WSL2-Linux-Kernel/include/linux/rwsem.h

183 строки
5.2 KiB
C
Исходник Обычный вид История

/* rwsem.h: R/W semaphores, public interface
*
* Written by David Howells (dhowells@redhat.com).
* Derived from asm-i386/semaphore.h
*/
#ifndef _LINUX_RWSEM_H
#define _LINUX_RWSEM_H
#include <linux/linkage.h>
#include <linux/types.h>
#include <linux/kernel.h>
#include <linux/list.h>
#include <linux/spinlock.h>
#include <linux/atomic.h>
locking/spinlocks/mcs: Rename optimistic_spin_queue() to optimistic_spin_node() Currently, the per-cpu nodes structure for the cancellable MCS spinlock is named "optimistic_spin_queue". However, in a follow up patch in the series we will be introducing a new structure that serves as the new "handle" for the lock. It would make more sense if that structure is named "optimistic_spin_queue". Additionally, since the current use of the "optimistic_spin_queue" structure are "nodes", it might be better if we rename them to "node" anyway. This preparatory patch renames all current "optimistic_spin_queue" to "optimistic_spin_node". Signed-off-by: Jason Low <jason.low2@hp.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Scott Norton <scott.norton@hp.com> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Waiman Long <waiman.long@hp.com> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@hp.com> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com> Cc: Aswin Chandramouleeswaran <aswin@hp.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com> Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Cc: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1405358872-3732-2-git-send-email-jason.low2@hp.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2014-07-14 21:27:48 +04:00
struct optimistic_spin_node;
struct rw_semaphore;
#ifdef CONFIG_RWSEM_GENERIC_SPINLOCK
#include <linux/rwsem-spinlock.h> /* use a generic implementation */
#else
/* All arch specific implementations share the same struct */
struct rw_semaphore {
locking/rwsem: Support optimistic spinning We have reached the point where our mutexes are quite fine tuned for a number of situations. This includes the use of heuristics and optimistic spinning, based on MCS locking techniques. Exclusive ownership of read-write semaphores are, conceptually, just about the same as mutexes, making them close cousins. To this end we need to make them both perform similarly, and right now, rwsems are simply not up to it. This was discovered by both reverting commit 4fc3f1d6 (mm/rmap, migration: Make rmap_walk_anon() and try_to_unmap_anon() more scalable) and similarly, converting some other mutexes (ie: i_mmap_mutex) to rwsems. This creates a situation where users have to choose between a rwsem and mutex taking into account this important performance difference. Specifically, biggest difference between both locks is when we fail to acquire a mutex in the fastpath, optimistic spinning comes in to play and we can avoid a large amount of unnecessary sleeping and overhead of moving tasks in and out of wait queue. Rwsems do not have such logic. This patch, based on the work from Tim Chen and I, adds support for write-side optimistic spinning when the lock is contended. It also includes support for the recently added cancelable MCS locking for adaptive spinning. Note that is is only applicable to the xadd method, and the spinlock rwsem variant remains intact. Allowing optimistic spinning before putting the writer on the wait queue reduces wait queue contention and provided greater chance for the rwsem to get acquired. With these changes, rwsem is on par with mutex. The performance benefits can be seen on a number of workloads. For instance, on a 8 socket, 80 core 64bit Westmere box, aim7 shows the following improvements in throughput: +--------------+---------------------+-----------------+ | Workload | throughput-increase | number of users | +--------------+---------------------+-----------------+ | alltests | 20% | >1000 | | custom | 27%, 60% | 10-100, >1000 | | high_systime | 36%, 30% | >100, >1000 | | shared | 58%, 29% | 10-100, >1000 | +--------------+---------------------+-----------------+ There was also improvement on smaller systems, such as a quad-core x86-64 laptop running a 30Gb PostgreSQL (pgbench) workload for up to +60% in throughput for over 50 clients. Additionally, benefits were also noticed in exim (mail server) workloads. Furthermore, no performance regression have been seen at all. Based-on-work-from: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@hp.com> [peterz: rej fixup due to comment patches, sched/rt.h header] Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Alex Shi <alex.shi@linaro.org> Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> Cc: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Cc: Peter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com> Cc: "Paul E.McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Jason Low <jason.low2@hp.com> Cc: Aswin Chandramouleeswaran <aswin@hp.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: "Scott J Norton" <scott.norton@hp.com> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com> Cc: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1399055055.6275.15.camel@buesod1.americas.hpqcorp.net Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2014-05-02 22:24:15 +04:00
long count;
raw_spinlock_t wait_lock;
struct list_head wait_list;
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
/*
* Write owner. Used as a speculative check to see
* if the owner is running on the cpu.
*/
struct task_struct *owner;
locking/spinlocks/mcs: Rename optimistic_spin_queue() to optimistic_spin_node() Currently, the per-cpu nodes structure for the cancellable MCS spinlock is named "optimistic_spin_queue". However, in a follow up patch in the series we will be introducing a new structure that serves as the new "handle" for the lock. It would make more sense if that structure is named "optimistic_spin_queue". Additionally, since the current use of the "optimistic_spin_queue" structure are "nodes", it might be better if we rename them to "node" anyway. This preparatory patch renames all current "optimistic_spin_queue" to "optimistic_spin_node". Signed-off-by: Jason Low <jason.low2@hp.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Scott Norton <scott.norton@hp.com> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Waiman Long <waiman.long@hp.com> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@hp.com> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com> Cc: Aswin Chandramouleeswaran <aswin@hp.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com> Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Cc: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1405358872-3732-2-git-send-email-jason.low2@hp.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2014-07-14 21:27:48 +04:00
struct optimistic_spin_node *osq; /* spinner MCS lock */
locking/rwsem: Support optimistic spinning We have reached the point where our mutexes are quite fine tuned for a number of situations. This includes the use of heuristics and optimistic spinning, based on MCS locking techniques. Exclusive ownership of read-write semaphores are, conceptually, just about the same as mutexes, making them close cousins. To this end we need to make them both perform similarly, and right now, rwsems are simply not up to it. This was discovered by both reverting commit 4fc3f1d6 (mm/rmap, migration: Make rmap_walk_anon() and try_to_unmap_anon() more scalable) and similarly, converting some other mutexes (ie: i_mmap_mutex) to rwsems. This creates a situation where users have to choose between a rwsem and mutex taking into account this important performance difference. Specifically, biggest difference between both locks is when we fail to acquire a mutex in the fastpath, optimistic spinning comes in to play and we can avoid a large amount of unnecessary sleeping and overhead of moving tasks in and out of wait queue. Rwsems do not have such logic. This patch, based on the work from Tim Chen and I, adds support for write-side optimistic spinning when the lock is contended. It also includes support for the recently added cancelable MCS locking for adaptive spinning. Note that is is only applicable to the xadd method, and the spinlock rwsem variant remains intact. Allowing optimistic spinning before putting the writer on the wait queue reduces wait queue contention and provided greater chance for the rwsem to get acquired. With these changes, rwsem is on par with mutex. The performance benefits can be seen on a number of workloads. For instance, on a 8 socket, 80 core 64bit Westmere box, aim7 shows the following improvements in throughput: +--------------+---------------------+-----------------+ | Workload | throughput-increase | number of users | +--------------+---------------------+-----------------+ | alltests | 20% | >1000 | | custom | 27%, 60% | 10-100, >1000 | | high_systime | 36%, 30% | >100, >1000 | | shared | 58%, 29% | 10-100, >1000 | +--------------+---------------------+-----------------+ There was also improvement on smaller systems, such as a quad-core x86-64 laptop running a 30Gb PostgreSQL (pgbench) workload for up to +60% in throughput for over 50 clients. Additionally, benefits were also noticed in exim (mail server) workloads. Furthermore, no performance regression have been seen at all. Based-on-work-from: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@hp.com> [peterz: rej fixup due to comment patches, sched/rt.h header] Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Alex Shi <alex.shi@linaro.org> Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> Cc: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Cc: Peter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com> Cc: "Paul E.McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Jason Low <jason.low2@hp.com> Cc: Aswin Chandramouleeswaran <aswin@hp.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: "Scott J Norton" <scott.norton@hp.com> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com> Cc: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1399055055.6275.15.camel@buesod1.americas.hpqcorp.net Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2014-05-02 22:24:15 +04:00
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
struct lockdep_map dep_map;
#endif
};
extern struct rw_semaphore *rwsem_down_read_failed(struct rw_semaphore *sem);
extern struct rw_semaphore *rwsem_down_write_failed(struct rw_semaphore *sem);
extern struct rw_semaphore *rwsem_wake(struct rw_semaphore *);
extern struct rw_semaphore *rwsem_downgrade_wake(struct rw_semaphore *sem);
/* Include the arch specific part */
#include <asm/rwsem.h>
/* In all implementations count != 0 means locked */
static inline int rwsem_is_locked(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
{
return sem->count != 0;
}
#endif
/* Common initializer macros and functions */
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
# define __RWSEM_DEP_MAP_INIT(lockname) , .dep_map = { .name = #lockname }
#else
# define __RWSEM_DEP_MAP_INIT(lockname)
#endif
locking/rwsem: Fix warnings for CONFIG_RWSEM_GENERIC_SPINLOCK Optimistic spinning is only used by the xadd variant of rw-semaphores. Make sure that we use the old version of the __RWSEM_INITIALIZER macro for systems that rely on the spinlock one, otherwise warnings can be triggered, such as the following reported on an arm box: ipc/ipcns_notifier.c:22:8: warning: excess elements in struct initializer [enabled by default] ipc/ipcns_notifier.c:22:8: warning: (near initialization for 'ipcns_chain.rwsem') [enabled by default] ipc/ipcns_notifier.c:22:8: warning: excess elements in struct initializer [enabled by default] ipc/ipcns_notifier.c:22:8: warning: (near initialization for 'ipcns_chain.rwsem') [enabled by default] Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@hp.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Paul McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com> Cc: Peter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com> Cc: Alex Shi <alex.shi@linaro.org> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Jason Low <jason.low2@hp.com> Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> Cc: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com> Cc: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1400545677.6399.10.camel@buesod1.americas.hpqcorp.net Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2014-05-20 04:27:57 +04:00
#if defined(CONFIG_SMP) && !defined(CONFIG_RWSEM_GENERIC_SPINLOCK)
locking/rwsem: Support optimistic spinning We have reached the point where our mutexes are quite fine tuned for a number of situations. This includes the use of heuristics and optimistic spinning, based on MCS locking techniques. Exclusive ownership of read-write semaphores are, conceptually, just about the same as mutexes, making them close cousins. To this end we need to make them both perform similarly, and right now, rwsems are simply not up to it. This was discovered by both reverting commit 4fc3f1d6 (mm/rmap, migration: Make rmap_walk_anon() and try_to_unmap_anon() more scalable) and similarly, converting some other mutexes (ie: i_mmap_mutex) to rwsems. This creates a situation where users have to choose between a rwsem and mutex taking into account this important performance difference. Specifically, biggest difference between both locks is when we fail to acquire a mutex in the fastpath, optimistic spinning comes in to play and we can avoid a large amount of unnecessary sleeping and overhead of moving tasks in and out of wait queue. Rwsems do not have such logic. This patch, based on the work from Tim Chen and I, adds support for write-side optimistic spinning when the lock is contended. It also includes support for the recently added cancelable MCS locking for adaptive spinning. Note that is is only applicable to the xadd method, and the spinlock rwsem variant remains intact. Allowing optimistic spinning before putting the writer on the wait queue reduces wait queue contention and provided greater chance for the rwsem to get acquired. With these changes, rwsem is on par with mutex. The performance benefits can be seen on a number of workloads. For instance, on a 8 socket, 80 core 64bit Westmere box, aim7 shows the following improvements in throughput: +--------------+---------------------+-----------------+ | Workload | throughput-increase | number of users | +--------------+---------------------+-----------------+ | alltests | 20% | >1000 | | custom | 27%, 60% | 10-100, >1000 | | high_systime | 36%, 30% | >100, >1000 | | shared | 58%, 29% | 10-100, >1000 | +--------------+---------------------+-----------------+ There was also improvement on smaller systems, such as a quad-core x86-64 laptop running a 30Gb PostgreSQL (pgbench) workload for up to +60% in throughput for over 50 clients. Additionally, benefits were also noticed in exim (mail server) workloads. Furthermore, no performance regression have been seen at all. Based-on-work-from: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@hp.com> [peterz: rej fixup due to comment patches, sched/rt.h header] Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Alex Shi <alex.shi@linaro.org> Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> Cc: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Cc: Peter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com> Cc: "Paul E.McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Jason Low <jason.low2@hp.com> Cc: Aswin Chandramouleeswaran <aswin@hp.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: "Scott J Norton" <scott.norton@hp.com> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com> Cc: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1399055055.6275.15.camel@buesod1.americas.hpqcorp.net Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2014-05-02 22:24:15 +04:00
#define __RWSEM_INITIALIZER(name) \
{ RWSEM_UNLOCKED_VALUE, \
__RAW_SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(name.wait_lock), \
LIST_HEAD_INIT((name).wait_list), \
NULL, /* owner */ \
NULL /* mcs lock */ \
__RWSEM_DEP_MAP_INIT(name) }
#else
#define __RWSEM_INITIALIZER(name) \
{ RWSEM_UNLOCKED_VALUE, \
__RAW_SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(name.wait_lock), \
LIST_HEAD_INIT((name).wait_list) \
__RWSEM_DEP_MAP_INIT(name) }
locking/rwsem: Support optimistic spinning We have reached the point where our mutexes are quite fine tuned for a number of situations. This includes the use of heuristics and optimistic spinning, based on MCS locking techniques. Exclusive ownership of read-write semaphores are, conceptually, just about the same as mutexes, making them close cousins. To this end we need to make them both perform similarly, and right now, rwsems are simply not up to it. This was discovered by both reverting commit 4fc3f1d6 (mm/rmap, migration: Make rmap_walk_anon() and try_to_unmap_anon() more scalable) and similarly, converting some other mutexes (ie: i_mmap_mutex) to rwsems. This creates a situation where users have to choose between a rwsem and mutex taking into account this important performance difference. Specifically, biggest difference between both locks is when we fail to acquire a mutex in the fastpath, optimistic spinning comes in to play and we can avoid a large amount of unnecessary sleeping and overhead of moving tasks in and out of wait queue. Rwsems do not have such logic. This patch, based on the work from Tim Chen and I, adds support for write-side optimistic spinning when the lock is contended. It also includes support for the recently added cancelable MCS locking for adaptive spinning. Note that is is only applicable to the xadd method, and the spinlock rwsem variant remains intact. Allowing optimistic spinning before putting the writer on the wait queue reduces wait queue contention and provided greater chance for the rwsem to get acquired. With these changes, rwsem is on par with mutex. The performance benefits can be seen on a number of workloads. For instance, on a 8 socket, 80 core 64bit Westmere box, aim7 shows the following improvements in throughput: +--------------+---------------------+-----------------+ | Workload | throughput-increase | number of users | +--------------+---------------------+-----------------+ | alltests | 20% | >1000 | | custom | 27%, 60% | 10-100, >1000 | | high_systime | 36%, 30% | >100, >1000 | | shared | 58%, 29% | 10-100, >1000 | +--------------+---------------------+-----------------+ There was also improvement on smaller systems, such as a quad-core x86-64 laptop running a 30Gb PostgreSQL (pgbench) workload for up to +60% in throughput for over 50 clients. Additionally, benefits were also noticed in exim (mail server) workloads. Furthermore, no performance regression have been seen at all. Based-on-work-from: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@hp.com> [peterz: rej fixup due to comment patches, sched/rt.h header] Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Alex Shi <alex.shi@linaro.org> Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> Cc: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Cc: Peter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com> Cc: "Paul E.McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Jason Low <jason.low2@hp.com> Cc: Aswin Chandramouleeswaran <aswin@hp.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: "Scott J Norton" <scott.norton@hp.com> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com> Cc: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1399055055.6275.15.camel@buesod1.americas.hpqcorp.net Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2014-05-02 22:24:15 +04:00
#endif
#define DECLARE_RWSEM(name) \
struct rw_semaphore name = __RWSEM_INITIALIZER(name)
extern void __init_rwsem(struct rw_semaphore *sem, const char *name,
struct lock_class_key *key);
#define init_rwsem(sem) \
do { \
static struct lock_class_key __key; \
\
__init_rwsem((sem), #sem, &__key); \
} while (0)
/*
* This is the same regardless of which rwsem implementation that is being used.
* It is just a heuristic meant to be called by somebody alreadying holding the
* rwsem to see if somebody from an incompatible type is wanting access to the
* lock.
*/
static inline int rwsem_is_contended(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
{
return !list_empty(&sem->wait_list);
}
/*
* lock for reading
*/
extern void down_read(struct rw_semaphore *sem);
/*
* trylock for reading -- returns 1 if successful, 0 if contention
*/
extern int down_read_trylock(struct rw_semaphore *sem);
/*
* lock for writing
*/
extern void down_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem);
/*
* trylock for writing -- returns 1 if successful, 0 if contention
*/
extern int down_write_trylock(struct rw_semaphore *sem);
/*
* release a read lock
*/
extern void up_read(struct rw_semaphore *sem);
/*
* release a write lock
*/
extern void up_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem);
/*
* downgrade write lock to read lock
*/
extern void downgrade_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem);
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
/*
* nested locking. NOTE: rwsems are not allowed to recurse
* (which occurs if the same task tries to acquire the same
* lock instance multiple times), but multiple locks of the
* same lock class might be taken, if the order of the locks
* is always the same. This ordering rule can be expressed
* to lockdep via the _nested() APIs, but enumerating the
* subclasses that are used. (If the nesting relationship is
* static then another method for expressing nested locking is
* the explicit definition of lock class keys and the use of
* lockdep_set_class() at lock initialization time.
* See Documentation/lockdep-design.txt for more details.)
*/
extern void down_read_nested(struct rw_semaphore *sem, int subclass);
extern void down_write_nested(struct rw_semaphore *sem, int subclass);
extern void _down_write_nest_lock(struct rw_semaphore *sem, struct lockdep_map *nest_lock);
# define down_write_nest_lock(sem, nest_lock) \
do { \
typecheck(struct lockdep_map *, &(nest_lock)->dep_map); \
_down_write_nest_lock(sem, &(nest_lock)->dep_map); \
} while (0);
/*
* Take/release a lock when not the owner will release it.
*
* [ This API should be avoided as much as possible - the
* proper abstraction for this case is completions. ]
*/
extern void down_read_non_owner(struct rw_semaphore *sem);
extern void up_read_non_owner(struct rw_semaphore *sem);
#else
# define down_read_nested(sem, subclass) down_read(sem)
# define down_write_nest_lock(sem, nest_lock) down_write(sem)
# define down_write_nested(sem, subclass) down_write(sem)
# define down_read_non_owner(sem) down_read(sem)
# define up_read_non_owner(sem) up_read(sem)
#endif
#endif /* _LINUX_RWSEM_H */