For some reason, only Visual Studio bothers to give a warning when you
write "return g()" inside a function f() when both f and g have void
return type.
(Of course it would be cleaner and more orthogonal if that was simply
legal C in the first place - but given that it's not, it would be nice
if more compilers let me know about it so I could fix it...)
This replaces all the macros like ssh_key_sign() and win_draw_text()
which take an object containing a vtable pointer and do the
dereferencing to find the actual concrete method to call. Now they're
all inline functions, which means more sensible type-checking and more
comprehensible error reports when the types go wrong, and also means
that there's no risk of double-evaluating the object argument.
This is a general cleanup which has been overdue for some time: lots
of length fields are now the machine word type rather than the (in
practice) fixed 'int'.
My normal habit these days, in new code, is to treat int and bool as
_almost_ completely separate types. I'm still willing to use C's
implicit test for zero on an integer (e.g. 'if (!blob.len)' is fine,
no need to spell it out as blob.len != 0), but generally, if a
variable is going to be conceptually a boolean, I like to declare it
bool and assign to it using 'true' or 'false' rather than 0 or 1.
PuTTY is an exception, because it predates the C99 bool, and I've
stuck to its existing coding style even when adding new code to it.
But it's been annoying me more and more, so now that I've decided C99
bool is an acceptable thing to require from our toolchain in the first
place, here's a quite thorough trawl through the source doing
'boolification'. Many variables and function parameters are now typed
as bool rather than int; many assignments of 0 or 1 to those variables
are now spelled 'true' or 'false'.
I managed this thorough conversion with the help of a custom clang
plugin that I wrote to trawl the AST and apply heuristics to point out
where things might want changing. So I've even managed to do a decent
job on parts of the code I haven't looked at in years!
To make the plugin's work easier, I pushed platform front ends
generally in the direction of using standard 'bool' in preference to
platform-specific boolean types like Windows BOOL or GTK's gboolean;
I've left the platform booleans in places they _have_ to be for the
platform APIs to work right, but variables only used by my own code
have been converted wherever I found them.
In a few places there are int values that look very like booleans in
_most_ of the places they're used, but have a rarely-used third value,
or a distinction between different nonzero values that most users
don't care about. In these cases, I've _removed_ uses of 'true' and
'false' for the return values, to emphasise that there's something
more subtle going on than a simple boolean answer:
- the 'multisel' field in dialog.h's list box structure, for which
the GTK front end in particular recognises a difference between 1
and 2 but nearly everything else treats as boolean
- the 'urgent' parameter to plug_receive, where 1 vs 2 tells you
something about the specific location of the urgent pointer, but
most clients only care about 0 vs 'something nonzero'
- the return value of wc_match, where -1 indicates a syntax error in
the wildcard.
- the return values from SSH-1 RSA-key loading functions, which use
-1 for 'wrong passphrase' and 0 for all other failures (so any
caller which already knows it's not loading an _encrypted private_
key can treat them as boolean)
- term->esc_query, and the 'query' parameter in toggle_mode in
terminal.c, which _usually_ hold 0 for ESC[123h or 1 for ESC[?123h,
but can also hold -1 for some other intervening character that we
don't support.
In a few places there's an integer that I haven't turned into a bool
even though it really _can_ only take values 0 or 1 (and, as above,
tried to make the call sites consistent in not calling those values
true and false), on the grounds that I thought it would make it more
confusing to imply that the 0 value was in some sense 'negative' or
bad and the 1 positive or good:
- the return value of plug_accepting uses the POSIXish convention of
0=success and nonzero=error; I think if I made it bool then I'd
also want to reverse its sense, and that's a job for a separate
piece of work.
- the 'screen' parameter to lineptr() in terminal.c, where 0 and 1
represent the default and alternate screens. There's no obvious
reason why one of those should be considered 'true' or 'positive'
or 'success' - they're just indices - so I've left it as int.
ssh_scp_recv had particularly confusing semantics for its previous int
return value: its call sites used '<= 0' to check for error, but it
never actually returned a negative number, just 0 or 1. Now the
function and its call sites agree that it's a bool.
In a couple of places I've renamed variables called 'ret', because I
don't like that name any more - it's unclear whether it means the
return value (in preparation) for the _containing_ function or the
return value received from a subroutine call, and occasionally I've
accidentally used the same variable for both and introduced a bug. So
where one of those got in my way, I've renamed it to 'toret' or 'retd'
(the latter short for 'returned') in line with my usual modern
practice, but I haven't done a thorough job of finding all of them.
Finally, one amusing side effect of doing this is that I've had to
separate quite a few chained assignments. It used to be perfectly fine
to write 'a = b = c = TRUE' when a,b,c were int and TRUE was just a
the 'true' defined by stdbool.h, that idiom provokes a warning from
gcc: 'suggest parentheses around assignment used as truth value'!
This commit includes <stdbool.h> from defs.h and deletes my
traditional definitions of TRUE and FALSE, but other than that, it's a
100% mechanical search-and-replace transforming all uses of TRUE and
FALSE into the C99-standardised lowercase spellings.
No actual types are changed in this commit; that will come next. This
is just getting the noise out of the way, so that subsequent commits
can have a higher proportion of signal.
ssh2connection.c now knows how to unmarshal the message formats for
all the channel requests we'll need to handle when we're the server
and a client sends them. Each one is translated into a call to a new
method in the Channel vtable, which is implemented by a trivial
'always fail' routine in every channel type we know about so far.
The vtable method underneath sshfwd_write now takes an is_stderr
parameter, and in SSH-2, this is implemented by having separate stdout
and stderr bufchains in each outgoing channel, and counting the size
of both for the purposes of measuring backlog and so forth.
To avoid making _most_ call sites more verbose, the usual macro
wrapper hasn't changed its API; it just sets is_stderr=FALSE. To use
the new feature, there's an sshfwd_write_ext macro that exposes the
extra parameter.
Some kinds of channel, even after they've sent EOF in both directions,
still have something to do before they initiate the CLOSE mechanism
and wind up the channel completely. For example, a session channel
with a subprocess running inside it will want to be sure to send the
"exit-status" or "exit-signal" notification, even if that happens
after bidirectional EOF of the data channels.
Previously, the SSH-2 connection layer had the standard policy that
once EOF had been both sent and received, it would start the final
close procedure. There's a method chan_want_close() by which a Channel
could vary this policy in one direction, by indicating that it wanted
the close procedure to commence after EOF was sent in only one
direction. Its parameters are a pair of booleans saying whether EOF
has been sent, and whether it's been received.
Now chan_want_close can vary the policy in the other direction as
well: if it returns FALSE even when _both_ parameters are true, the
connection layer will honour that, and not send CHANNEL_CLOSE. If it
does that, the Channel is responsible for indicating when it _does_
want close later, by calling sshfwd_initiate_close.
Turns out that initiation of a CHANNEL_CLOSE message before both sides
have sent EOF is not only for _unclean_ closures or emergencies; it's
actually a perfectly normal thing that some channel types want to do.
(For example, a channel with a pty at the server end of it has no real
concept of sending EOF independently in both directions: when the pty
master sends EIO, the pty is no longer functioning, and you can no
longer send to it any more than you can receive.)
This gets another big pile of logic out of ssh2connection and puts it
somewhere more central. Now the only thing left in ssh2connection is
the formatting and parsing of the various channel requests; the logic
deciding which ones to issue and what to do about them is devolved to
the Channel implementation, as it properly should be.
In my future plans, some SshChannels are going to need to be able to
ask favours from the connection layer as a whole. And an SshChannel is
inextricably tied to an instance of the connection layer, so there's
no real reason _not_ to make the pointer generally available.
Each of the new subroutines corresponds to one of the channel types
for which we know how to parse a CHANNEL_OPEN, and has a collection of
parameters corresponding to the fields of that message structure.
ssh2_connection_filter_queue now confines itself to parsing the
message, calling one of those functions, and constructing an
appropriate reply message if any.
Instead of the central code in ssh2_connection_filter_queue doing both
the job of parsing the channel request and deciding whether it's
acceptable, each Channel vtable now has a method for every channel
request type we recognise.
It doesn't really have to be in ssh.c sharing that file's internal
data structures; it's as much an independent object implementation as
any of the less trivial Channel instances. So it's another thing we
can get out of that too-large source file.
Clients outside ssh.c - all implementations of Channel - will now not
see the ssh_channel data type itself, but only a subobject of the
interface type SshChannel. All the sshfwd_* functions have become
methods in that interface type's vtable (though, wrapped in the usual
kind of macros, the call sites look identical).
This paves the way for me to split up the SSH-1 and SSH-2 connection
layers and have each one lay out its channel bookkeeping structure as
it sees fit; as long as they each provide an implementation of the
sshfwd_ method family, the types behind that need not look different.
A minor good effect of this is that the sshfwd_ methods are no longer
global symbols, so they don't have to be stubbed in Unix Pageant to
get it to compile.
There's now an interface called 'Channel', which handles the local
side of an SSH connection-layer channel, in terms of knowing where to
send incoming channel data to, whether to close the channel, etc.
Channel and the previous 'struct ssh_channel' mutually refer. The
latter contains all the SSH-specific parts, and as much of the common
logic as possible: in particular, Channel doesn't have to know
anything about SSH packet formats, or which SSH protocol version is in
use, or deal with all the fiddly stuff about window sizes - with the
exception that x11fwd.c's implementation of it does have to be able to
ask for a small fixed initial window size for the bodgy system that
distinguishes upstream from downstream X forwardings.
I've taken the opportunity to move the code implementing the detailed
behaviour of agent forwarding out of ssh.c, now that all of it is on
the far side of a uniform interface. (This also means that if I later
implement agent forwarding directly to a Unix socket as an
alternative, it'll be a matter of changing just the one call to
agentf_new() that makes the Channel to plug into a forwarding.)
Simon Tatham