WSL2-Linux-Kernel/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_bbt.c

1404 строки
38 KiB
C
Исходник Обычный вид История

/*
* drivers/mtd/nand_bbt.c
*
* Overview:
* Bad block table support for the NAND driver
*
* Copyright (C) 2004 Thomas Gleixner (tglx@linutronix.de)
*
* This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
* it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
* published by the Free Software Foundation.
*
* Description:
*
* When nand_scan_bbt is called, then it tries to find the bad block table
* depending on the options in the BBT descriptor(s). If no flash based BBT
* (NAND_BBT_USE_FLASH) is specified then the device is scanned for factory
* marked good / bad blocks. This information is used to create a memory BBT.
* Once a new bad block is discovered then the "factory" information is updated
* on the device.
* If a flash based BBT is specified then the function first tries to find the
* BBT on flash. If a BBT is found then the contents are read and the memory
* based BBT is created. If a mirrored BBT is selected then the mirror is
* searched too and the versions are compared. If the mirror has a greater
* version number than the mirror BBT is used to build the memory based BBT.
* If the tables are not versioned, then we "or" the bad block information.
* If one of the BBTs is out of date or does not exist it is (re)created.
* If no BBT exists at all then the device is scanned for factory marked
* good / bad blocks and the bad block tables are created.
*
* For manufacturer created BBTs like the one found on M-SYS DOC devices
* the BBT is searched and read but never created
*
* The auto generated bad block table is located in the last good blocks
* of the device. The table is mirrored, so it can be updated eventually.
* The table is marked in the OOB area with an ident pattern and a version
* number which indicates which of both tables is more up to date. If the NAND
* controller needs the complete OOB area for the ECC information then the
* option NAND_BBT_NO_OOB should be used (along with NAND_BBT_USE_FLASH, of
* course): it moves the ident pattern and the version byte into the data area
* and the OOB area will remain untouched.
*
* The table uses 2 bits per block
* 11b: block is good
* 00b: block is factory marked bad
* 01b, 10b: block is marked bad due to wear
*
* The memory bad block table uses the following scheme:
* 00b: block is good
* 01b: block is marked bad due to wear
* 10b: block is reserved (to protect the bbt area)
* 11b: block is factory marked bad
*
* Multichip devices like DOC store the bad block info per floor.
*
* Following assumptions are made:
* - bbts start at a page boundary, if autolocated on a block boundary
* - the space necessary for a bbt in FLASH does not exceed a block boundary
*
*/
#include <linux/slab.h>
#include <linux/types.h>
#include <linux/mtd/mtd.h>
#include <linux/mtd/nand.h>
#include <linux/mtd/nand_ecc.h>
#include <linux/bitops.h>
#include <linux/delay.h>
#include <linux/vmalloc.h>
static int check_pattern_no_oob(uint8_t *buf, struct nand_bbt_descr *td)
{
int ret;
ret = memcmp(buf, td->pattern, td->len);
if (!ret)
return ret;
return -1;
}
/**
* check_pattern - [GENERIC] check if a pattern is in the buffer
* @buf: the buffer to search
* @len: the length of buffer to search
* @paglen: the pagelength
* @td: search pattern descriptor
*
* Check for a pattern at the given place. Used to search bad block tables and
* good / bad block identifiers. If the SCAN_EMPTY option is set then check, if
* all bytes except the pattern area contain 0xff.
*/
static int check_pattern(uint8_t *buf, int len, int paglen, struct nand_bbt_descr *td)
{
int i, end = 0;
uint8_t *p = buf;
if (td->options & NAND_BBT_NO_OOB)
return check_pattern_no_oob(buf, td);
end = paglen + td->offs;
if (td->options & NAND_BBT_SCANEMPTY) {
for (i = 0; i < end; i++) {
if (p[i] != 0xff)
return -1;
}
}
p += end;
/* Compare the pattern */
for (i = 0; i < td->len; i++) {
if (p[i] != td->pattern[i])
return -1;
}
if (td->options & NAND_BBT_SCANEMPTY) {
p += td->len;
end += td->len;
for (i = end; i < len; i++) {
if (*p++ != 0xff)
return -1;
}
}
return 0;
}
/**
* check_short_pattern - [GENERIC] check if a pattern is in the buffer
* @buf: the buffer to search
* @td: search pattern descriptor
*
* Check for a pattern at the given place. Used to search bad block tables and
* good / bad block identifiers. Same as check_pattern, but no optional empty
* check.
*/
static int check_short_pattern(uint8_t *buf, struct nand_bbt_descr *td)
{
int i;
uint8_t *p = buf;
/* Compare the pattern */
for (i = 0; i < td->len; i++) {
if (p[td->offs + i] != td->pattern[i])
return -1;
}
return 0;
}
/**
* add_marker_len - compute the length of the marker in data area
* @td: BBT descriptor used for computation
*
* The length will be 0 if the marker is located in OOB area.
*/
static u32 add_marker_len(struct nand_bbt_descr *td)
{
u32 len;
if (!(td->options & NAND_BBT_NO_OOB))
return 0;
len = td->len;
if (td->options & NAND_BBT_VERSION)
len++;
return len;
}
/**
* read_bbt - [GENERIC] Read the bad block table starting from page
* @mtd: MTD device structure
* @buf: temporary buffer
* @page: the starting page
* @num: the number of bbt descriptors to read
* @td: the bbt describtion table
* @offs: offset in the memory table
*
* Read the bad block table starting from page.
*/
static int read_bbt(struct mtd_info *mtd, uint8_t *buf, int page, int num,
struct nand_bbt_descr *td, int offs)
{
int res, ret = 0, i, j, act = 0;
struct nand_chip *this = mtd->priv;
size_t retlen, len, totlen;
loff_t from;
int bits = td->options & NAND_BBT_NRBITS_MSK;
uint8_t msk = (uint8_t)((1 << bits) - 1);
u32 marker_len;
int reserved_block_code = td->reserved_block_code;
totlen = (num * bits) >> 3;
marker_len = add_marker_len(td);
from = ((loff_t)page) << this->page_shift;
while (totlen) {
len = min(totlen, (size_t)(1 << this->bbt_erase_shift));
if (marker_len) {
/*
* In case the BBT marker is not in the OOB area it
* will be just in the first page.
*/
len -= marker_len;
from += marker_len;
marker_len = 0;
}
res = mtd->read(mtd, from, len, &retlen, buf);
if (res < 0) {
if (mtd_is_eccerr(res)) {
pr_info("nand_bbt: ECC error in BBT at "
"0x%012llx\n", from & ~mtd->writesize);
return res;
} else if (mtd_is_bitflip(res)) {
pr_info("nand_bbt: corrected error in BBT at "
"0x%012llx\n", from & ~mtd->writesize);
ret = res;
} else {
pr_info("nand_bbt: error reading BBT\n");
return res;
}
}
/* Analyse data */
for (i = 0; i < len; i++) {
uint8_t dat = buf[i];
for (j = 0; j < 8; j += bits, act += 2) {
uint8_t tmp = (dat >> j) & msk;
if (tmp == msk)
continue;
if (reserved_block_code && (tmp == reserved_block_code)) {
pr_info("nand_read_bbt: reserved block at 0x%012llx\n",
(loff_t)((offs << 2) + (act >> 1)) << this->bbt_erase_shift);
this->bbt[offs + (act >> 3)] |= 0x2 << (act & 0x06);
mtd->ecc_stats.bbtblocks++;
continue;
}
/*
* Leave it for now, if it's matured we can
* move this message to pr_debug.
*/
pr_info("nand_read_bbt: bad block at 0x%012llx\n",
(loff_t)((offs << 2) + (act >> 1)) << this->bbt_erase_shift);
/* Factory marked bad or worn out? */
if (tmp == 0)
this->bbt[offs + (act >> 3)] |= 0x3 << (act & 0x06);
else
this->bbt[offs + (act >> 3)] |= 0x1 << (act & 0x06);
mtd->ecc_stats.badblocks++;
}
}
totlen -= len;
from += len;
}
return ret;
}
/**
* read_abs_bbt - [GENERIC] Read the bad block table starting at a given page
* @mtd: MTD device structure
* @buf: temporary buffer
* @td: descriptor for the bad block table
* @chip: read the table for a specific chip, -1 read all chips; applies only if
* NAND_BBT_PERCHIP option is set
*
* Read the bad block table for all chips starting at a given page. We assume
* that the bbt bits are in consecutive order.
*/
static int read_abs_bbt(struct mtd_info *mtd, uint8_t *buf, struct nand_bbt_descr *td, int chip)
{
struct nand_chip *this = mtd->priv;
int res = 0, i;
if (td->options & NAND_BBT_PERCHIP) {
int offs = 0;
for (i = 0; i < this->numchips; i++) {
if (chip == -1 || chip == i)
res = read_bbt(mtd, buf, td->pages[i],
this->chipsize >> this->bbt_erase_shift,
td, offs);
if (res)
return res;
offs += this->chipsize >> (this->bbt_erase_shift + 2);
}
} else {
res = read_bbt(mtd, buf, td->pages[0],
mtd->size >> this->bbt_erase_shift, td, 0);
if (res)
return res;
}
return 0;
}
/* BBT marker is in the first page, no OOB */
static int scan_read_raw_data(struct mtd_info *mtd, uint8_t *buf, loff_t offs,
struct nand_bbt_descr *td)
{
size_t retlen;
size_t len;
len = td->len;
if (td->options & NAND_BBT_VERSION)
len++;
return mtd->read(mtd, offs, len, &retlen, buf);
}
/* Scan read raw data from flash */
static int scan_read_raw_oob(struct mtd_info *mtd, uint8_t *buf, loff_t offs,
[MTD] Rework the out of band handling completely Hopefully the last iteration on this! The handling of out of band data on NAND was accompanied by tons of fruitless discussions and halfarsed patches to make it work for a particular problem. Sufficiently annoyed by I all those "I know it better" mails and the resonable amount of discarded "it solves my problem" patches, I finally decided to go for the big rework. After removing the _ecc variants of mtd read/write functions the solution to satisfy the various requirements was to refactor the read/write _oob functions in mtd. The major change is that read/write_oob now takes a pointer to an operation descriptor structure "struct mtd_oob_ops".instead of having a function with at least seven arguments. read/write_oob which should probably renamed to a more descriptive name, can do the following tasks: - read/write out of band data - read/write data content and out of band data - read/write raw data content and out of band data (ecc disabled) struct mtd_oob_ops has a mode field, which determines the oob handling mode. Aside of the MTD_OOB_RAW mode, which is intended to be especially for diagnostic purposes and some internal functions e.g. bad block table creation, the other two modes are for mtd clients: MTD_OOB_PLACE puts/gets the given oob data exactly to/from the place which is described by the ooboffs and ooblen fields of the mtd_oob_ops strcuture. It's up to the caller to make sure that the byte positions are not used by the ECC placement algorithms. MTD_OOB_AUTO puts/gets the given oob data automaticaly to/from the places in the out of band area which are described by the oobfree tuples in the ecclayout data structre which is associated to the devicee. The decision whether data plus oob or oob only handling is done depends on the setting of the datbuf member of the data structure. When datbuf == NULL then the internal read/write_oob functions are selected, otherwise the read/write data routines are invoked. Tested on a few platforms with all variants. Please be aware of possible regressions for your particular device / application scenario Disclaimer: Any whining will be ignored from those who just contributed "hot air blurb" and never sat down to tackle the underlying problem of the mess in the NAND driver grown over time and the big chunk of work to fix up the existing users. The problem was not the holiness of the existing MTD interfaces. The problems was the lack of time to go for the big overhaul. It's easy to add more mess to the existing one, but it takes alot of effort to go for a real solution. Improvements and bugfixes are welcome! Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2006-05-29 05:26:58 +04:00
size_t len)
{
struct mtd_oob_ops ops;
int res;
[MTD] Rework the out of band handling completely Hopefully the last iteration on this! The handling of out of band data on NAND was accompanied by tons of fruitless discussions and halfarsed patches to make it work for a particular problem. Sufficiently annoyed by I all those "I know it better" mails and the resonable amount of discarded "it solves my problem" patches, I finally decided to go for the big rework. After removing the _ecc variants of mtd read/write functions the solution to satisfy the various requirements was to refactor the read/write _oob functions in mtd. The major change is that read/write_oob now takes a pointer to an operation descriptor structure "struct mtd_oob_ops".instead of having a function with at least seven arguments. read/write_oob which should probably renamed to a more descriptive name, can do the following tasks: - read/write out of band data - read/write data content and out of band data - read/write raw data content and out of band data (ecc disabled) struct mtd_oob_ops has a mode field, which determines the oob handling mode. Aside of the MTD_OOB_RAW mode, which is intended to be especially for diagnostic purposes and some internal functions e.g. bad block table creation, the other two modes are for mtd clients: MTD_OOB_PLACE puts/gets the given oob data exactly to/from the place which is described by the ooboffs and ooblen fields of the mtd_oob_ops strcuture. It's up to the caller to make sure that the byte positions are not used by the ECC placement algorithms. MTD_OOB_AUTO puts/gets the given oob data automaticaly to/from the places in the out of band area which are described by the oobfree tuples in the ecclayout data structre which is associated to the devicee. The decision whether data plus oob or oob only handling is done depends on the setting of the datbuf member of the data structure. When datbuf == NULL then the internal read/write_oob functions are selected, otherwise the read/write data routines are invoked. Tested on a few platforms with all variants. Please be aware of possible regressions for your particular device / application scenario Disclaimer: Any whining will be ignored from those who just contributed "hot air blurb" and never sat down to tackle the underlying problem of the mess in the NAND driver grown over time and the big chunk of work to fix up the existing users. The problem was not the holiness of the existing MTD interfaces. The problems was the lack of time to go for the big overhaul. It's easy to add more mess to the existing one, but it takes alot of effort to go for a real solution. Improvements and bugfixes are welcome! Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2006-05-29 05:26:58 +04:00
ops.mode = MTD_OPS_RAW;
[MTD] Rework the out of band handling completely Hopefully the last iteration on this! The handling of out of band data on NAND was accompanied by tons of fruitless discussions and halfarsed patches to make it work for a particular problem. Sufficiently annoyed by I all those "I know it better" mails and the resonable amount of discarded "it solves my problem" patches, I finally decided to go for the big rework. After removing the _ecc variants of mtd read/write functions the solution to satisfy the various requirements was to refactor the read/write _oob functions in mtd. The major change is that read/write_oob now takes a pointer to an operation descriptor structure "struct mtd_oob_ops".instead of having a function with at least seven arguments. read/write_oob which should probably renamed to a more descriptive name, can do the following tasks: - read/write out of band data - read/write data content and out of band data - read/write raw data content and out of band data (ecc disabled) struct mtd_oob_ops has a mode field, which determines the oob handling mode. Aside of the MTD_OOB_RAW mode, which is intended to be especially for diagnostic purposes and some internal functions e.g. bad block table creation, the other two modes are for mtd clients: MTD_OOB_PLACE puts/gets the given oob data exactly to/from the place which is described by the ooboffs and ooblen fields of the mtd_oob_ops strcuture. It's up to the caller to make sure that the byte positions are not used by the ECC placement algorithms. MTD_OOB_AUTO puts/gets the given oob data automaticaly to/from the places in the out of band area which are described by the oobfree tuples in the ecclayout data structre which is associated to the devicee. The decision whether data plus oob or oob only handling is done depends on the setting of the datbuf member of the data structure. When datbuf == NULL then the internal read/write_oob functions are selected, otherwise the read/write data routines are invoked. Tested on a few platforms with all variants. Please be aware of possible regressions for your particular device / application scenario Disclaimer: Any whining will be ignored from those who just contributed "hot air blurb" and never sat down to tackle the underlying problem of the mess in the NAND driver grown over time and the big chunk of work to fix up the existing users. The problem was not the holiness of the existing MTD interfaces. The problems was the lack of time to go for the big overhaul. It's easy to add more mess to the existing one, but it takes alot of effort to go for a real solution. Improvements and bugfixes are welcome! Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2006-05-29 05:26:58 +04:00
ops.ooboffs = 0;
ops.ooblen = mtd->oobsize;
while (len > 0) {
ops.datbuf = buf;
ops.len = min(len, (size_t)mtd->writesize);
ops.oobbuf = buf + ops.len;
res = mtd->read_oob(mtd, offs, &ops);
if (res)
return res;
buf += mtd->oobsize + mtd->writesize;
len -= mtd->writesize;
}
return 0;
[MTD] Rework the out of band handling completely Hopefully the last iteration on this! The handling of out of band data on NAND was accompanied by tons of fruitless discussions and halfarsed patches to make it work for a particular problem. Sufficiently annoyed by I all those "I know it better" mails and the resonable amount of discarded "it solves my problem" patches, I finally decided to go for the big rework. After removing the _ecc variants of mtd read/write functions the solution to satisfy the various requirements was to refactor the read/write _oob functions in mtd. The major change is that read/write_oob now takes a pointer to an operation descriptor structure "struct mtd_oob_ops".instead of having a function with at least seven arguments. read/write_oob which should probably renamed to a more descriptive name, can do the following tasks: - read/write out of band data - read/write data content and out of band data - read/write raw data content and out of band data (ecc disabled) struct mtd_oob_ops has a mode field, which determines the oob handling mode. Aside of the MTD_OOB_RAW mode, which is intended to be especially for diagnostic purposes and some internal functions e.g. bad block table creation, the other two modes are for mtd clients: MTD_OOB_PLACE puts/gets the given oob data exactly to/from the place which is described by the ooboffs and ooblen fields of the mtd_oob_ops strcuture. It's up to the caller to make sure that the byte positions are not used by the ECC placement algorithms. MTD_OOB_AUTO puts/gets the given oob data automaticaly to/from the places in the out of band area which are described by the oobfree tuples in the ecclayout data structre which is associated to the devicee. The decision whether data plus oob or oob only handling is done depends on the setting of the datbuf member of the data structure. When datbuf == NULL then the internal read/write_oob functions are selected, otherwise the read/write data routines are invoked. Tested on a few platforms with all variants. Please be aware of possible regressions for your particular device / application scenario Disclaimer: Any whining will be ignored from those who just contributed "hot air blurb" and never sat down to tackle the underlying problem of the mess in the NAND driver grown over time and the big chunk of work to fix up the existing users. The problem was not the holiness of the existing MTD interfaces. The problems was the lack of time to go for the big overhaul. It's easy to add more mess to the existing one, but it takes alot of effort to go for a real solution. Improvements and bugfixes are welcome! Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2006-05-29 05:26:58 +04:00
}
static int scan_read_raw(struct mtd_info *mtd, uint8_t *buf, loff_t offs,
size_t len, struct nand_bbt_descr *td)
{
if (td->options & NAND_BBT_NO_OOB)
return scan_read_raw_data(mtd, buf, offs, td);
else
return scan_read_raw_oob(mtd, buf, offs, len);
}
/* Scan write data with oob to flash */
[MTD] Rework the out of band handling completely Hopefully the last iteration on this! The handling of out of band data on NAND was accompanied by tons of fruitless discussions and halfarsed patches to make it work for a particular problem. Sufficiently annoyed by I all those "I know it better" mails and the resonable amount of discarded "it solves my problem" patches, I finally decided to go for the big rework. After removing the _ecc variants of mtd read/write functions the solution to satisfy the various requirements was to refactor the read/write _oob functions in mtd. The major change is that read/write_oob now takes a pointer to an operation descriptor structure "struct mtd_oob_ops".instead of having a function with at least seven arguments. read/write_oob which should probably renamed to a more descriptive name, can do the following tasks: - read/write out of band data - read/write data content and out of band data - read/write raw data content and out of band data (ecc disabled) struct mtd_oob_ops has a mode field, which determines the oob handling mode. Aside of the MTD_OOB_RAW mode, which is intended to be especially for diagnostic purposes and some internal functions e.g. bad block table creation, the other two modes are for mtd clients: MTD_OOB_PLACE puts/gets the given oob data exactly to/from the place which is described by the ooboffs and ooblen fields of the mtd_oob_ops strcuture. It's up to the caller to make sure that the byte positions are not used by the ECC placement algorithms. MTD_OOB_AUTO puts/gets the given oob data automaticaly to/from the places in the out of band area which are described by the oobfree tuples in the ecclayout data structre which is associated to the devicee. The decision whether data plus oob or oob only handling is done depends on the setting of the datbuf member of the data structure. When datbuf == NULL then the internal read/write_oob functions are selected, otherwise the read/write data routines are invoked. Tested on a few platforms with all variants. Please be aware of possible regressions for your particular device / application scenario Disclaimer: Any whining will be ignored from those who just contributed "hot air blurb" and never sat down to tackle the underlying problem of the mess in the NAND driver grown over time and the big chunk of work to fix up the existing users. The problem was not the holiness of the existing MTD interfaces. The problems was the lack of time to go for the big overhaul. It's easy to add more mess to the existing one, but it takes alot of effort to go for a real solution. Improvements and bugfixes are welcome! Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2006-05-29 05:26:58 +04:00
static int scan_write_bbt(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t offs, size_t len,
uint8_t *buf, uint8_t *oob)
{
struct mtd_oob_ops ops;
ops.mode = MTD_OPS_PLACE_OOB;
[MTD] Rework the out of band handling completely Hopefully the last iteration on this! The handling of out of band data on NAND was accompanied by tons of fruitless discussions and halfarsed patches to make it work for a particular problem. Sufficiently annoyed by I all those "I know it better" mails and the resonable amount of discarded "it solves my problem" patches, I finally decided to go for the big rework. After removing the _ecc variants of mtd read/write functions the solution to satisfy the various requirements was to refactor the read/write _oob functions in mtd. The major change is that read/write_oob now takes a pointer to an operation descriptor structure "struct mtd_oob_ops".instead of having a function with at least seven arguments. read/write_oob which should probably renamed to a more descriptive name, can do the following tasks: - read/write out of band data - read/write data content and out of band data - read/write raw data content and out of band data (ecc disabled) struct mtd_oob_ops has a mode field, which determines the oob handling mode. Aside of the MTD_OOB_RAW mode, which is intended to be especially for diagnostic purposes and some internal functions e.g. bad block table creation, the other two modes are for mtd clients: MTD_OOB_PLACE puts/gets the given oob data exactly to/from the place which is described by the ooboffs and ooblen fields of the mtd_oob_ops strcuture. It's up to the caller to make sure that the byte positions are not used by the ECC placement algorithms. MTD_OOB_AUTO puts/gets the given oob data automaticaly to/from the places in the out of band area which are described by the oobfree tuples in the ecclayout data structre which is associated to the devicee. The decision whether data plus oob or oob only handling is done depends on the setting of the datbuf member of the data structure. When datbuf == NULL then the internal read/write_oob functions are selected, otherwise the read/write data routines are invoked. Tested on a few platforms with all variants. Please be aware of possible regressions for your particular device / application scenario Disclaimer: Any whining will be ignored from those who just contributed "hot air blurb" and never sat down to tackle the underlying problem of the mess in the NAND driver grown over time and the big chunk of work to fix up the existing users. The problem was not the holiness of the existing MTD interfaces. The problems was the lack of time to go for the big overhaul. It's easy to add more mess to the existing one, but it takes alot of effort to go for a real solution. Improvements and bugfixes are welcome! Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2006-05-29 05:26:58 +04:00
ops.ooboffs = 0;
ops.ooblen = mtd->oobsize;
ops.datbuf = buf;
ops.oobbuf = oob;
ops.len = len;
return mtd->write_oob(mtd, offs, &ops);
}
static u32 bbt_get_ver_offs(struct mtd_info *mtd, struct nand_bbt_descr *td)
{
u32 ver_offs = td->veroffs;
if (!(td->options & NAND_BBT_NO_OOB))
ver_offs += mtd->writesize;
return ver_offs;
}
/**
* read_abs_bbts - [GENERIC] Read the bad block table(s) for all chips starting at a given page
* @mtd: MTD device structure
* @buf: temporary buffer
* @td: descriptor for the bad block table
* @md: descriptor for the bad block table mirror
*
* Read the bad block table(s) for all chips starting at a given page. We
* assume that the bbt bits are in consecutive order.
*/
[MTD] Rework the out of band handling completely Hopefully the last iteration on this! The handling of out of band data on NAND was accompanied by tons of fruitless discussions and halfarsed patches to make it work for a particular problem. Sufficiently annoyed by I all those "I know it better" mails and the resonable amount of discarded "it solves my problem" patches, I finally decided to go for the big rework. After removing the _ecc variants of mtd read/write functions the solution to satisfy the various requirements was to refactor the read/write _oob functions in mtd. The major change is that read/write_oob now takes a pointer to an operation descriptor structure "struct mtd_oob_ops".instead of having a function with at least seven arguments. read/write_oob which should probably renamed to a more descriptive name, can do the following tasks: - read/write out of band data - read/write data content and out of band data - read/write raw data content and out of band data (ecc disabled) struct mtd_oob_ops has a mode field, which determines the oob handling mode. Aside of the MTD_OOB_RAW mode, which is intended to be especially for diagnostic purposes and some internal functions e.g. bad block table creation, the other two modes are for mtd clients: MTD_OOB_PLACE puts/gets the given oob data exactly to/from the place which is described by the ooboffs and ooblen fields of the mtd_oob_ops strcuture. It's up to the caller to make sure that the byte positions are not used by the ECC placement algorithms. MTD_OOB_AUTO puts/gets the given oob data automaticaly to/from the places in the out of band area which are described by the oobfree tuples in the ecclayout data structre which is associated to the devicee. The decision whether data plus oob or oob only handling is done depends on the setting of the datbuf member of the data structure. When datbuf == NULL then the internal read/write_oob functions are selected, otherwise the read/write data routines are invoked. Tested on a few platforms with all variants. Please be aware of possible regressions for your particular device / application scenario Disclaimer: Any whining will be ignored from those who just contributed "hot air blurb" and never sat down to tackle the underlying problem of the mess in the NAND driver grown over time and the big chunk of work to fix up the existing users. The problem was not the holiness of the existing MTD interfaces. The problems was the lack of time to go for the big overhaul. It's easy to add more mess to the existing one, but it takes alot of effort to go for a real solution. Improvements and bugfixes are welcome! Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2006-05-29 05:26:58 +04:00
static int read_abs_bbts(struct mtd_info *mtd, uint8_t *buf,
struct nand_bbt_descr *td, struct nand_bbt_descr *md)
{
struct nand_chip *this = mtd->priv;
/* Read the primary version, if available */
if (td->options & NAND_BBT_VERSION) {
scan_read_raw(mtd, buf, (loff_t)td->pages[0] << this->page_shift,
mtd->writesize, td);
td->version[0] = buf[bbt_get_ver_offs(mtd, td)];
pr_info("Bad block table at page %d, version 0x%02X\n",
td->pages[0], td->version[0]);
}
/* Read the mirror version, if available */
if (md && (md->options & NAND_BBT_VERSION)) {
scan_read_raw(mtd, buf, (loff_t)md->pages[0] << this->page_shift,
mtd->writesize, td);
md->version[0] = buf[bbt_get_ver_offs(mtd, md)];
pr_info("Bad block table at page %d, version 0x%02X\n",
md->pages[0], md->version[0]);
}
return 1;
}
/* Scan a given block full */
[MTD] Rework the out of band handling completely Hopefully the last iteration on this! The handling of out of band data on NAND was accompanied by tons of fruitless discussions and halfarsed patches to make it work for a particular problem. Sufficiently annoyed by I all those "I know it better" mails and the resonable amount of discarded "it solves my problem" patches, I finally decided to go for the big rework. After removing the _ecc variants of mtd read/write functions the solution to satisfy the various requirements was to refactor the read/write _oob functions in mtd. The major change is that read/write_oob now takes a pointer to an operation descriptor structure "struct mtd_oob_ops".instead of having a function with at least seven arguments. read/write_oob which should probably renamed to a more descriptive name, can do the following tasks: - read/write out of band data - read/write data content and out of band data - read/write raw data content and out of band data (ecc disabled) struct mtd_oob_ops has a mode field, which determines the oob handling mode. Aside of the MTD_OOB_RAW mode, which is intended to be especially for diagnostic purposes and some internal functions e.g. bad block table creation, the other two modes are for mtd clients: MTD_OOB_PLACE puts/gets the given oob data exactly to/from the place which is described by the ooboffs and ooblen fields of the mtd_oob_ops strcuture. It's up to the caller to make sure that the byte positions are not used by the ECC placement algorithms. MTD_OOB_AUTO puts/gets the given oob data automaticaly to/from the places in the out of band area which are described by the oobfree tuples in the ecclayout data structre which is associated to the devicee. The decision whether data plus oob or oob only handling is done depends on the setting of the datbuf member of the data structure. When datbuf == NULL then the internal read/write_oob functions are selected, otherwise the read/write data routines are invoked. Tested on a few platforms with all variants. Please be aware of possible regressions for your particular device / application scenario Disclaimer: Any whining will be ignored from those who just contributed "hot air blurb" and never sat down to tackle the underlying problem of the mess in the NAND driver grown over time and the big chunk of work to fix up the existing users. The problem was not the holiness of the existing MTD interfaces. The problems was the lack of time to go for the big overhaul. It's easy to add more mess to the existing one, but it takes alot of effort to go for a real solution. Improvements and bugfixes are welcome! Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2006-05-29 05:26:58 +04:00
static int scan_block_full(struct mtd_info *mtd, struct nand_bbt_descr *bd,
loff_t offs, uint8_t *buf, size_t readlen,
int scanlen, int len)
{
int ret, j;
ret = scan_read_raw_oob(mtd, buf, offs, readlen);
/* Ignore ECC errors when checking for BBM */
if (ret && !mtd_is_bitflip_or_eccerr(ret))
[MTD] Rework the out of band handling completely Hopefully the last iteration on this! The handling of out of band data on NAND was accompanied by tons of fruitless discussions and halfarsed patches to make it work for a particular problem. Sufficiently annoyed by I all those "I know it better" mails and the resonable amount of discarded "it solves my problem" patches, I finally decided to go for the big rework. After removing the _ecc variants of mtd read/write functions the solution to satisfy the various requirements was to refactor the read/write _oob functions in mtd. The major change is that read/write_oob now takes a pointer to an operation descriptor structure "struct mtd_oob_ops".instead of having a function with at least seven arguments. read/write_oob which should probably renamed to a more descriptive name, can do the following tasks: - read/write out of band data - read/write data content and out of band data - read/write raw data content and out of band data (ecc disabled) struct mtd_oob_ops has a mode field, which determines the oob handling mode. Aside of the MTD_OOB_RAW mode, which is intended to be especially for diagnostic purposes and some internal functions e.g. bad block table creation, the other two modes are for mtd clients: MTD_OOB_PLACE puts/gets the given oob data exactly to/from the place which is described by the ooboffs and ooblen fields of the mtd_oob_ops strcuture. It's up to the caller to make sure that the byte positions are not used by the ECC placement algorithms. MTD_OOB_AUTO puts/gets the given oob data automaticaly to/from the places in the out of band area which are described by the oobfree tuples in the ecclayout data structre which is associated to the devicee. The decision whether data plus oob or oob only handling is done depends on the setting of the datbuf member of the data structure. When datbuf == NULL then the internal read/write_oob functions are selected, otherwise the read/write data routines are invoked. Tested on a few platforms with all variants. Please be aware of possible regressions for your particular device / application scenario Disclaimer: Any whining will be ignored from those who just contributed "hot air blurb" and never sat down to tackle the underlying problem of the mess in the NAND driver grown over time and the big chunk of work to fix up the existing users. The problem was not the holiness of the existing MTD interfaces. The problems was the lack of time to go for the big overhaul. It's easy to add more mess to the existing one, but it takes alot of effort to go for a real solution. Improvements and bugfixes are welcome! Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2006-05-29 05:26:58 +04:00
return ret;
for (j = 0; j < len; j++, buf += scanlen) {
if (check_pattern(buf, scanlen, mtd->writesize, bd))
return 1;
}
return 0;
}
/* Scan a given block partially */
[MTD] Rework the out of band handling completely Hopefully the last iteration on this! The handling of out of band data on NAND was accompanied by tons of fruitless discussions and halfarsed patches to make it work for a particular problem. Sufficiently annoyed by I all those "I know it better" mails and the resonable amount of discarded "it solves my problem" patches, I finally decided to go for the big rework. After removing the _ecc variants of mtd read/write functions the solution to satisfy the various requirements was to refactor the read/write _oob functions in mtd. The major change is that read/write_oob now takes a pointer to an operation descriptor structure "struct mtd_oob_ops".instead of having a function with at least seven arguments. read/write_oob which should probably renamed to a more descriptive name, can do the following tasks: - read/write out of band data - read/write data content and out of band data - read/write raw data content and out of band data (ecc disabled) struct mtd_oob_ops has a mode field, which determines the oob handling mode. Aside of the MTD_OOB_RAW mode, which is intended to be especially for diagnostic purposes and some internal functions e.g. bad block table creation, the other two modes are for mtd clients: MTD_OOB_PLACE puts/gets the given oob data exactly to/from the place which is described by the ooboffs and ooblen fields of the mtd_oob_ops strcuture. It's up to the caller to make sure that the byte positions are not used by the ECC placement algorithms. MTD_OOB_AUTO puts/gets the given oob data automaticaly to/from the places in the out of band area which are described by the oobfree tuples in the ecclayout data structre which is associated to the devicee. The decision whether data plus oob or oob only handling is done depends on the setting of the datbuf member of the data structure. When datbuf == NULL then the internal read/write_oob functions are selected, otherwise the read/write data routines are invoked. Tested on a few platforms with all variants. Please be aware of possible regressions for your particular device / application scenario Disclaimer: Any whining will be ignored from those who just contributed "hot air blurb" and never sat down to tackle the underlying problem of the mess in the NAND driver grown over time and the big chunk of work to fix up the existing users. The problem was not the holiness of the existing MTD interfaces. The problems was the lack of time to go for the big overhaul. It's easy to add more mess to the existing one, but it takes alot of effort to go for a real solution. Improvements and bugfixes are welcome! Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2006-05-29 05:26:58 +04:00
static int scan_block_fast(struct mtd_info *mtd, struct nand_bbt_descr *bd,
loff_t offs, uint8_t *buf, int len)
{
struct mtd_oob_ops ops;
int j, ret;
ops.ooblen = mtd->oobsize;
ops.oobbuf = buf;
ops.ooboffs = 0;
ops.datbuf = NULL;
ops.mode = MTD_OPS_PLACE_OOB;
[MTD] Rework the out of band handling completely Hopefully the last iteration on this! The handling of out of band data on NAND was accompanied by tons of fruitless discussions and halfarsed patches to make it work for a particular problem. Sufficiently annoyed by I all those "I know it better" mails and the resonable amount of discarded "it solves my problem" patches, I finally decided to go for the big rework. After removing the _ecc variants of mtd read/write functions the solution to satisfy the various requirements was to refactor the read/write _oob functions in mtd. The major change is that read/write_oob now takes a pointer to an operation descriptor structure "struct mtd_oob_ops".instead of having a function with at least seven arguments. read/write_oob which should probably renamed to a more descriptive name, can do the following tasks: - read/write out of band data - read/write data content and out of band data - read/write raw data content and out of band data (ecc disabled) struct mtd_oob_ops has a mode field, which determines the oob handling mode. Aside of the MTD_OOB_RAW mode, which is intended to be especially for diagnostic purposes and some internal functions e.g. bad block table creation, the other two modes are for mtd clients: MTD_OOB_PLACE puts/gets the given oob data exactly to/from the place which is described by the ooboffs and ooblen fields of the mtd_oob_ops strcuture. It's up to the caller to make sure that the byte positions are not used by the ECC placement algorithms. MTD_OOB_AUTO puts/gets the given oob data automaticaly to/from the places in the out of band area which are described by the oobfree tuples in the ecclayout data structre which is associated to the devicee. The decision whether data plus oob or oob only handling is done depends on the setting of the datbuf member of the data structure. When datbuf == NULL then the internal read/write_oob functions are selected, otherwise the read/write data routines are invoked. Tested on a few platforms with all variants. Please be aware of possible regressions for your particular device / application scenario Disclaimer: Any whining will be ignored from those who just contributed "hot air blurb" and never sat down to tackle the underlying problem of the mess in the NAND driver grown over time and the big chunk of work to fix up the existing users. The problem was not the holiness of the existing MTD interfaces. The problems was the lack of time to go for the big overhaul. It's easy to add more mess to the existing one, but it takes alot of effort to go for a real solution. Improvements and bugfixes are welcome! Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2006-05-29 05:26:58 +04:00
for (j = 0; j < len; j++) {
/*
* Read the full oob until read_oob is fixed to handle single
* byte reads for 16 bit buswidth.
[MTD] Rework the out of band handling completely Hopefully the last iteration on this! The handling of out of band data on NAND was accompanied by tons of fruitless discussions and halfarsed patches to make it work for a particular problem. Sufficiently annoyed by I all those "I know it better" mails and the resonable amount of discarded "it solves my problem" patches, I finally decided to go for the big rework. After removing the _ecc variants of mtd read/write functions the solution to satisfy the various requirements was to refactor the read/write _oob functions in mtd. The major change is that read/write_oob now takes a pointer to an operation descriptor structure "struct mtd_oob_ops".instead of having a function with at least seven arguments. read/write_oob which should probably renamed to a more descriptive name, can do the following tasks: - read/write out of band data - read/write data content and out of band data - read/write raw data content and out of band data (ecc disabled) struct mtd_oob_ops has a mode field, which determines the oob handling mode. Aside of the MTD_OOB_RAW mode, which is intended to be especially for diagnostic purposes and some internal functions e.g. bad block table creation, the other two modes are for mtd clients: MTD_OOB_PLACE puts/gets the given oob data exactly to/from the place which is described by the ooboffs and ooblen fields of the mtd_oob_ops strcuture. It's up to the caller to make sure that the byte positions are not used by the ECC placement algorithms. MTD_OOB_AUTO puts/gets the given oob data automaticaly to/from the places in the out of band area which are described by the oobfree tuples in the ecclayout data structre which is associated to the devicee. The decision whether data plus oob or oob only handling is done depends on the setting of the datbuf member of the data structure. When datbuf == NULL then the internal read/write_oob functions are selected, otherwise the read/write data routines are invoked. Tested on a few platforms with all variants. Please be aware of possible regressions for your particular device / application scenario Disclaimer: Any whining will be ignored from those who just contributed "hot air blurb" and never sat down to tackle the underlying problem of the mess in the NAND driver grown over time and the big chunk of work to fix up the existing users. The problem was not the holiness of the existing MTD interfaces. The problems was the lack of time to go for the big overhaul. It's easy to add more mess to the existing one, but it takes alot of effort to go for a real solution. Improvements and bugfixes are welcome! Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2006-05-29 05:26:58 +04:00
*/
ret = mtd->read_oob(mtd, offs, &ops);
/* Ignore ECC errors when checking for BBM */
if (ret && !mtd_is_bitflip_or_eccerr(ret))
[MTD] Rework the out of band handling completely Hopefully the last iteration on this! The handling of out of band data on NAND was accompanied by tons of fruitless discussions and halfarsed patches to make it work for a particular problem. Sufficiently annoyed by I all those "I know it better" mails and the resonable amount of discarded "it solves my problem" patches, I finally decided to go for the big rework. After removing the _ecc variants of mtd read/write functions the solution to satisfy the various requirements was to refactor the read/write _oob functions in mtd. The major change is that read/write_oob now takes a pointer to an operation descriptor structure "struct mtd_oob_ops".instead of having a function with at least seven arguments. read/write_oob which should probably renamed to a more descriptive name, can do the following tasks: - read/write out of band data - read/write data content and out of band data - read/write raw data content and out of band data (ecc disabled) struct mtd_oob_ops has a mode field, which determines the oob handling mode. Aside of the MTD_OOB_RAW mode, which is intended to be especially for diagnostic purposes and some internal functions e.g. bad block table creation, the other two modes are for mtd clients: MTD_OOB_PLACE puts/gets the given oob data exactly to/from the place which is described by the ooboffs and ooblen fields of the mtd_oob_ops strcuture. It's up to the caller to make sure that the byte positions are not used by the ECC placement algorithms. MTD_OOB_AUTO puts/gets the given oob data automaticaly to/from the places in the out of band area which are described by the oobfree tuples in the ecclayout data structre which is associated to the devicee. The decision whether data plus oob or oob only handling is done depends on the setting of the datbuf member of the data structure. When datbuf == NULL then the internal read/write_oob functions are selected, otherwise the read/write data routines are invoked. Tested on a few platforms with all variants. Please be aware of possible regressions for your particular device / application scenario Disclaimer: Any whining will be ignored from those who just contributed "hot air blurb" and never sat down to tackle the underlying problem of the mess in the NAND driver grown over time and the big chunk of work to fix up the existing users. The problem was not the holiness of the existing MTD interfaces. The problems was the lack of time to go for the big overhaul. It's easy to add more mess to the existing one, but it takes alot of effort to go for a real solution. Improvements and bugfixes are welcome! Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2006-05-29 05:26:58 +04:00
return ret;
if (check_short_pattern(buf, bd))
return 1;
offs += mtd->writesize;
}
return 0;
}
/**
* create_bbt - [GENERIC] Create a bad block table by scanning the device
* @mtd: MTD device structure
* @buf: temporary buffer
* @bd: descriptor for the good/bad block search pattern
* @chip: create the table for a specific chip, -1 read all chips; applies only
* if NAND_BBT_PERCHIP option is set
*
* Create a bad block table by scanning the device for the given good/bad block
* identify pattern.
*/
[MTD] Rework the out of band handling completely Hopefully the last iteration on this! The handling of out of band data on NAND was accompanied by tons of fruitless discussions and halfarsed patches to make it work for a particular problem. Sufficiently annoyed by I all those "I know it better" mails and the resonable amount of discarded "it solves my problem" patches, I finally decided to go for the big rework. After removing the _ecc variants of mtd read/write functions the solution to satisfy the various requirements was to refactor the read/write _oob functions in mtd. The major change is that read/write_oob now takes a pointer to an operation descriptor structure "struct mtd_oob_ops".instead of having a function with at least seven arguments. read/write_oob which should probably renamed to a more descriptive name, can do the following tasks: - read/write out of band data - read/write data content and out of band data - read/write raw data content and out of band data (ecc disabled) struct mtd_oob_ops has a mode field, which determines the oob handling mode. Aside of the MTD_OOB_RAW mode, which is intended to be especially for diagnostic purposes and some internal functions e.g. bad block table creation, the other two modes are for mtd clients: MTD_OOB_PLACE puts/gets the given oob data exactly to/from the place which is described by the ooboffs and ooblen fields of the mtd_oob_ops strcuture. It's up to the caller to make sure that the byte positions are not used by the ECC placement algorithms. MTD_OOB_AUTO puts/gets the given oob data automaticaly to/from the places in the out of band area which are described by the oobfree tuples in the ecclayout data structre which is associated to the devicee. The decision whether data plus oob or oob only handling is done depends on the setting of the datbuf member of the data structure. When datbuf == NULL then the internal read/write_oob functions are selected, otherwise the read/write data routines are invoked. Tested on a few platforms with all variants. Please be aware of possible regressions for your particular device / application scenario Disclaimer: Any whining will be ignored from those who just contributed "hot air blurb" and never sat down to tackle the underlying problem of the mess in the NAND driver grown over time and the big chunk of work to fix up the existing users. The problem was not the holiness of the existing MTD interfaces. The problems was the lack of time to go for the big overhaul. It's easy to add more mess to the existing one, but it takes alot of effort to go for a real solution. Improvements and bugfixes are welcome! Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2006-05-29 05:26:58 +04:00
static int create_bbt(struct mtd_info *mtd, uint8_t *buf,
struct nand_bbt_descr *bd, int chip)
{
struct nand_chip *this = mtd->priv;
[MTD] Rework the out of band handling completely Hopefully the last iteration on this! The handling of out of band data on NAND was accompanied by tons of fruitless discussions and halfarsed patches to make it work for a particular problem. Sufficiently annoyed by I all those "I know it better" mails and the resonable amount of discarded "it solves my problem" patches, I finally decided to go for the big rework. After removing the _ecc variants of mtd read/write functions the solution to satisfy the various requirements was to refactor the read/write _oob functions in mtd. The major change is that read/write_oob now takes a pointer to an operation descriptor structure "struct mtd_oob_ops".instead of having a function with at least seven arguments. read/write_oob which should probably renamed to a more descriptive name, can do the following tasks: - read/write out of band data - read/write data content and out of band data - read/write raw data content and out of band data (ecc disabled) struct mtd_oob_ops has a mode field, which determines the oob handling mode. Aside of the MTD_OOB_RAW mode, which is intended to be especially for diagnostic purposes and some internal functions e.g. bad block table creation, the other two modes are for mtd clients: MTD_OOB_PLACE puts/gets the given oob data exactly to/from the place which is described by the ooboffs and ooblen fields of the mtd_oob_ops strcuture. It's up to the caller to make sure that the byte positions are not used by the ECC placement algorithms. MTD_OOB_AUTO puts/gets the given oob data automaticaly to/from the places in the out of band area which are described by the oobfree tuples in the ecclayout data structre which is associated to the devicee. The decision whether data plus oob or oob only handling is done depends on the setting of the datbuf member of the data structure. When datbuf == NULL then the internal read/write_oob functions are selected, otherwise the read/write data routines are invoked. Tested on a few platforms with all variants. Please be aware of possible regressions for your particular device / application scenario Disclaimer: Any whining will be ignored from those who just contributed "hot air blurb" and never sat down to tackle the underlying problem of the mess in the NAND driver grown over time and the big chunk of work to fix up the existing users. The problem was not the holiness of the existing MTD interfaces. The problems was the lack of time to go for the big overhaul. It's easy to add more mess to the existing one, but it takes alot of effort to go for a real solution. Improvements and bugfixes are welcome! Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2006-05-29 05:26:58 +04:00
int i, numblocks, len, scanlen;
int startblock;
loff_t from;
[MTD] Rework the out of band handling completely Hopefully the last iteration on this! The handling of out of band data on NAND was accompanied by tons of fruitless discussions and halfarsed patches to make it work for a particular problem. Sufficiently annoyed by I all those "I know it better" mails and the resonable amount of discarded "it solves my problem" patches, I finally decided to go for the big rework. After removing the _ecc variants of mtd read/write functions the solution to satisfy the various requirements was to refactor the read/write _oob functions in mtd. The major change is that read/write_oob now takes a pointer to an operation descriptor structure "struct mtd_oob_ops".instead of having a function with at least seven arguments. read/write_oob which should probably renamed to a more descriptive name, can do the following tasks: - read/write out of band data - read/write data content and out of band data - read/write raw data content and out of band data (ecc disabled) struct mtd_oob_ops has a mode field, which determines the oob handling mode. Aside of the MTD_OOB_RAW mode, which is intended to be especially for diagnostic purposes and some internal functions e.g. bad block table creation, the other two modes are for mtd clients: MTD_OOB_PLACE puts/gets the given oob data exactly to/from the place which is described by the ooboffs and ooblen fields of the mtd_oob_ops strcuture. It's up to the caller to make sure that the byte positions are not used by the ECC placement algorithms. MTD_OOB_AUTO puts/gets the given oob data automaticaly to/from the places in the out of band area which are described by the oobfree tuples in the ecclayout data structre which is associated to the devicee. The decision whether data plus oob or oob only handling is done depends on the setting of the datbuf member of the data structure. When datbuf == NULL then the internal read/write_oob functions are selected, otherwise the read/write data routines are invoked. Tested on a few platforms with all variants. Please be aware of possible regressions for your particular device / application scenario Disclaimer: Any whining will be ignored from those who just contributed "hot air blurb" and never sat down to tackle the underlying problem of the mess in the NAND driver grown over time and the big chunk of work to fix up the existing users. The problem was not the holiness of the existing MTD interfaces. The problems was the lack of time to go for the big overhaul. It's easy to add more mess to the existing one, but it takes alot of effort to go for a real solution. Improvements and bugfixes are welcome! Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2006-05-29 05:26:58 +04:00
size_t readlen;
pr_info("Scanning device for bad blocks\n");
if (bd->options & NAND_BBT_SCANALLPAGES)
len = 1 << (this->bbt_erase_shift - this->page_shift);
mtd: nand: more BB Detection refactoring and dynamic scan options This is a revision to PATCH 2/2 that I sent. Link: http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2010-July/030911.html Added new flag for scanning of both bytes 1 and 6 of the OOB for a BB marker (instead of simply one or the other). The "check_pattern" and "check_short_pattern" functions were updated to include support for scanning the two different locations in the OOB. In order to handle increases in variety of necessary scanning patterns, I implemented dynamic memory allocation of nand_bbt_descr structs in new function 'nand_create_default_bbt_descr()'. This replaces some increasingly-unwieldy, statically-declared descriptors. It can replace several more (e.g. "flashbased" structs). However, I do not test the flashbased options personally. How this was tested: I referenced 30+ data sheets (covering 100+ parts), and I tested a selection of 10 different chips to varying degrees. Particularly, I tested the creation of bad-block descriptors and basic BB scanning on three parts: ST NAND04GW3B2D, 2K page ST NAND128W3A, 512B page Samsung K9F1G08U0A, 2K page To test these, I wrote some fake bad block markers to the flash (in OOB bytes 1, 6, and elsewhere) to see if the scanning routine would detect them properly. However, this method was somewhat limited because the driver I am using has some bugs in its OOB write functionality. Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <norris@broadcom.com> Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com> Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
2010-07-15 23:15:44 +04:00
else if (bd->options & NAND_BBT_SCAN2NDPAGE)
len = 2;
else
len = 1;
if (!(bd->options & NAND_BBT_SCANEMPTY)) {
/* We need only read few bytes from the OOB area */
[MTD] Rework the out of band handling completely Hopefully the last iteration on this! The handling of out of band data on NAND was accompanied by tons of fruitless discussions and halfarsed patches to make it work for a particular problem. Sufficiently annoyed by I all those "I know it better" mails and the resonable amount of discarded "it solves my problem" patches, I finally decided to go for the big rework. After removing the _ecc variants of mtd read/write functions the solution to satisfy the various requirements was to refactor the read/write _oob functions in mtd. The major change is that read/write_oob now takes a pointer to an operation descriptor structure "struct mtd_oob_ops".instead of having a function with at least seven arguments. read/write_oob which should probably renamed to a more descriptive name, can do the following tasks: - read/write out of band data - read/write data content and out of band data - read/write raw data content and out of band data (ecc disabled) struct mtd_oob_ops has a mode field, which determines the oob handling mode. Aside of the MTD_OOB_RAW mode, which is intended to be especially for diagnostic purposes and some internal functions e.g. bad block table creation, the other two modes are for mtd clients: MTD_OOB_PLACE puts/gets the given oob data exactly to/from the place which is described by the ooboffs and ooblen fields of the mtd_oob_ops strcuture. It's up to the caller to make sure that the byte positions are not used by the ECC placement algorithms. MTD_OOB_AUTO puts/gets the given oob data automaticaly to/from the places in the out of band area which are described by the oobfree tuples in the ecclayout data structre which is associated to the devicee. The decision whether data plus oob or oob only handling is done depends on the setting of the datbuf member of the data structure. When datbuf == NULL then the internal read/write_oob functions are selected, otherwise the read/write data routines are invoked. Tested on a few platforms with all variants. Please be aware of possible regressions for your particular device / application scenario Disclaimer: Any whining will be ignored from those who just contributed "hot air blurb" and never sat down to tackle the underlying problem of the mess in the NAND driver grown over time and the big chunk of work to fix up the existing users. The problem was not the holiness of the existing MTD interfaces. The problems was the lack of time to go for the big overhaul. It's easy to add more mess to the existing one, but it takes alot of effort to go for a real solution. Improvements and bugfixes are welcome! Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2006-05-29 05:26:58 +04:00
scanlen = 0;
readlen = bd->len;
} else {
/* Full page content should be read */
scanlen = mtd->writesize + mtd->oobsize;
readlen = len * mtd->writesize;
}
if (chip == -1) {
/*
* Note that numblocks is 2 * (real numblocks) here, see i+=2
* below as it makes shifting and masking less painful
*/
numblocks = mtd->size >> (this->bbt_erase_shift - 1);
startblock = 0;
from = 0;
} else {
if (chip >= this->numchips) {
pr_warn("create_bbt(): chipnr (%d) > available chips (%d)\n",
chip + 1, this->numchips);
return -EINVAL;
}
numblocks = this->chipsize >> (this->bbt_erase_shift - 1);
startblock = chip * numblocks;
numblocks += startblock;
from = (loff_t)startblock << (this->bbt_erase_shift - 1);
}
if (this->bbt_options & NAND_BBT_SCANLASTPAGE)
mtd: nand: support alternate BB marker locations on MLC This is a slightly modified version of a patch submitted last year by Reuben Dowle <reuben.dowle@navico.com>. His original comments follow: This patch adds support for some MLC NAND flashes that place the BB marker in the LAST page of the bad block rather than the FIRST page used for SLC NAND and other types of MLC nand. Lifted from Samsung datasheet for K9LG8G08U0A (1Gbyte MLC NAND): " Identifying Initial Invalid Block(s) All device locations are erased(FFh) except locations where the initial invalid block(s) information is written prior to shipping. The initial invalid block(s) status is defined by the 1st byte in the spare area. Samsung makes sure that the last page of every initial invalid block has non-FFh data at the column address of 2,048. ... " As far as I can tell, this is the same for all Samsung MLC nand, and in fact the samsung bsp for the processor used in our project (s3c6410) actually contained a hack similar to this patch but less portable to enable use of their NAND parts. I discovered this problem when trying to use a Micron NAND which does not used this layout - I wish samsung would put their stuff in main-line to avoid this type of problem. Currently this patch causes all MLC nand with manufacturer codes from Samsung and ST(Numonyx) to use this alternative location, since these are the manufactures that I know of that use this layout. Signed-off-by: Kevin Cernekee <cernekee@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
2010-05-05 07:58:10 +04:00
from += mtd->erasesize - (mtd->writesize * len);
for (i = startblock; i < numblocks;) {
int ret;
BUG_ON(bd->options & NAND_BBT_NO_OOB);
[MTD] Rework the out of band handling completely Hopefully the last iteration on this! The handling of out of band data on NAND was accompanied by tons of fruitless discussions and halfarsed patches to make it work for a particular problem. Sufficiently annoyed by I all those "I know it better" mails and the resonable amount of discarded "it solves my problem" patches, I finally decided to go for the big rework. After removing the _ecc variants of mtd read/write functions the solution to satisfy the various requirements was to refactor the read/write _oob functions in mtd. The major change is that read/write_oob now takes a pointer to an operation descriptor structure "struct mtd_oob_ops".instead of having a function with at least seven arguments. read/write_oob which should probably renamed to a more descriptive name, can do the following tasks: - read/write out of band data - read/write data content and out of band data - read/write raw data content and out of band data (ecc disabled) struct mtd_oob_ops has a mode field, which determines the oob handling mode. Aside of the MTD_OOB_RAW mode, which is intended to be especially for diagnostic purposes and some internal functions e.g. bad block table creation, the other two modes are for mtd clients: MTD_OOB_PLACE puts/gets the given oob data exactly to/from the place which is described by the ooboffs and ooblen fields of the mtd_oob_ops strcuture. It's up to the caller to make sure that the byte positions are not used by the ECC placement algorithms. MTD_OOB_AUTO puts/gets the given oob data automaticaly to/from the places in the out of band area which are described by the oobfree tuples in the ecclayout data structre which is associated to the devicee. The decision whether data plus oob or oob only handling is done depends on the setting of the datbuf member of the data structure. When datbuf == NULL then the internal read/write_oob functions are selected, otherwise the read/write data routines are invoked. Tested on a few platforms with all variants. Please be aware of possible regressions for your particular device / application scenario Disclaimer: Any whining will be ignored from those who just contributed "hot air blurb" and never sat down to tackle the underlying problem of the mess in the NAND driver grown over time and the big chunk of work to fix up the existing users. The problem was not the holiness of the existing MTD interfaces. The problems was the lack of time to go for the big overhaul. It's easy to add more mess to the existing one, but it takes alot of effort to go for a real solution. Improvements and bugfixes are welcome! Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2006-05-29 05:26:58 +04:00
if (bd->options & NAND_BBT_SCANALLPAGES)
ret = scan_block_full(mtd, bd, from, buf, readlen,
scanlen, len);
else
ret = scan_block_fast(mtd, bd, from, buf, len);
if (ret < 0)
return ret;
if (ret) {
this->bbt[i >> 3] |= 0x03 << (i & 0x6);
pr_warn("Bad eraseblock %d at 0x%012llx\n",
i >> 1, (unsigned long long)from);
mtd->ecc_stats.badblocks++;
}
[MTD] Rework the out of band handling completely Hopefully the last iteration on this! The handling of out of band data on NAND was accompanied by tons of fruitless discussions and halfarsed patches to make it work for a particular problem. Sufficiently annoyed by I all those "I know it better" mails and the resonable amount of discarded "it solves my problem" patches, I finally decided to go for the big rework. After removing the _ecc variants of mtd read/write functions the solution to satisfy the various requirements was to refactor the read/write _oob functions in mtd. The major change is that read/write_oob now takes a pointer to an operation descriptor structure "struct mtd_oob_ops".instead of having a function with at least seven arguments. read/write_oob which should probably renamed to a more descriptive name, can do the following tasks: - read/write out of band data - read/write data content and out of band data - read/write raw data content and out of band data (ecc disabled) struct mtd_oob_ops has a mode field, which determines the oob handling mode. Aside of the MTD_OOB_RAW mode, which is intended to be especially for diagnostic purposes and some internal functions e.g. bad block table creation, the other two modes are for mtd clients: MTD_OOB_PLACE puts/gets the given oob data exactly to/from the place which is described by the ooboffs and ooblen fields of the mtd_oob_ops strcuture. It's up to the caller to make sure that the byte positions are not used by the ECC placement algorithms. MTD_OOB_AUTO puts/gets the given oob data automaticaly to/from the places in the out of band area which are described by the oobfree tuples in the ecclayout data structre which is associated to the devicee. The decision whether data plus oob or oob only handling is done depends on the setting of the datbuf member of the data structure. When datbuf == NULL then the internal read/write_oob functions are selected, otherwise the read/write data routines are invoked. Tested on a few platforms with all variants. Please be aware of possible regressions for your particular device / application scenario Disclaimer: Any whining will be ignored from those who just contributed "hot air blurb" and never sat down to tackle the underlying problem of the mess in the NAND driver grown over time and the big chunk of work to fix up the existing users. The problem was not the holiness of the existing MTD interfaces. The problems was the lack of time to go for the big overhaul. It's easy to add more mess to the existing one, but it takes alot of effort to go for a real solution. Improvements and bugfixes are welcome! Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2006-05-29 05:26:58 +04:00
i += 2;
from += (1 << this->bbt_erase_shift);
}
return 0;
}
/**
* search_bbt - [GENERIC] scan the device for a specific bad block table
* @mtd: MTD device structure
* @buf: temporary buffer
* @td: descriptor for the bad block table
*
* Read the bad block table by searching for a given ident pattern. Search is
* preformed either from the beginning up or from the end of the device
* downwards. The search starts always at the start of a block. If the option
* NAND_BBT_PERCHIP is given, each chip is searched for a bbt, which contains
* the bad block information of this chip. This is necessary to provide support
* for certain DOC devices.
*
* The bbt ident pattern resides in the oob area of the first page in a block.
*/
static int search_bbt(struct mtd_info *mtd, uint8_t *buf, struct nand_bbt_descr *td)
{
struct nand_chip *this = mtd->priv;
int i, chips;
int bits, startblock, block, dir;
int scanlen = mtd->writesize + mtd->oobsize;
int bbtblocks;
[MTD] Rework the out of band handling completely Hopefully the last iteration on this! The handling of out of band data on NAND was accompanied by tons of fruitless discussions and halfarsed patches to make it work for a particular problem. Sufficiently annoyed by I all those "I know it better" mails and the resonable amount of discarded "it solves my problem" patches, I finally decided to go for the big rework. After removing the _ecc variants of mtd read/write functions the solution to satisfy the various requirements was to refactor the read/write _oob functions in mtd. The major change is that read/write_oob now takes a pointer to an operation descriptor structure "struct mtd_oob_ops".instead of having a function with at least seven arguments. read/write_oob which should probably renamed to a more descriptive name, can do the following tasks: - read/write out of band data - read/write data content and out of band data - read/write raw data content and out of band data (ecc disabled) struct mtd_oob_ops has a mode field, which determines the oob handling mode. Aside of the MTD_OOB_RAW mode, which is intended to be especially for diagnostic purposes and some internal functions e.g. bad block table creation, the other two modes are for mtd clients: MTD_OOB_PLACE puts/gets the given oob data exactly to/from the place which is described by the ooboffs and ooblen fields of the mtd_oob_ops strcuture. It's up to the caller to make sure that the byte positions are not used by the ECC placement algorithms. MTD_OOB_AUTO puts/gets the given oob data automaticaly to/from the places in the out of band area which are described by the oobfree tuples in the ecclayout data structre which is associated to the devicee. The decision whether data plus oob or oob only handling is done depends on the setting of the datbuf member of the data structure. When datbuf == NULL then the internal read/write_oob functions are selected, otherwise the read/write data routines are invoked. Tested on a few platforms with all variants. Please be aware of possible regressions for your particular device / application scenario Disclaimer: Any whining will be ignored from those who just contributed "hot air blurb" and never sat down to tackle the underlying problem of the mess in the NAND driver grown over time and the big chunk of work to fix up the existing users. The problem was not the holiness of the existing MTD interfaces. The problems was the lack of time to go for the big overhaul. It's easy to add more mess to the existing one, but it takes alot of effort to go for a real solution. Improvements and bugfixes are welcome! Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2006-05-29 05:26:58 +04:00
int blocktopage = this->bbt_erase_shift - this->page_shift;
/* Search direction top -> down? */
if (td->options & NAND_BBT_LASTBLOCK) {
startblock = (mtd->size >> this->bbt_erase_shift) - 1;
dir = -1;
} else {
startblock = 0;
dir = 1;
}
/* Do we have a bbt per chip? */
if (td->options & NAND_BBT_PERCHIP) {
chips = this->numchips;
bbtblocks = this->chipsize >> this->bbt_erase_shift;
startblock &= bbtblocks - 1;
} else {
chips = 1;
bbtblocks = mtd->size >> this->bbt_erase_shift;
}
/* Number of bits for each erase block in the bbt */
bits = td->options & NAND_BBT_NRBITS_MSK;
for (i = 0; i < chips; i++) {
/* Reset version information */
td->version[i] = 0;
td->pages[i] = -1;
/* Scan the maximum number of blocks */
for (block = 0; block < td->maxblocks; block++) {
[MTD] Rework the out of band handling completely Hopefully the last iteration on this! The handling of out of band data on NAND was accompanied by tons of fruitless discussions and halfarsed patches to make it work for a particular problem. Sufficiently annoyed by I all those "I know it better" mails and the resonable amount of discarded "it solves my problem" patches, I finally decided to go for the big rework. After removing the _ecc variants of mtd read/write functions the solution to satisfy the various requirements was to refactor the read/write _oob functions in mtd. The major change is that read/write_oob now takes a pointer to an operation descriptor structure "struct mtd_oob_ops".instead of having a function with at least seven arguments. read/write_oob which should probably renamed to a more descriptive name, can do the following tasks: - read/write out of band data - read/write data content and out of band data - read/write raw data content and out of band data (ecc disabled) struct mtd_oob_ops has a mode field, which determines the oob handling mode. Aside of the MTD_OOB_RAW mode, which is intended to be especially for diagnostic purposes and some internal functions e.g. bad block table creation, the other two modes are for mtd clients: MTD_OOB_PLACE puts/gets the given oob data exactly to/from the place which is described by the ooboffs and ooblen fields of the mtd_oob_ops strcuture. It's up to the caller to make sure that the byte positions are not used by the ECC placement algorithms. MTD_OOB_AUTO puts/gets the given oob data automaticaly to/from the places in the out of band area which are described by the oobfree tuples in the ecclayout data structre which is associated to the devicee. The decision whether data plus oob or oob only handling is done depends on the setting of the datbuf member of the data structure. When datbuf == NULL then the internal read/write_oob functions are selected, otherwise the read/write data routines are invoked. Tested on a few platforms with all variants. Please be aware of possible regressions for your particular device / application scenario Disclaimer: Any whining will be ignored from those who just contributed "hot air blurb" and never sat down to tackle the underlying problem of the mess in the NAND driver grown over time and the big chunk of work to fix up the existing users. The problem was not the holiness of the existing MTD interfaces. The problems was the lack of time to go for the big overhaul. It's easy to add more mess to the existing one, but it takes alot of effort to go for a real solution. Improvements and bugfixes are welcome! Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2006-05-29 05:26:58 +04:00
int actblock = startblock + dir * block;
loff_t offs = (loff_t)actblock << this->bbt_erase_shift;
[MTD] Rework the out of band handling completely Hopefully the last iteration on this! The handling of out of band data on NAND was accompanied by tons of fruitless discussions and halfarsed patches to make it work for a particular problem. Sufficiently annoyed by I all those "I know it better" mails and the resonable amount of discarded "it solves my problem" patches, I finally decided to go for the big rework. After removing the _ecc variants of mtd read/write functions the solution to satisfy the various requirements was to refactor the read/write _oob functions in mtd. The major change is that read/write_oob now takes a pointer to an operation descriptor structure "struct mtd_oob_ops".instead of having a function with at least seven arguments. read/write_oob which should probably renamed to a more descriptive name, can do the following tasks: - read/write out of band data - read/write data content and out of band data - read/write raw data content and out of band data (ecc disabled) struct mtd_oob_ops has a mode field, which determines the oob handling mode. Aside of the MTD_OOB_RAW mode, which is intended to be especially for diagnostic purposes and some internal functions e.g. bad block table creation, the other two modes are for mtd clients: MTD_OOB_PLACE puts/gets the given oob data exactly to/from the place which is described by the ooboffs and ooblen fields of the mtd_oob_ops strcuture. It's up to the caller to make sure that the byte positions are not used by the ECC placement algorithms. MTD_OOB_AUTO puts/gets the given oob data automaticaly to/from the places in the out of band area which are described by the oobfree tuples in the ecclayout data structre which is associated to the devicee. The decision whether data plus oob or oob only handling is done depends on the setting of the datbuf member of the data structure. When datbuf == NULL then the internal read/write_oob functions are selected, otherwise the read/write data routines are invoked. Tested on a few platforms with all variants. Please be aware of possible regressions for your particular device / application scenario Disclaimer: Any whining will be ignored from those who just contributed "hot air blurb" and never sat down to tackle the underlying problem of the mess in the NAND driver grown over time and the big chunk of work to fix up the existing users. The problem was not the holiness of the existing MTD interfaces. The problems was the lack of time to go for the big overhaul. It's easy to add more mess to the existing one, but it takes alot of effort to go for a real solution. Improvements and bugfixes are welcome! Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2006-05-29 05:26:58 +04:00
/* Read first page */
scan_read_raw(mtd, buf, offs, mtd->writesize, td);
if (!check_pattern(buf, scanlen, mtd->writesize, td)) {
[MTD] Rework the out of band handling completely Hopefully the last iteration on this! The handling of out of band data on NAND was accompanied by tons of fruitless discussions and halfarsed patches to make it work for a particular problem. Sufficiently annoyed by I all those "I know it better" mails and the resonable amount of discarded "it solves my problem" patches, I finally decided to go for the big rework. After removing the _ecc variants of mtd read/write functions the solution to satisfy the various requirements was to refactor the read/write _oob functions in mtd. The major change is that read/write_oob now takes a pointer to an operation descriptor structure "struct mtd_oob_ops".instead of having a function with at least seven arguments. read/write_oob which should probably renamed to a more descriptive name, can do the following tasks: - read/write out of band data - read/write data content and out of band data - read/write raw data content and out of band data (ecc disabled) struct mtd_oob_ops has a mode field, which determines the oob handling mode. Aside of the MTD_OOB_RAW mode, which is intended to be especially for diagnostic purposes and some internal functions e.g. bad block table creation, the other two modes are for mtd clients: MTD_OOB_PLACE puts/gets the given oob data exactly to/from the place which is described by the ooboffs and ooblen fields of the mtd_oob_ops strcuture. It's up to the caller to make sure that the byte positions are not used by the ECC placement algorithms. MTD_OOB_AUTO puts/gets the given oob data automaticaly to/from the places in the out of band area which are described by the oobfree tuples in the ecclayout data structre which is associated to the devicee. The decision whether data plus oob or oob only handling is done depends on the setting of the datbuf member of the data structure. When datbuf == NULL then the internal read/write_oob functions are selected, otherwise the read/write data routines are invoked. Tested on a few platforms with all variants. Please be aware of possible regressions for your particular device / application scenario Disclaimer: Any whining will be ignored from those who just contributed "hot air blurb" and never sat down to tackle the underlying problem of the mess in the NAND driver grown over time and the big chunk of work to fix up the existing users. The problem was not the holiness of the existing MTD interfaces. The problems was the lack of time to go for the big overhaul. It's easy to add more mess to the existing one, but it takes alot of effort to go for a real solution. Improvements and bugfixes are welcome! Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2006-05-29 05:26:58 +04:00
td->pages[i] = actblock << blocktopage;
if (td->options & NAND_BBT_VERSION) {
offs = bbt_get_ver_offs(mtd, td);
td->version[i] = buf[offs];
}
break;
}
}
startblock += this->chipsize >> this->bbt_erase_shift;
}
/* Check, if we found a bbt for each requested chip */
for (i = 0; i < chips; i++) {
if (td->pages[i] == -1)
pr_warn("Bad block table not found for chip %d\n", i);
else
pr_info("Bad block table found at page %d, version "
"0x%02X\n", td->pages[i], td->version[i]);
}
return 0;
}
/**
* search_read_bbts - [GENERIC] scan the device for bad block table(s)
* @mtd: MTD device structure
* @buf: temporary buffer
* @td: descriptor for the bad block table
* @md: descriptor for the bad block table mirror
*
* Search and read the bad block table(s).
*/
static int search_read_bbts(struct mtd_info *mtd, uint8_t * buf, struct nand_bbt_descr *td, struct nand_bbt_descr *md)
{
/* Search the primary table */
search_bbt(mtd, buf, td);
/* Search the mirror table */
if (md)
search_bbt(mtd, buf, md);
/* Force result check */
return 1;
}
/**
* write_bbt - [GENERIC] (Re)write the bad block table
* @mtd: MTD device structure
* @buf: temporary buffer
* @td: descriptor for the bad block table
* @md: descriptor for the bad block table mirror
* @chipsel: selector for a specific chip, -1 for all
*
* (Re)write the bad block table.
*/
static int write_bbt(struct mtd_info *mtd, uint8_t *buf,
struct nand_bbt_descr *td, struct nand_bbt_descr *md,
int chipsel)
{
struct nand_chip *this = mtd->priv;
struct erase_info einfo;
int i, j, res, chip = 0;
int bits, startblock, dir, page, offs, numblocks, sft, sftmsk;
int nrchips, bbtoffs, pageoffs, ooboffs;
uint8_t msk[4];
uint8_t rcode = td->reserved_block_code;
[MTD] Rework the out of band handling completely Hopefully the last iteration on this! The handling of out of band data on NAND was accompanied by tons of fruitless discussions and halfarsed patches to make it work for a particular problem. Sufficiently annoyed by I all those "I know it better" mails and the resonable amount of discarded "it solves my problem" patches, I finally decided to go for the big rework. After removing the _ecc variants of mtd read/write functions the solution to satisfy the various requirements was to refactor the read/write _oob functions in mtd. The major change is that read/write_oob now takes a pointer to an operation descriptor structure "struct mtd_oob_ops".instead of having a function with at least seven arguments. read/write_oob which should probably renamed to a more descriptive name, can do the following tasks: - read/write out of band data - read/write data content and out of band data - read/write raw data content and out of band data (ecc disabled) struct mtd_oob_ops has a mode field, which determines the oob handling mode. Aside of the MTD_OOB_RAW mode, which is intended to be especially for diagnostic purposes and some internal functions e.g. bad block table creation, the other two modes are for mtd clients: MTD_OOB_PLACE puts/gets the given oob data exactly to/from the place which is described by the ooboffs and ooblen fields of the mtd_oob_ops strcuture. It's up to the caller to make sure that the byte positions are not used by the ECC placement algorithms. MTD_OOB_AUTO puts/gets the given oob data automaticaly to/from the places in the out of band area which are described by the oobfree tuples in the ecclayout data structre which is associated to the devicee. The decision whether data plus oob or oob only handling is done depends on the setting of the datbuf member of the data structure. When datbuf == NULL then the internal read/write_oob functions are selected, otherwise the read/write data routines are invoked. Tested on a few platforms with all variants. Please be aware of possible regressions for your particular device / application scenario Disclaimer: Any whining will be ignored from those who just contributed "hot air blurb" and never sat down to tackle the underlying problem of the mess in the NAND driver grown over time and the big chunk of work to fix up the existing users. The problem was not the holiness of the existing MTD interfaces. The problems was the lack of time to go for the big overhaul. It's easy to add more mess to the existing one, but it takes alot of effort to go for a real solution. Improvements and bugfixes are welcome! Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2006-05-29 05:26:58 +04:00
size_t retlen, len = 0;
loff_t to;
[MTD] Rework the out of band handling completely Hopefully the last iteration on this! The handling of out of band data on NAND was accompanied by tons of fruitless discussions and halfarsed patches to make it work for a particular problem. Sufficiently annoyed by I all those "I know it better" mails and the resonable amount of discarded "it solves my problem" patches, I finally decided to go for the big rework. After removing the _ecc variants of mtd read/write functions the solution to satisfy the various requirements was to refactor the read/write _oob functions in mtd. The major change is that read/write_oob now takes a pointer to an operation descriptor structure "struct mtd_oob_ops".instead of having a function with at least seven arguments. read/write_oob which should probably renamed to a more descriptive name, can do the following tasks: - read/write out of band data - read/write data content and out of band data - read/write raw data content and out of band data (ecc disabled) struct mtd_oob_ops has a mode field, which determines the oob handling mode. Aside of the MTD_OOB_RAW mode, which is intended to be especially for diagnostic purposes and some internal functions e.g. bad block table creation, the other two modes are for mtd clients: MTD_OOB_PLACE puts/gets the given oob data exactly to/from the place which is described by the ooboffs and ooblen fields of the mtd_oob_ops strcuture. It's up to the caller to make sure that the byte positions are not used by the ECC placement algorithms. MTD_OOB_AUTO puts/gets the given oob data automaticaly to/from the places in the out of band area which are described by the oobfree tuples in the ecclayout data structre which is associated to the devicee. The decision whether data plus oob or oob only handling is done depends on the setting of the datbuf member of the data structure. When datbuf == NULL then the internal read/write_oob functions are selected, otherwise the read/write data routines are invoked. Tested on a few platforms with all variants. Please be aware of possible regressions for your particular device / application scenario Disclaimer: Any whining will be ignored from those who just contributed "hot air blurb" and never sat down to tackle the underlying problem of the mess in the NAND driver grown over time and the big chunk of work to fix up the existing users. The problem was not the holiness of the existing MTD interfaces. The problems was the lack of time to go for the big overhaul. It's easy to add more mess to the existing one, but it takes alot of effort to go for a real solution. Improvements and bugfixes are welcome! Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2006-05-29 05:26:58 +04:00
struct mtd_oob_ops ops;
ops.ooblen = mtd->oobsize;
ops.ooboffs = 0;
ops.datbuf = NULL;
ops.mode = MTD_OPS_PLACE_OOB;
if (!rcode)
rcode = 0xff;
/* Write bad block table per chip rather than per device? */
if (td->options & NAND_BBT_PERCHIP) {
numblocks = (int)(this->chipsize >> this->bbt_erase_shift);
/* Full device write or specific chip? */
if (chipsel == -1) {
nrchips = this->numchips;
} else {
nrchips = chipsel + 1;
chip = chipsel;
}
} else {
numblocks = (int)(mtd->size >> this->bbt_erase_shift);
nrchips = 1;
}
/* Loop through the chips */
for (; chip < nrchips; chip++) {
/*
* There was already a version of the table, reuse the page
* This applies for absolute placement too, as we have the
* page nr. in td->pages.
*/
if (td->pages[chip] != -1) {
page = td->pages[chip];
goto write;
}
/*
* Automatic placement of the bad block table. Search direction
* top -> down?
*/
if (td->options & NAND_BBT_LASTBLOCK) {
startblock = numblocks * (chip + 1) - 1;
dir = -1;
} else {
startblock = chip * numblocks;
dir = 1;
}
for (i = 0; i < td->maxblocks; i++) {
int block = startblock + dir * i;
/* Check, if the block is bad */
switch ((this->bbt[block >> 2] >>
(2 * (block & 0x03))) & 0x03) {
case 0x01:
case 0x03:
continue;
}
page = block <<
(this->bbt_erase_shift - this->page_shift);
/* Check, if the block is used by the mirror table */
if (!md || md->pages[chip] != page)
goto write;
}
pr_err("No space left to write bad block table\n");
return -ENOSPC;
write:
/* Set up shift count and masks for the flash table */
bits = td->options & NAND_BBT_NRBITS_MSK;
msk[2] = ~rcode;
switch (bits) {
case 1: sft = 3; sftmsk = 0x07; msk[0] = 0x00; msk[1] = 0x01;
msk[3] = 0x01;
break;
case 2: sft = 2; sftmsk = 0x06; msk[0] = 0x00; msk[1] = 0x01;
msk[3] = 0x03;
break;
case 4: sft = 1; sftmsk = 0x04; msk[0] = 0x00; msk[1] = 0x0C;
msk[3] = 0x0f;
break;
case 8: sft = 0; sftmsk = 0x00; msk[0] = 0x00; msk[1] = 0x0F;
msk[3] = 0xff;
break;
default: return -EINVAL;
}
bbtoffs = chip * (numblocks >> 2);
to = ((loff_t)page) << this->page_shift;
/* Must we save the block contents? */
if (td->options & NAND_BBT_SAVECONTENT) {
/* Make it block aligned */
to &= ~((loff_t)((1 << this->bbt_erase_shift) - 1));
len = 1 << this->bbt_erase_shift;
res = mtd->read(mtd, to, len, &retlen, buf);
if (res < 0) {
if (retlen != len) {
pr_info("nand_bbt: error reading block "
"for writing the bad block table\n");
return res;
}
pr_warn("nand_bbt: ECC error while reading "
"block for writing bad block table\n");
}
/* Read oob data */
ops.ooblen = (len >> this->page_shift) * mtd->oobsize;
[MTD] Rework the out of band handling completely Hopefully the last iteration on this! The handling of out of band data on NAND was accompanied by tons of fruitless discussions and halfarsed patches to make it work for a particular problem. Sufficiently annoyed by I all those "I know it better" mails and the resonable amount of discarded "it solves my problem" patches, I finally decided to go for the big rework. After removing the _ecc variants of mtd read/write functions the solution to satisfy the various requirements was to refactor the read/write _oob functions in mtd. The major change is that read/write_oob now takes a pointer to an operation descriptor structure "struct mtd_oob_ops".instead of having a function with at least seven arguments. read/write_oob which should probably renamed to a more descriptive name, can do the following tasks: - read/write out of band data - read/write data content and out of band data - read/write raw data content and out of band data (ecc disabled) struct mtd_oob_ops has a mode field, which determines the oob handling mode. Aside of the MTD_OOB_RAW mode, which is intended to be especially for diagnostic purposes and some internal functions e.g. bad block table creation, the other two modes are for mtd clients: MTD_OOB_PLACE puts/gets the given oob data exactly to/from the place which is described by the ooboffs and ooblen fields of the mtd_oob_ops strcuture. It's up to the caller to make sure that the byte positions are not used by the ECC placement algorithms. MTD_OOB_AUTO puts/gets the given oob data automaticaly to/from the places in the out of band area which are described by the oobfree tuples in the ecclayout data structre which is associated to the devicee. The decision whether data plus oob or oob only handling is done depends on the setting of the datbuf member of the data structure. When datbuf == NULL then the internal read/write_oob functions are selected, otherwise the read/write data routines are invoked. Tested on a few platforms with all variants. Please be aware of possible regressions for your particular device / application scenario Disclaimer: Any whining will be ignored from those who just contributed "hot air blurb" and never sat down to tackle the underlying problem of the mess in the NAND driver grown over time and the big chunk of work to fix up the existing users. The problem was not the holiness of the existing MTD interfaces. The problems was the lack of time to go for the big overhaul. It's easy to add more mess to the existing one, but it takes alot of effort to go for a real solution. Improvements and bugfixes are welcome! Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2006-05-29 05:26:58 +04:00
ops.oobbuf = &buf[len];
res = mtd->read_oob(mtd, to + mtd->writesize, &ops);
if (res < 0 || ops.oobretlen != ops.ooblen)
goto outerr;
/* Calc the byte offset in the buffer */
pageoffs = page - (int)(to >> this->page_shift);
offs = pageoffs << this->page_shift;
/* Preset the bbt area with 0xff */
memset(&buf[offs], 0xff, (size_t)(numblocks >> sft));
ooboffs = len + (pageoffs * mtd->oobsize);
} else if (td->options & NAND_BBT_NO_OOB) {
ooboffs = 0;
offs = td->len;
/* The version byte */
if (td->options & NAND_BBT_VERSION)
offs++;
/* Calc length */
len = (size_t)(numblocks >> sft);
len += offs;
/* Make it page aligned! */
len = ALIGN(len, mtd->writesize);
/* Preset the buffer with 0xff */
memset(buf, 0xff, len);
/* Pattern is located at the begin of first page */
memcpy(buf, td->pattern, td->len);
} else {
/* Calc length */
len = (size_t)(numblocks >> sft);
/* Make it page aligned! */
len = ALIGN(len, mtd->writesize);
/* Preset the buffer with 0xff */
memset(buf, 0xff, len +
(len >> this->page_shift)* mtd->oobsize);
offs = 0;
ooboffs = len;
/* Pattern is located in oob area of first page */
memcpy(&buf[ooboffs + td->offs], td->pattern, td->len);
}
if (td->options & NAND_BBT_VERSION)
buf[ooboffs + td->veroffs] = td->version[chip];
/* Walk through the memory table */
for (i = 0; i < numblocks;) {
uint8_t dat;
dat = this->bbt[bbtoffs + (i >> 2)];
for (j = 0; j < 4; j++, i++) {
int sftcnt = (i << (3 - sft)) & sftmsk;
/* Do not store the reserved bbt blocks! */
buf[offs + (i >> sft)] &=
~(msk[dat & 0x03] << sftcnt);
dat >>= 2;
}
}
memset(&einfo, 0, sizeof(einfo));
einfo.mtd = mtd;
einfo.addr = to;
einfo.len = 1 << this->bbt_erase_shift;
res = nand_erase_nand(mtd, &einfo, 1);
if (res < 0)
goto outerr;
res = scan_write_bbt(mtd, to, len, buf,
td->options & NAND_BBT_NO_OOB ? NULL :
&buf[len]);
if (res < 0)
goto outerr;
pr_info("Bad block table written to 0x%012llx, version 0x%02X\n",
(unsigned long long)to, td->version[chip]);
/* Mark it as used */
td->pages[chip] = page;
}
return 0;
outerr:
pr_warn("nand_bbt: error while writing bad block table %d\n", res);
return res;
}
/**
* nand_memory_bbt - [GENERIC] create a memory based bad block table
* @mtd: MTD device structure
* @bd: descriptor for the good/bad block search pattern
*
* The function creates a memory based bbt by scanning the device for
* manufacturer / software marked good / bad blocks.
*/
static inline int nand_memory_bbt(struct mtd_info *mtd, struct nand_bbt_descr *bd)
{
struct nand_chip *this = mtd->priv;
bd->options &= ~NAND_BBT_SCANEMPTY;
return create_bbt(mtd, this->buffers->databuf, bd, -1);
}
/**
* check_create - [GENERIC] create and write bbt(s) if necessary
* @mtd: MTD device structure
* @buf: temporary buffer
* @bd: descriptor for the good/bad block search pattern
*
* The function checks the results of the previous call to read_bbt and creates
* / updates the bbt(s) if necessary. Creation is necessary if no bbt was found
* for the chip/device. Update is necessary if one of the tables is missing or
* the version nr. of one table is less than the other.
*/
static int check_create(struct mtd_info *mtd, uint8_t *buf, struct nand_bbt_descr *bd)
{
int i, chips, writeops, create, chipsel, res, res2;
struct nand_chip *this = mtd->priv;
struct nand_bbt_descr *td = this->bbt_td;
struct nand_bbt_descr *md = this->bbt_md;
struct nand_bbt_descr *rd, *rd2;
/* Do we have a bbt per chip? */
if (td->options & NAND_BBT_PERCHIP)
chips = this->numchips;
else
chips = 1;
for (i = 0; i < chips; i++) {
writeops = 0;
create = 0;
rd = NULL;
rd2 = NULL;
res = res2 = 0;
/* Per chip or per device? */
chipsel = (td->options & NAND_BBT_PERCHIP) ? i : -1;
/* Mirrored table available? */
if (md) {
if (td->pages[i] == -1 && md->pages[i] == -1) {
create = 1;
writeops = 0x03;
} else if (td->pages[i] == -1) {
rd = md;
td->version[i] = md->version[i];
writeops = 0x01;
} else if (md->pages[i] == -1) {
rd = td;
md->version[i] = td->version[i];
writeops = 0x02;
} else if (td->version[i] == md->version[i]) {
rd = td;
if (!(td->options & NAND_BBT_VERSION))
rd2 = md;
} else if (((int8_t)(td->version[i] - md->version[i])) > 0) {
rd = td;
md->version[i] = td->version[i];
writeops = 0x02;
} else {
rd = md;
td->version[i] = md->version[i];
writeops = 0x01;
}
} else {
if (td->pages[i] == -1) {
create = 1;
writeops = 0x01;
} else {
rd = td;
}
}
if (create) {
/* Create the bad block table by scanning the device? */
if (!(td->options & NAND_BBT_CREATE))
continue;
/* Create the table in memory by scanning the chip(s) */
if (!(this->bbt_options & NAND_BBT_CREATE_EMPTY))
create_bbt(mtd, buf, bd, chipsel);
td->version[i] = 1;
if (md)
md->version[i] = 1;
}
/* Read back first? */
if (rd) {
res = read_abs_bbt(mtd, buf, rd, chipsel);
if (mtd_is_eccerr(res)) {
/* Mark table as invalid */
rd->pages[i] = -1;
i--;
continue;
}
}
/* If they weren't versioned, read both */
if (rd2) {
res2 = read_abs_bbt(mtd, buf, rd2, chipsel);
if (mtd_is_eccerr(res2)) {
/* Mark table as invalid */
rd2->pages[i] = -1;
i--;
continue;
}
}
/* Scrub the flash table(s)? */
if (mtd_is_bitflip(res) || mtd_is_bitflip(res2))
writeops = 0x03;
/* Write the bad block table to the device? */
if ((writeops & 0x01) && (td->options & NAND_BBT_WRITE)) {
res = write_bbt(mtd, buf, td, md, chipsel);
if (res < 0)
return res;
}
/* Write the mirror bad block table to the device? */
if ((writeops & 0x02) && md && (md->options & NAND_BBT_WRITE)) {
res = write_bbt(mtd, buf, md, td, chipsel);
if (res < 0)
return res;
}
}
return 0;
}
/**
* mark_bbt_regions - [GENERIC] mark the bad block table regions
* @mtd: MTD device structure
* @td: bad block table descriptor
*
* The bad block table regions are marked as "bad" to prevent accidental
* erasures / writes. The regions are identified by the mark 0x02.
*/
static void mark_bbt_region(struct mtd_info *mtd, struct nand_bbt_descr *td)
{
struct nand_chip *this = mtd->priv;
int i, j, chips, block, nrblocks, update;
uint8_t oldval, newval;
/* Do we have a bbt per chip? */
if (td->options & NAND_BBT_PERCHIP) {
chips = this->numchips;
nrblocks = (int)(this->chipsize >> this->bbt_erase_shift);
} else {
chips = 1;
nrblocks = (int)(mtd->size >> this->bbt_erase_shift);
}
for (i = 0; i < chips; i++) {
if ((td->options & NAND_BBT_ABSPAGE) ||
!(td->options & NAND_BBT_WRITE)) {
if (td->pages[i] == -1)
continue;
block = td->pages[i] >> (this->bbt_erase_shift - this->page_shift);
block <<= 1;
oldval = this->bbt[(block >> 3)];
newval = oldval | (0x2 << (block & 0x06));
this->bbt[(block >> 3)] = newval;
if ((oldval != newval) && td->reserved_block_code)
nand_update_bbt(mtd, (loff_t)block << (this->bbt_erase_shift - 1));
continue;
}
update = 0;
if (td->options & NAND_BBT_LASTBLOCK)
block = ((i + 1) * nrblocks) - td->maxblocks;
else
block = i * nrblocks;
block <<= 1;
for (j = 0; j < td->maxblocks; j++) {
oldval = this->bbt[(block >> 3)];
newval = oldval | (0x2 << (block & 0x06));
this->bbt[(block >> 3)] = newval;
if (oldval != newval)
update = 1;
block += 2;
}
/*
* If we want reserved blocks to be recorded to flash, and some
* new ones have been marked, then we need to update the stored
* bbts. This should only happen once.
*/
if (update && td->reserved_block_code)
nand_update_bbt(mtd, (loff_t)(block - 2) << (this->bbt_erase_shift - 1));
}
}
/**
* verify_bbt_descr - verify the bad block description
* @mtd: MTD device structure
* @bd: the table to verify
*
* This functions performs a few sanity checks on the bad block description
* table.
*/
static void verify_bbt_descr(struct mtd_info *mtd, struct nand_bbt_descr *bd)
{
struct nand_chip *this = mtd->priv;
u32 pattern_len;
u32 bits;
u32 table_size;
if (!bd)
return;
pattern_len = bd->len;
bits = bd->options & NAND_BBT_NRBITS_MSK;
BUG_ON((this->bbt_options & NAND_BBT_NO_OOB) &&
!(this->bbt_options & NAND_BBT_USE_FLASH));
BUG_ON(!bits);
if (bd->options & NAND_BBT_VERSION)
pattern_len++;
if (bd->options & NAND_BBT_NO_OOB) {
BUG_ON(!(this->bbt_options & NAND_BBT_USE_FLASH));
BUG_ON(!(this->bbt_options & NAND_BBT_NO_OOB));
BUG_ON(bd->offs);
if (bd->options & NAND_BBT_VERSION)
BUG_ON(bd->veroffs != bd->len);
BUG_ON(bd->options & NAND_BBT_SAVECONTENT);
}
if (bd->options & NAND_BBT_PERCHIP)
table_size = this->chipsize >> this->bbt_erase_shift;
else
table_size = mtd->size >> this->bbt_erase_shift;
table_size >>= 3;
table_size *= bits;
if (bd->options & NAND_BBT_NO_OOB)
table_size += pattern_len;
BUG_ON(table_size > (1 << this->bbt_erase_shift));
}
/**
* nand_scan_bbt - [NAND Interface] scan, find, read and maybe create bad block table(s)
* @mtd: MTD device structure
* @bd: descriptor for the good/bad block search pattern
*
* The function checks, if a bad block table(s) is/are already available. If
* not it scans the device for manufacturer marked good / bad blocks and writes
* the bad block table(s) to the selected place.
*
* The bad block table memory is allocated here. It must be freed by calling
* the nand_free_bbt function.
*/
int nand_scan_bbt(struct mtd_info *mtd, struct nand_bbt_descr *bd)
{
struct nand_chip *this = mtd->priv;
int len, res = 0;
uint8_t *buf;
struct nand_bbt_descr *td = this->bbt_td;
struct nand_bbt_descr *md = this->bbt_md;
len = mtd->size >> (this->bbt_erase_shift + 2);
/*
* Allocate memory (2bit per block) and clear the memory bad block
* table.
*/
this->bbt = kzalloc(len, GFP_KERNEL);
if (!this->bbt)
return -ENOMEM;
/*
* If no primary table decriptor is given, scan the device to build a
* memory based bad block table.
*/
if (!td) {
if ((res = nand_memory_bbt(mtd, bd))) {
pr_err("nand_bbt: can't scan flash and build the RAM-based BBT\n");
kfree(this->bbt);
this->bbt = NULL;
}
return res;
}
verify_bbt_descr(mtd, td);
verify_bbt_descr(mtd, md);
/* Allocate a temporary buffer for one eraseblock incl. oob */
len = (1 << this->bbt_erase_shift);
len += (len >> this->page_shift) * mtd->oobsize;
buf = vmalloc(len);
if (!buf) {
kfree(this->bbt);
this->bbt = NULL;
return -ENOMEM;
}
/* Is the bbt at a given page? */
if (td->options & NAND_BBT_ABSPAGE) {
res = read_abs_bbts(mtd, buf, td, md);
} else {
/* Search the bad block table using a pattern in oob */
res = search_read_bbts(mtd, buf, td, md);
}
if (res)
res = check_create(mtd, buf, bd);
/* Prevent the bbt regions from erasing / writing */
mark_bbt_region(mtd, td);
if (md)
mark_bbt_region(mtd, md);
vfree(buf);
return res;
}
/**
* nand_update_bbt - [NAND Interface] update bad block table(s)
* @mtd: MTD device structure
* @offs: the offset of the newly marked block
*
* The function updates the bad block table(s).
*/
int nand_update_bbt(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t offs)
{
struct nand_chip *this = mtd->priv;
int len, res = 0;
int chip, chipsel;
uint8_t *buf;
struct nand_bbt_descr *td = this->bbt_td;
struct nand_bbt_descr *md = this->bbt_md;
if (!this->bbt || !td)
return -EINVAL;
/* Allocate a temporary buffer for one eraseblock incl. oob */
len = (1 << this->bbt_erase_shift);
len += (len >> this->page_shift) * mtd->oobsize;
buf = kmalloc(len, GFP_KERNEL);
if (!buf)
return -ENOMEM;
/* Do we have a bbt per chip? */
if (td->options & NAND_BBT_PERCHIP) {
chip = (int)(offs >> this->chip_shift);
chipsel = chip;
} else {
chip = 0;
chipsel = -1;
}
td->version[chip]++;
if (md)
md->version[chip]++;
/* Write the bad block table to the device? */
if (td->options & NAND_BBT_WRITE) {
res = write_bbt(mtd, buf, td, md, chipsel);
if (res < 0)
goto out;
}
/* Write the mirror bad block table to the device? */
if (md && (md->options & NAND_BBT_WRITE)) {
res = write_bbt(mtd, buf, md, td, chipsel);
}
out:
kfree(buf);
return res;
}
/*
* Define some generic bad / good block scan pattern which are used
* while scanning a device for factory marked good / bad blocks.
*/
static uint8_t scan_ff_pattern[] = { 0xff, 0xff };
static uint8_t scan_agand_pattern[] = { 0x1C, 0x71, 0xC7, 0x1C, 0x71, 0xC7 };
static struct nand_bbt_descr agand_flashbased = {
.options = NAND_BBT_SCANEMPTY | NAND_BBT_SCANALLPAGES,
.offs = 0x20,
.len = 6,
.pattern = scan_agand_pattern
};
/* Generic flash bbt descriptors */
static uint8_t bbt_pattern[] = {'B', 'b', 't', '0' };
static uint8_t mirror_pattern[] = {'1', 't', 'b', 'B' };
static struct nand_bbt_descr bbt_main_descr = {
.options = NAND_BBT_LASTBLOCK | NAND_BBT_CREATE | NAND_BBT_WRITE
| NAND_BBT_2BIT | NAND_BBT_VERSION | NAND_BBT_PERCHIP,
.offs = 8,
.len = 4,
.veroffs = 12,
.maxblocks = 4,
.pattern = bbt_pattern
};
static struct nand_bbt_descr bbt_mirror_descr = {
.options = NAND_BBT_LASTBLOCK | NAND_BBT_CREATE | NAND_BBT_WRITE
| NAND_BBT_2BIT | NAND_BBT_VERSION | NAND_BBT_PERCHIP,
.offs = 8,
.len = 4,
.veroffs = 12,
.maxblocks = 4,
.pattern = mirror_pattern
};
static struct nand_bbt_descr bbt_main_no_bbt_descr = {
.options = NAND_BBT_LASTBLOCK | NAND_BBT_CREATE | NAND_BBT_WRITE
| NAND_BBT_2BIT | NAND_BBT_VERSION | NAND_BBT_PERCHIP
| NAND_BBT_NO_OOB,
.len = 4,
.veroffs = 4,
.maxblocks = 4,
.pattern = bbt_pattern
};
static struct nand_bbt_descr bbt_mirror_no_bbt_descr = {
.options = NAND_BBT_LASTBLOCK | NAND_BBT_CREATE | NAND_BBT_WRITE
| NAND_BBT_2BIT | NAND_BBT_VERSION | NAND_BBT_PERCHIP
| NAND_BBT_NO_OOB,
.len = 4,
.veroffs = 4,
.maxblocks = 4,
.pattern = mirror_pattern
};
mtd: nand: more BB Detection refactoring and dynamic scan options This is a revision to PATCH 2/2 that I sent. Link: http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2010-July/030911.html Added new flag for scanning of both bytes 1 and 6 of the OOB for a BB marker (instead of simply one or the other). The "check_pattern" and "check_short_pattern" functions were updated to include support for scanning the two different locations in the OOB. In order to handle increases in variety of necessary scanning patterns, I implemented dynamic memory allocation of nand_bbt_descr structs in new function 'nand_create_default_bbt_descr()'. This replaces some increasingly-unwieldy, statically-declared descriptors. It can replace several more (e.g. "flashbased" structs). However, I do not test the flashbased options personally. How this was tested: I referenced 30+ data sheets (covering 100+ parts), and I tested a selection of 10 different chips to varying degrees. Particularly, I tested the creation of bad-block descriptors and basic BB scanning on three parts: ST NAND04GW3B2D, 2K page ST NAND128W3A, 512B page Samsung K9F1G08U0A, 2K page To test these, I wrote some fake bad block markers to the flash (in OOB bytes 1, 6, and elsewhere) to see if the scanning routine would detect them properly. However, this method was somewhat limited because the driver I am using has some bugs in its OOB write functionality. Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <norris@broadcom.com> Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com> Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
2010-07-15 23:15:44 +04:00
/**
* nand_create_default_bbt_descr - [INTERN] Creates a BBT descriptor structure
* @this: NAND chip to create descriptor for
mtd: nand: more BB Detection refactoring and dynamic scan options This is a revision to PATCH 2/2 that I sent. Link: http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2010-July/030911.html Added new flag for scanning of both bytes 1 and 6 of the OOB for a BB marker (instead of simply one or the other). The "check_pattern" and "check_short_pattern" functions were updated to include support for scanning the two different locations in the OOB. In order to handle increases in variety of necessary scanning patterns, I implemented dynamic memory allocation of nand_bbt_descr structs in new function 'nand_create_default_bbt_descr()'. This replaces some increasingly-unwieldy, statically-declared descriptors. It can replace several more (e.g. "flashbased" structs). However, I do not test the flashbased options personally. How this was tested: I referenced 30+ data sheets (covering 100+ parts), and I tested a selection of 10 different chips to varying degrees. Particularly, I tested the creation of bad-block descriptors and basic BB scanning on three parts: ST NAND04GW3B2D, 2K page ST NAND128W3A, 512B page Samsung K9F1G08U0A, 2K page To test these, I wrote some fake bad block markers to the flash (in OOB bytes 1, 6, and elsewhere) to see if the scanning routine would detect them properly. However, this method was somewhat limited because the driver I am using has some bugs in its OOB write functionality. Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <norris@broadcom.com> Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com> Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
2010-07-15 23:15:44 +04:00
*
* This function allocates and initializes a nand_bbt_descr for BBM detection
* based on the properties of "this". The new descriptor is stored in
* this->badblock_pattern. Thus, this->badblock_pattern should be NULL when
* passed to this function.
*/
static int nand_create_default_bbt_descr(struct nand_chip *this)
{
struct nand_bbt_descr *bd;
if (this->badblock_pattern) {
pr_warn("BBT descr already allocated; not replacing\n");
mtd: nand: more BB Detection refactoring and dynamic scan options This is a revision to PATCH 2/2 that I sent. Link: http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2010-July/030911.html Added new flag for scanning of both bytes 1 and 6 of the OOB for a BB marker (instead of simply one or the other). The "check_pattern" and "check_short_pattern" functions were updated to include support for scanning the two different locations in the OOB. In order to handle increases in variety of necessary scanning patterns, I implemented dynamic memory allocation of nand_bbt_descr structs in new function 'nand_create_default_bbt_descr()'. This replaces some increasingly-unwieldy, statically-declared descriptors. It can replace several more (e.g. "flashbased" structs). However, I do not test the flashbased options personally. How this was tested: I referenced 30+ data sheets (covering 100+ parts), and I tested a selection of 10 different chips to varying degrees. Particularly, I tested the creation of bad-block descriptors and basic BB scanning on three parts: ST NAND04GW3B2D, 2K page ST NAND128W3A, 512B page Samsung K9F1G08U0A, 2K page To test these, I wrote some fake bad block markers to the flash (in OOB bytes 1, 6, and elsewhere) to see if the scanning routine would detect them properly. However, this method was somewhat limited because the driver I am using has some bugs in its OOB write functionality. Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <norris@broadcom.com> Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com> Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
2010-07-15 23:15:44 +04:00
return -EINVAL;
}
bd = kzalloc(sizeof(*bd), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!bd)
mtd: nand: more BB Detection refactoring and dynamic scan options This is a revision to PATCH 2/2 that I sent. Link: http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2010-July/030911.html Added new flag for scanning of both bytes 1 and 6 of the OOB for a BB marker (instead of simply one or the other). The "check_pattern" and "check_short_pattern" functions were updated to include support for scanning the two different locations in the OOB. In order to handle increases in variety of necessary scanning patterns, I implemented dynamic memory allocation of nand_bbt_descr structs in new function 'nand_create_default_bbt_descr()'. This replaces some increasingly-unwieldy, statically-declared descriptors. It can replace several more (e.g. "flashbased" structs). However, I do not test the flashbased options personally. How this was tested: I referenced 30+ data sheets (covering 100+ parts), and I tested a selection of 10 different chips to varying degrees. Particularly, I tested the creation of bad-block descriptors and basic BB scanning on three parts: ST NAND04GW3B2D, 2K page ST NAND128W3A, 512B page Samsung K9F1G08U0A, 2K page To test these, I wrote some fake bad block markers to the flash (in OOB bytes 1, 6, and elsewhere) to see if the scanning routine would detect them properly. However, this method was somewhat limited because the driver I am using has some bugs in its OOB write functionality. Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <norris@broadcom.com> Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com> Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
2010-07-15 23:15:44 +04:00
return -ENOMEM;
bd->options = this->bbt_options;
mtd: nand: more BB Detection refactoring and dynamic scan options This is a revision to PATCH 2/2 that I sent. Link: http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2010-July/030911.html Added new flag for scanning of both bytes 1 and 6 of the OOB for a BB marker (instead of simply one or the other). The "check_pattern" and "check_short_pattern" functions were updated to include support for scanning the two different locations in the OOB. In order to handle increases in variety of necessary scanning patterns, I implemented dynamic memory allocation of nand_bbt_descr structs in new function 'nand_create_default_bbt_descr()'. This replaces some increasingly-unwieldy, statically-declared descriptors. It can replace several more (e.g. "flashbased" structs). However, I do not test the flashbased options personally. How this was tested: I referenced 30+ data sheets (covering 100+ parts), and I tested a selection of 10 different chips to varying degrees. Particularly, I tested the creation of bad-block descriptors and basic BB scanning on three parts: ST NAND04GW3B2D, 2K page ST NAND128W3A, 512B page Samsung K9F1G08U0A, 2K page To test these, I wrote some fake bad block markers to the flash (in OOB bytes 1, 6, and elsewhere) to see if the scanning routine would detect them properly. However, this method was somewhat limited because the driver I am using has some bugs in its OOB write functionality. Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <norris@broadcom.com> Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com> Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
2010-07-15 23:15:44 +04:00
bd->offs = this->badblockpos;
bd->len = (this->options & NAND_BUSWIDTH_16) ? 2 : 1;
bd->pattern = scan_ff_pattern;
bd->options |= NAND_BBT_DYNAMICSTRUCT;
this->badblock_pattern = bd;
return 0;
}
/**
* nand_default_bbt - [NAND Interface] Select a default bad block table for the device
* @mtd: MTD device structure
*
* This function selects the default bad block table support for the device and
* calls the nand_scan_bbt function.
*/
int nand_default_bbt(struct mtd_info *mtd)
{
struct nand_chip *this = mtd->priv;
/*
* Default for AG-AND. We must use a flash based bad block table as the
* devices have factory marked _good_ blocks. Erasing those blocks
* leads to loss of the good / bad information, so we _must_ store this
* information in a good / bad table during startup.
*/
if (this->options & NAND_IS_AND) {
/* Use the default pattern descriptors */
if (!this->bbt_td) {
this->bbt_td = &bbt_main_descr;
this->bbt_md = &bbt_mirror_descr;
}
this->bbt_options |= NAND_BBT_USE_FLASH;
return nand_scan_bbt(mtd, &agand_flashbased);
}
/* Is a flash based bad block table requested? */
if (this->bbt_options & NAND_BBT_USE_FLASH) {
/* Use the default pattern descriptors */
if (!this->bbt_td) {
if (this->bbt_options & NAND_BBT_NO_OOB) {
this->bbt_td = &bbt_main_no_bbt_descr;
this->bbt_md = &bbt_mirror_no_bbt_descr;
} else {
this->bbt_td = &bbt_main_descr;
this->bbt_md = &bbt_mirror_descr;
}
}
} else {
this->bbt_td = NULL;
this->bbt_md = NULL;
}
if (!this->badblock_pattern)
nand_create_default_bbt_descr(this);
return nand_scan_bbt(mtd, this->badblock_pattern);
}
/**
* nand_isbad_bbt - [NAND Interface] Check if a block is bad
* @mtd: MTD device structure
* @offs: offset in the device
* @allowbbt: allow access to bad block table region
*/
int nand_isbad_bbt(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t offs, int allowbbt)
{
struct nand_chip *this = mtd->priv;
int block;
uint8_t res;
/* Get block number * 2 */
block = (int)(offs >> (this->bbt_erase_shift - 1));
res = (this->bbt[block >> 3] >> (block & 0x06)) & 0x03;
pr_debug("nand_isbad_bbt(): bbt info for offs 0x%08x: "
"(block %d) 0x%02x\n",
(unsigned int)offs, block >> 1, res);
switch ((int)res) {
case 0x00:
return 0;
case 0x01:
return 1;
case 0x02:
return allowbbt ? 0 : 1;
}
return 1;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(nand_scan_bbt);
EXPORT_SYMBOL(nand_default_bbt);