[DOC] "is now bundled" is ambiguous

I think it meant it's now a bundled "gem", but "is now bundled" implies
it's a new gem that was neither default nor bundled gems. So I changed
wording.

I also want to change the subjects and reorder them so that it will read:
"The following default gem" (new) -> "The following default gem" (updated) ->
"The following bundled gem" (new) -> "The following bundled gem" (updated).
This commit is contained in:
Takashi Kokubun 2023-10-19 16:33:23 -07:00
Родитель a9df1e6990
Коммит bd2aee67c1
2 изменённых файлов: 7 добавлений и 7 удалений

10
NEWS.md
Просмотреть файл

@ -128,6 +128,10 @@ The following default gems are updated.
* timeout 0.4.0
* uri 0.12.2
The following bundled gem is promoted from default gems.
* racc 1.7.1
The following bundled gems are updated.
* minitest 5.20.0
@ -140,10 +144,6 @@ The following bundled gems are updated.
* typeprof 0.21.8
* debug 1.8.0
The following default gem is now bundled.
* racc 1.7.1
See GitHub releases like [Logger](https://github.com/ruby/logger/releases) or
changelog for details of the default gems or bundled gems.
@ -153,7 +153,7 @@ changelog for details of the default gems or bundled gems.
## Stdlib compatibility issues
* `racc` is promoted bundled gems.
* `racc` is promoted to bundled gems.
* You need to add `racc` to your `Gemfile` if you use `racc` under bundler environment.
* `ext/readline` is retired
* We have `reline` that is pure Ruby implementation compatible with `ext/readline` API. We rely on `reline` in the future. If you need to use `ext/readline`, you can install `ext/readline` via rubygems.org with `gem install readline-ext`.

Просмотреть файл

@ -32,9 +32,9 @@ ARGV.each do |type|
update[changed, type] or next
if added and !added.empty?
if type == 'bundled'
update[added, 'default', 'now bundled'] or next
update[added, type, 'promoted from default gems'] or next
else
update[added, 'default', 'added'] or next
update[added, type, 'added'] or next
end
end
File.write("NEWS.md", news)