зеркало из https://github.com/github/ruby.git
Move RDoc comments for Test::Unit
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://ci.ruby-lang.org/ruby/trunk@5887 b2dd03c8-39d4-4d8f-98ff-823fe69b080e
This commit is contained in:
dave
Родитель
f9da3539ed
Коммит
1c1a61a436
|
|
@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
|
|||
Fri Mar 5 00:51:35 2004 Dave Thomas <dave@pragprog.com>
|
||||
|
||||
* lib/test/unit.rb: MOve RDoc documentation so that you can
|
||||
now say 'ri Test::Unit'
|
||||
|
||||
Thu Mar 4 22:31:40 2004 Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org>
|
||||
|
||||
* Makefile.in: miniruby is not needed for cross compile.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
517
lib/test/unit.rb
517
lib/test/unit.rb
|
|
@ -1,266 +1,265 @@
|
|||
#
|
||||
# = Test::Unit - Ruby Unit Testing Framework
|
||||
#
|
||||
# == Introduction
|
||||
#
|
||||
# Unit testing is making waves all over the place, largely due to the
|
||||
# fact that it is a core practice of XP. While XP is great, unit testing
|
||||
# has been around for a long time and has always been a good idea. One
|
||||
# of the keys to good unit testing, though, is not just writing tests,
|
||||
# but having tests. What's the difference? Well, if you just _write_ a
|
||||
# test and throw it away, you have no guarantee that something won't
|
||||
# change later which breaks your code. If, on the other hand, you _have_
|
||||
# tests (obviously you have to write them first), and run them as often
|
||||
# as possible, you slowly build up a wall of things that cannot break
|
||||
# without you immediately knowing about it. This is when unit testing
|
||||
# hits its peak usefulness.
|
||||
#
|
||||
# Enter Test::Unit, a framework for unit testing in Ruby, helping you to
|
||||
# design, debug and evaluate your code by making it easy to write and
|
||||
# have tests for it.
|
||||
#
|
||||
#
|
||||
# == Notes
|
||||
#
|
||||
# Test::Unit has grown out of and superceded Lapidary.
|
||||
#
|
||||
#
|
||||
# == Feedback
|
||||
#
|
||||
# I like (and do my best to practice) XP, so I value early releases,
|
||||
# user feedback, and clean, simple, expressive code. There is always
|
||||
# room for improvement in everything I do, and Test::Unit is no
|
||||
# exception. Please, let me know what you think of Test::Unit as it
|
||||
# stands, and what you'd like to see expanded/changed/improved/etc. If
|
||||
# you find a bug, let me know ASAP; one good way to let me know what the
|
||||
# bug is is to submit a new test that catches it :-) Also, I'd love to
|
||||
# hear about any successes you have with Test::Unit, and any
|
||||
# documentation you might add will be greatly appreciated. My contact
|
||||
# info is below.
|
||||
#
|
||||
#
|
||||
# == Contact Information
|
||||
#
|
||||
# A lot of discussion happens about Ruby in general on the ruby-talk
|
||||
# mailing list (http://www.ruby-lang.org/en/ml.html), and you can ask
|
||||
# any questions you might have there. I monitor the list, as do many
|
||||
# other helpful Rubyists, and you're sure to get a quick answer. Of
|
||||
# course, you're also welcome to email me (Nathaniel Talbott) directly
|
||||
# at mailto:testunit@talbott.ws, and I'll do my best to help you out.
|
||||
#
|
||||
#
|
||||
# == Credits
|
||||
#
|
||||
# I'd like to thank...
|
||||
#
|
||||
# Matz, for a great language!
|
||||
#
|
||||
# Masaki Suketa, for his work on RubyUnit, which filled a vital need in
|
||||
# the Ruby world for a very long time. I'm also grateful for his help in
|
||||
# polishing Test::Unit and getting the RubyUnit compatibility layer
|
||||
# right. His graciousness in allowing Test::Unit to supercede RubyUnit
|
||||
# continues to be a challenge to me to be more willing to defer my own
|
||||
# rights.
|
||||
#
|
||||
# Ken McKinlay, for his interest and work on unit testing, and for his
|
||||
# willingness to dialog about it. He was also a great help in pointing
|
||||
# out some of the holes in the RubyUnit compatibility layer.
|
||||
#
|
||||
# Dave Thomas, for the original idea that led to the extremely simple
|
||||
# "require 'test/unit'", plus his code to improve it even more by
|
||||
# allowing the selection of tests from the command-line. Also, without
|
||||
# RDoc, the documentation for Test::Unit would stink a lot more than it
|
||||
# does now.
|
||||
#
|
||||
# Everyone who's helped out with bug reports, feature ideas,
|
||||
# encouragement to continue, etc. It's a real privilege to be a part of
|
||||
# the Ruby community.
|
||||
#
|
||||
# The guys at RoleModel Software, for putting up with me repeating, "But
|
||||
# this would be so much easier in Ruby!" whenever we're coding in Java.
|
||||
#
|
||||
# My Creator, for giving me life, and giving it more abundantly.
|
||||
#
|
||||
#
|
||||
# == License
|
||||
#
|
||||
# Test::Unit is copyright (c) 2000-2003 Nathaniel Talbott. It is free
|
||||
# software, and is distributed under the Ruby license. See the COPYING
|
||||
# file in the standard Ruby distribution for details.
|
||||
#
|
||||
#
|
||||
# == Warranty
|
||||
#
|
||||
# This software is provided "as is" and without any express or
|
||||
# implied warranties, including, without limitation, the implied
|
||||
# warranties of merchantibility and fitness for a particular
|
||||
# purpose.
|
||||
#
|
||||
#
|
||||
# == Author
|
||||
#
|
||||
# Nathaniel Talbott.
|
||||
# Copyright (c) 2000-2003, Nathaniel Talbott
|
||||
#
|
||||
# ----
|
||||
#
|
||||
# = Usage
|
||||
#
|
||||
# The general idea behind unit testing is that you write a _test_
|
||||
# _method_ that makes certain _assertions_ about your code, working
|
||||
# against a _test_ _fixture_. A bunch of these _test_ _methods_ are
|
||||
# bundled up into a _test_ _suite_ and can be run any time the
|
||||
# developer wants. The results of a run are gathered in a _test_
|
||||
# _result_ and displayed to the user through some UI. So, lets break
|
||||
# this down and see how Test::Unit provides each of these necessary
|
||||
# pieces.
|
||||
#
|
||||
#
|
||||
# == Assertions
|
||||
#
|
||||
# These are the heart of the framework. Think of an assertion as a
|
||||
# statement of expected outcome, i.e. "I assert that x should be equal
|
||||
# to y". If, when the assertion is executed, it turns out to be
|
||||
# correct, nothing happens, and life is good. If, on the other hand,
|
||||
# your assertion turns out to be false, an error is propagated with
|
||||
# pertinent information so that you can go back and make your
|
||||
# assertion succeed, and, once again, life is good. For an explanation
|
||||
# of the current assertions, see Test::Unit::Assertions.
|
||||
#
|
||||
#
|
||||
# == Test Method & Test Fixture
|
||||
#
|
||||
# Obviously, these assertions have to be called within a context that
|
||||
# knows about them and can do something meaningful with their
|
||||
# pass/fail value. Also, it's handy to collect a bunch of related
|
||||
# tests, each test represented by a method, into a common test class
|
||||
# that knows how to run them. The tests will be in a separate class
|
||||
# from the code they're testing for a couple of reasons. First of all,
|
||||
# it allows your code to stay uncluttered with test code, making it
|
||||
# easier to maintain. Second, it allows the tests to be stripped out
|
||||
# for deployment, since they're really there for you, the developer,
|
||||
# and your users don't need them. Third, and most importantly, it
|
||||
# allows you to set up a common test fixture for your tests to run
|
||||
# against.
|
||||
#
|
||||
# What's a test fixture? Well, tests do not live in a vacuum; rather,
|
||||
# they're run against the code they are testing. Often, a collection
|
||||
# of tests will run against a common set of data, also called a
|
||||
# fixture. If they're all bundled into the same test class, they can
|
||||
# all share the setting up and tearing down of that data, eliminating
|
||||
# unnecessary duplication and making it much easier to add related
|
||||
# tests.
|
||||
#
|
||||
# Test::Unit::TestCase wraps up a collection of test methods together
|
||||
# and allows you to easily set up and tear down the same test fixture
|
||||
# for each test. This is done by overriding #setup and/or #teardown,
|
||||
# which will be called before and after each test method that is
|
||||
# run. The TestCase also knows how to collect the results of your
|
||||
# assertions into a Test::Unit::TestResult, which can then be reported
|
||||
# back to you... but I'm getting ahead of myself. To write a test,
|
||||
# follow these steps:
|
||||
#
|
||||
# * Make sure Test::Unit is in your library path.
|
||||
# * require 'test/unit' in your test script.
|
||||
# * Create a class that subclasses Test::Unit::TestCase.
|
||||
# * Add a method that begins with "test" to your class.
|
||||
# * Make assertions in your test method.
|
||||
# * Optionally define #setup and/or #teardown to set up and/or tear
|
||||
# down your common test fixture.
|
||||
# * You can now run your test as you would any other Ruby
|
||||
# script... try it and see!
|
||||
#
|
||||
# A really simple test might look like this (#setup and #teardown are
|
||||
# commented out to indicate that they are completely optional):
|
||||
#
|
||||
# require 'test/unit'
|
||||
#
|
||||
# class TC_MyTest < Test::Unit::TestCase
|
||||
# # def setup
|
||||
# # end
|
||||
#
|
||||
# # def teardown
|
||||
# # end
|
||||
#
|
||||
# def test_fail
|
||||
# assert(false, 'Assertion was false.')
|
||||
# end
|
||||
# end
|
||||
#
|
||||
#
|
||||
# == Test Runners
|
||||
#
|
||||
# So, now you have this great test class, but you still need a way to
|
||||
# run it and view any failures that occur during the run. This is
|
||||
# where Test::Unit::UI::Console::TestRunner (and others, such as
|
||||
# Test::Unit::UI::GTK::TestRunner) comes into play. The console test
|
||||
# runner is automatically invoked for you if you require 'test/unit'
|
||||
# and simply run the file. To use another runner, or to manually
|
||||
# invoke a runner, simply call its run class method and pass in an
|
||||
# object that responds to the suite message with a
|
||||
# Test::Unit::TestSuite. This can be as simple as passing in your
|
||||
# TestCase class (which has a class suite method). It might look
|
||||
# something like this:
|
||||
#
|
||||
# require 'test/unit/ui/console/testrunner'
|
||||
# Test::Unit::UI::Console::TestRunner.run(TC_MyTest)
|
||||
#
|
||||
#
|
||||
# == Test Suite
|
||||
#
|
||||
# As more and more unit tests accumulate for a given project, it
|
||||
# becomes a real drag running them one at a time, and it also
|
||||
# introduces the potential to overlook a failing test because you
|
||||
# forget to run it. Suddenly it becomes very handy that the
|
||||
# TestRunners can take any object that returns a Test::Unit::TestSuite
|
||||
# in response to a suite method. The TestSuite can, in turn, contain
|
||||
# other TestSuites or individual tests (typically created by a
|
||||
# TestCase). In other words, you can easily wrap up a group of
|
||||
# TestCases and TestSuites like this:
|
||||
#
|
||||
# require 'test/unit/testsuite'
|
||||
# require 'tc_myfirsttests'
|
||||
# require 'tc_moretestsbyme'
|
||||
# require 'ts_anothersetoftests'
|
||||
#
|
||||
# class TS_MyTests
|
||||
# def self.suite
|
||||
# suite = Test::Unit::TestSuite.new
|
||||
# suite << TC_MyFirstTests.suite
|
||||
# suite << TC_MoreTestsByMe.suite
|
||||
# suite << TS_AnotherSetOfTests.suite
|
||||
# return suite
|
||||
# end
|
||||
# end
|
||||
# Test::Unit::UI::Console::TestRunner.run(TS_MyTests)
|
||||
#
|
||||
# Now, this is a bit cumbersome, so Test::Unit does a little bit more
|
||||
# for you, by wrapping these up automatically when you require
|
||||
# 'test/unit'. What does this mean? It means you could write the above
|
||||
# test case like this instead:
|
||||
#
|
||||
# require 'test/unit'
|
||||
# require 'tc_myfirsttests'
|
||||
# require 'tc_moretestsbyme'
|
||||
# require 'ts_anothersetoftests'
|
||||
#
|
||||
# Test::Unit is smart enough to find all the test cases existing in
|
||||
# the ObjectSpace and wrap them up into a suite for you. It then runs
|
||||
# the dynamic suite using the console TestRunner.
|
||||
#
|
||||
#
|
||||
# == Questions?
|
||||
#
|
||||
# I'd really like to get feedback from all levels of Ruby
|
||||
# practitioners about typos, grammatical errors, unclear statements,
|
||||
# missing points, etc., in this document (or any other).
|
||||
#
|
||||
|
||||
require 'test/unit/testcase'
|
||||
require 'test/unit/autorunner'
|
||||
|
||||
module Test # :nodoc:
|
||||
# For documentation, see file test/unit.rb.
|
||||
#
|
||||
# = Test::Unit - Ruby Unit Testing Framework
|
||||
#
|
||||
# == Introduction
|
||||
#
|
||||
# Unit testing is making waves all over the place, largely due to the
|
||||
# fact that it is a core practice of XP. While XP is great, unit testing
|
||||
# has been around for a long time and has always been a good idea. One
|
||||
# of the keys to good unit testing, though, is not just writing tests,
|
||||
# but having tests. What's the difference? Well, if you just _write_ a
|
||||
# test and throw it away, you have no guarantee that something won't
|
||||
# change later which breaks your code. If, on the other hand, you _have_
|
||||
# tests (obviously you have to write them first), and run them as often
|
||||
# as possible, you slowly build up a wall of things that cannot break
|
||||
# without you immediately knowing about it. This is when unit testing
|
||||
# hits its peak usefulness.
|
||||
#
|
||||
# Enter Test::Unit, a framework for unit testing in Ruby, helping you to
|
||||
# design, debug and evaluate your code by making it easy to write and
|
||||
# have tests for it.
|
||||
#
|
||||
#
|
||||
# == Notes
|
||||
#
|
||||
# Test::Unit has grown out of and superceded Lapidary.
|
||||
#
|
||||
#
|
||||
# == Feedback
|
||||
#
|
||||
# I like (and do my best to practice) XP, so I value early releases,
|
||||
# user feedback, and clean, simple, expressive code. There is always
|
||||
# room for improvement in everything I do, and Test::Unit is no
|
||||
# exception. Please, let me know what you think of Test::Unit as it
|
||||
# stands, and what you'd like to see expanded/changed/improved/etc. If
|
||||
# you find a bug, let me know ASAP; one good way to let me know what the
|
||||
# bug is is to submit a new test that catches it :-) Also, I'd love to
|
||||
# hear about any successes you have with Test::Unit, and any
|
||||
# documentation you might add will be greatly appreciated. My contact
|
||||
# info is below.
|
||||
#
|
||||
#
|
||||
# == Contact Information
|
||||
#
|
||||
# A lot of discussion happens about Ruby in general on the ruby-talk
|
||||
# mailing list (http://www.ruby-lang.org/en/ml.html), and you can ask
|
||||
# any questions you might have there. I monitor the list, as do many
|
||||
# other helpful Rubyists, and you're sure to get a quick answer. Of
|
||||
# course, you're also welcome to email me (Nathaniel Talbott) directly
|
||||
# at mailto:testunit@talbott.ws, and I'll do my best to help you out.
|
||||
#
|
||||
#
|
||||
# == Credits
|
||||
#
|
||||
# I'd like to thank...
|
||||
#
|
||||
# Matz, for a great language!
|
||||
#
|
||||
# Masaki Suketa, for his work on RubyUnit, which filled a vital need in
|
||||
# the Ruby world for a very long time. I'm also grateful for his help in
|
||||
# polishing Test::Unit and getting the RubyUnit compatibility layer
|
||||
# right. His graciousness in allowing Test::Unit to supercede RubyUnit
|
||||
# continues to be a challenge to me to be more willing to defer my own
|
||||
# rights.
|
||||
#
|
||||
# Ken McKinlay, for his interest and work on unit testing, and for his
|
||||
# willingness to dialog about it. He was also a great help in pointing
|
||||
# out some of the holes in the RubyUnit compatibility layer.
|
||||
#
|
||||
# Dave Thomas, for the original idea that led to the extremely simple
|
||||
# "require 'test/unit'", plus his code to improve it even more by
|
||||
# allowing the selection of tests from the command-line. Also, without
|
||||
# RDoc, the documentation for Test::Unit would stink a lot more than it
|
||||
# does now.
|
||||
#
|
||||
# Everyone who's helped out with bug reports, feature ideas,
|
||||
# encouragement to continue, etc. It's a real privilege to be a part of
|
||||
# the Ruby community.
|
||||
#
|
||||
# The guys at RoleModel Software, for putting up with me repeating, "But
|
||||
# this would be so much easier in Ruby!" whenever we're coding in Java.
|
||||
#
|
||||
# My Creator, for giving me life, and giving it more abundantly.
|
||||
#
|
||||
#
|
||||
# == License
|
||||
#
|
||||
# Test::Unit is copyright (c) 2000-2003 Nathaniel Talbott. It is free
|
||||
# software, and is distributed under the Ruby license. See the COPYING
|
||||
# file in the standard Ruby distribution for details.
|
||||
#
|
||||
#
|
||||
# == Warranty
|
||||
#
|
||||
# This software is provided "as is" and without any express or
|
||||
# implied warranties, including, without limitation, the implied
|
||||
# warranties of merchantibility and fitness for a particular
|
||||
# purpose.
|
||||
#
|
||||
#
|
||||
# == Author
|
||||
#
|
||||
# Nathaniel Talbott.
|
||||
# Copyright (c) 2000-2003, Nathaniel Talbott
|
||||
#
|
||||
# ----
|
||||
#
|
||||
# = Usage
|
||||
#
|
||||
# The general idea behind unit testing is that you write a _test_
|
||||
# _method_ that makes certain _assertions_ about your code, working
|
||||
# against a _test_ _fixture_. A bunch of these _test_ _methods_ are
|
||||
# bundled up into a _test_ _suite_ and can be run any time the
|
||||
# developer wants. The results of a run are gathered in a _test_
|
||||
# _result_ and displayed to the user through some UI. So, lets break
|
||||
# this down and see how Test::Unit provides each of these necessary
|
||||
# pieces.
|
||||
#
|
||||
#
|
||||
# == Assertions
|
||||
#
|
||||
# These are the heart of the framework. Think of an assertion as a
|
||||
# statement of expected outcome, i.e. "I assert that x should be equal
|
||||
# to y". If, when the assertion is executed, it turns out to be
|
||||
# correct, nothing happens, and life is good. If, on the other hand,
|
||||
# your assertion turns out to be false, an error is propagated with
|
||||
# pertinent information so that you can go back and make your
|
||||
# assertion succeed, and, once again, life is good. For an explanation
|
||||
# of the current assertions, see Test::Unit::Assertions.
|
||||
#
|
||||
#
|
||||
# == Test Method & Test Fixture
|
||||
#
|
||||
# Obviously, these assertions have to be called within a context that
|
||||
# knows about them and can do something meaningful with their
|
||||
# pass/fail value. Also, it's handy to collect a bunch of related
|
||||
# tests, each test represented by a method, into a common test class
|
||||
# that knows how to run them. The tests will be in a separate class
|
||||
# from the code they're testing for a couple of reasons. First of all,
|
||||
# it allows your code to stay uncluttered with test code, making it
|
||||
# easier to maintain. Second, it allows the tests to be stripped out
|
||||
# for deployment, since they're really there for you, the developer,
|
||||
# and your users don't need them. Third, and most importantly, it
|
||||
# allows you to set up a common test fixture for your tests to run
|
||||
# against.
|
||||
#
|
||||
# What's a test fixture? Well, tests do not live in a vacuum; rather,
|
||||
# they're run against the code they are testing. Often, a collection
|
||||
# of tests will run against a common set of data, also called a
|
||||
# fixture. If they're all bundled into the same test class, they can
|
||||
# all share the setting up and tearing down of that data, eliminating
|
||||
# unnecessary duplication and making it much easier to add related
|
||||
# tests.
|
||||
#
|
||||
# Test::Unit::TestCase wraps up a collection of test methods together
|
||||
# and allows you to easily set up and tear down the same test fixture
|
||||
# for each test. This is done by overriding #setup and/or #teardown,
|
||||
# which will be called before and after each test method that is
|
||||
# run. The TestCase also knows how to collect the results of your
|
||||
# assertions into a Test::Unit::TestResult, which can then be reported
|
||||
# back to you... but I'm getting ahead of myself. To write a test,
|
||||
# follow these steps:
|
||||
#
|
||||
# * Make sure Test::Unit is in your library path.
|
||||
# * require 'test/unit' in your test script.
|
||||
# * Create a class that subclasses Test::Unit::TestCase.
|
||||
# * Add a method that begins with "test" to your class.
|
||||
# * Make assertions in your test method.
|
||||
# * Optionally define #setup and/or #teardown to set up and/or tear
|
||||
# down your common test fixture.
|
||||
# * You can now run your test as you would any other Ruby
|
||||
# script... try it and see!
|
||||
#
|
||||
# A really simple test might look like this (#setup and #teardown are
|
||||
# commented out to indicate that they are completely optional):
|
||||
#
|
||||
# require 'test/unit'
|
||||
#
|
||||
# class TC_MyTest < Test::Unit::TestCase
|
||||
# # def setup
|
||||
# # end
|
||||
#
|
||||
# # def teardown
|
||||
# # end
|
||||
#
|
||||
# def test_fail
|
||||
# assert(false, 'Assertion was false.')
|
||||
# end
|
||||
# end
|
||||
#
|
||||
#
|
||||
# == Test Runners
|
||||
#
|
||||
# So, now you have this great test class, but you still need a way to
|
||||
# run it and view any failures that occur during the run. This is
|
||||
# where Test::Unit::UI::Console::TestRunner (and others, such as
|
||||
# Test::Unit::UI::GTK::TestRunner) comes into play. The console test
|
||||
# runner is automatically invoked for you if you require 'test/unit'
|
||||
# and simply run the file. To use another runner, or to manually
|
||||
# invoke a runner, simply call its run class method and pass in an
|
||||
# object that responds to the suite message with a
|
||||
# Test::Unit::TestSuite. This can be as simple as passing in your
|
||||
# TestCase class (which has a class suite method). It might look
|
||||
# something like this:
|
||||
#
|
||||
# require 'test/unit/ui/console/testrunner'
|
||||
# Test::Unit::UI::Console::TestRunner.run(TC_MyTest)
|
||||
#
|
||||
#
|
||||
# == Test Suite
|
||||
#
|
||||
# As more and more unit tests accumulate for a given project, it
|
||||
# becomes a real drag running them one at a time, and it also
|
||||
# introduces the potential to overlook a failing test because you
|
||||
# forget to run it. Suddenly it becomes very handy that the
|
||||
# TestRunners can take any object that returns a Test::Unit::TestSuite
|
||||
# in response to a suite method. The TestSuite can, in turn, contain
|
||||
# other TestSuites or individual tests (typically created by a
|
||||
# TestCase). In other words, you can easily wrap up a group of
|
||||
# TestCases and TestSuites like this:
|
||||
#
|
||||
# require 'test/unit/testsuite'
|
||||
# require 'tc_myfirsttests'
|
||||
# require 'tc_moretestsbyme'
|
||||
# require 'ts_anothersetoftests'
|
||||
#
|
||||
# class TS_MyTests
|
||||
# def self.suite
|
||||
# suite = Test::Unit::TestSuite.new
|
||||
# suite << TC_MyFirstTests.suite
|
||||
# suite << TC_MoreTestsByMe.suite
|
||||
# suite << TS_AnotherSetOfTests.suite
|
||||
# return suite
|
||||
# end
|
||||
# end
|
||||
# Test::Unit::UI::Console::TestRunner.run(TS_MyTests)
|
||||
#
|
||||
# Now, this is a bit cumbersome, so Test::Unit does a little bit more
|
||||
# for you, by wrapping these up automatically when you require
|
||||
# 'test/unit'. What does this mean? It means you could write the above
|
||||
# test case like this instead:
|
||||
#
|
||||
# require 'test/unit'
|
||||
# require 'tc_myfirsttests'
|
||||
# require 'tc_moretestsbyme'
|
||||
# require 'ts_anothersetoftests'
|
||||
#
|
||||
# Test::Unit is smart enough to find all the test cases existing in
|
||||
# the ObjectSpace and wrap them up into a suite for you. It then runs
|
||||
# the dynamic suite using the console TestRunner.
|
||||
#
|
||||
#
|
||||
# == Questions?
|
||||
#
|
||||
# I'd really like to get feedback from all levels of Ruby
|
||||
# practitioners about typos, grammatical errors, unclear statements,
|
||||
# missing points, etc., in this document (or any other).
|
||||
#
|
||||
|
||||
module Unit
|
||||
def self.run=(flag)
|
||||
@run = flag
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Загрузка…
Ссылка в новой задаче