WSL2-Linux-Kernel/arch/arm64/include/asm/uaccess.h

421 строка
11 KiB
C
Исходник Обычный вид История

/*
* Based on arch/arm/include/asm/uaccess.h
*
* Copyright (C) 2012 ARM Ltd.
*
* This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
* it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
* published by the Free Software Foundation.
*
* This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
* but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
* MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
* GNU General Public License for more details.
*
* You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
* along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
*/
#ifndef __ASM_UACCESS_H
#define __ASM_UACCESS_H
#include <asm/alternative.h>
#include <asm/kernel-pgtable.h>
#include <asm/sysreg.h>
/*
* User space memory access functions
*/
#include <linux/bitops.h>
#include <linux/kasan-checks.h>
#include <linux/string.h>
#include <asm/cpufeature.h>
#include <asm/ptrace.h>
#include <asm/memory.h>
#include <asm/compiler.h>
#include <asm/extable.h>
#define get_ds() (KERNEL_DS)
#define get_fs() (current_thread_info()->addr_limit)
static inline void set_fs(mm_segment_t fs)
{
current_thread_info()->addr_limit = fs;
arm64/syscalls: Check address limit on user-mode return Ensure the address limit is a user-mode segment before returning to user-mode. Otherwise a process can corrupt kernel-mode memory and elevate privileges [1]. The set_fs function sets the TIF_SETFS flag to force a slow path on return. In the slow path, the address limit is checked to be USER_DS if needed. [1] https://bugs.chromium.org/p/project-zero/issues/detail?id=990 Signed-off-by: Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@google.com> Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com> Cc: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@mellanox.com> Cc: Pratyush Anand <panand@redhat.com> Cc: Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk> Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: Will Drewry <wad@chromium.org> Cc: linux-api@vger.kernel.org Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170615011203.144108-3-thgarnie@google.com
2017-06-15 04:12:03 +03:00
/* On user-mode return, check fs is correct */
set_thread_flag(TIF_FSCHECK);
/*
* Enable/disable UAO so that copy_to_user() etc can access
* kernel memory with the unprivileged instructions.
*/
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64_UAO) && fs == KERNEL_DS)
asm(ALTERNATIVE("nop", SET_PSTATE_UAO(1), ARM64_HAS_UAO));
else
asm(ALTERNATIVE("nop", SET_PSTATE_UAO(0), ARM64_HAS_UAO,
CONFIG_ARM64_UAO));
}
#define segment_eq(a, b) ((a) == (b))
/*
* Test whether a block of memory is a valid user space address.
* Returns 1 if the range is valid, 0 otherwise.
*
* This is equivalent to the following test:
* (u65)addr + (u65)size <= (u65)current->addr_limit + 1
*/
static inline unsigned long __range_ok(unsigned long addr, unsigned long size)
{
unsigned long limit = current_thread_info()->addr_limit;
__chk_user_ptr(addr);
asm volatile(
// A + B <= C + 1 for all A,B,C, in four easy steps:
// 1: X = A + B; X' = X % 2^64
" adds %0, %0, %2\n"
// 2: Set C = 0 if X > 2^64, to guarantee X' > C in step 4
" csel %1, xzr, %1, hi\n"
// 3: Set X' = ~0 if X >= 2^64. For X == 2^64, this decrements X'
// to compensate for the carry flag being set in step 4. For
// X > 2^64, X' merely has to remain nonzero, which it does.
" csinv %0, %0, xzr, cc\n"
// 4: For X < 2^64, this gives us X' - C - 1 <= 0, where the -1
// comes from the carry in being clear. Otherwise, we are
// testing X' - C == 0, subject to the previous adjustments.
" sbcs xzr, %0, %1\n"
" cset %0, ls\n"
: "+r" (addr), "+r" (limit) : "Ir" (size) : "cc");
return addr;
}
/*
* When dealing with data aborts, watchpoints, or instruction traps we may end
* up with a tagged userland pointer. Clear the tag to get a sane pointer to
* pass on to access_ok(), for instance.
*/
#define untagged_addr(addr) sign_extend64(addr, 55)
#define access_ok(type, addr, size) __range_ok((unsigned long)(addr), size)
#define user_addr_max get_fs
#define _ASM_EXTABLE(from, to) \
" .pushsection __ex_table, \"a\"\n" \
" .align 3\n" \
" .long (" #from " - .), (" #to " - .)\n" \
" .popsection\n"
/*
* User access enabling/disabling.
*/
#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_SW_TTBR0_PAN
static inline void __uaccess_ttbr0_disable(void)
{
arm64: kpti: Fix the interaction between ASID switching and software PAN With ARM64_SW_TTBR0_PAN enabled, the exception entry code checks the active ASID to decide whether user access was enabled (non-zero ASID) when the exception was taken. On return from exception, if user access was previously disabled, it re-instates TTBR0_EL1 from the per-thread saved value (updated in switch_mm() or efi_set_pgd()). Commit 7655abb95386 ("arm64: mm: Move ASID from TTBR0 to TTBR1") makes a TTBR0_EL1 + ASID switching non-atomic. Subsequently, commit 27a921e75711 ("arm64: mm: Fix and re-enable ARM64_SW_TTBR0_PAN") changes the __uaccess_ttbr0_disable() function and asm macro to first write the reserved TTBR0_EL1 followed by the ASID=0 update in TTBR1_EL1. If an exception occurs between these two, the exception return code will re-instate a valid TTBR0_EL1. Similar scenario can happen in cpu_switch_mm() between setting the reserved TTBR0_EL1 and the ASID update in cpu_do_switch_mm(). This patch reverts the entry.S check for ASID == 0 to TTBR0_EL1 and disables the interrupts around the TTBR0_EL1 and ASID switching code in __uaccess_ttbr0_disable(). It also ensures that, when returning from the EFI runtime services, efi_set_pgd() doesn't leave a non-zero ASID in TTBR1_EL1 by using uaccess_ttbr0_{enable,disable}. The accesses to current_thread_info()->ttbr0 are updated to use READ_ONCE/WRITE_ONCE. As a safety measure, __uaccess_ttbr0_enable() always masks out any existing non-zero ASID TTBR1_EL1 before writing in the new ASID. Fixes: 27a921e75711 ("arm64: mm: Fix and re-enable ARM64_SW_TTBR0_PAN") Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Reported-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> Tested-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com> Tested-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com> Co-developed-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2018-01-10 16:18:30 +03:00
unsigned long flags, ttbr;
arm64: kpti: Fix the interaction between ASID switching and software PAN With ARM64_SW_TTBR0_PAN enabled, the exception entry code checks the active ASID to decide whether user access was enabled (non-zero ASID) when the exception was taken. On return from exception, if user access was previously disabled, it re-instates TTBR0_EL1 from the per-thread saved value (updated in switch_mm() or efi_set_pgd()). Commit 7655abb95386 ("arm64: mm: Move ASID from TTBR0 to TTBR1") makes a TTBR0_EL1 + ASID switching non-atomic. Subsequently, commit 27a921e75711 ("arm64: mm: Fix and re-enable ARM64_SW_TTBR0_PAN") changes the __uaccess_ttbr0_disable() function and asm macro to first write the reserved TTBR0_EL1 followed by the ASID=0 update in TTBR1_EL1. If an exception occurs between these two, the exception return code will re-instate a valid TTBR0_EL1. Similar scenario can happen in cpu_switch_mm() between setting the reserved TTBR0_EL1 and the ASID update in cpu_do_switch_mm(). This patch reverts the entry.S check for ASID == 0 to TTBR0_EL1 and disables the interrupts around the TTBR0_EL1 and ASID switching code in __uaccess_ttbr0_disable(). It also ensures that, when returning from the EFI runtime services, efi_set_pgd() doesn't leave a non-zero ASID in TTBR1_EL1 by using uaccess_ttbr0_{enable,disable}. The accesses to current_thread_info()->ttbr0 are updated to use READ_ONCE/WRITE_ONCE. As a safety measure, __uaccess_ttbr0_enable() always masks out any existing non-zero ASID TTBR1_EL1 before writing in the new ASID. Fixes: 27a921e75711 ("arm64: mm: Fix and re-enable ARM64_SW_TTBR0_PAN") Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Reported-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> Tested-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com> Tested-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com> Co-developed-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2018-01-10 16:18:30 +03:00
local_irq_save(flags);
ttbr = read_sysreg(ttbr1_el1);
arm64: kpti: Fix the interaction between ASID switching and software PAN With ARM64_SW_TTBR0_PAN enabled, the exception entry code checks the active ASID to decide whether user access was enabled (non-zero ASID) when the exception was taken. On return from exception, if user access was previously disabled, it re-instates TTBR0_EL1 from the per-thread saved value (updated in switch_mm() or efi_set_pgd()). Commit 7655abb95386 ("arm64: mm: Move ASID from TTBR0 to TTBR1") makes a TTBR0_EL1 + ASID switching non-atomic. Subsequently, commit 27a921e75711 ("arm64: mm: Fix and re-enable ARM64_SW_TTBR0_PAN") changes the __uaccess_ttbr0_disable() function and asm macro to first write the reserved TTBR0_EL1 followed by the ASID=0 update in TTBR1_EL1. If an exception occurs between these two, the exception return code will re-instate a valid TTBR0_EL1. Similar scenario can happen in cpu_switch_mm() between setting the reserved TTBR0_EL1 and the ASID update in cpu_do_switch_mm(). This patch reverts the entry.S check for ASID == 0 to TTBR0_EL1 and disables the interrupts around the TTBR0_EL1 and ASID switching code in __uaccess_ttbr0_disable(). It also ensures that, when returning from the EFI runtime services, efi_set_pgd() doesn't leave a non-zero ASID in TTBR1_EL1 by using uaccess_ttbr0_{enable,disable}. The accesses to current_thread_info()->ttbr0 are updated to use READ_ONCE/WRITE_ONCE. As a safety measure, __uaccess_ttbr0_enable() always masks out any existing non-zero ASID TTBR1_EL1 before writing in the new ASID. Fixes: 27a921e75711 ("arm64: mm: Fix and re-enable ARM64_SW_TTBR0_PAN") Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Reported-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> Tested-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com> Tested-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com> Co-developed-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2018-01-10 16:18:30 +03:00
ttbr &= ~TTBR_ASID_MASK;
/* reserved_ttbr0 placed before swapper_pg_dir */
write_sysreg(ttbr - RESERVED_TTBR0_SIZE, ttbr0_el1);
isb();
/* Set reserved ASID */
write_sysreg(ttbr, ttbr1_el1);
isb();
arm64: kpti: Fix the interaction between ASID switching and software PAN With ARM64_SW_TTBR0_PAN enabled, the exception entry code checks the active ASID to decide whether user access was enabled (non-zero ASID) when the exception was taken. On return from exception, if user access was previously disabled, it re-instates TTBR0_EL1 from the per-thread saved value (updated in switch_mm() or efi_set_pgd()). Commit 7655abb95386 ("arm64: mm: Move ASID from TTBR0 to TTBR1") makes a TTBR0_EL1 + ASID switching non-atomic. Subsequently, commit 27a921e75711 ("arm64: mm: Fix and re-enable ARM64_SW_TTBR0_PAN") changes the __uaccess_ttbr0_disable() function and asm macro to first write the reserved TTBR0_EL1 followed by the ASID=0 update in TTBR1_EL1. If an exception occurs between these two, the exception return code will re-instate a valid TTBR0_EL1. Similar scenario can happen in cpu_switch_mm() between setting the reserved TTBR0_EL1 and the ASID update in cpu_do_switch_mm(). This patch reverts the entry.S check for ASID == 0 to TTBR0_EL1 and disables the interrupts around the TTBR0_EL1 and ASID switching code in __uaccess_ttbr0_disable(). It also ensures that, when returning from the EFI runtime services, efi_set_pgd() doesn't leave a non-zero ASID in TTBR1_EL1 by using uaccess_ttbr0_{enable,disable}. The accesses to current_thread_info()->ttbr0 are updated to use READ_ONCE/WRITE_ONCE. As a safety measure, __uaccess_ttbr0_enable() always masks out any existing non-zero ASID TTBR1_EL1 before writing in the new ASID. Fixes: 27a921e75711 ("arm64: mm: Fix and re-enable ARM64_SW_TTBR0_PAN") Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Reported-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> Tested-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com> Tested-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com> Co-developed-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2018-01-10 16:18:30 +03:00
local_irq_restore(flags);
}
static inline void __uaccess_ttbr0_enable(void)
{
unsigned long flags, ttbr0, ttbr1;
/*
* Disable interrupts to avoid preemption between reading the 'ttbr0'
* variable and the MSR. A context switch could trigger an ASID
* roll-over and an update of 'ttbr0'.
*/
local_irq_save(flags);
arm64: kpti: Fix the interaction between ASID switching and software PAN With ARM64_SW_TTBR0_PAN enabled, the exception entry code checks the active ASID to decide whether user access was enabled (non-zero ASID) when the exception was taken. On return from exception, if user access was previously disabled, it re-instates TTBR0_EL1 from the per-thread saved value (updated in switch_mm() or efi_set_pgd()). Commit 7655abb95386 ("arm64: mm: Move ASID from TTBR0 to TTBR1") makes a TTBR0_EL1 + ASID switching non-atomic. Subsequently, commit 27a921e75711 ("arm64: mm: Fix and re-enable ARM64_SW_TTBR0_PAN") changes the __uaccess_ttbr0_disable() function and asm macro to first write the reserved TTBR0_EL1 followed by the ASID=0 update in TTBR1_EL1. If an exception occurs between these two, the exception return code will re-instate a valid TTBR0_EL1. Similar scenario can happen in cpu_switch_mm() between setting the reserved TTBR0_EL1 and the ASID update in cpu_do_switch_mm(). This patch reverts the entry.S check for ASID == 0 to TTBR0_EL1 and disables the interrupts around the TTBR0_EL1 and ASID switching code in __uaccess_ttbr0_disable(). It also ensures that, when returning from the EFI runtime services, efi_set_pgd() doesn't leave a non-zero ASID in TTBR1_EL1 by using uaccess_ttbr0_{enable,disable}. The accesses to current_thread_info()->ttbr0 are updated to use READ_ONCE/WRITE_ONCE. As a safety measure, __uaccess_ttbr0_enable() always masks out any existing non-zero ASID TTBR1_EL1 before writing in the new ASID. Fixes: 27a921e75711 ("arm64: mm: Fix and re-enable ARM64_SW_TTBR0_PAN") Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Reported-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> Tested-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com> Tested-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com> Co-developed-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2018-01-10 16:18:30 +03:00
ttbr0 = READ_ONCE(current_thread_info()->ttbr0);
/* Restore active ASID */
ttbr1 = read_sysreg(ttbr1_el1);
arm64: kpti: Fix the interaction between ASID switching and software PAN With ARM64_SW_TTBR0_PAN enabled, the exception entry code checks the active ASID to decide whether user access was enabled (non-zero ASID) when the exception was taken. On return from exception, if user access was previously disabled, it re-instates TTBR0_EL1 from the per-thread saved value (updated in switch_mm() or efi_set_pgd()). Commit 7655abb95386 ("arm64: mm: Move ASID from TTBR0 to TTBR1") makes a TTBR0_EL1 + ASID switching non-atomic. Subsequently, commit 27a921e75711 ("arm64: mm: Fix and re-enable ARM64_SW_TTBR0_PAN") changes the __uaccess_ttbr0_disable() function and asm macro to first write the reserved TTBR0_EL1 followed by the ASID=0 update in TTBR1_EL1. If an exception occurs between these two, the exception return code will re-instate a valid TTBR0_EL1. Similar scenario can happen in cpu_switch_mm() between setting the reserved TTBR0_EL1 and the ASID update in cpu_do_switch_mm(). This patch reverts the entry.S check for ASID == 0 to TTBR0_EL1 and disables the interrupts around the TTBR0_EL1 and ASID switching code in __uaccess_ttbr0_disable(). It also ensures that, when returning from the EFI runtime services, efi_set_pgd() doesn't leave a non-zero ASID in TTBR1_EL1 by using uaccess_ttbr0_{enable,disable}. The accesses to current_thread_info()->ttbr0 are updated to use READ_ONCE/WRITE_ONCE. As a safety measure, __uaccess_ttbr0_enable() always masks out any existing non-zero ASID TTBR1_EL1 before writing in the new ASID. Fixes: 27a921e75711 ("arm64: mm: Fix and re-enable ARM64_SW_TTBR0_PAN") Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Reported-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> Tested-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com> Tested-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com> Co-developed-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2018-01-10 16:18:30 +03:00
ttbr1 &= ~TTBR_ASID_MASK; /* safety measure */
ttbr1 |= ttbr0 & TTBR_ASID_MASK;
write_sysreg(ttbr1, ttbr1_el1);
isb();
/* Restore user page table */
write_sysreg(ttbr0, ttbr0_el1);
isb();
local_irq_restore(flags);
}
static inline bool uaccess_ttbr0_disable(void)
{
if (!system_uses_ttbr0_pan())
return false;
__uaccess_ttbr0_disable();
return true;
}
static inline bool uaccess_ttbr0_enable(void)
{
if (!system_uses_ttbr0_pan())
return false;
__uaccess_ttbr0_enable();
return true;
}
#else
static inline bool uaccess_ttbr0_disable(void)
{
return false;
}
static inline bool uaccess_ttbr0_enable(void)
{
return false;
}
#endif
static inline void __uaccess_disable_hw_pan(void)
{
asm(ALTERNATIVE("nop", SET_PSTATE_PAN(0), ARM64_HAS_PAN,
CONFIG_ARM64_PAN));
}
static inline void __uaccess_enable_hw_pan(void)
{
asm(ALTERNATIVE("nop", SET_PSTATE_PAN(1), ARM64_HAS_PAN,
CONFIG_ARM64_PAN));
}
#define __uaccess_disable(alt) \
do { \
if (!uaccess_ttbr0_disable()) \
asm(ALTERNATIVE("nop", SET_PSTATE_PAN(1), alt, \
CONFIG_ARM64_PAN)); \
} while (0)
#define __uaccess_enable(alt) \
do { \
if (!uaccess_ttbr0_enable()) \
asm(ALTERNATIVE("nop", SET_PSTATE_PAN(0), alt, \
CONFIG_ARM64_PAN)); \
} while (0)
static inline void uaccess_disable(void)
{
__uaccess_disable(ARM64_HAS_PAN);
}
static inline void uaccess_enable(void)
{
__uaccess_enable(ARM64_HAS_PAN);
}
/*
* These functions are no-ops when UAO is present.
*/
static inline void uaccess_disable_not_uao(void)
{
__uaccess_disable(ARM64_ALT_PAN_NOT_UAO);
}
static inline void uaccess_enable_not_uao(void)
{
__uaccess_enable(ARM64_ALT_PAN_NOT_UAO);
}
/*
* Sanitise a uaccess pointer such that it becomes NULL if above the
* current addr_limit.
*/
#define uaccess_mask_ptr(ptr) (__typeof__(ptr))__uaccess_mask_ptr(ptr)
static inline void __user *__uaccess_mask_ptr(const void __user *ptr)
{
void __user *safe_ptr;
asm volatile(
" bics xzr, %1, %2\n"
" csel %0, %1, xzr, eq\n"
: "=&r" (safe_ptr)
: "r" (ptr), "r" (current_thread_info()->addr_limit)
: "cc");
csdb();
return safe_ptr;
}
/*
* The "__xxx" versions of the user access functions do not verify the address
* space - it must have been done previously with a separate "access_ok()"
* call.
*
* The "__xxx_error" versions set the third argument to -EFAULT if an error
* occurs, and leave it unchanged on success.
*/
#define __get_user_asm(instr, alt_instr, reg, x, addr, err, feature) \
asm volatile( \
"1:"ALTERNATIVE(instr " " reg "1, [%2]\n", \
alt_instr " " reg "1, [%2]\n", feature) \
"2:\n" \
" .section .fixup, \"ax\"\n" \
" .align 2\n" \
"3: mov %w0, %3\n" \
" mov %1, #0\n" \
" b 2b\n" \
" .previous\n" \
_ASM_EXTABLE(1b, 3b) \
: "+r" (err), "=&r" (x) \
: "r" (addr), "i" (-EFAULT))
#define __get_user_err(x, ptr, err) \
do { \
unsigned long __gu_val; \
__chk_user_ptr(ptr); \
uaccess_enable_not_uao(); \
switch (sizeof(*(ptr))) { \
case 1: \
__get_user_asm("ldrb", "ldtrb", "%w", __gu_val, (ptr), \
(err), ARM64_HAS_UAO); \
break; \
case 2: \
__get_user_asm("ldrh", "ldtrh", "%w", __gu_val, (ptr), \
(err), ARM64_HAS_UAO); \
break; \
case 4: \
__get_user_asm("ldr", "ldtr", "%w", __gu_val, (ptr), \
(err), ARM64_HAS_UAO); \
break; \
case 8: \
arm64: uaccess: suppress spurious clang warning Clang tries to warn when there's a mismatch between an operand's size, and the size of the register it is held in, as this may indicate a bug. Specifically, clang warns when the operand's type is less than 64 bits wide, and the register is used unqualified (i.e. %N rather than %xN or %wN). Unfortunately clang can generate these warnings for unreachable code. For example, for code like: do { \ typeof(*(ptr)) __v = (v); \ switch(sizeof(*(ptr))) { \ case 1: \ // assume __v is 1 byte wide \ asm ("{op}b %w0" : : "r" (v)); \ break; \ case 8: \ // assume __v is 8 bytes wide \ asm ("{op} %0" : : "r" (v)); \ break; \ } while (0) ... if op() were passed a char value and pointer to char, clang may produce a warning for the unreachable case where sizeof(*(ptr)) is 8. For the same reasons, clang produces warnings when __put_user_err() is used for types that are less than 64 bits wide. We could avoid this with a cast to a fixed-width type in each of the cases. However, GCC will then warn that pointer types are being cast to mismatched integer sizes (in unreachable paths). Another option would be to use the same union trickery as we do for __smp_store_release() and __smp_load_acquire(), but this is fairly invasive. Instead, this patch suppresses the clang warning by using an x modifier in the assembly for the 8 byte case of __put_user_err(). No additional work is necessary as the value has been cast to typeof(*(ptr)), so the compiler will have performed any necessary extension for the reachable case. For consistency, __get_user_err() is also updated to use the x modifier for its 8 byte case. Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Reported-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2017-05-03 18:09:38 +03:00
__get_user_asm("ldr", "ldtr", "%x", __gu_val, (ptr), \
(err), ARM64_HAS_UAO); \
break; \
default: \
BUILD_BUG(); \
} \
uaccess_disable_not_uao(); \
(x) = (__force __typeof__(*(ptr)))__gu_val; \
} while (0)
#define __get_user(x, ptr) \
({ \
int __gu_err = 0; \
__get_user_err((x), (ptr), __gu_err); \
__gu_err; \
})
#define __get_user_error(x, ptr, err) \
({ \
__get_user_err((x), (ptr), (err)); \
(void)0; \
})
#define get_user(x, ptr) \
({ \
__typeof__(*(ptr)) __user *__p = (ptr); \
might_fault(); \
access_ok(VERIFY_READ, __p, sizeof(*__p)) ? \
__p = uaccess_mask_ptr(__p), __get_user((x), __p) : \
((x) = 0, -EFAULT); \
})
#define __put_user_asm(instr, alt_instr, reg, x, addr, err, feature) \
asm volatile( \
"1:"ALTERNATIVE(instr " " reg "1, [%2]\n", \
alt_instr " " reg "1, [%2]\n", feature) \
"2:\n" \
" .section .fixup,\"ax\"\n" \
" .align 2\n" \
"3: mov %w0, %3\n" \
" b 2b\n" \
" .previous\n" \
_ASM_EXTABLE(1b, 3b) \
: "+r" (err) \
: "r" (x), "r" (addr), "i" (-EFAULT))
#define __put_user_err(x, ptr, err) \
do { \
__typeof__(*(ptr)) __pu_val = (x); \
__chk_user_ptr(ptr); \
uaccess_enable_not_uao(); \
switch (sizeof(*(ptr))) { \
case 1: \
__put_user_asm("strb", "sttrb", "%w", __pu_val, (ptr), \
(err), ARM64_HAS_UAO); \
break; \
case 2: \
__put_user_asm("strh", "sttrh", "%w", __pu_val, (ptr), \
(err), ARM64_HAS_UAO); \
break; \
case 4: \
__put_user_asm("str", "sttr", "%w", __pu_val, (ptr), \
(err), ARM64_HAS_UAO); \
break; \
case 8: \
arm64: uaccess: suppress spurious clang warning Clang tries to warn when there's a mismatch between an operand's size, and the size of the register it is held in, as this may indicate a bug. Specifically, clang warns when the operand's type is less than 64 bits wide, and the register is used unqualified (i.e. %N rather than %xN or %wN). Unfortunately clang can generate these warnings for unreachable code. For example, for code like: do { \ typeof(*(ptr)) __v = (v); \ switch(sizeof(*(ptr))) { \ case 1: \ // assume __v is 1 byte wide \ asm ("{op}b %w0" : : "r" (v)); \ break; \ case 8: \ // assume __v is 8 bytes wide \ asm ("{op} %0" : : "r" (v)); \ break; \ } while (0) ... if op() were passed a char value and pointer to char, clang may produce a warning for the unreachable case where sizeof(*(ptr)) is 8. For the same reasons, clang produces warnings when __put_user_err() is used for types that are less than 64 bits wide. We could avoid this with a cast to a fixed-width type in each of the cases. However, GCC will then warn that pointer types are being cast to mismatched integer sizes (in unreachable paths). Another option would be to use the same union trickery as we do for __smp_store_release() and __smp_load_acquire(), but this is fairly invasive. Instead, this patch suppresses the clang warning by using an x modifier in the assembly for the 8 byte case of __put_user_err(). No additional work is necessary as the value has been cast to typeof(*(ptr)), so the compiler will have performed any necessary extension for the reachable case. For consistency, __get_user_err() is also updated to use the x modifier for its 8 byte case. Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Reported-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2017-05-03 18:09:38 +03:00
__put_user_asm("str", "sttr", "%x", __pu_val, (ptr), \
(err), ARM64_HAS_UAO); \
break; \
default: \
BUILD_BUG(); \
} \
uaccess_disable_not_uao(); \
} while (0)
#define __put_user(x, ptr) \
({ \
int __pu_err = 0; \
__put_user_err((x), (ptr), __pu_err); \
__pu_err; \
})
#define __put_user_error(x, ptr, err) \
({ \
__put_user_err((x), (ptr), (err)); \
(void)0; \
})
#define put_user(x, ptr) \
({ \
__typeof__(*(ptr)) __user *__p = (ptr); \
might_fault(); \
access_ok(VERIFY_WRITE, __p, sizeof(*__p)) ? \
__p = uaccess_mask_ptr(__p), __put_user((x), __p) : \
-EFAULT; \
})
extern unsigned long __must_check __arch_copy_from_user(void *to, const void __user *from, unsigned long n);
#define raw_copy_from_user __arch_copy_from_user
extern unsigned long __must_check __arch_copy_to_user(void __user *to, const void *from, unsigned long n);
#define raw_copy_to_user __arch_copy_to_user
extern unsigned long __must_check raw_copy_in_user(void __user *to, const void __user *from, unsigned long n);
extern unsigned long __must_check __clear_user(void __user *addr, unsigned long n);
#define INLINE_COPY_TO_USER
#define INLINE_COPY_FROM_USER
static inline unsigned long __must_check clear_user(void __user *to, unsigned long n)
{
if (access_ok(VERIFY_WRITE, to, n))
n = __clear_user(__uaccess_mask_ptr(to), n);
return n;
}
extern long strncpy_from_user(char *dest, const char __user *src, long count);
extern __must_check long strnlen_user(const char __user *str, long n);
#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_UACCESS_FLUSHCACHE
struct page;
void memcpy_page_flushcache(char *to, struct page *page, size_t offset, size_t len);
extern unsigned long __must_check __copy_user_flushcache(void *to, const void __user *from, unsigned long n);
static inline int __copy_from_user_flushcache(void *dst, const void __user *src, unsigned size)
{
kasan_check_write(dst, size);
return __copy_user_flushcache(dst, src, size);
}
#endif
#endif /* __ASM_UACCESS_H */