UBsan points out that if the input pointer is NULL, we'll pass it to
memcpy, which is technically illegal by the C standard _even_ if the
length you pass with it is zero.
The number of people has been steadily increasing who read our source
code with an editor that thinks tab stops are 4 spaces apart, as
opposed to the traditional tty-derived 8 that the PuTTY code expects.
So I've been wondering for ages about just fixing it, and switching to
a spaces-only policy throughout the code. And I recently found out
about 'git blame -w', which should make this change not too disruptive
for the purposes of source-control archaeology; so perhaps now is the
time.
While I'm at it, I've also taken the opportunity to remove all the
trailing spaces from source lines (on the basis that git dislikes
them, and is the only thing that seems to have a strong opinion one
way or the other).
Apologies to anyone downstream of this code who has complicated patch
sets to rebase past this change. I don't intend it to be needed again.
We were carefully checking for overflow inside safemalloc() before
multiplying together the two factors of the desired allocation size.
But snew_plus() did an addition _outside_ safemalloc, without the same
guard. Now that addition also happens inside safemalloc.
These versions, distinguished by the _nm suffix on their names, avoid
using realloc to grow the array, in case it moves the block and leaves
a copy of the data in the freed memory at the old address. (The suffix
'nm' stands for 'no moving'.) Instead, the array is grown by making a
new allocation, manually copying the data over, and carefully clearing
the old block before freeing it.
(An alternative would be to give this code base its own custom heap in
which the ordinary realloc takes care about this kind of thing, but I
don't really feel like going to that much effort!)
The idea of these is that they centralise the common idiom along the
lines of
if (logical_array_len >= physical_array_size) {
physical_array_size = logical_array_len * 5 / 4 + 256;
array = sresize(array, physical_array_size, ElementType);
}
which happens at a zillion call sites throughout this code base, with
different random choices of the geometric factor and additive
constant, sometimes forgetting them completely, and generally doing a
lot of repeated work.
The new macro sgrowarray(array,size,n) has the semantics: here are the
array pointer and its physical size for you to modify, now please
ensure that the nth element exists, so I can write into it. And
sgrowarrayn(array,size,n,m) is the same except that it ensures that
the array has size at least n+m (so sgrowarray is just the special
case where m=1).
Now that this is a single centralised implementation that will be used
everywhere, I've also gone to more effort in the implementation, with
careful overflow checks that would have been painful to put at all the
previous call sites.
This commit also switches over every use of sresize(), apart from a
few where I really didn't think it would gain anything. A consequence
of that is that a lot of array-size variables have to have their types
changed to size_t, because the macros require that (they address-take
the size to pass to the underlying function).
misc.c has always contained a combination of things that are tied
tightly into the PuTTY code base (e.g. they use the conf system, or
work with our sockets abstraction) and things that are pure standalone
utility functions like nullstrcmp() which could quite happily be
dropped into any C program without causing a link failure.
Now the latter kind of standalone utility code lives in the new source
file utils.c, whose only external dependency is on memory.c (for snew,
sfree etc), which in turn requires the user to provide an
out_of_memory() function. So it should now be much easier to link test
programs that use PuTTY's low-level functions without also pulling in
half its bulky infrastructure.
In the process, I came across a memory allocation logging system
enabled by -DMALLOC_LOG that looks long since bit-rotted; in any case
we have much more advanced tools for that kind of thing these days,
like valgrind and Leak Sanitiser, so I've just removed it rather than
trying to transplant it somewhere sensible. (We can always pull it
back out of the version control history if really necessary, but I
haven't used it in at least a decade.)
The other slightly silly thing I did was to give bufchain a function
pointer field that points to queue_idempotent_callback(), and disallow
direct setting of the 'ic' field in favour of calling
bufchain_set_callback which will fill that pointer in too. That allows
the bufchain system to live in utils.c rather than misc.c, so that
programs can use it without also having to link in the callback system
or provide an annoying stub of that function. In fact that's just
allowed me to remove stubs of that kind from PuTTYgen and Pageant!
Now they live in their own file memory.c. The advantage of this is
that you can link them into a binary without also pulling in the rest
of misc.c with its various dependencies on other parts of the code,
such as conf.c.
Simon Tatham