struct_ivar_get recently started using rb_class_superclass to
resolve super instead of RCLASS_SUPER. This change made
Qnil a possible case we need to return from within the
struct_ivar_get for loop.
rb_ary_tmp_new suggests that the array is temporary in some way, but
that's not true, it just creates an array that's hidden and not on the
transient heap. This commit renames it to rb_ary_hidden_new.
I used this regex:
([A-Za-z]+)\.html#(?:class|module)-[A-Za-z]+-label-([A-Za-z0-9\-\+]+)
And performed a global find & replace for this:
rdoc-ref:$1@$2
* As the "doc/" prefix is specified by the `--page-dir` option,
remove from the rdoc references.
* Refer to the original .rdoc instead of the converted .html.
* Warn Struct#initialize with only keyword args
A part of [Feature #16806]
* Do not warn if `keyword_init: false`
is explicitly specified
* Add a NEWS entry
* s/in/from/
* Make sure all fields are initialized
Adds a full discussion of #dig, along with links from Array, Hash, Struct, and OpenStruct.
CSV::Table and CSV::Row are over in ruby/csv. I'll get to them soon.
The art to the thing is to figure out how much (or how little) to say at each #dig.
Noticed that struct rb_builtin_function is a purely compile-time
constant. MJIT can eliminate some runtime calculations by statically
generate dedicated C code generator for each builtin functions.
[Bug #16465] [Bug #16801]
[Fix GH-2795] [Fix GH-2944] [Fix GH-3045] [Fix GH-3093]
Note: Backporting shouldn't modify object.h and instead can use
struct_new_kw which is basically a duplicate implementation of
rb_class_new_instance_pass_kw
Co-authored-by: Yusuke Endoh <mame@ruby-lang.org>
Co-authored-by: John Hawthorn <john@hawthorn.email>
Co-authored-by: Adam Hess <HParker@github.com>
Co-authored-by: Jose Cortinas <jacortinas@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Jean Boussier <jean.boussier@gmail.com>
As a semantics, Hash#each yields a 2-element array (pairs of keys and
values). So, `{ a: 1 }.each(&->(k, v) { })` should raise an exception
due to lambda's arity check.
However, the optimization that avoids Array allocation by using
rb_yield_values for blocks whose arity is more than 1 (introduced at
b9d2960337 and some commits), seemed to
overlook the lambda case, and wrongly allowed the code above to work.
This change experimentally attempts to make it strict; now the code
above raises an ArgumentError. This is an incompatible change; if the
compatibility issue is bigger than our expectation, it may be reverted
(until Ruby 3.0 release).
[Bug #12706]
Nobuyoshi Nakada
Alan Wu
Zack Deveau
S-H-GAMELINKS
Yuri Smirnov
Victor Shepelev
Peter Zhu
Takashi Kokubun
John Hawthorn
Burdette Lamar
Kazuhiro NISHIYAMA
Koichi Sasada
hkdnet
卜部昌平
Marc-Andre Lafortune
Yusuke Endoh