2015-05-05 22:16:19 +03:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* pageant.c: cross-platform code to implement Pageant.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#include <stddef.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <stdlib.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <assert.h>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#include "putty.h"
|
Complete rewrite of PuTTY's bignum library.
The old 'Bignum' data type is gone completely, and so is sshbn.c. In
its place is a new thing called 'mp_int', handled by an entirely new
library module mpint.c, with API differences both large and small.
The main aim of this change is that the new library should be free of
timing- and cache-related side channels. I've written the code so that
it _should_ - assuming I haven't made any mistakes - do all of its
work without either control flow or memory addressing depending on the
data words of the input numbers. (Though, being an _arbitrary_
precision library, it does have to at least depend on the sizes of the
numbers - but there's a 'formal' size that can vary separately from
the actual magnitude of the represented integer, so if you want to
keep it secret that your number is actually small, it should work fine
to have a very long mp_int and just happen to store 23 in it.) So I've
done all my conditionalisation by means of computing both answers and
doing bit-masking to swap the right one into place, and all loops over
the words of an mp_int go up to the formal size rather than the actual
size.
I haven't actually tested the constant-time property in any rigorous
way yet (I'm still considering the best way to do it). But this code
is surely at the very least a big improvement on the old version, even
if I later find a few more things to fix.
I've also completely rewritten the low-level elliptic curve arithmetic
from sshecc.c; the new ecc.c is closer to being an adjunct of mpint.c
than it is to the SSH end of the code. The new elliptic curve code
keeps all coordinates in Montgomery-multiplication transformed form to
speed up all the multiplications mod the same prime, and only converts
them back when you ask for the affine coordinates. Also, I adopted
extended coordinates for the Edwards curve implementation.
sshecc.c has also had a near-total rewrite in the course of switching
it over to the new system. While I was there, I've separated ECDSA and
EdDSA more completely - they now have separate vtables, instead of a
single vtable in which nearly every function had a big if statement in
it - and also made the externally exposed types for an ECDSA key and
an ECDH context different.
A minor new feature: since the new arithmetic code includes a modular
square root function, we can now support the compressed point
representation for the NIST curves. We seem to have been getting along
fine without that so far, but it seemed a shame not to put it in,
since it was suddenly easy.
In sshrsa.c, one major change is that I've removed the RSA blinding
step in rsa_privkey_op, in which we randomise the ciphertext before
doing the decryption. The purpose of that was to avoid timing leaks
giving away the plaintext - but the new arithmetic code should take
that in its stride in the course of also being careful enough to avoid
leaking the _private key_, which RSA blinding had no way to do
anything about in any case.
Apart from those specific points, most of the rest of the changes are
more or less mechanical, just changing type names and translating code
into the new API.
2018-12-31 16:53:41 +03:00
|
|
|
#include "mpint.h"
|
2015-05-05 22:16:19 +03:00
|
|
|
#include "ssh.h"
|
2019-02-28 21:05:38 +03:00
|
|
|
#include "sshcr.h"
|
2015-05-05 22:16:19 +03:00
|
|
|
#include "pageant.h"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
2018-05-24 10:22:44 +03:00
|
|
|
* We need this to link with the RSA code, because rsa_ssh1_encrypt()
|
|
|
|
* pads its data with random bytes. Since we only use rsa_ssh1_decrypt()
|
2015-05-05 22:16:19 +03:00
|
|
|
* and the signing functions, which are deterministic, this should
|
|
|
|
* never be called.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* If it _is_ called, there is a _serious_ problem, because it
|
|
|
|
* won't generate true random numbers. So we must scream, panic,
|
|
|
|
* and exit immediately if that should happen.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
Replace random_byte() with random_read().
This is in preparation for a PRNG revamp which will want to have a
well defined boundary for any given request-for-randomness, so that it
can destroy the evidence afterwards. So no more looping round calling
random_byte() and then stopping when we feel like it: now you say up
front how many random bytes you want, and call random_read() which
gives you that many in one go.
Most of the call sites that had to be fixed are fairly mechanical, and
quite a few ended up more concise afterwards. A few became more
cumbersome, such as mp_random_bits, in which the new API doesn't let
me load the random bytes directly into the target integer without
triggering undefined behaviour, so instead I have to allocate a
separate temporary buffer.
The _most_ interesting call site was in the PKCS#1 v1.5 padding code
in sshrsa.c (used in SSH-1), in which you need a stream of _nonzero_
random bytes. The previous code just looped on random_byte, retrying
if it got a zero. Now I'm doing a much more interesting thing with an
mpint, essentially scaling a binary fraction repeatedly to extract a
number in the range [0,255) and then adding 1 to it.
2019-01-22 22:43:27 +03:00
|
|
|
void random_read(void *buf, size_t size)
|
2015-05-05 22:16:19 +03:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
modalfatalbox("Internal error: attempt to use random numbers in Pageant");
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
Convert a lot of 'int' variables to 'bool'.
My normal habit these days, in new code, is to treat int and bool as
_almost_ completely separate types. I'm still willing to use C's
implicit test for zero on an integer (e.g. 'if (!blob.len)' is fine,
no need to spell it out as blob.len != 0), but generally, if a
variable is going to be conceptually a boolean, I like to declare it
bool and assign to it using 'true' or 'false' rather than 0 or 1.
PuTTY is an exception, because it predates the C99 bool, and I've
stuck to its existing coding style even when adding new code to it.
But it's been annoying me more and more, so now that I've decided C99
bool is an acceptable thing to require from our toolchain in the first
place, here's a quite thorough trawl through the source doing
'boolification'. Many variables and function parameters are now typed
as bool rather than int; many assignments of 0 or 1 to those variables
are now spelled 'true' or 'false'.
I managed this thorough conversion with the help of a custom clang
plugin that I wrote to trawl the AST and apply heuristics to point out
where things might want changing. So I've even managed to do a decent
job on parts of the code I haven't looked at in years!
To make the plugin's work easier, I pushed platform front ends
generally in the direction of using standard 'bool' in preference to
platform-specific boolean types like Windows BOOL or GTK's gboolean;
I've left the platform booleans in places they _have_ to be for the
platform APIs to work right, but variables only used by my own code
have been converted wherever I found them.
In a few places there are int values that look very like booleans in
_most_ of the places they're used, but have a rarely-used third value,
or a distinction between different nonzero values that most users
don't care about. In these cases, I've _removed_ uses of 'true' and
'false' for the return values, to emphasise that there's something
more subtle going on than a simple boolean answer:
- the 'multisel' field in dialog.h's list box structure, for which
the GTK front end in particular recognises a difference between 1
and 2 but nearly everything else treats as boolean
- the 'urgent' parameter to plug_receive, where 1 vs 2 tells you
something about the specific location of the urgent pointer, but
most clients only care about 0 vs 'something nonzero'
- the return value of wc_match, where -1 indicates a syntax error in
the wildcard.
- the return values from SSH-1 RSA-key loading functions, which use
-1 for 'wrong passphrase' and 0 for all other failures (so any
caller which already knows it's not loading an _encrypted private_
key can treat them as boolean)
- term->esc_query, and the 'query' parameter in toggle_mode in
terminal.c, which _usually_ hold 0 for ESC[123h or 1 for ESC[?123h,
but can also hold -1 for some other intervening character that we
don't support.
In a few places there's an integer that I haven't turned into a bool
even though it really _can_ only take values 0 or 1 (and, as above,
tried to make the call sites consistent in not calling those values
true and false), on the grounds that I thought it would make it more
confusing to imply that the 0 value was in some sense 'negative' or
bad and the 1 positive or good:
- the return value of plug_accepting uses the POSIXish convention of
0=success and nonzero=error; I think if I made it bool then I'd
also want to reverse its sense, and that's a job for a separate
piece of work.
- the 'screen' parameter to lineptr() in terminal.c, where 0 and 1
represent the default and alternate screens. There's no obvious
reason why one of those should be considered 'true' or 'positive'
or 'success' - they're just indices - so I've left it as int.
ssh_scp_recv had particularly confusing semantics for its previous int
return value: its call sites used '<= 0' to check for error, but it
never actually returned a negative number, just 0 or 1. Now the
function and its call sites agree that it's a bool.
In a couple of places I've renamed variables called 'ret', because I
don't like that name any more - it's unclear whether it means the
return value (in preparation) for the _containing_ function or the
return value received from a subroutine call, and occasionally I've
accidentally used the same variable for both and introduced a bug. So
where one of those got in my way, I've renamed it to 'toret' or 'retd'
(the latter short for 'returned') in line with my usual modern
practice, but I haven't done a thorough job of finding all of them.
Finally, one amusing side effect of doing this is that I've had to
separate quite a few chained assignments. It used to be perfectly fine
to write 'a = b = c = TRUE' when a,b,c were int and TRUE was just a
the 'true' defined by stdbool.h, that idiom provokes a warning from
gcc: 'suggest parentheses around assignment used as truth value'!
2018-11-02 22:23:19 +03:00
|
|
|
static bool pageant_local = false;
|
2015-05-11 17:06:25 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2020-01-07 22:56:47 +03:00
|
|
|
struct PageantClientDialogId {
|
|
|
|
int dummy;
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
2020-01-25 20:24:17 +03:00
|
|
|
typedef struct PageantKeySort PageantKeySort;
|
|
|
|
typedef struct PageantKey PageantKey;
|
Pageant: new asynchronous internal APIs.
This is a pure refactoring: no functional change expected.
This commit introduces two new small vtable-style APIs. One is
PageantClient, which identifies a particular client of the Pageant
'core' (meaning the code that handles each individual request). This
changes pageant_handle_msg into an asynchronous operation: you pass in
an agent request message and an identifier, and at some later point,
the got_response method in your PageantClient will be called with the
answer (and the same identifier, to allow you to match requests to
responses). The trait vtable also contains a logging system.
The main importance of PageantClient, and the reason why it has to
exist instead of just passing pageant_handle_msg a bare callback
function pointer and context parameter, is that it provides robustness
if a client stops existing while a request is still pending. You call
pageant_unregister_client, and any unfinished requests associated with
that client in the Pageant core will be cleaned up, so that you're
guaranteed that after the unregister operation, no stray callbacks
will happen with a stale pointer to that client.
The WM_COPYDATA interface of Windows Pageant is a direct client of
this API. The other client is PageantListener, the system that lives
in pageant.c and handles stream-based agent connections for both Unix
Pageant and the new Windows named-pipe IPC. More specifically, each
individual connection to the listening socket is a separate
PageantClient, which means that if a socket is closed abruptly or
suffers an OS error, that client can be unregistered and any pending
requests cancelled without disrupting other connections.
Users of PageantListener have a second client vtable they can use,
called PageantListenerClient. That contains _only_ logging facilities,
and at the moment, only Unix Pageant bothers to use it (and even that
only in debugging mode).
Finally, internally to the Pageant core, there's a new trait called
PageantAsyncOp which describes an agent request in the process of
being handled. But at the moment, it has only one trivial
implementation, which is handed the full response message already
constructed, and on the next toplevel callback, passes it back to the
PageantClient.
2020-01-25 20:24:28 +03:00
|
|
|
typedef struct PageantAsyncOp PageantAsyncOp;
|
|
|
|
typedef struct PageantAsyncOpVtable PageantAsyncOpVtable;
|
|
|
|
typedef struct PageantClientRequestNode PageantClientRequestNode;
|
|
|
|
typedef struct PageantKeyRequestNode PageantKeyRequestNode;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
struct PageantClientRequestNode {
|
|
|
|
PageantClientRequestNode *prev, *next;
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
struct PageantKeyRequestNode {
|
|
|
|
PageantKeyRequestNode *prev, *next;
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
struct PageantClientInfo {
|
|
|
|
PageantClient *pc; /* goes to NULL when client is unregistered */
|
|
|
|
PageantClientRequestNode head;
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
struct PageantAsyncOp {
|
|
|
|
const PageantAsyncOpVtable *vt;
|
|
|
|
PageantClientInfo *info;
|
|
|
|
PageantClientRequestNode cr;
|
|
|
|
PageantClientRequestId *reqid;
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
struct PageantAsyncOpVtable {
|
|
|
|
void (*coroutine)(PageantAsyncOp *pao);
|
|
|
|
void (*free)(PageantAsyncOp *pao);
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
static inline void pageant_async_op_coroutine(PageantAsyncOp *pao)
|
|
|
|
{ pao->vt->coroutine(pao); }
|
|
|
|
static inline void pageant_async_op_free(PageantAsyncOp *pao)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
delete_callbacks_for_context(pao);
|
|
|
|
pao->vt->free(pao);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
static inline void pageant_async_op_unlink(PageantAsyncOp *pao)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
pao->cr.prev->next = pao->cr.next;
|
|
|
|
pao->cr.next->prev = pao->cr.prev;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
static inline void pageant_async_op_unlink_and_free(PageantAsyncOp *pao)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
pageant_async_op_unlink(pao);
|
|
|
|
pageant_async_op_free(pao);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
static void pageant_async_op_callback(void *vctx)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
pageant_async_op_coroutine((PageantAsyncOp *)vctx);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2015-05-05 22:16:19 +03:00
|
|
|
/*
|
2020-01-06 23:59:07 +03:00
|
|
|
* Master list of all the keys we have stored, in any form at all.
|
2015-05-05 22:16:19 +03:00
|
|
|
*/
|
2020-01-06 23:59:07 +03:00
|
|
|
static tree234 *keytree;
|
2020-01-25 20:24:17 +03:00
|
|
|
struct PageantKeySort {
|
2020-01-06 23:59:07 +03:00
|
|
|
/* Prefix of the main PageantKey structure which contains all the
|
|
|
|
* data that the sorting order depends on. Also simple enough that
|
|
|
|
* you can construct one for lookup purposes. */
|
|
|
|
int ssh_version; /* 1 or 2; primary sort key */
|
|
|
|
ptrlen public_blob; /* secondary sort key */
|
2020-01-25 20:24:17 +03:00
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
struct PageantKey {
|
2020-01-06 23:59:07 +03:00
|
|
|
PageantKeySort sort;
|
|
|
|
strbuf *public_blob; /* the true owner of sort.public_blob */
|
2020-01-10 22:27:07 +03:00
|
|
|
char *comment; /* stored separately, whether or not in rkey/skey */
|
2020-01-06 23:59:07 +03:00
|
|
|
union {
|
|
|
|
RSAKey *rkey; /* if ssh_version == 1 */
|
|
|
|
ssh2_userkey *skey; /* if ssh_version == 2 */
|
|
|
|
};
|
2020-01-07 22:56:47 +03:00
|
|
|
strbuf *encrypted_key_file;
|
|
|
|
bool decryption_prompt_active;
|
2020-01-25 20:25:28 +03:00
|
|
|
PageantKeyRequestNode blocked_requests;
|
2020-01-07 22:56:47 +03:00
|
|
|
PageantClientDialogId dlgid;
|
2020-01-25 20:25:28 +03:00
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
typedef struct PageantSignOp PageantSignOp;
|
|
|
|
struct PageantSignOp {
|
|
|
|
PageantKey *pk;
|
|
|
|
strbuf *data_to_sign;
|
|
|
|
unsigned flags;
|
|
|
|
int crLine;
|
2020-02-10 23:45:31 +03:00
|
|
|
unsigned char failure_type;
|
2020-01-25 20:25:28 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PageantKeyRequestNode pkr;
|
|
|
|
PageantAsyncOp pao;
|
2020-01-25 20:24:17 +03:00
|
|
|
};
|
2020-01-06 23:59:07 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2020-02-08 21:08:20 +03:00
|
|
|
/* Master lock that indicates whether a GUI request is currently in
|
|
|
|
* progress */
|
|
|
|
static bool gui_request_in_progress = false;
|
|
|
|
|
Pageant: new asynchronous internal APIs.
This is a pure refactoring: no functional change expected.
This commit introduces two new small vtable-style APIs. One is
PageantClient, which identifies a particular client of the Pageant
'core' (meaning the code that handles each individual request). This
changes pageant_handle_msg into an asynchronous operation: you pass in
an agent request message and an identifier, and at some later point,
the got_response method in your PageantClient will be called with the
answer (and the same identifier, to allow you to match requests to
responses). The trait vtable also contains a logging system.
The main importance of PageantClient, and the reason why it has to
exist instead of just passing pageant_handle_msg a bare callback
function pointer and context parameter, is that it provides robustness
if a client stops existing while a request is still pending. You call
pageant_unregister_client, and any unfinished requests associated with
that client in the Pageant core will be cleaned up, so that you're
guaranteed that after the unregister operation, no stray callbacks
will happen with a stale pointer to that client.
The WM_COPYDATA interface of Windows Pageant is a direct client of
this API. The other client is PageantListener, the system that lives
in pageant.c and handles stream-based agent connections for both Unix
Pageant and the new Windows named-pipe IPC. More specifically, each
individual connection to the listening socket is a separate
PageantClient, which means that if a socket is closed abruptly or
suffers an OS error, that client can be unregistered and any pending
requests cancelled without disrupting other connections.
Users of PageantListener have a second client vtable they can use,
called PageantListenerClient. That contains _only_ logging facilities,
and at the moment, only Unix Pageant bothers to use it (and even that
only in debugging mode).
Finally, internally to the Pageant core, there's a new trait called
PageantAsyncOp which describes an agent request in the process of
being handled. But at the moment, it has only one trivial
implementation, which is handed the full response message already
constructed, and on the next toplevel callback, passes it back to the
PageantClient.
2020-01-25 20:24:28 +03:00
|
|
|
static void failure(PageantClient *pc, PageantClientRequestId *reqid,
|
2020-02-10 23:45:31 +03:00
|
|
|
strbuf *sb, unsigned char type, const char *fmt, ...);
|
2020-01-07 22:56:47 +03:00
|
|
|
static void fail_requests_for_key(PageantKey *pk, const char *reason);
|
Pageant: new asynchronous internal APIs.
This is a pure refactoring: no functional change expected.
This commit introduces two new small vtable-style APIs. One is
PageantClient, which identifies a particular client of the Pageant
'core' (meaning the code that handles each individual request). This
changes pageant_handle_msg into an asynchronous operation: you pass in
an agent request message and an identifier, and at some later point,
the got_response method in your PageantClient will be called with the
answer (and the same identifier, to allow you to match requests to
responses). The trait vtable also contains a logging system.
The main importance of PageantClient, and the reason why it has to
exist instead of just passing pageant_handle_msg a bare callback
function pointer and context parameter, is that it provides robustness
if a client stops existing while a request is still pending. You call
pageant_unregister_client, and any unfinished requests associated with
that client in the Pageant core will be cleaned up, so that you're
guaranteed that after the unregister operation, no stray callbacks
will happen with a stale pointer to that client.
The WM_COPYDATA interface of Windows Pageant is a direct client of
this API. The other client is PageantListener, the system that lives
in pageant.c and handles stream-based agent connections for both Unix
Pageant and the new Windows named-pipe IPC. More specifically, each
individual connection to the listening socket is a separate
PageantClient, which means that if a socket is closed abruptly or
suffers an OS error, that client can be unregistered and any pending
requests cancelled without disrupting other connections.
Users of PageantListener have a second client vtable they can use,
called PageantListenerClient. That contains _only_ logging facilities,
and at the moment, only Unix Pageant bothers to use it (and even that
only in debugging mode).
Finally, internally to the Pageant core, there's a new trait called
PageantAsyncOp which describes an agent request in the process of
being handled. But at the moment, it has only one trivial
implementation, which is handed the full response message already
constructed, and on the next toplevel callback, passes it back to the
PageantClient.
2020-01-25 20:24:28 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2020-01-06 23:59:07 +03:00
|
|
|
static void pk_free(PageantKey *pk)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
if (pk->public_blob) strbuf_free(pk->public_blob);
|
|
|
|
sfree(pk->comment);
|
|
|
|
if (pk->sort.ssh_version == 1 && pk->rkey) {
|
|
|
|
freersakey(pk->rkey);
|
|
|
|
sfree(pk->rkey);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (pk->sort.ssh_version == 2 && pk->skey) {
|
2020-01-10 22:27:07 +03:00
|
|
|
sfree(pk->skey->comment);
|
2020-01-06 23:59:07 +03:00
|
|
|
ssh_key_free(pk->skey->key);
|
|
|
|
sfree(pk->skey);
|
|
|
|
}
|
2020-01-07 22:56:47 +03:00
|
|
|
if (pk->encrypted_key_file) strbuf_free(pk->encrypted_key_file);
|
|
|
|
fail_requests_for_key(pk, "key deleted from Pageant while signing "
|
|
|
|
"request was pending");
|
2020-01-06 23:59:07 +03:00
|
|
|
sfree(pk);
|
|
|
|
}
|
2015-05-05 22:16:19 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2020-01-06 23:59:07 +03:00
|
|
|
static int cmpkeys(void *av, void *bv)
|
2015-05-05 22:16:19 +03:00
|
|
|
{
|
2020-01-06 23:59:07 +03:00
|
|
|
PageantKeySort *a = (PageantKeySort *)av, *b = (PageantKeySort *)bv;
|
2015-05-05 22:16:19 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2020-01-06 23:59:07 +03:00
|
|
|
if (a->ssh_version != b->ssh_version)
|
|
|
|
return a->ssh_version < b->ssh_version ? -1 : +1;
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
return ptrlen_strcmp(a->public_blob, b->public_blob);
|
2015-05-05 22:16:19 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2020-01-06 23:59:07 +03:00
|
|
|
static inline PageantKeySort keysort(int version, ptrlen blob)
|
2015-05-05 22:16:19 +03:00
|
|
|
{
|
2020-01-06 23:59:07 +03:00
|
|
|
PageantKeySort sort;
|
|
|
|
sort.ssh_version = version;
|
|
|
|
sort.public_blob = blob;
|
|
|
|
return sort;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2015-05-05 22:16:19 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2020-01-06 23:59:07 +03:00
|
|
|
static strbuf *makeblob1(RSAKey *rkey)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
strbuf *blob = strbuf_new();
|
|
|
|
rsa_ssh1_public_blob(BinarySink_UPCAST(blob), rkey,
|
|
|
|
RSA_SSH1_EXPONENT_FIRST);
|
|
|
|
return blob;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2015-05-05 22:16:19 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2020-01-06 23:59:07 +03:00
|
|
|
static strbuf *makeblob2(ssh2_userkey *skey)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
strbuf *blob = strbuf_new();
|
|
|
|
ssh_key_public_blob(skey->key, BinarySink_UPCAST(blob));
|
|
|
|
return blob;
|
2015-05-05 22:16:19 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2020-01-06 23:59:07 +03:00
|
|
|
static PageantKey *findkey1(RSAKey *reqkey)
|
2015-05-05 22:16:19 +03:00
|
|
|
{
|
2020-01-06 23:59:07 +03:00
|
|
|
strbuf *blob = makeblob1(reqkey);
|
|
|
|
PageantKeySort sort = keysort(1, ptrlen_from_strbuf(blob));
|
|
|
|
PageantKey *toret = find234(keytree, &sort, NULL);
|
|
|
|
strbuf_free(blob);
|
2018-05-24 12:59:39 +03:00
|
|
|
return toret;
|
2015-05-05 22:16:19 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2020-01-06 23:59:07 +03:00
|
|
|
static PageantKey *findkey2(ptrlen blob)
|
2015-05-05 22:16:19 +03:00
|
|
|
{
|
2020-01-06 23:59:07 +03:00
|
|
|
PageantKeySort sort = keysort(2, blob);
|
|
|
|
return find234(keytree, &sort, NULL);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static int find_first_key_for_version(int ssh_version)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
PageantKeySort sort = keysort(ssh_version, PTRLEN_LITERAL(""));
|
|
|
|
int pos;
|
|
|
|
if (findrelpos234(keytree, &sort, NULL, REL234_GE, &pos))
|
|
|
|
return pos;
|
|
|
|
return count234(keytree);
|
|
|
|
}
|
2015-05-05 22:16:19 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2020-01-06 23:59:07 +03:00
|
|
|
static int count_keys(int ssh_version)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
return (find_first_key_for_version(ssh_version + 1) -
|
|
|
|
find_first_key_for_version(ssh_version));
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
int pageant_count_ssh1_keys(void) { return count_keys(1); }
|
|
|
|
int pageant_count_ssh2_keys(void) { return count_keys(2); }
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
bool pageant_add_ssh1_key(RSAKey *rkey)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
PageantKey *pk = snew(PageantKey);
|
|
|
|
memset(pk, 0, sizeof(PageantKey));
|
|
|
|
pk->sort.ssh_version = 1;
|
|
|
|
pk->public_blob = makeblob1(rkey);
|
|
|
|
pk->sort.public_blob = ptrlen_from_strbuf(pk->public_blob);
|
2020-01-25 20:25:28 +03:00
|
|
|
pk->blocked_requests.next = pk->blocked_requests.prev =
|
|
|
|
&pk->blocked_requests;
|
2020-01-06 23:59:07 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (add234(keytree, pk) == pk) {
|
|
|
|
pk->rkey = rkey;
|
2020-01-10 22:27:07 +03:00
|
|
|
if (rkey->comment)
|
|
|
|
pk->comment = dupstr(rkey->comment);
|
2020-01-06 23:59:07 +03:00
|
|
|
return true;
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
pk_free(pk);
|
|
|
|
return false;
|
2015-05-05 22:16:19 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2020-01-06 23:59:07 +03:00
|
|
|
bool pageant_add_ssh2_key(ssh2_userkey *skey)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
PageantKey *pk = snew(PageantKey);
|
|
|
|
memset(pk, 0, sizeof(PageantKey));
|
|
|
|
pk->sort.ssh_version = 2;
|
|
|
|
pk->public_blob = makeblob2(skey);
|
|
|
|
pk->sort.public_blob = ptrlen_from_strbuf(pk->public_blob);
|
2020-01-25 20:25:28 +03:00
|
|
|
pk->blocked_requests.next = pk->blocked_requests.prev =
|
|
|
|
&pk->blocked_requests;
|
2020-01-06 23:59:07 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (add234(keytree, pk) == pk) {
|
|
|
|
pk->skey = skey;
|
2020-01-10 22:27:07 +03:00
|
|
|
if (skey->comment)
|
|
|
|
pk->comment = dupstr(skey->comment);
|
2020-01-06 23:59:07 +03:00
|
|
|
return true;
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
pk_free(pk);
|
|
|
|
return false;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void remove_all_keys(int ssh_version)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
int start = find_first_key_for_version(ssh_version);
|
|
|
|
int end = find_first_key_for_version(ssh_version + 1);
|
|
|
|
while (end > start) {
|
|
|
|
PageantKey *pk = delpos234(keytree, --end);
|
|
|
|
assert(pk->sort.ssh_version == ssh_version);
|
|
|
|
pk_free(pk);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void list_keys(BinarySink *bs, int ssh_version)
|
2015-05-05 22:16:19 +03:00
|
|
|
{
|
2018-05-24 12:59:39 +03:00
|
|
|
int i;
|
2020-01-06 23:59:07 +03:00
|
|
|
PageantKey *pk;
|
2015-05-05 22:16:19 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2020-01-06 23:59:07 +03:00
|
|
|
put_uint32(bs, count_keys(ssh_version));
|
|
|
|
for (i = find_first_key_for_version(ssh_version);
|
|
|
|
NULL != (pk = index234(keytree, i)); i++) {
|
|
|
|
if (pk->sort.ssh_version != ssh_version)
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (ssh_version > 1)
|
|
|
|
put_stringpl(bs, pk->sort.public_blob);
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
put_datapl(bs, pk->sort.public_blob); /* no header */
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
put_stringpl(bs, ptrlen_from_asciz(pk->comment));
|
2015-05-05 22:16:19 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2020-01-29 09:35:53 +03:00
|
|
|
void pageant_make_keylist1(BinarySink *bs) { list_keys(bs, 1); }
|
|
|
|
void pageant_make_keylist2(BinarySink *bs) { list_keys(bs, 2); }
|
2020-01-06 23:59:07 +03:00
|
|
|
|
Pageant: new asynchronous internal APIs.
This is a pure refactoring: no functional change expected.
This commit introduces two new small vtable-style APIs. One is
PageantClient, which identifies a particular client of the Pageant
'core' (meaning the code that handles each individual request). This
changes pageant_handle_msg into an asynchronous operation: you pass in
an agent request message and an identifier, and at some later point,
the got_response method in your PageantClient will be called with the
answer (and the same identifier, to allow you to match requests to
responses). The trait vtable also contains a logging system.
The main importance of PageantClient, and the reason why it has to
exist instead of just passing pageant_handle_msg a bare callback
function pointer and context parameter, is that it provides robustness
if a client stops existing while a request is still pending. You call
pageant_unregister_client, and any unfinished requests associated with
that client in the Pageant core will be cleaned up, so that you're
guaranteed that after the unregister operation, no stray callbacks
will happen with a stale pointer to that client.
The WM_COPYDATA interface of Windows Pageant is a direct client of
this API. The other client is PageantListener, the system that lives
in pageant.c and handles stream-based agent connections for both Unix
Pageant and the new Windows named-pipe IPC. More specifically, each
individual connection to the listening socket is a separate
PageantClient, which means that if a socket is closed abruptly or
suffers an OS error, that client can be unregistered and any pending
requests cancelled without disrupting other connections.
Users of PageantListener have a second client vtable they can use,
called PageantListenerClient. That contains _only_ logging facilities,
and at the moment, only Unix Pageant bothers to use it (and even that
only in debugging mode).
Finally, internally to the Pageant core, there's a new trait called
PageantAsyncOp which describes an agent request in the process of
being handled. But at the moment, it has only one trivial
implementation, which is handed the full response message already
constructed, and on the next toplevel callback, passes it back to the
PageantClient.
2020-01-25 20:24:28 +03:00
|
|
|
void pageant_register_client(PageantClient *pc)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
pc->info = snew(PageantClientInfo);
|
|
|
|
pc->info->pc = pc;
|
|
|
|
pc->info->head.prev = pc->info->head.next = &pc->info->head;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2015-05-06 21:32:26 +03:00
|
|
|
|
Pageant: new asynchronous internal APIs.
This is a pure refactoring: no functional change expected.
This commit introduces two new small vtable-style APIs. One is
PageantClient, which identifies a particular client of the Pageant
'core' (meaning the code that handles each individual request). This
changes pageant_handle_msg into an asynchronous operation: you pass in
an agent request message and an identifier, and at some later point,
the got_response method in your PageantClient will be called with the
answer (and the same identifier, to allow you to match requests to
responses). The trait vtable also contains a logging system.
The main importance of PageantClient, and the reason why it has to
exist instead of just passing pageant_handle_msg a bare callback
function pointer and context parameter, is that it provides robustness
if a client stops existing while a request is still pending. You call
pageant_unregister_client, and any unfinished requests associated with
that client in the Pageant core will be cleaned up, so that you're
guaranteed that after the unregister operation, no stray callbacks
will happen with a stale pointer to that client.
The WM_COPYDATA interface of Windows Pageant is a direct client of
this API. The other client is PageantListener, the system that lives
in pageant.c and handles stream-based agent connections for both Unix
Pageant and the new Windows named-pipe IPC. More specifically, each
individual connection to the listening socket is a separate
PageantClient, which means that if a socket is closed abruptly or
suffers an OS error, that client can be unregistered and any pending
requests cancelled without disrupting other connections.
Users of PageantListener have a second client vtable they can use,
called PageantListenerClient. That contains _only_ logging facilities,
and at the moment, only Unix Pageant bothers to use it (and even that
only in debugging mode).
Finally, internally to the Pageant core, there's a new trait called
PageantAsyncOp which describes an agent request in the process of
being handled. But at the moment, it has only one trivial
implementation, which is handed the full response message already
constructed, and on the next toplevel callback, passes it back to the
PageantClient.
2020-01-25 20:24:28 +03:00
|
|
|
void pageant_unregister_client(PageantClient *pc)
|
2015-05-06 21:32:26 +03:00
|
|
|
{
|
Pageant: new asynchronous internal APIs.
This is a pure refactoring: no functional change expected.
This commit introduces two new small vtable-style APIs. One is
PageantClient, which identifies a particular client of the Pageant
'core' (meaning the code that handles each individual request). This
changes pageant_handle_msg into an asynchronous operation: you pass in
an agent request message and an identifier, and at some later point,
the got_response method in your PageantClient will be called with the
answer (and the same identifier, to allow you to match requests to
responses). The trait vtable also contains a logging system.
The main importance of PageantClient, and the reason why it has to
exist instead of just passing pageant_handle_msg a bare callback
function pointer and context parameter, is that it provides robustness
if a client stops existing while a request is still pending. You call
pageant_unregister_client, and any unfinished requests associated with
that client in the Pageant core will be cleaned up, so that you're
guaranteed that after the unregister operation, no stray callbacks
will happen with a stale pointer to that client.
The WM_COPYDATA interface of Windows Pageant is a direct client of
this API. The other client is PageantListener, the system that lives
in pageant.c and handles stream-based agent connections for both Unix
Pageant and the new Windows named-pipe IPC. More specifically, each
individual connection to the listening socket is a separate
PageantClient, which means that if a socket is closed abruptly or
suffers an OS error, that client can be unregistered and any pending
requests cancelled without disrupting other connections.
Users of PageantListener have a second client vtable they can use,
called PageantListenerClient. That contains _only_ logging facilities,
and at the moment, only Unix Pageant bothers to use it (and even that
only in debugging mode).
Finally, internally to the Pageant core, there's a new trait called
PageantAsyncOp which describes an agent request in the process of
being handled. But at the moment, it has only one trivial
implementation, which is handed the full response message already
constructed, and on the next toplevel callback, passes it back to the
PageantClient.
2020-01-25 20:24:28 +03:00
|
|
|
PageantClientInfo *info = pc->info;
|
|
|
|
assert(info);
|
|
|
|
assert(info->pc == pc);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
while (pc->info->head.next != &pc->info->head) {
|
|
|
|
PageantAsyncOp *pao = container_of(pc->info->head.next,
|
|
|
|
PageantAsyncOp, cr);
|
|
|
|
pageant_async_op_unlink_and_free(pao);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
sfree(pc->info);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2020-02-10 23:45:31 +03:00
|
|
|
static PRINTF_LIKE(5, 6) void failure(
|
|
|
|
PageantClient *pc, PageantClientRequestId *reqid, strbuf *sb,
|
|
|
|
unsigned char type, const char *fmt, ...)
|
Pageant: new asynchronous internal APIs.
This is a pure refactoring: no functional change expected.
This commit introduces two new small vtable-style APIs. One is
PageantClient, which identifies a particular client of the Pageant
'core' (meaning the code that handles each individual request). This
changes pageant_handle_msg into an asynchronous operation: you pass in
an agent request message and an identifier, and at some later point,
the got_response method in your PageantClient will be called with the
answer (and the same identifier, to allow you to match requests to
responses). The trait vtable also contains a logging system.
The main importance of PageantClient, and the reason why it has to
exist instead of just passing pageant_handle_msg a bare callback
function pointer and context parameter, is that it provides robustness
if a client stops existing while a request is still pending. You call
pageant_unregister_client, and any unfinished requests associated with
that client in the Pageant core will be cleaned up, so that you're
guaranteed that after the unregister operation, no stray callbacks
will happen with a stale pointer to that client.
The WM_COPYDATA interface of Windows Pageant is a direct client of
this API. The other client is PageantListener, the system that lives
in pageant.c and handles stream-based agent connections for both Unix
Pageant and the new Windows named-pipe IPC. More specifically, each
individual connection to the listening socket is a separate
PageantClient, which means that if a socket is closed abruptly or
suffers an OS error, that client can be unregistered and any pending
requests cancelled without disrupting other connections.
Users of PageantListener have a second client vtable they can use,
called PageantListenerClient. That contains _only_ logging facilities,
and at the moment, only Unix Pageant bothers to use it (and even that
only in debugging mode).
Finally, internally to the Pageant core, there's a new trait called
PageantAsyncOp which describes an agent request in the process of
being handled. But at the moment, it has only one trivial
implementation, which is handed the full response message already
constructed, and on the next toplevel callback, passes it back to the
PageantClient.
2020-01-25 20:24:28 +03:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
strbuf_clear(sb);
|
2020-02-10 23:45:31 +03:00
|
|
|
put_byte(sb, type);
|
Pageant: new asynchronous internal APIs.
This is a pure refactoring: no functional change expected.
This commit introduces two new small vtable-style APIs. One is
PageantClient, which identifies a particular client of the Pageant
'core' (meaning the code that handles each individual request). This
changes pageant_handle_msg into an asynchronous operation: you pass in
an agent request message and an identifier, and at some later point,
the got_response method in your PageantClient will be called with the
answer (and the same identifier, to allow you to match requests to
responses). The trait vtable also contains a logging system.
The main importance of PageantClient, and the reason why it has to
exist instead of just passing pageant_handle_msg a bare callback
function pointer and context parameter, is that it provides robustness
if a client stops existing while a request is still pending. You call
pageant_unregister_client, and any unfinished requests associated with
that client in the Pageant core will be cleaned up, so that you're
guaranteed that after the unregister operation, no stray callbacks
will happen with a stale pointer to that client.
The WM_COPYDATA interface of Windows Pageant is a direct client of
this API. The other client is PageantListener, the system that lives
in pageant.c and handles stream-based agent connections for both Unix
Pageant and the new Windows named-pipe IPC. More specifically, each
individual connection to the listening socket is a separate
PageantClient, which means that if a socket is closed abruptly or
suffers an OS error, that client can be unregistered and any pending
requests cancelled without disrupting other connections.
Users of PageantListener have a second client vtable they can use,
called PageantListenerClient. That contains _only_ logging facilities,
and at the moment, only Unix Pageant bothers to use it (and even that
only in debugging mode).
Finally, internally to the Pageant core, there's a new trait called
PageantAsyncOp which describes an agent request in the process of
being handled. But at the moment, it has only one trivial
implementation, which is handed the full response message already
constructed, and on the next toplevel callback, passes it back to the
PageantClient.
2020-01-25 20:24:28 +03:00
|
|
|
if (!pc->suppress_logging) {
|
2015-05-06 21:32:26 +03:00
|
|
|
va_list ap;
|
|
|
|
va_start(ap, fmt);
|
2020-01-29 09:13:41 +03:00
|
|
|
char *msg = dupvprintf(fmt, ap);
|
2015-05-06 21:32:26 +03:00
|
|
|
va_end(ap);
|
Pageant: new asynchronous internal APIs.
This is a pure refactoring: no functional change expected.
This commit introduces two new small vtable-style APIs. One is
PageantClient, which identifies a particular client of the Pageant
'core' (meaning the code that handles each individual request). This
changes pageant_handle_msg into an asynchronous operation: you pass in
an agent request message and an identifier, and at some later point,
the got_response method in your PageantClient will be called with the
answer (and the same identifier, to allow you to match requests to
responses). The trait vtable also contains a logging system.
The main importance of PageantClient, and the reason why it has to
exist instead of just passing pageant_handle_msg a bare callback
function pointer and context parameter, is that it provides robustness
if a client stops existing while a request is still pending. You call
pageant_unregister_client, and any unfinished requests associated with
that client in the Pageant core will be cleaned up, so that you're
guaranteed that after the unregister operation, no stray callbacks
will happen with a stale pointer to that client.
The WM_COPYDATA interface of Windows Pageant is a direct client of
this API. The other client is PageantListener, the system that lives
in pageant.c and handles stream-based agent connections for both Unix
Pageant and the new Windows named-pipe IPC. More specifically, each
individual connection to the listening socket is a separate
PageantClient, which means that if a socket is closed abruptly or
suffers an OS error, that client can be unregistered and any pending
requests cancelled without disrupting other connections.
Users of PageantListener have a second client vtable they can use,
called PageantListenerClient. That contains _only_ logging facilities,
and at the moment, only Unix Pageant bothers to use it (and even that
only in debugging mode).
Finally, internally to the Pageant core, there's a new trait called
PageantAsyncOp which describes an agent request in the process of
being handled. But at the moment, it has only one trivial
implementation, which is handed the full response message already
constructed, and on the next toplevel callback, passes it back to the
PageantClient.
2020-01-25 20:24:28 +03:00
|
|
|
pageant_client_log(pc, reqid, "reply: SSH_AGENT_FAILURE (%s)", msg);
|
|
|
|
sfree(msg);
|
2015-05-06 21:32:26 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2020-02-11 22:11:10 +03:00
|
|
|
static void signop_link(PageantSignOp *so)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
assert(!so->pkr.prev);
|
|
|
|
assert(!so->pkr.next);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
so->pkr.prev = so->pk->blocked_requests.prev;
|
|
|
|
so->pkr.next = &so->pk->blocked_requests;
|
|
|
|
so->pkr.prev->next = &so->pkr;
|
|
|
|
so->pkr.next->prev = &so->pkr;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void signop_unlink(PageantSignOp *so)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
if (so->pkr.next) {
|
|
|
|
assert(so->pkr.prev);
|
|
|
|
so->pkr.next->prev = so->pkr.prev;
|
|
|
|
so->pkr.prev->next = so->pkr.next;
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
assert(!so->pkr.prev);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2020-01-25 20:25:28 +03:00
|
|
|
static void signop_free(PageantAsyncOp *pao)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
PageantSignOp *so = container_of(pao, PageantSignOp, pao);
|
|
|
|
strbuf_free(so->data_to_sign);
|
|
|
|
sfree(so);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2020-01-07 22:56:47 +03:00
|
|
|
static bool request_passphrase(PageantClient *pc, PageantKey *pk)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
if (!pk->decryption_prompt_active) {
|
2020-02-08 21:08:20 +03:00
|
|
|
assert(!gui_request_in_progress);
|
|
|
|
|
2020-01-07 22:56:47 +03:00
|
|
|
strbuf *sb = strbuf_new();
|
|
|
|
strbuf_catf(sb, "Enter passphrase to decrypt key '%s'", pk->comment);
|
|
|
|
bool created_dlg = pageant_client_ask_passphrase(
|
|
|
|
pc, &pk->dlgid, sb->s);
|
|
|
|
strbuf_free(sb);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (!created_dlg)
|
|
|
|
return false;
|
|
|
|
|
2020-02-08 21:08:20 +03:00
|
|
|
gui_request_in_progress = true;
|
2020-01-07 22:56:47 +03:00
|
|
|
pk->decryption_prompt_active = true;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return true;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2020-01-25 20:25:28 +03:00
|
|
|
static void signop_coroutine(PageantAsyncOp *pao)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
PageantSignOp *so = container_of(pao, PageantSignOp, pao);
|
2020-01-07 22:56:47 +03:00
|
|
|
strbuf *response;
|
2020-01-25 20:25:28 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
crBegin(so->crLine);
|
|
|
|
|
2020-02-08 21:08:20 +03:00
|
|
|
while (!so->pk->skey && gui_request_in_progress)
|
|
|
|
crReturnV;
|
|
|
|
|
2020-01-07 22:56:47 +03:00
|
|
|
if (!so->pk->skey) {
|
|
|
|
assert(so->pk->encrypted_key_file);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (!request_passphrase(so->pao.info->pc, so->pk)) {
|
|
|
|
response = strbuf_new();
|
|
|
|
failure(so->pao.info->pc, so->pao.reqid, response,
|
2020-02-10 23:45:31 +03:00
|
|
|
so->failure_type, "on-demand decryption could not "
|
|
|
|
"prompt for a passphrase");
|
2020-01-07 22:56:47 +03:00
|
|
|
goto respond;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2020-02-11 22:11:10 +03:00
|
|
|
signop_link(so);
|
2020-01-07 22:56:47 +03:00
|
|
|
crReturnV;
|
2020-02-11 22:11:10 +03:00
|
|
|
signop_unlink(so);
|
2020-01-07 22:56:47 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
uint32_t supported_flags = ssh_key_alg(so->pk->skey->key)->supported_flags;
|
|
|
|
if (so->flags & ~supported_flags) {
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* We MUST reject any message containing flags we don't
|
|
|
|
* understand.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
response = strbuf_new();
|
2020-02-10 23:45:31 +03:00
|
|
|
failure(so->pao.info->pc, so->pao.reqid, response, so->failure_type,
|
2020-01-07 22:56:47 +03:00
|
|
|
"unsupported flag bits 0x%08"PRIx32,
|
|
|
|
so->flags & ~supported_flags);
|
|
|
|
goto respond;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
char *invalid = ssh_key_invalid(so->pk->skey->key, so->flags);
|
|
|
|
if (invalid) {
|
|
|
|
response = strbuf_new();
|
2020-02-10 23:45:31 +03:00
|
|
|
failure(so->pao.info->pc, so->pao.reqid, response, so->failure_type,
|
2020-01-07 22:56:47 +03:00
|
|
|
"key invalid: %s", invalid);
|
|
|
|
sfree(invalid);
|
|
|
|
goto respond;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2020-01-25 20:25:28 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
strbuf *signature = strbuf_new();
|
|
|
|
ssh_key_sign(so->pk->skey->key, ptrlen_from_strbuf(so->data_to_sign),
|
|
|
|
so->flags, BinarySink_UPCAST(signature));
|
|
|
|
|
2020-01-07 22:56:47 +03:00
|
|
|
response = strbuf_new();
|
2020-01-25 20:25:28 +03:00
|
|
|
put_byte(response, SSH2_AGENT_SIGN_RESPONSE);
|
|
|
|
put_stringsb(response, signature);
|
2020-01-07 22:56:47 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
respond:
|
2020-01-25 20:25:28 +03:00
|
|
|
pageant_client_got_response(so->pao.info->pc, so->pao.reqid,
|
|
|
|
ptrlen_from_strbuf(response));
|
|
|
|
strbuf_free(response);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pageant_async_op_unlink_and_free(&so->pao);
|
|
|
|
crFinishFreedV;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static struct PageantAsyncOpVtable signop_vtable = {
|
|
|
|
signop_coroutine,
|
|
|
|
signop_free,
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
2020-01-07 22:56:47 +03:00
|
|
|
static void fail_requests_for_key(PageantKey *pk, const char *reason)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
while (pk->blocked_requests.next != &pk->blocked_requests) {
|
|
|
|
PageantSignOp *so = container_of(pk->blocked_requests.next,
|
|
|
|
PageantSignOp, pkr);
|
2020-02-11 22:11:10 +03:00
|
|
|
signop_unlink(so);
|
2020-01-07 22:56:47 +03:00
|
|
|
strbuf *sb = strbuf_new();
|
2020-02-10 23:45:31 +03:00
|
|
|
failure(so->pao.info->pc, so->pao.reqid, sb, so->failure_type,
|
|
|
|
"%s", reason);
|
2020-01-07 22:56:47 +03:00
|
|
|
pageant_client_got_response(so->pao.info->pc, so->pao.reqid,
|
|
|
|
ptrlen_from_strbuf(sb));
|
|
|
|
strbuf_free(sb);
|
|
|
|
pageant_async_op_unlink_and_free(&so->pao);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void unblock_requests_for_key(PageantKey *pk)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
for (PageantKeyRequestNode *pkr = pk->blocked_requests.next;
|
|
|
|
pkr != &pk->blocked_requests; pkr = pkr->next) {
|
|
|
|
PageantSignOp *so = container_of(pk->blocked_requests.next,
|
|
|
|
PageantSignOp, pkr);
|
|
|
|
queue_toplevel_callback(pageant_async_op_callback, &so->pao);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
void pageant_passphrase_request_success(PageantClientDialogId *dlgid,
|
|
|
|
ptrlen passphrase)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
PageantKey *pk = container_of(dlgid, PageantKey, dlgid);
|
|
|
|
|
2020-02-08 21:08:20 +03:00
|
|
|
assert(gui_request_in_progress);
|
|
|
|
gui_request_in_progress = false;
|
2020-02-15 19:35:41 +03:00
|
|
|
pk->decryption_prompt_active = false;
|
2020-02-08 21:08:20 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2020-01-07 22:56:47 +03:00
|
|
|
if (!pk->skey) {
|
|
|
|
const char *error;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BinarySource src[1];
|
|
|
|
BinarySource_BARE_INIT_PL(src, ptrlen_from_strbuf(
|
|
|
|
pk->encrypted_key_file));
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
strbuf *ppsb = strbuf_new_nm();
|
|
|
|
put_datapl(ppsb, passphrase);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pk->skey = ppk_load_s(src, ppsb->s, &error);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
strbuf_free(ppsb);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (!pk->skey) {
|
|
|
|
fail_requests_for_key(pk, "unable to decrypt key");
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
} else if (pk->skey == SSH2_WRONG_PASSPHRASE) {
|
2020-02-08 22:14:14 +03:00
|
|
|
pk->skey = NULL;
|
|
|
|
|
2020-01-07 22:56:47 +03:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Find a PageantClient to use for another attempt at
|
|
|
|
* request_passphrase.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
PageantKeyRequestNode *pkr = pk->blocked_requests.next;
|
|
|
|
if (pkr == &pk->blocked_requests) {
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Special case: if all the requests have gone away at
|
|
|
|
* this point, we need not bother putting up a request
|
|
|
|
* at all any more.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PageantSignOp *so = container_of(pk->blocked_requests.next,
|
|
|
|
PageantSignOp, pkr);
|
|
|
|
|
2020-02-08 22:14:14 +03:00
|
|
|
pk->decryption_prompt_active = false;
|
2020-01-07 22:56:47 +03:00
|
|
|
if (!request_passphrase(so->pao.info->pc, pk)) {
|
|
|
|
fail_requests_for_key(pk, "unable to continue creating "
|
|
|
|
"passphrase prompts");
|
|
|
|
}
|
2020-02-08 22:14:14 +03:00
|
|
|
return;
|
2020-01-07 22:56:47 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
unblock_requests_for_key(pk);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
void pageant_passphrase_request_refused(PageantClientDialogId *dlgid)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
PageantKey *pk = container_of(dlgid, PageantKey, dlgid);
|
2020-02-08 21:08:20 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert(gui_request_in_progress);
|
|
|
|
gui_request_in_progress = false;
|
2020-02-15 19:35:41 +03:00
|
|
|
pk->decryption_prompt_active = false;
|
2020-02-08 21:08:20 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2020-02-08 22:14:14 +03:00
|
|
|
fail_requests_for_key(pk, "user refused to supply passphrase");
|
2020-01-07 22:56:47 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
Pageant: new asynchronous internal APIs.
This is a pure refactoring: no functional change expected.
This commit introduces two new small vtable-style APIs. One is
PageantClient, which identifies a particular client of the Pageant
'core' (meaning the code that handles each individual request). This
changes pageant_handle_msg into an asynchronous operation: you pass in
an agent request message and an identifier, and at some later point,
the got_response method in your PageantClient will be called with the
answer (and the same identifier, to allow you to match requests to
responses). The trait vtable also contains a logging system.
The main importance of PageantClient, and the reason why it has to
exist instead of just passing pageant_handle_msg a bare callback
function pointer and context parameter, is that it provides robustness
if a client stops existing while a request is still pending. You call
pageant_unregister_client, and any unfinished requests associated with
that client in the Pageant core will be cleaned up, so that you're
guaranteed that after the unregister operation, no stray callbacks
will happen with a stale pointer to that client.
The WM_COPYDATA interface of Windows Pageant is a direct client of
this API. The other client is PageantListener, the system that lives
in pageant.c and handles stream-based agent connections for both Unix
Pageant and the new Windows named-pipe IPC. More specifically, each
individual connection to the listening socket is a separate
PageantClient, which means that if a socket is closed abruptly or
suffers an OS error, that client can be unregistered and any pending
requests cancelled without disrupting other connections.
Users of PageantListener have a second client vtable they can use,
called PageantListenerClient. That contains _only_ logging facilities,
and at the moment, only Unix Pageant bothers to use it (and even that
only in debugging mode).
Finally, internally to the Pageant core, there's a new trait called
PageantAsyncOp which describes an agent request in the process of
being handled. But at the moment, it has only one trivial
implementation, which is handed the full response message already
constructed, and on the next toplevel callback, passes it back to the
PageantClient.
2020-01-25 20:24:28 +03:00
|
|
|
typedef struct PageantImmOp PageantImmOp;
|
|
|
|
struct PageantImmOp {
|
|
|
|
int crLine;
|
|
|
|
strbuf *response;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PageantAsyncOp pao;
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void immop_free(PageantAsyncOp *pao)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
PageantImmOp *io = container_of(pao, PageantImmOp, pao);
|
2020-02-08 19:36:55 +03:00
|
|
|
if (io->response)
|
|
|
|
strbuf_free(io->response);
|
Pageant: new asynchronous internal APIs.
This is a pure refactoring: no functional change expected.
This commit introduces two new small vtable-style APIs. One is
PageantClient, which identifies a particular client of the Pageant
'core' (meaning the code that handles each individual request). This
changes pageant_handle_msg into an asynchronous operation: you pass in
an agent request message and an identifier, and at some later point,
the got_response method in your PageantClient will be called with the
answer (and the same identifier, to allow you to match requests to
responses). The trait vtable also contains a logging system.
The main importance of PageantClient, and the reason why it has to
exist instead of just passing pageant_handle_msg a bare callback
function pointer and context parameter, is that it provides robustness
if a client stops existing while a request is still pending. You call
pageant_unregister_client, and any unfinished requests associated with
that client in the Pageant core will be cleaned up, so that you're
guaranteed that after the unregister operation, no stray callbacks
will happen with a stale pointer to that client.
The WM_COPYDATA interface of Windows Pageant is a direct client of
this API. The other client is PageantListener, the system that lives
in pageant.c and handles stream-based agent connections for both Unix
Pageant and the new Windows named-pipe IPC. More specifically, each
individual connection to the listening socket is a separate
PageantClient, which means that if a socket is closed abruptly or
suffers an OS error, that client can be unregistered and any pending
requests cancelled without disrupting other connections.
Users of PageantListener have a second client vtable they can use,
called PageantListenerClient. That contains _only_ logging facilities,
and at the moment, only Unix Pageant bothers to use it (and even that
only in debugging mode).
Finally, internally to the Pageant core, there's a new trait called
PageantAsyncOp which describes an agent request in the process of
being handled. But at the moment, it has only one trivial
implementation, which is handed the full response message already
constructed, and on the next toplevel callback, passes it back to the
PageantClient.
2020-01-25 20:24:28 +03:00
|
|
|
sfree(io);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void immop_coroutine(PageantAsyncOp *pao)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
PageantImmOp *io = container_of(pao, PageantImmOp, pao);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
crBegin(io->crLine);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (0) crReturnV;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pageant_client_got_response(io->pao.info->pc, io->pao.reqid,
|
|
|
|
ptrlen_from_strbuf(io->response));
|
|
|
|
pageant_async_op_unlink_and_free(&io->pao);
|
|
|
|
crFinishFreedV;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static struct PageantAsyncOpVtable immop_vtable = {
|
|
|
|
immop_coroutine,
|
|
|
|
immop_free,
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
2020-02-15 19:37:10 +03:00
|
|
|
static bool reencrypt_key(PageantKey *pk)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
if (pk->sort.ssh_version != 2) {
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* We don't support storing SSH-1 keys in encrypted form at
|
|
|
|
* all.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
return false;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (!pk->encrypted_key_file) {
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* We can't re-encrypt a key if it doesn't have an encrypted
|
|
|
|
* form. (We could make one up, of course - but with what
|
|
|
|
* passphrase that we could expect the user to know later?)
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
return false;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Only actually free pk->skey if it exists. But we return success
|
|
|
|
* regardless, so that 'please ensure this key isn't stored
|
|
|
|
* decrypted' is idempotent. */
|
|
|
|
if (pk->skey) {
|
|
|
|
sfree(pk->skey->comment);
|
|
|
|
ssh_key_free(pk->skey->key);
|
|
|
|
sfree(pk->skey);
|
|
|
|
pk->skey = NULL;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return true;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2020-02-10 23:45:31 +03:00
|
|
|
#define PUTTYEXT(base) base "@putty.projects.tartarus.org"
|
|
|
|
|
2020-02-15 19:37:10 +03:00
|
|
|
#define KNOWN_EXTENSIONS(X) \
|
|
|
|
X(EXT_QUERY, "query") \
|
|
|
|
X(EXT_ADD_PPK, PUTTYEXT("add-ppk")) \
|
|
|
|
X(EXT_REENCRYPT, PUTTYEXT("reencrypt")) \
|
|
|
|
X(EXT_REENCRYPT_ALL, PUTTYEXT("reencrypt-all")) \
|
2020-02-10 23:45:31 +03:00
|
|
|
/* end of list */
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#define DECL_EXT_ENUM(id, name) id,
|
|
|
|
enum Extension { KNOWN_EXTENSIONS(DECL_EXT_ENUM) EXT_UNKNOWN };
|
|
|
|
#define DEF_EXT_NAMES(id, name) PTRLEN_DECL_LITERAL(name),
|
|
|
|
static const ptrlen extension_names[] = { KNOWN_EXTENSIONS(DEF_EXT_NAMES) };
|
2020-01-07 22:56:47 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2020-02-08 19:36:55 +03:00
|
|
|
static PageantAsyncOp *pageant_make_op(
|
|
|
|
PageantClient *pc, PageantClientRequestId *reqid, ptrlen msgpl)
|
2015-05-05 22:16:19 +03:00
|
|
|
{
|
2018-05-28 01:47:40 +03:00
|
|
|
BinarySource msg[1];
|
Pageant: new asynchronous internal APIs.
This is a pure refactoring: no functional change expected.
This commit introduces two new small vtable-style APIs. One is
PageantClient, which identifies a particular client of the Pageant
'core' (meaning the code that handles each individual request). This
changes pageant_handle_msg into an asynchronous operation: you pass in
an agent request message and an identifier, and at some later point,
the got_response method in your PageantClient will be called with the
answer (and the same identifier, to allow you to match requests to
responses). The trait vtable also contains a logging system.
The main importance of PageantClient, and the reason why it has to
exist instead of just passing pageant_handle_msg a bare callback
function pointer and context parameter, is that it provides robustness
if a client stops existing while a request is still pending. You call
pageant_unregister_client, and any unfinished requests associated with
that client in the Pageant core will be cleaned up, so that you're
guaranteed that after the unregister operation, no stray callbacks
will happen with a stale pointer to that client.
The WM_COPYDATA interface of Windows Pageant is a direct client of
this API. The other client is PageantListener, the system that lives
in pageant.c and handles stream-based agent connections for both Unix
Pageant and the new Windows named-pipe IPC. More specifically, each
individual connection to the listening socket is a separate
PageantClient, which means that if a socket is closed abruptly or
suffers an OS error, that client can be unregistered and any pending
requests cancelled without disrupting other connections.
Users of PageantListener have a second client vtable they can use,
called PageantListenerClient. That contains _only_ logging facilities,
and at the moment, only Unix Pageant bothers to use it (and even that
only in debugging mode).
Finally, internally to the Pageant core, there's a new trait called
PageantAsyncOp which describes an agent request in the process of
being handled. But at the moment, it has only one trivial
implementation, which is handed the full response message already
constructed, and on the next toplevel callback, passes it back to the
PageantClient.
2020-01-25 20:24:28 +03:00
|
|
|
strbuf *sb = strbuf_new_nm();
|
2020-02-10 23:45:31 +03:00
|
|
|
unsigned char failure_type = SSH_AGENT_FAILURE;
|
2015-05-05 22:16:19 +03:00
|
|
|
int type;
|
|
|
|
|
2020-02-10 23:45:31 +03:00
|
|
|
#define fail(...) failure(pc, reqid, sb, failure_type, __VA_ARGS__)
|
|
|
|
|
Pageant: new asynchronous internal APIs.
This is a pure refactoring: no functional change expected.
This commit introduces two new small vtable-style APIs. One is
PageantClient, which identifies a particular client of the Pageant
'core' (meaning the code that handles each individual request). This
changes pageant_handle_msg into an asynchronous operation: you pass in
an agent request message and an identifier, and at some later point,
the got_response method in your PageantClient will be called with the
answer (and the same identifier, to allow you to match requests to
responses). The trait vtable also contains a logging system.
The main importance of PageantClient, and the reason why it has to
exist instead of just passing pageant_handle_msg a bare callback
function pointer and context parameter, is that it provides robustness
if a client stops existing while a request is still pending. You call
pageant_unregister_client, and any unfinished requests associated with
that client in the Pageant core will be cleaned up, so that you're
guaranteed that after the unregister operation, no stray callbacks
will happen with a stale pointer to that client.
The WM_COPYDATA interface of Windows Pageant is a direct client of
this API. The other client is PageantListener, the system that lives
in pageant.c and handles stream-based agent connections for both Unix
Pageant and the new Windows named-pipe IPC. More specifically, each
individual connection to the listening socket is a separate
PageantClient, which means that if a socket is closed abruptly or
suffers an OS error, that client can be unregistered and any pending
requests cancelled without disrupting other connections.
Users of PageantListener have a second client vtable they can use,
called PageantListenerClient. That contains _only_ logging facilities,
and at the moment, only Unix Pageant bothers to use it (and even that
only in debugging mode).
Finally, internally to the Pageant core, there's a new trait called
PageantAsyncOp which describes an agent request in the process of
being handled. But at the moment, it has only one trivial
implementation, which is handed the full response message already
constructed, and on the next toplevel callback, passes it back to the
PageantClient.
2020-01-25 20:24:28 +03:00
|
|
|
BinarySource_BARE_INIT_PL(msg, msgpl);
|
2015-05-05 22:16:19 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2018-05-28 01:47:40 +03:00
|
|
|
type = get_byte(msg);
|
|
|
|
if (get_err(msg)) {
|
2020-02-10 23:45:31 +03:00
|
|
|
fail("message contained no type code");
|
Pageant: new asynchronous internal APIs.
This is a pure refactoring: no functional change expected.
This commit introduces two new small vtable-style APIs. One is
PageantClient, which identifies a particular client of the Pageant
'core' (meaning the code that handles each individual request). This
changes pageant_handle_msg into an asynchronous operation: you pass in
an agent request message and an identifier, and at some later point,
the got_response method in your PageantClient will be called with the
answer (and the same identifier, to allow you to match requests to
responses). The trait vtable also contains a logging system.
The main importance of PageantClient, and the reason why it has to
exist instead of just passing pageant_handle_msg a bare callback
function pointer and context parameter, is that it provides robustness
if a client stops existing while a request is still pending. You call
pageant_unregister_client, and any unfinished requests associated with
that client in the Pageant core will be cleaned up, so that you're
guaranteed that after the unregister operation, no stray callbacks
will happen with a stale pointer to that client.
The WM_COPYDATA interface of Windows Pageant is a direct client of
this API. The other client is PageantListener, the system that lives
in pageant.c and handles stream-based agent connections for both Unix
Pageant and the new Windows named-pipe IPC. More specifically, each
individual connection to the listening socket is a separate
PageantClient, which means that if a socket is closed abruptly or
suffers an OS error, that client can be unregistered and any pending
requests cancelled without disrupting other connections.
Users of PageantListener have a second client vtable they can use,
called PageantListenerClient. That contains _only_ logging facilities,
and at the moment, only Unix Pageant bothers to use it (and even that
only in debugging mode).
Finally, internally to the Pageant core, there's a new trait called
PageantAsyncOp which describes an agent request in the process of
being handled. But at the moment, it has only one trivial
implementation, which is handed the full response message already
constructed, and on the next toplevel callback, passes it back to the
PageantClient.
2020-01-25 20:24:28 +03:00
|
|
|
goto responded;
|
2015-05-06 21:32:26 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
2015-05-05 22:16:19 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
switch (type) {
|
Formatting change to braces around one case of a switch.
Sometimes, within a switch statement, you want to declare local
variables specific to the handler for one particular case. Until now
I've mostly been writing this in the form
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED:
{
declare variables;
do stuff;
}
break;
}
which is ugly because the two pieces of essentially similar code
appear at different indent levels, and also inconvenient because you
have less horizontal space available to write the complicated case
handler in - particuarly undesirable because _complicated_ case
handlers are the ones most likely to need all the space they can get!
After encountering a rather nicer idiom in the LLVM source code, and
after a bit of hackery this morning figuring out how to persuade
Emacs's auto-indent to do what I wanted with it, I've decided to move
to an idiom in which the open brace comes right after the case
statement, and the code within it is indented the same as it would
have been without the brace. Then the whole case handler (including
the break) lives inside those braces, and you get something that looks
more like this:
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED: {
declare variables;
do stuff;
break;
}
}
This commit is a big-bang change that reformats all the complicated
case handlers I could find into the new layout. This is particularly
nice in the Pageant main function, in which almost _every_ case
handler had a bundle of variables and was long and complicated. (In
fact that's what motivated me to get round to this.) Some of the
innermost parts of the terminal escape-sequence handling are also
breathing a bit easier now the horizontal pressure on them is
relieved.
(Also, in a few cases, I was able to remove the extra braces
completely, because the only variable local to the case handler was a
loop variable which our new C99 policy allows me to move into the
initialiser clause of its for statement.)
Viewed with whitespace ignored, this is not too disruptive a change.
Downstream patches that conflict with it may need to be reapplied
using --ignore-whitespace or similar.
2020-02-16 10:49:52 +03:00
|
|
|
case SSH1_AGENTC_REQUEST_RSA_IDENTITIES: {
|
2019-09-08 22:29:00 +03:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Reply with SSH1_AGENT_RSA_IDENTITIES_ANSWER.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
Formatting change to braces around one case of a switch.
Sometimes, within a switch statement, you want to declare local
variables specific to the handler for one particular case. Until now
I've mostly been writing this in the form
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED:
{
declare variables;
do stuff;
}
break;
}
which is ugly because the two pieces of essentially similar code
appear at different indent levels, and also inconvenient because you
have less horizontal space available to write the complicated case
handler in - particuarly undesirable because _complicated_ case
handlers are the ones most likely to need all the space they can get!
After encountering a rather nicer idiom in the LLVM source code, and
after a bit of hackery this morning figuring out how to persuade
Emacs's auto-indent to do what I wanted with it, I've decided to move
to an idiom in which the open brace comes right after the case
statement, and the code within it is indented the same as it would
have been without the brace. Then the whole case handler (including
the break) lives inside those braces, and you get something that looks
more like this:
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED: {
declare variables;
do stuff;
break;
}
}
This commit is a big-bang change that reformats all the complicated
case handlers I could find into the new layout. This is particularly
nice in the Pageant main function, in which almost _every_ case
handler had a bundle of variables and was long and complicated. (In
fact that's what motivated me to get round to this.) Some of the
innermost parts of the terminal escape-sequence handling are also
breathing a bit easier now the horizontal pressure on them is
relieved.
(Also, in a few cases, I was able to remove the extra braces
completely, because the only variable local to the case handler was a
loop variable which our new C99 policy allows me to move into the
initialiser clause of its for statement.)
Viewed with whitespace ignored, this is not too disruptive a change.
Downstream patches that conflict with it may need to be reapplied
using --ignore-whitespace or similar.
2020-02-16 10:49:52 +03:00
|
|
|
pageant_client_log(pc, reqid,
|
|
|
|
"request: SSH1_AGENTC_REQUEST_RSA_IDENTITIES");
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
put_byte(sb, SSH1_AGENT_RSA_IDENTITIES_ANSWER);
|
|
|
|
pageant_make_keylist1(BinarySink_UPCAST(sb));
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pageant_client_log(pc, reqid,
|
|
|
|
"reply: SSH1_AGENT_RSA_IDENTITIES_ANSWER");
|
|
|
|
if (!pc->suppress_logging) {
|
|
|
|
int i;
|
|
|
|
RSAKey *rkey;
|
|
|
|
for (i = 0; NULL != (rkey = pageant_nth_ssh1_key(i)); i++) {
|
|
|
|
char *fingerprint = rsa_ssh1_fingerprint(rkey);
|
|
|
|
pageant_client_log(pc, reqid, "returned key: %s",
|
|
|
|
fingerprint);
|
|
|
|
sfree(fingerprint);
|
|
|
|
}
|
2019-09-08 22:29:00 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
break;
|
Formatting change to braces around one case of a switch.
Sometimes, within a switch statement, you want to declare local
variables specific to the handler for one particular case. Until now
I've mostly been writing this in the form
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED:
{
declare variables;
do stuff;
}
break;
}
which is ugly because the two pieces of essentially similar code
appear at different indent levels, and also inconvenient because you
have less horizontal space available to write the complicated case
handler in - particuarly undesirable because _complicated_ case
handlers are the ones most likely to need all the space they can get!
After encountering a rather nicer idiom in the LLVM source code, and
after a bit of hackery this morning figuring out how to persuade
Emacs's auto-indent to do what I wanted with it, I've decided to move
to an idiom in which the open brace comes right after the case
statement, and the code within it is indented the same as it would
have been without the brace. Then the whole case handler (including
the break) lives inside those braces, and you get something that looks
more like this:
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED: {
declare variables;
do stuff;
break;
}
}
This commit is a big-bang change that reformats all the complicated
case handlers I could find into the new layout. This is particularly
nice in the Pageant main function, in which almost _every_ case
handler had a bundle of variables and was long and complicated. (In
fact that's what motivated me to get round to this.) Some of the
innermost parts of the terminal escape-sequence handling are also
breathing a bit easier now the horizontal pressure on them is
relieved.
(Also, in a few cases, I was able to remove the extra braces
completely, because the only variable local to the case handler was a
loop variable which our new C99 policy allows me to move into the
initialiser clause of its for statement.)
Viewed with whitespace ignored, this is not too disruptive a change.
Downstream patches that conflict with it may need to be reapplied
using --ignore-whitespace or similar.
2020-02-16 10:49:52 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
case SSH2_AGENTC_REQUEST_IDENTITIES: {
|
2019-09-08 22:29:00 +03:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Reply with SSH2_AGENT_IDENTITIES_ANSWER.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
Formatting change to braces around one case of a switch.
Sometimes, within a switch statement, you want to declare local
variables specific to the handler for one particular case. Until now
I've mostly been writing this in the form
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED:
{
declare variables;
do stuff;
}
break;
}
which is ugly because the two pieces of essentially similar code
appear at different indent levels, and also inconvenient because you
have less horizontal space available to write the complicated case
handler in - particuarly undesirable because _complicated_ case
handlers are the ones most likely to need all the space they can get!
After encountering a rather nicer idiom in the LLVM source code, and
after a bit of hackery this morning figuring out how to persuade
Emacs's auto-indent to do what I wanted with it, I've decided to move
to an idiom in which the open brace comes right after the case
statement, and the code within it is indented the same as it would
have been without the brace. Then the whole case handler (including
the break) lives inside those braces, and you get something that looks
more like this:
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED: {
declare variables;
do stuff;
break;
}
}
This commit is a big-bang change that reformats all the complicated
case handlers I could find into the new layout. This is particularly
nice in the Pageant main function, in which almost _every_ case
handler had a bundle of variables and was long and complicated. (In
fact that's what motivated me to get round to this.) Some of the
innermost parts of the terminal escape-sequence handling are also
breathing a bit easier now the horizontal pressure on them is
relieved.
(Also, in a few cases, I was able to remove the extra braces
completely, because the only variable local to the case handler was a
loop variable which our new C99 policy allows me to move into the
initialiser clause of its for statement.)
Viewed with whitespace ignored, this is not too disruptive a change.
Downstream patches that conflict with it may need to be reapplied
using --ignore-whitespace or similar.
2020-02-16 10:49:52 +03:00
|
|
|
pageant_client_log(pc, reqid,
|
|
|
|
"request: SSH2_AGENTC_REQUEST_IDENTITIES");
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
put_byte(sb, SSH2_AGENT_IDENTITIES_ANSWER);
|
|
|
|
pageant_make_keylist2(BinarySink_UPCAST(sb));
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pageant_client_log(pc, reqid,
|
|
|
|
"reply: SSH2_AGENT_IDENTITIES_ANSWER");
|
|
|
|
if (!pc->suppress_logging) {
|
|
|
|
int i;
|
|
|
|
ssh2_userkey *skey;
|
|
|
|
for (i = 0; NULL != (skey = pageant_nth_ssh2_key(i)); i++) {
|
|
|
|
char *fingerprint = ssh2_fingerprint(skey->key);
|
|
|
|
pageant_client_log(pc, reqid, "returned key: %s %s",
|
|
|
|
fingerprint, skey->comment);
|
|
|
|
sfree(fingerprint);
|
|
|
|
}
|
2019-09-08 22:29:00 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
break;
|
Formatting change to braces around one case of a switch.
Sometimes, within a switch statement, you want to declare local
variables specific to the handler for one particular case. Until now
I've mostly been writing this in the form
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED:
{
declare variables;
do stuff;
}
break;
}
which is ugly because the two pieces of essentially similar code
appear at different indent levels, and also inconvenient because you
have less horizontal space available to write the complicated case
handler in - particuarly undesirable because _complicated_ case
handlers are the ones most likely to need all the space they can get!
After encountering a rather nicer idiom in the LLVM source code, and
after a bit of hackery this morning figuring out how to persuade
Emacs's auto-indent to do what I wanted with it, I've decided to move
to an idiom in which the open brace comes right after the case
statement, and the code within it is indented the same as it would
have been without the brace. Then the whole case handler (including
the break) lives inside those braces, and you get something that looks
more like this:
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED: {
declare variables;
do stuff;
break;
}
}
This commit is a big-bang change that reformats all the complicated
case handlers I could find into the new layout. This is particularly
nice in the Pageant main function, in which almost _every_ case
handler had a bundle of variables and was long and complicated. (In
fact that's what motivated me to get round to this.) Some of the
innermost parts of the terminal escape-sequence handling are also
breathing a bit easier now the horizontal pressure on them is
relieved.
(Also, in a few cases, I was able to remove the extra braces
completely, because the only variable local to the case handler was a
loop variable which our new C99 policy allows me to move into the
initialiser clause of its for statement.)
Viewed with whitespace ignored, this is not too disruptive a change.
Downstream patches that conflict with it may need to be reapplied
using --ignore-whitespace or similar.
2020-02-16 10:49:52 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
case SSH1_AGENTC_RSA_CHALLENGE: {
|
2019-09-08 22:29:00 +03:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Reply with either SSH1_AGENT_RSA_RESPONSE or
|
|
|
|
* SSH_AGENT_FAILURE, depending on whether we have that key
|
|
|
|
* or not.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
Formatting change to braces around one case of a switch.
Sometimes, within a switch statement, you want to declare local
variables specific to the handler for one particular case. Until now
I've mostly been writing this in the form
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED:
{
declare variables;
do stuff;
}
break;
}
which is ugly because the two pieces of essentially similar code
appear at different indent levels, and also inconvenient because you
have less horizontal space available to write the complicated case
handler in - particuarly undesirable because _complicated_ case
handlers are the ones most likely to need all the space they can get!
After encountering a rather nicer idiom in the LLVM source code, and
after a bit of hackery this morning figuring out how to persuade
Emacs's auto-indent to do what I wanted with it, I've decided to move
to an idiom in which the open brace comes right after the case
statement, and the code within it is indented the same as it would
have been without the brace. Then the whole case handler (including
the break) lives inside those braces, and you get something that looks
more like this:
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED: {
declare variables;
do stuff;
break;
}
}
This commit is a big-bang change that reformats all the complicated
case handlers I could find into the new layout. This is particularly
nice in the Pageant main function, in which almost _every_ case
handler had a bundle of variables and was long and complicated. (In
fact that's what motivated me to get round to this.) Some of the
innermost parts of the terminal escape-sequence handling are also
breathing a bit easier now the horizontal pressure on them is
relieved.
(Also, in a few cases, I was able to remove the extra braces
completely, because the only variable local to the case handler was a
loop variable which our new C99 policy allows me to move into the
initialiser clause of its for statement.)
Viewed with whitespace ignored, this is not too disruptive a change.
Downstream patches that conflict with it may need to be reapplied
using --ignore-whitespace or similar.
2020-02-16 10:49:52 +03:00
|
|
|
RSAKey reqkey;
|
|
|
|
PageantKey *pk;
|
|
|
|
mp_int *challenge, *response;
|
|
|
|
ptrlen session_id;
|
|
|
|
unsigned response_type;
|
|
|
|
unsigned char response_md5[16];
|
|
|
|
int i;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pageant_client_log(pc, reqid,
|
|
|
|
"request: SSH1_AGENTC_RSA_CHALLENGE");
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
response = NULL;
|
|
|
|
memset(&reqkey, 0, sizeof(reqkey));
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
get_rsa_ssh1_pub(msg, &reqkey, RSA_SSH1_EXPONENT_FIRST);
|
|
|
|
challenge = get_mp_ssh1(msg);
|
|
|
|
session_id = get_data(msg, 16);
|
|
|
|
response_type = get_uint32(msg);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (get_err(msg)) {
|
|
|
|
fail("unable to decode request");
|
|
|
|
goto challenge1_cleanup;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (response_type != 1) {
|
|
|
|
fail("response type other than 1 not supported");
|
|
|
|
goto challenge1_cleanup;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2018-05-28 01:47:40 +03:00
|
|
|
|
Formatting change to braces around one case of a switch.
Sometimes, within a switch statement, you want to declare local
variables specific to the handler for one particular case. Until now
I've mostly been writing this in the form
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED:
{
declare variables;
do stuff;
}
break;
}
which is ugly because the two pieces of essentially similar code
appear at different indent levels, and also inconvenient because you
have less horizontal space available to write the complicated case
handler in - particuarly undesirable because _complicated_ case
handlers are the ones most likely to need all the space they can get!
After encountering a rather nicer idiom in the LLVM source code, and
after a bit of hackery this morning figuring out how to persuade
Emacs's auto-indent to do what I wanted with it, I've decided to move
to an idiom in which the open brace comes right after the case
statement, and the code within it is indented the same as it would
have been without the brace. Then the whole case handler (including
the break) lives inside those braces, and you get something that looks
more like this:
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED: {
declare variables;
do stuff;
break;
}
}
This commit is a big-bang change that reformats all the complicated
case handlers I could find into the new layout. This is particularly
nice in the Pageant main function, in which almost _every_ case
handler had a bundle of variables and was long and complicated. (In
fact that's what motivated me to get round to this.) Some of the
innermost parts of the terminal escape-sequence handling are also
breathing a bit easier now the horizontal pressure on them is
relieved.
(Also, in a few cases, I was able to remove the extra braces
completely, because the only variable local to the case handler was a
loop variable which our new C99 policy allows me to move into the
initialiser clause of its for statement.)
Viewed with whitespace ignored, this is not too disruptive a change.
Downstream patches that conflict with it may need to be reapplied
using --ignore-whitespace or similar.
2020-02-16 10:49:52 +03:00
|
|
|
if (!pc->suppress_logging) {
|
|
|
|
char *fingerprint;
|
|
|
|
reqkey.comment = NULL;
|
|
|
|
fingerprint = rsa_ssh1_fingerprint(&reqkey);
|
|
|
|
pageant_client_log(pc, reqid, "requested key: %s",
|
|
|
|
fingerprint);
|
|
|
|
sfree(fingerprint);
|
|
|
|
}
|
2018-05-28 01:47:40 +03:00
|
|
|
|
Formatting change to braces around one case of a switch.
Sometimes, within a switch statement, you want to declare local
variables specific to the handler for one particular case. Until now
I've mostly been writing this in the form
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED:
{
declare variables;
do stuff;
}
break;
}
which is ugly because the two pieces of essentially similar code
appear at different indent levels, and also inconvenient because you
have less horizontal space available to write the complicated case
handler in - particuarly undesirable because _complicated_ case
handlers are the ones most likely to need all the space they can get!
After encountering a rather nicer idiom in the LLVM source code, and
after a bit of hackery this morning figuring out how to persuade
Emacs's auto-indent to do what I wanted with it, I've decided to move
to an idiom in which the open brace comes right after the case
statement, and the code within it is indented the same as it would
have been without the brace. Then the whole case handler (including
the break) lives inside those braces, and you get something that looks
more like this:
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED: {
declare variables;
do stuff;
break;
}
}
This commit is a big-bang change that reformats all the complicated
case handlers I could find into the new layout. This is particularly
nice in the Pageant main function, in which almost _every_ case
handler had a bundle of variables and was long and complicated. (In
fact that's what motivated me to get round to this.) Some of the
innermost parts of the terminal escape-sequence handling are also
breathing a bit easier now the horizontal pressure on them is
relieved.
(Also, in a few cases, I was able to remove the extra braces
completely, because the only variable local to the case handler was a
loop variable which our new C99 policy allows me to move into the
initialiser clause of its for statement.)
Viewed with whitespace ignored, this is not too disruptive a change.
Downstream patches that conflict with it may need to be reapplied
using --ignore-whitespace or similar.
2020-02-16 10:49:52 +03:00
|
|
|
if ((pk = findkey1(&reqkey)) == NULL) {
|
|
|
|
fail("key not found");
|
|
|
|
goto challenge1_cleanup;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
response = rsa_ssh1_decrypt(challenge, pk->rkey);
|
2020-01-06 23:59:07 +03:00
|
|
|
|
Formatting change to braces around one case of a switch.
Sometimes, within a switch statement, you want to declare local
variables specific to the handler for one particular case. Until now
I've mostly been writing this in the form
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED:
{
declare variables;
do stuff;
}
break;
}
which is ugly because the two pieces of essentially similar code
appear at different indent levels, and also inconvenient because you
have less horizontal space available to write the complicated case
handler in - particuarly undesirable because _complicated_ case
handlers are the ones most likely to need all the space they can get!
After encountering a rather nicer idiom in the LLVM source code, and
after a bit of hackery this morning figuring out how to persuade
Emacs's auto-indent to do what I wanted with it, I've decided to move
to an idiom in which the open brace comes right after the case
statement, and the code within it is indented the same as it would
have been without the brace. Then the whole case handler (including
the break) lives inside those braces, and you get something that looks
more like this:
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED: {
declare variables;
do stuff;
break;
}
}
This commit is a big-bang change that reformats all the complicated
case handlers I could find into the new layout. This is particularly
nice in the Pageant main function, in which almost _every_ case
handler had a bundle of variables and was long and complicated. (In
fact that's what motivated me to get round to this.) Some of the
innermost parts of the terminal escape-sequence handling are also
breathing a bit easier now the horizontal pressure on them is
relieved.
(Also, in a few cases, I was able to remove the extra braces
completely, because the only variable local to the case handler was a
loop variable which our new C99 policy allows me to move into the
initialiser clause of its for statement.)
Viewed with whitespace ignored, this is not too disruptive a change.
Downstream patches that conflict with it may need to be reapplied
using --ignore-whitespace or similar.
2020-02-16 10:49:52 +03:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
ssh_hash *h = ssh_hash_new(&ssh_md5);
|
|
|
|
for (i = 0; i < 32; i++)
|
|
|
|
put_byte(h, mp_get_byte(response, 31 - i));
|
|
|
|
put_datapl(h, session_id);
|
|
|
|
ssh_hash_final(h, response_md5);
|
|
|
|
}
|
2015-05-05 22:16:19 +03:00
|
|
|
|
Formatting change to braces around one case of a switch.
Sometimes, within a switch statement, you want to declare local
variables specific to the handler for one particular case. Until now
I've mostly been writing this in the form
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED:
{
declare variables;
do stuff;
}
break;
}
which is ugly because the two pieces of essentially similar code
appear at different indent levels, and also inconvenient because you
have less horizontal space available to write the complicated case
handler in - particuarly undesirable because _complicated_ case
handlers are the ones most likely to need all the space they can get!
After encountering a rather nicer idiom in the LLVM source code, and
after a bit of hackery this morning figuring out how to persuade
Emacs's auto-indent to do what I wanted with it, I've decided to move
to an idiom in which the open brace comes right after the case
statement, and the code within it is indented the same as it would
have been without the brace. Then the whole case handler (including
the break) lives inside those braces, and you get something that looks
more like this:
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED: {
declare variables;
do stuff;
break;
}
}
This commit is a big-bang change that reformats all the complicated
case handlers I could find into the new layout. This is particularly
nice in the Pageant main function, in which almost _every_ case
handler had a bundle of variables and was long and complicated. (In
fact that's what motivated me to get round to this.) Some of the
innermost parts of the terminal escape-sequence handling are also
breathing a bit easier now the horizontal pressure on them is
relieved.
(Also, in a few cases, I was able to remove the extra braces
completely, because the only variable local to the case handler was a
loop variable which our new C99 policy allows me to move into the
initialiser clause of its for statement.)
Viewed with whitespace ignored, this is not too disruptive a change.
Downstream patches that conflict with it may need to be reapplied
using --ignore-whitespace or similar.
2020-02-16 10:49:52 +03:00
|
|
|
put_byte(sb, SSH1_AGENT_RSA_RESPONSE);
|
|
|
|
put_data(sb, response_md5, 16);
|
2015-05-06 21:32:26 +03:00
|
|
|
|
Formatting change to braces around one case of a switch.
Sometimes, within a switch statement, you want to declare local
variables specific to the handler for one particular case. Until now
I've mostly been writing this in the form
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED:
{
declare variables;
do stuff;
}
break;
}
which is ugly because the two pieces of essentially similar code
appear at different indent levels, and also inconvenient because you
have less horizontal space available to write the complicated case
handler in - particuarly undesirable because _complicated_ case
handlers are the ones most likely to need all the space they can get!
After encountering a rather nicer idiom in the LLVM source code, and
after a bit of hackery this morning figuring out how to persuade
Emacs's auto-indent to do what I wanted with it, I've decided to move
to an idiom in which the open brace comes right after the case
statement, and the code within it is indented the same as it would
have been without the brace. Then the whole case handler (including
the break) lives inside those braces, and you get something that looks
more like this:
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED: {
declare variables;
do stuff;
break;
}
}
This commit is a big-bang change that reformats all the complicated
case handlers I could find into the new layout. This is particularly
nice in the Pageant main function, in which almost _every_ case
handler had a bundle of variables and was long and complicated. (In
fact that's what motivated me to get round to this.) Some of the
innermost parts of the terminal escape-sequence handling are also
breathing a bit easier now the horizontal pressure on them is
relieved.
(Also, in a few cases, I was able to remove the extra braces
completely, because the only variable local to the case handler was a
loop variable which our new C99 policy allows me to move into the
initialiser clause of its for statement.)
Viewed with whitespace ignored, this is not too disruptive a change.
Downstream patches that conflict with it may need to be reapplied
using --ignore-whitespace or similar.
2020-02-16 10:49:52 +03:00
|
|
|
pageant_client_log(pc, reqid, "reply: SSH1_AGENT_RSA_RESPONSE");
|
2018-05-24 15:23:17 +03:00
|
|
|
|
Formatting change to braces around one case of a switch.
Sometimes, within a switch statement, you want to declare local
variables specific to the handler for one particular case. Until now
I've mostly been writing this in the form
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED:
{
declare variables;
do stuff;
}
break;
}
which is ugly because the two pieces of essentially similar code
appear at different indent levels, and also inconvenient because you
have less horizontal space available to write the complicated case
handler in - particuarly undesirable because _complicated_ case
handlers are the ones most likely to need all the space they can get!
After encountering a rather nicer idiom in the LLVM source code, and
after a bit of hackery this morning figuring out how to persuade
Emacs's auto-indent to do what I wanted with it, I've decided to move
to an idiom in which the open brace comes right after the case
statement, and the code within it is indented the same as it would
have been without the brace. Then the whole case handler (including
the break) lives inside those braces, and you get something that looks
more like this:
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED: {
declare variables;
do stuff;
break;
}
}
This commit is a big-bang change that reformats all the complicated
case handlers I could find into the new layout. This is particularly
nice in the Pageant main function, in which almost _every_ case
handler had a bundle of variables and was long and complicated. (In
fact that's what motivated me to get round to this.) Some of the
innermost parts of the terminal escape-sequence handling are also
breathing a bit easier now the horizontal pressure on them is
relieved.
(Also, in a few cases, I was able to remove the extra braces
completely, because the only variable local to the case handler was a
loop variable which our new C99 policy allows me to move into the
initialiser clause of its for statement.)
Viewed with whitespace ignored, this is not too disruptive a change.
Downstream patches that conflict with it may need to be reapplied
using --ignore-whitespace or similar.
2020-02-16 10:49:52 +03:00
|
|
|
challenge1_cleanup:
|
|
|
|
if (response)
|
|
|
|
mp_free(response);
|
|
|
|
mp_free(challenge);
|
|
|
|
freersakey(&reqkey);
|
2019-09-08 22:29:00 +03:00
|
|
|
break;
|
Formatting change to braces around one case of a switch.
Sometimes, within a switch statement, you want to declare local
variables specific to the handler for one particular case. Until now
I've mostly been writing this in the form
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED:
{
declare variables;
do stuff;
}
break;
}
which is ugly because the two pieces of essentially similar code
appear at different indent levels, and also inconvenient because you
have less horizontal space available to write the complicated case
handler in - particuarly undesirable because _complicated_ case
handlers are the ones most likely to need all the space they can get!
After encountering a rather nicer idiom in the LLVM source code, and
after a bit of hackery this morning figuring out how to persuade
Emacs's auto-indent to do what I wanted with it, I've decided to move
to an idiom in which the open brace comes right after the case
statement, and the code within it is indented the same as it would
have been without the brace. Then the whole case handler (including
the break) lives inside those braces, and you get something that looks
more like this:
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED: {
declare variables;
do stuff;
break;
}
}
This commit is a big-bang change that reformats all the complicated
case handlers I could find into the new layout. This is particularly
nice in the Pageant main function, in which almost _every_ case
handler had a bundle of variables and was long and complicated. (In
fact that's what motivated me to get round to this.) Some of the
innermost parts of the terminal escape-sequence handling are also
breathing a bit easier now the horizontal pressure on them is
relieved.
(Also, in a few cases, I was able to remove the extra braces
completely, because the only variable local to the case handler was a
loop variable which our new C99 policy allows me to move into the
initialiser clause of its for statement.)
Viewed with whitespace ignored, this is not too disruptive a change.
Downstream patches that conflict with it may need to be reapplied
using --ignore-whitespace or similar.
2020-02-16 10:49:52 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
case SSH2_AGENTC_SIGN_REQUEST: {
|
2019-09-08 22:29:00 +03:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Reply with either SSH2_AGENT_SIGN_RESPONSE or
|
|
|
|
* SSH_AGENT_FAILURE, depending on whether we have that key
|
|
|
|
* or not.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
Formatting change to braces around one case of a switch.
Sometimes, within a switch statement, you want to declare local
variables specific to the handler for one particular case. Until now
I've mostly been writing this in the form
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED:
{
declare variables;
do stuff;
}
break;
}
which is ugly because the two pieces of essentially similar code
appear at different indent levels, and also inconvenient because you
have less horizontal space available to write the complicated case
handler in - particuarly undesirable because _complicated_ case
handlers are the ones most likely to need all the space they can get!
After encountering a rather nicer idiom in the LLVM source code, and
after a bit of hackery this morning figuring out how to persuade
Emacs's auto-indent to do what I wanted with it, I've decided to move
to an idiom in which the open brace comes right after the case
statement, and the code within it is indented the same as it would
have been without the brace. Then the whole case handler (including
the break) lives inside those braces, and you get something that looks
more like this:
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED: {
declare variables;
do stuff;
break;
}
}
This commit is a big-bang change that reformats all the complicated
case handlers I could find into the new layout. This is particularly
nice in the Pageant main function, in which almost _every_ case
handler had a bundle of variables and was long and complicated. (In
fact that's what motivated me to get round to this.) Some of the
innermost parts of the terminal escape-sequence handling are also
breathing a bit easier now the horizontal pressure on them is
relieved.
(Also, in a few cases, I was able to remove the extra braces
completely, because the only variable local to the case handler was a
loop variable which our new C99 policy allows me to move into the
initialiser clause of its for statement.)
Viewed with whitespace ignored, this is not too disruptive a change.
Downstream patches that conflict with it may need to be reapplied
using --ignore-whitespace or similar.
2020-02-16 10:49:52 +03:00
|
|
|
PageantKey *pk;
|
|
|
|
ptrlen keyblob, sigdata;
|
|
|
|
uint32_t flags;
|
2015-05-05 22:16:19 +03:00
|
|
|
|
Formatting change to braces around one case of a switch.
Sometimes, within a switch statement, you want to declare local
variables specific to the handler for one particular case. Until now
I've mostly been writing this in the form
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED:
{
declare variables;
do stuff;
}
break;
}
which is ugly because the two pieces of essentially similar code
appear at different indent levels, and also inconvenient because you
have less horizontal space available to write the complicated case
handler in - particuarly undesirable because _complicated_ case
handlers are the ones most likely to need all the space they can get!
After encountering a rather nicer idiom in the LLVM source code, and
after a bit of hackery this morning figuring out how to persuade
Emacs's auto-indent to do what I wanted with it, I've decided to move
to an idiom in which the open brace comes right after the case
statement, and the code within it is indented the same as it would
have been without the brace. Then the whole case handler (including
the break) lives inside those braces, and you get something that looks
more like this:
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED: {
declare variables;
do stuff;
break;
}
}
This commit is a big-bang change that reformats all the complicated
case handlers I could find into the new layout. This is particularly
nice in the Pageant main function, in which almost _every_ case
handler had a bundle of variables and was long and complicated. (In
fact that's what motivated me to get round to this.) Some of the
innermost parts of the terminal escape-sequence handling are also
breathing a bit easier now the horizontal pressure on them is
relieved.
(Also, in a few cases, I was able to remove the extra braces
completely, because the only variable local to the case handler was a
loop variable which our new C99 policy allows me to move into the
initialiser clause of its for statement.)
Viewed with whitespace ignored, this is not too disruptive a change.
Downstream patches that conflict with it may need to be reapplied
using --ignore-whitespace or similar.
2020-02-16 10:49:52 +03:00
|
|
|
pageant_client_log(pc, reqid, "request: SSH2_AGENTC_SIGN_REQUEST");
|
2015-05-06 21:32:26 +03:00
|
|
|
|
Formatting change to braces around one case of a switch.
Sometimes, within a switch statement, you want to declare local
variables specific to the handler for one particular case. Until now
I've mostly been writing this in the form
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED:
{
declare variables;
do stuff;
}
break;
}
which is ugly because the two pieces of essentially similar code
appear at different indent levels, and also inconvenient because you
have less horizontal space available to write the complicated case
handler in - particuarly undesirable because _complicated_ case
handlers are the ones most likely to need all the space they can get!
After encountering a rather nicer idiom in the LLVM source code, and
after a bit of hackery this morning figuring out how to persuade
Emacs's auto-indent to do what I wanted with it, I've decided to move
to an idiom in which the open brace comes right after the case
statement, and the code within it is indented the same as it would
have been without the brace. Then the whole case handler (including
the break) lives inside those braces, and you get something that looks
more like this:
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED: {
declare variables;
do stuff;
break;
}
}
This commit is a big-bang change that reformats all the complicated
case handlers I could find into the new layout. This is particularly
nice in the Pageant main function, in which almost _every_ case
handler had a bundle of variables and was long and complicated. (In
fact that's what motivated me to get round to this.) Some of the
innermost parts of the terminal escape-sequence handling are also
breathing a bit easier now the horizontal pressure on them is
relieved.
(Also, in a few cases, I was able to remove the extra braces
completely, because the only variable local to the case handler was a
loop variable which our new C99 policy allows me to move into the
initialiser clause of its for statement.)
Viewed with whitespace ignored, this is not too disruptive a change.
Downstream patches that conflict with it may need to be reapplied
using --ignore-whitespace or similar.
2020-02-16 10:49:52 +03:00
|
|
|
keyblob = get_string(msg);
|
|
|
|
sigdata = get_string(msg);
|
2018-11-19 23:20:00 +03:00
|
|
|
|
Formatting change to braces around one case of a switch.
Sometimes, within a switch statement, you want to declare local
variables specific to the handler for one particular case. Until now
I've mostly been writing this in the form
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED:
{
declare variables;
do stuff;
}
break;
}
which is ugly because the two pieces of essentially similar code
appear at different indent levels, and also inconvenient because you
have less horizontal space available to write the complicated case
handler in - particuarly undesirable because _complicated_ case
handlers are the ones most likely to need all the space they can get!
After encountering a rather nicer idiom in the LLVM source code, and
after a bit of hackery this morning figuring out how to persuade
Emacs's auto-indent to do what I wanted with it, I've decided to move
to an idiom in which the open brace comes right after the case
statement, and the code within it is indented the same as it would
have been without the brace. Then the whole case handler (including
the break) lives inside those braces, and you get something that looks
more like this:
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED: {
declare variables;
do stuff;
break;
}
}
This commit is a big-bang change that reformats all the complicated
case handlers I could find into the new layout. This is particularly
nice in the Pageant main function, in which almost _every_ case
handler had a bundle of variables and was long and complicated. (In
fact that's what motivated me to get round to this.) Some of the
innermost parts of the terminal escape-sequence handling are also
breathing a bit easier now the horizontal pressure on them is
relieved.
(Also, in a few cases, I was able to remove the extra braces
completely, because the only variable local to the case handler was a
loop variable which our new C99 policy allows me to move into the
initialiser clause of its for statement.)
Viewed with whitespace ignored, this is not too disruptive a change.
Downstream patches that conflict with it may need to be reapplied
using --ignore-whitespace or similar.
2020-02-16 10:49:52 +03:00
|
|
|
if (get_err(msg)) {
|
|
|
|
fail("unable to decode request");
|
|
|
|
goto responded;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2018-05-24 15:23:17 +03:00
|
|
|
|
Formatting change to braces around one case of a switch.
Sometimes, within a switch statement, you want to declare local
variables specific to the handler for one particular case. Until now
I've mostly been writing this in the form
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED:
{
declare variables;
do stuff;
}
break;
}
which is ugly because the two pieces of essentially similar code
appear at different indent levels, and also inconvenient because you
have less horizontal space available to write the complicated case
handler in - particuarly undesirable because _complicated_ case
handlers are the ones most likely to need all the space they can get!
After encountering a rather nicer idiom in the LLVM source code, and
after a bit of hackery this morning figuring out how to persuade
Emacs's auto-indent to do what I wanted with it, I've decided to move
to an idiom in which the open brace comes right after the case
statement, and the code within it is indented the same as it would
have been without the brace. Then the whole case handler (including
the break) lives inside those braces, and you get something that looks
more like this:
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED: {
declare variables;
do stuff;
break;
}
}
This commit is a big-bang change that reformats all the complicated
case handlers I could find into the new layout. This is particularly
nice in the Pageant main function, in which almost _every_ case
handler had a bundle of variables and was long and complicated. (In
fact that's what motivated me to get round to this.) Some of the
innermost parts of the terminal escape-sequence handling are also
breathing a bit easier now the horizontal pressure on them is
relieved.
(Also, in a few cases, I was able to remove the extra braces
completely, because the only variable local to the case handler was a
loop variable which our new C99 policy allows me to move into the
initialiser clause of its for statement.)
Viewed with whitespace ignored, this is not too disruptive a change.
Downstream patches that conflict with it may need to be reapplied
using --ignore-whitespace or similar.
2020-02-16 10:49:52 +03:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Later versions of the agent protocol added a flags word
|
|
|
|
* on the end of the sign request. That hasn't always been
|
|
|
|
* there, so we don't complain if we don't find it.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* get_uint32 will default to returning zero if no data is
|
|
|
|
* available.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
bool have_flags = false;
|
|
|
|
flags = get_uint32(msg);
|
|
|
|
if (!get_err(msg))
|
|
|
|
have_flags = true;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (!pc->suppress_logging) {
|
|
|
|
char *fingerprint = ssh2_fingerprint_blob(keyblob);
|
|
|
|
pageant_client_log(pc, reqid, "requested key: %s",
|
|
|
|
fingerprint);
|
|
|
|
sfree(fingerprint);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if ((pk = findkey2(keyblob)) == NULL) {
|
|
|
|
fail("key not found");
|
|
|
|
goto responded;
|
2019-09-08 22:29:00 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
Formatting change to braces around one case of a switch.
Sometimes, within a switch statement, you want to declare local
variables specific to the handler for one particular case. Until now
I've mostly been writing this in the form
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED:
{
declare variables;
do stuff;
}
break;
}
which is ugly because the two pieces of essentially similar code
appear at different indent levels, and also inconvenient because you
have less horizontal space available to write the complicated case
handler in - particuarly undesirable because _complicated_ case
handlers are the ones most likely to need all the space they can get!
After encountering a rather nicer idiom in the LLVM source code, and
after a bit of hackery this morning figuring out how to persuade
Emacs's auto-indent to do what I wanted with it, I've decided to move
to an idiom in which the open brace comes right after the case
statement, and the code within it is indented the same as it would
have been without the brace. Then the whole case handler (including
the break) lives inside those braces, and you get something that looks
more like this:
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED: {
declare variables;
do stuff;
break;
}
}
This commit is a big-bang change that reformats all the complicated
case handlers I could find into the new layout. This is particularly
nice in the Pageant main function, in which almost _every_ case
handler had a bundle of variables and was long and complicated. (In
fact that's what motivated me to get round to this.) Some of the
innermost parts of the terminal escape-sequence handling are also
breathing a bit easier now the horizontal pressure on them is
relieved.
(Also, in a few cases, I was able to remove the extra braces
completely, because the only variable local to the case handler was a
loop variable which our new C99 policy allows me to move into the
initialiser clause of its for statement.)
Viewed with whitespace ignored, this is not too disruptive a change.
Downstream patches that conflict with it may need to be reapplied
using --ignore-whitespace or similar.
2020-02-16 10:49:52 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (have_flags)
|
|
|
|
pageant_client_log(pc, reqid, "signature flags = 0x%08"PRIx32,
|
|
|
|
flags);
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
pageant_client_log(pc, reqid, "no signature flags");
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
strbuf_free(sb); /* no immediate response */
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PageantSignOp *so = snew(PageantSignOp);
|
|
|
|
so->pao.vt = &signop_vtable;
|
|
|
|
so->pao.info = pc->info;
|
|
|
|
so->pao.cr.prev = pc->info->head.prev;
|
|
|
|
so->pao.cr.next = &pc->info->head;
|
|
|
|
so->pao.reqid = reqid;
|
|
|
|
so->pk = pk;
|
|
|
|
so->pkr.prev = so->pkr.next = NULL;
|
|
|
|
so->data_to_sign = strbuf_new();
|
|
|
|
put_datapl(so->data_to_sign, sigdata);
|
|
|
|
so->flags = flags;
|
|
|
|
so->failure_type = failure_type;
|
|
|
|
so->crLine = 0;
|
|
|
|
return &so->pao;
|
2019-09-08 22:29:00 +03:00
|
|
|
break;
|
Formatting change to braces around one case of a switch.
Sometimes, within a switch statement, you want to declare local
variables specific to the handler for one particular case. Until now
I've mostly been writing this in the form
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED:
{
declare variables;
do stuff;
}
break;
}
which is ugly because the two pieces of essentially similar code
appear at different indent levels, and also inconvenient because you
have less horizontal space available to write the complicated case
handler in - particuarly undesirable because _complicated_ case
handlers are the ones most likely to need all the space they can get!
After encountering a rather nicer idiom in the LLVM source code, and
after a bit of hackery this morning figuring out how to persuade
Emacs's auto-indent to do what I wanted with it, I've decided to move
to an idiom in which the open brace comes right after the case
statement, and the code within it is indented the same as it would
have been without the brace. Then the whole case handler (including
the break) lives inside those braces, and you get something that looks
more like this:
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED: {
declare variables;
do stuff;
break;
}
}
This commit is a big-bang change that reformats all the complicated
case handlers I could find into the new layout. This is particularly
nice in the Pageant main function, in which almost _every_ case
handler had a bundle of variables and was long and complicated. (In
fact that's what motivated me to get round to this.) Some of the
innermost parts of the terminal escape-sequence handling are also
breathing a bit easier now the horizontal pressure on them is
relieved.
(Also, in a few cases, I was able to remove the extra braces
completely, because the only variable local to the case handler was a
loop variable which our new C99 policy allows me to move into the
initialiser clause of its for statement.)
Viewed with whitespace ignored, this is not too disruptive a change.
Downstream patches that conflict with it may need to be reapplied
using --ignore-whitespace or similar.
2020-02-16 10:49:52 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
case SSH1_AGENTC_ADD_RSA_IDENTITY: {
|
2019-09-08 22:29:00 +03:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Add to the list and return SSH_AGENT_SUCCESS, or
|
|
|
|
* SSH_AGENT_FAILURE if the key was malformed.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
Formatting change to braces around one case of a switch.
Sometimes, within a switch statement, you want to declare local
variables specific to the handler for one particular case. Until now
I've mostly been writing this in the form
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED:
{
declare variables;
do stuff;
}
break;
}
which is ugly because the two pieces of essentially similar code
appear at different indent levels, and also inconvenient because you
have less horizontal space available to write the complicated case
handler in - particuarly undesirable because _complicated_ case
handlers are the ones most likely to need all the space they can get!
After encountering a rather nicer idiom in the LLVM source code, and
after a bit of hackery this morning figuring out how to persuade
Emacs's auto-indent to do what I wanted with it, I've decided to move
to an idiom in which the open brace comes right after the case
statement, and the code within it is indented the same as it would
have been without the brace. Then the whole case handler (including
the break) lives inside those braces, and you get something that looks
more like this:
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED: {
declare variables;
do stuff;
break;
}
}
This commit is a big-bang change that reformats all the complicated
case handlers I could find into the new layout. This is particularly
nice in the Pageant main function, in which almost _every_ case
handler had a bundle of variables and was long and complicated. (In
fact that's what motivated me to get round to this.) Some of the
innermost parts of the terminal escape-sequence handling are also
breathing a bit easier now the horizontal pressure on them is
relieved.
(Also, in a few cases, I was able to remove the extra braces
completely, because the only variable local to the case handler was a
loop variable which our new C99 policy allows me to move into the
initialiser clause of its for statement.)
Viewed with whitespace ignored, this is not too disruptive a change.
Downstream patches that conflict with it may need to be reapplied
using --ignore-whitespace or similar.
2020-02-16 10:49:52 +03:00
|
|
|
RSAKey *key;
|
2015-05-05 22:16:19 +03:00
|
|
|
|
Formatting change to braces around one case of a switch.
Sometimes, within a switch statement, you want to declare local
variables specific to the handler for one particular case. Until now
I've mostly been writing this in the form
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED:
{
declare variables;
do stuff;
}
break;
}
which is ugly because the two pieces of essentially similar code
appear at different indent levels, and also inconvenient because you
have less horizontal space available to write the complicated case
handler in - particuarly undesirable because _complicated_ case
handlers are the ones most likely to need all the space they can get!
After encountering a rather nicer idiom in the LLVM source code, and
after a bit of hackery this morning figuring out how to persuade
Emacs's auto-indent to do what I wanted with it, I've decided to move
to an idiom in which the open brace comes right after the case
statement, and the code within it is indented the same as it would
have been without the brace. Then the whole case handler (including
the break) lives inside those braces, and you get something that looks
more like this:
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED: {
declare variables;
do stuff;
break;
}
}
This commit is a big-bang change that reformats all the complicated
case handlers I could find into the new layout. This is particularly
nice in the Pageant main function, in which almost _every_ case
handler had a bundle of variables and was long and complicated. (In
fact that's what motivated me to get round to this.) Some of the
innermost parts of the terminal escape-sequence handling are also
breathing a bit easier now the horizontal pressure on them is
relieved.
(Also, in a few cases, I was able to remove the extra braces
completely, because the only variable local to the case handler was a
loop variable which our new C99 policy allows me to move into the
initialiser clause of its for statement.)
Viewed with whitespace ignored, this is not too disruptive a change.
Downstream patches that conflict with it may need to be reapplied
using --ignore-whitespace or similar.
2020-02-16 10:49:52 +03:00
|
|
|
pageant_client_log(pc, reqid,
|
|
|
|
"request: SSH1_AGENTC_ADD_RSA_IDENTITY");
|
2015-05-06 21:32:26 +03:00
|
|
|
|
Formatting change to braces around one case of a switch.
Sometimes, within a switch statement, you want to declare local
variables specific to the handler for one particular case. Until now
I've mostly been writing this in the form
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED:
{
declare variables;
do stuff;
}
break;
}
which is ugly because the two pieces of essentially similar code
appear at different indent levels, and also inconvenient because you
have less horizontal space available to write the complicated case
handler in - particuarly undesirable because _complicated_ case
handlers are the ones most likely to need all the space they can get!
After encountering a rather nicer idiom in the LLVM source code, and
after a bit of hackery this morning figuring out how to persuade
Emacs's auto-indent to do what I wanted with it, I've decided to move
to an idiom in which the open brace comes right after the case
statement, and the code within it is indented the same as it would
have been without the brace. Then the whole case handler (including
the break) lives inside those braces, and you get something that looks
more like this:
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED: {
declare variables;
do stuff;
break;
}
}
This commit is a big-bang change that reformats all the complicated
case handlers I could find into the new layout. This is particularly
nice in the Pageant main function, in which almost _every_ case
handler had a bundle of variables and was long and complicated. (In
fact that's what motivated me to get round to this.) Some of the
innermost parts of the terminal escape-sequence handling are also
breathing a bit easier now the horizontal pressure on them is
relieved.
(Also, in a few cases, I was able to remove the extra braces
completely, because the only variable local to the case handler was a
loop variable which our new C99 policy allows me to move into the
initialiser clause of its for statement.)
Viewed with whitespace ignored, this is not too disruptive a change.
Downstream patches that conflict with it may need to be reapplied
using --ignore-whitespace or similar.
2020-02-16 10:49:52 +03:00
|
|
|
key = get_rsa_ssh1_priv_agent(msg);
|
|
|
|
key->comment = mkstr(get_string(msg));
|
2015-05-05 22:16:19 +03:00
|
|
|
|
Formatting change to braces around one case of a switch.
Sometimes, within a switch statement, you want to declare local
variables specific to the handler for one particular case. Until now
I've mostly been writing this in the form
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED:
{
declare variables;
do stuff;
}
break;
}
which is ugly because the two pieces of essentially similar code
appear at different indent levels, and also inconvenient because you
have less horizontal space available to write the complicated case
handler in - particuarly undesirable because _complicated_ case
handlers are the ones most likely to need all the space they can get!
After encountering a rather nicer idiom in the LLVM source code, and
after a bit of hackery this morning figuring out how to persuade
Emacs's auto-indent to do what I wanted with it, I've decided to move
to an idiom in which the open brace comes right after the case
statement, and the code within it is indented the same as it would
have been without the brace. Then the whole case handler (including
the break) lives inside those braces, and you get something that looks
more like this:
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED: {
declare variables;
do stuff;
break;
}
}
This commit is a big-bang change that reformats all the complicated
case handlers I could find into the new layout. This is particularly
nice in the Pageant main function, in which almost _every_ case
handler had a bundle of variables and was long and complicated. (In
fact that's what motivated me to get round to this.) Some of the
innermost parts of the terminal escape-sequence handling are also
breathing a bit easier now the horizontal pressure on them is
relieved.
(Also, in a few cases, I was able to remove the extra braces
completely, because the only variable local to the case handler was a
loop variable which our new C99 policy allows me to move into the
initialiser clause of its for statement.)
Viewed with whitespace ignored, this is not too disruptive a change.
Downstream patches that conflict with it may need to be reapplied
using --ignore-whitespace or similar.
2020-02-16 10:49:52 +03:00
|
|
|
if (get_err(msg)) {
|
|
|
|
fail("unable to decode request");
|
|
|
|
goto add1_cleanup;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2015-05-05 22:16:19 +03:00
|
|
|
|
Formatting change to braces around one case of a switch.
Sometimes, within a switch statement, you want to declare local
variables specific to the handler for one particular case. Until now
I've mostly been writing this in the form
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED:
{
declare variables;
do stuff;
}
break;
}
which is ugly because the two pieces of essentially similar code
appear at different indent levels, and also inconvenient because you
have less horizontal space available to write the complicated case
handler in - particuarly undesirable because _complicated_ case
handlers are the ones most likely to need all the space they can get!
After encountering a rather nicer idiom in the LLVM source code, and
after a bit of hackery this morning figuring out how to persuade
Emacs's auto-indent to do what I wanted with it, I've decided to move
to an idiom in which the open brace comes right after the case
statement, and the code within it is indented the same as it would
have been without the brace. Then the whole case handler (including
the break) lives inside those braces, and you get something that looks
more like this:
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED: {
declare variables;
do stuff;
break;
}
}
This commit is a big-bang change that reformats all the complicated
case handlers I could find into the new layout. This is particularly
nice in the Pageant main function, in which almost _every_ case
handler had a bundle of variables and was long and complicated. (In
fact that's what motivated me to get round to this.) Some of the
innermost parts of the terminal escape-sequence handling are also
breathing a bit easier now the horizontal pressure on them is
relieved.
(Also, in a few cases, I was able to remove the extra braces
completely, because the only variable local to the case handler was a
loop variable which our new C99 policy allows me to move into the
initialiser clause of its for statement.)
Viewed with whitespace ignored, this is not too disruptive a change.
Downstream patches that conflict with it may need to be reapplied
using --ignore-whitespace or similar.
2020-02-16 10:49:52 +03:00
|
|
|
if (!rsa_verify(key)) {
|
|
|
|
fail("key is invalid");
|
|
|
|
goto add1_cleanup;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2018-05-26 20:00:23 +03:00
|
|
|
|
Formatting change to braces around one case of a switch.
Sometimes, within a switch statement, you want to declare local
variables specific to the handler for one particular case. Until now
I've mostly been writing this in the form
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED:
{
declare variables;
do stuff;
}
break;
}
which is ugly because the two pieces of essentially similar code
appear at different indent levels, and also inconvenient because you
have less horizontal space available to write the complicated case
handler in - particuarly undesirable because _complicated_ case
handlers are the ones most likely to need all the space they can get!
After encountering a rather nicer idiom in the LLVM source code, and
after a bit of hackery this morning figuring out how to persuade
Emacs's auto-indent to do what I wanted with it, I've decided to move
to an idiom in which the open brace comes right after the case
statement, and the code within it is indented the same as it would
have been without the brace. Then the whole case handler (including
the break) lives inside those braces, and you get something that looks
more like this:
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED: {
declare variables;
do stuff;
break;
}
}
This commit is a big-bang change that reformats all the complicated
case handlers I could find into the new layout. This is particularly
nice in the Pageant main function, in which almost _every_ case
handler had a bundle of variables and was long and complicated. (In
fact that's what motivated me to get round to this.) Some of the
innermost parts of the terminal escape-sequence handling are also
breathing a bit easier now the horizontal pressure on them is
relieved.
(Also, in a few cases, I was able to remove the extra braces
completely, because the only variable local to the case handler was a
loop variable which our new C99 policy allows me to move into the
initialiser clause of its for statement.)
Viewed with whitespace ignored, this is not too disruptive a change.
Downstream patches that conflict with it may need to be reapplied
using --ignore-whitespace or similar.
2020-02-16 10:49:52 +03:00
|
|
|
if (!pc->suppress_logging) {
|
|
|
|
char *fingerprint = rsa_ssh1_fingerprint(key);
|
|
|
|
pageant_client_log(pc, reqid,
|
|
|
|
"submitted key: %s", fingerprint);
|
|
|
|
sfree(fingerprint);
|
|
|
|
}
|
2015-05-06 21:32:26 +03:00
|
|
|
|
Formatting change to braces around one case of a switch.
Sometimes, within a switch statement, you want to declare local
variables specific to the handler for one particular case. Until now
I've mostly been writing this in the form
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED:
{
declare variables;
do stuff;
}
break;
}
which is ugly because the two pieces of essentially similar code
appear at different indent levels, and also inconvenient because you
have less horizontal space available to write the complicated case
handler in - particuarly undesirable because _complicated_ case
handlers are the ones most likely to need all the space they can get!
After encountering a rather nicer idiom in the LLVM source code, and
after a bit of hackery this morning figuring out how to persuade
Emacs's auto-indent to do what I wanted with it, I've decided to move
to an idiom in which the open brace comes right after the case
statement, and the code within it is indented the same as it would
have been without the brace. Then the whole case handler (including
the break) lives inside those braces, and you get something that looks
more like this:
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED: {
declare variables;
do stuff;
break;
}
}
This commit is a big-bang change that reformats all the complicated
case handlers I could find into the new layout. This is particularly
nice in the Pageant main function, in which almost _every_ case
handler had a bundle of variables and was long and complicated. (In
fact that's what motivated me to get round to this.) Some of the
innermost parts of the terminal escape-sequence handling are also
breathing a bit easier now the horizontal pressure on them is
relieved.
(Also, in a few cases, I was able to remove the extra braces
completely, because the only variable local to the case handler was a
loop variable which our new C99 policy allows me to move into the
initialiser clause of its for statement.)
Viewed with whitespace ignored, this is not too disruptive a change.
Downstream patches that conflict with it may need to be reapplied
using --ignore-whitespace or similar.
2020-02-16 10:49:52 +03:00
|
|
|
if (pageant_add_ssh1_key(key)) {
|
|
|
|
keylist_update();
|
|
|
|
put_byte(sb, SSH_AGENT_SUCCESS);
|
|
|
|
pageant_client_log(pc, reqid, "reply: SSH_AGENT_SUCCESS");
|
|
|
|
key = NULL; /* don't free it in cleanup */
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
fail("key already present");
|
|
|
|
}
|
2018-05-24 15:23:17 +03:00
|
|
|
|
Formatting change to braces around one case of a switch.
Sometimes, within a switch statement, you want to declare local
variables specific to the handler for one particular case. Until now
I've mostly been writing this in the form
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED:
{
declare variables;
do stuff;
}
break;
}
which is ugly because the two pieces of essentially similar code
appear at different indent levels, and also inconvenient because you
have less horizontal space available to write the complicated case
handler in - particuarly undesirable because _complicated_ case
handlers are the ones most likely to need all the space they can get!
After encountering a rather nicer idiom in the LLVM source code, and
after a bit of hackery this morning figuring out how to persuade
Emacs's auto-indent to do what I wanted with it, I've decided to move
to an idiom in which the open brace comes right after the case
statement, and the code within it is indented the same as it would
have been without the brace. Then the whole case handler (including
the break) lives inside those braces, and you get something that looks
more like this:
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED: {
declare variables;
do stuff;
break;
}
}
This commit is a big-bang change that reformats all the complicated
case handlers I could find into the new layout. This is particularly
nice in the Pageant main function, in which almost _every_ case
handler had a bundle of variables and was long and complicated. (In
fact that's what motivated me to get round to this.) Some of the
innermost parts of the terminal escape-sequence handling are also
breathing a bit easier now the horizontal pressure on them is
relieved.
(Also, in a few cases, I was able to remove the extra braces
completely, because the only variable local to the case handler was a
loop variable which our new C99 policy allows me to move into the
initialiser clause of its for statement.)
Viewed with whitespace ignored, this is not too disruptive a change.
Downstream patches that conflict with it may need to be reapplied
using --ignore-whitespace or similar.
2020-02-16 10:49:52 +03:00
|
|
|
add1_cleanup:
|
|
|
|
if (key) {
|
|
|
|
freersakey(key);
|
|
|
|
sfree(key);
|
2019-09-08 22:29:00 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
break;
|
Formatting change to braces around one case of a switch.
Sometimes, within a switch statement, you want to declare local
variables specific to the handler for one particular case. Until now
I've mostly been writing this in the form
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED:
{
declare variables;
do stuff;
}
break;
}
which is ugly because the two pieces of essentially similar code
appear at different indent levels, and also inconvenient because you
have less horizontal space available to write the complicated case
handler in - particuarly undesirable because _complicated_ case
handlers are the ones most likely to need all the space they can get!
After encountering a rather nicer idiom in the LLVM source code, and
after a bit of hackery this morning figuring out how to persuade
Emacs's auto-indent to do what I wanted with it, I've decided to move
to an idiom in which the open brace comes right after the case
statement, and the code within it is indented the same as it would
have been without the brace. Then the whole case handler (including
the break) lives inside those braces, and you get something that looks
more like this:
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED: {
declare variables;
do stuff;
break;
}
}
This commit is a big-bang change that reformats all the complicated
case handlers I could find into the new layout. This is particularly
nice in the Pageant main function, in which almost _every_ case
handler had a bundle of variables and was long and complicated. (In
fact that's what motivated me to get round to this.) Some of the
innermost parts of the terminal escape-sequence handling are also
breathing a bit easier now the horizontal pressure on them is
relieved.
(Also, in a few cases, I was able to remove the extra braces
completely, because the only variable local to the case handler was a
loop variable which our new C99 policy allows me to move into the
initialiser clause of its for statement.)
Viewed with whitespace ignored, this is not too disruptive a change.
Downstream patches that conflict with it may need to be reapplied
using --ignore-whitespace or similar.
2020-02-16 10:49:52 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
case SSH2_AGENTC_ADD_IDENTITY: {
|
2019-09-08 22:29:00 +03:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Add to the list and return SSH_AGENT_SUCCESS, or
|
|
|
|
* SSH_AGENT_FAILURE if the key was malformed.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
Formatting change to braces around one case of a switch.
Sometimes, within a switch statement, you want to declare local
variables specific to the handler for one particular case. Until now
I've mostly been writing this in the form
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED:
{
declare variables;
do stuff;
}
break;
}
which is ugly because the two pieces of essentially similar code
appear at different indent levels, and also inconvenient because you
have less horizontal space available to write the complicated case
handler in - particuarly undesirable because _complicated_ case
handlers are the ones most likely to need all the space they can get!
After encountering a rather nicer idiom in the LLVM source code, and
after a bit of hackery this morning figuring out how to persuade
Emacs's auto-indent to do what I wanted with it, I've decided to move
to an idiom in which the open brace comes right after the case
statement, and the code within it is indented the same as it would
have been without the brace. Then the whole case handler (including
the break) lives inside those braces, and you get something that looks
more like this:
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED: {
declare variables;
do stuff;
break;
}
}
This commit is a big-bang change that reformats all the complicated
case handlers I could find into the new layout. This is particularly
nice in the Pageant main function, in which almost _every_ case
handler had a bundle of variables and was long and complicated. (In
fact that's what motivated me to get round to this.) Some of the
innermost parts of the terminal escape-sequence handling are also
breathing a bit easier now the horizontal pressure on them is
relieved.
(Also, in a few cases, I was able to remove the extra braces
completely, because the only variable local to the case handler was a
loop variable which our new C99 policy allows me to move into the
initialiser clause of its for statement.)
Viewed with whitespace ignored, this is not too disruptive a change.
Downstream patches that conflict with it may need to be reapplied
using --ignore-whitespace or similar.
2020-02-16 10:49:52 +03:00
|
|
|
ssh2_userkey *key = NULL;
|
|
|
|
ptrlen algpl;
|
|
|
|
const ssh_keyalg *alg;
|
2015-05-05 22:16:19 +03:00
|
|
|
|
Formatting change to braces around one case of a switch.
Sometimes, within a switch statement, you want to declare local
variables specific to the handler for one particular case. Until now
I've mostly been writing this in the form
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED:
{
declare variables;
do stuff;
}
break;
}
which is ugly because the two pieces of essentially similar code
appear at different indent levels, and also inconvenient because you
have less horizontal space available to write the complicated case
handler in - particuarly undesirable because _complicated_ case
handlers are the ones most likely to need all the space they can get!
After encountering a rather nicer idiom in the LLVM source code, and
after a bit of hackery this morning figuring out how to persuade
Emacs's auto-indent to do what I wanted with it, I've decided to move
to an idiom in which the open brace comes right after the case
statement, and the code within it is indented the same as it would
have been without the brace. Then the whole case handler (including
the break) lives inside those braces, and you get something that looks
more like this:
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED: {
declare variables;
do stuff;
break;
}
}
This commit is a big-bang change that reformats all the complicated
case handlers I could find into the new layout. This is particularly
nice in the Pageant main function, in which almost _every_ case
handler had a bundle of variables and was long and complicated. (In
fact that's what motivated me to get round to this.) Some of the
innermost parts of the terminal escape-sequence handling are also
breathing a bit easier now the horizontal pressure on them is
relieved.
(Also, in a few cases, I was able to remove the extra braces
completely, because the only variable local to the case handler was a
loop variable which our new C99 policy allows me to move into the
initialiser clause of its for statement.)
Viewed with whitespace ignored, this is not too disruptive a change.
Downstream patches that conflict with it may need to be reapplied
using --ignore-whitespace or similar.
2020-02-16 10:49:52 +03:00
|
|
|
pageant_client_log(pc, reqid, "request: SSH2_AGENTC_ADD_IDENTITY");
|
2015-05-05 22:16:19 +03:00
|
|
|
|
Formatting change to braces around one case of a switch.
Sometimes, within a switch statement, you want to declare local
variables specific to the handler for one particular case. Until now
I've mostly been writing this in the form
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED:
{
declare variables;
do stuff;
}
break;
}
which is ugly because the two pieces of essentially similar code
appear at different indent levels, and also inconvenient because you
have less horizontal space available to write the complicated case
handler in - particuarly undesirable because _complicated_ case
handlers are the ones most likely to need all the space they can get!
After encountering a rather nicer idiom in the LLVM source code, and
after a bit of hackery this morning figuring out how to persuade
Emacs's auto-indent to do what I wanted with it, I've decided to move
to an idiom in which the open brace comes right after the case
statement, and the code within it is indented the same as it would
have been without the brace. Then the whole case handler (including
the break) lives inside those braces, and you get something that looks
more like this:
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED: {
declare variables;
do stuff;
break;
}
}
This commit is a big-bang change that reformats all the complicated
case handlers I could find into the new layout. This is particularly
nice in the Pageant main function, in which almost _every_ case
handler had a bundle of variables and was long and complicated. (In
fact that's what motivated me to get round to this.) Some of the
innermost parts of the terminal escape-sequence handling are also
breathing a bit easier now the horizontal pressure on them is
relieved.
(Also, in a few cases, I was able to remove the extra braces
completely, because the only variable local to the case handler was a
loop variable which our new C99 policy allows me to move into the
initialiser clause of its for statement.)
Viewed with whitespace ignored, this is not too disruptive a change.
Downstream patches that conflict with it may need to be reapplied
using --ignore-whitespace or similar.
2020-02-16 10:49:52 +03:00
|
|
|
algpl = get_string(msg);
|
2015-05-05 22:16:19 +03:00
|
|
|
|
Formatting change to braces around one case of a switch.
Sometimes, within a switch statement, you want to declare local
variables specific to the handler for one particular case. Until now
I've mostly been writing this in the form
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED:
{
declare variables;
do stuff;
}
break;
}
which is ugly because the two pieces of essentially similar code
appear at different indent levels, and also inconvenient because you
have less horizontal space available to write the complicated case
handler in - particuarly undesirable because _complicated_ case
handlers are the ones most likely to need all the space they can get!
After encountering a rather nicer idiom in the LLVM source code, and
after a bit of hackery this morning figuring out how to persuade
Emacs's auto-indent to do what I wanted with it, I've decided to move
to an idiom in which the open brace comes right after the case
statement, and the code within it is indented the same as it would
have been without the brace. Then the whole case handler (including
the break) lives inside those braces, and you get something that looks
more like this:
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED: {
declare variables;
do stuff;
break;
}
}
This commit is a big-bang change that reformats all the complicated
case handlers I could find into the new layout. This is particularly
nice in the Pageant main function, in which almost _every_ case
handler had a bundle of variables and was long and complicated. (In
fact that's what motivated me to get round to this.) Some of the
innermost parts of the terminal escape-sequence handling are also
breathing a bit easier now the horizontal pressure on them is
relieved.
(Also, in a few cases, I was able to remove the extra braces
completely, because the only variable local to the case handler was a
loop variable which our new C99 policy allows me to move into the
initialiser clause of its for statement.)
Viewed with whitespace ignored, this is not too disruptive a change.
Downstream patches that conflict with it may need to be reapplied
using --ignore-whitespace or similar.
2020-02-16 10:49:52 +03:00
|
|
|
key = snew(ssh2_userkey);
|
|
|
|
key->key = NULL;
|
|
|
|
key->comment = NULL;
|
|
|
|
alg = find_pubkey_alg_len(algpl);
|
|
|
|
if (!alg) {
|
|
|
|
fail("algorithm unknown");
|
|
|
|
goto add2_cleanup;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2015-05-05 22:16:19 +03:00
|
|
|
|
Formatting change to braces around one case of a switch.
Sometimes, within a switch statement, you want to declare local
variables specific to the handler for one particular case. Until now
I've mostly been writing this in the form
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED:
{
declare variables;
do stuff;
}
break;
}
which is ugly because the two pieces of essentially similar code
appear at different indent levels, and also inconvenient because you
have less horizontal space available to write the complicated case
handler in - particuarly undesirable because _complicated_ case
handlers are the ones most likely to need all the space they can get!
After encountering a rather nicer idiom in the LLVM source code, and
after a bit of hackery this morning figuring out how to persuade
Emacs's auto-indent to do what I wanted with it, I've decided to move
to an idiom in which the open brace comes right after the case
statement, and the code within it is indented the same as it would
have been without the brace. Then the whole case handler (including
the break) lives inside those braces, and you get something that looks
more like this:
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED: {
declare variables;
do stuff;
break;
}
}
This commit is a big-bang change that reformats all the complicated
case handlers I could find into the new layout. This is particularly
nice in the Pageant main function, in which almost _every_ case
handler had a bundle of variables and was long and complicated. (In
fact that's what motivated me to get round to this.) Some of the
innermost parts of the terminal escape-sequence handling are also
breathing a bit easier now the horizontal pressure on them is
relieved.
(Also, in a few cases, I was able to remove the extra braces
completely, because the only variable local to the case handler was a
loop variable which our new C99 policy allows me to move into the
initialiser clause of its for statement.)
Viewed with whitespace ignored, this is not too disruptive a change.
Downstream patches that conflict with it may need to be reapplied
using --ignore-whitespace or similar.
2020-02-16 10:49:52 +03:00
|
|
|
key->key = ssh_key_new_priv_openssh(alg, msg);
|
2018-05-28 01:47:40 +03:00
|
|
|
|
Formatting change to braces around one case of a switch.
Sometimes, within a switch statement, you want to declare local
variables specific to the handler for one particular case. Until now
I've mostly been writing this in the form
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED:
{
declare variables;
do stuff;
}
break;
}
which is ugly because the two pieces of essentially similar code
appear at different indent levels, and also inconvenient because you
have less horizontal space available to write the complicated case
handler in - particuarly undesirable because _complicated_ case
handlers are the ones most likely to need all the space they can get!
After encountering a rather nicer idiom in the LLVM source code, and
after a bit of hackery this morning figuring out how to persuade
Emacs's auto-indent to do what I wanted with it, I've decided to move
to an idiom in which the open brace comes right after the case
statement, and the code within it is indented the same as it would
have been without the brace. Then the whole case handler (including
the break) lives inside those braces, and you get something that looks
more like this:
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED: {
declare variables;
do stuff;
break;
}
}
This commit is a big-bang change that reformats all the complicated
case handlers I could find into the new layout. This is particularly
nice in the Pageant main function, in which almost _every_ case
handler had a bundle of variables and was long and complicated. (In
fact that's what motivated me to get round to this.) Some of the
innermost parts of the terminal escape-sequence handling are also
breathing a bit easier now the horizontal pressure on them is
relieved.
(Also, in a few cases, I was able to remove the extra braces
completely, because the only variable local to the case handler was a
loop variable which our new C99 policy allows me to move into the
initialiser clause of its for statement.)
Viewed with whitespace ignored, this is not too disruptive a change.
Downstream patches that conflict with it may need to be reapplied
using --ignore-whitespace or similar.
2020-02-16 10:49:52 +03:00
|
|
|
if (!key->key) {
|
|
|
|
fail("key setup failed");
|
|
|
|
goto add2_cleanup;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2015-05-05 22:16:19 +03:00
|
|
|
|
Formatting change to braces around one case of a switch.
Sometimes, within a switch statement, you want to declare local
variables specific to the handler for one particular case. Until now
I've mostly been writing this in the form
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED:
{
declare variables;
do stuff;
}
break;
}
which is ugly because the two pieces of essentially similar code
appear at different indent levels, and also inconvenient because you
have less horizontal space available to write the complicated case
handler in - particuarly undesirable because _complicated_ case
handlers are the ones most likely to need all the space they can get!
After encountering a rather nicer idiom in the LLVM source code, and
after a bit of hackery this morning figuring out how to persuade
Emacs's auto-indent to do what I wanted with it, I've decided to move
to an idiom in which the open brace comes right after the case
statement, and the code within it is indented the same as it would
have been without the brace. Then the whole case handler (including
the break) lives inside those braces, and you get something that looks
more like this:
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED: {
declare variables;
do stuff;
break;
}
}
This commit is a big-bang change that reformats all the complicated
case handlers I could find into the new layout. This is particularly
nice in the Pageant main function, in which almost _every_ case
handler had a bundle of variables and was long and complicated. (In
fact that's what motivated me to get round to this.) Some of the
innermost parts of the terminal escape-sequence handling are also
breathing a bit easier now the horizontal pressure on them is
relieved.
(Also, in a few cases, I was able to remove the extra braces
completely, because the only variable local to the case handler was a
loop variable which our new C99 policy allows me to move into the
initialiser clause of its for statement.)
Viewed with whitespace ignored, this is not too disruptive a change.
Downstream patches that conflict with it may need to be reapplied
using --ignore-whitespace or similar.
2020-02-16 10:49:52 +03:00
|
|
|
key->comment = mkstr(get_string(msg));
|
2015-05-05 22:16:19 +03:00
|
|
|
|
Formatting change to braces around one case of a switch.
Sometimes, within a switch statement, you want to declare local
variables specific to the handler for one particular case. Until now
I've mostly been writing this in the form
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED:
{
declare variables;
do stuff;
}
break;
}
which is ugly because the two pieces of essentially similar code
appear at different indent levels, and also inconvenient because you
have less horizontal space available to write the complicated case
handler in - particuarly undesirable because _complicated_ case
handlers are the ones most likely to need all the space they can get!
After encountering a rather nicer idiom in the LLVM source code, and
after a bit of hackery this morning figuring out how to persuade
Emacs's auto-indent to do what I wanted with it, I've decided to move
to an idiom in which the open brace comes right after the case
statement, and the code within it is indented the same as it would
have been without the brace. Then the whole case handler (including
the break) lives inside those braces, and you get something that looks
more like this:
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED: {
declare variables;
do stuff;
break;
}
}
This commit is a big-bang change that reformats all the complicated
case handlers I could find into the new layout. This is particularly
nice in the Pageant main function, in which almost _every_ case
handler had a bundle of variables and was long and complicated. (In
fact that's what motivated me to get round to this.) Some of the
innermost parts of the terminal escape-sequence handling are also
breathing a bit easier now the horizontal pressure on them is
relieved.
(Also, in a few cases, I was able to remove the extra braces
completely, because the only variable local to the case handler was a
loop variable which our new C99 policy allows me to move into the
initialiser clause of its for statement.)
Viewed with whitespace ignored, this is not too disruptive a change.
Downstream patches that conflict with it may need to be reapplied
using --ignore-whitespace or similar.
2020-02-16 10:49:52 +03:00
|
|
|
if (get_err(msg)) {
|
|
|
|
fail("unable to decode request");
|
|
|
|
goto add2_cleanup;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2015-05-05 22:16:19 +03:00
|
|
|
|
Formatting change to braces around one case of a switch.
Sometimes, within a switch statement, you want to declare local
variables specific to the handler for one particular case. Until now
I've mostly been writing this in the form
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED:
{
declare variables;
do stuff;
}
break;
}
which is ugly because the two pieces of essentially similar code
appear at different indent levels, and also inconvenient because you
have less horizontal space available to write the complicated case
handler in - particuarly undesirable because _complicated_ case
handlers are the ones most likely to need all the space they can get!
After encountering a rather nicer idiom in the LLVM source code, and
after a bit of hackery this morning figuring out how to persuade
Emacs's auto-indent to do what I wanted with it, I've decided to move
to an idiom in which the open brace comes right after the case
statement, and the code within it is indented the same as it would
have been without the brace. Then the whole case handler (including
the break) lives inside those braces, and you get something that looks
more like this:
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED: {
declare variables;
do stuff;
break;
}
}
This commit is a big-bang change that reformats all the complicated
case handlers I could find into the new layout. This is particularly
nice in the Pageant main function, in which almost _every_ case
handler had a bundle of variables and was long and complicated. (In
fact that's what motivated me to get round to this.) Some of the
innermost parts of the terminal escape-sequence handling are also
breathing a bit easier now the horizontal pressure on them is
relieved.
(Also, in a few cases, I was able to remove the extra braces
completely, because the only variable local to the case handler was a
loop variable which our new C99 policy allows me to move into the
initialiser clause of its for statement.)
Viewed with whitespace ignored, this is not too disruptive a change.
Downstream patches that conflict with it may need to be reapplied
using --ignore-whitespace or similar.
2020-02-16 10:49:52 +03:00
|
|
|
if (!pc->suppress_logging) {
|
|
|
|
char *fingerprint = ssh2_fingerprint(key->key);
|
|
|
|
pageant_client_log(pc, reqid, "submitted key: %s %s",
|
|
|
|
fingerprint, key->comment);
|
|
|
|
sfree(fingerprint);
|
|
|
|
}
|
2015-05-06 21:32:26 +03:00
|
|
|
|
Formatting change to braces around one case of a switch.
Sometimes, within a switch statement, you want to declare local
variables specific to the handler for one particular case. Until now
I've mostly been writing this in the form
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED:
{
declare variables;
do stuff;
}
break;
}
which is ugly because the two pieces of essentially similar code
appear at different indent levels, and also inconvenient because you
have less horizontal space available to write the complicated case
handler in - particuarly undesirable because _complicated_ case
handlers are the ones most likely to need all the space they can get!
After encountering a rather nicer idiom in the LLVM source code, and
after a bit of hackery this morning figuring out how to persuade
Emacs's auto-indent to do what I wanted with it, I've decided to move
to an idiom in which the open brace comes right after the case
statement, and the code within it is indented the same as it would
have been without the brace. Then the whole case handler (including
the break) lives inside those braces, and you get something that looks
more like this:
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED: {
declare variables;
do stuff;
break;
}
}
This commit is a big-bang change that reformats all the complicated
case handlers I could find into the new layout. This is particularly
nice in the Pageant main function, in which almost _every_ case
handler had a bundle of variables and was long and complicated. (In
fact that's what motivated me to get round to this.) Some of the
innermost parts of the terminal escape-sequence handling are also
breathing a bit easier now the horizontal pressure on them is
relieved.
(Also, in a few cases, I was able to remove the extra braces
completely, because the only variable local to the case handler was a
loop variable which our new C99 policy allows me to move into the
initialiser clause of its for statement.)
Viewed with whitespace ignored, this is not too disruptive a change.
Downstream patches that conflict with it may need to be reapplied
using --ignore-whitespace or similar.
2020-02-16 10:49:52 +03:00
|
|
|
if (pageant_add_ssh2_key(key)) {
|
|
|
|
keylist_update();
|
|
|
|
put_byte(sb, SSH_AGENT_SUCCESS);
|
2015-05-06 21:32:26 +03:00
|
|
|
|
Formatting change to braces around one case of a switch.
Sometimes, within a switch statement, you want to declare local
variables specific to the handler for one particular case. Until now
I've mostly been writing this in the form
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED:
{
declare variables;
do stuff;
}
break;
}
which is ugly because the two pieces of essentially similar code
appear at different indent levels, and also inconvenient because you
have less horizontal space available to write the complicated case
handler in - particuarly undesirable because _complicated_ case
handlers are the ones most likely to need all the space they can get!
After encountering a rather nicer idiom in the LLVM source code, and
after a bit of hackery this morning figuring out how to persuade
Emacs's auto-indent to do what I wanted with it, I've decided to move
to an idiom in which the open brace comes right after the case
statement, and the code within it is indented the same as it would
have been without the brace. Then the whole case handler (including
the break) lives inside those braces, and you get something that looks
more like this:
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED: {
declare variables;
do stuff;
break;
}
}
This commit is a big-bang change that reformats all the complicated
case handlers I could find into the new layout. This is particularly
nice in the Pageant main function, in which almost _every_ case
handler had a bundle of variables and was long and complicated. (In
fact that's what motivated me to get round to this.) Some of the
innermost parts of the terminal escape-sequence handling are also
breathing a bit easier now the horizontal pressure on them is
relieved.
(Also, in a few cases, I was able to remove the extra braces
completely, because the only variable local to the case handler was a
loop variable which our new C99 policy allows me to move into the
initialiser clause of its for statement.)
Viewed with whitespace ignored, this is not too disruptive a change.
Downstream patches that conflict with it may need to be reapplied
using --ignore-whitespace or similar.
2020-02-16 10:49:52 +03:00
|
|
|
pageant_client_log(pc, reqid, "reply: SSH_AGENT_SUCCESS");
|
2015-05-06 21:32:26 +03:00
|
|
|
|
Formatting change to braces around one case of a switch.
Sometimes, within a switch statement, you want to declare local
variables specific to the handler for one particular case. Until now
I've mostly been writing this in the form
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED:
{
declare variables;
do stuff;
}
break;
}
which is ugly because the two pieces of essentially similar code
appear at different indent levels, and also inconvenient because you
have less horizontal space available to write the complicated case
handler in - particuarly undesirable because _complicated_ case
handlers are the ones most likely to need all the space they can get!
After encountering a rather nicer idiom in the LLVM source code, and
after a bit of hackery this morning figuring out how to persuade
Emacs's auto-indent to do what I wanted with it, I've decided to move
to an idiom in which the open brace comes right after the case
statement, and the code within it is indented the same as it would
have been without the brace. Then the whole case handler (including
the break) lives inside those braces, and you get something that looks
more like this:
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED: {
declare variables;
do stuff;
break;
}
}
This commit is a big-bang change that reformats all the complicated
case handlers I could find into the new layout. This is particularly
nice in the Pageant main function, in which almost _every_ case
handler had a bundle of variables and was long and complicated. (In
fact that's what motivated me to get round to this.) Some of the
innermost parts of the terminal escape-sequence handling are also
breathing a bit easier now the horizontal pressure on them is
relieved.
(Also, in a few cases, I was able to remove the extra braces
completely, because the only variable local to the case handler was a
loop variable which our new C99 policy allows me to move into the
initialiser clause of its for statement.)
Viewed with whitespace ignored, this is not too disruptive a change.
Downstream patches that conflict with it may need to be reapplied
using --ignore-whitespace or similar.
2020-02-16 10:49:52 +03:00
|
|
|
key = NULL; /* don't clean it up */
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
fail("key already present");
|
|
|
|
}
|
2018-05-24 15:23:17 +03:00
|
|
|
|
Formatting change to braces around one case of a switch.
Sometimes, within a switch statement, you want to declare local
variables specific to the handler for one particular case. Until now
I've mostly been writing this in the form
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED:
{
declare variables;
do stuff;
}
break;
}
which is ugly because the two pieces of essentially similar code
appear at different indent levels, and also inconvenient because you
have less horizontal space available to write the complicated case
handler in - particuarly undesirable because _complicated_ case
handlers are the ones most likely to need all the space they can get!
After encountering a rather nicer idiom in the LLVM source code, and
after a bit of hackery this morning figuring out how to persuade
Emacs's auto-indent to do what I wanted with it, I've decided to move
to an idiom in which the open brace comes right after the case
statement, and the code within it is indented the same as it would
have been without the brace. Then the whole case handler (including
the break) lives inside those braces, and you get something that looks
more like this:
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED: {
declare variables;
do stuff;
break;
}
}
This commit is a big-bang change that reformats all the complicated
case handlers I could find into the new layout. This is particularly
nice in the Pageant main function, in which almost _every_ case
handler had a bundle of variables and was long and complicated. (In
fact that's what motivated me to get round to this.) Some of the
innermost parts of the terminal escape-sequence handling are also
breathing a bit easier now the horizontal pressure on them is
relieved.
(Also, in a few cases, I was able to remove the extra braces
completely, because the only variable local to the case handler was a
loop variable which our new C99 policy allows me to move into the
initialiser clause of its for statement.)
Viewed with whitespace ignored, this is not too disruptive a change.
Downstream patches that conflict with it may need to be reapplied
using --ignore-whitespace or similar.
2020-02-16 10:49:52 +03:00
|
|
|
add2_cleanup:
|
|
|
|
if (key) {
|
|
|
|
if (key->key)
|
|
|
|
ssh_key_free(key->key);
|
|
|
|
if (key->comment)
|
|
|
|
sfree(key->comment);
|
|
|
|
sfree(key);
|
2019-09-08 22:29:00 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
break;
|
Formatting change to braces around one case of a switch.
Sometimes, within a switch statement, you want to declare local
variables specific to the handler for one particular case. Until now
I've mostly been writing this in the form
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED:
{
declare variables;
do stuff;
}
break;
}
which is ugly because the two pieces of essentially similar code
appear at different indent levels, and also inconvenient because you
have less horizontal space available to write the complicated case
handler in - particuarly undesirable because _complicated_ case
handlers are the ones most likely to need all the space they can get!
After encountering a rather nicer idiom in the LLVM source code, and
after a bit of hackery this morning figuring out how to persuade
Emacs's auto-indent to do what I wanted with it, I've decided to move
to an idiom in which the open brace comes right after the case
statement, and the code within it is indented the same as it would
have been without the brace. Then the whole case handler (including
the break) lives inside those braces, and you get something that looks
more like this:
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED: {
declare variables;
do stuff;
break;
}
}
This commit is a big-bang change that reformats all the complicated
case handlers I could find into the new layout. This is particularly
nice in the Pageant main function, in which almost _every_ case
handler had a bundle of variables and was long and complicated. (In
fact that's what motivated me to get round to this.) Some of the
innermost parts of the terminal escape-sequence handling are also
breathing a bit easier now the horizontal pressure on them is
relieved.
(Also, in a few cases, I was able to remove the extra braces
completely, because the only variable local to the case handler was a
loop variable which our new C99 policy allows me to move into the
initialiser clause of its for statement.)
Viewed with whitespace ignored, this is not too disruptive a change.
Downstream patches that conflict with it may need to be reapplied
using --ignore-whitespace or similar.
2020-02-16 10:49:52 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
case SSH1_AGENTC_REMOVE_RSA_IDENTITY: {
|
2019-09-08 22:29:00 +03:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Remove from the list and return SSH_AGENT_SUCCESS, or
|
|
|
|
* perhaps SSH_AGENT_FAILURE if it wasn't in the list to
|
|
|
|
* start with.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
Formatting change to braces around one case of a switch.
Sometimes, within a switch statement, you want to declare local
variables specific to the handler for one particular case. Until now
I've mostly been writing this in the form
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED:
{
declare variables;
do stuff;
}
break;
}
which is ugly because the two pieces of essentially similar code
appear at different indent levels, and also inconvenient because you
have less horizontal space available to write the complicated case
handler in - particuarly undesirable because _complicated_ case
handlers are the ones most likely to need all the space they can get!
After encountering a rather nicer idiom in the LLVM source code, and
after a bit of hackery this morning figuring out how to persuade
Emacs's auto-indent to do what I wanted with it, I've decided to move
to an idiom in which the open brace comes right after the case
statement, and the code within it is indented the same as it would
have been without the brace. Then the whole case handler (including
the break) lives inside those braces, and you get something that looks
more like this:
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED: {
declare variables;
do stuff;
break;
}
}
This commit is a big-bang change that reformats all the complicated
case handlers I could find into the new layout. This is particularly
nice in the Pageant main function, in which almost _every_ case
handler had a bundle of variables and was long and complicated. (In
fact that's what motivated me to get round to this.) Some of the
innermost parts of the terminal escape-sequence handling are also
breathing a bit easier now the horizontal pressure on them is
relieved.
(Also, in a few cases, I was able to remove the extra braces
completely, because the only variable local to the case handler was a
loop variable which our new C99 policy allows me to move into the
initialiser clause of its for statement.)
Viewed with whitespace ignored, this is not too disruptive a change.
Downstream patches that conflict with it may need to be reapplied
using --ignore-whitespace or similar.
2020-02-16 10:49:52 +03:00
|
|
|
RSAKey reqkey;
|
|
|
|
PageantKey *pk;
|
2015-05-05 22:16:19 +03:00
|
|
|
|
Formatting change to braces around one case of a switch.
Sometimes, within a switch statement, you want to declare local
variables specific to the handler for one particular case. Until now
I've mostly been writing this in the form
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED:
{
declare variables;
do stuff;
}
break;
}
which is ugly because the two pieces of essentially similar code
appear at different indent levels, and also inconvenient because you
have less horizontal space available to write the complicated case
handler in - particuarly undesirable because _complicated_ case
handlers are the ones most likely to need all the space they can get!
After encountering a rather nicer idiom in the LLVM source code, and
after a bit of hackery this morning figuring out how to persuade
Emacs's auto-indent to do what I wanted with it, I've decided to move
to an idiom in which the open brace comes right after the case
statement, and the code within it is indented the same as it would
have been without the brace. Then the whole case handler (including
the break) lives inside those braces, and you get something that looks
more like this:
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED: {
declare variables;
do stuff;
break;
}
}
This commit is a big-bang change that reformats all the complicated
case handlers I could find into the new layout. This is particularly
nice in the Pageant main function, in which almost _every_ case
handler had a bundle of variables and was long and complicated. (In
fact that's what motivated me to get round to this.) Some of the
innermost parts of the terminal escape-sequence handling are also
breathing a bit easier now the horizontal pressure on them is
relieved.
(Also, in a few cases, I was able to remove the extra braces
completely, because the only variable local to the case handler was a
loop variable which our new C99 policy allows me to move into the
initialiser clause of its for statement.)
Viewed with whitespace ignored, this is not too disruptive a change.
Downstream patches that conflict with it may need to be reapplied
using --ignore-whitespace or similar.
2020-02-16 10:49:52 +03:00
|
|
|
pageant_client_log(pc, reqid,
|
|
|
|
"request: SSH1_AGENTC_REMOVE_RSA_IDENTITY");
|
2015-05-06 21:32:26 +03:00
|
|
|
|
Formatting change to braces around one case of a switch.
Sometimes, within a switch statement, you want to declare local
variables specific to the handler for one particular case. Until now
I've mostly been writing this in the form
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED:
{
declare variables;
do stuff;
}
break;
}
which is ugly because the two pieces of essentially similar code
appear at different indent levels, and also inconvenient because you
have less horizontal space available to write the complicated case
handler in - particuarly undesirable because _complicated_ case
handlers are the ones most likely to need all the space they can get!
After encountering a rather nicer idiom in the LLVM source code, and
after a bit of hackery this morning figuring out how to persuade
Emacs's auto-indent to do what I wanted with it, I've decided to move
to an idiom in which the open brace comes right after the case
statement, and the code within it is indented the same as it would
have been without the brace. Then the whole case handler (including
the break) lives inside those braces, and you get something that looks
more like this:
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED: {
declare variables;
do stuff;
break;
}
}
This commit is a big-bang change that reformats all the complicated
case handlers I could find into the new layout. This is particularly
nice in the Pageant main function, in which almost _every_ case
handler had a bundle of variables and was long and complicated. (In
fact that's what motivated me to get round to this.) Some of the
innermost parts of the terminal escape-sequence handling are also
breathing a bit easier now the horizontal pressure on them is
relieved.
(Also, in a few cases, I was able to remove the extra braces
completely, because the only variable local to the case handler was a
loop variable which our new C99 policy allows me to move into the
initialiser clause of its for statement.)
Viewed with whitespace ignored, this is not too disruptive a change.
Downstream patches that conflict with it may need to be reapplied
using --ignore-whitespace or similar.
2020-02-16 10:49:52 +03:00
|
|
|
memset(&reqkey, 0, sizeof(reqkey));
|
|
|
|
get_rsa_ssh1_pub(msg, &reqkey, RSA_SSH1_EXPONENT_FIRST);
|
2018-05-28 01:47:40 +03:00
|
|
|
|
Formatting change to braces around one case of a switch.
Sometimes, within a switch statement, you want to declare local
variables specific to the handler for one particular case. Until now
I've mostly been writing this in the form
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED:
{
declare variables;
do stuff;
}
break;
}
which is ugly because the two pieces of essentially similar code
appear at different indent levels, and also inconvenient because you
have less horizontal space available to write the complicated case
handler in - particuarly undesirable because _complicated_ case
handlers are the ones most likely to need all the space they can get!
After encountering a rather nicer idiom in the LLVM source code, and
after a bit of hackery this morning figuring out how to persuade
Emacs's auto-indent to do what I wanted with it, I've decided to move
to an idiom in which the open brace comes right after the case
statement, and the code within it is indented the same as it would
have been without the brace. Then the whole case handler (including
the break) lives inside those braces, and you get something that looks
more like this:
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED: {
declare variables;
do stuff;
break;
}
}
This commit is a big-bang change that reformats all the complicated
case handlers I could find into the new layout. This is particularly
nice in the Pageant main function, in which almost _every_ case
handler had a bundle of variables and was long and complicated. (In
fact that's what motivated me to get round to this.) Some of the
innermost parts of the terminal escape-sequence handling are also
breathing a bit easier now the horizontal pressure on them is
relieved.
(Also, in a few cases, I was able to remove the extra braces
completely, because the only variable local to the case handler was a
loop variable which our new C99 policy allows me to move into the
initialiser clause of its for statement.)
Viewed with whitespace ignored, this is not too disruptive a change.
Downstream patches that conflict with it may need to be reapplied
using --ignore-whitespace or similar.
2020-02-16 10:49:52 +03:00
|
|
|
if (get_err(msg)) {
|
|
|
|
fail("unable to decode request");
|
|
|
|
freersakey(&reqkey);
|
|
|
|
goto responded;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2015-05-06 21:32:26 +03:00
|
|
|
|
Formatting change to braces around one case of a switch.
Sometimes, within a switch statement, you want to declare local
variables specific to the handler for one particular case. Until now
I've mostly been writing this in the form
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED:
{
declare variables;
do stuff;
}
break;
}
which is ugly because the two pieces of essentially similar code
appear at different indent levels, and also inconvenient because you
have less horizontal space available to write the complicated case
handler in - particuarly undesirable because _complicated_ case
handlers are the ones most likely to need all the space they can get!
After encountering a rather nicer idiom in the LLVM source code, and
after a bit of hackery this morning figuring out how to persuade
Emacs's auto-indent to do what I wanted with it, I've decided to move
to an idiom in which the open brace comes right after the case
statement, and the code within it is indented the same as it would
have been without the brace. Then the whole case handler (including
the break) lives inside those braces, and you get something that looks
more like this:
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED: {
declare variables;
do stuff;
break;
}
}
This commit is a big-bang change that reformats all the complicated
case handlers I could find into the new layout. This is particularly
nice in the Pageant main function, in which almost _every_ case
handler had a bundle of variables and was long and complicated. (In
fact that's what motivated me to get round to this.) Some of the
innermost parts of the terminal escape-sequence handling are also
breathing a bit easier now the horizontal pressure on them is
relieved.
(Also, in a few cases, I was able to remove the extra braces
completely, because the only variable local to the case handler was a
loop variable which our new C99 policy allows me to move into the
initialiser clause of its for statement.)
Viewed with whitespace ignored, this is not too disruptive a change.
Downstream patches that conflict with it may need to be reapplied
using --ignore-whitespace or similar.
2020-02-16 10:49:52 +03:00
|
|
|
if (!pc->suppress_logging) {
|
|
|
|
char *fingerprint;
|
|
|
|
reqkey.comment = NULL;
|
|
|
|
fingerprint = rsa_ssh1_fingerprint(&reqkey);
|
|
|
|
pageant_client_log(pc, reqid, "unwanted key: %s", fingerprint);
|
|
|
|
sfree(fingerprint);
|
|
|
|
}
|
2015-05-05 22:16:19 +03:00
|
|
|
|
Formatting change to braces around one case of a switch.
Sometimes, within a switch statement, you want to declare local
variables specific to the handler for one particular case. Until now
I've mostly been writing this in the form
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED:
{
declare variables;
do stuff;
}
break;
}
which is ugly because the two pieces of essentially similar code
appear at different indent levels, and also inconvenient because you
have less horizontal space available to write the complicated case
handler in - particuarly undesirable because _complicated_ case
handlers are the ones most likely to need all the space they can get!
After encountering a rather nicer idiom in the LLVM source code, and
after a bit of hackery this morning figuring out how to persuade
Emacs's auto-indent to do what I wanted with it, I've decided to move
to an idiom in which the open brace comes right after the case
statement, and the code within it is indented the same as it would
have been without the brace. Then the whole case handler (including
the break) lives inside those braces, and you get something that looks
more like this:
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED: {
declare variables;
do stuff;
break;
}
}
This commit is a big-bang change that reformats all the complicated
case handlers I could find into the new layout. This is particularly
nice in the Pageant main function, in which almost _every_ case
handler had a bundle of variables and was long and complicated. (In
fact that's what motivated me to get round to this.) Some of the
innermost parts of the terminal escape-sequence handling are also
breathing a bit easier now the horizontal pressure on them is
relieved.
(Also, in a few cases, I was able to remove the extra braces
completely, because the only variable local to the case handler was a
loop variable which our new C99 policy allows me to move into the
initialiser clause of its for statement.)
Viewed with whitespace ignored, this is not too disruptive a change.
Downstream patches that conflict with it may need to be reapplied
using --ignore-whitespace or similar.
2020-02-16 10:49:52 +03:00
|
|
|
pk = findkey1(&reqkey);
|
|
|
|
freersakey(&reqkey);
|
|
|
|
if (pk) {
|
|
|
|
pageant_client_log(pc, reqid, "found with comment: %s",
|
|
|
|
pk->rkey->comment);
|
2015-05-06 21:32:26 +03:00
|
|
|
|
Formatting change to braces around one case of a switch.
Sometimes, within a switch statement, you want to declare local
variables specific to the handler for one particular case. Until now
I've mostly been writing this in the form
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED:
{
declare variables;
do stuff;
}
break;
}
which is ugly because the two pieces of essentially similar code
appear at different indent levels, and also inconvenient because you
have less horizontal space available to write the complicated case
handler in - particuarly undesirable because _complicated_ case
handlers are the ones most likely to need all the space they can get!
After encountering a rather nicer idiom in the LLVM source code, and
after a bit of hackery this morning figuring out how to persuade
Emacs's auto-indent to do what I wanted with it, I've decided to move
to an idiom in which the open brace comes right after the case
statement, and the code within it is indented the same as it would
have been without the brace. Then the whole case handler (including
the break) lives inside those braces, and you get something that looks
more like this:
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED: {
declare variables;
do stuff;
break;
}
}
This commit is a big-bang change that reformats all the complicated
case handlers I could find into the new layout. This is particularly
nice in the Pageant main function, in which almost _every_ case
handler had a bundle of variables and was long and complicated. (In
fact that's what motivated me to get round to this.) Some of the
innermost parts of the terminal escape-sequence handling are also
breathing a bit easier now the horizontal pressure on them is
relieved.
(Also, in a few cases, I was able to remove the extra braces
completely, because the only variable local to the case handler was a
loop variable which our new C99 policy allows me to move into the
initialiser clause of its for statement.)
Viewed with whitespace ignored, this is not too disruptive a change.
Downstream patches that conflict with it may need to be reapplied
using --ignore-whitespace or similar.
2020-02-16 10:49:52 +03:00
|
|
|
del234(keytree, pk);
|
|
|
|
keylist_update();
|
|
|
|
pk_free(pk);
|
|
|
|
put_byte(sb, SSH_AGENT_SUCCESS);
|
2015-05-06 21:32:26 +03:00
|
|
|
|
Formatting change to braces around one case of a switch.
Sometimes, within a switch statement, you want to declare local
variables specific to the handler for one particular case. Until now
I've mostly been writing this in the form
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED:
{
declare variables;
do stuff;
}
break;
}
which is ugly because the two pieces of essentially similar code
appear at different indent levels, and also inconvenient because you
have less horizontal space available to write the complicated case
handler in - particuarly undesirable because _complicated_ case
handlers are the ones most likely to need all the space they can get!
After encountering a rather nicer idiom in the LLVM source code, and
after a bit of hackery this morning figuring out how to persuade
Emacs's auto-indent to do what I wanted with it, I've decided to move
to an idiom in which the open brace comes right after the case
statement, and the code within it is indented the same as it would
have been without the brace. Then the whole case handler (including
the break) lives inside those braces, and you get something that looks
more like this:
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED: {
declare variables;
do stuff;
break;
}
}
This commit is a big-bang change that reformats all the complicated
case handlers I could find into the new layout. This is particularly
nice in the Pageant main function, in which almost _every_ case
handler had a bundle of variables and was long and complicated. (In
fact that's what motivated me to get round to this.) Some of the
innermost parts of the terminal escape-sequence handling are also
breathing a bit easier now the horizontal pressure on them is
relieved.
(Also, in a few cases, I was able to remove the extra braces
completely, because the only variable local to the case handler was a
loop variable which our new C99 policy allows me to move into the
initialiser clause of its for statement.)
Viewed with whitespace ignored, this is not too disruptive a change.
Downstream patches that conflict with it may need to be reapplied
using --ignore-whitespace or similar.
2020-02-16 10:49:52 +03:00
|
|
|
pageant_client_log(pc, reqid, "reply: SSH_AGENT_SUCCESS");
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
fail("key not found");
|
2019-09-08 22:29:00 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
break;
|
Formatting change to braces around one case of a switch.
Sometimes, within a switch statement, you want to declare local
variables specific to the handler for one particular case. Until now
I've mostly been writing this in the form
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED:
{
declare variables;
do stuff;
}
break;
}
which is ugly because the two pieces of essentially similar code
appear at different indent levels, and also inconvenient because you
have less horizontal space available to write the complicated case
handler in - particuarly undesirable because _complicated_ case
handlers are the ones most likely to need all the space they can get!
After encountering a rather nicer idiom in the LLVM source code, and
after a bit of hackery this morning figuring out how to persuade
Emacs's auto-indent to do what I wanted with it, I've decided to move
to an idiom in which the open brace comes right after the case
statement, and the code within it is indented the same as it would
have been without the brace. Then the whole case handler (including
the break) lives inside those braces, and you get something that looks
more like this:
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED: {
declare variables;
do stuff;
break;
}
}
This commit is a big-bang change that reformats all the complicated
case handlers I could find into the new layout. This is particularly
nice in the Pageant main function, in which almost _every_ case
handler had a bundle of variables and was long and complicated. (In
fact that's what motivated me to get round to this.) Some of the
innermost parts of the terminal escape-sequence handling are also
breathing a bit easier now the horizontal pressure on them is
relieved.
(Also, in a few cases, I was able to remove the extra braces
completely, because the only variable local to the case handler was a
loop variable which our new C99 policy allows me to move into the
initialiser clause of its for statement.)
Viewed with whitespace ignored, this is not too disruptive a change.
Downstream patches that conflict with it may need to be reapplied
using --ignore-whitespace or similar.
2020-02-16 10:49:52 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
case SSH2_AGENTC_REMOVE_IDENTITY: {
|
2019-09-08 22:29:00 +03:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Remove from the list and return SSH_AGENT_SUCCESS, or
|
|
|
|
* perhaps SSH_AGENT_FAILURE if it wasn't in the list to
|
|
|
|
* start with.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
Formatting change to braces around one case of a switch.
Sometimes, within a switch statement, you want to declare local
variables specific to the handler for one particular case. Until now
I've mostly been writing this in the form
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED:
{
declare variables;
do stuff;
}
break;
}
which is ugly because the two pieces of essentially similar code
appear at different indent levels, and also inconvenient because you
have less horizontal space available to write the complicated case
handler in - particuarly undesirable because _complicated_ case
handlers are the ones most likely to need all the space they can get!
After encountering a rather nicer idiom in the LLVM source code, and
after a bit of hackery this morning figuring out how to persuade
Emacs's auto-indent to do what I wanted with it, I've decided to move
to an idiom in which the open brace comes right after the case
statement, and the code within it is indented the same as it would
have been without the brace. Then the whole case handler (including
the break) lives inside those braces, and you get something that looks
more like this:
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED: {
declare variables;
do stuff;
break;
}
}
This commit is a big-bang change that reformats all the complicated
case handlers I could find into the new layout. This is particularly
nice in the Pageant main function, in which almost _every_ case
handler had a bundle of variables and was long and complicated. (In
fact that's what motivated me to get round to this.) Some of the
innermost parts of the terminal escape-sequence handling are also
breathing a bit easier now the horizontal pressure on them is
relieved.
(Also, in a few cases, I was able to remove the extra braces
completely, because the only variable local to the case handler was a
loop variable which our new C99 policy allows me to move into the
initialiser clause of its for statement.)
Viewed with whitespace ignored, this is not too disruptive a change.
Downstream patches that conflict with it may need to be reapplied
using --ignore-whitespace or similar.
2020-02-16 10:49:52 +03:00
|
|
|
PageantKey *pk;
|
|
|
|
ptrlen blob;
|
2015-05-05 22:16:19 +03:00
|
|
|
|
Formatting change to braces around one case of a switch.
Sometimes, within a switch statement, you want to declare local
variables specific to the handler for one particular case. Until now
I've mostly been writing this in the form
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED:
{
declare variables;
do stuff;
}
break;
}
which is ugly because the two pieces of essentially similar code
appear at different indent levels, and also inconvenient because you
have less horizontal space available to write the complicated case
handler in - particuarly undesirable because _complicated_ case
handlers are the ones most likely to need all the space they can get!
After encountering a rather nicer idiom in the LLVM source code, and
after a bit of hackery this morning figuring out how to persuade
Emacs's auto-indent to do what I wanted with it, I've decided to move
to an idiom in which the open brace comes right after the case
statement, and the code within it is indented the same as it would
have been without the brace. Then the whole case handler (including
the break) lives inside those braces, and you get something that looks
more like this:
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED: {
declare variables;
do stuff;
break;
}
}
This commit is a big-bang change that reformats all the complicated
case handlers I could find into the new layout. This is particularly
nice in the Pageant main function, in which almost _every_ case
handler had a bundle of variables and was long and complicated. (In
fact that's what motivated me to get round to this.) Some of the
innermost parts of the terminal escape-sequence handling are also
breathing a bit easier now the horizontal pressure on them is
relieved.
(Also, in a few cases, I was able to remove the extra braces
completely, because the only variable local to the case handler was a
loop variable which our new C99 policy allows me to move into the
initialiser clause of its for statement.)
Viewed with whitespace ignored, this is not too disruptive a change.
Downstream patches that conflict with it may need to be reapplied
using --ignore-whitespace or similar.
2020-02-16 10:49:52 +03:00
|
|
|
pageant_client_log(pc, reqid,
|
|
|
|
"request: SSH2_AGENTC_REMOVE_IDENTITY");
|
2015-05-06 21:32:26 +03:00
|
|
|
|
Formatting change to braces around one case of a switch.
Sometimes, within a switch statement, you want to declare local
variables specific to the handler for one particular case. Until now
I've mostly been writing this in the form
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED:
{
declare variables;
do stuff;
}
break;
}
which is ugly because the two pieces of essentially similar code
appear at different indent levels, and also inconvenient because you
have less horizontal space available to write the complicated case
handler in - particuarly undesirable because _complicated_ case
handlers are the ones most likely to need all the space they can get!
After encountering a rather nicer idiom in the LLVM source code, and
after a bit of hackery this morning figuring out how to persuade
Emacs's auto-indent to do what I wanted with it, I've decided to move
to an idiom in which the open brace comes right after the case
statement, and the code within it is indented the same as it would
have been without the brace. Then the whole case handler (including
the break) lives inside those braces, and you get something that looks
more like this:
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED: {
declare variables;
do stuff;
break;
}
}
This commit is a big-bang change that reformats all the complicated
case handlers I could find into the new layout. This is particularly
nice in the Pageant main function, in which almost _every_ case
handler had a bundle of variables and was long and complicated. (In
fact that's what motivated me to get round to this.) Some of the
innermost parts of the terminal escape-sequence handling are also
breathing a bit easier now the horizontal pressure on them is
relieved.
(Also, in a few cases, I was able to remove the extra braces
completely, because the only variable local to the case handler was a
loop variable which our new C99 policy allows me to move into the
initialiser clause of its for statement.)
Viewed with whitespace ignored, this is not too disruptive a change.
Downstream patches that conflict with it may need to be reapplied
using --ignore-whitespace or similar.
2020-02-16 10:49:52 +03:00
|
|
|
blob = get_string(msg);
|
2015-05-05 22:16:19 +03:00
|
|
|
|
Formatting change to braces around one case of a switch.
Sometimes, within a switch statement, you want to declare local
variables specific to the handler for one particular case. Until now
I've mostly been writing this in the form
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED:
{
declare variables;
do stuff;
}
break;
}
which is ugly because the two pieces of essentially similar code
appear at different indent levels, and also inconvenient because you
have less horizontal space available to write the complicated case
handler in - particuarly undesirable because _complicated_ case
handlers are the ones most likely to need all the space they can get!
After encountering a rather nicer idiom in the LLVM source code, and
after a bit of hackery this morning figuring out how to persuade
Emacs's auto-indent to do what I wanted with it, I've decided to move
to an idiom in which the open brace comes right after the case
statement, and the code within it is indented the same as it would
have been without the brace. Then the whole case handler (including
the break) lives inside those braces, and you get something that looks
more like this:
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED: {
declare variables;
do stuff;
break;
}
}
This commit is a big-bang change that reformats all the complicated
case handlers I could find into the new layout. This is particularly
nice in the Pageant main function, in which almost _every_ case
handler had a bundle of variables and was long and complicated. (In
fact that's what motivated me to get round to this.) Some of the
innermost parts of the terminal escape-sequence handling are also
breathing a bit easier now the horizontal pressure on them is
relieved.
(Also, in a few cases, I was able to remove the extra braces
completely, because the only variable local to the case handler was a
loop variable which our new C99 policy allows me to move into the
initialiser clause of its for statement.)
Viewed with whitespace ignored, this is not too disruptive a change.
Downstream patches that conflict with it may need to be reapplied
using --ignore-whitespace or similar.
2020-02-16 10:49:52 +03:00
|
|
|
if (get_err(msg)) {
|
|
|
|
fail("unable to decode request");
|
|
|
|
goto responded;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2015-05-05 22:16:19 +03:00
|
|
|
|
Formatting change to braces around one case of a switch.
Sometimes, within a switch statement, you want to declare local
variables specific to the handler for one particular case. Until now
I've mostly been writing this in the form
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED:
{
declare variables;
do stuff;
}
break;
}
which is ugly because the two pieces of essentially similar code
appear at different indent levels, and also inconvenient because you
have less horizontal space available to write the complicated case
handler in - particuarly undesirable because _complicated_ case
handlers are the ones most likely to need all the space they can get!
After encountering a rather nicer idiom in the LLVM source code, and
after a bit of hackery this morning figuring out how to persuade
Emacs's auto-indent to do what I wanted with it, I've decided to move
to an idiom in which the open brace comes right after the case
statement, and the code within it is indented the same as it would
have been without the brace. Then the whole case handler (including
the break) lives inside those braces, and you get something that looks
more like this:
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED: {
declare variables;
do stuff;
break;
}
}
This commit is a big-bang change that reformats all the complicated
case handlers I could find into the new layout. This is particularly
nice in the Pageant main function, in which almost _every_ case
handler had a bundle of variables and was long and complicated. (In
fact that's what motivated me to get round to this.) Some of the
innermost parts of the terminal escape-sequence handling are also
breathing a bit easier now the horizontal pressure on them is
relieved.
(Also, in a few cases, I was able to remove the extra braces
completely, because the only variable local to the case handler was a
loop variable which our new C99 policy allows me to move into the
initialiser clause of its for statement.)
Viewed with whitespace ignored, this is not too disruptive a change.
Downstream patches that conflict with it may need to be reapplied
using --ignore-whitespace or similar.
2020-02-16 10:49:52 +03:00
|
|
|
if (!pc->suppress_logging) {
|
|
|
|
char *fingerprint = ssh2_fingerprint_blob(blob);
|
|
|
|
pageant_client_log(pc, reqid, "unwanted key: %s", fingerprint);
|
|
|
|
sfree(fingerprint);
|
|
|
|
}
|
2015-05-06 21:32:26 +03:00
|
|
|
|
Formatting change to braces around one case of a switch.
Sometimes, within a switch statement, you want to declare local
variables specific to the handler for one particular case. Until now
I've mostly been writing this in the form
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED:
{
declare variables;
do stuff;
}
break;
}
which is ugly because the two pieces of essentially similar code
appear at different indent levels, and also inconvenient because you
have less horizontal space available to write the complicated case
handler in - particuarly undesirable because _complicated_ case
handlers are the ones most likely to need all the space they can get!
After encountering a rather nicer idiom in the LLVM source code, and
after a bit of hackery this morning figuring out how to persuade
Emacs's auto-indent to do what I wanted with it, I've decided to move
to an idiom in which the open brace comes right after the case
statement, and the code within it is indented the same as it would
have been without the brace. Then the whole case handler (including
the break) lives inside those braces, and you get something that looks
more like this:
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED: {
declare variables;
do stuff;
break;
}
}
This commit is a big-bang change that reformats all the complicated
case handlers I could find into the new layout. This is particularly
nice in the Pageant main function, in which almost _every_ case
handler had a bundle of variables and was long and complicated. (In
fact that's what motivated me to get round to this.) Some of the
innermost parts of the terminal escape-sequence handling are also
breathing a bit easier now the horizontal pressure on them is
relieved.
(Also, in a few cases, I was able to remove the extra braces
completely, because the only variable local to the case handler was a
loop variable which our new C99 policy allows me to move into the
initialiser clause of its for statement.)
Viewed with whitespace ignored, this is not too disruptive a change.
Downstream patches that conflict with it may need to be reapplied
using --ignore-whitespace or similar.
2020-02-16 10:49:52 +03:00
|
|
|
pk = findkey2(blob);
|
|
|
|
if (!pk) {
|
|
|
|
fail("key not found");
|
|
|
|
goto responded;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2015-05-06 21:32:26 +03:00
|
|
|
|
Formatting change to braces around one case of a switch.
Sometimes, within a switch statement, you want to declare local
variables specific to the handler for one particular case. Until now
I've mostly been writing this in the form
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED:
{
declare variables;
do stuff;
}
break;
}
which is ugly because the two pieces of essentially similar code
appear at different indent levels, and also inconvenient because you
have less horizontal space available to write the complicated case
handler in - particuarly undesirable because _complicated_ case
handlers are the ones most likely to need all the space they can get!
After encountering a rather nicer idiom in the LLVM source code, and
after a bit of hackery this morning figuring out how to persuade
Emacs's auto-indent to do what I wanted with it, I've decided to move
to an idiom in which the open brace comes right after the case
statement, and the code within it is indented the same as it would
have been without the brace. Then the whole case handler (including
the break) lives inside those braces, and you get something that looks
more like this:
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED: {
declare variables;
do stuff;
break;
}
}
This commit is a big-bang change that reformats all the complicated
case handlers I could find into the new layout. This is particularly
nice in the Pageant main function, in which almost _every_ case
handler had a bundle of variables and was long and complicated. (In
fact that's what motivated me to get round to this.) Some of the
innermost parts of the terminal escape-sequence handling are also
breathing a bit easier now the horizontal pressure on them is
relieved.
(Also, in a few cases, I was able to remove the extra braces
completely, because the only variable local to the case handler was a
loop variable which our new C99 policy allows me to move into the
initialiser clause of its for statement.)
Viewed with whitespace ignored, this is not too disruptive a change.
Downstream patches that conflict with it may need to be reapplied
using --ignore-whitespace or similar.
2020-02-16 10:49:52 +03:00
|
|
|
pageant_client_log(pc, reqid,
|
|
|
|
"found with comment: %s", pk->comment);
|
2015-05-05 22:16:19 +03:00
|
|
|
|
Formatting change to braces around one case of a switch.
Sometimes, within a switch statement, you want to declare local
variables specific to the handler for one particular case. Until now
I've mostly been writing this in the form
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED:
{
declare variables;
do stuff;
}
break;
}
which is ugly because the two pieces of essentially similar code
appear at different indent levels, and also inconvenient because you
have less horizontal space available to write the complicated case
handler in - particuarly undesirable because _complicated_ case
handlers are the ones most likely to need all the space they can get!
After encountering a rather nicer idiom in the LLVM source code, and
after a bit of hackery this morning figuring out how to persuade
Emacs's auto-indent to do what I wanted with it, I've decided to move
to an idiom in which the open brace comes right after the case
statement, and the code within it is indented the same as it would
have been without the brace. Then the whole case handler (including
the break) lives inside those braces, and you get something that looks
more like this:
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED: {
declare variables;
do stuff;
break;
}
}
This commit is a big-bang change that reformats all the complicated
case handlers I could find into the new layout. This is particularly
nice in the Pageant main function, in which almost _every_ case
handler had a bundle of variables and was long and complicated. (In
fact that's what motivated me to get round to this.) Some of the
innermost parts of the terminal escape-sequence handling are also
breathing a bit easier now the horizontal pressure on them is
relieved.
(Also, in a few cases, I was able to remove the extra braces
completely, because the only variable local to the case handler was a
loop variable which our new C99 policy allows me to move into the
initialiser clause of its for statement.)
Viewed with whitespace ignored, this is not too disruptive a change.
Downstream patches that conflict with it may need to be reapplied
using --ignore-whitespace or similar.
2020-02-16 10:49:52 +03:00
|
|
|
del234(keytree, pk);
|
|
|
|
keylist_update();
|
|
|
|
pk_free(pk);
|
|
|
|
put_byte(sb, SSH_AGENT_SUCCESS);
|
2015-05-06 21:32:26 +03:00
|
|
|
|
Formatting change to braces around one case of a switch.
Sometimes, within a switch statement, you want to declare local
variables specific to the handler for one particular case. Until now
I've mostly been writing this in the form
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED:
{
declare variables;
do stuff;
}
break;
}
which is ugly because the two pieces of essentially similar code
appear at different indent levels, and also inconvenient because you
have less horizontal space available to write the complicated case
handler in - particuarly undesirable because _complicated_ case
handlers are the ones most likely to need all the space they can get!
After encountering a rather nicer idiom in the LLVM source code, and
after a bit of hackery this morning figuring out how to persuade
Emacs's auto-indent to do what I wanted with it, I've decided to move
to an idiom in which the open brace comes right after the case
statement, and the code within it is indented the same as it would
have been without the brace. Then the whole case handler (including
the break) lives inside those braces, and you get something that looks
more like this:
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED: {
declare variables;
do stuff;
break;
}
}
This commit is a big-bang change that reformats all the complicated
case handlers I could find into the new layout. This is particularly
nice in the Pageant main function, in which almost _every_ case
handler had a bundle of variables and was long and complicated. (In
fact that's what motivated me to get round to this.) Some of the
innermost parts of the terminal escape-sequence handling are also
breathing a bit easier now the horizontal pressure on them is
relieved.
(Also, in a few cases, I was able to remove the extra braces
completely, because the only variable local to the case handler was a
loop variable which our new C99 policy allows me to move into the
initialiser clause of its for statement.)
Viewed with whitespace ignored, this is not too disruptive a change.
Downstream patches that conflict with it may need to be reapplied
using --ignore-whitespace or similar.
2020-02-16 10:49:52 +03:00
|
|
|
pageant_client_log(pc, reqid, "reply: SSH_AGENT_SUCCESS");
|
2019-09-08 22:29:00 +03:00
|
|
|
break;
|
Formatting change to braces around one case of a switch.
Sometimes, within a switch statement, you want to declare local
variables specific to the handler for one particular case. Until now
I've mostly been writing this in the form
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED:
{
declare variables;
do stuff;
}
break;
}
which is ugly because the two pieces of essentially similar code
appear at different indent levels, and also inconvenient because you
have less horizontal space available to write the complicated case
handler in - particuarly undesirable because _complicated_ case
handlers are the ones most likely to need all the space they can get!
After encountering a rather nicer idiom in the LLVM source code, and
after a bit of hackery this morning figuring out how to persuade
Emacs's auto-indent to do what I wanted with it, I've decided to move
to an idiom in which the open brace comes right after the case
statement, and the code within it is indented the same as it would
have been without the brace. Then the whole case handler (including
the break) lives inside those braces, and you get something that looks
more like this:
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED: {
declare variables;
do stuff;
break;
}
}
This commit is a big-bang change that reformats all the complicated
case handlers I could find into the new layout. This is particularly
nice in the Pageant main function, in which almost _every_ case
handler had a bundle of variables and was long and complicated. (In
fact that's what motivated me to get round to this.) Some of the
innermost parts of the terminal escape-sequence handling are also
breathing a bit easier now the horizontal pressure on them is
relieved.
(Also, in a few cases, I was able to remove the extra braces
completely, because the only variable local to the case handler was a
loop variable which our new C99 policy allows me to move into the
initialiser clause of its for statement.)
Viewed with whitespace ignored, this is not too disruptive a change.
Downstream patches that conflict with it may need to be reapplied
using --ignore-whitespace or similar.
2020-02-16 10:49:52 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
case SSH1_AGENTC_REMOVE_ALL_RSA_IDENTITIES: {
|
2019-09-08 22:29:00 +03:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Remove all SSH-1 keys. Always returns success.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
Formatting change to braces around one case of a switch.
Sometimes, within a switch statement, you want to declare local
variables specific to the handler for one particular case. Until now
I've mostly been writing this in the form
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED:
{
declare variables;
do stuff;
}
break;
}
which is ugly because the two pieces of essentially similar code
appear at different indent levels, and also inconvenient because you
have less horizontal space available to write the complicated case
handler in - particuarly undesirable because _complicated_ case
handlers are the ones most likely to need all the space they can get!
After encountering a rather nicer idiom in the LLVM source code, and
after a bit of hackery this morning figuring out how to persuade
Emacs's auto-indent to do what I wanted with it, I've decided to move
to an idiom in which the open brace comes right after the case
statement, and the code within it is indented the same as it would
have been without the brace. Then the whole case handler (including
the break) lives inside those braces, and you get something that looks
more like this:
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED: {
declare variables;
do stuff;
break;
}
}
This commit is a big-bang change that reformats all the complicated
case handlers I could find into the new layout. This is particularly
nice in the Pageant main function, in which almost _every_ case
handler had a bundle of variables and was long and complicated. (In
fact that's what motivated me to get round to this.) Some of the
innermost parts of the terminal escape-sequence handling are also
breathing a bit easier now the horizontal pressure on them is
relieved.
(Also, in a few cases, I was able to remove the extra braces
completely, because the only variable local to the case handler was a
loop variable which our new C99 policy allows me to move into the
initialiser clause of its for statement.)
Viewed with whitespace ignored, this is not too disruptive a change.
Downstream patches that conflict with it may need to be reapplied
using --ignore-whitespace or similar.
2020-02-16 10:49:52 +03:00
|
|
|
pageant_client_log(pc, reqid, "request:"
|
|
|
|
" SSH1_AGENTC_REMOVE_ALL_RSA_IDENTITIES");
|
2015-05-06 21:32:26 +03:00
|
|
|
|
Formatting change to braces around one case of a switch.
Sometimes, within a switch statement, you want to declare local
variables specific to the handler for one particular case. Until now
I've mostly been writing this in the form
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED:
{
declare variables;
do stuff;
}
break;
}
which is ugly because the two pieces of essentially similar code
appear at different indent levels, and also inconvenient because you
have less horizontal space available to write the complicated case
handler in - particuarly undesirable because _complicated_ case
handlers are the ones most likely to need all the space they can get!
After encountering a rather nicer idiom in the LLVM source code, and
after a bit of hackery this morning figuring out how to persuade
Emacs's auto-indent to do what I wanted with it, I've decided to move
to an idiom in which the open brace comes right after the case
statement, and the code within it is indented the same as it would
have been without the brace. Then the whole case handler (including
the break) lives inside those braces, and you get something that looks
more like this:
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED: {
declare variables;
do stuff;
break;
}
}
This commit is a big-bang change that reformats all the complicated
case handlers I could find into the new layout. This is particularly
nice in the Pageant main function, in which almost _every_ case
handler had a bundle of variables and was long and complicated. (In
fact that's what motivated me to get round to this.) Some of the
innermost parts of the terminal escape-sequence handling are also
breathing a bit easier now the horizontal pressure on them is
relieved.
(Also, in a few cases, I was able to remove the extra braces
completely, because the only variable local to the case handler was a
loop variable which our new C99 policy allows me to move into the
initialiser clause of its for statement.)
Viewed with whitespace ignored, this is not too disruptive a change.
Downstream patches that conflict with it may need to be reapplied
using --ignore-whitespace or similar.
2020-02-16 10:49:52 +03:00
|
|
|
remove_all_keys(1);
|
|
|
|
keylist_update();
|
2015-05-05 22:16:19 +03:00
|
|
|
|
Formatting change to braces around one case of a switch.
Sometimes, within a switch statement, you want to declare local
variables specific to the handler for one particular case. Until now
I've mostly been writing this in the form
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED:
{
declare variables;
do stuff;
}
break;
}
which is ugly because the two pieces of essentially similar code
appear at different indent levels, and also inconvenient because you
have less horizontal space available to write the complicated case
handler in - particuarly undesirable because _complicated_ case
handlers are the ones most likely to need all the space they can get!
After encountering a rather nicer idiom in the LLVM source code, and
after a bit of hackery this morning figuring out how to persuade
Emacs's auto-indent to do what I wanted with it, I've decided to move
to an idiom in which the open brace comes right after the case
statement, and the code within it is indented the same as it would
have been without the brace. Then the whole case handler (including
the break) lives inside those braces, and you get something that looks
more like this:
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED: {
declare variables;
do stuff;
break;
}
}
This commit is a big-bang change that reformats all the complicated
case handlers I could find into the new layout. This is particularly
nice in the Pageant main function, in which almost _every_ case
handler had a bundle of variables and was long and complicated. (In
fact that's what motivated me to get round to this.) Some of the
innermost parts of the terminal escape-sequence handling are also
breathing a bit easier now the horizontal pressure on them is
relieved.
(Also, in a few cases, I was able to remove the extra braces
completely, because the only variable local to the case handler was a
loop variable which our new C99 policy allows me to move into the
initialiser clause of its for statement.)
Viewed with whitespace ignored, this is not too disruptive a change.
Downstream patches that conflict with it may need to be reapplied
using --ignore-whitespace or similar.
2020-02-16 10:49:52 +03:00
|
|
|
put_byte(sb, SSH_AGENT_SUCCESS);
|
2015-05-06 21:32:26 +03:00
|
|
|
|
Formatting change to braces around one case of a switch.
Sometimes, within a switch statement, you want to declare local
variables specific to the handler for one particular case. Until now
I've mostly been writing this in the form
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED:
{
declare variables;
do stuff;
}
break;
}
which is ugly because the two pieces of essentially similar code
appear at different indent levels, and also inconvenient because you
have less horizontal space available to write the complicated case
handler in - particuarly undesirable because _complicated_ case
handlers are the ones most likely to need all the space they can get!
After encountering a rather nicer idiom in the LLVM source code, and
after a bit of hackery this morning figuring out how to persuade
Emacs's auto-indent to do what I wanted with it, I've decided to move
to an idiom in which the open brace comes right after the case
statement, and the code within it is indented the same as it would
have been without the brace. Then the whole case handler (including
the break) lives inside those braces, and you get something that looks
more like this:
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED: {
declare variables;
do stuff;
break;
}
}
This commit is a big-bang change that reformats all the complicated
case handlers I could find into the new layout. This is particularly
nice in the Pageant main function, in which almost _every_ case
handler had a bundle of variables and was long and complicated. (In
fact that's what motivated me to get round to this.) Some of the
innermost parts of the terminal escape-sequence handling are also
breathing a bit easier now the horizontal pressure on them is
relieved.
(Also, in a few cases, I was able to remove the extra braces
completely, because the only variable local to the case handler was a
loop variable which our new C99 policy allows me to move into the
initialiser clause of its for statement.)
Viewed with whitespace ignored, this is not too disruptive a change.
Downstream patches that conflict with it may need to be reapplied
using --ignore-whitespace or similar.
2020-02-16 10:49:52 +03:00
|
|
|
pageant_client_log(pc, reqid, "reply: SSH_AGENT_SUCCESS");
|
2019-09-08 22:29:00 +03:00
|
|
|
break;
|
Formatting change to braces around one case of a switch.
Sometimes, within a switch statement, you want to declare local
variables specific to the handler for one particular case. Until now
I've mostly been writing this in the form
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED:
{
declare variables;
do stuff;
}
break;
}
which is ugly because the two pieces of essentially similar code
appear at different indent levels, and also inconvenient because you
have less horizontal space available to write the complicated case
handler in - particuarly undesirable because _complicated_ case
handlers are the ones most likely to need all the space they can get!
After encountering a rather nicer idiom in the LLVM source code, and
after a bit of hackery this morning figuring out how to persuade
Emacs's auto-indent to do what I wanted with it, I've decided to move
to an idiom in which the open brace comes right after the case
statement, and the code within it is indented the same as it would
have been without the brace. Then the whole case handler (including
the break) lives inside those braces, and you get something that looks
more like this:
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED: {
declare variables;
do stuff;
break;
}
}
This commit is a big-bang change that reformats all the complicated
case handlers I could find into the new layout. This is particularly
nice in the Pageant main function, in which almost _every_ case
handler had a bundle of variables and was long and complicated. (In
fact that's what motivated me to get round to this.) Some of the
innermost parts of the terminal escape-sequence handling are also
breathing a bit easier now the horizontal pressure on them is
relieved.
(Also, in a few cases, I was able to remove the extra braces
completely, because the only variable local to the case handler was a
loop variable which our new C99 policy allows me to move into the
initialiser clause of its for statement.)
Viewed with whitespace ignored, this is not too disruptive a change.
Downstream patches that conflict with it may need to be reapplied
using --ignore-whitespace or similar.
2020-02-16 10:49:52 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
case SSH2_AGENTC_REMOVE_ALL_IDENTITIES: {
|
2019-09-08 22:29:00 +03:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Remove all SSH-2 keys. Always returns success.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
Formatting change to braces around one case of a switch.
Sometimes, within a switch statement, you want to declare local
variables specific to the handler for one particular case. Until now
I've mostly been writing this in the form
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED:
{
declare variables;
do stuff;
}
break;
}
which is ugly because the two pieces of essentially similar code
appear at different indent levels, and also inconvenient because you
have less horizontal space available to write the complicated case
handler in - particuarly undesirable because _complicated_ case
handlers are the ones most likely to need all the space they can get!
After encountering a rather nicer idiom in the LLVM source code, and
after a bit of hackery this morning figuring out how to persuade
Emacs's auto-indent to do what I wanted with it, I've decided to move
to an idiom in which the open brace comes right after the case
statement, and the code within it is indented the same as it would
have been without the brace. Then the whole case handler (including
the break) lives inside those braces, and you get something that looks
more like this:
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED: {
declare variables;
do stuff;
break;
}
}
This commit is a big-bang change that reformats all the complicated
case handlers I could find into the new layout. This is particularly
nice in the Pageant main function, in which almost _every_ case
handler had a bundle of variables and was long and complicated. (In
fact that's what motivated me to get round to this.) Some of the
innermost parts of the terminal escape-sequence handling are also
breathing a bit easier now the horizontal pressure on them is
relieved.
(Also, in a few cases, I was able to remove the extra braces
completely, because the only variable local to the case handler was a
loop variable which our new C99 policy allows me to move into the
initialiser clause of its for statement.)
Viewed with whitespace ignored, this is not too disruptive a change.
Downstream patches that conflict with it may need to be reapplied
using --ignore-whitespace or similar.
2020-02-16 10:49:52 +03:00
|
|
|
pageant_client_log(pc, reqid,
|
|
|
|
"request: SSH2_AGENTC_REMOVE_ALL_IDENTITIES");
|
2015-05-06 21:32:26 +03:00
|
|
|
|
Formatting change to braces around one case of a switch.
Sometimes, within a switch statement, you want to declare local
variables specific to the handler for one particular case. Until now
I've mostly been writing this in the form
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED:
{
declare variables;
do stuff;
}
break;
}
which is ugly because the two pieces of essentially similar code
appear at different indent levels, and also inconvenient because you
have less horizontal space available to write the complicated case
handler in - particuarly undesirable because _complicated_ case
handlers are the ones most likely to need all the space they can get!
After encountering a rather nicer idiom in the LLVM source code, and
after a bit of hackery this morning figuring out how to persuade
Emacs's auto-indent to do what I wanted with it, I've decided to move
to an idiom in which the open brace comes right after the case
statement, and the code within it is indented the same as it would
have been without the brace. Then the whole case handler (including
the break) lives inside those braces, and you get something that looks
more like this:
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED: {
declare variables;
do stuff;
break;
}
}
This commit is a big-bang change that reformats all the complicated
case handlers I could find into the new layout. This is particularly
nice in the Pageant main function, in which almost _every_ case
handler had a bundle of variables and was long and complicated. (In
fact that's what motivated me to get round to this.) Some of the
innermost parts of the terminal escape-sequence handling are also
breathing a bit easier now the horizontal pressure on them is
relieved.
(Also, in a few cases, I was able to remove the extra braces
completely, because the only variable local to the case handler was a
loop variable which our new C99 policy allows me to move into the
initialiser clause of its for statement.)
Viewed with whitespace ignored, this is not too disruptive a change.
Downstream patches that conflict with it may need to be reapplied
using --ignore-whitespace or similar.
2020-02-16 10:49:52 +03:00
|
|
|
remove_all_keys(2);
|
|
|
|
keylist_update();
|
2015-05-05 22:16:19 +03:00
|
|
|
|
Formatting change to braces around one case of a switch.
Sometimes, within a switch statement, you want to declare local
variables specific to the handler for one particular case. Until now
I've mostly been writing this in the form
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED:
{
declare variables;
do stuff;
}
break;
}
which is ugly because the two pieces of essentially similar code
appear at different indent levels, and also inconvenient because you
have less horizontal space available to write the complicated case
handler in - particuarly undesirable because _complicated_ case
handlers are the ones most likely to need all the space they can get!
After encountering a rather nicer idiom in the LLVM source code, and
after a bit of hackery this morning figuring out how to persuade
Emacs's auto-indent to do what I wanted with it, I've decided to move
to an idiom in which the open brace comes right after the case
statement, and the code within it is indented the same as it would
have been without the brace. Then the whole case handler (including
the break) lives inside those braces, and you get something that looks
more like this:
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED: {
declare variables;
do stuff;
break;
}
}
This commit is a big-bang change that reformats all the complicated
case handlers I could find into the new layout. This is particularly
nice in the Pageant main function, in which almost _every_ case
handler had a bundle of variables and was long and complicated. (In
fact that's what motivated me to get round to this.) Some of the
innermost parts of the terminal escape-sequence handling are also
breathing a bit easier now the horizontal pressure on them is
relieved.
(Also, in a few cases, I was able to remove the extra braces
completely, because the only variable local to the case handler was a
loop variable which our new C99 policy allows me to move into the
initialiser clause of its for statement.)
Viewed with whitespace ignored, this is not too disruptive a change.
Downstream patches that conflict with it may need to be reapplied
using --ignore-whitespace or similar.
2020-02-16 10:49:52 +03:00
|
|
|
put_byte(sb, SSH_AGENT_SUCCESS);
|
2015-05-06 21:32:26 +03:00
|
|
|
|
Formatting change to braces around one case of a switch.
Sometimes, within a switch statement, you want to declare local
variables specific to the handler for one particular case. Until now
I've mostly been writing this in the form
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED:
{
declare variables;
do stuff;
}
break;
}
which is ugly because the two pieces of essentially similar code
appear at different indent levels, and also inconvenient because you
have less horizontal space available to write the complicated case
handler in - particuarly undesirable because _complicated_ case
handlers are the ones most likely to need all the space they can get!
After encountering a rather nicer idiom in the LLVM source code, and
after a bit of hackery this morning figuring out how to persuade
Emacs's auto-indent to do what I wanted with it, I've decided to move
to an idiom in which the open brace comes right after the case
statement, and the code within it is indented the same as it would
have been without the brace. Then the whole case handler (including
the break) lives inside those braces, and you get something that looks
more like this:
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED: {
declare variables;
do stuff;
break;
}
}
This commit is a big-bang change that reformats all the complicated
case handlers I could find into the new layout. This is particularly
nice in the Pageant main function, in which almost _every_ case
handler had a bundle of variables and was long and complicated. (In
fact that's what motivated me to get round to this.) Some of the
innermost parts of the terminal escape-sequence handling are also
breathing a bit easier now the horizontal pressure on them is
relieved.
(Also, in a few cases, I was able to remove the extra braces
completely, because the only variable local to the case handler was a
loop variable which our new C99 policy allows me to move into the
initialiser clause of its for statement.)
Viewed with whitespace ignored, this is not too disruptive a change.
Downstream patches that conflict with it may need to be reapplied
using --ignore-whitespace or similar.
2020-02-16 10:49:52 +03:00
|
|
|
pageant_client_log(pc, reqid, "reply: SSH_AGENT_SUCCESS");
|
2019-09-08 22:29:00 +03:00
|
|
|
break;
|
Formatting change to braces around one case of a switch.
Sometimes, within a switch statement, you want to declare local
variables specific to the handler for one particular case. Until now
I've mostly been writing this in the form
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED:
{
declare variables;
do stuff;
}
break;
}
which is ugly because the two pieces of essentially similar code
appear at different indent levels, and also inconvenient because you
have less horizontal space available to write the complicated case
handler in - particuarly undesirable because _complicated_ case
handlers are the ones most likely to need all the space they can get!
After encountering a rather nicer idiom in the LLVM source code, and
after a bit of hackery this morning figuring out how to persuade
Emacs's auto-indent to do what I wanted with it, I've decided to move
to an idiom in which the open brace comes right after the case
statement, and the code within it is indented the same as it would
have been without the brace. Then the whole case handler (including
the break) lives inside those braces, and you get something that looks
more like this:
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED: {
declare variables;
do stuff;
break;
}
}
This commit is a big-bang change that reformats all the complicated
case handlers I could find into the new layout. This is particularly
nice in the Pageant main function, in which almost _every_ case
handler had a bundle of variables and was long and complicated. (In
fact that's what motivated me to get round to this.) Some of the
innermost parts of the terminal escape-sequence handling are also
breathing a bit easier now the horizontal pressure on them is
relieved.
(Also, in a few cases, I was able to remove the extra braces
completely, because the only variable local to the case handler was a
loop variable which our new C99 policy allows me to move into the
initialiser clause of its for statement.)
Viewed with whitespace ignored, this is not too disruptive a change.
Downstream patches that conflict with it may need to be reapplied
using --ignore-whitespace or similar.
2020-02-16 10:49:52 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
case SSH2_AGENTC_EXTENSION: {
|
|
|
|
enum Extension exttype = EXT_UNKNOWN;
|
|
|
|
ptrlen extname = get_string(msg);
|
|
|
|
pageant_client_log(pc, reqid,
|
|
|
|
"request: SSH2_AGENTC_EXTENSION \"%.*s\"",
|
|
|
|
PTRLEN_PRINTF(extname));
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for (size_t i = 0; i < lenof(extension_names); i++)
|
|
|
|
if (ptrlen_eq_ptrlen(extname, extension_names[i])) {
|
|
|
|
exttype = i;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* For SSH_AGENTC_EXTENSION requests, the message
|
|
|
|
* code SSH_AGENT_FAILURE is reserved for "I don't
|
|
|
|
* recognise this extension name at all". For any
|
|
|
|
* other kind of failure while processing an
|
|
|
|
* extension we _do_ recognise, we must switch to
|
|
|
|
* returning a different failure code, with
|
|
|
|
* semantics "I understood the extension name, but
|
|
|
|
* something else went wrong".
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
failure_type = SSH_AGENT_EXTENSION_FAILURE;
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2020-02-15 19:37:10 +03:00
|
|
|
|
Formatting change to braces around one case of a switch.
Sometimes, within a switch statement, you want to declare local
variables specific to the handler for one particular case. Until now
I've mostly been writing this in the form
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED:
{
declare variables;
do stuff;
}
break;
}
which is ugly because the two pieces of essentially similar code
appear at different indent levels, and also inconvenient because you
have less horizontal space available to write the complicated case
handler in - particuarly undesirable because _complicated_ case
handlers are the ones most likely to need all the space they can get!
After encountering a rather nicer idiom in the LLVM source code, and
after a bit of hackery this morning figuring out how to persuade
Emacs's auto-indent to do what I wanted with it, I've decided to move
to an idiom in which the open brace comes right after the case
statement, and the code within it is indented the same as it would
have been without the brace. Then the whole case handler (including
the break) lives inside those braces, and you get something that looks
more like this:
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED: {
declare variables;
do stuff;
break;
}
}
This commit is a big-bang change that reformats all the complicated
case handlers I could find into the new layout. This is particularly
nice in the Pageant main function, in which almost _every_ case
handler had a bundle of variables and was long and complicated. (In
fact that's what motivated me to get round to this.) Some of the
innermost parts of the terminal escape-sequence handling are also
breathing a bit easier now the horizontal pressure on them is
relieved.
(Also, in a few cases, I was able to remove the extra braces
completely, because the only variable local to the case handler was a
loop variable which our new C99 policy allows me to move into the
initialiser clause of its for statement.)
Viewed with whitespace ignored, this is not too disruptive a change.
Downstream patches that conflict with it may need to be reapplied
using --ignore-whitespace or similar.
2020-02-16 10:49:52 +03:00
|
|
|
switch (exttype) {
|
|
|
|
case EXT_UNKNOWN:
|
|
|
|
fail("unrecognised extension name '%.*s'",
|
|
|
|
PTRLEN_PRINTF(extname));
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
case EXT_QUERY:
|
|
|
|
/* Standard request to list the supported extensions. */
|
|
|
|
put_byte(sb, SSH_AGENT_SUCCESS);
|
2020-02-10 23:45:31 +03:00
|
|
|
for (size_t i = 0; i < lenof(extension_names); i++)
|
Formatting change to braces around one case of a switch.
Sometimes, within a switch statement, you want to declare local
variables specific to the handler for one particular case. Until now
I've mostly been writing this in the form
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED:
{
declare variables;
do stuff;
}
break;
}
which is ugly because the two pieces of essentially similar code
appear at different indent levels, and also inconvenient because you
have less horizontal space available to write the complicated case
handler in - particuarly undesirable because _complicated_ case
handlers are the ones most likely to need all the space they can get!
After encountering a rather nicer idiom in the LLVM source code, and
after a bit of hackery this morning figuring out how to persuade
Emacs's auto-indent to do what I wanted with it, I've decided to move
to an idiom in which the open brace comes right after the case
statement, and the code within it is indented the same as it would
have been without the brace. Then the whole case handler (including
the break) lives inside those braces, and you get something that looks
more like this:
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED: {
declare variables;
do stuff;
break;
}
}
This commit is a big-bang change that reformats all the complicated
case handlers I could find into the new layout. This is particularly
nice in the Pageant main function, in which almost _every_ case
handler had a bundle of variables and was long and complicated. (In
fact that's what motivated me to get round to this.) Some of the
innermost parts of the terminal escape-sequence handling are also
breathing a bit easier now the horizontal pressure on them is
relieved.
(Also, in a few cases, I was able to remove the extra braces
completely, because the only variable local to the case handler was a
loop variable which our new C99 policy allows me to move into the
initialiser clause of its for statement.)
Viewed with whitespace ignored, this is not too disruptive a change.
Downstream patches that conflict with it may need to be reapplied
using --ignore-whitespace or similar.
2020-02-16 10:49:52 +03:00
|
|
|
put_stringpl(sb, extension_names[i]);
|
|
|
|
pageant_client_log(pc, reqid,
|
|
|
|
"reply: SSH_AGENT_SUCCESS + names");
|
|
|
|
break;
|
2020-01-07 22:56:47 +03:00
|
|
|
|
Formatting change to braces around one case of a switch.
Sometimes, within a switch statement, you want to declare local
variables specific to the handler for one particular case. Until now
I've mostly been writing this in the form
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED:
{
declare variables;
do stuff;
}
break;
}
which is ugly because the two pieces of essentially similar code
appear at different indent levels, and also inconvenient because you
have less horizontal space available to write the complicated case
handler in - particuarly undesirable because _complicated_ case
handlers are the ones most likely to need all the space they can get!
After encountering a rather nicer idiom in the LLVM source code, and
after a bit of hackery this morning figuring out how to persuade
Emacs's auto-indent to do what I wanted with it, I've decided to move
to an idiom in which the open brace comes right after the case
statement, and the code within it is indented the same as it would
have been without the brace. Then the whole case handler (including
the break) lives inside those braces, and you get something that looks
more like this:
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED: {
declare variables;
do stuff;
break;
}
}
This commit is a big-bang change that reformats all the complicated
case handlers I could find into the new layout. This is particularly
nice in the Pageant main function, in which almost _every_ case
handler had a bundle of variables and was long and complicated. (In
fact that's what motivated me to get round to this.) Some of the
innermost parts of the terminal escape-sequence handling are also
breathing a bit easier now the horizontal pressure on them is
relieved.
(Also, in a few cases, I was able to remove the extra braces
completely, because the only variable local to the case handler was a
loop variable which our new C99 policy allows me to move into the
initialiser clause of its for statement.)
Viewed with whitespace ignored, this is not too disruptive a change.
Downstream patches that conflict with it may need to be reapplied
using --ignore-whitespace or similar.
2020-02-16 10:49:52 +03:00
|
|
|
case EXT_ADD_PPK: {
|
|
|
|
ptrlen keyfile = get_string(msg);
|
2020-02-15 19:37:10 +03:00
|
|
|
|
Formatting change to braces around one case of a switch.
Sometimes, within a switch statement, you want to declare local
variables specific to the handler for one particular case. Until now
I've mostly been writing this in the form
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED:
{
declare variables;
do stuff;
}
break;
}
which is ugly because the two pieces of essentially similar code
appear at different indent levels, and also inconvenient because you
have less horizontal space available to write the complicated case
handler in - particuarly undesirable because _complicated_ case
handlers are the ones most likely to need all the space they can get!
After encountering a rather nicer idiom in the LLVM source code, and
after a bit of hackery this morning figuring out how to persuade
Emacs's auto-indent to do what I wanted with it, I've decided to move
to an idiom in which the open brace comes right after the case
statement, and the code within it is indented the same as it would
have been without the brace. Then the whole case handler (including
the break) lives inside those braces, and you get something that looks
more like this:
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED: {
declare variables;
do stuff;
break;
}
}
This commit is a big-bang change that reformats all the complicated
case handlers I could find into the new layout. This is particularly
nice in the Pageant main function, in which almost _every_ case
handler had a bundle of variables and was long and complicated. (In
fact that's what motivated me to get round to this.) Some of the
innermost parts of the terminal escape-sequence handling are also
breathing a bit easier now the horizontal pressure on them is
relieved.
(Also, in a few cases, I was able to remove the extra braces
completely, because the only variable local to the case handler was a
loop variable which our new C99 policy allows me to move into the
initialiser clause of its for statement.)
Viewed with whitespace ignored, this is not too disruptive a change.
Downstream patches that conflict with it may need to be reapplied
using --ignore-whitespace or similar.
2020-02-16 10:49:52 +03:00
|
|
|
if (get_err(msg)) {
|
|
|
|
fail("unable to decode request");
|
|
|
|
goto responded;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2020-02-15 19:37:10 +03:00
|
|
|
|
Formatting change to braces around one case of a switch.
Sometimes, within a switch statement, you want to declare local
variables specific to the handler for one particular case. Until now
I've mostly been writing this in the form
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED:
{
declare variables;
do stuff;
}
break;
}
which is ugly because the two pieces of essentially similar code
appear at different indent levels, and also inconvenient because you
have less horizontal space available to write the complicated case
handler in - particuarly undesirable because _complicated_ case
handlers are the ones most likely to need all the space they can get!
After encountering a rather nicer idiom in the LLVM source code, and
after a bit of hackery this morning figuring out how to persuade
Emacs's auto-indent to do what I wanted with it, I've decided to move
to an idiom in which the open brace comes right after the case
statement, and the code within it is indented the same as it would
have been without the brace. Then the whole case handler (including
the break) lives inside those braces, and you get something that looks
more like this:
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED: {
declare variables;
do stuff;
break;
}
}
This commit is a big-bang change that reformats all the complicated
case handlers I could find into the new layout. This is particularly
nice in the Pageant main function, in which almost _every_ case
handler had a bundle of variables and was long and complicated. (In
fact that's what motivated me to get round to this.) Some of the
innermost parts of the terminal escape-sequence handling are also
breathing a bit easier now the horizontal pressure on them is
relieved.
(Also, in a few cases, I was able to remove the extra braces
completely, because the only variable local to the case handler was a
loop variable which our new C99 policy allows me to move into the
initialiser clause of its for statement.)
Viewed with whitespace ignored, this is not too disruptive a change.
Downstream patches that conflict with it may need to be reapplied
using --ignore-whitespace or similar.
2020-02-16 10:49:52 +03:00
|
|
|
BinarySource src[1];
|
|
|
|
const char *error;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
strbuf *public_blob = strbuf_new();
|
|
|
|
char *comment;
|
2020-02-15 19:37:10 +03:00
|
|
|
|
Formatting change to braces around one case of a switch.
Sometimes, within a switch statement, you want to declare local
variables specific to the handler for one particular case. Until now
I've mostly been writing this in the form
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED:
{
declare variables;
do stuff;
}
break;
}
which is ugly because the two pieces of essentially similar code
appear at different indent levels, and also inconvenient because you
have less horizontal space available to write the complicated case
handler in - particuarly undesirable because _complicated_ case
handlers are the ones most likely to need all the space they can get!
After encountering a rather nicer idiom in the LLVM source code, and
after a bit of hackery this morning figuring out how to persuade
Emacs's auto-indent to do what I wanted with it, I've decided to move
to an idiom in which the open brace comes right after the case
statement, and the code within it is indented the same as it would
have been without the brace. Then the whole case handler (including
the break) lives inside those braces, and you get something that looks
more like this:
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED: {
declare variables;
do stuff;
break;
}
}
This commit is a big-bang change that reformats all the complicated
case handlers I could find into the new layout. This is particularly
nice in the Pageant main function, in which almost _every_ case
handler had a bundle of variables and was long and complicated. (In
fact that's what motivated me to get round to this.) Some of the
innermost parts of the terminal escape-sequence handling are also
breathing a bit easier now the horizontal pressure on them is
relieved.
(Also, in a few cases, I was able to remove the extra braces
completely, because the only variable local to the case handler was a
loop variable which our new C99 policy allows me to move into the
initialiser clause of its for statement.)
Viewed with whitespace ignored, this is not too disruptive a change.
Downstream patches that conflict with it may need to be reapplied
using --ignore-whitespace or similar.
2020-02-16 10:49:52 +03:00
|
|
|
BinarySource_BARE_INIT_PL(src, keyfile);
|
|
|
|
if (!ppk_loadpub_s(src, NULL,
|
|
|
|
BinarySink_UPCAST(public_blob),
|
|
|
|
&comment, &error)) {
|
|
|
|
fail("failed to extract public key blob: %s", error);
|
|
|
|
goto add_ppk_cleanup;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (!pc->suppress_logging) {
|
|
|
|
char *fingerprint = ssh2_fingerprint_blob(
|
|
|
|
ptrlen_from_strbuf(public_blob));
|
|
|
|
pageant_client_log(pc, reqid, "add-ppk: %s %s",
|
|
|
|
fingerprint, comment);
|
|
|
|
sfree(fingerprint);
|
|
|
|
}
|
2020-02-15 19:37:10 +03:00
|
|
|
|
Formatting change to braces around one case of a switch.
Sometimes, within a switch statement, you want to declare local
variables specific to the handler for one particular case. Until now
I've mostly been writing this in the form
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED:
{
declare variables;
do stuff;
}
break;
}
which is ugly because the two pieces of essentially similar code
appear at different indent levels, and also inconvenient because you
have less horizontal space available to write the complicated case
handler in - particuarly undesirable because _complicated_ case
handlers are the ones most likely to need all the space they can get!
After encountering a rather nicer idiom in the LLVM source code, and
after a bit of hackery this morning figuring out how to persuade
Emacs's auto-indent to do what I wanted with it, I've decided to move
to an idiom in which the open brace comes right after the case
statement, and the code within it is indented the same as it would
have been without the brace. Then the whole case handler (including
the break) lives inside those braces, and you get something that looks
more like this:
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED: {
declare variables;
do stuff;
break;
}
}
This commit is a big-bang change that reformats all the complicated
case handlers I could find into the new layout. This is particularly
nice in the Pageant main function, in which almost _every_ case
handler had a bundle of variables and was long and complicated. (In
fact that's what motivated me to get round to this.) Some of the
innermost parts of the terminal escape-sequence handling are also
breathing a bit easier now the horizontal pressure on them is
relieved.
(Also, in a few cases, I was able to remove the extra braces
completely, because the only variable local to the case handler was a
loop variable which our new C99 policy allows me to move into the
initialiser clause of its for statement.)
Viewed with whitespace ignored, this is not too disruptive a change.
Downstream patches that conflict with it may need to be reapplied
using --ignore-whitespace or similar.
2020-02-16 10:49:52 +03:00
|
|
|
BinarySource_BARE_INIT_PL(src, keyfile);
|
|
|
|
bool encrypted = ppk_encrypted_s(src, NULL);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (!encrypted) {
|
|
|
|
/* If the key isn't encrypted, then we should just
|
|
|
|
* load and add it in the obvious way. */
|
|
|
|
BinarySource_BARE_INIT_PL(src, keyfile);
|
|
|
|
ssh2_userkey *skey = ppk_load_s(src, NULL, &error);
|
|
|
|
if (!skey) {
|
|
|
|
fail("failed to decode private key: %s", error);
|
|
|
|
} else if (pageant_add_ssh2_key(skey)) {
|
|
|
|
keylist_update();
|
2020-02-15 19:37:10 +03:00
|
|
|
put_byte(sb, SSH_AGENT_SUCCESS);
|
Formatting change to braces around one case of a switch.
Sometimes, within a switch statement, you want to declare local
variables specific to the handler for one particular case. Until now
I've mostly been writing this in the form
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED:
{
declare variables;
do stuff;
}
break;
}
which is ugly because the two pieces of essentially similar code
appear at different indent levels, and also inconvenient because you
have less horizontal space available to write the complicated case
handler in - particuarly undesirable because _complicated_ case
handlers are the ones most likely to need all the space they can get!
After encountering a rather nicer idiom in the LLVM source code, and
after a bit of hackery this morning figuring out how to persuade
Emacs's auto-indent to do what I wanted with it, I've decided to move
to an idiom in which the open brace comes right after the case
statement, and the code within it is indented the same as it would
have been without the brace. Then the whole case handler (including
the break) lives inside those braces, and you get something that looks
more like this:
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED: {
declare variables;
do stuff;
break;
}
}
This commit is a big-bang change that reformats all the complicated
case handlers I could find into the new layout. This is particularly
nice in the Pageant main function, in which almost _every_ case
handler had a bundle of variables and was long and complicated. (In
fact that's what motivated me to get round to this.) Some of the
innermost parts of the terminal escape-sequence handling are also
breathing a bit easier now the horizontal pressure on them is
relieved.
(Also, in a few cases, I was able to remove the extra braces
completely, because the only variable local to the case handler was a
loop variable which our new C99 policy allows me to move into the
initialiser clause of its for statement.)
Viewed with whitespace ignored, this is not too disruptive a change.
Downstream patches that conflict with it may need to be reapplied
using --ignore-whitespace or similar.
2020-02-16 10:49:52 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pageant_client_log(pc, reqid,
|
|
|
|
"reply: SSH_AGENT_SUCCESS"
|
|
|
|
" (loaded unencrypted PPK)");
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
fail("key already present");
|
|
|
|
if (skey->key)
|
|
|
|
ssh_key_free(skey->key);
|
|
|
|
if (skey->comment)
|
|
|
|
sfree(skey->comment);
|
|
|
|
sfree(skey);
|
2020-02-15 19:37:10 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
Formatting change to braces around one case of a switch.
Sometimes, within a switch statement, you want to declare local
variables specific to the handler for one particular case. Until now
I've mostly been writing this in the form
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED:
{
declare variables;
do stuff;
}
break;
}
which is ugly because the two pieces of essentially similar code
appear at different indent levels, and also inconvenient because you
have less horizontal space available to write the complicated case
handler in - particuarly undesirable because _complicated_ case
handlers are the ones most likely to need all the space they can get!
After encountering a rather nicer idiom in the LLVM source code, and
after a bit of hackery this morning figuring out how to persuade
Emacs's auto-indent to do what I wanted with it, I've decided to move
to an idiom in which the open brace comes right after the case
statement, and the code within it is indented the same as it would
have been without the brace. Then the whole case handler (including
the break) lives inside those braces, and you get something that looks
more like this:
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED: {
declare variables;
do stuff;
break;
}
}
This commit is a big-bang change that reformats all the complicated
case handlers I could find into the new layout. This is particularly
nice in the Pageant main function, in which almost _every_ case
handler had a bundle of variables and was long and complicated. (In
fact that's what motivated me to get round to this.) Some of the
innermost parts of the terminal escape-sequence handling are also
breathing a bit easier now the horizontal pressure on them is
relieved.
(Also, in a few cases, I was able to remove the extra braces
completely, because the only variable local to the case handler was a
loop variable which our new C99 policy allows me to move into the
initialiser clause of its for statement.)
Viewed with whitespace ignored, this is not too disruptive a change.
Downstream patches that conflict with it may need to be reapplied
using --ignore-whitespace or similar.
2020-02-16 10:49:52 +03:00
|
|
|
goto add_ppk_cleanup;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2020-02-15 19:37:10 +03:00
|
|
|
|
Formatting change to braces around one case of a switch.
Sometimes, within a switch statement, you want to declare local
variables specific to the handler for one particular case. Until now
I've mostly been writing this in the form
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED:
{
declare variables;
do stuff;
}
break;
}
which is ugly because the two pieces of essentially similar code
appear at different indent levels, and also inconvenient because you
have less horizontal space available to write the complicated case
handler in - particuarly undesirable because _complicated_ case
handlers are the ones most likely to need all the space they can get!
After encountering a rather nicer idiom in the LLVM source code, and
after a bit of hackery this morning figuring out how to persuade
Emacs's auto-indent to do what I wanted with it, I've decided to move
to an idiom in which the open brace comes right after the case
statement, and the code within it is indented the same as it would
have been without the brace. Then the whole case handler (including
the break) lives inside those braces, and you get something that looks
more like this:
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED: {
declare variables;
do stuff;
break;
}
}
This commit is a big-bang change that reformats all the complicated
case handlers I could find into the new layout. This is particularly
nice in the Pageant main function, in which almost _every_ case
handler had a bundle of variables and was long and complicated. (In
fact that's what motivated me to get round to this.) Some of the
innermost parts of the terminal escape-sequence handling are also
breathing a bit easier now the horizontal pressure on them is
relieved.
(Also, in a few cases, I was able to remove the extra braces
completely, because the only variable local to the case handler was a
loop variable which our new C99 policy allows me to move into the
initialiser clause of its for statement.)
Viewed with whitespace ignored, this is not too disruptive a change.
Downstream patches that conflict with it may need to be reapplied
using --ignore-whitespace or similar.
2020-02-16 10:49:52 +03:00
|
|
|
PageantKeySort sort =
|
|
|
|
keysort(2, ptrlen_from_strbuf(public_blob));
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PageantKey *pk = find234(keytree, &sort, NULL);
|
|
|
|
if (pk) {
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* This public key blob already exists in the
|
|
|
|
* keytree. Add the encrypted key file to the
|
|
|
|
* existing record, if it doesn't have one already.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
if (!pk->encrypted_key_file) {
|
|
|
|
pk->encrypted_key_file = strbuf_new_nm();
|
|
|
|
put_datapl(pk->encrypted_key_file, keyfile);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
put_byte(sb, SSH_AGENT_SUCCESS);
|
|
|
|
pageant_client_log(pc, reqid,
|
|
|
|
"reply: SSH_AGENT_SUCCESS (added"
|
|
|
|
" encrypted PPK to existing key"
|
|
|
|
" record)");
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
fail("key already present");
|
2020-02-15 19:37:10 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
Formatting change to braces around one case of a switch.
Sometimes, within a switch statement, you want to declare local
variables specific to the handler for one particular case. Until now
I've mostly been writing this in the form
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED:
{
declare variables;
do stuff;
}
break;
}
which is ugly because the two pieces of essentially similar code
appear at different indent levels, and also inconvenient because you
have less horizontal space available to write the complicated case
handler in - particuarly undesirable because _complicated_ case
handlers are the ones most likely to need all the space they can get!
After encountering a rather nicer idiom in the LLVM source code, and
after a bit of hackery this morning figuring out how to persuade
Emacs's auto-indent to do what I wanted with it, I've decided to move
to an idiom in which the open brace comes right after the case
statement, and the code within it is indented the same as it would
have been without the brace. Then the whole case handler (including
the break) lives inside those braces, and you get something that looks
more like this:
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED: {
declare variables;
do stuff;
break;
}
}
This commit is a big-bang change that reformats all the complicated
case handlers I could find into the new layout. This is particularly
nice in the Pageant main function, in which almost _every_ case
handler had a bundle of variables and was long and complicated. (In
fact that's what motivated me to get round to this.) Some of the
innermost parts of the terminal escape-sequence handling are also
breathing a bit easier now the horizontal pressure on them is
relieved.
(Also, in a few cases, I was able to remove the extra braces
completely, because the only variable local to the case handler was a
loop variable which our new C99 policy allows me to move into the
initialiser clause of its for statement.)
Viewed with whitespace ignored, this is not too disruptive a change.
Downstream patches that conflict with it may need to be reapplied
using --ignore-whitespace or similar.
2020-02-16 10:49:52 +03:00
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* We're adding a new key record containing only
|
|
|
|
* an encrypted key file.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
PageantKey *pk = snew(PageantKey);
|
|
|
|
memset(pk, 0, sizeof(PageantKey));
|
|
|
|
pk->blocked_requests.next = pk->blocked_requests.prev =
|
|
|
|
&pk->blocked_requests;
|
|
|
|
pk->sort.ssh_version = 2;
|
|
|
|
pk->public_blob = public_blob;
|
|
|
|
public_blob = NULL;
|
|
|
|
pk->sort.public_blob = ptrlen_from_strbuf(pk->public_blob);
|
|
|
|
pk->comment = dupstr(comment);
|
|
|
|
pk->encrypted_key_file = strbuf_new_nm();
|
|
|
|
put_datapl(pk->encrypted_key_file, keyfile);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PageantKey *added = add234(keytree, pk);
|
|
|
|
assert(added == pk); (void)added;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
put_byte(sb, SSH_AGENT_SUCCESS);
|
|
|
|
pageant_client_log(pc, reqid, "reply: SSH_AGENT_SUCCESS"
|
|
|
|
" (made new encrypted-only key"
|
|
|
|
" record)");
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
add_ppk_cleanup:
|
|
|
|
if (public_blob)
|
|
|
|
strbuf_free(public_blob);
|
|
|
|
sfree(comment);
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
case EXT_REENCRYPT: {
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Re-encrypt a single key, in the sense of deleting
|
|
|
|
* its unencrypted copy, returning it to the state of
|
|
|
|
* only having the encrypted PPK form stored, so that
|
|
|
|
* the next attempt to use it will have to re-prompt
|
|
|
|
* for the passphrase.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
ptrlen blob = get_string(msg);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (get_err(msg)) {
|
|
|
|
fail("unable to decode request");
|
|
|
|
goto responded;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (!pc->suppress_logging) {
|
|
|
|
char *fingerprint = ssh2_fingerprint_blob(blob);
|
|
|
|
pageant_client_log(pc, reqid, "key to re-encrypt: %s",
|
|
|
|
fingerprint);
|
|
|
|
sfree(fingerprint);
|
2020-01-07 22:56:47 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
Formatting change to braces around one case of a switch.
Sometimes, within a switch statement, you want to declare local
variables specific to the handler for one particular case. Until now
I've mostly been writing this in the form
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED:
{
declare variables;
do stuff;
}
break;
}
which is ugly because the two pieces of essentially similar code
appear at different indent levels, and also inconvenient because you
have less horizontal space available to write the complicated case
handler in - particuarly undesirable because _complicated_ case
handlers are the ones most likely to need all the space they can get!
After encountering a rather nicer idiom in the LLVM source code, and
after a bit of hackery this morning figuring out how to persuade
Emacs's auto-indent to do what I wanted with it, I've decided to move
to an idiom in which the open brace comes right after the case
statement, and the code within it is indented the same as it would
have been without the brace. Then the whole case handler (including
the break) lives inside those braces, and you get something that looks
more like this:
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED: {
declare variables;
do stuff;
break;
}
}
This commit is a big-bang change that reformats all the complicated
case handlers I could find into the new layout. This is particularly
nice in the Pageant main function, in which almost _every_ case
handler had a bundle of variables and was long and complicated. (In
fact that's what motivated me to get round to this.) Some of the
innermost parts of the terminal escape-sequence handling are also
breathing a bit easier now the horizontal pressure on them is
relieved.
(Also, in a few cases, I was able to remove the extra braces
completely, because the only variable local to the case handler was a
loop variable which our new C99 policy allows me to move into the
initialiser clause of its for statement.)
Viewed with whitespace ignored, this is not too disruptive a change.
Downstream patches that conflict with it may need to be reapplied
using --ignore-whitespace or similar.
2020-02-16 10:49:52 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PageantKey *pk = findkey2(blob);
|
|
|
|
if (!pk) {
|
|
|
|
fail("key not found");
|
|
|
|
goto responded;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pageant_client_log(pc, reqid,
|
|
|
|
"found with comment: %s", pk->comment);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (!reencrypt_key(pk)) {
|
|
|
|
fail("this key couldn't be re-encrypted");
|
|
|
|
goto responded;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
put_byte(sb, SSH_AGENT_SUCCESS);
|
|
|
|
pageant_client_log(pc, reqid, "reply: SSH_AGENT_SUCCESS");
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
case EXT_REENCRYPT_ALL: {
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Re-encrypt all keys that have an encrypted form
|
|
|
|
* stored. Usually, returns success, but with a uint32
|
|
|
|
* appended indicating how many keys remain
|
|
|
|
* unencrypted. The exception is if there is at least
|
|
|
|
* one key in the agent and _no_ key was successfully
|
|
|
|
* re-encrypted; in that situation we've done nothing,
|
|
|
|
* and the client didn't _want_ us to do nothing, so
|
|
|
|
* we return failure.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* (Rationale: the 'failure' message ought to be
|
|
|
|
* atomic, that is, you shouldn't return failure
|
|
|
|
* having made a state change.)
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
unsigned nfailures = 0, nsuccesses = 0;
|
|
|
|
PageantKey *pk;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for (int i = 0; (pk = index234(keytree, i)) != NULL; i++) {
|
|
|
|
if (reencrypt_key(pk))
|
|
|
|
nsuccesses++;
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
nfailures++;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (nsuccesses == 0 && nfailures > 0) {
|
|
|
|
fail("no key could be re-encrypted");
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
put_byte(sb, SSH_AGENT_SUCCESS);
|
|
|
|
put_uint32(sb, nfailures);
|
|
|
|
pageant_client_log(pc, reqid, "reply: SSH_AGENT_SUCCESS "
|
|
|
|
"(%u keys re-encrypted, %u failures)",
|
|
|
|
nsuccesses, nfailures);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2020-01-07 22:56:47 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
break;
|
Formatting change to braces around one case of a switch.
Sometimes, within a switch statement, you want to declare local
variables specific to the handler for one particular case. Until now
I've mostly been writing this in the form
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED:
{
declare variables;
do stuff;
}
break;
}
which is ugly because the two pieces of essentially similar code
appear at different indent levels, and also inconvenient because you
have less horizontal space available to write the complicated case
handler in - particuarly undesirable because _complicated_ case
handlers are the ones most likely to need all the space they can get!
After encountering a rather nicer idiom in the LLVM source code, and
after a bit of hackery this morning figuring out how to persuade
Emacs's auto-indent to do what I wanted with it, I've decided to move
to an idiom in which the open brace comes right after the case
statement, and the code within it is indented the same as it would
have been without the brace. Then the whole case handler (including
the break) lives inside those braces, and you get something that looks
more like this:
switch (discriminant) {
case SIMPLE:
do stuff;
break;
case COMPLICATED: {
declare variables;
do stuff;
break;
}
}
This commit is a big-bang change that reformats all the complicated
case handlers I could find into the new layout. This is particularly
nice in the Pageant main function, in which almost _every_ case
handler had a bundle of variables and was long and complicated. (In
fact that's what motivated me to get round to this.) Some of the
innermost parts of the terminal escape-sequence handling are also
breathing a bit easier now the horizontal pressure on them is
relieved.
(Also, in a few cases, I was able to remove the extra braces
completely, because the only variable local to the case handler was a
loop variable which our new C99 policy allows me to move into the
initialiser clause of its for statement.)
Viewed with whitespace ignored, this is not too disruptive a change.
Downstream patches that conflict with it may need to be reapplied
using --ignore-whitespace or similar.
2020-02-16 10:49:52 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
2015-05-05 22:16:19 +03:00
|
|
|
default:
|
Pageant: new asynchronous internal APIs.
This is a pure refactoring: no functional change expected.
This commit introduces two new small vtable-style APIs. One is
PageantClient, which identifies a particular client of the Pageant
'core' (meaning the code that handles each individual request). This
changes pageant_handle_msg into an asynchronous operation: you pass in
an agent request message and an identifier, and at some later point,
the got_response method in your PageantClient will be called with the
answer (and the same identifier, to allow you to match requests to
responses). The trait vtable also contains a logging system.
The main importance of PageantClient, and the reason why it has to
exist instead of just passing pageant_handle_msg a bare callback
function pointer and context parameter, is that it provides robustness
if a client stops existing while a request is still pending. You call
pageant_unregister_client, and any unfinished requests associated with
that client in the Pageant core will be cleaned up, so that you're
guaranteed that after the unregister operation, no stray callbacks
will happen with a stale pointer to that client.
The WM_COPYDATA interface of Windows Pageant is a direct client of
this API. The other client is PageantListener, the system that lives
in pageant.c and handles stream-based agent connections for both Unix
Pageant and the new Windows named-pipe IPC. More specifically, each
individual connection to the listening socket is a separate
PageantClient, which means that if a socket is closed abruptly or
suffers an OS error, that client can be unregistered and any pending
requests cancelled without disrupting other connections.
Users of PageantListener have a second client vtable they can use,
called PageantListenerClient. That contains _only_ logging facilities,
and at the moment, only Unix Pageant bothers to use it (and even that
only in debugging mode).
Finally, internally to the Pageant core, there's a new trait called
PageantAsyncOp which describes an agent request in the process of
being handled. But at the moment, it has only one trivial
implementation, which is handed the full response message already
constructed, and on the next toplevel callback, passes it back to the
PageantClient.
2020-01-25 20:24:28 +03:00
|
|
|
pageant_client_log(pc, reqid, "request: unknown message type %d",
|
|
|
|
type);
|
2020-02-10 23:45:31 +03:00
|
|
|
fail("unrecognised message");
|
2019-09-08 22:29:00 +03:00
|
|
|
break;
|
2015-05-05 22:16:19 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2020-02-10 23:45:31 +03:00
|
|
|
#undef fail
|
|
|
|
|
Pageant: new asynchronous internal APIs.
This is a pure refactoring: no functional change expected.
This commit introduces two new small vtable-style APIs. One is
PageantClient, which identifies a particular client of the Pageant
'core' (meaning the code that handles each individual request). This
changes pageant_handle_msg into an asynchronous operation: you pass in
an agent request message and an identifier, and at some later point,
the got_response method in your PageantClient will be called with the
answer (and the same identifier, to allow you to match requests to
responses). The trait vtable also contains a logging system.
The main importance of PageantClient, and the reason why it has to
exist instead of just passing pageant_handle_msg a bare callback
function pointer and context parameter, is that it provides robustness
if a client stops existing while a request is still pending. You call
pageant_unregister_client, and any unfinished requests associated with
that client in the Pageant core will be cleaned up, so that you're
guaranteed that after the unregister operation, no stray callbacks
will happen with a stale pointer to that client.
The WM_COPYDATA interface of Windows Pageant is a direct client of
this API. The other client is PageantListener, the system that lives
in pageant.c and handles stream-based agent connections for both Unix
Pageant and the new Windows named-pipe IPC. More specifically, each
individual connection to the listening socket is a separate
PageantClient, which means that if a socket is closed abruptly or
suffers an OS error, that client can be unregistered and any pending
requests cancelled without disrupting other connections.
Users of PageantListener have a second client vtable they can use,
called PageantListenerClient. That contains _only_ logging facilities,
and at the moment, only Unix Pageant bothers to use it (and even that
only in debugging mode).
Finally, internally to the Pageant core, there's a new trait called
PageantAsyncOp which describes an agent request in the process of
being handled. But at the moment, it has only one trivial
implementation, which is handed the full response message already
constructed, and on the next toplevel callback, passes it back to the
PageantClient.
2020-01-25 20:24:28 +03:00
|
|
|
responded:;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PageantImmOp *io = snew(PageantImmOp);
|
|
|
|
io->pao.vt = &immop_vtable;
|
|
|
|
io->pao.info = pc->info;
|
|
|
|
io->pao.cr.prev = pc->info->head.prev;
|
|
|
|
io->pao.cr.next = &pc->info->head;
|
|
|
|
io->pao.reqid = reqid;
|
|
|
|
io->response = sb;
|
|
|
|
io->crLine = 0;
|
2020-02-08 19:36:55 +03:00
|
|
|
return &io->pao;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
void pageant_handle_msg(PageantClient *pc, PageantClientRequestId *reqid,
|
|
|
|
ptrlen msgpl)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
PageantAsyncOp *pao = pageant_make_op(pc, reqid, msgpl);
|
|
|
|
queue_toplevel_callback(pageant_async_op_callback, pao);
|
2015-05-05 22:16:19 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
void pageant_init(void)
|
|
|
|
{
|
2018-10-29 22:50:29 +03:00
|
|
|
pageant_local = true;
|
2020-01-06 23:59:07 +03:00
|
|
|
keytree = newtree234(cmpkeys);
|
2015-05-05 22:16:19 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2019-01-04 09:51:44 +03:00
|
|
|
RSAKey *pageant_nth_ssh1_key(int i)
|
2015-05-05 22:16:19 +03:00
|
|
|
{
|
2020-01-06 23:59:07 +03:00
|
|
|
PageantKey *pk = index234(keytree, find_first_key_for_version(1) + i);
|
|
|
|
if (pk && pk->sort.ssh_version == 1)
|
|
|
|
return pk->rkey;
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
return NULL;
|
2015-05-05 22:16:19 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2019-01-04 09:51:44 +03:00
|
|
|
ssh2_userkey *pageant_nth_ssh2_key(int i)
|
2015-05-05 22:16:19 +03:00
|
|
|
{
|
2020-01-06 23:59:07 +03:00
|
|
|
PageantKey *pk = index234(keytree, find_first_key_for_version(2) + i);
|
|
|
|
if (pk && pk->sort.ssh_version == 2)
|
|
|
|
return pk->skey;
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
return NULL;
|
2015-05-05 22:16:19 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2019-01-04 09:51:44 +03:00
|
|
|
bool pageant_delete_ssh1_key(RSAKey *rkey)
|
2015-05-05 22:16:19 +03:00
|
|
|
{
|
2020-01-06 23:59:07 +03:00
|
|
|
strbuf *blob = makeblob1(rkey);
|
|
|
|
PageantKeySort sort = keysort(1, ptrlen_from_strbuf(blob));
|
|
|
|
PageantKey *deleted = del234(keytree, &sort);
|
|
|
|
strbuf_free(blob);
|
|
|
|
|
2015-05-05 22:16:19 +03:00
|
|
|
if (!deleted)
|
2018-10-29 22:50:29 +03:00
|
|
|
return false;
|
2020-01-06 23:59:07 +03:00
|
|
|
assert(deleted->sort.ssh_version == 1);
|
|
|
|
assert(deleted->rkey == rkey);
|
2018-10-29 22:50:29 +03:00
|
|
|
return true;
|
2015-05-05 22:16:19 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2019-01-04 09:51:44 +03:00
|
|
|
bool pageant_delete_ssh2_key(ssh2_userkey *skey)
|
2015-05-05 22:16:19 +03:00
|
|
|
{
|
2020-01-06 23:59:07 +03:00
|
|
|
strbuf *blob = makeblob2(skey);
|
|
|
|
PageantKeySort sort = keysort(2, ptrlen_from_strbuf(blob));
|
|
|
|
PageantKey *deleted = del234(keytree, &sort);
|
|
|
|
strbuf_free(blob);
|
|
|
|
|
2015-05-05 22:16:19 +03:00
|
|
|
if (!deleted)
|
2018-10-29 22:50:29 +03:00
|
|
|
return false;
|
2020-01-06 23:59:07 +03:00
|
|
|
assert(deleted->sort.ssh_version == 2);
|
|
|
|
assert(deleted->skey == skey);
|
2018-10-29 22:50:29 +03:00
|
|
|
return true;
|
2015-05-05 22:16:19 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
2015-05-05 22:16:20 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* ----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
* The agent plug.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
2019-02-28 21:05:38 +03:00
|
|
|
* An extra coroutine macro, specific to this code which is consuming
|
|
|
|
* 'const char *data'.
|
2015-05-05 22:16:20 +03:00
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
#define crGetChar(c) do \
|
|
|
|
{ \
|
|
|
|
while (len == 0) { \
|
2016-06-03 01:03:24 +03:00
|
|
|
*crLine =__LINE__; return; case __LINE__:; \
|
2015-05-05 22:16:20 +03:00
|
|
|
} \
|
|
|
|
len--; \
|
|
|
|
(c) = (unsigned char)*data++; \
|
|
|
|
} while (0)
|
|
|
|
|
Pageant: new asynchronous internal APIs.
This is a pure refactoring: no functional change expected.
This commit introduces two new small vtable-style APIs. One is
PageantClient, which identifies a particular client of the Pageant
'core' (meaning the code that handles each individual request). This
changes pageant_handle_msg into an asynchronous operation: you pass in
an agent request message and an identifier, and at some later point,
the got_response method in your PageantClient will be called with the
answer (and the same identifier, to allow you to match requests to
responses). The trait vtable also contains a logging system.
The main importance of PageantClient, and the reason why it has to
exist instead of just passing pageant_handle_msg a bare callback
function pointer and context parameter, is that it provides robustness
if a client stops existing while a request is still pending. You call
pageant_unregister_client, and any unfinished requests associated with
that client in the Pageant core will be cleaned up, so that you're
guaranteed that after the unregister operation, no stray callbacks
will happen with a stale pointer to that client.
The WM_COPYDATA interface of Windows Pageant is a direct client of
this API. The other client is PageantListener, the system that lives
in pageant.c and handles stream-based agent connections for both Unix
Pageant and the new Windows named-pipe IPC. More specifically, each
individual connection to the listening socket is a separate
PageantClient, which means that if a socket is closed abruptly or
suffers an OS error, that client can be unregistered and any pending
requests cancelled without disrupting other connections.
Users of PageantListener have a second client vtable they can use,
called PageantListenerClient. That contains _only_ logging facilities,
and at the moment, only Unix Pageant bothers to use it (and even that
only in debugging mode).
Finally, internally to the Pageant core, there's a new trait called
PageantAsyncOp which describes an agent request in the process of
being handled. But at the moment, it has only one trivial
implementation, which is handed the full response message already
constructed, and on the next toplevel callback, passes it back to the
PageantClient.
2020-01-25 20:24:28 +03:00
|
|
|
struct pageant_conn_queued_response {
|
|
|
|
struct pageant_conn_queued_response *next, *prev;
|
|
|
|
size_t req_index; /* for indexing requests in log messages */
|
|
|
|
strbuf *sb;
|
|
|
|
PageantClientRequestId reqid;
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
2015-05-05 22:16:20 +03:00
|
|
|
struct pageant_conn_state {
|
Get rid of lots of implicit pointer types.
All the main backend structures - Ssh, Telnet, Pty, Serial etc - now
describe structure types themselves rather than pointers to them. The
same goes for the codebase-wide trait types Socket and Plug, and the
supporting types SockAddr and Pinger.
All those things that were typedefed as pointers are older types; the
newer ones have the explicit * at the point of use, because that's
what I now seem to be preferring. But whichever one of those is
better, inconsistently using a mixture of the two styles is worse, so
let's make everything consistent.
A few types are still implicitly pointers, such as Bignum and some of
the GSSAPI types; generally this is either because they have to be
void *, or because they're typedefed differently on different
platforms and aren't always pointers at all. Can't be helped. But I've
got rid of the main ones, at least.
2018-10-04 21:10:23 +03:00
|
|
|
Socket *connsock;
|
Pageant: new asynchronous internal APIs.
This is a pure refactoring: no functional change expected.
This commit introduces two new small vtable-style APIs. One is
PageantClient, which identifies a particular client of the Pageant
'core' (meaning the code that handles each individual request). This
changes pageant_handle_msg into an asynchronous operation: you pass in
an agent request message and an identifier, and at some later point,
the got_response method in your PageantClient will be called with the
answer (and the same identifier, to allow you to match requests to
responses). The trait vtable also contains a logging system.
The main importance of PageantClient, and the reason why it has to
exist instead of just passing pageant_handle_msg a bare callback
function pointer and context parameter, is that it provides robustness
if a client stops existing while a request is still pending. You call
pageant_unregister_client, and any unfinished requests associated with
that client in the Pageant core will be cleaned up, so that you're
guaranteed that after the unregister operation, no stray callbacks
will happen with a stale pointer to that client.
The WM_COPYDATA interface of Windows Pageant is a direct client of
this API. The other client is PageantListener, the system that lives
in pageant.c and handles stream-based agent connections for both Unix
Pageant and the new Windows named-pipe IPC. More specifically, each
individual connection to the listening socket is a separate
PageantClient, which means that if a socket is closed abruptly or
suffers an OS error, that client can be unregistered and any pending
requests cancelled without disrupting other connections.
Users of PageantListener have a second client vtable they can use,
called PageantListenerClient. That contains _only_ logging facilities,
and at the moment, only Unix Pageant bothers to use it (and even that
only in debugging mode).
Finally, internally to the Pageant core, there's a new trait called
PageantAsyncOp which describes an agent request in the process of
being handled. But at the moment, it has only one trivial
implementation, which is handed the full response message already
constructed, and on the next toplevel callback, passes it back to the
PageantClient.
2020-01-25 20:24:28 +03:00
|
|
|
PageantListenerClient *plc;
|
2015-05-05 22:16:20 +03:00
|
|
|
unsigned char lenbuf[4], pktbuf[AGENT_MAX_MSGLEN];
|
|
|
|
unsigned len, got;
|
Convert a lot of 'int' variables to 'bool'.
My normal habit these days, in new code, is to treat int and bool as
_almost_ completely separate types. I'm still willing to use C's
implicit test for zero on an integer (e.g. 'if (!blob.len)' is fine,
no need to spell it out as blob.len != 0), but generally, if a
variable is going to be conceptually a boolean, I like to declare it
bool and assign to it using 'true' or 'false' rather than 0 or 1.
PuTTY is an exception, because it predates the C99 bool, and I've
stuck to its existing coding style even when adding new code to it.
But it's been annoying me more and more, so now that I've decided C99
bool is an acceptable thing to require from our toolchain in the first
place, here's a quite thorough trawl through the source doing
'boolification'. Many variables and function parameters are now typed
as bool rather than int; many assignments of 0 or 1 to those variables
are now spelled 'true' or 'false'.
I managed this thorough conversion with the help of a custom clang
plugin that I wrote to trawl the AST and apply heuristics to point out
where things might want changing. So I've even managed to do a decent
job on parts of the code I haven't looked at in years!
To make the plugin's work easier, I pushed platform front ends
generally in the direction of using standard 'bool' in preference to
platform-specific boolean types like Windows BOOL or GTK's gboolean;
I've left the platform booleans in places they _have_ to be for the
platform APIs to work right, but variables only used by my own code
have been converted wherever I found them.
In a few places there are int values that look very like booleans in
_most_ of the places they're used, but have a rarely-used third value,
or a distinction between different nonzero values that most users
don't care about. In these cases, I've _removed_ uses of 'true' and
'false' for the return values, to emphasise that there's something
more subtle going on than a simple boolean answer:
- the 'multisel' field in dialog.h's list box structure, for which
the GTK front end in particular recognises a difference between 1
and 2 but nearly everything else treats as boolean
- the 'urgent' parameter to plug_receive, where 1 vs 2 tells you
something about the specific location of the urgent pointer, but
most clients only care about 0 vs 'something nonzero'
- the return value of wc_match, where -1 indicates a syntax error in
the wildcard.
- the return values from SSH-1 RSA-key loading functions, which use
-1 for 'wrong passphrase' and 0 for all other failures (so any
caller which already knows it's not loading an _encrypted private_
key can treat them as boolean)
- term->esc_query, and the 'query' parameter in toggle_mode in
terminal.c, which _usually_ hold 0 for ESC[123h or 1 for ESC[?123h,
but can also hold -1 for some other intervening character that we
don't support.
In a few places there's an integer that I haven't turned into a bool
even though it really _can_ only take values 0 or 1 (and, as above,
tried to make the call sites consistent in not calling those values
true and false), on the grounds that I thought it would make it more
confusing to imply that the 0 value was in some sense 'negative' or
bad and the 1 positive or good:
- the return value of plug_accepting uses the POSIXish convention of
0=success and nonzero=error; I think if I made it bool then I'd
also want to reverse its sense, and that's a job for a separate
piece of work.
- the 'screen' parameter to lineptr() in terminal.c, where 0 and 1
represent the default and alternate screens. There's no obvious
reason why one of those should be considered 'true' or 'positive'
or 'success' - they're just indices - so I've left it as int.
ssh_scp_recv had particularly confusing semantics for its previous int
return value: its call sites used '<= 0' to check for error, but it
never actually returned a negative number, just 0 or 1. Now the
function and its call sites agree that it's a bool.
In a couple of places I've renamed variables called 'ret', because I
don't like that name any more - it's unclear whether it means the
return value (in preparation) for the _containing_ function or the
return value received from a subroutine call, and occasionally I've
accidentally used the same variable for both and introduced a bug. So
where one of those got in my way, I've renamed it to 'toret' or 'retd'
(the latter short for 'returned') in line with my usual modern
practice, but I haven't done a thorough job of finding all of them.
Finally, one amusing side effect of doing this is that I've had to
separate quite a few chained assignments. It used to be perfectly fine
to write 'a = b = c = TRUE' when a,b,c were int and TRUE was just a
the 'true' defined by stdbool.h, that idiom provokes a warning from
gcc: 'suggest parentheses around assignment used as truth value'!
2018-11-02 22:23:19 +03:00
|
|
|
bool real_packet;
|
Pageant: new asynchronous internal APIs.
This is a pure refactoring: no functional change expected.
This commit introduces two new small vtable-style APIs. One is
PageantClient, which identifies a particular client of the Pageant
'core' (meaning the code that handles each individual request). This
changes pageant_handle_msg into an asynchronous operation: you pass in
an agent request message and an identifier, and at some later point,
the got_response method in your PageantClient will be called with the
answer (and the same identifier, to allow you to match requests to
responses). The trait vtable also contains a logging system.
The main importance of PageantClient, and the reason why it has to
exist instead of just passing pageant_handle_msg a bare callback
function pointer and context parameter, is that it provides robustness
if a client stops existing while a request is still pending. You call
pageant_unregister_client, and any unfinished requests associated with
that client in the Pageant core will be cleaned up, so that you're
guaranteed that after the unregister operation, no stray callbacks
will happen with a stale pointer to that client.
The WM_COPYDATA interface of Windows Pageant is a direct client of
this API. The other client is PageantListener, the system that lives
in pageant.c and handles stream-based agent connections for both Unix
Pageant and the new Windows named-pipe IPC. More specifically, each
individual connection to the listening socket is a separate
PageantClient, which means that if a socket is closed abruptly or
suffers an OS error, that client can be unregistered and any pending
requests cancelled without disrupting other connections.
Users of PageantListener have a second client vtable they can use,
called PageantListenerClient. That contains _only_ logging facilities,
and at the moment, only Unix Pageant bothers to use it (and even that
only in debugging mode).
Finally, internally to the Pageant core, there's a new trait called
PageantAsyncOp which describes an agent request in the process of
being handled. But at the moment, it has only one trivial
implementation, which is handed the full response message already
constructed, and on the next toplevel callback, passes it back to the
PageantClient.
2020-01-25 20:24:28 +03:00
|
|
|
size_t conn_index; /* for indexing connections in log messages */
|
|
|
|
size_t req_index; /* for indexing requests in log messages */
|
2015-05-05 22:16:20 +03:00
|
|
|
int crLine; /* for coroutine in pageant_conn_receive */
|
2018-05-27 11:29:33 +03:00
|
|
|
|
Pageant: new asynchronous internal APIs.
This is a pure refactoring: no functional change expected.
This commit introduces two new small vtable-style APIs. One is
PageantClient, which identifies a particular client of the Pageant
'core' (meaning the code that handles each individual request). This
changes pageant_handle_msg into an asynchronous operation: you pass in
an agent request message and an identifier, and at some later point,
the got_response method in your PageantClient will be called with the
answer (and the same identifier, to allow you to match requests to
responses). The trait vtable also contains a logging system.
The main importance of PageantClient, and the reason why it has to
exist instead of just passing pageant_handle_msg a bare callback
function pointer and context parameter, is that it provides robustness
if a client stops existing while a request is still pending. You call
pageant_unregister_client, and any unfinished requests associated with
that client in the Pageant core will be cleaned up, so that you're
guaranteed that after the unregister operation, no stray callbacks
will happen with a stale pointer to that client.
The WM_COPYDATA interface of Windows Pageant is a direct client of
this API. The other client is PageantListener, the system that lives
in pageant.c and handles stream-based agent connections for both Unix
Pageant and the new Windows named-pipe IPC. More specifically, each
individual connection to the listening socket is a separate
PageantClient, which means that if a socket is closed abruptly or
suffers an OS error, that client can be unregistered and any pending
requests cancelled without disrupting other connections.
Users of PageantListener have a second client vtable they can use,
called PageantListenerClient. That contains _only_ logging facilities,
and at the moment, only Unix Pageant bothers to use it (and even that
only in debugging mode).
Finally, internally to the Pageant core, there's a new trait called
PageantAsyncOp which describes an agent request in the process of
being handled. But at the moment, it has only one trivial
implementation, which is handed the full response message already
constructed, and on the next toplevel callback, passes it back to the
PageantClient.
2020-01-25 20:24:28 +03:00
|
|
|
struct pageant_conn_queued_response response_queue;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PageantClient pc;
|
2018-10-05 09:24:16 +03:00
|
|
|
Plug plug;
|
2015-05-05 22:16:20 +03:00
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
Get rid of lots of implicit pointer types.
All the main backend structures - Ssh, Telnet, Pty, Serial etc - now
describe structure types themselves rather than pointers to them. The
same goes for the codebase-wide trait types Socket and Plug, and the
supporting types SockAddr and Pinger.
All those things that were typedefed as pointers are older types; the
newer ones have the explicit * at the point of use, because that's
what I now seem to be preferring. But whichever one of those is
better, inconsistently using a mixture of the two styles is worse, so
let's make everything consistent.
A few types are still implicitly pointers, such as Bignum and some of
the GSSAPI types; generally this is either because they have to be
void *, or because they're typedefed differently on different
platforms and aren't always pointers at all. Can't be helped. But I've
got rid of the main ones, at least.
2018-10-04 21:10:23 +03:00
|
|
|
static void pageant_conn_closing(Plug *plug, const char *error_msg,
|
2019-09-08 22:29:00 +03:00
|
|
|
int error_code, bool calling_back)
|
2015-05-05 22:16:20 +03:00
|
|
|
{
|
2018-10-06 01:49:08 +03:00
|
|
|
struct pageant_conn_state *pc = container_of(
|
2018-10-05 09:24:16 +03:00
|
|
|
plug, struct pageant_conn_state, plug);
|
2015-05-06 21:32:26 +03:00
|
|
|
if (error_msg)
|
2020-01-26 13:59:07 +03:00
|
|
|
pageant_listener_client_log(pc->plc, "c#%"SIZEu": error: %s",
|
Pageant: new asynchronous internal APIs.
This is a pure refactoring: no functional change expected.
This commit introduces two new small vtable-style APIs. One is
PageantClient, which identifies a particular client of the Pageant
'core' (meaning the code that handles each individual request). This
changes pageant_handle_msg into an asynchronous operation: you pass in
an agent request message and an identifier, and at some later point,
the got_response method in your PageantClient will be called with the
answer (and the same identifier, to allow you to match requests to
responses). The trait vtable also contains a logging system.
The main importance of PageantClient, and the reason why it has to
exist instead of just passing pageant_handle_msg a bare callback
function pointer and context parameter, is that it provides robustness
if a client stops existing while a request is still pending. You call
pageant_unregister_client, and any unfinished requests associated with
that client in the Pageant core will be cleaned up, so that you're
guaranteed that after the unregister operation, no stray callbacks
will happen with a stale pointer to that client.
The WM_COPYDATA interface of Windows Pageant is a direct client of
this API. The other client is PageantListener, the system that lives
in pageant.c and handles stream-based agent connections for both Unix
Pageant and the new Windows named-pipe IPC. More specifically, each
individual connection to the listening socket is a separate
PageantClient, which means that if a socket is closed abruptly or
suffers an OS error, that client can be unregistered and any pending
requests cancelled without disrupting other connections.
Users of PageantListener have a second client vtable they can use,
called PageantListenerClient. That contains _only_ logging facilities,
and at the moment, only Unix Pageant bothers to use it (and even that
only in debugging mode).
Finally, internally to the Pageant core, there's a new trait called
PageantAsyncOp which describes an agent request in the process of
being handled. But at the moment, it has only one trivial
implementation, which is handed the full response message already
constructed, and on the next toplevel callback, passes it back to the
PageantClient.
2020-01-25 20:24:28 +03:00
|
|
|
pc->conn_index, error_msg);
|
2015-05-06 21:32:26 +03:00
|
|
|
else
|
2020-01-26 13:59:07 +03:00
|
|
|
pageant_listener_client_log(pc->plc, "c#%"SIZEu": connection closed",
|
Pageant: new asynchronous internal APIs.
This is a pure refactoring: no functional change expected.
This commit introduces two new small vtable-style APIs. One is
PageantClient, which identifies a particular client of the Pageant
'core' (meaning the code that handles each individual request). This
changes pageant_handle_msg into an asynchronous operation: you pass in
an agent request message and an identifier, and at some later point,
the got_response method in your PageantClient will be called with the
answer (and the same identifier, to allow you to match requests to
responses). The trait vtable also contains a logging system.
The main importance of PageantClient, and the reason why it has to
exist instead of just passing pageant_handle_msg a bare callback
function pointer and context parameter, is that it provides robustness
if a client stops existing while a request is still pending. You call
pageant_unregister_client, and any unfinished requests associated with
that client in the Pageant core will be cleaned up, so that you're
guaranteed that after the unregister operation, no stray callbacks
will happen with a stale pointer to that client.
The WM_COPYDATA interface of Windows Pageant is a direct client of
this API. The other client is PageantListener, the system that lives
in pageant.c and handles stream-based agent connections for both Unix
Pageant and the new Windows named-pipe IPC. More specifically, each
individual connection to the listening socket is a separate
PageantClient, which means that if a socket is closed abruptly or
suffers an OS error, that client can be unregistered and any pending
requests cancelled without disrupting other connections.
Users of PageantListener have a second client vtable they can use,
called PageantListenerClient. That contains _only_ logging facilities,
and at the moment, only Unix Pageant bothers to use it (and even that
only in debugging mode).
Finally, internally to the Pageant core, there's a new trait called
PageantAsyncOp which describes an agent request in the process of
being handled. But at the moment, it has only one trivial
implementation, which is handed the full response message already
constructed, and on the next toplevel callback, passes it back to the
PageantClient.
2020-01-25 20:24:28 +03:00
|
|
|
pc->conn_index);
|
2015-05-05 22:16:20 +03:00
|
|
|
sk_close(pc->connsock);
|
Pageant: new asynchronous internal APIs.
This is a pure refactoring: no functional change expected.
This commit introduces two new small vtable-style APIs. One is
PageantClient, which identifies a particular client of the Pageant
'core' (meaning the code that handles each individual request). This
changes pageant_handle_msg into an asynchronous operation: you pass in
an agent request message and an identifier, and at some later point,
the got_response method in your PageantClient will be called with the
answer (and the same identifier, to allow you to match requests to
responses). The trait vtable also contains a logging system.
The main importance of PageantClient, and the reason why it has to
exist instead of just passing pageant_handle_msg a bare callback
function pointer and context parameter, is that it provides robustness
if a client stops existing while a request is still pending. You call
pageant_unregister_client, and any unfinished requests associated with
that client in the Pageant core will be cleaned up, so that you're
guaranteed that after the unregister operation, no stray callbacks
will happen with a stale pointer to that client.
The WM_COPYDATA interface of Windows Pageant is a direct client of
this API. The other client is PageantListener, the system that lives
in pageant.c and handles stream-based agent connections for both Unix
Pageant and the new Windows named-pipe IPC. More specifically, each
individual connection to the listening socket is a separate
PageantClient, which means that if a socket is closed abruptly or
suffers an OS error, that client can be unregistered and any pending
requests cancelled without disrupting other connections.
Users of PageantListener have a second client vtable they can use,
called PageantListenerClient. That contains _only_ logging facilities,
and at the moment, only Unix Pageant bothers to use it (and even that
only in debugging mode).
Finally, internally to the Pageant core, there's a new trait called
PageantAsyncOp which describes an agent request in the process of
being handled. But at the moment, it has only one trivial
implementation, which is handed the full response message already
constructed, and on the next toplevel callback, passes it back to the
PageantClient.
2020-01-25 20:24:28 +03:00
|
|
|
pageant_unregister_client(&pc->pc);
|
2015-05-05 22:16:20 +03:00
|
|
|
sfree(pc);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2019-02-06 23:42:44 +03:00
|
|
|
static void pageant_conn_sent(Plug *plug, size_t bufsize)
|
2015-05-05 22:16:20 +03:00
|
|
|
{
|
2018-10-06 01:49:08 +03:00
|
|
|
/* struct pageant_conn_state *pc = container_of(
|
2018-10-05 09:24:16 +03:00
|
|
|
plug, struct pageant_conn_state, plug); */
|
2015-05-05 22:16:20 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* We do nothing here, because we expect that there won't be a
|
|
|
|
* need to throttle and unthrottle the connection to an agent -
|
|
|
|
* clients will typically not send many requests, and will wait
|
|
|
|
* until they receive each reply before sending a new request.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
Pageant: new asynchronous internal APIs.
This is a pure refactoring: no functional change expected.
This commit introduces two new small vtable-style APIs. One is
PageantClient, which identifies a particular client of the Pageant
'core' (meaning the code that handles each individual request). This
changes pageant_handle_msg into an asynchronous operation: you pass in
an agent request message and an identifier, and at some later point,
the got_response method in your PageantClient will be called with the
answer (and the same identifier, to allow you to match requests to
responses). The trait vtable also contains a logging system.
The main importance of PageantClient, and the reason why it has to
exist instead of just passing pageant_handle_msg a bare callback
function pointer and context parameter, is that it provides robustness
if a client stops existing while a request is still pending. You call
pageant_unregister_client, and any unfinished requests associated with
that client in the Pageant core will be cleaned up, so that you're
guaranteed that after the unregister operation, no stray callbacks
will happen with a stale pointer to that client.
The WM_COPYDATA interface of Windows Pageant is a direct client of
this API. The other client is PageantListener, the system that lives
in pageant.c and handles stream-based agent connections for both Unix
Pageant and the new Windows named-pipe IPC. More specifically, each
individual connection to the listening socket is a separate
PageantClient, which means that if a socket is closed abruptly or
suffers an OS error, that client can be unregistered and any pending
requests cancelled without disrupting other connections.
Users of PageantListener have a second client vtable they can use,
called PageantListenerClient. That contains _only_ logging facilities,
and at the moment, only Unix Pageant bothers to use it (and even that
only in debugging mode).
Finally, internally to the Pageant core, there's a new trait called
PageantAsyncOp which describes an agent request in the process of
being handled. But at the moment, it has only one trivial
implementation, which is handed the full response message already
constructed, and on the next toplevel callback, passes it back to the
PageantClient.
2020-01-25 20:24:28 +03:00
|
|
|
static void pageant_conn_log(PageantClient *pc, PageantClientRequestId *reqid,
|
|
|
|
const char *fmt, va_list ap)
|
2015-05-06 21:32:26 +03:00
|
|
|
{
|
Pageant: new asynchronous internal APIs.
This is a pure refactoring: no functional change expected.
This commit introduces two new small vtable-style APIs. One is
PageantClient, which identifies a particular client of the Pageant
'core' (meaning the code that handles each individual request). This
changes pageant_handle_msg into an asynchronous operation: you pass in
an agent request message and an identifier, and at some later point,
the got_response method in your PageantClient will be called with the
answer (and the same identifier, to allow you to match requests to
responses). The trait vtable also contains a logging system.
The main importance of PageantClient, and the reason why it has to
exist instead of just passing pageant_handle_msg a bare callback
function pointer and context parameter, is that it provides robustness
if a client stops existing while a request is still pending. You call
pageant_unregister_client, and any unfinished requests associated with
that client in the Pageant core will be cleaned up, so that you're
guaranteed that after the unregister operation, no stray callbacks
will happen with a stale pointer to that client.
The WM_COPYDATA interface of Windows Pageant is a direct client of
this API. The other client is PageantListener, the system that lives
in pageant.c and handles stream-based agent connections for both Unix
Pageant and the new Windows named-pipe IPC. More specifically, each
individual connection to the listening socket is a separate
PageantClient, which means that if a socket is closed abruptly or
suffers an OS error, that client can be unregistered and any pending
requests cancelled without disrupting other connections.
Users of PageantListener have a second client vtable they can use,
called PageantListenerClient. That contains _only_ logging facilities,
and at the moment, only Unix Pageant bothers to use it (and even that
only in debugging mode).
Finally, internally to the Pageant core, there's a new trait called
PageantAsyncOp which describes an agent request in the process of
being handled. But at the moment, it has only one trivial
implementation, which is handed the full response message already
constructed, and on the next toplevel callback, passes it back to the
PageantClient.
2020-01-25 20:24:28 +03:00
|
|
|
struct pageant_conn_state *pcs =
|
|
|
|
container_of(pc, struct pageant_conn_state, pc);
|
|
|
|
struct pageant_conn_queued_response *qr =
|
|
|
|
container_of(reqid, struct pageant_conn_queued_response, reqid);
|
|
|
|
|
2015-05-06 21:32:26 +03:00
|
|
|
char *formatted = dupvprintf(fmt, ap);
|
2020-01-26 13:59:07 +03:00
|
|
|
pageant_listener_client_log(pcs->plc, "c#%"SIZEu",r#%"SIZEu": %s",
|
Pageant: new asynchronous internal APIs.
This is a pure refactoring: no functional change expected.
This commit introduces two new small vtable-style APIs. One is
PageantClient, which identifies a particular client of the Pageant
'core' (meaning the code that handles each individual request). This
changes pageant_handle_msg into an asynchronous operation: you pass in
an agent request message and an identifier, and at some later point,
the got_response method in your PageantClient will be called with the
answer (and the same identifier, to allow you to match requests to
responses). The trait vtable also contains a logging system.
The main importance of PageantClient, and the reason why it has to
exist instead of just passing pageant_handle_msg a bare callback
function pointer and context parameter, is that it provides robustness
if a client stops existing while a request is still pending. You call
pageant_unregister_client, and any unfinished requests associated with
that client in the Pageant core will be cleaned up, so that you're
guaranteed that after the unregister operation, no stray callbacks
will happen with a stale pointer to that client.
The WM_COPYDATA interface of Windows Pageant is a direct client of
this API. The other client is PageantListener, the system that lives
in pageant.c and handles stream-based agent connections for both Unix
Pageant and the new Windows named-pipe IPC. More specifically, each
individual connection to the listening socket is a separate
PageantClient, which means that if a socket is closed abruptly or
suffers an OS error, that client can be unregistered and any pending
requests cancelled without disrupting other connections.
Users of PageantListener have a second client vtable they can use,
called PageantListenerClient. That contains _only_ logging facilities,
and at the moment, only Unix Pageant bothers to use it (and even that
only in debugging mode).
Finally, internally to the Pageant core, there's a new trait called
PageantAsyncOp which describes an agent request in the process of
being handled. But at the moment, it has only one trivial
implementation, which is handed the full response message already
constructed, and on the next toplevel callback, passes it back to the
PageantClient.
2020-01-25 20:24:28 +03:00
|
|
|
pcs->conn_index, qr->req_index, formatted);
|
2015-05-06 21:32:26 +03:00
|
|
|
sfree(formatted);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
Pageant: new asynchronous internal APIs.
This is a pure refactoring: no functional change expected.
This commit introduces two new small vtable-style APIs. One is
PageantClient, which identifies a particular client of the Pageant
'core' (meaning the code that handles each individual request). This
changes pageant_handle_msg into an asynchronous operation: you pass in
an agent request message and an identifier, and at some later point,
the got_response method in your PageantClient will be called with the
answer (and the same identifier, to allow you to match requests to
responses). The trait vtable also contains a logging system.
The main importance of PageantClient, and the reason why it has to
exist instead of just passing pageant_handle_msg a bare callback
function pointer and context parameter, is that it provides robustness
if a client stops existing while a request is still pending. You call
pageant_unregister_client, and any unfinished requests associated with
that client in the Pageant core will be cleaned up, so that you're
guaranteed that after the unregister operation, no stray callbacks
will happen with a stale pointer to that client.
The WM_COPYDATA interface of Windows Pageant is a direct client of
this API. The other client is PageantListener, the system that lives
in pageant.c and handles stream-based agent connections for both Unix
Pageant and the new Windows named-pipe IPC. More specifically, each
individual connection to the listening socket is a separate
PageantClient, which means that if a socket is closed abruptly or
suffers an OS error, that client can be unregistered and any pending
requests cancelled without disrupting other connections.
Users of PageantListener have a second client vtable they can use,
called PageantListenerClient. That contains _only_ logging facilities,
and at the moment, only Unix Pageant bothers to use it (and even that
only in debugging mode).
Finally, internally to the Pageant core, there's a new trait called
PageantAsyncOp which describes an agent request in the process of
being handled. But at the moment, it has only one trivial
implementation, which is handed the full response message already
constructed, and on the next toplevel callback, passes it back to the
PageantClient.
2020-01-25 20:24:28 +03:00
|
|
|
static void pageant_conn_got_response(
|
|
|
|
PageantClient *pc, PageantClientRequestId *reqid, ptrlen response)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct pageant_conn_state *pcs =
|
|
|
|
container_of(pc, struct pageant_conn_state, pc);
|
|
|
|
struct pageant_conn_queued_response *qr =
|
|
|
|
container_of(reqid, struct pageant_conn_queued_response, reqid);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
qr->sb = strbuf_new_nm();
|
|
|
|
put_stringpl(qr->sb, response);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
while (pcs->response_queue.next != &pcs->response_queue &&
|
|
|
|
pcs->response_queue.next->sb) {
|
|
|
|
qr = pcs->response_queue.next;
|
|
|
|
sk_write(pcs->connsock, qr->sb->u, qr->sb->len);
|
|
|
|
qr->next->prev = qr->prev;
|
|
|
|
qr->prev->next = qr->next;
|
|
|
|
strbuf_free(qr->sb);
|
|
|
|
sfree(qr);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2020-01-21 00:22:33 +03:00
|
|
|
static bool pageant_conn_ask_passphrase(
|
|
|
|
PageantClient *pc, PageantClientDialogId *dlgid, const char *msg)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct pageant_conn_state *pcs =
|
|
|
|
container_of(pc, struct pageant_conn_state, pc);
|
|
|
|
return pageant_listener_client_ask_passphrase(pcs->plc, dlgid, msg);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
Pageant: new asynchronous internal APIs.
This is a pure refactoring: no functional change expected.
This commit introduces two new small vtable-style APIs. One is
PageantClient, which identifies a particular client of the Pageant
'core' (meaning the code that handles each individual request). This
changes pageant_handle_msg into an asynchronous operation: you pass in
an agent request message and an identifier, and at some later point,
the got_response method in your PageantClient will be called with the
answer (and the same identifier, to allow you to match requests to
responses). The trait vtable also contains a logging system.
The main importance of PageantClient, and the reason why it has to
exist instead of just passing pageant_handle_msg a bare callback
function pointer and context parameter, is that it provides robustness
if a client stops existing while a request is still pending. You call
pageant_unregister_client, and any unfinished requests associated with
that client in the Pageant core will be cleaned up, so that you're
guaranteed that after the unregister operation, no stray callbacks
will happen with a stale pointer to that client.
The WM_COPYDATA interface of Windows Pageant is a direct client of
this API. The other client is PageantListener, the system that lives
in pageant.c and handles stream-based agent connections for both Unix
Pageant and the new Windows named-pipe IPC. More specifically, each
individual connection to the listening socket is a separate
PageantClient, which means that if a socket is closed abruptly or
suffers an OS error, that client can be unregistered and any pending
requests cancelled without disrupting other connections.
Users of PageantListener have a second client vtable they can use,
called PageantListenerClient. That contains _only_ logging facilities,
and at the moment, only Unix Pageant bothers to use it (and even that
only in debugging mode).
Finally, internally to the Pageant core, there's a new trait called
PageantAsyncOp which describes an agent request in the process of
being handled. But at the moment, it has only one trivial
implementation, which is handed the full response message already
constructed, and on the next toplevel callback, passes it back to the
PageantClient.
2020-01-25 20:24:28 +03:00
|
|
|
static const struct PageantClientVtable pageant_connection_clientvt = {
|
|
|
|
pageant_conn_log,
|
|
|
|
pageant_conn_got_response,
|
2020-01-21 00:22:33 +03:00
|
|
|
pageant_conn_ask_passphrase,
|
Pageant: new asynchronous internal APIs.
This is a pure refactoring: no functional change expected.
This commit introduces two new small vtable-style APIs. One is
PageantClient, which identifies a particular client of the Pageant
'core' (meaning the code that handles each individual request). This
changes pageant_handle_msg into an asynchronous operation: you pass in
an agent request message and an identifier, and at some later point,
the got_response method in your PageantClient will be called with the
answer (and the same identifier, to allow you to match requests to
responses). The trait vtable also contains a logging system.
The main importance of PageantClient, and the reason why it has to
exist instead of just passing pageant_handle_msg a bare callback
function pointer and context parameter, is that it provides robustness
if a client stops existing while a request is still pending. You call
pageant_unregister_client, and any unfinished requests associated with
that client in the Pageant core will be cleaned up, so that you're
guaranteed that after the unregister operation, no stray callbacks
will happen with a stale pointer to that client.
The WM_COPYDATA interface of Windows Pageant is a direct client of
this API. The other client is PageantListener, the system that lives
in pageant.c and handles stream-based agent connections for both Unix
Pageant and the new Windows named-pipe IPC. More specifically, each
individual connection to the listening socket is a separate
PageantClient, which means that if a socket is closed abruptly or
suffers an OS error, that client can be unregistered and any pending
requests cancelled without disrupting other connections.
Users of PageantListener have a second client vtable they can use,
called PageantListenerClient. That contains _only_ logging facilities,
and at the moment, only Unix Pageant bothers to use it (and even that
only in debugging mode).
Finally, internally to the Pageant core, there's a new trait called
PageantAsyncOp which describes an agent request in the process of
being handled. But at the moment, it has only one trivial
implementation, which is handed the full response message already
constructed, and on the next toplevel callback, passes it back to the
PageantClient.
2020-01-25 20:24:28 +03:00
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
2019-02-06 23:18:19 +03:00
|
|
|
static void pageant_conn_receive(
|
2019-02-06 23:42:44 +03:00
|
|
|
Plug *plug, int urgent, const char *data, size_t len)
|
2015-05-05 22:16:20 +03:00
|
|
|
{
|
2018-10-06 01:49:08 +03:00
|
|
|
struct pageant_conn_state *pc = container_of(
|
2018-10-05 09:24:16 +03:00
|
|
|
plug, struct pageant_conn_state, plug);
|
2015-05-05 22:16:20 +03:00
|
|
|
char c;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
crBegin(pc->crLine);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
while (len > 0) {
|
|
|
|
pc->got = 0;
|
|
|
|
while (pc->got < 4) {
|
|
|
|
crGetChar(c);
|
|
|
|
pc->lenbuf[pc->got++] = c;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2019-02-04 10:39:03 +03:00
|
|
|
pc->len = GET_32BIT_MSB_FIRST(pc->lenbuf);
|
2015-05-05 22:16:20 +03:00
|
|
|
pc->got = 0;
|
|
|
|
pc->real_packet = (pc->len < AGENT_MAX_MSGLEN-4);
|
|
|
|
|
Pageant: new asynchronous internal APIs.
This is a pure refactoring: no functional change expected.
This commit introduces two new small vtable-style APIs. One is
PageantClient, which identifies a particular client of the Pageant
'core' (meaning the code that handles each individual request). This
changes pageant_handle_msg into an asynchronous operation: you pass in
an agent request message and an identifier, and at some later point,
the got_response method in your PageantClient will be called with the
answer (and the same identifier, to allow you to match requests to
responses). The trait vtable also contains a logging system.
The main importance of PageantClient, and the reason why it has to
exist instead of just passing pageant_handle_msg a bare callback
function pointer and context parameter, is that it provides robustness
if a client stops existing while a request is still pending. You call
pageant_unregister_client, and any unfinished requests associated with
that client in the Pageant core will be cleaned up, so that you're
guaranteed that after the unregister operation, no stray callbacks
will happen with a stale pointer to that client.
The WM_COPYDATA interface of Windows Pageant is a direct client of
this API. The other client is PageantListener, the system that lives
in pageant.c and handles stream-based agent connections for both Unix
Pageant and the new Windows named-pipe IPC. More specifically, each
individual connection to the listening socket is a separate
PageantClient, which means that if a socket is closed abruptly or
suffers an OS error, that client can be unregistered and any pending
requests cancelled without disrupting other connections.
Users of PageantListener have a second client vtable they can use,
called PageantListenerClient. That contains _only_ logging facilities,
and at the moment, only Unix Pageant bothers to use it (and even that
only in debugging mode).
Finally, internally to the Pageant core, there's a new trait called
PageantAsyncOp which describes an agent request in the process of
being handled. But at the moment, it has only one trivial
implementation, which is handed the full response message already
constructed, and on the next toplevel callback, passes it back to the
PageantClient.
2020-01-25 20:24:28 +03:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct pageant_conn_queued_response *qr =
|
|
|
|
snew(struct pageant_conn_queued_response);
|
|
|
|
qr->prev = pc->response_queue.prev;
|
|
|
|
qr->next = &pc->response_queue;
|
|
|
|
qr->prev->next = qr->next->prev = qr;
|
|
|
|
qr->sb = NULL;
|
|
|
|
qr->req_index = pc->req_index++;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (!pc->real_packet) {
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Send failure immediately, before consuming the packet
|
|
|
|
* data. That way we notify the client reasonably early
|
|
|
|
* even if the data channel has just started spewing
|
|
|
|
* nonsense.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
pageant_client_log(&pc->pc, &pc->response_queue.prev->reqid,
|
|
|
|
"early reply: SSH_AGENT_FAILURE "
|
|
|
|
"(overlong message, length %u)", pc->len);
|
|
|
|
static const unsigned char failure[] = { SSH_AGENT_FAILURE };
|
|
|
|
pageant_conn_got_response(&pc->pc, &pc->response_queue.prev->reqid,
|
|
|
|
make_ptrlen(failure, lenof(failure)));
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2015-05-05 22:16:20 +03:00
|
|
|
while (pc->got < pc->len) {
|
|
|
|
crGetChar(c);
|
|
|
|
if (pc->real_packet)
|
|
|
|
pc->pktbuf[pc->got] = c;
|
|
|
|
pc->got++;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
Pageant: new asynchronous internal APIs.
This is a pure refactoring: no functional change expected.
This commit introduces two new small vtable-style APIs. One is
PageantClient, which identifies a particular client of the Pageant
'core' (meaning the code that handles each individual request). This
changes pageant_handle_msg into an asynchronous operation: you pass in
an agent request message and an identifier, and at some later point,
the got_response method in your PageantClient will be called with the
answer (and the same identifier, to allow you to match requests to
responses). The trait vtable also contains a logging system.
The main importance of PageantClient, and the reason why it has to
exist instead of just passing pageant_handle_msg a bare callback
function pointer and context parameter, is that it provides robustness
if a client stops existing while a request is still pending. You call
pageant_unregister_client, and any unfinished requests associated with
that client in the Pageant core will be cleaned up, so that you're
guaranteed that after the unregister operation, no stray callbacks
will happen with a stale pointer to that client.
The WM_COPYDATA interface of Windows Pageant is a direct client of
this API. The other client is PageantListener, the system that lives
in pageant.c and handles stream-based agent connections for both Unix
Pageant and the new Windows named-pipe IPC. More specifically, each
individual connection to the listening socket is a separate
PageantClient, which means that if a socket is closed abruptly or
suffers an OS error, that client can be unregistered and any pending
requests cancelled without disrupting other connections.
Users of PageantListener have a second client vtable they can use,
called PageantListenerClient. That contains _only_ logging facilities,
and at the moment, only Unix Pageant bothers to use it (and even that
only in debugging mode).
Finally, internally to the Pageant core, there's a new trait called
PageantAsyncOp which describes an agent request in the process of
being handled. But at the moment, it has only one trivial
implementation, which is handed the full response message already
constructed, and on the next toplevel callback, passes it back to the
PageantClient.
2020-01-25 20:24:28 +03:00
|
|
|
if (pc->real_packet)
|
|
|
|
pageant_handle_msg(&pc->pc, &pc->response_queue.prev->reqid,
|
|
|
|
make_ptrlen(pc->pktbuf, pc->len));
|
2015-05-05 22:16:20 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2016-06-03 01:03:24 +03:00
|
|
|
crFinishV;
|
2015-05-05 22:16:20 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
struct pageant_listen_state {
|
Get rid of lots of implicit pointer types.
All the main backend structures - Ssh, Telnet, Pty, Serial etc - now
describe structure types themselves rather than pointers to them. The
same goes for the codebase-wide trait types Socket and Plug, and the
supporting types SockAddr and Pinger.
All those things that were typedefed as pointers are older types; the
newer ones have the explicit * at the point of use, because that's
what I now seem to be preferring. But whichever one of those is
better, inconsistently using a mixture of the two styles is worse, so
let's make everything consistent.
A few types are still implicitly pointers, such as Bignum and some of
the GSSAPI types; generally this is either because they have to be
void *, or because they're typedefed differently on different
platforms and aren't always pointers at all. Can't be helped. But I've
got rid of the main ones, at least.
2018-10-04 21:10:23 +03:00
|
|
|
Socket *listensock;
|
Pageant: new asynchronous internal APIs.
This is a pure refactoring: no functional change expected.
This commit introduces two new small vtable-style APIs. One is
PageantClient, which identifies a particular client of the Pageant
'core' (meaning the code that handles each individual request). This
changes pageant_handle_msg into an asynchronous operation: you pass in
an agent request message and an identifier, and at some later point,
the got_response method in your PageantClient will be called with the
answer (and the same identifier, to allow you to match requests to
responses). The trait vtable also contains a logging system.
The main importance of PageantClient, and the reason why it has to
exist instead of just passing pageant_handle_msg a bare callback
function pointer and context parameter, is that it provides robustness
if a client stops existing while a request is still pending. You call
pageant_unregister_client, and any unfinished requests associated with
that client in the Pageant core will be cleaned up, so that you're
guaranteed that after the unregister operation, no stray callbacks
will happen with a stale pointer to that client.
The WM_COPYDATA interface of Windows Pageant is a direct client of
this API. The other client is PageantListener, the system that lives
in pageant.c and handles stream-based agent connections for both Unix
Pageant and the new Windows named-pipe IPC. More specifically, each
individual connection to the listening socket is a separate
PageantClient, which means that if a socket is closed abruptly or
suffers an OS error, that client can be unregistered and any pending
requests cancelled without disrupting other connections.
Users of PageantListener have a second client vtable they can use,
called PageantListenerClient. That contains _only_ logging facilities,
and at the moment, only Unix Pageant bothers to use it (and even that
only in debugging mode).
Finally, internally to the Pageant core, there's a new trait called
PageantAsyncOp which describes an agent request in the process of
being handled. But at the moment, it has only one trivial
implementation, which is handed the full response message already
constructed, and on the next toplevel callback, passes it back to the
PageantClient.
2020-01-25 20:24:28 +03:00
|
|
|
PageantListenerClient *plc;
|
|
|
|
size_t conn_index; /* for indexing connections in log messages */
|
2018-05-27 11:29:33 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2018-10-05 09:24:16 +03:00
|
|
|
Plug plug;
|
2015-05-05 22:16:20 +03:00
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
Get rid of lots of implicit pointer types.
All the main backend structures - Ssh, Telnet, Pty, Serial etc - now
describe structure types themselves rather than pointers to them. The
same goes for the codebase-wide trait types Socket and Plug, and the
supporting types SockAddr and Pinger.
All those things that were typedefed as pointers are older types; the
newer ones have the explicit * at the point of use, because that's
what I now seem to be preferring. But whichever one of those is
better, inconsistently using a mixture of the two styles is worse, so
let's make everything consistent.
A few types are still implicitly pointers, such as Bignum and some of
the GSSAPI types; generally this is either because they have to be
void *, or because they're typedefed differently on different
platforms and aren't always pointers at all. Can't be helped. But I've
got rid of the main ones, at least.
2018-10-04 21:10:23 +03:00
|
|
|
static void pageant_listen_closing(Plug *plug, const char *error_msg,
|
2019-09-08 22:29:00 +03:00
|
|
|
int error_code, bool calling_back)
|
2015-05-05 22:16:20 +03:00
|
|
|
{
|
2018-10-06 01:49:08 +03:00
|
|
|
struct pageant_listen_state *pl = container_of(
|
2018-10-05 09:24:16 +03:00
|
|
|
plug, struct pageant_listen_state, plug);
|
2015-05-06 21:32:26 +03:00
|
|
|
if (error_msg)
|
Pageant: new asynchronous internal APIs.
This is a pure refactoring: no functional change expected.
This commit introduces two new small vtable-style APIs. One is
PageantClient, which identifies a particular client of the Pageant
'core' (meaning the code that handles each individual request). This
changes pageant_handle_msg into an asynchronous operation: you pass in
an agent request message and an identifier, and at some later point,
the got_response method in your PageantClient will be called with the
answer (and the same identifier, to allow you to match requests to
responses). The trait vtable also contains a logging system.
The main importance of PageantClient, and the reason why it has to
exist instead of just passing pageant_handle_msg a bare callback
function pointer and context parameter, is that it provides robustness
if a client stops existing while a request is still pending. You call
pageant_unregister_client, and any unfinished requests associated with
that client in the Pageant core will be cleaned up, so that you're
guaranteed that after the unregister operation, no stray callbacks
will happen with a stale pointer to that client.
The WM_COPYDATA interface of Windows Pageant is a direct client of
this API. The other client is PageantListener, the system that lives
in pageant.c and handles stream-based agent connections for both Unix
Pageant and the new Windows named-pipe IPC. More specifically, each
individual connection to the listening socket is a separate
PageantClient, which means that if a socket is closed abruptly or
suffers an OS error, that client can be unregistered and any pending
requests cancelled without disrupting other connections.
Users of PageantListener have a second client vtable they can use,
called PageantListenerClient. That contains _only_ logging facilities,
and at the moment, only Unix Pageant bothers to use it (and even that
only in debugging mode).
Finally, internally to the Pageant core, there's a new trait called
PageantAsyncOp which describes an agent request in the process of
being handled. But at the moment, it has only one trivial
implementation, which is handed the full response message already
constructed, and on the next toplevel callback, passes it back to the
PageantClient.
2020-01-25 20:24:28 +03:00
|
|
|
pageant_listener_client_log(pl->plc, "listening socket: error: %s",
|
|
|
|
error_msg);
|
2015-05-05 22:16:20 +03:00
|
|
|
sk_close(pl->listensock);
|
|
|
|
pl->listensock = NULL;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2018-10-05 09:03:46 +03:00
|
|
|
static const PlugVtable pageant_connection_plugvt = {
|
2018-05-27 11:29:33 +03:00
|
|
|
NULL, /* no log function, because that's for outgoing connections */
|
|
|
|
pageant_conn_closing,
|
|
|
|
pageant_conn_receive,
|
|
|
|
pageant_conn_sent,
|
|
|
|
NULL /* no accepting function, because we've already done it */
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
Get rid of lots of implicit pointer types.
All the main backend structures - Ssh, Telnet, Pty, Serial etc - now
describe structure types themselves rather than pointers to them. The
same goes for the codebase-wide trait types Socket and Plug, and the
supporting types SockAddr and Pinger.
All those things that were typedefed as pointers are older types; the
newer ones have the explicit * at the point of use, because that's
what I now seem to be preferring. But whichever one of those is
better, inconsistently using a mixture of the two styles is worse, so
let's make everything consistent.
A few types are still implicitly pointers, such as Bignum and some of
the GSSAPI types; generally this is either because they have to be
void *, or because they're typedefed differently on different
platforms and aren't always pointers at all. Can't be helped. But I've
got rid of the main ones, at least.
2018-10-04 21:10:23 +03:00
|
|
|
static int pageant_listen_accepting(Plug *plug,
|
2015-05-05 22:16:20 +03:00
|
|
|
accept_fn_t constructor, accept_ctx_t ctx)
|
|
|
|
{
|
2018-10-06 01:49:08 +03:00
|
|
|
struct pageant_listen_state *pl = container_of(
|
2018-10-05 09:24:16 +03:00
|
|
|
plug, struct pageant_listen_state, plug);
|
2015-05-05 22:16:20 +03:00
|
|
|
struct pageant_conn_state *pc;
|
|
|
|
const char *err;
|
2018-10-18 22:06:42 +03:00
|
|
|
SocketPeerInfo *peerinfo;
|
2015-05-05 22:16:20 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pc = snew(struct pageant_conn_state);
|
2018-10-05 09:24:16 +03:00
|
|
|
pc->plug.vt = &pageant_connection_plugvt;
|
Pageant: new asynchronous internal APIs.
This is a pure refactoring: no functional change expected.
This commit introduces two new small vtable-style APIs. One is
PageantClient, which identifies a particular client of the Pageant
'core' (meaning the code that handles each individual request). This
changes pageant_handle_msg into an asynchronous operation: you pass in
an agent request message and an identifier, and at some later point,
the got_response method in your PageantClient will be called with the
answer (and the same identifier, to allow you to match requests to
responses). The trait vtable also contains a logging system.
The main importance of PageantClient, and the reason why it has to
exist instead of just passing pageant_handle_msg a bare callback
function pointer and context parameter, is that it provides robustness
if a client stops existing while a request is still pending. You call
pageant_unregister_client, and any unfinished requests associated with
that client in the Pageant core will be cleaned up, so that you're
guaranteed that after the unregister operation, no stray callbacks
will happen with a stale pointer to that client.
The WM_COPYDATA interface of Windows Pageant is a direct client of
this API. The other client is PageantListener, the system that lives
in pageant.c and handles stream-based agent connections for both Unix
Pageant and the new Windows named-pipe IPC. More specifically, each
individual connection to the listening socket is a separate
PageantClient, which means that if a socket is closed abruptly or
suffers an OS error, that client can be unregistered and any pending
requests cancelled without disrupting other connections.
Users of PageantListener have a second client vtable they can use,
called PageantListenerClient. That contains _only_ logging facilities,
and at the moment, only Unix Pageant bothers to use it (and even that
only in debugging mode).
Finally, internally to the Pageant core, there's a new trait called
PageantAsyncOp which describes an agent request in the process of
being handled. But at the moment, it has only one trivial
implementation, which is handed the full response message already
constructed, and on the next toplevel callback, passes it back to the
PageantClient.
2020-01-25 20:24:28 +03:00
|
|
|
pc->pc.vt = &pageant_connection_clientvt;
|
|
|
|
pc->plc = pl->plc;
|
|
|
|
pc->response_queue.next = pc->response_queue.prev = &pc->response_queue;
|
|
|
|
pc->conn_index = pl->conn_index++;
|
|
|
|
pc->req_index = 0;
|
2015-05-05 22:16:20 +03:00
|
|
|
pc->crLine = 0;
|
|
|
|
|
2018-10-05 09:24:16 +03:00
|
|
|
pc->connsock = constructor(ctx, &pc->plug);
|
2015-05-05 22:16:20 +03:00
|
|
|
if ((err = sk_socket_error(pc->connsock)) != NULL) {
|
|
|
|
sk_close(pc->connsock);
|
|
|
|
sfree(pc);
|
2019-09-08 22:29:00 +03:00
|
|
|
return 1;
|
2015-05-05 22:16:20 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2020-02-13 00:35:04 +03:00
|
|
|
sk_set_frozen(pc->connsock, false);
|
2015-05-05 22:16:20 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2015-05-18 15:57:45 +03:00
|
|
|
peerinfo = sk_peer_info(pc->connsock);
|
2018-10-18 22:06:42 +03:00
|
|
|
if (peerinfo && peerinfo->log_text) {
|
2020-01-26 13:59:07 +03:00
|
|
|
pageant_listener_client_log(pl->plc,
|
|
|
|
"c#%"SIZEu": new connection from %s",
|
Pageant: new asynchronous internal APIs.
This is a pure refactoring: no functional change expected.
This commit introduces two new small vtable-style APIs. One is
PageantClient, which identifies a particular client of the Pageant
'core' (meaning the code that handles each individual request). This
changes pageant_handle_msg into an asynchronous operation: you pass in
an agent request message and an identifier, and at some later point,
the got_response method in your PageantClient will be called with the
answer (and the same identifier, to allow you to match requests to
responses). The trait vtable also contains a logging system.
The main importance of PageantClient, and the reason why it has to
exist instead of just passing pageant_handle_msg a bare callback
function pointer and context parameter, is that it provides robustness
if a client stops existing while a request is still pending. You call
pageant_unregister_client, and any unfinished requests associated with
that client in the Pageant core will be cleaned up, so that you're
guaranteed that after the unregister operation, no stray callbacks
will happen with a stale pointer to that client.
The WM_COPYDATA interface of Windows Pageant is a direct client of
this API. The other client is PageantListener, the system that lives
in pageant.c and handles stream-based agent connections for both Unix
Pageant and the new Windows named-pipe IPC. More specifically, each
individual connection to the listening socket is a separate
PageantClient, which means that if a socket is closed abruptly or
suffers an OS error, that client can be unregistered and any pending
requests cancelled without disrupting other connections.
Users of PageantListener have a second client vtable they can use,
called PageantListenerClient. That contains _only_ logging facilities,
and at the moment, only Unix Pageant bothers to use it (and even that
only in debugging mode).
Finally, internally to the Pageant core, there's a new trait called
PageantAsyncOp which describes an agent request in the process of
being handled. But at the moment, it has only one trivial
implementation, which is handed the full response message already
constructed, and on the next toplevel callback, passes it back to the
PageantClient.
2020-01-25 20:24:28 +03:00
|
|
|
pc->conn_index, peerinfo->log_text);
|
2015-05-18 15:57:45 +03:00
|
|
|
} else {
|
2020-01-26 13:59:07 +03:00
|
|
|
pageant_listener_client_log(pl->plc, "c#%"SIZEu": new connection",
|
Pageant: new asynchronous internal APIs.
This is a pure refactoring: no functional change expected.
This commit introduces two new small vtable-style APIs. One is
PageantClient, which identifies a particular client of the Pageant
'core' (meaning the code that handles each individual request). This
changes pageant_handle_msg into an asynchronous operation: you pass in
an agent request message and an identifier, and at some later point,
the got_response method in your PageantClient will be called with the
answer (and the same identifier, to allow you to match requests to
responses). The trait vtable also contains a logging system.
The main importance of PageantClient, and the reason why it has to
exist instead of just passing pageant_handle_msg a bare callback
function pointer and context parameter, is that it provides robustness
if a client stops existing while a request is still pending. You call
pageant_unregister_client, and any unfinished requests associated with
that client in the Pageant core will be cleaned up, so that you're
guaranteed that after the unregister operation, no stray callbacks
will happen with a stale pointer to that client.
The WM_COPYDATA interface of Windows Pageant is a direct client of
this API. The other client is PageantListener, the system that lives
in pageant.c and handles stream-based agent connections for both Unix
Pageant and the new Windows named-pipe IPC. More specifically, each
individual connection to the listening socket is a separate
PageantClient, which means that if a socket is closed abruptly or
suffers an OS error, that client can be unregistered and any pending
requests cancelled without disrupting other connections.
Users of PageantListener have a second client vtable they can use,
called PageantListenerClient. That contains _only_ logging facilities,
and at the moment, only Unix Pageant bothers to use it (and even that
only in debugging mode).
Finally, internally to the Pageant core, there's a new trait called
PageantAsyncOp which describes an agent request in the process of
being handled. But at the moment, it has only one trivial
implementation, which is handed the full response message already
constructed, and on the next toplevel callback, passes it back to the
PageantClient.
2020-01-25 20:24:28 +03:00
|
|
|
pc->conn_index);
|
2015-05-18 15:57:45 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
2018-10-18 22:06:42 +03:00
|
|
|
sk_free_peer_info(peerinfo);
|
2015-05-05 22:16:20 +03:00
|
|
|
|
Pageant: new asynchronous internal APIs.
This is a pure refactoring: no functional change expected.
This commit introduces two new small vtable-style APIs. One is
PageantClient, which identifies a particular client of the Pageant
'core' (meaning the code that handles each individual request). This
changes pageant_handle_msg into an asynchronous operation: you pass in
an agent request message and an identifier, and at some later point,
the got_response method in your PageantClient will be called with the
answer (and the same identifier, to allow you to match requests to
responses). The trait vtable also contains a logging system.
The main importance of PageantClient, and the reason why it has to
exist instead of just passing pageant_handle_msg a bare callback
function pointer and context parameter, is that it provides robustness
if a client stops existing while a request is still pending. You call
pageant_unregister_client, and any unfinished requests associated with
that client in the Pageant core will be cleaned up, so that you're
guaranteed that after the unregister operation, no stray callbacks
will happen with a stale pointer to that client.
The WM_COPYDATA interface of Windows Pageant is a direct client of
this API. The other client is PageantListener, the system that lives
in pageant.c and handles stream-based agent connections for both Unix
Pageant and the new Windows named-pipe IPC. More specifically, each
individual connection to the listening socket is a separate
PageantClient, which means that if a socket is closed abruptly or
suffers an OS error, that client can be unregistered and any pending
requests cancelled without disrupting other connections.
Users of PageantListener have a second client vtable they can use,
called PageantListenerClient. That contains _only_ logging facilities,
and at the moment, only Unix Pageant bothers to use it (and even that
only in debugging mode).
Finally, internally to the Pageant core, there's a new trait called
PageantAsyncOp which describes an agent request in the process of
being handled. But at the moment, it has only one trivial
implementation, which is handed the full response message already
constructed, and on the next toplevel callback, passes it back to the
PageantClient.
2020-01-25 20:24:28 +03:00
|
|
|
pageant_register_client(&pc->pc);
|
|
|
|
|
2015-05-05 22:16:20 +03:00
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2018-10-05 09:03:46 +03:00
|
|
|
static const PlugVtable pageant_listener_plugvt = {
|
2018-05-27 11:29:33 +03:00
|
|
|
NULL, /* no log function, because that's for outgoing connections */
|
|
|
|
pageant_listen_closing,
|
|
|
|
NULL, /* no receive function on a listening socket */
|
|
|
|
NULL, /* no sent function on a listening socket */
|
|
|
|
pageant_listen_accepting
|
|
|
|
};
|
2015-05-05 22:16:20 +03:00
|
|
|
|
Pageant: new asynchronous internal APIs.
This is a pure refactoring: no functional change expected.
This commit introduces two new small vtable-style APIs. One is
PageantClient, which identifies a particular client of the Pageant
'core' (meaning the code that handles each individual request). This
changes pageant_handle_msg into an asynchronous operation: you pass in
an agent request message and an identifier, and at some later point,
the got_response method in your PageantClient will be called with the
answer (and the same identifier, to allow you to match requests to
responses). The trait vtable also contains a logging system.
The main importance of PageantClient, and the reason why it has to
exist instead of just passing pageant_handle_msg a bare callback
function pointer and context parameter, is that it provides robustness
if a client stops existing while a request is still pending. You call
pageant_unregister_client, and any unfinished requests associated with
that client in the Pageant core will be cleaned up, so that you're
guaranteed that after the unregister operation, no stray callbacks
will happen with a stale pointer to that client.
The WM_COPYDATA interface of Windows Pageant is a direct client of
this API. The other client is PageantListener, the system that lives
in pageant.c and handles stream-based agent connections for both Unix
Pageant and the new Windows named-pipe IPC. More specifically, each
individual connection to the listening socket is a separate
PageantClient, which means that if a socket is closed abruptly or
suffers an OS error, that client can be unregistered and any pending
requests cancelled without disrupting other connections.
Users of PageantListener have a second client vtable they can use,
called PageantListenerClient. That contains _only_ logging facilities,
and at the moment, only Unix Pageant bothers to use it (and even that
only in debugging mode).
Finally, internally to the Pageant core, there's a new trait called
PageantAsyncOp which describes an agent request in the process of
being handled. But at the moment, it has only one trivial
implementation, which is handed the full response message already
constructed, and on the next toplevel callback, passes it back to the
PageantClient.
2020-01-25 20:24:28 +03:00
|
|
|
struct pageant_listen_state *pageant_listener_new(
|
|
|
|
Plug **plug, PageantListenerClient *plc)
|
2018-05-27 11:29:33 +03:00
|
|
|
{
|
2015-05-05 22:16:20 +03:00
|
|
|
struct pageant_listen_state *pl = snew(struct pageant_listen_state);
|
2018-10-05 09:24:16 +03:00
|
|
|
pl->plug.vt = &pageant_listener_plugvt;
|
Pageant: new asynchronous internal APIs.
This is a pure refactoring: no functional change expected.
This commit introduces two new small vtable-style APIs. One is
PageantClient, which identifies a particular client of the Pageant
'core' (meaning the code that handles each individual request). This
changes pageant_handle_msg into an asynchronous operation: you pass in
an agent request message and an identifier, and at some later point,
the got_response method in your PageantClient will be called with the
answer (and the same identifier, to allow you to match requests to
responses). The trait vtable also contains a logging system.
The main importance of PageantClient, and the reason why it has to
exist instead of just passing pageant_handle_msg a bare callback
function pointer and context parameter, is that it provides robustness
if a client stops existing while a request is still pending. You call
pageant_unregister_client, and any unfinished requests associated with
that client in the Pageant core will be cleaned up, so that you're
guaranteed that after the unregister operation, no stray callbacks
will happen with a stale pointer to that client.
The WM_COPYDATA interface of Windows Pageant is a direct client of
this API. The other client is PageantListener, the system that lives
in pageant.c and handles stream-based agent connections for both Unix
Pageant and the new Windows named-pipe IPC. More specifically, each
individual connection to the listening socket is a separate
PageantClient, which means that if a socket is closed abruptly or
suffers an OS error, that client can be unregistered and any pending
requests cancelled without disrupting other connections.
Users of PageantListener have a second client vtable they can use,
called PageantListenerClient. That contains _only_ logging facilities,
and at the moment, only Unix Pageant bothers to use it (and even that
only in debugging mode).
Finally, internally to the Pageant core, there's a new trait called
PageantAsyncOp which describes an agent request in the process of
being handled. But at the moment, it has only one trivial
implementation, which is handed the full response message already
constructed, and on the next toplevel callback, passes it back to the
PageantClient.
2020-01-25 20:24:28 +03:00
|
|
|
pl->plc = plc;
|
2015-05-05 22:16:20 +03:00
|
|
|
pl->listensock = NULL;
|
Pageant: new asynchronous internal APIs.
This is a pure refactoring: no functional change expected.
This commit introduces two new small vtable-style APIs. One is
PageantClient, which identifies a particular client of the Pageant
'core' (meaning the code that handles each individual request). This
changes pageant_handle_msg into an asynchronous operation: you pass in
an agent request message and an identifier, and at some later point,
the got_response method in your PageantClient will be called with the
answer (and the same identifier, to allow you to match requests to
responses). The trait vtable also contains a logging system.
The main importance of PageantClient, and the reason why it has to
exist instead of just passing pageant_handle_msg a bare callback
function pointer and context parameter, is that it provides robustness
if a client stops existing while a request is still pending. You call
pageant_unregister_client, and any unfinished requests associated with
that client in the Pageant core will be cleaned up, so that you're
guaranteed that after the unregister operation, no stray callbacks
will happen with a stale pointer to that client.
The WM_COPYDATA interface of Windows Pageant is a direct client of
this API. The other client is PageantListener, the system that lives
in pageant.c and handles stream-based agent connections for both Unix
Pageant and the new Windows named-pipe IPC. More specifically, each
individual connection to the listening socket is a separate
PageantClient, which means that if a socket is closed abruptly or
suffers an OS error, that client can be unregistered and any pending
requests cancelled without disrupting other connections.
Users of PageantListener have a second client vtable they can use,
called PageantListenerClient. That contains _only_ logging facilities,
and at the moment, only Unix Pageant bothers to use it (and even that
only in debugging mode).
Finally, internally to the Pageant core, there's a new trait called
PageantAsyncOp which describes an agent request in the process of
being handled. But at the moment, it has only one trivial
implementation, which is handed the full response message already
constructed, and on the next toplevel callback, passes it back to the
PageantClient.
2020-01-25 20:24:28 +03:00
|
|
|
pl->conn_index = 0;
|
2018-10-05 09:24:16 +03:00
|
|
|
*plug = &pl->plug;
|
2015-05-05 22:16:20 +03:00
|
|
|
return pl;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
Get rid of lots of implicit pointer types.
All the main backend structures - Ssh, Telnet, Pty, Serial etc - now
describe structure types themselves rather than pointers to them. The
same goes for the codebase-wide trait types Socket and Plug, and the
supporting types SockAddr and Pinger.
All those things that were typedefed as pointers are older types; the
newer ones have the explicit * at the point of use, because that's
what I now seem to be preferring. But whichever one of those is
better, inconsistently using a mixture of the two styles is worse, so
let's make everything consistent.
A few types are still implicitly pointers, such as Bignum and some of
the GSSAPI types; generally this is either because they have to be
void *, or because they're typedefed differently on different
platforms and aren't always pointers at all. Can't be helped. But I've
got rid of the main ones, at least.
2018-10-04 21:10:23 +03:00
|
|
|
void pageant_listener_got_socket(struct pageant_listen_state *pl, Socket *sock)
|
2015-05-05 22:16:20 +03:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
pl->listensock = sock;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
void pageant_listener_free(struct pageant_listen_state *pl)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
if (pl->listensock)
|
|
|
|
sk_close(pl->listensock);
|
|
|
|
sfree(pl);
|
|
|
|
}
|
2015-05-11 17:06:25 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* ----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
* Code to perform agent operations either as a client, or within the
|
|
|
|
* same process as the running agent.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static tree234 *passphrases = NULL;
|
|
|
|
|
2020-02-08 19:36:55 +03:00
|
|
|
typedef struct PageantInternalClient {
|
|
|
|
strbuf *response;
|
|
|
|
bool got_response;
|
|
|
|
PageantClient pc;
|
|
|
|
} PageantInternalClient;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void internal_client_got_response(
|
|
|
|
PageantClient *pc, PageantClientRequestId *reqid, ptrlen response)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
PageantInternalClient *pic = container_of(pc, PageantInternalClient, pc);
|
2020-02-15 10:30:19 +03:00
|
|
|
strbuf_clear(pic->response);
|
2020-02-08 19:36:55 +03:00
|
|
|
put_datapl(pic->response, response);
|
|
|
|
pic->got_response = true;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static bool internal_client_ask_passphrase(
|
|
|
|
PageantClient *pc, PageantClientDialogId *dlgid, const char *msg)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
/* No delaying operations are permitted in this mode */
|
|
|
|
return false;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static const struct PageantClientVtable internal_clientvt = {
|
|
|
|
NULL /* log */,
|
|
|
|
internal_client_got_response,
|
|
|
|
internal_client_ask_passphrase,
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
2020-02-15 10:30:19 +03:00
|
|
|
typedef struct PageantClientOp {
|
|
|
|
strbuf *buf;
|
|
|
|
bool request_made;
|
|
|
|
BinarySink_DELEGATE_IMPLEMENTATION;
|
|
|
|
BinarySource_IMPLEMENTATION;
|
|
|
|
} PageantClientOp;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static PageantClientOp *pageant_client_op_new(void)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
PageantClientOp *pco = snew(PageantClientOp);
|
|
|
|
pco->buf = strbuf_new_for_agent_query();
|
|
|
|
pco->request_made = false;
|
|
|
|
BinarySink_DELEGATE_INIT(pco, pco->buf);
|
|
|
|
BinarySource_INIT(pco, "", 0);
|
|
|
|
return pco;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void pageant_client_op_free(PageantClientOp *pco)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
if (pco->buf)
|
|
|
|
strbuf_free(pco->buf);
|
|
|
|
sfree(pco);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static unsigned pageant_client_op_query(PageantClientOp *pco)
|
2020-02-08 19:36:55 +03:00
|
|
|
{
|
2020-02-15 10:30:19 +03:00
|
|
|
/* Since we use the same strbuf for the request and the response,
|
|
|
|
* check by assertion that we aren't embarrassingly sending a
|
|
|
|
* previous response back to the agent */
|
|
|
|
assert(!pco->request_made);
|
|
|
|
pco->request_made = true;
|
|
|
|
|
2020-02-08 19:36:55 +03:00
|
|
|
if (!pageant_local) {
|
2020-02-15 10:30:19 +03:00
|
|
|
void *response_raw;
|
|
|
|
int resplen_raw;
|
|
|
|
agent_query_synchronous(pco->buf, &response_raw, &resplen_raw);
|
|
|
|
strbuf_clear(pco->buf);
|
|
|
|
put_data(pco->buf, response_raw, resplen_raw);
|
|
|
|
sfree(response_raw);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* The data coming back from agent_query_synchronous will have
|
|
|
|
* its length field prepended. So we start by parsing it as an
|
|
|
|
* SSH-formatted string, and then reinitialise our
|
|
|
|
* BinarySource with the interior of that string. */
|
|
|
|
BinarySource_INIT_PL(pco, ptrlen_from_strbuf(pco->buf));
|
|
|
|
BinarySource_INIT_PL(pco, get_string(pco));
|
2020-02-08 19:36:55 +03:00
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
PageantInternalClient pic;
|
|
|
|
PageantClientRequestId reqid;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pic.pc.vt = &internal_clientvt;
|
|
|
|
pic.pc.suppress_logging = true;
|
2020-02-15 10:30:19 +03:00
|
|
|
pic.response = pco->buf;
|
2020-02-08 19:36:55 +03:00
|
|
|
pic.got_response = false;
|
|
|
|
pageant_register_client(&pic.pc);
|
|
|
|
|
2020-02-15 10:30:19 +03:00
|
|
|
assert(pco->buf->len > 4);
|
2020-02-08 19:36:55 +03:00
|
|
|
PageantAsyncOp *pao = pageant_make_op(
|
2020-02-15 10:30:19 +03:00
|
|
|
&pic.pc, &reqid, make_ptrlen(pco->buf->s + 4, pco->buf->len - 4));
|
2020-02-08 19:36:55 +03:00
|
|
|
while (!pic.got_response)
|
|
|
|
pageant_async_op_coroutine(pao);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pageant_unregister_client(&pic.pc);
|
|
|
|
|
2020-02-15 10:30:19 +03:00
|
|
|
BinarySource_INIT_PL(pco, ptrlen_from_strbuf(pco->buf));
|
2020-02-08 19:36:55 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
2020-02-15 10:30:19 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Strip off and directly return the type byte, which every client
|
|
|
|
* will need, to save a boilerplate get_byte at each call site */
|
|
|
|
unsigned reply_type = get_byte(pco);
|
|
|
|
if (get_err(pco))
|
|
|
|
reply_type = 256; /* out-of-range code */
|
|
|
|
return reply_type;
|
2020-02-08 19:36:55 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2015-05-11 17:06:25 +03:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* After processing a list of filenames, we want to forget the
|
|
|
|
* passphrases.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
void pageant_forget_passphrases(void)
|
|
|
|
{
|
2015-05-14 11:16:26 +03:00
|
|
|
if (!passphrases) /* in case we never set it up at all */
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
|
2015-05-11 17:06:25 +03:00
|
|
|
while (count234(passphrases) > 0) {
|
2019-09-08 22:29:00 +03:00
|
|
|
char *pp = index234(passphrases, 0);
|
|
|
|
smemclr(pp, strlen(pp));
|
|
|
|
delpos234(passphrases, 0);
|
|
|
|
sfree(pp);
|
2015-05-11 17:06:25 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2020-02-15 10:30:19 +03:00
|
|
|
typedef struct KeyListEntry {
|
|
|
|
ptrlen blob, comment;
|
|
|
|
} KeyListEntry;
|
|
|
|
typedef struct KeyList {
|
|
|
|
strbuf *raw_data;
|
|
|
|
KeyListEntry *keys;
|
|
|
|
size_t nkeys;
|
|
|
|
bool broken;
|
|
|
|
} KeyList;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void keylist_free(KeyList *kl)
|
2015-05-11 17:06:25 +03:00
|
|
|
{
|
2020-02-15 10:30:19 +03:00
|
|
|
sfree(kl->keys);
|
|
|
|
strbuf_free(kl->raw_data);
|
|
|
|
sfree(kl);
|
2015-05-11 17:06:25 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2020-02-15 10:30:19 +03:00
|
|
|
static KeyList *pageant_get_keylist(unsigned ssh_version)
|
2015-05-11 17:06:25 +03:00
|
|
|
{
|
2020-02-15 10:30:19 +03:00
|
|
|
static const unsigned char requests[] = {
|
|
|
|
0, SSH1_AGENTC_REQUEST_RSA_IDENTITIES, SSH2_AGENTC_REQUEST_IDENTITIES
|
|
|
|
}, responses[] = {
|
|
|
|
0, SSH1_AGENT_RSA_IDENTITIES_ANSWER, SSH2_AGENT_IDENTITIES_ANSWER
|
|
|
|
};
|
2015-05-11 17:06:25 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2020-02-15 10:30:19 +03:00
|
|
|
PageantClientOp *pco = pageant_client_op_new();
|
|
|
|
put_byte(pco, requests[ssh_version]);
|
|
|
|
unsigned reply = pageant_client_op_query(pco);
|
2015-05-11 17:06:25 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2020-02-15 10:30:19 +03:00
|
|
|
if (reply != responses[ssh_version]) {
|
|
|
|
pageant_client_op_free(pco);
|
2020-02-08 19:36:55 +03:00
|
|
|
return NULL;
|
2015-05-11 17:06:25 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
2020-02-08 19:36:55 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2020-02-15 10:30:19 +03:00
|
|
|
KeyList *kl = snew(KeyList);
|
|
|
|
kl->nkeys = get_uint32(pco);
|
|
|
|
kl->keys = snewn(kl->nkeys, struct KeyListEntry);
|
2020-02-08 19:36:55 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2020-02-15 10:30:19 +03:00
|
|
|
for (size_t i = 0; i < kl->nkeys && !get_err(pco); i++) {
|
|
|
|
if (ssh_version == 1) {
|
|
|
|
kl->keys[i].blob = get_data(pco, rsa_ssh1_public_blob_len(
|
|
|
|
make_ptrlen(get_ptr(pco), get_avail(pco))));
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
kl->keys[i].blob = get_string(pco);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
kl->keys[i].comment = get_string(pco);
|
|
|
|
}
|
2020-02-08 19:36:55 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2020-02-15 10:30:19 +03:00
|
|
|
kl->broken = get_err(pco);
|
|
|
|
kl->raw_data = pco->buf;
|
|
|
|
pco->buf = NULL;
|
|
|
|
pageant_client_op_free(pco);
|
|
|
|
return kl;
|
2015-05-11 17:06:25 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
int pageant_add_keyfile(Filename *filename, const char *passphrase,
|
2020-02-08 20:28:46 +03:00
|
|
|
char **retstr, bool add_encrypted)
|
2015-05-11 17:06:25 +03:00
|
|
|
{
|
2019-01-04 09:51:44 +03:00
|
|
|
RSAKey *rkey = NULL;
|
|
|
|
ssh2_userkey *skey = NULL;
|
Convert a lot of 'int' variables to 'bool'.
My normal habit these days, in new code, is to treat int and bool as
_almost_ completely separate types. I'm still willing to use C's
implicit test for zero on an integer (e.g. 'if (!blob.len)' is fine,
no need to spell it out as blob.len != 0), but generally, if a
variable is going to be conceptually a boolean, I like to declare it
bool and assign to it using 'true' or 'false' rather than 0 or 1.
PuTTY is an exception, because it predates the C99 bool, and I've
stuck to its existing coding style even when adding new code to it.
But it's been annoying me more and more, so now that I've decided C99
bool is an acceptable thing to require from our toolchain in the first
place, here's a quite thorough trawl through the source doing
'boolification'. Many variables and function parameters are now typed
as bool rather than int; many assignments of 0 or 1 to those variables
are now spelled 'true' or 'false'.
I managed this thorough conversion with the help of a custom clang
plugin that I wrote to trawl the AST and apply heuristics to point out
where things might want changing. So I've even managed to do a decent
job on parts of the code I haven't looked at in years!
To make the plugin's work easier, I pushed platform front ends
generally in the direction of using standard 'bool' in preference to
platform-specific boolean types like Windows BOOL or GTK's gboolean;
I've left the platform booleans in places they _have_ to be for the
platform APIs to work right, but variables only used by my own code
have been converted wherever I found them.
In a few places there are int values that look very like booleans in
_most_ of the places they're used, but have a rarely-used third value,
or a distinction between different nonzero values that most users
don't care about. In these cases, I've _removed_ uses of 'true' and
'false' for the return values, to emphasise that there's something
more subtle going on than a simple boolean answer:
- the 'multisel' field in dialog.h's list box structure, for which
the GTK front end in particular recognises a difference between 1
and 2 but nearly everything else treats as boolean
- the 'urgent' parameter to plug_receive, where 1 vs 2 tells you
something about the specific location of the urgent pointer, but
most clients only care about 0 vs 'something nonzero'
- the return value of wc_match, where -1 indicates a syntax error in
the wildcard.
- the return values from SSH-1 RSA-key loading functions, which use
-1 for 'wrong passphrase' and 0 for all other failures (so any
caller which already knows it's not loading an _encrypted private_
key can treat them as boolean)
- term->esc_query, and the 'query' parameter in toggle_mode in
terminal.c, which _usually_ hold 0 for ESC[123h or 1 for ESC[?123h,
but can also hold -1 for some other intervening character that we
don't support.
In a few places there's an integer that I haven't turned into a bool
even though it really _can_ only take values 0 or 1 (and, as above,
tried to make the call sites consistent in not calling those values
true and false), on the grounds that I thought it would make it more
confusing to imply that the 0 value was in some sense 'negative' or
bad and the 1 positive or good:
- the return value of plug_accepting uses the POSIXish convention of
0=success and nonzero=error; I think if I made it bool then I'd
also want to reverse its sense, and that's a job for a separate
piece of work.
- the 'screen' parameter to lineptr() in terminal.c, where 0 and 1
represent the default and alternate screens. There's no obvious
reason why one of those should be considered 'true' or 'positive'
or 'success' - they're just indices - so I've left it as int.
ssh_scp_recv had particularly confusing semantics for its previous int
return value: its call sites used '<= 0' to check for error, but it
never actually returned a negative number, just 0 or 1. Now the
function and its call sites agree that it's a bool.
In a couple of places I've renamed variables called 'ret', because I
don't like that name any more - it's unclear whether it means the
return value (in preparation) for the _containing_ function or the
return value received from a subroutine call, and occasionally I've
accidentally used the same variable for both and introduced a bug. So
where one of those got in my way, I've renamed it to 'toret' or 'retd'
(the latter short for 'returned') in line with my usual modern
practice, but I haven't done a thorough job of finding all of them.
Finally, one amusing side effect of doing this is that I've had to
separate quite a few chained assignments. It used to be perfectly fine
to write 'a = b = c = TRUE' when a,b,c were int and TRUE was just a
the 'true' defined by stdbool.h, that idiom provokes a warning from
gcc: 'suggest parentheses around assignment used as truth value'!
2018-11-02 22:23:19 +03:00
|
|
|
bool needs_pass;
|
2015-05-11 17:06:25 +03:00
|
|
|
int ret;
|
|
|
|
int attempts;
|
|
|
|
char *comment;
|
|
|
|
const char *this_passphrase;
|
|
|
|
const char *error = NULL;
|
|
|
|
int type;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (!passphrases) {
|
|
|
|
passphrases = newtree234(NULL);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*retstr = NULL;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
type = key_type(filename);
|
|
|
|
if (type != SSH_KEYTYPE_SSH1 && type != SSH_KEYTYPE_SSH2) {
|
2019-09-08 22:29:00 +03:00
|
|
|
*retstr = dupprintf("Couldn't load this key (%s)",
|
2015-05-11 17:06:25 +03:00
|
|
|
key_type_to_str(type));
|
2019-09-08 22:29:00 +03:00
|
|
|
return PAGEANT_ACTION_FAILURE;
|
2015-05-11 17:06:25 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2020-02-08 20:28:46 +03:00
|
|
|
if (add_encrypted && type == SSH_KEYTYPE_SSH1) {
|
|
|
|
*retstr = dupprintf("Can't add SSH-1 keys in encrypted form");
|
|
|
|
return PAGEANT_ACTION_FAILURE;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2015-05-11 17:06:25 +03:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* See if the key is already loaded (in the primary Pageant,
|
|
|
|
* which may or may not be us).
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
{
|
2019-09-08 22:29:00 +03:00
|
|
|
strbuf *blob = strbuf_new();
|
2020-02-15 10:30:19 +03:00
|
|
|
KeyList *kl;
|
2015-05-11 17:06:25 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2019-09-08 22:29:00 +03:00
|
|
|
if (type == SSH_KEYTYPE_SSH1) {
|
2020-01-05 13:28:45 +03:00
|
|
|
if (!rsa1_loadpub_f(filename, BinarySink_UPCAST(blob),
|
|
|
|
NULL, &error)) {
|
2015-05-11 17:06:25 +03:00
|
|
|
*retstr = dupprintf("Couldn't load private key (%s)", error);
|
2018-05-24 12:59:39 +03:00
|
|
|
strbuf_free(blob);
|
2015-05-11 17:06:25 +03:00
|
|
|
return PAGEANT_ACTION_FAILURE;
|
2019-09-08 22:29:00 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
2020-02-15 10:30:19 +03:00
|
|
|
kl = pageant_get_keylist(1);
|
2019-09-08 22:29:00 +03:00
|
|
|
} else {
|
2020-01-05 13:28:45 +03:00
|
|
|
if (!ppk_loadpub_f(filename, NULL, BinarySink_UPCAST(blob),
|
|
|
|
NULL, &error)) {
|
2015-05-11 17:06:25 +03:00
|
|
|
*retstr = dupprintf("Couldn't load private key (%s)", error);
|
2018-05-24 12:59:39 +03:00
|
|
|
strbuf_free(blob);
|
2019-09-08 22:29:00 +03:00
|
|
|
return PAGEANT_ACTION_FAILURE;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2020-02-15 10:30:19 +03:00
|
|
|
kl = pageant_get_keylist(2);
|
2019-09-08 22:29:00 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
2020-02-15 10:30:19 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (kl) {
|
|
|
|
if (kl->broken) {
|
2019-09-08 22:29:00 +03:00
|
|
|
*retstr = dupstr("Received broken key list from agent");
|
2020-02-15 10:30:19 +03:00
|
|
|
keylist_free(kl);
|
2018-05-24 12:59:39 +03:00
|
|
|
strbuf_free(blob);
|
2019-09-08 22:29:00 +03:00
|
|
|
return PAGEANT_ACTION_FAILURE;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2020-02-15 10:30:19 +03:00
|
|
|
for (size_t i = 0; i < kl->nkeys; i++) {
|
|
|
|
if (ptrlen_eq_ptrlen(ptrlen_from_strbuf(blob),
|
|
|
|
kl->keys[i].blob)) {
|
2019-09-08 22:29:00 +03:00
|
|
|
/* Key is already present; we can now leave. */
|
2020-02-15 10:30:19 +03:00
|
|
|
keylist_free(kl);
|
2019-09-08 22:29:00 +03:00
|
|
|
strbuf_free(blob);
|
2015-05-11 17:06:25 +03:00
|
|
|
return PAGEANT_ACTION_OK;
|
2019-09-08 22:29:00 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
2015-05-11 17:06:25 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2020-02-15 10:30:19 +03:00
|
|
|
keylist_free(kl);
|
2019-09-08 22:29:00 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
2015-05-11 17:06:25 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2019-09-08 22:29:00 +03:00
|
|
|
strbuf_free(blob);
|
2015-05-11 17:06:25 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2020-02-08 20:28:46 +03:00
|
|
|
if (add_encrypted) {
|
|
|
|
const char *load_error;
|
|
|
|
LoadedFile *lf = lf_load_keyfile(filename, &load_error);
|
|
|
|
if (!lf) {
|
|
|
|
*retstr = dupstr(load_error);
|
|
|
|
return PAGEANT_ACTION_FAILURE;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2020-02-15 10:30:19 +03:00
|
|
|
PageantClientOp *pco = pageant_client_op_new();
|
|
|
|
put_byte(pco, SSH2_AGENTC_EXTENSION);
|
|
|
|
put_stringpl(pco, extension_names[EXT_ADD_PPK]);
|
|
|
|
put_string(pco, lf->data, lf->len);
|
2020-02-08 20:28:46 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
lf_free(lf);
|
|
|
|
|
2020-02-15 10:30:19 +03:00
|
|
|
unsigned reply = pageant_client_op_query(pco);
|
|
|
|
pageant_client_op_free(pco);
|
2020-02-08 20:28:46 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2020-02-15 10:30:19 +03:00
|
|
|
if (reply != SSH_AGENT_SUCCESS) {
|
2020-02-08 20:28:46 +03:00
|
|
|
*retstr = dupstr("The already running Pageant "
|
|
|
|
"refused to add the key.");
|
|
|
|
return PAGEANT_ACTION_FAILURE;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return PAGEANT_ACTION_OK;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2015-05-11 17:06:25 +03:00
|
|
|
error = NULL;
|
|
|
|
if (type == SSH_KEYTYPE_SSH1)
|
2020-01-05 13:28:45 +03:00
|
|
|
needs_pass = rsa1_encrypted_f(filename, &comment);
|
2015-05-11 17:06:25 +03:00
|
|
|
else
|
2020-01-05 13:28:45 +03:00
|
|
|
needs_pass = ppk_encrypted_f(filename, &comment);
|
2015-05-11 17:06:25 +03:00
|
|
|
attempts = 0;
|
|
|
|
if (type == SSH_KEYTYPE_SSH1)
|
2019-09-08 22:29:00 +03:00
|
|
|
rkey = snew(RSAKey);
|
2015-05-11 17:06:25 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Loop round repeatedly trying to load the key, until we either
|
|
|
|
* succeed, fail for some serious reason, or run out of
|
|
|
|
* passphrases to try.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
while (1) {
|
2019-09-08 22:29:00 +03:00
|
|
|
if (needs_pass) {
|
2015-05-11 17:06:25 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* If we've been given a passphrase on input, try using
|
|
|
|
* it. Otherwise, try one from our tree234 of previously
|
|
|
|
* useful passphrases.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
if (passphrase) {
|
|
|
|
this_passphrase = (attempts == 0 ? passphrase : NULL);
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
this_passphrase = (const char *)index234(passphrases, attempts);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (!this_passphrase) {
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Run out of passphrases to try.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
*retstr = comment;
|
2017-02-14 23:42:26 +03:00
|
|
|
sfree(rkey);
|
2015-05-11 17:06:25 +03:00
|
|
|
return PAGEANT_ACTION_NEED_PP;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2019-09-08 22:29:00 +03:00
|
|
|
} else
|
|
|
|
this_passphrase = "";
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (type == SSH_KEYTYPE_SSH1)
|
2020-01-05 13:28:45 +03:00
|
|
|
ret = rsa1_load_f(filename, rkey, this_passphrase, &error);
|
2019-09-08 22:29:00 +03:00
|
|
|
else {
|
2020-01-05 13:28:45 +03:00
|
|
|
skey = ppk_load_f(filename, this_passphrase, &error);
|
2019-09-08 22:29:00 +03:00
|
|
|
if (skey == SSH2_WRONG_PASSPHRASE)
|
|
|
|
ret = -1;
|
|
|
|
else if (!skey)
|
|
|
|
ret = 0;
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
ret = 1;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2015-05-11 17:06:25 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (ret == 0) {
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Failed to load the key file, for some reason other than
|
|
|
|
* a bad passphrase.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
*retstr = dupstr(error);
|
2017-02-14 23:42:26 +03:00
|
|
|
sfree(rkey);
|
2019-05-04 18:19:13 +03:00
|
|
|
if (comment)
|
|
|
|
sfree(comment);
|
2015-05-11 17:06:25 +03:00
|
|
|
return PAGEANT_ACTION_FAILURE;
|
|
|
|
} else if (ret == 1) {
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Successfully loaded the key file.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Passphrase wasn't right; go round again.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
attempts++;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
2017-04-15 11:06:22 +03:00
|
|
|
* If we get here, we've successfully loaded the key into
|
2015-05-11 17:06:25 +03:00
|
|
|
* rkey/skey, but not yet added it to the agent.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* If the key was successfully decrypted, save the passphrase for
|
|
|
|
* use with other keys we try to load.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
char *pp_copy = dupstr(this_passphrase);
|
2019-09-08 22:29:00 +03:00
|
|
|
if (addpos234(passphrases, pp_copy, 0) != pp_copy) {
|
2015-05-11 17:06:25 +03:00
|
|
|
/* No need; it was already there. */
|
|
|
|
smemclr(pp_copy, strlen(pp_copy));
|
|
|
|
sfree(pp_copy);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (comment)
|
2019-09-08 22:29:00 +03:00
|
|
|
sfree(comment);
|
2015-05-11 17:06:25 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (type == SSH_KEYTYPE_SSH1) {
|
2020-02-15 10:30:19 +03:00
|
|
|
PageantClientOp *pco = pageant_client_op_new();
|
|
|
|
put_byte(pco, SSH1_AGENTC_ADD_RSA_IDENTITY);
|
|
|
|
rsa_ssh1_private_blob_agent(BinarySink_UPCAST(pco), rkey);
|
|
|
|
put_stringz(pco, rkey->comment);
|
|
|
|
unsigned reply = pageant_client_op_query(pco);
|
|
|
|
pageant_client_op_free(pco);
|
|
|
|
|
2020-02-08 19:36:55 +03:00
|
|
|
freersakey(rkey);
|
|
|
|
sfree(rkey);
|
2020-02-15 10:30:19 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (reply != SSH_AGENT_SUCCESS) {
|
2020-02-08 19:36:55 +03:00
|
|
|
*retstr = dupstr("The already running Pageant "
|
|
|
|
"refused to add the key.");
|
|
|
|
return PAGEANT_ACTION_FAILURE;
|
2019-09-08 22:29:00 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
2020-02-15 10:30:19 +03:00
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
PageantClientOp *pco = pageant_client_op_new();
|
|
|
|
put_byte(pco, SSH2_AGENTC_ADD_IDENTITY);
|
|
|
|
put_stringz(pco, ssh_key_ssh_id(skey->key));
|
|
|
|
ssh_key_openssh_blob(skey->key, BinarySink_UPCAST(pco));
|
|
|
|
put_stringz(pco, skey->comment);
|
|
|
|
unsigned reply = pageant_client_op_query(pco);
|
|
|
|
pageant_client_op_free(pco);
|
2020-02-08 19:36:55 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2020-02-08 19:56:30 +03:00
|
|
|
sfree(skey->comment);
|
2020-02-08 19:36:55 +03:00
|
|
|
ssh_key_free(skey->key);
|
|
|
|
sfree(skey);
|
2020-02-15 10:30:19 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (reply != SSH_AGENT_SUCCESS) {
|
|
|
|
*retstr = dupstr("The already running Pageant "
|
|
|
|
"refused to add the key.");
|
|
|
|
return PAGEANT_ACTION_FAILURE;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2015-05-11 17:06:25 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return PAGEANT_ACTION_OK;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2015-05-11 20:34:45 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
int pageant_enum_keys(pageant_key_enum_fn_t callback, void *callback_ctx,
|
|
|
|
char **retstr)
|
|
|
|
{
|
2020-02-15 10:30:19 +03:00
|
|
|
KeyList *kl1 = NULL, *kl2 = NULL;
|
2015-05-12 15:27:33 +03:00
|
|
|
struct pageant_pubkey cbkey;
|
2020-02-15 10:30:19 +03:00
|
|
|
int toret = PAGEANT_ACTION_FAILURE;
|
2015-05-11 20:34:45 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2020-02-15 10:30:19 +03:00
|
|
|
kl1 = pageant_get_keylist(1);
|
|
|
|
if (!kl1) {
|
2018-05-28 01:58:20 +03:00
|
|
|
*retstr = dupstr("Did not receive an SSH-1 key list from agent");
|
2020-02-15 10:30:19 +03:00
|
|
|
goto out;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (kl1->broken) {
|
|
|
|
*retstr = dupstr("Received broken SSH-1 key list from agent");
|
|
|
|
goto out;
|
2015-05-11 20:34:45 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2020-02-15 10:30:19 +03:00
|
|
|
kl2 = pageant_get_keylist(2);
|
|
|
|
if (!kl2) {
|
|
|
|
*retstr = dupstr("Did not receive an SSH-2 key list from agent");
|
|
|
|
goto out;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (kl2->broken) {
|
|
|
|
*retstr = dupstr("Received broken SSH-2 key list from agent");
|
|
|
|
goto out;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2015-05-11 20:34:45 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2020-02-15 10:30:19 +03:00
|
|
|
for (size_t i = 0; i < kl1->nkeys; i++) {
|
|
|
|
cbkey.blob = strbuf_new();
|
|
|
|
put_datapl(cbkey.blob, kl1->keys[i].blob);
|
|
|
|
cbkey.comment = mkstr(kl1->keys[i].comment);
|
|
|
|
cbkey.ssh_version = 1;
|
2015-05-11 20:34:45 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2020-02-15 10:30:19 +03:00
|
|
|
/* Decode public blob into a key in order to fingerprint it */
|
|
|
|
RSAKey rkey;
|
|
|
|
memset(&rkey, 0, sizeof(rkey));
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
BinarySource src[1];
|
|
|
|
BinarySource_BARE_INIT_PL(src, kl1->keys[i].blob);
|
|
|
|
get_rsa_ssh1_pub(src, &rkey, RSA_SSH1_EXPONENT_FIRST);
|
|
|
|
if (get_err(src)) {
|
|
|
|
*retstr = dupstr("Received an invalid SSH-1 key from agent");
|
|
|
|
goto out;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2015-05-11 20:34:45 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
2020-02-15 10:30:19 +03:00
|
|
|
char *fingerprint = rsa_ssh1_fingerprint(&rkey);
|
|
|
|
freersakey(&rkey);
|
2018-05-28 01:58:20 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
callback(callback_ctx, fingerprint, cbkey.comment, &cbkey);
|
2018-05-24 12:59:39 +03:00
|
|
|
strbuf_free(cbkey.blob);
|
2018-05-28 01:58:20 +03:00
|
|
|
sfree(cbkey.comment);
|
2018-06-03 10:08:53 +03:00
|
|
|
sfree(fingerprint);
|
2015-05-11 20:34:45 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2020-02-15 10:30:19 +03:00
|
|
|
for (size_t i = 0; i < kl2->nkeys; i++) {
|
2018-05-28 01:58:20 +03:00
|
|
|
cbkey.blob = strbuf_new();
|
2020-02-15 10:30:19 +03:00
|
|
|
put_datapl(cbkey.blob, kl2->keys[i].blob);
|
|
|
|
cbkey.comment = mkstr(kl2->keys[i].comment);
|
2015-05-12 15:27:33 +03:00
|
|
|
cbkey.ssh_version = 2;
|
2020-02-15 10:30:19 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
char *fingerprint = ssh2_fingerprint_blob(kl2->keys[i].blob);
|
|
|
|
|
2018-05-28 01:58:20 +03:00
|
|
|
callback(callback_ctx, fingerprint, cbkey.comment, &cbkey);
|
2015-05-11 20:34:45 +03:00
|
|
|
sfree(fingerprint);
|
2018-05-28 01:58:20 +03:00
|
|
|
sfree(cbkey.comment);
|
2020-02-08 19:56:30 +03:00
|
|
|
strbuf_free(cbkey.blob);
|
2015-05-11 20:34:45 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2020-02-15 10:30:19 +03:00
|
|
|
*retstr = NULL;
|
|
|
|
toret = PAGEANT_ACTION_OK;
|
|
|
|
out:
|
|
|
|
if (kl1)
|
|
|
|
keylist_free(kl1);
|
|
|
|
if (kl2)
|
|
|
|
keylist_free(kl2);
|
|
|
|
return toret;
|
2015-05-11 20:34:45 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
2015-05-12 15:27:33 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
int pageant_delete_key(struct pageant_pubkey *key, char **retstr)
|
|
|
|
{
|
2020-02-15 10:30:19 +03:00
|
|
|
PageantClientOp *pco = pageant_client_op_new();
|
2018-05-24 15:18:13 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2015-05-12 15:27:33 +03:00
|
|
|
if (key->ssh_version == 1) {
|
2020-02-15 10:30:19 +03:00
|
|
|
put_byte(pco, SSH1_AGENTC_REMOVE_RSA_IDENTITY);
|
|
|
|
put_data(pco, key->blob->s, key->blob->len);
|
2015-05-12 15:27:33 +03:00
|
|
|
} else {
|
2020-02-15 10:30:19 +03:00
|
|
|
put_byte(pco, SSH2_AGENTC_REMOVE_IDENTITY);
|
|
|
|
put_string(pco, key->blob->s, key->blob->len);
|
2015-05-12 15:27:33 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2020-02-15 10:30:19 +03:00
|
|
|
unsigned reply = pageant_client_op_query(pco);
|
|
|
|
pageant_client_op_free(pco);
|
2018-05-24 15:18:13 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2020-02-15 10:30:19 +03:00
|
|
|
if (reply != SSH_AGENT_SUCCESS) {
|
2015-05-12 15:27:33 +03:00
|
|
|
*retstr = dupstr("Agent failed to delete key");
|
2020-02-15 10:30:19 +03:00
|
|
|
return PAGEANT_ACTION_FAILURE;
|
2015-05-12 15:27:33 +03:00
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
*retstr = NULL;
|
2020-02-15 10:30:19 +03:00
|
|
|
return PAGEANT_ACTION_OK;
|
2015-05-12 15:27:33 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2015-05-12 16:55:44 +03:00
|
|
|
int pageant_delete_all_keys(char **retstr)
|
|
|
|
{
|
2020-02-15 10:30:19 +03:00
|
|
|
PageantClientOp *pco;
|
|
|
|
unsigned reply;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pco = pageant_client_op_new();
|
|
|
|
put_byte(pco, SSH2_AGENTC_REMOVE_ALL_IDENTITIES);
|
|
|
|
reply = pageant_client_op_query(pco);
|
|
|
|
pageant_client_op_free(pco);
|
|
|
|
if (reply != SSH_AGENT_SUCCESS) {
|
2015-05-12 16:55:44 +03:00
|
|
|
*retstr = dupstr("Agent failed to delete SSH-2 keys");
|
|
|
|
return PAGEANT_ACTION_FAILURE;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2020-02-15 10:30:19 +03:00
|
|
|
pco = pageant_client_op_new();
|
|
|
|
put_byte(pco, SSH1_AGENTC_REMOVE_ALL_RSA_IDENTITIES);
|
|
|
|
reply = pageant_client_op_query(pco);
|
|
|
|
pageant_client_op_free(pco);
|
|
|
|
if (reply != SSH_AGENT_SUCCESS) {
|
2015-05-12 16:55:44 +03:00
|
|
|
*retstr = dupstr("Agent failed to delete SSH-1 keys");
|
|
|
|
return PAGEANT_ACTION_FAILURE;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*retstr = NULL;
|
|
|
|
return PAGEANT_ACTION_OK;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2020-02-15 19:39:02 +03:00
|
|
|
int pageant_reencrypt_key(struct pageant_pubkey *key, char **retstr)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
PageantClientOp *pco = pageant_client_op_new();
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (key->ssh_version == 1) {
|
|
|
|
*retstr = dupstr("Can't re-encrypt an SSH-1 key");
|
|
|
|
return PAGEANT_ACTION_FAILURE;
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
put_byte(pco, SSH2_AGENTC_EXTENSION);
|
|
|
|
put_stringpl(pco, extension_names[EXT_REENCRYPT]);
|
|
|
|
put_string(pco, key->blob->s, key->blob->len);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
unsigned reply = pageant_client_op_query(pco);
|
|
|
|
pageant_client_op_free(pco);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (reply != SSH_AGENT_SUCCESS) {
|
|
|
|
*retstr = dupstr("Agent failed to re-encrypt key");
|
|
|
|
return PAGEANT_ACTION_FAILURE;
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
*retstr = NULL;
|
|
|
|
return PAGEANT_ACTION_OK;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
int pageant_reencrypt_all_keys(char **retstr)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
PageantClientOp *pco = pageant_client_op_new();
|
|
|
|
put_byte(pco, SSH2_AGENTC_EXTENSION);
|
|
|
|
put_stringpl(pco, extension_names[EXT_REENCRYPT_ALL]);
|
|
|
|
unsigned reply = pageant_client_op_query(pco);
|
|
|
|
uint32_t failures = get_uint32(pco);
|
|
|
|
pageant_client_op_free(pco);
|
|
|
|
if (reply != SSH_AGENT_SUCCESS) {
|
|
|
|
*retstr = dupstr("Agent failed to re-encrypt any keys");
|
|
|
|
return PAGEANT_ACTION_FAILURE;
|
|
|
|
} else if (failures == 1) {
|
|
|
|
/* special case for English grammar */
|
|
|
|
*retstr = dupstr("1 key remains unencrypted");
|
|
|
|
return PAGEANT_ACTION_WARNING;
|
|
|
|
} else if (failures > 0) {
|
|
|
|
*retstr = dupprintf("%"PRIu32" keys remain unencrypted", failures);
|
|
|
|
return PAGEANT_ACTION_WARNING;
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
*retstr = NULL;
|
|
|
|
return PAGEANT_ACTION_OK;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2020-02-10 00:56:21 +03:00
|
|
|
int pageant_sign(struct pageant_pubkey *key, ptrlen message, strbuf *out,
|
|
|
|
uint32_t flags, char **retstr)
|
|
|
|
{
|
2020-02-15 10:30:19 +03:00
|
|
|
PageantClientOp *pco = pageant_client_op_new();
|
|
|
|
put_byte(pco, SSH2_AGENTC_SIGN_REQUEST);
|
|
|
|
put_string(pco, key->blob->s, key->blob->len);
|
|
|
|
put_stringpl(pco, message);
|
|
|
|
put_uint32(pco, flags);
|
|
|
|
unsigned reply = pageant_client_op_query(pco);
|
|
|
|
ptrlen signature = get_string(pco);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (reply == SSH2_AGENT_SIGN_RESPONSE && !get_err(pco)) {
|
2020-02-10 00:56:21 +03:00
|
|
|
*retstr = NULL;
|
2020-02-15 10:30:19 +03:00
|
|
|
put_datapl(out, signature);
|
|
|
|
pageant_client_op_free(pco);
|
2020-02-10 00:56:21 +03:00
|
|
|
return PAGEANT_ACTION_OK;
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
*retstr = dupstr("Agent failed to create signature");
|
2020-02-15 10:30:19 +03:00
|
|
|
pageant_client_op_free(pco);
|
2020-02-10 00:56:21 +03:00
|
|
|
return PAGEANT_ACTION_FAILURE;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2015-05-12 15:27:33 +03:00
|
|
|
struct pageant_pubkey *pageant_pubkey_copy(struct pageant_pubkey *key)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct pageant_pubkey *ret = snew(struct pageant_pubkey);
|
2018-05-24 12:59:39 +03:00
|
|
|
ret->blob = strbuf_new();
|
|
|
|
put_data(ret->blob, key->blob->s, key->blob->len);
|
2015-05-12 16:48:32 +03:00
|
|
|
ret->comment = key->comment ? dupstr(key->comment) : NULL;
|
2015-05-12 15:27:33 +03:00
|
|
|
ret->ssh_version = key->ssh_version;
|
|
|
|
return ret;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
void pageant_pubkey_free(struct pageant_pubkey *key)
|
|
|
|
{
|
2015-05-12 16:48:32 +03:00
|
|
|
sfree(key->comment);
|
2018-05-24 12:59:39 +03:00
|
|
|
strbuf_free(key->blob);
|
2015-05-12 15:27:33 +03:00
|
|
|
sfree(key);
|
|
|
|
}
|