putty

Граф коммитов

Автор	SHA1	Сообщение	Дата
Simon Tatham	751a989091	Add and use BinarySource_*INIT_PL. A great many BinarySource_BARE_INIT calls are passing the two halves of a ptrlen as separate arguments. It saves a lot of call-site faff to have a variant of the init function that just takes the whole ptrlen in one go.	2019-02-06 21:46:10 +00:00
Simon Tatham	3214563d8e	Convert a lot of 'int' variables to 'bool'. My normal habit these days, in new code, is to treat int and bool as _almost_ completely separate types. I'm still willing to use C's implicit test for zero on an integer (e.g. 'if (!blob.len)' is fine, no need to spell it out as blob.len != 0), but generally, if a variable is going to be conceptually a boolean, I like to declare it bool and assign to it using 'true' or 'false' rather than 0 or 1. PuTTY is an exception, because it predates the C99 bool, and I've stuck to its existing coding style even when adding new code to it. But it's been annoying me more and more, so now that I've decided C99 bool is an acceptable thing to require from our toolchain in the first place, here's a quite thorough trawl through the source doing 'boolification'. Many variables and function parameters are now typed as bool rather than int; many assignments of 0 or 1 to those variables are now spelled 'true' or 'false'. I managed this thorough conversion with the help of a custom clang plugin that I wrote to trawl the AST and apply heuristics to point out where things might want changing. So I've even managed to do a decent job on parts of the code I haven't looked at in years! To make the plugin's work easier, I pushed platform front ends generally in the direction of using standard 'bool' in preference to platform-specific boolean types like Windows BOOL or GTK's gboolean; I've left the platform booleans in places they _have_ to be for the platform APIs to work right, but variables only used by my own code have been converted wherever I found them. In a few places there are int values that look very like booleans in _most_ of the places they're used, but have a rarely-used third value, or a distinction between different nonzero values that most users don't care about. In these cases, I've _removed_ uses of 'true' and 'false' for the return values, to emphasise that there's something more subtle going on than a simple boolean answer: - the 'multisel' field in dialog.h's list box structure, for which the GTK front end in particular recognises a difference between 1 and 2 but nearly everything else treats as boolean - the 'urgent' parameter to plug_receive, where 1 vs 2 tells you something about the specific location of the urgent pointer, but most clients only care about 0 vs 'something nonzero' - the return value of wc_match, where -1 indicates a syntax error in the wildcard. - the return values from SSH-1 RSA-key loading functions, which use -1 for 'wrong passphrase' and 0 for all other failures (so any caller which already knows it's not loading an _encrypted private_ key can treat them as boolean) - term->esc_query, and the 'query' parameter in toggle_mode in terminal.c, which _usually_ hold 0 for ESC[123h or 1 for ESC[?123h, but can also hold -1 for some other intervening character that we don't support. In a few places there's an integer that I haven't turned into a bool even though it really _can_ only take values 0 or 1 (and, as above, tried to make the call sites consistent in not calling those values true and false), on the grounds that I thought it would make it more confusing to imply that the 0 value was in some sense 'negative' or bad and the 1 positive or good: - the return value of plug_accepting uses the POSIXish convention of 0=success and nonzero=error; I think if I made it bool then I'd also want to reverse its sense, and that's a job for a separate piece of work. - the 'screen' parameter to lineptr() in terminal.c, where 0 and 1 represent the default and alternate screens. There's no obvious reason why one of those should be considered 'true' or 'positive' or 'success' - they're just indices - so I've left it as int. ssh_scp_recv had particularly confusing semantics for its previous int return value: its call sites used '<= 0' to check for error, but it never actually returned a negative number, just 0 or 1. Now the function and its call sites agree that it's a bool. In a couple of places I've renamed variables called 'ret', because I don't like that name any more - it's unclear whether it means the return value (in preparation) for the _containing_ function or the return value received from a subroutine call, and occasionally I've accidentally used the same variable for both and introduced a bug. So where one of those got in my way, I've renamed it to 'toret' or 'retd' (the latter short for 'returned') in line with my usual modern practice, but I haven't done a thorough job of finding all of them. Finally, one amusing side effect of doing this is that I've had to separate quite a few chained assignments. It used to be perfectly fine to write 'a = b = c = TRUE' when a,b,c were int and TRUE was just a the 'true' defined by stdbool.h, that idiom provokes a warning from gcc: 'suggest parentheses around assignment used as truth value'!	2018-11-03 13:45:00 +00:00
Simon Tatham	679fa90dfe	Move binary packet protocols and censoring out of ssh.c. sshbpp.h now defines a classoid that encapsulates both directions of an SSH binary packet protocol - that is, a system for reading a bufchain of incoming data and turning it into a stream of PktIn, and another system for taking a PktOut and turning it into data on an outgoing bufchain. The state structure in each of those files contains everything that used to be in the 'rdpkt2_state' structure and its friends, and also quite a lot of bits and pieces like cipher and MAC states that used to live in the main Ssh structure. One minor effect of this layer separation is that I've had to extend the packet dispatch table by one, because the BPP layer can no longer directly trigger sending of SSH_MSG_UNIMPLEMENTED for a message too short to have a type byte. Instead, I extend the PktIn type field to use an out-of-range value to encode that, and the easiest way to make that trigger an UNIMPLEMENTED message is to have the dispatch table contain an entry for it. (That's a system that may come in useful again - I was also wondering about inventing a fake type code to indicate network EOF, so that that could be propagated through the layers and be handled by whichever one currently knew best how to respond.) I've also moved the packet-censoring code into its own pair of files, partly because I was going to want to do that anyway sooner or later, and mostly because it's called from the BPP code, and the SSH-2 version in particular has to be called from both the main SSH-2 BPP and the bare unencrypted protocol used for connection sharing. While I was at it, I took the opportunity to merge the outgoing and incoming censor functions, so that the parts that were common between them (e.g. CHANNEL_DATA messages look the same in both directions) didn't need to be repeated.	2018-06-09 14:41:30 +01:00

Автор

SHA1

Сообщение

Дата

Simon Tatham

751a989091

Add and use BinarySource_*INIT_PL.

A great many BinarySource_BARE_INIT calls are passing the two halves
of a ptrlen as separate arguments. It saves a lot of call-site faff to
have a variant of the init function that just takes the whole ptrlen
in one go.

2019-02-06 21:46:10 +00:00

Simon Tatham

3214563d8e

Convert a lot of 'int' variables to 'bool'.

My normal habit these days, in new code, is to treat int and bool as
_almost_ completely separate types. I'm still willing to use C's
implicit test for zero on an integer (e.g. 'if (!blob.len)' is fine,
no need to spell it out as blob.len != 0), but generally, if a
variable is going to be conceptually a boolean, I like to declare it
bool and assign to it using 'true' or 'false' rather than 0 or 1.

PuTTY is an exception, because it predates the C99 bool, and I've
stuck to its existing coding style even when adding new code to it.
But it's been annoying me more and more, so now that I've decided C99
bool is an acceptable thing to require from our toolchain in the first
place, here's a quite thorough trawl through the source doing
'boolification'. Many variables and function parameters are now typed
as bool rather than int; many assignments of 0 or 1 to those variables
are now spelled 'true' or 'false'.

I managed this thorough conversion with the help of a custom clang
plugin that I wrote to trawl the AST and apply heuristics to point out
where things might want changing. So I've even managed to do a decent
job on parts of the code I haven't looked at in years!

To make the plugin's work easier, I pushed platform front ends
generally in the direction of using standard 'bool' in preference to
platform-specific boolean types like Windows BOOL or GTK's gboolean;
I've left the platform booleans in places they _have_ to be for the
platform APIs to work right, but variables only used by my own code
have been converted wherever I found them.

In a few places there are int values that look very like booleans in
_most_ of the places they're used, but have a rarely-used third value,
or a distinction between different nonzero values that most users
don't care about. In these cases, I've _removed_ uses of 'true' and
'false' for the return values, to emphasise that there's something
more subtle going on than a simple boolean answer:
 - the 'multisel' field in dialog.h's list box structure, for which
   the GTK front end in particular recognises a difference between 1
   and 2 but nearly everything else treats as boolean
 - the 'urgent' parameter to plug_receive, where 1 vs 2 tells you
   something about the specific location of the urgent pointer, but
   most clients only care about 0 vs 'something nonzero'
 - the return value of wc_match, where -1 indicates a syntax error in
   the wildcard.
 - the return values from SSH-1 RSA-key loading functions, which use
   -1 for 'wrong passphrase' and 0 for all other failures (so any
   caller which already knows it's not loading an _encrypted private_
   key can treat them as boolean)
 - term->esc_query, and the 'query' parameter in toggle_mode in
   terminal.c, which _usually_ hold 0 for ESC[123h or 1 for ESC[?123h,
   but can also hold -1 for some other intervening character that we
   don't support.

In a few places there's an integer that I haven't turned into a bool
even though it really _can_ only take values 0 or 1 (and, as above,
tried to make the call sites consistent in not calling those values
true and false), on the grounds that I thought it would make it more
confusing to imply that the 0 value was in some sense 'negative' or
bad and the 1 positive or good:
 - the return value of plug_accepting uses the POSIXish convention of
   0=success and nonzero=error; I think if I made it bool then I'd
   also want to reverse its sense, and that's a job for a separate
   piece of work.
 - the 'screen' parameter to lineptr() in terminal.c, where 0 and 1
   represent the default and alternate screens. There's no obvious
   reason why one of those should be considered 'true' or 'positive'
   or 'success' - they're just indices - so I've left it as int.

ssh_scp_recv had particularly confusing semantics for its previous int
return value: its call sites used '<= 0' to check for error, but it
never actually returned a negative number, just 0 or 1. Now the
function and its call sites agree that it's a bool.

In a couple of places I've renamed variables called 'ret', because I
don't like that name any more - it's unclear whether it means the
return value (in preparation) for the _containing_ function or the
return value received from a subroutine call, and occasionally I've
accidentally used the same variable for both and introduced a bug. So
where one of those got in my way, I've renamed it to 'toret' or 'retd'
(the latter short for 'returned') in line with my usual modern
practice, but I haven't done a thorough job of finding all of them.

Finally, one amusing side effect of doing this is that I've had to
separate quite a few chained assignments. It used to be perfectly fine
to write 'a = b = c = TRUE' when a,b,c were int and TRUE was just a
the 'true' defined by stdbool.h, that idiom provokes a warning from
gcc: 'suggest parentheses around assignment used as truth value'!

2018-11-03 13:45:00 +00:00

Simon Tatham

679fa90dfe

Move binary packet protocols and censoring out of ssh.c.

sshbpp.h now defines a classoid that encapsulates both directions of
an SSH binary packet protocol - that is, a system for reading a
bufchain of incoming data and turning it into a stream of PktIn, and
another system for taking a PktOut and turning it into data on an
outgoing bufchain.

The state structure in each of those files contains everything that
used to be in the 'rdpkt2_state' structure and its friends, and also
quite a lot of bits and pieces like cipher and MAC states that used to
live in the main Ssh structure.

One minor effect of this layer separation is that I've had to extend
the packet dispatch table by one, because the BPP layer can no longer
directly trigger sending of SSH_MSG_UNIMPLEMENTED for a message too
short to have a type byte. Instead, I extend the PktIn type field to
use an out-of-range value to encode that, and the easiest way to make
that trigger an UNIMPLEMENTED message is to have the dispatch table
contain an entry for it.

(That's a system that may come in useful again - I was also wondering
about inventing a fake type code to indicate network EOF, so that that
could be propagated through the layers and be handled by whichever one
currently knew best how to respond.)

I've also moved the packet-censoring code into its own pair of files,
partly because I was going to want to do that anyway sooner or later,
and mostly because it's called from the BPP code, and the SSH-2
version in particular has to be called from both the main SSH-2 BPP
and the bare unencrypted protocol used for connection sharing. While I
was at it, I took the opportunity to merge the outgoing and incoming
censor functions, so that the parts that were common between them
(e.g. CHANNEL_DATA messages look the same in both directions) didn't
need to be repeated.

2018-06-09 14:41:30 +01:00

3 Коммитов