WSL2-Linux-Kernel/tools/bpf/bpftool/Makefile

165 строки
4.0 KiB
Makefile
Исходник Обычный вид История

# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
include ../../scripts/Makefile.include
include ../../scripts/utilities.mak
ifeq ($(srctree),)
srctree := $(patsubst %/,%,$(dir $(CURDIR)))
srctree := $(patsubst %/,%,$(dir $(srctree)))
srctree := $(patsubst %/,%,$(dir $(srctree)))
endif
ifeq ($(V),1)
Q =
else
Q = @
endif
BPF_DIR = $(srctree)/tools/lib/bpf/
ifneq ($(OUTPUT),)
tools: bpftool: improve and check builds for different make invocations There are a number of alternative "make" invocations that can be used to compile bpftool. The following invocations are expected to work: - through the kbuild system, from the top of the repository (make tools/bpf) - by telling make to change to the bpftool directory (make -C tools/bpf/bpftool) - by building the BPF tools from tools/ (cd tools && make bpf) - by running make from bpftool directory (cd tools/bpf/bpftool && make) Additionally, setting the O or OUTPUT variables should tell the build system to use a custom output path, for each of these alternatives. The following patch fixes the following invocations: $ make tools/bpf $ make tools/bpf O=<dir> $ make -C tools/bpf/bpftool OUTPUT=<dir> $ make -C tools/bpf/bpftool O=<dir> $ cd tools/ && make bpf O=<dir> $ cd tools/bpf/bpftool && make OUTPUT=<dir> $ cd tools/bpf/bpftool && make O=<dir> After this commit, the build still fails for two variants when passing the OUTPUT variable: $ make tools/bpf OUTPUT=<dir> $ cd tools/ && make bpf OUTPUT=<dir> In order to remember and check what make invocations are supposed to work, and to document the ones which do not, a new script is added to the BPF selftests. Note that some invocations require the kernel to be configured, so the script skips them if no .config file is found. v2: - In make_and_clean(), set $ERROR to 1 when "make" returns non-zero, even if the binary was produced. - Run "make clean" from the correct directory (bpf/ instead of bpftool/, when relevant). Reported-by: Lorenz Bauer <lmb@cloudflare.com> Signed-off-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin.monnet@netronome.com> Reviewed-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2019-08-30 14:00:38 +03:00
LIBBPF_OUTPUT = $(OUTPUT)/libbpf/
LIBBPF_PATH = $(LIBBPF_OUTPUT)
else
tools: bpftool: improve and check builds for different make invocations There are a number of alternative "make" invocations that can be used to compile bpftool. The following invocations are expected to work: - through the kbuild system, from the top of the repository (make tools/bpf) - by telling make to change to the bpftool directory (make -C tools/bpf/bpftool) - by building the BPF tools from tools/ (cd tools && make bpf) - by running make from bpftool directory (cd tools/bpf/bpftool && make) Additionally, setting the O or OUTPUT variables should tell the build system to use a custom output path, for each of these alternatives. The following patch fixes the following invocations: $ make tools/bpf $ make tools/bpf O=<dir> $ make -C tools/bpf/bpftool OUTPUT=<dir> $ make -C tools/bpf/bpftool O=<dir> $ cd tools/ && make bpf O=<dir> $ cd tools/bpf/bpftool && make OUTPUT=<dir> $ cd tools/bpf/bpftool && make O=<dir> After this commit, the build still fails for two variants when passing the OUTPUT variable: $ make tools/bpf OUTPUT=<dir> $ cd tools/ && make bpf OUTPUT=<dir> In order to remember and check what make invocations are supposed to work, and to document the ones which do not, a new script is added to the BPF selftests. Note that some invocations require the kernel to be configured, so the script skips them if no .config file is found. v2: - In make_and_clean(), set $ERROR to 1 when "make" returns non-zero, even if the binary was produced. - Run "make clean" from the correct directory (bpf/ instead of bpftool/, when relevant). Reported-by: Lorenz Bauer <lmb@cloudflare.com> Signed-off-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin.monnet@netronome.com> Reviewed-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2019-08-30 14:00:38 +03:00
LIBBPF_PATH = $(BPF_DIR)
endif
tools: bpftool: improve and check builds for different make invocations There are a number of alternative "make" invocations that can be used to compile bpftool. The following invocations are expected to work: - through the kbuild system, from the top of the repository (make tools/bpf) - by telling make to change to the bpftool directory (make -C tools/bpf/bpftool) - by building the BPF tools from tools/ (cd tools && make bpf) - by running make from bpftool directory (cd tools/bpf/bpftool && make) Additionally, setting the O or OUTPUT variables should tell the build system to use a custom output path, for each of these alternatives. The following patch fixes the following invocations: $ make tools/bpf $ make tools/bpf O=<dir> $ make -C tools/bpf/bpftool OUTPUT=<dir> $ make -C tools/bpf/bpftool O=<dir> $ cd tools/ && make bpf O=<dir> $ cd tools/bpf/bpftool && make OUTPUT=<dir> $ cd tools/bpf/bpftool && make O=<dir> After this commit, the build still fails for two variants when passing the OUTPUT variable: $ make tools/bpf OUTPUT=<dir> $ cd tools/ && make bpf OUTPUT=<dir> In order to remember and check what make invocations are supposed to work, and to document the ones which do not, a new script is added to the BPF selftests. Note that some invocations require the kernel to be configured, so the script skips them if no .config file is found. v2: - In make_and_clean(), set $ERROR to 1 when "make" returns non-zero, even if the binary was produced. - Run "make clean" from the correct directory (bpf/ instead of bpftool/, when relevant). Reported-by: Lorenz Bauer <lmb@cloudflare.com> Signed-off-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin.monnet@netronome.com> Reviewed-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2019-08-30 14:00:38 +03:00
LIBBPF = $(LIBBPF_PATH)libbpf.a
tools: bpftool: ignore make built-in rules for getting kernel version Bpftool calls the toplevel Makefile to get the kernel version for the sources it is built from. But when the utility is built from the top of the kernel repository, it may dump the following error message for certain architectures (including x86): $ make tools/bpf [...] make[3]: *** [checkbin] Error 1 [...] This does not prevent bpftool compilation, but may feel disconcerting. The "checkbin" arch-dependent target is not supposed to be called for target "kernelversion", which is a simple "echo" of the version number. It turns out this is caused by the make invocation in tools/bpf/bpftool, which attempts to find implicit rules to apply. Extract from debug output: Reading makefiles... Reading makefile 'Makefile'... Reading makefile 'scripts/Kbuild.include' (search path) (no ~ expansion)... Reading makefile 'scripts/subarch.include' (search path) (no ~ expansion)... Reading makefile 'arch/x86/Makefile' (search path) (no ~ expansion)... Reading makefile 'scripts/Makefile.kcov' (search path) (no ~ expansion)... Reading makefile 'scripts/Makefile.gcc-plugins' (search path) (no ~ expansion)... Reading makefile 'scripts/Makefile.kasan' (search path) (no ~ expansion)... Reading makefile 'scripts/Makefile.extrawarn' (search path) (no ~ expansion)... Reading makefile 'scripts/Makefile.ubsan' (search path) (no ~ expansion)... Updating makefiles.... Considering target file 'scripts/Makefile.ubsan'. Looking for an implicit rule for 'scripts/Makefile.ubsan'. Trying pattern rule with stem 'Makefile.ubsan'. [...] Trying pattern rule with stem 'Makefile.ubsan'. Trying implicit prerequisite 'scripts/Makefile.ubsan.o'. Looking for a rule with intermediate file 'scripts/Makefile.ubsan.o'. Avoiding implicit rule recursion. Trying pattern rule with stem 'Makefile.ubsan'. Trying rule prerequisite 'prepare'. Trying rule prerequisite 'FORCE'. Found an implicit rule for 'scripts/Makefile.ubsan'. Considering target file 'prepare'. File 'prepare' does not exist. Considering target file 'prepare0'. File 'prepare0' does not exist. Considering target file 'archprepare'. File 'archprepare' does not exist. Considering target file 'archheaders'. File 'archheaders' does not exist. Finished prerequisites of target file 'archheaders'. Must remake target 'archheaders'. Putting child 0x55976f4f6980 (archheaders) PID 31743 on the chain. To avoid that, pass the -r and -R flags to eliminate the use of make built-in rules (and while at it, built-in variables) when running command "make kernelversion" from bpftool's Makefile. Signed-off-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin.monnet@netronome.com> Reviewed-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2019-08-30 14:00:37 +03:00
BPFTOOL_VERSION := $(shell make -rR --no-print-directory -sC ../../.. kernelversion)
$(LIBBPF): FORCE
tools: bpftool: improve and check builds for different make invocations There are a number of alternative "make" invocations that can be used to compile bpftool. The following invocations are expected to work: - through the kbuild system, from the top of the repository (make tools/bpf) - by telling make to change to the bpftool directory (make -C tools/bpf/bpftool) - by building the BPF tools from tools/ (cd tools && make bpf) - by running make from bpftool directory (cd tools/bpf/bpftool && make) Additionally, setting the O or OUTPUT variables should tell the build system to use a custom output path, for each of these alternatives. The following patch fixes the following invocations: $ make tools/bpf $ make tools/bpf O=<dir> $ make -C tools/bpf/bpftool OUTPUT=<dir> $ make -C tools/bpf/bpftool O=<dir> $ cd tools/ && make bpf O=<dir> $ cd tools/bpf/bpftool && make OUTPUT=<dir> $ cd tools/bpf/bpftool && make O=<dir> After this commit, the build still fails for two variants when passing the OUTPUT variable: $ make tools/bpf OUTPUT=<dir> $ cd tools/ && make bpf OUTPUT=<dir> In order to remember and check what make invocations are supposed to work, and to document the ones which do not, a new script is added to the BPF selftests. Note that some invocations require the kernel to be configured, so the script skips them if no .config file is found. v2: - In make_and_clean(), set $ERROR to 1 when "make" returns non-zero, even if the binary was produced. - Run "make clean" from the correct directory (bpf/ instead of bpftool/, when relevant). Reported-by: Lorenz Bauer <lmb@cloudflare.com> Signed-off-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin.monnet@netronome.com> Reviewed-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2019-08-30 14:00:38 +03:00
$(if $(LIBBPF_OUTPUT),@mkdir -p $(LIBBPF_OUTPUT))
$(Q)$(MAKE) -C $(BPF_DIR) OUTPUT=$(LIBBPF_OUTPUT) $(LIBBPF_OUTPUT)libbpf.a
$(LIBBPF)-clean:
$(call QUIET_CLEAN, libbpf)
tools: bpftool: improve and check builds for different make invocations There are a number of alternative "make" invocations that can be used to compile bpftool. The following invocations are expected to work: - through the kbuild system, from the top of the repository (make tools/bpf) - by telling make to change to the bpftool directory (make -C tools/bpf/bpftool) - by building the BPF tools from tools/ (cd tools && make bpf) - by running make from bpftool directory (cd tools/bpf/bpftool && make) Additionally, setting the O or OUTPUT variables should tell the build system to use a custom output path, for each of these alternatives. The following patch fixes the following invocations: $ make tools/bpf $ make tools/bpf O=<dir> $ make -C tools/bpf/bpftool OUTPUT=<dir> $ make -C tools/bpf/bpftool O=<dir> $ cd tools/ && make bpf O=<dir> $ cd tools/bpf/bpftool && make OUTPUT=<dir> $ cd tools/bpf/bpftool && make O=<dir> After this commit, the build still fails for two variants when passing the OUTPUT variable: $ make tools/bpf OUTPUT=<dir> $ cd tools/ && make bpf OUTPUT=<dir> In order to remember and check what make invocations are supposed to work, and to document the ones which do not, a new script is added to the BPF selftests. Note that some invocations require the kernel to be configured, so the script skips them if no .config file is found. v2: - In make_and_clean(), set $ERROR to 1 when "make" returns non-zero, even if the binary was produced. - Run "make clean" from the correct directory (bpf/ instead of bpftool/, when relevant). Reported-by: Lorenz Bauer <lmb@cloudflare.com> Signed-off-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin.monnet@netronome.com> Reviewed-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2019-08-30 14:00:38 +03:00
$(Q)$(MAKE) -C $(BPF_DIR) OUTPUT=$(LIBBPF_OUTPUT) clean >/dev/null
prefix ?= /usr/local
bash_compdir ?= /usr/share/bash-completion/completions
CFLAGS += -O2
CFLAGS += -W -Wall -Wextra -Wno-unused-parameter -Wno-missing-field-initializers
CFLAGS += $(filter-out -Wswitch-enum,$(EXTRA_WARNINGS))
CFLAGS += -DPACKAGE='"bpftool"' -D__EXPORTED_HEADERS__ \
-I$(srctree)/kernel/bpf/ \
-I$(srctree)/tools/include \
-I$(srctree)/tools/include/uapi \
-I$(srctree)/tools/lib/bpf \
-I$(srctree)/tools/perf
CFLAGS += -DBPFTOOL_VERSION='"$(BPFTOOL_VERSION)"'
ifneq ($(EXTRA_CFLAGS),)
CFLAGS += $(EXTRA_CFLAGS)
endif
ifneq ($(EXTRA_LDFLAGS),)
LDFLAGS += $(EXTRA_LDFLAGS)
endif
LIBS = $(LIBBPF) -lelf -lz
INSTALL ?= install
RM ?= rm -f
FEATURE_USER = .bpftool
FEATURE_TESTS = libbfd disassembler-four-args reallocarray zlib
FEATURE_DISPLAY = libbfd disassembler-four-args zlib
check_feat := 1
NON_CHECK_FEAT_TARGETS := clean uninstall doc doc-clean doc-install doc-uninstall
ifdef MAKECMDGOALS
ifeq ($(filter-out $(NON_CHECK_FEAT_TARGETS),$(MAKECMDGOALS)),)
check_feat := 0
endif
endif
ifeq ($(check_feat),1)
ifeq ($(FEATURES_DUMP),)
include $(srctree)/tools/build/Makefile.feature
else
include $(FEATURES_DUMP)
endif
endif
ifeq ($(feature-disassembler-four-args), 1)
CFLAGS += -DDISASM_FOUR_ARGS_SIGNATURE
endif
ifeq ($(feature-reallocarray), 0)
CFLAGS += -DCOMPAT_NEED_REALLOCARRAY
endif
include $(wildcard $(OUTPUT)*.d)
all: $(OUTPUT)bpftool
BFD_SRCS = jit_disasm.c
SRCS = $(filter-out $(BFD_SRCS),$(wildcard *.c))
ifeq ($(feature-libbfd),1)
LIBS += -lbfd -ldl -lopcodes
else ifeq ($(feature-libbfd-liberty),1)
LIBS += -lbfd -ldl -lopcodes -liberty
else ifeq ($(feature-libbfd-liberty-z),1)
LIBS += -lbfd -ldl -lopcodes -liberty -lz
endif
ifneq ($(filter -lbfd,$(LIBS)),)
CFLAGS += -DHAVE_LIBBFD_SUPPORT
SRCS += $(BFD_SRCS)
endif
OBJS = $(patsubst %.c,$(OUTPUT)%.o,$(SRCS)) $(OUTPUT)disasm.o
$(OUTPUT)disasm.o: $(srctree)/kernel/bpf/disasm.c
$(QUIET_CC)$(COMPILE.c) -MMD -o $@ $<
$(OUTPUT)feature.o: | zdep
$(OUTPUT)bpftool: $(OBJS) $(LIBBPF)
$(QUIET_LINK)$(CC) $(CFLAGS) $(LDFLAGS) -o $@ $(OBJS) $(LIBS)
$(OUTPUT)%.o: %.c
$(QUIET_CC)$(COMPILE.c) -MMD -o $@ $<
clean: $(LIBBPF)-clean
$(call QUIET_CLEAN, bpftool)
$(Q)$(RM) -- $(OUTPUT)bpftool $(OUTPUT)*.o $(OUTPUT)*.d
$(Q)$(RM) -r -- $(OUTPUT)libbpf/
$(call QUIET_CLEAN, core-gen)
$(Q)$(RM) -- $(OUTPUT)FEATURE-DUMP.bpftool
$(Q)$(RM) -r -- $(OUTPUT)feature/
install: $(OUTPUT)bpftool
$(call QUIET_INSTALL, bpftool)
$(Q)$(INSTALL) -m 0755 -d $(DESTDIR)$(prefix)/sbin
$(Q)$(INSTALL) $(OUTPUT)bpftool $(DESTDIR)$(prefix)/sbin/bpftool
$(Q)$(INSTALL) -m 0755 -d $(DESTDIR)$(bash_compdir)
$(Q)$(INSTALL) -m 0644 bash-completion/bpftool $(DESTDIR)$(bash_compdir)
uninstall:
$(call QUIET_UNINST, bpftool)
$(Q)$(RM) -- $(DESTDIR)$(prefix)/sbin/bpftool
$(Q)$(RM) -- $(DESTDIR)$(bash_compdir)/bpftool
doc:
$(call descend,Documentation)
doc-clean:
$(call descend,Documentation,clean)
doc-install:
$(call descend,Documentation,install)
doc-uninstall:
$(call descend,Documentation,uninstall)
FORCE:
zdep:
@if [ "$(feature-zlib)" != "1" ]; then echo "No zlib found"; exit 1 ; fi
.PHONY: all FORCE clean install uninstall zdep
.PHONY: doc doc-clean doc-install doc-uninstall
.DEFAULT_GOAL := all