2018-09-19 23:56:44 +03:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Supporting routines used in common by all the various components of
|
|
|
|
* the SSH system.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#include <assert.h>
|
2018-09-19 22:36:40 +03:00
|
|
|
#include <stdlib.h>
|
2018-09-19 23:56:44 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2018-09-19 22:36:40 +03:00
|
|
|
#include "putty.h"
|
2018-09-19 23:56:44 +03:00
|
|
|
#include "ssh.h"
|
2018-09-24 15:45:10 +03:00
|
|
|
#include "sshbpp.h"
|
Move most of ssh.c out into separate source files.
I've tried to separate out as many individually coherent changes from
this work as I could into their own commits, but here's where I run
out and have to commit the rest of this major refactoring as a
big-bang change.
Most of ssh.c is now no longer in ssh.c: all five of the main
coroutines that handle layers of the SSH-1 and SSH-2 protocols now
each have their own source file to live in, and a lot of the
supporting functions have moved into the appropriate one of those too.
The new abstraction is a vtable called 'PacketProtocolLayer', which
has an input and output packet queue. Each layer's main coroutine is
invoked from the method ssh_ppl_process_queue(), which is usually
(though not exclusively) triggered automatically when things are
pushed on the input queue. In SSH-2, the base layer is the transport
protocol, and it contains a pair of subsidiary queues by which it
passes some of its packets to the higher SSH-2 layers - first userauth
and then connection, which are peers at the same level, with the
former abdicating in favour of the latter at the appropriate moment.
SSH-1 is simpler: the whole login phase of the protocol (crypto setup
and authentication) is all in one module, and since SSH-1 has no
repeat key exchange, that setup layer abdicates in favour of the
connection phase when it's done.
ssh.c itself is now about a tenth of its old size (which all by itself
is cause for celebration!). Its main job is to set up all the layers,
hook them up to each other and to the BPP, and to funnel data back and
forth between that collection of modules and external things such as
the network and the terminal. Once it's set up a collection of packet
protocol layers, it communicates with them partly by calling methods
of the base layer (and if that's ssh2transport then it will delegate
some functionality to the corresponding methods of its higher layer),
and partly by talking directly to the connection layer no matter where
it is in the stack by means of the separate ConnectionLayer vtable
which I introduced in commit 8001dd4cb, and to which I've now added
quite a few extra methods replacing services that used to be internal
function calls within ssh.c.
(One effect of this is that the SSH-1 and SSH-2 channel storage is now
no longer shared - there are distinct struct types ssh1_channel and
ssh2_channel. That means a bit more code duplication, but on the plus
side, a lot fewer confusing conditionals in the middle of half-shared
functions, and less risk of a piece of SSH-1 escaping into SSH-2 or
vice versa, which I remember has happened at least once in the past.)
The bulk of this commit introduces the five new source files, their
common header sshppl.h and some shared supporting routines in
sshcommon.c, and rewrites nearly all of ssh.c itself. But it also
includes a couple of other changes that I couldn't separate easily
enough:
Firstly, there's a new handling for socket EOF, in which ssh.c sets an
'input_eof' flag in the BPP, and that responds by checking a flag that
tells it whether to report the EOF as an error or not. (This is the
main reason for those new BPP_READ / BPP_WAITFOR macros - they can
check the EOF flag every time the coroutine is resumed.)
Secondly, the error reporting itself is changed around again. I'd
expected to put some data fields in the public PacketProtocolLayer
structure that it could set to report errors in the same way as the
BPPs have been doing, but in the end, I decided propagating all those
data fields around was a pain and that even the BPPs shouldn't have
been doing it that way. So I've reverted to a system where everything
calls back to functions in ssh.c itself to report any connection-
ending condition. But there's a new family of those functions,
categorising the possible such conditions by semantics, and each one
has a different set of detailed effects (e.g. how rudely to close the
network connection, what exit status should be passed back to the
whole application, whether to send a disconnect message and/or display
a GUI error box).
I don't expect this to be immediately perfect: of course, the code has
been through a big upheaval, new bugs are expected, and I haven't been
able to do a full job of testing (e.g. I haven't tested every auth or
kex method). But I've checked that it _basically_ works - both SSH
protocols, all the different kinds of forwarding channel, more than
one auth method, Windows and Linux, connection sharing - and I think
it's now at the point where the easiest way to find further bugs is to
let it out into the wild and see what users can spot.
2018-09-24 20:28:16 +03:00
|
|
|
#include "sshppl.h"
|
2018-09-19 23:56:44 +03:00
|
|
|
#include "sshchan.h"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* ----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
* Implementation of PacketQueue.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
2018-09-23 18:35:29 +03:00
|
|
|
static void pq_ensure_unlinked(PacketQueueNode *node)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
if (node->on_free_queue) {
|
|
|
|
node->next->prev = node->prev;
|
|
|
|
node->prev->next = node->next;
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
assert(!node->next);
|
|
|
|
assert(!node->prev);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2018-09-19 23:56:44 +03:00
|
|
|
void pq_base_push(PacketQueueBase *pqb, PacketQueueNode *node)
|
|
|
|
{
|
2018-09-23 18:35:29 +03:00
|
|
|
pq_ensure_unlinked(node);
|
2018-09-19 23:56:44 +03:00
|
|
|
node->next = &pqb->end;
|
|
|
|
node->prev = pqb->end.prev;
|
|
|
|
node->next->prev = node;
|
|
|
|
node->prev->next = node;
|
2018-09-21 15:16:38 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (pqb->ic)
|
|
|
|
queue_idempotent_callback(pqb->ic);
|
2018-09-19 23:56:44 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
void pq_base_push_front(PacketQueueBase *pqb, PacketQueueNode *node)
|
|
|
|
{
|
2018-09-23 18:35:29 +03:00
|
|
|
pq_ensure_unlinked(node);
|
2018-09-19 23:56:44 +03:00
|
|
|
node->prev = &pqb->end;
|
|
|
|
node->next = pqb->end.next;
|
|
|
|
node->next->prev = node;
|
|
|
|
node->prev->next = node;
|
2018-09-21 15:16:38 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (pqb->ic)
|
|
|
|
queue_idempotent_callback(pqb->ic);
|
2018-09-19 23:56:44 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2018-09-23 18:35:29 +03:00
|
|
|
static PacketQueueNode pktin_freeq_head = {
|
2018-10-29 22:50:29 +03:00
|
|
|
&pktin_freeq_head, &pktin_freeq_head, true
|
2018-09-23 18:35:29 +03:00
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void pktin_free_queue_callback(void *vctx)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
while (pktin_freeq_head.next != &pktin_freeq_head) {
|
|
|
|
PacketQueueNode *node = pktin_freeq_head.next;
|
2018-10-06 01:49:08 +03:00
|
|
|
PktIn *pktin = container_of(node, PktIn, qnode);
|
2018-09-23 18:35:29 +03:00
|
|
|
pktin_freeq_head.next = node->next;
|
|
|
|
sfree(pktin);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pktin_freeq_head.prev = &pktin_freeq_head;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static IdempotentCallback ic_pktin_free = {
|
2018-10-29 22:50:29 +03:00
|
|
|
pktin_free_queue_callback, NULL, false
|
2018-09-23 18:35:29 +03:00
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
2018-10-06 20:42:08 +03:00
|
|
|
static PktIn *pq_in_after(PacketQueueBase *pqb,
|
Convert a lot of 'int' variables to 'bool'.
My normal habit these days, in new code, is to treat int and bool as
_almost_ completely separate types. I'm still willing to use C's
implicit test for zero on an integer (e.g. 'if (!blob.len)' is fine,
no need to spell it out as blob.len != 0), but generally, if a
variable is going to be conceptually a boolean, I like to declare it
bool and assign to it using 'true' or 'false' rather than 0 or 1.
PuTTY is an exception, because it predates the C99 bool, and I've
stuck to its existing coding style even when adding new code to it.
But it's been annoying me more and more, so now that I've decided C99
bool is an acceptable thing to require from our toolchain in the first
place, here's a quite thorough trawl through the source doing
'boolification'. Many variables and function parameters are now typed
as bool rather than int; many assignments of 0 or 1 to those variables
are now spelled 'true' or 'false'.
I managed this thorough conversion with the help of a custom clang
plugin that I wrote to trawl the AST and apply heuristics to point out
where things might want changing. So I've even managed to do a decent
job on parts of the code I haven't looked at in years!
To make the plugin's work easier, I pushed platform front ends
generally in the direction of using standard 'bool' in preference to
platform-specific boolean types like Windows BOOL or GTK's gboolean;
I've left the platform booleans in places they _have_ to be for the
platform APIs to work right, but variables only used by my own code
have been converted wherever I found them.
In a few places there are int values that look very like booleans in
_most_ of the places they're used, but have a rarely-used third value,
or a distinction between different nonzero values that most users
don't care about. In these cases, I've _removed_ uses of 'true' and
'false' for the return values, to emphasise that there's something
more subtle going on than a simple boolean answer:
- the 'multisel' field in dialog.h's list box structure, for which
the GTK front end in particular recognises a difference between 1
and 2 but nearly everything else treats as boolean
- the 'urgent' parameter to plug_receive, where 1 vs 2 tells you
something about the specific location of the urgent pointer, but
most clients only care about 0 vs 'something nonzero'
- the return value of wc_match, where -1 indicates a syntax error in
the wildcard.
- the return values from SSH-1 RSA-key loading functions, which use
-1 for 'wrong passphrase' and 0 for all other failures (so any
caller which already knows it's not loading an _encrypted private_
key can treat them as boolean)
- term->esc_query, and the 'query' parameter in toggle_mode in
terminal.c, which _usually_ hold 0 for ESC[123h or 1 for ESC[?123h,
but can also hold -1 for some other intervening character that we
don't support.
In a few places there's an integer that I haven't turned into a bool
even though it really _can_ only take values 0 or 1 (and, as above,
tried to make the call sites consistent in not calling those values
true and false), on the grounds that I thought it would make it more
confusing to imply that the 0 value was in some sense 'negative' or
bad and the 1 positive or good:
- the return value of plug_accepting uses the POSIXish convention of
0=success and nonzero=error; I think if I made it bool then I'd
also want to reverse its sense, and that's a job for a separate
piece of work.
- the 'screen' parameter to lineptr() in terminal.c, where 0 and 1
represent the default and alternate screens. There's no obvious
reason why one of those should be considered 'true' or 'positive'
or 'success' - they're just indices - so I've left it as int.
ssh_scp_recv had particularly confusing semantics for its previous int
return value: its call sites used '<= 0' to check for error, but it
never actually returned a negative number, just 0 or 1. Now the
function and its call sites agree that it's a bool.
In a couple of places I've renamed variables called 'ret', because I
don't like that name any more - it's unclear whether it means the
return value (in preparation) for the _containing_ function or the
return value received from a subroutine call, and occasionally I've
accidentally used the same variable for both and introduced a bug. So
where one of those got in my way, I've renamed it to 'toret' or 'retd'
(the latter short for 'returned') in line with my usual modern
practice, but I haven't done a thorough job of finding all of them.
Finally, one amusing side effect of doing this is that I've had to
separate quite a few chained assignments. It used to be perfectly fine
to write 'a = b = c = TRUE' when a,b,c were int and TRUE was just a
the 'true' defined by stdbool.h, that idiom provokes a warning from
gcc: 'suggest parentheses around assignment used as truth value'!
2018-11-02 22:23:19 +03:00
|
|
|
PacketQueueNode *prev, bool pop)
|
2018-09-19 23:56:44 +03:00
|
|
|
{
|
2018-10-06 20:42:08 +03:00
|
|
|
PacketQueueNode *node = prev->next;
|
2018-09-19 23:56:44 +03:00
|
|
|
if (node == &pqb->end)
|
|
|
|
return NULL;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (pop) {
|
|
|
|
node->next->prev = node->prev;
|
|
|
|
node->prev->next = node->next;
|
2018-09-23 18:35:29 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
node->prev = pktin_freeq_head.prev;
|
|
|
|
node->next = &pktin_freeq_head;
|
|
|
|
node->next->prev = node;
|
|
|
|
node->prev->next = node;
|
2018-10-29 22:50:29 +03:00
|
|
|
node->on_free_queue = true;
|
2018-09-23 18:35:29 +03:00
|
|
|
queue_idempotent_callback(&ic_pktin_free);
|
2018-09-19 23:56:44 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2018-10-06 01:49:08 +03:00
|
|
|
return container_of(node, PktIn, qnode);
|
2018-09-19 23:56:44 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2018-10-06 20:42:08 +03:00
|
|
|
static PktOut *pq_out_after(PacketQueueBase *pqb,
|
Convert a lot of 'int' variables to 'bool'.
My normal habit these days, in new code, is to treat int and bool as
_almost_ completely separate types. I'm still willing to use C's
implicit test for zero on an integer (e.g. 'if (!blob.len)' is fine,
no need to spell it out as blob.len != 0), but generally, if a
variable is going to be conceptually a boolean, I like to declare it
bool and assign to it using 'true' or 'false' rather than 0 or 1.
PuTTY is an exception, because it predates the C99 bool, and I've
stuck to its existing coding style even when adding new code to it.
But it's been annoying me more and more, so now that I've decided C99
bool is an acceptable thing to require from our toolchain in the first
place, here's a quite thorough trawl through the source doing
'boolification'. Many variables and function parameters are now typed
as bool rather than int; many assignments of 0 or 1 to those variables
are now spelled 'true' or 'false'.
I managed this thorough conversion with the help of a custom clang
plugin that I wrote to trawl the AST and apply heuristics to point out
where things might want changing. So I've even managed to do a decent
job on parts of the code I haven't looked at in years!
To make the plugin's work easier, I pushed platform front ends
generally in the direction of using standard 'bool' in preference to
platform-specific boolean types like Windows BOOL or GTK's gboolean;
I've left the platform booleans in places they _have_ to be for the
platform APIs to work right, but variables only used by my own code
have been converted wherever I found them.
In a few places there are int values that look very like booleans in
_most_ of the places they're used, but have a rarely-used third value,
or a distinction between different nonzero values that most users
don't care about. In these cases, I've _removed_ uses of 'true' and
'false' for the return values, to emphasise that there's something
more subtle going on than a simple boolean answer:
- the 'multisel' field in dialog.h's list box structure, for which
the GTK front end in particular recognises a difference between 1
and 2 but nearly everything else treats as boolean
- the 'urgent' parameter to plug_receive, where 1 vs 2 tells you
something about the specific location of the urgent pointer, but
most clients only care about 0 vs 'something nonzero'
- the return value of wc_match, where -1 indicates a syntax error in
the wildcard.
- the return values from SSH-1 RSA-key loading functions, which use
-1 for 'wrong passphrase' and 0 for all other failures (so any
caller which already knows it's not loading an _encrypted private_
key can treat them as boolean)
- term->esc_query, and the 'query' parameter in toggle_mode in
terminal.c, which _usually_ hold 0 for ESC[123h or 1 for ESC[?123h,
but can also hold -1 for some other intervening character that we
don't support.
In a few places there's an integer that I haven't turned into a bool
even though it really _can_ only take values 0 or 1 (and, as above,
tried to make the call sites consistent in not calling those values
true and false), on the grounds that I thought it would make it more
confusing to imply that the 0 value was in some sense 'negative' or
bad and the 1 positive or good:
- the return value of plug_accepting uses the POSIXish convention of
0=success and nonzero=error; I think if I made it bool then I'd
also want to reverse its sense, and that's a job for a separate
piece of work.
- the 'screen' parameter to lineptr() in terminal.c, where 0 and 1
represent the default and alternate screens. There's no obvious
reason why one of those should be considered 'true' or 'positive'
or 'success' - they're just indices - so I've left it as int.
ssh_scp_recv had particularly confusing semantics for its previous int
return value: its call sites used '<= 0' to check for error, but it
never actually returned a negative number, just 0 or 1. Now the
function and its call sites agree that it's a bool.
In a couple of places I've renamed variables called 'ret', because I
don't like that name any more - it's unclear whether it means the
return value (in preparation) for the _containing_ function or the
return value received from a subroutine call, and occasionally I've
accidentally used the same variable for both and introduced a bug. So
where one of those got in my way, I've renamed it to 'toret' or 'retd'
(the latter short for 'returned') in line with my usual modern
practice, but I haven't done a thorough job of finding all of them.
Finally, one amusing side effect of doing this is that I've had to
separate quite a few chained assignments. It used to be perfectly fine
to write 'a = b = c = TRUE' when a,b,c were int and TRUE was just a
the 'true' defined by stdbool.h, that idiom provokes a warning from
gcc: 'suggest parentheses around assignment used as truth value'!
2018-11-02 22:23:19 +03:00
|
|
|
PacketQueueNode *prev, bool pop)
|
2018-09-19 23:56:44 +03:00
|
|
|
{
|
2018-10-06 20:42:08 +03:00
|
|
|
PacketQueueNode *node = prev->next;
|
2018-09-19 23:56:44 +03:00
|
|
|
if (node == &pqb->end)
|
|
|
|
return NULL;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (pop) {
|
|
|
|
node->next->prev = node->prev;
|
|
|
|
node->prev->next = node->next;
|
|
|
|
node->prev = node->next = NULL;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2018-10-06 01:49:08 +03:00
|
|
|
return container_of(node, PktOut, qnode);
|
2018-09-19 23:56:44 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
void pq_in_init(PktInQueue *pq)
|
|
|
|
{
|
2018-09-21 15:16:38 +03:00
|
|
|
pq->pqb.ic = NULL;
|
2018-09-19 23:56:44 +03:00
|
|
|
pq->pqb.end.next = pq->pqb.end.prev = &pq->pqb.end;
|
2018-10-06 20:42:08 +03:00
|
|
|
pq->after = pq_in_after;
|
2018-09-19 23:56:44 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
void pq_out_init(PktOutQueue *pq)
|
|
|
|
{
|
2018-09-21 15:16:38 +03:00
|
|
|
pq->pqb.ic = NULL;
|
2018-09-19 23:56:44 +03:00
|
|
|
pq->pqb.end.next = pq->pqb.end.prev = &pq->pqb.end;
|
2018-10-06 20:42:08 +03:00
|
|
|
pq->after = pq_out_after;
|
2018-09-19 23:56:44 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
void pq_in_clear(PktInQueue *pq)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
PktIn *pkt;
|
2018-09-21 15:16:38 +03:00
|
|
|
pq->pqb.ic = NULL;
|
2018-09-23 18:35:29 +03:00
|
|
|
while ((pkt = pq_pop(pq)) != NULL) {
|
|
|
|
/* No need to actually free these packets: pq_pop on a
|
|
|
|
* PktInQueue will automatically move them to the free
|
|
|
|
* queue. */
|
|
|
|
}
|
2018-09-19 23:56:44 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
void pq_out_clear(PktOutQueue *pq)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
PktOut *pkt;
|
2018-09-21 15:16:38 +03:00
|
|
|
pq->pqb.ic = NULL;
|
2018-09-19 23:56:44 +03:00
|
|
|
while ((pkt = pq_pop(pq)) != NULL)
|
|
|
|
ssh_free_pktout(pkt);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2018-09-19 22:30:40 +03:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Concatenate the contents of the two queues q1 and q2, and leave the
|
|
|
|
* result in qdest. qdest must be either empty, or one of the input
|
|
|
|
* queues.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
void pq_base_concatenate(PacketQueueBase *qdest,
|
|
|
|
PacketQueueBase *q1, PacketQueueBase *q2)
|
2018-09-19 23:56:44 +03:00
|
|
|
{
|
2018-09-19 22:30:40 +03:00
|
|
|
struct PacketQueueNode *head1, *tail1, *head2, *tail2;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Extract the contents from both input queues, and empty them.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
head1 = (q1->end.next == &q1->end ? NULL : q1->end.next);
|
|
|
|
tail1 = (q1->end.prev == &q1->end ? NULL : q1->end.prev);
|
|
|
|
head2 = (q2->end.next == &q2->end ? NULL : q2->end.next);
|
|
|
|
tail2 = (q2->end.prev == &q2->end ? NULL : q2->end.prev);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
q1->end.next = q1->end.prev = &q1->end;
|
|
|
|
q2->end.next = q2->end.prev = &q2->end;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Link the two lists together, handling the case where one or
|
|
|
|
* both is empty.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (tail1)
|
|
|
|
tail1->next = head2;
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
head1 = head2;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (head2)
|
|
|
|
head2->prev = tail1;
|
|
|
|
else
|
2018-09-22 11:32:08 +03:00
|
|
|
tail2 = tail1;
|
2018-09-19 22:30:40 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Check the destination queue is currently empty. (If it was one
|
|
|
|
* of the input queues, then it will be, because we emptied both
|
|
|
|
* of those just a moment ago.)
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert(qdest->end.next == &qdest->end);
|
|
|
|
assert(qdest->end.prev == &qdest->end);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* If our concatenated list has anything in it, then put it in
|
|
|
|
* dest.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (!head1) {
|
|
|
|
assert(!tail2);
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
assert(tail2);
|
|
|
|
qdest->end.next = head1;
|
|
|
|
qdest->end.prev = tail2;
|
|
|
|
head1->prev = &qdest->end;
|
|
|
|
tail2->next = &qdest->end;
|
2018-09-21 15:16:38 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (qdest->ic)
|
|
|
|
queue_idempotent_callback(qdest->ic);
|
2018-09-19 22:30:40 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
2018-09-19 23:56:44 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* ----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
* Low-level functions for the packet structures themselves.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void ssh_pkt_BinarySink_write(BinarySink *bs,
|
|
|
|
const void *data, size_t len);
|
|
|
|
PktOut *ssh_new_packet(void)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
PktOut *pkt = snew(PktOut);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BinarySink_INIT(pkt, ssh_pkt_BinarySink_write);
|
|
|
|
pkt->data = NULL;
|
|
|
|
pkt->length = 0;
|
|
|
|
pkt->maxlen = 0;
|
|
|
|
pkt->downstream_id = 0;
|
|
|
|
pkt->additional_log_text = NULL;
|
|
|
|
pkt->qnode.next = pkt->qnode.prev = NULL;
|
2018-10-29 22:50:29 +03:00
|
|
|
pkt->qnode.on_free_queue = false;
|
2018-09-19 23:56:44 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return pkt;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void ssh_pkt_ensure(PktOut *pkt, int length)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
if (pkt->maxlen < length) {
|
|
|
|
pkt->maxlen = length + 256;
|
|
|
|
pkt->data = sresize(pkt->data, pkt->maxlen, unsigned char);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
static void ssh_pkt_adddata(PktOut *pkt, const void *data, int len)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
pkt->length += len;
|
|
|
|
ssh_pkt_ensure(pkt, pkt->length);
|
|
|
|
memcpy(pkt->data + pkt->length - len, data, len);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void ssh_pkt_BinarySink_write(BinarySink *bs,
|
|
|
|
const void *data, size_t len)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
PktOut *pkt = BinarySink_DOWNCAST(bs, PktOut);
|
|
|
|
ssh_pkt_adddata(pkt, data, len);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
void ssh_free_pktout(PktOut *pkt)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
sfree(pkt->data);
|
|
|
|
sfree(pkt);
|
|
|
|
}
|
2018-09-24 20:08:09 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2018-09-19 22:31:19 +03:00
|
|
|
/* ----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
* Implement zombiechan_new() and its trivial vtable.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void zombiechan_free(Channel *chan);
|
Convert a lot of 'int' variables to 'bool'.
My normal habit these days, in new code, is to treat int and bool as
_almost_ completely separate types. I'm still willing to use C's
implicit test for zero on an integer (e.g. 'if (!blob.len)' is fine,
no need to spell it out as blob.len != 0), but generally, if a
variable is going to be conceptually a boolean, I like to declare it
bool and assign to it using 'true' or 'false' rather than 0 or 1.
PuTTY is an exception, because it predates the C99 bool, and I've
stuck to its existing coding style even when adding new code to it.
But it's been annoying me more and more, so now that I've decided C99
bool is an acceptable thing to require from our toolchain in the first
place, here's a quite thorough trawl through the source doing
'boolification'. Many variables and function parameters are now typed
as bool rather than int; many assignments of 0 or 1 to those variables
are now spelled 'true' or 'false'.
I managed this thorough conversion with the help of a custom clang
plugin that I wrote to trawl the AST and apply heuristics to point out
where things might want changing. So I've even managed to do a decent
job on parts of the code I haven't looked at in years!
To make the plugin's work easier, I pushed platform front ends
generally in the direction of using standard 'bool' in preference to
platform-specific boolean types like Windows BOOL or GTK's gboolean;
I've left the platform booleans in places they _have_ to be for the
platform APIs to work right, but variables only used by my own code
have been converted wherever I found them.
In a few places there are int values that look very like booleans in
_most_ of the places they're used, but have a rarely-used third value,
or a distinction between different nonzero values that most users
don't care about. In these cases, I've _removed_ uses of 'true' and
'false' for the return values, to emphasise that there's something
more subtle going on than a simple boolean answer:
- the 'multisel' field in dialog.h's list box structure, for which
the GTK front end in particular recognises a difference between 1
and 2 but nearly everything else treats as boolean
- the 'urgent' parameter to plug_receive, where 1 vs 2 tells you
something about the specific location of the urgent pointer, but
most clients only care about 0 vs 'something nonzero'
- the return value of wc_match, where -1 indicates a syntax error in
the wildcard.
- the return values from SSH-1 RSA-key loading functions, which use
-1 for 'wrong passphrase' and 0 for all other failures (so any
caller which already knows it's not loading an _encrypted private_
key can treat them as boolean)
- term->esc_query, and the 'query' parameter in toggle_mode in
terminal.c, which _usually_ hold 0 for ESC[123h or 1 for ESC[?123h,
but can also hold -1 for some other intervening character that we
don't support.
In a few places there's an integer that I haven't turned into a bool
even though it really _can_ only take values 0 or 1 (and, as above,
tried to make the call sites consistent in not calling those values
true and false), on the grounds that I thought it would make it more
confusing to imply that the 0 value was in some sense 'negative' or
bad and the 1 positive or good:
- the return value of plug_accepting uses the POSIXish convention of
0=success and nonzero=error; I think if I made it bool then I'd
also want to reverse its sense, and that's a job for a separate
piece of work.
- the 'screen' parameter to lineptr() in terminal.c, where 0 and 1
represent the default and alternate screens. There's no obvious
reason why one of those should be considered 'true' or 'positive'
or 'success' - they're just indices - so I've left it as int.
ssh_scp_recv had particularly confusing semantics for its previous int
return value: its call sites used '<= 0' to check for error, but it
never actually returned a negative number, just 0 or 1. Now the
function and its call sites agree that it's a bool.
In a couple of places I've renamed variables called 'ret', because I
don't like that name any more - it's unclear whether it means the
return value (in preparation) for the _containing_ function or the
return value received from a subroutine call, and occasionally I've
accidentally used the same variable for both and introduced a bug. So
where one of those got in my way, I've renamed it to 'toret' or 'retd'
(the latter short for 'returned') in line with my usual modern
practice, but I haven't done a thorough job of finding all of them.
Finally, one amusing side effect of doing this is that I've had to
separate quite a few chained assignments. It used to be perfectly fine
to write 'a = b = c = TRUE' when a,b,c were int and TRUE was just a
the 'true' defined by stdbool.h, that idiom provokes a warning from
gcc: 'suggest parentheses around assignment used as truth value'!
2018-11-02 22:23:19 +03:00
|
|
|
static int zombiechan_send(Channel *chan, bool is_stderr, const void *, int);
|
|
|
|
static void zombiechan_set_input_wanted(Channel *chan, bool wanted);
|
2018-09-19 22:31:19 +03:00
|
|
|
static void zombiechan_do_nothing(Channel *chan);
|
|
|
|
static void zombiechan_open_failure(Channel *chan, const char *);
|
Convert a lot of 'int' variables to 'bool'.
My normal habit these days, in new code, is to treat int and bool as
_almost_ completely separate types. I'm still willing to use C's
implicit test for zero on an integer (e.g. 'if (!blob.len)' is fine,
no need to spell it out as blob.len != 0), but generally, if a
variable is going to be conceptually a boolean, I like to declare it
bool and assign to it using 'true' or 'false' rather than 0 or 1.
PuTTY is an exception, because it predates the C99 bool, and I've
stuck to its existing coding style even when adding new code to it.
But it's been annoying me more and more, so now that I've decided C99
bool is an acceptable thing to require from our toolchain in the first
place, here's a quite thorough trawl through the source doing
'boolification'. Many variables and function parameters are now typed
as bool rather than int; many assignments of 0 or 1 to those variables
are now spelled 'true' or 'false'.
I managed this thorough conversion with the help of a custom clang
plugin that I wrote to trawl the AST and apply heuristics to point out
where things might want changing. So I've even managed to do a decent
job on parts of the code I haven't looked at in years!
To make the plugin's work easier, I pushed platform front ends
generally in the direction of using standard 'bool' in preference to
platform-specific boolean types like Windows BOOL or GTK's gboolean;
I've left the platform booleans in places they _have_ to be for the
platform APIs to work right, but variables only used by my own code
have been converted wherever I found them.
In a few places there are int values that look very like booleans in
_most_ of the places they're used, but have a rarely-used third value,
or a distinction between different nonzero values that most users
don't care about. In these cases, I've _removed_ uses of 'true' and
'false' for the return values, to emphasise that there's something
more subtle going on than a simple boolean answer:
- the 'multisel' field in dialog.h's list box structure, for which
the GTK front end in particular recognises a difference between 1
and 2 but nearly everything else treats as boolean
- the 'urgent' parameter to plug_receive, where 1 vs 2 tells you
something about the specific location of the urgent pointer, but
most clients only care about 0 vs 'something nonzero'
- the return value of wc_match, where -1 indicates a syntax error in
the wildcard.
- the return values from SSH-1 RSA-key loading functions, which use
-1 for 'wrong passphrase' and 0 for all other failures (so any
caller which already knows it's not loading an _encrypted private_
key can treat them as boolean)
- term->esc_query, and the 'query' parameter in toggle_mode in
terminal.c, which _usually_ hold 0 for ESC[123h or 1 for ESC[?123h,
but can also hold -1 for some other intervening character that we
don't support.
In a few places there's an integer that I haven't turned into a bool
even though it really _can_ only take values 0 or 1 (and, as above,
tried to make the call sites consistent in not calling those values
true and false), on the grounds that I thought it would make it more
confusing to imply that the 0 value was in some sense 'negative' or
bad and the 1 positive or good:
- the return value of plug_accepting uses the POSIXish convention of
0=success and nonzero=error; I think if I made it bool then I'd
also want to reverse its sense, and that's a job for a separate
piece of work.
- the 'screen' parameter to lineptr() in terminal.c, where 0 and 1
represent the default and alternate screens. There's no obvious
reason why one of those should be considered 'true' or 'positive'
or 'success' - they're just indices - so I've left it as int.
ssh_scp_recv had particularly confusing semantics for its previous int
return value: its call sites used '<= 0' to check for error, but it
never actually returned a negative number, just 0 or 1. Now the
function and its call sites agree that it's a bool.
In a couple of places I've renamed variables called 'ret', because I
don't like that name any more - it's unclear whether it means the
return value (in preparation) for the _containing_ function or the
return value received from a subroutine call, and occasionally I've
accidentally used the same variable for both and introduced a bug. So
where one of those got in my way, I've renamed it to 'toret' or 'retd'
(the latter short for 'returned') in line with my usual modern
practice, but I haven't done a thorough job of finding all of them.
Finally, one amusing side effect of doing this is that I've had to
separate quite a few chained assignments. It used to be perfectly fine
to write 'a = b = c = TRUE' when a,b,c were int and TRUE was just a
the 'true' defined by stdbool.h, that idiom provokes a warning from
gcc: 'suggest parentheses around assignment used as truth value'!
2018-11-02 22:23:19 +03:00
|
|
|
static bool zombiechan_want_close(Channel *chan, bool sent_eof, bool rcvd_eof);
|
2018-09-19 22:31:19 +03:00
|
|
|
static char *zombiechan_log_close_msg(Channel *chan) { return NULL; }
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static const struct ChannelVtable zombiechan_channelvt = {
|
|
|
|
zombiechan_free,
|
|
|
|
zombiechan_do_nothing, /* open_confirmation */
|
|
|
|
zombiechan_open_failure,
|
|
|
|
zombiechan_send,
|
|
|
|
zombiechan_do_nothing, /* send_eof */
|
|
|
|
zombiechan_set_input_wanted,
|
|
|
|
zombiechan_log_close_msg,
|
|
|
|
zombiechan_want_close,
|
2018-09-26 19:34:20 +03:00
|
|
|
chan_no_exit_status,
|
|
|
|
chan_no_exit_signal,
|
|
|
|
chan_no_exit_signal_numeric,
|
2018-10-20 23:48:49 +03:00
|
|
|
chan_no_run_shell,
|
|
|
|
chan_no_run_command,
|
|
|
|
chan_no_run_subsystem,
|
|
|
|
chan_no_enable_x11_forwarding,
|
|
|
|
chan_no_enable_agent_forwarding,
|
|
|
|
chan_no_allocate_pty,
|
|
|
|
chan_no_set_env,
|
|
|
|
chan_no_send_break,
|
|
|
|
chan_no_send_signal,
|
|
|
|
chan_no_change_window_size,
|
2018-09-26 20:02:33 +03:00
|
|
|
chan_no_request_response,
|
2018-09-19 22:31:19 +03:00
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Channel *zombiechan_new(void)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
Channel *chan = snew(Channel);
|
|
|
|
chan->vt = &zombiechan_channelvt;
|
|
|
|
chan->initial_fixed_window_size = 0;
|
|
|
|
return chan;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void zombiechan_free(Channel *chan)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
assert(chan->vt == &zombiechan_channelvt);
|
|
|
|
sfree(chan);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void zombiechan_do_nothing(Channel *chan)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
assert(chan->vt == &zombiechan_channelvt);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void zombiechan_open_failure(Channel *chan, const char *errtext)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
assert(chan->vt == &zombiechan_channelvt);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
Convert a lot of 'int' variables to 'bool'.
My normal habit these days, in new code, is to treat int and bool as
_almost_ completely separate types. I'm still willing to use C's
implicit test for zero on an integer (e.g. 'if (!blob.len)' is fine,
no need to spell it out as blob.len != 0), but generally, if a
variable is going to be conceptually a boolean, I like to declare it
bool and assign to it using 'true' or 'false' rather than 0 or 1.
PuTTY is an exception, because it predates the C99 bool, and I've
stuck to its existing coding style even when adding new code to it.
But it's been annoying me more and more, so now that I've decided C99
bool is an acceptable thing to require from our toolchain in the first
place, here's a quite thorough trawl through the source doing
'boolification'. Many variables and function parameters are now typed
as bool rather than int; many assignments of 0 or 1 to those variables
are now spelled 'true' or 'false'.
I managed this thorough conversion with the help of a custom clang
plugin that I wrote to trawl the AST and apply heuristics to point out
where things might want changing. So I've even managed to do a decent
job on parts of the code I haven't looked at in years!
To make the plugin's work easier, I pushed platform front ends
generally in the direction of using standard 'bool' in preference to
platform-specific boolean types like Windows BOOL or GTK's gboolean;
I've left the platform booleans in places they _have_ to be for the
platform APIs to work right, but variables only used by my own code
have been converted wherever I found them.
In a few places there are int values that look very like booleans in
_most_ of the places they're used, but have a rarely-used third value,
or a distinction between different nonzero values that most users
don't care about. In these cases, I've _removed_ uses of 'true' and
'false' for the return values, to emphasise that there's something
more subtle going on than a simple boolean answer:
- the 'multisel' field in dialog.h's list box structure, for which
the GTK front end in particular recognises a difference between 1
and 2 but nearly everything else treats as boolean
- the 'urgent' parameter to plug_receive, where 1 vs 2 tells you
something about the specific location of the urgent pointer, but
most clients only care about 0 vs 'something nonzero'
- the return value of wc_match, where -1 indicates a syntax error in
the wildcard.
- the return values from SSH-1 RSA-key loading functions, which use
-1 for 'wrong passphrase' and 0 for all other failures (so any
caller which already knows it's not loading an _encrypted private_
key can treat them as boolean)
- term->esc_query, and the 'query' parameter in toggle_mode in
terminal.c, which _usually_ hold 0 for ESC[123h or 1 for ESC[?123h,
but can also hold -1 for some other intervening character that we
don't support.
In a few places there's an integer that I haven't turned into a bool
even though it really _can_ only take values 0 or 1 (and, as above,
tried to make the call sites consistent in not calling those values
true and false), on the grounds that I thought it would make it more
confusing to imply that the 0 value was in some sense 'negative' or
bad and the 1 positive or good:
- the return value of plug_accepting uses the POSIXish convention of
0=success and nonzero=error; I think if I made it bool then I'd
also want to reverse its sense, and that's a job for a separate
piece of work.
- the 'screen' parameter to lineptr() in terminal.c, where 0 and 1
represent the default and alternate screens. There's no obvious
reason why one of those should be considered 'true' or 'positive'
or 'success' - they're just indices - so I've left it as int.
ssh_scp_recv had particularly confusing semantics for its previous int
return value: its call sites used '<= 0' to check for error, but it
never actually returned a negative number, just 0 or 1. Now the
function and its call sites agree that it's a bool.
In a couple of places I've renamed variables called 'ret', because I
don't like that name any more - it's unclear whether it means the
return value (in preparation) for the _containing_ function or the
return value received from a subroutine call, and occasionally I've
accidentally used the same variable for both and introduced a bug. So
where one of those got in my way, I've renamed it to 'toret' or 'retd'
(the latter short for 'returned') in line with my usual modern
practice, but I haven't done a thorough job of finding all of them.
Finally, one amusing side effect of doing this is that I've had to
separate quite a few chained assignments. It used to be perfectly fine
to write 'a = b = c = TRUE' when a,b,c were int and TRUE was just a
the 'true' defined by stdbool.h, that idiom provokes a warning from
gcc: 'suggest parentheses around assignment used as truth value'!
2018-11-02 22:23:19 +03:00
|
|
|
static int zombiechan_send(Channel *chan, bool is_stderr,
|
2018-09-19 22:31:19 +03:00
|
|
|
const void *data, int length)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
assert(chan->vt == &zombiechan_channelvt);
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
Convert a lot of 'int' variables to 'bool'.
My normal habit these days, in new code, is to treat int and bool as
_almost_ completely separate types. I'm still willing to use C's
implicit test for zero on an integer (e.g. 'if (!blob.len)' is fine,
no need to spell it out as blob.len != 0), but generally, if a
variable is going to be conceptually a boolean, I like to declare it
bool and assign to it using 'true' or 'false' rather than 0 or 1.
PuTTY is an exception, because it predates the C99 bool, and I've
stuck to its existing coding style even when adding new code to it.
But it's been annoying me more and more, so now that I've decided C99
bool is an acceptable thing to require from our toolchain in the first
place, here's a quite thorough trawl through the source doing
'boolification'. Many variables and function parameters are now typed
as bool rather than int; many assignments of 0 or 1 to those variables
are now spelled 'true' or 'false'.
I managed this thorough conversion with the help of a custom clang
plugin that I wrote to trawl the AST and apply heuristics to point out
where things might want changing. So I've even managed to do a decent
job on parts of the code I haven't looked at in years!
To make the plugin's work easier, I pushed platform front ends
generally in the direction of using standard 'bool' in preference to
platform-specific boolean types like Windows BOOL or GTK's gboolean;
I've left the platform booleans in places they _have_ to be for the
platform APIs to work right, but variables only used by my own code
have been converted wherever I found them.
In a few places there are int values that look very like booleans in
_most_ of the places they're used, but have a rarely-used third value,
or a distinction between different nonzero values that most users
don't care about. In these cases, I've _removed_ uses of 'true' and
'false' for the return values, to emphasise that there's something
more subtle going on than a simple boolean answer:
- the 'multisel' field in dialog.h's list box structure, for which
the GTK front end in particular recognises a difference between 1
and 2 but nearly everything else treats as boolean
- the 'urgent' parameter to plug_receive, where 1 vs 2 tells you
something about the specific location of the urgent pointer, but
most clients only care about 0 vs 'something nonzero'
- the return value of wc_match, where -1 indicates a syntax error in
the wildcard.
- the return values from SSH-1 RSA-key loading functions, which use
-1 for 'wrong passphrase' and 0 for all other failures (so any
caller which already knows it's not loading an _encrypted private_
key can treat them as boolean)
- term->esc_query, and the 'query' parameter in toggle_mode in
terminal.c, which _usually_ hold 0 for ESC[123h or 1 for ESC[?123h,
but can also hold -1 for some other intervening character that we
don't support.
In a few places there's an integer that I haven't turned into a bool
even though it really _can_ only take values 0 or 1 (and, as above,
tried to make the call sites consistent in not calling those values
true and false), on the grounds that I thought it would make it more
confusing to imply that the 0 value was in some sense 'negative' or
bad and the 1 positive or good:
- the return value of plug_accepting uses the POSIXish convention of
0=success and nonzero=error; I think if I made it bool then I'd
also want to reverse its sense, and that's a job for a separate
piece of work.
- the 'screen' parameter to lineptr() in terminal.c, where 0 and 1
represent the default and alternate screens. There's no obvious
reason why one of those should be considered 'true' or 'positive'
or 'success' - they're just indices - so I've left it as int.
ssh_scp_recv had particularly confusing semantics for its previous int
return value: its call sites used '<= 0' to check for error, but it
never actually returned a negative number, just 0 or 1. Now the
function and its call sites agree that it's a bool.
In a couple of places I've renamed variables called 'ret', because I
don't like that name any more - it's unclear whether it means the
return value (in preparation) for the _containing_ function or the
return value received from a subroutine call, and occasionally I've
accidentally used the same variable for both and introduced a bug. So
where one of those got in my way, I've renamed it to 'toret' or 'retd'
(the latter short for 'returned') in line with my usual modern
practice, but I haven't done a thorough job of finding all of them.
Finally, one amusing side effect of doing this is that I've had to
separate quite a few chained assignments. It used to be perfectly fine
to write 'a = b = c = TRUE' when a,b,c were int and TRUE was just a
the 'true' defined by stdbool.h, that idiom provokes a warning from
gcc: 'suggest parentheses around assignment used as truth value'!
2018-11-02 22:23:19 +03:00
|
|
|
static void zombiechan_set_input_wanted(Channel *chan, bool enable)
|
2018-09-19 22:31:19 +03:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
assert(chan->vt == &zombiechan_channelvt);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
Convert a lot of 'int' variables to 'bool'.
My normal habit these days, in new code, is to treat int and bool as
_almost_ completely separate types. I'm still willing to use C's
implicit test for zero on an integer (e.g. 'if (!blob.len)' is fine,
no need to spell it out as blob.len != 0), but generally, if a
variable is going to be conceptually a boolean, I like to declare it
bool and assign to it using 'true' or 'false' rather than 0 or 1.
PuTTY is an exception, because it predates the C99 bool, and I've
stuck to its existing coding style even when adding new code to it.
But it's been annoying me more and more, so now that I've decided C99
bool is an acceptable thing to require from our toolchain in the first
place, here's a quite thorough trawl through the source doing
'boolification'. Many variables and function parameters are now typed
as bool rather than int; many assignments of 0 or 1 to those variables
are now spelled 'true' or 'false'.
I managed this thorough conversion with the help of a custom clang
plugin that I wrote to trawl the AST and apply heuristics to point out
where things might want changing. So I've even managed to do a decent
job on parts of the code I haven't looked at in years!
To make the plugin's work easier, I pushed platform front ends
generally in the direction of using standard 'bool' in preference to
platform-specific boolean types like Windows BOOL or GTK's gboolean;
I've left the platform booleans in places they _have_ to be for the
platform APIs to work right, but variables only used by my own code
have been converted wherever I found them.
In a few places there are int values that look very like booleans in
_most_ of the places they're used, but have a rarely-used third value,
or a distinction between different nonzero values that most users
don't care about. In these cases, I've _removed_ uses of 'true' and
'false' for the return values, to emphasise that there's something
more subtle going on than a simple boolean answer:
- the 'multisel' field in dialog.h's list box structure, for which
the GTK front end in particular recognises a difference between 1
and 2 but nearly everything else treats as boolean
- the 'urgent' parameter to plug_receive, where 1 vs 2 tells you
something about the specific location of the urgent pointer, but
most clients only care about 0 vs 'something nonzero'
- the return value of wc_match, where -1 indicates a syntax error in
the wildcard.
- the return values from SSH-1 RSA-key loading functions, which use
-1 for 'wrong passphrase' and 0 for all other failures (so any
caller which already knows it's not loading an _encrypted private_
key can treat them as boolean)
- term->esc_query, and the 'query' parameter in toggle_mode in
terminal.c, which _usually_ hold 0 for ESC[123h or 1 for ESC[?123h,
but can also hold -1 for some other intervening character that we
don't support.
In a few places there's an integer that I haven't turned into a bool
even though it really _can_ only take values 0 or 1 (and, as above,
tried to make the call sites consistent in not calling those values
true and false), on the grounds that I thought it would make it more
confusing to imply that the 0 value was in some sense 'negative' or
bad and the 1 positive or good:
- the return value of plug_accepting uses the POSIXish convention of
0=success and nonzero=error; I think if I made it bool then I'd
also want to reverse its sense, and that's a job for a separate
piece of work.
- the 'screen' parameter to lineptr() in terminal.c, where 0 and 1
represent the default and alternate screens. There's no obvious
reason why one of those should be considered 'true' or 'positive'
or 'success' - they're just indices - so I've left it as int.
ssh_scp_recv had particularly confusing semantics for its previous int
return value: its call sites used '<= 0' to check for error, but it
never actually returned a negative number, just 0 or 1. Now the
function and its call sites agree that it's a bool.
In a couple of places I've renamed variables called 'ret', because I
don't like that name any more - it's unclear whether it means the
return value (in preparation) for the _containing_ function or the
return value received from a subroutine call, and occasionally I've
accidentally used the same variable for both and introduced a bug. So
where one of those got in my way, I've renamed it to 'toret' or 'retd'
(the latter short for 'returned') in line with my usual modern
practice, but I haven't done a thorough job of finding all of them.
Finally, one amusing side effect of doing this is that I've had to
separate quite a few chained assignments. It used to be perfectly fine
to write 'a = b = c = TRUE' when a,b,c were int and TRUE was just a
the 'true' defined by stdbool.h, that idiom provokes a warning from
gcc: 'suggest parentheses around assignment used as truth value'!
2018-11-02 22:23:19 +03:00
|
|
|
static bool zombiechan_want_close(Channel *chan, bool sent_eof, bool rcvd_eof)
|
2018-09-19 22:31:19 +03:00
|
|
|
{
|
2018-10-29 22:50:29 +03:00
|
|
|
return true;
|
2018-09-19 22:31:19 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2018-09-19 22:32:27 +03:00
|
|
|
/* ----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
* Centralised standard methods for other channel implementations to
|
|
|
|
* borrow.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
void chan_remotely_opened_confirmation(Channel *chan)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
assert(0 && "this channel type should never receive OPEN_CONFIRMATION");
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
void chan_remotely_opened_failure(Channel *chan, const char *errtext)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
assert(0 && "this channel type should never receive OPEN_FAILURE");
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
Convert a lot of 'int' variables to 'bool'.
My normal habit these days, in new code, is to treat int and bool as
_almost_ completely separate types. I'm still willing to use C's
implicit test for zero on an integer (e.g. 'if (!blob.len)' is fine,
no need to spell it out as blob.len != 0), but generally, if a
variable is going to be conceptually a boolean, I like to declare it
bool and assign to it using 'true' or 'false' rather than 0 or 1.
PuTTY is an exception, because it predates the C99 bool, and I've
stuck to its existing coding style even when adding new code to it.
But it's been annoying me more and more, so now that I've decided C99
bool is an acceptable thing to require from our toolchain in the first
place, here's a quite thorough trawl through the source doing
'boolification'. Many variables and function parameters are now typed
as bool rather than int; many assignments of 0 or 1 to those variables
are now spelled 'true' or 'false'.
I managed this thorough conversion with the help of a custom clang
plugin that I wrote to trawl the AST and apply heuristics to point out
where things might want changing. So I've even managed to do a decent
job on parts of the code I haven't looked at in years!
To make the plugin's work easier, I pushed platform front ends
generally in the direction of using standard 'bool' in preference to
platform-specific boolean types like Windows BOOL or GTK's gboolean;
I've left the platform booleans in places they _have_ to be for the
platform APIs to work right, but variables only used by my own code
have been converted wherever I found them.
In a few places there are int values that look very like booleans in
_most_ of the places they're used, but have a rarely-used third value,
or a distinction between different nonzero values that most users
don't care about. In these cases, I've _removed_ uses of 'true' and
'false' for the return values, to emphasise that there's something
more subtle going on than a simple boolean answer:
- the 'multisel' field in dialog.h's list box structure, for which
the GTK front end in particular recognises a difference between 1
and 2 but nearly everything else treats as boolean
- the 'urgent' parameter to plug_receive, where 1 vs 2 tells you
something about the specific location of the urgent pointer, but
most clients only care about 0 vs 'something nonzero'
- the return value of wc_match, where -1 indicates a syntax error in
the wildcard.
- the return values from SSH-1 RSA-key loading functions, which use
-1 for 'wrong passphrase' and 0 for all other failures (so any
caller which already knows it's not loading an _encrypted private_
key can treat them as boolean)
- term->esc_query, and the 'query' parameter in toggle_mode in
terminal.c, which _usually_ hold 0 for ESC[123h or 1 for ESC[?123h,
but can also hold -1 for some other intervening character that we
don't support.
In a few places there's an integer that I haven't turned into a bool
even though it really _can_ only take values 0 or 1 (and, as above,
tried to make the call sites consistent in not calling those values
true and false), on the grounds that I thought it would make it more
confusing to imply that the 0 value was in some sense 'negative' or
bad and the 1 positive or good:
- the return value of plug_accepting uses the POSIXish convention of
0=success and nonzero=error; I think if I made it bool then I'd
also want to reverse its sense, and that's a job for a separate
piece of work.
- the 'screen' parameter to lineptr() in terminal.c, where 0 and 1
represent the default and alternate screens. There's no obvious
reason why one of those should be considered 'true' or 'positive'
or 'success' - they're just indices - so I've left it as int.
ssh_scp_recv had particularly confusing semantics for its previous int
return value: its call sites used '<= 0' to check for error, but it
never actually returned a negative number, just 0 or 1. Now the
function and its call sites agree that it's a bool.
In a couple of places I've renamed variables called 'ret', because I
don't like that name any more - it's unclear whether it means the
return value (in preparation) for the _containing_ function or the
return value received from a subroutine call, and occasionally I've
accidentally used the same variable for both and introduced a bug. So
where one of those got in my way, I've renamed it to 'toret' or 'retd'
(the latter short for 'returned') in line with my usual modern
practice, but I haven't done a thorough job of finding all of them.
Finally, one amusing side effect of doing this is that I've had to
separate quite a few chained assignments. It used to be perfectly fine
to write 'a = b = c = TRUE' when a,b,c were int and TRUE was just a
the 'true' defined by stdbool.h, that idiom provokes a warning from
gcc: 'suggest parentheses around assignment used as truth value'!
2018-11-02 22:23:19 +03:00
|
|
|
bool chan_default_want_close(
|
|
|
|
Channel *chan, bool sent_local_eof, bool rcvd_remote_eof)
|
2018-09-19 22:32:27 +03:00
|
|
|
{
|
Allow channels not to close immediately after two EOFs.
Some kinds of channel, even after they've sent EOF in both directions,
still have something to do before they initiate the CLOSE mechanism
and wind up the channel completely. For example, a session channel
with a subprocess running inside it will want to be sure to send the
"exit-status" or "exit-signal" notification, even if that happens
after bidirectional EOF of the data channels.
Previously, the SSH-2 connection layer had the standard policy that
once EOF had been both sent and received, it would start the final
close procedure. There's a method chan_want_close() by which a Channel
could vary this policy in one direction, by indicating that it wanted
the close procedure to commence after EOF was sent in only one
direction. Its parameters are a pair of booleans saying whether EOF
has been sent, and whether it's been received.
Now chan_want_close can vary the policy in the other direction as
well: if it returns FALSE even when _both_ parameters are true, the
connection layer will honour that, and not send CHANNEL_CLOSE. If it
does that, the Channel is responsible for indicating when it _does_
want close later, by calling sshfwd_initiate_close.
2018-10-18 20:02:59 +03:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Default close policy: we start initiating the CHANNEL_CLOSE
|
|
|
|
* procedure as soon as both sides of the channel have seen EOF.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
return sent_local_eof && rcvd_remote_eof;
|
2018-09-19 22:32:27 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
2018-09-19 22:36:40 +03:00
|
|
|
|
Convert a lot of 'int' variables to 'bool'.
My normal habit these days, in new code, is to treat int and bool as
_almost_ completely separate types. I'm still willing to use C's
implicit test for zero on an integer (e.g. 'if (!blob.len)' is fine,
no need to spell it out as blob.len != 0), but generally, if a
variable is going to be conceptually a boolean, I like to declare it
bool and assign to it using 'true' or 'false' rather than 0 or 1.
PuTTY is an exception, because it predates the C99 bool, and I've
stuck to its existing coding style even when adding new code to it.
But it's been annoying me more and more, so now that I've decided C99
bool is an acceptable thing to require from our toolchain in the first
place, here's a quite thorough trawl through the source doing
'boolification'. Many variables and function parameters are now typed
as bool rather than int; many assignments of 0 or 1 to those variables
are now spelled 'true' or 'false'.
I managed this thorough conversion with the help of a custom clang
plugin that I wrote to trawl the AST and apply heuristics to point out
where things might want changing. So I've even managed to do a decent
job on parts of the code I haven't looked at in years!
To make the plugin's work easier, I pushed platform front ends
generally in the direction of using standard 'bool' in preference to
platform-specific boolean types like Windows BOOL or GTK's gboolean;
I've left the platform booleans in places they _have_ to be for the
platform APIs to work right, but variables only used by my own code
have been converted wherever I found them.
In a few places there are int values that look very like booleans in
_most_ of the places they're used, but have a rarely-used third value,
or a distinction between different nonzero values that most users
don't care about. In these cases, I've _removed_ uses of 'true' and
'false' for the return values, to emphasise that there's something
more subtle going on than a simple boolean answer:
- the 'multisel' field in dialog.h's list box structure, for which
the GTK front end in particular recognises a difference between 1
and 2 but nearly everything else treats as boolean
- the 'urgent' parameter to plug_receive, where 1 vs 2 tells you
something about the specific location of the urgent pointer, but
most clients only care about 0 vs 'something nonzero'
- the return value of wc_match, where -1 indicates a syntax error in
the wildcard.
- the return values from SSH-1 RSA-key loading functions, which use
-1 for 'wrong passphrase' and 0 for all other failures (so any
caller which already knows it's not loading an _encrypted private_
key can treat them as boolean)
- term->esc_query, and the 'query' parameter in toggle_mode in
terminal.c, which _usually_ hold 0 for ESC[123h or 1 for ESC[?123h,
but can also hold -1 for some other intervening character that we
don't support.
In a few places there's an integer that I haven't turned into a bool
even though it really _can_ only take values 0 or 1 (and, as above,
tried to make the call sites consistent in not calling those values
true and false), on the grounds that I thought it would make it more
confusing to imply that the 0 value was in some sense 'negative' or
bad and the 1 positive or good:
- the return value of plug_accepting uses the POSIXish convention of
0=success and nonzero=error; I think if I made it bool then I'd
also want to reverse its sense, and that's a job for a separate
piece of work.
- the 'screen' parameter to lineptr() in terminal.c, where 0 and 1
represent the default and alternate screens. There's no obvious
reason why one of those should be considered 'true' or 'positive'
or 'success' - they're just indices - so I've left it as int.
ssh_scp_recv had particularly confusing semantics for its previous int
return value: its call sites used '<= 0' to check for error, but it
never actually returned a negative number, just 0 or 1. Now the
function and its call sites agree that it's a bool.
In a couple of places I've renamed variables called 'ret', because I
don't like that name any more - it's unclear whether it means the
return value (in preparation) for the _containing_ function or the
return value received from a subroutine call, and occasionally I've
accidentally used the same variable for both and introduced a bug. So
where one of those got in my way, I've renamed it to 'toret' or 'retd'
(the latter short for 'returned') in line with my usual modern
practice, but I haven't done a thorough job of finding all of them.
Finally, one amusing side effect of doing this is that I've had to
separate quite a few chained assignments. It used to be perfectly fine
to write 'a = b = c = TRUE' when a,b,c were int and TRUE was just a
the 'true' defined by stdbool.h, that idiom provokes a warning from
gcc: 'suggest parentheses around assignment used as truth value'!
2018-11-02 22:23:19 +03:00
|
|
|
bool chan_no_exit_status(Channel *chan, int status)
|
2018-09-26 19:34:20 +03:00
|
|
|
{
|
2018-10-29 22:50:29 +03:00
|
|
|
return false;
|
2018-09-26 19:34:20 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
Convert a lot of 'int' variables to 'bool'.
My normal habit these days, in new code, is to treat int and bool as
_almost_ completely separate types. I'm still willing to use C's
implicit test for zero on an integer (e.g. 'if (!blob.len)' is fine,
no need to spell it out as blob.len != 0), but generally, if a
variable is going to be conceptually a boolean, I like to declare it
bool and assign to it using 'true' or 'false' rather than 0 or 1.
PuTTY is an exception, because it predates the C99 bool, and I've
stuck to its existing coding style even when adding new code to it.
But it's been annoying me more and more, so now that I've decided C99
bool is an acceptable thing to require from our toolchain in the first
place, here's a quite thorough trawl through the source doing
'boolification'. Many variables and function parameters are now typed
as bool rather than int; many assignments of 0 or 1 to those variables
are now spelled 'true' or 'false'.
I managed this thorough conversion with the help of a custom clang
plugin that I wrote to trawl the AST and apply heuristics to point out
where things might want changing. So I've even managed to do a decent
job on parts of the code I haven't looked at in years!
To make the plugin's work easier, I pushed platform front ends
generally in the direction of using standard 'bool' in preference to
platform-specific boolean types like Windows BOOL or GTK's gboolean;
I've left the platform booleans in places they _have_ to be for the
platform APIs to work right, but variables only used by my own code
have been converted wherever I found them.
In a few places there are int values that look very like booleans in
_most_ of the places they're used, but have a rarely-used third value,
or a distinction between different nonzero values that most users
don't care about. In these cases, I've _removed_ uses of 'true' and
'false' for the return values, to emphasise that there's something
more subtle going on than a simple boolean answer:
- the 'multisel' field in dialog.h's list box structure, for which
the GTK front end in particular recognises a difference between 1
and 2 but nearly everything else treats as boolean
- the 'urgent' parameter to plug_receive, where 1 vs 2 tells you
something about the specific location of the urgent pointer, but
most clients only care about 0 vs 'something nonzero'
- the return value of wc_match, where -1 indicates a syntax error in
the wildcard.
- the return values from SSH-1 RSA-key loading functions, which use
-1 for 'wrong passphrase' and 0 for all other failures (so any
caller which already knows it's not loading an _encrypted private_
key can treat them as boolean)
- term->esc_query, and the 'query' parameter in toggle_mode in
terminal.c, which _usually_ hold 0 for ESC[123h or 1 for ESC[?123h,
but can also hold -1 for some other intervening character that we
don't support.
In a few places there's an integer that I haven't turned into a bool
even though it really _can_ only take values 0 or 1 (and, as above,
tried to make the call sites consistent in not calling those values
true and false), on the grounds that I thought it would make it more
confusing to imply that the 0 value was in some sense 'negative' or
bad and the 1 positive or good:
- the return value of plug_accepting uses the POSIXish convention of
0=success and nonzero=error; I think if I made it bool then I'd
also want to reverse its sense, and that's a job for a separate
piece of work.
- the 'screen' parameter to lineptr() in terminal.c, where 0 and 1
represent the default and alternate screens. There's no obvious
reason why one of those should be considered 'true' or 'positive'
or 'success' - they're just indices - so I've left it as int.
ssh_scp_recv had particularly confusing semantics for its previous int
return value: its call sites used '<= 0' to check for error, but it
never actually returned a negative number, just 0 or 1. Now the
function and its call sites agree that it's a bool.
In a couple of places I've renamed variables called 'ret', because I
don't like that name any more - it's unclear whether it means the
return value (in preparation) for the _containing_ function or the
return value received from a subroutine call, and occasionally I've
accidentally used the same variable for both and introduced a bug. So
where one of those got in my way, I've renamed it to 'toret' or 'retd'
(the latter short for 'returned') in line with my usual modern
practice, but I haven't done a thorough job of finding all of them.
Finally, one amusing side effect of doing this is that I've had to
separate quite a few chained assignments. It used to be perfectly fine
to write 'a = b = c = TRUE' when a,b,c were int and TRUE was just a
the 'true' defined by stdbool.h, that idiom provokes a warning from
gcc: 'suggest parentheses around assignment used as truth value'!
2018-11-02 22:23:19 +03:00
|
|
|
bool chan_no_exit_signal(
|
|
|
|
Channel *chan, ptrlen signame, bool core_dumped, ptrlen msg)
|
2018-09-26 19:34:20 +03:00
|
|
|
{
|
2018-10-29 22:50:29 +03:00
|
|
|
return false;
|
2018-09-26 19:34:20 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
Convert a lot of 'int' variables to 'bool'.
My normal habit these days, in new code, is to treat int and bool as
_almost_ completely separate types. I'm still willing to use C's
implicit test for zero on an integer (e.g. 'if (!blob.len)' is fine,
no need to spell it out as blob.len != 0), but generally, if a
variable is going to be conceptually a boolean, I like to declare it
bool and assign to it using 'true' or 'false' rather than 0 or 1.
PuTTY is an exception, because it predates the C99 bool, and I've
stuck to its existing coding style even when adding new code to it.
But it's been annoying me more and more, so now that I've decided C99
bool is an acceptable thing to require from our toolchain in the first
place, here's a quite thorough trawl through the source doing
'boolification'. Many variables and function parameters are now typed
as bool rather than int; many assignments of 0 or 1 to those variables
are now spelled 'true' or 'false'.
I managed this thorough conversion with the help of a custom clang
plugin that I wrote to trawl the AST and apply heuristics to point out
where things might want changing. So I've even managed to do a decent
job on parts of the code I haven't looked at in years!
To make the plugin's work easier, I pushed platform front ends
generally in the direction of using standard 'bool' in preference to
platform-specific boolean types like Windows BOOL or GTK's gboolean;
I've left the platform booleans in places they _have_ to be for the
platform APIs to work right, but variables only used by my own code
have been converted wherever I found them.
In a few places there are int values that look very like booleans in
_most_ of the places they're used, but have a rarely-used third value,
or a distinction between different nonzero values that most users
don't care about. In these cases, I've _removed_ uses of 'true' and
'false' for the return values, to emphasise that there's something
more subtle going on than a simple boolean answer:
- the 'multisel' field in dialog.h's list box structure, for which
the GTK front end in particular recognises a difference between 1
and 2 but nearly everything else treats as boolean
- the 'urgent' parameter to plug_receive, where 1 vs 2 tells you
something about the specific location of the urgent pointer, but
most clients only care about 0 vs 'something nonzero'
- the return value of wc_match, where -1 indicates a syntax error in
the wildcard.
- the return values from SSH-1 RSA-key loading functions, which use
-1 for 'wrong passphrase' and 0 for all other failures (so any
caller which already knows it's not loading an _encrypted private_
key can treat them as boolean)
- term->esc_query, and the 'query' parameter in toggle_mode in
terminal.c, which _usually_ hold 0 for ESC[123h or 1 for ESC[?123h,
but can also hold -1 for some other intervening character that we
don't support.
In a few places there's an integer that I haven't turned into a bool
even though it really _can_ only take values 0 or 1 (and, as above,
tried to make the call sites consistent in not calling those values
true and false), on the grounds that I thought it would make it more
confusing to imply that the 0 value was in some sense 'negative' or
bad and the 1 positive or good:
- the return value of plug_accepting uses the POSIXish convention of
0=success and nonzero=error; I think if I made it bool then I'd
also want to reverse its sense, and that's a job for a separate
piece of work.
- the 'screen' parameter to lineptr() in terminal.c, where 0 and 1
represent the default and alternate screens. There's no obvious
reason why one of those should be considered 'true' or 'positive'
or 'success' - they're just indices - so I've left it as int.
ssh_scp_recv had particularly confusing semantics for its previous int
return value: its call sites used '<= 0' to check for error, but it
never actually returned a negative number, just 0 or 1. Now the
function and its call sites agree that it's a bool.
In a couple of places I've renamed variables called 'ret', because I
don't like that name any more - it's unclear whether it means the
return value (in preparation) for the _containing_ function or the
return value received from a subroutine call, and occasionally I've
accidentally used the same variable for both and introduced a bug. So
where one of those got in my way, I've renamed it to 'toret' or 'retd'
(the latter short for 'returned') in line with my usual modern
practice, but I haven't done a thorough job of finding all of them.
Finally, one amusing side effect of doing this is that I've had to
separate quite a few chained assignments. It used to be perfectly fine
to write 'a = b = c = TRUE' when a,b,c were int and TRUE was just a
the 'true' defined by stdbool.h, that idiom provokes a warning from
gcc: 'suggest parentheses around assignment used as truth value'!
2018-11-02 22:23:19 +03:00
|
|
|
bool chan_no_exit_signal_numeric(
|
|
|
|
Channel *chan, int signum, bool core_dumped, ptrlen msg)
|
2018-09-26 19:34:20 +03:00
|
|
|
{
|
2018-10-29 22:50:29 +03:00
|
|
|
return false;
|
2018-09-26 19:34:20 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
Convert a lot of 'int' variables to 'bool'.
My normal habit these days, in new code, is to treat int and bool as
_almost_ completely separate types. I'm still willing to use C's
implicit test for zero on an integer (e.g. 'if (!blob.len)' is fine,
no need to spell it out as blob.len != 0), but generally, if a
variable is going to be conceptually a boolean, I like to declare it
bool and assign to it using 'true' or 'false' rather than 0 or 1.
PuTTY is an exception, because it predates the C99 bool, and I've
stuck to its existing coding style even when adding new code to it.
But it's been annoying me more and more, so now that I've decided C99
bool is an acceptable thing to require from our toolchain in the first
place, here's a quite thorough trawl through the source doing
'boolification'. Many variables and function parameters are now typed
as bool rather than int; many assignments of 0 or 1 to those variables
are now spelled 'true' or 'false'.
I managed this thorough conversion with the help of a custom clang
plugin that I wrote to trawl the AST and apply heuristics to point out
where things might want changing. So I've even managed to do a decent
job on parts of the code I haven't looked at in years!
To make the plugin's work easier, I pushed platform front ends
generally in the direction of using standard 'bool' in preference to
platform-specific boolean types like Windows BOOL or GTK's gboolean;
I've left the platform booleans in places they _have_ to be for the
platform APIs to work right, but variables only used by my own code
have been converted wherever I found them.
In a few places there are int values that look very like booleans in
_most_ of the places they're used, but have a rarely-used third value,
or a distinction between different nonzero values that most users
don't care about. In these cases, I've _removed_ uses of 'true' and
'false' for the return values, to emphasise that there's something
more subtle going on than a simple boolean answer:
- the 'multisel' field in dialog.h's list box structure, for which
the GTK front end in particular recognises a difference between 1
and 2 but nearly everything else treats as boolean
- the 'urgent' parameter to plug_receive, where 1 vs 2 tells you
something about the specific location of the urgent pointer, but
most clients only care about 0 vs 'something nonzero'
- the return value of wc_match, where -1 indicates a syntax error in
the wildcard.
- the return values from SSH-1 RSA-key loading functions, which use
-1 for 'wrong passphrase' and 0 for all other failures (so any
caller which already knows it's not loading an _encrypted private_
key can treat them as boolean)
- term->esc_query, and the 'query' parameter in toggle_mode in
terminal.c, which _usually_ hold 0 for ESC[123h or 1 for ESC[?123h,
but can also hold -1 for some other intervening character that we
don't support.
In a few places there's an integer that I haven't turned into a bool
even though it really _can_ only take values 0 or 1 (and, as above,
tried to make the call sites consistent in not calling those values
true and false), on the grounds that I thought it would make it more
confusing to imply that the 0 value was in some sense 'negative' or
bad and the 1 positive or good:
- the return value of plug_accepting uses the POSIXish convention of
0=success and nonzero=error; I think if I made it bool then I'd
also want to reverse its sense, and that's a job for a separate
piece of work.
- the 'screen' parameter to lineptr() in terminal.c, where 0 and 1
represent the default and alternate screens. There's no obvious
reason why one of those should be considered 'true' or 'positive'
or 'success' - they're just indices - so I've left it as int.
ssh_scp_recv had particularly confusing semantics for its previous int
return value: its call sites used '<= 0' to check for error, but it
never actually returned a negative number, just 0 or 1. Now the
function and its call sites agree that it's a bool.
In a couple of places I've renamed variables called 'ret', because I
don't like that name any more - it's unclear whether it means the
return value (in preparation) for the _containing_ function or the
return value received from a subroutine call, and occasionally I've
accidentally used the same variable for both and introduced a bug. So
where one of those got in my way, I've renamed it to 'toret' or 'retd'
(the latter short for 'returned') in line with my usual modern
practice, but I haven't done a thorough job of finding all of them.
Finally, one amusing side effect of doing this is that I've had to
separate quite a few chained assignments. It used to be perfectly fine
to write 'a = b = c = TRUE' when a,b,c were int and TRUE was just a
the 'true' defined by stdbool.h, that idiom provokes a warning from
gcc: 'suggest parentheses around assignment used as truth value'!
2018-11-02 22:23:19 +03:00
|
|
|
bool chan_no_run_shell(Channel *chan)
|
2018-10-20 23:48:49 +03:00
|
|
|
{
|
2018-10-29 22:50:29 +03:00
|
|
|
return false;
|
2018-10-20 23:48:49 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
Convert a lot of 'int' variables to 'bool'.
My normal habit these days, in new code, is to treat int and bool as
_almost_ completely separate types. I'm still willing to use C's
implicit test for zero on an integer (e.g. 'if (!blob.len)' is fine,
no need to spell it out as blob.len != 0), but generally, if a
variable is going to be conceptually a boolean, I like to declare it
bool and assign to it using 'true' or 'false' rather than 0 or 1.
PuTTY is an exception, because it predates the C99 bool, and I've
stuck to its existing coding style even when adding new code to it.
But it's been annoying me more and more, so now that I've decided C99
bool is an acceptable thing to require from our toolchain in the first
place, here's a quite thorough trawl through the source doing
'boolification'. Many variables and function parameters are now typed
as bool rather than int; many assignments of 0 or 1 to those variables
are now spelled 'true' or 'false'.
I managed this thorough conversion with the help of a custom clang
plugin that I wrote to trawl the AST and apply heuristics to point out
where things might want changing. So I've even managed to do a decent
job on parts of the code I haven't looked at in years!
To make the plugin's work easier, I pushed platform front ends
generally in the direction of using standard 'bool' in preference to
platform-specific boolean types like Windows BOOL or GTK's gboolean;
I've left the platform booleans in places they _have_ to be for the
platform APIs to work right, but variables only used by my own code
have been converted wherever I found them.
In a few places there are int values that look very like booleans in
_most_ of the places they're used, but have a rarely-used third value,
or a distinction between different nonzero values that most users
don't care about. In these cases, I've _removed_ uses of 'true' and
'false' for the return values, to emphasise that there's something
more subtle going on than a simple boolean answer:
- the 'multisel' field in dialog.h's list box structure, for which
the GTK front end in particular recognises a difference between 1
and 2 but nearly everything else treats as boolean
- the 'urgent' parameter to plug_receive, where 1 vs 2 tells you
something about the specific location of the urgent pointer, but
most clients only care about 0 vs 'something nonzero'
- the return value of wc_match, where -1 indicates a syntax error in
the wildcard.
- the return values from SSH-1 RSA-key loading functions, which use
-1 for 'wrong passphrase' and 0 for all other failures (so any
caller which already knows it's not loading an _encrypted private_
key can treat them as boolean)
- term->esc_query, and the 'query' parameter in toggle_mode in
terminal.c, which _usually_ hold 0 for ESC[123h or 1 for ESC[?123h,
but can also hold -1 for some other intervening character that we
don't support.
In a few places there's an integer that I haven't turned into a bool
even though it really _can_ only take values 0 or 1 (and, as above,
tried to make the call sites consistent in not calling those values
true and false), on the grounds that I thought it would make it more
confusing to imply that the 0 value was in some sense 'negative' or
bad and the 1 positive or good:
- the return value of plug_accepting uses the POSIXish convention of
0=success and nonzero=error; I think if I made it bool then I'd
also want to reverse its sense, and that's a job for a separate
piece of work.
- the 'screen' parameter to lineptr() in terminal.c, where 0 and 1
represent the default and alternate screens. There's no obvious
reason why one of those should be considered 'true' or 'positive'
or 'success' - they're just indices - so I've left it as int.
ssh_scp_recv had particularly confusing semantics for its previous int
return value: its call sites used '<= 0' to check for error, but it
never actually returned a negative number, just 0 or 1. Now the
function and its call sites agree that it's a bool.
In a couple of places I've renamed variables called 'ret', because I
don't like that name any more - it's unclear whether it means the
return value (in preparation) for the _containing_ function or the
return value received from a subroutine call, and occasionally I've
accidentally used the same variable for both and introduced a bug. So
where one of those got in my way, I've renamed it to 'toret' or 'retd'
(the latter short for 'returned') in line with my usual modern
practice, but I haven't done a thorough job of finding all of them.
Finally, one amusing side effect of doing this is that I've had to
separate quite a few chained assignments. It used to be perfectly fine
to write 'a = b = c = TRUE' when a,b,c were int and TRUE was just a
the 'true' defined by stdbool.h, that idiom provokes a warning from
gcc: 'suggest parentheses around assignment used as truth value'!
2018-11-02 22:23:19 +03:00
|
|
|
bool chan_no_run_command(Channel *chan, ptrlen command)
|
2018-10-20 23:48:49 +03:00
|
|
|
{
|
2018-10-29 22:50:29 +03:00
|
|
|
return false;
|
2018-10-20 23:48:49 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
Convert a lot of 'int' variables to 'bool'.
My normal habit these days, in new code, is to treat int and bool as
_almost_ completely separate types. I'm still willing to use C's
implicit test for zero on an integer (e.g. 'if (!blob.len)' is fine,
no need to spell it out as blob.len != 0), but generally, if a
variable is going to be conceptually a boolean, I like to declare it
bool and assign to it using 'true' or 'false' rather than 0 or 1.
PuTTY is an exception, because it predates the C99 bool, and I've
stuck to its existing coding style even when adding new code to it.
But it's been annoying me more and more, so now that I've decided C99
bool is an acceptable thing to require from our toolchain in the first
place, here's a quite thorough trawl through the source doing
'boolification'. Many variables and function parameters are now typed
as bool rather than int; many assignments of 0 or 1 to those variables
are now spelled 'true' or 'false'.
I managed this thorough conversion with the help of a custom clang
plugin that I wrote to trawl the AST and apply heuristics to point out
where things might want changing. So I've even managed to do a decent
job on parts of the code I haven't looked at in years!
To make the plugin's work easier, I pushed platform front ends
generally in the direction of using standard 'bool' in preference to
platform-specific boolean types like Windows BOOL or GTK's gboolean;
I've left the platform booleans in places they _have_ to be for the
platform APIs to work right, but variables only used by my own code
have been converted wherever I found them.
In a few places there are int values that look very like booleans in
_most_ of the places they're used, but have a rarely-used third value,
or a distinction between different nonzero values that most users
don't care about. In these cases, I've _removed_ uses of 'true' and
'false' for the return values, to emphasise that there's something
more subtle going on than a simple boolean answer:
- the 'multisel' field in dialog.h's list box structure, for which
the GTK front end in particular recognises a difference between 1
and 2 but nearly everything else treats as boolean
- the 'urgent' parameter to plug_receive, where 1 vs 2 tells you
something about the specific location of the urgent pointer, but
most clients only care about 0 vs 'something nonzero'
- the return value of wc_match, where -1 indicates a syntax error in
the wildcard.
- the return values from SSH-1 RSA-key loading functions, which use
-1 for 'wrong passphrase' and 0 for all other failures (so any
caller which already knows it's not loading an _encrypted private_
key can treat them as boolean)
- term->esc_query, and the 'query' parameter in toggle_mode in
terminal.c, which _usually_ hold 0 for ESC[123h or 1 for ESC[?123h,
but can also hold -1 for some other intervening character that we
don't support.
In a few places there's an integer that I haven't turned into a bool
even though it really _can_ only take values 0 or 1 (and, as above,
tried to make the call sites consistent in not calling those values
true and false), on the grounds that I thought it would make it more
confusing to imply that the 0 value was in some sense 'negative' or
bad and the 1 positive or good:
- the return value of plug_accepting uses the POSIXish convention of
0=success and nonzero=error; I think if I made it bool then I'd
also want to reverse its sense, and that's a job for a separate
piece of work.
- the 'screen' parameter to lineptr() in terminal.c, where 0 and 1
represent the default and alternate screens. There's no obvious
reason why one of those should be considered 'true' or 'positive'
or 'success' - they're just indices - so I've left it as int.
ssh_scp_recv had particularly confusing semantics for its previous int
return value: its call sites used '<= 0' to check for error, but it
never actually returned a negative number, just 0 or 1. Now the
function and its call sites agree that it's a bool.
In a couple of places I've renamed variables called 'ret', because I
don't like that name any more - it's unclear whether it means the
return value (in preparation) for the _containing_ function or the
return value received from a subroutine call, and occasionally I've
accidentally used the same variable for both and introduced a bug. So
where one of those got in my way, I've renamed it to 'toret' or 'retd'
(the latter short for 'returned') in line with my usual modern
practice, but I haven't done a thorough job of finding all of them.
Finally, one amusing side effect of doing this is that I've had to
separate quite a few chained assignments. It used to be perfectly fine
to write 'a = b = c = TRUE' when a,b,c were int and TRUE was just a
the 'true' defined by stdbool.h, that idiom provokes a warning from
gcc: 'suggest parentheses around assignment used as truth value'!
2018-11-02 22:23:19 +03:00
|
|
|
bool chan_no_run_subsystem(Channel *chan, ptrlen subsys)
|
2018-10-20 23:48:49 +03:00
|
|
|
{
|
2018-10-29 22:50:29 +03:00
|
|
|
return false;
|
2018-10-20 23:48:49 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
Convert a lot of 'int' variables to 'bool'.
My normal habit these days, in new code, is to treat int and bool as
_almost_ completely separate types. I'm still willing to use C's
implicit test for zero on an integer (e.g. 'if (!blob.len)' is fine,
no need to spell it out as blob.len != 0), but generally, if a
variable is going to be conceptually a boolean, I like to declare it
bool and assign to it using 'true' or 'false' rather than 0 or 1.
PuTTY is an exception, because it predates the C99 bool, and I've
stuck to its existing coding style even when adding new code to it.
But it's been annoying me more and more, so now that I've decided C99
bool is an acceptable thing to require from our toolchain in the first
place, here's a quite thorough trawl through the source doing
'boolification'. Many variables and function parameters are now typed
as bool rather than int; many assignments of 0 or 1 to those variables
are now spelled 'true' or 'false'.
I managed this thorough conversion with the help of a custom clang
plugin that I wrote to trawl the AST and apply heuristics to point out
where things might want changing. So I've even managed to do a decent
job on parts of the code I haven't looked at in years!
To make the plugin's work easier, I pushed platform front ends
generally in the direction of using standard 'bool' in preference to
platform-specific boolean types like Windows BOOL or GTK's gboolean;
I've left the platform booleans in places they _have_ to be for the
platform APIs to work right, but variables only used by my own code
have been converted wherever I found them.
In a few places there are int values that look very like booleans in
_most_ of the places they're used, but have a rarely-used third value,
or a distinction between different nonzero values that most users
don't care about. In these cases, I've _removed_ uses of 'true' and
'false' for the return values, to emphasise that there's something
more subtle going on than a simple boolean answer:
- the 'multisel' field in dialog.h's list box structure, for which
the GTK front end in particular recognises a difference between 1
and 2 but nearly everything else treats as boolean
- the 'urgent' parameter to plug_receive, where 1 vs 2 tells you
something about the specific location of the urgent pointer, but
most clients only care about 0 vs 'something nonzero'
- the return value of wc_match, where -1 indicates a syntax error in
the wildcard.
- the return values from SSH-1 RSA-key loading functions, which use
-1 for 'wrong passphrase' and 0 for all other failures (so any
caller which already knows it's not loading an _encrypted private_
key can treat them as boolean)
- term->esc_query, and the 'query' parameter in toggle_mode in
terminal.c, which _usually_ hold 0 for ESC[123h or 1 for ESC[?123h,
but can also hold -1 for some other intervening character that we
don't support.
In a few places there's an integer that I haven't turned into a bool
even though it really _can_ only take values 0 or 1 (and, as above,
tried to make the call sites consistent in not calling those values
true and false), on the grounds that I thought it would make it more
confusing to imply that the 0 value was in some sense 'negative' or
bad and the 1 positive or good:
- the return value of plug_accepting uses the POSIXish convention of
0=success and nonzero=error; I think if I made it bool then I'd
also want to reverse its sense, and that's a job for a separate
piece of work.
- the 'screen' parameter to lineptr() in terminal.c, where 0 and 1
represent the default and alternate screens. There's no obvious
reason why one of those should be considered 'true' or 'positive'
or 'success' - they're just indices - so I've left it as int.
ssh_scp_recv had particularly confusing semantics for its previous int
return value: its call sites used '<= 0' to check for error, but it
never actually returned a negative number, just 0 or 1. Now the
function and its call sites agree that it's a bool.
In a couple of places I've renamed variables called 'ret', because I
don't like that name any more - it's unclear whether it means the
return value (in preparation) for the _containing_ function or the
return value received from a subroutine call, and occasionally I've
accidentally used the same variable for both and introduced a bug. So
where one of those got in my way, I've renamed it to 'toret' or 'retd'
(the latter short for 'returned') in line with my usual modern
practice, but I haven't done a thorough job of finding all of them.
Finally, one amusing side effect of doing this is that I've had to
separate quite a few chained assignments. It used to be perfectly fine
to write 'a = b = c = TRUE' when a,b,c were int and TRUE was just a
the 'true' defined by stdbool.h, that idiom provokes a warning from
gcc: 'suggest parentheses around assignment used as truth value'!
2018-11-02 22:23:19 +03:00
|
|
|
bool chan_no_enable_x11_forwarding(
|
|
|
|
Channel *chan, bool oneshot, ptrlen authproto, ptrlen authdata,
|
2018-10-20 23:48:49 +03:00
|
|
|
unsigned screen_number)
|
|
|
|
{
|
2018-10-29 22:50:29 +03:00
|
|
|
return false;
|
2018-10-20 23:48:49 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
Convert a lot of 'int' variables to 'bool'.
My normal habit these days, in new code, is to treat int and bool as
_almost_ completely separate types. I'm still willing to use C's
implicit test for zero on an integer (e.g. 'if (!blob.len)' is fine,
no need to spell it out as blob.len != 0), but generally, if a
variable is going to be conceptually a boolean, I like to declare it
bool and assign to it using 'true' or 'false' rather than 0 or 1.
PuTTY is an exception, because it predates the C99 bool, and I've
stuck to its existing coding style even when adding new code to it.
But it's been annoying me more and more, so now that I've decided C99
bool is an acceptable thing to require from our toolchain in the first
place, here's a quite thorough trawl through the source doing
'boolification'. Many variables and function parameters are now typed
as bool rather than int; many assignments of 0 or 1 to those variables
are now spelled 'true' or 'false'.
I managed this thorough conversion with the help of a custom clang
plugin that I wrote to trawl the AST and apply heuristics to point out
where things might want changing. So I've even managed to do a decent
job on parts of the code I haven't looked at in years!
To make the plugin's work easier, I pushed platform front ends
generally in the direction of using standard 'bool' in preference to
platform-specific boolean types like Windows BOOL or GTK's gboolean;
I've left the platform booleans in places they _have_ to be for the
platform APIs to work right, but variables only used by my own code
have been converted wherever I found them.
In a few places there are int values that look very like booleans in
_most_ of the places they're used, but have a rarely-used third value,
or a distinction between different nonzero values that most users
don't care about. In these cases, I've _removed_ uses of 'true' and
'false' for the return values, to emphasise that there's something
more subtle going on than a simple boolean answer:
- the 'multisel' field in dialog.h's list box structure, for which
the GTK front end in particular recognises a difference between 1
and 2 but nearly everything else treats as boolean
- the 'urgent' parameter to plug_receive, where 1 vs 2 tells you
something about the specific location of the urgent pointer, but
most clients only care about 0 vs 'something nonzero'
- the return value of wc_match, where -1 indicates a syntax error in
the wildcard.
- the return values from SSH-1 RSA-key loading functions, which use
-1 for 'wrong passphrase' and 0 for all other failures (so any
caller which already knows it's not loading an _encrypted private_
key can treat them as boolean)
- term->esc_query, and the 'query' parameter in toggle_mode in
terminal.c, which _usually_ hold 0 for ESC[123h or 1 for ESC[?123h,
but can also hold -1 for some other intervening character that we
don't support.
In a few places there's an integer that I haven't turned into a bool
even though it really _can_ only take values 0 or 1 (and, as above,
tried to make the call sites consistent in not calling those values
true and false), on the grounds that I thought it would make it more
confusing to imply that the 0 value was in some sense 'negative' or
bad and the 1 positive or good:
- the return value of plug_accepting uses the POSIXish convention of
0=success and nonzero=error; I think if I made it bool then I'd
also want to reverse its sense, and that's a job for a separate
piece of work.
- the 'screen' parameter to lineptr() in terminal.c, where 0 and 1
represent the default and alternate screens. There's no obvious
reason why one of those should be considered 'true' or 'positive'
or 'success' - they're just indices - so I've left it as int.
ssh_scp_recv had particularly confusing semantics for its previous int
return value: its call sites used '<= 0' to check for error, but it
never actually returned a negative number, just 0 or 1. Now the
function and its call sites agree that it's a bool.
In a couple of places I've renamed variables called 'ret', because I
don't like that name any more - it's unclear whether it means the
return value (in preparation) for the _containing_ function or the
return value received from a subroutine call, and occasionally I've
accidentally used the same variable for both and introduced a bug. So
where one of those got in my way, I've renamed it to 'toret' or 'retd'
(the latter short for 'returned') in line with my usual modern
practice, but I haven't done a thorough job of finding all of them.
Finally, one amusing side effect of doing this is that I've had to
separate quite a few chained assignments. It used to be perfectly fine
to write 'a = b = c = TRUE' when a,b,c were int and TRUE was just a
the 'true' defined by stdbool.h, that idiom provokes a warning from
gcc: 'suggest parentheses around assignment used as truth value'!
2018-11-02 22:23:19 +03:00
|
|
|
bool chan_no_enable_agent_forwarding(Channel *chan)
|
2018-10-20 23:48:49 +03:00
|
|
|
{
|
2018-10-29 22:50:29 +03:00
|
|
|
return false;
|
2018-10-20 23:48:49 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
Convert a lot of 'int' variables to 'bool'.
My normal habit these days, in new code, is to treat int and bool as
_almost_ completely separate types. I'm still willing to use C's
implicit test for zero on an integer (e.g. 'if (!blob.len)' is fine,
no need to spell it out as blob.len != 0), but generally, if a
variable is going to be conceptually a boolean, I like to declare it
bool and assign to it using 'true' or 'false' rather than 0 or 1.
PuTTY is an exception, because it predates the C99 bool, and I've
stuck to its existing coding style even when adding new code to it.
But it's been annoying me more and more, so now that I've decided C99
bool is an acceptable thing to require from our toolchain in the first
place, here's a quite thorough trawl through the source doing
'boolification'. Many variables and function parameters are now typed
as bool rather than int; many assignments of 0 or 1 to those variables
are now spelled 'true' or 'false'.
I managed this thorough conversion with the help of a custom clang
plugin that I wrote to trawl the AST and apply heuristics to point out
where things might want changing. So I've even managed to do a decent
job on parts of the code I haven't looked at in years!
To make the plugin's work easier, I pushed platform front ends
generally in the direction of using standard 'bool' in preference to
platform-specific boolean types like Windows BOOL or GTK's gboolean;
I've left the platform booleans in places they _have_ to be for the
platform APIs to work right, but variables only used by my own code
have been converted wherever I found them.
In a few places there are int values that look very like booleans in
_most_ of the places they're used, but have a rarely-used third value,
or a distinction between different nonzero values that most users
don't care about. In these cases, I've _removed_ uses of 'true' and
'false' for the return values, to emphasise that there's something
more subtle going on than a simple boolean answer:
- the 'multisel' field in dialog.h's list box structure, for which
the GTK front end in particular recognises a difference between 1
and 2 but nearly everything else treats as boolean
- the 'urgent' parameter to plug_receive, where 1 vs 2 tells you
something about the specific location of the urgent pointer, but
most clients only care about 0 vs 'something nonzero'
- the return value of wc_match, where -1 indicates a syntax error in
the wildcard.
- the return values from SSH-1 RSA-key loading functions, which use
-1 for 'wrong passphrase' and 0 for all other failures (so any
caller which already knows it's not loading an _encrypted private_
key can treat them as boolean)
- term->esc_query, and the 'query' parameter in toggle_mode in
terminal.c, which _usually_ hold 0 for ESC[123h or 1 for ESC[?123h,
but can also hold -1 for some other intervening character that we
don't support.
In a few places there's an integer that I haven't turned into a bool
even though it really _can_ only take values 0 or 1 (and, as above,
tried to make the call sites consistent in not calling those values
true and false), on the grounds that I thought it would make it more
confusing to imply that the 0 value was in some sense 'negative' or
bad and the 1 positive or good:
- the return value of plug_accepting uses the POSIXish convention of
0=success and nonzero=error; I think if I made it bool then I'd
also want to reverse its sense, and that's a job for a separate
piece of work.
- the 'screen' parameter to lineptr() in terminal.c, where 0 and 1
represent the default and alternate screens. There's no obvious
reason why one of those should be considered 'true' or 'positive'
or 'success' - they're just indices - so I've left it as int.
ssh_scp_recv had particularly confusing semantics for its previous int
return value: its call sites used '<= 0' to check for error, but it
never actually returned a negative number, just 0 or 1. Now the
function and its call sites agree that it's a bool.
In a couple of places I've renamed variables called 'ret', because I
don't like that name any more - it's unclear whether it means the
return value (in preparation) for the _containing_ function or the
return value received from a subroutine call, and occasionally I've
accidentally used the same variable for both and introduced a bug. So
where one of those got in my way, I've renamed it to 'toret' or 'retd'
(the latter short for 'returned') in line with my usual modern
practice, but I haven't done a thorough job of finding all of them.
Finally, one amusing side effect of doing this is that I've had to
separate quite a few chained assignments. It used to be perfectly fine
to write 'a = b = c = TRUE' when a,b,c were int and TRUE was just a
the 'true' defined by stdbool.h, that idiom provokes a warning from
gcc: 'suggest parentheses around assignment used as truth value'!
2018-11-02 22:23:19 +03:00
|
|
|
bool chan_no_allocate_pty(
|
2018-10-20 23:48:49 +03:00
|
|
|
Channel *chan, ptrlen termtype, unsigned width, unsigned height,
|
|
|
|
unsigned pixwidth, unsigned pixheight, struct ssh_ttymodes modes)
|
|
|
|
{
|
2018-10-29 22:50:29 +03:00
|
|
|
return false;
|
2018-10-20 23:48:49 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
Convert a lot of 'int' variables to 'bool'.
My normal habit these days, in new code, is to treat int and bool as
_almost_ completely separate types. I'm still willing to use C's
implicit test for zero on an integer (e.g. 'if (!blob.len)' is fine,
no need to spell it out as blob.len != 0), but generally, if a
variable is going to be conceptually a boolean, I like to declare it
bool and assign to it using 'true' or 'false' rather than 0 or 1.
PuTTY is an exception, because it predates the C99 bool, and I've
stuck to its existing coding style even when adding new code to it.
But it's been annoying me more and more, so now that I've decided C99
bool is an acceptable thing to require from our toolchain in the first
place, here's a quite thorough trawl through the source doing
'boolification'. Many variables and function parameters are now typed
as bool rather than int; many assignments of 0 or 1 to those variables
are now spelled 'true' or 'false'.
I managed this thorough conversion with the help of a custom clang
plugin that I wrote to trawl the AST and apply heuristics to point out
where things might want changing. So I've even managed to do a decent
job on parts of the code I haven't looked at in years!
To make the plugin's work easier, I pushed platform front ends
generally in the direction of using standard 'bool' in preference to
platform-specific boolean types like Windows BOOL or GTK's gboolean;
I've left the platform booleans in places they _have_ to be for the
platform APIs to work right, but variables only used by my own code
have been converted wherever I found them.
In a few places there are int values that look very like booleans in
_most_ of the places they're used, but have a rarely-used third value,
or a distinction between different nonzero values that most users
don't care about. In these cases, I've _removed_ uses of 'true' and
'false' for the return values, to emphasise that there's something
more subtle going on than a simple boolean answer:
- the 'multisel' field in dialog.h's list box structure, for which
the GTK front end in particular recognises a difference between 1
and 2 but nearly everything else treats as boolean
- the 'urgent' parameter to plug_receive, where 1 vs 2 tells you
something about the specific location of the urgent pointer, but
most clients only care about 0 vs 'something nonzero'
- the return value of wc_match, where -1 indicates a syntax error in
the wildcard.
- the return values from SSH-1 RSA-key loading functions, which use
-1 for 'wrong passphrase' and 0 for all other failures (so any
caller which already knows it's not loading an _encrypted private_
key can treat them as boolean)
- term->esc_query, and the 'query' parameter in toggle_mode in
terminal.c, which _usually_ hold 0 for ESC[123h or 1 for ESC[?123h,
but can also hold -1 for some other intervening character that we
don't support.
In a few places there's an integer that I haven't turned into a bool
even though it really _can_ only take values 0 or 1 (and, as above,
tried to make the call sites consistent in not calling those values
true and false), on the grounds that I thought it would make it more
confusing to imply that the 0 value was in some sense 'negative' or
bad and the 1 positive or good:
- the return value of plug_accepting uses the POSIXish convention of
0=success and nonzero=error; I think if I made it bool then I'd
also want to reverse its sense, and that's a job for a separate
piece of work.
- the 'screen' parameter to lineptr() in terminal.c, where 0 and 1
represent the default and alternate screens. There's no obvious
reason why one of those should be considered 'true' or 'positive'
or 'success' - they're just indices - so I've left it as int.
ssh_scp_recv had particularly confusing semantics for its previous int
return value: its call sites used '<= 0' to check for error, but it
never actually returned a negative number, just 0 or 1. Now the
function and its call sites agree that it's a bool.
In a couple of places I've renamed variables called 'ret', because I
don't like that name any more - it's unclear whether it means the
return value (in preparation) for the _containing_ function or the
return value received from a subroutine call, and occasionally I've
accidentally used the same variable for both and introduced a bug. So
where one of those got in my way, I've renamed it to 'toret' or 'retd'
(the latter short for 'returned') in line with my usual modern
practice, but I haven't done a thorough job of finding all of them.
Finally, one amusing side effect of doing this is that I've had to
separate quite a few chained assignments. It used to be perfectly fine
to write 'a = b = c = TRUE' when a,b,c were int and TRUE was just a
the 'true' defined by stdbool.h, that idiom provokes a warning from
gcc: 'suggest parentheses around assignment used as truth value'!
2018-11-02 22:23:19 +03:00
|
|
|
bool chan_no_set_env(Channel *chan, ptrlen var, ptrlen value)
|
2018-10-20 23:48:49 +03:00
|
|
|
{
|
2018-10-29 22:50:29 +03:00
|
|
|
return false;
|
2018-10-20 23:48:49 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
Convert a lot of 'int' variables to 'bool'.
My normal habit these days, in new code, is to treat int and bool as
_almost_ completely separate types. I'm still willing to use C's
implicit test for zero on an integer (e.g. 'if (!blob.len)' is fine,
no need to spell it out as blob.len != 0), but generally, if a
variable is going to be conceptually a boolean, I like to declare it
bool and assign to it using 'true' or 'false' rather than 0 or 1.
PuTTY is an exception, because it predates the C99 bool, and I've
stuck to its existing coding style even when adding new code to it.
But it's been annoying me more and more, so now that I've decided C99
bool is an acceptable thing to require from our toolchain in the first
place, here's a quite thorough trawl through the source doing
'boolification'. Many variables and function parameters are now typed
as bool rather than int; many assignments of 0 or 1 to those variables
are now spelled 'true' or 'false'.
I managed this thorough conversion with the help of a custom clang
plugin that I wrote to trawl the AST and apply heuristics to point out
where things might want changing. So I've even managed to do a decent
job on parts of the code I haven't looked at in years!
To make the plugin's work easier, I pushed platform front ends
generally in the direction of using standard 'bool' in preference to
platform-specific boolean types like Windows BOOL or GTK's gboolean;
I've left the platform booleans in places they _have_ to be for the
platform APIs to work right, but variables only used by my own code
have been converted wherever I found them.
In a few places there are int values that look very like booleans in
_most_ of the places they're used, but have a rarely-used third value,
or a distinction between different nonzero values that most users
don't care about. In these cases, I've _removed_ uses of 'true' and
'false' for the return values, to emphasise that there's something
more subtle going on than a simple boolean answer:
- the 'multisel' field in dialog.h's list box structure, for which
the GTK front end in particular recognises a difference between 1
and 2 but nearly everything else treats as boolean
- the 'urgent' parameter to plug_receive, where 1 vs 2 tells you
something about the specific location of the urgent pointer, but
most clients only care about 0 vs 'something nonzero'
- the return value of wc_match, where -1 indicates a syntax error in
the wildcard.
- the return values from SSH-1 RSA-key loading functions, which use
-1 for 'wrong passphrase' and 0 for all other failures (so any
caller which already knows it's not loading an _encrypted private_
key can treat them as boolean)
- term->esc_query, and the 'query' parameter in toggle_mode in
terminal.c, which _usually_ hold 0 for ESC[123h or 1 for ESC[?123h,
but can also hold -1 for some other intervening character that we
don't support.
In a few places there's an integer that I haven't turned into a bool
even though it really _can_ only take values 0 or 1 (and, as above,
tried to make the call sites consistent in not calling those values
true and false), on the grounds that I thought it would make it more
confusing to imply that the 0 value was in some sense 'negative' or
bad and the 1 positive or good:
- the return value of plug_accepting uses the POSIXish convention of
0=success and nonzero=error; I think if I made it bool then I'd
also want to reverse its sense, and that's a job for a separate
piece of work.
- the 'screen' parameter to lineptr() in terminal.c, where 0 and 1
represent the default and alternate screens. There's no obvious
reason why one of those should be considered 'true' or 'positive'
or 'success' - they're just indices - so I've left it as int.
ssh_scp_recv had particularly confusing semantics for its previous int
return value: its call sites used '<= 0' to check for error, but it
never actually returned a negative number, just 0 or 1. Now the
function and its call sites agree that it's a bool.
In a couple of places I've renamed variables called 'ret', because I
don't like that name any more - it's unclear whether it means the
return value (in preparation) for the _containing_ function or the
return value received from a subroutine call, and occasionally I've
accidentally used the same variable for both and introduced a bug. So
where one of those got in my way, I've renamed it to 'toret' or 'retd'
(the latter short for 'returned') in line with my usual modern
practice, but I haven't done a thorough job of finding all of them.
Finally, one amusing side effect of doing this is that I've had to
separate quite a few chained assignments. It used to be perfectly fine
to write 'a = b = c = TRUE' when a,b,c were int and TRUE was just a
the 'true' defined by stdbool.h, that idiom provokes a warning from
gcc: 'suggest parentheses around assignment used as truth value'!
2018-11-02 22:23:19 +03:00
|
|
|
bool chan_no_send_break(Channel *chan, unsigned length)
|
2018-10-20 23:48:49 +03:00
|
|
|
{
|
2018-10-29 22:50:29 +03:00
|
|
|
return false;
|
2018-10-20 23:48:49 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
Convert a lot of 'int' variables to 'bool'.
My normal habit these days, in new code, is to treat int and bool as
_almost_ completely separate types. I'm still willing to use C's
implicit test for zero on an integer (e.g. 'if (!blob.len)' is fine,
no need to spell it out as blob.len != 0), but generally, if a
variable is going to be conceptually a boolean, I like to declare it
bool and assign to it using 'true' or 'false' rather than 0 or 1.
PuTTY is an exception, because it predates the C99 bool, and I've
stuck to its existing coding style even when adding new code to it.
But it's been annoying me more and more, so now that I've decided C99
bool is an acceptable thing to require from our toolchain in the first
place, here's a quite thorough trawl through the source doing
'boolification'. Many variables and function parameters are now typed
as bool rather than int; many assignments of 0 or 1 to those variables
are now spelled 'true' or 'false'.
I managed this thorough conversion with the help of a custom clang
plugin that I wrote to trawl the AST and apply heuristics to point out
where things might want changing. So I've even managed to do a decent
job on parts of the code I haven't looked at in years!
To make the plugin's work easier, I pushed platform front ends
generally in the direction of using standard 'bool' in preference to
platform-specific boolean types like Windows BOOL or GTK's gboolean;
I've left the platform booleans in places they _have_ to be for the
platform APIs to work right, but variables only used by my own code
have been converted wherever I found them.
In a few places there are int values that look very like booleans in
_most_ of the places they're used, but have a rarely-used third value,
or a distinction between different nonzero values that most users
don't care about. In these cases, I've _removed_ uses of 'true' and
'false' for the return values, to emphasise that there's something
more subtle going on than a simple boolean answer:
- the 'multisel' field in dialog.h's list box structure, for which
the GTK front end in particular recognises a difference between 1
and 2 but nearly everything else treats as boolean
- the 'urgent' parameter to plug_receive, where 1 vs 2 tells you
something about the specific location of the urgent pointer, but
most clients only care about 0 vs 'something nonzero'
- the return value of wc_match, where -1 indicates a syntax error in
the wildcard.
- the return values from SSH-1 RSA-key loading functions, which use
-1 for 'wrong passphrase' and 0 for all other failures (so any
caller which already knows it's not loading an _encrypted private_
key can treat them as boolean)
- term->esc_query, and the 'query' parameter in toggle_mode in
terminal.c, which _usually_ hold 0 for ESC[123h or 1 for ESC[?123h,
but can also hold -1 for some other intervening character that we
don't support.
In a few places there's an integer that I haven't turned into a bool
even though it really _can_ only take values 0 or 1 (and, as above,
tried to make the call sites consistent in not calling those values
true and false), on the grounds that I thought it would make it more
confusing to imply that the 0 value was in some sense 'negative' or
bad and the 1 positive or good:
- the return value of plug_accepting uses the POSIXish convention of
0=success and nonzero=error; I think if I made it bool then I'd
also want to reverse its sense, and that's a job for a separate
piece of work.
- the 'screen' parameter to lineptr() in terminal.c, where 0 and 1
represent the default and alternate screens. There's no obvious
reason why one of those should be considered 'true' or 'positive'
or 'success' - they're just indices - so I've left it as int.
ssh_scp_recv had particularly confusing semantics for its previous int
return value: its call sites used '<= 0' to check for error, but it
never actually returned a negative number, just 0 or 1. Now the
function and its call sites agree that it's a bool.
In a couple of places I've renamed variables called 'ret', because I
don't like that name any more - it's unclear whether it means the
return value (in preparation) for the _containing_ function or the
return value received from a subroutine call, and occasionally I've
accidentally used the same variable for both and introduced a bug. So
where one of those got in my way, I've renamed it to 'toret' or 'retd'
(the latter short for 'returned') in line with my usual modern
practice, but I haven't done a thorough job of finding all of them.
Finally, one amusing side effect of doing this is that I've had to
separate quite a few chained assignments. It used to be perfectly fine
to write 'a = b = c = TRUE' when a,b,c were int and TRUE was just a
the 'true' defined by stdbool.h, that idiom provokes a warning from
gcc: 'suggest parentheses around assignment used as truth value'!
2018-11-02 22:23:19 +03:00
|
|
|
bool chan_no_send_signal(Channel *chan, ptrlen signame)
|
2018-10-20 23:48:49 +03:00
|
|
|
{
|
2018-10-29 22:50:29 +03:00
|
|
|
return false;
|
2018-10-20 23:48:49 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
Convert a lot of 'int' variables to 'bool'.
My normal habit these days, in new code, is to treat int and bool as
_almost_ completely separate types. I'm still willing to use C's
implicit test for zero on an integer (e.g. 'if (!blob.len)' is fine,
no need to spell it out as blob.len != 0), but generally, if a
variable is going to be conceptually a boolean, I like to declare it
bool and assign to it using 'true' or 'false' rather than 0 or 1.
PuTTY is an exception, because it predates the C99 bool, and I've
stuck to its existing coding style even when adding new code to it.
But it's been annoying me more and more, so now that I've decided C99
bool is an acceptable thing to require from our toolchain in the first
place, here's a quite thorough trawl through the source doing
'boolification'. Many variables and function parameters are now typed
as bool rather than int; many assignments of 0 or 1 to those variables
are now spelled 'true' or 'false'.
I managed this thorough conversion with the help of a custom clang
plugin that I wrote to trawl the AST and apply heuristics to point out
where things might want changing. So I've even managed to do a decent
job on parts of the code I haven't looked at in years!
To make the plugin's work easier, I pushed platform front ends
generally in the direction of using standard 'bool' in preference to
platform-specific boolean types like Windows BOOL or GTK's gboolean;
I've left the platform booleans in places they _have_ to be for the
platform APIs to work right, but variables only used by my own code
have been converted wherever I found them.
In a few places there are int values that look very like booleans in
_most_ of the places they're used, but have a rarely-used third value,
or a distinction between different nonzero values that most users
don't care about. In these cases, I've _removed_ uses of 'true' and
'false' for the return values, to emphasise that there's something
more subtle going on than a simple boolean answer:
- the 'multisel' field in dialog.h's list box structure, for which
the GTK front end in particular recognises a difference between 1
and 2 but nearly everything else treats as boolean
- the 'urgent' parameter to plug_receive, where 1 vs 2 tells you
something about the specific location of the urgent pointer, but
most clients only care about 0 vs 'something nonzero'
- the return value of wc_match, where -1 indicates a syntax error in
the wildcard.
- the return values from SSH-1 RSA-key loading functions, which use
-1 for 'wrong passphrase' and 0 for all other failures (so any
caller which already knows it's not loading an _encrypted private_
key can treat them as boolean)
- term->esc_query, and the 'query' parameter in toggle_mode in
terminal.c, which _usually_ hold 0 for ESC[123h or 1 for ESC[?123h,
but can also hold -1 for some other intervening character that we
don't support.
In a few places there's an integer that I haven't turned into a bool
even though it really _can_ only take values 0 or 1 (and, as above,
tried to make the call sites consistent in not calling those values
true and false), on the grounds that I thought it would make it more
confusing to imply that the 0 value was in some sense 'negative' or
bad and the 1 positive or good:
- the return value of plug_accepting uses the POSIXish convention of
0=success and nonzero=error; I think if I made it bool then I'd
also want to reverse its sense, and that's a job for a separate
piece of work.
- the 'screen' parameter to lineptr() in terminal.c, where 0 and 1
represent the default and alternate screens. There's no obvious
reason why one of those should be considered 'true' or 'positive'
or 'success' - they're just indices - so I've left it as int.
ssh_scp_recv had particularly confusing semantics for its previous int
return value: its call sites used '<= 0' to check for error, but it
never actually returned a negative number, just 0 or 1. Now the
function and its call sites agree that it's a bool.
In a couple of places I've renamed variables called 'ret', because I
don't like that name any more - it's unclear whether it means the
return value (in preparation) for the _containing_ function or the
return value received from a subroutine call, and occasionally I've
accidentally used the same variable for both and introduced a bug. So
where one of those got in my way, I've renamed it to 'toret' or 'retd'
(the latter short for 'returned') in line with my usual modern
practice, but I haven't done a thorough job of finding all of them.
Finally, one amusing side effect of doing this is that I've had to
separate quite a few chained assignments. It used to be perfectly fine
to write 'a = b = c = TRUE' when a,b,c were int and TRUE was just a
the 'true' defined by stdbool.h, that idiom provokes a warning from
gcc: 'suggest parentheses around assignment used as truth value'!
2018-11-02 22:23:19 +03:00
|
|
|
bool chan_no_change_window_size(
|
2018-10-20 23:48:49 +03:00
|
|
|
Channel *chan, unsigned width, unsigned height,
|
|
|
|
unsigned pixwidth, unsigned pixheight)
|
|
|
|
{
|
2018-10-29 22:50:29 +03:00
|
|
|
return false;
|
2018-10-20 23:48:49 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
Convert a lot of 'int' variables to 'bool'.
My normal habit these days, in new code, is to treat int and bool as
_almost_ completely separate types. I'm still willing to use C's
implicit test for zero on an integer (e.g. 'if (!blob.len)' is fine,
no need to spell it out as blob.len != 0), but generally, if a
variable is going to be conceptually a boolean, I like to declare it
bool and assign to it using 'true' or 'false' rather than 0 or 1.
PuTTY is an exception, because it predates the C99 bool, and I've
stuck to its existing coding style even when adding new code to it.
But it's been annoying me more and more, so now that I've decided C99
bool is an acceptable thing to require from our toolchain in the first
place, here's a quite thorough trawl through the source doing
'boolification'. Many variables and function parameters are now typed
as bool rather than int; many assignments of 0 or 1 to those variables
are now spelled 'true' or 'false'.
I managed this thorough conversion with the help of a custom clang
plugin that I wrote to trawl the AST and apply heuristics to point out
where things might want changing. So I've even managed to do a decent
job on parts of the code I haven't looked at in years!
To make the plugin's work easier, I pushed platform front ends
generally in the direction of using standard 'bool' in preference to
platform-specific boolean types like Windows BOOL or GTK's gboolean;
I've left the platform booleans in places they _have_ to be for the
platform APIs to work right, but variables only used by my own code
have been converted wherever I found them.
In a few places there are int values that look very like booleans in
_most_ of the places they're used, but have a rarely-used third value,
or a distinction between different nonzero values that most users
don't care about. In these cases, I've _removed_ uses of 'true' and
'false' for the return values, to emphasise that there's something
more subtle going on than a simple boolean answer:
- the 'multisel' field in dialog.h's list box structure, for which
the GTK front end in particular recognises a difference between 1
and 2 but nearly everything else treats as boolean
- the 'urgent' parameter to plug_receive, where 1 vs 2 tells you
something about the specific location of the urgent pointer, but
most clients only care about 0 vs 'something nonzero'
- the return value of wc_match, where -1 indicates a syntax error in
the wildcard.
- the return values from SSH-1 RSA-key loading functions, which use
-1 for 'wrong passphrase' and 0 for all other failures (so any
caller which already knows it's not loading an _encrypted private_
key can treat them as boolean)
- term->esc_query, and the 'query' parameter in toggle_mode in
terminal.c, which _usually_ hold 0 for ESC[123h or 1 for ESC[?123h,
but can also hold -1 for some other intervening character that we
don't support.
In a few places there's an integer that I haven't turned into a bool
even though it really _can_ only take values 0 or 1 (and, as above,
tried to make the call sites consistent in not calling those values
true and false), on the grounds that I thought it would make it more
confusing to imply that the 0 value was in some sense 'negative' or
bad and the 1 positive or good:
- the return value of plug_accepting uses the POSIXish convention of
0=success and nonzero=error; I think if I made it bool then I'd
also want to reverse its sense, and that's a job for a separate
piece of work.
- the 'screen' parameter to lineptr() in terminal.c, where 0 and 1
represent the default and alternate screens. There's no obvious
reason why one of those should be considered 'true' or 'positive'
or 'success' - they're just indices - so I've left it as int.
ssh_scp_recv had particularly confusing semantics for its previous int
return value: its call sites used '<= 0' to check for error, but it
never actually returned a negative number, just 0 or 1. Now the
function and its call sites agree that it's a bool.
In a couple of places I've renamed variables called 'ret', because I
don't like that name any more - it's unclear whether it means the
return value (in preparation) for the _containing_ function or the
return value received from a subroutine call, and occasionally I've
accidentally used the same variable for both and introduced a bug. So
where one of those got in my way, I've renamed it to 'toret' or 'retd'
(the latter short for 'returned') in line with my usual modern
practice, but I haven't done a thorough job of finding all of them.
Finally, one amusing side effect of doing this is that I've had to
separate quite a few chained assignments. It used to be perfectly fine
to write 'a = b = c = TRUE' when a,b,c were int and TRUE was just a
the 'true' defined by stdbool.h, that idiom provokes a warning from
gcc: 'suggest parentheses around assignment used as truth value'!
2018-11-02 22:23:19 +03:00
|
|
|
void chan_no_request_response(Channel *chan, bool success)
|
2018-09-26 20:02:33 +03:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
assert(0 && "this channel type should never send a want-reply request");
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2018-09-19 22:36:40 +03:00
|
|
|
/* ----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
2018-10-12 21:25:59 +03:00
|
|
|
* Common routines for handling SSH tty modes.
|
2018-09-19 22:36:40 +03:00
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
2018-10-12 21:25:59 +03:00
|
|
|
static unsigned real_ttymode_opcode(unsigned our_opcode, int ssh_version)
|
2018-09-19 22:36:40 +03:00
|
|
|
{
|
2018-10-12 21:25:59 +03:00
|
|
|
switch (our_opcode) {
|
|
|
|
case TTYMODE_ISPEED:
|
|
|
|
return ssh_version == 1 ? TTYMODE_ISPEED_SSH1 : TTYMODE_ISPEED_SSH2;
|
|
|
|
case TTYMODE_OSPEED:
|
|
|
|
return ssh_version == 1 ? TTYMODE_OSPEED_SSH1 : TTYMODE_OSPEED_SSH2;
|
|
|
|
default:
|
|
|
|
return our_opcode;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
2018-09-19 22:36:40 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2018-10-20 23:48:49 +03:00
|
|
|
static unsigned our_ttymode_opcode(unsigned real_opcode, int ssh_version)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
if (ssh_version == 1) {
|
|
|
|
switch (real_opcode) {
|
|
|
|
case TTYMODE_ISPEED_SSH1:
|
|
|
|
return TTYMODE_ISPEED;
|
|
|
|
case TTYMODE_OSPEED_SSH1:
|
|
|
|
return TTYMODE_OSPEED;
|
|
|
|
default:
|
|
|
|
return real_opcode;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
switch (real_opcode) {
|
|
|
|
case TTYMODE_ISPEED_SSH2:
|
|
|
|
return TTYMODE_ISPEED;
|
|
|
|
case TTYMODE_OSPEED_SSH2:
|
|
|
|
return TTYMODE_OSPEED;
|
|
|
|
default:
|
|
|
|
return real_opcode;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2018-10-12 21:25:59 +03:00
|
|
|
struct ssh_ttymodes get_ttymodes_from_conf(Seat *seat, Conf *conf)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct ssh_ttymodes modes;
|
|
|
|
size_t i;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static const struct mode_name_type {
|
2018-09-19 22:36:40 +03:00
|
|
|
const char *mode;
|
|
|
|
int opcode;
|
2018-10-12 21:25:59 +03:00
|
|
|
enum { TYPE_CHAR, TYPE_BOOL } type;
|
|
|
|
} modes_names_types[] = {
|
|
|
|
#define TTYMODE_CHAR(name, val, index) { #name, val, TYPE_CHAR },
|
|
|
|
#define TTYMODE_FLAG(name, val, field, mask) { #name, val, TYPE_BOOL },
|
|
|
|
#include "sshttymodes.h"
|
|
|
|
#undef TTYMODE_CHAR
|
|
|
|
#undef TTYMODE_FLAG
|
2018-09-19 22:36:40 +03:00
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
2018-10-12 21:25:59 +03:00
|
|
|
memset(&modes, 0, sizeof(modes));
|
2018-09-19 22:36:40 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2018-10-12 21:25:59 +03:00
|
|
|
for (i = 0; i < lenof(modes_names_types); i++) {
|
|
|
|
const struct mode_name_type *mode = &modes_names_types[i];
|
2018-09-19 22:36:40 +03:00
|
|
|
const char *sval = conf_get_str_str(conf, CONF_ttymodes, mode->mode);
|
|
|
|
char *to_free = NULL;
|
|
|
|
|
2018-10-12 21:25:59 +03:00
|
|
|
if (!sval)
|
|
|
|
sval = "N"; /* just in case */
|
2018-09-19 22:36:40 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* sval[0] can be
|
|
|
|
* - 'V', indicating that an explicit value follows it;
|
|
|
|
* - 'A', indicating that we should pass the value through from
|
|
|
|
* the local environment via get_ttymode; or
|
|
|
|
* - 'N', indicating that we should explicitly not send this
|
|
|
|
* mode.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
if (sval[0] == 'A') {
|
New abstraction 'Seat', to pass to backends.
This is a new vtable-based abstraction which is passed to a backend in
place of Frontend, and it implements only the subset of the Frontend
functions needed by a backend. (Many other Frontend functions still
exist, notably the wide range of things called by terminal.c providing
platform-independent operations on the GUI terminal window.)
The purpose of making it a vtable is that this opens up the
possibility of creating a backend as an internal implementation detail
of some other activity, by providing just that one backend with a
custom Seat that implements the methods differently.
For example, this refactoring should make it feasible to directly
implement an SSH proxy type, aka the 'jump host' feature supported by
OpenSSH, aka 'open a secondary SSH session in MAINCHAN_DIRECT_TCP
mode, and then expose the main channel of that as the Socket for the
primary connection'. (Which of course you can already do by spawning
'plink -nc' as a separate proxy process, but this would permit it in
the _same_ process without anything getting confused.)
I've centralised a full set of stub methods in misc.c for the new
abstraction, which allows me to get rid of several annoying stubs in
the previous code. Also, while I'm here, I've moved a lot of
duplicated modalfatalbox() type functions from application main
program files into wincons.c / uxcons.c, which I think saves
duplication overall. (A minor visible effect is that the prefixes on
those console-based fatal error messages will now be more consistent
between applications.)
2018-10-11 21:58:42 +03:00
|
|
|
sval = to_free = seat_get_ttymode(seat, mode->mode);
|
2018-09-19 22:36:40 +03:00
|
|
|
} else if (sval[0] == 'V') {
|
|
|
|
sval++; /* skip the 'V' */
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
/* else 'N', or something from the future we don't understand */
|
|
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (sval) {
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Parse the string representation of the tty mode
|
|
|
|
* into the integer value it will take on the wire.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
unsigned ival = 0;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
switch (mode->type) {
|
2018-10-12 21:25:59 +03:00
|
|
|
case TYPE_CHAR:
|
2018-09-19 22:36:40 +03:00
|
|
|
if (*sval) {
|
|
|
|
char *next = NULL;
|
|
|
|
/* We know ctrlparse won't write to the string, so
|
|
|
|
* casting away const is ugly but allowable. */
|
|
|
|
ival = ctrlparse((char *)sval, &next);
|
|
|
|
if (!next)
|
|
|
|
ival = sval[0];
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
ival = 255; /* special value meaning "don't set" */
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
break;
|
2018-10-12 21:25:59 +03:00
|
|
|
case TYPE_BOOL:
|
2018-09-19 22:36:40 +03:00
|
|
|
if (stricmp(sval, "yes") == 0 ||
|
|
|
|
stricmp(sval, "on") == 0 ||
|
|
|
|
stricmp(sval, "true") == 0 ||
|
|
|
|
stricmp(sval, "+") == 0)
|
|
|
|
ival = 1; /* true */
|
|
|
|
else if (stricmp(sval, "no") == 0 ||
|
|
|
|
stricmp(sval, "off") == 0 ||
|
|
|
|
stricmp(sval, "false") == 0 ||
|
|
|
|
stricmp(sval, "-") == 0)
|
|
|
|
ival = 0; /* false */
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
ival = (atoi(sval) != 0);
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
default:
|
|
|
|
assert(0 && "Bad mode->type");
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2018-10-29 22:50:29 +03:00
|
|
|
modes.have_mode[mode->opcode] = true;
|
2018-10-12 21:25:59 +03:00
|
|
|
modes.mode_val[mode->opcode] = ival;
|
2018-09-19 22:36:40 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
sfree(to_free);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2018-10-12 21:25:59 +03:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
unsigned ospeed, ispeed;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Unpick the terminal-speed config string. */
|
|
|
|
ospeed = ispeed = 38400; /* last-resort defaults */
|
|
|
|
sscanf(conf_get_str(conf, CONF_termspeed), "%u,%u", &ospeed, &ispeed);
|
|
|
|
/* Currently we unconditionally set these */
|
2018-10-29 22:50:29 +03:00
|
|
|
modes.have_mode[TTYMODE_ISPEED] = true;
|
2018-10-12 21:25:59 +03:00
|
|
|
modes.mode_val[TTYMODE_ISPEED] = ispeed;
|
2018-10-29 22:50:29 +03:00
|
|
|
modes.have_mode[TTYMODE_OSPEED] = true;
|
2018-10-12 21:25:59 +03:00
|
|
|
modes.mode_val[TTYMODE_OSPEED] = ospeed;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return modes;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2018-10-20 23:48:49 +03:00
|
|
|
struct ssh_ttymodes read_ttymodes_from_packet(
|
|
|
|
BinarySource *bs, int ssh_version)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct ssh_ttymodes modes;
|
|
|
|
memset(&modes, 0, sizeof(modes));
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
while (1) {
|
|
|
|
unsigned real_opcode, our_opcode;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
real_opcode = get_byte(bs);
|
|
|
|
if (real_opcode == TTYMODE_END_OF_LIST)
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
if (real_opcode >= 160) {
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* RFC 4254 (and the SSH 1.5 spec): "Opcodes 160 to 255
|
|
|
|
* are not yet defined, and cause parsing to stop (they
|
|
|
|
* should only be used after any other data)."
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* My interpretation of this is that if one of these
|
|
|
|
* opcodes appears, it's not a parse _error_, but it is
|
|
|
|
* something that we don't know how to parse even well
|
|
|
|
* enough to step over it to find the next opcode, so we
|
|
|
|
* stop parsing now and assume that the rest of the string
|
|
|
|
* is composed entirely of things we don't understand and
|
|
|
|
* (as usual for unsupported terminal modes) silently
|
|
|
|
* ignore.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
return modes;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
our_opcode = our_ttymode_opcode(real_opcode, ssh_version);
|
|
|
|
assert(our_opcode < TTYMODE_LIMIT);
|
2018-10-29 22:50:29 +03:00
|
|
|
modes.have_mode[our_opcode] = true;
|
2018-10-20 23:48:49 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (ssh_version == 1 && real_opcode >= 1 && real_opcode <= 127)
|
|
|
|
modes.mode_val[our_opcode] = get_byte(bs);
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
modes.mode_val[our_opcode] = get_uint32(bs);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return modes;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2018-10-12 21:25:59 +03:00
|
|
|
void write_ttymodes_to_packet(BinarySink *bs, int ssh_version,
|
|
|
|
struct ssh_ttymodes modes)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
unsigned i;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for (i = 0; i < TTYMODE_LIMIT; i++) {
|
|
|
|
if (modes.have_mode[i]) {
|
|
|
|
unsigned val = modes.mode_val[i];
|
|
|
|
unsigned opcode = real_ttymode_opcode(i, ssh_version);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
put_byte(bs, opcode);
|
|
|
|
if (ssh_version == 1 && opcode >= 1 && opcode <= 127)
|
|
|
|
put_byte(bs, val);
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
put_uint32(bs, val);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
put_byte(bs, TTYMODE_END_OF_LIST);
|
2018-09-19 22:36:40 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
2018-09-19 22:37:12 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* ----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
* Routine for allocating a new channel ID, given a means of finding
|
|
|
|
* the index field in a given channel structure.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
unsigned alloc_channel_id_general(tree234 *channels, size_t localid_offset)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
const unsigned CHANNEL_NUMBER_OFFSET = 256;
|
|
|
|
search234_state ss;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* First-fit allocation of channel numbers: we always pick the
|
|
|
|
* lowest unused one.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Every channel before that, and no channel after it, has an ID
|
|
|
|
* exactly equal to its tree index plus CHANNEL_NUMBER_OFFSET. So
|
|
|
|
* we can use the search234 system to identify the length of that
|
|
|
|
* initial sequence, in a single log-time pass down the channels
|
|
|
|
* tree.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
search234_start(&ss, channels);
|
|
|
|
while (ss.element) {
|
|
|
|
unsigned localid = *(unsigned *)((char *)ss.element + localid_offset);
|
|
|
|
if (localid == ss.index + CHANNEL_NUMBER_OFFSET)
|
|
|
|
search234_step(&ss, +1);
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
search234_step(&ss, -1);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Now ss.index gives exactly the number of channels in that
|
|
|
|
* initial sequence. So adding CHANNEL_NUMBER_OFFSET to it must
|
|
|
|
* give precisely the lowest unused channel number.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
return ss.index + CHANNEL_NUMBER_OFFSET;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2018-09-19 22:39:25 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* ----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
* Functions for handling the comma-separated strings used to store
|
|
|
|
* lists of protocol identifiers in SSH-2.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
void add_to_commasep(strbuf *buf, const char *data)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
if (buf->len > 0)
|
|
|
|
put_byte(buf, ',');
|
|
|
|
put_data(buf, data, strlen(data));
|
|
|
|
}
|
2018-09-19 22:40:21 +03:00
|
|
|
|
Convert a lot of 'int' variables to 'bool'.
My normal habit these days, in new code, is to treat int and bool as
_almost_ completely separate types. I'm still willing to use C's
implicit test for zero on an integer (e.g. 'if (!blob.len)' is fine,
no need to spell it out as blob.len != 0), but generally, if a
variable is going to be conceptually a boolean, I like to declare it
bool and assign to it using 'true' or 'false' rather than 0 or 1.
PuTTY is an exception, because it predates the C99 bool, and I've
stuck to its existing coding style even when adding new code to it.
But it's been annoying me more and more, so now that I've decided C99
bool is an acceptable thing to require from our toolchain in the first
place, here's a quite thorough trawl through the source doing
'boolification'. Many variables and function parameters are now typed
as bool rather than int; many assignments of 0 or 1 to those variables
are now spelled 'true' or 'false'.
I managed this thorough conversion with the help of a custom clang
plugin that I wrote to trawl the AST and apply heuristics to point out
where things might want changing. So I've even managed to do a decent
job on parts of the code I haven't looked at in years!
To make the plugin's work easier, I pushed platform front ends
generally in the direction of using standard 'bool' in preference to
platform-specific boolean types like Windows BOOL or GTK's gboolean;
I've left the platform booleans in places they _have_ to be for the
platform APIs to work right, but variables only used by my own code
have been converted wherever I found them.
In a few places there are int values that look very like booleans in
_most_ of the places they're used, but have a rarely-used third value,
or a distinction between different nonzero values that most users
don't care about. In these cases, I've _removed_ uses of 'true' and
'false' for the return values, to emphasise that there's something
more subtle going on than a simple boolean answer:
- the 'multisel' field in dialog.h's list box structure, for which
the GTK front end in particular recognises a difference between 1
and 2 but nearly everything else treats as boolean
- the 'urgent' parameter to plug_receive, where 1 vs 2 tells you
something about the specific location of the urgent pointer, but
most clients only care about 0 vs 'something nonzero'
- the return value of wc_match, where -1 indicates a syntax error in
the wildcard.
- the return values from SSH-1 RSA-key loading functions, which use
-1 for 'wrong passphrase' and 0 for all other failures (so any
caller which already knows it's not loading an _encrypted private_
key can treat them as boolean)
- term->esc_query, and the 'query' parameter in toggle_mode in
terminal.c, which _usually_ hold 0 for ESC[123h or 1 for ESC[?123h,
but can also hold -1 for some other intervening character that we
don't support.
In a few places there's an integer that I haven't turned into a bool
even though it really _can_ only take values 0 or 1 (and, as above,
tried to make the call sites consistent in not calling those values
true and false), on the grounds that I thought it would make it more
confusing to imply that the 0 value was in some sense 'negative' or
bad and the 1 positive or good:
- the return value of plug_accepting uses the POSIXish convention of
0=success and nonzero=error; I think if I made it bool then I'd
also want to reverse its sense, and that's a job for a separate
piece of work.
- the 'screen' parameter to lineptr() in terminal.c, where 0 and 1
represent the default and alternate screens. There's no obvious
reason why one of those should be considered 'true' or 'positive'
or 'success' - they're just indices - so I've left it as int.
ssh_scp_recv had particularly confusing semantics for its previous int
return value: its call sites used '<= 0' to check for error, but it
never actually returned a negative number, just 0 or 1. Now the
function and its call sites agree that it's a bool.
In a couple of places I've renamed variables called 'ret', because I
don't like that name any more - it's unclear whether it means the
return value (in preparation) for the _containing_ function or the
return value received from a subroutine call, and occasionally I've
accidentally used the same variable for both and introduced a bug. So
where one of those got in my way, I've renamed it to 'toret' or 'retd'
(the latter short for 'returned') in line with my usual modern
practice, but I haven't done a thorough job of finding all of them.
Finally, one amusing side effect of doing this is that I've had to
separate quite a few chained assignments. It used to be perfectly fine
to write 'a = b = c = TRUE' when a,b,c were int and TRUE was just a
the 'true' defined by stdbool.h, that idiom provokes a warning from
gcc: 'suggest parentheses around assignment used as truth value'!
2018-11-02 22:23:19 +03:00
|
|
|
bool get_commasep_word(ptrlen *list, ptrlen *word)
|
2018-10-07 15:51:04 +03:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
const char *comma;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Discard empty list elements, should there be any, because we
|
|
|
|
* never want to return one as if it was a real string. (This
|
|
|
|
* introduces a mild tolerance of badly formatted data in lists we
|
|
|
|
* receive, but I think that's acceptable.)
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
while (list->len > 0 && *(const char *)list->ptr == ',') {
|
|
|
|
list->ptr = (const char *)list->ptr + 1;
|
|
|
|
list->len--;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (!list->len)
|
2018-10-29 22:50:29 +03:00
|
|
|
return false;
|
2018-10-07 15:51:04 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
comma = memchr(list->ptr, ',', list->len);
|
|
|
|
if (!comma) {
|
|
|
|
*word = *list;
|
|
|
|
list->len = 0;
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
size_t wordlen = comma - (const char *)list->ptr;
|
|
|
|
word->ptr = list->ptr;
|
|
|
|
word->len = wordlen;
|
|
|
|
list->ptr = (const char *)list->ptr + wordlen + 1;
|
|
|
|
list->len -= wordlen + 1;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2018-10-29 22:50:29 +03:00
|
|
|
return true;
|
2018-10-07 15:51:04 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2018-09-19 22:40:21 +03:00
|
|
|
/* ----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
* Functions for translating SSH packet type codes into their symbolic
|
|
|
|
* string names.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
2018-09-24 15:29:09 +03:00
|
|
|
#define TRANSLATE_UNIVERSAL(y, name, value) \
|
|
|
|
if (type == value) return #name;
|
|
|
|
#define TRANSLATE_KEX(y, name, value, ctx) \
|
|
|
|
if (type == value && pkt_kctx == ctx) return #name;
|
|
|
|
#define TRANSLATE_AUTH(y, name, value, ctx) \
|
|
|
|
if (type == value && pkt_actx == ctx) return #name;
|
|
|
|
|
2018-09-19 22:40:21 +03:00
|
|
|
const char *ssh1_pkt_type(int type)
|
|
|
|
{
|
2018-09-24 15:29:09 +03:00
|
|
|
SSH1_MESSAGE_TYPES(TRANSLATE_UNIVERSAL, y);
|
2018-09-19 22:40:21 +03:00
|
|
|
return "unknown";
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
const char *ssh2_pkt_type(Pkt_KCtx pkt_kctx, Pkt_ACtx pkt_actx, int type)
|
|
|
|
{
|
2018-09-24 15:29:09 +03:00
|
|
|
SSH2_MESSAGE_TYPES(TRANSLATE_UNIVERSAL, TRANSLATE_KEX, TRANSLATE_AUTH, y);
|
2018-09-19 22:40:21 +03:00
|
|
|
return "unknown";
|
|
|
|
}
|
2018-09-24 15:29:09 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#undef TRANSLATE_UNIVERSAL
|
|
|
|
#undef TRANSLATE_KEX
|
|
|
|
#undef TRANSLATE_AUTH
|
2018-09-24 15:45:10 +03:00
|
|
|
|
Move most of ssh.c out into separate source files.
I've tried to separate out as many individually coherent changes from
this work as I could into their own commits, but here's where I run
out and have to commit the rest of this major refactoring as a
big-bang change.
Most of ssh.c is now no longer in ssh.c: all five of the main
coroutines that handle layers of the SSH-1 and SSH-2 protocols now
each have their own source file to live in, and a lot of the
supporting functions have moved into the appropriate one of those too.
The new abstraction is a vtable called 'PacketProtocolLayer', which
has an input and output packet queue. Each layer's main coroutine is
invoked from the method ssh_ppl_process_queue(), which is usually
(though not exclusively) triggered automatically when things are
pushed on the input queue. In SSH-2, the base layer is the transport
protocol, and it contains a pair of subsidiary queues by which it
passes some of its packets to the higher SSH-2 layers - first userauth
and then connection, which are peers at the same level, with the
former abdicating in favour of the latter at the appropriate moment.
SSH-1 is simpler: the whole login phase of the protocol (crypto setup
and authentication) is all in one module, and since SSH-1 has no
repeat key exchange, that setup layer abdicates in favour of the
connection phase when it's done.
ssh.c itself is now about a tenth of its old size (which all by itself
is cause for celebration!). Its main job is to set up all the layers,
hook them up to each other and to the BPP, and to funnel data back and
forth between that collection of modules and external things such as
the network and the terminal. Once it's set up a collection of packet
protocol layers, it communicates with them partly by calling methods
of the base layer (and if that's ssh2transport then it will delegate
some functionality to the corresponding methods of its higher layer),
and partly by talking directly to the connection layer no matter where
it is in the stack by means of the separate ConnectionLayer vtable
which I introduced in commit 8001dd4cb, and to which I've now added
quite a few extra methods replacing services that used to be internal
function calls within ssh.c.
(One effect of this is that the SSH-1 and SSH-2 channel storage is now
no longer shared - there are distinct struct types ssh1_channel and
ssh2_channel. That means a bit more code duplication, but on the plus
side, a lot fewer confusing conditionals in the middle of half-shared
functions, and less risk of a piece of SSH-1 escaping into SSH-2 or
vice versa, which I remember has happened at least once in the past.)
The bulk of this commit introduces the five new source files, their
common header sshppl.h and some shared supporting routines in
sshcommon.c, and rewrites nearly all of ssh.c itself. But it also
includes a couple of other changes that I couldn't separate easily
enough:
Firstly, there's a new handling for socket EOF, in which ssh.c sets an
'input_eof' flag in the BPP, and that responds by checking a flag that
tells it whether to report the EOF as an error or not. (This is the
main reason for those new BPP_READ / BPP_WAITFOR macros - they can
check the EOF flag every time the coroutine is resumed.)
Secondly, the error reporting itself is changed around again. I'd
expected to put some data fields in the public PacketProtocolLayer
structure that it could set to report errors in the same way as the
BPPs have been doing, but in the end, I decided propagating all those
data fields around was a pain and that even the BPPs shouldn't have
been doing it that way. So I've reverted to a system where everything
calls back to functions in ssh.c itself to report any connection-
ending condition. But there's a new family of those functions,
categorising the possible such conditions by semantics, and each one
has a different set of detailed effects (e.g. how rudely to close the
network connection, what exit status should be passed back to the
whole application, whether to send a disconnect message and/or display
a GUI error box).
I don't expect this to be immediately perfect: of course, the code has
been through a big upheaval, new bugs are expected, and I haven't been
able to do a full job of testing (e.g. I haven't tested every auth or
kex method). But I've checked that it _basically_ works - both SSH
protocols, all the different kinds of forwarding channel, more than
one auth method, Windows and Linux, connection sharing - and I think
it's now at the point where the easiest way to find further bugs is to
let it out into the wild and see what users can spot.
2018-09-24 20:28:16 +03:00
|
|
|
/* ----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
* Common helper function for clients and implementations of
|
|
|
|
* PacketProtocolLayer.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
void ssh_ppl_replace(PacketProtocolLayer *old, PacketProtocolLayer *new)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
new->bpp = old->bpp;
|
|
|
|
ssh_ppl_setup_queues(new, old->in_pq, old->out_pq);
|
|
|
|
new->selfptr = old->selfptr;
|
|
|
|
new->user_input = old->user_input;
|
New abstraction 'Seat', to pass to backends.
This is a new vtable-based abstraction which is passed to a backend in
place of Frontend, and it implements only the subset of the Frontend
functions needed by a backend. (Many other Frontend functions still
exist, notably the wide range of things called by terminal.c providing
platform-independent operations on the GUI terminal window.)
The purpose of making it a vtable is that this opens up the
possibility of creating a backend as an internal implementation detail
of some other activity, by providing just that one backend with a
custom Seat that implements the methods differently.
For example, this refactoring should make it feasible to directly
implement an SSH proxy type, aka the 'jump host' feature supported by
OpenSSH, aka 'open a secondary SSH session in MAINCHAN_DIRECT_TCP
mode, and then expose the main channel of that as the Socket for the
primary connection'. (Which of course you can already do by spawning
'plink -nc' as a separate proxy process, but this would permit it in
the _same_ process without anything getting confused.)
I've centralised a full set of stub methods in misc.c for the new
abstraction, which allows me to get rid of several annoying stubs in
the previous code. Also, while I'm here, I've moved a lot of
duplicated modalfatalbox() type functions from application main
program files into wincons.c / uxcons.c, which I think saves
duplication overall. (A minor visible effect is that the prefixes on
those console-based fatal error messages will now be more consistent
between applications.)
2018-10-11 21:58:42 +03:00
|
|
|
new->seat = old->seat;
|
Move most of ssh.c out into separate source files.
I've tried to separate out as many individually coherent changes from
this work as I could into their own commits, but here's where I run
out and have to commit the rest of this major refactoring as a
big-bang change.
Most of ssh.c is now no longer in ssh.c: all five of the main
coroutines that handle layers of the SSH-1 and SSH-2 protocols now
each have their own source file to live in, and a lot of the
supporting functions have moved into the appropriate one of those too.
The new abstraction is a vtable called 'PacketProtocolLayer', which
has an input and output packet queue. Each layer's main coroutine is
invoked from the method ssh_ppl_process_queue(), which is usually
(though not exclusively) triggered automatically when things are
pushed on the input queue. In SSH-2, the base layer is the transport
protocol, and it contains a pair of subsidiary queues by which it
passes some of its packets to the higher SSH-2 layers - first userauth
and then connection, which are peers at the same level, with the
former abdicating in favour of the latter at the appropriate moment.
SSH-1 is simpler: the whole login phase of the protocol (crypto setup
and authentication) is all in one module, and since SSH-1 has no
repeat key exchange, that setup layer abdicates in favour of the
connection phase when it's done.
ssh.c itself is now about a tenth of its old size (which all by itself
is cause for celebration!). Its main job is to set up all the layers,
hook them up to each other and to the BPP, and to funnel data back and
forth between that collection of modules and external things such as
the network and the terminal. Once it's set up a collection of packet
protocol layers, it communicates with them partly by calling methods
of the base layer (and if that's ssh2transport then it will delegate
some functionality to the corresponding methods of its higher layer),
and partly by talking directly to the connection layer no matter where
it is in the stack by means of the separate ConnectionLayer vtable
which I introduced in commit 8001dd4cb, and to which I've now added
quite a few extra methods replacing services that used to be internal
function calls within ssh.c.
(One effect of this is that the SSH-1 and SSH-2 channel storage is now
no longer shared - there are distinct struct types ssh1_channel and
ssh2_channel. That means a bit more code duplication, but on the plus
side, a lot fewer confusing conditionals in the middle of half-shared
functions, and less risk of a piece of SSH-1 escaping into SSH-2 or
vice versa, which I remember has happened at least once in the past.)
The bulk of this commit introduces the five new source files, their
common header sshppl.h and some shared supporting routines in
sshcommon.c, and rewrites nearly all of ssh.c itself. But it also
includes a couple of other changes that I couldn't separate easily
enough:
Firstly, there's a new handling for socket EOF, in which ssh.c sets an
'input_eof' flag in the BPP, and that responds by checking a flag that
tells it whether to report the EOF as an error or not. (This is the
main reason for those new BPP_READ / BPP_WAITFOR macros - they can
check the EOF flag every time the coroutine is resumed.)
Secondly, the error reporting itself is changed around again. I'd
expected to put some data fields in the public PacketProtocolLayer
structure that it could set to report errors in the same way as the
BPPs have been doing, but in the end, I decided propagating all those
data fields around was a pain and that even the BPPs shouldn't have
been doing it that way. So I've reverted to a system where everything
calls back to functions in ssh.c itself to report any connection-
ending condition. But there's a new family of those functions,
categorising the possible such conditions by semantics, and each one
has a different set of detailed effects (e.g. how rudely to close the
network connection, what exit status should be passed back to the
whole application, whether to send a disconnect message and/or display
a GUI error box).
I don't expect this to be immediately perfect: of course, the code has
been through a big upheaval, new bugs are expected, and I haven't been
able to do a full job of testing (e.g. I haven't tested every auth or
kex method). But I've checked that it _basically_ works - both SSH
protocols, all the different kinds of forwarding channel, more than
one auth method, Windows and Linux, connection sharing - and I think
it's now at the point where the easiest way to find further bugs is to
let it out into the wild and see what users can spot.
2018-09-24 20:28:16 +03:00
|
|
|
new->ssh = old->ssh;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*new->selfptr = new;
|
|
|
|
ssh_ppl_free(old);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* The new layer might need to be the first one that sends a
|
|
|
|
* packet, so trigger a call to its main coroutine immediately. If
|
|
|
|
* it doesn't need to go first, the worst that will do is return
|
|
|
|
* straight away. */
|
|
|
|
queue_idempotent_callback(&new->ic_process_queue);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
void ssh_ppl_free(PacketProtocolLayer *ppl)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
delete_callbacks_for_context(ppl);
|
|
|
|
ppl->vt->free(ppl);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void ssh_ppl_ic_process_queue_callback(void *context)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
PacketProtocolLayer *ppl = (PacketProtocolLayer *)context;
|
|
|
|
ssh_ppl_process_queue(ppl);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
void ssh_ppl_setup_queues(PacketProtocolLayer *ppl,
|
|
|
|
PktInQueue *inq, PktOutQueue *outq)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
ppl->in_pq = inq;
|
|
|
|
ppl->out_pq = outq;
|
|
|
|
ppl->in_pq->pqb.ic = &ppl->ic_process_queue;
|
|
|
|
ppl->ic_process_queue.fn = ssh_ppl_ic_process_queue_callback;
|
|
|
|
ppl->ic_process_queue.ctx = ppl;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* If there's already something on the input queue, it will want
|
|
|
|
* handling immediately. */
|
|
|
|
if (pq_peek(ppl->in_pq))
|
|
|
|
queue_idempotent_callback(&ppl->ic_process_queue);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
void ssh_ppl_user_output_string_and_free(PacketProtocolLayer *ppl, char *text)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
/* Messages sent via this function are from the SSH layer, not
|
|
|
|
* from the server-side process, so they always have the stderr
|
|
|
|
* flag set. */
|
New abstraction 'Seat', to pass to backends.
This is a new vtable-based abstraction which is passed to a backend in
place of Frontend, and it implements only the subset of the Frontend
functions needed by a backend. (Many other Frontend functions still
exist, notably the wide range of things called by terminal.c providing
platform-independent operations on the GUI terminal window.)
The purpose of making it a vtable is that this opens up the
possibility of creating a backend as an internal implementation detail
of some other activity, by providing just that one backend with a
custom Seat that implements the methods differently.
For example, this refactoring should make it feasible to directly
implement an SSH proxy type, aka the 'jump host' feature supported by
OpenSSH, aka 'open a secondary SSH session in MAINCHAN_DIRECT_TCP
mode, and then expose the main channel of that as the Socket for the
primary connection'. (Which of course you can already do by spawning
'plink -nc' as a separate proxy process, but this would permit it in
the _same_ process without anything getting confused.)
I've centralised a full set of stub methods in misc.c for the new
abstraction, which allows me to get rid of several annoying stubs in
the previous code. Also, while I'm here, I've moved a lot of
duplicated modalfatalbox() type functions from application main
program files into wincons.c / uxcons.c, which I think saves
duplication overall. (A minor visible effect is that the prefixes on
those console-based fatal error messages will now be more consistent
between applications.)
2018-10-11 21:58:42 +03:00
|
|
|
seat_stderr(ppl->seat, text, strlen(text));
|
Move most of ssh.c out into separate source files.
I've tried to separate out as many individually coherent changes from
this work as I could into their own commits, but here's where I run
out and have to commit the rest of this major refactoring as a
big-bang change.
Most of ssh.c is now no longer in ssh.c: all five of the main
coroutines that handle layers of the SSH-1 and SSH-2 protocols now
each have their own source file to live in, and a lot of the
supporting functions have moved into the appropriate one of those too.
The new abstraction is a vtable called 'PacketProtocolLayer', which
has an input and output packet queue. Each layer's main coroutine is
invoked from the method ssh_ppl_process_queue(), which is usually
(though not exclusively) triggered automatically when things are
pushed on the input queue. In SSH-2, the base layer is the transport
protocol, and it contains a pair of subsidiary queues by which it
passes some of its packets to the higher SSH-2 layers - first userauth
and then connection, which are peers at the same level, with the
former abdicating in favour of the latter at the appropriate moment.
SSH-1 is simpler: the whole login phase of the protocol (crypto setup
and authentication) is all in one module, and since SSH-1 has no
repeat key exchange, that setup layer abdicates in favour of the
connection phase when it's done.
ssh.c itself is now about a tenth of its old size (which all by itself
is cause for celebration!). Its main job is to set up all the layers,
hook them up to each other and to the BPP, and to funnel data back and
forth between that collection of modules and external things such as
the network and the terminal. Once it's set up a collection of packet
protocol layers, it communicates with them partly by calling methods
of the base layer (and if that's ssh2transport then it will delegate
some functionality to the corresponding methods of its higher layer),
and partly by talking directly to the connection layer no matter where
it is in the stack by means of the separate ConnectionLayer vtable
which I introduced in commit 8001dd4cb, and to which I've now added
quite a few extra methods replacing services that used to be internal
function calls within ssh.c.
(One effect of this is that the SSH-1 and SSH-2 channel storage is now
no longer shared - there are distinct struct types ssh1_channel and
ssh2_channel. That means a bit more code duplication, but on the plus
side, a lot fewer confusing conditionals in the middle of half-shared
functions, and less risk of a piece of SSH-1 escaping into SSH-2 or
vice versa, which I remember has happened at least once in the past.)
The bulk of this commit introduces the five new source files, their
common header sshppl.h and some shared supporting routines in
sshcommon.c, and rewrites nearly all of ssh.c itself. But it also
includes a couple of other changes that I couldn't separate easily
enough:
Firstly, there's a new handling for socket EOF, in which ssh.c sets an
'input_eof' flag in the BPP, and that responds by checking a flag that
tells it whether to report the EOF as an error or not. (This is the
main reason for those new BPP_READ / BPP_WAITFOR macros - they can
check the EOF flag every time the coroutine is resumed.)
Secondly, the error reporting itself is changed around again. I'd
expected to put some data fields in the public PacketProtocolLayer
structure that it could set to report errors in the same way as the
BPPs have been doing, but in the end, I decided propagating all those
data fields around was a pain and that even the BPPs shouldn't have
been doing it that way. So I've reverted to a system where everything
calls back to functions in ssh.c itself to report any connection-
ending condition. But there's a new family of those functions,
categorising the possible such conditions by semantics, and each one
has a different set of detailed effects (e.g. how rudely to close the
network connection, what exit status should be passed back to the
whole application, whether to send a disconnect message and/or display
a GUI error box).
I don't expect this to be immediately perfect: of course, the code has
been through a big upheaval, new bugs are expected, and I haven't been
able to do a full job of testing (e.g. I haven't tested every auth or
kex method). But I've checked that it _basically_ works - both SSH
protocols, all the different kinds of forwarding channel, more than
one auth method, Windows and Linux, connection sharing - and I think
it's now at the point where the easiest way to find further bugs is to
let it out into the wild and see what users can spot.
2018-09-24 20:28:16 +03:00
|
|
|
sfree(text);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2018-09-24 15:45:10 +03:00
|
|
|
/* ----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
2018-09-24 20:08:09 +03:00
|
|
|
* Common helper functions for clients and implementations of
|
|
|
|
* BinaryPacketProtocol.
|
2018-09-24 15:45:10 +03:00
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
2018-09-24 20:08:09 +03:00
|
|
|
static void ssh_bpp_input_raw_data_callback(void *context)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
BinaryPacketProtocol *bpp = (BinaryPacketProtocol *)context;
|
|
|
|
ssh_bpp_handle_input(bpp);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void ssh_bpp_output_packet_callback(void *context)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
BinaryPacketProtocol *bpp = (BinaryPacketProtocol *)context;
|
|
|
|
ssh_bpp_handle_output(bpp);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
void ssh_bpp_common_setup(BinaryPacketProtocol *bpp)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
pq_in_init(&bpp->in_pq);
|
|
|
|
pq_out_init(&bpp->out_pq);
|
2018-10-29 22:50:29 +03:00
|
|
|
bpp->input_eof = false;
|
2018-09-24 20:08:09 +03:00
|
|
|
bpp->ic_in_raw.fn = ssh_bpp_input_raw_data_callback;
|
|
|
|
bpp->ic_in_raw.ctx = bpp;
|
|
|
|
bpp->ic_out_pq.fn = ssh_bpp_output_packet_callback;
|
|
|
|
bpp->ic_out_pq.ctx = bpp;
|
|
|
|
bpp->out_pq.pqb.ic = &bpp->ic_out_pq;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
void ssh_bpp_free(BinaryPacketProtocol *bpp)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
delete_callbacks_for_context(bpp);
|
|
|
|
bpp->vt->free(bpp);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2018-09-24 20:14:33 +03:00
|
|
|
void ssh2_bpp_queue_disconnect(BinaryPacketProtocol *bpp,
|
|
|
|
const char *msg, int category)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
PktOut *pkt = ssh_bpp_new_pktout(bpp, SSH2_MSG_DISCONNECT);
|
|
|
|
put_uint32(pkt, category);
|
|
|
|
put_stringz(pkt, msg);
|
|
|
|
put_stringz(pkt, "en"); /* language tag */
|
|
|
|
pq_push(&bpp->out_pq, pkt);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2018-09-24 15:45:10 +03:00
|
|
|
#define BITMAP_UNIVERSAL(y, name, value) \
|
|
|
|
| (value >= y && value < y+32 ? 1UL << (value-y) : 0)
|
|
|
|
#define BITMAP_CONDITIONAL(y, name, value, ctx) \
|
|
|
|
BITMAP_UNIVERSAL(y, name, value)
|
|
|
|
#define SSH2_BITMAP_WORD(y) \
|
|
|
|
(0 SSH2_MESSAGE_TYPES(BITMAP_UNIVERSAL, BITMAP_CONDITIONAL, \
|
|
|
|
BITMAP_CONDITIONAL, (32*y)))
|
|
|
|
|
Convert a lot of 'int' variables to 'bool'.
My normal habit these days, in new code, is to treat int and bool as
_almost_ completely separate types. I'm still willing to use C's
implicit test for zero on an integer (e.g. 'if (!blob.len)' is fine,
no need to spell it out as blob.len != 0), but generally, if a
variable is going to be conceptually a boolean, I like to declare it
bool and assign to it using 'true' or 'false' rather than 0 or 1.
PuTTY is an exception, because it predates the C99 bool, and I've
stuck to its existing coding style even when adding new code to it.
But it's been annoying me more and more, so now that I've decided C99
bool is an acceptable thing to require from our toolchain in the first
place, here's a quite thorough trawl through the source doing
'boolification'. Many variables and function parameters are now typed
as bool rather than int; many assignments of 0 or 1 to those variables
are now spelled 'true' or 'false'.
I managed this thorough conversion with the help of a custom clang
plugin that I wrote to trawl the AST and apply heuristics to point out
where things might want changing. So I've even managed to do a decent
job on parts of the code I haven't looked at in years!
To make the plugin's work easier, I pushed platform front ends
generally in the direction of using standard 'bool' in preference to
platform-specific boolean types like Windows BOOL or GTK's gboolean;
I've left the platform booleans in places they _have_ to be for the
platform APIs to work right, but variables only used by my own code
have been converted wherever I found them.
In a few places there are int values that look very like booleans in
_most_ of the places they're used, but have a rarely-used third value,
or a distinction between different nonzero values that most users
don't care about. In these cases, I've _removed_ uses of 'true' and
'false' for the return values, to emphasise that there's something
more subtle going on than a simple boolean answer:
- the 'multisel' field in dialog.h's list box structure, for which
the GTK front end in particular recognises a difference between 1
and 2 but nearly everything else treats as boolean
- the 'urgent' parameter to plug_receive, where 1 vs 2 tells you
something about the specific location of the urgent pointer, but
most clients only care about 0 vs 'something nonzero'
- the return value of wc_match, where -1 indicates a syntax error in
the wildcard.
- the return values from SSH-1 RSA-key loading functions, which use
-1 for 'wrong passphrase' and 0 for all other failures (so any
caller which already knows it's not loading an _encrypted private_
key can treat them as boolean)
- term->esc_query, and the 'query' parameter in toggle_mode in
terminal.c, which _usually_ hold 0 for ESC[123h or 1 for ESC[?123h,
but can also hold -1 for some other intervening character that we
don't support.
In a few places there's an integer that I haven't turned into a bool
even though it really _can_ only take values 0 or 1 (and, as above,
tried to make the call sites consistent in not calling those values
true and false), on the grounds that I thought it would make it more
confusing to imply that the 0 value was in some sense 'negative' or
bad and the 1 positive or good:
- the return value of plug_accepting uses the POSIXish convention of
0=success and nonzero=error; I think if I made it bool then I'd
also want to reverse its sense, and that's a job for a separate
piece of work.
- the 'screen' parameter to lineptr() in terminal.c, where 0 and 1
represent the default and alternate screens. There's no obvious
reason why one of those should be considered 'true' or 'positive'
or 'success' - they're just indices - so I've left it as int.
ssh_scp_recv had particularly confusing semantics for its previous int
return value: its call sites used '<= 0' to check for error, but it
never actually returned a negative number, just 0 or 1. Now the
function and its call sites agree that it's a bool.
In a couple of places I've renamed variables called 'ret', because I
don't like that name any more - it's unclear whether it means the
return value (in preparation) for the _containing_ function or the
return value received from a subroutine call, and occasionally I've
accidentally used the same variable for both and introduced a bug. So
where one of those got in my way, I've renamed it to 'toret' or 'retd'
(the latter short for 'returned') in line with my usual modern
practice, but I haven't done a thorough job of finding all of them.
Finally, one amusing side effect of doing this is that I've had to
separate quite a few chained assignments. It used to be perfectly fine
to write 'a = b = c = TRUE' when a,b,c were int and TRUE was just a
the 'true' defined by stdbool.h, that idiom provokes a warning from
gcc: 'suggest parentheses around assignment used as truth value'!
2018-11-02 22:23:19 +03:00
|
|
|
bool ssh2_bpp_check_unimplemented(BinaryPacketProtocol *bpp, PktIn *pktin)
|
2018-09-24 15:45:10 +03:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
static const unsigned valid_bitmap[] = {
|
|
|
|
SSH2_BITMAP_WORD(0),
|
|
|
|
SSH2_BITMAP_WORD(1),
|
|
|
|
SSH2_BITMAP_WORD(2),
|
|
|
|
SSH2_BITMAP_WORD(3),
|
|
|
|
SSH2_BITMAP_WORD(4),
|
|
|
|
SSH2_BITMAP_WORD(5),
|
|
|
|
SSH2_BITMAP_WORD(6),
|
|
|
|
SSH2_BITMAP_WORD(7),
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (pktin->type < 0x100 &&
|
|
|
|
!((valid_bitmap[pktin->type >> 5] >> (pktin->type & 0x1F)) & 1)) {
|
|
|
|
PktOut *pkt = ssh_bpp_new_pktout(bpp, SSH2_MSG_UNIMPLEMENTED);
|
|
|
|
put_uint32(pkt, pktin->sequence);
|
2018-09-24 20:08:09 +03:00
|
|
|
pq_push(&bpp->out_pq, pkt);
|
2018-10-29 22:50:29 +03:00
|
|
|
return true;
|
2018-09-24 15:45:10 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2018-10-29 22:50:29 +03:00
|
|
|
return false;
|
2018-09-24 15:45:10 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#undef BITMAP_UNIVERSAL
|
|
|
|
#undef BITMAP_CONDITIONAL
|
|
|
|
#undef SSH1_BITMAP_WORD
|
2018-09-24 16:15:32 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* ----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
* Function to check a host key against any manually configured in Conf.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
int verify_ssh_manual_host_key(
|
|
|
|
Conf *conf, const char *fingerprint, ssh_key *key)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
if (!conf_get_str_nthstrkey(conf, CONF_ssh_manual_hostkeys, 0))
|
|
|
|
return -1; /* no manual keys configured */
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (fingerprint) {
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* The fingerprint string we've been given will have things
|
|
|
|
* like 'ssh-rsa 2048' at the front of it. Strip those off and
|
|
|
|
* narrow down to just the colon-separated hex block at the
|
|
|
|
* end of the string.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
const char *p = strrchr(fingerprint, ' ');
|
|
|
|
fingerprint = p ? p+1 : fingerprint;
|
|
|
|
/* Quick sanity checks, including making sure it's in lowercase */
|
|
|
|
assert(strlen(fingerprint) == 16*3 - 1);
|
|
|
|
assert(fingerprint[2] == ':');
|
|
|
|
assert(fingerprint[strspn(fingerprint, "0123456789abcdef:")] == 0);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (conf_get_str_str_opt(conf, CONF_ssh_manual_hostkeys, fingerprint))
|
|
|
|
return 1; /* success */
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (key) {
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Construct the base64-encoded public key blob and see if
|
|
|
|
* that's listed.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
strbuf *binblob;
|
|
|
|
char *base64blob;
|
|
|
|
int atoms, i;
|
|
|
|
binblob = strbuf_new();
|
|
|
|
ssh_key_public_blob(key, BinarySink_UPCAST(binblob));
|
|
|
|
atoms = (binblob->len + 2) / 3;
|
|
|
|
base64blob = snewn(atoms * 4 + 1, char);
|
|
|
|
for (i = 0; i < atoms; i++)
|
|
|
|
base64_encode_atom(binblob->u + 3*i,
|
|
|
|
binblob->len - 3*i, base64blob + 4*i);
|
|
|
|
base64blob[atoms * 4] = '\0';
|
|
|
|
strbuf_free(binblob);
|
|
|
|
if (conf_get_str_str_opt(conf, CONF_ssh_manual_hostkeys, base64blob)) {
|
|
|
|
sfree(base64blob);
|
|
|
|
return 1; /* success */
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
sfree(base64blob);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
}
|
Move most of ssh.c out into separate source files.
I've tried to separate out as many individually coherent changes from
this work as I could into their own commits, but here's where I run
out and have to commit the rest of this major refactoring as a
big-bang change.
Most of ssh.c is now no longer in ssh.c: all five of the main
coroutines that handle layers of the SSH-1 and SSH-2 protocols now
each have their own source file to live in, and a lot of the
supporting functions have moved into the appropriate one of those too.
The new abstraction is a vtable called 'PacketProtocolLayer', which
has an input and output packet queue. Each layer's main coroutine is
invoked from the method ssh_ppl_process_queue(), which is usually
(though not exclusively) triggered automatically when things are
pushed on the input queue. In SSH-2, the base layer is the transport
protocol, and it contains a pair of subsidiary queues by which it
passes some of its packets to the higher SSH-2 layers - first userauth
and then connection, which are peers at the same level, with the
former abdicating in favour of the latter at the appropriate moment.
SSH-1 is simpler: the whole login phase of the protocol (crypto setup
and authentication) is all in one module, and since SSH-1 has no
repeat key exchange, that setup layer abdicates in favour of the
connection phase when it's done.
ssh.c itself is now about a tenth of its old size (which all by itself
is cause for celebration!). Its main job is to set up all the layers,
hook them up to each other and to the BPP, and to funnel data back and
forth between that collection of modules and external things such as
the network and the terminal. Once it's set up a collection of packet
protocol layers, it communicates with them partly by calling methods
of the base layer (and if that's ssh2transport then it will delegate
some functionality to the corresponding methods of its higher layer),
and partly by talking directly to the connection layer no matter where
it is in the stack by means of the separate ConnectionLayer vtable
which I introduced in commit 8001dd4cb, and to which I've now added
quite a few extra methods replacing services that used to be internal
function calls within ssh.c.
(One effect of this is that the SSH-1 and SSH-2 channel storage is now
no longer shared - there are distinct struct types ssh1_channel and
ssh2_channel. That means a bit more code duplication, but on the plus
side, a lot fewer confusing conditionals in the middle of half-shared
functions, and less risk of a piece of SSH-1 escaping into SSH-2 or
vice versa, which I remember has happened at least once in the past.)
The bulk of this commit introduces the five new source files, their
common header sshppl.h and some shared supporting routines in
sshcommon.c, and rewrites nearly all of ssh.c itself. But it also
includes a couple of other changes that I couldn't separate easily
enough:
Firstly, there's a new handling for socket EOF, in which ssh.c sets an
'input_eof' flag in the BPP, and that responds by checking a flag that
tells it whether to report the EOF as an error or not. (This is the
main reason for those new BPP_READ / BPP_WAITFOR macros - they can
check the EOF flag every time the coroutine is resumed.)
Secondly, the error reporting itself is changed around again. I'd
expected to put some data fields in the public PacketProtocolLayer
structure that it could set to report errors in the same way as the
BPPs have been doing, but in the end, I decided propagating all those
data fields around was a pain and that even the BPPs shouldn't have
been doing it that way. So I've reverted to a system where everything
calls back to functions in ssh.c itself to report any connection-
ending condition. But there's a new family of those functions,
categorising the possible such conditions by semantics, and each one
has a different set of detailed effects (e.g. how rudely to close the
network connection, what exit status should be passed back to the
whole application, whether to send a disconnect message and/or display
a GUI error box).
I don't expect this to be immediately perfect: of course, the code has
been through a big upheaval, new bugs are expected, and I haven't been
able to do a full job of testing (e.g. I haven't tested every auth or
kex method). But I've checked that it _basically_ works - both SSH
protocols, all the different kinds of forwarding channel, more than
one auth method, Windows and Linux, connection sharing - and I think
it's now at the point where the easiest way to find further bugs is to
let it out into the wild and see what users can spot.
2018-09-24 20:28:16 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* ----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
Move client-specific SSH code into new files.
This is a major code reorganisation in preparation for making this
code base into one that can build an SSH server as well as a client.
(Mostly for purposes of using the server as a regression test suite
for the client, though I have some other possible uses in mind too.
However, it's currently no part of my plan to harden the server to the
point where it can sensibly be deployed in a hostile environment.)
In this preparatory commit, I've broken up the SSH-2 transport and
connection layers, and the SSH-1 connection layer, into multiple
source files, with each layer having its own header file containing
the shared type definitions. In each case, the new source file
contains code that's specific to the client side of the protocol, so
that a new file can be swapped in in its place when building the
server.
Mostly this is just a straightforward moving of code without changing
it very much, but there are a couple of actual changes in the process:
The parsing of SSH-2 global-request and channel open-messages is now
done by a new pair of functions in the client module. For channel
opens, I've invented a new union data type to be the return value from
that function, representing either failure (plus error message),
success (plus Channel instance to manage the new channel), or an
instruction to hand the channel over to a sharing downstream (plus a
pointer to the downstream in question).
Also, the tree234 of remote port forwardings in ssh2connection is now
initialised on first use by the client-specific code, so that's where
its compare function lives. The shared ssh2connection_free() still
takes responsibility for freeing it, but now has to check if it's
non-null first.
The outer shell of the ssh2_lportfwd_open method, for making a
local-to-remote port forwarding, is still centralised in
ssh2connection.c, but the part of it that actually constructs the
outgoing channel-open message has moved into the client code, because
that will have to change depending on whether the channel-open has to
have type direct-tcpip or forwarded-tcpip.
In the SSH-1 connection layer, half the filter_queue method has moved
out into the new client-specific code, but not all of it -
bidirectional channel maintenance messages are still handled
centrally. One exception is SSH_MSG_PORT_OPEN, which can be sent in
both directions, but with subtly different semantics - from server to
client, it's referring to a previously established remote forwarding
(and must be rejected if there isn't one that matches it), but from
client to server it's just a "direct-tcpip" request with no prior
context. So that one is in the client-specific module, and when I add
the server code it will have its own different handler.
2018-10-20 19:57:37 +03:00
|
|
|
* Common functions shared between SSH-1 layers.
|
Move most of ssh.c out into separate source files.
I've tried to separate out as many individually coherent changes from
this work as I could into their own commits, but here's where I run
out and have to commit the rest of this major refactoring as a
big-bang change.
Most of ssh.c is now no longer in ssh.c: all five of the main
coroutines that handle layers of the SSH-1 and SSH-2 protocols now
each have their own source file to live in, and a lot of the
supporting functions have moved into the appropriate one of those too.
The new abstraction is a vtable called 'PacketProtocolLayer', which
has an input and output packet queue. Each layer's main coroutine is
invoked from the method ssh_ppl_process_queue(), which is usually
(though not exclusively) triggered automatically when things are
pushed on the input queue. In SSH-2, the base layer is the transport
protocol, and it contains a pair of subsidiary queues by which it
passes some of its packets to the higher SSH-2 layers - first userauth
and then connection, which are peers at the same level, with the
former abdicating in favour of the latter at the appropriate moment.
SSH-1 is simpler: the whole login phase of the protocol (crypto setup
and authentication) is all in one module, and since SSH-1 has no
repeat key exchange, that setup layer abdicates in favour of the
connection phase when it's done.
ssh.c itself is now about a tenth of its old size (which all by itself
is cause for celebration!). Its main job is to set up all the layers,
hook them up to each other and to the BPP, and to funnel data back and
forth between that collection of modules and external things such as
the network and the terminal. Once it's set up a collection of packet
protocol layers, it communicates with them partly by calling methods
of the base layer (and if that's ssh2transport then it will delegate
some functionality to the corresponding methods of its higher layer),
and partly by talking directly to the connection layer no matter where
it is in the stack by means of the separate ConnectionLayer vtable
which I introduced in commit 8001dd4cb, and to which I've now added
quite a few extra methods replacing services that used to be internal
function calls within ssh.c.
(One effect of this is that the SSH-1 and SSH-2 channel storage is now
no longer shared - there are distinct struct types ssh1_channel and
ssh2_channel. That means a bit more code duplication, but on the plus
side, a lot fewer confusing conditionals in the middle of half-shared
functions, and less risk of a piece of SSH-1 escaping into SSH-2 or
vice versa, which I remember has happened at least once in the past.)
The bulk of this commit introduces the five new source files, their
common header sshppl.h and some shared supporting routines in
sshcommon.c, and rewrites nearly all of ssh.c itself. But it also
includes a couple of other changes that I couldn't separate easily
enough:
Firstly, there's a new handling for socket EOF, in which ssh.c sets an
'input_eof' flag in the BPP, and that responds by checking a flag that
tells it whether to report the EOF as an error or not. (This is the
main reason for those new BPP_READ / BPP_WAITFOR macros - they can
check the EOF flag every time the coroutine is resumed.)
Secondly, the error reporting itself is changed around again. I'd
expected to put some data fields in the public PacketProtocolLayer
structure that it could set to report errors in the same way as the
BPPs have been doing, but in the end, I decided propagating all those
data fields around was a pain and that even the BPPs shouldn't have
been doing it that way. So I've reverted to a system where everything
calls back to functions in ssh.c itself to report any connection-
ending condition. But there's a new family of those functions,
categorising the possible such conditions by semantics, and each one
has a different set of detailed effects (e.g. how rudely to close the
network connection, what exit status should be passed back to the
whole application, whether to send a disconnect message and/or display
a GUI error box).
I don't expect this to be immediately perfect: of course, the code has
been through a big upheaval, new bugs are expected, and I haven't been
able to do a full job of testing (e.g. I haven't tested every auth or
kex method). But I've checked that it _basically_ works - both SSH
protocols, all the different kinds of forwarding channel, more than
one auth method, Windows and Linux, connection sharing - and I think
it's now at the point where the easiest way to find further bugs is to
let it out into the wild and see what users can spot.
2018-09-24 20:28:16 +03:00
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
Convert a lot of 'int' variables to 'bool'.
My normal habit these days, in new code, is to treat int and bool as
_almost_ completely separate types. I'm still willing to use C's
implicit test for zero on an integer (e.g. 'if (!blob.len)' is fine,
no need to spell it out as blob.len != 0), but generally, if a
variable is going to be conceptually a boolean, I like to declare it
bool and assign to it using 'true' or 'false' rather than 0 or 1.
PuTTY is an exception, because it predates the C99 bool, and I've
stuck to its existing coding style even when adding new code to it.
But it's been annoying me more and more, so now that I've decided C99
bool is an acceptable thing to require from our toolchain in the first
place, here's a quite thorough trawl through the source doing
'boolification'. Many variables and function parameters are now typed
as bool rather than int; many assignments of 0 or 1 to those variables
are now spelled 'true' or 'false'.
I managed this thorough conversion with the help of a custom clang
plugin that I wrote to trawl the AST and apply heuristics to point out
where things might want changing. So I've even managed to do a decent
job on parts of the code I haven't looked at in years!
To make the plugin's work easier, I pushed platform front ends
generally in the direction of using standard 'bool' in preference to
platform-specific boolean types like Windows BOOL or GTK's gboolean;
I've left the platform booleans in places they _have_ to be for the
platform APIs to work right, but variables only used by my own code
have been converted wherever I found them.
In a few places there are int values that look very like booleans in
_most_ of the places they're used, but have a rarely-used third value,
or a distinction between different nonzero values that most users
don't care about. In these cases, I've _removed_ uses of 'true' and
'false' for the return values, to emphasise that there's something
more subtle going on than a simple boolean answer:
- the 'multisel' field in dialog.h's list box structure, for which
the GTK front end in particular recognises a difference between 1
and 2 but nearly everything else treats as boolean
- the 'urgent' parameter to plug_receive, where 1 vs 2 tells you
something about the specific location of the urgent pointer, but
most clients only care about 0 vs 'something nonzero'
- the return value of wc_match, where -1 indicates a syntax error in
the wildcard.
- the return values from SSH-1 RSA-key loading functions, which use
-1 for 'wrong passphrase' and 0 for all other failures (so any
caller which already knows it's not loading an _encrypted private_
key can treat them as boolean)
- term->esc_query, and the 'query' parameter in toggle_mode in
terminal.c, which _usually_ hold 0 for ESC[123h or 1 for ESC[?123h,
but can also hold -1 for some other intervening character that we
don't support.
In a few places there's an integer that I haven't turned into a bool
even though it really _can_ only take values 0 or 1 (and, as above,
tried to make the call sites consistent in not calling those values
true and false), on the grounds that I thought it would make it more
confusing to imply that the 0 value was in some sense 'negative' or
bad and the 1 positive or good:
- the return value of plug_accepting uses the POSIXish convention of
0=success and nonzero=error; I think if I made it bool then I'd
also want to reverse its sense, and that's a job for a separate
piece of work.
- the 'screen' parameter to lineptr() in terminal.c, where 0 and 1
represent the default and alternate screens. There's no obvious
reason why one of those should be considered 'true' or 'positive'
or 'success' - they're just indices - so I've left it as int.
ssh_scp_recv had particularly confusing semantics for its previous int
return value: its call sites used '<= 0' to check for error, but it
never actually returned a negative number, just 0 or 1. Now the
function and its call sites agree that it's a bool.
In a couple of places I've renamed variables called 'ret', because I
don't like that name any more - it's unclear whether it means the
return value (in preparation) for the _containing_ function or the
return value received from a subroutine call, and occasionally I've
accidentally used the same variable for both and introduced a bug. So
where one of those got in my way, I've renamed it to 'toret' or 'retd'
(the latter short for 'returned') in line with my usual modern
practice, but I haven't done a thorough job of finding all of them.
Finally, one amusing side effect of doing this is that I've had to
separate quite a few chained assignments. It used to be perfectly fine
to write 'a = b = c = TRUE' when a,b,c were int and TRUE was just a
the 'true' defined by stdbool.h, that idiom provokes a warning from
gcc: 'suggest parentheses around assignment used as truth value'!
2018-11-02 22:23:19 +03:00
|
|
|
bool ssh1_common_get_specials(
|
Move most of ssh.c out into separate source files.
I've tried to separate out as many individually coherent changes from
this work as I could into their own commits, but here's where I run
out and have to commit the rest of this major refactoring as a
big-bang change.
Most of ssh.c is now no longer in ssh.c: all five of the main
coroutines that handle layers of the SSH-1 and SSH-2 protocols now
each have their own source file to live in, and a lot of the
supporting functions have moved into the appropriate one of those too.
The new abstraction is a vtable called 'PacketProtocolLayer', which
has an input and output packet queue. Each layer's main coroutine is
invoked from the method ssh_ppl_process_queue(), which is usually
(though not exclusively) triggered automatically when things are
pushed on the input queue. In SSH-2, the base layer is the transport
protocol, and it contains a pair of subsidiary queues by which it
passes some of its packets to the higher SSH-2 layers - first userauth
and then connection, which are peers at the same level, with the
former abdicating in favour of the latter at the appropriate moment.
SSH-1 is simpler: the whole login phase of the protocol (crypto setup
and authentication) is all in one module, and since SSH-1 has no
repeat key exchange, that setup layer abdicates in favour of the
connection phase when it's done.
ssh.c itself is now about a tenth of its old size (which all by itself
is cause for celebration!). Its main job is to set up all the layers,
hook them up to each other and to the BPP, and to funnel data back and
forth between that collection of modules and external things such as
the network and the terminal. Once it's set up a collection of packet
protocol layers, it communicates with them partly by calling methods
of the base layer (and if that's ssh2transport then it will delegate
some functionality to the corresponding methods of its higher layer),
and partly by talking directly to the connection layer no matter where
it is in the stack by means of the separate ConnectionLayer vtable
which I introduced in commit 8001dd4cb, and to which I've now added
quite a few extra methods replacing services that used to be internal
function calls within ssh.c.
(One effect of this is that the SSH-1 and SSH-2 channel storage is now
no longer shared - there are distinct struct types ssh1_channel and
ssh2_channel. That means a bit more code duplication, but on the plus
side, a lot fewer confusing conditionals in the middle of half-shared
functions, and less risk of a piece of SSH-1 escaping into SSH-2 or
vice versa, which I remember has happened at least once in the past.)
The bulk of this commit introduces the five new source files, their
common header sshppl.h and some shared supporting routines in
sshcommon.c, and rewrites nearly all of ssh.c itself. But it also
includes a couple of other changes that I couldn't separate easily
enough:
Firstly, there's a new handling for socket EOF, in which ssh.c sets an
'input_eof' flag in the BPP, and that responds by checking a flag that
tells it whether to report the EOF as an error or not. (This is the
main reason for those new BPP_READ / BPP_WAITFOR macros - they can
check the EOF flag every time the coroutine is resumed.)
Secondly, the error reporting itself is changed around again. I'd
expected to put some data fields in the public PacketProtocolLayer
structure that it could set to report errors in the same way as the
BPPs have been doing, but in the end, I decided propagating all those
data fields around was a pain and that even the BPPs shouldn't have
been doing it that way. So I've reverted to a system where everything
calls back to functions in ssh.c itself to report any connection-
ending condition. But there's a new family of those functions,
categorising the possible such conditions by semantics, and each one
has a different set of detailed effects (e.g. how rudely to close the
network connection, what exit status should be passed back to the
whole application, whether to send a disconnect message and/or display
a GUI error box).
I don't expect this to be immediately perfect: of course, the code has
been through a big upheaval, new bugs are expected, and I haven't been
able to do a full job of testing (e.g. I haven't tested every auth or
kex method). But I've checked that it _basically_ works - both SSH
protocols, all the different kinds of forwarding channel, more than
one auth method, Windows and Linux, connection sharing - and I think
it's now at the point where the easiest way to find further bugs is to
let it out into the wild and see what users can spot.
2018-09-24 20:28:16 +03:00
|
|
|
PacketProtocolLayer *ppl, add_special_fn_t add_special, void *ctx)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Don't bother offering IGNORE if we've decided the remote
|
|
|
|
* won't cope with it, since we wouldn't bother sending it if
|
|
|
|
* asked anyway.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
if (!(ppl->remote_bugs & BUG_CHOKES_ON_SSH1_IGNORE)) {
|
|
|
|
add_special(ctx, "IGNORE message", SS_NOP, 0);
|
2018-10-29 22:50:29 +03:00
|
|
|
return true;
|
Move most of ssh.c out into separate source files.
I've tried to separate out as many individually coherent changes from
this work as I could into their own commits, but here's where I run
out and have to commit the rest of this major refactoring as a
big-bang change.
Most of ssh.c is now no longer in ssh.c: all five of the main
coroutines that handle layers of the SSH-1 and SSH-2 protocols now
each have their own source file to live in, and a lot of the
supporting functions have moved into the appropriate one of those too.
The new abstraction is a vtable called 'PacketProtocolLayer', which
has an input and output packet queue. Each layer's main coroutine is
invoked from the method ssh_ppl_process_queue(), which is usually
(though not exclusively) triggered automatically when things are
pushed on the input queue. In SSH-2, the base layer is the transport
protocol, and it contains a pair of subsidiary queues by which it
passes some of its packets to the higher SSH-2 layers - first userauth
and then connection, which are peers at the same level, with the
former abdicating in favour of the latter at the appropriate moment.
SSH-1 is simpler: the whole login phase of the protocol (crypto setup
and authentication) is all in one module, and since SSH-1 has no
repeat key exchange, that setup layer abdicates in favour of the
connection phase when it's done.
ssh.c itself is now about a tenth of its old size (which all by itself
is cause for celebration!). Its main job is to set up all the layers,
hook them up to each other and to the BPP, and to funnel data back and
forth between that collection of modules and external things such as
the network and the terminal. Once it's set up a collection of packet
protocol layers, it communicates with them partly by calling methods
of the base layer (and if that's ssh2transport then it will delegate
some functionality to the corresponding methods of its higher layer),
and partly by talking directly to the connection layer no matter where
it is in the stack by means of the separate ConnectionLayer vtable
which I introduced in commit 8001dd4cb, and to which I've now added
quite a few extra methods replacing services that used to be internal
function calls within ssh.c.
(One effect of this is that the SSH-1 and SSH-2 channel storage is now
no longer shared - there are distinct struct types ssh1_channel and
ssh2_channel. That means a bit more code duplication, but on the plus
side, a lot fewer confusing conditionals in the middle of half-shared
functions, and less risk of a piece of SSH-1 escaping into SSH-2 or
vice versa, which I remember has happened at least once in the past.)
The bulk of this commit introduces the five new source files, their
common header sshppl.h and some shared supporting routines in
sshcommon.c, and rewrites nearly all of ssh.c itself. But it also
includes a couple of other changes that I couldn't separate easily
enough:
Firstly, there's a new handling for socket EOF, in which ssh.c sets an
'input_eof' flag in the BPP, and that responds by checking a flag that
tells it whether to report the EOF as an error or not. (This is the
main reason for those new BPP_READ / BPP_WAITFOR macros - they can
check the EOF flag every time the coroutine is resumed.)
Secondly, the error reporting itself is changed around again. I'd
expected to put some data fields in the public PacketProtocolLayer
structure that it could set to report errors in the same way as the
BPPs have been doing, but in the end, I decided propagating all those
data fields around was a pain and that even the BPPs shouldn't have
been doing it that way. So I've reverted to a system where everything
calls back to functions in ssh.c itself to report any connection-
ending condition. But there's a new family of those functions,
categorising the possible such conditions by semantics, and each one
has a different set of detailed effects (e.g. how rudely to close the
network connection, what exit status should be passed back to the
whole application, whether to send a disconnect message and/or display
a GUI error box).
I don't expect this to be immediately perfect: of course, the code has
been through a big upheaval, new bugs are expected, and I haven't been
able to do a full job of testing (e.g. I haven't tested every auth or
kex method). But I've checked that it _basically_ works - both SSH
protocols, all the different kinds of forwarding channel, more than
one auth method, Windows and Linux, connection sharing - and I think
it's now at the point where the easiest way to find further bugs is to
let it out into the wild and see what users can spot.
2018-09-24 20:28:16 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2018-10-29 22:50:29 +03:00
|
|
|
return false;
|
Move most of ssh.c out into separate source files.
I've tried to separate out as many individually coherent changes from
this work as I could into their own commits, but here's where I run
out and have to commit the rest of this major refactoring as a
big-bang change.
Most of ssh.c is now no longer in ssh.c: all five of the main
coroutines that handle layers of the SSH-1 and SSH-2 protocols now
each have their own source file to live in, and a lot of the
supporting functions have moved into the appropriate one of those too.
The new abstraction is a vtable called 'PacketProtocolLayer', which
has an input and output packet queue. Each layer's main coroutine is
invoked from the method ssh_ppl_process_queue(), which is usually
(though not exclusively) triggered automatically when things are
pushed on the input queue. In SSH-2, the base layer is the transport
protocol, and it contains a pair of subsidiary queues by which it
passes some of its packets to the higher SSH-2 layers - first userauth
and then connection, which are peers at the same level, with the
former abdicating in favour of the latter at the appropriate moment.
SSH-1 is simpler: the whole login phase of the protocol (crypto setup
and authentication) is all in one module, and since SSH-1 has no
repeat key exchange, that setup layer abdicates in favour of the
connection phase when it's done.
ssh.c itself is now about a tenth of its old size (which all by itself
is cause for celebration!). Its main job is to set up all the layers,
hook them up to each other and to the BPP, and to funnel data back and
forth between that collection of modules and external things such as
the network and the terminal. Once it's set up a collection of packet
protocol layers, it communicates with them partly by calling methods
of the base layer (and if that's ssh2transport then it will delegate
some functionality to the corresponding methods of its higher layer),
and partly by talking directly to the connection layer no matter where
it is in the stack by means of the separate ConnectionLayer vtable
which I introduced in commit 8001dd4cb, and to which I've now added
quite a few extra methods replacing services that used to be internal
function calls within ssh.c.
(One effect of this is that the SSH-1 and SSH-2 channel storage is now
no longer shared - there are distinct struct types ssh1_channel and
ssh2_channel. That means a bit more code duplication, but on the plus
side, a lot fewer confusing conditionals in the middle of half-shared
functions, and less risk of a piece of SSH-1 escaping into SSH-2 or
vice versa, which I remember has happened at least once in the past.)
The bulk of this commit introduces the five new source files, their
common header sshppl.h and some shared supporting routines in
sshcommon.c, and rewrites nearly all of ssh.c itself. But it also
includes a couple of other changes that I couldn't separate easily
enough:
Firstly, there's a new handling for socket EOF, in which ssh.c sets an
'input_eof' flag in the BPP, and that responds by checking a flag that
tells it whether to report the EOF as an error or not. (This is the
main reason for those new BPP_READ / BPP_WAITFOR macros - they can
check the EOF flag every time the coroutine is resumed.)
Secondly, the error reporting itself is changed around again. I'd
expected to put some data fields in the public PacketProtocolLayer
structure that it could set to report errors in the same way as the
BPPs have been doing, but in the end, I decided propagating all those
data fields around was a pain and that even the BPPs shouldn't have
been doing it that way. So I've reverted to a system where everything
calls back to functions in ssh.c itself to report any connection-
ending condition. But there's a new family of those functions,
categorising the possible such conditions by semantics, and each one
has a different set of detailed effects (e.g. how rudely to close the
network connection, what exit status should be passed back to the
whole application, whether to send a disconnect message and/or display
a GUI error box).
I don't expect this to be immediately perfect: of course, the code has
been through a big upheaval, new bugs are expected, and I haven't been
able to do a full job of testing (e.g. I haven't tested every auth or
kex method). But I've checked that it _basically_ works - both SSH
protocols, all the different kinds of forwarding channel, more than
one auth method, Windows and Linux, connection sharing - and I think
it's now at the point where the easiest way to find further bugs is to
let it out into the wild and see what users can spot.
2018-09-24 20:28:16 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
Convert a lot of 'int' variables to 'bool'.
My normal habit these days, in new code, is to treat int and bool as
_almost_ completely separate types. I'm still willing to use C's
implicit test for zero on an integer (e.g. 'if (!blob.len)' is fine,
no need to spell it out as blob.len != 0), but generally, if a
variable is going to be conceptually a boolean, I like to declare it
bool and assign to it using 'true' or 'false' rather than 0 or 1.
PuTTY is an exception, because it predates the C99 bool, and I've
stuck to its existing coding style even when adding new code to it.
But it's been annoying me more and more, so now that I've decided C99
bool is an acceptable thing to require from our toolchain in the first
place, here's a quite thorough trawl through the source doing
'boolification'. Many variables and function parameters are now typed
as bool rather than int; many assignments of 0 or 1 to those variables
are now spelled 'true' or 'false'.
I managed this thorough conversion with the help of a custom clang
plugin that I wrote to trawl the AST and apply heuristics to point out
where things might want changing. So I've even managed to do a decent
job on parts of the code I haven't looked at in years!
To make the plugin's work easier, I pushed platform front ends
generally in the direction of using standard 'bool' in preference to
platform-specific boolean types like Windows BOOL or GTK's gboolean;
I've left the platform booleans in places they _have_ to be for the
platform APIs to work right, but variables only used by my own code
have been converted wherever I found them.
In a few places there are int values that look very like booleans in
_most_ of the places they're used, but have a rarely-used third value,
or a distinction between different nonzero values that most users
don't care about. In these cases, I've _removed_ uses of 'true' and
'false' for the return values, to emphasise that there's something
more subtle going on than a simple boolean answer:
- the 'multisel' field in dialog.h's list box structure, for which
the GTK front end in particular recognises a difference between 1
and 2 but nearly everything else treats as boolean
- the 'urgent' parameter to plug_receive, where 1 vs 2 tells you
something about the specific location of the urgent pointer, but
most clients only care about 0 vs 'something nonzero'
- the return value of wc_match, where -1 indicates a syntax error in
the wildcard.
- the return values from SSH-1 RSA-key loading functions, which use
-1 for 'wrong passphrase' and 0 for all other failures (so any
caller which already knows it's not loading an _encrypted private_
key can treat them as boolean)
- term->esc_query, and the 'query' parameter in toggle_mode in
terminal.c, which _usually_ hold 0 for ESC[123h or 1 for ESC[?123h,
but can also hold -1 for some other intervening character that we
don't support.
In a few places there's an integer that I haven't turned into a bool
even though it really _can_ only take values 0 or 1 (and, as above,
tried to make the call sites consistent in not calling those values
true and false), on the grounds that I thought it would make it more
confusing to imply that the 0 value was in some sense 'negative' or
bad and the 1 positive or good:
- the return value of plug_accepting uses the POSIXish convention of
0=success and nonzero=error; I think if I made it bool then I'd
also want to reverse its sense, and that's a job for a separate
piece of work.
- the 'screen' parameter to lineptr() in terminal.c, where 0 and 1
represent the default and alternate screens. There's no obvious
reason why one of those should be considered 'true' or 'positive'
or 'success' - they're just indices - so I've left it as int.
ssh_scp_recv had particularly confusing semantics for its previous int
return value: its call sites used '<= 0' to check for error, but it
never actually returned a negative number, just 0 or 1. Now the
function and its call sites agree that it's a bool.
In a couple of places I've renamed variables called 'ret', because I
don't like that name any more - it's unclear whether it means the
return value (in preparation) for the _containing_ function or the
return value received from a subroutine call, and occasionally I've
accidentally used the same variable for both and introduced a bug. So
where one of those got in my way, I've renamed it to 'toret' or 'retd'
(the latter short for 'returned') in line with my usual modern
practice, but I haven't done a thorough job of finding all of them.
Finally, one amusing side effect of doing this is that I've had to
separate quite a few chained assignments. It used to be perfectly fine
to write 'a = b = c = TRUE' when a,b,c were int and TRUE was just a
the 'true' defined by stdbool.h, that idiom provokes a warning from
gcc: 'suggest parentheses around assignment used as truth value'!
2018-11-02 22:23:19 +03:00
|
|
|
bool ssh1_common_filter_queue(PacketProtocolLayer *ppl)
|
Move client-specific SSH code into new files.
This is a major code reorganisation in preparation for making this
code base into one that can build an SSH server as well as a client.
(Mostly for purposes of using the server as a regression test suite
for the client, though I have some other possible uses in mind too.
However, it's currently no part of my plan to harden the server to the
point where it can sensibly be deployed in a hostile environment.)
In this preparatory commit, I've broken up the SSH-2 transport and
connection layers, and the SSH-1 connection layer, into multiple
source files, with each layer having its own header file containing
the shared type definitions. In each case, the new source file
contains code that's specific to the client side of the protocol, so
that a new file can be swapped in in its place when building the
server.
Mostly this is just a straightforward moving of code without changing
it very much, but there are a couple of actual changes in the process:
The parsing of SSH-2 global-request and channel open-messages is now
done by a new pair of functions in the client module. For channel
opens, I've invented a new union data type to be the return value from
that function, representing either failure (plus error message),
success (plus Channel instance to manage the new channel), or an
instruction to hand the channel over to a sharing downstream (plus a
pointer to the downstream in question).
Also, the tree234 of remote port forwardings in ssh2connection is now
initialised on first use by the client-specific code, so that's where
its compare function lives. The shared ssh2connection_free() still
takes responsibility for freeing it, but now has to check if it's
non-null first.
The outer shell of the ssh2_lportfwd_open method, for making a
local-to-remote port forwarding, is still centralised in
ssh2connection.c, but the part of it that actually constructs the
outgoing channel-open message has moved into the client code, because
that will have to change depending on whether the channel-open has to
have type direct-tcpip or forwarded-tcpip.
In the SSH-1 connection layer, half the filter_queue method has moved
out into the new client-specific code, but not all of it -
bidirectional channel maintenance messages are still handled
centrally. One exception is SSH_MSG_PORT_OPEN, which can be sent in
both directions, but with subtly different semantics - from server to
client, it's referring to a previously established remote forwarding
(and must be rejected if there isn't one that matches it), but from
client to server it's just a "direct-tcpip" request with no prior
context. So that one is in the client-specific module, and when I add
the server code it will have its own different handler.
2018-10-20 19:57:37 +03:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
PktIn *pktin;
|
|
|
|
ptrlen msg;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
while ((pktin = pq_peek(ppl->in_pq)) != NULL) {
|
|
|
|
switch (pktin->type) {
|
|
|
|
case SSH1_MSG_DISCONNECT:
|
|
|
|
msg = get_string(pktin);
|
|
|
|
ssh_remote_error(ppl->ssh,
|
|
|
|
"Remote side sent disconnect message:\n\"%.*s\"",
|
|
|
|
PTRLEN_PRINTF(msg));
|
|
|
|
pq_pop(ppl->in_pq);
|
2018-10-29 22:50:29 +03:00
|
|
|
return true; /* indicate that we've been freed */
|
Move client-specific SSH code into new files.
This is a major code reorganisation in preparation for making this
code base into one that can build an SSH server as well as a client.
(Mostly for purposes of using the server as a regression test suite
for the client, though I have some other possible uses in mind too.
However, it's currently no part of my plan to harden the server to the
point where it can sensibly be deployed in a hostile environment.)
In this preparatory commit, I've broken up the SSH-2 transport and
connection layers, and the SSH-1 connection layer, into multiple
source files, with each layer having its own header file containing
the shared type definitions. In each case, the new source file
contains code that's specific to the client side of the protocol, so
that a new file can be swapped in in its place when building the
server.
Mostly this is just a straightforward moving of code without changing
it very much, but there are a couple of actual changes in the process:
The parsing of SSH-2 global-request and channel open-messages is now
done by a new pair of functions in the client module. For channel
opens, I've invented a new union data type to be the return value from
that function, representing either failure (plus error message),
success (plus Channel instance to manage the new channel), or an
instruction to hand the channel over to a sharing downstream (plus a
pointer to the downstream in question).
Also, the tree234 of remote port forwardings in ssh2connection is now
initialised on first use by the client-specific code, so that's where
its compare function lives. The shared ssh2connection_free() still
takes responsibility for freeing it, but now has to check if it's
non-null first.
The outer shell of the ssh2_lportfwd_open method, for making a
local-to-remote port forwarding, is still centralised in
ssh2connection.c, but the part of it that actually constructs the
outgoing channel-open message has moved into the client code, because
that will have to change depending on whether the channel-open has to
have type direct-tcpip or forwarded-tcpip.
In the SSH-1 connection layer, half the filter_queue method has moved
out into the new client-specific code, but not all of it -
bidirectional channel maintenance messages are still handled
centrally. One exception is SSH_MSG_PORT_OPEN, which can be sent in
both directions, but with subtly different semantics - from server to
client, it's referring to a previously established remote forwarding
(and must be rejected if there isn't one that matches it), but from
client to server it's just a "direct-tcpip" request with no prior
context. So that one is in the client-specific module, and when I add
the server code it will have its own different handler.
2018-10-20 19:57:37 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
case SSH1_MSG_DEBUG:
|
|
|
|
msg = get_string(pktin);
|
Start using C99 variadic macros.
In the past, I've had a lot of macros which you call with double
parentheses, along the lines of debug(("format string", params)), so
that the inner parens protect the commas and permit the macro to treat
the whole printf-style argument list as one macro argument.
That's all very well, but it's a bit inconvenient (it doesn't leave
you any way to implement such a macro by prepending another argument
to the list), and now this code base's rules allow C99isms, I can
switch all those macros to using a single pair of parens, using the
C99 ability to say '...' in the parameter list of the #define and get
at the corresponding suffix of the arguments as __VA_ARGS__.
So I'm doing it. I've made the following printf-style macros variadic:
bpp_logevent, ppl_logevent, ppl_printf and debug.
While I'm here, I've also fixed up a collection of conditioned-out
calls to debug() in the Windows front end which were clearly expecting
a macro with a different calling syntax, because they had an integer
parameter first. If I ever have a need to condition those back in,
they should actually work now.
2018-12-08 23:32:31 +03:00
|
|
|
ppl_logevent("Remote debug message: %.*s", PTRLEN_PRINTF(msg));
|
Move client-specific SSH code into new files.
This is a major code reorganisation in preparation for making this
code base into one that can build an SSH server as well as a client.
(Mostly for purposes of using the server as a regression test suite
for the client, though I have some other possible uses in mind too.
However, it's currently no part of my plan to harden the server to the
point where it can sensibly be deployed in a hostile environment.)
In this preparatory commit, I've broken up the SSH-2 transport and
connection layers, and the SSH-1 connection layer, into multiple
source files, with each layer having its own header file containing
the shared type definitions. In each case, the new source file
contains code that's specific to the client side of the protocol, so
that a new file can be swapped in in its place when building the
server.
Mostly this is just a straightforward moving of code without changing
it very much, but there are a couple of actual changes in the process:
The parsing of SSH-2 global-request and channel open-messages is now
done by a new pair of functions in the client module. For channel
opens, I've invented a new union data type to be the return value from
that function, representing either failure (plus error message),
success (plus Channel instance to manage the new channel), or an
instruction to hand the channel over to a sharing downstream (plus a
pointer to the downstream in question).
Also, the tree234 of remote port forwardings in ssh2connection is now
initialised on first use by the client-specific code, so that's where
its compare function lives. The shared ssh2connection_free() still
takes responsibility for freeing it, but now has to check if it's
non-null first.
The outer shell of the ssh2_lportfwd_open method, for making a
local-to-remote port forwarding, is still centralised in
ssh2connection.c, but the part of it that actually constructs the
outgoing channel-open message has moved into the client code, because
that will have to change depending on whether the channel-open has to
have type direct-tcpip or forwarded-tcpip.
In the SSH-1 connection layer, half the filter_queue method has moved
out into the new client-specific code, but not all of it -
bidirectional channel maintenance messages are still handled
centrally. One exception is SSH_MSG_PORT_OPEN, which can be sent in
both directions, but with subtly different semantics - from server to
client, it's referring to a previously established remote forwarding
(and must be rejected if there isn't one that matches it), but from
client to server it's just a "direct-tcpip" request with no prior
context. So that one is in the client-specific module, and when I add
the server code it will have its own different handler.
2018-10-20 19:57:37 +03:00
|
|
|
pq_pop(ppl->in_pq);
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
case SSH1_MSG_IGNORE:
|
|
|
|
/* Do nothing, because we're ignoring it! Duhh. */
|
|
|
|
pq_pop(ppl->in_pq);
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
default:
|
2018-10-29 22:50:29 +03:00
|
|
|
return false;
|
Move client-specific SSH code into new files.
This is a major code reorganisation in preparation for making this
code base into one that can build an SSH server as well as a client.
(Mostly for purposes of using the server as a regression test suite
for the client, though I have some other possible uses in mind too.
However, it's currently no part of my plan to harden the server to the
point where it can sensibly be deployed in a hostile environment.)
In this preparatory commit, I've broken up the SSH-2 transport and
connection layers, and the SSH-1 connection layer, into multiple
source files, with each layer having its own header file containing
the shared type definitions. In each case, the new source file
contains code that's specific to the client side of the protocol, so
that a new file can be swapped in in its place when building the
server.
Mostly this is just a straightforward moving of code without changing
it very much, but there are a couple of actual changes in the process:
The parsing of SSH-2 global-request and channel open-messages is now
done by a new pair of functions in the client module. For channel
opens, I've invented a new union data type to be the return value from
that function, representing either failure (plus error message),
success (plus Channel instance to manage the new channel), or an
instruction to hand the channel over to a sharing downstream (plus a
pointer to the downstream in question).
Also, the tree234 of remote port forwardings in ssh2connection is now
initialised on first use by the client-specific code, so that's where
its compare function lives. The shared ssh2connection_free() still
takes responsibility for freeing it, but now has to check if it's
non-null first.
The outer shell of the ssh2_lportfwd_open method, for making a
local-to-remote port forwarding, is still centralised in
ssh2connection.c, but the part of it that actually constructs the
outgoing channel-open message has moved into the client code, because
that will have to change depending on whether the channel-open has to
have type direct-tcpip or forwarded-tcpip.
In the SSH-1 connection layer, half the filter_queue method has moved
out into the new client-specific code, but not all of it -
bidirectional channel maintenance messages are still handled
centrally. One exception is SSH_MSG_PORT_OPEN, which can be sent in
both directions, but with subtly different semantics - from server to
client, it's referring to a previously established remote forwarding
(and must be rejected if there isn't one that matches it), but from
client to server it's just a "direct-tcpip" request with no prior
context. So that one is in the client-specific module, and when I add
the server code it will have its own different handler.
2018-10-20 19:57:37 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2018-10-29 22:50:29 +03:00
|
|
|
return false;
|
Move client-specific SSH code into new files.
This is a major code reorganisation in preparation for making this
code base into one that can build an SSH server as well as a client.
(Mostly for purposes of using the server as a regression test suite
for the client, though I have some other possible uses in mind too.
However, it's currently no part of my plan to harden the server to the
point where it can sensibly be deployed in a hostile environment.)
In this preparatory commit, I've broken up the SSH-2 transport and
connection layers, and the SSH-1 connection layer, into multiple
source files, with each layer having its own header file containing
the shared type definitions. In each case, the new source file
contains code that's specific to the client side of the protocol, so
that a new file can be swapped in in its place when building the
server.
Mostly this is just a straightforward moving of code without changing
it very much, but there are a couple of actual changes in the process:
The parsing of SSH-2 global-request and channel open-messages is now
done by a new pair of functions in the client module. For channel
opens, I've invented a new union data type to be the return value from
that function, representing either failure (plus error message),
success (plus Channel instance to manage the new channel), or an
instruction to hand the channel over to a sharing downstream (plus a
pointer to the downstream in question).
Also, the tree234 of remote port forwardings in ssh2connection is now
initialised on first use by the client-specific code, so that's where
its compare function lives. The shared ssh2connection_free() still
takes responsibility for freeing it, but now has to check if it's
non-null first.
The outer shell of the ssh2_lportfwd_open method, for making a
local-to-remote port forwarding, is still centralised in
ssh2connection.c, but the part of it that actually constructs the
outgoing channel-open message has moved into the client code, because
that will have to change depending on whether the channel-open has to
have type direct-tcpip or forwarded-tcpip.
In the SSH-1 connection layer, half the filter_queue method has moved
out into the new client-specific code, but not all of it -
bidirectional channel maintenance messages are still handled
centrally. One exception is SSH_MSG_PORT_OPEN, which can be sent in
both directions, but with subtly different semantics - from server to
client, it's referring to a previously established remote forwarding
(and must be rejected if there isn't one that matches it), but from
client to server it's just a "direct-tcpip" request with no prior
context. So that one is in the client-specific module, and when I add
the server code it will have its own different handler.
2018-10-20 19:57:37 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
void ssh1_compute_session_id(
|
|
|
|
unsigned char *session_id, const unsigned char *cookie,
|
|
|
|
struct RSAKey *hostkey, struct RSAKey *servkey)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct MD5Context md5c;
|
|
|
|
int i;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MD5Init(&md5c);
|
|
|
|
for (i = (bignum_bitcount(hostkey->modulus) + 7) / 8; i-- ;)
|
|
|
|
put_byte(&md5c, bignum_byte(hostkey->modulus, i));
|
|
|
|
for (i = (bignum_bitcount(servkey->modulus) + 7) / 8; i-- ;)
|
|
|
|
put_byte(&md5c, bignum_byte(servkey->modulus, i));
|
|
|
|
put_data(&md5c, cookie, 8);
|
|
|
|
MD5Final(session_id, &md5c);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
Move most of ssh.c out into separate source files.
I've tried to separate out as many individually coherent changes from
this work as I could into their own commits, but here's where I run
out and have to commit the rest of this major refactoring as a
big-bang change.
Most of ssh.c is now no longer in ssh.c: all five of the main
coroutines that handle layers of the SSH-1 and SSH-2 protocols now
each have their own source file to live in, and a lot of the
supporting functions have moved into the appropriate one of those too.
The new abstraction is a vtable called 'PacketProtocolLayer', which
has an input and output packet queue. Each layer's main coroutine is
invoked from the method ssh_ppl_process_queue(), which is usually
(though not exclusively) triggered automatically when things are
pushed on the input queue. In SSH-2, the base layer is the transport
protocol, and it contains a pair of subsidiary queues by which it
passes some of its packets to the higher SSH-2 layers - first userauth
and then connection, which are peers at the same level, with the
former abdicating in favour of the latter at the appropriate moment.
SSH-1 is simpler: the whole login phase of the protocol (crypto setup
and authentication) is all in one module, and since SSH-1 has no
repeat key exchange, that setup layer abdicates in favour of the
connection phase when it's done.
ssh.c itself is now about a tenth of its old size (which all by itself
is cause for celebration!). Its main job is to set up all the layers,
hook them up to each other and to the BPP, and to funnel data back and
forth between that collection of modules and external things such as
the network and the terminal. Once it's set up a collection of packet
protocol layers, it communicates with them partly by calling methods
of the base layer (and if that's ssh2transport then it will delegate
some functionality to the corresponding methods of its higher layer),
and partly by talking directly to the connection layer no matter where
it is in the stack by means of the separate ConnectionLayer vtable
which I introduced in commit 8001dd4cb, and to which I've now added
quite a few extra methods replacing services that used to be internal
function calls within ssh.c.
(One effect of this is that the SSH-1 and SSH-2 channel storage is now
no longer shared - there are distinct struct types ssh1_channel and
ssh2_channel. That means a bit more code duplication, but on the plus
side, a lot fewer confusing conditionals in the middle of half-shared
functions, and less risk of a piece of SSH-1 escaping into SSH-2 or
vice versa, which I remember has happened at least once in the past.)
The bulk of this commit introduces the five new source files, their
common header sshppl.h and some shared supporting routines in
sshcommon.c, and rewrites nearly all of ssh.c itself. But it also
includes a couple of other changes that I couldn't separate easily
enough:
Firstly, there's a new handling for socket EOF, in which ssh.c sets an
'input_eof' flag in the BPP, and that responds by checking a flag that
tells it whether to report the EOF as an error or not. (This is the
main reason for those new BPP_READ / BPP_WAITFOR macros - they can
check the EOF flag every time the coroutine is resumed.)
Secondly, the error reporting itself is changed around again. I'd
expected to put some data fields in the public PacketProtocolLayer
structure that it could set to report errors in the same way as the
BPPs have been doing, but in the end, I decided propagating all those
data fields around was a pain and that even the BPPs shouldn't have
been doing it that way. So I've reverted to a system where everything
calls back to functions in ssh.c itself to report any connection-
ending condition. But there's a new family of those functions,
categorising the possible such conditions by semantics, and each one
has a different set of detailed effects (e.g. how rudely to close the
network connection, what exit status should be passed back to the
whole application, whether to send a disconnect message and/or display
a GUI error box).
I don't expect this to be immediately perfect: of course, the code has
been through a big upheaval, new bugs are expected, and I haven't been
able to do a full job of testing (e.g. I haven't tested every auth or
kex method). But I've checked that it _basically_ works - both SSH
protocols, all the different kinds of forwarding channel, more than
one auth method, Windows and Linux, connection sharing - and I think
it's now at the point where the easiest way to find further bugs is to
let it out into the wild and see what users can spot.
2018-09-24 20:28:16 +03:00
|
|
|
/* ----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
* Other miscellaneous utility functions.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
void free_rportfwd(struct ssh_rportfwd *rpf)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
if (rpf) {
|
|
|
|
sfree(rpf->log_description);
|
|
|
|
sfree(rpf->shost);
|
|
|
|
sfree(rpf->dhost);
|
|
|
|
sfree(rpf);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|