ruby/internal/compar.h

Ignoring revisions in .git-blame-ignore-revs. Click here to bypass and see the normal blame view.

30 строки
1.2 KiB
C
Исходник Обычный вид История

#ifndef INTERNAL_COMPAR_H /*-*-C-*-vi:se ft=c:*/
#define INTERNAL_COMPAR_H
/**
* @author Ruby developers <ruby-core@ruby-lang.org>
* @copyright This file is a part of the programming language Ruby.
* Permission is hereby granted, to either redistribute and/or
* modify this file, provided that the conditions mentioned in the
* file COPYING are met. Consult the file for details.
* @brief Internal header for Comparable.
*/
Introduce BOP_CMP for optimized comparison Prior to this commit the `OPTIMIZED_CMP` macro relied on a method lookup to determine whether `<=>` was overridden. The result of the lookup was cached, but only for the duration of the specific method that initialized the cmp_opt_data cache structure. With this method lookup, `[x,y].max` is slower than doing `x > y ? x : y` even though there's an optimized instruction for "new array max". (John noticed somebody a proposed micro-optimization based on this fact in https://github.com/mastodon/mastodon/pull/19903.) ```rb a, b = 1, 2 Benchmark.ips do |bm| bm.report('conditional') { a > b ? a : b } bm.report('method') { [a, b].max } bm.compare! end ``` Before: ``` Comparison: conditional: 22603733.2 i/s method: 19820412.7 i/s - 1.14x (± 0.00) slower ``` This commit replaces the method lookup with a new CMP basic op, which gives the examples above equivalent performance. After: ``` Comparison: method: 24022466.5 i/s conditional: 23851094.2 i/s - same-ish: difference falls within error ``` Relevant benchmarks show an improvement to Array#max and Array#min when not using the optimized newarray_max instruction as well. They are noticeably faster for small arrays with the relevant types, and the same or maybe a touch faster on larger arrays. ``` $ make benchmark COMPARE_RUBY=<master@5958c305> ITEM=array_min $ make benchmark COMPARE_RUBY=<master@5958c305> ITEM=array_max ``` The benchmarks added in this commit also look generally improved. Co-authored-by: John Hawthorn <jhawthorn@github.com>
2022-11-23 05:16:11 +03:00
#include "internal/basic_operators.h"
#define STRING_P(s) (RB_TYPE_P((s), T_STRING) && CLASS_OF(s) == rb_cString)
Introduce BOP_CMP for optimized comparison Prior to this commit the `OPTIMIZED_CMP` macro relied on a method lookup to determine whether `<=>` was overridden. The result of the lookup was cached, but only for the duration of the specific method that initialized the cmp_opt_data cache structure. With this method lookup, `[x,y].max` is slower than doing `x > y ? x : y` even though there's an optimized instruction for "new array max". (John noticed somebody a proposed micro-optimization based on this fact in https://github.com/mastodon/mastodon/pull/19903.) ```rb a, b = 1, 2 Benchmark.ips do |bm| bm.report('conditional') { a > b ? a : b } bm.report('method') { [a, b].max } bm.compare! end ``` Before: ``` Comparison: conditional: 22603733.2 i/s method: 19820412.7 i/s - 1.14x (± 0.00) slower ``` This commit replaces the method lookup with a new CMP basic op, which gives the examples above equivalent performance. After: ``` Comparison: method: 24022466.5 i/s conditional: 23851094.2 i/s - same-ish: difference falls within error ``` Relevant benchmarks show an improvement to Array#max and Array#min when not using the optimized newarray_max instruction as well. They are noticeably faster for small arrays with the relevant types, and the same or maybe a touch faster on larger arrays. ``` $ make benchmark COMPARE_RUBY=<master@5958c305> ITEM=array_min $ make benchmark COMPARE_RUBY=<master@5958c305> ITEM=array_max ``` The benchmarks added in this commit also look generally improved. Co-authored-by: John Hawthorn <jhawthorn@github.com>
2022-11-23 05:16:11 +03:00
#define CMP_OPTIMIZABLE(type) BASIC_OP_UNREDEFINED_P(BOP_CMP, type##_REDEFINED_OP_FLAG)
Introduce BOP_CMP for optimized comparison Prior to this commit the `OPTIMIZED_CMP` macro relied on a method lookup to determine whether `<=>` was overridden. The result of the lookup was cached, but only for the duration of the specific method that initialized the cmp_opt_data cache structure. With this method lookup, `[x,y].max` is slower than doing `x > y ? x : y` even though there's an optimized instruction for "new array max". (John noticed somebody a proposed micro-optimization based on this fact in https://github.com/mastodon/mastodon/pull/19903.) ```rb a, b = 1, 2 Benchmark.ips do |bm| bm.report('conditional') { a > b ? a : b } bm.report('method') { [a, b].max } bm.compare! end ``` Before: ``` Comparison: conditional: 22603733.2 i/s method: 19820412.7 i/s - 1.14x (± 0.00) slower ``` This commit replaces the method lookup with a new CMP basic op, which gives the examples above equivalent performance. After: ``` Comparison: method: 24022466.5 i/s conditional: 23851094.2 i/s - same-ish: difference falls within error ``` Relevant benchmarks show an improvement to Array#max and Array#min when not using the optimized newarray_max instruction as well. They are noticeably faster for small arrays with the relevant types, and the same or maybe a touch faster on larger arrays. ``` $ make benchmark COMPARE_RUBY=<master@5958c305> ITEM=array_min $ make benchmark COMPARE_RUBY=<master@5958c305> ITEM=array_max ``` The benchmarks added in this commit also look generally improved. Co-authored-by: John Hawthorn <jhawthorn@github.com>
2022-11-23 05:16:11 +03:00
#define OPTIMIZED_CMP(a, b) \
((FIXNUM_P(a) && FIXNUM_P(b) && CMP_OPTIMIZABLE(INTEGER)) ? \
(((long)a > (long)b) ? 1 : ((long)a < (long)b) ? -1 : 0) : \
Introduce BOP_CMP for optimized comparison Prior to this commit the `OPTIMIZED_CMP` macro relied on a method lookup to determine whether `<=>` was overridden. The result of the lookup was cached, but only for the duration of the specific method that initialized the cmp_opt_data cache structure. With this method lookup, `[x,y].max` is slower than doing `x > y ? x : y` even though there's an optimized instruction for "new array max". (John noticed somebody a proposed micro-optimization based on this fact in https://github.com/mastodon/mastodon/pull/19903.) ```rb a, b = 1, 2 Benchmark.ips do |bm| bm.report('conditional') { a > b ? a : b } bm.report('method') { [a, b].max } bm.compare! end ``` Before: ``` Comparison: conditional: 22603733.2 i/s method: 19820412.7 i/s - 1.14x (± 0.00) slower ``` This commit replaces the method lookup with a new CMP basic op, which gives the examples above equivalent performance. After: ``` Comparison: method: 24022466.5 i/s conditional: 23851094.2 i/s - same-ish: difference falls within error ``` Relevant benchmarks show an improvement to Array#max and Array#min when not using the optimized newarray_max instruction as well. They are noticeably faster for small arrays with the relevant types, and the same or maybe a touch faster on larger arrays. ``` $ make benchmark COMPARE_RUBY=<master@5958c305> ITEM=array_min $ make benchmark COMPARE_RUBY=<master@5958c305> ITEM=array_max ``` The benchmarks added in this commit also look generally improved. Co-authored-by: John Hawthorn <jhawthorn@github.com>
2022-11-23 05:16:11 +03:00
(STRING_P(a) && STRING_P(b) && CMP_OPTIMIZABLE(STRING)) ? \
rb_str_cmp(a, b) : \
Introduce BOP_CMP for optimized comparison Prior to this commit the `OPTIMIZED_CMP` macro relied on a method lookup to determine whether `<=>` was overridden. The result of the lookup was cached, but only for the duration of the specific method that initialized the cmp_opt_data cache structure. With this method lookup, `[x,y].max` is slower than doing `x > y ? x : y` even though there's an optimized instruction for "new array max". (John noticed somebody a proposed micro-optimization based on this fact in https://github.com/mastodon/mastodon/pull/19903.) ```rb a, b = 1, 2 Benchmark.ips do |bm| bm.report('conditional') { a > b ? a : b } bm.report('method') { [a, b].max } bm.compare! end ``` Before: ``` Comparison: conditional: 22603733.2 i/s method: 19820412.7 i/s - 1.14x (± 0.00) slower ``` This commit replaces the method lookup with a new CMP basic op, which gives the examples above equivalent performance. After: ``` Comparison: method: 24022466.5 i/s conditional: 23851094.2 i/s - same-ish: difference falls within error ``` Relevant benchmarks show an improvement to Array#max and Array#min when not using the optimized newarray_max instruction as well. They are noticeably faster for small arrays with the relevant types, and the same or maybe a touch faster on larger arrays. ``` $ make benchmark COMPARE_RUBY=<master@5958c305> ITEM=array_min $ make benchmark COMPARE_RUBY=<master@5958c305> ITEM=array_max ``` The benchmarks added in this commit also look generally improved. Co-authored-by: John Hawthorn <jhawthorn@github.com>
2022-11-23 05:16:11 +03:00
(RB_FLOAT_TYPE_P(a) && RB_FLOAT_TYPE_P(b) && CMP_OPTIMIZABLE(FLOAT)) ? \
rb_float_cmp(a, b) : \
rb_cmpint(rb_funcallv(a, id_cmp, 1, &b), a, b))
/* compar.c */
VALUE rb_invcmp(VALUE, VALUE);
#endif /* INTERNAL_COMPAR_H */