WSL2-Linux-Kernel/fs/hfsplus/catalog.c

521 строка
13 KiB
C
Исходник Обычный вид История

/*
* linux/fs/hfsplus/catalog.c
*
* Copyright (C) 2001
* Brad Boyer (flar@allandria.com)
* (C) 2003 Ardis Technologies <roman@ardistech.com>
*
* Handling of catalog records
*/
#include "hfsplus_fs.h"
#include "hfsplus_raw.h"
int hfsplus_cat_case_cmp_key(const hfsplus_btree_key *k1,
const hfsplus_btree_key *k2)
{
__be32 k1p, k2p;
k1p = k1->cat.parent;
k2p = k2->cat.parent;
if (k1p != k2p)
return be32_to_cpu(k1p) < be32_to_cpu(k2p) ? -1 : 1;
return hfsplus_strcasecmp(&k1->cat.name, &k2->cat.name);
}
int hfsplus_cat_bin_cmp_key(const hfsplus_btree_key *k1,
const hfsplus_btree_key *k2)
{
__be32 k1p, k2p;
k1p = k1->cat.parent;
k2p = k2->cat.parent;
if (k1p != k2p)
return be32_to_cpu(k1p) < be32_to_cpu(k2p) ? -1 : 1;
return hfsplus_strcmp(&k1->cat.name, &k2->cat.name);
}
hfsplus: fix longname handling Longname is not correctly handled by hfsplus driver. If an attempt to create a longname(>255) file/directory is made, it succeeds by creating a file/directory with HFSPLUS_MAX_STRLEN and incorrect catalog key. Thus leaving the volume in an inconsistent state. This patch fixes this issue. Although lookup is always called first to create a negative entry, so just doing a check in lookup would probably fix this issue. I choose to propagate error to other iops as well. Please NOTE: I have factored out hfsplus_cat_build_key_with_cnid from hfsplus_cat_build_key, to avoid unncessary branching. Thanks a lot. TEST: ------ dir="TEST_DIR" cdir=`pwd` name255="_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234" name256="${name255}5" mkdir $dir cd $dir touch $name255 rm -f $name255 touch $name256 ls -la cd $cdir rm -rf $dir RESULT: ------- [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ cdir=`pwd` [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ name255="_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234" [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ name256="${name255}5" [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ mkdir $dir [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ cd $dir [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ touch $name255 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ rm -f $name255 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ touch $name256 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ ls -la ls: cannot access _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234: No such file or directory total 0 drwxrwxr-x 1 sougata sougata 3 Feb 20 19:56 . drwxrwxrwx 1 root root 6 Feb 20 19:56 .. -????????? ? ? ? ? ? _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ cd $cdir [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ rm -rf $dir rm: cannot remove `TEST_DIR': Directory not empty -ENAMETOOLONG returned from hfsplus_asc2uni was not propaged to iops. This allowed hfsplus to create files/directories with HFSPLUS_MAX_STRLEN and incorrect keys, leaving the FS in an inconsistent state. This patch fixes this issue. Signed-off-by: Sougata Santra <sougata@tuxera.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Vyacheslav Dubeyko <slava@dubeyko.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2014-12-19 03:17:12 +03:00
/* Generates key for catalog file/folders record. */
int hfsplus_cat_build_key(struct super_block *sb,
hfsplus_btree_key *key, u32 parent, struct qstr *str)
{
hfsplus: fix longname handling Longname is not correctly handled by hfsplus driver. If an attempt to create a longname(>255) file/directory is made, it succeeds by creating a file/directory with HFSPLUS_MAX_STRLEN and incorrect catalog key. Thus leaving the volume in an inconsistent state. This patch fixes this issue. Although lookup is always called first to create a negative entry, so just doing a check in lookup would probably fix this issue. I choose to propagate error to other iops as well. Please NOTE: I have factored out hfsplus_cat_build_key_with_cnid from hfsplus_cat_build_key, to avoid unncessary branching. Thanks a lot. TEST: ------ dir="TEST_DIR" cdir=`pwd` name255="_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234" name256="${name255}5" mkdir $dir cd $dir touch $name255 rm -f $name255 touch $name256 ls -la cd $cdir rm -rf $dir RESULT: ------- [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ cdir=`pwd` [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ name255="_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234" [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ name256="${name255}5" [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ mkdir $dir [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ cd $dir [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ touch $name255 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ rm -f $name255 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ touch $name256 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ ls -la ls: cannot access _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234: No such file or directory total 0 drwxrwxr-x 1 sougata sougata 3 Feb 20 19:56 . drwxrwxrwx 1 root root 6 Feb 20 19:56 .. -????????? ? ? ? ? ? _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ cd $cdir [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ rm -rf $dir rm: cannot remove `TEST_DIR': Directory not empty -ENAMETOOLONG returned from hfsplus_asc2uni was not propaged to iops. This allowed hfsplus to create files/directories with HFSPLUS_MAX_STRLEN and incorrect keys, leaving the FS in an inconsistent state. This patch fixes this issue. Signed-off-by: Sougata Santra <sougata@tuxera.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Vyacheslav Dubeyko <slava@dubeyko.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2014-12-19 03:17:12 +03:00
int len, err;
key->cat.parent = cpu_to_be32(parent);
hfsplus: fix longname handling Longname is not correctly handled by hfsplus driver. If an attempt to create a longname(>255) file/directory is made, it succeeds by creating a file/directory with HFSPLUS_MAX_STRLEN and incorrect catalog key. Thus leaving the volume in an inconsistent state. This patch fixes this issue. Although lookup is always called first to create a negative entry, so just doing a check in lookup would probably fix this issue. I choose to propagate error to other iops as well. Please NOTE: I have factored out hfsplus_cat_build_key_with_cnid from hfsplus_cat_build_key, to avoid unncessary branching. Thanks a lot. TEST: ------ dir="TEST_DIR" cdir=`pwd` name255="_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234" name256="${name255}5" mkdir $dir cd $dir touch $name255 rm -f $name255 touch $name256 ls -la cd $cdir rm -rf $dir RESULT: ------- [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ cdir=`pwd` [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ name255="_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234" [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ name256="${name255}5" [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ mkdir $dir [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ cd $dir [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ touch $name255 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ rm -f $name255 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ touch $name256 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ ls -la ls: cannot access _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234: No such file or directory total 0 drwxrwxr-x 1 sougata sougata 3 Feb 20 19:56 . drwxrwxrwx 1 root root 6 Feb 20 19:56 .. -????????? ? ? ? ? ? _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ cd $cdir [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ rm -rf $dir rm: cannot remove `TEST_DIR': Directory not empty -ENAMETOOLONG returned from hfsplus_asc2uni was not propaged to iops. This allowed hfsplus to create files/directories with HFSPLUS_MAX_STRLEN and incorrect keys, leaving the FS in an inconsistent state. This patch fixes this issue. Signed-off-by: Sougata Santra <sougata@tuxera.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Vyacheslav Dubeyko <slava@dubeyko.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2014-12-19 03:17:12 +03:00
err = hfsplus_asc2uni(sb, &key->cat.name, HFSPLUS_MAX_STRLEN,
str->name, str->len);
if (unlikely(err < 0))
return err;
len = be16_to_cpu(key->cat.name.length);
key->key_len = cpu_to_be16(6 + 2 * len);
hfsplus: fix longname handling Longname is not correctly handled by hfsplus driver. If an attempt to create a longname(>255) file/directory is made, it succeeds by creating a file/directory with HFSPLUS_MAX_STRLEN and incorrect catalog key. Thus leaving the volume in an inconsistent state. This patch fixes this issue. Although lookup is always called first to create a negative entry, so just doing a check in lookup would probably fix this issue. I choose to propagate error to other iops as well. Please NOTE: I have factored out hfsplus_cat_build_key_with_cnid from hfsplus_cat_build_key, to avoid unncessary branching. Thanks a lot. TEST: ------ dir="TEST_DIR" cdir=`pwd` name255="_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234" name256="${name255}5" mkdir $dir cd $dir touch $name255 rm -f $name255 touch $name256 ls -la cd $cdir rm -rf $dir RESULT: ------- [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ cdir=`pwd` [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ name255="_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234" [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ name256="${name255}5" [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ mkdir $dir [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ cd $dir [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ touch $name255 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ rm -f $name255 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ touch $name256 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ ls -la ls: cannot access _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234: No such file or directory total 0 drwxrwxr-x 1 sougata sougata 3 Feb 20 19:56 . drwxrwxrwx 1 root root 6 Feb 20 19:56 .. -????????? ? ? ? ? ? _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ cd $cdir [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ rm -rf $dir rm: cannot remove `TEST_DIR': Directory not empty -ENAMETOOLONG returned from hfsplus_asc2uni was not propaged to iops. This allowed hfsplus to create files/directories with HFSPLUS_MAX_STRLEN and incorrect keys, leaving the FS in an inconsistent state. This patch fixes this issue. Signed-off-by: Sougata Santra <sougata@tuxera.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Vyacheslav Dubeyko <slava@dubeyko.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2014-12-19 03:17:12 +03:00
return 0;
}
/* Generates key for catalog thread record. */
void hfsplus_cat_build_key_with_cnid(struct super_block *sb,
hfsplus_btree_key *key, u32 parent)
{
key->cat.parent = cpu_to_be32(parent);
key->cat.name.length = 0;
key->key_len = cpu_to_be16(6);
}
static void hfsplus_cat_build_key_uni(hfsplus_btree_key *key, u32 parent,
struct hfsplus_unistr *name)
{
int ustrlen;
ustrlen = be16_to_cpu(name->length);
key->cat.parent = cpu_to_be32(parent);
key->cat.name.length = cpu_to_be16(ustrlen);
ustrlen *= 2;
memcpy(key->cat.name.unicode, name->unicode, ustrlen);
key->key_len = cpu_to_be16(6 + ustrlen);
}
void hfsplus_cat_set_perms(struct inode *inode, struct hfsplus_perm *perms)
{
if (inode->i_flags & S_IMMUTABLE)
perms->rootflags |= HFSPLUS_FLG_IMMUTABLE;
else
perms->rootflags &= ~HFSPLUS_FLG_IMMUTABLE;
if (inode->i_flags & S_APPEND)
perms->rootflags |= HFSPLUS_FLG_APPEND;
else
perms->rootflags &= ~HFSPLUS_FLG_APPEND;
perms->userflags = HFSPLUS_I(inode)->userflags;
perms->mode = cpu_to_be16(inode->i_mode);
perms->owner = cpu_to_be32(i_uid_read(inode));
perms->group = cpu_to_be32(i_gid_read(inode));
if (S_ISREG(inode->i_mode))
perms->dev = cpu_to_be32(inode->i_nlink);
else if (S_ISBLK(inode->i_mode) || S_ISCHR(inode->i_mode))
perms->dev = cpu_to_be32(inode->i_rdev);
else
perms->dev = 0;
}
static int hfsplus_cat_build_record(hfsplus_cat_entry *entry,
u32 cnid, struct inode *inode)
{
struct hfsplus_sb_info *sbi = HFSPLUS_SB(inode->i_sb);
if (S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode)) {
struct hfsplus_cat_folder *folder;
folder = &entry->folder;
memset(folder, 0, sizeof(*folder));
folder->type = cpu_to_be16(HFSPLUS_FOLDER);
if (test_bit(HFSPLUS_SB_HFSX, &sbi->flags))
folder->flags |= cpu_to_be16(HFSPLUS_HAS_FOLDER_COUNT);
folder->id = cpu_to_be32(inode->i_ino);
HFSPLUS_I(inode)->create_date =
folder->create_date =
folder->content_mod_date =
folder->attribute_mod_date =
folder->access_date = hfsp_now2mt();
hfsplus_cat_set_perms(inode, &folder->permissions);
if (inode == sbi->hidden_dir)
/* invisible and namelocked */
folder->user_info.frFlags = cpu_to_be16(0x5000);
return sizeof(*folder);
} else {
struct hfsplus_cat_file *file;
file = &entry->file;
memset(file, 0, sizeof(*file));
file->type = cpu_to_be16(HFSPLUS_FILE);
file->flags = cpu_to_be16(HFSPLUS_FILE_THREAD_EXISTS);
file->id = cpu_to_be32(cnid);
HFSPLUS_I(inode)->create_date =
file->create_date =
file->content_mod_date =
file->attribute_mod_date =
file->access_date = hfsp_now2mt();
if (cnid == inode->i_ino) {
hfsplus_cat_set_perms(inode, &file->permissions);
if (S_ISLNK(inode->i_mode)) {
file->user_info.fdType =
cpu_to_be32(HFSP_SYMLINK_TYPE);
file->user_info.fdCreator =
cpu_to_be32(HFSP_SYMLINK_CREATOR);
} else {
file->user_info.fdType =
cpu_to_be32(sbi->type);
file->user_info.fdCreator =
cpu_to_be32(sbi->creator);
}
if (HFSPLUS_FLG_IMMUTABLE &
(file->permissions.rootflags |
file->permissions.userflags))
file->flags |=
cpu_to_be16(HFSPLUS_FILE_LOCKED);
} else {
file->user_info.fdType =
cpu_to_be32(HFSP_HARDLINK_TYPE);
file->user_info.fdCreator =
cpu_to_be32(HFSP_HFSPLUS_CREATOR);
file->user_info.fdFlags =
cpu_to_be16(0x100);
file->create_date =
HFSPLUS_I(sbi->hidden_dir)->create_date;
file->permissions.dev =
cpu_to_be32(HFSPLUS_I(inode)->linkid);
}
return sizeof(*file);
}
}
static int hfsplus_fill_cat_thread(struct super_block *sb,
hfsplus_cat_entry *entry, int type,
u32 parentid, struct qstr *str)
{
hfsplus: fix longname handling Longname is not correctly handled by hfsplus driver. If an attempt to create a longname(>255) file/directory is made, it succeeds by creating a file/directory with HFSPLUS_MAX_STRLEN and incorrect catalog key. Thus leaving the volume in an inconsistent state. This patch fixes this issue. Although lookup is always called first to create a negative entry, so just doing a check in lookup would probably fix this issue. I choose to propagate error to other iops as well. Please NOTE: I have factored out hfsplus_cat_build_key_with_cnid from hfsplus_cat_build_key, to avoid unncessary branching. Thanks a lot. TEST: ------ dir="TEST_DIR" cdir=`pwd` name255="_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234" name256="${name255}5" mkdir $dir cd $dir touch $name255 rm -f $name255 touch $name256 ls -la cd $cdir rm -rf $dir RESULT: ------- [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ cdir=`pwd` [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ name255="_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234" [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ name256="${name255}5" [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ mkdir $dir [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ cd $dir [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ touch $name255 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ rm -f $name255 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ touch $name256 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ ls -la ls: cannot access _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234: No such file or directory total 0 drwxrwxr-x 1 sougata sougata 3 Feb 20 19:56 . drwxrwxrwx 1 root root 6 Feb 20 19:56 .. -????????? ? ? ? ? ? _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ cd $cdir [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ rm -rf $dir rm: cannot remove `TEST_DIR': Directory not empty -ENAMETOOLONG returned from hfsplus_asc2uni was not propaged to iops. This allowed hfsplus to create files/directories with HFSPLUS_MAX_STRLEN and incorrect keys, leaving the FS in an inconsistent state. This patch fixes this issue. Signed-off-by: Sougata Santra <sougata@tuxera.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Vyacheslav Dubeyko <slava@dubeyko.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2014-12-19 03:17:12 +03:00
int err;
entry->type = cpu_to_be16(type);
entry->thread.reserved = 0;
entry->thread.parentID = cpu_to_be32(parentid);
hfsplus: fix longname handling Longname is not correctly handled by hfsplus driver. If an attempt to create a longname(>255) file/directory is made, it succeeds by creating a file/directory with HFSPLUS_MAX_STRLEN and incorrect catalog key. Thus leaving the volume in an inconsistent state. This patch fixes this issue. Although lookup is always called first to create a negative entry, so just doing a check in lookup would probably fix this issue. I choose to propagate error to other iops as well. Please NOTE: I have factored out hfsplus_cat_build_key_with_cnid from hfsplus_cat_build_key, to avoid unncessary branching. Thanks a lot. TEST: ------ dir="TEST_DIR" cdir=`pwd` name255="_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234" name256="${name255}5" mkdir $dir cd $dir touch $name255 rm -f $name255 touch $name256 ls -la cd $cdir rm -rf $dir RESULT: ------- [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ cdir=`pwd` [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ name255="_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234" [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ name256="${name255}5" [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ mkdir $dir [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ cd $dir [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ touch $name255 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ rm -f $name255 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ touch $name256 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ ls -la ls: cannot access _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234: No such file or directory total 0 drwxrwxr-x 1 sougata sougata 3 Feb 20 19:56 . drwxrwxrwx 1 root root 6 Feb 20 19:56 .. -????????? ? ? ? ? ? _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ cd $cdir [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ rm -rf $dir rm: cannot remove `TEST_DIR': Directory not empty -ENAMETOOLONG returned from hfsplus_asc2uni was not propaged to iops. This allowed hfsplus to create files/directories with HFSPLUS_MAX_STRLEN and incorrect keys, leaving the FS in an inconsistent state. This patch fixes this issue. Signed-off-by: Sougata Santra <sougata@tuxera.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Vyacheslav Dubeyko <slava@dubeyko.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2014-12-19 03:17:12 +03:00
err = hfsplus_asc2uni(sb, &entry->thread.nodeName, HFSPLUS_MAX_STRLEN,
str->name, str->len);
hfsplus: fix longname handling Longname is not correctly handled by hfsplus driver. If an attempt to create a longname(>255) file/directory is made, it succeeds by creating a file/directory with HFSPLUS_MAX_STRLEN and incorrect catalog key. Thus leaving the volume in an inconsistent state. This patch fixes this issue. Although lookup is always called first to create a negative entry, so just doing a check in lookup would probably fix this issue. I choose to propagate error to other iops as well. Please NOTE: I have factored out hfsplus_cat_build_key_with_cnid from hfsplus_cat_build_key, to avoid unncessary branching. Thanks a lot. TEST: ------ dir="TEST_DIR" cdir=`pwd` name255="_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234" name256="${name255}5" mkdir $dir cd $dir touch $name255 rm -f $name255 touch $name256 ls -la cd $cdir rm -rf $dir RESULT: ------- [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ cdir=`pwd` [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ name255="_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234" [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ name256="${name255}5" [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ mkdir $dir [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ cd $dir [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ touch $name255 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ rm -f $name255 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ touch $name256 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ ls -la ls: cannot access _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234: No such file or directory total 0 drwxrwxr-x 1 sougata sougata 3 Feb 20 19:56 . drwxrwxrwx 1 root root 6 Feb 20 19:56 .. -????????? ? ? ? ? ? _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ cd $cdir [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ rm -rf $dir rm: cannot remove `TEST_DIR': Directory not empty -ENAMETOOLONG returned from hfsplus_asc2uni was not propaged to iops. This allowed hfsplus to create files/directories with HFSPLUS_MAX_STRLEN and incorrect keys, leaving the FS in an inconsistent state. This patch fixes this issue. Signed-off-by: Sougata Santra <sougata@tuxera.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Vyacheslav Dubeyko <slava@dubeyko.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2014-12-19 03:17:12 +03:00
if (unlikely(err < 0))
return err;
return 10 + be16_to_cpu(entry->thread.nodeName.length) * 2;
}
/* Try to get a catalog entry for given catalog id */
int hfsplus_find_cat(struct super_block *sb, u32 cnid,
struct hfs_find_data *fd)
{
hfsplus_cat_entry tmp;
int err;
u16 type;
hfsplus: fix longname handling Longname is not correctly handled by hfsplus driver. If an attempt to create a longname(>255) file/directory is made, it succeeds by creating a file/directory with HFSPLUS_MAX_STRLEN and incorrect catalog key. Thus leaving the volume in an inconsistent state. This patch fixes this issue. Although lookup is always called first to create a negative entry, so just doing a check in lookup would probably fix this issue. I choose to propagate error to other iops as well. Please NOTE: I have factored out hfsplus_cat_build_key_with_cnid from hfsplus_cat_build_key, to avoid unncessary branching. Thanks a lot. TEST: ------ dir="TEST_DIR" cdir=`pwd` name255="_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234" name256="${name255}5" mkdir $dir cd $dir touch $name255 rm -f $name255 touch $name256 ls -la cd $cdir rm -rf $dir RESULT: ------- [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ cdir=`pwd` [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ name255="_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234" [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ name256="${name255}5" [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ mkdir $dir [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ cd $dir [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ touch $name255 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ rm -f $name255 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ touch $name256 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ ls -la ls: cannot access _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234: No such file or directory total 0 drwxrwxr-x 1 sougata sougata 3 Feb 20 19:56 . drwxrwxrwx 1 root root 6 Feb 20 19:56 .. -????????? ? ? ? ? ? _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ cd $cdir [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ rm -rf $dir rm: cannot remove `TEST_DIR': Directory not empty -ENAMETOOLONG returned from hfsplus_asc2uni was not propaged to iops. This allowed hfsplus to create files/directories with HFSPLUS_MAX_STRLEN and incorrect keys, leaving the FS in an inconsistent state. This patch fixes this issue. Signed-off-by: Sougata Santra <sougata@tuxera.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Vyacheslav Dubeyko <slava@dubeyko.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2014-12-19 03:17:12 +03:00
hfsplus_cat_build_key_with_cnid(sb, fd->search_key, cnid);
err = hfs_brec_read(fd, &tmp, sizeof(hfsplus_cat_entry));
if (err)
return err;
type = be16_to_cpu(tmp.type);
if (type != HFSPLUS_FOLDER_THREAD && type != HFSPLUS_FILE_THREAD) {
pr_err("found bad thread record in catalog\n");
return -EIO;
}
hfsplus: fix Buffer overflow with a corrupted image When an hfsplus image gets corrupted it might happen that the catalog namelength field gets b0rked. If we mount such an image the memcpy() in hfsplus_cat_build_key_uni() writes more than the 255 that fit in the name field. Depending on the size of the overwritten data, we either only get memory corruption or also trigger an oops like this: [ 221.628020] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at c82b0000 [ 221.629066] IP: [<c022d4b1>] hfsplus_find_cat+0x10d/0x151 [ 221.629066] *pde = 0ea29163 *pte = 082b0160 [ 221.629066] Oops: 0002 [#1] PREEMPT DEBUG_PAGEALLOC [ 221.629066] Modules linked in: [ 221.629066] [ 221.629066] Pid: 4845, comm: mount Not tainted (2.6.27-rc4-00123-gd3ee1b4-dirty #28) [ 221.629066] EIP: 0060:[<c022d4b1>] EFLAGS: 00010206 CPU: 0 [ 221.629066] EIP is at hfsplus_find_cat+0x10d/0x151 [ 221.629066] EAX: 00000029 EBX: 00016210 ECX: 000042c2 EDX: 00000002 [ 221.629066] ESI: c82d70ca EDI: c82b0000 EBP: c82d1bcc ESP: c82d199c [ 221.629066] DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 0000 GS: 0033 SS: 0068 [ 221.629066] Process mount (pid: 4845, ti=c82d1000 task=c8224060 task.ti=c82d1000) [ 221.629066] Stack: c080b3c4 c82aa8f8 c82d19c2 00016210 c080b3be c82d1bd4 c82aa8f0 00000300 [ 221.629066] 01000000 750008b1 74006e00 74006900 65006c00 c82d6400 c013bd35 c8224060 [ 221.629066] 00000036 00000046 c82d19f0 00000082 c8224548 c8224060 00000036 c0d653cc [ 221.629066] Call Trace: [ 221.629066] [<c013bd35>] ? trace_hardirqs_off+0xb/0xd [ 221.629066] [<c013bca3>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x14/0x9b [ 221.629066] [<c013bd35>] ? trace_hardirqs_off+0xb/0xd [ 221.629066] [<c013bca3>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x14/0x9b [ 221.629066] [<c013bd35>] ? trace_hardirqs_off+0xb/0xd [ 221.629066] [<c0107aa3>] ? native_sched_clock+0x82/0x96 [ 221.629066] [<c01302d2>] ? __kernel_text_address+0x1b/0x27 [ 221.629066] [<c010487a>] ? dump_trace+0xca/0xd6 [ 221.629066] [<c0109e32>] ? save_stack_address+0x0/0x2c [ 221.629066] [<c0109eaf>] ? save_stack_trace+0x1c/0x3a [ 221.629066] [<c013b571>] ? save_trace+0x37/0x8d [ 221.629066] [<c013b62e>] ? add_lock_to_list+0x67/0x8d [ 221.629066] [<c013ea1c>] ? validate_chain+0x8a4/0x9f4 [ 221.629066] [<c013553d>] ? down+0xc/0x2f [ 221.629066] [<c013f1f6>] ? __lock_acquire+0x68a/0x6e0 [ 221.629066] [<c013bd35>] ? trace_hardirqs_off+0xb/0xd [ 221.629066] [<c013bca3>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x14/0x9b [ 221.629066] [<c013bd35>] ? trace_hardirqs_off+0xb/0xd [ 221.629066] [<c0107aa3>] ? native_sched_clock+0x82/0x96 [ 221.629066] [<c013da5d>] ? mark_held_locks+0x43/0x5a [ 221.629066] [<c013dc3a>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xb/0xd [ 221.629066] [<c013dbf4>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0xf4/0x12f [ 221.629066] [<c06abec8>] ? _spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x42/0x58 [ 221.629066] [<c013555c>] ? down+0x2b/0x2f [ 221.629066] [<c022aa68>] ? hfsplus_iget+0xa0/0x154 [ 221.629066] [<c022b0b9>] ? hfsplus_fill_super+0x280/0x447 [ 221.629066] [<c0107aa3>] ? native_sched_clock+0x82/0x96 [ 221.629066] [<c013bca3>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x14/0x9b [ 221.629066] [<c013bca3>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x14/0x9b [ 221.629066] [<c013f1f6>] ? __lock_acquire+0x68a/0x6e0 [ 221.629066] [<c041c9e4>] ? string+0x2b/0x74 [ 221.629066] [<c041cd16>] ? vsnprintf+0x2e9/0x512 [ 221.629066] [<c010487a>] ? dump_trace+0xca/0xd6 [ 221.629066] [<c0109eaf>] ? save_stack_trace+0x1c/0x3a [ 221.629066] [<c0109eaf>] ? save_stack_trace+0x1c/0x3a [ 221.629066] [<c013b571>] ? save_trace+0x37/0x8d [ 221.629066] [<c013b62e>] ? add_lock_to_list+0x67/0x8d [ 221.629066] [<c013ea1c>] ? validate_chain+0x8a4/0x9f4 [ 221.629066] [<c01354d3>] ? up+0xc/0x2f [ 221.629066] [<c013f1f6>] ? __lock_acquire+0x68a/0x6e0 [ 221.629066] [<c013bd35>] ? trace_hardirqs_off+0xb/0xd [ 221.629066] [<c013bca3>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x14/0x9b [ 221.629066] [<c013bd35>] ? trace_hardirqs_off+0xb/0xd [ 221.629066] [<c0107aa3>] ? native_sched_clock+0x82/0x96 [ 221.629066] [<c041cfb7>] ? snprintf+0x1b/0x1d [ 221.629066] [<c01ba466>] ? disk_name+0x25/0x67 [ 221.629066] [<c0183960>] ? get_sb_bdev+0xcd/0x10b [ 221.629066] [<c016ad92>] ? kstrdup+0x2a/0x4c [ 221.629066] [<c022a7b3>] ? hfsplus_get_sb+0x13/0x15 [ 221.629066] [<c022ae39>] ? hfsplus_fill_super+0x0/0x447 [ 221.629066] [<c0183583>] ? vfs_kern_mount+0x3b/0x76 [ 221.629066] [<c0183602>] ? do_kern_mount+0x32/0xba [ 221.629066] [<c01960d4>] ? do_new_mount+0x46/0x74 [ 221.629066] [<c0196277>] ? do_mount+0x175/0x193 [ 221.629066] [<c013dbf4>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0xf4/0x12f [ 221.629066] [<c01663b2>] ? __get_free_pages+0x1e/0x24 [ 221.629066] [<c06ac07b>] ? lock_kernel+0x19/0x8c [ 221.629066] [<c01962e6>] ? sys_mount+0x51/0x9b [ 221.629066] [<c01962f9>] ? sys_mount+0x64/0x9b [ 221.629066] [<c01038bd>] ? sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x31 [ 221.629066] ======================= [ 221.629066] Code: 89 c2 c1 e2 08 c1 e8 08 09 c2 8b 85 e8 fd ff ff 66 89 50 06 89 c7 53 83 c7 08 56 57 68 c4 b3 80 c0 e8 8c 5c ef ff 89 d9 c1 e9 02 <f3> a5 89 d9 83 e1 03 74 02 f3 a4 83 c3 06 8b 95 e8 fd ff ff 0f [ 221.629066] EIP: [<c022d4b1>] hfsplus_find_cat+0x10d/0x151 SS:ESP 0068:c82d199c [ 221.629066] ---[ end trace e417a1d67f0d0066 ]--- Since hfsplus_cat_build_key_uni() returns void and only has one callsite, the check is performed at the callsite. Signed-off-by: Eric Sesterhenn <snakebyte@gmx.de> Reviewed-by: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi> Cc: Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-10-16 09:04:08 +04:00
if (be16_to_cpu(tmp.thread.nodeName.length) > 255) {
pr_err("catalog name length corrupted\n");
hfsplus: fix Buffer overflow with a corrupted image When an hfsplus image gets corrupted it might happen that the catalog namelength field gets b0rked. If we mount such an image the memcpy() in hfsplus_cat_build_key_uni() writes more than the 255 that fit in the name field. Depending on the size of the overwritten data, we either only get memory corruption or also trigger an oops like this: [ 221.628020] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at c82b0000 [ 221.629066] IP: [<c022d4b1>] hfsplus_find_cat+0x10d/0x151 [ 221.629066] *pde = 0ea29163 *pte = 082b0160 [ 221.629066] Oops: 0002 [#1] PREEMPT DEBUG_PAGEALLOC [ 221.629066] Modules linked in: [ 221.629066] [ 221.629066] Pid: 4845, comm: mount Not tainted (2.6.27-rc4-00123-gd3ee1b4-dirty #28) [ 221.629066] EIP: 0060:[<c022d4b1>] EFLAGS: 00010206 CPU: 0 [ 221.629066] EIP is at hfsplus_find_cat+0x10d/0x151 [ 221.629066] EAX: 00000029 EBX: 00016210 ECX: 000042c2 EDX: 00000002 [ 221.629066] ESI: c82d70ca EDI: c82b0000 EBP: c82d1bcc ESP: c82d199c [ 221.629066] DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 0000 GS: 0033 SS: 0068 [ 221.629066] Process mount (pid: 4845, ti=c82d1000 task=c8224060 task.ti=c82d1000) [ 221.629066] Stack: c080b3c4 c82aa8f8 c82d19c2 00016210 c080b3be c82d1bd4 c82aa8f0 00000300 [ 221.629066] 01000000 750008b1 74006e00 74006900 65006c00 c82d6400 c013bd35 c8224060 [ 221.629066] 00000036 00000046 c82d19f0 00000082 c8224548 c8224060 00000036 c0d653cc [ 221.629066] Call Trace: [ 221.629066] [<c013bd35>] ? trace_hardirqs_off+0xb/0xd [ 221.629066] [<c013bca3>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x14/0x9b [ 221.629066] [<c013bd35>] ? trace_hardirqs_off+0xb/0xd [ 221.629066] [<c013bca3>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x14/0x9b [ 221.629066] [<c013bd35>] ? trace_hardirqs_off+0xb/0xd [ 221.629066] [<c0107aa3>] ? native_sched_clock+0x82/0x96 [ 221.629066] [<c01302d2>] ? __kernel_text_address+0x1b/0x27 [ 221.629066] [<c010487a>] ? dump_trace+0xca/0xd6 [ 221.629066] [<c0109e32>] ? save_stack_address+0x0/0x2c [ 221.629066] [<c0109eaf>] ? save_stack_trace+0x1c/0x3a [ 221.629066] [<c013b571>] ? save_trace+0x37/0x8d [ 221.629066] [<c013b62e>] ? add_lock_to_list+0x67/0x8d [ 221.629066] [<c013ea1c>] ? validate_chain+0x8a4/0x9f4 [ 221.629066] [<c013553d>] ? down+0xc/0x2f [ 221.629066] [<c013f1f6>] ? __lock_acquire+0x68a/0x6e0 [ 221.629066] [<c013bd35>] ? trace_hardirqs_off+0xb/0xd [ 221.629066] [<c013bca3>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x14/0x9b [ 221.629066] [<c013bd35>] ? trace_hardirqs_off+0xb/0xd [ 221.629066] [<c0107aa3>] ? native_sched_clock+0x82/0x96 [ 221.629066] [<c013da5d>] ? mark_held_locks+0x43/0x5a [ 221.629066] [<c013dc3a>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xb/0xd [ 221.629066] [<c013dbf4>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0xf4/0x12f [ 221.629066] [<c06abec8>] ? _spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x42/0x58 [ 221.629066] [<c013555c>] ? down+0x2b/0x2f [ 221.629066] [<c022aa68>] ? hfsplus_iget+0xa0/0x154 [ 221.629066] [<c022b0b9>] ? hfsplus_fill_super+0x280/0x447 [ 221.629066] [<c0107aa3>] ? native_sched_clock+0x82/0x96 [ 221.629066] [<c013bca3>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x14/0x9b [ 221.629066] [<c013bca3>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x14/0x9b [ 221.629066] [<c013f1f6>] ? __lock_acquire+0x68a/0x6e0 [ 221.629066] [<c041c9e4>] ? string+0x2b/0x74 [ 221.629066] [<c041cd16>] ? vsnprintf+0x2e9/0x512 [ 221.629066] [<c010487a>] ? dump_trace+0xca/0xd6 [ 221.629066] [<c0109eaf>] ? save_stack_trace+0x1c/0x3a [ 221.629066] [<c0109eaf>] ? save_stack_trace+0x1c/0x3a [ 221.629066] [<c013b571>] ? save_trace+0x37/0x8d [ 221.629066] [<c013b62e>] ? add_lock_to_list+0x67/0x8d [ 221.629066] [<c013ea1c>] ? validate_chain+0x8a4/0x9f4 [ 221.629066] [<c01354d3>] ? up+0xc/0x2f [ 221.629066] [<c013f1f6>] ? __lock_acquire+0x68a/0x6e0 [ 221.629066] [<c013bd35>] ? trace_hardirqs_off+0xb/0xd [ 221.629066] [<c013bca3>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x14/0x9b [ 221.629066] [<c013bd35>] ? trace_hardirqs_off+0xb/0xd [ 221.629066] [<c0107aa3>] ? native_sched_clock+0x82/0x96 [ 221.629066] [<c041cfb7>] ? snprintf+0x1b/0x1d [ 221.629066] [<c01ba466>] ? disk_name+0x25/0x67 [ 221.629066] [<c0183960>] ? get_sb_bdev+0xcd/0x10b [ 221.629066] [<c016ad92>] ? kstrdup+0x2a/0x4c [ 221.629066] [<c022a7b3>] ? hfsplus_get_sb+0x13/0x15 [ 221.629066] [<c022ae39>] ? hfsplus_fill_super+0x0/0x447 [ 221.629066] [<c0183583>] ? vfs_kern_mount+0x3b/0x76 [ 221.629066] [<c0183602>] ? do_kern_mount+0x32/0xba [ 221.629066] [<c01960d4>] ? do_new_mount+0x46/0x74 [ 221.629066] [<c0196277>] ? do_mount+0x175/0x193 [ 221.629066] [<c013dbf4>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0xf4/0x12f [ 221.629066] [<c01663b2>] ? __get_free_pages+0x1e/0x24 [ 221.629066] [<c06ac07b>] ? lock_kernel+0x19/0x8c [ 221.629066] [<c01962e6>] ? sys_mount+0x51/0x9b [ 221.629066] [<c01962f9>] ? sys_mount+0x64/0x9b [ 221.629066] [<c01038bd>] ? sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x31 [ 221.629066] ======================= [ 221.629066] Code: 89 c2 c1 e2 08 c1 e8 08 09 c2 8b 85 e8 fd ff ff 66 89 50 06 89 c7 53 83 c7 08 56 57 68 c4 b3 80 c0 e8 8c 5c ef ff 89 d9 c1 e9 02 <f3> a5 89 d9 83 e1 03 74 02 f3 a4 83 c3 06 8b 95 e8 fd ff ff 0f [ 221.629066] EIP: [<c022d4b1>] hfsplus_find_cat+0x10d/0x151 SS:ESP 0068:c82d199c [ 221.629066] ---[ end trace e417a1d67f0d0066 ]--- Since hfsplus_cat_build_key_uni() returns void and only has one callsite, the check is performed at the callsite. Signed-off-by: Eric Sesterhenn <snakebyte@gmx.de> Reviewed-by: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi> Cc: Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-10-16 09:04:08 +04:00
return -EIO;
}
hfsplus_cat_build_key_uni(fd->search_key,
be32_to_cpu(tmp.thread.parentID),
&tmp.thread.nodeName);
return hfs_brec_find(fd, hfs_find_rec_by_key);
}
static void hfsplus_subfolders_inc(struct inode *dir)
{
struct hfsplus_sb_info *sbi = HFSPLUS_SB(dir->i_sb);
if (test_bit(HFSPLUS_SB_HFSX, &sbi->flags)) {
/*
* Increment subfolder count. Note, the value is only meaningful
* for folders with HFSPLUS_HAS_FOLDER_COUNT flag set.
*/
HFSPLUS_I(dir)->subfolders++;
}
}
static void hfsplus_subfolders_dec(struct inode *dir)
{
struct hfsplus_sb_info *sbi = HFSPLUS_SB(dir->i_sb);
if (test_bit(HFSPLUS_SB_HFSX, &sbi->flags)) {
/*
* Decrement subfolder count. Note, the value is only meaningful
* for folders with HFSPLUS_HAS_FOLDER_COUNT flag set.
*
* Check for zero. Some subfolders may have been created
* by an implementation ignorant of this counter.
*/
if (HFSPLUS_I(dir)->subfolders)
HFSPLUS_I(dir)->subfolders--;
}
}
int hfsplus_create_cat(u32 cnid, struct inode *dir,
struct qstr *str, struct inode *inode)
{
struct super_block *sb = dir->i_sb;
struct hfs_find_data fd;
hfsplus_cat_entry entry;
int entry_size;
int err;
hfs_dbg(CAT_MOD, "create_cat: %s,%u(%d)\n",
str->name, cnid, inode->i_nlink);
err = hfs_find_init(HFSPLUS_SB(sb)->cat_tree, &fd);
if (err)
return err;
hfsplus: fix longname handling Longname is not correctly handled by hfsplus driver. If an attempt to create a longname(>255) file/directory is made, it succeeds by creating a file/directory with HFSPLUS_MAX_STRLEN and incorrect catalog key. Thus leaving the volume in an inconsistent state. This patch fixes this issue. Although lookup is always called first to create a negative entry, so just doing a check in lookup would probably fix this issue. I choose to propagate error to other iops as well. Please NOTE: I have factored out hfsplus_cat_build_key_with_cnid from hfsplus_cat_build_key, to avoid unncessary branching. Thanks a lot. TEST: ------ dir="TEST_DIR" cdir=`pwd` name255="_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234" name256="${name255}5" mkdir $dir cd $dir touch $name255 rm -f $name255 touch $name256 ls -la cd $cdir rm -rf $dir RESULT: ------- [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ cdir=`pwd` [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ name255="_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234" [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ name256="${name255}5" [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ mkdir $dir [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ cd $dir [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ touch $name255 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ rm -f $name255 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ touch $name256 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ ls -la ls: cannot access _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234: No such file or directory total 0 drwxrwxr-x 1 sougata sougata 3 Feb 20 19:56 . drwxrwxrwx 1 root root 6 Feb 20 19:56 .. -????????? ? ? ? ? ? _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ cd $cdir [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ rm -rf $dir rm: cannot remove `TEST_DIR': Directory not empty -ENAMETOOLONG returned from hfsplus_asc2uni was not propaged to iops. This allowed hfsplus to create files/directories with HFSPLUS_MAX_STRLEN and incorrect keys, leaving the FS in an inconsistent state. This patch fixes this issue. Signed-off-by: Sougata Santra <sougata@tuxera.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Vyacheslav Dubeyko <slava@dubeyko.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2014-12-19 03:17:12 +03:00
hfsplus_cat_build_key_with_cnid(sb, fd.search_key, cnid);
entry_size = hfsplus_fill_cat_thread(sb, &entry,
S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode) ?
HFSPLUS_FOLDER_THREAD : HFSPLUS_FILE_THREAD,
dir->i_ino, str);
hfsplus: fix longname handling Longname is not correctly handled by hfsplus driver. If an attempt to create a longname(>255) file/directory is made, it succeeds by creating a file/directory with HFSPLUS_MAX_STRLEN and incorrect catalog key. Thus leaving the volume in an inconsistent state. This patch fixes this issue. Although lookup is always called first to create a negative entry, so just doing a check in lookup would probably fix this issue. I choose to propagate error to other iops as well. Please NOTE: I have factored out hfsplus_cat_build_key_with_cnid from hfsplus_cat_build_key, to avoid unncessary branching. Thanks a lot. TEST: ------ dir="TEST_DIR" cdir=`pwd` name255="_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234" name256="${name255}5" mkdir $dir cd $dir touch $name255 rm -f $name255 touch $name256 ls -la cd $cdir rm -rf $dir RESULT: ------- [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ cdir=`pwd` [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ name255="_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234" [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ name256="${name255}5" [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ mkdir $dir [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ cd $dir [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ touch $name255 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ rm -f $name255 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ touch $name256 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ ls -la ls: cannot access _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234: No such file or directory total 0 drwxrwxr-x 1 sougata sougata 3 Feb 20 19:56 . drwxrwxrwx 1 root root 6 Feb 20 19:56 .. -????????? ? ? ? ? ? _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ cd $cdir [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ rm -rf $dir rm: cannot remove `TEST_DIR': Directory not empty -ENAMETOOLONG returned from hfsplus_asc2uni was not propaged to iops. This allowed hfsplus to create files/directories with HFSPLUS_MAX_STRLEN and incorrect keys, leaving the FS in an inconsistent state. This patch fixes this issue. Signed-off-by: Sougata Santra <sougata@tuxera.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Vyacheslav Dubeyko <slava@dubeyko.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2014-12-19 03:17:12 +03:00
if (unlikely(entry_size < 0)) {
err = entry_size;
goto err2;
}
err = hfs_brec_find(&fd, hfs_find_rec_by_key);
if (err != -ENOENT) {
if (!err)
err = -EEXIST;
goto err2;
}
err = hfs_brec_insert(&fd, &entry, entry_size);
if (err)
goto err2;
hfsplus: fix longname handling Longname is not correctly handled by hfsplus driver. If an attempt to create a longname(>255) file/directory is made, it succeeds by creating a file/directory with HFSPLUS_MAX_STRLEN and incorrect catalog key. Thus leaving the volume in an inconsistent state. This patch fixes this issue. Although lookup is always called first to create a negative entry, so just doing a check in lookup would probably fix this issue. I choose to propagate error to other iops as well. Please NOTE: I have factored out hfsplus_cat_build_key_with_cnid from hfsplus_cat_build_key, to avoid unncessary branching. Thanks a lot. TEST: ------ dir="TEST_DIR" cdir=`pwd` name255="_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234" name256="${name255}5" mkdir $dir cd $dir touch $name255 rm -f $name255 touch $name256 ls -la cd $cdir rm -rf $dir RESULT: ------- [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ cdir=`pwd` [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ name255="_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234" [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ name256="${name255}5" [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ mkdir $dir [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ cd $dir [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ touch $name255 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ rm -f $name255 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ touch $name256 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ ls -la ls: cannot access _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234: No such file or directory total 0 drwxrwxr-x 1 sougata sougata 3 Feb 20 19:56 . drwxrwxrwx 1 root root 6 Feb 20 19:56 .. -????????? ? ? ? ? ? _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ cd $cdir [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ rm -rf $dir rm: cannot remove `TEST_DIR': Directory not empty -ENAMETOOLONG returned from hfsplus_asc2uni was not propaged to iops. This allowed hfsplus to create files/directories with HFSPLUS_MAX_STRLEN and incorrect keys, leaving the FS in an inconsistent state. This patch fixes this issue. Signed-off-by: Sougata Santra <sougata@tuxera.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Vyacheslav Dubeyko <slava@dubeyko.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2014-12-19 03:17:12 +03:00
err = hfsplus_cat_build_key(sb, fd.search_key, dir->i_ino, str);
if (unlikely(err))
goto err1;
entry_size = hfsplus_cat_build_record(&entry, cnid, inode);
err = hfs_brec_find(&fd, hfs_find_rec_by_key);
if (err != -ENOENT) {
/* panic? */
if (!err)
err = -EEXIST;
goto err1;
}
err = hfs_brec_insert(&fd, &entry, entry_size);
if (err)
goto err1;
dir->i_size++;
if (S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode))
hfsplus_subfolders_inc(dir);
dir->i_mtime = dir->i_ctime = CURRENT_TIME_SEC;
hfsplus_mark_inode_dirty(dir, HFSPLUS_I_CAT_DIRTY);
hfs_find_exit(&fd);
return 0;
err1:
hfsplus: fix longname handling Longname is not correctly handled by hfsplus driver. If an attempt to create a longname(>255) file/directory is made, it succeeds by creating a file/directory with HFSPLUS_MAX_STRLEN and incorrect catalog key. Thus leaving the volume in an inconsistent state. This patch fixes this issue. Although lookup is always called first to create a negative entry, so just doing a check in lookup would probably fix this issue. I choose to propagate error to other iops as well. Please NOTE: I have factored out hfsplus_cat_build_key_with_cnid from hfsplus_cat_build_key, to avoid unncessary branching. Thanks a lot. TEST: ------ dir="TEST_DIR" cdir=`pwd` name255="_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234" name256="${name255}5" mkdir $dir cd $dir touch $name255 rm -f $name255 touch $name256 ls -la cd $cdir rm -rf $dir RESULT: ------- [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ cdir=`pwd` [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ name255="_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234" [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ name256="${name255}5" [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ mkdir $dir [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ cd $dir [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ touch $name255 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ rm -f $name255 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ touch $name256 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ ls -la ls: cannot access _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234: No such file or directory total 0 drwxrwxr-x 1 sougata sougata 3 Feb 20 19:56 . drwxrwxrwx 1 root root 6 Feb 20 19:56 .. -????????? ? ? ? ? ? _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ cd $cdir [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ rm -rf $dir rm: cannot remove `TEST_DIR': Directory not empty -ENAMETOOLONG returned from hfsplus_asc2uni was not propaged to iops. This allowed hfsplus to create files/directories with HFSPLUS_MAX_STRLEN and incorrect keys, leaving the FS in an inconsistent state. This patch fixes this issue. Signed-off-by: Sougata Santra <sougata@tuxera.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Vyacheslav Dubeyko <slava@dubeyko.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2014-12-19 03:17:12 +03:00
hfsplus_cat_build_key_with_cnid(sb, fd.search_key, cnid);
if (!hfs_brec_find(&fd, hfs_find_rec_by_key))
hfs_brec_remove(&fd);
err2:
hfs_find_exit(&fd);
return err;
}
int hfsplus_delete_cat(u32 cnid, struct inode *dir, struct qstr *str)
{
struct super_block *sb = dir->i_sb;
struct hfs_find_data fd;
struct hfsplus_fork_raw fork;
struct list_head *pos;
int err, off;
u16 type;
hfs_dbg(CAT_MOD, "delete_cat: %s,%u\n", str ? str->name : NULL, cnid);
err = hfs_find_init(HFSPLUS_SB(sb)->cat_tree, &fd);
if (err)
return err;
if (!str) {
int len;
hfsplus: fix longname handling Longname is not correctly handled by hfsplus driver. If an attempt to create a longname(>255) file/directory is made, it succeeds by creating a file/directory with HFSPLUS_MAX_STRLEN and incorrect catalog key. Thus leaving the volume in an inconsistent state. This patch fixes this issue. Although lookup is always called first to create a negative entry, so just doing a check in lookup would probably fix this issue. I choose to propagate error to other iops as well. Please NOTE: I have factored out hfsplus_cat_build_key_with_cnid from hfsplus_cat_build_key, to avoid unncessary branching. Thanks a lot. TEST: ------ dir="TEST_DIR" cdir=`pwd` name255="_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234" name256="${name255}5" mkdir $dir cd $dir touch $name255 rm -f $name255 touch $name256 ls -la cd $cdir rm -rf $dir RESULT: ------- [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ cdir=`pwd` [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ name255="_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234" [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ name256="${name255}5" [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ mkdir $dir [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ cd $dir [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ touch $name255 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ rm -f $name255 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ touch $name256 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ ls -la ls: cannot access _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234: No such file or directory total 0 drwxrwxr-x 1 sougata sougata 3 Feb 20 19:56 . drwxrwxrwx 1 root root 6 Feb 20 19:56 .. -????????? ? ? ? ? ? _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ cd $cdir [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ rm -rf $dir rm: cannot remove `TEST_DIR': Directory not empty -ENAMETOOLONG returned from hfsplus_asc2uni was not propaged to iops. This allowed hfsplus to create files/directories with HFSPLUS_MAX_STRLEN and incorrect keys, leaving the FS in an inconsistent state. This patch fixes this issue. Signed-off-by: Sougata Santra <sougata@tuxera.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Vyacheslav Dubeyko <slava@dubeyko.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2014-12-19 03:17:12 +03:00
hfsplus_cat_build_key_with_cnid(sb, fd.search_key, cnid);
err = hfs_brec_find(&fd, hfs_find_rec_by_key);
if (err)
goto out;
off = fd.entryoffset +
offsetof(struct hfsplus_cat_thread, nodeName);
fd.search_key->cat.parent = cpu_to_be32(dir->i_ino);
hfs_bnode_read(fd.bnode,
&fd.search_key->cat.name.length, off, 2);
len = be16_to_cpu(fd.search_key->cat.name.length) * 2;
hfs_bnode_read(fd.bnode,
&fd.search_key->cat.name.unicode,
off + 2, len);
fd.search_key->key_len = cpu_to_be16(6 + len);
} else
hfsplus: fix longname handling Longname is not correctly handled by hfsplus driver. If an attempt to create a longname(>255) file/directory is made, it succeeds by creating a file/directory with HFSPLUS_MAX_STRLEN and incorrect catalog key. Thus leaving the volume in an inconsistent state. This patch fixes this issue. Although lookup is always called first to create a negative entry, so just doing a check in lookup would probably fix this issue. I choose to propagate error to other iops as well. Please NOTE: I have factored out hfsplus_cat_build_key_with_cnid from hfsplus_cat_build_key, to avoid unncessary branching. Thanks a lot. TEST: ------ dir="TEST_DIR" cdir=`pwd` name255="_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234" name256="${name255}5" mkdir $dir cd $dir touch $name255 rm -f $name255 touch $name256 ls -la cd $cdir rm -rf $dir RESULT: ------- [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ cdir=`pwd` [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ name255="_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234" [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ name256="${name255}5" [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ mkdir $dir [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ cd $dir [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ touch $name255 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ rm -f $name255 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ touch $name256 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ ls -la ls: cannot access _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234: No such file or directory total 0 drwxrwxr-x 1 sougata sougata 3 Feb 20 19:56 . drwxrwxrwx 1 root root 6 Feb 20 19:56 .. -????????? ? ? ? ? ? _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ cd $cdir [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ rm -rf $dir rm: cannot remove `TEST_DIR': Directory not empty -ENAMETOOLONG returned from hfsplus_asc2uni was not propaged to iops. This allowed hfsplus to create files/directories with HFSPLUS_MAX_STRLEN and incorrect keys, leaving the FS in an inconsistent state. This patch fixes this issue. Signed-off-by: Sougata Santra <sougata@tuxera.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Vyacheslav Dubeyko <slava@dubeyko.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2014-12-19 03:17:12 +03:00
err = hfsplus_cat_build_key(sb, fd.search_key, dir->i_ino, str);
if (unlikely(err))
goto out;
err = hfs_brec_find(&fd, hfs_find_rec_by_key);
if (err)
goto out;
type = hfs_bnode_read_u16(fd.bnode, fd.entryoffset);
if (type == HFSPLUS_FILE) {
#if 0
off = fd.entryoffset + offsetof(hfsplus_cat_file, data_fork);
hfs_bnode_read(fd.bnode, &fork, off, sizeof(fork));
hfsplus_free_fork(sb, cnid, &fork, HFSPLUS_TYPE_DATA);
#endif
off = fd.entryoffset +
offsetof(struct hfsplus_cat_file, rsrc_fork);
hfs_bnode_read(fd.bnode, &fork, off, sizeof(fork));
hfsplus_free_fork(sb, cnid, &fork, HFSPLUS_TYPE_RSRC);
}
list_for_each(pos, &HFSPLUS_I(dir)->open_dir_list) {
struct hfsplus_readdir_data *rd =
list_entry(pos, struct hfsplus_readdir_data, list);
if (fd.tree->keycmp(fd.search_key, (void *)&rd->key) < 0)
rd->file->f_pos--;
}
err = hfs_brec_remove(&fd);
if (err)
goto out;
hfsplus: fix longname handling Longname is not correctly handled by hfsplus driver. If an attempt to create a longname(>255) file/directory is made, it succeeds by creating a file/directory with HFSPLUS_MAX_STRLEN and incorrect catalog key. Thus leaving the volume in an inconsistent state. This patch fixes this issue. Although lookup is always called first to create a negative entry, so just doing a check in lookup would probably fix this issue. I choose to propagate error to other iops as well. Please NOTE: I have factored out hfsplus_cat_build_key_with_cnid from hfsplus_cat_build_key, to avoid unncessary branching. Thanks a lot. TEST: ------ dir="TEST_DIR" cdir=`pwd` name255="_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234" name256="${name255}5" mkdir $dir cd $dir touch $name255 rm -f $name255 touch $name256 ls -la cd $cdir rm -rf $dir RESULT: ------- [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ cdir=`pwd` [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ name255="_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234" [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ name256="${name255}5" [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ mkdir $dir [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ cd $dir [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ touch $name255 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ rm -f $name255 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ touch $name256 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ ls -la ls: cannot access _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234: No such file or directory total 0 drwxrwxr-x 1 sougata sougata 3 Feb 20 19:56 . drwxrwxrwx 1 root root 6 Feb 20 19:56 .. -????????? ? ? ? ? ? _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ cd $cdir [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ rm -rf $dir rm: cannot remove `TEST_DIR': Directory not empty -ENAMETOOLONG returned from hfsplus_asc2uni was not propaged to iops. This allowed hfsplus to create files/directories with HFSPLUS_MAX_STRLEN and incorrect keys, leaving the FS in an inconsistent state. This patch fixes this issue. Signed-off-by: Sougata Santra <sougata@tuxera.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Vyacheslav Dubeyko <slava@dubeyko.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2014-12-19 03:17:12 +03:00
hfsplus_cat_build_key_with_cnid(sb, fd.search_key, cnid);
err = hfs_brec_find(&fd, hfs_find_rec_by_key);
if (err)
goto out;
err = hfs_brec_remove(&fd);
if (err)
goto out;
dir->i_size--;
if (type == HFSPLUS_FOLDER)
hfsplus_subfolders_dec(dir);
dir->i_mtime = dir->i_ctime = CURRENT_TIME_SEC;
hfsplus_mark_inode_dirty(dir, HFSPLUS_I_CAT_DIRTY);
if (type == HFSPLUS_FILE || type == HFSPLUS_FOLDER) {
if (HFSPLUS_SB(sb)->attr_tree)
hfsplus_delete_all_attrs(dir, cnid);
}
out:
hfs_find_exit(&fd);
return err;
}
int hfsplus_rename_cat(u32 cnid,
struct inode *src_dir, struct qstr *src_name,
struct inode *dst_dir, struct qstr *dst_name)
{
struct super_block *sb = src_dir->i_sb;
struct hfs_find_data src_fd, dst_fd;
hfsplus_cat_entry entry;
int entry_size, type;
int err;
hfs_dbg(CAT_MOD, "rename_cat: %u - %lu,%s - %lu,%s\n",
cnid, src_dir->i_ino, src_name->name,
dst_dir->i_ino, dst_name->name);
err = hfs_find_init(HFSPLUS_SB(sb)->cat_tree, &src_fd);
if (err)
return err;
dst_fd = src_fd;
/* find the old dir entry and read the data */
hfsplus: fix longname handling Longname is not correctly handled by hfsplus driver. If an attempt to create a longname(>255) file/directory is made, it succeeds by creating a file/directory with HFSPLUS_MAX_STRLEN and incorrect catalog key. Thus leaving the volume in an inconsistent state. This patch fixes this issue. Although lookup is always called first to create a negative entry, so just doing a check in lookup would probably fix this issue. I choose to propagate error to other iops as well. Please NOTE: I have factored out hfsplus_cat_build_key_with_cnid from hfsplus_cat_build_key, to avoid unncessary branching. Thanks a lot. TEST: ------ dir="TEST_DIR" cdir=`pwd` name255="_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234" name256="${name255}5" mkdir $dir cd $dir touch $name255 rm -f $name255 touch $name256 ls -la cd $cdir rm -rf $dir RESULT: ------- [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ cdir=`pwd` [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ name255="_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234" [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ name256="${name255}5" [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ mkdir $dir [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ cd $dir [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ touch $name255 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ rm -f $name255 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ touch $name256 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ ls -la ls: cannot access _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234: No such file or directory total 0 drwxrwxr-x 1 sougata sougata 3 Feb 20 19:56 . drwxrwxrwx 1 root root 6 Feb 20 19:56 .. -????????? ? ? ? ? ? _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ cd $cdir [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ rm -rf $dir rm: cannot remove `TEST_DIR': Directory not empty -ENAMETOOLONG returned from hfsplus_asc2uni was not propaged to iops. This allowed hfsplus to create files/directories with HFSPLUS_MAX_STRLEN and incorrect keys, leaving the FS in an inconsistent state. This patch fixes this issue. Signed-off-by: Sougata Santra <sougata@tuxera.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Vyacheslav Dubeyko <slava@dubeyko.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2014-12-19 03:17:12 +03:00
err = hfsplus_cat_build_key(sb, src_fd.search_key,
src_dir->i_ino, src_name);
if (unlikely(err))
goto out;
err = hfs_brec_find(&src_fd, hfs_find_rec_by_key);
if (err)
goto out;
if (src_fd.entrylength > sizeof(entry) || src_fd.entrylength < 0) {
err = -EIO;
goto out;
}
hfs_bnode_read(src_fd.bnode, &entry, src_fd.entryoffset,
src_fd.entrylength);
type = be16_to_cpu(entry.type);
/* create new dir entry with the data from the old entry */
hfsplus: fix longname handling Longname is not correctly handled by hfsplus driver. If an attempt to create a longname(>255) file/directory is made, it succeeds by creating a file/directory with HFSPLUS_MAX_STRLEN and incorrect catalog key. Thus leaving the volume in an inconsistent state. This patch fixes this issue. Although lookup is always called first to create a negative entry, so just doing a check in lookup would probably fix this issue. I choose to propagate error to other iops as well. Please NOTE: I have factored out hfsplus_cat_build_key_with_cnid from hfsplus_cat_build_key, to avoid unncessary branching. Thanks a lot. TEST: ------ dir="TEST_DIR" cdir=`pwd` name255="_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234" name256="${name255}5" mkdir $dir cd $dir touch $name255 rm -f $name255 touch $name256 ls -la cd $cdir rm -rf $dir RESULT: ------- [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ cdir=`pwd` [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ name255="_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234" [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ name256="${name255}5" [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ mkdir $dir [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ cd $dir [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ touch $name255 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ rm -f $name255 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ touch $name256 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ ls -la ls: cannot access _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234: No such file or directory total 0 drwxrwxr-x 1 sougata sougata 3 Feb 20 19:56 . drwxrwxrwx 1 root root 6 Feb 20 19:56 .. -????????? ? ? ? ? ? _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ cd $cdir [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ rm -rf $dir rm: cannot remove `TEST_DIR': Directory not empty -ENAMETOOLONG returned from hfsplus_asc2uni was not propaged to iops. This allowed hfsplus to create files/directories with HFSPLUS_MAX_STRLEN and incorrect keys, leaving the FS in an inconsistent state. This patch fixes this issue. Signed-off-by: Sougata Santra <sougata@tuxera.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Vyacheslav Dubeyko <slava@dubeyko.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2014-12-19 03:17:12 +03:00
err = hfsplus_cat_build_key(sb, dst_fd.search_key,
dst_dir->i_ino, dst_name);
if (unlikely(err))
goto out;
err = hfs_brec_find(&dst_fd, hfs_find_rec_by_key);
if (err != -ENOENT) {
if (!err)
err = -EEXIST;
goto out;
}
err = hfs_brec_insert(&dst_fd, &entry, src_fd.entrylength);
if (err)
goto out;
dst_dir->i_size++;
if (type == HFSPLUS_FOLDER)
hfsplus_subfolders_inc(dst_dir);
dst_dir->i_mtime = dst_dir->i_ctime = CURRENT_TIME_SEC;
/* finally remove the old entry */
hfsplus: fix longname handling Longname is not correctly handled by hfsplus driver. If an attempt to create a longname(>255) file/directory is made, it succeeds by creating a file/directory with HFSPLUS_MAX_STRLEN and incorrect catalog key. Thus leaving the volume in an inconsistent state. This patch fixes this issue. Although lookup is always called first to create a negative entry, so just doing a check in lookup would probably fix this issue. I choose to propagate error to other iops as well. Please NOTE: I have factored out hfsplus_cat_build_key_with_cnid from hfsplus_cat_build_key, to avoid unncessary branching. Thanks a lot. TEST: ------ dir="TEST_DIR" cdir=`pwd` name255="_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234" name256="${name255}5" mkdir $dir cd $dir touch $name255 rm -f $name255 touch $name256 ls -la cd $cdir rm -rf $dir RESULT: ------- [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ cdir=`pwd` [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ name255="_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234" [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ name256="${name255}5" [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ mkdir $dir [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ cd $dir [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ touch $name255 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ rm -f $name255 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ touch $name256 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ ls -la ls: cannot access _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234: No such file or directory total 0 drwxrwxr-x 1 sougata sougata 3 Feb 20 19:56 . drwxrwxrwx 1 root root 6 Feb 20 19:56 .. -????????? ? ? ? ? ? _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ cd $cdir [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ rm -rf $dir rm: cannot remove `TEST_DIR': Directory not empty -ENAMETOOLONG returned from hfsplus_asc2uni was not propaged to iops. This allowed hfsplus to create files/directories with HFSPLUS_MAX_STRLEN and incorrect keys, leaving the FS in an inconsistent state. This patch fixes this issue. Signed-off-by: Sougata Santra <sougata@tuxera.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Vyacheslav Dubeyko <slava@dubeyko.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2014-12-19 03:17:12 +03:00
err = hfsplus_cat_build_key(sb, src_fd.search_key,
src_dir->i_ino, src_name);
if (unlikely(err))
goto out;
err = hfs_brec_find(&src_fd, hfs_find_rec_by_key);
if (err)
goto out;
err = hfs_brec_remove(&src_fd);
if (err)
goto out;
src_dir->i_size--;
if (type == HFSPLUS_FOLDER)
hfsplus_subfolders_dec(src_dir);
src_dir->i_mtime = src_dir->i_ctime = CURRENT_TIME_SEC;
/* remove old thread entry */
hfsplus: fix longname handling Longname is not correctly handled by hfsplus driver. If an attempt to create a longname(>255) file/directory is made, it succeeds by creating a file/directory with HFSPLUS_MAX_STRLEN and incorrect catalog key. Thus leaving the volume in an inconsistent state. This patch fixes this issue. Although lookup is always called first to create a negative entry, so just doing a check in lookup would probably fix this issue. I choose to propagate error to other iops as well. Please NOTE: I have factored out hfsplus_cat_build_key_with_cnid from hfsplus_cat_build_key, to avoid unncessary branching. Thanks a lot. TEST: ------ dir="TEST_DIR" cdir=`pwd` name255="_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234" name256="${name255}5" mkdir $dir cd $dir touch $name255 rm -f $name255 touch $name256 ls -la cd $cdir rm -rf $dir RESULT: ------- [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ cdir=`pwd` [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ name255="_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234" [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ name256="${name255}5" [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ mkdir $dir [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ cd $dir [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ touch $name255 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ rm -f $name255 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ touch $name256 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ ls -la ls: cannot access _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234: No such file or directory total 0 drwxrwxr-x 1 sougata sougata 3 Feb 20 19:56 . drwxrwxrwx 1 root root 6 Feb 20 19:56 .. -????????? ? ? ? ? ? _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ cd $cdir [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ rm -rf $dir rm: cannot remove `TEST_DIR': Directory not empty -ENAMETOOLONG returned from hfsplus_asc2uni was not propaged to iops. This allowed hfsplus to create files/directories with HFSPLUS_MAX_STRLEN and incorrect keys, leaving the FS in an inconsistent state. This patch fixes this issue. Signed-off-by: Sougata Santra <sougata@tuxera.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Vyacheslav Dubeyko <slava@dubeyko.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2014-12-19 03:17:12 +03:00
hfsplus_cat_build_key_with_cnid(sb, src_fd.search_key, cnid);
err = hfs_brec_find(&src_fd, hfs_find_rec_by_key);
if (err)
goto out;
type = hfs_bnode_read_u16(src_fd.bnode, src_fd.entryoffset);
err = hfs_brec_remove(&src_fd);
if (err)
goto out;
/* create new thread entry */
hfsplus: fix longname handling Longname is not correctly handled by hfsplus driver. If an attempt to create a longname(>255) file/directory is made, it succeeds by creating a file/directory with HFSPLUS_MAX_STRLEN and incorrect catalog key. Thus leaving the volume in an inconsistent state. This patch fixes this issue. Although lookup is always called first to create a negative entry, so just doing a check in lookup would probably fix this issue. I choose to propagate error to other iops as well. Please NOTE: I have factored out hfsplus_cat_build_key_with_cnid from hfsplus_cat_build_key, to avoid unncessary branching. Thanks a lot. TEST: ------ dir="TEST_DIR" cdir=`pwd` name255="_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234" name256="${name255}5" mkdir $dir cd $dir touch $name255 rm -f $name255 touch $name256 ls -la cd $cdir rm -rf $dir RESULT: ------- [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ cdir=`pwd` [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ name255="_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234" [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ name256="${name255}5" [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ mkdir $dir [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ cd $dir [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ touch $name255 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ rm -f $name255 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ touch $name256 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ ls -la ls: cannot access _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234: No such file or directory total 0 drwxrwxr-x 1 sougata sougata 3 Feb 20 19:56 . drwxrwxrwx 1 root root 6 Feb 20 19:56 .. -????????? ? ? ? ? ? _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ cd $cdir [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ rm -rf $dir rm: cannot remove `TEST_DIR': Directory not empty -ENAMETOOLONG returned from hfsplus_asc2uni was not propaged to iops. This allowed hfsplus to create files/directories with HFSPLUS_MAX_STRLEN and incorrect keys, leaving the FS in an inconsistent state. This patch fixes this issue. Signed-off-by: Sougata Santra <sougata@tuxera.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Vyacheslav Dubeyko <slava@dubeyko.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2014-12-19 03:17:12 +03:00
hfsplus_cat_build_key_with_cnid(sb, dst_fd.search_key, cnid);
entry_size = hfsplus_fill_cat_thread(sb, &entry, type,
dst_dir->i_ino, dst_name);
hfsplus: fix longname handling Longname is not correctly handled by hfsplus driver. If an attempt to create a longname(>255) file/directory is made, it succeeds by creating a file/directory with HFSPLUS_MAX_STRLEN and incorrect catalog key. Thus leaving the volume in an inconsistent state. This patch fixes this issue. Although lookup is always called first to create a negative entry, so just doing a check in lookup would probably fix this issue. I choose to propagate error to other iops as well. Please NOTE: I have factored out hfsplus_cat_build_key_with_cnid from hfsplus_cat_build_key, to avoid unncessary branching. Thanks a lot. TEST: ------ dir="TEST_DIR" cdir=`pwd` name255="_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234" name256="${name255}5" mkdir $dir cd $dir touch $name255 rm -f $name255 touch $name256 ls -la cd $cdir rm -rf $dir RESULT: ------- [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ cdir=`pwd` [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ name255="_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234" [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ name256="${name255}5" [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ mkdir $dir [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ cd $dir [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ touch $name255 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ rm -f $name255 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ touch $name256 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ ls -la ls: cannot access _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234: No such file or directory total 0 drwxrwxr-x 1 sougata sougata 3 Feb 20 19:56 . drwxrwxrwx 1 root root 6 Feb 20 19:56 .. -????????? ? ? ? ? ? _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ cd $cdir [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ rm -rf $dir rm: cannot remove `TEST_DIR': Directory not empty -ENAMETOOLONG returned from hfsplus_asc2uni was not propaged to iops. This allowed hfsplus to create files/directories with HFSPLUS_MAX_STRLEN and incorrect keys, leaving the FS in an inconsistent state. This patch fixes this issue. Signed-off-by: Sougata Santra <sougata@tuxera.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Vyacheslav Dubeyko <slava@dubeyko.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2014-12-19 03:17:12 +03:00
if (unlikely(entry_size < 0)) {
err = entry_size;
goto out;
}
err = hfs_brec_find(&dst_fd, hfs_find_rec_by_key);
if (err != -ENOENT) {
if (!err)
err = -EEXIST;
goto out;
}
err = hfs_brec_insert(&dst_fd, &entry, entry_size);
hfsplus_mark_inode_dirty(dst_dir, HFSPLUS_I_CAT_DIRTY);
hfsplus_mark_inode_dirty(src_dir, HFSPLUS_I_CAT_DIRTY);
out:
hfs_bnode_put(dst_fd.bnode);
hfs_find_exit(&src_fd);
return err;
}