* Replaces the wording of "is forbidden" with "cannot be used"
* Fixes the method signature of VersionRange::Empty#eql?
https://github.com/rubygems/rubygems/commit/8c6b3f130b
Co-authored-by: Daniel Colson <danieljamescolson@gmail.com>
I did a bad thing (script that edits the Gemfile.lock directly) and
ended up with a Gemfile.lock that was completely missing some indirect
dependencies. While this is my fault and an error is reasonable, I
noticed that the error got progressively less friendly in recent
versions of bundler.
Something similar came up in https://github.com/rubygems/rubygems/issues/6210,
and this commit would have helped with that case as well
(although we've already handled this a different way with #6219).
Details:
---
Back on Bundler 2.2.23, a corrupt lockfile like this would cause a helpful error:
```
Unable to find a spec satisfying minitest (>= 5.1) in the set. Perhaps the lockfile is corrupted?
```
Bundler 2.3.26 gave a helpful warning:
```
Warning:
Your lockfile was created by an old Bundler that left some things out.
Because of the missing DEPENDENCIES, we can only install gems one at a time,
instead of installing 16 at a time.
You can fix this by adding the missing gems to your Gemfile, running bundle
install, and then removing the gems from your Gemfile.
The missing gems are:
* minitest depended upon by activesupport
```
But then continued on and crashed while trying to report the unmet
dependency:
```
--- ERROR REPORT TEMPLATE -------------------------------------------------------
NoMethodError: undefined method `full_name' for nil:NilClass
lib/bundler/installer/parallel_installer.rb:127:in `block (2 levels) in check_for_unmet_dependencies'
...
```
Bundler 2.4.0 and up crash as above when jobs=1, but crash
even harder when run in parallel:
```
--- ERROR REPORT TEMPLATE -------------------------------------------------------
fatal: No live threads left. Deadlock?
3 threads, 3 sleeps current:0x00007fa6b6704660 main thread:0x00007fa6b6704660
* #<Thread:0x000000010833b130 sleep_forever>
rb_thread_t:0x00007fa6b6704660 native:0x0000000108985600 int:0
* #<Thread:0x0000000108dea630@Parallel Installer Worker #0 tmp/1/gems/system/gems/bundler-2.5.0.dev/lib/bundler/worker.rb:90 sleep_forever>
rb_thread_t:0x00007fa6b67f67c0 native:0x0000700009a62000 int:0
* #<Thread:0x0000000108dea4a0@Parallel Installer Worker #1 tmp/1/gems/system/gems/bundler-2.5.0.dev/lib/bundler/worker.rb:90 sleep_forever>
rb_thread_t:0x00007fa6b67f63c0 native:0x0000700009c65000 int:0
<internal:thread_sync>:18:in `pop'
tmp/1/gems/system/gems/bundler-2.5.0.dev/lib/bundler/worker.rb:42:in `deq'
...
```
Changes
---
This commit fixes the confusing thread deadlock crash by detecting if
dependencies are missing such that we'll never be able to enqueue. When
that happens we treat it as a failure so the install can finish.
That gets us back to the `NoMethodError`, which this commit fixes by
using a different warning in the case where no spec is found.
https://github.com/rubygems/rubygems/commit/d73001a21d
`trying to manually editing` doesn't seem quite grammatically
correct. We could change it to `trying to manually edit` (is that a
split infinitive?), but I don't think `trying to` adds much here so
I've removed it instead so `editing` is the verb.
For the list of dependencies, the wording before this commit seemed to
reverse the dependency. "B, depended on A" sounds like B depends on A
(or did in the past but doesn't anymore?), but that's not correct. I
think there's a missing word: "B, depended on by A", but I find "B,
dependency of A" a bit nicer.
https://github.com/rubygems/rubygems/commit/49a31257e3
The previous code loads bundler's gemspec which does not include the generated
gemspec file, and thus the test was passing where it should indeed fail.
With this change, the test properly fails now.
https://github.com/rubygems/rubygems/commit/2098ea0d75
Given an existing application using native gems (e.g., nokogiri)
And a lockfile generated with a stable ruby version
When we test the application against ruby-head and `bundle install`
Then bundler should fall back to the generic ruby platform gem
Note that this test has been passing since 45931ac9
https://github.com/rubygems/rubygems/commit/0ecc6de378
Prior to this commit `bundle binstubs --standalone --all` would output a
warning about not being able to generate a standalone binstub for
bundler.
This warning predates the `--all` option, and I don't think it makes
sense in this context. The warning makes good sense when explicitly
trying to generate a bundler standalone binstub with `bundle binstubs
bundler --standalone`, since that command won't do what the user might
have expected. But `--all` is not specifically asking for bundler, and
having it report each time that the bundler binstubs could not be
generated does not seem particularly helpful. The only way to make that
warning go away would be to stop using `--standalone --all`.
This commit skips the warning when running with the `--all` option.
https://github.com/rubygems/rubygems/commit/e6a72e19eb
With `GemVersionPromoter#sort_versions` being so simple, we no longer
need to reach into the class's internals to make private methods public
in order to effectively test. We can just allow both cases to go through
the main method.
https://github.com/rubygems/rubygems/commit/6cbe891003
We have a check for a corrupt lockfile right before installing. However,
the check accounted for locked specs not satisfying locked dependencies,
but not for locked specs missing for some locked dependencies.
Instead of fixing this check, I decided to remove it in favor of
automatically detecting the situation and re-resolve to automatically
fix the lockfile rather than printing a warning but leave the problem
there.
https://github.com/rubygems/rubygems/commit/4a7a584252
bundle lock --update can do everything that bundle update can do, but
it doesn't actually install gems. This is especially useful for
generating a lockfile on a machine that doesn't have the libraries
available to be able to build native extensions.
But, there was no parallel for bundle update --bundler. So let's add
one.
https://github.com/rubygems/rubygems/commit/7fc00bd2a5
Cases like this:
```ruby
obj = Object.new
loop do
obj.instance_variable_set(:@foo, 1)
obj.remove_instance_variable(:@foo)
end
```
can cause us to use many more shapes than we want (and even run out).
This commit changes the code such that when an instance variable is
removed, we'll walk up the shape tree, find the shape, then rebuild any
child nodes that happened to be below the "targetted for removal" IV.
This also requires moving any instance variables so that indexes derived
from the shape tree will work correctly.
Co-Authored-By: Jemma Issroff <jemmaissroff@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: John Hawthorn <jhawthorn@github.com>
Ruby interpreter loads some special gems at startup: did_you_mean,
error_highlight, and syntax_suggest. These gems are loaded before
`bundler/setup` is loaded by `RUBYOPT=-rbundler/setup`.
So, the versions of the gems are not controllable by Gemfile.
This change will `require "bundler/setup"` in rubygems.rb (i.e., before
the special gems are loaded). Now `bundle exec` sets an environment
variable `BUNDLER_SETUP`, and rubygems requires the variable if defined.
See also: https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/19089https://github.com/rubygems/rubygems/commit/963cb65a2d
Mercedes Bernard
Hiroshi SHIBATA
David Rodríguez
John Hawthorn
Daniel Colson
Akira Matsuda
Mike Dalessio
Tim Bates
yoka
Mark Burns
Josef Šimánek
Michael Siegfried
Michael Siegfried
Alyssa Ross
Aaron Patterson
Aaron Patterson
Yusuke Endoh
Bo Anderson