Instead, match the poll() implementation used on Linux for now;
as the Linux poll(2) manpage describes using negative FD to
easily ignore an FD in a larger FD set while (sleeping the given
timeout). I'm not entirely sure if matching poll() behavior
is a good idea for a single FD, but it's better than segfaulting
or NoMemoryError.
* thread.c (init_set_fd): ignore negative FD
* test/-ext-/wait_for_single_fd/test_wait_for_single_fd.rb
(test_wait_for_invalid_fd): check values which may trigger
segfaults or OOM
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://ci.ruby-lang.org/ruby/trunk@58925 b2dd03c8-39d4-4d8f-98ff-823fe69b080e
* ext/-test-/**/extconf.rb: bring up extension libraries which
have same name as the parent directory to reduce feature names.
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://ci.ruby-lang.org/ruby/trunk@53494 b2dd03c8-39d4-4d8f-98ff-823fe69b080e
When you change this to true, you may need to add more tests.
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://ci.ruby-lang.org/ruby/trunk@53141 b2dd03c8-39d4-4d8f-98ff-823fe69b080e
* test/-ext-/wait_for_single_fd/test_wait_for_single_fd.rb
(TestWaitForSingleFD#test_wait_for_closed_pipe): test for it.
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://ci.ruby-lang.org/ruby/trunk@31429 b2dd03c8-39d4-4d8f-98ff-823fe69b080e
rb_wait_for_single_fd() internal function.
The patch was written by Eric Wong. [ruby-core:35991]
* test/-ext-/wait_for_single_fd/test_wait_for_single_fd.rb: ditto.
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://ci.ruby-lang.org/ruby/trunk@31428 b2dd03c8-39d4-4d8f-98ff-823fe69b080e
normal
nobu
naruse
kazu
kosaki