microsoft
/
WSL2-Linux-Kernel
зеркало из https://github.com/microsoft/WSL2-Linux-Kernel.git
1
0
Форкнуть 0
Код Задачи Пакеты Проекты Релизы Вики Активность
WSL2-Linux-Kernel/fs/btrfs/raid56.h

69 строки
2.3 KiB
C
Исходник Обычный вид История

Btrfs: RAID5 and RAID6 This builds on David Woodhouse's original Btrfs raid5/6 implementation. The code has changed quite a bit, blame Chris Mason for any bugs. Read/modify/write is done after the higher levels of the filesystem have prepared a given bio. This means the higher layers are not responsible for building full stripes, and they don't need to query for the topology of the extents that may get allocated during delayed allocation runs. It also means different files can easily share the same stripe. But, it does expose us to incorrect parity if we crash or lose power while doing a read/modify/write cycle. This will be addressed in a later commit. Scrub is unable to repair crc errors on raid5/6 chunks. Discard does not work on raid5/6 (yet) The stripe size is fixed at 64KiB per disk. This will be tunable in a later commit. Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-01-30 03:40:14 +04:00
/*
* Copyright (C) 2012 Fusion-io All rights reserved.
* Copyright (C) 2012 Intel Corp. All rights reserved.
*
* This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
* modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public
* License v2 as published by the Free Software Foundation.
*
* This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
* but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
* MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU
* General Public License for more details.
*
* You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public
* License along with this program; if not, write to the
* Free Software Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place - Suite 330,
* Boston, MA 021110-1307, USA.
*/
#ifndef __BTRFS_RAID56__
#define __BTRFS_RAID56__
static inline int nr_parity_stripes(struct map_lookup *map)
{
if (map->type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID5)
return 1;
else if (map->type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID6)
return 2;
else
return 0;
}
static inline int nr_data_stripes(struct map_lookup *map)
{
return map->num_stripes - nr_parity_stripes(map);
}
#define RAID5_P_STRIPE ((u64)-2)
#define RAID6_Q_STRIPE ((u64)-1)
#define is_parity_stripe(x) (((x) == RAID5_P_STRIPE) || \
((x) == RAID6_Q_STRIPE))
Btrfs, raid56: support parity scrub on raid56 The implementation is: - Read and check all the data with checksum in the same stripe. All the data which has checksum is COW data, and we are sure that it is not changed though we don't lock the stripe. because the space of that data just can be reclaimed after the current transction is committed, and then the fs can use it to store the other data, but when doing scrub, we hold the current transaction, that is that data can not be recovered, it is safe that read and check it out of the stripe lock. - Lock the stripe - Read out all the data without checksum and parity The data without checksum and the parity may be changed if we don't lock the stripe, so we need read it in the stripe lock context. - Check the parity - Re-calculate the new parity and write back it if the old parity is not right - Unlock the stripe If we can not read out the data or the data we read is corrupted, we will try to repair it. If the repair fails. we will mark the horizontal sub-stripe(pages on the same horizontal) as corrupted sub-stripe, and we will skip the parity check and repair of that horizontal sub-stripe. And in order to skip the horizontal sub-stripe that has no data, we introduce a bitmap. If there is some data on the horizontal sub-stripe, we will the relative bit to 1, and when we check and repair the parity, we will skip those horizontal sub-stripes that the relative bits is 0. Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
2014-11-06 12:20:58 +03:00
struct btrfs_raid_bio;
struct btrfs_device;
Btrfs: RAID5 and RAID6 This builds on David Woodhouse's original Btrfs raid5/6 implementation. The code has changed quite a bit, blame Chris Mason for any bugs. Read/modify/write is done after the higher levels of the filesystem have prepared a given bio. This means the higher layers are not responsible for building full stripes, and they don't need to query for the topology of the extents that may get allocated during delayed allocation runs. It also means different files can easily share the same stripe. But, it does expose us to incorrect parity if we crash or lose power while doing a read/modify/write cycle. This will be addressed in a later commit. Scrub is unable to repair crc errors on raid5/6 chunks. Discard does not work on raid5/6 (yet) The stripe size is fixed at 64KiB per disk. This will be tunable in a later commit. Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-01-30 03:40:14 +04:00
int raid56_parity_recover(struct btrfs_root *root, struct bio *bio,
Btrfs: Make raid_map array be inlined in btrfs_bio structure It can make code more simple and clear, we need not care about free bbio and raid_map together. Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Zhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2015-01-20 10:11:33 +03:00
struct btrfs_bio *bbio, u64 stripe_len,
int mirror_num, int generic_io);
Btrfs: RAID5 and RAID6 This builds on David Woodhouse's original Btrfs raid5/6 implementation. The code has changed quite a bit, blame Chris Mason for any bugs. Read/modify/write is done after the higher levels of the filesystem have prepared a given bio. This means the higher layers are not responsible for building full stripes, and they don't need to query for the topology of the extents that may get allocated during delayed allocation runs. It also means different files can easily share the same stripe. But, it does expose us to incorrect parity if we crash or lose power while doing a read/modify/write cycle. This will be addressed in a later commit. Scrub is unable to repair crc errors on raid5/6 chunks. Discard does not work on raid5/6 (yet) The stripe size is fixed at 64KiB per disk. This will be tunable in a later commit. Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-01-30 03:40:14 +04:00
int raid56_parity_write(struct btrfs_root *root, struct bio *bio,
Btrfs: Make raid_map array be inlined in btrfs_bio structure It can make code more simple and clear, we need not care about free bbio and raid_map together. Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Zhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2015-01-20 10:11:33 +03:00
struct btrfs_bio *bbio, u64 stripe_len);
Btrfs: RAID5 and RAID6 This builds on David Woodhouse's original Btrfs raid5/6 implementation. The code has changed quite a bit, blame Chris Mason for any bugs. Read/modify/write is done after the higher levels of the filesystem have prepared a given bio. This means the higher layers are not responsible for building full stripes, and they don't need to query for the topology of the extents that may get allocated during delayed allocation runs. It also means different files can easily share the same stripe. But, it does expose us to incorrect parity if we crash or lose power while doing a read/modify/write cycle. This will be addressed in a later commit. Scrub is unable to repair crc errors on raid5/6 chunks. Discard does not work on raid5/6 (yet) The stripe size is fixed at 64KiB per disk. This will be tunable in a later commit. Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-01-30 03:40:14 +04:00
Btrfs: add RAID 5/6 BTRFS_RBIO_REBUILD_MISSING operation The current RAID 5/6 recovery code isn't quite prepared to handle missing devices. In particular, it expects a bio that we previously attempted to use in the read path, meaning that it has valid pages allocated. However, missing devices have a NULL blkdev, and we can't call bio_add_page() on a bio with a NULL blkdev. We could do manual manipulation of bio->bi_io_vec, but that's pretty gross. So instead, add a separate path that allows us to manually add pages to the rbio. Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2015-06-19 21:52:50 +03:00
void raid56_add_scrub_pages(struct btrfs_raid_bio *rbio, struct page *page,
u64 logical);
Btrfs, raid56: support parity scrub on raid56 The implementation is: - Read and check all the data with checksum in the same stripe. All the data which has checksum is COW data, and we are sure that it is not changed though we don't lock the stripe. because the space of that data just can be reclaimed after the current transction is committed, and then the fs can use it to store the other data, but when doing scrub, we hold the current transaction, that is that data can not be recovered, it is safe that read and check it out of the stripe lock. - Lock the stripe - Read out all the data without checksum and parity The data without checksum and the parity may be changed if we don't lock the stripe, so we need read it in the stripe lock context. - Check the parity - Re-calculate the new parity and write back it if the old parity is not right - Unlock the stripe If we can not read out the data or the data we read is corrupted, we will try to repair it. If the repair fails. we will mark the horizontal sub-stripe(pages on the same horizontal) as corrupted sub-stripe, and we will skip the parity check and repair of that horizontal sub-stripe. And in order to skip the horizontal sub-stripe that has no data, we introduce a bitmap. If there is some data on the horizontal sub-stripe, we will the relative bit to 1, and when we check and repair the parity, we will skip those horizontal sub-stripes that the relative bits is 0. Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
2014-11-06 12:20:58 +03:00
struct btrfs_raid_bio *
raid56_parity_alloc_scrub_rbio(struct btrfs_root *root, struct bio *bio,
Btrfs: Make raid_map array be inlined in btrfs_bio structure It can make code more simple and clear, we need not care about free bbio and raid_map together. Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Zhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2015-01-20 10:11:33 +03:00
struct btrfs_bio *bbio, u64 stripe_len,
struct btrfs_device *scrub_dev,
Btrfs, raid56: support parity scrub on raid56 The implementation is: - Read and check all the data with checksum in the same stripe. All the data which has checksum is COW data, and we are sure that it is not changed though we don't lock the stripe. because the space of that data just can be reclaimed after the current transction is committed, and then the fs can use it to store the other data, but when doing scrub, we hold the current transaction, that is that data can not be recovered, it is safe that read and check it out of the stripe lock. - Lock the stripe - Read out all the data without checksum and parity The data without checksum and the parity may be changed if we don't lock the stripe, so we need read it in the stripe lock context. - Check the parity - Re-calculate the new parity and write back it if the old parity is not right - Unlock the stripe If we can not read out the data or the data we read is corrupted, we will try to repair it. If the repair fails. we will mark the horizontal sub-stripe(pages on the same horizontal) as corrupted sub-stripe, and we will skip the parity check and repair of that horizontal sub-stripe. And in order to skip the horizontal sub-stripe that has no data, we introduce a bitmap. If there is some data on the horizontal sub-stripe, we will the relative bit to 1, and when we check and repair the parity, we will skip those horizontal sub-stripes that the relative bits is 0. Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
2014-11-06 12:20:58 +03:00
unsigned long *dbitmap, int stripe_nsectors);
void raid56_parity_submit_scrub_rbio(struct btrfs_raid_bio *rbio);
Btrfs: add RAID 5/6 BTRFS_RBIO_REBUILD_MISSING operation The current RAID 5/6 recovery code isn't quite prepared to handle missing devices. In particular, it expects a bio that we previously attempted to use in the read path, meaning that it has valid pages allocated. However, missing devices have a NULL blkdev, and we can't call bio_add_page() on a bio with a NULL blkdev. We could do manual manipulation of bio->bi_io_vec, but that's pretty gross. So instead, add a separate path that allows us to manually add pages to the rbio. Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2015-06-19 21:52:50 +03:00
struct btrfs_raid_bio *
raid56_alloc_missing_rbio(struct btrfs_root *root, struct bio *bio,
struct btrfs_bio *bbio, u64 length);
void raid56_submit_missing_rbio(struct btrfs_raid_bio *rbio);
Btrfs: RAID5 and RAID6 This builds on David Woodhouse's original Btrfs raid5/6 implementation. The code has changed quite a bit, blame Chris Mason for any bugs. Read/modify/write is done after the higher levels of the filesystem have prepared a given bio. This means the higher layers are not responsible for building full stripes, and they don't need to query for the topology of the extents that may get allocated during delayed allocation runs. It also means different files can easily share the same stripe. But, it does expose us to incorrect parity if we crash or lose power while doing a read/modify/write cycle. This will be addressed in a later commit. Scrub is unable to repair crc errors on raid5/6 chunks. Discard does not work on raid5/6 (yet) The stripe size is fixed at 64KiB per disk. This will be tunable in a later commit. Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-01-30 03:40:14 +04:00
int btrfs_alloc_stripe_hash_table(struct btrfs_fs_info *info);
void btrfs_free_stripe_hash_table(struct btrfs_fs_info *info);
#endif