WSL2-Linux-Kernel/drivers/mmc/core/core.c

2875 строки
72 KiB
C
Исходник Обычный вид История

/*
* linux/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
*
* Copyright (C) 2003-2004 Russell King, All Rights Reserved.
* SD support Copyright (C) 2004 Ian Molton, All Rights Reserved.
* Copyright (C) 2005-2008 Pierre Ossman, All Rights Reserved.
* MMCv4 support Copyright (C) 2006 Philip Langdale, All Rights Reserved.
*
* This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
* it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
* published by the Free Software Foundation.
*/
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/init.h>
#include <linux/interrupt.h>
#include <linux/completion.h>
#include <linux/device.h>
#include <linux/delay.h>
#include <linux/pagemap.h>
#include <linux/err.h>
#include <linux/leds.h>
#include <linux/scatterlist.h>
#include <linux/log2.h>
#include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
#include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
#include <linux/pm_wakeup.h>
#include <linux/suspend.h>
#include <linux/fault-inject.h>
#include <linux/random.h>
#include <linux/slab.h>
#include <linux/of.h>
#include <linux/mmc/card.h>
#include <linux/mmc/host.h>
#include <linux/mmc/mmc.h>
#include <linux/mmc/sd.h>
#include <linux/mmc/slot-gpio.h>
#define CREATE_TRACE_POINTS
#include <trace/events/mmc.h>
#include "core.h"
#include "card.h"
#include "bus.h"
#include "host.h"
#include "sdio_bus.h"
#include "pwrseq.h"
#include "mmc_ops.h"
#include "sd_ops.h"
#include "sdio_ops.h"
/* If the device is not responding */
#define MMC_CORE_TIMEOUT_MS (10 * 60 * 1000) /* 10 minute timeout */
/* The max erase timeout, used when host->max_busy_timeout isn't specified */
#define MMC_ERASE_TIMEOUT_MS (60 * 1000) /* 60 s */
static const unsigned freqs[] = { 400000, 300000, 200000, 100000 };
MMC core learns about SPI Teach the MMC/SD/SDIO core about using SPI mode. - Use mmc_host_is_spi() so enumeration works through SPI signaling and protocols, not just the native versions. - Provide the SPI response type flags with each request issued, including requests from the new lock/unlock code. - Understand that cmd->resp[0] and mmc_get_status() results for SPI return different values than for "native" MMC/SD protocol; this affects resetting, checking card lock status, and some others. - Understand that some commands act a bit differently ... notably: * OP_COND command doesn't return the OCR * APP_CMD status doesn't have an R1_APP_CMD analogue Those changes required some new and updated primitives: - Provide utilities to access two SPI-only requests, and one request that wasn't previously needed: * mmc_spi_read_ocr() ... SPI only * mmc_spi_set_crc() ... SPI only (override by module parm) * mmc_send_cid() ... for use without broadcast mode - Updated internal routines: * Previous mmc_send_csd() modified into mmc_send_cxd_native(); it uses native "R2" responses, which include 16 bytes of data. * Previous mmc_send_ext_csd() becomes new mmc_send_cxd_data() helper for command-and-data access * Bugfix to that mmc_send_cxd_data() code: dma-to-stack is unsafe/nonportable, so kmalloc a bounce buffer instead. - Modified mmc_send_ext_csd() now uses mmc_send_cxd_data() helper - Modified mmc_send_csd(), and new mmc_spi_send_cid(), routines use those helper routines based on whether they're native or SPI The newest categories of cards supported by the MMC stack aren't expected to work yet with SPI: MMC or SD cards with over 4GB data, and SDIO. All those cards support SPI mode, so eventually they should work too. Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net> Signed-off-by: Pierre Ossman <drzeus@drzeus.cx>
2007-08-08 20:11:32 +04:00
/*
* Enabling software CRCs on the data blocks can be a significant (30%)
* performance cost, and for other reasons may not always be desired.
* So we allow it it to be disabled.
*/
bool use_spi_crc = 1;
MMC core learns about SPI Teach the MMC/SD/SDIO core about using SPI mode. - Use mmc_host_is_spi() so enumeration works through SPI signaling and protocols, not just the native versions. - Provide the SPI response type flags with each request issued, including requests from the new lock/unlock code. - Understand that cmd->resp[0] and mmc_get_status() results for SPI return different values than for "native" MMC/SD protocol; this affects resetting, checking card lock status, and some others. - Understand that some commands act a bit differently ... notably: * OP_COND command doesn't return the OCR * APP_CMD status doesn't have an R1_APP_CMD analogue Those changes required some new and updated primitives: - Provide utilities to access two SPI-only requests, and one request that wasn't previously needed: * mmc_spi_read_ocr() ... SPI only * mmc_spi_set_crc() ... SPI only (override by module parm) * mmc_send_cid() ... for use without broadcast mode - Updated internal routines: * Previous mmc_send_csd() modified into mmc_send_cxd_native(); it uses native "R2" responses, which include 16 bytes of data. * Previous mmc_send_ext_csd() becomes new mmc_send_cxd_data() helper for command-and-data access * Bugfix to that mmc_send_cxd_data() code: dma-to-stack is unsafe/nonportable, so kmalloc a bounce buffer instead. - Modified mmc_send_ext_csd() now uses mmc_send_cxd_data() helper - Modified mmc_send_csd(), and new mmc_spi_send_cid(), routines use those helper routines based on whether they're native or SPI The newest categories of cards supported by the MMC stack aren't expected to work yet with SPI: MMC or SD cards with over 4GB data, and SDIO. All those cards support SPI mode, so eventually they should work too. Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net> Signed-off-by: Pierre Ossman <drzeus@drzeus.cx>
2007-08-08 20:11:32 +04:00
module_param(use_spi_crc, bool, 0);
static int mmc_schedule_delayed_work(struct delayed_work *work,
unsigned long delay)
{
mmc: core: Optimize boot time by detecting cards simultaneously The mmc workqueue is an ordered workqueue, allowing only one work to execute per given time. As this workqueue is used for card detection, the conseqeunce is that cards will be detected one by one waiting for each other. Moreover, most of the time spent during card initialization is waiting for the card's internal firmware to be ready. From a CPU perspective this typically means waiting for a completion variable to be kicked via an IRQ-handler or waiting for a sleep timer to finish. This behaviour of detecting/initializing cards is sub-optimal, especially for SOCs having several controllers/cards. Let's convert to use the system_freezable_wq for the mmc detect works. This enables several works to be executed simultaneously and thus also cards to be detected like so. Tests on UX500, which holds two eMMC cards and an SD-card (actually also an SDIO card, currently not detected), shows a significant improved behaviour due to this change. Before this change, both the eMMC cards waited for the SD card to be initialized as its detect work entered the workqueue first. In some cases, depending on the characteristic of the SD-card, they got delayed 1-1.5 s. Additionally for the second eMMC, it needed to wait for the first eMMC to be initialized which added another 120-190 ms. Converting to the system_freezable_wq, removed these delays and made both the eMMC cards available far earlier in the boot sequence. Selecting the system_freezable_wq, in favour of for example the system_wq, is because we need card detection mechanism to be disabled once userspace are frozen during system PM. Currently the mmc core deal with this via PM notifiers, but following patches may utilize the behaviour of the system_freezable_wq, to simplify the use of the PM notifiers. Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Tested-by: Alan Cooper <alcooperx@gmail.com> Tested-by: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>
2015-12-01 12:35:29 +03:00
/*
* We use the system_freezable_wq, because of two reasons.
* First, it allows several works (not the same work item) to be
* executed simultaneously. Second, the queue becomes frozen when
* userspace becomes frozen during system PM.
*/
return queue_delayed_work(system_freezable_wq, work, delay);
}
#ifdef CONFIG_FAIL_MMC_REQUEST
/*
* Internal function. Inject random data errors.
* If mmc_data is NULL no errors are injected.
*/
static void mmc_should_fail_request(struct mmc_host *host,
struct mmc_request *mrq)
{
struct mmc_command *cmd = mrq->cmd;
struct mmc_data *data = mrq->data;
static const int data_errors[] = {
-ETIMEDOUT,
-EILSEQ,
-EIO,
};
if (!data)
return;
if (cmd->error || data->error ||
!should_fail(&host->fail_mmc_request, data->blksz * data->blocks))
return;
data->error = data_errors[prandom_u32() % ARRAY_SIZE(data_errors)];
data->bytes_xfered = (prandom_u32() % (data->bytes_xfered >> 9)) << 9;
}
#else /* CONFIG_FAIL_MMC_REQUEST */
static inline void mmc_should_fail_request(struct mmc_host *host,
struct mmc_request *mrq)
{
}
#endif /* CONFIG_FAIL_MMC_REQUEST */
mmc: core: Add support for sending commands during data transfer A host controller driver exposes its capability using caps flag MMC_CAP_CMD_DURING_TFR. A driver with that capability can accept requests that are marked mrq->cap_cmd_during_tfr = true. Then the driver informs the upper layers when the command line is available for further commands by calling mmc_command_done(). Because of that, the driver will not then automatically send STOP commands, and it is the responsibility of the upper layer to send a STOP command if it is required. For requests submitted through the mmc_wait_for_req() interface, the caller sets mrq->cap_cmd_during_tfr = true which causes mmc_wait_for_req() in fact not to wait. The caller can then send commands that do not use the data lines. Finally the caller can wait for the transfer to complete by calling mmc_wait_for_req_done() which is now exported. For requests submitted through the mmc_start_req() interface, the caller again sets mrq->cap_cmd_during_tfr = true, but mmc_start_req() anyway does not wait. The caller can then send commands that do not use the data lines. Finally the caller can wait for the transfer to complete in the normal way i.e. calling mmc_start_req() again. Irrespective of how a cap_cmd_during_tfr request is started, mmc_is_req_done() can be called if the upper layer needs to determine if the request is done. However the appropriate waiting function (either mmc_wait_for_req_done() or mmc_start_req()) must still be called. The implementation consists primarily of a new completion mrq->cmd_completion which notifies when the command line is available for further commands. That completion is completed by mmc_command_done(). When there is an ongoing data transfer, calls to mmc_wait_for_req() will automatically wait on that completion, so the caller does not have to do anything special. Note, in the case of errors, the driver may call mmc_request_done() without calling mmc_command_done() because mmc_request_done() always calls mmc_command_done(). Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
2016-08-16 13:44:11 +03:00
static inline void mmc_complete_cmd(struct mmc_request *mrq)
{
if (mrq->cap_cmd_during_tfr && !completion_done(&mrq->cmd_completion))
complete_all(&mrq->cmd_completion);
}
void mmc_command_done(struct mmc_host *host, struct mmc_request *mrq)
{
if (!mrq->cap_cmd_during_tfr)
return;
mmc_complete_cmd(mrq);
pr_debug("%s: cmd done, tfr ongoing (CMD%u)\n",
mmc_hostname(host), mrq->cmd->opcode);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(mmc_command_done);
/**
* mmc_request_done - finish processing an MMC request
* @host: MMC host which completed request
* @mrq: MMC request which request
*
* MMC drivers should call this function when they have completed
* their processing of a request.
*/
void mmc_request_done(struct mmc_host *host, struct mmc_request *mrq)
{
struct mmc_command *cmd = mrq->cmd;
int err = cmd->error;
/* Flag re-tuning needed on CRC errors */
if ((cmd->opcode != MMC_SEND_TUNING_BLOCK &&
cmd->opcode != MMC_SEND_TUNING_BLOCK_HS200) &&
(err == -EILSEQ || (mrq->sbc && mrq->sbc->error == -EILSEQ) ||
(mrq->data && mrq->data->error == -EILSEQ) ||
(mrq->stop && mrq->stop->error == -EILSEQ)))
mmc_retune_needed(host);
MMC core learns about SPI Teach the MMC/SD/SDIO core about using SPI mode. - Use mmc_host_is_spi() so enumeration works through SPI signaling and protocols, not just the native versions. - Provide the SPI response type flags with each request issued, including requests from the new lock/unlock code. - Understand that cmd->resp[0] and mmc_get_status() results for SPI return different values than for "native" MMC/SD protocol; this affects resetting, checking card lock status, and some others. - Understand that some commands act a bit differently ... notably: * OP_COND command doesn't return the OCR * APP_CMD status doesn't have an R1_APP_CMD analogue Those changes required some new and updated primitives: - Provide utilities to access two SPI-only requests, and one request that wasn't previously needed: * mmc_spi_read_ocr() ... SPI only * mmc_spi_set_crc() ... SPI only (override by module parm) * mmc_send_cid() ... for use without broadcast mode - Updated internal routines: * Previous mmc_send_csd() modified into mmc_send_cxd_native(); it uses native "R2" responses, which include 16 bytes of data. * Previous mmc_send_ext_csd() becomes new mmc_send_cxd_data() helper for command-and-data access * Bugfix to that mmc_send_cxd_data() code: dma-to-stack is unsafe/nonportable, so kmalloc a bounce buffer instead. - Modified mmc_send_ext_csd() now uses mmc_send_cxd_data() helper - Modified mmc_send_csd(), and new mmc_spi_send_cid(), routines use those helper routines based on whether they're native or SPI The newest categories of cards supported by the MMC stack aren't expected to work yet with SPI: MMC or SD cards with over 4GB data, and SDIO. All those cards support SPI mode, so eventually they should work too. Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net> Signed-off-by: Pierre Ossman <drzeus@drzeus.cx>
2007-08-08 20:11:32 +04:00
if (err && cmd->retries && mmc_host_is_spi(host)) {
if (cmd->resp[0] & R1_SPI_ILLEGAL_COMMAND)
cmd->retries = 0;
}
mmc: core: Add support for sending commands during data transfer A host controller driver exposes its capability using caps flag MMC_CAP_CMD_DURING_TFR. A driver with that capability can accept requests that are marked mrq->cap_cmd_during_tfr = true. Then the driver informs the upper layers when the command line is available for further commands by calling mmc_command_done(). Because of that, the driver will not then automatically send STOP commands, and it is the responsibility of the upper layer to send a STOP command if it is required. For requests submitted through the mmc_wait_for_req() interface, the caller sets mrq->cap_cmd_during_tfr = true which causes mmc_wait_for_req() in fact not to wait. The caller can then send commands that do not use the data lines. Finally the caller can wait for the transfer to complete by calling mmc_wait_for_req_done() which is now exported. For requests submitted through the mmc_start_req() interface, the caller again sets mrq->cap_cmd_during_tfr = true, but mmc_start_req() anyway does not wait. The caller can then send commands that do not use the data lines. Finally the caller can wait for the transfer to complete in the normal way i.e. calling mmc_start_req() again. Irrespective of how a cap_cmd_during_tfr request is started, mmc_is_req_done() can be called if the upper layer needs to determine if the request is done. However the appropriate waiting function (either mmc_wait_for_req_done() or mmc_start_req()) must still be called. The implementation consists primarily of a new completion mrq->cmd_completion which notifies when the command line is available for further commands. That completion is completed by mmc_command_done(). When there is an ongoing data transfer, calls to mmc_wait_for_req() will automatically wait on that completion, so the caller does not have to do anything special. Note, in the case of errors, the driver may call mmc_request_done() without calling mmc_command_done() because mmc_request_done() always calls mmc_command_done(). Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
2016-08-16 13:44:11 +03:00
if (host->ongoing_mrq == mrq)
host->ongoing_mrq = NULL;
mmc_complete_cmd(mrq);
trace_mmc_request_done(host, mrq);
/*
* We list various conditions for the command to be considered
* properly done:
*
* - There was no error, OK fine then
* - We are not doing some kind of retry
* - The card was removed (...so just complete everything no matter
* if there are errors or retries)
*/
if (!err || !cmd->retries || mmc_card_removed(host->card)) {
mmc_should_fail_request(host, mrq);
mmc: core: Add support for sending commands during data transfer A host controller driver exposes its capability using caps flag MMC_CAP_CMD_DURING_TFR. A driver with that capability can accept requests that are marked mrq->cap_cmd_during_tfr = true. Then the driver informs the upper layers when the command line is available for further commands by calling mmc_command_done(). Because of that, the driver will not then automatically send STOP commands, and it is the responsibility of the upper layer to send a STOP command if it is required. For requests submitted through the mmc_wait_for_req() interface, the caller sets mrq->cap_cmd_during_tfr = true which causes mmc_wait_for_req() in fact not to wait. The caller can then send commands that do not use the data lines. Finally the caller can wait for the transfer to complete by calling mmc_wait_for_req_done() which is now exported. For requests submitted through the mmc_start_req() interface, the caller again sets mrq->cap_cmd_during_tfr = true, but mmc_start_req() anyway does not wait. The caller can then send commands that do not use the data lines. Finally the caller can wait for the transfer to complete in the normal way i.e. calling mmc_start_req() again. Irrespective of how a cap_cmd_during_tfr request is started, mmc_is_req_done() can be called if the upper layer needs to determine if the request is done. However the appropriate waiting function (either mmc_wait_for_req_done() or mmc_start_req()) must still be called. The implementation consists primarily of a new completion mrq->cmd_completion which notifies when the command line is available for further commands. That completion is completed by mmc_command_done(). When there is an ongoing data transfer, calls to mmc_wait_for_req() will automatically wait on that completion, so the caller does not have to do anything special. Note, in the case of errors, the driver may call mmc_request_done() without calling mmc_command_done() because mmc_request_done() always calls mmc_command_done(). Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
2016-08-16 13:44:11 +03:00
if (!host->ongoing_mrq)
led_trigger_event(host->led, LED_OFF);
if (mrq->sbc) {
pr_debug("%s: req done <CMD%u>: %d: %08x %08x %08x %08x\n",
mmc_hostname(host), mrq->sbc->opcode,
mrq->sbc->error,
mrq->sbc->resp[0], mrq->sbc->resp[1],
mrq->sbc->resp[2], mrq->sbc->resp[3]);
}
pr_debug("%s: req done (CMD%u): %d: %08x %08x %08x %08x\n",
mmc_hostname(host), cmd->opcode, err,
cmd->resp[0], cmd->resp[1],
cmd->resp[2], cmd->resp[3]);
if (mrq->data) {
pr_debug("%s: %d bytes transferred: %d\n",
mmc_hostname(host),
mrq->data->bytes_xfered, mrq->data->error);
}
if (mrq->stop) {
pr_debug("%s: (CMD%u): %d: %08x %08x %08x %08x\n",
mmc_hostname(host), mrq->stop->opcode,
mrq->stop->error,
mrq->stop->resp[0], mrq->stop->resp[1],
mrq->stop->resp[2], mrq->stop->resp[3]);
}
}
/*
* Request starter must handle retries - see
* mmc_wait_for_req_done().
*/
if (mrq->done)
mrq->done(mrq);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(mmc_request_done);
static void __mmc_start_request(struct mmc_host *host, struct mmc_request *mrq)
{
int err;
/* Assumes host controller has been runtime resumed by mmc_claim_host */
err = mmc_retune(host);
if (err) {
mrq->cmd->error = err;
mmc_request_done(host, mrq);
return;
}
/*
* For sdio rw commands we must wait for card busy otherwise some
* sdio devices won't work properly.
* And bypass I/O abort, reset and bus suspend operations.
*/
if (sdio_is_io_busy(mrq->cmd->opcode, mrq->cmd->arg) &&
host->ops->card_busy) {
int tries = 500; /* Wait aprox 500ms at maximum */
while (host->ops->card_busy(host) && --tries)
mmc_delay(1);
if (tries == 0) {
mrq->cmd->error = -EBUSY;
mmc_request_done(host, mrq);
return;
}
}
mmc: core: Add support for sending commands during data transfer A host controller driver exposes its capability using caps flag MMC_CAP_CMD_DURING_TFR. A driver with that capability can accept requests that are marked mrq->cap_cmd_during_tfr = true. Then the driver informs the upper layers when the command line is available for further commands by calling mmc_command_done(). Because of that, the driver will not then automatically send STOP commands, and it is the responsibility of the upper layer to send a STOP command if it is required. For requests submitted through the mmc_wait_for_req() interface, the caller sets mrq->cap_cmd_during_tfr = true which causes mmc_wait_for_req() in fact not to wait. The caller can then send commands that do not use the data lines. Finally the caller can wait for the transfer to complete by calling mmc_wait_for_req_done() which is now exported. For requests submitted through the mmc_start_req() interface, the caller again sets mrq->cap_cmd_during_tfr = true, but mmc_start_req() anyway does not wait. The caller can then send commands that do not use the data lines. Finally the caller can wait for the transfer to complete in the normal way i.e. calling mmc_start_req() again. Irrespective of how a cap_cmd_during_tfr request is started, mmc_is_req_done() can be called if the upper layer needs to determine if the request is done. However the appropriate waiting function (either mmc_wait_for_req_done() or mmc_start_req()) must still be called. The implementation consists primarily of a new completion mrq->cmd_completion which notifies when the command line is available for further commands. That completion is completed by mmc_command_done(). When there is an ongoing data transfer, calls to mmc_wait_for_req() will automatically wait on that completion, so the caller does not have to do anything special. Note, in the case of errors, the driver may call mmc_request_done() without calling mmc_command_done() because mmc_request_done() always calls mmc_command_done(). Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
2016-08-16 13:44:11 +03:00
if (mrq->cap_cmd_during_tfr) {
host->ongoing_mrq = mrq;
/*
* Retry path could come through here without having waiting on
* cmd_completion, so ensure it is reinitialised.
*/
reinit_completion(&mrq->cmd_completion);
}
trace_mmc_request_start(host, mrq);
if (host->cqe_on)
host->cqe_ops->cqe_off(host);
host->ops->request(host, mrq);
}
static void mmc_mrq_pr_debug(struct mmc_host *host, struct mmc_request *mrq)
{
if (mrq->sbc) {
pr_debug("<%s: starting CMD%u arg %08x flags %08x>\n",
mmc_hostname(host), mrq->sbc->opcode,
mrq->sbc->arg, mrq->sbc->flags);
}
if (mrq->cmd) {
pr_debug("%s: starting CMD%u arg %08x flags %08x\n",
mmc_hostname(host), mrq->cmd->opcode, mrq->cmd->arg,
mrq->cmd->flags);
}
if (mrq->data) {
pr_debug("%s: blksz %d blocks %d flags %08x "
"tsac %d ms nsac %d\n",
mmc_hostname(host), mrq->data->blksz,
mrq->data->blocks, mrq->data->flags,
mrq->data->timeout_ns / 1000000,
mrq->data->timeout_clks);
}
if (mrq->stop) {
pr_debug("%s: CMD%u arg %08x flags %08x\n",
mmc_hostname(host), mrq->stop->opcode,
mrq->stop->arg, mrq->stop->flags);
}
}
static int mmc_mrq_prep(struct mmc_host *host, struct mmc_request *mrq)
{
unsigned int i, sz = 0;
struct scatterlist *sg;
if (mrq->cmd) {
mrq->cmd->error = 0;
mrq->cmd->mrq = mrq;
mrq->cmd->data = mrq->data;
}
if (mrq->sbc) {
mrq->sbc->error = 0;
mrq->sbc->mrq = mrq;
}
if (mrq->data) {
if (mrq->data->blksz > host->max_blk_size ||
mrq->data->blocks > host->max_blk_count ||
mrq->data->blocks * mrq->data->blksz > host->max_req_size)
return -EINVAL;
for_each_sg(mrq->data->sg, sg, mrq->data->sg_len, i)
sz += sg->length;
if (sz != mrq->data->blocks * mrq->data->blksz)
return -EINVAL;
mrq->data->error = 0;
mrq->data->mrq = mrq;
if (mrq->stop) {
mrq->data->stop = mrq->stop;
mrq->stop->error = 0;
mrq->stop->mrq = mrq;
}
}
return 0;
}
static int mmc_start_request(struct mmc_host *host, struct mmc_request *mrq)
{
int err;
mmc_retune_hold(host);
if (mmc_card_removed(host->card))
return -ENOMEDIUM;
mmc_mrq_pr_debug(host, mrq);
WARN_ON(!host->claimed);
err = mmc_mrq_prep(host, mrq);
if (err)
return err;
led_trigger_event(host->led, LED_FULL);
__mmc_start_request(host, mrq);
return 0;
}
/*
* mmc_wait_data_done() - done callback for data request
* @mrq: done data request
*
* Wakes up mmc context, passed as a callback to host controller driver
*/
static void mmc_wait_data_done(struct mmc_request *mrq)
{
mmc: core: fix race condition in mmc_wait_data_done The following panic is captured in ker3.14, but the issue still exists in latest kernel. --------------------------------------------------------------------- [ 20.738217] c0 3136 (Compiler) Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000578 ...... [ 20.738499] c0 3136 (Compiler) PC is at _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x24/0x60 [ 20.738527] c0 3136 (Compiler) LR is at _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x20/0x60 [ 20.740134] c0 3136 (Compiler) Call trace: [ 20.740165] c0 3136 (Compiler) [<ffffffc0008ee900>] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x24/0x60 [ 20.740200] c0 3136 (Compiler) [<ffffffc0000dd024>] __wake_up+0x1c/0x54 [ 20.740230] c0 3136 (Compiler) [<ffffffc000639414>] mmc_wait_data_done+0x28/0x34 [ 20.740262] c0 3136 (Compiler) [<ffffffc0006391a0>] mmc_request_done+0xa4/0x220 [ 20.740314] c0 3136 (Compiler) [<ffffffc000656894>] sdhci_tasklet_finish+0xac/0x264 [ 20.740352] c0 3136 (Compiler) [<ffffffc0000a2b58>] tasklet_action+0xa0/0x158 [ 20.740382] c0 3136 (Compiler) [<ffffffc0000a2078>] __do_softirq+0x10c/0x2e4 [ 20.740411] c0 3136 (Compiler) [<ffffffc0000a24bc>] irq_exit+0x8c/0xc0 [ 20.740439] c0 3136 (Compiler) [<ffffffc00008489c>] handle_IRQ+0x48/0xac [ 20.740469] c0 3136 (Compiler) [<ffffffc000081428>] gic_handle_irq+0x38/0x7c ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Because in SMP, "mrq" has race condition between below two paths: path1: CPU0: <tasklet context> static void mmc_wait_data_done(struct mmc_request *mrq) { mrq->host->context_info.is_done_rcv = true; // // If CPU0 has just finished "is_done_rcv = true" in path1, and at // this moment, IRQ or ICache line missing happens in CPU0. // What happens in CPU1 (path2)? // // If the mmcqd thread in CPU1(path2) hasn't entered to sleep mode: // path2 would have chance to break from wait_event_interruptible // in mmc_wait_for_data_req_done and continue to run for next // mmc_request (mmc_blk_rw_rq_prep). // // Within mmc_blk_rq_prep, mrq is cleared to 0. // If below line still gets host from "mrq" as the result of // compiler, the panic happens as we traced. wake_up_interruptible(&mrq->host->context_info.wait); } path2: CPU1: <The mmcqd thread runs mmc_queue_thread> static int mmc_wait_for_data_req_done(... { ... while (1) { wait_event_interruptible(context_info->wait, (context_info->is_done_rcv || context_info->is_new_req)); static void mmc_blk_rw_rq_prep(... { ... memset(brq, 0, sizeof(struct mmc_blk_request)); This issue happens very coincidentally; however adding mdelay(1) in mmc_wait_data_done as below could duplicate it easily. static void mmc_wait_data_done(struct mmc_request *mrq) { mrq->host->context_info.is_done_rcv = true; + mdelay(1); wake_up_interruptible(&mrq->host->context_info.wait); } At runtime, IRQ or ICache line missing may just happen at the same place of the mdelay(1). This patch gets the mmc_context_info at the beginning of function, it can avoid this race condition. Signed-off-by: Jialing Fu <jlfu@marvell.com> Tested-by: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com> Fixes: 2220eedfd7ae ("mmc: fix async request mechanism ....") Signed-off-by: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com> Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
2015-08-28 06:13:09 +03:00
struct mmc_context_info *context_info = &mrq->host->context_info;
context_info->is_done_rcv = true;
wake_up_interruptible(&context_info->wait);
}
static void mmc_wait_done(struct mmc_request *mrq)
{
mmc: core: add non-blocking mmc request function Previously there has only been one function mmc_wait_for_req() to start and wait for a request. This patch adds: * mmc_start_req() - starts a request wihtout waiting If there is on ongoing request wait for completion of that request and start the new one and return. Does not wait for the new command to complete. This patch also adds new function members in struct mmc_host_ops only called from core.c: * pre_req - asks the host driver to prepare for the next job * post_req - asks the host driver to clean up after a completed job The intention is to use pre_req() and post_req() to do cache maintenance while a request is active. pre_req() can be called while a request is active to minimize latency to start next job. post_req() can be used after the next job is started to clean up the request. This will minimize the host driver request end latency. post_req() is typically used before ending the block request and handing over the buffer to the block layer. Add a host-private member in mmc_data to be used by pre_req to mark the data. The host driver will then check this mark to see if the data is prepared or not. Signed-off-by: Per Forlin <per.forlin@linaro.org> Acked-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Reviewed-by: Venkatraman S <svenkatr@ti.com> Tested-by: Sourav Poddar <sourav.poddar@ti.com> Tested-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>
2011-07-01 20:55:22 +04:00
complete(&mrq->completion);
}
mmc: core: Add support for sending commands during data transfer A host controller driver exposes its capability using caps flag MMC_CAP_CMD_DURING_TFR. A driver with that capability can accept requests that are marked mrq->cap_cmd_during_tfr = true. Then the driver informs the upper layers when the command line is available for further commands by calling mmc_command_done(). Because of that, the driver will not then automatically send STOP commands, and it is the responsibility of the upper layer to send a STOP command if it is required. For requests submitted through the mmc_wait_for_req() interface, the caller sets mrq->cap_cmd_during_tfr = true which causes mmc_wait_for_req() in fact not to wait. The caller can then send commands that do not use the data lines. Finally the caller can wait for the transfer to complete by calling mmc_wait_for_req_done() which is now exported. For requests submitted through the mmc_start_req() interface, the caller again sets mrq->cap_cmd_during_tfr = true, but mmc_start_req() anyway does not wait. The caller can then send commands that do not use the data lines. Finally the caller can wait for the transfer to complete in the normal way i.e. calling mmc_start_req() again. Irrespective of how a cap_cmd_during_tfr request is started, mmc_is_req_done() can be called if the upper layer needs to determine if the request is done. However the appropriate waiting function (either mmc_wait_for_req_done() or mmc_start_req()) must still be called. The implementation consists primarily of a new completion mrq->cmd_completion which notifies when the command line is available for further commands. That completion is completed by mmc_command_done(). When there is an ongoing data transfer, calls to mmc_wait_for_req() will automatically wait on that completion, so the caller does not have to do anything special. Note, in the case of errors, the driver may call mmc_request_done() without calling mmc_command_done() because mmc_request_done() always calls mmc_command_done(). Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
2016-08-16 13:44:11 +03:00
static inline void mmc_wait_ongoing_tfr_cmd(struct mmc_host *host)
{
struct mmc_request *ongoing_mrq = READ_ONCE(host->ongoing_mrq);
/*
* If there is an ongoing transfer, wait for the command line to become
* available.
*/
if (ongoing_mrq && !completion_done(&ongoing_mrq->cmd_completion))
wait_for_completion(&ongoing_mrq->cmd_completion);
}
/*
*__mmc_start_data_req() - starts data request
* @host: MMC host to start the request
* @mrq: data request to start
*
* Sets the done callback to be called when request is completed by the card.
* Starts data mmc request execution
mmc: core: Add support for sending commands during data transfer A host controller driver exposes its capability using caps flag MMC_CAP_CMD_DURING_TFR. A driver with that capability can accept requests that are marked mrq->cap_cmd_during_tfr = true. Then the driver informs the upper layers when the command line is available for further commands by calling mmc_command_done(). Because of that, the driver will not then automatically send STOP commands, and it is the responsibility of the upper layer to send a STOP command if it is required. For requests submitted through the mmc_wait_for_req() interface, the caller sets mrq->cap_cmd_during_tfr = true which causes mmc_wait_for_req() in fact not to wait. The caller can then send commands that do not use the data lines. Finally the caller can wait for the transfer to complete by calling mmc_wait_for_req_done() which is now exported. For requests submitted through the mmc_start_req() interface, the caller again sets mrq->cap_cmd_during_tfr = true, but mmc_start_req() anyway does not wait. The caller can then send commands that do not use the data lines. Finally the caller can wait for the transfer to complete in the normal way i.e. calling mmc_start_req() again. Irrespective of how a cap_cmd_during_tfr request is started, mmc_is_req_done() can be called if the upper layer needs to determine if the request is done. However the appropriate waiting function (either mmc_wait_for_req_done() or mmc_start_req()) must still be called. The implementation consists primarily of a new completion mrq->cmd_completion which notifies when the command line is available for further commands. That completion is completed by mmc_command_done(). When there is an ongoing data transfer, calls to mmc_wait_for_req() will automatically wait on that completion, so the caller does not have to do anything special. Note, in the case of errors, the driver may call mmc_request_done() without calling mmc_command_done() because mmc_request_done() always calls mmc_command_done(). Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
2016-08-16 13:44:11 +03:00
* If an ongoing transfer is already in progress, wait for the command line
* to become available before sending another command.
*/
static int __mmc_start_data_req(struct mmc_host *host, struct mmc_request *mrq)
{
int err;
mmc: core: Add support for sending commands during data transfer A host controller driver exposes its capability using caps flag MMC_CAP_CMD_DURING_TFR. A driver with that capability can accept requests that are marked mrq->cap_cmd_during_tfr = true. Then the driver informs the upper layers when the command line is available for further commands by calling mmc_command_done(). Because of that, the driver will not then automatically send STOP commands, and it is the responsibility of the upper layer to send a STOP command if it is required. For requests submitted through the mmc_wait_for_req() interface, the caller sets mrq->cap_cmd_during_tfr = true which causes mmc_wait_for_req() in fact not to wait. The caller can then send commands that do not use the data lines. Finally the caller can wait for the transfer to complete by calling mmc_wait_for_req_done() which is now exported. For requests submitted through the mmc_start_req() interface, the caller again sets mrq->cap_cmd_during_tfr = true, but mmc_start_req() anyway does not wait. The caller can then send commands that do not use the data lines. Finally the caller can wait for the transfer to complete in the normal way i.e. calling mmc_start_req() again. Irrespective of how a cap_cmd_during_tfr request is started, mmc_is_req_done() can be called if the upper layer needs to determine if the request is done. However the appropriate waiting function (either mmc_wait_for_req_done() or mmc_start_req()) must still be called. The implementation consists primarily of a new completion mrq->cmd_completion which notifies when the command line is available for further commands. That completion is completed by mmc_command_done(). When there is an ongoing data transfer, calls to mmc_wait_for_req() will automatically wait on that completion, so the caller does not have to do anything special. Note, in the case of errors, the driver may call mmc_request_done() without calling mmc_command_done() because mmc_request_done() always calls mmc_command_done(). Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
2016-08-16 13:44:11 +03:00
mmc_wait_ongoing_tfr_cmd(host);
mrq->done = mmc_wait_data_done;
mrq->host = host;
mmc: core: Add support for sending commands during data transfer A host controller driver exposes its capability using caps flag MMC_CAP_CMD_DURING_TFR. A driver with that capability can accept requests that are marked mrq->cap_cmd_during_tfr = true. Then the driver informs the upper layers when the command line is available for further commands by calling mmc_command_done(). Because of that, the driver will not then automatically send STOP commands, and it is the responsibility of the upper layer to send a STOP command if it is required. For requests submitted through the mmc_wait_for_req() interface, the caller sets mrq->cap_cmd_during_tfr = true which causes mmc_wait_for_req() in fact not to wait. The caller can then send commands that do not use the data lines. Finally the caller can wait for the transfer to complete by calling mmc_wait_for_req_done() which is now exported. For requests submitted through the mmc_start_req() interface, the caller again sets mrq->cap_cmd_during_tfr = true, but mmc_start_req() anyway does not wait. The caller can then send commands that do not use the data lines. Finally the caller can wait for the transfer to complete in the normal way i.e. calling mmc_start_req() again. Irrespective of how a cap_cmd_during_tfr request is started, mmc_is_req_done() can be called if the upper layer needs to determine if the request is done. However the appropriate waiting function (either mmc_wait_for_req_done() or mmc_start_req()) must still be called. The implementation consists primarily of a new completion mrq->cmd_completion which notifies when the command line is available for further commands. That completion is completed by mmc_command_done(). When there is an ongoing data transfer, calls to mmc_wait_for_req() will automatically wait on that completion, so the caller does not have to do anything special. Note, in the case of errors, the driver may call mmc_request_done() without calling mmc_command_done() because mmc_request_done() always calls mmc_command_done(). Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
2016-08-16 13:44:11 +03:00
init_completion(&mrq->cmd_completion);
err = mmc_start_request(host, mrq);
if (err) {
mrq->cmd->error = err;
mmc: core: Add support for sending commands during data transfer A host controller driver exposes its capability using caps flag MMC_CAP_CMD_DURING_TFR. A driver with that capability can accept requests that are marked mrq->cap_cmd_during_tfr = true. Then the driver informs the upper layers when the command line is available for further commands by calling mmc_command_done(). Because of that, the driver will not then automatically send STOP commands, and it is the responsibility of the upper layer to send a STOP command if it is required. For requests submitted through the mmc_wait_for_req() interface, the caller sets mrq->cap_cmd_during_tfr = true which causes mmc_wait_for_req() in fact not to wait. The caller can then send commands that do not use the data lines. Finally the caller can wait for the transfer to complete by calling mmc_wait_for_req_done() which is now exported. For requests submitted through the mmc_start_req() interface, the caller again sets mrq->cap_cmd_during_tfr = true, but mmc_start_req() anyway does not wait. The caller can then send commands that do not use the data lines. Finally the caller can wait for the transfer to complete in the normal way i.e. calling mmc_start_req() again. Irrespective of how a cap_cmd_during_tfr request is started, mmc_is_req_done() can be called if the upper layer needs to determine if the request is done. However the appropriate waiting function (either mmc_wait_for_req_done() or mmc_start_req()) must still be called. The implementation consists primarily of a new completion mrq->cmd_completion which notifies when the command line is available for further commands. That completion is completed by mmc_command_done(). When there is an ongoing data transfer, calls to mmc_wait_for_req() will automatically wait on that completion, so the caller does not have to do anything special. Note, in the case of errors, the driver may call mmc_request_done() without calling mmc_command_done() because mmc_request_done() always calls mmc_command_done(). Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
2016-08-16 13:44:11 +03:00
mmc_complete_cmd(mrq);
mmc_wait_data_done(mrq);
}
return err;
}
static int __mmc_start_req(struct mmc_host *host, struct mmc_request *mrq)
mmc: core: add non-blocking mmc request function Previously there has only been one function mmc_wait_for_req() to start and wait for a request. This patch adds: * mmc_start_req() - starts a request wihtout waiting If there is on ongoing request wait for completion of that request and start the new one and return. Does not wait for the new command to complete. This patch also adds new function members in struct mmc_host_ops only called from core.c: * pre_req - asks the host driver to prepare for the next job * post_req - asks the host driver to clean up after a completed job The intention is to use pre_req() and post_req() to do cache maintenance while a request is active. pre_req() can be called while a request is active to minimize latency to start next job. post_req() can be used after the next job is started to clean up the request. This will minimize the host driver request end latency. post_req() is typically used before ending the block request and handing over the buffer to the block layer. Add a host-private member in mmc_data to be used by pre_req to mark the data. The host driver will then check this mark to see if the data is prepared or not. Signed-off-by: Per Forlin <per.forlin@linaro.org> Acked-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Reviewed-by: Venkatraman S <svenkatr@ti.com> Tested-by: Sourav Poddar <sourav.poddar@ti.com> Tested-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>
2011-07-01 20:55:22 +04:00
{
int err;
mmc: core: Add support for sending commands during data transfer A host controller driver exposes its capability using caps flag MMC_CAP_CMD_DURING_TFR. A driver with that capability can accept requests that are marked mrq->cap_cmd_during_tfr = true. Then the driver informs the upper layers when the command line is available for further commands by calling mmc_command_done(). Because of that, the driver will not then automatically send STOP commands, and it is the responsibility of the upper layer to send a STOP command if it is required. For requests submitted through the mmc_wait_for_req() interface, the caller sets mrq->cap_cmd_during_tfr = true which causes mmc_wait_for_req() in fact not to wait. The caller can then send commands that do not use the data lines. Finally the caller can wait for the transfer to complete by calling mmc_wait_for_req_done() which is now exported. For requests submitted through the mmc_start_req() interface, the caller again sets mrq->cap_cmd_during_tfr = true, but mmc_start_req() anyway does not wait. The caller can then send commands that do not use the data lines. Finally the caller can wait for the transfer to complete in the normal way i.e. calling mmc_start_req() again. Irrespective of how a cap_cmd_during_tfr request is started, mmc_is_req_done() can be called if the upper layer needs to determine if the request is done. However the appropriate waiting function (either mmc_wait_for_req_done() or mmc_start_req()) must still be called. The implementation consists primarily of a new completion mrq->cmd_completion which notifies when the command line is available for further commands. That completion is completed by mmc_command_done(). When there is an ongoing data transfer, calls to mmc_wait_for_req() will automatically wait on that completion, so the caller does not have to do anything special. Note, in the case of errors, the driver may call mmc_request_done() without calling mmc_command_done() because mmc_request_done() always calls mmc_command_done(). Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
2016-08-16 13:44:11 +03:00
mmc_wait_ongoing_tfr_cmd(host);
mmc: core: add non-blocking mmc request function Previously there has only been one function mmc_wait_for_req() to start and wait for a request. This patch adds: * mmc_start_req() - starts a request wihtout waiting If there is on ongoing request wait for completion of that request and start the new one and return. Does not wait for the new command to complete. This patch also adds new function members in struct mmc_host_ops only called from core.c: * pre_req - asks the host driver to prepare for the next job * post_req - asks the host driver to clean up after a completed job The intention is to use pre_req() and post_req() to do cache maintenance while a request is active. pre_req() can be called while a request is active to minimize latency to start next job. post_req() can be used after the next job is started to clean up the request. This will minimize the host driver request end latency. post_req() is typically used before ending the block request and handing over the buffer to the block layer. Add a host-private member in mmc_data to be used by pre_req to mark the data. The host driver will then check this mark to see if the data is prepared or not. Signed-off-by: Per Forlin <per.forlin@linaro.org> Acked-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Reviewed-by: Venkatraman S <svenkatr@ti.com> Tested-by: Sourav Poddar <sourav.poddar@ti.com> Tested-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>
2011-07-01 20:55:22 +04:00
init_completion(&mrq->completion);
mrq->done = mmc_wait_done;
mmc: core: Add support for sending commands during data transfer A host controller driver exposes its capability using caps flag MMC_CAP_CMD_DURING_TFR. A driver with that capability can accept requests that are marked mrq->cap_cmd_during_tfr = true. Then the driver informs the upper layers when the command line is available for further commands by calling mmc_command_done(). Because of that, the driver will not then automatically send STOP commands, and it is the responsibility of the upper layer to send a STOP command if it is required. For requests submitted through the mmc_wait_for_req() interface, the caller sets mrq->cap_cmd_during_tfr = true which causes mmc_wait_for_req() in fact not to wait. The caller can then send commands that do not use the data lines. Finally the caller can wait for the transfer to complete by calling mmc_wait_for_req_done() which is now exported. For requests submitted through the mmc_start_req() interface, the caller again sets mrq->cap_cmd_during_tfr = true, but mmc_start_req() anyway does not wait. The caller can then send commands that do not use the data lines. Finally the caller can wait for the transfer to complete in the normal way i.e. calling mmc_start_req() again. Irrespective of how a cap_cmd_during_tfr request is started, mmc_is_req_done() can be called if the upper layer needs to determine if the request is done. However the appropriate waiting function (either mmc_wait_for_req_done() or mmc_start_req()) must still be called. The implementation consists primarily of a new completion mrq->cmd_completion which notifies when the command line is available for further commands. That completion is completed by mmc_command_done(). When there is an ongoing data transfer, calls to mmc_wait_for_req() will automatically wait on that completion, so the caller does not have to do anything special. Note, in the case of errors, the driver may call mmc_request_done() without calling mmc_command_done() because mmc_request_done() always calls mmc_command_done(). Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
2016-08-16 13:44:11 +03:00
init_completion(&mrq->cmd_completion);
err = mmc_start_request(host, mrq);
if (err) {
mrq->cmd->error = err;
mmc: core: Add support for sending commands during data transfer A host controller driver exposes its capability using caps flag MMC_CAP_CMD_DURING_TFR. A driver with that capability can accept requests that are marked mrq->cap_cmd_during_tfr = true. Then the driver informs the upper layers when the command line is available for further commands by calling mmc_command_done(). Because of that, the driver will not then automatically send STOP commands, and it is the responsibility of the upper layer to send a STOP command if it is required. For requests submitted through the mmc_wait_for_req() interface, the caller sets mrq->cap_cmd_during_tfr = true which causes mmc_wait_for_req() in fact not to wait. The caller can then send commands that do not use the data lines. Finally the caller can wait for the transfer to complete by calling mmc_wait_for_req_done() which is now exported. For requests submitted through the mmc_start_req() interface, the caller again sets mrq->cap_cmd_during_tfr = true, but mmc_start_req() anyway does not wait. The caller can then send commands that do not use the data lines. Finally the caller can wait for the transfer to complete in the normal way i.e. calling mmc_start_req() again. Irrespective of how a cap_cmd_during_tfr request is started, mmc_is_req_done() can be called if the upper layer needs to determine if the request is done. However the appropriate waiting function (either mmc_wait_for_req_done() or mmc_start_req()) must still be called. The implementation consists primarily of a new completion mrq->cmd_completion which notifies when the command line is available for further commands. That completion is completed by mmc_command_done(). When there is an ongoing data transfer, calls to mmc_wait_for_req() will automatically wait on that completion, so the caller does not have to do anything special. Note, in the case of errors, the driver may call mmc_request_done() without calling mmc_command_done() because mmc_request_done() always calls mmc_command_done(). Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
2016-08-16 13:44:11 +03:00
mmc_complete_cmd(mrq);
complete(&mrq->completion);
}
return err;
mmc: core: add non-blocking mmc request function Previously there has only been one function mmc_wait_for_req() to start and wait for a request. This patch adds: * mmc_start_req() - starts a request wihtout waiting If there is on ongoing request wait for completion of that request and start the new one and return. Does not wait for the new command to complete. This patch also adds new function members in struct mmc_host_ops only called from core.c: * pre_req - asks the host driver to prepare for the next job * post_req - asks the host driver to clean up after a completed job The intention is to use pre_req() and post_req() to do cache maintenance while a request is active. pre_req() can be called while a request is active to minimize latency to start next job. post_req() can be used after the next job is started to clean up the request. This will minimize the host driver request end latency. post_req() is typically used before ending the block request and handing over the buffer to the block layer. Add a host-private member in mmc_data to be used by pre_req to mark the data. The host driver will then check this mark to see if the data is prepared or not. Signed-off-by: Per Forlin <per.forlin@linaro.org> Acked-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Reviewed-by: Venkatraman S <svenkatr@ti.com> Tested-by: Sourav Poddar <sourav.poddar@ti.com> Tested-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>
2011-07-01 20:55:22 +04:00
}
mmc: core: Add support for sending commands during data transfer A host controller driver exposes its capability using caps flag MMC_CAP_CMD_DURING_TFR. A driver with that capability can accept requests that are marked mrq->cap_cmd_during_tfr = true. Then the driver informs the upper layers when the command line is available for further commands by calling mmc_command_done(). Because of that, the driver will not then automatically send STOP commands, and it is the responsibility of the upper layer to send a STOP command if it is required. For requests submitted through the mmc_wait_for_req() interface, the caller sets mrq->cap_cmd_during_tfr = true which causes mmc_wait_for_req() in fact not to wait. The caller can then send commands that do not use the data lines. Finally the caller can wait for the transfer to complete by calling mmc_wait_for_req_done() which is now exported. For requests submitted through the mmc_start_req() interface, the caller again sets mrq->cap_cmd_during_tfr = true, but mmc_start_req() anyway does not wait. The caller can then send commands that do not use the data lines. Finally the caller can wait for the transfer to complete in the normal way i.e. calling mmc_start_req() again. Irrespective of how a cap_cmd_during_tfr request is started, mmc_is_req_done() can be called if the upper layer needs to determine if the request is done. However the appropriate waiting function (either mmc_wait_for_req_done() or mmc_start_req()) must still be called. The implementation consists primarily of a new completion mrq->cmd_completion which notifies when the command line is available for further commands. That completion is completed by mmc_command_done(). When there is an ongoing data transfer, calls to mmc_wait_for_req() will automatically wait on that completion, so the caller does not have to do anything special. Note, in the case of errors, the driver may call mmc_request_done() without calling mmc_command_done() because mmc_request_done() always calls mmc_command_done(). Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
2016-08-16 13:44:11 +03:00
void mmc_wait_for_req_done(struct mmc_host *host, struct mmc_request *mrq)
mmc: core: add non-blocking mmc request function Previously there has only been one function mmc_wait_for_req() to start and wait for a request. This patch adds: * mmc_start_req() - starts a request wihtout waiting If there is on ongoing request wait for completion of that request and start the new one and return. Does not wait for the new command to complete. This patch also adds new function members in struct mmc_host_ops only called from core.c: * pre_req - asks the host driver to prepare for the next job * post_req - asks the host driver to clean up after a completed job The intention is to use pre_req() and post_req() to do cache maintenance while a request is active. pre_req() can be called while a request is active to minimize latency to start next job. post_req() can be used after the next job is started to clean up the request. This will minimize the host driver request end latency. post_req() is typically used before ending the block request and handing over the buffer to the block layer. Add a host-private member in mmc_data to be used by pre_req to mark the data. The host driver will then check this mark to see if the data is prepared or not. Signed-off-by: Per Forlin <per.forlin@linaro.org> Acked-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Reviewed-by: Venkatraman S <svenkatr@ti.com> Tested-by: Sourav Poddar <sourav.poddar@ti.com> Tested-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>
2011-07-01 20:55:22 +04:00
{
struct mmc_command *cmd;
while (1) {
wait_for_completion(&mrq->completion);
cmd = mrq->cmd;
/*
* If host has timed out waiting for the sanitize
* to complete, card might be still in programming state
* so let's try to bring the card out of programming
* state.
*/
if (cmd->sanitize_busy && cmd->error == -ETIMEDOUT) {
if (!mmc_interrupt_hpi(host->card)) {
pr_warn("%s: %s: Interrupted sanitize\n",
mmc_hostname(host), __func__);
cmd->error = 0;
break;
} else {
pr_err("%s: %s: Failed to interrupt sanitize\n",
mmc_hostname(host), __func__);
}
}
if (!cmd->error || !cmd->retries ||
mmc_card_removed(host->card))
break;
mmc_retune_recheck(host);
pr_debug("%s: req failed (CMD%u): %d, retrying...\n",
mmc_hostname(host), cmd->opcode, cmd->error);
cmd->retries--;
cmd->error = 0;
__mmc_start_request(host, mrq);
}
mmc_retune_release(host);
mmc: core: add non-blocking mmc request function Previously there has only been one function mmc_wait_for_req() to start and wait for a request. This patch adds: * mmc_start_req() - starts a request wihtout waiting If there is on ongoing request wait for completion of that request and start the new one and return. Does not wait for the new command to complete. This patch also adds new function members in struct mmc_host_ops only called from core.c: * pre_req - asks the host driver to prepare for the next job * post_req - asks the host driver to clean up after a completed job The intention is to use pre_req() and post_req() to do cache maintenance while a request is active. pre_req() can be called while a request is active to minimize latency to start next job. post_req() can be used after the next job is started to clean up the request. This will minimize the host driver request end latency. post_req() is typically used before ending the block request and handing over the buffer to the block layer. Add a host-private member in mmc_data to be used by pre_req to mark the data. The host driver will then check this mark to see if the data is prepared or not. Signed-off-by: Per Forlin <per.forlin@linaro.org> Acked-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Reviewed-by: Venkatraman S <svenkatr@ti.com> Tested-by: Sourav Poddar <sourav.poddar@ti.com> Tested-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>
2011-07-01 20:55:22 +04:00
}
mmc: core: Add support for sending commands during data transfer A host controller driver exposes its capability using caps flag MMC_CAP_CMD_DURING_TFR. A driver with that capability can accept requests that are marked mrq->cap_cmd_during_tfr = true. Then the driver informs the upper layers when the command line is available for further commands by calling mmc_command_done(). Because of that, the driver will not then automatically send STOP commands, and it is the responsibility of the upper layer to send a STOP command if it is required. For requests submitted through the mmc_wait_for_req() interface, the caller sets mrq->cap_cmd_during_tfr = true which causes mmc_wait_for_req() in fact not to wait. The caller can then send commands that do not use the data lines. Finally the caller can wait for the transfer to complete by calling mmc_wait_for_req_done() which is now exported. For requests submitted through the mmc_start_req() interface, the caller again sets mrq->cap_cmd_during_tfr = true, but mmc_start_req() anyway does not wait. The caller can then send commands that do not use the data lines. Finally the caller can wait for the transfer to complete in the normal way i.e. calling mmc_start_req() again. Irrespective of how a cap_cmd_during_tfr request is started, mmc_is_req_done() can be called if the upper layer needs to determine if the request is done. However the appropriate waiting function (either mmc_wait_for_req_done() or mmc_start_req()) must still be called. The implementation consists primarily of a new completion mrq->cmd_completion which notifies when the command line is available for further commands. That completion is completed by mmc_command_done(). When there is an ongoing data transfer, calls to mmc_wait_for_req() will automatically wait on that completion, so the caller does not have to do anything special. Note, in the case of errors, the driver may call mmc_request_done() without calling mmc_command_done() because mmc_request_done() always calls mmc_command_done(). Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
2016-08-16 13:44:11 +03:00
EXPORT_SYMBOL(mmc_wait_for_req_done);
/**
* mmc_is_req_done - Determine if a 'cap_cmd_during_tfr' request is done
* @host: MMC host
* @mrq: MMC request
*
* mmc_is_req_done() is used with requests that have
* mrq->cap_cmd_during_tfr = true. mmc_is_req_done() must be called after
* starting a request and before waiting for it to complete. That is,
* either in between calls to mmc_start_req(), or after mmc_wait_for_req()
* and before mmc_wait_for_req_done(). If it is called at other times the
* result is not meaningful.
*/
bool mmc_is_req_done(struct mmc_host *host, struct mmc_request *mrq)
{
if (host->areq)
return host->context_info.is_done_rcv;
else
return completion_done(&mrq->completion);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(mmc_is_req_done);
mmc: core: add non-blocking mmc request function Previously there has only been one function mmc_wait_for_req() to start and wait for a request. This patch adds: * mmc_start_req() - starts a request wihtout waiting If there is on ongoing request wait for completion of that request and start the new one and return. Does not wait for the new command to complete. This patch also adds new function members in struct mmc_host_ops only called from core.c: * pre_req - asks the host driver to prepare for the next job * post_req - asks the host driver to clean up after a completed job The intention is to use pre_req() and post_req() to do cache maintenance while a request is active. pre_req() can be called while a request is active to minimize latency to start next job. post_req() can be used after the next job is started to clean up the request. This will minimize the host driver request end latency. post_req() is typically used before ending the block request and handing over the buffer to the block layer. Add a host-private member in mmc_data to be used by pre_req to mark the data. The host driver will then check this mark to see if the data is prepared or not. Signed-off-by: Per Forlin <per.forlin@linaro.org> Acked-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Reviewed-by: Venkatraman S <svenkatr@ti.com> Tested-by: Sourav Poddar <sourav.poddar@ti.com> Tested-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>
2011-07-01 20:55:22 +04:00
/**
* mmc_pre_req - Prepare for a new request
* @host: MMC host to prepare command
* @mrq: MMC request to prepare for
*
* mmc_pre_req() is called in prior to mmc_start_req() to let
* host prepare for the new request. Preparation of a request may be
* performed while another request is running on the host.
*/
static void mmc_pre_req(struct mmc_host *host, struct mmc_request *mrq)
mmc: core: add non-blocking mmc request function Previously there has only been one function mmc_wait_for_req() to start and wait for a request. This patch adds: * mmc_start_req() - starts a request wihtout waiting If there is on ongoing request wait for completion of that request and start the new one and return. Does not wait for the new command to complete. This patch also adds new function members in struct mmc_host_ops only called from core.c: * pre_req - asks the host driver to prepare for the next job * post_req - asks the host driver to clean up after a completed job The intention is to use pre_req() and post_req() to do cache maintenance while a request is active. pre_req() can be called while a request is active to minimize latency to start next job. post_req() can be used after the next job is started to clean up the request. This will minimize the host driver request end latency. post_req() is typically used before ending the block request and handing over the buffer to the block layer. Add a host-private member in mmc_data to be used by pre_req to mark the data. The host driver will then check this mark to see if the data is prepared or not. Signed-off-by: Per Forlin <per.forlin@linaro.org> Acked-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Reviewed-by: Venkatraman S <svenkatr@ti.com> Tested-by: Sourav Poddar <sourav.poddar@ti.com> Tested-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>
2011-07-01 20:55:22 +04:00
{
if (host->ops->pre_req)
host->ops->pre_req(host, mrq);
mmc: core: add non-blocking mmc request function Previously there has only been one function mmc_wait_for_req() to start and wait for a request. This patch adds: * mmc_start_req() - starts a request wihtout waiting If there is on ongoing request wait for completion of that request and start the new one and return. Does not wait for the new command to complete. This patch also adds new function members in struct mmc_host_ops only called from core.c: * pre_req - asks the host driver to prepare for the next job * post_req - asks the host driver to clean up after a completed job The intention is to use pre_req() and post_req() to do cache maintenance while a request is active. pre_req() can be called while a request is active to minimize latency to start next job. post_req() can be used after the next job is started to clean up the request. This will minimize the host driver request end latency. post_req() is typically used before ending the block request and handing over the buffer to the block layer. Add a host-private member in mmc_data to be used by pre_req to mark the data. The host driver will then check this mark to see if the data is prepared or not. Signed-off-by: Per Forlin <per.forlin@linaro.org> Acked-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Reviewed-by: Venkatraman S <svenkatr@ti.com> Tested-by: Sourav Poddar <sourav.poddar@ti.com> Tested-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>
2011-07-01 20:55:22 +04:00
}
/**
* mmc_post_req - Post process a completed request
* @host: MMC host to post process command
* @mrq: MMC request to post process for
* @err: Error, if non zero, clean up any resources made in pre_req
*
* Let the host post process a completed request. Post processing of
* a request may be performed while another reuqest is running.
*/
static void mmc_post_req(struct mmc_host *host, struct mmc_request *mrq,
int err)
{
if (host->ops->post_req)
mmc: core: add non-blocking mmc request function Previously there has only been one function mmc_wait_for_req() to start and wait for a request. This patch adds: * mmc_start_req() - starts a request wihtout waiting If there is on ongoing request wait for completion of that request and start the new one and return. Does not wait for the new command to complete. This patch also adds new function members in struct mmc_host_ops only called from core.c: * pre_req - asks the host driver to prepare for the next job * post_req - asks the host driver to clean up after a completed job The intention is to use pre_req() and post_req() to do cache maintenance while a request is active. pre_req() can be called while a request is active to minimize latency to start next job. post_req() can be used after the next job is started to clean up the request. This will minimize the host driver request end latency. post_req() is typically used before ending the block request and handing over the buffer to the block layer. Add a host-private member in mmc_data to be used by pre_req to mark the data. The host driver will then check this mark to see if the data is prepared or not. Signed-off-by: Per Forlin <per.forlin@linaro.org> Acked-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Reviewed-by: Venkatraman S <svenkatr@ti.com> Tested-by: Sourav Poddar <sourav.poddar@ti.com> Tested-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>
2011-07-01 20:55:22 +04:00
host->ops->post_req(host, mrq, err);
}
/**
* mmc_finalize_areq() - finalize an asynchronous request
* @host: MMC host to finalize any ongoing request on
*
* Returns the status of the ongoing asynchronous request, but
* MMC_BLK_SUCCESS if no request was going on.
*/
static enum mmc_blk_status mmc_finalize_areq(struct mmc_host *host)
{
struct mmc_context_info *context_info = &host->context_info;
enum mmc_blk_status status;
if (!host->areq)
return MMC_BLK_SUCCESS;
while (1) {
wait_event_interruptible(context_info->wait,
(context_info->is_done_rcv ||
context_info->is_new_req));
if (context_info->is_done_rcv) {
struct mmc_command *cmd;
context_info->is_done_rcv = false;
cmd = host->areq->mrq->cmd;
if (!cmd->error || !cmd->retries ||
mmc_card_removed(host->card)) {
status = host->areq->err_check(host->card,
host->areq);
break; /* return status */
} else {
mmc_retune_recheck(host);
pr_info("%s: req failed (CMD%u): %d, retrying...\n",
mmc_hostname(host),
cmd->opcode, cmd->error);
cmd->retries--;
cmd->error = 0;
__mmc_start_request(host, host->areq->mrq);
continue; /* wait for done/new event again */
}
}
return MMC_BLK_NEW_REQUEST;
}
mmc_retune_release(host);
/*
* Check BKOPS urgency for each R1 response
*/
if (host->card && mmc_card_mmc(host->card) &&
((mmc_resp_type(host->areq->mrq->cmd) == MMC_RSP_R1) ||
(mmc_resp_type(host->areq->mrq->cmd) == MMC_RSP_R1B)) &&
(host->areq->mrq->cmd->resp[0] & R1_EXCEPTION_EVENT)) {
mmc_start_bkops(host->card, true);
}
return status;
}
mmc: core: add non-blocking mmc request function Previously there has only been one function mmc_wait_for_req() to start and wait for a request. This patch adds: * mmc_start_req() - starts a request wihtout waiting If there is on ongoing request wait for completion of that request and start the new one and return. Does not wait for the new command to complete. This patch also adds new function members in struct mmc_host_ops only called from core.c: * pre_req - asks the host driver to prepare for the next job * post_req - asks the host driver to clean up after a completed job The intention is to use pre_req() and post_req() to do cache maintenance while a request is active. pre_req() can be called while a request is active to minimize latency to start next job. post_req() can be used after the next job is started to clean up the request. This will minimize the host driver request end latency. post_req() is typically used before ending the block request and handing over the buffer to the block layer. Add a host-private member in mmc_data to be used by pre_req to mark the data. The host driver will then check this mark to see if the data is prepared or not. Signed-off-by: Per Forlin <per.forlin@linaro.org> Acked-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Reviewed-by: Venkatraman S <svenkatr@ti.com> Tested-by: Sourav Poddar <sourav.poddar@ti.com> Tested-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>
2011-07-01 20:55:22 +04:00
/**
* mmc_start_areq - start an asynchronous request
mmc: core: add non-blocking mmc request function Previously there has only been one function mmc_wait_for_req() to start and wait for a request. This patch adds: * mmc_start_req() - starts a request wihtout waiting If there is on ongoing request wait for completion of that request and start the new one and return. Does not wait for the new command to complete. This patch also adds new function members in struct mmc_host_ops only called from core.c: * pre_req - asks the host driver to prepare for the next job * post_req - asks the host driver to clean up after a completed job The intention is to use pre_req() and post_req() to do cache maintenance while a request is active. pre_req() can be called while a request is active to minimize latency to start next job. post_req() can be used after the next job is started to clean up the request. This will minimize the host driver request end latency. post_req() is typically used before ending the block request and handing over the buffer to the block layer. Add a host-private member in mmc_data to be used by pre_req to mark the data. The host driver will then check this mark to see if the data is prepared or not. Signed-off-by: Per Forlin <per.forlin@linaro.org> Acked-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Reviewed-by: Venkatraman S <svenkatr@ti.com> Tested-by: Sourav Poddar <sourav.poddar@ti.com> Tested-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>
2011-07-01 20:55:22 +04:00
* @host: MMC host to start command
* @areq: asynchronous request to start
* @ret_stat: out parameter for status
mmc: core: add non-blocking mmc request function Previously there has only been one function mmc_wait_for_req() to start and wait for a request. This patch adds: * mmc_start_req() - starts a request wihtout waiting If there is on ongoing request wait for completion of that request and start the new one and return. Does not wait for the new command to complete. This patch also adds new function members in struct mmc_host_ops only called from core.c: * pre_req - asks the host driver to prepare for the next job * post_req - asks the host driver to clean up after a completed job The intention is to use pre_req() and post_req() to do cache maintenance while a request is active. pre_req() can be called while a request is active to minimize latency to start next job. post_req() can be used after the next job is started to clean up the request. This will minimize the host driver request end latency. post_req() is typically used before ending the block request and handing over the buffer to the block layer. Add a host-private member in mmc_data to be used by pre_req to mark the data. The host driver will then check this mark to see if the data is prepared or not. Signed-off-by: Per Forlin <per.forlin@linaro.org> Acked-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Reviewed-by: Venkatraman S <svenkatr@ti.com> Tested-by: Sourav Poddar <sourav.poddar@ti.com> Tested-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>
2011-07-01 20:55:22 +04:00
*
* Start a new MMC custom command request for a host.
* If there is on ongoing async request wait for completion
* of that request and start the new one and return.
* Does not wait for the new request to complete.
*
* Returns the completed request, NULL in case of none completed.
* Wait for the an ongoing request (previoulsy started) to complete and
* return the completed request. If there is no ongoing request, NULL
* is returned without waiting. NULL is not an error condition.
*/
struct mmc_async_req *mmc_start_areq(struct mmc_host *host,
struct mmc_async_req *areq,
enum mmc_blk_status *ret_stat)
mmc: core: add non-blocking mmc request function Previously there has only been one function mmc_wait_for_req() to start and wait for a request. This patch adds: * mmc_start_req() - starts a request wihtout waiting If there is on ongoing request wait for completion of that request and start the new one and return. Does not wait for the new command to complete. This patch also adds new function members in struct mmc_host_ops only called from core.c: * pre_req - asks the host driver to prepare for the next job * post_req - asks the host driver to clean up after a completed job The intention is to use pre_req() and post_req() to do cache maintenance while a request is active. pre_req() can be called while a request is active to minimize latency to start next job. post_req() can be used after the next job is started to clean up the request. This will minimize the host driver request end latency. post_req() is typically used before ending the block request and handing over the buffer to the block layer. Add a host-private member in mmc_data to be used by pre_req to mark the data. The host driver will then check this mark to see if the data is prepared or not. Signed-off-by: Per Forlin <per.forlin@linaro.org> Acked-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Reviewed-by: Venkatraman S <svenkatr@ti.com> Tested-by: Sourav Poddar <sourav.poddar@ti.com> Tested-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>
2011-07-01 20:55:22 +04:00
{
enum mmc_blk_status status;
int start_err = 0;
struct mmc_async_req *previous = host->areq;
mmc: core: add non-blocking mmc request function Previously there has only been one function mmc_wait_for_req() to start and wait for a request. This patch adds: * mmc_start_req() - starts a request wihtout waiting If there is on ongoing request wait for completion of that request and start the new one and return. Does not wait for the new command to complete. This patch also adds new function members in struct mmc_host_ops only called from core.c: * pre_req - asks the host driver to prepare for the next job * post_req - asks the host driver to clean up after a completed job The intention is to use pre_req() and post_req() to do cache maintenance while a request is active. pre_req() can be called while a request is active to minimize latency to start next job. post_req() can be used after the next job is started to clean up the request. This will minimize the host driver request end latency. post_req() is typically used before ending the block request and handing over the buffer to the block layer. Add a host-private member in mmc_data to be used by pre_req to mark the data. The host driver will then check this mark to see if the data is prepared or not. Signed-off-by: Per Forlin <per.forlin@linaro.org> Acked-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Reviewed-by: Venkatraman S <svenkatr@ti.com> Tested-by: Sourav Poddar <sourav.poddar@ti.com> Tested-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>
2011-07-01 20:55:22 +04:00
/* Prepare a new request */
if (areq)
mmc_pre_req(host, areq->mrq);
mmc: core: add non-blocking mmc request function Previously there has only been one function mmc_wait_for_req() to start and wait for a request. This patch adds: * mmc_start_req() - starts a request wihtout waiting If there is on ongoing request wait for completion of that request and start the new one and return. Does not wait for the new command to complete. This patch also adds new function members in struct mmc_host_ops only called from core.c: * pre_req - asks the host driver to prepare for the next job * post_req - asks the host driver to clean up after a completed job The intention is to use pre_req() and post_req() to do cache maintenance while a request is active. pre_req() can be called while a request is active to minimize latency to start next job. post_req() can be used after the next job is started to clean up the request. This will minimize the host driver request end latency. post_req() is typically used before ending the block request and handing over the buffer to the block layer. Add a host-private member in mmc_data to be used by pre_req to mark the data. The host driver will then check this mark to see if the data is prepared or not. Signed-off-by: Per Forlin <per.forlin@linaro.org> Acked-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Reviewed-by: Venkatraman S <svenkatr@ti.com> Tested-by: Sourav Poddar <sourav.poddar@ti.com> Tested-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>
2011-07-01 20:55:22 +04:00
/* Finalize previous request */
status = mmc_finalize_areq(host);
if (ret_stat)
*ret_stat = status;
/* The previous request is still going on... */
if (status == MMC_BLK_NEW_REQUEST)
return NULL;
mmc: core: add non-blocking mmc request function Previously there has only been one function mmc_wait_for_req() to start and wait for a request. This patch adds: * mmc_start_req() - starts a request wihtout waiting If there is on ongoing request wait for completion of that request and start the new one and return. Does not wait for the new command to complete. This patch also adds new function members in struct mmc_host_ops only called from core.c: * pre_req - asks the host driver to prepare for the next job * post_req - asks the host driver to clean up after a completed job The intention is to use pre_req() and post_req() to do cache maintenance while a request is active. pre_req() can be called while a request is active to minimize latency to start next job. post_req() can be used after the next job is started to clean up the request. This will minimize the host driver request end latency. post_req() is typically used before ending the block request and handing over the buffer to the block layer. Add a host-private member in mmc_data to be used by pre_req to mark the data. The host driver will then check this mark to see if the data is prepared or not. Signed-off-by: Per Forlin <per.forlin@linaro.org> Acked-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Reviewed-by: Venkatraman S <svenkatr@ti.com> Tested-by: Sourav Poddar <sourav.poddar@ti.com> Tested-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>
2011-07-01 20:55:22 +04:00
/* Fine so far, start the new request! */
mmc: core: use enum mmc_blk_status properly There were several instances of code using the enum mmc_blk_status by arbitrarily converting it to an int and throwing it around to different functions. This makes the code hard to understand to may give rise to strange errors. Especially the function prototype mmc_start_req() had to be modified to take a pointer to an enum mmc_blk_status and the function pointer .err_check() inside struct mmc_async_req needed to return an enum mmc_blk_status. In every case: instead of assigning the block layer error code to an int, use the enum, also change the signature of all functions actually passing this enum to use the enum. To make it possible to use the enum everywhere applicable, move it to <linux/mmc/core.h> so that all code actually using it can also see it. An interesting case was encountered in the MMC test code which did not return a enum mmc_blk_status at all in the .err_check function supposed to check whether asynchronous requests worked or not: instead it returned a normal -ERROR or even the test frameworks internal error codes. The test code would also pass on enum mmc_blk_status codes as error codes inside the test code instead of converting them to the local RESULT_* codes. I have tried to fix all instances properly and run some tests on the result. Cc: Chunyan Zhang <zhang.chunyan@linaro.org> Cc: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
2016-11-04 13:05:19 +03:00
if (status == MMC_BLK_SUCCESS && areq)
start_err = __mmc_start_data_req(host, areq->mrq);
mmc: core: add non-blocking mmc request function Previously there has only been one function mmc_wait_for_req() to start and wait for a request. This patch adds: * mmc_start_req() - starts a request wihtout waiting If there is on ongoing request wait for completion of that request and start the new one and return. Does not wait for the new command to complete. This patch also adds new function members in struct mmc_host_ops only called from core.c: * pre_req - asks the host driver to prepare for the next job * post_req - asks the host driver to clean up after a completed job The intention is to use pre_req() and post_req() to do cache maintenance while a request is active. pre_req() can be called while a request is active to minimize latency to start next job. post_req() can be used after the next job is started to clean up the request. This will minimize the host driver request end latency. post_req() is typically used before ending the block request and handing over the buffer to the block layer. Add a host-private member in mmc_data to be used by pre_req to mark the data. The host driver will then check this mark to see if the data is prepared or not. Signed-off-by: Per Forlin <per.forlin@linaro.org> Acked-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Reviewed-by: Venkatraman S <svenkatr@ti.com> Tested-by: Sourav Poddar <sourav.poddar@ti.com> Tested-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>
2011-07-01 20:55:22 +04:00
/* Postprocess the old request at this point */
mmc: core: add non-blocking mmc request function Previously there has only been one function mmc_wait_for_req() to start and wait for a request. This patch adds: * mmc_start_req() - starts a request wihtout waiting If there is on ongoing request wait for completion of that request and start the new one and return. Does not wait for the new command to complete. This patch also adds new function members in struct mmc_host_ops only called from core.c: * pre_req - asks the host driver to prepare for the next job * post_req - asks the host driver to clean up after a completed job The intention is to use pre_req() and post_req() to do cache maintenance while a request is active. pre_req() can be called while a request is active to minimize latency to start next job. post_req() can be used after the next job is started to clean up the request. This will minimize the host driver request end latency. post_req() is typically used before ending the block request and handing over the buffer to the block layer. Add a host-private member in mmc_data to be used by pre_req to mark the data. The host driver will then check this mark to see if the data is prepared or not. Signed-off-by: Per Forlin <per.forlin@linaro.org> Acked-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Reviewed-by: Venkatraman S <svenkatr@ti.com> Tested-by: Sourav Poddar <sourav.poddar@ti.com> Tested-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>
2011-07-01 20:55:22 +04:00
if (host->areq)
mmc_post_req(host, host->areq->mrq, 0);
/* Cancel a prepared request if it was not started. */
mmc: core: use enum mmc_blk_status properly There were several instances of code using the enum mmc_blk_status by arbitrarily converting it to an int and throwing it around to different functions. This makes the code hard to understand to may give rise to strange errors. Especially the function prototype mmc_start_req() had to be modified to take a pointer to an enum mmc_blk_status and the function pointer .err_check() inside struct mmc_async_req needed to return an enum mmc_blk_status. In every case: instead of assigning the block layer error code to an int, use the enum, also change the signature of all functions actually passing this enum to use the enum. To make it possible to use the enum everywhere applicable, move it to <linux/mmc/core.h> so that all code actually using it can also see it. An interesting case was encountered in the MMC test code which did not return a enum mmc_blk_status at all in the .err_check function supposed to check whether asynchronous requests worked or not: instead it returned a normal -ERROR or even the test frameworks internal error codes. The test code would also pass on enum mmc_blk_status codes as error codes inside the test code instead of converting them to the local RESULT_* codes. I have tried to fix all instances properly and run some tests on the result. Cc: Chunyan Zhang <zhang.chunyan@linaro.org> Cc: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
2016-11-04 13:05:19 +03:00
if ((status != MMC_BLK_SUCCESS || start_err) && areq)
mmc_post_req(host, areq->mrq, -EINVAL);
mmc: core: use enum mmc_blk_status properly There were several instances of code using the enum mmc_blk_status by arbitrarily converting it to an int and throwing it around to different functions. This makes the code hard to understand to may give rise to strange errors. Especially the function prototype mmc_start_req() had to be modified to take a pointer to an enum mmc_blk_status and the function pointer .err_check() inside struct mmc_async_req needed to return an enum mmc_blk_status. In every case: instead of assigning the block layer error code to an int, use the enum, also change the signature of all functions actually passing this enum to use the enum. To make it possible to use the enum everywhere applicable, move it to <linux/mmc/core.h> so that all code actually using it can also see it. An interesting case was encountered in the MMC test code which did not return a enum mmc_blk_status at all in the .err_check function supposed to check whether asynchronous requests worked or not: instead it returned a normal -ERROR or even the test frameworks internal error codes. The test code would also pass on enum mmc_blk_status codes as error codes inside the test code instead of converting them to the local RESULT_* codes. I have tried to fix all instances properly and run some tests on the result. Cc: Chunyan Zhang <zhang.chunyan@linaro.org> Cc: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
2016-11-04 13:05:19 +03:00
if (status != MMC_BLK_SUCCESS)
host->areq = NULL;
else
host->areq = areq;
return previous;
mmc: core: add non-blocking mmc request function Previously there has only been one function mmc_wait_for_req() to start and wait for a request. This patch adds: * mmc_start_req() - starts a request wihtout waiting If there is on ongoing request wait for completion of that request and start the new one and return. Does not wait for the new command to complete. This patch also adds new function members in struct mmc_host_ops only called from core.c: * pre_req - asks the host driver to prepare for the next job * post_req - asks the host driver to clean up after a completed job The intention is to use pre_req() and post_req() to do cache maintenance while a request is active. pre_req() can be called while a request is active to minimize latency to start next job. post_req() can be used after the next job is started to clean up the request. This will minimize the host driver request end latency. post_req() is typically used before ending the block request and handing over the buffer to the block layer. Add a host-private member in mmc_data to be used by pre_req to mark the data. The host driver will then check this mark to see if the data is prepared or not. Signed-off-by: Per Forlin <per.forlin@linaro.org> Acked-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Reviewed-by: Venkatraman S <svenkatr@ti.com> Tested-by: Sourav Poddar <sourav.poddar@ti.com> Tested-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>
2011-07-01 20:55:22 +04:00
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(mmc_start_areq);
mmc: core: add non-blocking mmc request function Previously there has only been one function mmc_wait_for_req() to start and wait for a request. This patch adds: * mmc_start_req() - starts a request wihtout waiting If there is on ongoing request wait for completion of that request and start the new one and return. Does not wait for the new command to complete. This patch also adds new function members in struct mmc_host_ops only called from core.c: * pre_req - asks the host driver to prepare for the next job * post_req - asks the host driver to clean up after a completed job The intention is to use pre_req() and post_req() to do cache maintenance while a request is active. pre_req() can be called while a request is active to minimize latency to start next job. post_req() can be used after the next job is started to clean up the request. This will minimize the host driver request end latency. post_req() is typically used before ending the block request and handing over the buffer to the block layer. Add a host-private member in mmc_data to be used by pre_req to mark the data. The host driver will then check this mark to see if the data is prepared or not. Signed-off-by: Per Forlin <per.forlin@linaro.org> Acked-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Reviewed-by: Venkatraman S <svenkatr@ti.com> Tested-by: Sourav Poddar <sourav.poddar@ti.com> Tested-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>
2011-07-01 20:55:22 +04:00
/**
* mmc_wait_for_req - start a request and wait for completion
* @host: MMC host to start command
* @mrq: MMC request to start
*
* Start a new MMC custom command request for a host, and wait
mmc: core: Add support for sending commands during data transfer A host controller driver exposes its capability using caps flag MMC_CAP_CMD_DURING_TFR. A driver with that capability can accept requests that are marked mrq->cap_cmd_during_tfr = true. Then the driver informs the upper layers when the command line is available for further commands by calling mmc_command_done(). Because of that, the driver will not then automatically send STOP commands, and it is the responsibility of the upper layer to send a STOP command if it is required. For requests submitted through the mmc_wait_for_req() interface, the caller sets mrq->cap_cmd_during_tfr = true which causes mmc_wait_for_req() in fact not to wait. The caller can then send commands that do not use the data lines. Finally the caller can wait for the transfer to complete by calling mmc_wait_for_req_done() which is now exported. For requests submitted through the mmc_start_req() interface, the caller again sets mrq->cap_cmd_during_tfr = true, but mmc_start_req() anyway does not wait. The caller can then send commands that do not use the data lines. Finally the caller can wait for the transfer to complete in the normal way i.e. calling mmc_start_req() again. Irrespective of how a cap_cmd_during_tfr request is started, mmc_is_req_done() can be called if the upper layer needs to determine if the request is done. However the appropriate waiting function (either mmc_wait_for_req_done() or mmc_start_req()) must still be called. The implementation consists primarily of a new completion mrq->cmd_completion which notifies when the command line is available for further commands. That completion is completed by mmc_command_done(). When there is an ongoing data transfer, calls to mmc_wait_for_req() will automatically wait on that completion, so the caller does not have to do anything special. Note, in the case of errors, the driver may call mmc_request_done() without calling mmc_command_done() because mmc_request_done() always calls mmc_command_done(). Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
2016-08-16 13:44:11 +03:00
* for the command to complete. In the case of 'cap_cmd_during_tfr'
* requests, the transfer is ongoing and the caller can issue further
* commands that do not use the data lines, and then wait by calling
* mmc_wait_for_req_done().
* Does not attempt to parse the response.
*/
void mmc_wait_for_req(struct mmc_host *host, struct mmc_request *mrq)
{
mmc: core: add non-blocking mmc request function Previously there has only been one function mmc_wait_for_req() to start and wait for a request. This patch adds: * mmc_start_req() - starts a request wihtout waiting If there is on ongoing request wait for completion of that request and start the new one and return. Does not wait for the new command to complete. This patch also adds new function members in struct mmc_host_ops only called from core.c: * pre_req - asks the host driver to prepare for the next job * post_req - asks the host driver to clean up after a completed job The intention is to use pre_req() and post_req() to do cache maintenance while a request is active. pre_req() can be called while a request is active to minimize latency to start next job. post_req() can be used after the next job is started to clean up the request. This will minimize the host driver request end latency. post_req() is typically used before ending the block request and handing over the buffer to the block layer. Add a host-private member in mmc_data to be used by pre_req to mark the data. The host driver will then check this mark to see if the data is prepared or not. Signed-off-by: Per Forlin <per.forlin@linaro.org> Acked-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Reviewed-by: Venkatraman S <svenkatr@ti.com> Tested-by: Sourav Poddar <sourav.poddar@ti.com> Tested-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>
2011-07-01 20:55:22 +04:00
__mmc_start_req(host, mrq);
mmc: core: Add support for sending commands during data transfer A host controller driver exposes its capability using caps flag MMC_CAP_CMD_DURING_TFR. A driver with that capability can accept requests that are marked mrq->cap_cmd_during_tfr = true. Then the driver informs the upper layers when the command line is available for further commands by calling mmc_command_done(). Because of that, the driver will not then automatically send STOP commands, and it is the responsibility of the upper layer to send a STOP command if it is required. For requests submitted through the mmc_wait_for_req() interface, the caller sets mrq->cap_cmd_during_tfr = true which causes mmc_wait_for_req() in fact not to wait. The caller can then send commands that do not use the data lines. Finally the caller can wait for the transfer to complete by calling mmc_wait_for_req_done() which is now exported. For requests submitted through the mmc_start_req() interface, the caller again sets mrq->cap_cmd_during_tfr = true, but mmc_start_req() anyway does not wait. The caller can then send commands that do not use the data lines. Finally the caller can wait for the transfer to complete in the normal way i.e. calling mmc_start_req() again. Irrespective of how a cap_cmd_during_tfr request is started, mmc_is_req_done() can be called if the upper layer needs to determine if the request is done. However the appropriate waiting function (either mmc_wait_for_req_done() or mmc_start_req()) must still be called. The implementation consists primarily of a new completion mrq->cmd_completion which notifies when the command line is available for further commands. That completion is completed by mmc_command_done(). When there is an ongoing data transfer, calls to mmc_wait_for_req() will automatically wait on that completion, so the caller does not have to do anything special. Note, in the case of errors, the driver may call mmc_request_done() without calling mmc_command_done() because mmc_request_done() always calls mmc_command_done(). Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
2016-08-16 13:44:11 +03:00
if (!mrq->cap_cmd_during_tfr)
mmc_wait_for_req_done(host, mrq);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(mmc_wait_for_req);
/**
* mmc_wait_for_cmd - start a command and wait for completion
* @host: MMC host to start command
* @cmd: MMC command to start
* @retries: maximum number of retries
*
* Start a new MMC command for a host, and wait for the command
* to complete. Return any error that occurred while the command
* was executing. Do not attempt to parse the response.
*/
int mmc_wait_for_cmd(struct mmc_host *host, struct mmc_command *cmd, int retries)
{
struct mmc_request mrq = {};
WARN_ON(!host->claimed);
memset(cmd->resp, 0, sizeof(cmd->resp));
cmd->retries = retries;
mrq.cmd = cmd;
cmd->data = NULL;
mmc_wait_for_req(host, &mrq);
return cmd->error;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(mmc_wait_for_cmd);
/**
* mmc_set_data_timeout - set the timeout for a data command
* @data: data phase for command
* @card: the MMC card associated with the data transfer
*
* Computes the data timeout parameters according to the
* correct algorithm given the card type.
*/
void mmc_set_data_timeout(struct mmc_data *data, const struct mmc_card *card)
{
unsigned int mult;
/*
* SDIO cards only define an upper 1 s limit on access.
*/
if (mmc_card_sdio(card)) {
data->timeout_ns = 1000000000;
data->timeout_clks = 0;
return;
}
/*
* SD cards use a 100 multiplier rather than 10
*/
mult = mmc_card_sd(card) ? 100 : 10;
/*
* Scale up the multiplier (and therefore the timeout) by
* the r2w factor for writes.
*/
if (data->flags & MMC_DATA_WRITE)
mult <<= card->csd.r2w_factor;
data->timeout_ns = card->csd.taac_ns * mult;
data->timeout_clks = card->csd.taac_clks * mult;
/*
* SD cards also have an upper limit on the timeout.
*/
if (mmc_card_sd(card)) {
unsigned int timeout_us, limit_us;
timeout_us = data->timeout_ns / 1000;
if (card->host->ios.clock)
timeout_us += data->timeout_clks * 1000 /
(card->host->ios.clock / 1000);
if (data->flags & MMC_DATA_WRITE)
/*
* The MMC spec "It is strongly recommended
* for hosts to implement more than 500ms
* timeout value even if the card indicates
* the 250ms maximum busy length." Even the
* previous value of 300ms is known to be
* insufficient for some cards.
*/
limit_us = 3000000;
else
limit_us = 100000;
/*
* SDHC cards always use these fixed values.
*/
if (timeout_us > limit_us) {
data->timeout_ns = limit_us * 1000;
data->timeout_clks = 0;
}
mmc: core: Use maximum timeout values in case TACC field is zero When plugging a specific micro SD card at MMC socket of a custom i.MX28 board, we get the following kernel warning: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 30 at drivers/mmc/host/mxs-mmc.c:342 mxs_mmc_start_cmd+0x34c/0x378() Modules linked in: CPU: 0 PID: 30 Comm: kworker/u2:1 Not tainted 3.14.0-rc5 #8 Workqueue: kmmcd mmc_rescan [<c0015420>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c0012cb0>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14) [<c0012cb0>] (show_stack) from [<c001daf8>] (warn_slowpath_common+0x6c/0x8c) [<c001daf8>] (warn_slowpath_common) from [<c001db34>] (warn_slowpath_null+0x1c/0x24) [<c001db34>] (warn_slowpath_null) from [<c0349478>] (mxs_mmc_start_cmd+0x34c/0x378) [<c0349478>] (mxs_mmc_start_cmd) from [<c0338fa0>] (mmc_start_request+0xc4/0xf4) [<c0338fa0>] (mmc_start_request) from [<c03390b4>] (mmc_wait_for_req+0x50/0x164) [<c03390b4>] (mmc_wait_for_req) from [<c03405b8>] (mmc_app_send_scr+0x158/0x1c8) [<c03405b8>] (mmc_app_send_scr) from [<c033ee1c>] (mmc_sd_setup_card+0x80/0x3c8) [<c033ee1c>] (mmc_sd_setup_card) from [<c033f788>] (mmc_sd_init_card+0x124/0x66c) [<c033f788>] (mmc_sd_init_card) from [<c033fd7c>] (mmc_attach_sd+0xac/0x174) [<c033fd7c>] (mmc_attach_sd) from [<c033a658>] (mmc_rescan+0x25c/0x2d8) [<c033a658>] (mmc_rescan) from [<c003597c>] (process_one_work+0x1b4/0x4ec) [<c003597c>] (process_one_work) from [<c0035de4>] (worker_thread+0x130/0x464) [<c0035de4>] (worker_thread) from [<c003c824>] (kthread+0xb4/0xd0) [<c003c824>] (kthread) from [<c000f420>] (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x34) The error is due to an invalid value in CSD register of a specific 2GB micro SD card. The CSD version of this card is 1.0 but the TACC field has the invalid value 0. cid:0000005553442020000000000000583f csd:00000032535a83bfedb7ffbf1680003f date:08/2005 erase_size:512 fwrev:0x0 hwrev:0x0 manfid:0x000000 name:USD oemid:0x0000 preferred_erase_size:4194304 scr:0225000000000000 serial:0x00000000 type:SD Since the kernel is making use of this TACC field to calculate the SD card timeout, an invalid value 0 leads to a warning at mxs_ns_to_ssp_ticks() and later the following misleading error message appears in a loop: mxs-mmc 80010000.ssp: card claims to support voltages below defined range mxs-mmc 80010000.ssp: no support for card's volts mmc0: error -22 whilst initialising MMC card This error is only found on this 2GB SD card on mxs platform. On x86 this card works without any problems. The following patch based on the work of Peter Chan and Otavio Salvador. It catches the case that the determined timeout is still 0 and sets it to a valid value. Successful tested on a i.MX28 board. Signed-off-by: Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@i2se.com> Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Chris Ball <chris@printf.net>
2014-04-03 19:32:05 +04:00
/* assign limit value if invalid */
if (timeout_us == 0)
data->timeout_ns = limit_us * 1000;
}
/*
* Some cards require longer data read timeout than indicated in CSD.
* Address this by setting the read timeout to a "reasonably high"
* value. For the cards tested, 600ms has proven enough. If necessary,
* this value can be increased if other problematic cards require this.
*/
if (mmc_card_long_read_time(card) && data->flags & MMC_DATA_READ) {
data->timeout_ns = 600000000;
data->timeout_clks = 0;
}
/*
* Some cards need very high timeouts if driven in SPI mode.
* The worst observed timeout was 900ms after writing a
* continuous stream of data until the internal logic
* overflowed.
*/
if (mmc_host_is_spi(card->host)) {
if (data->flags & MMC_DATA_WRITE) {
if (data->timeout_ns < 1000000000)
data->timeout_ns = 1000000000; /* 1s */
} else {
if (data->timeout_ns < 100000000)
data->timeout_ns = 100000000; /* 100ms */
}
}
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(mmc_set_data_timeout);
/**
* mmc_align_data_size - pads a transfer size to a more optimal value
* @card: the MMC card associated with the data transfer
* @sz: original transfer size
*
* Pads the original data size with a number of extra bytes in
* order to avoid controller bugs and/or performance hits
* (e.g. some controllers revert to PIO for certain sizes).
*
* Returns the improved size, which might be unmodified.
*
* Note that this function is only relevant when issuing a
* single scatter gather entry.
*/
unsigned int mmc_align_data_size(struct mmc_card *card, unsigned int sz)
{
/*
* FIXME: We don't have a system for the controller to tell
* the core about its problems yet, so for now we just 32-bit
* align the size.
*/
sz = ((sz + 3) / 4) * 4;
return sz;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(mmc_align_data_size);
/*
* Allow claiming an already claimed host if the context is the same or there is
* no context but the task is the same.
*/
static inline bool mmc_ctx_matches(struct mmc_host *host, struct mmc_ctx *ctx,
struct task_struct *task)
{
return host->claimer == ctx ||
(!ctx && task && host->claimer->task == task);
}
static inline void mmc_ctx_set_claimer(struct mmc_host *host,
struct mmc_ctx *ctx,
struct task_struct *task)
{
if (!host->claimer) {
if (ctx)
host->claimer = ctx;
else
host->claimer = &host->default_ctx;
}
if (task)
host->claimer->task = task;
}
/**
* __mmc_claim_host - exclusively claim a host
* @host: mmc host to claim
* @ctx: context that claims the host or NULL in which case the default
* context will be used
* @abort: whether or not the operation should be aborted
*
* Claim a host for a set of operations. If @abort is non null and
* dereference a non-zero value then this will return prematurely with
* that non-zero value without acquiring the lock. Returns zero
* with the lock held otherwise.
*/
int __mmc_claim_host(struct mmc_host *host, struct mmc_ctx *ctx,
atomic_t *abort)
{
struct task_struct *task = ctx ? NULL : current;
DECLARE_WAITQUEUE(wait, current);
unsigned long flags;
int stop;
bool pm = false;
might_sleep();
add_wait_queue(&host->wq, &wait);
spin_lock_irqsave(&host->lock, flags);
while (1) {
set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
stop = abort ? atomic_read(abort) : 0;
if (stop || !host->claimed || mmc_ctx_matches(host, ctx, task))
break;
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&host->lock, flags);
schedule();
spin_lock_irqsave(&host->lock, flags);
}
set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
if (!stop) {
host->claimed = 1;
mmc_ctx_set_claimer(host, ctx, task);
host->claim_cnt += 1;
if (host->claim_cnt == 1)
pm = true;
} else
wake_up(&host->wq);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&host->lock, flags);
remove_wait_queue(&host->wq, &wait);
if (pm)
pm_runtime_get_sync(mmc_dev(host));
return stop;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(__mmc_claim_host);
/**
* mmc_release_host - release a host
* @host: mmc host to release
*
* Release a MMC host, allowing others to claim the host
* for their operations.
*/
void mmc_release_host(struct mmc_host *host)
{
unsigned long flags;
WARN_ON(!host->claimed);
spin_lock_irqsave(&host->lock, flags);
if (--host->claim_cnt) {
/* Release for nested claim */
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&host->lock, flags);
} else {
host->claimed = 0;
host->claimer->task = NULL;
host->claimer = NULL;
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&host->lock, flags);
wake_up(&host->wq);
pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(mmc_dev(host));
pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(mmc_dev(host));
}
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(mmc_release_host);
/*
* This is a helper function, which fetches a runtime pm reference for the
* card device and also claims the host.
*/
void mmc_get_card(struct mmc_card *card, struct mmc_ctx *ctx)
{
pm_runtime_get_sync(&card->dev);
__mmc_claim_host(card->host, ctx, NULL);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(mmc_get_card);
/*
* This is a helper function, which releases the host and drops the runtime
* pm reference for the card device.
*/
void mmc_put_card(struct mmc_card *card, struct mmc_ctx *ctx)
{
struct mmc_host *host = card->host;
WARN_ON(ctx && host->claimer != ctx);
mmc_release_host(host);
pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(&card->dev);
pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(&card->dev);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(mmc_put_card);
/*
* Internal function that does the actual ios call to the host driver,
* optionally printing some debug output.
*/
static inline void mmc_set_ios(struct mmc_host *host)
{
struct mmc_ios *ios = &host->ios;
pr_debug("%s: clock %uHz busmode %u powermode %u cs %u Vdd %u "
"width %u timing %u\n",
mmc_hostname(host), ios->clock, ios->bus_mode,
ios->power_mode, ios->chip_select, ios->vdd,
1 << ios->bus_width, ios->timing);
host->ops->set_ios(host, ios);
}
/*
* Control chip select pin on a host.
*/
void mmc_set_chip_select(struct mmc_host *host, int mode)
{
host->ios.chip_select = mode;
mmc_set_ios(host);
}
/*
* Sets the host clock to the highest possible frequency that
* is below "hz".
*/
void mmc_set_clock(struct mmc_host *host, unsigned int hz)
{
WARN_ON(hz && hz < host->f_min);
if (hz > host->f_max)
hz = host->f_max;
host->ios.clock = hz;
mmc_set_ios(host);
}
int mmc_execute_tuning(struct mmc_card *card)
{
struct mmc_host *host = card->host;
u32 opcode;
int err;
if (!host->ops->execute_tuning)
return 0;
if (host->cqe_on)
host->cqe_ops->cqe_off(host);
if (mmc_card_mmc(card))
opcode = MMC_SEND_TUNING_BLOCK_HS200;
else
opcode = MMC_SEND_TUNING_BLOCK;
err = host->ops->execute_tuning(host, opcode);
if (err)
pr_err("%s: tuning execution failed: %d\n",
mmc_hostname(host), err);
else
mmc_retune_enable(host);
return err;
}
/*
* Change the bus mode (open drain/push-pull) of a host.
*/
void mmc_set_bus_mode(struct mmc_host *host, unsigned int mode)
{
host->ios.bus_mode = mode;
mmc_set_ios(host);
}
/*
* Change data bus width of a host.
*/
void mmc_set_bus_width(struct mmc_host *host, unsigned int width)
{
host->ios.bus_width = width;
mmc_set_ios(host);
}
/*
* Set initial state after a power cycle or a hw_reset.
*/
void mmc_set_initial_state(struct mmc_host *host)
{
if (host->cqe_on)
host->cqe_ops->cqe_off(host);
mmc_retune_disable(host);
if (mmc_host_is_spi(host))
host->ios.chip_select = MMC_CS_HIGH;
else
host->ios.chip_select = MMC_CS_DONTCARE;
host->ios.bus_mode = MMC_BUSMODE_PUSHPULL;
host->ios.bus_width = MMC_BUS_WIDTH_1;
host->ios.timing = MMC_TIMING_LEGACY;
host->ios.drv_type = 0;
host->ios.enhanced_strobe = false;
/*
* Make sure we are in non-enhanced strobe mode before we
* actually enable it in ext_csd.
*/
if ((host->caps2 & MMC_CAP2_HS400_ES) &&
host->ops->hs400_enhanced_strobe)
host->ops->hs400_enhanced_strobe(host, &host->ios);
mmc_set_ios(host);
}
/**
* mmc_vdd_to_ocrbitnum - Convert a voltage to the OCR bit number
* @vdd: voltage (mV)
* @low_bits: prefer low bits in boundary cases
*
* This function returns the OCR bit number according to the provided @vdd
* value. If conversion is not possible a negative errno value returned.
*
* Depending on the @low_bits flag the function prefers low or high OCR bits
* on boundary voltages. For example,
* with @low_bits = true, 3300 mV translates to ilog2(MMC_VDD_32_33);
* with @low_bits = false, 3300 mV translates to ilog2(MMC_VDD_33_34);
*
* Any value in the [1951:1999] range translates to the ilog2(MMC_VDD_20_21).
*/
static int mmc_vdd_to_ocrbitnum(int vdd, bool low_bits)
{
const int max_bit = ilog2(MMC_VDD_35_36);
int bit;
if (vdd < 1650 || vdd > 3600)
return -EINVAL;
if (vdd >= 1650 && vdd <= 1950)
return ilog2(MMC_VDD_165_195);
if (low_bits)
vdd -= 1;
/* Base 2000 mV, step 100 mV, bit's base 8. */
bit = (vdd - 2000) / 100 + 8;
if (bit > max_bit)
return max_bit;
return bit;
}
/**
* mmc_vddrange_to_ocrmask - Convert a voltage range to the OCR mask
* @vdd_min: minimum voltage value (mV)
* @vdd_max: maximum voltage value (mV)
*
* This function returns the OCR mask bits according to the provided @vdd_min
* and @vdd_max values. If conversion is not possible the function returns 0.
*
* Notes wrt boundary cases:
* This function sets the OCR bits for all boundary voltages, for example
* [3300:3400] range is translated to MMC_VDD_32_33 | MMC_VDD_33_34 |
* MMC_VDD_34_35 mask.
*/
u32 mmc_vddrange_to_ocrmask(int vdd_min, int vdd_max)
{
u32 mask = 0;
if (vdd_max < vdd_min)
return 0;
/* Prefer high bits for the boundary vdd_max values. */
vdd_max = mmc_vdd_to_ocrbitnum(vdd_max, false);
if (vdd_max < 0)
return 0;
/* Prefer low bits for the boundary vdd_min values. */
vdd_min = mmc_vdd_to_ocrbitnum(vdd_min, true);
if (vdd_min < 0)
return 0;
/* Fill the mask, from max bit to min bit. */
while (vdd_max >= vdd_min)
mask |= 1 << vdd_max--;
return mask;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(mmc_vddrange_to_ocrmask);
#ifdef CONFIG_OF
/**
* mmc_of_parse_voltage - return mask of supported voltages
* @np: The device node need to be parsed.
* @mask: mask of voltages available for MMC/SD/SDIO
*
* Parse the "voltage-ranges" DT property, returning zero if it is not
* found, negative errno if the voltage-range specification is invalid,
* or one if the voltage-range is specified and successfully parsed.
*/
int mmc_of_parse_voltage(struct device_node *np, u32 *mask)
{
const u32 *voltage_ranges;
int num_ranges, i;
voltage_ranges = of_get_property(np, "voltage-ranges", &num_ranges);
num_ranges = num_ranges / sizeof(*voltage_ranges) / 2;
if (!voltage_ranges) {
pr_debug("%pOF: voltage-ranges unspecified\n", np);
return 0;
}
if (!num_ranges) {
pr_err("%pOF: voltage-ranges empty\n", np);
return -EINVAL;
}
for (i = 0; i < num_ranges; i++) {
const int j = i * 2;
u32 ocr_mask;
ocr_mask = mmc_vddrange_to_ocrmask(
be32_to_cpu(voltage_ranges[j]),
be32_to_cpu(voltage_ranges[j + 1]));
if (!ocr_mask) {
pr_err("%pOF: voltage-range #%d is invalid\n",
np, i);
return -EINVAL;
}
*mask |= ocr_mask;
}
return 1;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(mmc_of_parse_voltage);
#endif /* CONFIG_OF */
static int mmc_of_get_func_num(struct device_node *node)
{
u32 reg;
int ret;
ret = of_property_read_u32(node, "reg", &reg);
if (ret < 0)
return ret;
return reg;
}
struct device_node *mmc_of_find_child_device(struct mmc_host *host,
unsigned func_num)
{
struct device_node *node;
if (!host->parent || !host->parent->of_node)
return NULL;
for_each_child_of_node(host->parent->of_node, node) {
if (mmc_of_get_func_num(node) == func_num)
return node;
}
return NULL;
}
#ifdef CONFIG_REGULATOR
/**
* mmc_ocrbitnum_to_vdd - Convert a OCR bit number to its voltage
* @vdd_bit: OCR bit number
* @min_uV: minimum voltage value (mV)
* @max_uV: maximum voltage value (mV)
*
* This function returns the voltage range according to the provided OCR
* bit number. If conversion is not possible a negative errno value returned.
*/
static int mmc_ocrbitnum_to_vdd(int vdd_bit, int *min_uV, int *max_uV)
{
int tmp;
if (!vdd_bit)
return -EINVAL;
/*
* REVISIT mmc_vddrange_to_ocrmask() may have set some
* bits this regulator doesn't quite support ... don't
* be too picky, most cards and regulators are OK with
* a 0.1V range goof (it's a small error percentage).
*/
tmp = vdd_bit - ilog2(MMC_VDD_165_195);
if (tmp == 0) {
*min_uV = 1650 * 1000;
*max_uV = 1950 * 1000;
} else {
*min_uV = 1900 * 1000 + tmp * 100 * 1000;
*max_uV = *min_uV + 100 * 1000;
}
return 0;
}
/**
* mmc_regulator_get_ocrmask - return mask of supported voltages
* @supply: regulator to use
*
* This returns either a negative errno, or a mask of voltages that
* can be provided to MMC/SD/SDIO devices using the specified voltage
* regulator. This would normally be called before registering the
* MMC host adapter.
*/
int mmc_regulator_get_ocrmask(struct regulator *supply)
{
int result = 0;
int count;
int i;
int vdd_uV;
int vdd_mV;
count = regulator_count_voltages(supply);
if (count < 0)
return count;
for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
vdd_uV = regulator_list_voltage(supply, i);
if (vdd_uV <= 0)
continue;
vdd_mV = vdd_uV / 1000;
result |= mmc_vddrange_to_ocrmask(vdd_mV, vdd_mV);
}
if (!result) {
vdd_uV = regulator_get_voltage(supply);
if (vdd_uV <= 0)
return vdd_uV;
vdd_mV = vdd_uV / 1000;
result = mmc_vddrange_to_ocrmask(vdd_mV, vdd_mV);
}
return result;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mmc_regulator_get_ocrmask);
/**
* mmc_regulator_set_ocr - set regulator to match host->ios voltage
* @mmc: the host to regulate
* @supply: regulator to use
* @vdd_bit: zero for power off, else a bit number (host->ios.vdd)
*
* Returns zero on success, else negative errno.
*
* MMC host drivers may use this to enable or disable a regulator using
* a particular supply voltage. This would normally be called from the
* set_ios() method.
*/
int mmc_regulator_set_ocr(struct mmc_host *mmc,
struct regulator *supply,
unsigned short vdd_bit)
{
int result = 0;
int min_uV, max_uV;
if (vdd_bit) {
mmc_ocrbitnum_to_vdd(vdd_bit, &min_uV, &max_uV);
result = regulator_set_voltage(supply, min_uV, max_uV);
if (result == 0 && !mmc->regulator_enabled) {
result = regulator_enable(supply);
if (!result)
mmc->regulator_enabled = true;
}
} else if (mmc->regulator_enabled) {
result = regulator_disable(supply);
if (result == 0)
mmc->regulator_enabled = false;
}
if (result)
dev_err(mmc_dev(mmc),
"could not set regulator OCR (%d)\n", result);
return result;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mmc_regulator_set_ocr);
mmc: core: Add mmc_regulator_set_vqmmc() This adds logic to the MMC core to set VQMMC. This is expected to be called by MMC drivers like dw_mmc as part of (or instead of) their start_signal_voltage_switch() callback. A few notes: * When setting the signal voltage to 3.3V we do our best to make VQMMC and VMMC match. It's been reported that this makes some old cards happy since they were tested back in the day before UHS when VQMMC and VMMC were provided by the same regulator. A nice side effect of this is that we don't end up on the hairy edge of VQMMC (2.7V), which some EEs claim is a little too close to the minimum for comfort. This is done in two steps. At first we try to find a VQMMC within a 0.3V tolerance of VMMC and if this is not supported by the supplying regulator we try to find a suitable voltage within the whole 2.7V-3.6V area of the spec. * The two step approach is currently necessary, as the used regulator_set_voltage_triplet(min, target, max) uses a simple implementation that just tries two basic steps: regulator_set_voltage(target, max); regulator_set_voltage(min, target); So with only one step with 2.7-3.6V borders, if a suitable voltage is a bit below VMMC, we would directly get the lowest 2.7V which some boards (like Rockchips) don't like at all. * When setting the signal voltage to 1.8V or 1.2V we aim for that specific voltage instead of picking the lowest one in the range. * We very purposely don't print errors in mmc_regulator_set_vqmmc(). There are cases where the MMC core will try several different voltages and we don't want to pollute the logs. Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de> Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
2015-10-12 15:48:25 +03:00
static int mmc_regulator_set_voltage_if_supported(struct regulator *regulator,
int min_uV, int target_uV,
int max_uV)
{
/*
* Check if supported first to avoid errors since we may try several
* signal levels during power up and don't want to show errors.
*/
if (!regulator_is_supported_voltage(regulator, min_uV, max_uV))
return -EINVAL;
return regulator_set_voltage_triplet(regulator, min_uV, target_uV,
max_uV);
}
/**
* mmc_regulator_set_vqmmc - Set VQMMC as per the ios
*
* For 3.3V signaling, we try to match VQMMC to VMMC as closely as possible.
* That will match the behavior of old boards where VQMMC and VMMC were supplied
* by the same supply. The Bus Operating conditions for 3.3V signaling in the
* SD card spec also define VQMMC in terms of VMMC.
* If this is not possible we'll try the full 2.7-3.6V of the spec.
*
* For 1.2V and 1.8V signaling we'll try to get as close as possible to the
* requested voltage. This is definitely a good idea for UHS where there's a
* separate regulator on the card that's trying to make 1.8V and it's best if
* we match.
*
* This function is expected to be used by a controller's
* start_signal_voltage_switch() function.
*/
int mmc_regulator_set_vqmmc(struct mmc_host *mmc, struct mmc_ios *ios)
{
struct device *dev = mmc_dev(mmc);
int ret, volt, min_uV, max_uV;
/* If no vqmmc supply then we can't change the voltage */
if (IS_ERR(mmc->supply.vqmmc))
return -EINVAL;
switch (ios->signal_voltage) {
case MMC_SIGNAL_VOLTAGE_120:
return mmc_regulator_set_voltage_if_supported(mmc->supply.vqmmc,
1100000, 1200000, 1300000);
case MMC_SIGNAL_VOLTAGE_180:
return mmc_regulator_set_voltage_if_supported(mmc->supply.vqmmc,
1700000, 1800000, 1950000);
case MMC_SIGNAL_VOLTAGE_330:
ret = mmc_ocrbitnum_to_vdd(mmc->ios.vdd, &volt, &max_uV);
if (ret < 0)
return ret;
dev_dbg(dev, "%s: found vmmc voltage range of %d-%duV\n",
__func__, volt, max_uV);
min_uV = max(volt - 300000, 2700000);
max_uV = min(max_uV + 200000, 3600000);
/*
* Due to a limitation in the current implementation of
* regulator_set_voltage_triplet() which is taking the lowest
* voltage possible if below the target, search for a suitable
* voltage in two steps and try to stay close to vmmc
* with a 0.3V tolerance at first.
*/
if (!mmc_regulator_set_voltage_if_supported(mmc->supply.vqmmc,
min_uV, volt, max_uV))
return 0;
return mmc_regulator_set_voltage_if_supported(mmc->supply.vqmmc,
2700000, volt, 3600000);
default:
return -EINVAL;
}
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mmc_regulator_set_vqmmc);
#endif /* CONFIG_REGULATOR */
int mmc_regulator_get_supply(struct mmc_host *mmc)
{
struct device *dev = mmc_dev(mmc);
int ret;
mmc->supply.vmmc = devm_regulator_get_optional(dev, "vmmc");
mmc->supply.vqmmc = devm_regulator_get_optional(dev, "vqmmc");
if (IS_ERR(mmc->supply.vmmc)) {
if (PTR_ERR(mmc->supply.vmmc) == -EPROBE_DEFER)
return -EPROBE_DEFER;
dev_dbg(dev, "No vmmc regulator found\n");
} else {
ret = mmc_regulator_get_ocrmask(mmc->supply.vmmc);
if (ret > 0)
mmc->ocr_avail = ret;
else
dev_warn(dev, "Failed getting OCR mask: %d\n", ret);
}
if (IS_ERR(mmc->supply.vqmmc)) {
if (PTR_ERR(mmc->supply.vqmmc) == -EPROBE_DEFER)
return -EPROBE_DEFER;
dev_dbg(dev, "No vqmmc regulator found\n");
}
return 0;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mmc_regulator_get_supply);
/*
* Mask off any voltages we don't support and select
* the lowest voltage
*/
u32 mmc_select_voltage(struct mmc_host *host, u32 ocr)
{
int bit;
/*
* Sanity check the voltages that the card claims to
* support.
*/
if (ocr & 0x7F) {
dev_warn(mmc_dev(host),
"card claims to support voltages below defined range\n");
ocr &= ~0x7F;
}
ocr &= host->ocr_avail;
if (!ocr) {
dev_warn(mmc_dev(host), "no support for card's volts\n");
return 0;
}
if (host->caps2 & MMC_CAP2_FULL_PWR_CYCLE) {
bit = ffs(ocr) - 1;
ocr &= 3 << bit;
mmc_power_cycle(host, ocr);
} else {
bit = fls(ocr) - 1;
ocr &= 3 << bit;
if (bit != host->ios.vdd)
dev_warn(mmc_dev(host), "exceeding card's volts\n");
}
return ocr;
}
int mmc_set_signal_voltage(struct mmc_host *host, int signal_voltage)
{
int err = 0;
int old_signal_voltage = host->ios.signal_voltage;
host->ios.signal_voltage = signal_voltage;
if (host->ops->start_signal_voltage_switch)
err = host->ops->start_signal_voltage_switch(host, &host->ios);
if (err)
host->ios.signal_voltage = old_signal_voltage;
return err;
}
int mmc_set_uhs_voltage(struct mmc_host *host, u32 ocr)
mmc: sd: add support for signal voltage switch procedure Host Controller v3.00 adds another Capabilities register. Apart from other things, this new register indicates whether the Host Controller supports SDR50, SDR104, and DDR50 UHS-I modes. The spec doesn't mention about explicit support for SDR12 and SDR25 UHS-I modes, so the Host Controller v3.00 should support them by default. Also if the controller supports SDR104 mode, it will also support SDR50 mode as well. So depending on the host support, we set the corresponding MMC_CAP_* flags. One more new register. Host Control2 is added in v3.00, which is used during Signal Voltage Switch procedure described below. Since as per v3.00 spec, UHS-I supported hosts should set S18R to 1, we set S18R (bit 24) of OCR before sending ACMD41. We also need to set XPC (bit 28) of OCR in case the host can supply >150mA. This support is indicated by the Maximum Current Capabilities register of the Host Controller. If the response of ACMD41 has both CCS and S18A set, we start the signal voltage switch procedure, which if successfull, will switch the card from 3.3V signalling to 1.8V signalling. Signal voltage switch procedure adds support for a new command CMD11 in the Physical Layer Spec v3.01. As part of this procedure, we need to set 1.8V Signalling Enable (bit 3) of Host Control2 register, which if remains set after 5ms, means the switch to 1.8V signalling is successfull. Otherwise, we clear bit 24 of OCR and retry the initialization sequence. When we remove the card, and insert the same or another card, we need to make sure that we start with 3.3V signalling voltage. So we call mmc_set_signal_voltage() with MMC_SIGNAL_VOLTAGE_330 set so that we are back to 3.3V signalling voltage before we actually start initializing the card. Tested by Zhangfei Gao with a Toshiba uhs card and general hs card, on mmp2 in SDMA mode. Signed-off-by: Arindam Nath <arindam.nath@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Philip Rakity <prakity@marvell.com> Tested-by: Philip Rakity <prakity@marvell.com> Acked-by: Zhangfei Gao <zhangfei.gao@marvell.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>
2011-05-05 10:48:57 +04:00
{
struct mmc_command cmd = {};
mmc: sd: add support for signal voltage switch procedure Host Controller v3.00 adds another Capabilities register. Apart from other things, this new register indicates whether the Host Controller supports SDR50, SDR104, and DDR50 UHS-I modes. The spec doesn't mention about explicit support for SDR12 and SDR25 UHS-I modes, so the Host Controller v3.00 should support them by default. Also if the controller supports SDR104 mode, it will also support SDR50 mode as well. So depending on the host support, we set the corresponding MMC_CAP_* flags. One more new register. Host Control2 is added in v3.00, which is used during Signal Voltage Switch procedure described below. Since as per v3.00 spec, UHS-I supported hosts should set S18R to 1, we set S18R (bit 24) of OCR before sending ACMD41. We also need to set XPC (bit 28) of OCR in case the host can supply >150mA. This support is indicated by the Maximum Current Capabilities register of the Host Controller. If the response of ACMD41 has both CCS and S18A set, we start the signal voltage switch procedure, which if successfull, will switch the card from 3.3V signalling to 1.8V signalling. Signal voltage switch procedure adds support for a new command CMD11 in the Physical Layer Spec v3.01. As part of this procedure, we need to set 1.8V Signalling Enable (bit 3) of Host Control2 register, which if remains set after 5ms, means the switch to 1.8V signalling is successfull. Otherwise, we clear bit 24 of OCR and retry the initialization sequence. When we remove the card, and insert the same or another card, we need to make sure that we start with 3.3V signalling voltage. So we call mmc_set_signal_voltage() with MMC_SIGNAL_VOLTAGE_330 set so that we are back to 3.3V signalling voltage before we actually start initializing the card. Tested by Zhangfei Gao with a Toshiba uhs card and general hs card, on mmp2 in SDMA mode. Signed-off-by: Arindam Nath <arindam.nath@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Philip Rakity <prakity@marvell.com> Tested-by: Philip Rakity <prakity@marvell.com> Acked-by: Zhangfei Gao <zhangfei.gao@marvell.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>
2011-05-05 10:48:57 +04:00
int err = 0;
u32 clock;
mmc: sd: add support for signal voltage switch procedure Host Controller v3.00 adds another Capabilities register. Apart from other things, this new register indicates whether the Host Controller supports SDR50, SDR104, and DDR50 UHS-I modes. The spec doesn't mention about explicit support for SDR12 and SDR25 UHS-I modes, so the Host Controller v3.00 should support them by default. Also if the controller supports SDR104 mode, it will also support SDR50 mode as well. So depending on the host support, we set the corresponding MMC_CAP_* flags. One more new register. Host Control2 is added in v3.00, which is used during Signal Voltage Switch procedure described below. Since as per v3.00 spec, UHS-I supported hosts should set S18R to 1, we set S18R (bit 24) of OCR before sending ACMD41. We also need to set XPC (bit 28) of OCR in case the host can supply >150mA. This support is indicated by the Maximum Current Capabilities register of the Host Controller. If the response of ACMD41 has both CCS and S18A set, we start the signal voltage switch procedure, which if successfull, will switch the card from 3.3V signalling to 1.8V signalling. Signal voltage switch procedure adds support for a new command CMD11 in the Physical Layer Spec v3.01. As part of this procedure, we need to set 1.8V Signalling Enable (bit 3) of Host Control2 register, which if remains set after 5ms, means the switch to 1.8V signalling is successfull. Otherwise, we clear bit 24 of OCR and retry the initialization sequence. When we remove the card, and insert the same or another card, we need to make sure that we start with 3.3V signalling voltage. So we call mmc_set_signal_voltage() with MMC_SIGNAL_VOLTAGE_330 set so that we are back to 3.3V signalling voltage before we actually start initializing the card. Tested by Zhangfei Gao with a Toshiba uhs card and general hs card, on mmp2 in SDMA mode. Signed-off-by: Arindam Nath <arindam.nath@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Philip Rakity <prakity@marvell.com> Tested-by: Philip Rakity <prakity@marvell.com> Acked-by: Zhangfei Gao <zhangfei.gao@marvell.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>
2011-05-05 10:48:57 +04:00
/*
* If we cannot switch voltages, return failure so the caller
* can continue without UHS mode
*/
if (!host->ops->start_signal_voltage_switch)
return -EPERM;
if (!host->ops->card_busy)
pr_warn("%s: cannot verify signal voltage switch\n",
mmc_hostname(host));
cmd.opcode = SD_SWITCH_VOLTAGE;
cmd.arg = 0;
cmd.flags = MMC_RSP_R1 | MMC_CMD_AC;
err = mmc_wait_for_cmd(host, &cmd, 0);
if (err)
return err;
if (!mmc_host_is_spi(host) && (cmd.resp[0] & R1_ERROR))
return -EIO;
/*
* The card should drive cmd and dat[0:3] low immediately
* after the response of cmd11, but wait 1 ms to be sure
*/
mmc_delay(1);
if (host->ops->card_busy && !host->ops->card_busy(host)) {
err = -EAGAIN;
goto power_cycle;
}
/*
* During a signal voltage level switch, the clock must be gated
* for 5 ms according to the SD spec
*/
clock = host->ios.clock;
host->ios.clock = 0;
mmc_set_ios(host);
mmc: sd: add support for signal voltage switch procedure Host Controller v3.00 adds another Capabilities register. Apart from other things, this new register indicates whether the Host Controller supports SDR50, SDR104, and DDR50 UHS-I modes. The spec doesn't mention about explicit support for SDR12 and SDR25 UHS-I modes, so the Host Controller v3.00 should support them by default. Also if the controller supports SDR104 mode, it will also support SDR50 mode as well. So depending on the host support, we set the corresponding MMC_CAP_* flags. One more new register. Host Control2 is added in v3.00, which is used during Signal Voltage Switch procedure described below. Since as per v3.00 spec, UHS-I supported hosts should set S18R to 1, we set S18R (bit 24) of OCR before sending ACMD41. We also need to set XPC (bit 28) of OCR in case the host can supply >150mA. This support is indicated by the Maximum Current Capabilities register of the Host Controller. If the response of ACMD41 has both CCS and S18A set, we start the signal voltage switch procedure, which if successfull, will switch the card from 3.3V signalling to 1.8V signalling. Signal voltage switch procedure adds support for a new command CMD11 in the Physical Layer Spec v3.01. As part of this procedure, we need to set 1.8V Signalling Enable (bit 3) of Host Control2 register, which if remains set after 5ms, means the switch to 1.8V signalling is successfull. Otherwise, we clear bit 24 of OCR and retry the initialization sequence. When we remove the card, and insert the same or another card, we need to make sure that we start with 3.3V signalling voltage. So we call mmc_set_signal_voltage() with MMC_SIGNAL_VOLTAGE_330 set so that we are back to 3.3V signalling voltage before we actually start initializing the card. Tested by Zhangfei Gao with a Toshiba uhs card and general hs card, on mmp2 in SDMA mode. Signed-off-by: Arindam Nath <arindam.nath@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Philip Rakity <prakity@marvell.com> Tested-by: Philip Rakity <prakity@marvell.com> Acked-by: Zhangfei Gao <zhangfei.gao@marvell.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>
2011-05-05 10:48:57 +04:00
if (mmc_set_signal_voltage(host, MMC_SIGNAL_VOLTAGE_180)) {
/*
* Voltages may not have been switched, but we've already
* sent CMD11, so a power cycle is required anyway
*/
err = -EAGAIN;
goto power_cycle;
mmc: sd: add support for signal voltage switch procedure Host Controller v3.00 adds another Capabilities register. Apart from other things, this new register indicates whether the Host Controller supports SDR50, SDR104, and DDR50 UHS-I modes. The spec doesn't mention about explicit support for SDR12 and SDR25 UHS-I modes, so the Host Controller v3.00 should support them by default. Also if the controller supports SDR104 mode, it will also support SDR50 mode as well. So depending on the host support, we set the corresponding MMC_CAP_* flags. One more new register. Host Control2 is added in v3.00, which is used during Signal Voltage Switch procedure described below. Since as per v3.00 spec, UHS-I supported hosts should set S18R to 1, we set S18R (bit 24) of OCR before sending ACMD41. We also need to set XPC (bit 28) of OCR in case the host can supply >150mA. This support is indicated by the Maximum Current Capabilities register of the Host Controller. If the response of ACMD41 has both CCS and S18A set, we start the signal voltage switch procedure, which if successfull, will switch the card from 3.3V signalling to 1.8V signalling. Signal voltage switch procedure adds support for a new command CMD11 in the Physical Layer Spec v3.01. As part of this procedure, we need to set 1.8V Signalling Enable (bit 3) of Host Control2 register, which if remains set after 5ms, means the switch to 1.8V signalling is successfull. Otherwise, we clear bit 24 of OCR and retry the initialization sequence. When we remove the card, and insert the same or another card, we need to make sure that we start with 3.3V signalling voltage. So we call mmc_set_signal_voltage() with MMC_SIGNAL_VOLTAGE_330 set so that we are back to 3.3V signalling voltage before we actually start initializing the card. Tested by Zhangfei Gao with a Toshiba uhs card and general hs card, on mmp2 in SDMA mode. Signed-off-by: Arindam Nath <arindam.nath@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Philip Rakity <prakity@marvell.com> Tested-by: Philip Rakity <prakity@marvell.com> Acked-by: Zhangfei Gao <zhangfei.gao@marvell.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>
2011-05-05 10:48:57 +04:00
}
mmc: core: Increase delay for voltage to stabilize from 3.3V to 1.8V Since the regulator used for the SDMMC IO voltage is not expected to draw a lot of current, most systems will probably use an inexpensive LDO for it. LDO regulators apparently have the feature that they don't actively drive the voltage down--they wait for other components in the system to drag the voltage down. Thus they will transition faster under heavy loads and slower under light loads. During an SDMMC voltage change from 3.3V to 1.8V, we are almost certainly under a light load. To be specific: * The regulator is hooked through pulls to CMD0-3 and DAT. Probably the CMD pulls are something like 47K and the DAT is something like 10K. * The card is supposed to be driving DAT0-3 low during voltage change which will draw _some_ current, but not a lot. * The regulator is also provided to the SDMMC host controller, but the SDMMC host controller is in open drain mode during the voltage change and so shouldn't be drawing much current. In order to keep the SDMMC host working properly (or for noise reasons), there might also be a capacitor attached to the SDMMC IO regulator. This also will have the effect of slowing down transitions of the regulator, especially under light loads. From experimental evidence, we've seen the voltage change fail if the card doesn't detect that the voltage fell to less than about 2.3V when we turn on the clock. On one device (that admittedly had a 47K CMD pullup instead of a 10K CMD pullup) we saw that the voltage was just about 2.3V after 5ms and thus the voltage change would sometimes fail. Doubling the delay gave margin and made the voltage change work 100% of the time, despite the slightly weaker CMD pull. At the moment submitting this as an RFC patch since my problem _could_ be fixed by increasing the pull strength (or using a smaller capacitor). However being a little bit more lenient to strange hardware could also be a good thing. Signed-off-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
2015-05-13 00:46:11 +03:00
/* Keep clock gated for at least 10 ms, though spec only says 5 ms */
mmc_delay(10);
host->ios.clock = clock;
mmc_set_ios(host);
/* Wait for at least 1 ms according to spec */
mmc_delay(1);
/*
* Failure to switch is indicated by the card holding
* dat[0:3] low
*/
if (host->ops->card_busy && host->ops->card_busy(host))
err = -EAGAIN;
power_cycle:
if (err) {
pr_debug("%s: Signal voltage switch failed, "
"power cycling card\n", mmc_hostname(host));
mmc_power_cycle(host, ocr);
}
return err;
mmc: sd: add support for signal voltage switch procedure Host Controller v3.00 adds another Capabilities register. Apart from other things, this new register indicates whether the Host Controller supports SDR50, SDR104, and DDR50 UHS-I modes. The spec doesn't mention about explicit support for SDR12 and SDR25 UHS-I modes, so the Host Controller v3.00 should support them by default. Also if the controller supports SDR104 mode, it will also support SDR50 mode as well. So depending on the host support, we set the corresponding MMC_CAP_* flags. One more new register. Host Control2 is added in v3.00, which is used during Signal Voltage Switch procedure described below. Since as per v3.00 spec, UHS-I supported hosts should set S18R to 1, we set S18R (bit 24) of OCR before sending ACMD41. We also need to set XPC (bit 28) of OCR in case the host can supply >150mA. This support is indicated by the Maximum Current Capabilities register of the Host Controller. If the response of ACMD41 has both CCS and S18A set, we start the signal voltage switch procedure, which if successfull, will switch the card from 3.3V signalling to 1.8V signalling. Signal voltage switch procedure adds support for a new command CMD11 in the Physical Layer Spec v3.01. As part of this procedure, we need to set 1.8V Signalling Enable (bit 3) of Host Control2 register, which if remains set after 5ms, means the switch to 1.8V signalling is successfull. Otherwise, we clear bit 24 of OCR and retry the initialization sequence. When we remove the card, and insert the same or another card, we need to make sure that we start with 3.3V signalling voltage. So we call mmc_set_signal_voltage() with MMC_SIGNAL_VOLTAGE_330 set so that we are back to 3.3V signalling voltage before we actually start initializing the card. Tested by Zhangfei Gao with a Toshiba uhs card and general hs card, on mmp2 in SDMA mode. Signed-off-by: Arindam Nath <arindam.nath@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Philip Rakity <prakity@marvell.com> Tested-by: Philip Rakity <prakity@marvell.com> Acked-by: Zhangfei Gao <zhangfei.gao@marvell.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>
2011-05-05 10:48:57 +04:00
}
/*
* Select timing parameters for host.
*/
void mmc_set_timing(struct mmc_host *host, unsigned int timing)
{
host->ios.timing = timing;
mmc_set_ios(host);
}
/*
* Select appropriate driver type for host.
*/
void mmc_set_driver_type(struct mmc_host *host, unsigned int drv_type)
{
host->ios.drv_type = drv_type;
mmc_set_ios(host);
}
int mmc_select_drive_strength(struct mmc_card *card, unsigned int max_dtr,
int card_drv_type, int *drv_type)
{
struct mmc_host *host = card->host;
int host_drv_type = SD_DRIVER_TYPE_B;
*drv_type = 0;
if (!host->ops->select_drive_strength)
return 0;
/* Use SD definition of driver strength for hosts */
if (host->caps & MMC_CAP_DRIVER_TYPE_A)
host_drv_type |= SD_DRIVER_TYPE_A;
if (host->caps & MMC_CAP_DRIVER_TYPE_C)
host_drv_type |= SD_DRIVER_TYPE_C;
if (host->caps & MMC_CAP_DRIVER_TYPE_D)
host_drv_type |= SD_DRIVER_TYPE_D;
/*
* The drive strength that the hardware can support
* depends on the board design. Pass the appropriate
* information and let the hardware specific code
* return what is possible given the options
*/
return host->ops->select_drive_strength(card, max_dtr,
host_drv_type,
card_drv_type,
drv_type);
}
/*
* Apply power to the MMC stack. This is a two-stage process.
* First, we enable power to the card without the clock running.
* We then wait a bit for the power to stabilise. Finally,
* enable the bus drivers and clock to the card.
*
* We must _NOT_ enable the clock prior to power stablising.
*
* If a host does all the power sequencing itself, ignore the
* initial MMC_POWER_UP stage.
*/
void mmc_power_up(struct mmc_host *host, u32 ocr)
{
if (host->ios.power_mode == MMC_POWER_ON)
return;
mmc_pwrseq_pre_power_on(host);
host->ios.vdd = fls(ocr) - 1;
host->ios.power_mode = MMC_POWER_UP;
/* Set initial state and call mmc_set_ios */
mmc_set_initial_state(host);
/* Try to set signal voltage to 3.3V but fall back to 1.8v or 1.2v */
if (!mmc_set_signal_voltage(host, MMC_SIGNAL_VOLTAGE_330))
dev_dbg(mmc_dev(host), "Initial signal voltage of 3.3v\n");
else if (!mmc_set_signal_voltage(host, MMC_SIGNAL_VOLTAGE_180))
dev_dbg(mmc_dev(host), "Initial signal voltage of 1.8v\n");
else if (!mmc_set_signal_voltage(host, MMC_SIGNAL_VOLTAGE_120))
dev_dbg(mmc_dev(host), "Initial signal voltage of 1.2v\n");
/*
* This delay should be sufficient to allow the power supply
* to reach the minimum voltage.
*/
mmc_delay(10);
mmc_pwrseq_post_power_on(host);
host->ios.clock = host->f_init;
host->ios.power_mode = MMC_POWER_ON;
mmc_set_ios(host);
/*
* This delay must be at least 74 clock sizes, or 1 ms, or the
* time required to reach a stable voltage.
*/
mmc_delay(10);
}
void mmc_power_off(struct mmc_host *host)
{
if (host->ios.power_mode == MMC_POWER_OFF)
return;
mmc_pwrseq_power_off(host);
host->ios.clock = 0;
host->ios.vdd = 0;
host->ios.power_mode = MMC_POWER_OFF;
/* Set initial state and call mmc_set_ios */
mmc_set_initial_state(host);
mmc: core: prevent aggressive clock gating racing with ios updates We have seen at least two different races when clock gating kicks in in a middle of ios structure update. First one happens when ios->clock is changed outside of aggressive clock gating framework, for example via mmc_set_clock(). The race might happen when we run following code: mmc_set_ios(): ... if (ios->clock > 0) mmc_set_ungated(host); Now if gating kicks in right after the condition check we end up setting host->clk_gated to false even though we have just gated the clock. Next time a request is started we try to ungate and restore the clock in mmc_host_clk_hold(). However since we have host->clk_gated set to false the original clock is not restored. This eventually will cause the host controller to hang since its clock is disabled while we are trying to issue a request. For example on Intel Medfield platform we see: [ 13.818610] mmc2: Timeout waiting for hardware interrupt. [ 13.818698] sdhci: =========== REGISTER DUMP (mmc2)=========== [ 13.818753] sdhci: Sys addr: 0x00000000 | Version: 0x00008901 [ 13.818804] sdhci: Blk size: 0x00000000 | Blk cnt: 0x00000000 [ 13.818853] sdhci: Argument: 0x00000000 | Trn mode: 0x00000000 [ 13.818903] sdhci: Present: 0x1fff0000 | Host ctl: 0x00000001 [ 13.818951] sdhci: Power: 0x0000000d | Blk gap: 0x00000000 [ 13.819000] sdhci: Wake-up: 0x00000000 | Clock: 0x00000000 [ 13.819049] sdhci: Timeout: 0x00000000 | Int stat: 0x00000000 [ 13.819098] sdhci: Int enab: 0x00ff00c3 | Sig enab: 0x00ff00c3 [ 13.819147] sdhci: AC12 err: 0x00000000 | Slot int: 0x00000000 [ 13.819196] sdhci: Caps: 0x6bee32b2 | Caps_1: 0x00000000 [ 13.819245] sdhci: Cmd: 0x00000000 | Max curr: 0x00000000 [ 13.819292] sdhci: Host ctl2: 0x00000000 [ 13.819331] sdhci: ADMA Err: 0x00000000 | ADMA Ptr: 0x00000000 [ 13.819377] sdhci: =========================================== [ 13.919605] mmc2: Reset 0x2 never completed. and it never recovers. Second race might happen while running mmc_power_off(): static void mmc_power_off(struct mmc_host *host) { host->ios.clock = 0; host->ios.vdd = 0; [ clock gating kicks in here ] /* * Reset ocr mask to be the highest possible voltage supported for * this mmc host. This value will be used at next power up. */ host->ocr = 1 << (fls(host->ocr_avail) - 1); if (!mmc_host_is_spi(host)) { host->ios.bus_mode = MMC_BUSMODE_OPENDRAIN; host->ios.chip_select = MMC_CS_DONTCARE; } host->ios.power_mode = MMC_POWER_OFF; host->ios.bus_width = MMC_BUS_WIDTH_1; host->ios.timing = MMC_TIMING_LEGACY; mmc_set_ios(host); } If the clock gating worker kicks in while we are only partially updated the ios structure the host controller gets incomplete ios and might not work as supposed. Again on Intel Medfield platform we get: [ 4.185349] kernel BUG at drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c:1155! [ 4.185422] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP [ 4.185509] Modules linked in: [ 4.185565] [ 4.185608] Pid: 4, comm: kworker/0:0 Not tainted 3.0.0+ #240 Intel Corporation Medfield/iCDKA [ 4.185742] EIP: 0060:[<c136364e>] EFLAGS: 00010083 CPU: 0 [ 4.185827] EIP is at sdhci_set_power+0x3e/0xd0 [ 4.185891] EAX: f5ff98e0 EBX: f5ff98e0 ECX: 00000000 EDX: 00000001 [ 4.185970] ESI: f5ff977c EDI: f5ff9904 EBP: f644fe98 ESP: f644fe94 [ 4.186049] DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 00d8 GS: 0000 SS: 0068 [ 4.186125] Process kworker/0:0 (pid: 4, ti=f644e000 task=f644c0e0 task.ti=f644e000) [ 4.186219] Stack: [ 4.186257] f5ff98e0 f644feb0 c1365173 00000282 f5ff9460 f5ff96e0 f5ff96e0 f644feec [ 4.186418] c1355bd8 f644c0e0 c1499c3d f5ff96e0 f644fed4 00000006 f5ff96e0 00000286 [ 4.186579] f644fedc c107922b f644feec 00000286 f5ff9460 f5ff9700 f644ff10 c135839e [ 4.186739] Call Trace: [ 4.186802] [<c1365173>] sdhci_set_ios+0x1c3/0x340 [ 4.186883] [<c1355bd8>] mmc_gate_clock+0x68/0x120 [ 4.186963] [<c1499c3d>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x4d/0x60 [ 4.187052] [<c107922b>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xb/0x10 [ 4.187134] [<c135839e>] mmc_host_clk_gate_delayed+0xbe/0x130 [ 4.187219] [<c105ec09>] ? process_one_work+0xf9/0x5b0 [ 4.187300] [<c135841d>] mmc_host_clk_gate_work+0xd/0x10 [ 4.187379] [<c105ec82>] process_one_work+0x172/0x5b0 [ 4.187457] [<c105ec09>] ? process_one_work+0xf9/0x5b0 [ 4.187538] [<c1358410>] ? mmc_host_clk_gate_delayed+0x130/0x130 [ 4.187625] [<c105f3c8>] worker_thread+0x118/0x330 [ 4.187700] [<c1496cee>] ? preempt_schedule+0x2e/0x50 [ 4.187779] [<c105f2b0>] ? rescuer_thread+0x1f0/0x1f0 [ 4.187857] [<c1062cf4>] kthread+0x74/0x80 [ 4.187931] [<c1062c80>] ? __init_kthread_worker+0x60/0x60 [ 4.188015] [<c149acfa>] kernel_thread_helper+0x6/0xd [ 4.188079] Code: 81 fa 00 00 04 00 0f 84 a7 00 00 00 7f 21 81 fa 80 00 00 00 0f 84 92 00 00 00 81 fa 00 00 0 [ 4.188780] EIP: [<c136364e>] sdhci_set_power+0x3e/0xd0 SS:ESP 0068:f644fe94 [ 4.188898] ---[ end trace a7b23eecc71777e4 ]--- This BUG() comes from the fact that ios.power_mode was still in previous value (MMC_POWER_ON) and ios.vdd was set to zero. We prevent these by inhibiting the clock gating while we update the ios structure. Both problems can be reproduced by simply running the device in a reboot loop. Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Tested-by: Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org> Cc: <stable@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>
2011-08-18 16:23:48 +04:00
/*
* Some configurations, such as the 802.11 SDIO card in the OLPC
* XO-1.5, require a short delay after poweroff before the card
* can be successfully turned on again.
*/
mmc_delay(1);
}
void mmc_power_cycle(struct mmc_host *host, u32 ocr)
{
mmc_power_off(host);
/* Wait at least 1 ms according to SD spec */
mmc_delay(1);
mmc_power_up(host, ocr);
}
/*
* Cleanup when the last reference to the bus operator is dropped.
*/
static void __mmc_release_bus(struct mmc_host *host)
{
WARN_ON(!host->bus_dead);
host->bus_ops = NULL;
}
/*
* Increase reference count of bus operator
*/
static inline void mmc_bus_get(struct mmc_host *host)
{
unsigned long flags;
spin_lock_irqsave(&host->lock, flags);
host->bus_refs++;
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&host->lock, flags);
}
/*
* Decrease reference count of bus operator and free it if
* it is the last reference.
*/
static inline void mmc_bus_put(struct mmc_host *host)
{
unsigned long flags;
spin_lock_irqsave(&host->lock, flags);
host->bus_refs--;
if ((host->bus_refs == 0) && host->bus_ops)
__mmc_release_bus(host);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&host->lock, flags);
}
/*
* Assign a mmc bus handler to a host. Only one bus handler may control a
* host at any given time.
*/
void mmc_attach_bus(struct mmc_host *host, const struct mmc_bus_ops *ops)
{
unsigned long flags;
WARN_ON(!host->claimed);
spin_lock_irqsave(&host->lock, flags);
WARN_ON(host->bus_ops);
WARN_ON(host->bus_refs);
host->bus_ops = ops;
host->bus_refs = 1;
host->bus_dead = 0;
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&host->lock, flags);
}
/*
* Remove the current bus handler from a host.
*/
void mmc_detach_bus(struct mmc_host *host)
{
unsigned long flags;
WARN_ON(!host->claimed);
WARN_ON(!host->bus_ops);
spin_lock_irqsave(&host->lock, flags);
host->bus_dead = 1;
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&host->lock, flags);
mmc_bus_put(host);
}
static void _mmc_detect_change(struct mmc_host *host, unsigned long delay,
bool cd_irq)
{
/*
* If the device is configured as wakeup, we prevent a new sleep for
* 5 s to give provision for user space to consume the event.
*/
if (cd_irq && !(host->caps & MMC_CAP_NEEDS_POLL) &&
device_can_wakeup(mmc_dev(host)))
pm_wakeup_event(mmc_dev(host), 5000);
host->detect_change = 1;
mmc_schedule_delayed_work(&host->detect, delay);
}
/**
* mmc_detect_change - process change of state on a MMC socket
* @host: host which changed state.
* @delay: optional delay to wait before detection (jiffies)
*
* MMC drivers should call this when they detect a card has been
* inserted or removed. The MMC layer will confirm that any
* present card is still functional, and initialize any newly
* inserted.
*/
void mmc_detect_change(struct mmc_host *host, unsigned long delay)
{
_mmc_detect_change(host, delay, true);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(mmc_detect_change);
mmc: add erase, secure erase, trim and secure trim operations SD/MMC cards tend to support an erase operation. In addition, eMMC v4.4 cards can support secure erase, trim and secure trim operations that are all variants of the basic erase command. SD/MMC device attributes "erase_size" and "preferred_erase_size" have been added. "erase_size" is the minimum size, in bytes, of an erase operation. For MMC, "erase_size" is the erase group size reported by the card. Note that "erase_size" does not apply to trim or secure trim operations where the minimum size is always one 512 byte sector. For SD, "erase_size" is 512 if the card is block-addressed, 0 otherwise. SD/MMC cards can erase an arbitrarily large area up to and including the whole card. When erasing a large area it may be desirable to do it in smaller chunks for three reasons: 1. A single erase command will make all other I/O on the card wait. This is not a problem if the whole card is being erased, but erasing one partition will make I/O for another partition on the same card wait for the duration of the erase - which could be a several minutes. 2. To be able to inform the user of erase progress. 3. The erase timeout becomes too large to be very useful. Because the erase timeout contains a margin which is multiplied by the size of the erase area, the value can end up being several minutes for large areas. "erase_size" is not the most efficient unit to erase (especially for SD where it is just one sector), hence "preferred_erase_size" provides a good chunk size for erasing large areas. For MMC, "preferred_erase_size" is the high-capacity erase size if a card specifies one, otherwise it is based on the capacity of the card. For SD, "preferred_erase_size" is the allocation unit size specified by the card. "preferred_erase_size" is in bytes. Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@nokia.com> Acked-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Cc: Kyungmin Park <kmpark@infradead.org> Cc: Madhusudhan Chikkature <madhu.cr@ti.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Ben Gardiner <bengardiner@nanometrics.ca> Cc: <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2010-08-12 01:17:46 +04:00
void mmc_init_erase(struct mmc_card *card)
{
unsigned int sz;
if (is_power_of_2(card->erase_size))
card->erase_shift = ffs(card->erase_size) - 1;
else
card->erase_shift = 0;
/*
* It is possible to erase an arbitrarily large area of an SD or MMC
* card. That is not desirable because it can take a long time
* (minutes) potentially delaying more important I/O, and also the
* timeout calculations become increasingly hugely over-estimated.
* Consequently, 'pref_erase' is defined as a guide to limit erases
* to that size and alignment.
*
* For SD cards that define Allocation Unit size, limit erases to one
* Allocation Unit at a time.
* For MMC, have a stab at ai good value and for modern cards it will
* end up being 4MiB. Note that if the value is too small, it can end
* up taking longer to erase. Also note, erase_size is already set to
* High Capacity Erase Size if available when this function is called.
mmc: add erase, secure erase, trim and secure trim operations SD/MMC cards tend to support an erase operation. In addition, eMMC v4.4 cards can support secure erase, trim and secure trim operations that are all variants of the basic erase command. SD/MMC device attributes "erase_size" and "preferred_erase_size" have been added. "erase_size" is the minimum size, in bytes, of an erase operation. For MMC, "erase_size" is the erase group size reported by the card. Note that "erase_size" does not apply to trim or secure trim operations where the minimum size is always one 512 byte sector. For SD, "erase_size" is 512 if the card is block-addressed, 0 otherwise. SD/MMC cards can erase an arbitrarily large area up to and including the whole card. When erasing a large area it may be desirable to do it in smaller chunks for three reasons: 1. A single erase command will make all other I/O on the card wait. This is not a problem if the whole card is being erased, but erasing one partition will make I/O for another partition on the same card wait for the duration of the erase - which could be a several minutes. 2. To be able to inform the user of erase progress. 3. The erase timeout becomes too large to be very useful. Because the erase timeout contains a margin which is multiplied by the size of the erase area, the value can end up being several minutes for large areas. "erase_size" is not the most efficient unit to erase (especially for SD where it is just one sector), hence "preferred_erase_size" provides a good chunk size for erasing large areas. For MMC, "preferred_erase_size" is the high-capacity erase size if a card specifies one, otherwise it is based on the capacity of the card. For SD, "preferred_erase_size" is the allocation unit size specified by the card. "preferred_erase_size" is in bytes. Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@nokia.com> Acked-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Cc: Kyungmin Park <kmpark@infradead.org> Cc: Madhusudhan Chikkature <madhu.cr@ti.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Ben Gardiner <bengardiner@nanometrics.ca> Cc: <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2010-08-12 01:17:46 +04:00
*/
if (mmc_card_sd(card) && card->ssr.au) {
card->pref_erase = card->ssr.au;
card->erase_shift = ffs(card->ssr.au) - 1;
mmc: core: resolve divded by zero panic With one special SD card, below divide by zero error observed: ... [ 2.144300] divide error: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP [ 2.148860] Modules linked in: [ 2.151898] [ 2.152685] Set up 4031 stolen pages starting at 0x0001f000, GTT offset 0K [ 2.157330] Set up 0 CI stolen pages starting at 0x00000000, GTT offset 131072K [ 2.167581] Pid: 5, comm: kworker/u:0 Not tainted 3.0.8-138216-g974a2ab #1 [ 2.169506] [drm] PSB GTT mem manager ready, tt_start 4031, tt_size 28737 pages [ 2.169906] [drm] SGX core id = 0x00000000 [ 2.169920] [drm] SGX core rev major = 0x00, minor = 0x00 [ 2.169934] [drm] SGX core rev maintenance = 0x00, designer = 0x00 [ 2.197370] Intel Corporation Medfield/iCDKB [ 2.201716] EIP: 0060:[<c1697ca6>] EFLAGS: 00010246 CPU: 1 [ 2.207198] EIP is at mmc_init_erase+0x76/0x150 [ 2.211704] EAX: 00002000 EBX: dcd1b400 ECX: 00002000 EDX: 00000000 [ 2.217957] ESI: 00000000 EDI: dcd5c800 EBP: dd867e84 ESP: dd867e7c [ 2.224214] DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 00d8 GS: 0000 SS: 0068 [ 2.229605] Process kworker/u:0 (pid: 5, ti=dd866000 task=dd868000 task.ti=dd866000) [ 2.237325] Stack: [ 2.239322] dcd1b400 00000000 dd867eb0 c16a06da c1ab7c44 dd995aa8 00000003 00000000 [ 2.247054] 00000000 00000000 dcd5c800 00000000 dcd1b400 dd867ef8 c16a1012 c1698b00 [ 2.254785] 00000029 00000001 c194eb80 dcd5c9ec dd867e00 c1239b00 00000000 00000000 [ 2.262519] Call Trace: [ 2.264975] [<c16a06da>] mmc_sd_setup_card+0x1da/0x4f0 [ 2.270183] [<c16a1012>] mmc_sd_init_card+0x192/0xc40 [ 2.275304] [<c1698b00>] ? __mmc_claim_host+0x160/0x160 [ 2.280610] [<c1239b00>] ? __schedule_bug+0x50/0x80 [ 2.285556] [<c16a1b89>] mmc_attach_sd+0xc9/0x230 [ 2.290333] [<c169b6ef>] mmc_rescan+0x25f/0x2c0 [ 2.294943] [<c1274223>] process_one_work+0x103/0x400 [ 2.300065] [<c12670fd>] ? mod_timer+0x1ad/0x3c0 [ 2.304756] [<c169b490>] ? mmc_suspend_host+0x1a0/0x1a0 [ 2.310056] [<c127502d>] worker_thread+0x12d/0x4a0 [ 2.314921] [<c18fcfbd>] ? preempt_schedule+0x2d/0x50 [ 2.320047] [<c1274f00[ 2.323976] ---[ end trace 5398ec2720494438 ]--- ... So, seems this bad SD card does not set valid value in related SSR / CSD register fields. And then the driver will set card->erase_size to 0. Then it triggered this divided by zero error when calculate card->pref_erase. Submit this patch to fix the issue. Signed-off-by: Yunpeng Gao <yunpeng.gao@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Chuanxiao Dong <chuanxiao.dong@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
2014-08-14 14:29:24 +04:00
} else if (card->erase_size) {
mmc: add erase, secure erase, trim and secure trim operations SD/MMC cards tend to support an erase operation. In addition, eMMC v4.4 cards can support secure erase, trim and secure trim operations that are all variants of the basic erase command. SD/MMC device attributes "erase_size" and "preferred_erase_size" have been added. "erase_size" is the minimum size, in bytes, of an erase operation. For MMC, "erase_size" is the erase group size reported by the card. Note that "erase_size" does not apply to trim or secure trim operations where the minimum size is always one 512 byte sector. For SD, "erase_size" is 512 if the card is block-addressed, 0 otherwise. SD/MMC cards can erase an arbitrarily large area up to and including the whole card. When erasing a large area it may be desirable to do it in smaller chunks for three reasons: 1. A single erase command will make all other I/O on the card wait. This is not a problem if the whole card is being erased, but erasing one partition will make I/O for another partition on the same card wait for the duration of the erase - which could be a several minutes. 2. To be able to inform the user of erase progress. 3. The erase timeout becomes too large to be very useful. Because the erase timeout contains a margin which is multiplied by the size of the erase area, the value can end up being several minutes for large areas. "erase_size" is not the most efficient unit to erase (especially for SD where it is just one sector), hence "preferred_erase_size" provides a good chunk size for erasing large areas. For MMC, "preferred_erase_size" is the high-capacity erase size if a card specifies one, otherwise it is based on the capacity of the card. For SD, "preferred_erase_size" is the allocation unit size specified by the card. "preferred_erase_size" is in bytes. Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@nokia.com> Acked-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Cc: Kyungmin Park <kmpark@infradead.org> Cc: Madhusudhan Chikkature <madhu.cr@ti.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Ben Gardiner <bengardiner@nanometrics.ca> Cc: <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2010-08-12 01:17:46 +04:00
sz = (card->csd.capacity << (card->csd.read_blkbits - 9)) >> 11;
if (sz < 128)
card->pref_erase = 512 * 1024 / 512;
else if (sz < 512)
card->pref_erase = 1024 * 1024 / 512;
else if (sz < 1024)
card->pref_erase = 2 * 1024 * 1024 / 512;
else
card->pref_erase = 4 * 1024 * 1024 / 512;
if (card->pref_erase < card->erase_size)
card->pref_erase = card->erase_size;
else {
sz = card->pref_erase % card->erase_size;
if (sz)
card->pref_erase += card->erase_size - sz;
}
mmc: core: resolve divded by zero panic With one special SD card, below divide by zero error observed: ... [ 2.144300] divide error: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP [ 2.148860] Modules linked in: [ 2.151898] [ 2.152685] Set up 4031 stolen pages starting at 0x0001f000, GTT offset 0K [ 2.157330] Set up 0 CI stolen pages starting at 0x00000000, GTT offset 131072K [ 2.167581] Pid: 5, comm: kworker/u:0 Not tainted 3.0.8-138216-g974a2ab #1 [ 2.169506] [drm] PSB GTT mem manager ready, tt_start 4031, tt_size 28737 pages [ 2.169906] [drm] SGX core id = 0x00000000 [ 2.169920] [drm] SGX core rev major = 0x00, minor = 0x00 [ 2.169934] [drm] SGX core rev maintenance = 0x00, designer = 0x00 [ 2.197370] Intel Corporation Medfield/iCDKB [ 2.201716] EIP: 0060:[<c1697ca6>] EFLAGS: 00010246 CPU: 1 [ 2.207198] EIP is at mmc_init_erase+0x76/0x150 [ 2.211704] EAX: 00002000 EBX: dcd1b400 ECX: 00002000 EDX: 00000000 [ 2.217957] ESI: 00000000 EDI: dcd5c800 EBP: dd867e84 ESP: dd867e7c [ 2.224214] DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 00d8 GS: 0000 SS: 0068 [ 2.229605] Process kworker/u:0 (pid: 5, ti=dd866000 task=dd868000 task.ti=dd866000) [ 2.237325] Stack: [ 2.239322] dcd1b400 00000000 dd867eb0 c16a06da c1ab7c44 dd995aa8 00000003 00000000 [ 2.247054] 00000000 00000000 dcd5c800 00000000 dcd1b400 dd867ef8 c16a1012 c1698b00 [ 2.254785] 00000029 00000001 c194eb80 dcd5c9ec dd867e00 c1239b00 00000000 00000000 [ 2.262519] Call Trace: [ 2.264975] [<c16a06da>] mmc_sd_setup_card+0x1da/0x4f0 [ 2.270183] [<c16a1012>] mmc_sd_init_card+0x192/0xc40 [ 2.275304] [<c1698b00>] ? __mmc_claim_host+0x160/0x160 [ 2.280610] [<c1239b00>] ? __schedule_bug+0x50/0x80 [ 2.285556] [<c16a1b89>] mmc_attach_sd+0xc9/0x230 [ 2.290333] [<c169b6ef>] mmc_rescan+0x25f/0x2c0 [ 2.294943] [<c1274223>] process_one_work+0x103/0x400 [ 2.300065] [<c12670fd>] ? mod_timer+0x1ad/0x3c0 [ 2.304756] [<c169b490>] ? mmc_suspend_host+0x1a0/0x1a0 [ 2.310056] [<c127502d>] worker_thread+0x12d/0x4a0 [ 2.314921] [<c18fcfbd>] ? preempt_schedule+0x2d/0x50 [ 2.320047] [<c1274f00[ 2.323976] ---[ end trace 5398ec2720494438 ]--- ... So, seems this bad SD card does not set valid value in related SSR / CSD register fields. And then the driver will set card->erase_size to 0. Then it triggered this divided by zero error when calculate card->pref_erase. Submit this patch to fix the issue. Signed-off-by: Yunpeng Gao <yunpeng.gao@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Chuanxiao Dong <chuanxiao.dong@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
2014-08-14 14:29:24 +04:00
} else
card->pref_erase = 0;
mmc: add erase, secure erase, trim and secure trim operations SD/MMC cards tend to support an erase operation. In addition, eMMC v4.4 cards can support secure erase, trim and secure trim operations that are all variants of the basic erase command. SD/MMC device attributes "erase_size" and "preferred_erase_size" have been added. "erase_size" is the minimum size, in bytes, of an erase operation. For MMC, "erase_size" is the erase group size reported by the card. Note that "erase_size" does not apply to trim or secure trim operations where the minimum size is always one 512 byte sector. For SD, "erase_size" is 512 if the card is block-addressed, 0 otherwise. SD/MMC cards can erase an arbitrarily large area up to and including the whole card. When erasing a large area it may be desirable to do it in smaller chunks for three reasons: 1. A single erase command will make all other I/O on the card wait. This is not a problem if the whole card is being erased, but erasing one partition will make I/O for another partition on the same card wait for the duration of the erase - which could be a several minutes. 2. To be able to inform the user of erase progress. 3. The erase timeout becomes too large to be very useful. Because the erase timeout contains a margin which is multiplied by the size of the erase area, the value can end up being several minutes for large areas. "erase_size" is not the most efficient unit to erase (especially for SD where it is just one sector), hence "preferred_erase_size" provides a good chunk size for erasing large areas. For MMC, "preferred_erase_size" is the high-capacity erase size if a card specifies one, otherwise it is based on the capacity of the card. For SD, "preferred_erase_size" is the allocation unit size specified by the card. "preferred_erase_size" is in bytes. Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@nokia.com> Acked-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Cc: Kyungmin Park <kmpark@infradead.org> Cc: Madhusudhan Chikkature <madhu.cr@ti.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Ben Gardiner <bengardiner@nanometrics.ca> Cc: <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2010-08-12 01:17:46 +04:00
}
static unsigned int mmc_mmc_erase_timeout(struct mmc_card *card,
unsigned int arg, unsigned int qty)
mmc: add erase, secure erase, trim and secure trim operations SD/MMC cards tend to support an erase operation. In addition, eMMC v4.4 cards can support secure erase, trim and secure trim operations that are all variants of the basic erase command. SD/MMC device attributes "erase_size" and "preferred_erase_size" have been added. "erase_size" is the minimum size, in bytes, of an erase operation. For MMC, "erase_size" is the erase group size reported by the card. Note that "erase_size" does not apply to trim or secure trim operations where the minimum size is always one 512 byte sector. For SD, "erase_size" is 512 if the card is block-addressed, 0 otherwise. SD/MMC cards can erase an arbitrarily large area up to and including the whole card. When erasing a large area it may be desirable to do it in smaller chunks for three reasons: 1. A single erase command will make all other I/O on the card wait. This is not a problem if the whole card is being erased, but erasing one partition will make I/O for another partition on the same card wait for the duration of the erase - which could be a several minutes. 2. To be able to inform the user of erase progress. 3. The erase timeout becomes too large to be very useful. Because the erase timeout contains a margin which is multiplied by the size of the erase area, the value can end up being several minutes for large areas. "erase_size" is not the most efficient unit to erase (especially for SD where it is just one sector), hence "preferred_erase_size" provides a good chunk size for erasing large areas. For MMC, "preferred_erase_size" is the high-capacity erase size if a card specifies one, otherwise it is based on the capacity of the card. For SD, "preferred_erase_size" is the allocation unit size specified by the card. "preferred_erase_size" is in bytes. Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@nokia.com> Acked-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Cc: Kyungmin Park <kmpark@infradead.org> Cc: Madhusudhan Chikkature <madhu.cr@ti.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Ben Gardiner <bengardiner@nanometrics.ca> Cc: <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2010-08-12 01:17:46 +04:00
{
unsigned int erase_timeout;
if (arg == MMC_DISCARD_ARG ||
(arg == MMC_TRIM_ARG && card->ext_csd.rev >= 6)) {
erase_timeout = card->ext_csd.trim_timeout;
} else if (card->ext_csd.erase_group_def & 1) {
mmc: add erase, secure erase, trim and secure trim operations SD/MMC cards tend to support an erase operation. In addition, eMMC v4.4 cards can support secure erase, trim and secure trim operations that are all variants of the basic erase command. SD/MMC device attributes "erase_size" and "preferred_erase_size" have been added. "erase_size" is the minimum size, in bytes, of an erase operation. For MMC, "erase_size" is the erase group size reported by the card. Note that "erase_size" does not apply to trim or secure trim operations where the minimum size is always one 512 byte sector. For SD, "erase_size" is 512 if the card is block-addressed, 0 otherwise. SD/MMC cards can erase an arbitrarily large area up to and including the whole card. When erasing a large area it may be desirable to do it in smaller chunks for three reasons: 1. A single erase command will make all other I/O on the card wait. This is not a problem if the whole card is being erased, but erasing one partition will make I/O for another partition on the same card wait for the duration of the erase - which could be a several minutes. 2. To be able to inform the user of erase progress. 3. The erase timeout becomes too large to be very useful. Because the erase timeout contains a margin which is multiplied by the size of the erase area, the value can end up being several minutes for large areas. "erase_size" is not the most efficient unit to erase (especially for SD where it is just one sector), hence "preferred_erase_size" provides a good chunk size for erasing large areas. For MMC, "preferred_erase_size" is the high-capacity erase size if a card specifies one, otherwise it is based on the capacity of the card. For SD, "preferred_erase_size" is the allocation unit size specified by the card. "preferred_erase_size" is in bytes. Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@nokia.com> Acked-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Cc: Kyungmin Park <kmpark@infradead.org> Cc: Madhusudhan Chikkature <madhu.cr@ti.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Ben Gardiner <bengardiner@nanometrics.ca> Cc: <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2010-08-12 01:17:46 +04:00
/* High Capacity Erase Group Size uses HC timeouts */
if (arg == MMC_TRIM_ARG)
erase_timeout = card->ext_csd.trim_timeout;
else
erase_timeout = card->ext_csd.hc_erase_timeout;
} else {
/* CSD Erase Group Size uses write timeout */
unsigned int mult = (10 << card->csd.r2w_factor);
unsigned int timeout_clks = card->csd.taac_clks * mult;
mmc: add erase, secure erase, trim and secure trim operations SD/MMC cards tend to support an erase operation. In addition, eMMC v4.4 cards can support secure erase, trim and secure trim operations that are all variants of the basic erase command. SD/MMC device attributes "erase_size" and "preferred_erase_size" have been added. "erase_size" is the minimum size, in bytes, of an erase operation. For MMC, "erase_size" is the erase group size reported by the card. Note that "erase_size" does not apply to trim or secure trim operations where the minimum size is always one 512 byte sector. For SD, "erase_size" is 512 if the card is block-addressed, 0 otherwise. SD/MMC cards can erase an arbitrarily large area up to and including the whole card. When erasing a large area it may be desirable to do it in smaller chunks for three reasons: 1. A single erase command will make all other I/O on the card wait. This is not a problem if the whole card is being erased, but erasing one partition will make I/O for another partition on the same card wait for the duration of the erase - which could be a several minutes. 2. To be able to inform the user of erase progress. 3. The erase timeout becomes too large to be very useful. Because the erase timeout contains a margin which is multiplied by the size of the erase area, the value can end up being several minutes for large areas. "erase_size" is not the most efficient unit to erase (especially for SD where it is just one sector), hence "preferred_erase_size" provides a good chunk size for erasing large areas. For MMC, "preferred_erase_size" is the high-capacity erase size if a card specifies one, otherwise it is based on the capacity of the card. For SD, "preferred_erase_size" is the allocation unit size specified by the card. "preferred_erase_size" is in bytes. Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@nokia.com> Acked-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Cc: Kyungmin Park <kmpark@infradead.org> Cc: Madhusudhan Chikkature <madhu.cr@ti.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Ben Gardiner <bengardiner@nanometrics.ca> Cc: <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2010-08-12 01:17:46 +04:00
unsigned int timeout_us;
/* Avoid overflow: e.g. taac_ns=80000000 mult=1280 */
if (card->csd.taac_ns < 1000000)
timeout_us = (card->csd.taac_ns * mult) / 1000;
mmc: add erase, secure erase, trim and secure trim operations SD/MMC cards tend to support an erase operation. In addition, eMMC v4.4 cards can support secure erase, trim and secure trim operations that are all variants of the basic erase command. SD/MMC device attributes "erase_size" and "preferred_erase_size" have been added. "erase_size" is the minimum size, in bytes, of an erase operation. For MMC, "erase_size" is the erase group size reported by the card. Note that "erase_size" does not apply to trim or secure trim operations where the minimum size is always one 512 byte sector. For SD, "erase_size" is 512 if the card is block-addressed, 0 otherwise. SD/MMC cards can erase an arbitrarily large area up to and including the whole card. When erasing a large area it may be desirable to do it in smaller chunks for three reasons: 1. A single erase command will make all other I/O on the card wait. This is not a problem if the whole card is being erased, but erasing one partition will make I/O for another partition on the same card wait for the duration of the erase - which could be a several minutes. 2. To be able to inform the user of erase progress. 3. The erase timeout becomes too large to be very useful. Because the erase timeout contains a margin which is multiplied by the size of the erase area, the value can end up being several minutes for large areas. "erase_size" is not the most efficient unit to erase (especially for SD where it is just one sector), hence "preferred_erase_size" provides a good chunk size for erasing large areas. For MMC, "preferred_erase_size" is the high-capacity erase size if a card specifies one, otherwise it is based on the capacity of the card. For SD, "preferred_erase_size" is the allocation unit size specified by the card. "preferred_erase_size" is in bytes. Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@nokia.com> Acked-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Cc: Kyungmin Park <kmpark@infradead.org> Cc: Madhusudhan Chikkature <madhu.cr@ti.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Ben Gardiner <bengardiner@nanometrics.ca> Cc: <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2010-08-12 01:17:46 +04:00
else
timeout_us = (card->csd.taac_ns / 1000) * mult;
mmc: add erase, secure erase, trim and secure trim operations SD/MMC cards tend to support an erase operation. In addition, eMMC v4.4 cards can support secure erase, trim and secure trim operations that are all variants of the basic erase command. SD/MMC device attributes "erase_size" and "preferred_erase_size" have been added. "erase_size" is the minimum size, in bytes, of an erase operation. For MMC, "erase_size" is the erase group size reported by the card. Note that "erase_size" does not apply to trim or secure trim operations where the minimum size is always one 512 byte sector. For SD, "erase_size" is 512 if the card is block-addressed, 0 otherwise. SD/MMC cards can erase an arbitrarily large area up to and including the whole card. When erasing a large area it may be desirable to do it in smaller chunks for three reasons: 1. A single erase command will make all other I/O on the card wait. This is not a problem if the whole card is being erased, but erasing one partition will make I/O for another partition on the same card wait for the duration of the erase - which could be a several minutes. 2. To be able to inform the user of erase progress. 3. The erase timeout becomes too large to be very useful. Because the erase timeout contains a margin which is multiplied by the size of the erase area, the value can end up being several minutes for large areas. "erase_size" is not the most efficient unit to erase (especially for SD where it is just one sector), hence "preferred_erase_size" provides a good chunk size for erasing large areas. For MMC, "preferred_erase_size" is the high-capacity erase size if a card specifies one, otherwise it is based on the capacity of the card. For SD, "preferred_erase_size" is the allocation unit size specified by the card. "preferred_erase_size" is in bytes. Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@nokia.com> Acked-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Cc: Kyungmin Park <kmpark@infradead.org> Cc: Madhusudhan Chikkature <madhu.cr@ti.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Ben Gardiner <bengardiner@nanometrics.ca> Cc: <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2010-08-12 01:17:46 +04:00
/*
* ios.clock is only a target. The real clock rate might be
* less but not that much less, so fudge it by multiplying by 2.
*/
timeout_clks <<= 1;
timeout_us += (timeout_clks * 1000) /
(card->host->ios.clock / 1000);
mmc: add erase, secure erase, trim and secure trim operations SD/MMC cards tend to support an erase operation. In addition, eMMC v4.4 cards can support secure erase, trim and secure trim operations that are all variants of the basic erase command. SD/MMC device attributes "erase_size" and "preferred_erase_size" have been added. "erase_size" is the minimum size, in bytes, of an erase operation. For MMC, "erase_size" is the erase group size reported by the card. Note that "erase_size" does not apply to trim or secure trim operations where the minimum size is always one 512 byte sector. For SD, "erase_size" is 512 if the card is block-addressed, 0 otherwise. SD/MMC cards can erase an arbitrarily large area up to and including the whole card. When erasing a large area it may be desirable to do it in smaller chunks for three reasons: 1. A single erase command will make all other I/O on the card wait. This is not a problem if the whole card is being erased, but erasing one partition will make I/O for another partition on the same card wait for the duration of the erase - which could be a several minutes. 2. To be able to inform the user of erase progress. 3. The erase timeout becomes too large to be very useful. Because the erase timeout contains a margin which is multiplied by the size of the erase area, the value can end up being several minutes for large areas. "erase_size" is not the most efficient unit to erase (especially for SD where it is just one sector), hence "preferred_erase_size" provides a good chunk size for erasing large areas. For MMC, "preferred_erase_size" is the high-capacity erase size if a card specifies one, otherwise it is based on the capacity of the card. For SD, "preferred_erase_size" is the allocation unit size specified by the card. "preferred_erase_size" is in bytes. Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@nokia.com> Acked-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Cc: Kyungmin Park <kmpark@infradead.org> Cc: Madhusudhan Chikkature <madhu.cr@ti.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Ben Gardiner <bengardiner@nanometrics.ca> Cc: <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2010-08-12 01:17:46 +04:00
erase_timeout = timeout_us / 1000;
/*
* Theoretically, the calculation could underflow so round up
* to 1ms in that case.
*/
if (!erase_timeout)
erase_timeout = 1;
}
/* Multiplier for secure operations */
if (arg & MMC_SECURE_ARGS) {
if (arg == MMC_SECURE_ERASE_ARG)
erase_timeout *= card->ext_csd.sec_erase_mult;
else
erase_timeout *= card->ext_csd.sec_trim_mult;
}
erase_timeout *= qty;
/*
* Ensure at least a 1 second timeout for SPI as per
* 'mmc_set_data_timeout()'
*/
if (mmc_host_is_spi(card->host) && erase_timeout < 1000)
erase_timeout = 1000;
return erase_timeout;
mmc: add erase, secure erase, trim and secure trim operations SD/MMC cards tend to support an erase operation. In addition, eMMC v4.4 cards can support secure erase, trim and secure trim operations that are all variants of the basic erase command. SD/MMC device attributes "erase_size" and "preferred_erase_size" have been added. "erase_size" is the minimum size, in bytes, of an erase operation. For MMC, "erase_size" is the erase group size reported by the card. Note that "erase_size" does not apply to trim or secure trim operations where the minimum size is always one 512 byte sector. For SD, "erase_size" is 512 if the card is block-addressed, 0 otherwise. SD/MMC cards can erase an arbitrarily large area up to and including the whole card. When erasing a large area it may be desirable to do it in smaller chunks for three reasons: 1. A single erase command will make all other I/O on the card wait. This is not a problem if the whole card is being erased, but erasing one partition will make I/O for another partition on the same card wait for the duration of the erase - which could be a several minutes. 2. To be able to inform the user of erase progress. 3. The erase timeout becomes too large to be very useful. Because the erase timeout contains a margin which is multiplied by the size of the erase area, the value can end up being several minutes for large areas. "erase_size" is not the most efficient unit to erase (especially for SD where it is just one sector), hence "preferred_erase_size" provides a good chunk size for erasing large areas. For MMC, "preferred_erase_size" is the high-capacity erase size if a card specifies one, otherwise it is based on the capacity of the card. For SD, "preferred_erase_size" is the allocation unit size specified by the card. "preferred_erase_size" is in bytes. Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@nokia.com> Acked-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Cc: Kyungmin Park <kmpark@infradead.org> Cc: Madhusudhan Chikkature <madhu.cr@ti.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Ben Gardiner <bengardiner@nanometrics.ca> Cc: <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2010-08-12 01:17:46 +04:00
}
static unsigned int mmc_sd_erase_timeout(struct mmc_card *card,
unsigned int arg,
unsigned int qty)
mmc: add erase, secure erase, trim and secure trim operations SD/MMC cards tend to support an erase operation. In addition, eMMC v4.4 cards can support secure erase, trim and secure trim operations that are all variants of the basic erase command. SD/MMC device attributes "erase_size" and "preferred_erase_size" have been added. "erase_size" is the minimum size, in bytes, of an erase operation. For MMC, "erase_size" is the erase group size reported by the card. Note that "erase_size" does not apply to trim or secure trim operations where the minimum size is always one 512 byte sector. For SD, "erase_size" is 512 if the card is block-addressed, 0 otherwise. SD/MMC cards can erase an arbitrarily large area up to and including the whole card. When erasing a large area it may be desirable to do it in smaller chunks for three reasons: 1. A single erase command will make all other I/O on the card wait. This is not a problem if the whole card is being erased, but erasing one partition will make I/O for another partition on the same card wait for the duration of the erase - which could be a several minutes. 2. To be able to inform the user of erase progress. 3. The erase timeout becomes too large to be very useful. Because the erase timeout contains a margin which is multiplied by the size of the erase area, the value can end up being several minutes for large areas. "erase_size" is not the most efficient unit to erase (especially for SD where it is just one sector), hence "preferred_erase_size" provides a good chunk size for erasing large areas. For MMC, "preferred_erase_size" is the high-capacity erase size if a card specifies one, otherwise it is based on the capacity of the card. For SD, "preferred_erase_size" is the allocation unit size specified by the card. "preferred_erase_size" is in bytes. Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@nokia.com> Acked-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Cc: Kyungmin Park <kmpark@infradead.org> Cc: Madhusudhan Chikkature <madhu.cr@ti.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Ben Gardiner <bengardiner@nanometrics.ca> Cc: <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2010-08-12 01:17:46 +04:00
{
unsigned int erase_timeout;
mmc: add erase, secure erase, trim and secure trim operations SD/MMC cards tend to support an erase operation. In addition, eMMC v4.4 cards can support secure erase, trim and secure trim operations that are all variants of the basic erase command. SD/MMC device attributes "erase_size" and "preferred_erase_size" have been added. "erase_size" is the minimum size, in bytes, of an erase operation. For MMC, "erase_size" is the erase group size reported by the card. Note that "erase_size" does not apply to trim or secure trim operations where the minimum size is always one 512 byte sector. For SD, "erase_size" is 512 if the card is block-addressed, 0 otherwise. SD/MMC cards can erase an arbitrarily large area up to and including the whole card. When erasing a large area it may be desirable to do it in smaller chunks for three reasons: 1. A single erase command will make all other I/O on the card wait. This is not a problem if the whole card is being erased, but erasing one partition will make I/O for another partition on the same card wait for the duration of the erase - which could be a several minutes. 2. To be able to inform the user of erase progress. 3. The erase timeout becomes too large to be very useful. Because the erase timeout contains a margin which is multiplied by the size of the erase area, the value can end up being several minutes for large areas. "erase_size" is not the most efficient unit to erase (especially for SD where it is just one sector), hence "preferred_erase_size" provides a good chunk size for erasing large areas. For MMC, "preferred_erase_size" is the high-capacity erase size if a card specifies one, otherwise it is based on the capacity of the card. For SD, "preferred_erase_size" is the allocation unit size specified by the card. "preferred_erase_size" is in bytes. Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@nokia.com> Acked-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Cc: Kyungmin Park <kmpark@infradead.org> Cc: Madhusudhan Chikkature <madhu.cr@ti.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Ben Gardiner <bengardiner@nanometrics.ca> Cc: <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2010-08-12 01:17:46 +04:00
if (card->ssr.erase_timeout) {
/* Erase timeout specified in SD Status Register (SSR) */
erase_timeout = card->ssr.erase_timeout * qty +
card->ssr.erase_offset;
mmc: add erase, secure erase, trim and secure trim operations SD/MMC cards tend to support an erase operation. In addition, eMMC v4.4 cards can support secure erase, trim and secure trim operations that are all variants of the basic erase command. SD/MMC device attributes "erase_size" and "preferred_erase_size" have been added. "erase_size" is the minimum size, in bytes, of an erase operation. For MMC, "erase_size" is the erase group size reported by the card. Note that "erase_size" does not apply to trim or secure trim operations where the minimum size is always one 512 byte sector. For SD, "erase_size" is 512 if the card is block-addressed, 0 otherwise. SD/MMC cards can erase an arbitrarily large area up to and including the whole card. When erasing a large area it may be desirable to do it in smaller chunks for three reasons: 1. A single erase command will make all other I/O on the card wait. This is not a problem if the whole card is being erased, but erasing one partition will make I/O for another partition on the same card wait for the duration of the erase - which could be a several minutes. 2. To be able to inform the user of erase progress. 3. The erase timeout becomes too large to be very useful. Because the erase timeout contains a margin which is multiplied by the size of the erase area, the value can end up being several minutes for large areas. "erase_size" is not the most efficient unit to erase (especially for SD where it is just one sector), hence "preferred_erase_size" provides a good chunk size for erasing large areas. For MMC, "preferred_erase_size" is the high-capacity erase size if a card specifies one, otherwise it is based on the capacity of the card. For SD, "preferred_erase_size" is the allocation unit size specified by the card. "preferred_erase_size" is in bytes. Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@nokia.com> Acked-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Cc: Kyungmin Park <kmpark@infradead.org> Cc: Madhusudhan Chikkature <madhu.cr@ti.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Ben Gardiner <bengardiner@nanometrics.ca> Cc: <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2010-08-12 01:17:46 +04:00
} else {
/*
* Erase timeout not specified in SD Status Register (SSR) so
* use 250ms per write block.
*/
erase_timeout = 250 * qty;
mmc: add erase, secure erase, trim and secure trim operations SD/MMC cards tend to support an erase operation. In addition, eMMC v4.4 cards can support secure erase, trim and secure trim operations that are all variants of the basic erase command. SD/MMC device attributes "erase_size" and "preferred_erase_size" have been added. "erase_size" is the minimum size, in bytes, of an erase operation. For MMC, "erase_size" is the erase group size reported by the card. Note that "erase_size" does not apply to trim or secure trim operations where the minimum size is always one 512 byte sector. For SD, "erase_size" is 512 if the card is block-addressed, 0 otherwise. SD/MMC cards can erase an arbitrarily large area up to and including the whole card. When erasing a large area it may be desirable to do it in smaller chunks for three reasons: 1. A single erase command will make all other I/O on the card wait. This is not a problem if the whole card is being erased, but erasing one partition will make I/O for another partition on the same card wait for the duration of the erase - which could be a several minutes. 2. To be able to inform the user of erase progress. 3. The erase timeout becomes too large to be very useful. Because the erase timeout contains a margin which is multiplied by the size of the erase area, the value can end up being several minutes for large areas. "erase_size" is not the most efficient unit to erase (especially for SD where it is just one sector), hence "preferred_erase_size" provides a good chunk size for erasing large areas. For MMC, "preferred_erase_size" is the high-capacity erase size if a card specifies one, otherwise it is based on the capacity of the card. For SD, "preferred_erase_size" is the allocation unit size specified by the card. "preferred_erase_size" is in bytes. Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@nokia.com> Acked-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Cc: Kyungmin Park <kmpark@infradead.org> Cc: Madhusudhan Chikkature <madhu.cr@ti.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Ben Gardiner <bengardiner@nanometrics.ca> Cc: <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2010-08-12 01:17:46 +04:00
}
/* Must not be less than 1 second */
if (erase_timeout < 1000)
erase_timeout = 1000;
return erase_timeout;
mmc: add erase, secure erase, trim and secure trim operations SD/MMC cards tend to support an erase operation. In addition, eMMC v4.4 cards can support secure erase, trim and secure trim operations that are all variants of the basic erase command. SD/MMC device attributes "erase_size" and "preferred_erase_size" have been added. "erase_size" is the minimum size, in bytes, of an erase operation. For MMC, "erase_size" is the erase group size reported by the card. Note that "erase_size" does not apply to trim or secure trim operations where the minimum size is always one 512 byte sector. For SD, "erase_size" is 512 if the card is block-addressed, 0 otherwise. SD/MMC cards can erase an arbitrarily large area up to and including the whole card. When erasing a large area it may be desirable to do it in smaller chunks for three reasons: 1. A single erase command will make all other I/O on the card wait. This is not a problem if the whole card is being erased, but erasing one partition will make I/O for another partition on the same card wait for the duration of the erase - which could be a several minutes. 2. To be able to inform the user of erase progress. 3. The erase timeout becomes too large to be very useful. Because the erase timeout contains a margin which is multiplied by the size of the erase area, the value can end up being several minutes for large areas. "erase_size" is not the most efficient unit to erase (especially for SD where it is just one sector), hence "preferred_erase_size" provides a good chunk size for erasing large areas. For MMC, "preferred_erase_size" is the high-capacity erase size if a card specifies one, otherwise it is based on the capacity of the card. For SD, "preferred_erase_size" is the allocation unit size specified by the card. "preferred_erase_size" is in bytes. Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@nokia.com> Acked-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Cc: Kyungmin Park <kmpark@infradead.org> Cc: Madhusudhan Chikkature <madhu.cr@ti.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Ben Gardiner <bengardiner@nanometrics.ca> Cc: <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2010-08-12 01:17:46 +04:00
}
static unsigned int mmc_erase_timeout(struct mmc_card *card,
unsigned int arg,
unsigned int qty)
mmc: add erase, secure erase, trim and secure trim operations SD/MMC cards tend to support an erase operation. In addition, eMMC v4.4 cards can support secure erase, trim and secure trim operations that are all variants of the basic erase command. SD/MMC device attributes "erase_size" and "preferred_erase_size" have been added. "erase_size" is the minimum size, in bytes, of an erase operation. For MMC, "erase_size" is the erase group size reported by the card. Note that "erase_size" does not apply to trim or secure trim operations where the minimum size is always one 512 byte sector. For SD, "erase_size" is 512 if the card is block-addressed, 0 otherwise. SD/MMC cards can erase an arbitrarily large area up to and including the whole card. When erasing a large area it may be desirable to do it in smaller chunks for three reasons: 1. A single erase command will make all other I/O on the card wait. This is not a problem if the whole card is being erased, but erasing one partition will make I/O for another partition on the same card wait for the duration of the erase - which could be a several minutes. 2. To be able to inform the user of erase progress. 3. The erase timeout becomes too large to be very useful. Because the erase timeout contains a margin which is multiplied by the size of the erase area, the value can end up being several minutes for large areas. "erase_size" is not the most efficient unit to erase (especially for SD where it is just one sector), hence "preferred_erase_size" provides a good chunk size for erasing large areas. For MMC, "preferred_erase_size" is the high-capacity erase size if a card specifies one, otherwise it is based on the capacity of the card. For SD, "preferred_erase_size" is the allocation unit size specified by the card. "preferred_erase_size" is in bytes. Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@nokia.com> Acked-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Cc: Kyungmin Park <kmpark@infradead.org> Cc: Madhusudhan Chikkature <madhu.cr@ti.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Ben Gardiner <bengardiner@nanometrics.ca> Cc: <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2010-08-12 01:17:46 +04:00
{
if (mmc_card_sd(card))
return mmc_sd_erase_timeout(card, arg, qty);
mmc: add erase, secure erase, trim and secure trim operations SD/MMC cards tend to support an erase operation. In addition, eMMC v4.4 cards can support secure erase, trim and secure trim operations that are all variants of the basic erase command. SD/MMC device attributes "erase_size" and "preferred_erase_size" have been added. "erase_size" is the minimum size, in bytes, of an erase operation. For MMC, "erase_size" is the erase group size reported by the card. Note that "erase_size" does not apply to trim or secure trim operations where the minimum size is always one 512 byte sector. For SD, "erase_size" is 512 if the card is block-addressed, 0 otherwise. SD/MMC cards can erase an arbitrarily large area up to and including the whole card. When erasing a large area it may be desirable to do it in smaller chunks for three reasons: 1. A single erase command will make all other I/O on the card wait. This is not a problem if the whole card is being erased, but erasing one partition will make I/O for another partition on the same card wait for the duration of the erase - which could be a several minutes. 2. To be able to inform the user of erase progress. 3. The erase timeout becomes too large to be very useful. Because the erase timeout contains a margin which is multiplied by the size of the erase area, the value can end up being several minutes for large areas. "erase_size" is not the most efficient unit to erase (especially for SD where it is just one sector), hence "preferred_erase_size" provides a good chunk size for erasing large areas. For MMC, "preferred_erase_size" is the high-capacity erase size if a card specifies one, otherwise it is based on the capacity of the card. For SD, "preferred_erase_size" is the allocation unit size specified by the card. "preferred_erase_size" is in bytes. Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@nokia.com> Acked-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Cc: Kyungmin Park <kmpark@infradead.org> Cc: Madhusudhan Chikkature <madhu.cr@ti.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Ben Gardiner <bengardiner@nanometrics.ca> Cc: <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2010-08-12 01:17:46 +04:00
else
return mmc_mmc_erase_timeout(card, arg, qty);
mmc: add erase, secure erase, trim and secure trim operations SD/MMC cards tend to support an erase operation. In addition, eMMC v4.4 cards can support secure erase, trim and secure trim operations that are all variants of the basic erase command. SD/MMC device attributes "erase_size" and "preferred_erase_size" have been added. "erase_size" is the minimum size, in bytes, of an erase operation. For MMC, "erase_size" is the erase group size reported by the card. Note that "erase_size" does not apply to trim or secure trim operations where the minimum size is always one 512 byte sector. For SD, "erase_size" is 512 if the card is block-addressed, 0 otherwise. SD/MMC cards can erase an arbitrarily large area up to and including the whole card. When erasing a large area it may be desirable to do it in smaller chunks for three reasons: 1. A single erase command will make all other I/O on the card wait. This is not a problem if the whole card is being erased, but erasing one partition will make I/O for another partition on the same card wait for the duration of the erase - which could be a several minutes. 2. To be able to inform the user of erase progress. 3. The erase timeout becomes too large to be very useful. Because the erase timeout contains a margin which is multiplied by the size of the erase area, the value can end up being several minutes for large areas. "erase_size" is not the most efficient unit to erase (especially for SD where it is just one sector), hence "preferred_erase_size" provides a good chunk size for erasing large areas. For MMC, "preferred_erase_size" is the high-capacity erase size if a card specifies one, otherwise it is based on the capacity of the card. For SD, "preferred_erase_size" is the allocation unit size specified by the card. "preferred_erase_size" is in bytes. Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@nokia.com> Acked-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Cc: Kyungmin Park <kmpark@infradead.org> Cc: Madhusudhan Chikkature <madhu.cr@ti.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Ben Gardiner <bengardiner@nanometrics.ca> Cc: <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2010-08-12 01:17:46 +04:00
}
static int mmc_do_erase(struct mmc_card *card, unsigned int from,
unsigned int to, unsigned int arg)
{
struct mmc_command cmd = {};
unsigned int qty = 0, busy_timeout = 0;
bool use_r1b_resp = false;
unsigned long timeout;
mmc: add erase, secure erase, trim and secure trim operations SD/MMC cards tend to support an erase operation. In addition, eMMC v4.4 cards can support secure erase, trim and secure trim operations that are all variants of the basic erase command. SD/MMC device attributes "erase_size" and "preferred_erase_size" have been added. "erase_size" is the minimum size, in bytes, of an erase operation. For MMC, "erase_size" is the erase group size reported by the card. Note that "erase_size" does not apply to trim or secure trim operations where the minimum size is always one 512 byte sector. For SD, "erase_size" is 512 if the card is block-addressed, 0 otherwise. SD/MMC cards can erase an arbitrarily large area up to and including the whole card. When erasing a large area it may be desirable to do it in smaller chunks for three reasons: 1. A single erase command will make all other I/O on the card wait. This is not a problem if the whole card is being erased, but erasing one partition will make I/O for another partition on the same card wait for the duration of the erase - which could be a several minutes. 2. To be able to inform the user of erase progress. 3. The erase timeout becomes too large to be very useful. Because the erase timeout contains a margin which is multiplied by the size of the erase area, the value can end up being several minutes for large areas. "erase_size" is not the most efficient unit to erase (especially for SD where it is just one sector), hence "preferred_erase_size" provides a good chunk size for erasing large areas. For MMC, "preferred_erase_size" is the high-capacity erase size if a card specifies one, otherwise it is based on the capacity of the card. For SD, "preferred_erase_size" is the allocation unit size specified by the card. "preferred_erase_size" is in bytes. Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@nokia.com> Acked-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Cc: Kyungmin Park <kmpark@infradead.org> Cc: Madhusudhan Chikkature <madhu.cr@ti.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Ben Gardiner <bengardiner@nanometrics.ca> Cc: <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2010-08-12 01:17:46 +04:00
int err;
mmc_retune_hold(card->host);
mmc: add erase, secure erase, trim and secure trim operations SD/MMC cards tend to support an erase operation. In addition, eMMC v4.4 cards can support secure erase, trim and secure trim operations that are all variants of the basic erase command. SD/MMC device attributes "erase_size" and "preferred_erase_size" have been added. "erase_size" is the minimum size, in bytes, of an erase operation. For MMC, "erase_size" is the erase group size reported by the card. Note that "erase_size" does not apply to trim or secure trim operations where the minimum size is always one 512 byte sector. For SD, "erase_size" is 512 if the card is block-addressed, 0 otherwise. SD/MMC cards can erase an arbitrarily large area up to and including the whole card. When erasing a large area it may be desirable to do it in smaller chunks for three reasons: 1. A single erase command will make all other I/O on the card wait. This is not a problem if the whole card is being erased, but erasing one partition will make I/O for another partition on the same card wait for the duration of the erase - which could be a several minutes. 2. To be able to inform the user of erase progress. 3. The erase timeout becomes too large to be very useful. Because the erase timeout contains a margin which is multiplied by the size of the erase area, the value can end up being several minutes for large areas. "erase_size" is not the most efficient unit to erase (especially for SD where it is just one sector), hence "preferred_erase_size" provides a good chunk size for erasing large areas. For MMC, "preferred_erase_size" is the high-capacity erase size if a card specifies one, otherwise it is based on the capacity of the card. For SD, "preferred_erase_size" is the allocation unit size specified by the card. "preferred_erase_size" is in bytes. Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@nokia.com> Acked-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Cc: Kyungmin Park <kmpark@infradead.org> Cc: Madhusudhan Chikkature <madhu.cr@ti.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Ben Gardiner <bengardiner@nanometrics.ca> Cc: <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2010-08-12 01:17:46 +04:00
/*
* qty is used to calculate the erase timeout which depends on how many
* erase groups (or allocation units in SD terminology) are affected.
* We count erasing part of an erase group as one erase group.
* For SD, the allocation units are always a power of 2. For MMC, the
* erase group size is almost certainly also power of 2, but it does not
* seem to insist on that in the JEDEC standard, so we fall back to
* division in that case. SD may not specify an allocation unit size,
* in which case the timeout is based on the number of write blocks.
*
* Note that the timeout for secure trim 2 will only be correct if the
* number of erase groups specified is the same as the total of all
* preceding secure trim 1 commands. Since the power may have been
* lost since the secure trim 1 commands occurred, it is generally
* impossible to calculate the secure trim 2 timeout correctly.
*/
if (card->erase_shift)
qty += ((to >> card->erase_shift) -
(from >> card->erase_shift)) + 1;
else if (mmc_card_sd(card))
qty += to - from + 1;
else
qty += ((to / card->erase_size) -
(from / card->erase_size)) + 1;
if (!mmc_card_blockaddr(card)) {
from <<= 9;
to <<= 9;
}
if (mmc_card_sd(card))
cmd.opcode = SD_ERASE_WR_BLK_START;
else
cmd.opcode = MMC_ERASE_GROUP_START;
cmd.arg = from;
cmd.flags = MMC_RSP_SPI_R1 | MMC_RSP_R1 | MMC_CMD_AC;
err = mmc_wait_for_cmd(card->host, &cmd, 0);
if (err) {
pr_err("mmc_erase: group start error %d, "
mmc: add erase, secure erase, trim and secure trim operations SD/MMC cards tend to support an erase operation. In addition, eMMC v4.4 cards can support secure erase, trim and secure trim operations that are all variants of the basic erase command. SD/MMC device attributes "erase_size" and "preferred_erase_size" have been added. "erase_size" is the minimum size, in bytes, of an erase operation. For MMC, "erase_size" is the erase group size reported by the card. Note that "erase_size" does not apply to trim or secure trim operations where the minimum size is always one 512 byte sector. For SD, "erase_size" is 512 if the card is block-addressed, 0 otherwise. SD/MMC cards can erase an arbitrarily large area up to and including the whole card. When erasing a large area it may be desirable to do it in smaller chunks for three reasons: 1. A single erase command will make all other I/O on the card wait. This is not a problem if the whole card is being erased, but erasing one partition will make I/O for another partition on the same card wait for the duration of the erase - which could be a several minutes. 2. To be able to inform the user of erase progress. 3. The erase timeout becomes too large to be very useful. Because the erase timeout contains a margin which is multiplied by the size of the erase area, the value can end up being several minutes for large areas. "erase_size" is not the most efficient unit to erase (especially for SD where it is just one sector), hence "preferred_erase_size" provides a good chunk size for erasing large areas. For MMC, "preferred_erase_size" is the high-capacity erase size if a card specifies one, otherwise it is based on the capacity of the card. For SD, "preferred_erase_size" is the allocation unit size specified by the card. "preferred_erase_size" is in bytes. Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@nokia.com> Acked-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Cc: Kyungmin Park <kmpark@infradead.org> Cc: Madhusudhan Chikkature <madhu.cr@ti.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Ben Gardiner <bengardiner@nanometrics.ca> Cc: <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2010-08-12 01:17:46 +04:00
"status %#x\n", err, cmd.resp[0]);
err = -EIO;
mmc: add erase, secure erase, trim and secure trim operations SD/MMC cards tend to support an erase operation. In addition, eMMC v4.4 cards can support secure erase, trim and secure trim operations that are all variants of the basic erase command. SD/MMC device attributes "erase_size" and "preferred_erase_size" have been added. "erase_size" is the minimum size, in bytes, of an erase operation. For MMC, "erase_size" is the erase group size reported by the card. Note that "erase_size" does not apply to trim or secure trim operations where the minimum size is always one 512 byte sector. For SD, "erase_size" is 512 if the card is block-addressed, 0 otherwise. SD/MMC cards can erase an arbitrarily large area up to and including the whole card. When erasing a large area it may be desirable to do it in smaller chunks for three reasons: 1. A single erase command will make all other I/O on the card wait. This is not a problem if the whole card is being erased, but erasing one partition will make I/O for another partition on the same card wait for the duration of the erase - which could be a several minutes. 2. To be able to inform the user of erase progress. 3. The erase timeout becomes too large to be very useful. Because the erase timeout contains a margin which is multiplied by the size of the erase area, the value can end up being several minutes for large areas. "erase_size" is not the most efficient unit to erase (especially for SD where it is just one sector), hence "preferred_erase_size" provides a good chunk size for erasing large areas. For MMC, "preferred_erase_size" is the high-capacity erase size if a card specifies one, otherwise it is based on the capacity of the card. For SD, "preferred_erase_size" is the allocation unit size specified by the card. "preferred_erase_size" is in bytes. Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@nokia.com> Acked-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Cc: Kyungmin Park <kmpark@infradead.org> Cc: Madhusudhan Chikkature <madhu.cr@ti.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Ben Gardiner <bengardiner@nanometrics.ca> Cc: <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2010-08-12 01:17:46 +04:00
goto out;
}
memset(&cmd, 0, sizeof(struct mmc_command));
if (mmc_card_sd(card))
cmd.opcode = SD_ERASE_WR_BLK_END;
else
cmd.opcode = MMC_ERASE_GROUP_END;
cmd.arg = to;
cmd.flags = MMC_RSP_SPI_R1 | MMC_RSP_R1 | MMC_CMD_AC;
err = mmc_wait_for_cmd(card->host, &cmd, 0);
if (err) {
pr_err("mmc_erase: group end error %d, status %#x\n",
mmc: add erase, secure erase, trim and secure trim operations SD/MMC cards tend to support an erase operation. In addition, eMMC v4.4 cards can support secure erase, trim and secure trim operations that are all variants of the basic erase command. SD/MMC device attributes "erase_size" and "preferred_erase_size" have been added. "erase_size" is the minimum size, in bytes, of an erase operation. For MMC, "erase_size" is the erase group size reported by the card. Note that "erase_size" does not apply to trim or secure trim operations where the minimum size is always one 512 byte sector. For SD, "erase_size" is 512 if the card is block-addressed, 0 otherwise. SD/MMC cards can erase an arbitrarily large area up to and including the whole card. When erasing a large area it may be desirable to do it in smaller chunks for three reasons: 1. A single erase command will make all other I/O on the card wait. This is not a problem if the whole card is being erased, but erasing one partition will make I/O for another partition on the same card wait for the duration of the erase - which could be a several minutes. 2. To be able to inform the user of erase progress. 3. The erase timeout becomes too large to be very useful. Because the erase timeout contains a margin which is multiplied by the size of the erase area, the value can end up being several minutes for large areas. "erase_size" is not the most efficient unit to erase (especially for SD where it is just one sector), hence "preferred_erase_size" provides a good chunk size for erasing large areas. For MMC, "preferred_erase_size" is the high-capacity erase size if a card specifies one, otherwise it is based on the capacity of the card. For SD, "preferred_erase_size" is the allocation unit size specified by the card. "preferred_erase_size" is in bytes. Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@nokia.com> Acked-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Cc: Kyungmin Park <kmpark@infradead.org> Cc: Madhusudhan Chikkature <madhu.cr@ti.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Ben Gardiner <bengardiner@nanometrics.ca> Cc: <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2010-08-12 01:17:46 +04:00
err, cmd.resp[0]);
err = -EIO;
mmc: add erase, secure erase, trim and secure trim operations SD/MMC cards tend to support an erase operation. In addition, eMMC v4.4 cards can support secure erase, trim and secure trim operations that are all variants of the basic erase command. SD/MMC device attributes "erase_size" and "preferred_erase_size" have been added. "erase_size" is the minimum size, in bytes, of an erase operation. For MMC, "erase_size" is the erase group size reported by the card. Note that "erase_size" does not apply to trim or secure trim operations where the minimum size is always one 512 byte sector. For SD, "erase_size" is 512 if the card is block-addressed, 0 otherwise. SD/MMC cards can erase an arbitrarily large area up to and including the whole card. When erasing a large area it may be desirable to do it in smaller chunks for three reasons: 1. A single erase command will make all other I/O on the card wait. This is not a problem if the whole card is being erased, but erasing one partition will make I/O for another partition on the same card wait for the duration of the erase - which could be a several minutes. 2. To be able to inform the user of erase progress. 3. The erase timeout becomes too large to be very useful. Because the erase timeout contains a margin which is multiplied by the size of the erase area, the value can end up being several minutes for large areas. "erase_size" is not the most efficient unit to erase (especially for SD where it is just one sector), hence "preferred_erase_size" provides a good chunk size for erasing large areas. For MMC, "preferred_erase_size" is the high-capacity erase size if a card specifies one, otherwise it is based on the capacity of the card. For SD, "preferred_erase_size" is the allocation unit size specified by the card. "preferred_erase_size" is in bytes. Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@nokia.com> Acked-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Cc: Kyungmin Park <kmpark@infradead.org> Cc: Madhusudhan Chikkature <madhu.cr@ti.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Ben Gardiner <bengardiner@nanometrics.ca> Cc: <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2010-08-12 01:17:46 +04:00
goto out;
}
memset(&cmd, 0, sizeof(struct mmc_command));
cmd.opcode = MMC_ERASE;
cmd.arg = arg;
busy_timeout = mmc_erase_timeout(card, arg, qty);
/*
* If the host controller supports busy signalling and the timeout for
* the erase operation does not exceed the max_busy_timeout, we should
* use R1B response. Or we need to prevent the host from doing hw busy
* detection, which is done by converting to a R1 response instead.
*/
if (card->host->max_busy_timeout &&
busy_timeout > card->host->max_busy_timeout) {
cmd.flags = MMC_RSP_SPI_R1 | MMC_RSP_R1 | MMC_CMD_AC;
} else {
cmd.flags = MMC_RSP_SPI_R1B | MMC_RSP_R1B | MMC_CMD_AC;
cmd.busy_timeout = busy_timeout;
use_r1b_resp = true;
}
mmc: add erase, secure erase, trim and secure trim operations SD/MMC cards tend to support an erase operation. In addition, eMMC v4.4 cards can support secure erase, trim and secure trim operations that are all variants of the basic erase command. SD/MMC device attributes "erase_size" and "preferred_erase_size" have been added. "erase_size" is the minimum size, in bytes, of an erase operation. For MMC, "erase_size" is the erase group size reported by the card. Note that "erase_size" does not apply to trim or secure trim operations where the minimum size is always one 512 byte sector. For SD, "erase_size" is 512 if the card is block-addressed, 0 otherwise. SD/MMC cards can erase an arbitrarily large area up to and including the whole card. When erasing a large area it may be desirable to do it in smaller chunks for three reasons: 1. A single erase command will make all other I/O on the card wait. This is not a problem if the whole card is being erased, but erasing one partition will make I/O for another partition on the same card wait for the duration of the erase - which could be a several minutes. 2. To be able to inform the user of erase progress. 3. The erase timeout becomes too large to be very useful. Because the erase timeout contains a margin which is multiplied by the size of the erase area, the value can end up being several minutes for large areas. "erase_size" is not the most efficient unit to erase (especially for SD where it is just one sector), hence "preferred_erase_size" provides a good chunk size for erasing large areas. For MMC, "preferred_erase_size" is the high-capacity erase size if a card specifies one, otherwise it is based on the capacity of the card. For SD, "preferred_erase_size" is the allocation unit size specified by the card. "preferred_erase_size" is in bytes. Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@nokia.com> Acked-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Cc: Kyungmin Park <kmpark@infradead.org> Cc: Madhusudhan Chikkature <madhu.cr@ti.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Ben Gardiner <bengardiner@nanometrics.ca> Cc: <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2010-08-12 01:17:46 +04:00
err = mmc_wait_for_cmd(card->host, &cmd, 0);
if (err) {
pr_err("mmc_erase: erase error %d, status %#x\n",
mmc: add erase, secure erase, trim and secure trim operations SD/MMC cards tend to support an erase operation. In addition, eMMC v4.4 cards can support secure erase, trim and secure trim operations that are all variants of the basic erase command. SD/MMC device attributes "erase_size" and "preferred_erase_size" have been added. "erase_size" is the minimum size, in bytes, of an erase operation. For MMC, "erase_size" is the erase group size reported by the card. Note that "erase_size" does not apply to trim or secure trim operations where the minimum size is always one 512 byte sector. For SD, "erase_size" is 512 if the card is block-addressed, 0 otherwise. SD/MMC cards can erase an arbitrarily large area up to and including the whole card. When erasing a large area it may be desirable to do it in smaller chunks for three reasons: 1. A single erase command will make all other I/O on the card wait. This is not a problem if the whole card is being erased, but erasing one partition will make I/O for another partition on the same card wait for the duration of the erase - which could be a several minutes. 2. To be able to inform the user of erase progress. 3. The erase timeout becomes too large to be very useful. Because the erase timeout contains a margin which is multiplied by the size of the erase area, the value can end up being several minutes for large areas. "erase_size" is not the most efficient unit to erase (especially for SD where it is just one sector), hence "preferred_erase_size" provides a good chunk size for erasing large areas. For MMC, "preferred_erase_size" is the high-capacity erase size if a card specifies one, otherwise it is based on the capacity of the card. For SD, "preferred_erase_size" is the allocation unit size specified by the card. "preferred_erase_size" is in bytes. Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@nokia.com> Acked-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Cc: Kyungmin Park <kmpark@infradead.org> Cc: Madhusudhan Chikkature <madhu.cr@ti.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Ben Gardiner <bengardiner@nanometrics.ca> Cc: <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2010-08-12 01:17:46 +04:00
err, cmd.resp[0]);
err = -EIO;
goto out;
}
if (mmc_host_is_spi(card->host))
goto out;
/*
* In case of when R1B + MMC_CAP_WAIT_WHILE_BUSY is used, the polling
* shall be avoided.
*/
if ((card->host->caps & MMC_CAP_WAIT_WHILE_BUSY) && use_r1b_resp)
goto out;
timeout = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(busy_timeout);
mmc: add erase, secure erase, trim and secure trim operations SD/MMC cards tend to support an erase operation. In addition, eMMC v4.4 cards can support secure erase, trim and secure trim operations that are all variants of the basic erase command. SD/MMC device attributes "erase_size" and "preferred_erase_size" have been added. "erase_size" is the minimum size, in bytes, of an erase operation. For MMC, "erase_size" is the erase group size reported by the card. Note that "erase_size" does not apply to trim or secure trim operations where the minimum size is always one 512 byte sector. For SD, "erase_size" is 512 if the card is block-addressed, 0 otherwise. SD/MMC cards can erase an arbitrarily large area up to and including the whole card. When erasing a large area it may be desirable to do it in smaller chunks for three reasons: 1. A single erase command will make all other I/O on the card wait. This is not a problem if the whole card is being erased, but erasing one partition will make I/O for another partition on the same card wait for the duration of the erase - which could be a several minutes. 2. To be able to inform the user of erase progress. 3. The erase timeout becomes too large to be very useful. Because the erase timeout contains a margin which is multiplied by the size of the erase area, the value can end up being several minutes for large areas. "erase_size" is not the most efficient unit to erase (especially for SD where it is just one sector), hence "preferred_erase_size" provides a good chunk size for erasing large areas. For MMC, "preferred_erase_size" is the high-capacity erase size if a card specifies one, otherwise it is based on the capacity of the card. For SD, "preferred_erase_size" is the allocation unit size specified by the card. "preferred_erase_size" is in bytes. Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@nokia.com> Acked-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Cc: Kyungmin Park <kmpark@infradead.org> Cc: Madhusudhan Chikkature <madhu.cr@ti.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Ben Gardiner <bengardiner@nanometrics.ca> Cc: <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2010-08-12 01:17:46 +04:00
do {
memset(&cmd, 0, sizeof(struct mmc_command));
cmd.opcode = MMC_SEND_STATUS;
cmd.arg = card->rca << 16;
cmd.flags = MMC_RSP_R1 | MMC_CMD_AC;
/* Do not retry else we can't see errors */
err = mmc_wait_for_cmd(card->host, &cmd, 0);
if (err || (cmd.resp[0] & 0xFDF92000)) {
pr_err("error %d requesting status %#x\n",
mmc: add erase, secure erase, trim and secure trim operations SD/MMC cards tend to support an erase operation. In addition, eMMC v4.4 cards can support secure erase, trim and secure trim operations that are all variants of the basic erase command. SD/MMC device attributes "erase_size" and "preferred_erase_size" have been added. "erase_size" is the minimum size, in bytes, of an erase operation. For MMC, "erase_size" is the erase group size reported by the card. Note that "erase_size" does not apply to trim or secure trim operations where the minimum size is always one 512 byte sector. For SD, "erase_size" is 512 if the card is block-addressed, 0 otherwise. SD/MMC cards can erase an arbitrarily large area up to and including the whole card. When erasing a large area it may be desirable to do it in smaller chunks for three reasons: 1. A single erase command will make all other I/O on the card wait. This is not a problem if the whole card is being erased, but erasing one partition will make I/O for another partition on the same card wait for the duration of the erase - which could be a several minutes. 2. To be able to inform the user of erase progress. 3. The erase timeout becomes too large to be very useful. Because the erase timeout contains a margin which is multiplied by the size of the erase area, the value can end up being several minutes for large areas. "erase_size" is not the most efficient unit to erase (especially for SD where it is just one sector), hence "preferred_erase_size" provides a good chunk size for erasing large areas. For MMC, "preferred_erase_size" is the high-capacity erase size if a card specifies one, otherwise it is based on the capacity of the card. For SD, "preferred_erase_size" is the allocation unit size specified by the card. "preferred_erase_size" is in bytes. Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@nokia.com> Acked-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Cc: Kyungmin Park <kmpark@infradead.org> Cc: Madhusudhan Chikkature <madhu.cr@ti.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Ben Gardiner <bengardiner@nanometrics.ca> Cc: <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2010-08-12 01:17:46 +04:00
err, cmd.resp[0]);
err = -EIO;
goto out;
}
/* Timeout if the device never becomes ready for data and
* never leaves the program state.
*/
if (time_after(jiffies, timeout)) {
pr_err("%s: Card stuck in programming state! %s\n",
mmc_hostname(card->host), __func__);
err = -EIO;
goto out;
}
mmc: add erase, secure erase, trim and secure trim operations SD/MMC cards tend to support an erase operation. In addition, eMMC v4.4 cards can support secure erase, trim and secure trim operations that are all variants of the basic erase command. SD/MMC device attributes "erase_size" and "preferred_erase_size" have been added. "erase_size" is the minimum size, in bytes, of an erase operation. For MMC, "erase_size" is the erase group size reported by the card. Note that "erase_size" does not apply to trim or secure trim operations where the minimum size is always one 512 byte sector. For SD, "erase_size" is 512 if the card is block-addressed, 0 otherwise. SD/MMC cards can erase an arbitrarily large area up to and including the whole card. When erasing a large area it may be desirable to do it in smaller chunks for three reasons: 1. A single erase command will make all other I/O on the card wait. This is not a problem if the whole card is being erased, but erasing one partition will make I/O for another partition on the same card wait for the duration of the erase - which could be a several minutes. 2. To be able to inform the user of erase progress. 3. The erase timeout becomes too large to be very useful. Because the erase timeout contains a margin which is multiplied by the size of the erase area, the value can end up being several minutes for large areas. "erase_size" is not the most efficient unit to erase (especially for SD where it is just one sector), hence "preferred_erase_size" provides a good chunk size for erasing large areas. For MMC, "preferred_erase_size" is the high-capacity erase size if a card specifies one, otherwise it is based on the capacity of the card. For SD, "preferred_erase_size" is the allocation unit size specified by the card. "preferred_erase_size" is in bytes. Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@nokia.com> Acked-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Cc: Kyungmin Park <kmpark@infradead.org> Cc: Madhusudhan Chikkature <madhu.cr@ti.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Ben Gardiner <bengardiner@nanometrics.ca> Cc: <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2010-08-12 01:17:46 +04:00
} while (!(cmd.resp[0] & R1_READY_FOR_DATA) ||
(R1_CURRENT_STATE(cmd.resp[0]) == R1_STATE_PRG));
mmc: add erase, secure erase, trim and secure trim operations SD/MMC cards tend to support an erase operation. In addition, eMMC v4.4 cards can support secure erase, trim and secure trim operations that are all variants of the basic erase command. SD/MMC device attributes "erase_size" and "preferred_erase_size" have been added. "erase_size" is the minimum size, in bytes, of an erase operation. For MMC, "erase_size" is the erase group size reported by the card. Note that "erase_size" does not apply to trim or secure trim operations where the minimum size is always one 512 byte sector. For SD, "erase_size" is 512 if the card is block-addressed, 0 otherwise. SD/MMC cards can erase an arbitrarily large area up to and including the whole card. When erasing a large area it may be desirable to do it in smaller chunks for three reasons: 1. A single erase command will make all other I/O on the card wait. This is not a problem if the whole card is being erased, but erasing one partition will make I/O for another partition on the same card wait for the duration of the erase - which could be a several minutes. 2. To be able to inform the user of erase progress. 3. The erase timeout becomes too large to be very useful. Because the erase timeout contains a margin which is multiplied by the size of the erase area, the value can end up being several minutes for large areas. "erase_size" is not the most efficient unit to erase (especially for SD where it is just one sector), hence "preferred_erase_size" provides a good chunk size for erasing large areas. For MMC, "preferred_erase_size" is the high-capacity erase size if a card specifies one, otherwise it is based on the capacity of the card. For SD, "preferred_erase_size" is the allocation unit size specified by the card. "preferred_erase_size" is in bytes. Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@nokia.com> Acked-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Cc: Kyungmin Park <kmpark@infradead.org> Cc: Madhusudhan Chikkature <madhu.cr@ti.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Ben Gardiner <bengardiner@nanometrics.ca> Cc: <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2010-08-12 01:17:46 +04:00
out:
mmc_retune_release(card->host);
mmc: add erase, secure erase, trim and secure trim operations SD/MMC cards tend to support an erase operation. In addition, eMMC v4.4 cards can support secure erase, trim and secure trim operations that are all variants of the basic erase command. SD/MMC device attributes "erase_size" and "preferred_erase_size" have been added. "erase_size" is the minimum size, in bytes, of an erase operation. For MMC, "erase_size" is the erase group size reported by the card. Note that "erase_size" does not apply to trim or secure trim operations where the minimum size is always one 512 byte sector. For SD, "erase_size" is 512 if the card is block-addressed, 0 otherwise. SD/MMC cards can erase an arbitrarily large area up to and including the whole card. When erasing a large area it may be desirable to do it in smaller chunks for three reasons: 1. A single erase command will make all other I/O on the card wait. This is not a problem if the whole card is being erased, but erasing one partition will make I/O for another partition on the same card wait for the duration of the erase - which could be a several minutes. 2. To be able to inform the user of erase progress. 3. The erase timeout becomes too large to be very useful. Because the erase timeout contains a margin which is multiplied by the size of the erase area, the value can end up being several minutes for large areas. "erase_size" is not the most efficient unit to erase (especially for SD where it is just one sector), hence "preferred_erase_size" provides a good chunk size for erasing large areas. For MMC, "preferred_erase_size" is the high-capacity erase size if a card specifies one, otherwise it is based on the capacity of the card. For SD, "preferred_erase_size" is the allocation unit size specified by the card. "preferred_erase_size" is in bytes. Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@nokia.com> Acked-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Cc: Kyungmin Park <kmpark@infradead.org> Cc: Madhusudhan Chikkature <madhu.cr@ti.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Ben Gardiner <bengardiner@nanometrics.ca> Cc: <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2010-08-12 01:17:46 +04:00
return err;
}
static unsigned int mmc_align_erase_size(struct mmc_card *card,
unsigned int *from,
unsigned int *to,
unsigned int nr)
{
unsigned int from_new = *from, nr_new = nr, rem;
/*
* When the 'card->erase_size' is power of 2, we can use round_up/down()
* to align the erase size efficiently.
*/
if (is_power_of_2(card->erase_size)) {
unsigned int temp = from_new;
from_new = round_up(temp, card->erase_size);
rem = from_new - temp;
if (nr_new > rem)
nr_new -= rem;
else
return 0;
nr_new = round_down(nr_new, card->erase_size);
} else {
rem = from_new % card->erase_size;
if (rem) {
rem = card->erase_size - rem;
from_new += rem;
if (nr_new > rem)
nr_new -= rem;
else
return 0;
}
rem = nr_new % card->erase_size;
if (rem)
nr_new -= rem;
}
if (nr_new == 0)
return 0;
*to = from_new + nr_new;
*from = from_new;
return nr_new;
}
mmc: add erase, secure erase, trim and secure trim operations SD/MMC cards tend to support an erase operation. In addition, eMMC v4.4 cards can support secure erase, trim and secure trim operations that are all variants of the basic erase command. SD/MMC device attributes "erase_size" and "preferred_erase_size" have been added. "erase_size" is the minimum size, in bytes, of an erase operation. For MMC, "erase_size" is the erase group size reported by the card. Note that "erase_size" does not apply to trim or secure trim operations where the minimum size is always one 512 byte sector. For SD, "erase_size" is 512 if the card is block-addressed, 0 otherwise. SD/MMC cards can erase an arbitrarily large area up to and including the whole card. When erasing a large area it may be desirable to do it in smaller chunks for three reasons: 1. A single erase command will make all other I/O on the card wait. This is not a problem if the whole card is being erased, but erasing one partition will make I/O for another partition on the same card wait for the duration of the erase - which could be a several minutes. 2. To be able to inform the user of erase progress. 3. The erase timeout becomes too large to be very useful. Because the erase timeout contains a margin which is multiplied by the size of the erase area, the value can end up being several minutes for large areas. "erase_size" is not the most efficient unit to erase (especially for SD where it is just one sector), hence "preferred_erase_size" provides a good chunk size for erasing large areas. For MMC, "preferred_erase_size" is the high-capacity erase size if a card specifies one, otherwise it is based on the capacity of the card. For SD, "preferred_erase_size" is the allocation unit size specified by the card. "preferred_erase_size" is in bytes. Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@nokia.com> Acked-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Cc: Kyungmin Park <kmpark@infradead.org> Cc: Madhusudhan Chikkature <madhu.cr@ti.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Ben Gardiner <bengardiner@nanometrics.ca> Cc: <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2010-08-12 01:17:46 +04:00
/**
* mmc_erase - erase sectors.
* @card: card to erase
* @from: first sector to erase
* @nr: number of sectors to erase
* @arg: erase command argument (SD supports only %MMC_ERASE_ARG)
*
* Caller must claim host before calling this function.
*/
int mmc_erase(struct mmc_card *card, unsigned int from, unsigned int nr,
unsigned int arg)
{
unsigned int rem, to = from + nr;
int err;
mmc: add erase, secure erase, trim and secure trim operations SD/MMC cards tend to support an erase operation. In addition, eMMC v4.4 cards can support secure erase, trim and secure trim operations that are all variants of the basic erase command. SD/MMC device attributes "erase_size" and "preferred_erase_size" have been added. "erase_size" is the minimum size, in bytes, of an erase operation. For MMC, "erase_size" is the erase group size reported by the card. Note that "erase_size" does not apply to trim or secure trim operations where the minimum size is always one 512 byte sector. For SD, "erase_size" is 512 if the card is block-addressed, 0 otherwise. SD/MMC cards can erase an arbitrarily large area up to and including the whole card. When erasing a large area it may be desirable to do it in smaller chunks for three reasons: 1. A single erase command will make all other I/O on the card wait. This is not a problem if the whole card is being erased, but erasing one partition will make I/O for another partition on the same card wait for the duration of the erase - which could be a several minutes. 2. To be able to inform the user of erase progress. 3. The erase timeout becomes too large to be very useful. Because the erase timeout contains a margin which is multiplied by the size of the erase area, the value can end up being several minutes for large areas. "erase_size" is not the most efficient unit to erase (especially for SD where it is just one sector), hence "preferred_erase_size" provides a good chunk size for erasing large areas. For MMC, "preferred_erase_size" is the high-capacity erase size if a card specifies one, otherwise it is based on the capacity of the card. For SD, "preferred_erase_size" is the allocation unit size specified by the card. "preferred_erase_size" is in bytes. Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@nokia.com> Acked-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Cc: Kyungmin Park <kmpark@infradead.org> Cc: Madhusudhan Chikkature <madhu.cr@ti.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Ben Gardiner <bengardiner@nanometrics.ca> Cc: <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2010-08-12 01:17:46 +04:00
if (!(card->host->caps & MMC_CAP_ERASE) ||
!(card->csd.cmdclass & CCC_ERASE))
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
if (!card->erase_size)
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
if (mmc_card_sd(card) && arg != MMC_ERASE_ARG)
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
if ((arg & MMC_SECURE_ARGS) &&
!(card->ext_csd.sec_feature_support & EXT_CSD_SEC_ER_EN))
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
if ((arg & MMC_TRIM_ARGS) &&
!(card->ext_csd.sec_feature_support & EXT_CSD_SEC_GB_CL_EN))
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
if (arg == MMC_SECURE_ERASE_ARG) {
if (from % card->erase_size || nr % card->erase_size)
return -EINVAL;
}
if (arg == MMC_ERASE_ARG)
nr = mmc_align_erase_size(card, &from, &to, nr);
mmc: add erase, secure erase, trim and secure trim operations SD/MMC cards tend to support an erase operation. In addition, eMMC v4.4 cards can support secure erase, trim and secure trim operations that are all variants of the basic erase command. SD/MMC device attributes "erase_size" and "preferred_erase_size" have been added. "erase_size" is the minimum size, in bytes, of an erase operation. For MMC, "erase_size" is the erase group size reported by the card. Note that "erase_size" does not apply to trim or secure trim operations where the minimum size is always one 512 byte sector. For SD, "erase_size" is 512 if the card is block-addressed, 0 otherwise. SD/MMC cards can erase an arbitrarily large area up to and including the whole card. When erasing a large area it may be desirable to do it in smaller chunks for three reasons: 1. A single erase command will make all other I/O on the card wait. This is not a problem if the whole card is being erased, but erasing one partition will make I/O for another partition on the same card wait for the duration of the erase - which could be a several minutes. 2. To be able to inform the user of erase progress. 3. The erase timeout becomes too large to be very useful. Because the erase timeout contains a margin which is multiplied by the size of the erase area, the value can end up being several minutes for large areas. "erase_size" is not the most efficient unit to erase (especially for SD where it is just one sector), hence "preferred_erase_size" provides a good chunk size for erasing large areas. For MMC, "preferred_erase_size" is the high-capacity erase size if a card specifies one, otherwise it is based on the capacity of the card. For SD, "preferred_erase_size" is the allocation unit size specified by the card. "preferred_erase_size" is in bytes. Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@nokia.com> Acked-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Cc: Kyungmin Park <kmpark@infradead.org> Cc: Madhusudhan Chikkature <madhu.cr@ti.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Ben Gardiner <bengardiner@nanometrics.ca> Cc: <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2010-08-12 01:17:46 +04:00
if (nr == 0)
return 0;
if (to <= from)
return -EINVAL;
/* 'from' and 'to' are inclusive */
to -= 1;
/*
* Special case where only one erase-group fits in the timeout budget:
* If the region crosses an erase-group boundary on this particular
* case, we will be trimming more than one erase-group which, does not
* fit in the timeout budget of the controller, so we need to split it
* and call mmc_do_erase() twice if necessary. This special case is
* identified by the card->eg_boundary flag.
*/
rem = card->erase_size - (from % card->erase_size);
if ((arg & MMC_TRIM_ARGS) && (card->eg_boundary) && (nr > rem)) {
err = mmc_do_erase(card, from, from + rem - 1, arg);
from += rem;
if ((err) || (to <= from))
return err;
}
mmc: add erase, secure erase, trim and secure trim operations SD/MMC cards tend to support an erase operation. In addition, eMMC v4.4 cards can support secure erase, trim and secure trim operations that are all variants of the basic erase command. SD/MMC device attributes "erase_size" and "preferred_erase_size" have been added. "erase_size" is the minimum size, in bytes, of an erase operation. For MMC, "erase_size" is the erase group size reported by the card. Note that "erase_size" does not apply to trim or secure trim operations where the minimum size is always one 512 byte sector. For SD, "erase_size" is 512 if the card is block-addressed, 0 otherwise. SD/MMC cards can erase an arbitrarily large area up to and including the whole card. When erasing a large area it may be desirable to do it in smaller chunks for three reasons: 1. A single erase command will make all other I/O on the card wait. This is not a problem if the whole card is being erased, but erasing one partition will make I/O for another partition on the same card wait for the duration of the erase - which could be a several minutes. 2. To be able to inform the user of erase progress. 3. The erase timeout becomes too large to be very useful. Because the erase timeout contains a margin which is multiplied by the size of the erase area, the value can end up being several minutes for large areas. "erase_size" is not the most efficient unit to erase (especially for SD where it is just one sector), hence "preferred_erase_size" provides a good chunk size for erasing large areas. For MMC, "preferred_erase_size" is the high-capacity erase size if a card specifies one, otherwise it is based on the capacity of the card. For SD, "preferred_erase_size" is the allocation unit size specified by the card. "preferred_erase_size" is in bytes. Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@nokia.com> Acked-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Cc: Kyungmin Park <kmpark@infradead.org> Cc: Madhusudhan Chikkature <madhu.cr@ti.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Ben Gardiner <bengardiner@nanometrics.ca> Cc: <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2010-08-12 01:17:46 +04:00
return mmc_do_erase(card, from, to, arg);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(mmc_erase);
int mmc_can_erase(struct mmc_card *card)
{
if ((card->host->caps & MMC_CAP_ERASE) &&
(card->csd.cmdclass & CCC_ERASE) && card->erase_size)
return 1;
return 0;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(mmc_can_erase);
int mmc_can_trim(struct mmc_card *card)
{
if ((card->ext_csd.sec_feature_support & EXT_CSD_SEC_GB_CL_EN) &&
(!(card->quirks & MMC_QUIRK_TRIM_BROKEN)))
mmc: add erase, secure erase, trim and secure trim operations SD/MMC cards tend to support an erase operation. In addition, eMMC v4.4 cards can support secure erase, trim and secure trim operations that are all variants of the basic erase command. SD/MMC device attributes "erase_size" and "preferred_erase_size" have been added. "erase_size" is the minimum size, in bytes, of an erase operation. For MMC, "erase_size" is the erase group size reported by the card. Note that "erase_size" does not apply to trim or secure trim operations where the minimum size is always one 512 byte sector. For SD, "erase_size" is 512 if the card is block-addressed, 0 otherwise. SD/MMC cards can erase an arbitrarily large area up to and including the whole card. When erasing a large area it may be desirable to do it in smaller chunks for three reasons: 1. A single erase command will make all other I/O on the card wait. This is not a problem if the whole card is being erased, but erasing one partition will make I/O for another partition on the same card wait for the duration of the erase - which could be a several minutes. 2. To be able to inform the user of erase progress. 3. The erase timeout becomes too large to be very useful. Because the erase timeout contains a margin which is multiplied by the size of the erase area, the value can end up being several minutes for large areas. "erase_size" is not the most efficient unit to erase (especially for SD where it is just one sector), hence "preferred_erase_size" provides a good chunk size for erasing large areas. For MMC, "preferred_erase_size" is the high-capacity erase size if a card specifies one, otherwise it is based on the capacity of the card. For SD, "preferred_erase_size" is the allocation unit size specified by the card. "preferred_erase_size" is in bytes. Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@nokia.com> Acked-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Cc: Kyungmin Park <kmpark@infradead.org> Cc: Madhusudhan Chikkature <madhu.cr@ti.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Ben Gardiner <bengardiner@nanometrics.ca> Cc: <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2010-08-12 01:17:46 +04:00
return 1;
return 0;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(mmc_can_trim);
int mmc_can_discard(struct mmc_card *card)
{
/*
* As there's no way to detect the discard support bit at v4.5
* use the s/w feature support filed.
*/
if (card->ext_csd.feature_support & MMC_DISCARD_FEATURE)
return 1;
return 0;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(mmc_can_discard);
int mmc_can_sanitize(struct mmc_card *card)
{
if (!mmc_can_trim(card) && !mmc_can_erase(card))
return 0;
if (card->ext_csd.sec_feature_support & EXT_CSD_SEC_SANITIZE)
return 1;
return 0;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(mmc_can_sanitize);
mmc: add erase, secure erase, trim and secure trim operations SD/MMC cards tend to support an erase operation. In addition, eMMC v4.4 cards can support secure erase, trim and secure trim operations that are all variants of the basic erase command. SD/MMC device attributes "erase_size" and "preferred_erase_size" have been added. "erase_size" is the minimum size, in bytes, of an erase operation. For MMC, "erase_size" is the erase group size reported by the card. Note that "erase_size" does not apply to trim or secure trim operations where the minimum size is always one 512 byte sector. For SD, "erase_size" is 512 if the card is block-addressed, 0 otherwise. SD/MMC cards can erase an arbitrarily large area up to and including the whole card. When erasing a large area it may be desirable to do it in smaller chunks for three reasons: 1. A single erase command will make all other I/O on the card wait. This is not a problem if the whole card is being erased, but erasing one partition will make I/O for another partition on the same card wait for the duration of the erase - which could be a several minutes. 2. To be able to inform the user of erase progress. 3. The erase timeout becomes too large to be very useful. Because the erase timeout contains a margin which is multiplied by the size of the erase area, the value can end up being several minutes for large areas. "erase_size" is not the most efficient unit to erase (especially for SD where it is just one sector), hence "preferred_erase_size" provides a good chunk size for erasing large areas. For MMC, "preferred_erase_size" is the high-capacity erase size if a card specifies one, otherwise it is based on the capacity of the card. For SD, "preferred_erase_size" is the allocation unit size specified by the card. "preferred_erase_size" is in bytes. Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@nokia.com> Acked-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Cc: Kyungmin Park <kmpark@infradead.org> Cc: Madhusudhan Chikkature <madhu.cr@ti.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Ben Gardiner <bengardiner@nanometrics.ca> Cc: <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2010-08-12 01:17:46 +04:00
int mmc_can_secure_erase_trim(struct mmc_card *card)
{
if ((card->ext_csd.sec_feature_support & EXT_CSD_SEC_ER_EN) &&
!(card->quirks & MMC_QUIRK_SEC_ERASE_TRIM_BROKEN))
mmc: add erase, secure erase, trim and secure trim operations SD/MMC cards tend to support an erase operation. In addition, eMMC v4.4 cards can support secure erase, trim and secure trim operations that are all variants of the basic erase command. SD/MMC device attributes "erase_size" and "preferred_erase_size" have been added. "erase_size" is the minimum size, in bytes, of an erase operation. For MMC, "erase_size" is the erase group size reported by the card. Note that "erase_size" does not apply to trim or secure trim operations where the minimum size is always one 512 byte sector. For SD, "erase_size" is 512 if the card is block-addressed, 0 otherwise. SD/MMC cards can erase an arbitrarily large area up to and including the whole card. When erasing a large area it may be desirable to do it in smaller chunks for three reasons: 1. A single erase command will make all other I/O on the card wait. This is not a problem if the whole card is being erased, but erasing one partition will make I/O for another partition on the same card wait for the duration of the erase - which could be a several minutes. 2. To be able to inform the user of erase progress. 3. The erase timeout becomes too large to be very useful. Because the erase timeout contains a margin which is multiplied by the size of the erase area, the value can end up being several minutes for large areas. "erase_size" is not the most efficient unit to erase (especially for SD where it is just one sector), hence "preferred_erase_size" provides a good chunk size for erasing large areas. For MMC, "preferred_erase_size" is the high-capacity erase size if a card specifies one, otherwise it is based on the capacity of the card. For SD, "preferred_erase_size" is the allocation unit size specified by the card. "preferred_erase_size" is in bytes. Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@nokia.com> Acked-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Cc: Kyungmin Park <kmpark@infradead.org> Cc: Madhusudhan Chikkature <madhu.cr@ti.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Ben Gardiner <bengardiner@nanometrics.ca> Cc: <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2010-08-12 01:17:46 +04:00
return 1;
return 0;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(mmc_can_secure_erase_trim);
int mmc_erase_group_aligned(struct mmc_card *card, unsigned int from,
unsigned int nr)
{
if (!card->erase_size)
return 0;
if (from % card->erase_size || nr % card->erase_size)
return 0;
return 1;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(mmc_erase_group_aligned);
static unsigned int mmc_do_calc_max_discard(struct mmc_card *card,
unsigned int arg)
{
struct mmc_host *host = card->host;
unsigned int max_discard, x, y, qty = 0, max_qty, min_qty, timeout;
unsigned int last_timeout = 0;
unsigned int max_busy_timeout = host->max_busy_timeout ?
host->max_busy_timeout : MMC_ERASE_TIMEOUT_MS;
if (card->erase_shift) {
max_qty = UINT_MAX >> card->erase_shift;
min_qty = card->pref_erase >> card->erase_shift;
} else if (mmc_card_sd(card)) {
max_qty = UINT_MAX;
min_qty = card->pref_erase;
} else {
max_qty = UINT_MAX / card->erase_size;
min_qty = card->pref_erase / card->erase_size;
}
/*
* We should not only use 'host->max_busy_timeout' as the limitation
* when deciding the max discard sectors. We should set a balance value
* to improve the erase speed, and it can not get too long timeout at
* the same time.
*
* Here we set 'card->pref_erase' as the minimal discard sectors no
* matter what size of 'host->max_busy_timeout', but if the
* 'host->max_busy_timeout' is large enough for more discard sectors,
* then we can continue to increase the max discard sectors until we
* get a balance value. In cases when the 'host->max_busy_timeout'
* isn't specified, use the default max erase timeout.
*/
do {
y = 0;
for (x = 1; x && x <= max_qty && max_qty - x >= qty; x <<= 1) {
timeout = mmc_erase_timeout(card, arg, qty + x);
if (qty + x > min_qty && timeout > max_busy_timeout)
break;
if (timeout < last_timeout)
break;
last_timeout = timeout;
y = x;
}
qty += y;
} while (y);
if (!qty)
return 0;
/*
* When specifying a sector range to trim, chances are we might cross
* an erase-group boundary even if the amount of sectors is less than
* one erase-group.
* If we can only fit one erase-group in the controller timeout budget,
* we have to care that erase-group boundaries are not crossed by a
* single trim operation. We flag that special case with "eg_boundary".
* In all other cases we can just decrement qty and pretend that we
* always touch (qty + 1) erase-groups as a simple optimization.
*/
if (qty == 1)
card->eg_boundary = 1;
else
qty--;
/* Convert qty to sectors */
if (card->erase_shift)
max_discard = qty << card->erase_shift;
else if (mmc_card_sd(card))
max_discard = qty + 1;
else
max_discard = qty * card->erase_size;
return max_discard;
}
unsigned int mmc_calc_max_discard(struct mmc_card *card)
{
struct mmc_host *host = card->host;
unsigned int max_discard, max_trim;
/*
* Without erase_group_def set, MMC erase timeout depends on clock
* frequence which can change. In that case, the best choice is
* just the preferred erase size.
*/
if (mmc_card_mmc(card) && !(card->ext_csd.erase_group_def & 1))
return card->pref_erase;
max_discard = mmc_do_calc_max_discard(card, MMC_ERASE_ARG);
if (mmc_can_trim(card)) {
max_trim = mmc_do_calc_max_discard(card, MMC_TRIM_ARG);
if (max_trim < max_discard)
max_discard = max_trim;
} else if (max_discard < card->erase_size) {
max_discard = 0;
}
pr_debug("%s: calculated max. discard sectors %u for timeout %u ms\n",
mmc_hostname(host), max_discard, host->max_busy_timeout ?
host->max_busy_timeout : MMC_ERASE_TIMEOUT_MS);
return max_discard;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(mmc_calc_max_discard);
bool mmc_card_is_blockaddr(struct mmc_card *card)
{
return card ? mmc_card_blockaddr(card) : false;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(mmc_card_is_blockaddr);
int mmc_set_blocklen(struct mmc_card *card, unsigned int blocklen)
{
struct mmc_command cmd = {};
if (mmc_card_blockaddr(card) || mmc_card_ddr52(card) ||
mmc_card_hs400(card) || mmc_card_hs400es(card))
return 0;
cmd.opcode = MMC_SET_BLOCKLEN;
cmd.arg = blocklen;
cmd.flags = MMC_RSP_SPI_R1 | MMC_RSP_R1 | MMC_CMD_AC;
return mmc_wait_for_cmd(card->host, &cmd, 5);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(mmc_set_blocklen);
int mmc_set_blockcount(struct mmc_card *card, unsigned int blockcount,
bool is_rel_write)
{
struct mmc_command cmd = {};
cmd.opcode = MMC_SET_BLOCK_COUNT;
cmd.arg = blockcount & 0x0000FFFF;
if (is_rel_write)
cmd.arg |= 1 << 31;
cmd.flags = MMC_RSP_SPI_R1 | MMC_RSP_R1 | MMC_CMD_AC;
return mmc_wait_for_cmd(card->host, &cmd, 5);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(mmc_set_blockcount);
static void mmc_hw_reset_for_init(struct mmc_host *host)
{
mmc_pwrseq_reset(host);
if (!(host->caps & MMC_CAP_HW_RESET) || !host->ops->hw_reset)
return;
host->ops->hw_reset(host);
}
int mmc_hw_reset(struct mmc_host *host)
{
int ret;
if (!host->card)
return -EINVAL;
mmc_bus_get(host);
if (!host->bus_ops || host->bus_dead || !host->bus_ops->reset) {
mmc_bus_put(host);
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
}
ret = host->bus_ops->reset(host);
mmc_bus_put(host);
if (ret)
pr_warn("%s: tried to reset card, got error %d\n",
mmc_hostname(host), ret);
return ret;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(mmc_hw_reset);
static int mmc_rescan_try_freq(struct mmc_host *host, unsigned freq)
{
host->f_init = freq;
pr_debug("%s: %s: trying to init card at %u Hz\n",
mmc_hostname(host), __func__, host->f_init);
mmc_power_up(host, host->ocr_avail);
/*
* Some eMMCs (with VCCQ always on) may not be reset after power up, so
* do a hardware reset if possible.
*/
mmc_hw_reset_for_init(host);
/*
* sdio_reset sends CMD52 to reset card. Since we do not know
* if the card is being re-initialized, just send it. CMD52
* should be ignored by SD/eMMC cards.
* Skip it if we already know that we do not support SDIO commands
*/
if (!(host->caps2 & MMC_CAP2_NO_SDIO))
sdio_reset(host);
mmc_go_idle(host);
if (!(host->caps2 & MMC_CAP2_NO_SD))
mmc_send_if_cond(host, host->ocr_avail);
/* Order's important: probe SDIO, then SD, then MMC */
if (!(host->caps2 & MMC_CAP2_NO_SDIO))
if (!mmc_attach_sdio(host))
return 0;
if (!(host->caps2 & MMC_CAP2_NO_SD))
if (!mmc_attach_sd(host))
return 0;
if (!(host->caps2 & MMC_CAP2_NO_MMC))
if (!mmc_attach_mmc(host))
return 0;
mmc_power_off(host);
return -EIO;
}
int _mmc_detect_card_removed(struct mmc_host *host)
{
int ret;
if (!host->card || mmc_card_removed(host->card))
return 1;
ret = host->bus_ops->alive(host);
mmc: core: enhance card removal judgement for slow removal Function _mmc_detect_card_removed will be called to know whether the card is still present when host->bus_ops->detect is called. In current code, the return value of this function generally only depend on the result of sending cmd13 to card, which may not safe for card with detection support like slot gpio detection. Because the communication status between host and card may out of sync with the detect status if remove the card slowly or hands shake during the process. The direct reason is the async between card detect switch and card/slot pad contaction in hardware, which is defined by spec. The spec define card insert/remove sequence as below (both standard size SD card and MicroSD card have the same sequence): "Part 1 Standard Size SD Card Mechanical Addendum Ver4.00 Final, Appendix C: Card Detection Switch" (Take normally open type as example) a)SD card insertion sequence: The card detection switch should be turned on after all SD card contact pads are connected to the host connector contact pads. b)SD removal sequence: The card detection switch should be turned off when the SD card is just going to be removed and before any SD card contact pad is disconnected from the host connector contact pad. Below is the sequence when this issue occur (Take slot gpio detection as example and remove the card slowly during the process): 1. gpio level changed and card detect interrupt triggered. 2. mmc_rescan was launched. 3. the card pads were still contacted with the slot pads because of slow removal. So _mmc_detect_card_removed and mmc_rescan think card was still present (cmd13 succeed). 4. card pads were discontacted from the card slot pads. So the card was actually removed finally but the card removal event has been missed by system. The interval length between step 1 and step 4 depends on the card removal speed. If it's longer than the detect work schedule delay which is 200ms, this issue will likely happen. This patch add the card detect status check in function _mmc_detect_card_removed if cmd13 check succeed and host->ops->get_cd provided. If get_cd detect no card present then schedule another detect work 200ms later. Signed-off-by: Kevin Liu <kliu5@marvell.com> Tested-by: Johan Rudholm <johan.rudholm@stericsson.com> Reviewed-by: Philip Rakity <prakity@nvidia.com> Acked-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>
2013-02-28 11:29:29 +04:00
/*
* Card detect status and alive check may be out of sync if card is
* removed slowly, when card detect switch changes while card/slot
* pads are still contacted in hardware (refer to "SD Card Mechanical
* Addendum, Appendix C: Card Detection Switch"). So reschedule a
* detect work 200ms later for this case.
*/
if (!ret && host->ops->get_cd && !host->ops->get_cd(host)) {
mmc_detect_change(host, msecs_to_jiffies(200));
pr_debug("%s: card removed too slowly\n", mmc_hostname(host));
}
if (ret) {
mmc_card_set_removed(host->card);
pr_debug("%s: card remove detected\n", mmc_hostname(host));
}
return ret;
}
int mmc_detect_card_removed(struct mmc_host *host)
{
struct mmc_card *card = host->card;
int ret;
WARN_ON(!host->claimed);
if (!card)
return 1;
if (!mmc_card_is_removable(host))
return 0;
ret = mmc_card_removed(card);
/*
* The card will be considered unchanged unless we have been asked to
* detect a change or host requires polling to provide card detection.
*/
if (!host->detect_change && !(host->caps & MMC_CAP_NEEDS_POLL))
return ret;
host->detect_change = 0;
if (!ret) {
ret = _mmc_detect_card_removed(host);
if (ret && (host->caps & MMC_CAP_NEEDS_POLL)) {
/*
* Schedule a detect work as soon as possible to let a
* rescan handle the card removal.
*/
cancel_delayed_work(&host->detect);
_mmc_detect_change(host, 0, false);
}
}
return ret;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(mmc_detect_card_removed);
void mmc_rescan(struct work_struct *work)
{
struct mmc_host *host =
container_of(work, struct mmc_host, detect.work);
int i;
if (host->rescan_disable)
return;
/* If there is a non-removable card registered, only scan once */
if (!mmc_card_is_removable(host) && host->rescan_entered)
return;
host->rescan_entered = 1;
if (host->trigger_card_event && host->ops->card_event) {
mmc_claim_host(host);
host->ops->card_event(host);
mmc_release_host(host);
host->trigger_card_event = false;
}
mmc_bus_get(host);
/*
* if there is a _removable_ card registered, check whether it is
* still present
*/
if (host->bus_ops && !host->bus_dead && mmc_card_is_removable(host))
host->bus_ops->detect(host);
host->detect_change = 0;
/*
* Let mmc_bus_put() free the bus/bus_ops if we've found that
* the card is no longer present.
*/
mmc_bus_put(host);
mmc_bus_get(host);
/* if there still is a card present, stop here */
if (host->bus_ops != NULL) {
mmc_bus_put(host);
goto out;
}
/*
* Only we can add a new handler, so it's safe to
* release the lock here.
*/
mmc_bus_put(host);
mmc_claim_host(host);
if (mmc_card_is_removable(host) && host->ops->get_cd &&
host->ops->get_cd(host) == 0) {
mmc_power_off(host);
mmc_release_host(host);
goto out;
}
for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(freqs); i++) {
if (!mmc_rescan_try_freq(host, max(freqs[i], host->f_min)))
break;
if (freqs[i] <= host->f_min)
break;
}
mmc_release_host(host);
out:
if (host->caps & MMC_CAP_NEEDS_POLL)
mmc_schedule_delayed_work(&host->detect, HZ);
}
void mmc_start_host(struct mmc_host *host)
{
host->f_init = max(freqs[0], host->f_min);
host->rescan_disable = 0;
host->ios.power_mode = MMC_POWER_UNDEFINED;
if (!(host->caps2 & MMC_CAP2_NO_PRESCAN_POWERUP)) {
mmc_claim_host(host);
mmc_power_up(host, host->ocr_avail);
mmc_release_host(host);
}
mmc_gpiod_request_cd_irq(host);
_mmc_detect_change(host, 0, false);
}
void mmc_stop_host(struct mmc_host *host)
{
if (host->slot.cd_irq >= 0) {
if (host->slot.cd_wake_enabled)
disable_irq_wake(host->slot.cd_irq);
disable_irq(host->slot.cd_irq);
}
host->rescan_disable = 1;
cancel_delayed_work_sync(&host->detect);
/* clear pm flags now and let card drivers set them as needed */
host->pm_flags = 0;
mmc_bus_get(host);
if (host->bus_ops && !host->bus_dead) {
/* Calling bus_ops->remove() with a claimed host can deadlock */
host->bus_ops->remove(host);
mmc_claim_host(host);
mmc_detach_bus(host);
mmc_power_off(host);
mmc_release_host(host);
mmc_bus_put(host);
return;
}
mmc_bus_put(host);
mmc_claim_host(host);
mmc_power_off(host);
mmc_release_host(host);
}
int mmc_power_save_host(struct mmc_host *host)
{
int ret = 0;
pr_debug("%s: %s: powering down\n", mmc_hostname(host), __func__);
mmc_bus_get(host);
if (!host->bus_ops || host->bus_dead) {
mmc_bus_put(host);
return -EINVAL;
}
if (host->bus_ops->power_save)
ret = host->bus_ops->power_save(host);
mmc_bus_put(host);
mmc_power_off(host);
return ret;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(mmc_power_save_host);
int mmc_power_restore_host(struct mmc_host *host)
{
int ret;
pr_debug("%s: %s: powering up\n", mmc_hostname(host), __func__);
mmc_bus_get(host);
if (!host->bus_ops || host->bus_dead) {
mmc_bus_put(host);
return -EINVAL;
}
mmc_power_up(host, host->card->ocr);
ret = host->bus_ops->power_restore(host);
mmc_bus_put(host);
return ret;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(mmc_power_restore_host);
#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
/* Do the card removal on suspend if card is assumed removeable
* Do that in pm notifier while userspace isn't yet frozen, so we will be able
to sync the card.
*/
static int mmc_pm_notify(struct notifier_block *notify_block,
unsigned long mode, void *unused)
{
struct mmc_host *host = container_of(
notify_block, struct mmc_host, pm_notify);
unsigned long flags;
int err = 0;
switch (mode) {
case PM_HIBERNATION_PREPARE:
case PM_SUSPEND_PREPARE:
case PM_RESTORE_PREPARE:
spin_lock_irqsave(&host->lock, flags);
host->rescan_disable = 1;
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&host->lock, flags);
cancel_delayed_work_sync(&host->detect);
if (!host->bus_ops)
break;
/* Validate prerequisites for suspend */
if (host->bus_ops->pre_suspend)
err = host->bus_ops->pre_suspend(host);
if (!err)
break;
/* Calling bus_ops->remove() with a claimed host can deadlock */
host->bus_ops->remove(host);
mmc_claim_host(host);
mmc_detach_bus(host);
mmc_power_off(host);
mmc_release_host(host);
host->pm_flags = 0;
break;
case PM_POST_SUSPEND:
case PM_POST_HIBERNATION:
case PM_POST_RESTORE:
spin_lock_irqsave(&host->lock, flags);
host->rescan_disable = 0;
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&host->lock, flags);
_mmc_detect_change(host, 0, false);
}
return 0;
}
void mmc_register_pm_notifier(struct mmc_host *host)
{
host->pm_notify.notifier_call = mmc_pm_notify;
register_pm_notifier(&host->pm_notify);
}
void mmc_unregister_pm_notifier(struct mmc_host *host)
{
unregister_pm_notifier(&host->pm_notify);
}
#endif
/**
* mmc_init_context_info() - init synchronization context
* @host: mmc host
*
* Init struct context_info needed to implement asynchronous
* request mechanism, used by mmc core, host driver and mmc requests
* supplier.
*/
void mmc_init_context_info(struct mmc_host *host)
{
host->context_info.is_new_req = false;
host->context_info.is_done_rcv = false;
host->context_info.is_waiting_last_req = false;
init_waitqueue_head(&host->context_info.wait);
}
static int __init mmc_init(void)
{
int ret;
ret = mmc_register_bus();
if (ret)
mmc: core: Optimize boot time by detecting cards simultaneously The mmc workqueue is an ordered workqueue, allowing only one work to execute per given time. As this workqueue is used for card detection, the conseqeunce is that cards will be detected one by one waiting for each other. Moreover, most of the time spent during card initialization is waiting for the card's internal firmware to be ready. From a CPU perspective this typically means waiting for a completion variable to be kicked via an IRQ-handler or waiting for a sleep timer to finish. This behaviour of detecting/initializing cards is sub-optimal, especially for SOCs having several controllers/cards. Let's convert to use the system_freezable_wq for the mmc detect works. This enables several works to be executed simultaneously and thus also cards to be detected like so. Tests on UX500, which holds two eMMC cards and an SD-card (actually also an SDIO card, currently not detected), shows a significant improved behaviour due to this change. Before this change, both the eMMC cards waited for the SD card to be initialized as its detect work entered the workqueue first. In some cases, depending on the characteristic of the SD-card, they got delayed 1-1.5 s. Additionally for the second eMMC, it needed to wait for the first eMMC to be initialized which added another 120-190 ms. Converting to the system_freezable_wq, removed these delays and made both the eMMC cards available far earlier in the boot sequence. Selecting the system_freezable_wq, in favour of for example the system_wq, is because we need card detection mechanism to be disabled once userspace are frozen during system PM. Currently the mmc core deal with this via PM notifiers, but following patches may utilize the behaviour of the system_freezable_wq, to simplify the use of the PM notifiers. Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Tested-by: Alan Cooper <alcooperx@gmail.com> Tested-by: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>
2015-12-01 12:35:29 +03:00
return ret;
ret = mmc_register_host_class();
if (ret)
goto unregister_bus;
ret = sdio_register_bus();
if (ret)
goto unregister_host_class;
return 0;
unregister_host_class:
mmc_unregister_host_class();
unregister_bus:
mmc_unregister_bus();
return ret;
}
static void __exit mmc_exit(void)
{
sdio_unregister_bus();
mmc_unregister_host_class();
mmc_unregister_bus();
}
subsys_initcall(mmc_init);
module_exit(mmc_exit);
MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");