OMAP4: PRCM: add OMAP4-specific accessor/mutator functions
In some ways, the OMAP4 PRCM register layout is quite different than
the OMAP2/3 PRCM register layout. For example, on OMAP2/3, from a
register layout point of view, all CM instances were located in the CM
subsystem, and all PRM instances were located in the PRM subsystem.
OMAP4 changes this. Now, for example, some CM instances, such as
WKUP_CM and EMU_CM, are located in the system PRM subsystem. And a
"local PRCM" exists for the MPU - this PRCM combines registers that
would normally appear in both CM and PRM instances, but uses its own
register layout which matches neither the OMAP2/3 PRCM layout nor the
OMAP4 PRCM layout.
To try to deal with this, introduce some new functions, omap4_cminst*
and omap4_prminst*. The former is to be used when writing to a CM
instance register (no matter what subsystem or hardware module it
exists in), and the latter, similarly, with PRM instance registers.
To determine which "PRCM partition" to write to, the functions take a
PRCM instance ID argument. Subsequent patches add these partition IDs
to the OMAP4 powerdomain and clockdomain definitions.
As far as I can see, there's really no good way to handle these types
of register access inconsistencies. This patch seemed like the least
bad approach.
Moving forward, the long-term goal is to remove all direct PRCM
register access from the PM code. PRCM register access should go
through layers such as the powerdomain and clockdomain code that can
hide the details of how to interact with the specific hardware
variant.
While here, rename cm4xxx.c to cm44xx.c to match the naming convention
of the other OMAP4 PRCM files.
Thanks to Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>, Rajendra Nayak
<rnayak@ti.com>, and Benoît Cousson <b-cousson@ti.com> for some comments.
Signed-off-by: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
Cc: Benoît Cousson <b-cousson@ti.com>
Cc: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@ti.com>
Cc: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
2010-12-22 07:05:14 +03:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* OMAP4 PRM instance functions
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Copyright (C) 2009 Nokia Corporation
|
2011-07-10 15:56:31 +04:00
|
|
|
* Copyright (C) 2011 Texas Instruments, Inc.
|
OMAP4: PRCM: add OMAP4-specific accessor/mutator functions
In some ways, the OMAP4 PRCM register layout is quite different than
the OMAP2/3 PRCM register layout. For example, on OMAP2/3, from a
register layout point of view, all CM instances were located in the CM
subsystem, and all PRM instances were located in the PRM subsystem.
OMAP4 changes this. Now, for example, some CM instances, such as
WKUP_CM and EMU_CM, are located in the system PRM subsystem. And a
"local PRCM" exists for the MPU - this PRCM combines registers that
would normally appear in both CM and PRM instances, but uses its own
register layout which matches neither the OMAP2/3 PRCM layout nor the
OMAP4 PRCM layout.
To try to deal with this, introduce some new functions, omap4_cminst*
and omap4_prminst*. The former is to be used when writing to a CM
instance register (no matter what subsystem or hardware module it
exists in), and the latter, similarly, with PRM instance registers.
To determine which "PRCM partition" to write to, the functions take a
PRCM instance ID argument. Subsequent patches add these partition IDs
to the OMAP4 powerdomain and clockdomain definitions.
As far as I can see, there's really no good way to handle these types
of register access inconsistencies. This patch seemed like the least
bad approach.
Moving forward, the long-term goal is to remove all direct PRCM
register access from the PM code. PRCM register access should go
through layers such as the powerdomain and clockdomain code that can
hide the details of how to interact with the specific hardware
variant.
While here, rename cm4xxx.c to cm44xx.c to match the naming convention
of the other OMAP4 PRCM files.
Thanks to Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>, Rajendra Nayak
<rnayak@ti.com>, and Benoît Cousson <b-cousson@ti.com> for some comments.
Signed-off-by: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
Cc: Benoît Cousson <b-cousson@ti.com>
Cc: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@ti.com>
Cc: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
2010-12-22 07:05:14 +03:00
|
|
|
* Paul Walmsley
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
|
|
|
|
* it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
|
|
|
|
* published by the Free Software Foundation.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#include <linux/kernel.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <linux/types.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <linux/errno.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <linux/err.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <linux/io.h>
|
|
|
|
|
2012-02-24 22:34:35 +04:00
|
|
|
#include "iomap.h"
|
2011-11-11 01:45:17 +04:00
|
|
|
#include "common.h"
|
2012-05-08 09:55:22 +04:00
|
|
|
#include "prcm-common.h"
|
OMAP4: PRCM: add OMAP4-specific accessor/mutator functions
In some ways, the OMAP4 PRCM register layout is quite different than
the OMAP2/3 PRCM register layout. For example, on OMAP2/3, from a
register layout point of view, all CM instances were located in the CM
subsystem, and all PRM instances were located in the PRM subsystem.
OMAP4 changes this. Now, for example, some CM instances, such as
WKUP_CM and EMU_CM, are located in the system PRM subsystem. And a
"local PRCM" exists for the MPU - this PRCM combines registers that
would normally appear in both CM and PRM instances, but uses its own
register layout which matches neither the OMAP2/3 PRCM layout nor the
OMAP4 PRCM layout.
To try to deal with this, introduce some new functions, omap4_cminst*
and omap4_prminst*. The former is to be used when writing to a CM
instance register (no matter what subsystem or hardware module it
exists in), and the latter, similarly, with PRM instance registers.
To determine which "PRCM partition" to write to, the functions take a
PRCM instance ID argument. Subsequent patches add these partition IDs
to the OMAP4 powerdomain and clockdomain definitions.
As far as I can see, there's really no good way to handle these types
of register access inconsistencies. This patch seemed like the least
bad approach.
Moving forward, the long-term goal is to remove all direct PRCM
register access from the PM code. PRCM register access should go
through layers such as the powerdomain and clockdomain code that can
hide the details of how to interact with the specific hardware
variant.
While here, rename cm4xxx.c to cm44xx.c to match the naming convention
of the other OMAP4 PRCM files.
Thanks to Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>, Rajendra Nayak
<rnayak@ti.com>, and Benoît Cousson <b-cousson@ti.com> for some comments.
Signed-off-by: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
Cc: Benoît Cousson <b-cousson@ti.com>
Cc: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@ti.com>
Cc: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
2010-12-22 07:05:14 +03:00
|
|
|
#include "prm44xx.h"
|
2013-07-09 11:32:15 +04:00
|
|
|
#include "prm54xx.h"
|
|
|
|
#include "prm7xx.h"
|
OMAP4: PRCM: add OMAP4-specific accessor/mutator functions
In some ways, the OMAP4 PRCM register layout is quite different than
the OMAP2/3 PRCM register layout. For example, on OMAP2/3, from a
register layout point of view, all CM instances were located in the CM
subsystem, and all PRM instances were located in the PRM subsystem.
OMAP4 changes this. Now, for example, some CM instances, such as
WKUP_CM and EMU_CM, are located in the system PRM subsystem. And a
"local PRCM" exists for the MPU - this PRCM combines registers that
would normally appear in both CM and PRM instances, but uses its own
register layout which matches neither the OMAP2/3 PRCM layout nor the
OMAP4 PRCM layout.
To try to deal with this, introduce some new functions, omap4_cminst*
and omap4_prminst*. The former is to be used when writing to a CM
instance register (no matter what subsystem or hardware module it
exists in), and the latter, similarly, with PRM instance registers.
To determine which "PRCM partition" to write to, the functions take a
PRCM instance ID argument. Subsequent patches add these partition IDs
to the OMAP4 powerdomain and clockdomain definitions.
As far as I can see, there's really no good way to handle these types
of register access inconsistencies. This patch seemed like the least
bad approach.
Moving forward, the long-term goal is to remove all direct PRCM
register access from the PM code. PRCM register access should go
through layers such as the powerdomain and clockdomain code that can
hide the details of how to interact with the specific hardware
variant.
While here, rename cm4xxx.c to cm44xx.c to match the naming convention
of the other OMAP4 PRCM files.
Thanks to Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>, Rajendra Nayak
<rnayak@ti.com>, and Benoît Cousson <b-cousson@ti.com> for some comments.
Signed-off-by: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
Cc: Benoît Cousson <b-cousson@ti.com>
Cc: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@ti.com>
Cc: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
2010-12-22 07:05:14 +03:00
|
|
|
#include "prminst44xx.h"
|
|
|
|
#include "prm-regbits-44xx.h"
|
|
|
|
#include "prcm44xx.h"
|
2014-02-28 23:43:45 +04:00
|
|
|
#include "prcm43xx.h"
|
OMAP4: PRCM: add OMAP4-specific accessor/mutator functions
In some ways, the OMAP4 PRCM register layout is quite different than
the OMAP2/3 PRCM register layout. For example, on OMAP2/3, from a
register layout point of view, all CM instances were located in the CM
subsystem, and all PRM instances were located in the PRM subsystem.
OMAP4 changes this. Now, for example, some CM instances, such as
WKUP_CM and EMU_CM, are located in the system PRM subsystem. And a
"local PRCM" exists for the MPU - this PRCM combines registers that
would normally appear in both CM and PRM instances, but uses its own
register layout which matches neither the OMAP2/3 PRCM layout nor the
OMAP4 PRCM layout.
To try to deal with this, introduce some new functions, omap4_cminst*
and omap4_prminst*. The former is to be used when writing to a CM
instance register (no matter what subsystem or hardware module it
exists in), and the latter, similarly, with PRM instance registers.
To determine which "PRCM partition" to write to, the functions take a
PRCM instance ID argument. Subsequent patches add these partition IDs
to the OMAP4 powerdomain and clockdomain definitions.
As far as I can see, there's really no good way to handle these types
of register access inconsistencies. This patch seemed like the least
bad approach.
Moving forward, the long-term goal is to remove all direct PRCM
register access from the PM code. PRCM register access should go
through layers such as the powerdomain and clockdomain code that can
hide the details of how to interact with the specific hardware
variant.
While here, rename cm4xxx.c to cm44xx.c to match the naming convention
of the other OMAP4 PRCM files.
Thanks to Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>, Rajendra Nayak
<rnayak@ti.com>, and Benoît Cousson <b-cousson@ti.com> for some comments.
Signed-off-by: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
Cc: Benoît Cousson <b-cousson@ti.com>
Cc: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@ti.com>
Cc: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
2010-12-22 07:05:14 +03:00
|
|
|
#include "prcm_mpu44xx.h"
|
2013-07-09 11:32:15 +04:00
|
|
|
#include "soc.h"
|
OMAP4: PRCM: add OMAP4-specific accessor/mutator functions
In some ways, the OMAP4 PRCM register layout is quite different than
the OMAP2/3 PRCM register layout. For example, on OMAP2/3, from a
register layout point of view, all CM instances were located in the CM
subsystem, and all PRM instances were located in the PRM subsystem.
OMAP4 changes this. Now, for example, some CM instances, such as
WKUP_CM and EMU_CM, are located in the system PRM subsystem. And a
"local PRCM" exists for the MPU - this PRCM combines registers that
would normally appear in both CM and PRM instances, but uses its own
register layout which matches neither the OMAP2/3 PRCM layout nor the
OMAP4 PRCM layout.
To try to deal with this, introduce some new functions, omap4_cminst*
and omap4_prminst*. The former is to be used when writing to a CM
instance register (no matter what subsystem or hardware module it
exists in), and the latter, similarly, with PRM instance registers.
To determine which "PRCM partition" to write to, the functions take a
PRCM instance ID argument. Subsequent patches add these partition IDs
to the OMAP4 powerdomain and clockdomain definitions.
As far as I can see, there's really no good way to handle these types
of register access inconsistencies. This patch seemed like the least
bad approach.
Moving forward, the long-term goal is to remove all direct PRCM
register access from the PM code. PRCM register access should go
through layers such as the powerdomain and clockdomain code that can
hide the details of how to interact with the specific hardware
variant.
While here, rename cm4xxx.c to cm44xx.c to match the naming convention
of the other OMAP4 PRCM files.
Thanks to Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>, Rajendra Nayak
<rnayak@ti.com>, and Benoît Cousson <b-cousson@ti.com> for some comments.
Signed-off-by: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
Cc: Benoît Cousson <b-cousson@ti.com>
Cc: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@ti.com>
Cc: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
2010-12-22 07:05:14 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2012-05-08 09:55:22 +04:00
|
|
|
static void __iomem *_prm_bases[OMAP4_MAX_PRCM_PARTITIONS];
|
|
|
|
|
2014-05-22 23:53:54 +04:00
|
|
|
static s32 prm_dev_inst = PRM_INSTANCE_UNKNOWN;
|
|
|
|
|
2012-05-08 09:55:22 +04:00
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
* omap_prm_base_init - Populates the prm partitions
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Populates the base addresses of the _prm_bases
|
|
|
|
* array used for read/write of prm module registers.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
void omap_prm_base_init(void)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
_prm_bases[OMAP4430_PRM_PARTITION] = prm_base;
|
|
|
|
_prm_bases[OMAP4430_PRCM_MPU_PARTITION] = prcm_mpu_base;
|
|
|
|
}
|
OMAP4: PRCM: add OMAP4-specific accessor/mutator functions
In some ways, the OMAP4 PRCM register layout is quite different than
the OMAP2/3 PRCM register layout. For example, on OMAP2/3, from a
register layout point of view, all CM instances were located in the CM
subsystem, and all PRM instances were located in the PRM subsystem.
OMAP4 changes this. Now, for example, some CM instances, such as
WKUP_CM and EMU_CM, are located in the system PRM subsystem. And a
"local PRCM" exists for the MPU - this PRCM combines registers that
would normally appear in both CM and PRM instances, but uses its own
register layout which matches neither the OMAP2/3 PRCM layout nor the
OMAP4 PRCM layout.
To try to deal with this, introduce some new functions, omap4_cminst*
and omap4_prminst*. The former is to be used when writing to a CM
instance register (no matter what subsystem or hardware module it
exists in), and the latter, similarly, with PRM instance registers.
To determine which "PRCM partition" to write to, the functions take a
PRCM instance ID argument. Subsequent patches add these partition IDs
to the OMAP4 powerdomain and clockdomain definitions.
As far as I can see, there's really no good way to handle these types
of register access inconsistencies. This patch seemed like the least
bad approach.
Moving forward, the long-term goal is to remove all direct PRCM
register access from the PM code. PRCM register access should go
through layers such as the powerdomain and clockdomain code that can
hide the details of how to interact with the specific hardware
variant.
While here, rename cm4xxx.c to cm44xx.c to match the naming convention
of the other OMAP4 PRCM files.
Thanks to Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>, Rajendra Nayak
<rnayak@ti.com>, and Benoît Cousson <b-cousson@ti.com> for some comments.
Signed-off-by: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
Cc: Benoît Cousson <b-cousson@ti.com>
Cc: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@ti.com>
Cc: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
2010-12-22 07:05:14 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2014-05-22 23:53:54 +04:00
|
|
|
s32 omap4_prmst_get_prm_dev_inst(void)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
return prm_dev_inst;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2014-09-08 12:29:43 +04:00
|
|
|
void omap4_prminst_set_prm_dev_inst(s32 dev_inst)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
prm_dev_inst = dev_inst;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
OMAP4: PRCM: add OMAP4-specific accessor/mutator functions
In some ways, the OMAP4 PRCM register layout is quite different than
the OMAP2/3 PRCM register layout. For example, on OMAP2/3, from a
register layout point of view, all CM instances were located in the CM
subsystem, and all PRM instances were located in the PRM subsystem.
OMAP4 changes this. Now, for example, some CM instances, such as
WKUP_CM and EMU_CM, are located in the system PRM subsystem. And a
"local PRCM" exists for the MPU - this PRCM combines registers that
would normally appear in both CM and PRM instances, but uses its own
register layout which matches neither the OMAP2/3 PRCM layout nor the
OMAP4 PRCM layout.
To try to deal with this, introduce some new functions, omap4_cminst*
and omap4_prminst*. The former is to be used when writing to a CM
instance register (no matter what subsystem or hardware module it
exists in), and the latter, similarly, with PRM instance registers.
To determine which "PRCM partition" to write to, the functions take a
PRCM instance ID argument. Subsequent patches add these partition IDs
to the OMAP4 powerdomain and clockdomain definitions.
As far as I can see, there's really no good way to handle these types
of register access inconsistencies. This patch seemed like the least
bad approach.
Moving forward, the long-term goal is to remove all direct PRCM
register access from the PM code. PRCM register access should go
through layers such as the powerdomain and clockdomain code that can
hide the details of how to interact with the specific hardware
variant.
While here, rename cm4xxx.c to cm44xx.c to match the naming convention
of the other OMAP4 PRCM files.
Thanks to Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>, Rajendra Nayak
<rnayak@ti.com>, and Benoît Cousson <b-cousson@ti.com> for some comments.
Signed-off-by: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
Cc: Benoît Cousson <b-cousson@ti.com>
Cc: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@ti.com>
Cc: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
2010-12-22 07:05:14 +03:00
|
|
|
/* Read a register in a PRM instance */
|
|
|
|
u32 omap4_prminst_read_inst_reg(u8 part, s16 inst, u16 idx)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
BUG_ON(part >= OMAP4_MAX_PRCM_PARTITIONS ||
|
|
|
|
part == OMAP4430_INVALID_PRCM_PARTITION ||
|
|
|
|
!_prm_bases[part]);
|
2014-04-15 21:37:46 +04:00
|
|
|
return readl_relaxed(_prm_bases[part] + inst + idx);
|
OMAP4: PRCM: add OMAP4-specific accessor/mutator functions
In some ways, the OMAP4 PRCM register layout is quite different than
the OMAP2/3 PRCM register layout. For example, on OMAP2/3, from a
register layout point of view, all CM instances were located in the CM
subsystem, and all PRM instances were located in the PRM subsystem.
OMAP4 changes this. Now, for example, some CM instances, such as
WKUP_CM and EMU_CM, are located in the system PRM subsystem. And a
"local PRCM" exists for the MPU - this PRCM combines registers that
would normally appear in both CM and PRM instances, but uses its own
register layout which matches neither the OMAP2/3 PRCM layout nor the
OMAP4 PRCM layout.
To try to deal with this, introduce some new functions, omap4_cminst*
and omap4_prminst*. The former is to be used when writing to a CM
instance register (no matter what subsystem or hardware module it
exists in), and the latter, similarly, with PRM instance registers.
To determine which "PRCM partition" to write to, the functions take a
PRCM instance ID argument. Subsequent patches add these partition IDs
to the OMAP4 powerdomain and clockdomain definitions.
As far as I can see, there's really no good way to handle these types
of register access inconsistencies. This patch seemed like the least
bad approach.
Moving forward, the long-term goal is to remove all direct PRCM
register access from the PM code. PRCM register access should go
through layers such as the powerdomain and clockdomain code that can
hide the details of how to interact with the specific hardware
variant.
While here, rename cm4xxx.c to cm44xx.c to match the naming convention
of the other OMAP4 PRCM files.
Thanks to Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>, Rajendra Nayak
<rnayak@ti.com>, and Benoît Cousson <b-cousson@ti.com> for some comments.
Signed-off-by: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
Cc: Benoît Cousson <b-cousson@ti.com>
Cc: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@ti.com>
Cc: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
2010-12-22 07:05:14 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Write into a register in a PRM instance */
|
|
|
|
void omap4_prminst_write_inst_reg(u32 val, u8 part, s16 inst, u16 idx)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
BUG_ON(part >= OMAP4_MAX_PRCM_PARTITIONS ||
|
|
|
|
part == OMAP4430_INVALID_PRCM_PARTITION ||
|
|
|
|
!_prm_bases[part]);
|
2014-04-15 21:37:46 +04:00
|
|
|
writel_relaxed(val, _prm_bases[part] + inst + idx);
|
OMAP4: PRCM: add OMAP4-specific accessor/mutator functions
In some ways, the OMAP4 PRCM register layout is quite different than
the OMAP2/3 PRCM register layout. For example, on OMAP2/3, from a
register layout point of view, all CM instances were located in the CM
subsystem, and all PRM instances were located in the PRM subsystem.
OMAP4 changes this. Now, for example, some CM instances, such as
WKUP_CM and EMU_CM, are located in the system PRM subsystem. And a
"local PRCM" exists for the MPU - this PRCM combines registers that
would normally appear in both CM and PRM instances, but uses its own
register layout which matches neither the OMAP2/3 PRCM layout nor the
OMAP4 PRCM layout.
To try to deal with this, introduce some new functions, omap4_cminst*
and omap4_prminst*. The former is to be used when writing to a CM
instance register (no matter what subsystem or hardware module it
exists in), and the latter, similarly, with PRM instance registers.
To determine which "PRCM partition" to write to, the functions take a
PRCM instance ID argument. Subsequent patches add these partition IDs
to the OMAP4 powerdomain and clockdomain definitions.
As far as I can see, there's really no good way to handle these types
of register access inconsistencies. This patch seemed like the least
bad approach.
Moving forward, the long-term goal is to remove all direct PRCM
register access from the PM code. PRCM register access should go
through layers such as the powerdomain and clockdomain code that can
hide the details of how to interact with the specific hardware
variant.
While here, rename cm4xxx.c to cm44xx.c to match the naming convention
of the other OMAP4 PRCM files.
Thanks to Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>, Rajendra Nayak
<rnayak@ti.com>, and Benoît Cousson <b-cousson@ti.com> for some comments.
Signed-off-by: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
Cc: Benoît Cousson <b-cousson@ti.com>
Cc: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@ti.com>
Cc: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
2010-12-22 07:05:14 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Read-modify-write a register in PRM. Caller must lock */
|
|
|
|
u32 omap4_prminst_rmw_inst_reg_bits(u32 mask, u32 bits, u8 part, s16 inst,
|
2011-07-10 15:56:31 +04:00
|
|
|
u16 idx)
|
OMAP4: PRCM: add OMAP4-specific accessor/mutator functions
In some ways, the OMAP4 PRCM register layout is quite different than
the OMAP2/3 PRCM register layout. For example, on OMAP2/3, from a
register layout point of view, all CM instances were located in the CM
subsystem, and all PRM instances were located in the PRM subsystem.
OMAP4 changes this. Now, for example, some CM instances, such as
WKUP_CM and EMU_CM, are located in the system PRM subsystem. And a
"local PRCM" exists for the MPU - this PRCM combines registers that
would normally appear in both CM and PRM instances, but uses its own
register layout which matches neither the OMAP2/3 PRCM layout nor the
OMAP4 PRCM layout.
To try to deal with this, introduce some new functions, omap4_cminst*
and omap4_prminst*. The former is to be used when writing to a CM
instance register (no matter what subsystem or hardware module it
exists in), and the latter, similarly, with PRM instance registers.
To determine which "PRCM partition" to write to, the functions take a
PRCM instance ID argument. Subsequent patches add these partition IDs
to the OMAP4 powerdomain and clockdomain definitions.
As far as I can see, there's really no good way to handle these types
of register access inconsistencies. This patch seemed like the least
bad approach.
Moving forward, the long-term goal is to remove all direct PRCM
register access from the PM code. PRCM register access should go
through layers such as the powerdomain and clockdomain code that can
hide the details of how to interact with the specific hardware
variant.
While here, rename cm4xxx.c to cm44xx.c to match the naming convention
of the other OMAP4 PRCM files.
Thanks to Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>, Rajendra Nayak
<rnayak@ti.com>, and Benoît Cousson <b-cousson@ti.com> for some comments.
Signed-off-by: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
Cc: Benoît Cousson <b-cousson@ti.com>
Cc: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@ti.com>
Cc: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
2010-12-22 07:05:14 +03:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
u32 v;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
v = omap4_prminst_read_inst_reg(part, inst, idx);
|
|
|
|
v &= ~mask;
|
|
|
|
v |= bits;
|
|
|
|
omap4_prminst_write_inst_reg(v, part, inst, idx);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return v;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2011-07-10 15:56:31 +04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
* omap4_prminst_is_hardreset_asserted - read the HW reset line state of
|
|
|
|
* submodules contained in the hwmod module
|
|
|
|
* @rstctrl_reg: RM_RSTCTRL register address for this module
|
|
|
|
* @shift: register bit shift corresponding to the reset line to check
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Returns 1 if the (sub)module hardreset line is currently asserted,
|
|
|
|
* 0 if the (sub)module hardreset line is not currently asserted, or
|
|
|
|
* -EINVAL upon parameter error.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
int omap4_prminst_is_hardreset_asserted(u8 shift, u8 part, s16 inst,
|
|
|
|
u16 rstctrl_offs)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
u32 v;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
v = omap4_prminst_read_inst_reg(part, inst, rstctrl_offs);
|
|
|
|
v &= 1 << shift;
|
|
|
|
v >>= shift;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return v;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
* omap4_prminst_assert_hardreset - assert the HW reset line of a submodule
|
|
|
|
* @rstctrl_reg: RM_RSTCTRL register address for this module
|
|
|
|
* @shift: register bit shift corresponding to the reset line to assert
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Some IPs like dsp, ipu or iva contain processors that require an HW
|
|
|
|
* reset line to be asserted / deasserted in order to fully enable the
|
|
|
|
* IP. These modules may have multiple hard-reset lines that reset
|
|
|
|
* different 'submodules' inside the IP block. This function will
|
|
|
|
* place the submodule into reset. Returns 0 upon success or -EINVAL
|
|
|
|
* upon an argument error.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
int omap4_prminst_assert_hardreset(u8 shift, u8 part, s16 inst,
|
|
|
|
u16 rstctrl_offs)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
u32 mask = 1 << shift;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
omap4_prminst_rmw_inst_reg_bits(mask, mask, part, inst, rstctrl_offs);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
* omap4_prminst_deassert_hardreset - deassert a submodule hardreset line and
|
|
|
|
* wait
|
|
|
|
* @shift: register bit shift corresponding to the reset line to deassert
|
2015-05-05 16:33:04 +03:00
|
|
|
* @st_shift: status bit offset corresponding to the reset line
|
2014-10-27 18:39:25 +03:00
|
|
|
* @part: PRM partition
|
|
|
|
* @inst: PRM instance offset
|
|
|
|
* @rstctrl_offs: reset register offset
|
2015-05-05 16:33:04 +03:00
|
|
|
* @rstst_offs: reset status register offset
|
2011-07-10 15:56:31 +04:00
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Some IPs like dsp, ipu or iva contain processors that require an HW
|
|
|
|
* reset line to be asserted / deasserted in order to fully enable the
|
|
|
|
* IP. These modules may have multiple hard-reset lines that reset
|
|
|
|
* different 'submodules' inside the IP block. This function will
|
|
|
|
* take the submodule out of reset and wait until the PRCM indicates
|
|
|
|
* that the reset has completed before returning. Returns 0 upon success or
|
|
|
|
* -EINVAL upon an argument error, -EEXIST if the submodule was already out
|
|
|
|
* of reset, or -EBUSY if the submodule did not exit reset promptly.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2014-10-27 18:39:25 +03:00
|
|
|
int omap4_prminst_deassert_hardreset(u8 shift, u8 st_shift, u8 part, s16 inst,
|
2015-05-05 16:33:04 +03:00
|
|
|
u16 rstctrl_offs, u16 rstst_offs)
|
2011-07-10 15:56:31 +04:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
int c;
|
|
|
|
u32 mask = 1 << shift;
|
2015-05-05 16:33:04 +03:00
|
|
|
u32 st_mask = 1 << st_shift;
|
2011-07-10 15:56:31 +04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Check the current status to avoid de-asserting the line twice */
|
|
|
|
if (omap4_prminst_is_hardreset_asserted(shift, part, inst,
|
|
|
|
rstctrl_offs) == 0)
|
|
|
|
return -EEXIST;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Clear the reset status by writing 1 to the status bit */
|
2015-05-05 16:33:04 +03:00
|
|
|
omap4_prminst_rmw_inst_reg_bits(0xffffffff, st_mask, part, inst,
|
2011-07-10 15:56:31 +04:00
|
|
|
rstst_offs);
|
|
|
|
/* de-assert the reset control line */
|
|
|
|
omap4_prminst_rmw_inst_reg_bits(mask, 0, part, inst, rstctrl_offs);
|
|
|
|
/* wait the status to be set */
|
2015-05-05 16:33:04 +03:00
|
|
|
omap_test_timeout(omap4_prminst_is_hardreset_asserted(st_shift, part,
|
|
|
|
inst, rstst_offs),
|
2011-07-10 15:56:31 +04:00
|
|
|
MAX_MODULE_HARDRESET_WAIT, c);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return (c == MAX_MODULE_HARDRESET_WAIT) ? -EBUSY : 0;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2011-07-10 15:56:31 +04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
void omap4_prminst_global_warm_sw_reset(void)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
u32 v;
|
2014-05-22 23:53:54 +04:00
|
|
|
s32 inst = omap4_prmst_get_prm_dev_inst();
|
2013-07-09 11:32:15 +04:00
|
|
|
|
2014-05-22 23:53:54 +04:00
|
|
|
if (inst == PRM_INSTANCE_UNKNOWN)
|
2013-07-09 11:32:15 +04:00
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
|
2014-05-22 23:53:54 +04:00
|
|
|
v = omap4_prminst_read_inst_reg(OMAP4430_PRM_PARTITION, inst,
|
2013-07-09 11:32:15 +04:00
|
|
|
OMAP4_PRM_RSTCTRL_OFFSET);
|
2011-07-10 15:56:31 +04:00
|
|
|
v |= OMAP4430_RST_GLOBAL_WARM_SW_MASK;
|
|
|
|
omap4_prminst_write_inst_reg(v, OMAP4430_PRM_PARTITION,
|
2014-05-22 23:53:54 +04:00
|
|
|
inst, OMAP4_PRM_RSTCTRL_OFFSET);
|
2011-07-10 15:56:31 +04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* OCP barrier */
|
|
|
|
v = omap4_prminst_read_inst_reg(OMAP4430_PRM_PARTITION,
|
2014-05-22 23:53:54 +04:00
|
|
|
inst, OMAP4_PRM_RSTCTRL_OFFSET);
|
2011-07-10 15:56:31 +04:00
|
|
|
}
|