WSL2-Linux-Kernel/drivers/mtd/nftlcore.c

817 строки
22 KiB
C
Исходник Обычный вид История

// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
/*
* Linux driver for NAND Flash Translation Layer
*
* Copyright © 1999 Machine Vision Holdings, Inc.
* Copyright © 1999-2010 David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
*/
#define PRERELEASE
#include <linux/kernel.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <asm/errno.h>
#include <asm/io.h>
#include <linux/uaccess.h>
#include <linux/delay.h>
#include <linux/slab.h>
#include <linux/init.h>
#include <linux/hdreg.h>
#include <linux/blkdev.h>
#include <linux/kmod.h>
#include <linux/mtd/mtd.h>
#include <linux/mtd/rawnand.h>
#include <linux/mtd/nftl.h>
#include <linux/mtd/blktrans.h>
/* maximum number of loops while examining next block, to have a
chance to detect consistency problems (they should never happen
because of the checks done in the mounting */
#define MAX_LOOPS 10000
static void nftl_add_mtd(struct mtd_blktrans_ops *tr, struct mtd_info *mtd)
{
struct NFTLrecord *nftl;
unsigned long temp;
if (!mtd_type_is_nand(mtd) || mtd->size > UINT_MAX)
return;
/* OK, this is moderately ugly. But probably safe. Alternatives? */
if (memcmp(mtd->name, "DiskOnChip", 10))
return;
pr_debug("NFTL: add_mtd for %s\n", mtd->name);
nftl = kzalloc(sizeof(struct NFTLrecord), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!nftl)
return;
nftl->mbd.mtd = mtd;
nftl->mbd.devnum = -1;
nftl->mbd.tr = tr;
if (NFTL_mount(nftl) < 0) {
printk(KERN_WARNING "NFTL: could not mount device\n");
kfree(nftl);
return;
}
/* OK, it's a new one. Set up all the data structures. */
/* Calculate geometry */
nftl->cylinders = 1024;
nftl->heads = 16;
temp = nftl->cylinders * nftl->heads;
nftl->sectors = nftl->mbd.size / temp;
if (nftl->mbd.size % temp) {
nftl->sectors++;
temp = nftl->cylinders * nftl->sectors;
nftl->heads = nftl->mbd.size / temp;
if (nftl->mbd.size % temp) {
nftl->heads++;
temp = nftl->heads * nftl->sectors;
nftl->cylinders = nftl->mbd.size / temp;
}
}
if (nftl->mbd.size != nftl->heads * nftl->cylinders * nftl->sectors) {
/*
Oh no we don't have
mbd.size == heads * cylinders * sectors
*/
printk(KERN_WARNING "NFTL: cannot calculate a geometry to "
"match size of 0x%lx.\n", nftl->mbd.size);
printk(KERN_WARNING "NFTL: using C:%d H:%d S:%d "
"(== 0x%lx sects)\n",
nftl->cylinders, nftl->heads , nftl->sectors,
(long)nftl->cylinders * (long)nftl->heads *
(long)nftl->sectors );
}
if (add_mtd_blktrans_dev(&nftl->mbd)) {
kfree(nftl->ReplUnitTable);
kfree(nftl->EUNtable);
kfree(nftl);
return;
}
#ifdef PSYCHO_DEBUG
printk(KERN_INFO "NFTL: Found new nftl%c\n", nftl->mbd.devnum + 'a');
#endif
}
static void nftl_remove_dev(struct mtd_blktrans_dev *dev)
{
struct NFTLrecord *nftl = (void *)dev;
pr_debug("NFTL: remove_dev (i=%d)\n", dev->devnum);
del_mtd_blktrans_dev(dev);
kfree(nftl->ReplUnitTable);
kfree(nftl->EUNtable);
}
[MTD] Rework the out of band handling completely Hopefully the last iteration on this! The handling of out of band data on NAND was accompanied by tons of fruitless discussions and halfarsed patches to make it work for a particular problem. Sufficiently annoyed by I all those "I know it better" mails and the resonable amount of discarded "it solves my problem" patches, I finally decided to go for the big rework. After removing the _ecc variants of mtd read/write functions the solution to satisfy the various requirements was to refactor the read/write _oob functions in mtd. The major change is that read/write_oob now takes a pointer to an operation descriptor structure "struct mtd_oob_ops".instead of having a function with at least seven arguments. read/write_oob which should probably renamed to a more descriptive name, can do the following tasks: - read/write out of band data - read/write data content and out of band data - read/write raw data content and out of band data (ecc disabled) struct mtd_oob_ops has a mode field, which determines the oob handling mode. Aside of the MTD_OOB_RAW mode, which is intended to be especially for diagnostic purposes and some internal functions e.g. bad block table creation, the other two modes are for mtd clients: MTD_OOB_PLACE puts/gets the given oob data exactly to/from the place which is described by the ooboffs and ooblen fields of the mtd_oob_ops strcuture. It's up to the caller to make sure that the byte positions are not used by the ECC placement algorithms. MTD_OOB_AUTO puts/gets the given oob data automaticaly to/from the places in the out of band area which are described by the oobfree tuples in the ecclayout data structre which is associated to the devicee. The decision whether data plus oob or oob only handling is done depends on the setting of the datbuf member of the data structure. When datbuf == NULL then the internal read/write_oob functions are selected, otherwise the read/write data routines are invoked. Tested on a few platforms with all variants. Please be aware of possible regressions for your particular device / application scenario Disclaimer: Any whining will be ignored from those who just contributed "hot air blurb" and never sat down to tackle the underlying problem of the mess in the NAND driver grown over time and the big chunk of work to fix up the existing users. The problem was not the holiness of the existing MTD interfaces. The problems was the lack of time to go for the big overhaul. It's easy to add more mess to the existing one, but it takes alot of effort to go for a real solution. Improvements and bugfixes are welcome! Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2006-05-29 05:26:58 +04:00
/*
* Read oob data from flash
*/
int nftl_read_oob(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t offs, size_t len,
size_t *retlen, uint8_t *buf)
{
loff_t mask = mtd->writesize - 1;
[MTD] Rework the out of band handling completely Hopefully the last iteration on this! The handling of out of band data on NAND was accompanied by tons of fruitless discussions and halfarsed patches to make it work for a particular problem. Sufficiently annoyed by I all those "I know it better" mails and the resonable amount of discarded "it solves my problem" patches, I finally decided to go for the big rework. After removing the _ecc variants of mtd read/write functions the solution to satisfy the various requirements was to refactor the read/write _oob functions in mtd. The major change is that read/write_oob now takes a pointer to an operation descriptor structure "struct mtd_oob_ops".instead of having a function with at least seven arguments. read/write_oob which should probably renamed to a more descriptive name, can do the following tasks: - read/write out of band data - read/write data content and out of band data - read/write raw data content and out of band data (ecc disabled) struct mtd_oob_ops has a mode field, which determines the oob handling mode. Aside of the MTD_OOB_RAW mode, which is intended to be especially for diagnostic purposes and some internal functions e.g. bad block table creation, the other two modes are for mtd clients: MTD_OOB_PLACE puts/gets the given oob data exactly to/from the place which is described by the ooboffs and ooblen fields of the mtd_oob_ops strcuture. It's up to the caller to make sure that the byte positions are not used by the ECC placement algorithms. MTD_OOB_AUTO puts/gets the given oob data automaticaly to/from the places in the out of band area which are described by the oobfree tuples in the ecclayout data structre which is associated to the devicee. The decision whether data plus oob or oob only handling is done depends on the setting of the datbuf member of the data structure. When datbuf == NULL then the internal read/write_oob functions are selected, otherwise the read/write data routines are invoked. Tested on a few platforms with all variants. Please be aware of possible regressions for your particular device / application scenario Disclaimer: Any whining will be ignored from those who just contributed "hot air blurb" and never sat down to tackle the underlying problem of the mess in the NAND driver grown over time and the big chunk of work to fix up the existing users. The problem was not the holiness of the existing MTD interfaces. The problems was the lack of time to go for the big overhaul. It's easy to add more mess to the existing one, but it takes alot of effort to go for a real solution. Improvements and bugfixes are welcome! Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2006-05-29 05:26:58 +04:00
struct mtd_oob_ops ops;
int res;
ops.mode = MTD_OPS_PLACE_OOB;
ops.ooboffs = offs & mask;
[MTD] Rework the out of band handling completely Hopefully the last iteration on this! The handling of out of band data on NAND was accompanied by tons of fruitless discussions and halfarsed patches to make it work for a particular problem. Sufficiently annoyed by I all those "I know it better" mails and the resonable amount of discarded "it solves my problem" patches, I finally decided to go for the big rework. After removing the _ecc variants of mtd read/write functions the solution to satisfy the various requirements was to refactor the read/write _oob functions in mtd. The major change is that read/write_oob now takes a pointer to an operation descriptor structure "struct mtd_oob_ops".instead of having a function with at least seven arguments. read/write_oob which should probably renamed to a more descriptive name, can do the following tasks: - read/write out of band data - read/write data content and out of band data - read/write raw data content and out of band data (ecc disabled) struct mtd_oob_ops has a mode field, which determines the oob handling mode. Aside of the MTD_OOB_RAW mode, which is intended to be especially for diagnostic purposes and some internal functions e.g. bad block table creation, the other two modes are for mtd clients: MTD_OOB_PLACE puts/gets the given oob data exactly to/from the place which is described by the ooboffs and ooblen fields of the mtd_oob_ops strcuture. It's up to the caller to make sure that the byte positions are not used by the ECC placement algorithms. MTD_OOB_AUTO puts/gets the given oob data automaticaly to/from the places in the out of band area which are described by the oobfree tuples in the ecclayout data structre which is associated to the devicee. The decision whether data plus oob or oob only handling is done depends on the setting of the datbuf member of the data structure. When datbuf == NULL then the internal read/write_oob functions are selected, otherwise the read/write data routines are invoked. Tested on a few platforms with all variants. Please be aware of possible regressions for your particular device / application scenario Disclaimer: Any whining will be ignored from those who just contributed "hot air blurb" and never sat down to tackle the underlying problem of the mess in the NAND driver grown over time and the big chunk of work to fix up the existing users. The problem was not the holiness of the existing MTD interfaces. The problems was the lack of time to go for the big overhaul. It's easy to add more mess to the existing one, but it takes alot of effort to go for a real solution. Improvements and bugfixes are welcome! Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2006-05-29 05:26:58 +04:00
ops.ooblen = len;
ops.oobbuf = buf;
ops.datbuf = NULL;
res = mtd_read_oob(mtd, offs & ~mask, &ops);
*retlen = ops.oobretlen;
[MTD] Rework the out of band handling completely Hopefully the last iteration on this! The handling of out of band data on NAND was accompanied by tons of fruitless discussions and halfarsed patches to make it work for a particular problem. Sufficiently annoyed by I all those "I know it better" mails and the resonable amount of discarded "it solves my problem" patches, I finally decided to go for the big rework. After removing the _ecc variants of mtd read/write functions the solution to satisfy the various requirements was to refactor the read/write _oob functions in mtd. The major change is that read/write_oob now takes a pointer to an operation descriptor structure "struct mtd_oob_ops".instead of having a function with at least seven arguments. read/write_oob which should probably renamed to a more descriptive name, can do the following tasks: - read/write out of band data - read/write data content and out of band data - read/write raw data content and out of band data (ecc disabled) struct mtd_oob_ops has a mode field, which determines the oob handling mode. Aside of the MTD_OOB_RAW mode, which is intended to be especially for diagnostic purposes and some internal functions e.g. bad block table creation, the other two modes are for mtd clients: MTD_OOB_PLACE puts/gets the given oob data exactly to/from the place which is described by the ooboffs and ooblen fields of the mtd_oob_ops strcuture. It's up to the caller to make sure that the byte positions are not used by the ECC placement algorithms. MTD_OOB_AUTO puts/gets the given oob data automaticaly to/from the places in the out of band area which are described by the oobfree tuples in the ecclayout data structre which is associated to the devicee. The decision whether data plus oob or oob only handling is done depends on the setting of the datbuf member of the data structure. When datbuf == NULL then the internal read/write_oob functions are selected, otherwise the read/write data routines are invoked. Tested on a few platforms with all variants. Please be aware of possible regressions for your particular device / application scenario Disclaimer: Any whining will be ignored from those who just contributed "hot air blurb" and never sat down to tackle the underlying problem of the mess in the NAND driver grown over time and the big chunk of work to fix up the existing users. The problem was not the holiness of the existing MTD interfaces. The problems was the lack of time to go for the big overhaul. It's easy to add more mess to the existing one, but it takes alot of effort to go for a real solution. Improvements and bugfixes are welcome! Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2006-05-29 05:26:58 +04:00
return res;
}
/*
* Write oob data to flash
*/
int nftl_write_oob(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t offs, size_t len,
size_t *retlen, uint8_t *buf)
{
loff_t mask = mtd->writesize - 1;
[MTD] Rework the out of band handling completely Hopefully the last iteration on this! The handling of out of band data on NAND was accompanied by tons of fruitless discussions and halfarsed patches to make it work for a particular problem. Sufficiently annoyed by I all those "I know it better" mails and the resonable amount of discarded "it solves my problem" patches, I finally decided to go for the big rework. After removing the _ecc variants of mtd read/write functions the solution to satisfy the various requirements was to refactor the read/write _oob functions in mtd. The major change is that read/write_oob now takes a pointer to an operation descriptor structure "struct mtd_oob_ops".instead of having a function with at least seven arguments. read/write_oob which should probably renamed to a more descriptive name, can do the following tasks: - read/write out of band data - read/write data content and out of band data - read/write raw data content and out of band data (ecc disabled) struct mtd_oob_ops has a mode field, which determines the oob handling mode. Aside of the MTD_OOB_RAW mode, which is intended to be especially for diagnostic purposes and some internal functions e.g. bad block table creation, the other two modes are for mtd clients: MTD_OOB_PLACE puts/gets the given oob data exactly to/from the place which is described by the ooboffs and ooblen fields of the mtd_oob_ops strcuture. It's up to the caller to make sure that the byte positions are not used by the ECC placement algorithms. MTD_OOB_AUTO puts/gets the given oob data automaticaly to/from the places in the out of band area which are described by the oobfree tuples in the ecclayout data structre which is associated to the devicee. The decision whether data plus oob or oob only handling is done depends on the setting of the datbuf member of the data structure. When datbuf == NULL then the internal read/write_oob functions are selected, otherwise the read/write data routines are invoked. Tested on a few platforms with all variants. Please be aware of possible regressions for your particular device / application scenario Disclaimer: Any whining will be ignored from those who just contributed "hot air blurb" and never sat down to tackle the underlying problem of the mess in the NAND driver grown over time and the big chunk of work to fix up the existing users. The problem was not the holiness of the existing MTD interfaces. The problems was the lack of time to go for the big overhaul. It's easy to add more mess to the existing one, but it takes alot of effort to go for a real solution. Improvements and bugfixes are welcome! Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2006-05-29 05:26:58 +04:00
struct mtd_oob_ops ops;
int res;
ops.mode = MTD_OPS_PLACE_OOB;
ops.ooboffs = offs & mask;
[MTD] Rework the out of band handling completely Hopefully the last iteration on this! The handling of out of band data on NAND was accompanied by tons of fruitless discussions and halfarsed patches to make it work for a particular problem. Sufficiently annoyed by I all those "I know it better" mails and the resonable amount of discarded "it solves my problem" patches, I finally decided to go for the big rework. After removing the _ecc variants of mtd read/write functions the solution to satisfy the various requirements was to refactor the read/write _oob functions in mtd. The major change is that read/write_oob now takes a pointer to an operation descriptor structure "struct mtd_oob_ops".instead of having a function with at least seven arguments. read/write_oob which should probably renamed to a more descriptive name, can do the following tasks: - read/write out of band data - read/write data content and out of band data - read/write raw data content and out of band data (ecc disabled) struct mtd_oob_ops has a mode field, which determines the oob handling mode. Aside of the MTD_OOB_RAW mode, which is intended to be especially for diagnostic purposes and some internal functions e.g. bad block table creation, the other two modes are for mtd clients: MTD_OOB_PLACE puts/gets the given oob data exactly to/from the place which is described by the ooboffs and ooblen fields of the mtd_oob_ops strcuture. It's up to the caller to make sure that the byte positions are not used by the ECC placement algorithms. MTD_OOB_AUTO puts/gets the given oob data automaticaly to/from the places in the out of band area which are described by the oobfree tuples in the ecclayout data structre which is associated to the devicee. The decision whether data plus oob or oob only handling is done depends on the setting of the datbuf member of the data structure. When datbuf == NULL then the internal read/write_oob functions are selected, otherwise the read/write data routines are invoked. Tested on a few platforms with all variants. Please be aware of possible regressions for your particular device / application scenario Disclaimer: Any whining will be ignored from those who just contributed "hot air blurb" and never sat down to tackle the underlying problem of the mess in the NAND driver grown over time and the big chunk of work to fix up the existing users. The problem was not the holiness of the existing MTD interfaces. The problems was the lack of time to go for the big overhaul. It's easy to add more mess to the existing one, but it takes alot of effort to go for a real solution. Improvements and bugfixes are welcome! Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2006-05-29 05:26:58 +04:00
ops.ooblen = len;
ops.oobbuf = buf;
ops.datbuf = NULL;
res = mtd_write_oob(mtd, offs & ~mask, &ops);
*retlen = ops.oobretlen;
[MTD] Rework the out of band handling completely Hopefully the last iteration on this! The handling of out of band data on NAND was accompanied by tons of fruitless discussions and halfarsed patches to make it work for a particular problem. Sufficiently annoyed by I all those "I know it better" mails and the resonable amount of discarded "it solves my problem" patches, I finally decided to go for the big rework. After removing the _ecc variants of mtd read/write functions the solution to satisfy the various requirements was to refactor the read/write _oob functions in mtd. The major change is that read/write_oob now takes a pointer to an operation descriptor structure "struct mtd_oob_ops".instead of having a function with at least seven arguments. read/write_oob which should probably renamed to a more descriptive name, can do the following tasks: - read/write out of band data - read/write data content and out of band data - read/write raw data content and out of band data (ecc disabled) struct mtd_oob_ops has a mode field, which determines the oob handling mode. Aside of the MTD_OOB_RAW mode, which is intended to be especially for diagnostic purposes and some internal functions e.g. bad block table creation, the other two modes are for mtd clients: MTD_OOB_PLACE puts/gets the given oob data exactly to/from the place which is described by the ooboffs and ooblen fields of the mtd_oob_ops strcuture. It's up to the caller to make sure that the byte positions are not used by the ECC placement algorithms. MTD_OOB_AUTO puts/gets the given oob data automaticaly to/from the places in the out of band area which are described by the oobfree tuples in the ecclayout data structre which is associated to the devicee. The decision whether data plus oob or oob only handling is done depends on the setting of the datbuf member of the data structure. When datbuf == NULL then the internal read/write_oob functions are selected, otherwise the read/write data routines are invoked. Tested on a few platforms with all variants. Please be aware of possible regressions for your particular device / application scenario Disclaimer: Any whining will be ignored from those who just contributed "hot air blurb" and never sat down to tackle the underlying problem of the mess in the NAND driver grown over time and the big chunk of work to fix up the existing users. The problem was not the holiness of the existing MTD interfaces. The problems was the lack of time to go for the big overhaul. It's easy to add more mess to the existing one, but it takes alot of effort to go for a real solution. Improvements and bugfixes are welcome! Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2006-05-29 05:26:58 +04:00
return res;
}
#ifdef CONFIG_NFTL_RW
[MTD] Rework the out of band handling completely Hopefully the last iteration on this! The handling of out of band data on NAND was accompanied by tons of fruitless discussions and halfarsed patches to make it work for a particular problem. Sufficiently annoyed by I all those "I know it better" mails and the resonable amount of discarded "it solves my problem" patches, I finally decided to go for the big rework. After removing the _ecc variants of mtd read/write functions the solution to satisfy the various requirements was to refactor the read/write _oob functions in mtd. The major change is that read/write_oob now takes a pointer to an operation descriptor structure "struct mtd_oob_ops".instead of having a function with at least seven arguments. read/write_oob which should probably renamed to a more descriptive name, can do the following tasks: - read/write out of band data - read/write data content and out of band data - read/write raw data content and out of band data (ecc disabled) struct mtd_oob_ops has a mode field, which determines the oob handling mode. Aside of the MTD_OOB_RAW mode, which is intended to be especially for diagnostic purposes and some internal functions e.g. bad block table creation, the other two modes are for mtd clients: MTD_OOB_PLACE puts/gets the given oob data exactly to/from the place which is described by the ooboffs and ooblen fields of the mtd_oob_ops strcuture. It's up to the caller to make sure that the byte positions are not used by the ECC placement algorithms. MTD_OOB_AUTO puts/gets the given oob data automaticaly to/from the places in the out of band area which are described by the oobfree tuples in the ecclayout data structre which is associated to the devicee. The decision whether data plus oob or oob only handling is done depends on the setting of the datbuf member of the data structure. When datbuf == NULL then the internal read/write_oob functions are selected, otherwise the read/write data routines are invoked. Tested on a few platforms with all variants. Please be aware of possible regressions for your particular device / application scenario Disclaimer: Any whining will be ignored from those who just contributed "hot air blurb" and never sat down to tackle the underlying problem of the mess in the NAND driver grown over time and the big chunk of work to fix up the existing users. The problem was not the holiness of the existing MTD interfaces. The problems was the lack of time to go for the big overhaul. It's easy to add more mess to the existing one, but it takes alot of effort to go for a real solution. Improvements and bugfixes are welcome! Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2006-05-29 05:26:58 +04:00
/*
* Write data and oob to flash
*/
static int nftl_write(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t offs, size_t len,
size_t *retlen, uint8_t *buf, uint8_t *oob)
{
loff_t mask = mtd->writesize - 1;
[MTD] Rework the out of band handling completely Hopefully the last iteration on this! The handling of out of band data on NAND was accompanied by tons of fruitless discussions and halfarsed patches to make it work for a particular problem. Sufficiently annoyed by I all those "I know it better" mails and the resonable amount of discarded "it solves my problem" patches, I finally decided to go for the big rework. After removing the _ecc variants of mtd read/write functions the solution to satisfy the various requirements was to refactor the read/write _oob functions in mtd. The major change is that read/write_oob now takes a pointer to an operation descriptor structure "struct mtd_oob_ops".instead of having a function with at least seven arguments. read/write_oob which should probably renamed to a more descriptive name, can do the following tasks: - read/write out of band data - read/write data content and out of band data - read/write raw data content and out of band data (ecc disabled) struct mtd_oob_ops has a mode field, which determines the oob handling mode. Aside of the MTD_OOB_RAW mode, which is intended to be especially for diagnostic purposes and some internal functions e.g. bad block table creation, the other two modes are for mtd clients: MTD_OOB_PLACE puts/gets the given oob data exactly to/from the place which is described by the ooboffs and ooblen fields of the mtd_oob_ops strcuture. It's up to the caller to make sure that the byte positions are not used by the ECC placement algorithms. MTD_OOB_AUTO puts/gets the given oob data automaticaly to/from the places in the out of band area which are described by the oobfree tuples in the ecclayout data structre which is associated to the devicee. The decision whether data plus oob or oob only handling is done depends on the setting of the datbuf member of the data structure. When datbuf == NULL then the internal read/write_oob functions are selected, otherwise the read/write data routines are invoked. Tested on a few platforms with all variants. Please be aware of possible regressions for your particular device / application scenario Disclaimer: Any whining will be ignored from those who just contributed "hot air blurb" and never sat down to tackle the underlying problem of the mess in the NAND driver grown over time and the big chunk of work to fix up the existing users. The problem was not the holiness of the existing MTD interfaces. The problems was the lack of time to go for the big overhaul. It's easy to add more mess to the existing one, but it takes alot of effort to go for a real solution. Improvements and bugfixes are welcome! Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2006-05-29 05:26:58 +04:00
struct mtd_oob_ops ops;
int res;
ops.mode = MTD_OPS_PLACE_OOB;
ops.ooboffs = offs & mask;
[MTD] Rework the out of band handling completely Hopefully the last iteration on this! The handling of out of band data on NAND was accompanied by tons of fruitless discussions and halfarsed patches to make it work for a particular problem. Sufficiently annoyed by I all those "I know it better" mails and the resonable amount of discarded "it solves my problem" patches, I finally decided to go for the big rework. After removing the _ecc variants of mtd read/write functions the solution to satisfy the various requirements was to refactor the read/write _oob functions in mtd. The major change is that read/write_oob now takes a pointer to an operation descriptor structure "struct mtd_oob_ops".instead of having a function with at least seven arguments. read/write_oob which should probably renamed to a more descriptive name, can do the following tasks: - read/write out of band data - read/write data content and out of band data - read/write raw data content and out of band data (ecc disabled) struct mtd_oob_ops has a mode field, which determines the oob handling mode. Aside of the MTD_OOB_RAW mode, which is intended to be especially for diagnostic purposes and some internal functions e.g. bad block table creation, the other two modes are for mtd clients: MTD_OOB_PLACE puts/gets the given oob data exactly to/from the place which is described by the ooboffs and ooblen fields of the mtd_oob_ops strcuture. It's up to the caller to make sure that the byte positions are not used by the ECC placement algorithms. MTD_OOB_AUTO puts/gets the given oob data automaticaly to/from the places in the out of band area which are described by the oobfree tuples in the ecclayout data structre which is associated to the devicee. The decision whether data plus oob or oob only handling is done depends on the setting of the datbuf member of the data structure. When datbuf == NULL then the internal read/write_oob functions are selected, otherwise the read/write data routines are invoked. Tested on a few platforms with all variants. Please be aware of possible regressions for your particular device / application scenario Disclaimer: Any whining will be ignored from those who just contributed "hot air blurb" and never sat down to tackle the underlying problem of the mess in the NAND driver grown over time and the big chunk of work to fix up the existing users. The problem was not the holiness of the existing MTD interfaces. The problems was the lack of time to go for the big overhaul. It's easy to add more mess to the existing one, but it takes alot of effort to go for a real solution. Improvements and bugfixes are welcome! Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2006-05-29 05:26:58 +04:00
ops.ooblen = mtd->oobsize;
ops.oobbuf = oob;
ops.datbuf = buf;
ops.len = len;
res = mtd_write_oob(mtd, offs & ~mask, &ops);
[MTD] Rework the out of band handling completely Hopefully the last iteration on this! The handling of out of band data on NAND was accompanied by tons of fruitless discussions and halfarsed patches to make it work for a particular problem. Sufficiently annoyed by I all those "I know it better" mails and the resonable amount of discarded "it solves my problem" patches, I finally decided to go for the big rework. After removing the _ecc variants of mtd read/write functions the solution to satisfy the various requirements was to refactor the read/write _oob functions in mtd. The major change is that read/write_oob now takes a pointer to an operation descriptor structure "struct mtd_oob_ops".instead of having a function with at least seven arguments. read/write_oob which should probably renamed to a more descriptive name, can do the following tasks: - read/write out of band data - read/write data content and out of band data - read/write raw data content and out of band data (ecc disabled) struct mtd_oob_ops has a mode field, which determines the oob handling mode. Aside of the MTD_OOB_RAW mode, which is intended to be especially for diagnostic purposes and some internal functions e.g. bad block table creation, the other two modes are for mtd clients: MTD_OOB_PLACE puts/gets the given oob data exactly to/from the place which is described by the ooboffs and ooblen fields of the mtd_oob_ops strcuture. It's up to the caller to make sure that the byte positions are not used by the ECC placement algorithms. MTD_OOB_AUTO puts/gets the given oob data automaticaly to/from the places in the out of band area which are described by the oobfree tuples in the ecclayout data structre which is associated to the devicee. The decision whether data plus oob or oob only handling is done depends on the setting of the datbuf member of the data structure. When datbuf == NULL then the internal read/write_oob functions are selected, otherwise the read/write data routines are invoked. Tested on a few platforms with all variants. Please be aware of possible regressions for your particular device / application scenario Disclaimer: Any whining will be ignored from those who just contributed "hot air blurb" and never sat down to tackle the underlying problem of the mess in the NAND driver grown over time and the big chunk of work to fix up the existing users. The problem was not the holiness of the existing MTD interfaces. The problems was the lack of time to go for the big overhaul. It's easy to add more mess to the existing one, but it takes alot of effort to go for a real solution. Improvements and bugfixes are welcome! Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2006-05-29 05:26:58 +04:00
*retlen = ops.retlen;
return res;
}
/* Actual NFTL access routines */
/* NFTL_findfreeblock: Find a free Erase Unit on the NFTL partition. This function is used
* when the give Virtual Unit Chain
*/
static u16 NFTL_findfreeblock(struct NFTLrecord *nftl, int desperate )
{
/* For a given Virtual Unit Chain: find or create a free block and
add it to the chain */
/* We're passed the number of the last EUN in the chain, to save us from
having to look it up again */
u16 pot = nftl->LastFreeEUN;
int silly = nftl->nb_blocks;
/* Normally, we force a fold to happen before we run out of free blocks completely */
if (!desperate && nftl->numfreeEUNs < 2) {
pr_debug("NFTL_findfreeblock: there are too few free EUNs\n");
return BLOCK_NIL;
}
/* Scan for a free block */
do {
if (nftl->ReplUnitTable[pot] == BLOCK_FREE) {
nftl->LastFreeEUN = pot;
nftl->numfreeEUNs--;
return pot;
}
/* This will probably point to the MediaHdr unit itself,
right at the beginning of the partition. But that unit
(and the backup unit too) should have the UCI set
up so that it's not selected for overwriting */
if (++pot > nftl->lastEUN)
pot = le16_to_cpu(nftl->MediaHdr.FirstPhysicalEUN);
if (!silly--) {
printk("Argh! No free blocks found! LastFreeEUN = %d, "
"FirstEUN = %d\n", nftl->LastFreeEUN,
le16_to_cpu(nftl->MediaHdr.FirstPhysicalEUN));
return BLOCK_NIL;
}
} while (pot != nftl->LastFreeEUN);
return BLOCK_NIL;
}
static u16 NFTL_foldchain (struct NFTLrecord *nftl, unsigned thisVUC, unsigned pendingblock )
{
struct mtd_info *mtd = nftl->mbd.mtd;
u16 BlockMap[MAX_SECTORS_PER_UNIT];
unsigned char BlockLastState[MAX_SECTORS_PER_UNIT];
unsigned char BlockFreeFound[MAX_SECTORS_PER_UNIT];
unsigned int thisEUN;
int block;
int silly;
unsigned int targetEUN;
struct nftl_oob oob;
int inplace = 1;
size_t retlen;
memset(BlockMap, 0xff, sizeof(BlockMap));
memset(BlockFreeFound, 0, sizeof(BlockFreeFound));
thisEUN = nftl->EUNtable[thisVUC];
if (thisEUN == BLOCK_NIL) {
printk(KERN_WARNING "Trying to fold non-existent "
"Virtual Unit Chain %d!\n", thisVUC);
return BLOCK_NIL;
}
/* Scan to find the Erase Unit which holds the actual data for each
512-byte block within the Chain.
*/
silly = MAX_LOOPS;
targetEUN = BLOCK_NIL;
while (thisEUN <= nftl->lastEUN ) {
unsigned int status, foldmark;
targetEUN = thisEUN;
for (block = 0; block < nftl->EraseSize / 512; block ++) {
[MTD] Rework the out of band handling completely Hopefully the last iteration on this! The handling of out of band data on NAND was accompanied by tons of fruitless discussions and halfarsed patches to make it work for a particular problem. Sufficiently annoyed by I all those "I know it better" mails and the resonable amount of discarded "it solves my problem" patches, I finally decided to go for the big rework. After removing the _ecc variants of mtd read/write functions the solution to satisfy the various requirements was to refactor the read/write _oob functions in mtd. The major change is that read/write_oob now takes a pointer to an operation descriptor structure "struct mtd_oob_ops".instead of having a function with at least seven arguments. read/write_oob which should probably renamed to a more descriptive name, can do the following tasks: - read/write out of band data - read/write data content and out of band data - read/write raw data content and out of band data (ecc disabled) struct mtd_oob_ops has a mode field, which determines the oob handling mode. Aside of the MTD_OOB_RAW mode, which is intended to be especially for diagnostic purposes and some internal functions e.g. bad block table creation, the other two modes are for mtd clients: MTD_OOB_PLACE puts/gets the given oob data exactly to/from the place which is described by the ooboffs and ooblen fields of the mtd_oob_ops strcuture. It's up to the caller to make sure that the byte positions are not used by the ECC placement algorithms. MTD_OOB_AUTO puts/gets the given oob data automaticaly to/from the places in the out of band area which are described by the oobfree tuples in the ecclayout data structre which is associated to the devicee. The decision whether data plus oob or oob only handling is done depends on the setting of the datbuf member of the data structure. When datbuf == NULL then the internal read/write_oob functions are selected, otherwise the read/write data routines are invoked. Tested on a few platforms with all variants. Please be aware of possible regressions for your particular device / application scenario Disclaimer: Any whining will be ignored from those who just contributed "hot air blurb" and never sat down to tackle the underlying problem of the mess in the NAND driver grown over time and the big chunk of work to fix up the existing users. The problem was not the holiness of the existing MTD interfaces. The problems was the lack of time to go for the big overhaul. It's easy to add more mess to the existing one, but it takes alot of effort to go for a real solution. Improvements and bugfixes are welcome! Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2006-05-29 05:26:58 +04:00
nftl_read_oob(mtd, (thisEUN * nftl->EraseSize) +
(block * 512), 16 , &retlen,
(char *)&oob);
if (block == 2) {
foldmark = oob.u.c.FoldMark | oob.u.c.FoldMark1;
if (foldmark == FOLD_MARK_IN_PROGRESS) {
pr_debug("Write Inhibited on EUN %d\n", thisEUN);
inplace = 0;
} else {
/* There's no other reason not to do inplace,
except ones that come later. So we don't need
to preserve inplace */
inplace = 1;
}
}
status = oob.b.Status | oob.b.Status1;
BlockLastState[block] = status;
switch(status) {
case SECTOR_FREE:
BlockFreeFound[block] = 1;
break;
case SECTOR_USED:
if (!BlockFreeFound[block])
BlockMap[block] = thisEUN;
else
printk(KERN_WARNING
"SECTOR_USED found after SECTOR_FREE "
"in Virtual Unit Chain %d for block %d\n",
thisVUC, block);
break;
case SECTOR_DELETED:
if (!BlockFreeFound[block])
BlockMap[block] = BLOCK_NIL;
else
printk(KERN_WARNING
"SECTOR_DELETED found after SECTOR_FREE "
"in Virtual Unit Chain %d for block %d\n",
thisVUC, block);
break;
case SECTOR_IGNORE:
break;
default:
printk("Unknown status for block %d in EUN %d: %x\n",
block, thisEUN, status);
}
}
if (!silly--) {
printk(KERN_WARNING "Infinite loop in Virtual Unit Chain 0x%x\n",
thisVUC);
return BLOCK_NIL;
}
thisEUN = nftl->ReplUnitTable[thisEUN];
}
if (inplace) {
/* We're being asked to be a fold-in-place. Check
that all blocks which actually have data associated
with them (i.e. BlockMap[block] != BLOCK_NIL) are
either already present or SECTOR_FREE in the target
block. If not, we're going to have to fold out-of-place
anyway.
*/
for (block = 0; block < nftl->EraseSize / 512 ; block++) {
if (BlockLastState[block] != SECTOR_FREE &&
BlockMap[block] != BLOCK_NIL &&
BlockMap[block] != targetEUN) {
pr_debug("Setting inplace to 0. VUC %d, "
"block %d was %x lastEUN, "
"and is in EUN %d (%s) %d\n",
thisVUC, block, BlockLastState[block],
BlockMap[block],
BlockMap[block]== targetEUN ? "==" : "!=",
targetEUN);
inplace = 0;
break;
}
}
if (pendingblock >= (thisVUC * (nftl->EraseSize / 512)) &&
pendingblock < ((thisVUC + 1)* (nftl->EraseSize / 512)) &&
BlockLastState[pendingblock - (thisVUC * (nftl->EraseSize / 512))] !=
SECTOR_FREE) {
pr_debug("Pending write not free in EUN %d. "
"Folding out of place.\n", targetEUN);
inplace = 0;
}
}
if (!inplace) {
pr_debug("Cannot fold Virtual Unit Chain %d in place. "
"Trying out-of-place\n", thisVUC);
/* We need to find a targetEUN to fold into. */
targetEUN = NFTL_findfreeblock(nftl, 1);
if (targetEUN == BLOCK_NIL) {
/* Ouch. Now we're screwed. We need to do a
fold-in-place of another chain to make room
for this one. We need a better way of selecting
which chain to fold, because makefreeblock will
only ask us to fold the same one again.
*/
printk(KERN_WARNING
"NFTL_findfreeblock(desperate) returns 0xffff.\n");
return BLOCK_NIL;
}
} else {
/* We put a fold mark in the chain we are folding only if we
fold in place to help the mount check code. If we do not fold in
place, it is possible to find the valid chain by selecting the
longer one */
oob.u.c.FoldMark = oob.u.c.FoldMark1 = cpu_to_le16(FOLD_MARK_IN_PROGRESS);
oob.u.c.unused = 0xffffffff;
[MTD] Rework the out of band handling completely Hopefully the last iteration on this! The handling of out of band data on NAND was accompanied by tons of fruitless discussions and halfarsed patches to make it work for a particular problem. Sufficiently annoyed by I all those "I know it better" mails and the resonable amount of discarded "it solves my problem" patches, I finally decided to go for the big rework. After removing the _ecc variants of mtd read/write functions the solution to satisfy the various requirements was to refactor the read/write _oob functions in mtd. The major change is that read/write_oob now takes a pointer to an operation descriptor structure "struct mtd_oob_ops".instead of having a function with at least seven arguments. read/write_oob which should probably renamed to a more descriptive name, can do the following tasks: - read/write out of band data - read/write data content and out of band data - read/write raw data content and out of band data (ecc disabled) struct mtd_oob_ops has a mode field, which determines the oob handling mode. Aside of the MTD_OOB_RAW mode, which is intended to be especially for diagnostic purposes and some internal functions e.g. bad block table creation, the other two modes are for mtd clients: MTD_OOB_PLACE puts/gets the given oob data exactly to/from the place which is described by the ooboffs and ooblen fields of the mtd_oob_ops strcuture. It's up to the caller to make sure that the byte positions are not used by the ECC placement algorithms. MTD_OOB_AUTO puts/gets the given oob data automaticaly to/from the places in the out of band area which are described by the oobfree tuples in the ecclayout data structre which is associated to the devicee. The decision whether data plus oob or oob only handling is done depends on the setting of the datbuf member of the data structure. When datbuf == NULL then the internal read/write_oob functions are selected, otherwise the read/write data routines are invoked. Tested on a few platforms with all variants. Please be aware of possible regressions for your particular device / application scenario Disclaimer: Any whining will be ignored from those who just contributed "hot air blurb" and never sat down to tackle the underlying problem of the mess in the NAND driver grown over time and the big chunk of work to fix up the existing users. The problem was not the holiness of the existing MTD interfaces. The problems was the lack of time to go for the big overhaul. It's easy to add more mess to the existing one, but it takes alot of effort to go for a real solution. Improvements and bugfixes are welcome! Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2006-05-29 05:26:58 +04:00
nftl_write_oob(mtd, (nftl->EraseSize * targetEUN) + 2 * 512 + 8,
8, &retlen, (char *)&oob.u);
}
/* OK. We now know the location of every block in the Virtual Unit Chain,
and the Erase Unit into which we are supposed to be copying.
Go for it.
*/
pr_debug("Folding chain %d into unit %d\n", thisVUC, targetEUN);
for (block = 0; block < nftl->EraseSize / 512 ; block++) {
unsigned char movebuf[512];
int ret;
/* If it's in the target EUN already, or if it's pending write, do nothing */
if (BlockMap[block] == targetEUN ||
(pendingblock == (thisVUC * (nftl->EraseSize / 512) + block))) {
continue;
}
/* copy only in non free block (free blocks can only
happen in case of media errors or deleted blocks) */
if (BlockMap[block] == BLOCK_NIL)
continue;
ret = mtd_read(mtd,
(nftl->EraseSize * BlockMap[block]) + (block * 512),
512,
&retlen,
movebuf);
if (ret < 0 && !mtd_is_bitflip(ret)) {
ret = mtd_read(mtd,
(nftl->EraseSize * BlockMap[block]) + (block * 512),
512,
&retlen,
movebuf);
if (ret != -EIO)
printk("Error went away on retry.\n");
}
memset(&oob, 0xff, sizeof(struct nftl_oob));
oob.b.Status = oob.b.Status1 = SECTOR_USED;
[MTD] Rework the out of band handling completely Hopefully the last iteration on this! The handling of out of band data on NAND was accompanied by tons of fruitless discussions and halfarsed patches to make it work for a particular problem. Sufficiently annoyed by I all those "I know it better" mails and the resonable amount of discarded "it solves my problem" patches, I finally decided to go for the big rework. After removing the _ecc variants of mtd read/write functions the solution to satisfy the various requirements was to refactor the read/write _oob functions in mtd. The major change is that read/write_oob now takes a pointer to an operation descriptor structure "struct mtd_oob_ops".instead of having a function with at least seven arguments. read/write_oob which should probably renamed to a more descriptive name, can do the following tasks: - read/write out of band data - read/write data content and out of band data - read/write raw data content and out of band data (ecc disabled) struct mtd_oob_ops has a mode field, which determines the oob handling mode. Aside of the MTD_OOB_RAW mode, which is intended to be especially for diagnostic purposes and some internal functions e.g. bad block table creation, the other two modes are for mtd clients: MTD_OOB_PLACE puts/gets the given oob data exactly to/from the place which is described by the ooboffs and ooblen fields of the mtd_oob_ops strcuture. It's up to the caller to make sure that the byte positions are not used by the ECC placement algorithms. MTD_OOB_AUTO puts/gets the given oob data automaticaly to/from the places in the out of band area which are described by the oobfree tuples in the ecclayout data structre which is associated to the devicee. The decision whether data plus oob or oob only handling is done depends on the setting of the datbuf member of the data structure. When datbuf == NULL then the internal read/write_oob functions are selected, otherwise the read/write data routines are invoked. Tested on a few platforms with all variants. Please be aware of possible regressions for your particular device / application scenario Disclaimer: Any whining will be ignored from those who just contributed "hot air blurb" and never sat down to tackle the underlying problem of the mess in the NAND driver grown over time and the big chunk of work to fix up the existing users. The problem was not the holiness of the existing MTD interfaces. The problems was the lack of time to go for the big overhaul. It's easy to add more mess to the existing one, but it takes alot of effort to go for a real solution. Improvements and bugfixes are welcome! Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2006-05-29 05:26:58 +04:00
nftl_write(nftl->mbd.mtd, (nftl->EraseSize * targetEUN) +
(block * 512), 512, &retlen, movebuf, (char *)&oob);
}
/* add the header so that it is now a valid chain */
oob.u.a.VirtUnitNum = oob.u.a.SpareVirtUnitNum = cpu_to_le16(thisVUC);
oob.u.a.ReplUnitNum = oob.u.a.SpareReplUnitNum = BLOCK_NIL;
[MTD] Rework the out of band handling completely Hopefully the last iteration on this! The handling of out of band data on NAND was accompanied by tons of fruitless discussions and halfarsed patches to make it work for a particular problem. Sufficiently annoyed by I all those "I know it better" mails and the resonable amount of discarded "it solves my problem" patches, I finally decided to go for the big rework. After removing the _ecc variants of mtd read/write functions the solution to satisfy the various requirements was to refactor the read/write _oob functions in mtd. The major change is that read/write_oob now takes a pointer to an operation descriptor structure "struct mtd_oob_ops".instead of having a function with at least seven arguments. read/write_oob which should probably renamed to a more descriptive name, can do the following tasks: - read/write out of band data - read/write data content and out of band data - read/write raw data content and out of band data (ecc disabled) struct mtd_oob_ops has a mode field, which determines the oob handling mode. Aside of the MTD_OOB_RAW mode, which is intended to be especially for diagnostic purposes and some internal functions e.g. bad block table creation, the other two modes are for mtd clients: MTD_OOB_PLACE puts/gets the given oob data exactly to/from the place which is described by the ooboffs and ooblen fields of the mtd_oob_ops strcuture. It's up to the caller to make sure that the byte positions are not used by the ECC placement algorithms. MTD_OOB_AUTO puts/gets the given oob data automaticaly to/from the places in the out of band area which are described by the oobfree tuples in the ecclayout data structre which is associated to the devicee. The decision whether data plus oob or oob only handling is done depends on the setting of the datbuf member of the data structure. When datbuf == NULL then the internal read/write_oob functions are selected, otherwise the read/write data routines are invoked. Tested on a few platforms with all variants. Please be aware of possible regressions for your particular device / application scenario Disclaimer: Any whining will be ignored from those who just contributed "hot air blurb" and never sat down to tackle the underlying problem of the mess in the NAND driver grown over time and the big chunk of work to fix up the existing users. The problem was not the holiness of the existing MTD interfaces. The problems was the lack of time to go for the big overhaul. It's easy to add more mess to the existing one, but it takes alot of effort to go for a real solution. Improvements and bugfixes are welcome! Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2006-05-29 05:26:58 +04:00
nftl_write_oob(mtd, (nftl->EraseSize * targetEUN) + 8,
8, &retlen, (char *)&oob.u);
/* OK. We've moved the whole lot into the new block. Now we have to free the original blocks. */
/* At this point, we have two different chains for this Virtual Unit, and no way to tell
them apart. If we crash now, we get confused. However, both contain the same data, so we
shouldn't actually lose data in this case. It's just that when we load up on a medium which
has duplicate chains, we need to free one of the chains because it's not necessary any more.
*/
thisEUN = nftl->EUNtable[thisVUC];
pr_debug("Want to erase\n");
/* For each block in the old chain (except the targetEUN of course),
free it and make it available for future use */
while (thisEUN <= nftl->lastEUN && thisEUN != targetEUN) {
unsigned int EUNtmp;
EUNtmp = nftl->ReplUnitTable[thisEUN];
if (NFTL_formatblock(nftl, thisEUN) < 0) {
/* could not erase : mark block as reserved
*/
nftl->ReplUnitTable[thisEUN] = BLOCK_RESERVED;
} else {
/* correctly erased : mark it as free */
nftl->ReplUnitTable[thisEUN] = BLOCK_FREE;
nftl->numfreeEUNs++;
}
thisEUN = EUNtmp;
}
/* Make this the new start of chain for thisVUC */
nftl->ReplUnitTable[targetEUN] = BLOCK_NIL;
nftl->EUNtable[thisVUC] = targetEUN;
return targetEUN;
}
static u16 NFTL_makefreeblock( struct NFTLrecord *nftl , unsigned pendingblock)
{
/* This is the part that needs some cleverness applied.
For now, I'm doing the minimum applicable to actually
get the thing to work.
Wear-levelling and other clever stuff needs to be implemented
and we also need to do some assessment of the results when
the system loses power half-way through the routine.
*/
u16 LongestChain = 0;
u16 ChainLength = 0, thislen;
u16 chain, EUN;
for (chain = 0; chain < le32_to_cpu(nftl->MediaHdr.FormattedSize) / nftl->EraseSize; chain++) {
EUN = nftl->EUNtable[chain];
thislen = 0;
while (EUN <= nftl->lastEUN) {
thislen++;
//printk("VUC %d reaches len %d with EUN %d\n", chain, thislen, EUN);
EUN = nftl->ReplUnitTable[EUN] & 0x7fff;
if (thislen > 0xff00) {
printk("Endless loop in Virtual Chain %d: Unit %x\n",
chain, EUN);
}
if (thislen > 0xff10) {
/* Actually, don't return failure. Just ignore this chain and
get on with it. */
thislen = 0;
break;
}
}
if (thislen > ChainLength) {
//printk("New longest chain is %d with length %d\n", chain, thislen);
ChainLength = thislen;
LongestChain = chain;
}
}
if (ChainLength < 2) {
printk(KERN_WARNING "No Virtual Unit Chains available for folding. "
"Failing request\n");
return BLOCK_NIL;
}
return NFTL_foldchain (nftl, LongestChain, pendingblock);
}
/* NFTL_findwriteunit: Return the unit number into which we can write
for this block. Make it available if it isn't already
*/
static inline u16 NFTL_findwriteunit(struct NFTLrecord *nftl, unsigned block)
{
u16 lastEUN;
u16 thisVUC = block / (nftl->EraseSize / 512);
struct mtd_info *mtd = nftl->mbd.mtd;
unsigned int writeEUN;
unsigned long blockofs = (block * 512) & (nftl->EraseSize -1);
size_t retlen;
int silly, silly2 = 3;
struct nftl_oob oob;
do {
/* Scan the media to find a unit in the VUC which has
a free space for the block in question.
*/
/* This condition catches the 0x[7f]fff cases, as well as
being a sanity check for past-end-of-media access
*/
lastEUN = BLOCK_NIL;
writeEUN = nftl->EUNtable[thisVUC];
silly = MAX_LOOPS;
while (writeEUN <= nftl->lastEUN) {
struct nftl_bci bci;
size_t retlen;
unsigned int status;
lastEUN = writeEUN;
[MTD] Rework the out of band handling completely Hopefully the last iteration on this! The handling of out of band data on NAND was accompanied by tons of fruitless discussions and halfarsed patches to make it work for a particular problem. Sufficiently annoyed by I all those "I know it better" mails and the resonable amount of discarded "it solves my problem" patches, I finally decided to go for the big rework. After removing the _ecc variants of mtd read/write functions the solution to satisfy the various requirements was to refactor the read/write _oob functions in mtd. The major change is that read/write_oob now takes a pointer to an operation descriptor structure "struct mtd_oob_ops".instead of having a function with at least seven arguments. read/write_oob which should probably renamed to a more descriptive name, can do the following tasks: - read/write out of band data - read/write data content and out of band data - read/write raw data content and out of band data (ecc disabled) struct mtd_oob_ops has a mode field, which determines the oob handling mode. Aside of the MTD_OOB_RAW mode, which is intended to be especially for diagnostic purposes and some internal functions e.g. bad block table creation, the other two modes are for mtd clients: MTD_OOB_PLACE puts/gets the given oob data exactly to/from the place which is described by the ooboffs and ooblen fields of the mtd_oob_ops strcuture. It's up to the caller to make sure that the byte positions are not used by the ECC placement algorithms. MTD_OOB_AUTO puts/gets the given oob data automaticaly to/from the places in the out of band area which are described by the oobfree tuples in the ecclayout data structre which is associated to the devicee. The decision whether data plus oob or oob only handling is done depends on the setting of the datbuf member of the data structure. When datbuf == NULL then the internal read/write_oob functions are selected, otherwise the read/write data routines are invoked. Tested on a few platforms with all variants. Please be aware of possible regressions for your particular device / application scenario Disclaimer: Any whining will be ignored from those who just contributed "hot air blurb" and never sat down to tackle the underlying problem of the mess in the NAND driver grown over time and the big chunk of work to fix up the existing users. The problem was not the holiness of the existing MTD interfaces. The problems was the lack of time to go for the big overhaul. It's easy to add more mess to the existing one, but it takes alot of effort to go for a real solution. Improvements and bugfixes are welcome! Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2006-05-29 05:26:58 +04:00
nftl_read_oob(mtd,
(writeEUN * nftl->EraseSize) + blockofs,
8, &retlen, (char *)&bci);
pr_debug("Status of block %d in EUN %d is %x\n",
block , writeEUN, le16_to_cpu(bci.Status));
status = bci.Status | bci.Status1;
switch(status) {
case SECTOR_FREE:
return writeEUN;
case SECTOR_DELETED:
case SECTOR_USED:
case SECTOR_IGNORE:
break;
default:
// Invalid block. Don't use it any more. Must implement.
break;
}
if (!silly--) {
printk(KERN_WARNING
"Infinite loop in Virtual Unit Chain 0x%x\n",
thisVUC);
return BLOCK_NIL;
}
/* Skip to next block in chain */
writeEUN = nftl->ReplUnitTable[writeEUN];
}
/* OK. We didn't find one in the existing chain, or there
is no existing chain. */
/* Try to find an already-free block */
writeEUN = NFTL_findfreeblock(nftl, 0);
if (writeEUN == BLOCK_NIL) {
/* That didn't work - there were no free blocks just
waiting to be picked up. We're going to have to fold
a chain to make room.
*/
/* First remember the start of this chain */
//u16 startEUN = nftl->EUNtable[thisVUC];
//printk("Write to VirtualUnitChain %d, calling makefreeblock()\n", thisVUC);
writeEUN = NFTL_makefreeblock(nftl, BLOCK_NIL);
if (writeEUN == BLOCK_NIL) {
/* OK, we accept that the above comment is
lying - there may have been free blocks
last time we called NFTL_findfreeblock(),
but they are reserved for when we're
desperate. Well, now we're desperate.
*/
pr_debug("Using desperate==1 to find free EUN to accommodate write to VUC %d\n", thisVUC);
writeEUN = NFTL_findfreeblock(nftl, 1);
}
if (writeEUN == BLOCK_NIL) {
/* Ouch. This should never happen - we should
always be able to make some room somehow.
If we get here, we've allocated more storage
space than actual media, or our makefreeblock
routine is missing something.
*/
printk(KERN_WARNING "Cannot make free space.\n");
return BLOCK_NIL;
}
//printk("Restarting scan\n");
lastEUN = BLOCK_NIL;
continue;
}
/* We've found a free block. Insert it into the chain. */
if (lastEUN != BLOCK_NIL) {
thisVUC |= 0x8000; /* It's a replacement block */
} else {
/* The first block in a new chain */
nftl->EUNtable[thisVUC] = writeEUN;
}
/* set up the actual EUN we're writing into */
/* Both in our cache... */
nftl->ReplUnitTable[writeEUN] = BLOCK_NIL;
/* ... and on the flash itself */
[MTD] Rework the out of band handling completely Hopefully the last iteration on this! The handling of out of band data on NAND was accompanied by tons of fruitless discussions and halfarsed patches to make it work for a particular problem. Sufficiently annoyed by I all those "I know it better" mails and the resonable amount of discarded "it solves my problem" patches, I finally decided to go for the big rework. After removing the _ecc variants of mtd read/write functions the solution to satisfy the various requirements was to refactor the read/write _oob functions in mtd. The major change is that read/write_oob now takes a pointer to an operation descriptor structure "struct mtd_oob_ops".instead of having a function with at least seven arguments. read/write_oob which should probably renamed to a more descriptive name, can do the following tasks: - read/write out of band data - read/write data content and out of band data - read/write raw data content and out of band data (ecc disabled) struct mtd_oob_ops has a mode field, which determines the oob handling mode. Aside of the MTD_OOB_RAW mode, which is intended to be especially for diagnostic purposes and some internal functions e.g. bad block table creation, the other two modes are for mtd clients: MTD_OOB_PLACE puts/gets the given oob data exactly to/from the place which is described by the ooboffs and ooblen fields of the mtd_oob_ops strcuture. It's up to the caller to make sure that the byte positions are not used by the ECC placement algorithms. MTD_OOB_AUTO puts/gets the given oob data automaticaly to/from the places in the out of band area which are described by the oobfree tuples in the ecclayout data structre which is associated to the devicee. The decision whether data plus oob or oob only handling is done depends on the setting of the datbuf member of the data structure. When datbuf == NULL then the internal read/write_oob functions are selected, otherwise the read/write data routines are invoked. Tested on a few platforms with all variants. Please be aware of possible regressions for your particular device / application scenario Disclaimer: Any whining will be ignored from those who just contributed "hot air blurb" and never sat down to tackle the underlying problem of the mess in the NAND driver grown over time and the big chunk of work to fix up the existing users. The problem was not the holiness of the existing MTD interfaces. The problems was the lack of time to go for the big overhaul. It's easy to add more mess to the existing one, but it takes alot of effort to go for a real solution. Improvements and bugfixes are welcome! Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2006-05-29 05:26:58 +04:00
nftl_read_oob(mtd, writeEUN * nftl->EraseSize + 8, 8,
&retlen, (char *)&oob.u);
oob.u.a.VirtUnitNum = oob.u.a.SpareVirtUnitNum = cpu_to_le16(thisVUC);
[MTD] Rework the out of band handling completely Hopefully the last iteration on this! The handling of out of band data on NAND was accompanied by tons of fruitless discussions and halfarsed patches to make it work for a particular problem. Sufficiently annoyed by I all those "I know it better" mails and the resonable amount of discarded "it solves my problem" patches, I finally decided to go for the big rework. After removing the _ecc variants of mtd read/write functions the solution to satisfy the various requirements was to refactor the read/write _oob functions in mtd. The major change is that read/write_oob now takes a pointer to an operation descriptor structure "struct mtd_oob_ops".instead of having a function with at least seven arguments. read/write_oob which should probably renamed to a more descriptive name, can do the following tasks: - read/write out of band data - read/write data content and out of band data - read/write raw data content and out of band data (ecc disabled) struct mtd_oob_ops has a mode field, which determines the oob handling mode. Aside of the MTD_OOB_RAW mode, which is intended to be especially for diagnostic purposes and some internal functions e.g. bad block table creation, the other two modes are for mtd clients: MTD_OOB_PLACE puts/gets the given oob data exactly to/from the place which is described by the ooboffs and ooblen fields of the mtd_oob_ops strcuture. It's up to the caller to make sure that the byte positions are not used by the ECC placement algorithms. MTD_OOB_AUTO puts/gets the given oob data automaticaly to/from the places in the out of band area which are described by the oobfree tuples in the ecclayout data structre which is associated to the devicee. The decision whether data plus oob or oob only handling is done depends on the setting of the datbuf member of the data structure. When datbuf == NULL then the internal read/write_oob functions are selected, otherwise the read/write data routines are invoked. Tested on a few platforms with all variants. Please be aware of possible regressions for your particular device / application scenario Disclaimer: Any whining will be ignored from those who just contributed "hot air blurb" and never sat down to tackle the underlying problem of the mess in the NAND driver grown over time and the big chunk of work to fix up the existing users. The problem was not the holiness of the existing MTD interfaces. The problems was the lack of time to go for the big overhaul. It's easy to add more mess to the existing one, but it takes alot of effort to go for a real solution. Improvements and bugfixes are welcome! Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2006-05-29 05:26:58 +04:00
nftl_write_oob(mtd, writeEUN * nftl->EraseSize + 8, 8,
&retlen, (char *)&oob.u);
/* we link the new block to the chain only after the
block is ready. It avoids the case where the chain
could point to a free block */
if (lastEUN != BLOCK_NIL) {
/* Both in our cache... */
nftl->ReplUnitTable[lastEUN] = writeEUN;
/* ... and on the flash itself */
[MTD] Rework the out of band handling completely Hopefully the last iteration on this! The handling of out of band data on NAND was accompanied by tons of fruitless discussions and halfarsed patches to make it work for a particular problem. Sufficiently annoyed by I all those "I know it better" mails and the resonable amount of discarded "it solves my problem" patches, I finally decided to go for the big rework. After removing the _ecc variants of mtd read/write functions the solution to satisfy the various requirements was to refactor the read/write _oob functions in mtd. The major change is that read/write_oob now takes a pointer to an operation descriptor structure "struct mtd_oob_ops".instead of having a function with at least seven arguments. read/write_oob which should probably renamed to a more descriptive name, can do the following tasks: - read/write out of band data - read/write data content and out of band data - read/write raw data content and out of band data (ecc disabled) struct mtd_oob_ops has a mode field, which determines the oob handling mode. Aside of the MTD_OOB_RAW mode, which is intended to be especially for diagnostic purposes and some internal functions e.g. bad block table creation, the other two modes are for mtd clients: MTD_OOB_PLACE puts/gets the given oob data exactly to/from the place which is described by the ooboffs and ooblen fields of the mtd_oob_ops strcuture. It's up to the caller to make sure that the byte positions are not used by the ECC placement algorithms. MTD_OOB_AUTO puts/gets the given oob data automaticaly to/from the places in the out of band area which are described by the oobfree tuples in the ecclayout data structre which is associated to the devicee. The decision whether data plus oob or oob only handling is done depends on the setting of the datbuf member of the data structure. When datbuf == NULL then the internal read/write_oob functions are selected, otherwise the read/write data routines are invoked. Tested on a few platforms with all variants. Please be aware of possible regressions for your particular device / application scenario Disclaimer: Any whining will be ignored from those who just contributed "hot air blurb" and never sat down to tackle the underlying problem of the mess in the NAND driver grown over time and the big chunk of work to fix up the existing users. The problem was not the holiness of the existing MTD interfaces. The problems was the lack of time to go for the big overhaul. It's easy to add more mess to the existing one, but it takes alot of effort to go for a real solution. Improvements and bugfixes are welcome! Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2006-05-29 05:26:58 +04:00
nftl_read_oob(mtd, (lastEUN * nftl->EraseSize) + 8,
8, &retlen, (char *)&oob.u);
oob.u.a.ReplUnitNum = oob.u.a.SpareReplUnitNum
= cpu_to_le16(writeEUN);
[MTD] Rework the out of band handling completely Hopefully the last iteration on this! The handling of out of band data on NAND was accompanied by tons of fruitless discussions and halfarsed patches to make it work for a particular problem. Sufficiently annoyed by I all those "I know it better" mails and the resonable amount of discarded "it solves my problem" patches, I finally decided to go for the big rework. After removing the _ecc variants of mtd read/write functions the solution to satisfy the various requirements was to refactor the read/write _oob functions in mtd. The major change is that read/write_oob now takes a pointer to an operation descriptor structure "struct mtd_oob_ops".instead of having a function with at least seven arguments. read/write_oob which should probably renamed to a more descriptive name, can do the following tasks: - read/write out of band data - read/write data content and out of band data - read/write raw data content and out of band data (ecc disabled) struct mtd_oob_ops has a mode field, which determines the oob handling mode. Aside of the MTD_OOB_RAW mode, which is intended to be especially for diagnostic purposes and some internal functions e.g. bad block table creation, the other two modes are for mtd clients: MTD_OOB_PLACE puts/gets the given oob data exactly to/from the place which is described by the ooboffs and ooblen fields of the mtd_oob_ops strcuture. It's up to the caller to make sure that the byte positions are not used by the ECC placement algorithms. MTD_OOB_AUTO puts/gets the given oob data automaticaly to/from the places in the out of band area which are described by the oobfree tuples in the ecclayout data structre which is associated to the devicee. The decision whether data plus oob or oob only handling is done depends on the setting of the datbuf member of the data structure. When datbuf == NULL then the internal read/write_oob functions are selected, otherwise the read/write data routines are invoked. Tested on a few platforms with all variants. Please be aware of possible regressions for your particular device / application scenario Disclaimer: Any whining will be ignored from those who just contributed "hot air blurb" and never sat down to tackle the underlying problem of the mess in the NAND driver grown over time and the big chunk of work to fix up the existing users. The problem was not the holiness of the existing MTD interfaces. The problems was the lack of time to go for the big overhaul. It's easy to add more mess to the existing one, but it takes alot of effort to go for a real solution. Improvements and bugfixes are welcome! Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2006-05-29 05:26:58 +04:00
nftl_write_oob(mtd, (lastEUN * nftl->EraseSize) + 8,
8, &retlen, (char *)&oob.u);
}
return writeEUN;
} while (silly2--);
printk(KERN_WARNING "Error folding to make room for Virtual Unit Chain 0x%x\n",
thisVUC);
return BLOCK_NIL;
}
static int nftl_writeblock(struct mtd_blktrans_dev *mbd, unsigned long block,
char *buffer)
{
struct NFTLrecord *nftl = (void *)mbd;
u16 writeEUN;
unsigned long blockofs = (block * 512) & (nftl->EraseSize - 1);
size_t retlen;
struct nftl_oob oob;
writeEUN = NFTL_findwriteunit(nftl, block);
if (writeEUN == BLOCK_NIL) {
printk(KERN_WARNING
"NFTL_writeblock(): Cannot find block to write to\n");
/* If we _still_ haven't got a block to use, we're screwed */
return 1;
}
memset(&oob, 0xff, sizeof(struct nftl_oob));
oob.b.Status = oob.b.Status1 = SECTOR_USED;
[MTD] Rework the out of band handling completely Hopefully the last iteration on this! The handling of out of band data on NAND was accompanied by tons of fruitless discussions and halfarsed patches to make it work for a particular problem. Sufficiently annoyed by I all those "I know it better" mails and the resonable amount of discarded "it solves my problem" patches, I finally decided to go for the big rework. After removing the _ecc variants of mtd read/write functions the solution to satisfy the various requirements was to refactor the read/write _oob functions in mtd. The major change is that read/write_oob now takes a pointer to an operation descriptor structure "struct mtd_oob_ops".instead of having a function with at least seven arguments. read/write_oob which should probably renamed to a more descriptive name, can do the following tasks: - read/write out of band data - read/write data content and out of band data - read/write raw data content and out of band data (ecc disabled) struct mtd_oob_ops has a mode field, which determines the oob handling mode. Aside of the MTD_OOB_RAW mode, which is intended to be especially for diagnostic purposes and some internal functions e.g. bad block table creation, the other two modes are for mtd clients: MTD_OOB_PLACE puts/gets the given oob data exactly to/from the place which is described by the ooboffs and ooblen fields of the mtd_oob_ops strcuture. It's up to the caller to make sure that the byte positions are not used by the ECC placement algorithms. MTD_OOB_AUTO puts/gets the given oob data automaticaly to/from the places in the out of band area which are described by the oobfree tuples in the ecclayout data structre which is associated to the devicee. The decision whether data plus oob or oob only handling is done depends on the setting of the datbuf member of the data structure. When datbuf == NULL then the internal read/write_oob functions are selected, otherwise the read/write data routines are invoked. Tested on a few platforms with all variants. Please be aware of possible regressions for your particular device / application scenario Disclaimer: Any whining will be ignored from those who just contributed "hot air blurb" and never sat down to tackle the underlying problem of the mess in the NAND driver grown over time and the big chunk of work to fix up the existing users. The problem was not the holiness of the existing MTD interfaces. The problems was the lack of time to go for the big overhaul. It's easy to add more mess to the existing one, but it takes alot of effort to go for a real solution. Improvements and bugfixes are welcome! Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2006-05-29 05:26:58 +04:00
nftl_write(nftl->mbd.mtd, (writeEUN * nftl->EraseSize) + blockofs,
512, &retlen, (char *)buffer, (char *)&oob);
return 0;
}
#endif /* CONFIG_NFTL_RW */
static int nftl_readblock(struct mtd_blktrans_dev *mbd, unsigned long block,
char *buffer)
{
struct NFTLrecord *nftl = (void *)mbd;
struct mtd_info *mtd = nftl->mbd.mtd;
u16 lastgoodEUN;
u16 thisEUN = nftl->EUNtable[block / (nftl->EraseSize / 512)];
unsigned long blockofs = (block * 512) & (nftl->EraseSize - 1);
unsigned int status;
int silly = MAX_LOOPS;
size_t retlen;
struct nftl_bci bci;
lastgoodEUN = BLOCK_NIL;
if (thisEUN != BLOCK_NIL) {
while (thisEUN < nftl->nb_blocks) {
[MTD] Rework the out of band handling completely Hopefully the last iteration on this! The handling of out of band data on NAND was accompanied by tons of fruitless discussions and halfarsed patches to make it work for a particular problem. Sufficiently annoyed by I all those "I know it better" mails and the resonable amount of discarded "it solves my problem" patches, I finally decided to go for the big rework. After removing the _ecc variants of mtd read/write functions the solution to satisfy the various requirements was to refactor the read/write _oob functions in mtd. The major change is that read/write_oob now takes a pointer to an operation descriptor structure "struct mtd_oob_ops".instead of having a function with at least seven arguments. read/write_oob which should probably renamed to a more descriptive name, can do the following tasks: - read/write out of band data - read/write data content and out of band data - read/write raw data content and out of band data (ecc disabled) struct mtd_oob_ops has a mode field, which determines the oob handling mode. Aside of the MTD_OOB_RAW mode, which is intended to be especially for diagnostic purposes and some internal functions e.g. bad block table creation, the other two modes are for mtd clients: MTD_OOB_PLACE puts/gets the given oob data exactly to/from the place which is described by the ooboffs and ooblen fields of the mtd_oob_ops strcuture. It's up to the caller to make sure that the byte positions are not used by the ECC placement algorithms. MTD_OOB_AUTO puts/gets the given oob data automaticaly to/from the places in the out of band area which are described by the oobfree tuples in the ecclayout data structre which is associated to the devicee. The decision whether data plus oob or oob only handling is done depends on the setting of the datbuf member of the data structure. When datbuf == NULL then the internal read/write_oob functions are selected, otherwise the read/write data routines are invoked. Tested on a few platforms with all variants. Please be aware of possible regressions for your particular device / application scenario Disclaimer: Any whining will be ignored from those who just contributed "hot air blurb" and never sat down to tackle the underlying problem of the mess in the NAND driver grown over time and the big chunk of work to fix up the existing users. The problem was not the holiness of the existing MTD interfaces. The problems was the lack of time to go for the big overhaul. It's easy to add more mess to the existing one, but it takes alot of effort to go for a real solution. Improvements and bugfixes are welcome! Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2006-05-29 05:26:58 +04:00
if (nftl_read_oob(mtd, (thisEUN * nftl->EraseSize) +
blockofs, 8, &retlen,
(char *)&bci) < 0)
status = SECTOR_IGNORE;
else
status = bci.Status | bci.Status1;
switch (status) {
case SECTOR_FREE:
/* no modification of a sector should follow a free sector */
goto the_end;
case SECTOR_DELETED:
lastgoodEUN = BLOCK_NIL;
break;
case SECTOR_USED:
lastgoodEUN = thisEUN;
break;
case SECTOR_IGNORE:
break;
default:
printk("Unknown status for block %ld in EUN %d: %x\n",
block, thisEUN, status);
break;
}
if (!silly--) {
printk(KERN_WARNING "Infinite loop in Virtual Unit Chain 0x%lx\n",
block / (nftl->EraseSize / 512));
return 1;
}
thisEUN = nftl->ReplUnitTable[thisEUN];
}
}
the_end:
if (lastgoodEUN == BLOCK_NIL) {
/* the requested block is not on the media, return all 0x00 */
memset(buffer, 0, 512);
} else {
loff_t ptr = (lastgoodEUN * nftl->EraseSize) + blockofs;
size_t retlen;
int res = mtd_read(mtd, ptr, 512, &retlen, buffer);
if (res < 0 && !mtd_is_bitflip(res))
return -EIO;
}
return 0;
}
static int nftl_getgeo(struct mtd_blktrans_dev *dev, struct hd_geometry *geo)
{
struct NFTLrecord *nftl = (void *)dev;
geo->heads = nftl->heads;
geo->sectors = nftl->sectors;
geo->cylinders = nftl->cylinders;
return 0;
}
/****************************************************************************
*
* Module stuff
*
****************************************************************************/
static struct mtd_blktrans_ops nftl_tr = {
.name = "nftl",
.major = NFTL_MAJOR,
.part_bits = NFTL_PARTN_BITS,
.blksize = 512,
.getgeo = nftl_getgeo,
.readsect = nftl_readblock,
#ifdef CONFIG_NFTL_RW
.writesect = nftl_writeblock,
#endif
.add_mtd = nftl_add_mtd,
.remove_dev = nftl_remove_dev,
.owner = THIS_MODULE,
};
static int __init init_nftl(void)
{
return register_mtd_blktrans(&nftl_tr);
}
static void __exit cleanup_nftl(void)
{
deregister_mtd_blktrans(&nftl_tr);
}
module_init(init_nftl);
module_exit(cleanup_nftl);
MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
MODULE_AUTHOR("David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>, Fabrice Bellard <fabrice.bellard@netgem.com> et al.");
MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Support code for NAND Flash Translation Layer, used on M-Systems DiskOnChip 2000 and Millennium");
MODULE_ALIAS_BLOCKDEV_MAJOR(NFTL_MAJOR);