thorough trawl through the source doing 'boolification'. Many variables and function parameters are now typed as bool rather than int; many assignments of 0 or 1 to those variables are now spelled 'true' or 'false'. I managed this thorough conversion with the help of a custom clang plugin that I wrote to trawl the AST and apply heuristics to point out where things might want changing. So I've even managed to do a decent job on parts of the code I haven't looked at in years! To make the plugin's work easier, I pushed platform front ends generally in the direction of using standard 'bool' in preference to platform-specific boolean types like Windows BOOL or GTK's gboolean; I've left the platform booleans in places they _have_ to be for the platform APIs to work right, but variables only used by my own code have been converted wherever I found them. In a few places there are int values that look very like booleans in _most_ of the places they're used, but have a rarely-used third value, or a distinction between different nonzero values that most users don't care about. In these cases, I've _removed_ uses of 'true' and 'false' for the return values, to emphasise that there's something more subtle going on than a simple boolean answer: - the 'multisel' field in dialog.h's list box structure, for which the GTK front end in particular recognises a difference between 1 and 2 but nearly everything else treats as boolean - the 'urgent' parameter to plug_receive, where 1 vs 2 tells you something about the specific location of the urgent pointer, but most clients only care about 0 vs 'something nonzero' - the return value of wc_match, where -1 indicates a syntax error in the wildcard. - the return values from SSH-1 RSA-key loading functions, which use -1 for 'wrong passphrase' and 0 for all other failures (so any caller which already knows it's not loading an _encrypted private_ key can treat them as boolean) - term->esc_query, and the 'query' parameter in toggle_mode in terminal.c, which _usually_ hold 0 for ESC[123h or 1 for ESC[?123h, but can also hold -1 for some other intervening character that we don't support. In a few places there's an integer that I haven't turned into a bool even though it really _can_ only take values 0 or 1 (and, as above, tried to make the call sites consistent in not calling those values true and false), on the grounds that I thought it would make it more confusing to imply that the 0 value was in some sense 'negative' or bad and the 1 positive or good: - the return value of plug_accepting uses the POSIXish convention of 0=success and nonzero=error; I think if I made it bool then I'd also want to reverse its sense, and that's a job for a separate piece of work. - the 'screen' parameter to lineptr() in terminal.c, where 0 and 1 represent the default and alternate screens. There's no obvious reason why one of those should be considered 'true' or 'positive' or 'success' - they're just indices - so I've left it as int. ssh_scp_recv had particularly confusing semantics for its previous int return value: its call sites used '<= 0' to check for error, but it never actually returned a negative number, just 0 or 1. Now the function and its call sites agree that it's a bool. In a couple of places I've renamed variables called 'ret', because I don't like that name any more - it's unclear whether it means the return value (in preparation) for the _containing_ function or the return value received from a subroutine call, and occasionally I've accidentally used the same variable for both and introduced a bug. So where one of those got in my way, I've renamed it to 'toret' or 'retd' (the latter short for 'returned') in line with my usual modern practice, but I haven't done a thorough job of finding all of them. Finally, one amusing side effect of doing this is that I've had to separate quite a few chained assignments. It used to be perfectly fine to write 'a = b = c = TRUE' when a,b,c were int and TRUE was just a the 'true' defined by stdbool.h, that idiom provokes a warning from gcc: 'suggest parentheses around assignment used as truth value'!
2018-11-02 22:23:19 +03:00
static void mainchan_set_input_wanted(Channel *chan, bool wanted)
Move mainchan into its own file, like agentf. This gets another big pile of logic out of ssh2connection and puts it somewhere more central. Now the only thing left in ssh2connection is the formatting and parsing of the various channel requests; the logic deciding which ones to issue and what to do about them is devolved to the Channel implementation, as it properly should be.
2018-09-30 09:16:38 +03:00
{
assert(chan->vt == &mainchan_channelvt);
mainchan *mc = container_of(chan, mainchan, chan);
/*
* This is the main channel of the SSH session, i.e. the one tied
* to the standard input (or GUI) of the primary SSH client user
* interface. So ssh->send_ok is how we control whether we're
* reading from that input.
*/
ssh_set_wants_user_input(mc->cl, wanted);
}
static char *mainchan_log_close_msg(Channel *chan)
{
return dupstr("Main session channel closed");
}
Convert a lot of 'int' variables to 'bool'. My normal habit these days, in new code, is to treat int and bool as _almost_ completely separate types. I'm still willing to use C's implicit test for zero on an integer (e.g. 'if (!blob.len)' is fine, no need to spell it out as blob.len != 0), but generally, if a variable is going to be conceptually a boolean, I like to declare it bool and assign to it using 'true' or 'false' rather than 0 or 1. PuTTY is an exception, because it predates the C99 bool, and I've stuck to its existing coding style even when adding new code to it. But it's been annoying me more and more, so now that I've decided C99 bool is an acceptable thing to require from our toolchain in the first place, here's a quite thorough trawl through the source doing 'boolification'. Many variables and function parameters are now typed as bool rather than int; many assignments of 0 or 1 to those variables are now spelled 'true' or 'false'. I managed this thorough conversion with the help of a custom clang plugin that I wrote to trawl the AST and apply heuristics to point out where things might want changing. So I've even managed to do a decent job on parts of the code I haven't looked at in years! To make the plugin's work easier, I pushed platform front ends generally in the direction of using standard 'bool' in preference to platform-specific boolean types like Windows BOOL or GTK's gboolean; I've left the platform booleans in places they _have_ to be for the platform APIs to work right, but variables only used by my own code have been converted wherever I found them. In a few places there are int values that look very like booleans in _most_ of the places they're used, but have a rarely-used third value, or a distinction between different nonzero values that most users don't care about. In these cases, I've _removed_ uses of 'true' and 'false' for the return values, to emphasise that there's something more subtle going on than a simple boolean answer: - the 'multisel' field in dialog.h's list box structure, for which the GTK front end in particular recognises a difference between 1 and 2 but nearly everything else treats as boolean - the 'urgent' parameter to plug_receive, where 1 vs 2 tells you something about the specific location of the urgent pointer, but most clients only care about 0 vs 'something nonzero' - the return value of wc_match, where -1 indicates a syntax error in the wildcard. - the return values from SSH-1 RSA-key loading functions, which use -1 for 'wrong passphrase' and 0 for all other failures (so any caller which already knows it's not loading an _encrypted private_ key can treat them as boolean) - term->esc_query, and the 'query' parameter in toggle_mode in terminal.c, which _usually_ hold 0 for ESC[123h or 1 for ESC[?123h, but can also hold -1 for some other intervening character that we don't support. In a few places there's an integer that I haven't turned into a bool even though it really _can_ only take values 0 or 1 (and, as above, tried to make the call sites consistent in not calling those values true and false), on the grounds that I thought it would make it more confusing to imply that the 0 value was in some sense 'negative' or bad and the 1 positive or good: - the return value of plug_accepting uses the POSIXish convention of 0=success and nonzero=error; I think if I made it bool then I'd also want to reverse its sense, and that's a job for a separate piece of work. - the 'screen' parameter to lineptr() in terminal.c, where 0 and 1 represent the default and alternate screens. There's no obvious reason why one of those should be considered 'true' or 'positive' or 'success' - they're just indices - so I've left it as int. ssh_scp_recv had particularly confusing semantics for its previous int return value: its call sites used '<= 0' to check for error, but it never actually returned a negative number, just 0 or 1. Now the function and its call sites agree that it's a bool. In a couple of places I've renamed variables called 'ret', because I don't like that name any more - it's unclear whether it means the return value (in preparation) for the _containing_ function or the return value received from a subroutine call, and occasionally I've accidentally used the same variable for both and introduced a bug. So where one of those got in my way, I've renamed it to 'toret' or 'retd' (the latter short for 'returned') in line with my usual modern practice, but I haven't done a thorough job of finding all of them. Finally, one amusing side effect of doing this is that I've had to separate quite a few chained assignments. It used to be perfectly fine to write 'a = b = c = TRUE' when a,b,c were int and TRUE was just a the 'true' defined by stdbool.h, that idiom provokes a warning from gcc: 'suggest parentheses around assignment used as truth value'!
2018-11-02 22:23:19 +03:00
static bool mainchan_rcvd_exit_status(Channel *chan, int status)
Move mainchan into its own file, like agentf. This gets another big pile of logic out of ssh2connection and puts it somewhere more central. Now the only thing left in ssh2connection is the formatting and parsing of the various channel requests; the logic deciding which ones to issue and what to do about them is devolved to the Channel implementation, as it properly should be.
2018-09-30 09:16:38 +03:00
{
assert(chan->vt == &mainchan_channelvt);
mainchan *mc = container_of(chan, mainchan, chan);
PacketProtocolLayer *ppl = mc->ppl; /* for ppl_logevent */
ssh_got_exitcode(mc->ppl->ssh, status);
Start using C99 variadic macros. In the past, I've had a lot of macros which you call with double parentheses, along the lines of debug(("format string", params)), so that the inner parens protect the commas and permit the macro to treat the whole printf-style argument list as one macro argument. That's all very well, but it's a bit inconvenient (it doesn't leave you any way to implement such a macro by prepending another argument to the list), and now this code base's rules allow C99isms, I can switch all those macros to using a single pair of parens, using the C99 ability to say '...' in the parameter list of the #define and get at the corresponding suffix of the arguments as __VA_ARGS__. So I'm doing it. I've made the following printf-style macros variadic: bpp_logevent, ppl_logevent, ppl_printf and debug. While I'm here, I've also fixed up a collection of conditioned-out calls to debug() in the Windows front end which were clearly expecting a macro with a different calling syntax, because they had an integer parameter first. If I ever have a need to condition those back in, they should actually work now.
2018-12-08 23:32:31 +03:00
ppl_logevent("Session sent command exit status %d", status);
Adopt C99 <stdbool.h>'s true/false. This commit includes <stdbool.h> from defs.h and deletes my traditional definitions of TRUE and FALSE, but other than that, it's a 100% mechanical search-and-replace transforming all uses of TRUE and FALSE into the C99-standardised lowercase spellings. No actual types are changed in this commit; that will come next. This is just getting the noise out of the way, so that subsequent commits can have a higher proportion of signal.
2018-10-29 22:50:29 +03:00
return true;
Move mainchan into its own file, like agentf. This gets another big pile of logic out of ssh2connection and puts it somewhere more central. Now the only thing left in ssh2connection is the formatting and parsing of the various channel requests; the logic deciding which ones to issue and what to do about them is devolved to the Channel implementation, as it properly should be.
2018-09-30 09:16:38 +03:00
}
static void mainchan_log_exit_signal_common(
mainchan *mc, const char *sigdesc,
Convert a lot of 'int' variables to 'bool'. My normal habit these days, in new code, is to treat int and bool as _almost_ completely separate types. I'm still willing to use C's implicit test for zero on an integer (e.g. 'if (!blob.len)' is fine, no need to spell it out as blob.len != 0), but generally, if a variable is going to be conceptually a boolean, I like to declare it bool and assign to it using 'true' or 'false' rather than 0 or 1. PuTTY is an exception, because it predates the C99 bool, and I've stuck to its existing coding style even when adding new code to it. But it's been annoying me more and more, so now that I've decided C99 bool is an acceptable thing to require from our toolchain in the first place, here's a quite thorough trawl through the source doing 'boolification'. Many variables and function parameters are now typed as bool rather than int; many assignments of 0 or 1 to those variables are now spelled 'true' or 'false'. I managed this thorough conversion with the help of a custom clang plugin that I wrote to trawl the AST and apply heuristics to point out where things might want changing. So I've even managed to do a decent job on parts of the code I haven't looked at in years! To make the plugin's work easier, I pushed platform front ends generally in the direction of using standard 'bool' in preference to platform-specific boolean types like Windows BOOL or GTK's gboolean; I've left the platform booleans in places they _have_ to be for the platform APIs to work right, but variables only used by my own code have been converted wherever I found them. In a few places there are int values that look very like booleans in _most_ of the places they're used, but have a rarely-used third value, or a distinction between different nonzero values that most users don't care about. In these cases, I've _removed_ uses of 'true' and 'false' for the return values, to emphasise that there's something more subtle going on than a simple boolean answer: - the 'multisel' field in dialog.h's list box structure, for which the GTK front end in particular recognises a difference between 1 and 2 but nearly everything else treats as boolean - the 'urgent' parameter to plug_receive, where 1 vs 2 tells you something about the specific location of the urgent pointer, but most clients only care about 0 vs 'something nonzero' - the return value of wc_match, where -1 indicates a syntax error in the wildcard. - the return values from SSH-1 RSA-key loading functions, which use -1 for 'wrong passphrase' and 0 for all other failures (so any caller which already knows it's not loading an _encrypted private_ key can treat them as boolean) - term->esc_query, and the 'query' parameter in toggle_mode in terminal.c, which _usually_ hold 0 for ESC[123h or 1 for ESC[?123h, but can also hold -1 for some other intervening character that we don't support. In a few places there's an integer that I haven't turned into a bool even though it really _can_ only take values 0 or 1 (and, as above, tried to make the call sites consistent in not calling those values true and false), on the grounds that I thought it would make it more confusing to imply that the 0 value was in some sense 'negative' or bad and the 1 positive or good: - the return value of plug_accepting uses the POSIXish convention of 0=success and nonzero=error; I think if I made it bool then I'd also want to reverse its sense, and that's a job for a separate piece of work. - the 'screen' parameter to lineptr() in terminal.c, where 0 and 1 represent the default and alternate screens. There's no obvious reason why one of those should be considered 'true' or 'positive' or 'success' - they're just indices - so I've left it as int. ssh_scp_recv had particularly confusing semantics for its previous int return value: its call sites used '<= 0' to check for error, but it never actually returned a negative number, just 0 or 1. Now the function and its call sites agree that it's a bool. In a couple of places I've renamed variables called 'ret', because I don't like that name any more - it's unclear whether it means the return value (in preparation) for the _containing_ function or the return value received from a subroutine call, and occasionally I've accidentally used the same variable for both and introduced a bug. So where one of those got in my way, I've renamed it to 'toret' or 'retd' (the latter short for 'returned') in line with my usual modern practice, but I haven't done a thorough job of finding all of them. Finally, one amusing side effect of doing this is that I've had to separate quite a few chained assignments. It used to be perfectly fine to write 'a = b = c = TRUE' when a,b,c were int and TRUE was just a the 'true' defined by stdbool.h, that idiom provokes a warning from gcc: 'suggest parentheses around assignment used as truth value'!
2018-11-02 22:23:19 +03:00
bool core_dumped, ptrlen msg)
Move mainchan into its own file, like agentf. This gets another big pile of logic out of ssh2connection and puts it somewhere more central. Now the only thing left in ssh2connection is the formatting and parsing of the various channel requests; the logic deciding which ones to issue and what to do about them is devolved to the Channel implementation, as it properly should be.
2018-09-30 09:16:38 +03:00
{
PacketProtocolLayer *ppl = mc->ppl; /* for ppl_logevent */
const char *core_msg = core_dumped ? " (core dumped)" : "";
const char *msg_pre = (msg.len ? " (" : "");
const char *msg_post = (msg.len ? ")" : "");
Start using C99 variadic macros. In the past, I've had a lot of macros which you call with double parentheses, along the lines of debug(("format string", params)), so that the inner parens protect the commas and permit the macro to treat the whole printf-style argument list as one macro argument. That's all very well, but it's a bit inconvenient (it doesn't leave you any way to implement such a macro by prepending another argument to the list), and now this code base's rules allow C99isms, I can switch all those macros to using a single pair of parens, using the C99 ability to say '...' in the parameter list of the #define and get at the corresponding suffix of the arguments as __VA_ARGS__. So I'm doing it. I've made the following printf-style macros variadic: bpp_logevent, ppl_logevent, ppl_printf and debug. While I'm here, I've also fixed up a collection of conditioned-out calls to debug() in the Windows front end which were clearly expecting a macro with a different calling syntax, because they had an integer parameter first. If I ever have a need to condition those back in, they should actually work now.
2018-12-08 23:32:31 +03:00
ppl_logevent("Session exited on %s%s%s%.*s%s",
sigdesc, core_msg, msg_pre, PTRLEN_PRINTF(msg), msg_post);
Move mainchan into its own file, like agentf. This gets another big pile of logic out of ssh2connection and puts it somewhere more central. Now the only thing left in ssh2connection is the formatting and parsing of the various channel requests; the logic deciding which ones to issue and what to do about them is devolved to the Channel implementation, as it properly should be.
2018-09-30 09:16:38 +03:00
}
Convert a lot of 'int' variables to 'bool'. My normal habit these days, in new code, is to treat int and bool as _almost_ completely separate types. I'm still willing to use C's implicit test for zero on an integer (e.g. 'if (!blob.len)' is fine, no need to spell it out as blob.len != 0), but generally, if a variable is going to be conceptually a boolean, I like to declare it bool and assign to it using 'true' or 'false' rather than 0 or 1. PuTTY is an exception, because it predates the C99 bool, and I've stuck to its existing coding style even when adding new code to it. But it's been annoying me more and more, so now that I've decided C99 bool is an acceptable thing to require from our toolchain in the first place, here's a quite thorough trawl through the source doing 'boolification'. Many variables and function parameters are now typed as bool rather than int; many assignments of 0 or 1 to those variables are now spelled 'true' or 'false'. I managed this thorough conversion with the help of a custom clang plugin that I wrote to trawl the AST and apply heuristics to point out where things might want changing. So I've even managed to do a decent job on parts of the code I haven't looked at in years! To make the plugin's work easier, I pushed platform front ends generally in the direction of using standard 'bool' in preference to platform-specific boolean types like Windows BOOL or GTK's gboolean; I've left the platform booleans in places they _have_ to be for the platform APIs to work right, but variables only used by my own code have been converted wherever I found them. In a few places there are int values that look very like booleans in _most_ of the places they're used, but have a rarely-used third value, or a distinction between different nonzero values that most users don't care about. In these cases, I've _removed_ uses of 'true' and 'false' for the return values, to emphasise that there's something more subtle going on than a simple boolean answer: - the 'multisel' field in dialog.h's list box structure, for which the GTK front end in particular recognises a difference between 1 and 2 but nearly everything else treats as boolean - the 'urgent' parameter to plug_receive, where 1 vs 2 tells you something about the specific location of the urgent pointer, but most clients only care about 0 vs 'something nonzero' - the return value of wc_match, where -1 indicates a syntax error in the wildcard. - the return values from SSH-1 RSA-key loading functions, which use -1 for 'wrong passphrase' and 0 for all other failures (so any caller which already knows it's not loading an _encrypted private_ key can treat them as boolean) - term->esc_query, and the 'query' parameter in toggle_mode in terminal.c, which _usually_ hold 0 for ESC[123h or 1 for ESC[?123h, but can also hold -1 for some other intervening character that we don't support. In a few places there's an integer that I haven't turned into a bool even though it really _can_ only take values 0 or 1 (and, as above, tried to make the call sites consistent in not calling those values true and false), on the grounds that I thought it would make it more confusing to imply that the 0 value was in some sense 'negative' or bad and the 1 positive or good: - the return value of plug_accepting uses the POSIXish convention of 0=success and nonzero=error; I think if I made it bool then I'd also want to reverse its sense, and that's a job for a separate piece of work. - the 'screen' parameter to lineptr() in terminal.c, where 0 and 1 represent the default and alternate screens. There's no obvious reason why one of those should be considered 'true' or 'positive' or 'success' - they're just indices - so I've left it as int. ssh_scp_recv had particularly confusing semantics for its previous int return value: its call sites used '<= 0' to check for error, but it never actually returned a negative number, just 0 or 1. Now the function and its call sites agree that it's a bool. In a couple of places I've renamed variables called 'ret', because I don't like that name any more - it's unclear whether it means the return value (in preparation) for the _containing_ function or the return value received from a subroutine call, and occasionally I've accidentally used the same variable for both and introduced a bug. So where one of those got in my way, I've renamed it to 'toret' or 'retd' (the latter short for 'returned') in line with my usual modern practice, but I haven't done a thorough job of finding all of them. Finally, one amusing side effect of doing this is that I've had to separate quite a few chained assignments. It used to be perfectly fine to write 'a = b = c = TRUE' when a,b,c were int and TRUE was just a the 'true' defined by stdbool.h, that idiom provokes a warning from gcc: 'suggest parentheses around assignment used as truth value'!
2018-11-02 22:23:19 +03:00
static bool mainchan_rcvd_exit_signal(
Channel *chan, ptrlen signame, bool core_dumped, ptrlen msg)
Move mainchan into its own file, like agentf. This gets another big pile of logic out of ssh2connection and puts it somewhere more central. Now the only thing left in ssh2connection is the formatting and parsing of the various channel requests; the logic deciding which ones to issue and what to do about them is devolved to the Channel implementation, as it properly should be.
2018-09-30 09:16:38 +03:00
{
assert(chan->vt == &mainchan_channelvt);
mainchan *mc = container_of(chan, mainchan, chan);
int exitcode;
char *signame_str;
/*
New system for handling SSH signals. This is in much the same style as the ttymodes revamp, using a header file which can be included in different ways to either iterate over _all_ the signals in the known list or just the ones for which a definition exists on the target OS. So this doesn't actually _remove_ the horrid pile of ifdefs in mainchan_rcvd_exit_signal, but at least it puts it somewhere less intrusive and more reusable.
2018-10-14 12:05:23 +03:00
* Translate the signal description back into a locally meaningful
* number, or 128 if the string didn't match any we recognise.
Move mainchan into its own file, like agentf. This gets another big pile of logic out of ssh2connection and puts it somewhere more central. Now the only thing left in ssh2connection is the formatting and parsing of the various channel requests; the logic deciding which ones to issue and what to do about them is devolved to the Channel implementation, as it properly should be.
2018-09-30 09:16:38 +03:00
*/
New system for handling SSH signals. This is in much the same style as the ttymodes revamp, using a header file which can be included in different ways to either iterate over _all_ the signals in the known list or just the ones for which a definition exists on the target OS. So this doesn't actually _remove_ the horrid pile of ifdefs in mainchan_rcvd_exit_signal, but at least it puts it somewhere less intrusive and more reusable.
2018-10-14 12:05:23 +03:00
exitcode = 128;
#define SIGNAL_SUB(s) \
if (ptrlen_eq_string(signame, #s)) \
exitcode = 128 + SIG ## s;
#define SIGNAL_MAIN(s, text) SIGNAL_SUB(s)
#define SIGNALS_LOCAL_ONLY
#include "sshsignals.h"
#undef SIGNAL_SUB
#undef SIGNAL_MAIN
#undef SIGNALS_LOCAL_ONLY
Move mainchan into its own file, like agentf. This gets another big pile of logic out of ssh2connection and puts it somewhere more central. Now the only thing left in ssh2connection is the formatting and parsing of the various channel requests; the logic deciding which ones to issue and what to do about them is devolved to the Channel implementation, as it properly should be.
2018-09-30 09:16:38 +03:00
ssh_got_exitcode(mc->ppl->ssh, exitcode);
if (exitcode == 128)
signame_str = dupprintf("unrecognised signal \"%.*s\"",
PTRLEN_PRINTF(signame));
else
signame_str = dupprintf("signal SIG%.*s", PTRLEN_PRINTF(signame));
mainchan_log_exit_signal_common(mc, signame_str, core_dumped, msg);
sfree(signame_str);
Adopt C99 <stdbool.h>'s true/false. This commit includes <stdbool.h> from defs.h and deletes my traditional definitions of TRUE and FALSE, but other than that, it's a 100% mechanical search-and-replace transforming all uses of TRUE and FALSE into the C99-standardised lowercase spellings. No actual types are changed in this commit; that will come next. This is just getting the noise out of the way, so that subsequent commits can have a higher proportion of signal.
2018-10-29 22:50:29 +03:00
return true;
Move mainchan into its own file, like agentf. This gets another big pile of logic out of ssh2connection and puts it somewhere more central. Now the only thing left in ssh2connection is the formatting and parsing of the various channel requests; the logic deciding which ones to issue and what to do about them is devolved to the Channel implementation, as it properly should be.
2018-09-30 09:16:38 +03:00
}
Convert a lot of 'int' variables to 'bool'. My normal habit these days, in new code, is to treat int and bool as _almost_ completely separate types. I'm still willing to use C's implicit test for zero on an integer (e.g. 'if (!blob.len)' is fine, no need to spell it out as blob.len != 0), but generally, if a variable is going to be conceptually a boolean, I like to declare it bool and assign to it using 'true' or 'false' rather than 0 or 1. PuTTY is an exception, because it predates the C99 bool, and I've stuck to its existing coding style even when adding new code to it. But it's been annoying me more and more, so now that I've decided C99 bool is an acceptable thing to require from our toolchain in the first place, here's a quite thorough trawl through the source doing 'boolification'. Many variables and function parameters are now typed as bool rather than int; many assignments of 0 or 1 to those variables are now spelled 'true' or 'false'. I managed this thorough conversion with the help of a custom clang plugin that I wrote to trawl the AST and apply heuristics to point out where things might want changing. So I've even managed to do a decent job on parts of the code I haven't looked at in years! To make the plugin's work easier, I pushed platform front ends generally in the direction of using standard 'bool' in preference to platform-specific boolean types like Windows BOOL or GTK's gboolean; I've left the platform booleans in places they _have_ to be for the platform APIs to work right, but variables only used by my own code have been converted wherever I found them. In a few places there are int values that look very like booleans in _most_ of the places they're used, but have a rarely-used third value, or a distinction between different nonzero values that most users don't care about. In these cases, I've _removed_ uses of 'true' and 'false' for the return values, to emphasise that there's something more subtle going on than a simple boolean answer: - the 'multisel' field in dialog.h's list box structure, for which the GTK front end in particular recognises a difference between 1 and 2 but nearly everything else treats as boolean - the 'urgent' parameter to plug_receive, where 1 vs 2 tells you something about the specific location of the urgent pointer, but most clients only care about 0 vs 'something nonzero' - the return value of wc_match, where -1 indicates a syntax error in the wildcard. - the return values from SSH-1 RSA-key loading functions, which use -1 for 'wrong passphrase' and 0 for all other failures (so any caller which already knows it's not loading an _encrypted private_ key can treat them as boolean) - term->esc_query, and the 'query' parameter in toggle_mode in terminal.c, which _usually_ hold 0 for ESC[123h or 1 for ESC[?123h, but can also hold -1 for some other intervening character that we don't support. In a few places there's an integer that I haven't turned into a bool even though it really _can_ only take values 0 or 1 (and, as above, tried to make the call sites consistent in not calling those values true and false), on the grounds that I thought it would make it more confusing to imply that the 0 value was in some sense 'negative' or bad and the 1 positive or good: - the return value of plug_accepting uses the POSIXish convention of 0=success and nonzero=error; I think if I made it bool then I'd also want to reverse its sense, and that's a job for a separate piece of work. - the 'screen' parameter to lineptr() in terminal.c, where 0 and 1 represent the default and alternate screens. There's no obvious reason why one of those should be considered 'true' or 'positive' or 'success' - they're just indices - so I've left it as int. ssh_scp_recv had particularly confusing semantics for its previous int return value: its call sites used '<= 0' to check for error, but it never actually returned a negative number, just 0 or 1. Now the function and its call sites agree that it's a bool. In a couple of places I've renamed variables called 'ret', because I don't like that name any more - it's unclear whether it means the return value (in preparation) for the _containing_ function or the return value received from a subroutine call, and occasionally I've accidentally used the same variable for both and introduced a bug. So where one of those got in my way, I've renamed it to 'toret' or 'retd' (the latter short for 'returned') in line with my usual modern practice, but I haven't done a thorough job of finding all of them. Finally, one amusing side effect of doing this is that I've had to separate quite a few chained assignments. It used to be perfectly fine to write 'a = b = c = TRUE' when a,b,c were int and TRUE was just a the 'true' defined by stdbool.h, that idiom provokes a warning from gcc: 'suggest parentheses around assignment used as truth value'!
2018-11-02 22:23:19 +03:00
static bool mainchan_rcvd_exit_signal_numeric(
Channel *chan, int signum, bool core_dumped, ptrlen msg)
Move mainchan into its own file, like agentf. This gets another big pile of logic out of ssh2connection and puts it somewhere more central. Now the only thing left in ssh2connection is the formatting and parsing of the various channel requests; the logic deciding which ones to issue and what to do about them is devolved to the Channel implementation, as it properly should be.
2018-09-30 09:16:38 +03:00
{
assert(chan->vt == &mainchan_channelvt);
mainchan *mc = container_of(chan, mainchan, chan);
char *signum_str;
ssh_got_exitcode(mc->ppl->ssh, 128 + signum);
signum_str = dupprintf("signal %d", signum);
mainchan_log_exit_signal_common(mc, signum_str, core_dumped, msg);
sfree(signum_str);
Adopt C99 <stdbool.h>'s true/false. This commit includes <stdbool.h> from defs.h and deletes my traditional definitions of TRUE and FALSE, but other than that, it's a 100% mechanical search-and-replace transforming all uses of TRUE and FALSE into the C99-standardised lowercase spellings. No actual types are changed in this commit; that will come next. This is just getting the noise out of the way, so that subsequent commits can have a higher proportion of signal.
2018-10-29 22:50:29 +03:00
return true;
Move mainchan into its own file, like agentf. This gets another big pile of logic out of ssh2connection and puts it somewhere more central. Now the only thing left in ssh2connection is the formatting and parsing of the various channel requests; the logic deciding which ones to issue and what to do about them is devolved to the Channel implementation, as it properly should be.
2018-09-30 09:16:38 +03:00
}
void mainchan_get_specials(
mainchan *mc, add_special_fn_t add_special, void *ctx)
{
/* FIXME: this _does_ depend on whether these services are supported */
add_special(ctx, "Break", SS_BRK, 0);
New system for handling SSH signals. This is in much the same style as the ttymodes revamp, using a header file which can be included in different ways to either iterate over _all_ the signals in the known list or just the ones for which a definition exists on the target OS. So this doesn't actually _remove_ the horrid pile of ifdefs in mainchan_rcvd_exit_signal, but at least it puts it somewhere less intrusive and more reusable.
2018-10-14 12:05:23 +03:00
#define SIGNAL_MAIN(name, desc) \
Move mainchan into its own file, like agentf. This gets another big pile of logic out of ssh2connection and puts it somewhere more central. Now the only thing left in ssh2connection is the formatting and parsing of the various channel requests; the logic deciding which ones to issue and what to do about them is devolved to the Channel implementation, as it properly should be.
2018-09-30 09:16:38 +03:00
add_special(ctx, "SIG" #name " (" desc ")", SS_SIG ## name, 0);
New system for handling SSH signals. This is in much the same style as the ttymodes revamp, using a header file which can be included in different ways to either iterate over _all_ the signals in the known list or just the ones for which a definition exists on the target OS. So this doesn't actually _remove_ the horrid pile of ifdefs in mainchan_rcvd_exit_signal, but at least it puts it somewhere less intrusive and more reusable.
2018-10-14 12:05:23 +03:00
#define SIGNAL_SUB(name)
#include "sshsignals.h"
#undef SIGNAL_MAIN
#undef SIGNAL_SUB
Move mainchan into its own file, like agentf. This gets another big pile of logic out of ssh2connection and puts it somewhere more central. Now the only thing left in ssh2connection is the formatting and parsing of the various channel requests; the logic deciding which ones to issue and what to do about them is devolved to the Channel implementation, as it properly should be.
2018-09-30 09:16:38 +03:00
add_special(ctx, "More signals", SS_SUBMENU, 0);
New system for handling SSH signals. This is in much the same style as the ttymodes revamp, using a header file which can be included in different ways to either iterate over _all_ the signals in the known list or just the ones for which a definition exists on the target OS. So this doesn't actually _remove_ the horrid pile of ifdefs in mainchan_rcvd_exit_signal, but at least it puts it somewhere less intrusive and more reusable.
2018-10-14 12:05:23 +03:00
#define SIGNAL_MAIN(name, desc)
#define SIGNAL_SUB(name) \
add_special(ctx, "SIG" #name, SS_SIG ## name, 0);
#include "sshsignals.h"
#undef SIGNAL_MAIN
#undef SIGNAL_SUB
add_special(ctx, NULL, SS_EXITMENU, 0);
Move mainchan into its own file, like agentf. This gets another big pile of logic out of ssh2connection and puts it somewhere more central. Now the only thing left in ssh2connection is the formatting and parsing of the various channel requests; the logic deciding which ones to issue and what to do about them is devolved to the Channel implementation, as it properly should be.
2018-09-30 09:16:38 +03:00
}
static const char *ssh_signal_lookup(SessionSpecialCode code)
{
New system for handling SSH signals. This is in much the same style as the ttymodes revamp, using a header file which can be included in different ways to either iterate over _all_ the signals in the known list or just the ones for which a definition exists on the target OS. So this doesn't actually _remove_ the horrid pile of ifdefs in mainchan_rcvd_exit_signal, but at least it puts it somewhere less intrusive and more reusable.
2018-10-14 12:05:23 +03:00
#define SIGNAL_SUB(name) \
Move mainchan into its own file, like agentf. This gets another big pile of logic out of ssh2connection and puts it somewhere more central. Now the only thing left in ssh2connection is the formatting and parsing of the various channel requests; the logic deciding which ones to issue and what to do about them is devolved to the Channel implementation, as it properly should be.
2018-09-30 09:16:38 +03:00
if (code == SS_SIG ## name) return #name;
New system for handling SSH signals. This is in much the same style as the ttymodes revamp, using a header file which can be included in different ways to either iterate over _all_ the signals in the known list or just the ones for which a definition exists on the target OS. So this doesn't actually _remove_ the horrid pile of ifdefs in mainchan_rcvd_exit_signal, but at least it puts it somewhere less intrusive and more reusable.
2018-10-14 12:05:23 +03:00
#define SIGNAL_MAIN(name, desc) SIGNAL_SUB(name)
#include "sshsignals.h"
#undef SIGNAL_MAIN
#undef SIGNAL_SUB
Move mainchan into its own file, like agentf. This gets another big pile of logic out of ssh2connection and puts it somewhere more central. Now the only thing left in ssh2connection is the formatting and parsing of the various channel requests; the logic deciding which ones to issue and what to do about them is devolved to the Channel implementation, as it properly should be.
2018-09-30 09:16:38 +03:00
New system for handling SSH signals. This is in much the same style as the ttymodes revamp, using a header file which can be included in different ways to either iterate over _all_ the signals in the known list or just the ones for which a definition exists on the target OS. So this doesn't actually _remove_ the horrid pile of ifdefs in mainchan_rcvd_exit_signal, but at least it puts it somewhere less intrusive and more reusable.
2018-10-14 12:05:23 +03:00
/* If none of those clauses matched, fail lookup. */
Move mainchan into its own file, like agentf. This gets another big pile of logic out of ssh2connection and puts it somewhere more central. Now the only thing left in ssh2connection is the formatting and parsing of the various channel requests; the logic deciding which ones to issue and what to do about them is devolved to the Channel implementation, as it properly should be.
2018-09-30 09:16:38 +03:00
return NULL;
}
void mainchan_special_cmd(mainchan *mc, SessionSpecialCode code, int arg)
{
PacketProtocolLayer *ppl = mc->ppl; /* for ppl_logevent */
const char *signame;
if (code == SS_EOF) {
if (!mc->ready) {
/*
* Buffer the EOF to send as soon as the main channel is
* fully set up.
*/
Adopt C99 <stdbool.h>'s true/false. This commit includes <stdbool.h> from defs.h and deletes my traditional definitions of TRUE and FALSE, but other than that, it's a 100% mechanical search-and-replace transforming all uses of TRUE and FALSE into the C99-standardised lowercase spellings. No actual types are changed in this commit; that will come next. This is just getting the noise out of the way, so that subsequent commits can have a higher proportion of signal.
2018-10-29 22:50:29 +03:00
mc->eof_pending = true;
Move mainchan into its own file, like agentf. This gets another big pile of logic out of ssh2connection and puts it somewhere more central. Now the only thing left in ssh2connection is the formatting and parsing of the various channel requests; the logic deciding which ones to issue and what to do about them is devolved to the Channel implementation, as it properly should be.
2018-09-30 09:16:38 +03:00
} else if (!mc->eof_sent) {
sshfwd_write_eof(mc->sc);
Adopt C99 <stdbool.h>'s true/false. This commit includes <stdbool.h> from defs.h and deletes my traditional definitions of TRUE and FALSE, but other than that, it's a 100% mechanical search-and-replace transforming all uses of TRUE and FALSE into the C99-standardised lowercase spellings. No actual types are changed in this commit; that will come next. This is just getting the noise out of the way, so that subsequent commits can have a higher proportion of signal.
2018-10-29 22:50:29 +03:00
mc->eof_sent = true;
Move mainchan into its own file, like agentf. This gets another big pile of logic out of ssh2connection and puts it somewhere more central. Now the only thing left in ssh2connection is the formatting and parsing of the various channel requests; the logic deciding which ones to issue and what to do about them is devolved to the Channel implementation, as it properly should be.
2018-09-30 09:16:38 +03:00
}
} else if (code == SS_BRK) {
sshfwd_send_serial_break(
Adopt C99 <stdbool.h>'s true/false. This commit includes <stdbool.h> from defs.h and deletes my traditional definitions of TRUE and FALSE, but other than that, it's a 100% mechanical search-and-replace transforming all uses of TRUE and FALSE into the C99-standardised lowercase spellings. No actual types are changed in this commit; that will come next. This is just getting the noise out of the way, so that subsequent commits can have a higher proportion of signal.
2018-10-29 22:50:29 +03:00
mc->sc, false, 0 /* default break length */);
Move mainchan into its own file, like agentf. This gets another big pile of logic out of ssh2connection and puts it somewhere more central. Now the only thing left in ssh2connection is the formatting and parsing of the various channel requests; the logic deciding which ones to issue and what to do about them is devolved to the Channel implementation, as it properly should be.
2018-09-30 09:16:38 +03:00
} else if ((signame = ssh_signal_lookup(code)) != NULL) {
/* It's a signal. */
Adopt C99 <stdbool.h>'s true/false. This commit includes <stdbool.h> from defs.h and deletes my traditional definitions of TRUE and FALSE, but other than that, it's a 100% mechanical search-and-replace transforming all uses of TRUE and FALSE into the C99-standardised lowercase spellings. No actual types are changed in this commit; that will come next. This is just getting the noise out of the way, so that subsequent commits can have a higher proportion of signal.
2018-10-29 22:50:29 +03:00
sshfwd_send_signal(mc->sc, false, signame);
Start using C99 variadic macros. In the past, I've had a lot of macros which you call with double parentheses, along the lines of debug(("format string", params)), so that the inner parens protect the commas and permit the macro to treat the whole printf-style argument list as one macro argument. That's all very well, but it's a bit inconvenient (it doesn't leave you any way to implement such a macro by prepending another argument to the list), and now this code base's rules allow C99isms, I can switch all those macros to using a single pair of parens, using the C99 ability to say '...' in the parameter list of the #define and get at the corresponding suffix of the arguments as __VA_ARGS__. So I'm doing it. I've made the following printf-style macros variadic: bpp_logevent, ppl_logevent, ppl_printf and debug. While I'm here, I've also fixed up a collection of conditioned-out calls to debug() in the Windows front end which were clearly expecting a macro with a different calling syntax, because they had an integer parameter first. If I ever have a need to condition those back in, they should actually work now.
2018-12-08 23:32:31 +03:00
ppl_logevent("Sent signal SIG%s", signame);
Move mainchan into its own file, like agentf. This gets another big pile of logic out of ssh2connection and puts it somewhere more central. Now the only thing left in ssh2connection is the formatting and parsing of the various channel requests; the logic deciding which ones to issue and what to do about them is devolved to the Channel implementation, as it properly should be.
2018-09-30 09:16:38 +03:00
}
}
void mainchan_terminal_size(mainchan *mc, int width, int height)
{
mc->term_width = width;
mc->term_height = height;
if (mc->req_pty || mc->got_pty)
sshfwd_send_terminal_size_change(mc->sc, width, height);
}