Redo of 34a2acdac788602c14bf05fb616215187badd504 and
931138b00696419945dc03e10f033b1f53cd50f3 which were reverted.
GitHub PR #4340.
This change implements a cache for class variables. Previously there was
no cache for cvars. Cvar access is slow due to needing to travel all the
way up th ancestor tree before returning the cvar value. The deeper the
ancestor tree the slower cvar access will be.
The benefits of the cache are more visible with a higher number of
included modules due to the way Ruby looks up class variables. The
benchmark here includes 26 modules and shows with the cache, this branch
is 6.5x faster when accessing class variables.
```
compare-ruby: ruby 3.1.0dev (2021-03-15T06:22:34Z master 9e5105c) [x86_64-darwin19]
built-ruby: ruby 3.1.0dev (2021-03-15T12:12:44Z add-cache-for-clas.. c6be009) [x86_64-darwin19]
| |compare-ruby|built-ruby|
|:--------|-----------:|---------:|
|vm_cvar | 5.681M| 36.980M|
| | -| 6.51x|
```
Benchmark.ips calling `ActiveRecord::Base.logger` from within a Rails
application. ActiveRecord::Base.logger has 71 ancestors. The more
ancestors a tree has, the more clear the speed increase. IE if Base had
only one ancestor we'd see no improvement. This benchmark is run on a
vanilla Rails application.
Benchmark code:
```ruby
require "benchmark/ips"
require_relative "config/environment"
Benchmark.ips do |x|
x.report "logger" do
ActiveRecord::Base.logger
end
end
```
Ruby 3.0 master / Rails 6.1:
```
Warming up --------------------------------------
logger 155.251k i/100ms
Calculating -------------------------------------
```
Ruby 3.0 with cvar cache / Rails 6.1:
```
Warming up --------------------------------------
logger 1.546M i/100ms
Calculating -------------------------------------
logger 14.857M (± 4.8%) i/s - 74.198M in 5.006202s
```
Lastly we ran a benchmark to demonstate the difference between master
and our cache when the number of modules increases. This benchmark
measures 1 ancestor, 30 ancestors, and 100 ancestors.
Ruby 3.0 master:
```
Warming up --------------------------------------
1 module 1.231M i/100ms
30 modules 432.020k i/100ms
100 modules 145.399k i/100ms
Calculating -------------------------------------
1 module 12.210M (± 2.1%) i/s - 61.553M in 5.043400s
30 modules 4.354M (± 2.7%) i/s - 22.033M in 5.063839s
100 modules 1.434M (± 2.9%) i/s - 7.270M in 5.072531s
Comparison:
1 module: 12209958.3 i/s
30 modules: 4354217.8 i/s - 2.80x (± 0.00) slower
100 modules: 1434447.3 i/s - 8.51x (± 0.00) slower
```
Ruby 3.0 with cvar cache:
```
Warming up --------------------------------------
1 module 1.641M i/100ms
30 modules 1.655M i/100ms
100 modules 1.620M i/100ms
Calculating -------------------------------------
1 module 16.279M (± 3.8%) i/s - 82.038M in 5.046923s
30 modules 15.891M (± 3.9%) i/s - 79.459M in 5.007958s
100 modules 16.087M (± 3.6%) i/s - 81.005M in 5.041931s
Comparison:
1 module: 16279458.0 i/s
100 modules: 16087484.6 i/s - same-ish: difference falls within error
30 modules: 15891406.2 i/s - same-ish: difference falls within error
```
Co-authored-by: Aaron Patterson <tenderlove@ruby-lang.org>
by merging `rb_ast_body_t#line_count` and `#script_lines`.
Fortunately `line_count == RARRAY_LEN(script_lines)` was always
satisfied. When script_lines is saved, it has an array of lines, and
when not saved, it has a Fixnum that represents the old line_count.
This change implements a cache for class variables. Previously there was
no cache for cvars. Cvar access is slow due to needing to travel all the
way up th ancestor tree before returning the cvar value. The deeper the
ancestor tree the slower cvar access will be.
The benefits of the cache are more visible with a higher number of
included modules due to the way Ruby looks up class variables. The
benchmark here includes 26 modules and shows with the cache, this branch
is 6.5x faster when accessing class variables.
```
compare-ruby: ruby 3.1.0dev (2021-03-15T06:22:34Z master 9e5105ca45) [x86_64-darwin19]
built-ruby: ruby 3.1.0dev (2021-03-15T12:12:44Z add-cache-for-clas.. c6be0093ae) [x86_64-darwin19]
| |compare-ruby|built-ruby|
|:--------|-----------:|---------:|
|vm_cvar | 5.681M| 36.980M|
| | -| 6.51x|
```
Benchmark.ips calling `ActiveRecord::Base.logger` from within a Rails
application. ActiveRecord::Base.logger has 71 ancestors. The more
ancestors a tree has, the more clear the speed increase. IE if Base had
only one ancestor we'd see no improvement. This benchmark is run on a
vanilla Rails application.
Benchmark code:
```ruby
require "benchmark/ips"
require_relative "config/environment"
Benchmark.ips do |x|
x.report "logger" do
ActiveRecord::Base.logger
end
end
```
Ruby 3.0 master / Rails 6.1:
```
Warming up --------------------------------------
logger 155.251k i/100ms
Calculating -------------------------------------
```
Ruby 3.0 with cvar cache / Rails 6.1:
```
Warming up --------------------------------------
logger 1.546M i/100ms
Calculating -------------------------------------
logger 14.857M (± 4.8%) i/s - 74.198M in 5.006202s
```
Lastly we ran a benchmark to demonstate the difference between master
and our cache when the number of modules increases. This benchmark
measures 1 ancestor, 30 ancestors, and 100 ancestors.
Ruby 3.0 master:
```
Warming up --------------------------------------
1 module 1.231M i/100ms
30 modules 432.020k i/100ms
100 modules 145.399k i/100ms
Calculating -------------------------------------
1 module 12.210M (± 2.1%) i/s - 61.553M in 5.043400s
30 modules 4.354M (± 2.7%) i/s - 22.033M in 5.063839s
100 modules 1.434M (± 2.9%) i/s - 7.270M in 5.072531s
Comparison:
1 module: 12209958.3 i/s
30 modules: 4354217.8 i/s - 2.80x (± 0.00) slower
100 modules: 1434447.3 i/s - 8.51x (± 0.00) slower
```
Ruby 3.0 with cvar cache:
```
Warming up --------------------------------------
1 module 1.641M i/100ms
30 modules 1.655M i/100ms
100 modules 1.620M i/100ms
Calculating -------------------------------------
1 module 16.279M (± 3.8%) i/s - 82.038M in 5.046923s
30 modules 15.891M (± 3.9%) i/s - 79.459M in 5.007958s
100 modules 16.087M (± 3.6%) i/s - 81.005M in 5.041931s
Comparison:
1 module: 16279458.0 i/s
100 modules: 16087484.6 i/s - same-ish: difference falls within error
30 modules: 15891406.2 i/s - same-ish: difference falls within error
```
Co-authored-by: Aaron Patterson <tenderlove@ruby-lang.org>
We can take advantage of fstrings to de-duplicate the defined strings.
This means we don't need to keep the list of defined strings on the VM
(or register them as mark objects)
rb_funcall* (rb_funcall(), rb_funcallv(), ...) functions invokes
Ruby's method with given receiver. Ruby 2.7 introduced inline method
cache with static memory area. However, Ruby 3.0 reimplemented the
method cache data structures and the inline cache was removed.
Without inline cache, rb_funcall* searched methods everytime.
Most of cases per-Class Method Cache (pCMC) will be helped but
pCMC requires VM-wide locking and it hurts performance on
multi-Ractor execution, especially all Ractors calls methods
with rb_funcall*.
This patch introduced Global Call-Cache Cache Table (gccct) for
rb_funcall*. Call-Cache was introduced from Ruby 3.0 to manage
method cache entry atomically and gccct enables method-caching
without VM-wide locking. This table solves the performance issue
on multi-ractor execution.
[Bug #17497]
Ruby-level method invocation does not use gccct because it has
inline-method-cache and the table size is limited. Basically
rb_funcall* is not used frequently, so 1023 entries can be enough.
We will revisit the table size if it is not enough.
because the name "MJIT" is an internal code name, it's inconsistent with
--jit while they are related to each other, and I want to discourage future
JIT implementation-specific (e.g. MJIT-specific) APIs by this rename.
[Feature #17490]
"experimental_everything" makes the assigned value, it means
the assignment change the state of assigned value.
"experimental_copy" tries to make a deep copy and make copyied object
sharable.
When `literal`, check if the literal about to be assigned to a
constant is ractor-shareable, otherwise raise `Ractor::Error` at
runtime instead of `SyntaxError`.
Ractor has several restrictions to keep each ractor being isolated
and some operation such as `CONST="foo"` in non-main ractor raises
an exception. This kind of operation raises an error but there is
confusion (some code raises RuntimeError and some code raises
NameError).
To make clear we introduce Ractor::IsolationError which is raised
when the isolation between ractors is violated.
to avoid SEGV on mjit_recompile and compact_all_jit_code.
For some reason, ISeqs on stack are sometimes GC-ed (why?) and therefore
it may run mjit_recompile on a GC-ed ISeq, which I expected d07183ec85
to fix but apparently it may refer to random things if already GC-ed.
Marking active_units would workaround the situation.
http://ci.rvm.jp/results/trunk-mjit-wait@phosphorus-docker/3292740
Also, while compact_all_jit_code was executed, we saw some SEGVs where
CCs seemed to be already GC-ed, meaning their owner ISeq was not marked
properly. Even if units are still in active_units, it's not guaranteed
that their ISeqs are in use. So in this case we need to mark active_units
for a legitimate reason.
http://ci.rvm.jp/results/trunk-mjit-wait@phosphorus-docker/3293277http://ci.rvm.jp/results/trunk-mjit-wait@phosphorus-docker/3293090
The original motivation of this marking was https://github.com/k0kubun/yarv-mjit/issues/20.
As wanabe said, there are multiple options to mitigate the issue, and
Eric Wong introduced another fix at 143776f6fe by checking unit->iseq
inside the lock.
Therefore this particular condition has been covered in two ways, and
the script given by wanabe no longer crashes without mjit_mark().
On windows, MJIT doesn't work without this patch because of
the declaration of ruby_single_main_ractor. This patch fix this
issue and move the definition of it from ractor.c to vm.c to locate
near place of ruby_current_vm_ptr.
C extensions can violate the ractor-safety, so only ractor-safe
C extensions (C methods) can run on non-main ractors.
rb_ext_ractor_safe(true) declares that the successive
defined methods are ractor-safe. Otherwiwze, defined methods
checked they are invoked in main ractor and raise an error
if invoked at non-main ractors.
[Feature #17307]
The vm mark function should only check if the current frame is a local
or not and then mark values in that frame. Since it's walking up the
stack looking at each cfp, then all ep's should be examined.
This fixes a bug in the Rails tests where we're seeing segv in railties.
Thanks Yasuo Honda for giving me a reliable repro!
To make some kind of Ractor related extensions, some functions
should be exposed.
* include/ruby/thread_native.h
* rb_native_mutex_*
* rb_native_cond_*
* include/ruby/ractor.h
* RB_OBJ_SHAREABLE_P(obj)
* rb_ractor_shareable_p(obj)
* rb_ractor_std*()
* rb_cRactor
and rm ractor_pub.h
and rename srcdir/ractor.h to srcdir/ractor_core.h
(to avoid conflict with include/ruby/ractor.h)
* `GC.auto_compact=`, `GC.auto_compact` can be used to control when
compaction runs. Setting `auto_compact=` to true will cause
compaction to occurr duing major collections. At the moment,
compaction adds significant overhead to major collections, so please
test first!
[Feature #17176]
Ractor.make_shareable() supports Proc object if
(1) a Proc only read outer local variables (no assignments)
(2) read outer local variables are shareable.
Read local variables are stored in a snapshot, so after making
shareable Proc, any assignments are not affeect like that:
```ruby
a = 1
pr = Ractor.make_shareable(Proc.new{p a})
pr.call #=> 1
a = 2
pr.call #=> 1 # `a = 2` doesn't affect
```
[Feature #17284]
To access TLS, it is faster to use language TLS specifier instead
of using pthread_get/setspecific functions.
Original proposal is: Use native thread locals. #3665
We should let fibers update their own references on compaction. I don't
think we need the thread to update the associated fiber because there
will be a fiber object on the heap that knows how to update itself.
This commit introduces Ractor mechanism to run Ruby program in
parallel. See doc/ractor.md for more details about Ractor.
See ticket [Feature #17100] to see the implementation details
and discussions.
[Feature #17100]
This commit does not complete the implementation. You can find
many bugs on using Ractor. Also the specification will be changed
so that this feature is experimental. You will see a warning when
you make the first Ractor with `Ractor.new`.
I hope this feature can help programmers from thread-safety issues.
Samuel Williams
Nobuyoshi Nakada
eileencodes
Yusuke Endoh
Aaron Patterson
Benoit Daloze
S-H-GAMELINKS
Peter Zhu
Koichi Sasada
Takashi Kokubun
Alan Wu
Kazuhiro NISHIYAMA
卜部昌平