For the most common cases of `rotate!` one place to the right or to the
left, instead of doing some reversals of the array we just keep a single
value in a temporary value, use memmove and then put the temporary
value where it should be.
Saves comitters' daily life by avoid #include-ing everything from
internal.h to make each file do so instead. This would significantly
speed up incremental builds.
We take the following inclusion order in this changeset:
1. "ruby/config.h", where _GNU_SOURCE is defined (must be the very
first thing among everything).
2. RUBY_EXTCONF_H if any.
3. Standard C headers, sorted alphabetically.
4. Other system headers, maybe guarded by #ifdef
5. Everything else, sorted alphabetically.
Exceptions are those win32-related headers, which tend not be self-
containing (headers have inclusion order dependencies).
These functions are used from within a compilation unit so we can
make them static, for better binary size. This changeset reduces
the size of generated ruby binary from 26,590,128 bytes to
26,584,472 bytes on my macihne.
This removes the related tests, and puts the related specs behind
version guards. This affects all code in lib, including some
libraries that may want to support older versions of Ruby.
The declaration of local variable in loop, it will initialize local variable for each run of the loop with clang generated code.
So, it shouldn't declare the local variable in heavy loop.
Array#sum with float elements will be faster around 30%.
* Before
user system total real
3.320000 0.010000 3.330000 ( 3.336088)
* After
user system total real
2.590000 0.010000 2.600000 ( 2.602399)
* Test code
require 'benchmark'
Benchmark.bmbm do |x|
ary = []
10000.times { ary << Random.rand }
x.report do
50000.times do
ary.sum
end
end
end
to suppress the following warning:
```
compiling cxxanyargs.cpp
In file included from cxxanyargs.cpp:1:
In file included from ../../.././include/ruby/ruby.h:2150:
../../.././include/ruby/intern.h:56:19: warning: 'register' storage class specifier is deprecated and incompatible with C++17 [-Wdeprecated-register]
void rb_mem_clear(register VALUE*, register long);
^~~~~~~~~
../../.././include/ruby/intern.h:56:36: warning: 'register' storage class specifier is deprecated and incompatible with C++17 [-Wdeprecated-register]
void rb_mem_clear(register VALUE*, register long);
^~~~~~~~~
```
Previously, Array#uniq would return subclass instance if the
length of the array were 2 or greater, and would return Array
instance if the length of the array were 0 or 1.
Fixes [Bug #7768]
My previous attempt to correct #2068 apparently failed and the confusing
wording ("instances") was merged into trunk instead.
This should address any potential confusion.
rb_str_buf_new always allocates at least 127 bytes of capacity, even
when less is requested.
> ObjectSpace.dump(%w[a b c].join)
{"address":"0x7f935f06ebf0", "type":"STRING", "class":"0x7f935d8b7bb0", "bytesize":3, "capacity":127, "value":"abc", "encoding":"UTF-8", "memsize":168, "flags":{"wb_protected":true}}
Instead, by using rb_str_new and then setting the length to 0, we can
allocate the exact amount of memory needed, without extra capacity.
> ObjectSpace.dump(%w[a b c].join)
{"address":"0x7f903fcab530", "type":"STRING", "class":"0x7f903f8b7988", "embedded":true, "bytesize":3, "value":"abc", "encoding":"UTF-8", "memsize":40, "flags":{"wb_protected":true}}
ARY_SHARED_P and ARY_EMBED_P included:
assert(!FL_TEST((ary), ELTS_SHARED) || !FL_TEST((ary), RARRAY_EMBED_FLAG)),
The two predicate macros are used in many other assert conditions,
which caused memory bloat during C compilation.
This change factors out the assertion above to a function.
Now gcc consumes 160 MB instead of 250 MB to compile array.c.
The assertion blows up gcc 8 by consuming approx. 1.8 GB memory.
This change reduces the amount of memory required to about 200 MB.
A follow-up of ae750799c1.
Shared arrays created by Array#dup and so on points
a shared_root object to manage lifetime of Array buffer.
However, sometimes shared_root is called only shared so
it is confusing. So I fixed these wording "shared" to "shared_root".
* RArray::heap::aux::shared -> RArray::heap::aux::shared_root
* ARY_SHARED() -> ARY_SHARED_ROOT()
* ARY_SHARED_NUM() -> ARY_SHARED_ROOT_REFCNT()
Also, add some debug_counters to count shared array objects.
* ary_shared_create: shared ary by Array#dup and so on.
* ary_shared: finished in shard.
* ary_shared_root_occupied: shared_root but has only 1 refcnt.
The number (ary_shared - ary_shared_root_occupied) is meaningful.
Array#minmax was previous not implemented, so calling #minmax on
array was actually calling Enumerable#minmax. This is a simple
implementation of #minmax by just calling rb_ary_min and
rb_ary_max, which improves performance significantly.
Fixes [Bug #15929]
For array.c (Array#sort) and enum.c (Enumerable#sort_by),
add comments mentioning that sort.reverse! / sort_by { ... }.reverse!
can/should be used to reverse the result. [ci skip]
* array.c (rb_ary_join_m): warn use of non-nil $,.
* io.c (rb_output_fs_setter): warn when set to non-nil value.
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://ci.ruby-lang.org/ruby/trunk@67606 b2dd03c8-39d4-4d8f-98ff-823fe69b080e
Because hard to specify commits related to r67479 only.
So please commit again.
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://ci.ruby-lang.org/ruby/trunk@67499 b2dd03c8-39d4-4d8f-98ff-823fe69b080e
Currently we are not explicit enough regarding the potentially confusing
behavior of `Array#-` and `Array#difference` when it comes to duplicate items
within receiver arrays.
Although the original documentation for these methods does use an array with
multiple instance of the same integers, the explanation for the behavior is
actually imprecise.
> removing any items that also appear in +other_ary+
Not only does `Array#-` remove any items that also appear in `other_ary` but
it also remove any instance of any item in `other_ary`.
One may expect `Array#-` to behave like mathematical subtraction or difference
when it doesn't. One could be forgiven to expect the following behavior:
```ruby
[1,1,2,2,3,3,4,4] - [1,2,3,4]
=> [1,2,3,4]
```
In reality this is the result:
```ruby
[1,1,2,2,3,3,4,4] - [1,2,3,4]
=> []
```
I hope that I've prevented this potential confusion with the clarifications
in this change. I can offer this as evidence of likeliness for confusion:
https://twitter.com/olivierlacan/status/1084930269533085696
I'll freely admit I was surprised by this behavior myself since I needed to
obtain an Array with only one instance of each item in the argument array
removed.
[Fix GH-2068] [ci skip]
From: Olivier Lacan <hi@olivierlacan.com>
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://ci.ruby-lang.org/ruby/trunk@66831 b2dd03c8-39d4-4d8f-98ff-823fe69b080e
Nobuyoshi Nakada
Ary Borenszweig
卜部昌平
Jeremy Evans
Ben Woosley
Watson
Prajjwal Singh
Yusuke Endoh
Benoit Daloze
Dylan Thacker-Smith
Koichi Sasada
Kenichi Kamiya
Olivier Lacan
John Hawthorn
git
Luke Gruber
Martin Dürst
Kazuhiro NISHIYAMA
nobu
ktsj
kazu
Stefan Schüßler