We were previously behaving as though the slice/map values in the
options struct could be modified directly. The options should be cloned
before modification. Also, convert any usage of source.Options to
*source.Options.
Fixesgolang/go#39592
Change-Id: Ib39f668bca0fa1038162206bd7793fd2049af576
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/254558
Trust: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
gopls-CI: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
As we have modified the ways that we control which analyzers get
executed for a given case, we have lost the behavior of enabling and
disabling staticcheck smoothly. This CL splits out the staticcheck
analyzers from the main group so that the "staticcheck" setting can
override whether or not a given staticcheck analysis is enabled.
Fixesgolang/go#41311
Change-Id: I9c1695afe4a8f89cd0ee50a79e83b2f42a2c20cb
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/254038
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
gopls-CI: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
gopls has many settings. We want to automatically generate
documentation, and we want to allow clients to perform their own
validation if they so desire.
Using all three of AST, type information, and reflection, generate a
JSON description of the settings and their default values. Add a gopls
command that prints it. Add a documentation generator that uses it to
write settings.md.
I assumed that everything not explicitly documented was experimental,
and moved it into that section. I also moved expandWorkspaceToModule to
experimental; I hope it's not long for this world, personally.
Along the way, rename many fields, make the enum matching case
insensitive, and add a stringer call so that the defaults print nicely.
Fixesgolang/go#33544.
Change-Id: Ibb652002933e355ed3c6038d6ca48345b39b3025
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/252322
Run-TryBot: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
SA5011 relies on facts from dependencies to avoid false positives.
However, gopls currently only loads export data for dependencies, it
does not compute facts.
SA5011 is unlike other analyzers in staticcheck, which may produce
false negatives if facts are missing, but no false positives.
Change-Id: I5063b701bbedca7b09d1894997f8c574fa497939
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/228119
Run-TryBot: Dominik Honnef <dominik@honnef.co>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
If we release gopls/v0.4.0 soon, we should keep these new analyzers off
by default. They were just merged, so they haven't been used enough to
be enabled, I think. We'll turn them on by default for gopls/v0.5.0.
Also, ended up creating a helper function to check if analysis has been
abled (which fixed a small bug in FindAnalysisError), and another helper
function to enable all analyses for testing purposes.
Updates golang/go#38212
Change-Id: I5ee94b3582dfc0863978650fc6ce51bfa0606c13
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/226962
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rohan Challa <rohan@golang.org>
This change adds support within gopls for analyzers that work with type errors to provide suggested fixes.
Updates golang/go#34644
Change-Id: Ia8929173752fda6bd84a9edaabd310e758f25fe8
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/222761
Run-TryBot: Rohan Challa <rohan@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Forgot to enable the staticcheck hooks when I created a struct for analyzers inside of the lsp (https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/223662).
Change-Id: Ice7798089100107113741caed3ddc41d172830b4
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/225837
Run-TryBot: Rohan Challa <rohan@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Jolly <paul@myitcv.org.uk>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
This change removes the disabledAnalyses setting and replaces it with a more general feature named "analyses". This will allow users to opt in as well as opt out of analyzers that they do not find useful. This also updates some documentation to show users what analyzers gopls is using and which are enabled by default.
Change-Id: Id3239b4c4c9667e834f262c889270d14fdba0f93
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/223662
Run-TryBot: Rohan Challa <rohan@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
The nilness analyzer requires SSA, which is very expensive to build and
uses a lot of RAM. It also seems to really shoot up memory usage when it
hits certain cases, which is causing a lot of problems for users.
Disable this analysis - we'll leave SSA to staticcheck.
Updates golang/go#36639
Change-Id: I46e67a6fd7828a5fddcd42d1aa00876f17c79e3d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/219203
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
Users with staticcheck enabled will be more tolerant of increased RAM
usage. We might be able to disable this check entirely once the next
version of staticcheck is released with a similar analysis (https://staticcheck.io/docs/checks#SA5011).
Change-Id: I1a844cc226e34e0f62222f12912797a6cc9d06e2
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/219018
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
Hardcoded for now. Will need a better approach if more of these come up.
Fixesgolang/go#34494
Change-Id: Id442d68fa16d81e747ad5ec951fb6b80fdb65f94
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/215118
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
The early return logic for didOpen events in
(*snapshot).invalidateContent was preventing the creation of a new
snapshot, which was in turn stopping the versions from being updated.
This exposed a fundamental issue in the way we were calculating
workspace diagnostics. Since we weren't waiting for diagnostics to be
completed for an entire snapshot before replying that the server had
been initialized, snapshots were being cloned without any type
information. For quickfix code actions, we assume that we have all
information cached (since we need to have sent the diagnostics that the
quickfix is mapped to), so we were not finding the cached analysis
results.
To handle this in the short-term, we key analyses by their names, and
then regenerate results as-needed for code actions. This is technically
more correct than simply assuming that we have the analyses cached. In a
follow-up CL, I will send a follow-up that will make sure that
snapshots "wait" on each other to be fully constructed before being
cloned.
Change-Id: Ie89fcdb438b6b8b675f87335561bf47b768641ac
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/208265
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Cottrell <iancottrell@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
Rebecca Stambler
Heschi Kreinick
Dominik Honnef
Rohan Challa
Ian Cottrell