Since Bundler 2.4, we will try to checkout any branch specified in the
Gemfile, while until Bundler 2.3 we would directly checkout the locked
revision.
This should not make any difference in most situations, but in some edge
cases, like if the branch specified in the `Gemfile` has been renamed,
but the locked revision still exist, it causes an error now while before
it would update the lockfile without issues.
I debated which behavior was best, since I was not sure. But my
conclusion is that if the situation does not require expiring the
lockfile source in favor of the Gemfile source, we should use the locked
revision directly and proceed happily. So I restored Bundler 2.3
behavior.
I think this is consistent with how yanked gems are handled, for example.
Of course, if explicitly updating the git source itself, or all gems, we
will still get any errors like missing branches related to the git source.
This was working fine for direct dependencies using
`force_ruby_platform` explicitly through Gemfile, but not for indirect
dependencies. In general, indirect dependencies do not have this
property set, but in truffleruby this is different and the default value
is to have it set.
This should be a very rare edge case, however, it does happen when using
a .dev version of Bundler because in that case, that's the only version
that the resolver considers, and it should not be ignored.
We could've special cased this specifically for Bundler, but I think it
does make sense for every gem.
Currently, the --no-install option to `bundle package` is totally
ignored for git sources. This can have very strange effects if you have:
- a git-sourced gem,
- with native extensions,
- whose extconf.rb script depends on another gem,
- which is installed from Rubygems in the gemfile.
In that circumstance, `bundle package --no-install --all` will download
the Rubygems dependencies to `vendor/cache` but NOT install them. It
will also check out the git gems to `vendor/cache` (good), and attempt
to build their native extensions (bad!).
The native extension build will fail because the extconf.rb script crashes,
since the dependency it needs is missing.
I implemented a fix for this in `source/git.rb`, since this is analogous
to what's happening in `source/rubygems.rb`. I do admit though the whole
thing is a little strange though - an "install" method that.... proceeds
to look at a global flag to not install anything.
Add test to confirm cache respects the --no-install flag
https://github.com/rubygems/rubygems/commit/5a77d1c397
Co-authored-by: KJ Tsanaktsidis <kj@kjtsanaktsidis.id.au>
If the original `BUNDLE_GEMFILE` is different from the default, then the
suggestion wouldn't work as is.
Before:
```
$ util/rubocop
Could not find rubocop-1.30.1 in locally installed gems
Run `bundle install` to install missing gems.
$ rubygems git:(better-cmd-suggestion) ✗ bundle install
Could not locate Gemfile
```
After:
```
$ util/rubocop
Could not find rubocop-1.30.1 in locally installed gems
Run `bundle install --gemfile /path/to/rubygems/bundler/tool/bundler/lint_gems.rb` to install missing gems.
$ bundle install --gemfile /path/to/rubygems/bundler/tool/bundler/lint_gems.rb
Fetching gem metadata from https://rubygems.org/.........
Using ast 2.4.2
Using bundler 2.4.7
Using parser 3.1.2.0
Using rainbow 3.1.1
Using parallel 1.22.1
Using regexp_parser 2.5.0
Using rubocop-ast 1.18.0
Using rexml 3.2.5
Using ruby-progressbar 1.11.0
Using unicode-display_width 2.1.0
Fetching rubocop 1.30.1
Installing rubocop 1.30.1
Using rubocop-performance 1.14.2
Bundle complete! 2 Gemfile dependencies, 12 gems now installed.
Use `bundle info [gemname]` to see where a bundled gem is installed.
$ util/rubocop
Inspecting 345 files
.........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
345 files inspected, no offenses detected
```
https://github.com/rubygems/rubygems/commit/bf1320d805
Following up on https://github.com/rubygems/rubygems/pull/6355, which
turned a crash into a nicer error message, this commit auto-heals the
corrupt lockfile instead.
In this particular case (a corrupt Gemfile.lock with missing
dependencies) the LazySpecification will not have accurate dependency
information, we have to materialize the SpecSet to determine there are
missing dependencies. We've already got a way to handle this, via
`SpecSet#incomplete_specs`, but it wasn't quite working for this case
because we'd get to `@incomplete_specs += lookup[name]` and
`lookup[name]` would be empty for the dependency.
With this commit we catch it a bit earlier, marking the parent spec
containing the missing dependency as incomplete.
https://github.com/rubygems/rubygems/commit/486ecb8f20
[Bug #19439]
The instance variables were restore on the Regexp source,
not the regexp itself.
Unfortunately we have a bit of a chicken and egg problem.
The source holds the encoding, and the encoding need to be set on
the source to be able to instantiate the Regexp.
So the instance variables have to be read on the `source`.
To correct this we transfert the instance variables after
instantiating the Regexp.
The only way to avoid this would be to read the instance variable
twice and rewind.
* Replaces the wording of "is forbidden" with "cannot be used"
* Fixes the method signature of VersionRange::Empty#eql?
https://github.com/rubygems/rubygems/commit/8c6b3f130b
Co-authored-by: Daniel Colson <danieljamescolson@gmail.com>
This test is no longer passing:
```
1)
BigDecimal#remainder returns NaN if Infinity is involved FAILED
Expected Infinity.nan?
to be truthy but was false
/home/runner/work/ruby/ruby/src/spec/ruby/library/bigdecimal/remainder_spec.rb:58:in `block (2 levels) in <top (required)>'
/home/runner/work/ruby/ruby/src/spec/ruby/library/bigdecimal/remainder_spec.rb:4:in `<top (required)>'
```
https://github.com/ruby/bigdecimal/pull/243