зеркало из https://github.com/github/putty.git
207 строки
7.8 KiB
Plaintext
207 строки
7.8 KiB
Plaintext
Checklists for PuTTY administrative procedures
|
|
==============================================
|
|
|
|
Locations of the licence
|
|
------------------------
|
|
|
|
The PuTTY copyright notice and licence are stored in quite a few
|
|
places. At the start of a new year, the copyright year needs
|
|
updating in all of them; and when someone sends a massive patch,
|
|
their name needs adding in all of them too.
|
|
|
|
The LICENCE file in the main source distribution:
|
|
|
|
- putty/LICENCE
|
|
|
|
The resource files:
|
|
|
|
- putty/windows/pageant.rc
|
|
+ the copyright date appears twice, once in the About box and
|
|
once in the Licence box. Don't forget to change both!
|
|
- putty/windows/puttygen.rc
|
|
+ the copyright date appears twice, once in the About box and
|
|
once in the Licence box. Don't forget to change both!
|
|
- putty/windows/win_res.rc2
|
|
+ the copyright date appears twice, once in the About box and
|
|
once in the Licence box. Don't forget to change both!
|
|
- putty/windows/version.rc2
|
|
+ the copyright date appears once only.
|
|
- putty/unix/gtkdlg.c
|
|
+ the copyright date appears twice, once in the About box and
|
|
once in the Licence box. Don't forget to change both!
|
|
|
|
The documentation (both the preamble blurb and the licence appendix):
|
|
|
|
- putty/doc/blurb.but
|
|
- putty/doc/licence.but
|
|
|
|
The website:
|
|
|
|
- putty-website/licence.html
|
|
|
|
Before tagging a release
|
|
------------------------
|
|
|
|
- First of all, go through the source (including the documentation),
|
|
and the website, and review anything tagged with a comment
|
|
containing the word XXX-REVIEW-BEFORE-RELEASE.
|
|
(Any such comments should state clearly what needs to be done.)
|
|
|
|
- Also, do some testing of the Windows version with Minefield, and
|
|
of the Unix version with valgrind or efence or both. In
|
|
particular, any headline features for the release should get a
|
|
workout with memory checking enabled!
|
|
|
|
For a long time we got away with never checking the current version
|
|
number in at all - all version numbers were passed into the build
|
|
system on the compiler command line, and the _only_ place version
|
|
numbers showed up in the source files was in the tag information.
|
|
|
|
Unfortunately, those halcyon days are gone, and we do need the
|
|
version number checked in in a couple of places. These must be updated
|
|
_before_ tagging a new release.
|
|
|
|
The file used to generate the Unix snapshot version numbers (which
|
|
are <previousrelease>-<date> so that the Debian versioning system
|
|
orders them correctly with respect to releases):
|
|
|
|
- putty/LATEST.VER
|
|
|
|
The Windows installer script (_four_ times, on consecutive lines):
|
|
|
|
- putty/windows/putty.iss
|
|
|
|
It might also be worth going through the documentation looking for
|
|
version numbers - we have a couple of transcripts showing the help
|
|
text from the command-line tools, and it would be nice to ensure the
|
|
whole transcripts (certainly including the version numbers) are up
|
|
to date. Sometimes these are marked in between releases as `0.XX', so
|
|
it's worth grepping for that too.
|
|
|
|
- putty/doc/pscp.but
|
|
- putty/doc/plink.but
|
|
- putty/doc/psftp.but (in case it ever acquires a similar thing)
|
|
|
|
Finally, reset the epoch used for the $(Days) value computed in
|
|
Buildscr for the Windows binary version resource. It's probably not a
|
|
good idea to set it to _today_ (since it might clash with the
|
|
zero-valued field used in actual releases), so perhaps we should start
|
|
it 1000 days before the release date so as to have a largish number
|
|
recognisable as being the right kind of thing by its order of
|
|
magnitude. So, do this:
|
|
|
|
perl -e 'printf "%d\n", time/86400 - 1000'
|
|
|
|
and then substitute the resulting value into the definition of 'Epoch'
|
|
in Buildscr.
|
|
|
|
The actual release procedure
|
|
----------------------------
|
|
|
|
This is the procedure I (SGT) currently follow (or _should_ follow
|
|
:-) when actually making a release, once I'm happy with the position
|
|
of the tag.
|
|
|
|
- Double-check that we have removed anything tagged with a comment
|
|
containing the words XXX-REMOVE-BEFORE-RELEASE or
|
|
XXX-REVIEW-BEFORE-RELEASE.
|
|
|
|
- Write a release announcement (basically a summary of the changes
|
|
since the last release). Squirrel it away in
|
|
atreus:src/putty/local/announce-<ver> in case it's needed again
|
|
within days of the release going out.
|
|
|
|
- Build the release: `bob -b 0.XX putty RELEASE=0.XX'. This should
|
|
generate a basically valid release directory as `build.out/putty',
|
|
and provide link maps and sign.sh alongside that in build.out.
|
|
|
|
- Do a bit of checking that the release binaries basically work,
|
|
report their version numbers accurately, and so on. Test the
|
|
installer and the Unix source tarball.
|
|
|
|
- Save the link maps. Currently I keep these on atreus, in
|
|
src/putty/local/maps-<version>.
|
|
|
|
- Sign the release: in the `build.out' directory, type `./sign.sh
|
|
putty Releases', and enter the passphrases a lot of times.
|
|
|
|
- Now the whole release directory should be present and correct.
|
|
Upload it to atreus:www/putty/<ver>.
|
|
|
|
- Do final checks on the release directory:
|
|
+ verify all the signatures:
|
|
for i in `find . -name '*.*SA'`; do case $i in *sums*) gpg --verify $i;; *) gpg --verify $i ${i%%.?SA};; esac; done
|
|
+ check the checksum files:
|
|
md5sum -c md5sums
|
|
sha1sum -c sha1sums
|
|
sha256sum -c sha256sums
|
|
sha512sum -c sha512sums
|
|
|
|
- Having double-checked the release, copy it from atreus to
|
|
chiark:ftp/putty-<ver> and to the:www/putty/<ver>.
|
|
|
|
- Check the permissions! Actually try downloading from the, to make
|
|
sure it really works.
|
|
|
|
- Update the HTTP redirects.
|
|
+ Update the one at the:www/putty/htaccess which points the
|
|
virtual subdir `latest' at the actual latest release dir. TEST
|
|
THIS ONE - it's quite important.
|
|
+ atreus:www/putty/.htaccess has an individual redirect for each
|
|
version number. Add a new one.
|
|
|
|
- Update the FTP symlink (chiark:ftp/putty-latest -> putty-<ver>).
|
|
|
|
- Update web site.
|
|
+ Adjust front page to say 'The latest version is <ver>'.
|
|
+ Adjust front page to add a news item.
|
|
+ Adjust Download page to say 'The latest release version (<ver>)'.
|
|
+ Adjust Download page to update filenames of installer and Unix
|
|
tarball (both in the hrefs themselves and the link text).
|
|
+ Check over the Download page and remove any mention of
|
|
pre-releases, if there were any before this release. Comment out
|
|
the big pre-release section at the top, and also adjust the
|
|
sections about source archives at the bottom.
|
|
+ Adjust header text on Changelog page. (That includes changing
|
|
`are new' in previous version to `were new'!)
|
|
|
|
- Update the wishlist. This can be done without touching individual
|
|
items by editing the @releases array in control/bugs2html.
|
|
|
|
- Check the Docs page links correctly to the release docs. (It
|
|
should do this automatically, owing to the `latest' HTTP
|
|
redirect.)
|
|
|
|
- Check that the web server attaches the right content type to .HLP
|
|
and .CNT files.
|
|
|
|
- Run webupdate, so that all the changes on atreus propagate to
|
|
chiark. Important to do this _before_ announcing that the release
|
|
is available.
|
|
|
|
- After running webupdate, run update-rsync on chiark and verify that
|
|
the rsync mirror package (~/ftp/putty-website-mirror) contains a
|
|
subdirectory for the new version and mentions it in its .htaccess.
|
|
|
|
- Announce the release!
|
|
+ Construct a release announcement email whose message body is the
|
|
announcement written above, and which includes the following
|
|
headers:
|
|
* Reply-To: <putty@projects.tartarus.org>
|
|
* Subject: PuTTY X.YZ is released
|
|
+ Mail that release announcement to
|
|
<putty-announce@lists.tartarus.org>.
|
|
+ Post it to comp.security.ssh.
|
|
+ Mention it in <TDHTT> on mono.
|
|
|
|
- Relax (slightly).
|
|
|
|
After the release
|
|
-----------------
|
|
|
|
The following want doing some time soon after a release has been made:
|
|
|
|
- If the release was made from a branch, make sure the version number
|
|
on the _trunk_ is up to date in all the locations listed above, so
|
|
that (e.g.) Unix snapshots come out right.
|