putty/sshdss.c

508 строки
14 KiB
C
Исходник Обычный вид История

/*
* Digital Signature Standard implementation for PuTTY.
*/
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <assert.h>
#include "ssh.h"
#include "misc.h"
Invent a struct type for polymorphic SSH key data. During last week's work, I made a mistake in which I got the arguments backwards in one of the key-blob-generating functions - mistakenly swapped the 'void *' key instance with the 'BinarySink *' output destination - and I didn't spot the mistake until run time, because in C you can implicitly convert both to and from void * and so there was no compile-time failure of type checking. Now that I've introduced the FROMFIELD macro that downcasts a pointer to one field of a structure to retrieve a pointer to the whole structure, I think I might start using that more widely to indicate this kind of polymorphic subtyping. So now all the public-key functions in the struct ssh_signkey vtable handle their data instance in the form of a pointer to a subfield of a new zero-sized structure type 'ssh_key', which outside the key implementations indicates 'this is some kind of key instance but it could be of any type'; they downcast that pointer internally using FROMFIELD in place of the previous ordinary C cast, and return one by returning &foo->sshk for whatever foo they've just made up. The sshk member is not at the beginning of the structure, which means all those FROMFIELDs and &key->sshk are actually adding and subtracting an offset. Of course I could have put the member at the start anyway, but I had the idea that it's actually a feature _not_ to have the two types start at the same address, because it means you should notice earlier rather than later if you absentmindedly cast from one to the other directly rather than by the approved method (in particular, if you accidentally assign one through a void * and back without even _noticing_ you perpetrated a cast). In particular, this enforces that you can't sfree() the thing even once without realising you should instead of called the right freekey function. (I found several bugs by this method during initial testing, so I think it's already proved its worth!) While I'm here, I've also renamed the vtable structure ssh_signkey to ssh_keyalg, because it was a confusing name anyway - it describes the _algorithm_ for handling all keys of that type, not a specific key. So ssh_keyalg is the collection of code, and ssh_key is one instance of the data it handles.
2018-05-27 10:32:21 +03:00
static void dss_freekey(ssh_key *key); /* forward reference */
static ssh_key *dss_new_pub(const ssh_keyalg *self, ptrlen data)
{
BinarySource src[1];
struct dss_key *dss;
BinarySource_BARE_INIT(src, data.ptr, data.len);
if (!ptrlen_eq_string(get_string(src), "ssh-dss"))
return NULL;
dss = snew(struct dss_key);
dss->sshk = &ssh_dss;
dss->p = get_mp_ssh2(src);
dss->q = get_mp_ssh2(src);
dss->g = get_mp_ssh2(src);
dss->y = get_mp_ssh2(src);
dss->x = NULL;
if (get_err(src) ||
!bignum_cmp(dss->q, Zero) || !bignum_cmp(dss->p, Zero)) {
/* Invalid key. */
Invent a struct type for polymorphic SSH key data. During last week's work, I made a mistake in which I got the arguments backwards in one of the key-blob-generating functions - mistakenly swapped the 'void *' key instance with the 'BinarySink *' output destination - and I didn't spot the mistake until run time, because in C you can implicitly convert both to and from void * and so there was no compile-time failure of type checking. Now that I've introduced the FROMFIELD macro that downcasts a pointer to one field of a structure to retrieve a pointer to the whole structure, I think I might start using that more widely to indicate this kind of polymorphic subtyping. So now all the public-key functions in the struct ssh_signkey vtable handle their data instance in the form of a pointer to a subfield of a new zero-sized structure type 'ssh_key', which outside the key implementations indicates 'this is some kind of key instance but it could be of any type'; they downcast that pointer internally using FROMFIELD in place of the previous ordinary C cast, and return one by returning &foo->sshk for whatever foo they've just made up. The sshk member is not at the beginning of the structure, which means all those FROMFIELDs and &key->sshk are actually adding and subtracting an offset. Of course I could have put the member at the start anyway, but I had the idea that it's actually a feature _not_ to have the two types start at the same address, because it means you should notice earlier rather than later if you absentmindedly cast from one to the other directly rather than by the approved method (in particular, if you accidentally assign one through a void * and back without even _noticing_ you perpetrated a cast). In particular, this enforces that you can't sfree() the thing even once without realising you should instead of called the right freekey function. (I found several bugs by this method during initial testing, so I think it's already proved its worth!) While I'm here, I've also renamed the vtable structure ssh_signkey to ssh_keyalg, because it was a confusing name anyway - it describes the _algorithm_ for handling all keys of that type, not a specific key. So ssh_keyalg is the collection of code, and ssh_key is one instance of the data it handles.
2018-05-27 10:32:21 +03:00
dss_freekey(&dss->sshk);
return NULL;
}
Invent a struct type for polymorphic SSH key data. During last week's work, I made a mistake in which I got the arguments backwards in one of the key-blob-generating functions - mistakenly swapped the 'void *' key instance with the 'BinarySink *' output destination - and I didn't spot the mistake until run time, because in C you can implicitly convert both to and from void * and so there was no compile-time failure of type checking. Now that I've introduced the FROMFIELD macro that downcasts a pointer to one field of a structure to retrieve a pointer to the whole structure, I think I might start using that more widely to indicate this kind of polymorphic subtyping. So now all the public-key functions in the struct ssh_signkey vtable handle their data instance in the form of a pointer to a subfield of a new zero-sized structure type 'ssh_key', which outside the key implementations indicates 'this is some kind of key instance but it could be of any type'; they downcast that pointer internally using FROMFIELD in place of the previous ordinary C cast, and return one by returning &foo->sshk for whatever foo they've just made up. The sshk member is not at the beginning of the structure, which means all those FROMFIELDs and &key->sshk are actually adding and subtracting an offset. Of course I could have put the member at the start anyway, but I had the idea that it's actually a feature _not_ to have the two types start at the same address, because it means you should notice earlier rather than later if you absentmindedly cast from one to the other directly rather than by the approved method (in particular, if you accidentally assign one through a void * and back without even _noticing_ you perpetrated a cast). In particular, this enforces that you can't sfree() the thing even once without realising you should instead of called the right freekey function. (I found several bugs by this method during initial testing, so I think it's already proved its worth!) While I'm here, I've also renamed the vtable structure ssh_signkey to ssh_keyalg, because it was a confusing name anyway - it describes the _algorithm_ for handling all keys of that type, not a specific key. So ssh_keyalg is the collection of code, and ssh_key is one instance of the data it handles.
2018-05-27 10:32:21 +03:00
return &dss->sshk;
}
Invent a struct type for polymorphic SSH key data. During last week's work, I made a mistake in which I got the arguments backwards in one of the key-blob-generating functions - mistakenly swapped the 'void *' key instance with the 'BinarySink *' output destination - and I didn't spot the mistake until run time, because in C you can implicitly convert both to and from void * and so there was no compile-time failure of type checking. Now that I've introduced the FROMFIELD macro that downcasts a pointer to one field of a structure to retrieve a pointer to the whole structure, I think I might start using that more widely to indicate this kind of polymorphic subtyping. So now all the public-key functions in the struct ssh_signkey vtable handle their data instance in the form of a pointer to a subfield of a new zero-sized structure type 'ssh_key', which outside the key implementations indicates 'this is some kind of key instance but it could be of any type'; they downcast that pointer internally using FROMFIELD in place of the previous ordinary C cast, and return one by returning &foo->sshk for whatever foo they've just made up. The sshk member is not at the beginning of the structure, which means all those FROMFIELDs and &key->sshk are actually adding and subtracting an offset. Of course I could have put the member at the start anyway, but I had the idea that it's actually a feature _not_ to have the two types start at the same address, because it means you should notice earlier rather than later if you absentmindedly cast from one to the other directly rather than by the approved method (in particular, if you accidentally assign one through a void * and back without even _noticing_ you perpetrated a cast). In particular, this enforces that you can't sfree() the thing even once without realising you should instead of called the right freekey function. (I found several bugs by this method during initial testing, so I think it's already proved its worth!) While I'm here, I've also renamed the vtable structure ssh_signkey to ssh_keyalg, because it was a confusing name anyway - it describes the _algorithm_ for handling all keys of that type, not a specific key. So ssh_keyalg is the collection of code, and ssh_key is one instance of the data it handles.
2018-05-27 10:32:21 +03:00
static void dss_freekey(ssh_key *key)
{
struct dss_key *dss = container_of(key, struct dss_key, sshk);
if (dss->p)
freebn(dss->p);
if (dss->q)
freebn(dss->q);
if (dss->g)
freebn(dss->g);
if (dss->y)
freebn(dss->y);
if (dss->x)
freebn(dss->x);
sfree(dss);
}
static char *dss_cache_str(ssh_key *key)
{
struct dss_key *dss = container_of(key, struct dss_key, sshk);
char *p;
int len, i, pos, nibbles;
static const char hex[] = "0123456789abcdef";
if (!dss->p)
return NULL;
len = 8 + 4 + 1; /* 4 x "0x", punctuation, \0 */
len += 4 * (bignum_bitcount(dss->p) + 15) / 16;
len += 4 * (bignum_bitcount(dss->q) + 15) / 16;
len += 4 * (bignum_bitcount(dss->g) + 15) / 16;
len += 4 * (bignum_bitcount(dss->y) + 15) / 16;
p = snewn(len, char);
if (!p)
return NULL;
pos = 0;
pos += sprintf(p + pos, "0x");
nibbles = (3 + bignum_bitcount(dss->p)) / 4;
if (nibbles < 1)
nibbles = 1;
for (i = nibbles; i--;)
p[pos++] =
hex[(bignum_byte(dss->p, i / 2) >> (4 * (i % 2))) & 0xF];
pos += sprintf(p + pos, ",0x");
nibbles = (3 + bignum_bitcount(dss->q)) / 4;
if (nibbles < 1)
nibbles = 1;
for (i = nibbles; i--;)
p[pos++] =
hex[(bignum_byte(dss->q, i / 2) >> (4 * (i % 2))) & 0xF];
pos += sprintf(p + pos, ",0x");
nibbles = (3 + bignum_bitcount(dss->g)) / 4;
if (nibbles < 1)
nibbles = 1;
for (i = nibbles; i--;)
p[pos++] =
hex[(bignum_byte(dss->g, i / 2) >> (4 * (i % 2))) & 0xF];
pos += sprintf(p + pos, ",0x");
nibbles = (3 + bignum_bitcount(dss->y)) / 4;
if (nibbles < 1)
nibbles = 1;
for (i = nibbles; i--;)
p[pos++] =
hex[(bignum_byte(dss->y, i / 2) >> (4 * (i % 2))) & 0xF];
p[pos] = '\0';
return p;
}
Convert a lot of 'int' variables to 'bool'. My normal habit these days, in new code, is to treat int and bool as _almost_ completely separate types. I'm still willing to use C's implicit test for zero on an integer (e.g. 'if (!blob.len)' is fine, no need to spell it out as blob.len != 0), but generally, if a variable is going to be conceptually a boolean, I like to declare it bool and assign to it using 'true' or 'false' rather than 0 or 1. PuTTY is an exception, because it predates the C99 bool, and I've stuck to its existing coding style even when adding new code to it. But it's been annoying me more and more, so now that I've decided C99 bool is an acceptable thing to require from our toolchain in the first place, here's a quite thorough trawl through the source doing 'boolification'. Many variables and function parameters are now typed as bool rather than int; many assignments of 0 or 1 to those variables are now spelled 'true' or 'false'. I managed this thorough conversion with the help of a custom clang plugin that I wrote to trawl the AST and apply heuristics to point out where things might want changing. So I've even managed to do a decent job on parts of the code I haven't looked at in years! To make the plugin's work easier, I pushed platform front ends generally in the direction of using standard 'bool' in preference to platform-specific boolean types like Windows BOOL or GTK's gboolean; I've left the platform booleans in places they _have_ to be for the platform APIs to work right, but variables only used by my own code have been converted wherever I found them. In a few places there are int values that look very like booleans in _most_ of the places they're used, but have a rarely-used third value, or a distinction between different nonzero values that most users don't care about. In these cases, I've _removed_ uses of 'true' and 'false' for the return values, to emphasise that there's something more subtle going on than a simple boolean answer: - the 'multisel' field in dialog.h's list box structure, for which the GTK front end in particular recognises a difference between 1 and 2 but nearly everything else treats as boolean - the 'urgent' parameter to plug_receive, where 1 vs 2 tells you something about the specific location of the urgent pointer, but most clients only care about 0 vs 'something nonzero' - the return value of wc_match, where -1 indicates a syntax error in the wildcard. - the return values from SSH-1 RSA-key loading functions, which use -1 for 'wrong passphrase' and 0 for all other failures (so any caller which already knows it's not loading an _encrypted private_ key can treat them as boolean) - term->esc_query, and the 'query' parameter in toggle_mode in terminal.c, which _usually_ hold 0 for ESC[123h or 1 for ESC[?123h, but can also hold -1 for some other intervening character that we don't support. In a few places there's an integer that I haven't turned into a bool even though it really _can_ only take values 0 or 1 (and, as above, tried to make the call sites consistent in not calling those values true and false), on the grounds that I thought it would make it more confusing to imply that the 0 value was in some sense 'negative' or bad and the 1 positive or good: - the return value of plug_accepting uses the POSIXish convention of 0=success and nonzero=error; I think if I made it bool then I'd also want to reverse its sense, and that's a job for a separate piece of work. - the 'screen' parameter to lineptr() in terminal.c, where 0 and 1 represent the default and alternate screens. There's no obvious reason why one of those should be considered 'true' or 'positive' or 'success' - they're just indices - so I've left it as int. ssh_scp_recv had particularly confusing semantics for its previous int return value: its call sites used '<= 0' to check for error, but it never actually returned a negative number, just 0 or 1. Now the function and its call sites agree that it's a bool. In a couple of places I've renamed variables called 'ret', because I don't like that name any more - it's unclear whether it means the return value (in preparation) for the _containing_ function or the return value received from a subroutine call, and occasionally I've accidentally used the same variable for both and introduced a bug. So where one of those got in my way, I've renamed it to 'toret' or 'retd' (the latter short for 'returned') in line with my usual modern practice, but I haven't done a thorough job of finding all of them. Finally, one amusing side effect of doing this is that I've had to separate quite a few chained assignments. It used to be perfectly fine to write 'a = b = c = TRUE' when a,b,c were int and TRUE was just a the 'true' defined by stdbool.h, that idiom provokes a warning from gcc: 'suggest parentheses around assignment used as truth value'!
2018-11-02 22:23:19 +03:00
static bool dss_verify(ssh_key *key, ptrlen sig, ptrlen data)
{
struct dss_key *dss = container_of(key, struct dss_key, sshk);
BinarySource src[1];
unsigned char hash[20];
Bignum r, s, w, gu1p, yu2p, gu1yu2p, u1, u2, sha, v;
Convert a lot of 'int' variables to 'bool'. My normal habit these days, in new code, is to treat int and bool as _almost_ completely separate types. I'm still willing to use C's implicit test for zero on an integer (e.g. 'if (!blob.len)' is fine, no need to spell it out as blob.len != 0), but generally, if a variable is going to be conceptually a boolean, I like to declare it bool and assign to it using 'true' or 'false' rather than 0 or 1. PuTTY is an exception, because it predates the C99 bool, and I've stuck to its existing coding style even when adding new code to it. But it's been annoying me more and more, so now that I've decided C99 bool is an acceptable thing to require from our toolchain in the first place, here's a quite thorough trawl through the source doing 'boolification'. Many variables and function parameters are now typed as bool rather than int; many assignments of 0 or 1 to those variables are now spelled 'true' or 'false'. I managed this thorough conversion with the help of a custom clang plugin that I wrote to trawl the AST and apply heuristics to point out where things might want changing. So I've even managed to do a decent job on parts of the code I haven't looked at in years! To make the plugin's work easier, I pushed platform front ends generally in the direction of using standard 'bool' in preference to platform-specific boolean types like Windows BOOL or GTK's gboolean; I've left the platform booleans in places they _have_ to be for the platform APIs to work right, but variables only used by my own code have been converted wherever I found them. In a few places there are int values that look very like booleans in _most_ of the places they're used, but have a rarely-used third value, or a distinction between different nonzero values that most users don't care about. In these cases, I've _removed_ uses of 'true' and 'false' for the return values, to emphasise that there's something more subtle going on than a simple boolean answer: - the 'multisel' field in dialog.h's list box structure, for which the GTK front end in particular recognises a difference between 1 and 2 but nearly everything else treats as boolean - the 'urgent' parameter to plug_receive, where 1 vs 2 tells you something about the specific location of the urgent pointer, but most clients only care about 0 vs 'something nonzero' - the return value of wc_match, where -1 indicates a syntax error in the wildcard. - the return values from SSH-1 RSA-key loading functions, which use -1 for 'wrong passphrase' and 0 for all other failures (so any caller which already knows it's not loading an _encrypted private_ key can treat them as boolean) - term->esc_query, and the 'query' parameter in toggle_mode in terminal.c, which _usually_ hold 0 for ESC[123h or 1 for ESC[?123h, but can also hold -1 for some other intervening character that we don't support. In a few places there's an integer that I haven't turned into a bool even though it really _can_ only take values 0 or 1 (and, as above, tried to make the call sites consistent in not calling those values true and false), on the grounds that I thought it would make it more confusing to imply that the 0 value was in some sense 'negative' or bad and the 1 positive or good: - the return value of plug_accepting uses the POSIXish convention of 0=success and nonzero=error; I think if I made it bool then I'd also want to reverse its sense, and that's a job for a separate piece of work. - the 'screen' parameter to lineptr() in terminal.c, where 0 and 1 represent the default and alternate screens. There's no obvious reason why one of those should be considered 'true' or 'positive' or 'success' - they're just indices - so I've left it as int. ssh_scp_recv had particularly confusing semantics for its previous int return value: its call sites used '<= 0' to check for error, but it never actually returned a negative number, just 0 or 1. Now the function and its call sites agree that it's a bool. In a couple of places I've renamed variables called 'ret', because I don't like that name any more - it's unclear whether it means the return value (in preparation) for the _containing_ function or the return value received from a subroutine call, and occasionally I've accidentally used the same variable for both and introduced a bug. So where one of those got in my way, I've renamed it to 'toret' or 'retd' (the latter short for 'returned') in line with my usual modern practice, but I haven't done a thorough job of finding all of them. Finally, one amusing side effect of doing this is that I've had to separate quite a few chained assignments. It used to be perfectly fine to write 'a = b = c = TRUE' when a,b,c were int and TRUE was just a the 'true' defined by stdbool.h, that idiom provokes a warning from gcc: 'suggest parentheses around assignment used as truth value'!
2018-11-02 22:23:19 +03:00
bool toret;
if (!dss->p)
Convert a lot of 'int' variables to 'bool'. My normal habit these days, in new code, is to treat int and bool as _almost_ completely separate types. I'm still willing to use C's implicit test for zero on an integer (e.g. 'if (!blob.len)' is fine, no need to spell it out as blob.len != 0), but generally, if a variable is going to be conceptually a boolean, I like to declare it bool and assign to it using 'true' or 'false' rather than 0 or 1. PuTTY is an exception, because it predates the C99 bool, and I've stuck to its existing coding style even when adding new code to it. But it's been annoying me more and more, so now that I've decided C99 bool is an acceptable thing to require from our toolchain in the first place, here's a quite thorough trawl through the source doing 'boolification'. Many variables and function parameters are now typed as bool rather than int; many assignments of 0 or 1 to those variables are now spelled 'true' or 'false'. I managed this thorough conversion with the help of a custom clang plugin that I wrote to trawl the AST and apply heuristics to point out where things might want changing. So I've even managed to do a decent job on parts of the code I haven't looked at in years! To make the plugin's work easier, I pushed platform front ends generally in the direction of using standard 'bool' in preference to platform-specific boolean types like Windows BOOL or GTK's gboolean; I've left the platform booleans in places they _have_ to be for the platform APIs to work right, but variables only used by my own code have been converted wherever I found them. In a few places there are int values that look very like booleans in _most_ of the places they're used, but have a rarely-used third value, or a distinction between different nonzero values that most users don't care about. In these cases, I've _removed_ uses of 'true' and 'false' for the return values, to emphasise that there's something more subtle going on than a simple boolean answer: - the 'multisel' field in dialog.h's list box structure, for which the GTK front end in particular recognises a difference between 1 and 2 but nearly everything else treats as boolean - the 'urgent' parameter to plug_receive, where 1 vs 2 tells you something about the specific location of the urgent pointer, but most clients only care about 0 vs 'something nonzero' - the return value of wc_match, where -1 indicates a syntax error in the wildcard. - the return values from SSH-1 RSA-key loading functions, which use -1 for 'wrong passphrase' and 0 for all other failures (so any caller which already knows it's not loading an _encrypted private_ key can treat them as boolean) - term->esc_query, and the 'query' parameter in toggle_mode in terminal.c, which _usually_ hold 0 for ESC[123h or 1 for ESC[?123h, but can also hold -1 for some other intervening character that we don't support. In a few places there's an integer that I haven't turned into a bool even though it really _can_ only take values 0 or 1 (and, as above, tried to make the call sites consistent in not calling those values true and false), on the grounds that I thought it would make it more confusing to imply that the 0 value was in some sense 'negative' or bad and the 1 positive or good: - the return value of plug_accepting uses the POSIXish convention of 0=success and nonzero=error; I think if I made it bool then I'd also want to reverse its sense, and that's a job for a separate piece of work. - the 'screen' parameter to lineptr() in terminal.c, where 0 and 1 represent the default and alternate screens. There's no obvious reason why one of those should be considered 'true' or 'positive' or 'success' - they're just indices - so I've left it as int. ssh_scp_recv had particularly confusing semantics for its previous int return value: its call sites used '<= 0' to check for error, but it never actually returned a negative number, just 0 or 1. Now the function and its call sites agree that it's a bool. In a couple of places I've renamed variables called 'ret', because I don't like that name any more - it's unclear whether it means the return value (in preparation) for the _containing_ function or the return value received from a subroutine call, and occasionally I've accidentally used the same variable for both and introduced a bug. So where one of those got in my way, I've renamed it to 'toret' or 'retd' (the latter short for 'returned') in line with my usual modern practice, but I haven't done a thorough job of finding all of them. Finally, one amusing side effect of doing this is that I've had to separate quite a few chained assignments. It used to be perfectly fine to write 'a = b = c = TRUE' when a,b,c were int and TRUE was just a the 'true' defined by stdbool.h, that idiom provokes a warning from gcc: 'suggest parentheses around assignment used as truth value'!
2018-11-02 22:23:19 +03:00
return false;
BinarySource_BARE_INIT(src, sig.ptr, sig.len);
/*
* Commercial SSH (2.0.13) and OpenSSH disagree over the format
* of a DSA signature. OpenSSH is in line with RFC 4253:
* it uses a string "ssh-dss", followed by a 40-byte string
* containing two 160-bit integers end-to-end. Commercial SSH
* can't be bothered with the header bit, and considers a DSA
* signature blob to be _just_ the 40-byte string containing
* the two 160-bit integers. We tell them apart by measuring
* the length: length 40 means the commercial-SSH bug, anything
* else is assumed to be RFC-compliant.
*/
if (sig.len != 40) { /* bug not present; read admin fields */
ptrlen type = get_string(src);
sig = get_string(src);
if (get_err(src) || !ptrlen_eq_string(type, "ssh-dss") ||
sig.len != 40)
Convert a lot of 'int' variables to 'bool'. My normal habit these days, in new code, is to treat int and bool as _almost_ completely separate types. I'm still willing to use C's implicit test for zero on an integer (e.g. 'if (!blob.len)' is fine, no need to spell it out as blob.len != 0), but generally, if a variable is going to be conceptually a boolean, I like to declare it bool and assign to it using 'true' or 'false' rather than 0 or 1. PuTTY is an exception, because it predates the C99 bool, and I've stuck to its existing coding style even when adding new code to it. But it's been annoying me more and more, so now that I've decided C99 bool is an acceptable thing to require from our toolchain in the first place, here's a quite thorough trawl through the source doing 'boolification'. Many variables and function parameters are now typed as bool rather than int; many assignments of 0 or 1 to those variables are now spelled 'true' or 'false'. I managed this thorough conversion with the help of a custom clang plugin that I wrote to trawl the AST and apply heuristics to point out where things might want changing. So I've even managed to do a decent job on parts of the code I haven't looked at in years! To make the plugin's work easier, I pushed platform front ends generally in the direction of using standard 'bool' in preference to platform-specific boolean types like Windows BOOL or GTK's gboolean; I've left the platform booleans in places they _have_ to be for the platform APIs to work right, but variables only used by my own code have been converted wherever I found them. In a few places there are int values that look very like booleans in _most_ of the places they're used, but have a rarely-used third value, or a distinction between different nonzero values that most users don't care about. In these cases, I've _removed_ uses of 'true' and 'false' for the return values, to emphasise that there's something more subtle going on than a simple boolean answer: - the 'multisel' field in dialog.h's list box structure, for which the GTK front end in particular recognises a difference between 1 and 2 but nearly everything else treats as boolean - the 'urgent' parameter to plug_receive, where 1 vs 2 tells you something about the specific location of the urgent pointer, but most clients only care about 0 vs 'something nonzero' - the return value of wc_match, where -1 indicates a syntax error in the wildcard. - the return values from SSH-1 RSA-key loading functions, which use -1 for 'wrong passphrase' and 0 for all other failures (so any caller which already knows it's not loading an _encrypted private_ key can treat them as boolean) - term->esc_query, and the 'query' parameter in toggle_mode in terminal.c, which _usually_ hold 0 for ESC[123h or 1 for ESC[?123h, but can also hold -1 for some other intervening character that we don't support. In a few places there's an integer that I haven't turned into a bool even though it really _can_ only take values 0 or 1 (and, as above, tried to make the call sites consistent in not calling those values true and false), on the grounds that I thought it would make it more confusing to imply that the 0 value was in some sense 'negative' or bad and the 1 positive or good: - the return value of plug_accepting uses the POSIXish convention of 0=success and nonzero=error; I think if I made it bool then I'd also want to reverse its sense, and that's a job for a separate piece of work. - the 'screen' parameter to lineptr() in terminal.c, where 0 and 1 represent the default and alternate screens. There's no obvious reason why one of those should be considered 'true' or 'positive' or 'success' - they're just indices - so I've left it as int. ssh_scp_recv had particularly confusing semantics for its previous int return value: its call sites used '<= 0' to check for error, but it never actually returned a negative number, just 0 or 1. Now the function and its call sites agree that it's a bool. In a couple of places I've renamed variables called 'ret', because I don't like that name any more - it's unclear whether it means the return value (in preparation) for the _containing_ function or the return value received from a subroutine call, and occasionally I've accidentally used the same variable for both and introduced a bug. So where one of those got in my way, I've renamed it to 'toret' or 'retd' (the latter short for 'returned') in line with my usual modern practice, but I haven't done a thorough job of finding all of them. Finally, one amusing side effect of doing this is that I've had to separate quite a few chained assignments. It used to be perfectly fine to write 'a = b = c = TRUE' when a,b,c were int and TRUE was just a the 'true' defined by stdbool.h, that idiom provokes a warning from gcc: 'suggest parentheses around assignment used as truth value'!
2018-11-02 22:23:19 +03:00
return false;
}
/* Now we're sitting on a 40-byte string for sure. */
r = bignum_from_bytes(sig.ptr, 20);
s = bignum_from_bytes((const char *)sig.ptr + 20, 20);
if (!r || !s) {
if (r)
freebn(r);
if (s)
freebn(s);
Convert a lot of 'int' variables to 'bool'. My normal habit these days, in new code, is to treat int and bool as _almost_ completely separate types. I'm still willing to use C's implicit test for zero on an integer (e.g. 'if (!blob.len)' is fine, no need to spell it out as blob.len != 0), but generally, if a variable is going to be conceptually a boolean, I like to declare it bool and assign to it using 'true' or 'false' rather than 0 or 1. PuTTY is an exception, because it predates the C99 bool, and I've stuck to its existing coding style even when adding new code to it. But it's been annoying me more and more, so now that I've decided C99 bool is an acceptable thing to require from our toolchain in the first place, here's a quite thorough trawl through the source doing 'boolification'. Many variables and function parameters are now typed as bool rather than int; many assignments of 0 or 1 to those variables are now spelled 'true' or 'false'. I managed this thorough conversion with the help of a custom clang plugin that I wrote to trawl the AST and apply heuristics to point out where things might want changing. So I've even managed to do a decent job on parts of the code I haven't looked at in years! To make the plugin's work easier, I pushed platform front ends generally in the direction of using standard 'bool' in preference to platform-specific boolean types like Windows BOOL or GTK's gboolean; I've left the platform booleans in places they _have_ to be for the platform APIs to work right, but variables only used by my own code have been converted wherever I found them. In a few places there are int values that look very like booleans in _most_ of the places they're used, but have a rarely-used third value, or a distinction between different nonzero values that most users don't care about. In these cases, I've _removed_ uses of 'true' and 'false' for the return values, to emphasise that there's something more subtle going on than a simple boolean answer: - the 'multisel' field in dialog.h's list box structure, for which the GTK front end in particular recognises a difference between 1 and 2 but nearly everything else treats as boolean - the 'urgent' parameter to plug_receive, where 1 vs 2 tells you something about the specific location of the urgent pointer, but most clients only care about 0 vs 'something nonzero' - the return value of wc_match, where -1 indicates a syntax error in the wildcard. - the return values from SSH-1 RSA-key loading functions, which use -1 for 'wrong passphrase' and 0 for all other failures (so any caller which already knows it's not loading an _encrypted private_ key can treat them as boolean) - term->esc_query, and the 'query' parameter in toggle_mode in terminal.c, which _usually_ hold 0 for ESC[123h or 1 for ESC[?123h, but can also hold -1 for some other intervening character that we don't support. In a few places there's an integer that I haven't turned into a bool even though it really _can_ only take values 0 or 1 (and, as above, tried to make the call sites consistent in not calling those values true and false), on the grounds that I thought it would make it more confusing to imply that the 0 value was in some sense 'negative' or bad and the 1 positive or good: - the return value of plug_accepting uses the POSIXish convention of 0=success and nonzero=error; I think if I made it bool then I'd also want to reverse its sense, and that's a job for a separate piece of work. - the 'screen' parameter to lineptr() in terminal.c, where 0 and 1 represent the default and alternate screens. There's no obvious reason why one of those should be considered 'true' or 'positive' or 'success' - they're just indices - so I've left it as int. ssh_scp_recv had particularly confusing semantics for its previous int return value: its call sites used '<= 0' to check for error, but it never actually returned a negative number, just 0 or 1. Now the function and its call sites agree that it's a bool. In a couple of places I've renamed variables called 'ret', because I don't like that name any more - it's unclear whether it means the return value (in preparation) for the _containing_ function or the return value received from a subroutine call, and occasionally I've accidentally used the same variable for both and introduced a bug. So where one of those got in my way, I've renamed it to 'toret' or 'retd' (the latter short for 'returned') in line with my usual modern practice, but I haven't done a thorough job of finding all of them. Finally, one amusing side effect of doing this is that I've had to separate quite a few chained assignments. It used to be perfectly fine to write 'a = b = c = TRUE' when a,b,c were int and TRUE was just a the 'true' defined by stdbool.h, that idiom provokes a warning from gcc: 'suggest parentheses around assignment used as truth value'!
2018-11-02 22:23:19 +03:00
return false;
}
if (!bignum_cmp(s, Zero)) {
freebn(r);
freebn(s);
Convert a lot of 'int' variables to 'bool'. My normal habit these days, in new code, is to treat int and bool as _almost_ completely separate types. I'm still willing to use C's implicit test for zero on an integer (e.g. 'if (!blob.len)' is fine, no need to spell it out as blob.len != 0), but generally, if a variable is going to be conceptually a boolean, I like to declare it bool and assign to it using 'true' or 'false' rather than 0 or 1. PuTTY is an exception, because it predates the C99 bool, and I've stuck to its existing coding style even when adding new code to it. But it's been annoying me more and more, so now that I've decided C99 bool is an acceptable thing to require from our toolchain in the first place, here's a quite thorough trawl through the source doing 'boolification'. Many variables and function parameters are now typed as bool rather than int; many assignments of 0 or 1 to those variables are now spelled 'true' or 'false'. I managed this thorough conversion with the help of a custom clang plugin that I wrote to trawl the AST and apply heuristics to point out where things might want changing. So I've even managed to do a decent job on parts of the code I haven't looked at in years! To make the plugin's work easier, I pushed platform front ends generally in the direction of using standard 'bool' in preference to platform-specific boolean types like Windows BOOL or GTK's gboolean; I've left the platform booleans in places they _have_ to be for the platform APIs to work right, but variables only used by my own code have been converted wherever I found them. In a few places there are int values that look very like booleans in _most_ of the places they're used, but have a rarely-used third value, or a distinction between different nonzero values that most users don't care about. In these cases, I've _removed_ uses of 'true' and 'false' for the return values, to emphasise that there's something more subtle going on than a simple boolean answer: - the 'multisel' field in dialog.h's list box structure, for which the GTK front end in particular recognises a difference between 1 and 2 but nearly everything else treats as boolean - the 'urgent' parameter to plug_receive, where 1 vs 2 tells you something about the specific location of the urgent pointer, but most clients only care about 0 vs 'something nonzero' - the return value of wc_match, where -1 indicates a syntax error in the wildcard. - the return values from SSH-1 RSA-key loading functions, which use -1 for 'wrong passphrase' and 0 for all other failures (so any caller which already knows it's not loading an _encrypted private_ key can treat them as boolean) - term->esc_query, and the 'query' parameter in toggle_mode in terminal.c, which _usually_ hold 0 for ESC[123h or 1 for ESC[?123h, but can also hold -1 for some other intervening character that we don't support. In a few places there's an integer that I haven't turned into a bool even though it really _can_ only take values 0 or 1 (and, as above, tried to make the call sites consistent in not calling those values true and false), on the grounds that I thought it would make it more confusing to imply that the 0 value was in some sense 'negative' or bad and the 1 positive or good: - the return value of plug_accepting uses the POSIXish convention of 0=success and nonzero=error; I think if I made it bool then I'd also want to reverse its sense, and that's a job for a separate piece of work. - the 'screen' parameter to lineptr() in terminal.c, where 0 and 1 represent the default and alternate screens. There's no obvious reason why one of those should be considered 'true' or 'positive' or 'success' - they're just indices - so I've left it as int. ssh_scp_recv had particularly confusing semantics for its previous int return value: its call sites used '<= 0' to check for error, but it never actually returned a negative number, just 0 or 1. Now the function and its call sites agree that it's a bool. In a couple of places I've renamed variables called 'ret', because I don't like that name any more - it's unclear whether it means the return value (in preparation) for the _containing_ function or the return value received from a subroutine call, and occasionally I've accidentally used the same variable for both and introduced a bug. So where one of those got in my way, I've renamed it to 'toret' or 'retd' (the latter short for 'returned') in line with my usual modern practice, but I haven't done a thorough job of finding all of them. Finally, one amusing side effect of doing this is that I've had to separate quite a few chained assignments. It used to be perfectly fine to write 'a = b = c = TRUE' when a,b,c were int and TRUE was just a the 'true' defined by stdbool.h, that idiom provokes a warning from gcc: 'suggest parentheses around assignment used as truth value'!
2018-11-02 22:23:19 +03:00
return false;
}
/*
* Step 1. w <- s^-1 mod q.
*/
w = modinv(s, dss->q);
if (!w) {
freebn(r);
freebn(s);
Convert a lot of 'int' variables to 'bool'. My normal habit these days, in new code, is to treat int and bool as _almost_ completely separate types. I'm still willing to use C's implicit test for zero on an integer (e.g. 'if (!blob.len)' is fine, no need to spell it out as blob.len != 0), but generally, if a variable is going to be conceptually a boolean, I like to declare it bool and assign to it using 'true' or 'false' rather than 0 or 1. PuTTY is an exception, because it predates the C99 bool, and I've stuck to its existing coding style even when adding new code to it. But it's been annoying me more and more, so now that I've decided C99 bool is an acceptable thing to require from our toolchain in the first place, here's a quite thorough trawl through the source doing 'boolification'. Many variables and function parameters are now typed as bool rather than int; many assignments of 0 or 1 to those variables are now spelled 'true' or 'false'. I managed this thorough conversion with the help of a custom clang plugin that I wrote to trawl the AST and apply heuristics to point out where things might want changing. So I've even managed to do a decent job on parts of the code I haven't looked at in years! To make the plugin's work easier, I pushed platform front ends generally in the direction of using standard 'bool' in preference to platform-specific boolean types like Windows BOOL or GTK's gboolean; I've left the platform booleans in places they _have_ to be for the platform APIs to work right, but variables only used by my own code have been converted wherever I found them. In a few places there are int values that look very like booleans in _most_ of the places they're used, but have a rarely-used third value, or a distinction between different nonzero values that most users don't care about. In these cases, I've _removed_ uses of 'true' and 'false' for the return values, to emphasise that there's something more subtle going on than a simple boolean answer: - the 'multisel' field in dialog.h's list box structure, for which the GTK front end in particular recognises a difference between 1 and 2 but nearly everything else treats as boolean - the 'urgent' parameter to plug_receive, where 1 vs 2 tells you something about the specific location of the urgent pointer, but most clients only care about 0 vs 'something nonzero' - the return value of wc_match, where -1 indicates a syntax error in the wildcard. - the return values from SSH-1 RSA-key loading functions, which use -1 for 'wrong passphrase' and 0 for all other failures (so any caller which already knows it's not loading an _encrypted private_ key can treat them as boolean) - term->esc_query, and the 'query' parameter in toggle_mode in terminal.c, which _usually_ hold 0 for ESC[123h or 1 for ESC[?123h, but can also hold -1 for some other intervening character that we don't support. In a few places there's an integer that I haven't turned into a bool even though it really _can_ only take values 0 or 1 (and, as above, tried to make the call sites consistent in not calling those values true and false), on the grounds that I thought it would make it more confusing to imply that the 0 value was in some sense 'negative' or bad and the 1 positive or good: - the return value of plug_accepting uses the POSIXish convention of 0=success and nonzero=error; I think if I made it bool then I'd also want to reverse its sense, and that's a job for a separate piece of work. - the 'screen' parameter to lineptr() in terminal.c, where 0 and 1 represent the default and alternate screens. There's no obvious reason why one of those should be considered 'true' or 'positive' or 'success' - they're just indices - so I've left it as int. ssh_scp_recv had particularly confusing semantics for its previous int return value: its call sites used '<= 0' to check for error, but it never actually returned a negative number, just 0 or 1. Now the function and its call sites agree that it's a bool. In a couple of places I've renamed variables called 'ret', because I don't like that name any more - it's unclear whether it means the return value (in preparation) for the _containing_ function or the return value received from a subroutine call, and occasionally I've accidentally used the same variable for both and introduced a bug. So where one of those got in my way, I've renamed it to 'toret' or 'retd' (the latter short for 'returned') in line with my usual modern practice, but I haven't done a thorough job of finding all of them. Finally, one amusing side effect of doing this is that I've had to separate quite a few chained assignments. It used to be perfectly fine to write 'a = b = c = TRUE' when a,b,c were int and TRUE was just a the 'true' defined by stdbool.h, that idiom provokes a warning from gcc: 'suggest parentheses around assignment used as truth value'!
2018-11-02 22:23:19 +03:00
return false;
}
/*
* Step 2. u1 <- SHA(message) * w mod q.
*/
SHA_Simple(data.ptr, data.len, hash);
sha = bignum_from_bytes(hash, 20);
u1 = modmul(sha, w, dss->q);
/*
* Step 3. u2 <- r * w mod q.
*/
u2 = modmul(r, w, dss->q);
/*
* Step 4. v <- (g^u1 * y^u2 mod p) mod q.
*/
gu1p = modpow(dss->g, u1, dss->p);
yu2p = modpow(dss->y, u2, dss->p);
gu1yu2p = modmul(gu1p, yu2p, dss->p);
v = modmul(gu1yu2p, One, dss->q);
/*
* Step 5. v should now be equal to r.
*/
Convert a lot of 'int' variables to 'bool'. My normal habit these days, in new code, is to treat int and bool as _almost_ completely separate types. I'm still willing to use C's implicit test for zero on an integer (e.g. 'if (!blob.len)' is fine, no need to spell it out as blob.len != 0), but generally, if a variable is going to be conceptually a boolean, I like to declare it bool and assign to it using 'true' or 'false' rather than 0 or 1. PuTTY is an exception, because it predates the C99 bool, and I've stuck to its existing coding style even when adding new code to it. But it's been annoying me more and more, so now that I've decided C99 bool is an acceptable thing to require from our toolchain in the first place, here's a quite thorough trawl through the source doing 'boolification'. Many variables and function parameters are now typed as bool rather than int; many assignments of 0 or 1 to those variables are now spelled 'true' or 'false'. I managed this thorough conversion with the help of a custom clang plugin that I wrote to trawl the AST and apply heuristics to point out where things might want changing. So I've even managed to do a decent job on parts of the code I haven't looked at in years! To make the plugin's work easier, I pushed platform front ends generally in the direction of using standard 'bool' in preference to platform-specific boolean types like Windows BOOL or GTK's gboolean; I've left the platform booleans in places they _have_ to be for the platform APIs to work right, but variables only used by my own code have been converted wherever I found them. In a few places there are int values that look very like booleans in _most_ of the places they're used, but have a rarely-used third value, or a distinction between different nonzero values that most users don't care about. In these cases, I've _removed_ uses of 'true' and 'false' for the return values, to emphasise that there's something more subtle going on than a simple boolean answer: - the 'multisel' field in dialog.h's list box structure, for which the GTK front end in particular recognises a difference between 1 and 2 but nearly everything else treats as boolean - the 'urgent' parameter to plug_receive, where 1 vs 2 tells you something about the specific location of the urgent pointer, but most clients only care about 0 vs 'something nonzero' - the return value of wc_match, where -1 indicates a syntax error in the wildcard. - the return values from SSH-1 RSA-key loading functions, which use -1 for 'wrong passphrase' and 0 for all other failures (so any caller which already knows it's not loading an _encrypted private_ key can treat them as boolean) - term->esc_query, and the 'query' parameter in toggle_mode in terminal.c, which _usually_ hold 0 for ESC[123h or 1 for ESC[?123h, but can also hold -1 for some other intervening character that we don't support. In a few places there's an integer that I haven't turned into a bool even though it really _can_ only take values 0 or 1 (and, as above, tried to make the call sites consistent in not calling those values true and false), on the grounds that I thought it would make it more confusing to imply that the 0 value was in some sense 'negative' or bad and the 1 positive or good: - the return value of plug_accepting uses the POSIXish convention of 0=success and nonzero=error; I think if I made it bool then I'd also want to reverse its sense, and that's a job for a separate piece of work. - the 'screen' parameter to lineptr() in terminal.c, where 0 and 1 represent the default and alternate screens. There's no obvious reason why one of those should be considered 'true' or 'positive' or 'success' - they're just indices - so I've left it as int. ssh_scp_recv had particularly confusing semantics for its previous int return value: its call sites used '<= 0' to check for error, but it never actually returned a negative number, just 0 or 1. Now the function and its call sites agree that it's a bool. In a couple of places I've renamed variables called 'ret', because I don't like that name any more - it's unclear whether it means the return value (in preparation) for the _containing_ function or the return value received from a subroutine call, and occasionally I've accidentally used the same variable for both and introduced a bug. So where one of those got in my way, I've renamed it to 'toret' or 'retd' (the latter short for 'returned') in line with my usual modern practice, but I haven't done a thorough job of finding all of them. Finally, one amusing side effect of doing this is that I've had to separate quite a few chained assignments. It used to be perfectly fine to write 'a = b = c = TRUE' when a,b,c were int and TRUE was just a the 'true' defined by stdbool.h, that idiom provokes a warning from gcc: 'suggest parentheses around assignment used as truth value'!
2018-11-02 22:23:19 +03:00
toret = !bignum_cmp(v, r);
freebn(w);
freebn(sha);
freebn(u1);
freebn(u2);
freebn(gu1p);
freebn(yu2p);
freebn(gu1yu2p);
freebn(v);
freebn(r);
freebn(s);
Convert a lot of 'int' variables to 'bool'. My normal habit these days, in new code, is to treat int and bool as _almost_ completely separate types. I'm still willing to use C's implicit test for zero on an integer (e.g. 'if (!blob.len)' is fine, no need to spell it out as blob.len != 0), but generally, if a variable is going to be conceptually a boolean, I like to declare it bool and assign to it using 'true' or 'false' rather than 0 or 1. PuTTY is an exception, because it predates the C99 bool, and I've stuck to its existing coding style even when adding new code to it. But it's been annoying me more and more, so now that I've decided C99 bool is an acceptable thing to require from our toolchain in the first place, here's a quite thorough trawl through the source doing 'boolification'. Many variables and function parameters are now typed as bool rather than int; many assignments of 0 or 1 to those variables are now spelled 'true' or 'false'. I managed this thorough conversion with the help of a custom clang plugin that I wrote to trawl the AST and apply heuristics to point out where things might want changing. So I've even managed to do a decent job on parts of the code I haven't looked at in years! To make the plugin's work easier, I pushed platform front ends generally in the direction of using standard 'bool' in preference to platform-specific boolean types like Windows BOOL or GTK's gboolean; I've left the platform booleans in places they _have_ to be for the platform APIs to work right, but variables only used by my own code have been converted wherever I found them. In a few places there are int values that look very like booleans in _most_ of the places they're used, but have a rarely-used third value, or a distinction between different nonzero values that most users don't care about. In these cases, I've _removed_ uses of 'true' and 'false' for the return values, to emphasise that there's something more subtle going on than a simple boolean answer: - the 'multisel' field in dialog.h's list box structure, for which the GTK front end in particular recognises a difference between 1 and 2 but nearly everything else treats as boolean - the 'urgent' parameter to plug_receive, where 1 vs 2 tells you something about the specific location of the urgent pointer, but most clients only care about 0 vs 'something nonzero' - the return value of wc_match, where -1 indicates a syntax error in the wildcard. - the return values from SSH-1 RSA-key loading functions, which use -1 for 'wrong passphrase' and 0 for all other failures (so any caller which already knows it's not loading an _encrypted private_ key can treat them as boolean) - term->esc_query, and the 'query' parameter in toggle_mode in terminal.c, which _usually_ hold 0 for ESC[123h or 1 for ESC[?123h, but can also hold -1 for some other intervening character that we don't support. In a few places there's an integer that I haven't turned into a bool even though it really _can_ only take values 0 or 1 (and, as above, tried to make the call sites consistent in not calling those values true and false), on the grounds that I thought it would make it more confusing to imply that the 0 value was in some sense 'negative' or bad and the 1 positive or good: - the return value of plug_accepting uses the POSIXish convention of 0=success and nonzero=error; I think if I made it bool then I'd also want to reverse its sense, and that's a job for a separate piece of work. - the 'screen' parameter to lineptr() in terminal.c, where 0 and 1 represent the default and alternate screens. There's no obvious reason why one of those should be considered 'true' or 'positive' or 'success' - they're just indices - so I've left it as int. ssh_scp_recv had particularly confusing semantics for its previous int return value: its call sites used '<= 0' to check for error, but it never actually returned a negative number, just 0 or 1. Now the function and its call sites agree that it's a bool. In a couple of places I've renamed variables called 'ret', because I don't like that name any more - it's unclear whether it means the return value (in preparation) for the _containing_ function or the return value received from a subroutine call, and occasionally I've accidentally used the same variable for both and introduced a bug. So where one of those got in my way, I've renamed it to 'toret' or 'retd' (the latter short for 'returned') in line with my usual modern practice, but I haven't done a thorough job of finding all of them. Finally, one amusing side effect of doing this is that I've had to separate quite a few chained assignments. It used to be perfectly fine to write 'a = b = c = TRUE' when a,b,c were int and TRUE was just a the 'true' defined by stdbool.h, that idiom provokes a warning from gcc: 'suggest parentheses around assignment used as truth value'!
2018-11-02 22:23:19 +03:00
return toret;
}
Invent a struct type for polymorphic SSH key data. During last week's work, I made a mistake in which I got the arguments backwards in one of the key-blob-generating functions - mistakenly swapped the 'void *' key instance with the 'BinarySink *' output destination - and I didn't spot the mistake until run time, because in C you can implicitly convert both to and from void * and so there was no compile-time failure of type checking. Now that I've introduced the FROMFIELD macro that downcasts a pointer to one field of a structure to retrieve a pointer to the whole structure, I think I might start using that more widely to indicate this kind of polymorphic subtyping. So now all the public-key functions in the struct ssh_signkey vtable handle their data instance in the form of a pointer to a subfield of a new zero-sized structure type 'ssh_key', which outside the key implementations indicates 'this is some kind of key instance but it could be of any type'; they downcast that pointer internally using FROMFIELD in place of the previous ordinary C cast, and return one by returning &foo->sshk for whatever foo they've just made up. The sshk member is not at the beginning of the structure, which means all those FROMFIELDs and &key->sshk are actually adding and subtracting an offset. Of course I could have put the member at the start anyway, but I had the idea that it's actually a feature _not_ to have the two types start at the same address, because it means you should notice earlier rather than later if you absentmindedly cast from one to the other directly rather than by the approved method (in particular, if you accidentally assign one through a void * and back without even _noticing_ you perpetrated a cast). In particular, this enforces that you can't sfree() the thing even once without realising you should instead of called the right freekey function. (I found several bugs by this method during initial testing, so I think it's already proved its worth!) While I'm here, I've also renamed the vtable structure ssh_signkey to ssh_keyalg, because it was a confusing name anyway - it describes the _algorithm_ for handling all keys of that type, not a specific key. So ssh_keyalg is the collection of code, and ssh_key is one instance of the data it handles.
2018-05-27 10:32:21 +03:00
static void dss_public_blob(ssh_key *key, BinarySink *bs)
{
struct dss_key *dss = container_of(key, struct dss_key, sshk);
put_stringz(bs, "ssh-dss");
put_mp_ssh2(bs, dss->p);
put_mp_ssh2(bs, dss->q);
put_mp_ssh2(bs, dss->g);
put_mp_ssh2(bs, dss->y);
}
Invent a struct type for polymorphic SSH key data. During last week's work, I made a mistake in which I got the arguments backwards in one of the key-blob-generating functions - mistakenly swapped the 'void *' key instance with the 'BinarySink *' output destination - and I didn't spot the mistake until run time, because in C you can implicitly convert both to and from void * and so there was no compile-time failure of type checking. Now that I've introduced the FROMFIELD macro that downcasts a pointer to one field of a structure to retrieve a pointer to the whole structure, I think I might start using that more widely to indicate this kind of polymorphic subtyping. So now all the public-key functions in the struct ssh_signkey vtable handle their data instance in the form of a pointer to a subfield of a new zero-sized structure type 'ssh_key', which outside the key implementations indicates 'this is some kind of key instance but it could be of any type'; they downcast that pointer internally using FROMFIELD in place of the previous ordinary C cast, and return one by returning &foo->sshk for whatever foo they've just made up. The sshk member is not at the beginning of the structure, which means all those FROMFIELDs and &key->sshk are actually adding and subtracting an offset. Of course I could have put the member at the start anyway, but I had the idea that it's actually a feature _not_ to have the two types start at the same address, because it means you should notice earlier rather than later if you absentmindedly cast from one to the other directly rather than by the approved method (in particular, if you accidentally assign one through a void * and back without even _noticing_ you perpetrated a cast). In particular, this enforces that you can't sfree() the thing even once without realising you should instead of called the right freekey function. (I found several bugs by this method during initial testing, so I think it's already proved its worth!) While I'm here, I've also renamed the vtable structure ssh_signkey to ssh_keyalg, because it was a confusing name anyway - it describes the _algorithm_ for handling all keys of that type, not a specific key. So ssh_keyalg is the collection of code, and ssh_key is one instance of the data it handles.
2018-05-27 10:32:21 +03:00
static void dss_private_blob(ssh_key *key, BinarySink *bs)
{
struct dss_key *dss = container_of(key, struct dss_key, sshk);
put_mp_ssh2(bs, dss->x);
}
static ssh_key *dss_new_priv(const ssh_keyalg *self, ptrlen pub, ptrlen priv)
{
BinarySource src[1];
ssh_key *sshk;
struct dss_key *dss;
ptrlen hash;
SHA_State s;
unsigned char digest[20];
Bignum ytest;
sshk = dss_new_pub(self, pub);
if (!sshk)
return NULL;
dss = container_of(sshk, struct dss_key, sshk);
BinarySource_BARE_INIT(src, priv.ptr, priv.len);
dss->x = get_mp_ssh2(src);
if (get_err(src)) {
Invent a struct type for polymorphic SSH key data. During last week's work, I made a mistake in which I got the arguments backwards in one of the key-blob-generating functions - mistakenly swapped the 'void *' key instance with the 'BinarySink *' output destination - and I didn't spot the mistake until run time, because in C you can implicitly convert both to and from void * and so there was no compile-time failure of type checking. Now that I've introduced the FROMFIELD macro that downcasts a pointer to one field of a structure to retrieve a pointer to the whole structure, I think I might start using that more widely to indicate this kind of polymorphic subtyping. So now all the public-key functions in the struct ssh_signkey vtable handle their data instance in the form of a pointer to a subfield of a new zero-sized structure type 'ssh_key', which outside the key implementations indicates 'this is some kind of key instance but it could be of any type'; they downcast that pointer internally using FROMFIELD in place of the previous ordinary C cast, and return one by returning &foo->sshk for whatever foo they've just made up. The sshk member is not at the beginning of the structure, which means all those FROMFIELDs and &key->sshk are actually adding and subtracting an offset. Of course I could have put the member at the start anyway, but I had the idea that it's actually a feature _not_ to have the two types start at the same address, because it means you should notice earlier rather than later if you absentmindedly cast from one to the other directly rather than by the approved method (in particular, if you accidentally assign one through a void * and back without even _noticing_ you perpetrated a cast). In particular, this enforces that you can't sfree() the thing even once without realising you should instead of called the right freekey function. (I found several bugs by this method during initial testing, so I think it's already proved its worth!) While I'm here, I've also renamed the vtable structure ssh_signkey to ssh_keyalg, because it was a confusing name anyway - it describes the _algorithm_ for handling all keys of that type, not a specific key. So ssh_keyalg is the collection of code, and ssh_key is one instance of the data it handles.
2018-05-27 10:32:21 +03:00
dss_freekey(&dss->sshk);
return NULL;
}
/*
* Check the obsolete hash in the old DSS key format.
*/
hash = get_string(src);
if (hash.len == 20) {
SHA_Init(&s);
put_mp_ssh2(&s, dss->p);
put_mp_ssh2(&s, dss->q);
put_mp_ssh2(&s, dss->g);
SHA_Final(&s, digest);
if (0 != memcmp(hash.ptr, digest, 20)) {
Invent a struct type for polymorphic SSH key data. During last week's work, I made a mistake in which I got the arguments backwards in one of the key-blob-generating functions - mistakenly swapped the 'void *' key instance with the 'BinarySink *' output destination - and I didn't spot the mistake until run time, because in C you can implicitly convert both to and from void * and so there was no compile-time failure of type checking. Now that I've introduced the FROMFIELD macro that downcasts a pointer to one field of a structure to retrieve a pointer to the whole structure, I think I might start using that more widely to indicate this kind of polymorphic subtyping. So now all the public-key functions in the struct ssh_signkey vtable handle their data instance in the form of a pointer to a subfield of a new zero-sized structure type 'ssh_key', which outside the key implementations indicates 'this is some kind of key instance but it could be of any type'; they downcast that pointer internally using FROMFIELD in place of the previous ordinary C cast, and return one by returning &foo->sshk for whatever foo they've just made up. The sshk member is not at the beginning of the structure, which means all those FROMFIELDs and &key->sshk are actually adding and subtracting an offset. Of course I could have put the member at the start anyway, but I had the idea that it's actually a feature _not_ to have the two types start at the same address, because it means you should notice earlier rather than later if you absentmindedly cast from one to the other directly rather than by the approved method (in particular, if you accidentally assign one through a void * and back without even _noticing_ you perpetrated a cast). In particular, this enforces that you can't sfree() the thing even once without realising you should instead of called the right freekey function. (I found several bugs by this method during initial testing, so I think it's already proved its worth!) While I'm here, I've also renamed the vtable structure ssh_signkey to ssh_keyalg, because it was a confusing name anyway - it describes the _algorithm_ for handling all keys of that type, not a specific key. So ssh_keyalg is the collection of code, and ssh_key is one instance of the data it handles.
2018-05-27 10:32:21 +03:00
dss_freekey(&dss->sshk);
return NULL;
}
}
/*
* Now ensure g^x mod p really is y.
*/
ytest = modpow(dss->g, dss->x, dss->p);
if (0 != bignum_cmp(ytest, dss->y)) {
Invent a struct type for polymorphic SSH key data. During last week's work, I made a mistake in which I got the arguments backwards in one of the key-blob-generating functions - mistakenly swapped the 'void *' key instance with the 'BinarySink *' output destination - and I didn't spot the mistake until run time, because in C you can implicitly convert both to and from void * and so there was no compile-time failure of type checking. Now that I've introduced the FROMFIELD macro that downcasts a pointer to one field of a structure to retrieve a pointer to the whole structure, I think I might start using that more widely to indicate this kind of polymorphic subtyping. So now all the public-key functions in the struct ssh_signkey vtable handle their data instance in the form of a pointer to a subfield of a new zero-sized structure type 'ssh_key', which outside the key implementations indicates 'this is some kind of key instance but it could be of any type'; they downcast that pointer internally using FROMFIELD in place of the previous ordinary C cast, and return one by returning &foo->sshk for whatever foo they've just made up. The sshk member is not at the beginning of the structure, which means all those FROMFIELDs and &key->sshk are actually adding and subtracting an offset. Of course I could have put the member at the start anyway, but I had the idea that it's actually a feature _not_ to have the two types start at the same address, because it means you should notice earlier rather than later if you absentmindedly cast from one to the other directly rather than by the approved method (in particular, if you accidentally assign one through a void * and back without even _noticing_ you perpetrated a cast). In particular, this enforces that you can't sfree() the thing even once without realising you should instead of called the right freekey function. (I found several bugs by this method during initial testing, so I think it's already proved its worth!) While I'm here, I've also renamed the vtable structure ssh_signkey to ssh_keyalg, because it was a confusing name anyway - it describes the _algorithm_ for handling all keys of that type, not a specific key. So ssh_keyalg is the collection of code, and ssh_key is one instance of the data it handles.
2018-05-27 10:32:21 +03:00
dss_freekey(&dss->sshk);
freebn(ytest);
return NULL;
}
freebn(ytest);
Invent a struct type for polymorphic SSH key data. During last week's work, I made a mistake in which I got the arguments backwards in one of the key-blob-generating functions - mistakenly swapped the 'void *' key instance with the 'BinarySink *' output destination - and I didn't spot the mistake until run time, because in C you can implicitly convert both to and from void * and so there was no compile-time failure of type checking. Now that I've introduced the FROMFIELD macro that downcasts a pointer to one field of a structure to retrieve a pointer to the whole structure, I think I might start using that more widely to indicate this kind of polymorphic subtyping. So now all the public-key functions in the struct ssh_signkey vtable handle their data instance in the form of a pointer to a subfield of a new zero-sized structure type 'ssh_key', which outside the key implementations indicates 'this is some kind of key instance but it could be of any type'; they downcast that pointer internally using FROMFIELD in place of the previous ordinary C cast, and return one by returning &foo->sshk for whatever foo they've just made up. The sshk member is not at the beginning of the structure, which means all those FROMFIELDs and &key->sshk are actually adding and subtracting an offset. Of course I could have put the member at the start anyway, but I had the idea that it's actually a feature _not_ to have the two types start at the same address, because it means you should notice earlier rather than later if you absentmindedly cast from one to the other directly rather than by the approved method (in particular, if you accidentally assign one through a void * and back without even _noticing_ you perpetrated a cast). In particular, this enforces that you can't sfree() the thing even once without realising you should instead of called the right freekey function. (I found several bugs by this method during initial testing, so I think it's already proved its worth!) While I'm here, I've also renamed the vtable structure ssh_signkey to ssh_keyalg, because it was a confusing name anyway - it describes the _algorithm_ for handling all keys of that type, not a specific key. So ssh_keyalg is the collection of code, and ssh_key is one instance of the data it handles.
2018-05-27 10:32:21 +03:00
return &dss->sshk;
}
static ssh_key *dss_new_priv_openssh(const ssh_keyalg *self,
BinarySource *src)
{
struct dss_key *dss;
dss = snew(struct dss_key);
dss->sshk = &ssh_dss;
dss->p = get_mp_ssh2(src);
dss->q = get_mp_ssh2(src);
dss->g = get_mp_ssh2(src);
dss->y = get_mp_ssh2(src);
dss->x = get_mp_ssh2(src);
if (get_err(src) ||
!bignum_cmp(dss->q, Zero) || !bignum_cmp(dss->p, Zero)) {
/* Invalid key. */
Invent a struct type for polymorphic SSH key data. During last week's work, I made a mistake in which I got the arguments backwards in one of the key-blob-generating functions - mistakenly swapped the 'void *' key instance with the 'BinarySink *' output destination - and I didn't spot the mistake until run time, because in C you can implicitly convert both to and from void * and so there was no compile-time failure of type checking. Now that I've introduced the FROMFIELD macro that downcasts a pointer to one field of a structure to retrieve a pointer to the whole structure, I think I might start using that more widely to indicate this kind of polymorphic subtyping. So now all the public-key functions in the struct ssh_signkey vtable handle their data instance in the form of a pointer to a subfield of a new zero-sized structure type 'ssh_key', which outside the key implementations indicates 'this is some kind of key instance but it could be of any type'; they downcast that pointer internally using FROMFIELD in place of the previous ordinary C cast, and return one by returning &foo->sshk for whatever foo they've just made up. The sshk member is not at the beginning of the structure, which means all those FROMFIELDs and &key->sshk are actually adding and subtracting an offset. Of course I could have put the member at the start anyway, but I had the idea that it's actually a feature _not_ to have the two types start at the same address, because it means you should notice earlier rather than later if you absentmindedly cast from one to the other directly rather than by the approved method (in particular, if you accidentally assign one through a void * and back without even _noticing_ you perpetrated a cast). In particular, this enforces that you can't sfree() the thing even once without realising you should instead of called the right freekey function. (I found several bugs by this method during initial testing, so I think it's already proved its worth!) While I'm here, I've also renamed the vtable structure ssh_signkey to ssh_keyalg, because it was a confusing name anyway - it describes the _algorithm_ for handling all keys of that type, not a specific key. So ssh_keyalg is the collection of code, and ssh_key is one instance of the data it handles.
2018-05-27 10:32:21 +03:00
dss_freekey(&dss->sshk);
return NULL;
}
Invent a struct type for polymorphic SSH key data. During last week's work, I made a mistake in which I got the arguments backwards in one of the key-blob-generating functions - mistakenly swapped the 'void *' key instance with the 'BinarySink *' output destination - and I didn't spot the mistake until run time, because in C you can implicitly convert both to and from void * and so there was no compile-time failure of type checking. Now that I've introduced the FROMFIELD macro that downcasts a pointer to one field of a structure to retrieve a pointer to the whole structure, I think I might start using that more widely to indicate this kind of polymorphic subtyping. So now all the public-key functions in the struct ssh_signkey vtable handle their data instance in the form of a pointer to a subfield of a new zero-sized structure type 'ssh_key', which outside the key implementations indicates 'this is some kind of key instance but it could be of any type'; they downcast that pointer internally using FROMFIELD in place of the previous ordinary C cast, and return one by returning &foo->sshk for whatever foo they've just made up. The sshk member is not at the beginning of the structure, which means all those FROMFIELDs and &key->sshk are actually adding and subtracting an offset. Of course I could have put the member at the start anyway, but I had the idea that it's actually a feature _not_ to have the two types start at the same address, because it means you should notice earlier rather than later if you absentmindedly cast from one to the other directly rather than by the approved method (in particular, if you accidentally assign one through a void * and back without even _noticing_ you perpetrated a cast). In particular, this enforces that you can't sfree() the thing even once without realising you should instead of called the right freekey function. (I found several bugs by this method during initial testing, so I think it's already proved its worth!) While I'm here, I've also renamed the vtable structure ssh_signkey to ssh_keyalg, because it was a confusing name anyway - it describes the _algorithm_ for handling all keys of that type, not a specific key. So ssh_keyalg is the collection of code, and ssh_key is one instance of the data it handles.
2018-05-27 10:32:21 +03:00
return &dss->sshk;
}
static void dss_openssh_blob(ssh_key *key, BinarySink *bs)
{
struct dss_key *dss = container_of(key, struct dss_key, sshk);
put_mp_ssh2(bs, dss->p);
put_mp_ssh2(bs, dss->q);
put_mp_ssh2(bs, dss->g);
put_mp_ssh2(bs, dss->y);
put_mp_ssh2(bs, dss->x);
}
static int dss_pubkey_bits(const ssh_keyalg *self, ptrlen pub)
{
ssh_key *sshk;
struct dss_key *dss;
int ret;
sshk = dss_new_pub(self, pub);
if (!sshk)
return -1;
dss = container_of(sshk, struct dss_key, sshk);
ret = bignum_bitcount(dss->p);
Invent a struct type for polymorphic SSH key data. During last week's work, I made a mistake in which I got the arguments backwards in one of the key-blob-generating functions - mistakenly swapped the 'void *' key instance with the 'BinarySink *' output destination - and I didn't spot the mistake until run time, because in C you can implicitly convert both to and from void * and so there was no compile-time failure of type checking. Now that I've introduced the FROMFIELD macro that downcasts a pointer to one field of a structure to retrieve a pointer to the whole structure, I think I might start using that more widely to indicate this kind of polymorphic subtyping. So now all the public-key functions in the struct ssh_signkey vtable handle their data instance in the form of a pointer to a subfield of a new zero-sized structure type 'ssh_key', which outside the key implementations indicates 'this is some kind of key instance but it could be of any type'; they downcast that pointer internally using FROMFIELD in place of the previous ordinary C cast, and return one by returning &foo->sshk for whatever foo they've just made up. The sshk member is not at the beginning of the structure, which means all those FROMFIELDs and &key->sshk are actually adding and subtracting an offset. Of course I could have put the member at the start anyway, but I had the idea that it's actually a feature _not_ to have the two types start at the same address, because it means you should notice earlier rather than later if you absentmindedly cast from one to the other directly rather than by the approved method (in particular, if you accidentally assign one through a void * and back without even _noticing_ you perpetrated a cast). In particular, this enforces that you can't sfree() the thing even once without realising you should instead of called the right freekey function. (I found several bugs by this method during initial testing, so I think it's already proved its worth!) While I'm here, I've also renamed the vtable structure ssh_signkey to ssh_keyalg, because it was a confusing name anyway - it describes the _algorithm_ for handling all keys of that type, not a specific key. So ssh_keyalg is the collection of code, and ssh_key is one instance of the data it handles.
2018-05-27 10:32:21 +03:00
dss_freekey(&dss->sshk);
return ret;
}
Bignum *dss_gen_k(const char *id_string, Bignum modulus, Bignum private_key,
unsigned char *digest, int digest_len)
{
/*
* The basic DSS signing algorithm is:
*
* - invent a random k between 1 and q-1 (exclusive).
* - Compute r = (g^k mod p) mod q.
* - Compute s = k^-1 * (hash + x*r) mod q.
*
* This has the dangerous properties that:
*
* - if an attacker in possession of the public key _and_ the
* signature (for example, the host you just authenticated
* to) can guess your k, he can reverse the computation of s
* and work out x = r^-1 * (s*k - hash) mod q. That is, he
* can deduce the private half of your key, and masquerade
* as you for as long as the key is still valid.
*
* - since r is a function purely of k and the public key, if
* the attacker only has a _range of possibilities_ for k
* it's easy for him to work through them all and check each
* one against r; he'll never be unsure of whether he's got
* the right one.
*
* - if you ever sign two different hashes with the same k, it
* will be immediately obvious because the two signatures
* will have the same r, and moreover an attacker in
* possession of both signatures (and the public key of
* course) can compute k = (hash1-hash2) * (s1-s2)^-1 mod q,
* and from there deduce x as before.
*
* - the Bleichenbacher attack on DSA makes use of methods of
* generating k which are significantly non-uniformly
* distributed; in particular, generating a 160-bit random
* number and reducing it mod q is right out.
*
* For this reason we must be pretty careful about how we
* generate our k. Since this code runs on Windows, with no
* particularly good system entropy sources, we can't trust our
* RNG itself to produce properly unpredictable data. Hence, we
* use a totally different scheme instead.
*
* What we do is to take a SHA-512 (_big_) hash of the private
* key x, and then feed this into another SHA-512 hash that
* also includes the message hash being signed. That is:
*
* proto_k = SHA512 ( SHA512(x) || SHA160(message) )
*
* This number is 512 bits long, so reducing it mod q won't be
* noticeably non-uniform. So
*
* k = proto_k mod q
*
* This has the interesting property that it's _deterministic_:
* signing the same hash twice with the same key yields the
* same signature.
*
* Despite this determinism, it's still not predictable to an
* attacker, because in order to repeat the SHA-512
* construction that created it, the attacker would have to
* know the private key value x - and by assumption he doesn't,
* because if he knew that he wouldn't be attacking k!
*
* (This trick doesn't, _per se_, protect against reuse of k.
* Reuse of k is left to chance; all it does is prevent
* _excessively high_ chances of reuse of k due to entropy
* problems.)
*
* Thanks to Colin Plumb for the general idea of using x to
* ensure k is hard to guess, and to the Cambridge University
* Computer Security Group for helping to argue out all the
* fine details.
*/
SHA512_State ss;
unsigned char digest512[64];
Bignum proto_k, k;
/*
* Hash some identifying text plus x.
*/
SHA512_Init(&ss);
put_asciz(&ss, id_string);
put_mp_ssh2(&ss, private_key);
SHA512_Final(&ss, digest512);
/*
* Now hash that digest plus the message hash.
*/
SHA512_Init(&ss);
put_data(&ss, digest512, sizeof(digest512));
put_data(&ss, digest, digest_len);
while (1) {
SHA512_State ss2 = ss; /* structure copy */
SHA512_Final(&ss2, digest512);
smemclr(&ss2, sizeof(ss2));
/*
* Now convert the result into a bignum, and reduce it mod q.
*/
proto_k = bignum_from_bytes(digest512, 64);
k = bigmod(proto_k, modulus);
freebn(proto_k);
if (bignum_cmp(k, One) != 0 && bignum_cmp(k, Zero) != 0) {
smemclr(&ss, sizeof(ss));
smemclr(digest512, sizeof(digest512));
return k;
}
/* Very unlikely we get here, but if so, k was unsuitable. */
freebn(k);
/* Perturb the hash to think of a different k. */
put_byte(&ss, 'x');
/* Go round and try again. */
}
}
Invent a struct type for polymorphic SSH key data. During last week's work, I made a mistake in which I got the arguments backwards in one of the key-blob-generating functions - mistakenly swapped the 'void *' key instance with the 'BinarySink *' output destination - and I didn't spot the mistake until run time, because in C you can implicitly convert both to and from void * and so there was no compile-time failure of type checking. Now that I've introduced the FROMFIELD macro that downcasts a pointer to one field of a structure to retrieve a pointer to the whole structure, I think I might start using that more widely to indicate this kind of polymorphic subtyping. So now all the public-key functions in the struct ssh_signkey vtable handle their data instance in the form of a pointer to a subfield of a new zero-sized structure type 'ssh_key', which outside the key implementations indicates 'this is some kind of key instance but it could be of any type'; they downcast that pointer internally using FROMFIELD in place of the previous ordinary C cast, and return one by returning &foo->sshk for whatever foo they've just made up. The sshk member is not at the beginning of the structure, which means all those FROMFIELDs and &key->sshk are actually adding and subtracting an offset. Of course I could have put the member at the start anyway, but I had the idea that it's actually a feature _not_ to have the two types start at the same address, because it means you should notice earlier rather than later if you absentmindedly cast from one to the other directly rather than by the approved method (in particular, if you accidentally assign one through a void * and back without even _noticing_ you perpetrated a cast). In particular, this enforces that you can't sfree() the thing even once without realising you should instead of called the right freekey function. (I found several bugs by this method during initial testing, so I think it's already proved its worth!) While I'm here, I've also renamed the vtable structure ssh_signkey to ssh_keyalg, because it was a confusing name anyway - it describes the _algorithm_ for handling all keys of that type, not a specific key. So ssh_keyalg is the collection of code, and ssh_key is one instance of the data it handles.
2018-05-27 10:32:21 +03:00
static void dss_sign(ssh_key *key, const void *data, int datalen,
BinarySink *bs)
{
struct dss_key *dss = container_of(key, struct dss_key, sshk);
Bignum k, gkp, hash, kinv, hxr, r, s;
unsigned char digest[20];
int i;
SHA_Simple(data, datalen, digest);
k = dss_gen_k("DSA deterministic k generator", dss->q, dss->x,
digest, sizeof(digest));
kinv = modinv(k, dss->q); /* k^-1 mod q */
assert(kinv);
/*
* Now we have k, so just go ahead and compute the signature.
*/
gkp = modpow(dss->g, k, dss->p); /* g^k mod p */
r = bigmod(gkp, dss->q); /* r = (g^k mod p) mod q */
freebn(gkp);
hash = bignum_from_bytes(digest, 20);
hxr = bigmuladd(dss->x, r, hash); /* hash + x*r */
s = modmul(kinv, hxr, dss->q); /* s = k^-1 * (hash + x*r) mod q */
freebn(hxr);
freebn(kinv);
freebn(k);
freebn(hash);
put_stringz(bs, "ssh-dss");
put_uint32(bs, 40);
for (i = 0; i < 20; i++)
put_byte(bs, bignum_byte(r, 19 - i));
for (i = 0; i < 20; i++)
put_byte(bs, bignum_byte(s, 19 - i));
freebn(r);
freebn(s);
}
Invent a struct type for polymorphic SSH key data. During last week's work, I made a mistake in which I got the arguments backwards in one of the key-blob-generating functions - mistakenly swapped the 'void *' key instance with the 'BinarySink *' output destination - and I didn't spot the mistake until run time, because in C you can implicitly convert both to and from void * and so there was no compile-time failure of type checking. Now that I've introduced the FROMFIELD macro that downcasts a pointer to one field of a structure to retrieve a pointer to the whole structure, I think I might start using that more widely to indicate this kind of polymorphic subtyping. So now all the public-key functions in the struct ssh_signkey vtable handle their data instance in the form of a pointer to a subfield of a new zero-sized structure type 'ssh_key', which outside the key implementations indicates 'this is some kind of key instance but it could be of any type'; they downcast that pointer internally using FROMFIELD in place of the previous ordinary C cast, and return one by returning &foo->sshk for whatever foo they've just made up. The sshk member is not at the beginning of the structure, which means all those FROMFIELDs and &key->sshk are actually adding and subtracting an offset. Of course I could have put the member at the start anyway, but I had the idea that it's actually a feature _not_ to have the two types start at the same address, because it means you should notice earlier rather than later if you absentmindedly cast from one to the other directly rather than by the approved method (in particular, if you accidentally assign one through a void * and back without even _noticing_ you perpetrated a cast). In particular, this enforces that you can't sfree() the thing even once without realising you should instead of called the right freekey function. (I found several bugs by this method during initial testing, so I think it's already proved its worth!) While I'm here, I've also renamed the vtable structure ssh_signkey to ssh_keyalg, because it was a confusing name anyway - it describes the _algorithm_ for handling all keys of that type, not a specific key. So ssh_keyalg is the collection of code, and ssh_key is one instance of the data it handles.
2018-05-27 10:32:21 +03:00
const ssh_keyalg ssh_dss = {
dss_new_pub,
dss_new_priv,
dss_new_priv_openssh,
dss_freekey,
dss_sign,
dss_verify,
dss_public_blob,
dss_private_blob,
dss_openssh_blob,
dss_cache_str,
dss_pubkey_bits,
"ssh-dss",
"dss",
NULL,
};