WSL2-Linux-Kernel/drivers/mfd/twl-core.h

/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
#ifndef __TWL_CORE_H__
#define __TWL_CORE_H__

extern int twl6030_init_irq(struct device *dev, int irq_num);
extern void twl6030_exit_irq(void);
extern int twl4030_init_irq(struct device *dev, int irq_num);
extern void twl4030_exit_irq(void);
extern int twl4030_init_chip_irq(const char *chip);

#endif /*  __TWL_CORE_H__ */
License cleanup: add SPDX GPL-2.0 license identifier to files with no license Many source files in the tree are missing licensing information, which makes it harder for compliance tools to determine the correct license. By default all files without license information are under the default license of the kernel, which is GPL version 2. Update the files which contain no license information with the 'GPL-2.0' SPDX license identifier. The SPDX identifier is a legally binding shorthand, which can be used instead of the full boiler plate text. This patch is based on work done by Thomas Gleixner and Kate Stewart and Philippe Ombredanne. How this work was done: Patches were generated and checked against linux-4.14-rc6 for a subset of the use cases: - file had no licensing information it it. - file was a /uapi/ one with no licensing information in it, - file was a /uapi/ one with existing licensing information, Further patches will be generated in subsequent months to fix up cases where non-standard license headers were used, and references to license had to be inferred by heuristics based on keywords. The analysis to determine which SPDX License Identifier to be applied to a file was done in a spreadsheet of side by side results from of the output of two independent scanners (ScanCode & Windriver) producing SPDX tag:value files created by Philippe Ombredanne. Philippe prepared the base worksheet, and did an initial spot review of a few 1000 files. The 4.13 kernel was the starting point of the analysis with 60,537 files assessed. Kate Stewart did a file by file comparison of the scanner results in the spreadsheet to determine which SPDX license identifier(s) to be applied to the file. She confirmed any determination that was not immediately clear with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation. Criteria used to select files for SPDX license identifier tagging was: - Files considered eligible had to be source code files. - Make and config files were included as candidates if they contained >5 lines of source - File already had some variant of a license header in it (even if <5 lines). All documentation files were explicitly excluded. The following heuristics were used to determine which SPDX license identifiers to apply. - when both scanners couldn't find any license traces, file was considered to have no license information in it, and the top level COPYING file license applied. For non /uapi/ files that summary was: SPDX license identifier # files ---------------------------------------------------\|------- GPL-2.0 11139 and resulted in the first patch in this series. If that file was a /uapi/ path one, it was "GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note" otherwise it was "GPL-2.0". Results of that was: SPDX license identifier # files ---------------------------------------------------\|------- GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note 930 and resulted in the second patch in this series. - if a file had some form of licensing information in it, and was one of the /uapi/ ones, it was denoted with the Linux-syscall-note if any GPL family license was found in the file or had no licensing in it (per prior point). Results summary: SPDX license identifier # files ---------------------------------------------------\|------ GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note 270 GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 169 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-2-Clause) 21 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause) 17 LGPL-2.1+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 15 GPL-1.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 14 ((GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause) 5 LGPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 4 LGPL-2.1 WITH Linux-syscall-note 3 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR MIT) 3 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) AND MIT) 1 and that resulted in the third patch in this series. - when the two scanners agreed on the detected license(s), that became the concluded license(s). - when there was disagreement between the two scanners (one detected a license but the other didn't, or they both detected different licenses) a manual inspection of the file occurred. - In most cases a manual inspection of the information in the file resulted in a clear resolution of the license that should apply (and which scanner probably needed to revisit its heuristics). - When it was not immediately clear, the license identifier was confirmed with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation. - If there was any question as to the appropriate license identifier, the file was flagged for further research and to be revisited later in time. In total, over 70 hours of logged manual review was done on the spreadsheet to determine the SPDX license identifiers to apply to the source files by Kate, Philippe, Thomas and, in some cases, confirmation by lawyers working with the Linux Foundation. Kate also obtained a third independent scan of the 4.13 code base from FOSSology, and compared selected files where the other two scanners disagreed against that SPDX file, to see if there was new insights. The Windriver scanner is based on an older version of FOSSology in part, so they are related. Thomas did random spot checks in about 500 files from the spreadsheets for the uapi headers and agreed with SPDX license identifier in the files he inspected. For the non-uapi files Thomas did random spot checks in about 15000 files. In initial set of patches against 4.14-rc6, 3 files were found to have copy/paste license identifier errors, and have been fixed to reflect the correct identifier. Additionally Philippe spent 10 hours this week doing a detailed manual inspection and review of the 12,461 patched files from the initial patch version early this week with: - a full scancode scan run, collecting the matched texts, detected license ids and scores - reviewing anything where there was a license detected (about 500+ files) to ensure that the applied SPDX license was correct - reviewing anything where there was no detection but the patch license was not GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note to ensure that the applied SPDX license was correct This produced a worksheet with 20 files needing minor correction. This worksheet was then exported into 3 different .csv files for the different types of files to be modified. These .csv files were then reviewed by Greg. Thomas wrote a script to parse the csv files and add the proper SPDX tag to the file, in the format that the file expected. This script was further refined by Greg based on the output to detect more types of files automatically and to distinguish between header and source .c files (which need different comment types.) Finally Greg ran the script using the .csv files to generate the patches. Reviewed-by: Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org> Reviewed-by: Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@nexb.com> Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 2017-11-01 17:07:57 +03:00			`/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */`
mfd: Fix twl-irq function declaration warnings Fixes following sparse warnings for twl4030 and twl6030 irq files. drivers/mfd/twl4030-irq.c:783:5: warning: symbol 'twl4030_init_irq' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/mfd/twl4030-irq.c:863:5: warning: symbol 'twl4030_exit_irq' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/mfd/twl4030-irq.c:873:5: warning: symbol 'twl4030_init_chip_irq' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/mfd/twl6030-irq.c:226:5: warning: symbol 'twl6030_init_irq' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/mfd/twl6030-irq.c:290:5: warning: symbol 'twl6030_exit_irq' was not declared. Should it be static? Signed-off-by: G, Manjunath Kondaiah <manjugk@ti.com> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> Cc: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com> 2010-10-19 13:02:48 +04:00			`#ifndef __TWL_CORE_H__`
			`#define __TWL_CORE_H__`

mfd: Move twl-core IRQ allocation into twl[4030\|6030]-irq files During DT adaptation, the irq_alloc_desc was added into twl-core, but due to the rather different and weird IRQ management required by the twl4030, it is much better to have a different approach for it. The issue is that twl4030 uses a two level IRQ mechanism but handles all the PWR interrupts as part of the twl-core interrupt range. It ends up with a range of 16 interrupts total for CORE and PWR. The other twl4030 functionalities already have a dedicated driver and thus their IRQs and irqdomain can and should be defined localy. twl6030 is using a single level IRQ controller and thus does not require any trick. Move the irq_alloc_desc and irq_domain_add_legacy in twl4030-irq and twl6030-irq. Allocate together CORE and PWR IRQs for twl4030-irq. Conflicts: drivers/mfd/twl-core.c Signed-off-by: Benoit Cousson <b-cousson@ti.com> Acked-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com> 2012-02-29 22:40:31 +04:00			`extern int twl6030_init_irq(struct device *dev, int irq_num);`
mfd: twl6030: Make twl6030_exit_irq() return void This function returns 0 unconditionally, so there is no benefit in returning a value at all and make the caller do error checking. Also the caller (twl_remove()) cannot do anything sensible with an error code. Passing it up the call stack isn't a good option because the i2c core ignores error codes (apart from emitting an error message). Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220113101430.12869-2-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de 2022-01-13 13:14:29 +03:00			`extern void twl6030_exit_irq(void);`
mfd: Move twl-core IRQ allocation into twl[4030\|6030]-irq files During DT adaptation, the irq_alloc_desc was added into twl-core, but due to the rather different and weird IRQ management required by the twl4030, it is much better to have a different approach for it. The issue is that twl4030 uses a two level IRQ mechanism but handles all the PWR interrupts as part of the twl-core interrupt range. It ends up with a range of 16 interrupts total for CORE and PWR. The other twl4030 functionalities already have a dedicated driver and thus their IRQs and irqdomain can and should be defined localy. twl6030 is using a single level IRQ controller and thus does not require any trick. Move the irq_alloc_desc and irq_domain_add_legacy in twl4030-irq and twl6030-irq. Allocate together CORE and PWR IRQs for twl4030-irq. Conflicts: drivers/mfd/twl-core.c Signed-off-by: Benoit Cousson <b-cousson@ti.com> Acked-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com> 2012-02-29 22:40:31 +04:00			`extern int twl4030_init_irq(struct device *dev, int irq_num);`
mfd: twl4030: Make twl4030_exit_irq() return void If twl4030_exit_irq() returns an error, the effect is that the caller (twl_remove()) forwards the error to the i2c core without unregistering its dummy slave devices. This only makes the i2c core emit another error message and then it still removes the device. In this situation it doesn't make sense to abort the remove cleanup and not unregister the slave devices. So do that. Then return value is actually unused and twl4030_exit_irq() can better be changed to return no value at all. Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220113101430.12869-3-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de 2022-01-13 13:14:30 +03:00			`extern void twl4030_exit_irq(void);`
mfd: Fix twl-irq function declaration warnings Fixes following sparse warnings for twl4030 and twl6030 irq files. drivers/mfd/twl4030-irq.c:783:5: warning: symbol 'twl4030_init_irq' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/mfd/twl4030-irq.c:863:5: warning: symbol 'twl4030_exit_irq' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/mfd/twl4030-irq.c:873:5: warning: symbol 'twl4030_init_chip_irq' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/mfd/twl6030-irq.c:226:5: warning: symbol 'twl6030_init_irq' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/mfd/twl6030-irq.c:290:5: warning: symbol 'twl6030_exit_irq' was not declared. Should it be static? Signed-off-by: G, Manjunath Kondaiah <manjugk@ti.com> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> Cc: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com> 2010-10-19 13:02:48 +04:00			`extern int twl4030_init_chip_irq(const char *chip);`

			`#endif /* __TWL_CORE_H__ */`