```
ruby: YJIT has panicked. More info to follow...
thread '<unnamed>' panicked at src/core.rs:2751:9:
assertion `left == right` failed: each stub expects a particular iseq
left: 0x7fc8d8e09850
right: 0x7fc8d2c2f3a0
stack backtrace:
0: rust_begin_unwind
at /rustc/82e1608dfa6e0b5569232559e3d385fea5a93112/library/std/src/panicking.rs:645:5
1: core::panicking::panic_fmt
at /rustc/82e1608dfa6e0b5569232559e3d385fea5a93112/library/core/src/panicking.rs:72:14
2: core::panicking::assert_failed_inner
3: core::panicking::assert_failed
at /rustc/82e1608dfa6e0b5569232559e3d385fea5a93112/library/core/src/panicking.rs:279:5
4: yjit::core::branch_stub_hit_body
at /home/runner/work/ruby/ruby/src/yjit/src/core.rs:2751:9
5: yjit::core::branch_stub_hit::{{closure}}::{{closure}}
at /home/runner/work/ruby/ruby/src/yjit/src/core.rs:2696:36
6: yjit::stats::with_compile_time
at /home/runner/work/ruby/ruby/src/yjit/src/stats.rs:979:15
7: yjit::core::branch_stub_hit::{{closure}}
at /home/runner/work/ruby/ruby/src/yjit/src/core.rs:2696:13
8: std::panicking::try::do_call
at /rustc/82e1608dfa6e0b5569232559e3d385fea5a93112/library/std/src/panicking.rs:552:40
9: __rust_try
10: std::panicking::try
at /rustc/82e1608dfa6e0b5569232559e3d385fea5a93112/library/std/src/panicking.rs:516:19
11: std::panic::catch_unwind
at /rustc/82e1608dfa6e0b5569232559e3d385fea5a93112/library/std/src/panic.rs:142:14
12: yjit::cruby::with_vm_lock
at /home/runner/work/ruby/ruby/src/yjit/src/cruby.rs:647:21
13: yjit::core::branch_stub_hit
at /home/runner/work/ruby/ruby/src/yjit/src/core.rs:2695:9
14: <unknown>
```
newarray, duparray, concatarray, and splatarray always leave an
array at the top of the stack. expandarray does not, it takes
an array from the top of the stack as input, and leaves individual
elements on the stack. I assume no Ruby code generates the
expandarray/splatarray sequence, or it could break. The only
use of expandarray outside the peephole optimizer is in the
masgn code, and it does not appear to generate splatarray
directly after expandarray.
The splatarray/splatarray peephole optimization is probably
also wrong in the following case:
```
putobject [1,2]
splatarray false
splatarray true
```
This instruction sequence should result in a duplicate of
[1,2] at the top of the stack, but the peephole optimizer would
remove the `splatarray true`, resulting in change that made
[1,2] on top of the stack. I'm not sure Ruby code can generate
`splatarray false` followed by `splatarray true` (I could get it
to generate chains of `splatarray true`), so maybe this has no
effect.
newarray, duparray, and concatarray all result in newly allocated
arrays at the top of the stack, so they shouldn't have an issue
with removing either `splatarray true` or `splatarray false`.
Given code such as:
```ruby
h[*a, :a], h[*b] = v
```
Ruby would previously allocate 5 arrays for the mass assignment:
* splatarray true for a
* newarray for v[0]
* concatarray for [*a, a] and v[0]
* newarray for v[1]
* concatarray for b and v[1]
This optimizes it to only allocate 2 arrays:
* splatarray true for a
* splatarray true for b
Instead of the newarray/concatarray combination, pushtoarray is used.
Note above that there was no splatarray true for b originally. The
normal compilation uses splatarray false for b. Instead of trying
to find and modify the splatarray false to splatarray true, this
adds splatarray true for b, which requires a couple of swap
instructions, before the pushtoarray. This could be further
optimized to remove the need for those three instructions, but I'm
not sure if the complexity is worth it.
Additionally, this sets VM_CALL_ARGS_SPLAT_MUT on the call to
[]= in the h[*b] case, so that if []= has a splat parameter, the
new array can be used directly, without additional duplication.
Given code such as:
```ruby
h[*a, 1] += 1
h[*b] += 2
```
Ruby would previously allocate 5 arrays:
* splatarray true for a
* newarray for 1
* concatarray for [*a, 1] and [1]
* newarray for 2
* concatarray for b and [2]
This optimizes it to only allocate 2 arrays:
* splatarray true for a
* splatarray true for b
Instead of the newarray/concatarray combination, pushtoarray is used.
Note above that there was no splatarray true for b originally. The
normal compilation uses splatarray false for b. Instead of trying
to find and modify the splatarray false to splatarray true, this
adds splatarray true for b, which requires a couple of swap
instructions, before the pushtoarray. This could be further
optimized to remove the need for those three instructions, but I'm
not sure if the complexity is worth it.
Additionally, this sets VM_CALL_ARGS_SPLAT_MUT on the call to
[]= in the h[*b] case, so that if []= has a splat parameter, the
new array can be used directly, without additional duplication.
Previously, a literal array with a splat and any other args resulted in
more than one array allocation:
```ruby
[1, *a]
[*a, 1]
[*a, *a]
[*a, 1, 2]
[*a, a]
[*a, 1, *a]
[*a, 1, a]
[*a, a, a]
[*a, a, *a]
[*a, 1, *a, 1]
[*a, 1, *a, *a]
[*a, a, *a, a]
```
This is because previously Ruby would use newarray and concatarray
to create the array, which both each allocate an array internally.
This changes the compilation to use concattoarray and pushtoarray,
which do not allocate arrays. It also updates the peephole optimizer
to optimize the duparray/concattoarray sequence to
putobject/concattoarray, mirroring the existing duparray/concatarray
optimization.
These changes reduce the array allocations for the above examples to
a single array allocation, except for:
```
[*a, 1, a]
[*a, a, a]
```
The reason for this is because optimizing this case to only allocate
1 array requires changes to compile_array, which would currently
conflict with an unmerged pull request (#9721). After that pull
request is merged, it should be possible to refactor things to only
allocate a 1 array for all literal arrays (or 2 for arrays with
keyword splats).
Split up the diagnostic levels so that error and warning levels
aren't mixed. Also fix up deconstruct_keys implementation.
https://github.com/ruby/prism/commit/bd3eeb308d
Co-authored-by: Benoit Daloze <eregontp@gmail.com>
To avoid stack overflow, Ruby splits compilation of large arrays
into smaller arrays, and concatenates the small arrays together.
It previously used newarray/concatarray for this, which is
inefficient. This switches the compilation to use pushtoarray,
which is much faster. This makes almost all literal arrays only
allocate a single array.
For cases where there is a large amount of static values in the
array, Ruby will statically compile subarrays, and previously
added them using concatarray. This switches to concattoarray,
avoiding an array allocation for the append.
Keyword splats are also supported in arrays, and ignored if the
keyword splat is empty. Previously, this used newarraykwsplat and
concatarray. This still uses newarraykwsplat, but switches to
concattoarray to save an allocation. So large arrays with keyword
splats can allocate 2 arrays instead of 1.
Previously, for the following array sizes (assuming local variable
access for each element), Ruby allocated the following number of
arrays:
1000 elements: 7 arrays
10000 elements: 79 arrays
100000 elements: 781 arrays
With these changes, only a single array is allocated (or 2 for a
large array with a keyword splat.
Results using the included benchmark:
```
array_1000
miniruby: 34770.0 i/s
./miniruby-before: 10511.7 i/s - 3.31x slower
array_10000
miniruby: 4938.8 i/s
./miniruby-before: 483.8 i/s - 10.21x slower
array_100000
miniruby: 727.2 i/s
./miniruby-before: 4.1 i/s - 176.98x slower
```
Co-authored-by: Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org>
`__ENCODING__ `was managed by `NODE_LIT` with Encoding object.
Introduce `NODE_ENCODING` for
1. `__ENCODING__` is detectable from AST Node.
2. Reduce dependency Ruby object for parse.y
Ensure we don't accidentally parse the symbol encoding twice, and
ensure we parse it in every circumstance we need to by requiring
it as a parameter.
https://github.com/ruby/prism/commit/9cea31c785
On s390x, a long is 8 bytes. st_data_t is an unsigned long but
pm_constant_id_t is a 4 byte integer. We need to cast it to st_data_t
when passing it to ST functions.
Ruby sets a Symbol literal's encoding to US-ASCII if the symbols consists only of US ASCII code points. Character escapes can also lead a Symbol to have a different encoding than its source's encoding.
https://github.com/ruby/prism/commit/f315660b31
For zsuper calls with a keyword splat but no actual keywords, the
keyword splat is passed directly, so it cannot be mutable, because
if the callee accepts a keyword splat, changes to the keyword splat
by the callee would be reflected in the caller.
While here, simplify the logic when the method supports
literal keywords. I don't think it is possible for
a method with has_kw param flags to not have keywords, so add an
assertion for that, and set VM_CALL_KW_SPLAT_MUT in a single place.
Nobuyoshi Nakada
Masato Nakamura
Kevin Newton
Jeremy Evans
Benoit Daloze
Masato Ohba
S.H
yui-knk
Peter Zhu
Kevin Menard
Haldun Bayhantopcu
Max Prokopiev
Hiroshi SHIBATA
Takashi Kokubun