WSL2-Linux-Kernel/kernel/bpf/task_iter.c

344 строки
7.6 KiB
C
Исходник Обычный вид История

// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
/* Copyright (c) 2020 Facebook */
#include <linux/init.h>
#include <linux/namei.h>
#include <linux/pid_namespace.h>
#include <linux/fs.h>
#include <linux/fdtable.h>
#include <linux/filter.h>
#include <linux/btf_ids.h>
struct bpf_iter_seq_task_common {
struct pid_namespace *ns;
};
struct bpf_iter_seq_task_info {
/* The first field must be struct bpf_iter_seq_task_common.
* this is assumed by {init, fini}_seq_pidns() callback functions.
*/
struct bpf_iter_seq_task_common common;
u32 tid;
};
static struct task_struct *task_seq_get_next(struct pid_namespace *ns,
u32 *tid,
bool skip_if_dup_files)
{
struct task_struct *task = NULL;
struct pid *pid;
rcu_read_lock();
retry:
pid = find_ge_pid(*tid, ns);
if (pid) {
*tid = pid_nr_ns(pid, ns);
task = get_pid_task(pid, PIDTYPE_PID);
if (!task) {
++*tid;
goto retry;
} else if (skip_if_dup_files && task->tgid != task->pid &&
task->files == task->group_leader->files) {
put_task_struct(task);
task = NULL;
++*tid;
goto retry;
}
}
rcu_read_unlock();
return task;
}
static void *task_seq_start(struct seq_file *seq, loff_t *pos)
{
struct bpf_iter_seq_task_info *info = seq->private;
struct task_struct *task;
task = task_seq_get_next(info->common.ns, &info->tid, false);
if (!task)
return NULL;
if (*pos == 0)
++*pos;
return task;
}
static void *task_seq_next(struct seq_file *seq, void *v, loff_t *pos)
{
struct bpf_iter_seq_task_info *info = seq->private;
struct task_struct *task;
++*pos;
++info->tid;
put_task_struct((struct task_struct *)v);
task = task_seq_get_next(info->common.ns, &info->tid, false);
if (!task)
return NULL;
return task;
}
struct bpf_iter__task {
__bpf_md_ptr(struct bpf_iter_meta *, meta);
__bpf_md_ptr(struct task_struct *, task);
};
DEFINE_BPF_ITER_FUNC(task, struct bpf_iter_meta *meta, struct task_struct *task)
static int __task_seq_show(struct seq_file *seq, struct task_struct *task,
bool in_stop)
{
struct bpf_iter_meta meta;
struct bpf_iter__task ctx;
struct bpf_prog *prog;
meta.seq = seq;
prog = bpf_iter_get_info(&meta, in_stop);
if (!prog)
return 0;
meta.seq = seq;
ctx.meta = &meta;
ctx.task = task;
return bpf_iter_run_prog(prog, &ctx);
}
static int task_seq_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
{
return __task_seq_show(seq, v, false);
}
static void task_seq_stop(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
{
if (!v)
(void)__task_seq_show(seq, v, true);
else
put_task_struct((struct task_struct *)v);
}
static const struct seq_operations task_seq_ops = {
.start = task_seq_start,
.next = task_seq_next,
.stop = task_seq_stop,
.show = task_seq_show,
};
struct bpf_iter_seq_task_file_info {
/* The first field must be struct bpf_iter_seq_task_common.
* this is assumed by {init, fini}_seq_pidns() callback functions.
*/
struct bpf_iter_seq_task_common common;
struct task_struct *task;
u32 tid;
u32 fd;
};
static struct file *
task_file_seq_get_next(struct bpf_iter_seq_task_file_info *info)
{
struct pid_namespace *ns = info->common.ns;
bpf/task_iter: In task_file_seq_get_next use task_lookup_next_fd_rcu When discussing[1] exec and posix file locks it was realized that none of the callers of get_files_struct fundamentally needed to call get_files_struct, and that by switching them to helper functions instead it will both simplify their code and remove unnecessary increments of files_struct.count. Those unnecessary increments can result in exec unnecessarily unsharing files_struct which breaking posix locks, and it can result in fget_light having to fallback to fget reducing system performance. Using task_lookup_next_fd_rcu simplifies task_file_seq_get_next, by moving the checking for the maximum file descritor into the generic code, and by remvoing the need for capturing and releasing a reference on files_struct. As the reference count of files_struct no longer needs to be maintained bpf_iter_seq_task_file_info can have it's files member removed and task_file_seq_get_next no longer needs it's fstruct argument. The curr_fd local variable does need to become unsigned to be used with fnext_task. As curr_fd is assigned from and assigned a u32 making curr_fd an unsigned int won't cause problems and might prevent them. [1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180915160423.GA31461@redhat.com Suggested-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> v1: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200817220425.9389-11-ebiederm@xmission.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201120231441.29911-16-ebiederm@xmission.com Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
2020-11-21 02:14:33 +03:00
u32 curr_tid = info->tid;
struct task_struct *curr_task;
bpf/task_iter: In task_file_seq_get_next use task_lookup_next_fd_rcu When discussing[1] exec and posix file locks it was realized that none of the callers of get_files_struct fundamentally needed to call get_files_struct, and that by switching them to helper functions instead it will both simplify their code and remove unnecessary increments of files_struct.count. Those unnecessary increments can result in exec unnecessarily unsharing files_struct which breaking posix locks, and it can result in fget_light having to fallback to fget reducing system performance. Using task_lookup_next_fd_rcu simplifies task_file_seq_get_next, by moving the checking for the maximum file descritor into the generic code, and by remvoing the need for capturing and releasing a reference on files_struct. As the reference count of files_struct no longer needs to be maintained bpf_iter_seq_task_file_info can have it's files member removed and task_file_seq_get_next no longer needs it's fstruct argument. The curr_fd local variable does need to become unsigned to be used with fnext_task. As curr_fd is assigned from and assigned a u32 making curr_fd an unsigned int won't cause problems and might prevent them. [1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180915160423.GA31461@redhat.com Suggested-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> v1: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200817220425.9389-11-ebiederm@xmission.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201120231441.29911-16-ebiederm@xmission.com Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
2020-11-21 02:14:33 +03:00
unsigned int curr_fd = info->fd;
/* If this function returns a non-NULL file object,
bpf/task_iter: In task_file_seq_get_next use task_lookup_next_fd_rcu When discussing[1] exec and posix file locks it was realized that none of the callers of get_files_struct fundamentally needed to call get_files_struct, and that by switching them to helper functions instead it will both simplify their code and remove unnecessary increments of files_struct.count. Those unnecessary increments can result in exec unnecessarily unsharing files_struct which breaking posix locks, and it can result in fget_light having to fallback to fget reducing system performance. Using task_lookup_next_fd_rcu simplifies task_file_seq_get_next, by moving the checking for the maximum file descritor into the generic code, and by remvoing the need for capturing and releasing a reference on files_struct. As the reference count of files_struct no longer needs to be maintained bpf_iter_seq_task_file_info can have it's files member removed and task_file_seq_get_next no longer needs it's fstruct argument. The curr_fd local variable does need to become unsigned to be used with fnext_task. As curr_fd is assigned from and assigned a u32 making curr_fd an unsigned int won't cause problems and might prevent them. [1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180915160423.GA31461@redhat.com Suggested-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> v1: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200817220425.9389-11-ebiederm@xmission.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201120231441.29911-16-ebiederm@xmission.com Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
2020-11-21 02:14:33 +03:00
* it held a reference to the task/file.
* Otherwise, it does not hold any reference.
*/
again:
if (info->task) {
curr_task = info->task;
curr_fd = info->fd;
} else {
curr_task = task_seq_get_next(ns, &curr_tid, true);
if (!curr_task) {
info->task = NULL;
return NULL;
}
Merge branch 'exec-for-v5.11' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ebiederm/user-namespace Pull execve updates from Eric Biederman: "This set of changes ultimately fixes the interaction of posix file lock and exec. Fundamentally most of the change is just moving where unshare_files is called during exec, and tweaking the users of files_struct so that the count of files_struct is not unnecessarily played with. Along the way fcheck and related helpers were renamed to more accurately reflect what they do. There were also many other small changes that fell out, as this is the first time in a long time much of this code has been touched. Benchmarks haven't turned up any practical issues but Al Viro has observed a possibility for a lot of pounding on task_lock. So I have some changes in progress to convert put_files_struct to always rcu free files_struct. That wasn't ready for the merge window so that will have to wait until next time" * 'exec-for-v5.11' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ebiederm/user-namespace: (27 commits) exec: Move io_uring_task_cancel after the point of no return coredump: Document coredump code exclusively used by cell spufs file: Remove get_files_struct file: Rename __close_fd_get_file close_fd_get_file file: Replace ksys_close with close_fd file: Rename __close_fd to close_fd and remove the files parameter file: Merge __alloc_fd into alloc_fd file: In f_dupfd read RLIMIT_NOFILE once. file: Merge __fd_install into fd_install proc/fd: In fdinfo seq_show don't use get_files_struct bpf/task_iter: In task_file_seq_get_next use task_lookup_next_fd_rcu proc/fd: In proc_readfd_common use task_lookup_next_fd_rcu file: Implement task_lookup_next_fd_rcu kcmp: In get_file_raw_ptr use task_lookup_fd_rcu proc/fd: In tid_fd_mode use task_lookup_fd_rcu file: Implement task_lookup_fd_rcu file: Rename fcheck lookup_fd_rcu file: Replace fcheck_files with files_lookup_fd_rcu file: Factor files_lookup_fd_locked out of fcheck_files file: Rename __fcheck_files to files_lookup_fd_raw ...
2020-12-16 06:29:43 +03:00
/* set info->task and info->tid */
info->task = curr_task;
if (curr_tid == info->tid) {
curr_fd = info->fd;
} else {
info->tid = curr_tid;
curr_fd = 0;
}
}
rcu_read_lock();
bpf/task_iter: In task_file_seq_get_next use task_lookup_next_fd_rcu When discussing[1] exec and posix file locks it was realized that none of the callers of get_files_struct fundamentally needed to call get_files_struct, and that by switching them to helper functions instead it will both simplify their code and remove unnecessary increments of files_struct.count. Those unnecessary increments can result in exec unnecessarily unsharing files_struct which breaking posix locks, and it can result in fget_light having to fallback to fget reducing system performance. Using task_lookup_next_fd_rcu simplifies task_file_seq_get_next, by moving the checking for the maximum file descritor into the generic code, and by remvoing the need for capturing and releasing a reference on files_struct. As the reference count of files_struct no longer needs to be maintained bpf_iter_seq_task_file_info can have it's files member removed and task_file_seq_get_next no longer needs it's fstruct argument. The curr_fd local variable does need to become unsigned to be used with fnext_task. As curr_fd is assigned from and assigned a u32 making curr_fd an unsigned int won't cause problems and might prevent them. [1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180915160423.GA31461@redhat.com Suggested-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> v1: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200817220425.9389-11-ebiederm@xmission.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201120231441.29911-16-ebiederm@xmission.com Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
2020-11-21 02:14:33 +03:00
for (;; curr_fd++) {
struct file *f;
bpf/task_iter: In task_file_seq_get_next use task_lookup_next_fd_rcu When discussing[1] exec and posix file locks it was realized that none of the callers of get_files_struct fundamentally needed to call get_files_struct, and that by switching them to helper functions instead it will both simplify their code and remove unnecessary increments of files_struct.count. Those unnecessary increments can result in exec unnecessarily unsharing files_struct which breaking posix locks, and it can result in fget_light having to fallback to fget reducing system performance. Using task_lookup_next_fd_rcu simplifies task_file_seq_get_next, by moving the checking for the maximum file descritor into the generic code, and by remvoing the need for capturing and releasing a reference on files_struct. As the reference count of files_struct no longer needs to be maintained bpf_iter_seq_task_file_info can have it's files member removed and task_file_seq_get_next no longer needs it's fstruct argument. The curr_fd local variable does need to become unsigned to be used with fnext_task. As curr_fd is assigned from and assigned a u32 making curr_fd an unsigned int won't cause problems and might prevent them. [1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180915160423.GA31461@redhat.com Suggested-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> v1: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200817220425.9389-11-ebiederm@xmission.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201120231441.29911-16-ebiederm@xmission.com Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
2020-11-21 02:14:33 +03:00
f = task_lookup_next_fd_rcu(curr_task, &curr_fd);
if (!f)
bpf/task_iter: In task_file_seq_get_next use task_lookup_next_fd_rcu When discussing[1] exec and posix file locks it was realized that none of the callers of get_files_struct fundamentally needed to call get_files_struct, and that by switching them to helper functions instead it will both simplify their code and remove unnecessary increments of files_struct.count. Those unnecessary increments can result in exec unnecessarily unsharing files_struct which breaking posix locks, and it can result in fget_light having to fallback to fget reducing system performance. Using task_lookup_next_fd_rcu simplifies task_file_seq_get_next, by moving the checking for the maximum file descritor into the generic code, and by remvoing the need for capturing and releasing a reference on files_struct. As the reference count of files_struct no longer needs to be maintained bpf_iter_seq_task_file_info can have it's files member removed and task_file_seq_get_next no longer needs it's fstruct argument. The curr_fd local variable does need to become unsigned to be used with fnext_task. As curr_fd is assigned from and assigned a u32 making curr_fd an unsigned int won't cause problems and might prevent them. [1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180915160423.GA31461@redhat.com Suggested-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> v1: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200817220425.9389-11-ebiederm@xmission.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201120231441.29911-16-ebiederm@xmission.com Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
2020-11-21 02:14:33 +03:00
break;
bpf: Use get_file_rcu() instead of get_file() for task_file iterator With latest `bpftool prog` command, we observed the following kernel panic. BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000000 #PF: supervisor instruction fetch in kernel mode #PF: error_code(0x0010) - not-present page PGD dfe894067 P4D dfe894067 PUD deb663067 PMD 0 Oops: 0010 [#1] SMP CPU: 9 PID: 6023 ... RIP: 0010:0x0 Code: Bad RIP value. RSP: 0000:ffffc900002b8f18 EFLAGS: 00010286 RAX: ffff8883a405f400 RBX: ffff888e46a6bf00 RCX: 000000008020000c RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI: ffff8883a405f400 RBP: ffff888e46a6bf50 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffffffff81129600 R10: ffff8883a405f300 R11: 0000160000000000 R12: 0000000000002710 R13: 000000e9494b690c R14: 0000000000000202 R15: 0000000000000009 FS: 00007fd9187fe700(0000) GS:ffff888e46a40000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: ffffffffffffffd6 CR3: 0000000de5d33002 CR4: 0000000000360ee0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Call Trace: <IRQ> rcu_core+0x1a4/0x440 __do_softirq+0xd3/0x2c8 irq_exit+0x9d/0xa0 smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x68/0x120 apic_timer_interrupt+0xf/0x20 </IRQ> RIP: 0033:0x47ce80 Code: Bad RIP value. RSP: 002b:00007fd9187fba40 EFLAGS: 00000206 ORIG_RAX: ffffffffffffff13 RAX: 0000000000000002 RBX: 00007fd931789160 RCX: 000000000000010c RDX: 00007fd9308cdfb4 RSI: 00007fd9308cdfb4 RDI: 00007ffedd1ea0a8 RBP: 00007fd9187fbab0 R08: 000000000000000e R09: 000000000000002a R10: 0000000000480210 R11: 00007fd9187fc570 R12: 00007fd9316cc400 R13: 0000000000000118 R14: 00007fd9308cdfb4 R15: 00007fd9317a9380 After further analysis, the bug is triggered by Commit eaaacd23910f ("bpf: Add task and task/file iterator targets") which introduced task_file bpf iterator, which traverses all open file descriptors for all tasks in the current namespace. The latest `bpftool prog` calls a task_file bpf program to traverse all files in the system in order to associate processes with progs/maps, etc. When traversing files for a given task, rcu read_lock is taken to access all files in a file_struct. But it used get_file() to grab a file, which is not right. It is possible file->f_count is 0 and get_file() will unconditionally increase it. Later put_file() may cause all kind of issues with the above as one of sympotoms. The failure can be reproduced with the following steps in a few seconds: $ cat t.c #include <stdio.h> #include <sys/types.h> #include <sys/stat.h> #include <fcntl.h> #include <unistd.h> #define N 10000 int fd[N]; int main() { int i; for (i = 0; i < N; i++) { fd[i] = open("./note.txt", 'r'); if (fd[i] < 0) { fprintf(stderr, "failed\n"); return -1; } } for (i = 0; i < N; i++) close(fd[i]); return 0; } $ gcc -O2 t.c $ cat run.sh #/bin/bash for i in {1..100} do while true; do ./a.out; done & done $ ./run.sh $ while true; do bpftool prog >& /dev/null; done This patch used get_file_rcu() which only grabs a file if the file->f_count is not zero. This is to ensure the file pointer is always valid. The above reproducer did not fail for more than 30 minutes. Fixes: eaaacd23910f ("bpf: Add task and task/file iterator targets") Suggested-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200817174214.252601-1-yhs@fb.com
2020-08-17 20:42:14 +03:00
if (!get_file_rcu(f))
continue;
/* set info->fd */
info->fd = curr_fd;
rcu_read_unlock();
return f;
}
/* the current task is done, go to the next task */
rcu_read_unlock();
put_task_struct(curr_task);
info->task = NULL;
info->fd = 0;
curr_tid = ++(info->tid);
goto again;
}
static void *task_file_seq_start(struct seq_file *seq, loff_t *pos)
{
struct bpf_iter_seq_task_file_info *info = seq->private;
struct file *file;
info->task = NULL;
file = task_file_seq_get_next(info);
if (file && *pos == 0)
++*pos;
return file;
}
static void *task_file_seq_next(struct seq_file *seq, void *v, loff_t *pos)
{
struct bpf_iter_seq_task_file_info *info = seq->private;
++*pos;
++info->fd;
fput((struct file *)v);
return task_file_seq_get_next(info);
}
struct bpf_iter__task_file {
__bpf_md_ptr(struct bpf_iter_meta *, meta);
__bpf_md_ptr(struct task_struct *, task);
u32 fd __aligned(8);
__bpf_md_ptr(struct file *, file);
};
DEFINE_BPF_ITER_FUNC(task_file, struct bpf_iter_meta *meta,
struct task_struct *task, u32 fd,
struct file *file)
static int __task_file_seq_show(struct seq_file *seq, struct file *file,
bool in_stop)
{
struct bpf_iter_seq_task_file_info *info = seq->private;
struct bpf_iter__task_file ctx;
struct bpf_iter_meta meta;
struct bpf_prog *prog;
meta.seq = seq;
prog = bpf_iter_get_info(&meta, in_stop);
if (!prog)
return 0;
ctx.meta = &meta;
ctx.task = info->task;
ctx.fd = info->fd;
ctx.file = file;
return bpf_iter_run_prog(prog, &ctx);
}
static int task_file_seq_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
{
return __task_file_seq_show(seq, v, false);
}
static void task_file_seq_stop(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
{
struct bpf_iter_seq_task_file_info *info = seq->private;
if (!v) {
(void)__task_file_seq_show(seq, v, true);
} else {
fput((struct file *)v);
put_task_struct(info->task);
info->task = NULL;
}
}
static int init_seq_pidns(void *priv_data, struct bpf_iter_aux_info *aux)
{
struct bpf_iter_seq_task_common *common = priv_data;
common->ns = get_pid_ns(task_active_pid_ns(current));
return 0;
}
static void fini_seq_pidns(void *priv_data)
{
struct bpf_iter_seq_task_common *common = priv_data;
put_pid_ns(common->ns);
}
static const struct seq_operations task_file_seq_ops = {
.start = task_file_seq_start,
.next = task_file_seq_next,
.stop = task_file_seq_stop,
.show = task_file_seq_show,
};
BTF_ID_LIST(btf_task_file_ids)
BTF_ID(struct, task_struct)
BTF_ID(struct, file)
static const struct bpf_iter_seq_info task_seq_info = {
.seq_ops = &task_seq_ops,
.init_seq_private = init_seq_pidns,
.fini_seq_private = fini_seq_pidns,
.seq_priv_size = sizeof(struct bpf_iter_seq_task_info),
};
static struct bpf_iter_reg task_reg_info = {
.target = "task",
bpf: Permit cond_resched for some iterators Commit e679654a704e ("bpf: Fix a rcu_sched stall issue with bpf task/task_file iterator") tries to fix rcu stalls warning which is caused by bpf task_file iterator when running "bpftool prog". rcu: INFO: rcu_sched self-detected stall on CPU rcu: \x097-....: (20999 ticks this GP) idle=302/1/0x4000000000000000 softirq=1508852/1508852 fqs=4913 \x09(t=21031 jiffies g=2534773 q=179750) NMI backtrace for cpu 7 CPU: 7 PID: 184195 Comm: bpftool Kdump: loaded Tainted: G W 5.8.0-00004-g68bfc7f8c1b4 #6 Hardware name: Quanta Twin Lakes MP/Twin Lakes Passive MP, BIOS F09_3A17 05/03/2019 Call Trace: <IRQ> dump_stack+0x57/0x70 nmi_cpu_backtrace.cold+0x14/0x53 ? lapic_can_unplug_cpu.cold+0x39/0x39 nmi_trigger_cpumask_backtrace+0xb7/0xc7 rcu_dump_cpu_stacks+0xa2/0xd0 rcu_sched_clock_irq.cold+0x1ff/0x3d9 ? tick_nohz_handler+0x100/0x100 update_process_times+0x5b/0x90 tick_sched_timer+0x5e/0xf0 __hrtimer_run_queues+0x12a/0x2a0 hrtimer_interrupt+0x10e/0x280 __sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x51/0xe0 asm_call_on_stack+0xf/0x20 </IRQ> sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x6f/0x80 ... task_file_seq_next+0x52/0xa0 bpf_seq_read+0xb9/0x320 vfs_read+0x9d/0x180 ksys_read+0x5f/0xe0 do_syscall_64+0x38/0x60 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 The fix is to limit the number of bpf program runs to be one million. This fixed the program in most cases. But we also found under heavy load, which can increase the wallclock time for bpf_seq_read(), the warning may still be possible. For example, calling bpf_delay() in the "while" loop of bpf_seq_read(), which will introduce artificial delay, the warning will show up in my qemu run. static unsigned q; volatile unsigned *p = &q; volatile unsigned long long ll; static void bpf_delay(void) { int i, j; for (i = 0; i < 10000; i++) for (j = 0; j < 10000; j++) ll += *p; } There are two ways to fix this issue. One is to reduce the above one million threshold to say 100,000 and hopefully rcu warning will not show up any more. Another is to introduce a target feature which enables bpf_seq_read() calling cond_resched(). This patch took second approach as the first approach may cause more -EAGAIN failures for read() syscalls. Note that not all bpf_iter targets can permit cond_resched() in bpf_seq_read() as some, e.g., netlink seq iterator, rcu read lock critical section spans through seq_ops->next() -> seq_ops->show() -> seq_ops->next(). For the kernel code with the above hack, "bpftool p" roughly takes 38 seconds to finish on my VM with 184 bpf program runs. Using the following command, I am able to collect the number of context switches: perf stat -e context-switches -- ./bpftool p >& log Without this patch, 69 context-switches With this patch, 75 context-switches This patch added additional 6 context switches, roughly every 6 seconds to reschedule, to avoid lengthy no-rescheduling which may cause the above RCU warnings. Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20201028061054.1411116-1-yhs@fb.com
2020-10-28 09:10:54 +03:00
.feature = BPF_ITER_RESCHED,
.ctx_arg_info_size = 1,
.ctx_arg_info = {
{ offsetof(struct bpf_iter__task, task),
PTR_TO_BTF_ID_OR_NULL },
},
.seq_info = &task_seq_info,
};
static const struct bpf_iter_seq_info task_file_seq_info = {
.seq_ops = &task_file_seq_ops,
.init_seq_private = init_seq_pidns,
.fini_seq_private = fini_seq_pidns,
.seq_priv_size = sizeof(struct bpf_iter_seq_task_file_info),
};
static struct bpf_iter_reg task_file_reg_info = {
.target = "task_file",
bpf: Permit cond_resched for some iterators Commit e679654a704e ("bpf: Fix a rcu_sched stall issue with bpf task/task_file iterator") tries to fix rcu stalls warning which is caused by bpf task_file iterator when running "bpftool prog". rcu: INFO: rcu_sched self-detected stall on CPU rcu: \x097-....: (20999 ticks this GP) idle=302/1/0x4000000000000000 softirq=1508852/1508852 fqs=4913 \x09(t=21031 jiffies g=2534773 q=179750) NMI backtrace for cpu 7 CPU: 7 PID: 184195 Comm: bpftool Kdump: loaded Tainted: G W 5.8.0-00004-g68bfc7f8c1b4 #6 Hardware name: Quanta Twin Lakes MP/Twin Lakes Passive MP, BIOS F09_3A17 05/03/2019 Call Trace: <IRQ> dump_stack+0x57/0x70 nmi_cpu_backtrace.cold+0x14/0x53 ? lapic_can_unplug_cpu.cold+0x39/0x39 nmi_trigger_cpumask_backtrace+0xb7/0xc7 rcu_dump_cpu_stacks+0xa2/0xd0 rcu_sched_clock_irq.cold+0x1ff/0x3d9 ? tick_nohz_handler+0x100/0x100 update_process_times+0x5b/0x90 tick_sched_timer+0x5e/0xf0 __hrtimer_run_queues+0x12a/0x2a0 hrtimer_interrupt+0x10e/0x280 __sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x51/0xe0 asm_call_on_stack+0xf/0x20 </IRQ> sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x6f/0x80 ... task_file_seq_next+0x52/0xa0 bpf_seq_read+0xb9/0x320 vfs_read+0x9d/0x180 ksys_read+0x5f/0xe0 do_syscall_64+0x38/0x60 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 The fix is to limit the number of bpf program runs to be one million. This fixed the program in most cases. But we also found under heavy load, which can increase the wallclock time for bpf_seq_read(), the warning may still be possible. For example, calling bpf_delay() in the "while" loop of bpf_seq_read(), which will introduce artificial delay, the warning will show up in my qemu run. static unsigned q; volatile unsigned *p = &q; volatile unsigned long long ll; static void bpf_delay(void) { int i, j; for (i = 0; i < 10000; i++) for (j = 0; j < 10000; j++) ll += *p; } There are two ways to fix this issue. One is to reduce the above one million threshold to say 100,000 and hopefully rcu warning will not show up any more. Another is to introduce a target feature which enables bpf_seq_read() calling cond_resched(). This patch took second approach as the first approach may cause more -EAGAIN failures for read() syscalls. Note that not all bpf_iter targets can permit cond_resched() in bpf_seq_read() as some, e.g., netlink seq iterator, rcu read lock critical section spans through seq_ops->next() -> seq_ops->show() -> seq_ops->next(). For the kernel code with the above hack, "bpftool p" roughly takes 38 seconds to finish on my VM with 184 bpf program runs. Using the following command, I am able to collect the number of context switches: perf stat -e context-switches -- ./bpftool p >& log Without this patch, 69 context-switches With this patch, 75 context-switches This patch added additional 6 context switches, roughly every 6 seconds to reschedule, to avoid lengthy no-rescheduling which may cause the above RCU warnings. Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20201028061054.1411116-1-yhs@fb.com
2020-10-28 09:10:54 +03:00
.feature = BPF_ITER_RESCHED,
.ctx_arg_info_size = 2,
.ctx_arg_info = {
{ offsetof(struct bpf_iter__task_file, task),
PTR_TO_BTF_ID_OR_NULL },
{ offsetof(struct bpf_iter__task_file, file),
PTR_TO_BTF_ID_OR_NULL },
},
.seq_info = &task_file_seq_info,
};
static int __init task_iter_init(void)
{
int ret;
task_reg_info.ctx_arg_info[0].btf_id = btf_task_file_ids[0];
ret = bpf_iter_reg_target(&task_reg_info);
if (ret)
return ret;
task_file_reg_info.ctx_arg_info[0].btf_id = btf_task_file_ids[0];
task_file_reg_info.ctx_arg_info[1].btf_id = btf_task_file_ids[1];
return bpf_iter_reg_target(&task_file_reg_info);
}
late_initcall(task_iter_init);