WSL2-Linux-Kernel/arch/x86/xen/Kconfig

58 строки
1.4 KiB
Plaintext
Исходник Обычный вид История

#
# This Kconfig describes xen options
#
config XEN
bool "Xen guest support"
depends on PARAVIRT
select PARAVIRT_CLOCK
select XEN_HAVE_PVMMU
depends on X86_64 || (X86_32 && X86_PAE && !X86_VISWS)
depends on X86_TSC
help
This is the Linux Xen port. Enabling this will allow the
kernel to boot in a paravirtualized environment under the
Xen hypervisor.
config XEN_DOM0
def_bool y
depends on XEN && PCI_XEN && SWIOTLB_XEN
depends on X86_LOCAL_APIC && X86_IO_APIC && ACPI && PCI
# Dummy symbol since people have come to rely on the PRIVILEGED_GUEST
# name in tools.
config XEN_PRIVILEGED_GUEST
def_bool XEN_DOM0
config XEN_PVHVM
def_bool y
depends on XEN && PCI && X86_LOCAL_APIC
config XEN_MAX_DOMAIN_MEMORY
int
default 500 if X86_64
default 64 if X86_32
depends on XEN
help
This only affects the sizing of some bss arrays, the unused
portions of which are freed.
config XEN_SAVE_RESTORE
bool
depends on XEN
select HIBERNATE_CALLBACKS
default y
config XEN_DEBUG_FS
bool "Enable Xen debug and tuning parameters in debugfs"
depends on XEN && DEBUG_FS
default n
help
Enable statistics output and various tuning options in debugfs.
Enabling this option may incur a significant performance overhead.
xen/pvh/x86: Define what an PVH guest is (v3). Which is a PV guest with auto page translation enabled and with vector callback. It is a cross between PVHVM and PV. The Xen side defines PVH as (from docs/misc/pvh-readme.txt, with modifications): "* the guest uses auto translate: - p2m is managed by Xen - pagetables are owned by the guest - mmu_update hypercall not available * it uses event callback and not vlapic emulation, * IDT is native, so set_trap_table hcall is also N/A for a PVH guest. For a full list of hcalls supported for PVH, see pvh_hypercall64_table in arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c in xen. From the ABI prespective, it's mostly a PV guest with auto translate, although it does use hvm_op for setting callback vector." Also we use the PV cpuid, albeit we can use the HVM (native) cpuid. However, we do have a fair bit of filtering in the xen_cpuid and we can piggyback on that until the hypervisor/toolstack filters the appropiate cpuids. Once that is done we can swap over to use the native one. We setup a Kconfig entry that is disabled by default and cannot be enabled. Note that on ARM the concept of PVH is non-existent. As Ian put it: "an ARM guest is neither PV nor HVM nor PVHVM. It's a bit like PVH but is different also (it's further towards the H end of the spectrum than even PVH).". As such these options (PVHVM, PVH) are never enabled nor seen on ARM compilations. Signed-off-by: Mukesh Rathor <mukesh.rathor@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
2013-12-13 21:39:56 +04:00
config XEN_PVH
bool "Support for running as a PVH guest"
depends on X86_64 && XEN && XEN_PVHVM
xen/pvh/x86: Define what an PVH guest is (v3). Which is a PV guest with auto page translation enabled and with vector callback. It is a cross between PVHVM and PV. The Xen side defines PVH as (from docs/misc/pvh-readme.txt, with modifications): "* the guest uses auto translate: - p2m is managed by Xen - pagetables are owned by the guest - mmu_update hypercall not available * it uses event callback and not vlapic emulation, * IDT is native, so set_trap_table hcall is also N/A for a PVH guest. For a full list of hcalls supported for PVH, see pvh_hypercall64_table in arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c in xen. From the ABI prespective, it's mostly a PV guest with auto translate, although it does use hvm_op for setting callback vector." Also we use the PV cpuid, albeit we can use the HVM (native) cpuid. However, we do have a fair bit of filtering in the xen_cpuid and we can piggyback on that until the hypervisor/toolstack filters the appropiate cpuids. Once that is done we can swap over to use the native one. We setup a Kconfig entry that is disabled by default and cannot be enabled. Note that on ARM the concept of PVH is non-existent. As Ian put it: "an ARM guest is neither PV nor HVM nor PVHVM. It's a bit like PVH but is different also (it's further towards the H end of the spectrum than even PVH).". As such these options (PVHVM, PVH) are never enabled nor seen on ARM compilations. Signed-off-by: Mukesh Rathor <mukesh.rathor@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
2013-12-13 21:39:56 +04:00
def_bool n