WSL2-Linux-Kernel/net/xdp/xsk_queue.h

443 строки
12 KiB
C
Исходник Обычный вид История

/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
/* XDP user-space ring structure
* Copyright(c) 2018 Intel Corporation.
*/
#ifndef _LINUX_XSK_QUEUE_H
#define _LINUX_XSK_QUEUE_H
#include <linux/types.h>
#include <linux/if_xdp.h>
#include <net/xdp_sock.h>
xsk: Introduce AF_XDP buffer allocation API In order to simplify AF_XDP zero-copy enablement for NIC driver developers, a new AF_XDP buffer allocation API is added. The implementation is based on a single core (single producer/consumer) buffer pool for the AF_XDP UMEM. A buffer is allocated using the xsk_buff_alloc() function, and returned using xsk_buff_free(). If a buffer is disassociated with the pool, e.g. when a buffer is passed to an AF_XDP socket, a buffer is said to be released. Currently, the release function is only used by the AF_XDP internals and not visible to the driver. Drivers using this API should register the XDP memory model with the new MEM_TYPE_XSK_BUFF_POOL type. The API is defined in net/xdp_sock_drv.h. The buffer type is struct xdp_buff, and follows the lifetime of regular xdp_buffs, i.e. the lifetime of an xdp_buff is restricted to a NAPI context. In other words, the API is not replacing xdp_frames. In addition to introducing the API and implementations, the AF_XDP core is migrated to use the new APIs. rfc->v1: Fixed build errors/warnings for m68k and riscv. (kbuild test robot) Added headroom/chunk size getter. (Maxim/Björn) v1->v2: Swapped SoBs. (Maxim) v2->v3: Initialize struct xdp_buff member frame_sz. (Björn) Add API to query the DMA address of a frame. (Maxim) Do DMA sync for CPU till the end of the frame to handle possible growth (frame_sz). (Maxim) Signed-off-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Maxim Mikityanskiy <maximmi@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200520192103.355233-6-bjorn.topel@gmail.com
2020-05-20 22:20:53 +03:00
#include <net/xsk_buff_pool.h>
#include "xsk.h"
struct xdp_ring {
u32 producer ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
/* Hinder the adjacent cache prefetcher to prefetch the consumer
* pointer if the producer pointer is touched and vice versa.
*/
u32 pad1 ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
u32 consumer ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
u32 pad2 ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
xsk: add support for need_wakeup flag in AF_XDP rings This commit adds support for a new flag called need_wakeup in the AF_XDP Tx and fill rings. When this flag is set, it means that the application has to explicitly wake up the kernel Rx (for the bit in the fill ring) or kernel Tx (for bit in the Tx ring) processing by issuing a syscall. Poll() can wake up both depending on the flags submitted and sendto() will wake up tx processing only. The main reason for introducing this new flag is to be able to efficiently support the case when application and driver is executing on the same core. Previously, the driver was just busy-spinning on the fill ring if it ran out of buffers in the HW and there were none on the fill ring. This approach works when the application is running on another core as it can replenish the fill ring while the driver is busy-spinning. Though, this is a lousy approach if both of them are running on the same core as the probability of the fill ring getting more entries when the driver is busy-spinning is zero. With this new feature the driver now sets the need_wakeup flag and returns to the application. The application can then replenish the fill queue and then explicitly wake up the Rx processing in the kernel using the syscall poll(). For Tx, the flag is only set to one if the driver has no outstanding Tx completion interrupts. If it has some, the flag is zero as it will be woken up by a completion interrupt anyway. As a nice side effect, this new flag also improves the performance of the case where application and driver are running on two different cores as it reduces the number of syscalls to the kernel. The kernel tells user space if it needs to be woken up by a syscall, and this eliminates many of the syscalls. This flag needs some simple driver support. If the driver does not support this, the Rx flag is always zero and the Tx flag is always one. This makes any application relying on this feature default to the old behaviour of not requiring any syscalls in the Rx path and always having to call sendto() in the Tx path. For backwards compatibility reasons, this feature has to be explicitly turned on using a new bind flag (XDP_USE_NEED_WAKEUP). I recommend that you always turn it on as it so far always have had a positive performance impact. The name and inspiration of the flag has been taken from io_uring by Jens Axboe. Details about this feature in io_uring can be found in http://kernel.dk/io_uring.pdf, section 8.3. Signed-off-by: Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@intel.com> Acked-by: Jonathan Lemon <jonathan.lemon@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2019-08-14 10:27:17 +03:00
u32 flags;
u32 pad3 ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
};
/* Used for the RX and TX queues for packets */
struct xdp_rxtx_ring {
struct xdp_ring ptrs;
struct xdp_desc desc[] ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
};
/* Used for the fill and completion queues for buffers */
struct xdp_umem_ring {
struct xdp_ring ptrs;
u64 desc[] ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
};
struct xsk_queue {
u32 ring_mask;
u32 nentries;
xsk: Consolidate to one single cached producer pointer Currently, the xsk ring code has two cached producer pointers: prod_head and prod_tail. This patch consolidates these two into a single one called cached_prod to make the code simpler and easier to maintain. This will be in line with the user space part of the the code found in libbpf, that only uses a single cached pointer. The Rx path only uses the two top level functions xskq_produce_batch_desc and xskq_produce_flush_desc and they both use prod_head and never prod_tail. So just move them over to cached_prod. The Tx XDP_DRV path uses xskq_produce_addr_lazy and xskq_produce_flush_addr_n and unnecessarily operates on both prod_tail and prod_head, so move them over to just use cached_prod by skipping the intermediate step of updating prod_tail. The Tx path in XDP_SKB mode uses xskq_reserve_addr and xskq_produce_addr. They currently use both cached pointers, but we can operate on the global producer pointer in xskq_produce_addr since it has to be updated anyway, thus eliminating the use of both cached pointers. We can also remove the xskq_nb_free in xskq_produce_addr since it is already called in xskq_reserve_addr. No need to do it twice. When there is only one cached producer pointer, we can also simplify xskq_nb_free by removing one argument. Signed-off-by: Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/1576759171-28550-4-git-send-email-magnus.karlsson@intel.com
2019-12-19 15:39:22 +03:00
u32 cached_prod;
u32 cached_cons;
struct xdp_ring *ring;
u64 invalid_descs;
u64 queue_empty_descs;
};
xsk: Update rings for load-acquire/store-release barriers Currently, the AF_XDP rings uses general smp_{r,w,}mb() barriers on the kernel-side. On most modern architectures load-acquire/store-release barriers perform better, and results in simpler code for circular ring buffers. This change updates the XDP socket rings to use load-acquire/store-release barriers. It is important to note that changing from the old smp_{r,w,}mb() barriers, to load-acquire/store-release barriers does not break compatibility. The old semantics work with the new one, and vice versa. As pointed out by "Documentation/memory-barriers.txt" in the "SMP BARRIER PAIRING" section: "General barriers pair with each other, though they also pair with most other types of barriers, albeit without multicopy atomicity. An acquire barrier pairs with a release barrier, but both may also pair with other barriers, including of course general barriers." How different barriers behaves and pairs is outlined in "tools/memory-model/Documentation/cheatsheet.txt". In order to make sure that compatibility is not broken, LKMM herd7 based litmus tests can be constructed and verified. We generalize the XDP socket ring to a one entry ring, and create two scenarios; One where the ring is full, where only the consumer can proceed, followed by the producer. One where the ring is empty, where only the producer can proceed, followed by the consumer. Each scenario is then expanded to four different tests: general producer/general consumer, general producer/acqrel consumer, acqrel producer/general consumer, acqrel producer/acqrel consumer. In total eight tests. The empty ring test: C spsc-rb+empty // Simple one entry ring: // prod cons allowed action prod cons // 0 0 => prod => 1 0 // 0 1 => cons => 0 0 // 1 0 => cons => 1 1 // 1 1 => prod => 0 1 {} // We start at prod==0, cons==0, data==0, i.e. nothing has been // written to the ring. From here only the producer can start, and // should write 1. Afterwards, consumer can continue and read 1 to // data. Can we enter state prod==1, cons==1, but consumer observed // the incorrect value of 0? P0(int *prod, int *cons, int *data) { ... producer } P1(int *prod, int *cons, int *data) { ... consumer } exists( 1:d=0 /\ prod=1 /\ cons=1 ); The full ring test: C spsc-rb+full // Simple one entry ring: // prod cons allowed action prod cons // 0 0 => prod => 1 0 // 0 1 => cons => 0 0 // 1 0 => cons => 1 1 // 1 1 => prod => 0 1 { prod = 1; } // We start at prod==1, cons==0, data==1, i.e. producer has // written 0, so from here only the consumer can start, and should // consume 0. Afterwards, producer can continue and write 1 to // data. Can we enter state prod==0, cons==1, but consumer observed // the write of 1? P0(int *prod, int *cons, int *data) { ... producer } P1(int *prod, int *cons, int *data) { ... consumer } exists( 1:d=1 /\ prod=0 /\ cons=1 ); where P0 and P1 are: P0(int *prod, int *cons, int *data) { int p; p = READ_ONCE(*prod); if (READ_ONCE(*cons) == p) { WRITE_ONCE(*data, 1); smp_wmb(); WRITE_ONCE(*prod, p ^ 1); } } P0(int *prod, int *cons, int *data) { int p; p = READ_ONCE(*prod); if (READ_ONCE(*cons) == p) { WRITE_ONCE(*data, 1); smp_store_release(prod, p ^ 1); } } P1(int *prod, int *cons, int *data) { int c; int d = -1; c = READ_ONCE(*cons); if (READ_ONCE(*prod) != c) { smp_rmb(); d = READ_ONCE(*data); smp_mb(); WRITE_ONCE(*cons, c ^ 1); } } P1(int *prod, int *cons, int *data) { int c; int d = -1; c = READ_ONCE(*cons); if (smp_load_acquire(prod) != c) { d = READ_ONCE(*data); smp_store_release(cons, c ^ 1); } } The full LKMM litmus tests are found at [1]. On x86-64 systems the l2fwd AF_XDP xdpsock sample performance increases by 1%. This is mostly due to that the smp_mb() is removed, which is a relatively expensive operation on these platforms. Weakly-ordered platforms, such as ARM64 might benefit even more. [1] https://github.com/bjoto/litmus-xsk Signed-off-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Acked-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210305094113.413544-2-bjorn.topel@gmail.com
2021-03-05 12:41:12 +03:00
/* The structure of the shared state of the rings are a simple
* circular buffer, as outlined in
* Documentation/core-api/circular-buffers.rst. For the Rx and
* completion ring, the kernel is the producer and user space is the
* consumer. For the Tx and fill rings, the kernel is the consumer and
* user space is the producer.
*
* producer consumer
*
xsk: Update rings for load-acquire/store-release barriers Currently, the AF_XDP rings uses general smp_{r,w,}mb() barriers on the kernel-side. On most modern architectures load-acquire/store-release barriers perform better, and results in simpler code for circular ring buffers. This change updates the XDP socket rings to use load-acquire/store-release barriers. It is important to note that changing from the old smp_{r,w,}mb() barriers, to load-acquire/store-release barriers does not break compatibility. The old semantics work with the new one, and vice versa. As pointed out by "Documentation/memory-barriers.txt" in the "SMP BARRIER PAIRING" section: "General barriers pair with each other, though they also pair with most other types of barriers, albeit without multicopy atomicity. An acquire barrier pairs with a release barrier, but both may also pair with other barriers, including of course general barriers." How different barriers behaves and pairs is outlined in "tools/memory-model/Documentation/cheatsheet.txt". In order to make sure that compatibility is not broken, LKMM herd7 based litmus tests can be constructed and verified. We generalize the XDP socket ring to a one entry ring, and create two scenarios; One where the ring is full, where only the consumer can proceed, followed by the producer. One where the ring is empty, where only the producer can proceed, followed by the consumer. Each scenario is then expanded to four different tests: general producer/general consumer, general producer/acqrel consumer, acqrel producer/general consumer, acqrel producer/acqrel consumer. In total eight tests. The empty ring test: C spsc-rb+empty // Simple one entry ring: // prod cons allowed action prod cons // 0 0 => prod => 1 0 // 0 1 => cons => 0 0 // 1 0 => cons => 1 1 // 1 1 => prod => 0 1 {} // We start at prod==0, cons==0, data==0, i.e. nothing has been // written to the ring. From here only the producer can start, and // should write 1. Afterwards, consumer can continue and read 1 to // data. Can we enter state prod==1, cons==1, but consumer observed // the incorrect value of 0? P0(int *prod, int *cons, int *data) { ... producer } P1(int *prod, int *cons, int *data) { ... consumer } exists( 1:d=0 /\ prod=1 /\ cons=1 ); The full ring test: C spsc-rb+full // Simple one entry ring: // prod cons allowed action prod cons // 0 0 => prod => 1 0 // 0 1 => cons => 0 0 // 1 0 => cons => 1 1 // 1 1 => prod => 0 1 { prod = 1; } // We start at prod==1, cons==0, data==1, i.e. producer has // written 0, so from here only the consumer can start, and should // consume 0. Afterwards, producer can continue and write 1 to // data. Can we enter state prod==0, cons==1, but consumer observed // the write of 1? P0(int *prod, int *cons, int *data) { ... producer } P1(int *prod, int *cons, int *data) { ... consumer } exists( 1:d=1 /\ prod=0 /\ cons=1 ); where P0 and P1 are: P0(int *prod, int *cons, int *data) { int p; p = READ_ONCE(*prod); if (READ_ONCE(*cons) == p) { WRITE_ONCE(*data, 1); smp_wmb(); WRITE_ONCE(*prod, p ^ 1); } } P0(int *prod, int *cons, int *data) { int p; p = READ_ONCE(*prod); if (READ_ONCE(*cons) == p) { WRITE_ONCE(*data, 1); smp_store_release(prod, p ^ 1); } } P1(int *prod, int *cons, int *data) { int c; int d = -1; c = READ_ONCE(*cons); if (READ_ONCE(*prod) != c) { smp_rmb(); d = READ_ONCE(*data); smp_mb(); WRITE_ONCE(*cons, c ^ 1); } } P1(int *prod, int *cons, int *data) { int c; int d = -1; c = READ_ONCE(*cons); if (smp_load_acquire(prod) != c) { d = READ_ONCE(*data); smp_store_release(cons, c ^ 1); } } The full LKMM litmus tests are found at [1]. On x86-64 systems the l2fwd AF_XDP xdpsock sample performance increases by 1%. This is mostly due to that the smp_mb() is removed, which is a relatively expensive operation on these platforms. Weakly-ordered platforms, such as ARM64 might benefit even more. [1] https://github.com/bjoto/litmus-xsk Signed-off-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Acked-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210305094113.413544-2-bjorn.topel@gmail.com
2021-03-05 12:41:12 +03:00
* if (LOAD ->consumer) { (A) LOAD.acq ->producer (C)
* STORE $data LOAD $data
xsk: Update rings for load-acquire/store-release barriers Currently, the AF_XDP rings uses general smp_{r,w,}mb() barriers on the kernel-side. On most modern architectures load-acquire/store-release barriers perform better, and results in simpler code for circular ring buffers. This change updates the XDP socket rings to use load-acquire/store-release barriers. It is important to note that changing from the old smp_{r,w,}mb() barriers, to load-acquire/store-release barriers does not break compatibility. The old semantics work with the new one, and vice versa. As pointed out by "Documentation/memory-barriers.txt" in the "SMP BARRIER PAIRING" section: "General barriers pair with each other, though they also pair with most other types of barriers, albeit without multicopy atomicity. An acquire barrier pairs with a release barrier, but both may also pair with other barriers, including of course general barriers." How different barriers behaves and pairs is outlined in "tools/memory-model/Documentation/cheatsheet.txt". In order to make sure that compatibility is not broken, LKMM herd7 based litmus tests can be constructed and verified. We generalize the XDP socket ring to a one entry ring, and create two scenarios; One where the ring is full, where only the consumer can proceed, followed by the producer. One where the ring is empty, where only the producer can proceed, followed by the consumer. Each scenario is then expanded to four different tests: general producer/general consumer, general producer/acqrel consumer, acqrel producer/general consumer, acqrel producer/acqrel consumer. In total eight tests. The empty ring test: C spsc-rb+empty // Simple one entry ring: // prod cons allowed action prod cons // 0 0 => prod => 1 0 // 0 1 => cons => 0 0 // 1 0 => cons => 1 1 // 1 1 => prod => 0 1 {} // We start at prod==0, cons==0, data==0, i.e. nothing has been // written to the ring. From here only the producer can start, and // should write 1. Afterwards, consumer can continue and read 1 to // data. Can we enter state prod==1, cons==1, but consumer observed // the incorrect value of 0? P0(int *prod, int *cons, int *data) { ... producer } P1(int *prod, int *cons, int *data) { ... consumer } exists( 1:d=0 /\ prod=1 /\ cons=1 ); The full ring test: C spsc-rb+full // Simple one entry ring: // prod cons allowed action prod cons // 0 0 => prod => 1 0 // 0 1 => cons => 0 0 // 1 0 => cons => 1 1 // 1 1 => prod => 0 1 { prod = 1; } // We start at prod==1, cons==0, data==1, i.e. producer has // written 0, so from here only the consumer can start, and should // consume 0. Afterwards, producer can continue and write 1 to // data. Can we enter state prod==0, cons==1, but consumer observed // the write of 1? P0(int *prod, int *cons, int *data) { ... producer } P1(int *prod, int *cons, int *data) { ... consumer } exists( 1:d=1 /\ prod=0 /\ cons=1 ); where P0 and P1 are: P0(int *prod, int *cons, int *data) { int p; p = READ_ONCE(*prod); if (READ_ONCE(*cons) == p) { WRITE_ONCE(*data, 1); smp_wmb(); WRITE_ONCE(*prod, p ^ 1); } } P0(int *prod, int *cons, int *data) { int p; p = READ_ONCE(*prod); if (READ_ONCE(*cons) == p) { WRITE_ONCE(*data, 1); smp_store_release(prod, p ^ 1); } } P1(int *prod, int *cons, int *data) { int c; int d = -1; c = READ_ONCE(*cons); if (READ_ONCE(*prod) != c) { smp_rmb(); d = READ_ONCE(*data); smp_mb(); WRITE_ONCE(*cons, c ^ 1); } } P1(int *prod, int *cons, int *data) { int c; int d = -1; c = READ_ONCE(*cons); if (smp_load_acquire(prod) != c) { d = READ_ONCE(*data); smp_store_release(cons, c ^ 1); } } The full LKMM litmus tests are found at [1]. On x86-64 systems the l2fwd AF_XDP xdpsock sample performance increases by 1%. This is mostly due to that the smp_mb() is removed, which is a relatively expensive operation on these platforms. Weakly-ordered platforms, such as ARM64 might benefit even more. [1] https://github.com/bjoto/litmus-xsk Signed-off-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Acked-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210305094113.413544-2-bjorn.topel@gmail.com
2021-03-05 12:41:12 +03:00
* STORE.rel ->producer (B) STORE.rel ->consumer (D)
* }
*
* (A) pairs with (D), and (B) pairs with (C).
*
* Starting with (B), it protects the data from being written after
* the producer pointer. If this barrier was missing, the consumer
* could observe the producer pointer being set and thus load the data
* before the producer has written the new data. The consumer would in
* this case load the old data.
*
* (C) protects the consumer from speculatively loading the data before
* the producer pointer actually has been read. If we do not have this
* barrier, some architectures could load old data as speculative loads
* are not discarded as the CPU does not know there is a dependency
* between ->producer and data.
*
* (A) is a control dependency that separates the load of ->consumer
* from the stores of $data. In case ->consumer indicates there is no
xsk: Update rings for load-acquire/store-release barriers Currently, the AF_XDP rings uses general smp_{r,w,}mb() barriers on the kernel-side. On most modern architectures load-acquire/store-release barriers perform better, and results in simpler code for circular ring buffers. This change updates the XDP socket rings to use load-acquire/store-release barriers. It is important to note that changing from the old smp_{r,w,}mb() barriers, to load-acquire/store-release barriers does not break compatibility. The old semantics work with the new one, and vice versa. As pointed out by "Documentation/memory-barriers.txt" in the "SMP BARRIER PAIRING" section: "General barriers pair with each other, though they also pair with most other types of barriers, albeit without multicopy atomicity. An acquire barrier pairs with a release barrier, but both may also pair with other barriers, including of course general barriers." How different barriers behaves and pairs is outlined in "tools/memory-model/Documentation/cheatsheet.txt". In order to make sure that compatibility is not broken, LKMM herd7 based litmus tests can be constructed and verified. We generalize the XDP socket ring to a one entry ring, and create two scenarios; One where the ring is full, where only the consumer can proceed, followed by the producer. One where the ring is empty, where only the producer can proceed, followed by the consumer. Each scenario is then expanded to four different tests: general producer/general consumer, general producer/acqrel consumer, acqrel producer/general consumer, acqrel producer/acqrel consumer. In total eight tests. The empty ring test: C spsc-rb+empty // Simple one entry ring: // prod cons allowed action prod cons // 0 0 => prod => 1 0 // 0 1 => cons => 0 0 // 1 0 => cons => 1 1 // 1 1 => prod => 0 1 {} // We start at prod==0, cons==0, data==0, i.e. nothing has been // written to the ring. From here only the producer can start, and // should write 1. Afterwards, consumer can continue and read 1 to // data. Can we enter state prod==1, cons==1, but consumer observed // the incorrect value of 0? P0(int *prod, int *cons, int *data) { ... producer } P1(int *prod, int *cons, int *data) { ... consumer } exists( 1:d=0 /\ prod=1 /\ cons=1 ); The full ring test: C spsc-rb+full // Simple one entry ring: // prod cons allowed action prod cons // 0 0 => prod => 1 0 // 0 1 => cons => 0 0 // 1 0 => cons => 1 1 // 1 1 => prod => 0 1 { prod = 1; } // We start at prod==1, cons==0, data==1, i.e. producer has // written 0, so from here only the consumer can start, and should // consume 0. Afterwards, producer can continue and write 1 to // data. Can we enter state prod==0, cons==1, but consumer observed // the write of 1? P0(int *prod, int *cons, int *data) { ... producer } P1(int *prod, int *cons, int *data) { ... consumer } exists( 1:d=1 /\ prod=0 /\ cons=1 ); where P0 and P1 are: P0(int *prod, int *cons, int *data) { int p; p = READ_ONCE(*prod); if (READ_ONCE(*cons) == p) { WRITE_ONCE(*data, 1); smp_wmb(); WRITE_ONCE(*prod, p ^ 1); } } P0(int *prod, int *cons, int *data) { int p; p = READ_ONCE(*prod); if (READ_ONCE(*cons) == p) { WRITE_ONCE(*data, 1); smp_store_release(prod, p ^ 1); } } P1(int *prod, int *cons, int *data) { int c; int d = -1; c = READ_ONCE(*cons); if (READ_ONCE(*prod) != c) { smp_rmb(); d = READ_ONCE(*data); smp_mb(); WRITE_ONCE(*cons, c ^ 1); } } P1(int *prod, int *cons, int *data) { int c; int d = -1; c = READ_ONCE(*cons); if (smp_load_acquire(prod) != c) { d = READ_ONCE(*data); smp_store_release(cons, c ^ 1); } } The full LKMM litmus tests are found at [1]. On x86-64 systems the l2fwd AF_XDP xdpsock sample performance increases by 1%. This is mostly due to that the smp_mb() is removed, which is a relatively expensive operation on these platforms. Weakly-ordered platforms, such as ARM64 might benefit even more. [1] https://github.com/bjoto/litmus-xsk Signed-off-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Acked-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210305094113.413544-2-bjorn.topel@gmail.com
2021-03-05 12:41:12 +03:00
* room in the buffer to store $data we do not. The dependency will
* order both of the stores after the loads. So no barrier is needed.
*
* (D) protects the load of the data to be observed to happen after the
* store of the consumer pointer. If we did not have this memory
* barrier, the producer could observe the consumer pointer being set
* and overwrite the data with a new value before the consumer got the
* chance to read the old value. The consumer would thus miss reading
* the old entry and very likely read the new entry twice, once right
* now and again after circling through the ring.
*/
/* The operations on the rings are the following:
*
* producer consumer
*
* RESERVE entries PEEK in the ring for entries
* WRITE data into the ring READ data from the ring
* SUBMIT entries RELEASE entries
*
* The producer reserves one or more entries in the ring. It can then
* fill in these entries and finally submit them so that they can be
* seen and read by the consumer.
*
* The consumer peeks into the ring to see if the producer has written
* any new entries. If so, the consumer can then read these entries
* and when it is done reading them release them back to the producer
* so that the producer can use these slots to fill in new entries.
*
* The function names below reflect these operations.
*/
/* Functions that read and validate content from consumer rings. */
xsk: Introduce AF_XDP buffer allocation API In order to simplify AF_XDP zero-copy enablement for NIC driver developers, a new AF_XDP buffer allocation API is added. The implementation is based on a single core (single producer/consumer) buffer pool for the AF_XDP UMEM. A buffer is allocated using the xsk_buff_alloc() function, and returned using xsk_buff_free(). If a buffer is disassociated with the pool, e.g. when a buffer is passed to an AF_XDP socket, a buffer is said to be released. Currently, the release function is only used by the AF_XDP internals and not visible to the driver. Drivers using this API should register the XDP memory model with the new MEM_TYPE_XSK_BUFF_POOL type. The API is defined in net/xdp_sock_drv.h. The buffer type is struct xdp_buff, and follows the lifetime of regular xdp_buffs, i.e. the lifetime of an xdp_buff is restricted to a NAPI context. In other words, the API is not replacing xdp_frames. In addition to introducing the API and implementations, the AF_XDP core is migrated to use the new APIs. rfc->v1: Fixed build errors/warnings for m68k and riscv. (kbuild test robot) Added headroom/chunk size getter. (Maxim/Björn) v1->v2: Swapped SoBs. (Maxim) v2->v3: Initialize struct xdp_buff member frame_sz. (Björn) Add API to query the DMA address of a frame. (Maxim) Do DMA sync for CPU till the end of the frame to handle possible growth (frame_sz). (Maxim) Signed-off-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Maxim Mikityanskiy <maximmi@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200520192103.355233-6-bjorn.topel@gmail.com
2020-05-20 22:20:53 +03:00
static inline bool xskq_cons_read_addr_unchecked(struct xsk_queue *q, u64 *addr)
{
struct xdp_umem_ring *ring = (struct xdp_umem_ring *)q->ring;
if (q->cached_cons != q->cached_prod) {
u32 idx = q->cached_cons & q->ring_mask;
*addr = ring->desc[idx];
return true;
}
xsk: Introduce AF_XDP buffer allocation API In order to simplify AF_XDP zero-copy enablement for NIC driver developers, a new AF_XDP buffer allocation API is added. The implementation is based on a single core (single producer/consumer) buffer pool for the AF_XDP UMEM. A buffer is allocated using the xsk_buff_alloc() function, and returned using xsk_buff_free(). If a buffer is disassociated with the pool, e.g. when a buffer is passed to an AF_XDP socket, a buffer is said to be released. Currently, the release function is only used by the AF_XDP internals and not visible to the driver. Drivers using this API should register the XDP memory model with the new MEM_TYPE_XSK_BUFF_POOL type. The API is defined in net/xdp_sock_drv.h. The buffer type is struct xdp_buff, and follows the lifetime of regular xdp_buffs, i.e. the lifetime of an xdp_buff is restricted to a NAPI context. In other words, the API is not replacing xdp_frames. In addition to introducing the API and implementations, the AF_XDP core is migrated to use the new APIs. rfc->v1: Fixed build errors/warnings for m68k and riscv. (kbuild test robot) Added headroom/chunk size getter. (Maxim/Björn) v1->v2: Swapped SoBs. (Maxim) v2->v3: Initialize struct xdp_buff member frame_sz. (Björn) Add API to query the DMA address of a frame. (Maxim) Do DMA sync for CPU till the end of the frame to handle possible growth (frame_sz). (Maxim) Signed-off-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Maxim Mikityanskiy <maximmi@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200520192103.355233-6-bjorn.topel@gmail.com
2020-05-20 22:20:53 +03:00
return false;
}
static inline bool xp_aligned_validate_desc(struct xsk_buff_pool *pool,
struct xdp_desc *desc)
{
u64 chunk, chunk_end;
chunk = xp_aligned_extract_addr(pool, desc->addr);
chunk_end = xp_aligned_extract_addr(pool, desc->addr + desc->len);
if (chunk != chunk_end)
return false;
if (chunk >= pool->addrs_cnt)
return false;
if (desc->options)
return false;
return true;
}
static inline bool xp_unaligned_validate_desc(struct xsk_buff_pool *pool,
struct xdp_desc *desc)
{
u64 addr, base_addr;
base_addr = xp_unaligned_extract_addr(desc->addr);
addr = xp_unaligned_add_offset_to_addr(desc->addr);
if (desc->len > pool->chunk_size)
return false;
if (base_addr >= pool->addrs_cnt || addr >= pool->addrs_cnt ||
xp_desc_crosses_non_contig_pg(pool, addr, desc->len))
return false;
if (desc->options)
return false;
return true;
}
static inline bool xp_validate_desc(struct xsk_buff_pool *pool,
struct xdp_desc *desc)
{
return pool->unaligned ? xp_unaligned_validate_desc(pool, desc) :
xp_aligned_validate_desc(pool, desc);
}
xsk: Introduce AF_XDP buffer allocation API In order to simplify AF_XDP zero-copy enablement for NIC driver developers, a new AF_XDP buffer allocation API is added. The implementation is based on a single core (single producer/consumer) buffer pool for the AF_XDP UMEM. A buffer is allocated using the xsk_buff_alloc() function, and returned using xsk_buff_free(). If a buffer is disassociated with the pool, e.g. when a buffer is passed to an AF_XDP socket, a buffer is said to be released. Currently, the release function is only used by the AF_XDP internals and not visible to the driver. Drivers using this API should register the XDP memory model with the new MEM_TYPE_XSK_BUFF_POOL type. The API is defined in net/xdp_sock_drv.h. The buffer type is struct xdp_buff, and follows the lifetime of regular xdp_buffs, i.e. the lifetime of an xdp_buff is restricted to a NAPI context. In other words, the API is not replacing xdp_frames. In addition to introducing the API and implementations, the AF_XDP core is migrated to use the new APIs. rfc->v1: Fixed build errors/warnings for m68k and riscv. (kbuild test robot) Added headroom/chunk size getter. (Maxim/Björn) v1->v2: Swapped SoBs. (Maxim) v2->v3: Initialize struct xdp_buff member frame_sz. (Björn) Add API to query the DMA address of a frame. (Maxim) Do DMA sync for CPU till the end of the frame to handle possible growth (frame_sz). (Maxim) Signed-off-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Maxim Mikityanskiy <maximmi@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200520192103.355233-6-bjorn.topel@gmail.com
2020-05-20 22:20:53 +03:00
static inline bool xskq_cons_is_valid_desc(struct xsk_queue *q,
struct xdp_desc *d,
struct xsk_buff_pool *pool)
xsk: Introduce AF_XDP buffer allocation API In order to simplify AF_XDP zero-copy enablement for NIC driver developers, a new AF_XDP buffer allocation API is added. The implementation is based on a single core (single producer/consumer) buffer pool for the AF_XDP UMEM. A buffer is allocated using the xsk_buff_alloc() function, and returned using xsk_buff_free(). If a buffer is disassociated with the pool, e.g. when a buffer is passed to an AF_XDP socket, a buffer is said to be released. Currently, the release function is only used by the AF_XDP internals and not visible to the driver. Drivers using this API should register the XDP memory model with the new MEM_TYPE_XSK_BUFF_POOL type. The API is defined in net/xdp_sock_drv.h. The buffer type is struct xdp_buff, and follows the lifetime of regular xdp_buffs, i.e. the lifetime of an xdp_buff is restricted to a NAPI context. In other words, the API is not replacing xdp_frames. In addition to introducing the API and implementations, the AF_XDP core is migrated to use the new APIs. rfc->v1: Fixed build errors/warnings for m68k and riscv. (kbuild test robot) Added headroom/chunk size getter. (Maxim/Björn) v1->v2: Swapped SoBs. (Maxim) v2->v3: Initialize struct xdp_buff member frame_sz. (Björn) Add API to query the DMA address of a frame. (Maxim) Do DMA sync for CPU till the end of the frame to handle possible growth (frame_sz). (Maxim) Signed-off-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Maxim Mikityanskiy <maximmi@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200520192103.355233-6-bjorn.topel@gmail.com
2020-05-20 22:20:53 +03:00
{
if (!xp_validate_desc(pool, d)) {
q->invalid_descs++;
return false;
}
return true;
}
static inline bool xskq_cons_read_desc(struct xsk_queue *q,
struct xdp_desc *desc,
struct xsk_buff_pool *pool)
{
while (q->cached_cons != q->cached_prod) {
struct xdp_rxtx_ring *ring = (struct xdp_rxtx_ring *)q->ring;
u32 idx = q->cached_cons & q->ring_mask;
*desc = ring->desc[idx];
if (xskq_cons_is_valid_desc(q, desc, pool))
return true;
q->cached_cons++;
}
return false;
}
static inline u32 xskq_cons_read_desc_batch(struct xsk_queue *q,
struct xdp_desc *descs,
struct xsk_buff_pool *pool, u32 max)
{
u32 cached_cons = q->cached_cons, nb_entries = 0;
while (cached_cons != q->cached_prod && nb_entries < max) {
struct xdp_rxtx_ring *ring = (struct xdp_rxtx_ring *)q->ring;
u32 idx = cached_cons & q->ring_mask;
descs[nb_entries] = ring->desc[idx];
if (unlikely(!xskq_cons_is_valid_desc(q, &descs[nb_entries], pool))) {
/* Skip the entry */
cached_cons++;
continue;
}
nb_entries++;
cached_cons++;
}
return nb_entries;
}
/* Functions for consumers */
static inline void __xskq_cons_release(struct xsk_queue *q)
{
xsk: Update rings for load-acquire/store-release barriers Currently, the AF_XDP rings uses general smp_{r,w,}mb() barriers on the kernel-side. On most modern architectures load-acquire/store-release barriers perform better, and results in simpler code for circular ring buffers. This change updates the XDP socket rings to use load-acquire/store-release barriers. It is important to note that changing from the old smp_{r,w,}mb() barriers, to load-acquire/store-release barriers does not break compatibility. The old semantics work with the new one, and vice versa. As pointed out by "Documentation/memory-barriers.txt" in the "SMP BARRIER PAIRING" section: "General barriers pair with each other, though they also pair with most other types of barriers, albeit without multicopy atomicity. An acquire barrier pairs with a release barrier, but both may also pair with other barriers, including of course general barriers." How different barriers behaves and pairs is outlined in "tools/memory-model/Documentation/cheatsheet.txt". In order to make sure that compatibility is not broken, LKMM herd7 based litmus tests can be constructed and verified. We generalize the XDP socket ring to a one entry ring, and create two scenarios; One where the ring is full, where only the consumer can proceed, followed by the producer. One where the ring is empty, where only the producer can proceed, followed by the consumer. Each scenario is then expanded to four different tests: general producer/general consumer, general producer/acqrel consumer, acqrel producer/general consumer, acqrel producer/acqrel consumer. In total eight tests. The empty ring test: C spsc-rb+empty // Simple one entry ring: // prod cons allowed action prod cons // 0 0 => prod => 1 0 // 0 1 => cons => 0 0 // 1 0 => cons => 1 1 // 1 1 => prod => 0 1 {} // We start at prod==0, cons==0, data==0, i.e. nothing has been // written to the ring. From here only the producer can start, and // should write 1. Afterwards, consumer can continue and read 1 to // data. Can we enter state prod==1, cons==1, but consumer observed // the incorrect value of 0? P0(int *prod, int *cons, int *data) { ... producer } P1(int *prod, int *cons, int *data) { ... consumer } exists( 1:d=0 /\ prod=1 /\ cons=1 ); The full ring test: C spsc-rb+full // Simple one entry ring: // prod cons allowed action prod cons // 0 0 => prod => 1 0 // 0 1 => cons => 0 0 // 1 0 => cons => 1 1 // 1 1 => prod => 0 1 { prod = 1; } // We start at prod==1, cons==0, data==1, i.e. producer has // written 0, so from here only the consumer can start, and should // consume 0. Afterwards, producer can continue and write 1 to // data. Can we enter state prod==0, cons==1, but consumer observed // the write of 1? P0(int *prod, int *cons, int *data) { ... producer } P1(int *prod, int *cons, int *data) { ... consumer } exists( 1:d=1 /\ prod=0 /\ cons=1 ); where P0 and P1 are: P0(int *prod, int *cons, int *data) { int p; p = READ_ONCE(*prod); if (READ_ONCE(*cons) == p) { WRITE_ONCE(*data, 1); smp_wmb(); WRITE_ONCE(*prod, p ^ 1); } } P0(int *prod, int *cons, int *data) { int p; p = READ_ONCE(*prod); if (READ_ONCE(*cons) == p) { WRITE_ONCE(*data, 1); smp_store_release(prod, p ^ 1); } } P1(int *prod, int *cons, int *data) { int c; int d = -1; c = READ_ONCE(*cons); if (READ_ONCE(*prod) != c) { smp_rmb(); d = READ_ONCE(*data); smp_mb(); WRITE_ONCE(*cons, c ^ 1); } } P1(int *prod, int *cons, int *data) { int c; int d = -1; c = READ_ONCE(*cons); if (smp_load_acquire(prod) != c) { d = READ_ONCE(*data); smp_store_release(cons, c ^ 1); } } The full LKMM litmus tests are found at [1]. On x86-64 systems the l2fwd AF_XDP xdpsock sample performance increases by 1%. This is mostly due to that the smp_mb() is removed, which is a relatively expensive operation on these platforms. Weakly-ordered platforms, such as ARM64 might benefit even more. [1] https://github.com/bjoto/litmus-xsk Signed-off-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Acked-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210305094113.413544-2-bjorn.topel@gmail.com
2021-03-05 12:41:12 +03:00
smp_store_release(&q->ring->consumer, q->cached_cons); /* D, matchees A */
}
static inline void __xskq_cons_peek(struct xsk_queue *q)
{
/* Refresh the local pointer */
xsk: Update rings for load-acquire/store-release barriers Currently, the AF_XDP rings uses general smp_{r,w,}mb() barriers on the kernel-side. On most modern architectures load-acquire/store-release barriers perform better, and results in simpler code for circular ring buffers. This change updates the XDP socket rings to use load-acquire/store-release barriers. It is important to note that changing from the old smp_{r,w,}mb() barriers, to load-acquire/store-release barriers does not break compatibility. The old semantics work with the new one, and vice versa. As pointed out by "Documentation/memory-barriers.txt" in the "SMP BARRIER PAIRING" section: "General barriers pair with each other, though they also pair with most other types of barriers, albeit without multicopy atomicity. An acquire barrier pairs with a release barrier, but both may also pair with other barriers, including of course general barriers." How different barriers behaves and pairs is outlined in "tools/memory-model/Documentation/cheatsheet.txt". In order to make sure that compatibility is not broken, LKMM herd7 based litmus tests can be constructed and verified. We generalize the XDP socket ring to a one entry ring, and create two scenarios; One where the ring is full, where only the consumer can proceed, followed by the producer. One where the ring is empty, where only the producer can proceed, followed by the consumer. Each scenario is then expanded to four different tests: general producer/general consumer, general producer/acqrel consumer, acqrel producer/general consumer, acqrel producer/acqrel consumer. In total eight tests. The empty ring test: C spsc-rb+empty // Simple one entry ring: // prod cons allowed action prod cons // 0 0 => prod => 1 0 // 0 1 => cons => 0 0 // 1 0 => cons => 1 1 // 1 1 => prod => 0 1 {} // We start at prod==0, cons==0, data==0, i.e. nothing has been // written to the ring. From here only the producer can start, and // should write 1. Afterwards, consumer can continue and read 1 to // data. Can we enter state prod==1, cons==1, but consumer observed // the incorrect value of 0? P0(int *prod, int *cons, int *data) { ... producer } P1(int *prod, int *cons, int *data) { ... consumer } exists( 1:d=0 /\ prod=1 /\ cons=1 ); The full ring test: C spsc-rb+full // Simple one entry ring: // prod cons allowed action prod cons // 0 0 => prod => 1 0 // 0 1 => cons => 0 0 // 1 0 => cons => 1 1 // 1 1 => prod => 0 1 { prod = 1; } // We start at prod==1, cons==0, data==1, i.e. producer has // written 0, so from here only the consumer can start, and should // consume 0. Afterwards, producer can continue and write 1 to // data. Can we enter state prod==0, cons==1, but consumer observed // the write of 1? P0(int *prod, int *cons, int *data) { ... producer } P1(int *prod, int *cons, int *data) { ... consumer } exists( 1:d=1 /\ prod=0 /\ cons=1 ); where P0 and P1 are: P0(int *prod, int *cons, int *data) { int p; p = READ_ONCE(*prod); if (READ_ONCE(*cons) == p) { WRITE_ONCE(*data, 1); smp_wmb(); WRITE_ONCE(*prod, p ^ 1); } } P0(int *prod, int *cons, int *data) { int p; p = READ_ONCE(*prod); if (READ_ONCE(*cons) == p) { WRITE_ONCE(*data, 1); smp_store_release(prod, p ^ 1); } } P1(int *prod, int *cons, int *data) { int c; int d = -1; c = READ_ONCE(*cons); if (READ_ONCE(*prod) != c) { smp_rmb(); d = READ_ONCE(*data); smp_mb(); WRITE_ONCE(*cons, c ^ 1); } } P1(int *prod, int *cons, int *data) { int c; int d = -1; c = READ_ONCE(*cons); if (smp_load_acquire(prod) != c) { d = READ_ONCE(*data); smp_store_release(cons, c ^ 1); } } The full LKMM litmus tests are found at [1]. On x86-64 systems the l2fwd AF_XDP xdpsock sample performance increases by 1%. This is mostly due to that the smp_mb() is removed, which is a relatively expensive operation on these platforms. Weakly-ordered platforms, such as ARM64 might benefit even more. [1] https://github.com/bjoto/litmus-xsk Signed-off-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Acked-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210305094113.413544-2-bjorn.topel@gmail.com
2021-03-05 12:41:12 +03:00
q->cached_prod = smp_load_acquire(&q->ring->producer); /* C, matches B */
}
static inline void xskq_cons_get_entries(struct xsk_queue *q)
{
__xskq_cons_release(q);
__xskq_cons_peek(q);
}
static inline u32 xskq_cons_nb_entries(struct xsk_queue *q, u32 max)
{
u32 entries = q->cached_prod - q->cached_cons;
if (entries >= max)
return max;
__xskq_cons_peek(q);
entries = q->cached_prod - q->cached_cons;
return entries >= max ? max : entries;
}
static inline bool xskq_cons_has_entries(struct xsk_queue *q, u32 cnt)
{
return xskq_cons_nb_entries(q, cnt) >= cnt ? true : false;
}
xsk: Introduce AF_XDP buffer allocation API In order to simplify AF_XDP zero-copy enablement for NIC driver developers, a new AF_XDP buffer allocation API is added. The implementation is based on a single core (single producer/consumer) buffer pool for the AF_XDP UMEM. A buffer is allocated using the xsk_buff_alloc() function, and returned using xsk_buff_free(). If a buffer is disassociated with the pool, e.g. when a buffer is passed to an AF_XDP socket, a buffer is said to be released. Currently, the release function is only used by the AF_XDP internals and not visible to the driver. Drivers using this API should register the XDP memory model with the new MEM_TYPE_XSK_BUFF_POOL type. The API is defined in net/xdp_sock_drv.h. The buffer type is struct xdp_buff, and follows the lifetime of regular xdp_buffs, i.e. the lifetime of an xdp_buff is restricted to a NAPI context. In other words, the API is not replacing xdp_frames. In addition to introducing the API and implementations, the AF_XDP core is migrated to use the new APIs. rfc->v1: Fixed build errors/warnings for m68k and riscv. (kbuild test robot) Added headroom/chunk size getter. (Maxim/Björn) v1->v2: Swapped SoBs. (Maxim) v2->v3: Initialize struct xdp_buff member frame_sz. (Björn) Add API to query the DMA address of a frame. (Maxim) Do DMA sync for CPU till the end of the frame to handle possible growth (frame_sz). (Maxim) Signed-off-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Maxim Mikityanskiy <maximmi@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200520192103.355233-6-bjorn.topel@gmail.com
2020-05-20 22:20:53 +03:00
static inline bool xskq_cons_peek_addr_unchecked(struct xsk_queue *q, u64 *addr)
{
if (q->cached_prod == q->cached_cons)
xskq_cons_get_entries(q);
return xskq_cons_read_addr_unchecked(q, addr);
}
static inline bool xskq_cons_peek_desc(struct xsk_queue *q,
struct xdp_desc *desc,
struct xsk_buff_pool *pool)
{
if (q->cached_prod == q->cached_cons)
xskq_cons_get_entries(q);
return xskq_cons_read_desc(q, desc, pool);
}
static inline u32 xskq_cons_peek_desc_batch(struct xsk_queue *q, struct xdp_desc *descs,
struct xsk_buff_pool *pool, u32 max)
{
u32 entries = xskq_cons_nb_entries(q, max);
return xskq_cons_read_desc_batch(q, descs, pool, entries);
}
/* To improve performance in the xskq_cons_release functions, only update local state here.
* Reflect this to global state when we get new entries from the ring in
* xskq_cons_get_entries() and whenever Rx or Tx processing are completed in the NAPI loop.
*/
static inline void xskq_cons_release(struct xsk_queue *q)
{
q->cached_cons++;
}
static inline void xskq_cons_release_n(struct xsk_queue *q, u32 cnt)
{
q->cached_cons += cnt;
}
static inline bool xskq_cons_is_full(struct xsk_queue *q)
{
/* No barriers needed since data is not accessed */
return READ_ONCE(q->ring->producer) - READ_ONCE(q->ring->consumer) ==
q->nentries;
}
static inline u32 xskq_cons_present_entries(struct xsk_queue *q)
{
/* No barriers needed since data is not accessed */
return READ_ONCE(q->ring->producer) - READ_ONCE(q->ring->consumer);
}
/* Functions for producers */
static inline u32 xskq_prod_nb_free(struct xsk_queue *q, u32 max)
{
u32 free_entries = q->nentries - (q->cached_prod - q->cached_cons);
if (free_entries >= max)
return max;
/* Refresh the local tail pointer */
q->cached_cons = READ_ONCE(q->ring->consumer);
free_entries = q->nentries - (q->cached_prod - q->cached_cons);
return free_entries >= max ? max : free_entries;
}
static inline bool xskq_prod_is_full(struct xsk_queue *q)
{
return xskq_prod_nb_free(q, 1) ? false : true;
}
static inline void xskq_prod_cancel(struct xsk_queue *q)
{
q->cached_prod--;
}
static inline int xskq_prod_reserve(struct xsk_queue *q)
{
if (xskq_prod_is_full(q))
return -ENOSPC;
/* A, matches D */
q->cached_prod++;
return 0;
}
static inline int xskq_prod_reserve_addr(struct xsk_queue *q, u64 addr)
{
struct xdp_umem_ring *ring = (struct xdp_umem_ring *)q->ring;
if (xskq_prod_is_full(q))
return -ENOSPC;
/* A, matches D */
ring->desc[q->cached_prod++ & q->ring_mask] = addr;
return 0;
}
static inline u32 xskq_prod_reserve_addr_batch(struct xsk_queue *q, struct xdp_desc *descs,
u32 max)
{
struct xdp_umem_ring *ring = (struct xdp_umem_ring *)q->ring;
u32 nb_entries, i, cached_prod;
nb_entries = xskq_prod_nb_free(q, max);
/* A, matches D */
cached_prod = q->cached_prod;
for (i = 0; i < nb_entries; i++)
ring->desc[cached_prod++ & q->ring_mask] = descs[i].addr;
q->cached_prod = cached_prod;
return nb_entries;
}
static inline int xskq_prod_reserve_desc(struct xsk_queue *q,
u64 addr, u32 len)
{
struct xdp_rxtx_ring *ring = (struct xdp_rxtx_ring *)q->ring;
u32 idx;
if (xskq_prod_is_full(q))
return -ENOSPC;
/* A, matches D */
xsk: Consolidate to one single cached producer pointer Currently, the xsk ring code has two cached producer pointers: prod_head and prod_tail. This patch consolidates these two into a single one called cached_prod to make the code simpler and easier to maintain. This will be in line with the user space part of the the code found in libbpf, that only uses a single cached pointer. The Rx path only uses the two top level functions xskq_produce_batch_desc and xskq_produce_flush_desc and they both use prod_head and never prod_tail. So just move them over to cached_prod. The Tx XDP_DRV path uses xskq_produce_addr_lazy and xskq_produce_flush_addr_n and unnecessarily operates on both prod_tail and prod_head, so move them over to just use cached_prod by skipping the intermediate step of updating prod_tail. The Tx path in XDP_SKB mode uses xskq_reserve_addr and xskq_produce_addr. They currently use both cached pointers, but we can operate on the global producer pointer in xskq_produce_addr since it has to be updated anyway, thus eliminating the use of both cached pointers. We can also remove the xskq_nb_free in xskq_produce_addr since it is already called in xskq_reserve_addr. No need to do it twice. When there is only one cached producer pointer, we can also simplify xskq_nb_free by removing one argument. Signed-off-by: Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/1576759171-28550-4-git-send-email-magnus.karlsson@intel.com
2019-12-19 15:39:22 +03:00
idx = q->cached_prod++ & q->ring_mask;
xsk: new descriptor addressing scheme Currently, AF_XDP only supports a fixed frame-size memory scheme where each frame is referenced via an index (idx). A user passes the frame index to the kernel, and the kernel acts upon the data. Some NICs, however, do not have a fixed frame-size model, instead they have a model where a memory window is passed to the hardware and multiple frames are filled into that window (referred to as the "type-writer" model). By changing the descriptor format from the current frame index addressing scheme, AF_XDP can in the future be extended to support these kinds of NICs. In the index-based model, an idx refers to a frame of size frame_size. Addressing a frame in the UMEM is done by offseting the UMEM starting address by a global offset, idx * frame_size + offset. Communicating via the fill- and completion-rings are done by means of idx. In this commit, the idx is removed in favor of an address (addr), which is a relative address ranging over the UMEM. To convert an idx-based address to the new addr is simply: addr = idx * frame_size + offset. We also stop referring to the UMEM "frame" as a frame. Instead it is simply called a chunk. To transfer ownership of a chunk to the kernel, the addr of the chunk is passed in the fill-ring. Note, that the kernel will mask addr to make it chunk aligned, so there is no need for userspace to do that. E.g., for a chunk size of 2k, passing an addr of 2048, 2050 or 3000 to the fill-ring will refer to the same chunk. On the completion-ring, the addr will match that of the Tx descriptor, passed to the kernel. Changing the descriptor format to use chunks/addr will allow for future changes to move to a type-writer based model, where multiple frames can reside in one chunk. In this model passing one single chunk into the fill-ring, would potentially result in multiple Rx descriptors. This commit changes the uapi of AF_XDP sockets, and updates the documentation. Signed-off-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-06-04 14:57:13 +03:00
ring->desc[idx].addr = addr;
ring->desc[idx].len = len;
return 0;
}
static inline void __xskq_prod_submit(struct xsk_queue *q, u32 idx)
{
xsk: Update rings for load-acquire/store-release barriers Currently, the AF_XDP rings uses general smp_{r,w,}mb() barriers on the kernel-side. On most modern architectures load-acquire/store-release barriers perform better, and results in simpler code for circular ring buffers. This change updates the XDP socket rings to use load-acquire/store-release barriers. It is important to note that changing from the old smp_{r,w,}mb() barriers, to load-acquire/store-release barriers does not break compatibility. The old semantics work with the new one, and vice versa. As pointed out by "Documentation/memory-barriers.txt" in the "SMP BARRIER PAIRING" section: "General barriers pair with each other, though they also pair with most other types of barriers, albeit without multicopy atomicity. An acquire barrier pairs with a release barrier, but both may also pair with other barriers, including of course general barriers." How different barriers behaves and pairs is outlined in "tools/memory-model/Documentation/cheatsheet.txt". In order to make sure that compatibility is not broken, LKMM herd7 based litmus tests can be constructed and verified. We generalize the XDP socket ring to a one entry ring, and create two scenarios; One where the ring is full, where only the consumer can proceed, followed by the producer. One where the ring is empty, where only the producer can proceed, followed by the consumer. Each scenario is then expanded to four different tests: general producer/general consumer, general producer/acqrel consumer, acqrel producer/general consumer, acqrel producer/acqrel consumer. In total eight tests. The empty ring test: C spsc-rb+empty // Simple one entry ring: // prod cons allowed action prod cons // 0 0 => prod => 1 0 // 0 1 => cons => 0 0 // 1 0 => cons => 1 1 // 1 1 => prod => 0 1 {} // We start at prod==0, cons==0, data==0, i.e. nothing has been // written to the ring. From here only the producer can start, and // should write 1. Afterwards, consumer can continue and read 1 to // data. Can we enter state prod==1, cons==1, but consumer observed // the incorrect value of 0? P0(int *prod, int *cons, int *data) { ... producer } P1(int *prod, int *cons, int *data) { ... consumer } exists( 1:d=0 /\ prod=1 /\ cons=1 ); The full ring test: C spsc-rb+full // Simple one entry ring: // prod cons allowed action prod cons // 0 0 => prod => 1 0 // 0 1 => cons => 0 0 // 1 0 => cons => 1 1 // 1 1 => prod => 0 1 { prod = 1; } // We start at prod==1, cons==0, data==1, i.e. producer has // written 0, so from here only the consumer can start, and should // consume 0. Afterwards, producer can continue and write 1 to // data. Can we enter state prod==0, cons==1, but consumer observed // the write of 1? P0(int *prod, int *cons, int *data) { ... producer } P1(int *prod, int *cons, int *data) { ... consumer } exists( 1:d=1 /\ prod=0 /\ cons=1 ); where P0 and P1 are: P0(int *prod, int *cons, int *data) { int p; p = READ_ONCE(*prod); if (READ_ONCE(*cons) == p) { WRITE_ONCE(*data, 1); smp_wmb(); WRITE_ONCE(*prod, p ^ 1); } } P0(int *prod, int *cons, int *data) { int p; p = READ_ONCE(*prod); if (READ_ONCE(*cons) == p) { WRITE_ONCE(*data, 1); smp_store_release(prod, p ^ 1); } } P1(int *prod, int *cons, int *data) { int c; int d = -1; c = READ_ONCE(*cons); if (READ_ONCE(*prod) != c) { smp_rmb(); d = READ_ONCE(*data); smp_mb(); WRITE_ONCE(*cons, c ^ 1); } } P1(int *prod, int *cons, int *data) { int c; int d = -1; c = READ_ONCE(*cons); if (smp_load_acquire(prod) != c) { d = READ_ONCE(*data); smp_store_release(cons, c ^ 1); } } The full LKMM litmus tests are found at [1]. On x86-64 systems the l2fwd AF_XDP xdpsock sample performance increases by 1%. This is mostly due to that the smp_mb() is removed, which is a relatively expensive operation on these platforms. Weakly-ordered platforms, such as ARM64 might benefit even more. [1] https://github.com/bjoto/litmus-xsk Signed-off-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Acked-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210305094113.413544-2-bjorn.topel@gmail.com
2021-03-05 12:41:12 +03:00
smp_store_release(&q->ring->producer, idx); /* B, matches C */
}
static inline void xskq_prod_submit(struct xsk_queue *q)
{
__xskq_prod_submit(q, q->cached_prod);
}
static inline void xskq_prod_submit_addr(struct xsk_queue *q, u64 addr)
{
struct xdp_umem_ring *ring = (struct xdp_umem_ring *)q->ring;
u32 idx = q->ring->producer;
ring->desc[idx++ & q->ring_mask] = addr;
__xskq_prod_submit(q, idx);
}
static inline void xskq_prod_submit_n(struct xsk_queue *q, u32 nb_entries)
{
__xskq_prod_submit(q, q->ring->producer + nb_entries);
}
static inline bool xskq_prod_is_empty(struct xsk_queue *q)
{
/* No barriers needed since data is not accessed */
return READ_ONCE(q->ring->consumer) == READ_ONCE(q->ring->producer);
}
/* For both producers and consumers */
static inline u64 xskq_nb_invalid_descs(struct xsk_queue *q)
{
return q ? q->invalid_descs : 0;
}
static inline u64 xskq_nb_queue_empty_descs(struct xsk_queue *q)
{
return q ? q->queue_empty_descs : 0;
}
struct xsk_queue *xskq_create(u32 nentries, bool umem_queue);
void xskq_destroy(struct xsk_queue *q_ops);
#endif /* _LINUX_XSK_QUEUE_H */