WSL2-Linux-Kernel/kernel/rcu/srcutiny.c

283 строки
7.8 KiB
C
Исходник Обычный вид История

// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
/*
* Sleepable Read-Copy Update mechanism for mutual exclusion,
* tiny version for non-preemptible single-CPU use.
*
* Copyright (C) IBM Corporation, 2017
*
* Author: Paul McKenney <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
*/
#include <linux/export.h>
#include <linux/mutex.h>
#include <linux/preempt.h>
#include <linux/rcupdate_wait.h>
#include <linux/sched.h>
#include <linux/delay.h>
#include <linux/srcu.h>
#include <linux/rcu_node_tree.h>
#include "rcu_segcblist.h"
#include "rcu.h"
int rcu_scheduler_active __read_mostly;
srcu: Make call_srcu() available during very early boot Event tracing is moving to SRCU in order to take advantage of the fact that SRCU may be safely used from idle and even offline CPUs. However, event tracing can invoke call_srcu() very early in the boot process, even before workqueue_init_early() is invoked (let alone rcu_init()). Therefore, call_srcu()'s attempts to queue work fail miserably. This commit therefore detects this situation, and refrains from attempting to queue work before rcu_init() time, but does everything else that it would have done, and in addition, adds the srcu_struct to a global list. The rcu_init() function now invokes a new srcu_init() function, which is empty if CONFIG_SRCU=n. Otherwise, srcu_init() queues work for each srcu_struct on the list. This all happens early enough in boot that there is but a single CPU with interrupts disabled, which allows synchronization to be dispensed with. Of course, the queued work won't actually be invoked until after workqueue_init() is invoked, which happens shortly after the scheduler is up and running. This means that although call_srcu() may be invoked any time after per-CPU variables have been set up, there is still a very narrow window when synchronize_srcu() won't work, and this window extends from the time that the scheduler starts until the time that workqueue_init() returns. This can be fixed in a manner similar to the fix for synchronize_rcu_expedited() and friends, but until someone actually needs to use synchronize_srcu() during this window, this fix is added churn for no benefit. Finally, note that Tree SRCU's new srcu_init() function invokes queue_work() rather than the queue_delayed_work() function that is invoked post-boot. The reason is that queue_delayed_work() will (as you would expect) post a timer, and timers have not yet been initialized. So use of queue_work() avoids the complaints about use of uninitialized spinlocks that would otherwise result. Besides, some delay is already provide by the aforementioned fact that the queued work won't actually be invoked until after the scheduler is up and running. Requested-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Tested-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
2018-08-14 18:45:54 +03:00
static LIST_HEAD(srcu_boot_list);
static bool srcu_init_done;
static int init_srcu_struct_fields(struct srcu_struct *ssp)
{
ssp->srcu_lock_nesting[0] = 0;
ssp->srcu_lock_nesting[1] = 0;
init_swait_queue_head(&ssp->srcu_wq);
ssp->srcu_cb_head = NULL;
ssp->srcu_cb_tail = &ssp->srcu_cb_head;
ssp->srcu_gp_running = false;
ssp->srcu_gp_waiting = false;
ssp->srcu_idx = 0;
ssp->srcu_idx_max = 0;
INIT_WORK(&ssp->srcu_work, srcu_drive_gp);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ssp->srcu_work.entry);
return 0;
}
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
int __init_srcu_struct(struct srcu_struct *ssp, const char *name,
struct lock_class_key *key)
{
/* Don't re-initialize a lock while it is held. */
debug_check_no_locks_freed((void *)ssp, sizeof(*ssp));
lockdep_init_map(&ssp->dep_map, name, key, 0);
return init_srcu_struct_fields(ssp);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__init_srcu_struct);
#else /* #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC */
/*
* init_srcu_struct - initialize a sleep-RCU structure
* @ssp: structure to initialize.
*
* Must invoke this on a given srcu_struct before passing that srcu_struct
* to any other function. Each srcu_struct represents a separate domain
* of SRCU protection.
*/
int init_srcu_struct(struct srcu_struct *ssp)
{
return init_srcu_struct_fields(ssp);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(init_srcu_struct);
#endif /* #else #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC */
/*
* cleanup_srcu_struct - deconstruct a sleep-RCU structure
* @ssp: structure to clean up.
*
* Must invoke this after you are finished using a given srcu_struct that
* was initialized via init_srcu_struct(), else you leak memory.
*/
srcu: Remove cleanup_srcu_struct_quiesced() The cleanup_srcu_struct_quiesced() function was added because NVME used WQ_MEM_RECLAIM workqueues and SRCU did not, which meant that NVME workqueues waiting on SRCU workqueues could result in deadlocks during low-memory conditions. However, SRCU now also has WQ_MEM_RECLAIM workqueues, so there is no longer a potential for deadlock. Furthermore, it turns out to be extremely hard to use cleanup_srcu_struct_quiesced() correctly due to the fact that SRCU callback invocation accesses the srcu_struct structure's per-CPU data area just after callbacks are invoked. Therefore, the usual practice of using srcu_barrier() to wait for callbacks to be invoked before invoking cleanup_srcu_struct_quiesced() fails because SRCU's callback-invocation workqueue handler might be delayed, which can result in cleanup_srcu_struct_quiesced() being invoked (and thus freeing the per-CPU data) before the SRCU's callback-invocation workqueue handler is finished using that per-CPU data. Nor is this a theoretical problem: KASAN emitted use-after-free warnings because of this problem on actual runs. In short, NVME can now safely invoke cleanup_srcu_struct(), which avoids the use-after-free scenario. And cleanup_srcu_struct_quiesced() is quite difficult to use safely. This commit therefore removes cleanup_srcu_struct_quiesced(), switching its sole user back to cleanup_srcu_struct(). This effectively reverts the following pair of commits: f7194ac32ca2 ("srcu: Add cleanup_srcu_struct_quiesced()") 4317228ad9b8 ("nvme: Avoid flush dependency in delete controller flow") Reported-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org> Tested-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
2019-02-14 00:54:37 +03:00
void cleanup_srcu_struct(struct srcu_struct *ssp)
{
WARN_ON(ssp->srcu_lock_nesting[0] || ssp->srcu_lock_nesting[1]);
srcu: Remove cleanup_srcu_struct_quiesced() The cleanup_srcu_struct_quiesced() function was added because NVME used WQ_MEM_RECLAIM workqueues and SRCU did not, which meant that NVME workqueues waiting on SRCU workqueues could result in deadlocks during low-memory conditions. However, SRCU now also has WQ_MEM_RECLAIM workqueues, so there is no longer a potential for deadlock. Furthermore, it turns out to be extremely hard to use cleanup_srcu_struct_quiesced() correctly due to the fact that SRCU callback invocation accesses the srcu_struct structure's per-CPU data area just after callbacks are invoked. Therefore, the usual practice of using srcu_barrier() to wait for callbacks to be invoked before invoking cleanup_srcu_struct_quiesced() fails because SRCU's callback-invocation workqueue handler might be delayed, which can result in cleanup_srcu_struct_quiesced() being invoked (and thus freeing the per-CPU data) before the SRCU's callback-invocation workqueue handler is finished using that per-CPU data. Nor is this a theoretical problem: KASAN emitted use-after-free warnings because of this problem on actual runs. In short, NVME can now safely invoke cleanup_srcu_struct(), which avoids the use-after-free scenario. And cleanup_srcu_struct_quiesced() is quite difficult to use safely. This commit therefore removes cleanup_srcu_struct_quiesced(), switching its sole user back to cleanup_srcu_struct(). This effectively reverts the following pair of commits: f7194ac32ca2 ("srcu: Add cleanup_srcu_struct_quiesced()") 4317228ad9b8 ("nvme: Avoid flush dependency in delete controller flow") Reported-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org> Tested-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
2019-02-14 00:54:37 +03:00
flush_work(&ssp->srcu_work);
WARN_ON(ssp->srcu_gp_running);
WARN_ON(ssp->srcu_gp_waiting);
WARN_ON(ssp->srcu_cb_head);
WARN_ON(&ssp->srcu_cb_head != ssp->srcu_cb_tail);
WARN_ON(ssp->srcu_idx != ssp->srcu_idx_max);
WARN_ON(ssp->srcu_idx & 0x1);
}
srcu: Remove cleanup_srcu_struct_quiesced() The cleanup_srcu_struct_quiesced() function was added because NVME used WQ_MEM_RECLAIM workqueues and SRCU did not, which meant that NVME workqueues waiting on SRCU workqueues could result in deadlocks during low-memory conditions. However, SRCU now also has WQ_MEM_RECLAIM workqueues, so there is no longer a potential for deadlock. Furthermore, it turns out to be extremely hard to use cleanup_srcu_struct_quiesced() correctly due to the fact that SRCU callback invocation accesses the srcu_struct structure's per-CPU data area just after callbacks are invoked. Therefore, the usual practice of using srcu_barrier() to wait for callbacks to be invoked before invoking cleanup_srcu_struct_quiesced() fails because SRCU's callback-invocation workqueue handler might be delayed, which can result in cleanup_srcu_struct_quiesced() being invoked (and thus freeing the per-CPU data) before the SRCU's callback-invocation workqueue handler is finished using that per-CPU data. Nor is this a theoretical problem: KASAN emitted use-after-free warnings because of this problem on actual runs. In short, NVME can now safely invoke cleanup_srcu_struct(), which avoids the use-after-free scenario. And cleanup_srcu_struct_quiesced() is quite difficult to use safely. This commit therefore removes cleanup_srcu_struct_quiesced(), switching its sole user back to cleanup_srcu_struct(). This effectively reverts the following pair of commits: f7194ac32ca2 ("srcu: Add cleanup_srcu_struct_quiesced()") 4317228ad9b8 ("nvme: Avoid flush dependency in delete controller flow") Reported-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org> Tested-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
2019-02-14 00:54:37 +03:00
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cleanup_srcu_struct);
/*
* Removes the count for the old reader from the appropriate element of
srcu: Allow use of Tiny/Tree SRCU from both process and interrupt context Linu Cherian reported a WARN in cleanup_srcu_struct() when shutting down a guest running iperf on a VFIO assigned device. This happens because irqfd_wakeup() calls srcu_read_lock(&kvm->irq_srcu) in interrupt context, while a worker thread does the same inside kvm_set_irq(). If the interrupt happens while the worker thread is executing __srcu_read_lock(), updates to the Classic SRCU ->lock_count[] field or the Tree SRCU ->srcu_lock_count[] field can be lost. The docs say you are not supposed to call srcu_read_lock() and srcu_read_unlock() from irq context, but KVM interrupt injection happens from (host) interrupt context and it would be nice if SRCU supported the use case. KVM is using SRCU here not really for the "sleepable" part, but rather due to its IPI-free fast detection of grace periods. It is therefore not desirable to switch back to RCU, which would effectively revert commit 719d93cd5f5c ("kvm/irqchip: Speed up KVM_SET_GSI_ROUTING", 2014-01-16). However, the docs are overly conservative. You can have an SRCU instance only has users in irq context, and you can mix process and irq context as long as process context users disable interrupts. In addition, __srcu_read_unlock() actually uses this_cpu_dec() on both Tree SRCU and Classic SRCU. For those two implementations, only srcu_read_lock() is unsafe. When Classic SRCU's __srcu_read_unlock() was changed to use this_cpu_dec(), in commit 5a41344a3d83 ("srcu: Simplify __srcu_read_unlock() via this_cpu_dec()", 2012-11-29), __srcu_read_lock() did two increments. Therefore it kept __this_cpu_inc(), with preempt_disable/enable in the caller. Tree SRCU however only does one increment, so on most architectures it is more efficient for __srcu_read_lock() to use this_cpu_inc(), and any performance differences appear to be down in the noise. Unlike Classic and Tree SRCU, Tiny SRCU does increments and decrements on a single variable. Therefore, as Peter Zijlstra pointed out, Tiny SRCU's implementation already supports mixed-context use of srcu_read_lock() and srcu_read_unlock(), at least as long as uses of srcu_read_lock() and srcu_read_unlock() in each handler are nested and paired properly. In other words, it is still illegal to (say) invoke srcu_read_lock() in an interrupt handler and to invoke the matching srcu_read_unlock() in a softirq handler. Therefore, the only change required for Tiny SRCU is to its comments. Fixes: 719d93cd5f5c ("kvm/irqchip: Speed up KVM_SET_GSI_ROUTING") Reported-by: Linu Cherian <linuc.decode@gmail.com> Suggested-by: Linu Cherian <linuc.decode@gmail.com> Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Tested-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
2017-05-31 15:03:10 +03:00
* the srcu_struct.
*/
void __srcu_read_unlock(struct srcu_struct *ssp, int idx)
{
int newval = READ_ONCE(ssp->srcu_lock_nesting[idx]) - 1;
WRITE_ONCE(ssp->srcu_lock_nesting[idx], newval);
srcu: Prevent redundant __srcu_read_unlock() wakeup Tiny SRCU readers can appear at task level, but also in interrupt and softirq handlers. Because Tiny SRCU is selected only in kernels built with CONFIG_SMP=n and CONFIG_PREEMPTION=n, it is not possible for a grace period to start while there is a non-task-level SRCU reader executing. This means that it does not make sense for __srcu_read_unlock() to awaken the Tiny SRCU grace period, because that can only happen when the grace period is waiting for one value of ->srcu_idx and __srcu_read_unlock() is ending the last reader for some other value of ->srcu_idx. After all, any such wakeup will be redundant. Worse yet, in some cases, such wakeups generate lockdep splats: ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.15.0-rc1+ #3758 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ rcu_torture_rea/53 is trying to acquire lock: ffffffff9514e6a8 (srcu_ctl.srcu_wq.lock){..-.}-{2:2}, at: xa/0x30 but task is already holding lock: ffff95c642479d80 (&p->pi_lock){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: _extend+0x370/0x400 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #1 (&p->pi_lock){-.-.}-{2:2}: _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x2f/0x50 try_to_wake_up+0x50/0x580 swake_up_locked.part.7+0xe/0x30 swake_up_one+0x22/0x30 rcutorture_one_extend+0x1b6/0x400 rcu_torture_one_read+0x290/0x5d0 rcu_torture_timer+0x1a/0x70 call_timer_fn+0xa6/0x230 run_timer_softirq+0x493/0x4c0 __do_softirq+0xc0/0x371 irq_exit+0x73/0x90 sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x63/0x80 asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x12/0x20 default_idle+0xb/0x10 default_idle_call+0x5e/0x170 do_idle+0x18a/0x1f0 cpu_startup_entry+0xa/0x10 start_kernel+0x678/0x69f secondary_startup_64_no_verify+0xc2/0xcb -> #0 (srcu_ctl.srcu_wq.lock){..-.}-{2:2}: __lock_acquire+0x130c/0x2440 lock_acquire+0xc2/0x270 _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x2f/0x50 swake_up_one+0xa/0x30 rcutorture_one_extend+0x387/0x400 rcu_torture_one_read+0x290/0x5d0 rcu_torture_reader+0xac/0x200 kthread+0x12d/0x150 ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&p->pi_lock); lock(srcu_ctl.srcu_wq.lock); lock(&p->pi_lock); lock(srcu_ctl.srcu_wq.lock); *** DEADLOCK *** 1 lock held by rcu_torture_rea/53: #0: ffff95c642479d80 (&p->pi_lock){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: _extend+0x370/0x400 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 PID: 53 Comm: rcu_torture_rea Not tainted 5.15.0-rc1+ Hardware name: Red Hat KVM/RHEL-AV, BIOS e_el8.5.0+746+bbd5d70c 04/01/2014 Call Trace: check_noncircular+0xfe/0x110 ? find_held_lock+0x2d/0x90 __lock_acquire+0x130c/0x2440 lock_acquire+0xc2/0x270 ? swake_up_one+0xa/0x30 ? find_held_lock+0x72/0x90 _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x2f/0x50 ? swake_up_one+0xa/0x30 swake_up_one+0xa/0x30 rcutorture_one_extend+0x387/0x400 rcu_torture_one_read+0x290/0x5d0 rcu_torture_reader+0xac/0x200 ? rcutorture_oom_notify+0xf0/0xf0 ? __kthread_parkme+0x61/0x90 ? rcu_torture_one_read+0x5d0/0x5d0 kthread+0x12d/0x150 ? set_kthread_struct+0x40/0x40 ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 This is a false positive because there is only one CPU, and both locks are raw (non-preemptible) spinlocks. However, it is worthwhile getting rid of the redundant wakeup, which has the side effect of breaking the theoretical deadlock cycle. This commit therefore eliminates the redundant wakeups. Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2021-09-23 20:07:14 +03:00
if (!newval && READ_ONCE(ssp->srcu_gp_waiting) && in_task())
swake_up_one(&ssp->srcu_wq);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__srcu_read_unlock);
/*
* Workqueue handler to drive one grace period and invoke any callbacks
* that become ready as a result. Single-CPU and !PREEMPTION operation
* means that we get away with murder on synchronization. ;-)
*/
void srcu_drive_gp(struct work_struct *wp)
{
int idx;
struct rcu_head *lh;
struct rcu_head *rhp;
struct srcu_struct *ssp;
ssp = container_of(wp, struct srcu_struct, srcu_work);
if (ssp->srcu_gp_running || ULONG_CMP_GE(ssp->srcu_idx, READ_ONCE(ssp->srcu_idx_max)))
return; /* Already running or nothing to do. */
/* Remove recently arrived callbacks and wait for readers. */
WRITE_ONCE(ssp->srcu_gp_running, true);
local_irq_disable();
lh = ssp->srcu_cb_head;
ssp->srcu_cb_head = NULL;
ssp->srcu_cb_tail = &ssp->srcu_cb_head;
local_irq_enable();
idx = (ssp->srcu_idx & 0x2) / 2;
WRITE_ONCE(ssp->srcu_idx, ssp->srcu_idx + 1);
WRITE_ONCE(ssp->srcu_gp_waiting, true); /* srcu_read_unlock() wakes! */
swait_event_exclusive(ssp->srcu_wq, !READ_ONCE(ssp->srcu_lock_nesting[idx]));
WRITE_ONCE(ssp->srcu_gp_waiting, false); /* srcu_read_unlock() cheap. */
WRITE_ONCE(ssp->srcu_idx, ssp->srcu_idx + 1);
/* Invoke the callbacks we removed above. */
while (lh) {
rhp = lh;
lh = lh->next;
local_bh_disable();
rhp->func(rhp);
local_bh_enable();
}
/*
* Enable rescheduling, and if there are more callbacks,
* reschedule ourselves. This can race with a call_srcu()
* at interrupt level, but the ->srcu_gp_running checks will
* straighten that out.
*/
WRITE_ONCE(ssp->srcu_gp_running, false);
if (ULONG_CMP_LT(ssp->srcu_idx, READ_ONCE(ssp->srcu_idx_max)))
schedule_work(&ssp->srcu_work);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(srcu_drive_gp);
static void srcu_gp_start_if_needed(struct srcu_struct *ssp)
{
unsigned long cookie;
cookie = get_state_synchronize_srcu(ssp);
if (ULONG_CMP_GE(READ_ONCE(ssp->srcu_idx_max), cookie))
return;
WRITE_ONCE(ssp->srcu_idx_max, cookie);
if (!READ_ONCE(ssp->srcu_gp_running)) {
if (likely(srcu_init_done))
schedule_work(&ssp->srcu_work);
else if (list_empty(&ssp->srcu_work.entry))
list_add(&ssp->srcu_work.entry, &srcu_boot_list);
}
}
/*
* Enqueue an SRCU callback on the specified srcu_struct structure,
* initiating grace-period processing if it is not already running.
*/
void call_srcu(struct srcu_struct *ssp, struct rcu_head *rhp,
rcu_callback_t func)
{
unsigned long flags;
rhp->func = func;
rhp->next = NULL;
local_irq_save(flags);
*ssp->srcu_cb_tail = rhp;
ssp->srcu_cb_tail = &rhp->next;
local_irq_restore(flags);
srcu_gp_start_if_needed(ssp);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(call_srcu);
/*
* synchronize_srcu - wait for prior SRCU read-side critical-section completion
*/
void synchronize_srcu(struct srcu_struct *ssp)
{
struct rcu_synchronize rs;
RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(lockdep_is_held(ssp) ||
lock_is_held(&rcu_bh_lock_map) ||
lock_is_held(&rcu_lock_map) ||
lock_is_held(&rcu_sched_lock_map),
"Illegal synchronize_srcu() in same-type SRCU (or in RCU) read-side critical section");
if (rcu_scheduler_active == RCU_SCHEDULER_INACTIVE)
return;
might_sleep();
init_rcu_head_on_stack(&rs.head);
init_completion(&rs.completion);
call_srcu(ssp, &rs.head, wakeme_after_rcu);
wait_for_completion(&rs.completion);
destroy_rcu_head_on_stack(&rs.head);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(synchronize_srcu);
/*
* get_state_synchronize_srcu - Provide an end-of-grace-period cookie
*/
unsigned long get_state_synchronize_srcu(struct srcu_struct *ssp)
{
unsigned long ret;
barrier();
ret = (READ_ONCE(ssp->srcu_idx) + 3) & ~0x1;
barrier();
return ret;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(get_state_synchronize_srcu);
/*
* start_poll_synchronize_srcu - Provide cookie and start grace period
*
* The difference between this and get_state_synchronize_srcu() is that
* this function ensures that the poll_state_synchronize_srcu() will
* eventually return the value true.
*/
unsigned long start_poll_synchronize_srcu(struct srcu_struct *ssp)
{
unsigned long ret = get_state_synchronize_srcu(ssp);
srcu_gp_start_if_needed(ssp);
return ret;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(start_poll_synchronize_srcu);
/*
* poll_state_synchronize_srcu - Has cookie's grace period ended?
*/
bool poll_state_synchronize_srcu(struct srcu_struct *ssp, unsigned long cookie)
{
unsigned long cur_s = READ_ONCE(ssp->srcu_idx);
barrier();
return ULONG_CMP_GE(cur_s, cookie) || ULONG_CMP_LT(cur_s, cookie - 3);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(poll_state_synchronize_srcu);
/* Lockdep diagnostics. */
void __init rcu_scheduler_starting(void)
{
rcu_scheduler_active = RCU_SCHEDULER_RUNNING;
}
srcu: Make call_srcu() available during very early boot Event tracing is moving to SRCU in order to take advantage of the fact that SRCU may be safely used from idle and even offline CPUs. However, event tracing can invoke call_srcu() very early in the boot process, even before workqueue_init_early() is invoked (let alone rcu_init()). Therefore, call_srcu()'s attempts to queue work fail miserably. This commit therefore detects this situation, and refrains from attempting to queue work before rcu_init() time, but does everything else that it would have done, and in addition, adds the srcu_struct to a global list. The rcu_init() function now invokes a new srcu_init() function, which is empty if CONFIG_SRCU=n. Otherwise, srcu_init() queues work for each srcu_struct on the list. This all happens early enough in boot that there is but a single CPU with interrupts disabled, which allows synchronization to be dispensed with. Of course, the queued work won't actually be invoked until after workqueue_init() is invoked, which happens shortly after the scheduler is up and running. This means that although call_srcu() may be invoked any time after per-CPU variables have been set up, there is still a very narrow window when synchronize_srcu() won't work, and this window extends from the time that the scheduler starts until the time that workqueue_init() returns. This can be fixed in a manner similar to the fix for synchronize_rcu_expedited() and friends, but until someone actually needs to use synchronize_srcu() during this window, this fix is added churn for no benefit. Finally, note that Tree SRCU's new srcu_init() function invokes queue_work() rather than the queue_delayed_work() function that is invoked post-boot. The reason is that queue_delayed_work() will (as you would expect) post a timer, and timers have not yet been initialized. So use of queue_work() avoids the complaints about use of uninitialized spinlocks that would otherwise result. Besides, some delay is already provide by the aforementioned fact that the queued work won't actually be invoked until after the scheduler is up and running. Requested-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Tested-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
2018-08-14 18:45:54 +03:00
/*
* Queue work for srcu_struct structures with early boot callbacks.
* The work won't actually execute until the workqueue initialization
* phase that takes place after the scheduler starts.
*/
void __init srcu_init(void)
{
struct srcu_struct *ssp;
srcu: Make call_srcu() available during very early boot Event tracing is moving to SRCU in order to take advantage of the fact that SRCU may be safely used from idle and even offline CPUs. However, event tracing can invoke call_srcu() very early in the boot process, even before workqueue_init_early() is invoked (let alone rcu_init()). Therefore, call_srcu()'s attempts to queue work fail miserably. This commit therefore detects this situation, and refrains from attempting to queue work before rcu_init() time, but does everything else that it would have done, and in addition, adds the srcu_struct to a global list. The rcu_init() function now invokes a new srcu_init() function, which is empty if CONFIG_SRCU=n. Otherwise, srcu_init() queues work for each srcu_struct on the list. This all happens early enough in boot that there is but a single CPU with interrupts disabled, which allows synchronization to be dispensed with. Of course, the queued work won't actually be invoked until after workqueue_init() is invoked, which happens shortly after the scheduler is up and running. This means that although call_srcu() may be invoked any time after per-CPU variables have been set up, there is still a very narrow window when synchronize_srcu() won't work, and this window extends from the time that the scheduler starts until the time that workqueue_init() returns. This can be fixed in a manner similar to the fix for synchronize_rcu_expedited() and friends, but until someone actually needs to use synchronize_srcu() during this window, this fix is added churn for no benefit. Finally, note that Tree SRCU's new srcu_init() function invokes queue_work() rather than the queue_delayed_work() function that is invoked post-boot. The reason is that queue_delayed_work() will (as you would expect) post a timer, and timers have not yet been initialized. So use of queue_work() avoids the complaints about use of uninitialized spinlocks that would otherwise result. Besides, some delay is already provide by the aforementioned fact that the queued work won't actually be invoked until after the scheduler is up and running. Requested-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Tested-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
2018-08-14 18:45:54 +03:00
srcu_init_done = true;
while (!list_empty(&srcu_boot_list)) {
ssp = list_first_entry(&srcu_boot_list,
struct srcu_struct, srcu_work.entry);
list_del_init(&ssp->srcu_work.entry);
schedule_work(&ssp->srcu_work);
srcu: Make call_srcu() available during very early boot Event tracing is moving to SRCU in order to take advantage of the fact that SRCU may be safely used from idle and even offline CPUs. However, event tracing can invoke call_srcu() very early in the boot process, even before workqueue_init_early() is invoked (let alone rcu_init()). Therefore, call_srcu()'s attempts to queue work fail miserably. This commit therefore detects this situation, and refrains from attempting to queue work before rcu_init() time, but does everything else that it would have done, and in addition, adds the srcu_struct to a global list. The rcu_init() function now invokes a new srcu_init() function, which is empty if CONFIG_SRCU=n. Otherwise, srcu_init() queues work for each srcu_struct on the list. This all happens early enough in boot that there is but a single CPU with interrupts disabled, which allows synchronization to be dispensed with. Of course, the queued work won't actually be invoked until after workqueue_init() is invoked, which happens shortly after the scheduler is up and running. This means that although call_srcu() may be invoked any time after per-CPU variables have been set up, there is still a very narrow window when synchronize_srcu() won't work, and this window extends from the time that the scheduler starts until the time that workqueue_init() returns. This can be fixed in a manner similar to the fix for synchronize_rcu_expedited() and friends, but until someone actually needs to use synchronize_srcu() during this window, this fix is added churn for no benefit. Finally, note that Tree SRCU's new srcu_init() function invokes queue_work() rather than the queue_delayed_work() function that is invoked post-boot. The reason is that queue_delayed_work() will (as you would expect) post a timer, and timers have not yet been initialized. So use of queue_work() avoids the complaints about use of uninitialized spinlocks that would otherwise result. Besides, some delay is already provide by the aforementioned fact that the queued work won't actually be invoked until after the scheduler is up and running. Requested-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Tested-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
2018-08-14 18:45:54 +03:00
}
}