In the XDG Specification, if ~/.config/readline/inputrc exists, then ~/.inputrc
should not be read, but for compatibility with GNU Readline, if ~/.inputrc
exists, then it is given priority.
https://github.com/ruby/reline/commit/97f1e7db04
* Support XDG_CONFIG_HOME for gemrc.
* Support XDG_DATA_HOME for .gem
* Added test for XDG_DATA_HOME
* Do not reuse environmental variable.
* Unify .rdoc path to RDoc.home.
* Support XDG_DATA_HOME for .rdoc
* Ignore exists?
* Extracted config_home path
* Use XDG_CONFIG_HOME for default credential path
* Fixed inconsistency location.
* Fixed the broken tests.
* Support XDG_CONFIG_HOME for irbrc
* Introduce Gem.cache_home as XDG_CACHE_HOME
* Use Gem.cache_home instead of Gem.config_home for the credential file of RubyGems.
* Initialized the old configurations
* Fixed test failure related the configuration initialization
* restore XDG_DATA_HOME
* Fixed the broken examples of bundler with XDG_*
* Do not modify environmental variable on test file
* Use XDG_DATA_HOME insted of XDG_CACHE_HOME for credential file
* stub out Gem.data_home
* Move dir accessor to defaults.rb file
* Use XDG_DATA_HOME for signed gem features
* Use XDG_DATA_HOME for spec cache
* Do not rely on Gem.user_home
* Gem.user_home is always exists. Don't need to use FileUitls.mkdir_p
* Bump support version to RubyGems 3.2.0+
* Removed the needless fallback configuration
* Fixed the inconsistency methods that are find_config_file and config_file
* Use Gem.configuration.credentials_path instead of hard-coded path
* gem_path is always provided
* Removed the duplicated code of find_home
* Also removed the duplicated code of user_home
* use Gem::UNTAINT instead of untaint for surpressing the warnings
* Use File.directory
* Restore XDG_DATA_HOME
* Use File.write
* `RbConfig::CONFIG['ridir']` has been set since 1.9.2
* `ENV["HOME"]` has been defaulted to `USERPROFILE` since 1.9.0,
and backported to 1.8.5 or later.
https://github.com/ruby/rdoc/commit/a3a614e676
search_method() can return invalid method, but vm_defined() checks
it as valid method entry. This is why defined?(foo) if foo is undef'ed.
To solve this problem, check invalidation and return NULL.
[Bug #16669]
https://twitter.com/kamipo/status/1252881930103558144
Tests will be merged by nobu soon.
Now, the order is good, old-fashioned style:
```
$ ./local/bin/ruby -e 'def foo; raise; end
def bar; foo; end
def baz; bar; end
def qux; baz; end
qux
'
-e:1:in `foo': unhandled exception
from -e:2:in `bar'
from -e:3:in `baz'
from -e:4:in `qux'
from -e:5:in `<main>'
```