2018-11-27 11:15:37 +03:00
|
|
|
.. _perf_security:
|
|
|
|
|
doc/admin-guide: Update perf-security.rst with CAP_PERFMON information
Update perf-security.rst documentation file with the information
related to usage of CAP_PERFMON capability to secure performance
monitoring and observability operations in system.
Committer notes:
While testing 'perf top' under cap_perfmon I noticed that it needs
some more capability and Alexey pointed out cap_ipc_lock, as needed by
this kernel chunk:
kernel/events/core.c: 6101
if ((locked > lock_limit) && perf_is_paranoid() &&
!capable(CAP_IPC_LOCK)) {
ret = -EPERM;
goto unlock;
}
So I added it to the documentation, and also mentioned that if the
libcap version doesn't yet supports 'cap_perfmon', its numeric value can
be used instead, i.e. if:
# setcap "cap_perfmon,cap_ipc_lock,cap_sys_ptrace,cap_syslog=ep" perf
Fails, try:
# setcap "38,cap_ipc_lock,cap_sys_ptrace,cap_syslog=ep" perf
I also added a paragraph stating that using an unpatched libcap will
fail the check for CAP_PERFMON, as it checks the cap number against a
maximum to see if it is valid, which makes it use as the default the
'cycles:u' event, even tho a cap_perfmon capable perf binary can get
kernel samples, to workaround that just use, e.g.:
# perf top -e cycles
# perf record -e cycles
And it will sample kernel and user modes.
Signed-off-by: Alexey Budankov <alexey.budankov@linux.intel.com>
Tested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Igor Lubashev <ilubashe@akamai.com>
Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com>
Cc: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-man@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
Cc: selinux@vger.kernel.org
Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/17278551-9399-9ebe-d665-8827016a217d@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2020-04-02 11:54:01 +03:00
|
|
|
Perf events and tool security
|
2018-11-27 11:15:37 +03:00
|
|
|
=============================
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Overview
|
|
|
|
--------
|
|
|
|
|
2019-02-11 17:58:24 +03:00
|
|
|
Usage of Performance Counters for Linux (perf_events) [1]_ , [2]_ , [3]_
|
|
|
|
can impose a considerable risk of leaking sensitive data accessed by
|
|
|
|
monitored processes. The data leakage is possible both in scenarios of
|
|
|
|
direct usage of perf_events system call API [2]_ and over data files
|
|
|
|
generated by Perf tool user mode utility (Perf) [3]_ , [4]_ . The risk
|
|
|
|
depends on the nature of data that perf_events performance monitoring
|
|
|
|
units (PMU) [2]_ and Perf collect and expose for performance analysis.
|
|
|
|
Collected system and performance data may be split into several
|
|
|
|
categories:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. System hardware and software configuration data, for example: a CPU
|
|
|
|
model and its cache configuration, an amount of available memory and
|
|
|
|
its topology, used kernel and Perf versions, performance monitoring
|
|
|
|
setup including experiment time, events configuration, Perf command
|
|
|
|
line parameters, etc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. User and kernel module paths and their load addresses with sizes,
|
|
|
|
process and thread names with their PIDs and TIDs, timestamps for
|
|
|
|
captured hardware and software events.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. Content of kernel software counters (e.g., for context switches, page
|
|
|
|
faults, CPU migrations), architectural hardware performance counters
|
|
|
|
(PMC) [8]_ and machine specific registers (MSR) [9]_ that provide
|
|
|
|
execution metrics for various monitored parts of the system (e.g.,
|
|
|
|
memory controller (IMC), interconnect (QPI/UPI) or peripheral (PCIe)
|
|
|
|
uncore counters) without direct attribution to any execution context
|
|
|
|
state.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. Content of architectural execution context registers (e.g., RIP, RSP,
|
|
|
|
RBP on x86_64), process user and kernel space memory addresses and
|
|
|
|
data, content of various architectural MSRs that capture data from
|
|
|
|
this category.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Data that belong to the fourth category can potentially contain
|
|
|
|
sensitive process data. If PMUs in some monitoring modes capture values
|
|
|
|
of execution context registers or data from process memory then access
|
doc/admin-guide: Update perf-security.rst with CAP_PERFMON information
Update perf-security.rst documentation file with the information
related to usage of CAP_PERFMON capability to secure performance
monitoring and observability operations in system.
Committer notes:
While testing 'perf top' under cap_perfmon I noticed that it needs
some more capability and Alexey pointed out cap_ipc_lock, as needed by
this kernel chunk:
kernel/events/core.c: 6101
if ((locked > lock_limit) && perf_is_paranoid() &&
!capable(CAP_IPC_LOCK)) {
ret = -EPERM;
goto unlock;
}
So I added it to the documentation, and also mentioned that if the
libcap version doesn't yet supports 'cap_perfmon', its numeric value can
be used instead, i.e. if:
# setcap "cap_perfmon,cap_ipc_lock,cap_sys_ptrace,cap_syslog=ep" perf
Fails, try:
# setcap "38,cap_ipc_lock,cap_sys_ptrace,cap_syslog=ep" perf
I also added a paragraph stating that using an unpatched libcap will
fail the check for CAP_PERFMON, as it checks the cap number against a
maximum to see if it is valid, which makes it use as the default the
'cycles:u' event, even tho a cap_perfmon capable perf binary can get
kernel samples, to workaround that just use, e.g.:
# perf top -e cycles
# perf record -e cycles
And it will sample kernel and user modes.
Signed-off-by: Alexey Budankov <alexey.budankov@linux.intel.com>
Tested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Igor Lubashev <ilubashe@akamai.com>
Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com>
Cc: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-man@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
Cc: selinux@vger.kernel.org
Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/17278551-9399-9ebe-d665-8827016a217d@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2020-04-02 11:54:01 +03:00
|
|
|
to such monitoring modes requires to be ordered and secured properly.
|
|
|
|
So, perf_events performance monitoring and observability operations are
|
|
|
|
the subject for security access control management [5]_ .
|
2018-11-27 11:15:37 +03:00
|
|
|
|
doc/admin-guide: Update perf-security.rst with CAP_PERFMON information
Update perf-security.rst documentation file with the information
related to usage of CAP_PERFMON capability to secure performance
monitoring and observability operations in system.
Committer notes:
While testing 'perf top' under cap_perfmon I noticed that it needs
some more capability and Alexey pointed out cap_ipc_lock, as needed by
this kernel chunk:
kernel/events/core.c: 6101
if ((locked > lock_limit) && perf_is_paranoid() &&
!capable(CAP_IPC_LOCK)) {
ret = -EPERM;
goto unlock;
}
So I added it to the documentation, and also mentioned that if the
libcap version doesn't yet supports 'cap_perfmon', its numeric value can
be used instead, i.e. if:
# setcap "cap_perfmon,cap_ipc_lock,cap_sys_ptrace,cap_syslog=ep" perf
Fails, try:
# setcap "38,cap_ipc_lock,cap_sys_ptrace,cap_syslog=ep" perf
I also added a paragraph stating that using an unpatched libcap will
fail the check for CAP_PERFMON, as it checks the cap number against a
maximum to see if it is valid, which makes it use as the default the
'cycles:u' event, even tho a cap_perfmon capable perf binary can get
kernel samples, to workaround that just use, e.g.:
# perf top -e cycles
# perf record -e cycles
And it will sample kernel and user modes.
Signed-off-by: Alexey Budankov <alexey.budankov@linux.intel.com>
Tested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Igor Lubashev <ilubashe@akamai.com>
Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com>
Cc: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-man@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
Cc: selinux@vger.kernel.org
Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/17278551-9399-9ebe-d665-8827016a217d@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2020-04-02 11:54:01 +03:00
|
|
|
perf_events access control
|
2018-11-27 11:15:37 +03:00
|
|
|
-------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
2019-02-11 17:58:24 +03:00
|
|
|
To perform security checks, the Linux implementation splits processes
|
|
|
|
into two categories [6]_ : a) privileged processes (whose effective user
|
|
|
|
ID is 0, referred to as superuser or root), and b) unprivileged
|
|
|
|
processes (whose effective UID is nonzero). Privileged processes bypass
|
|
|
|
all kernel security permission checks so perf_events performance
|
|
|
|
monitoring is fully available to privileged processes without access,
|
|
|
|
scope and resource restrictions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unprivileged processes are subject to a full security permission check
|
|
|
|
based on the process's credentials [5]_ (usually: effective UID,
|
|
|
|
effective GID, and supplementary group list).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Linux divides the privileges traditionally associated with superuser
|
|
|
|
into distinct units, known as capabilities [6]_ , which can be
|
|
|
|
independently enabled and disabled on per-thread basis for processes and
|
|
|
|
files of unprivileged users.
|
|
|
|
|
doc/admin-guide: Update perf-security.rst with CAP_PERFMON information
Update perf-security.rst documentation file with the information
related to usage of CAP_PERFMON capability to secure performance
monitoring and observability operations in system.
Committer notes:
While testing 'perf top' under cap_perfmon I noticed that it needs
some more capability and Alexey pointed out cap_ipc_lock, as needed by
this kernel chunk:
kernel/events/core.c: 6101
if ((locked > lock_limit) && perf_is_paranoid() &&
!capable(CAP_IPC_LOCK)) {
ret = -EPERM;
goto unlock;
}
So I added it to the documentation, and also mentioned that if the
libcap version doesn't yet supports 'cap_perfmon', its numeric value can
be used instead, i.e. if:
# setcap "cap_perfmon,cap_ipc_lock,cap_sys_ptrace,cap_syslog=ep" perf
Fails, try:
# setcap "38,cap_ipc_lock,cap_sys_ptrace,cap_syslog=ep" perf
I also added a paragraph stating that using an unpatched libcap will
fail the check for CAP_PERFMON, as it checks the cap number against a
maximum to see if it is valid, which makes it use as the default the
'cycles:u' event, even tho a cap_perfmon capable perf binary can get
kernel samples, to workaround that just use, e.g.:
# perf top -e cycles
# perf record -e cycles
And it will sample kernel and user modes.
Signed-off-by: Alexey Budankov <alexey.budankov@linux.intel.com>
Tested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Igor Lubashev <ilubashe@akamai.com>
Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com>
Cc: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-man@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
Cc: selinux@vger.kernel.org
Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/17278551-9399-9ebe-d665-8827016a217d@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2020-04-02 11:54:01 +03:00
|
|
|
Unprivileged processes with enabled CAP_PERFMON capability are treated
|
2019-02-11 17:58:24 +03:00
|
|
|
as privileged processes with respect to perf_events performance
|
doc/admin-guide: Update perf-security.rst with CAP_PERFMON information
Update perf-security.rst documentation file with the information
related to usage of CAP_PERFMON capability to secure performance
monitoring and observability operations in system.
Committer notes:
While testing 'perf top' under cap_perfmon I noticed that it needs
some more capability and Alexey pointed out cap_ipc_lock, as needed by
this kernel chunk:
kernel/events/core.c: 6101
if ((locked > lock_limit) && perf_is_paranoid() &&
!capable(CAP_IPC_LOCK)) {
ret = -EPERM;
goto unlock;
}
So I added it to the documentation, and also mentioned that if the
libcap version doesn't yet supports 'cap_perfmon', its numeric value can
be used instead, i.e. if:
# setcap "cap_perfmon,cap_ipc_lock,cap_sys_ptrace,cap_syslog=ep" perf
Fails, try:
# setcap "38,cap_ipc_lock,cap_sys_ptrace,cap_syslog=ep" perf
I also added a paragraph stating that using an unpatched libcap will
fail the check for CAP_PERFMON, as it checks the cap number against a
maximum to see if it is valid, which makes it use as the default the
'cycles:u' event, even tho a cap_perfmon capable perf binary can get
kernel samples, to workaround that just use, e.g.:
# perf top -e cycles
# perf record -e cycles
And it will sample kernel and user modes.
Signed-off-by: Alexey Budankov <alexey.budankov@linux.intel.com>
Tested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Igor Lubashev <ilubashe@akamai.com>
Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com>
Cc: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-man@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
Cc: selinux@vger.kernel.org
Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/17278551-9399-9ebe-d665-8827016a217d@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2020-04-02 11:54:01 +03:00
|
|
|
monitoring and observability operations, thus, bypass *scope* permissions
|
|
|
|
checks in the kernel. CAP_PERFMON implements the principle of least
|
|
|
|
privilege [13]_ (POSIX 1003.1e: 2.2.2.39) for performance monitoring and
|
|
|
|
observability operations in the kernel and provides a secure approach to
|
2021-02-10 14:56:24 +03:00
|
|
|
performance monitoring and observability in the system.
|
doc/admin-guide: Update perf-security.rst with CAP_PERFMON information
Update perf-security.rst documentation file with the information
related to usage of CAP_PERFMON capability to secure performance
monitoring and observability operations in system.
Committer notes:
While testing 'perf top' under cap_perfmon I noticed that it needs
some more capability and Alexey pointed out cap_ipc_lock, as needed by
this kernel chunk:
kernel/events/core.c: 6101
if ((locked > lock_limit) && perf_is_paranoid() &&
!capable(CAP_IPC_LOCK)) {
ret = -EPERM;
goto unlock;
}
So I added it to the documentation, and also mentioned that if the
libcap version doesn't yet supports 'cap_perfmon', its numeric value can
be used instead, i.e. if:
# setcap "cap_perfmon,cap_ipc_lock,cap_sys_ptrace,cap_syslog=ep" perf
Fails, try:
# setcap "38,cap_ipc_lock,cap_sys_ptrace,cap_syslog=ep" perf
I also added a paragraph stating that using an unpatched libcap will
fail the check for CAP_PERFMON, as it checks the cap number against a
maximum to see if it is valid, which makes it use as the default the
'cycles:u' event, even tho a cap_perfmon capable perf binary can get
kernel samples, to workaround that just use, e.g.:
# perf top -e cycles
# perf record -e cycles
And it will sample kernel and user modes.
Signed-off-by: Alexey Budankov <alexey.budankov@linux.intel.com>
Tested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Igor Lubashev <ilubashe@akamai.com>
Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com>
Cc: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-man@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
Cc: selinux@vger.kernel.org
Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/17278551-9399-9ebe-d665-8827016a217d@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2020-04-02 11:54:01 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For backward compatibility reasons the access to perf_events monitoring and
|
|
|
|
observability operations is also open for CAP_SYS_ADMIN privileged
|
|
|
|
processes but CAP_SYS_ADMIN usage for secure monitoring and observability
|
|
|
|
use cases is discouraged with respect to the CAP_PERFMON capability.
|
|
|
|
If system audit records [14]_ for a process using perf_events system call
|
|
|
|
API contain denial records of acquiring both CAP_PERFMON and CAP_SYS_ADMIN
|
|
|
|
capabilities then providing the process with CAP_PERFMON capability singly
|
|
|
|
is recommended as the preferred secure approach to resolve double access
|
|
|
|
denial logging related to usage of performance monitoring and observability.
|
|
|
|
|
2020-10-19 20:16:49 +03:00
|
|
|
Prior Linux v5.9 unprivileged processes using perf_events system call
|
|
|
|
are also subject for PTRACE_MODE_READ_REALCREDS ptrace access mode check
|
|
|
|
[7]_ , whose outcome determines whether monitoring is permitted.
|
|
|
|
So unprivileged processes provided with CAP_SYS_PTRACE capability are
|
|
|
|
effectively permitted to pass the check. Starting from Linux v5.9
|
|
|
|
CAP_SYS_PTRACE capability is not required and CAP_PERFMON is enough to
|
|
|
|
be provided for processes to make performance monitoring and observability
|
|
|
|
operations.
|
2019-02-11 17:58:24 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other capabilities being granted to unprivileged processes can
|
|
|
|
effectively enable capturing of additional data required for later
|
|
|
|
performance analysis of monitored processes or a system. For example,
|
|
|
|
CAP_SYSLOG capability permits reading kernel space memory addresses from
|
|
|
|
/proc/kallsyms file.
|
2018-11-27 11:15:37 +03:00
|
|
|
|
doc/admin-guide: Update perf-security.rst with CAP_PERFMON information
Update perf-security.rst documentation file with the information
related to usage of CAP_PERFMON capability to secure performance
monitoring and observability operations in system.
Committer notes:
While testing 'perf top' under cap_perfmon I noticed that it needs
some more capability and Alexey pointed out cap_ipc_lock, as needed by
this kernel chunk:
kernel/events/core.c: 6101
if ((locked > lock_limit) && perf_is_paranoid() &&
!capable(CAP_IPC_LOCK)) {
ret = -EPERM;
goto unlock;
}
So I added it to the documentation, and also mentioned that if the
libcap version doesn't yet supports 'cap_perfmon', its numeric value can
be used instead, i.e. if:
# setcap "cap_perfmon,cap_ipc_lock,cap_sys_ptrace,cap_syslog=ep" perf
Fails, try:
# setcap "38,cap_ipc_lock,cap_sys_ptrace,cap_syslog=ep" perf
I also added a paragraph stating that using an unpatched libcap will
fail the check for CAP_PERFMON, as it checks the cap number against a
maximum to see if it is valid, which makes it use as the default the
'cycles:u' event, even tho a cap_perfmon capable perf binary can get
kernel samples, to workaround that just use, e.g.:
# perf top -e cycles
# perf record -e cycles
And it will sample kernel and user modes.
Signed-off-by: Alexey Budankov <alexey.budankov@linux.intel.com>
Tested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Igor Lubashev <ilubashe@akamai.com>
Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com>
Cc: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-man@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
Cc: selinux@vger.kernel.org
Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/17278551-9399-9ebe-d665-8827016a217d@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2020-04-02 11:54:01 +03:00
|
|
|
Privileged Perf users groups
|
2019-02-11 16:44:55 +03:00
|
|
|
---------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
2020-10-19 20:18:12 +03:00
|
|
|
Mechanisms of capabilities, privileged capability-dumb files [6]_,
|
|
|
|
file system ACLs [10]_ and sudo [15]_ utility can be used to create
|
|
|
|
dedicated groups of privileged Perf users who are permitted to execute
|
|
|
|
performance monitoring and observability without limits. The following
|
|
|
|
steps can be taken to create such groups of privileged Perf users.
|
2019-02-11 16:44:55 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2019-02-11 17:58:24 +03:00
|
|
|
1. Create perf_users group of privileged Perf users, assign perf_users
|
|
|
|
group to Perf tool executable and limit access to the executable for
|
|
|
|
other users in the system who are not in the perf_users group:
|
2019-02-11 16:44:55 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# groupadd perf_users
|
|
|
|
# ls -alhF
|
|
|
|
-rwxr-xr-x 2 root root 11M Oct 19 15:12 perf
|
|
|
|
# chgrp perf_users perf
|
|
|
|
# ls -alhF
|
|
|
|
-rwxr-xr-x 2 root perf_users 11M Oct 19 15:12 perf
|
|
|
|
# chmod o-rwx perf
|
|
|
|
# ls -alhF
|
|
|
|
-rwxr-x--- 2 root perf_users 11M Oct 19 15:12 perf
|
|
|
|
|
2019-02-11 17:58:24 +03:00
|
|
|
2. Assign the required capabilities to the Perf tool executable file and
|
doc/admin-guide: Update perf-security.rst with CAP_PERFMON information
Update perf-security.rst documentation file with the information
related to usage of CAP_PERFMON capability to secure performance
monitoring and observability operations in system.
Committer notes:
While testing 'perf top' under cap_perfmon I noticed that it needs
some more capability and Alexey pointed out cap_ipc_lock, as needed by
this kernel chunk:
kernel/events/core.c: 6101
if ((locked > lock_limit) && perf_is_paranoid() &&
!capable(CAP_IPC_LOCK)) {
ret = -EPERM;
goto unlock;
}
So I added it to the documentation, and also mentioned that if the
libcap version doesn't yet supports 'cap_perfmon', its numeric value can
be used instead, i.e. if:
# setcap "cap_perfmon,cap_ipc_lock,cap_sys_ptrace,cap_syslog=ep" perf
Fails, try:
# setcap "38,cap_ipc_lock,cap_sys_ptrace,cap_syslog=ep" perf
I also added a paragraph stating that using an unpatched libcap will
fail the check for CAP_PERFMON, as it checks the cap number against a
maximum to see if it is valid, which makes it use as the default the
'cycles:u' event, even tho a cap_perfmon capable perf binary can get
kernel samples, to workaround that just use, e.g.:
# perf top -e cycles
# perf record -e cycles
And it will sample kernel and user modes.
Signed-off-by: Alexey Budankov <alexey.budankov@linux.intel.com>
Tested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Igor Lubashev <ilubashe@akamai.com>
Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com>
Cc: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-man@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
Cc: selinux@vger.kernel.org
Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/17278551-9399-9ebe-d665-8827016a217d@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2020-04-02 11:54:01 +03:00
|
|
|
enable members of perf_users group with monitoring and observability
|
2019-02-11 17:58:24 +03:00
|
|
|
privileges [6]_ :
|
2019-02-11 16:44:55 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
::
|
|
|
|
|
doc/admin-guide: Update perf-security.rst with CAP_PERFMON information
Update perf-security.rst documentation file with the information
related to usage of CAP_PERFMON capability to secure performance
monitoring and observability operations in system.
Committer notes:
While testing 'perf top' under cap_perfmon I noticed that it needs
some more capability and Alexey pointed out cap_ipc_lock, as needed by
this kernel chunk:
kernel/events/core.c: 6101
if ((locked > lock_limit) && perf_is_paranoid() &&
!capable(CAP_IPC_LOCK)) {
ret = -EPERM;
goto unlock;
}
So I added it to the documentation, and also mentioned that if the
libcap version doesn't yet supports 'cap_perfmon', its numeric value can
be used instead, i.e. if:
# setcap "cap_perfmon,cap_ipc_lock,cap_sys_ptrace,cap_syslog=ep" perf
Fails, try:
# setcap "38,cap_ipc_lock,cap_sys_ptrace,cap_syslog=ep" perf
I also added a paragraph stating that using an unpatched libcap will
fail the check for CAP_PERFMON, as it checks the cap number against a
maximum to see if it is valid, which makes it use as the default the
'cycles:u' event, even tho a cap_perfmon capable perf binary can get
kernel samples, to workaround that just use, e.g.:
# perf top -e cycles
# perf record -e cycles
And it will sample kernel and user modes.
Signed-off-by: Alexey Budankov <alexey.budankov@linux.intel.com>
Tested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Igor Lubashev <ilubashe@akamai.com>
Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com>
Cc: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-man@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
Cc: selinux@vger.kernel.org
Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/17278551-9399-9ebe-d665-8827016a217d@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2020-04-02 11:54:01 +03:00
|
|
|
# setcap "cap_perfmon,cap_sys_ptrace,cap_syslog=ep" perf
|
|
|
|
# setcap -v "cap_perfmon,cap_sys_ptrace,cap_syslog=ep" perf
|
2019-02-11 16:44:55 +03:00
|
|
|
perf: OK
|
|
|
|
# getcap perf
|
doc/admin-guide: Update perf-security.rst with CAP_PERFMON information
Update perf-security.rst documentation file with the information
related to usage of CAP_PERFMON capability to secure performance
monitoring and observability operations in system.
Committer notes:
While testing 'perf top' under cap_perfmon I noticed that it needs
some more capability and Alexey pointed out cap_ipc_lock, as needed by
this kernel chunk:
kernel/events/core.c: 6101
if ((locked > lock_limit) && perf_is_paranoid() &&
!capable(CAP_IPC_LOCK)) {
ret = -EPERM;
goto unlock;
}
So I added it to the documentation, and also mentioned that if the
libcap version doesn't yet supports 'cap_perfmon', its numeric value can
be used instead, i.e. if:
# setcap "cap_perfmon,cap_ipc_lock,cap_sys_ptrace,cap_syslog=ep" perf
Fails, try:
# setcap "38,cap_ipc_lock,cap_sys_ptrace,cap_syslog=ep" perf
I also added a paragraph stating that using an unpatched libcap will
fail the check for CAP_PERFMON, as it checks the cap number against a
maximum to see if it is valid, which makes it use as the default the
'cycles:u' event, even tho a cap_perfmon capable perf binary can get
kernel samples, to workaround that just use, e.g.:
# perf top -e cycles
# perf record -e cycles
And it will sample kernel and user modes.
Signed-off-by: Alexey Budankov <alexey.budankov@linux.intel.com>
Tested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Igor Lubashev <ilubashe@akamai.com>
Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com>
Cc: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-man@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
Cc: selinux@vger.kernel.org
Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/17278551-9399-9ebe-d665-8827016a217d@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2020-04-02 11:54:01 +03:00
|
|
|
perf = cap_sys_ptrace,cap_syslog,cap_perfmon+ep
|
|
|
|
|
2020-10-19 20:18:12 +03:00
|
|
|
If the libcap [16]_ installed doesn't yet support "cap_perfmon", use "38" instead,
|
doc/admin-guide: Update perf-security.rst with CAP_PERFMON information
Update perf-security.rst documentation file with the information
related to usage of CAP_PERFMON capability to secure performance
monitoring and observability operations in system.
Committer notes:
While testing 'perf top' under cap_perfmon I noticed that it needs
some more capability and Alexey pointed out cap_ipc_lock, as needed by
this kernel chunk:
kernel/events/core.c: 6101
if ((locked > lock_limit) && perf_is_paranoid() &&
!capable(CAP_IPC_LOCK)) {
ret = -EPERM;
goto unlock;
}
So I added it to the documentation, and also mentioned that if the
libcap version doesn't yet supports 'cap_perfmon', its numeric value can
be used instead, i.e. if:
# setcap "cap_perfmon,cap_ipc_lock,cap_sys_ptrace,cap_syslog=ep" perf
Fails, try:
# setcap "38,cap_ipc_lock,cap_sys_ptrace,cap_syslog=ep" perf
I also added a paragraph stating that using an unpatched libcap will
fail the check for CAP_PERFMON, as it checks the cap number against a
maximum to see if it is valid, which makes it use as the default the
'cycles:u' event, even tho a cap_perfmon capable perf binary can get
kernel samples, to workaround that just use, e.g.:
# perf top -e cycles
# perf record -e cycles
And it will sample kernel and user modes.
Signed-off-by: Alexey Budankov <alexey.budankov@linux.intel.com>
Tested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Igor Lubashev <ilubashe@akamai.com>
Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com>
Cc: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-man@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
Cc: selinux@vger.kernel.org
Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/17278551-9399-9ebe-d665-8827016a217d@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2020-04-02 11:54:01 +03:00
|
|
|
i.e.:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# setcap "38,cap_ipc_lock,cap_sys_ptrace,cap_syslog=ep" perf
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note that you may need to have 'cap_ipc_lock' in the mix for tools such as
|
|
|
|
'perf top', alternatively use 'perf top -m N', to reduce the memory that
|
|
|
|
it uses for the perf ring buffer, see the memory allocation section below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Using a libcap without support for CAP_PERFMON will make cap_get_flag(caps, 38,
|
|
|
|
CAP_EFFECTIVE, &val) fail, which will lead the default event to be 'cycles:u',
|
|
|
|
so as a workaround explicitly ask for the 'cycles' event, i.e.:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# perf top -e cycles
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To get kernel and user samples with a perf binary with just CAP_PERFMON.
|
2019-02-11 16:44:55 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2019-02-11 17:58:24 +03:00
|
|
|
As a result, members of perf_users group are capable of conducting
|
doc/admin-guide: Update perf-security.rst with CAP_PERFMON information
Update perf-security.rst documentation file with the information
related to usage of CAP_PERFMON capability to secure performance
monitoring and observability operations in system.
Committer notes:
While testing 'perf top' under cap_perfmon I noticed that it needs
some more capability and Alexey pointed out cap_ipc_lock, as needed by
this kernel chunk:
kernel/events/core.c: 6101
if ((locked > lock_limit) && perf_is_paranoid() &&
!capable(CAP_IPC_LOCK)) {
ret = -EPERM;
goto unlock;
}
So I added it to the documentation, and also mentioned that if the
libcap version doesn't yet supports 'cap_perfmon', its numeric value can
be used instead, i.e. if:
# setcap "cap_perfmon,cap_ipc_lock,cap_sys_ptrace,cap_syslog=ep" perf
Fails, try:
# setcap "38,cap_ipc_lock,cap_sys_ptrace,cap_syslog=ep" perf
I also added a paragraph stating that using an unpatched libcap will
fail the check for CAP_PERFMON, as it checks the cap number against a
maximum to see if it is valid, which makes it use as the default the
'cycles:u' event, even tho a cap_perfmon capable perf binary can get
kernel samples, to workaround that just use, e.g.:
# perf top -e cycles
# perf record -e cycles
And it will sample kernel and user modes.
Signed-off-by: Alexey Budankov <alexey.budankov@linux.intel.com>
Tested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Igor Lubashev <ilubashe@akamai.com>
Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com>
Cc: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-man@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
Cc: selinux@vger.kernel.org
Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/17278551-9399-9ebe-d665-8827016a217d@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2020-04-02 11:54:01 +03:00
|
|
|
performance monitoring and observability by using functionality of the
|
|
|
|
configured Perf tool executable that, when executes, passes perf_events
|
|
|
|
subsystem scope checks.
|
2019-02-11 16:44:55 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2020-10-19 20:18:12 +03:00
|
|
|
In case Perf tool executable can't be assigned required capabilities (e.g.
|
|
|
|
file system is mounted with nosuid option or extended attributes are
|
|
|
|
not supported by the file system) then creation of the capabilities
|
|
|
|
privileged environment, naturally shell, is possible. The shell provides
|
|
|
|
inherent processes with CAP_PERFMON and other required capabilities so that
|
|
|
|
performance monitoring and observability operations are available in the
|
|
|
|
environment without limits. Access to the environment can be open via sudo
|
|
|
|
utility for members of perf_users group only. In order to create such
|
|
|
|
environment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. Create shell script that uses capsh utility [16]_ to assign CAP_PERFMON
|
|
|
|
and other required capabilities into ambient capability set of the shell
|
|
|
|
process, lock the process security bits after enabling SECBIT_NO_SETUID_FIXUP,
|
|
|
|
SECBIT_NOROOT and SECBIT_NO_CAP_AMBIENT_RAISE bits and then change
|
|
|
|
the process identity to sudo caller of the script who should essentially
|
|
|
|
be a member of perf_users group:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# ls -alh /usr/local/bin/perf.shell
|
|
|
|
-rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 83 Oct 13 23:57 /usr/local/bin/perf.shell
|
|
|
|
# cat /usr/local/bin/perf.shell
|
|
|
|
exec /usr/sbin/capsh --iab=^cap_perfmon --secbits=239 --user=$SUDO_USER -- -l
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. Extend sudo policy at /etc/sudoers file with a rule for perf_users group:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# grep perf_users /etc/sudoers
|
|
|
|
%perf_users ALL=/usr/local/bin/perf.shell
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. Check that members of perf_users group have access to the privileged
|
|
|
|
shell and have CAP_PERFMON and other required capabilities enabled
|
|
|
|
in permitted, effective and ambient capability sets of an inherent process:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ id
|
|
|
|
uid=1003(capsh_test) gid=1004(capsh_test) groups=1004(capsh_test),1000(perf_users) context=unconfined_u:unconfined_r:unconfined_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023
|
|
|
|
$ sudo perf.shell
|
|
|
|
[sudo] password for capsh_test:
|
|
|
|
$ grep Cap /proc/self/status
|
|
|
|
CapInh: 0000004000000000
|
|
|
|
CapPrm: 0000004000000000
|
|
|
|
CapEff: 0000004000000000
|
|
|
|
CapBnd: 000000ffffffffff
|
|
|
|
CapAmb: 0000004000000000
|
|
|
|
$ capsh --decode=0000004000000000
|
|
|
|
0x0000004000000000=cap_perfmon
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a result, members of perf_users group have access to the privileged
|
|
|
|
environment where they can use tools employing performance monitoring APIs
|
|
|
|
governed by CAP_PERFMON Linux capability.
|
|
|
|
|
2019-02-11 17:58:24 +03:00
|
|
|
This specific access control management is only available to superuser
|
|
|
|
or root running processes with CAP_SETPCAP, CAP_SETFCAP [6]_
|
|
|
|
capabilities.
|
2019-02-11 16:44:55 +03:00
|
|
|
|
doc/admin-guide: Update perf-security.rst with CAP_PERFMON information
Update perf-security.rst documentation file with the information
related to usage of CAP_PERFMON capability to secure performance
monitoring and observability operations in system.
Committer notes:
While testing 'perf top' under cap_perfmon I noticed that it needs
some more capability and Alexey pointed out cap_ipc_lock, as needed by
this kernel chunk:
kernel/events/core.c: 6101
if ((locked > lock_limit) && perf_is_paranoid() &&
!capable(CAP_IPC_LOCK)) {
ret = -EPERM;
goto unlock;
}
So I added it to the documentation, and also mentioned that if the
libcap version doesn't yet supports 'cap_perfmon', its numeric value can
be used instead, i.e. if:
# setcap "cap_perfmon,cap_ipc_lock,cap_sys_ptrace,cap_syslog=ep" perf
Fails, try:
# setcap "38,cap_ipc_lock,cap_sys_ptrace,cap_syslog=ep" perf
I also added a paragraph stating that using an unpatched libcap will
fail the check for CAP_PERFMON, as it checks the cap number against a
maximum to see if it is valid, which makes it use as the default the
'cycles:u' event, even tho a cap_perfmon capable perf binary can get
kernel samples, to workaround that just use, e.g.:
# perf top -e cycles
# perf record -e cycles
And it will sample kernel and user modes.
Signed-off-by: Alexey Budankov <alexey.budankov@linux.intel.com>
Tested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Igor Lubashev <ilubashe@akamai.com>
Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com>
Cc: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-man@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
Cc: selinux@vger.kernel.org
Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/17278551-9399-9ebe-d665-8827016a217d@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2020-04-02 11:54:01 +03:00
|
|
|
Unprivileged users
|
2018-11-27 11:15:37 +03:00
|
|
|
-----------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
doc/admin-guide: Update perf-security.rst with CAP_PERFMON information
Update perf-security.rst documentation file with the information
related to usage of CAP_PERFMON capability to secure performance
monitoring and observability operations in system.
Committer notes:
While testing 'perf top' under cap_perfmon I noticed that it needs
some more capability and Alexey pointed out cap_ipc_lock, as needed by
this kernel chunk:
kernel/events/core.c: 6101
if ((locked > lock_limit) && perf_is_paranoid() &&
!capable(CAP_IPC_LOCK)) {
ret = -EPERM;
goto unlock;
}
So I added it to the documentation, and also mentioned that if the
libcap version doesn't yet supports 'cap_perfmon', its numeric value can
be used instead, i.e. if:
# setcap "cap_perfmon,cap_ipc_lock,cap_sys_ptrace,cap_syslog=ep" perf
Fails, try:
# setcap "38,cap_ipc_lock,cap_sys_ptrace,cap_syslog=ep" perf
I also added a paragraph stating that using an unpatched libcap will
fail the check for CAP_PERFMON, as it checks the cap number against a
maximum to see if it is valid, which makes it use as the default the
'cycles:u' event, even tho a cap_perfmon capable perf binary can get
kernel samples, to workaround that just use, e.g.:
# perf top -e cycles
# perf record -e cycles
And it will sample kernel and user modes.
Signed-off-by: Alexey Budankov <alexey.budankov@linux.intel.com>
Tested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Igor Lubashev <ilubashe@akamai.com>
Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com>
Cc: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-man@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
Cc: selinux@vger.kernel.org
Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/17278551-9399-9ebe-d665-8827016a217d@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2020-04-02 11:54:01 +03:00
|
|
|
perf_events *scope* and *access* control for unprivileged processes
|
2019-02-11 17:58:24 +03:00
|
|
|
is governed by perf_event_paranoid [2]_ setting:
|
2018-11-27 11:15:37 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-1:
|
2019-02-11 17:58:24 +03:00
|
|
|
Impose no *scope* and *access* restrictions on using perf_events
|
|
|
|
performance monitoring. Per-user per-cpu perf_event_mlock_kb [2]_
|
|
|
|
locking limit is ignored when allocating memory buffers for storing
|
|
|
|
performance data. This is the least secure mode since allowed
|
|
|
|
monitored *scope* is maximized and no perf_events specific limits
|
|
|
|
are imposed on *resources* allocated for performance monitoring.
|
2018-11-27 11:15:37 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
>=0:
|
|
|
|
*scope* includes per-process and system wide performance monitoring
|
2019-02-11 17:58:24 +03:00
|
|
|
but excludes raw tracepoints and ftrace function tracepoints
|
|
|
|
monitoring. CPU and system events happened when executing either in
|
|
|
|
user or in kernel space can be monitored and captured for later
|
|
|
|
analysis. Per-user per-cpu perf_event_mlock_kb locking limit is
|
|
|
|
imposed but ignored for unprivileged processes with CAP_IPC_LOCK
|
|
|
|
[6]_ capability.
|
2018-11-27 11:15:37 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
>=1:
|
2019-02-11 17:58:24 +03:00
|
|
|
*scope* includes per-process performance monitoring only and
|
|
|
|
excludes system wide performance monitoring. CPU and system events
|
|
|
|
happened when executing either in user or in kernel space can be
|
|
|
|
monitored and captured for later analysis. Per-user per-cpu
|
|
|
|
perf_event_mlock_kb locking limit is imposed but ignored for
|
|
|
|
unprivileged processes with CAP_IPC_LOCK capability.
|
2018-11-27 11:15:37 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
>=2:
|
2019-02-11 17:58:24 +03:00
|
|
|
*scope* includes per-process performance monitoring only. CPU and
|
|
|
|
system events happened when executing in user space only can be
|
|
|
|
monitored and captured for later analysis. Per-user per-cpu
|
|
|
|
perf_event_mlock_kb locking limit is imposed but ignored for
|
|
|
|
unprivileged processes with CAP_IPC_LOCK capability.
|
2018-11-27 11:15:37 +03:00
|
|
|
|
doc/admin-guide: Update perf-security.rst with CAP_PERFMON information
Update perf-security.rst documentation file with the information
related to usage of CAP_PERFMON capability to secure performance
monitoring and observability operations in system.
Committer notes:
While testing 'perf top' under cap_perfmon I noticed that it needs
some more capability and Alexey pointed out cap_ipc_lock, as needed by
this kernel chunk:
kernel/events/core.c: 6101
if ((locked > lock_limit) && perf_is_paranoid() &&
!capable(CAP_IPC_LOCK)) {
ret = -EPERM;
goto unlock;
}
So I added it to the documentation, and also mentioned that if the
libcap version doesn't yet supports 'cap_perfmon', its numeric value can
be used instead, i.e. if:
# setcap "cap_perfmon,cap_ipc_lock,cap_sys_ptrace,cap_syslog=ep" perf
Fails, try:
# setcap "38,cap_ipc_lock,cap_sys_ptrace,cap_syslog=ep" perf
I also added a paragraph stating that using an unpatched libcap will
fail the check for CAP_PERFMON, as it checks the cap number against a
maximum to see if it is valid, which makes it use as the default the
'cycles:u' event, even tho a cap_perfmon capable perf binary can get
kernel samples, to workaround that just use, e.g.:
# perf top -e cycles
# perf record -e cycles
And it will sample kernel and user modes.
Signed-off-by: Alexey Budankov <alexey.budankov@linux.intel.com>
Tested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Igor Lubashev <ilubashe@akamai.com>
Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com>
Cc: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-man@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
Cc: selinux@vger.kernel.org
Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/17278551-9399-9ebe-d665-8827016a217d@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2020-04-02 11:54:01 +03:00
|
|
|
Resource control
|
2019-02-11 16:42:58 +03:00
|
|
|
---------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Open file descriptors
|
|
|
|
+++++++++++++++++++++
|
|
|
|
|
2019-02-11 17:58:24 +03:00
|
|
|
The perf_events system call API [2]_ allocates file descriptors for
|
|
|
|
every configured PMU event. Open file descriptors are a per-process
|
|
|
|
accountable resource governed by the RLIMIT_NOFILE [11]_ limit
|
|
|
|
(ulimit -n), which is usually derived from the login shell process. When
|
|
|
|
configuring Perf collection for a long list of events on a large server
|
|
|
|
system, this limit can be easily hit preventing required monitoring
|
|
|
|
configuration. RLIMIT_NOFILE limit can be increased on per-user basis
|
|
|
|
modifying content of the limits.conf file [12]_ . Ordinarily, a Perf
|
|
|
|
sampling session (perf record) requires an amount of open perf_event
|
|
|
|
file descriptors that is not less than the number of monitored events
|
|
|
|
multiplied by the number of monitored CPUs.
|
2019-02-11 16:42:58 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Memory allocation
|
|
|
|
+++++++++++++++++
|
|
|
|
|
2019-02-11 17:58:24 +03:00
|
|
|
The amount of memory available to user processes for capturing
|
|
|
|
performance monitoring data is governed by the perf_event_mlock_kb [2]_
|
|
|
|
setting. This perf_event specific resource setting defines overall
|
|
|
|
per-cpu limits of memory allowed for mapping by the user processes to
|
|
|
|
execute performance monitoring. The setting essentially extends the
|
|
|
|
RLIMIT_MEMLOCK [11]_ limit, but only for memory regions mapped
|
|
|
|
specifically for capturing monitored performance events and related data.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For example, if a machine has eight cores and perf_event_mlock_kb limit
|
|
|
|
is set to 516 KiB, then a user process is provided with 516 KiB * 8 =
|
|
|
|
4128 KiB of memory above the RLIMIT_MEMLOCK limit (ulimit -l) for
|
|
|
|
perf_event mmap buffers. In particular, this means that, if the user
|
|
|
|
wants to start two or more performance monitoring processes, the user is
|
|
|
|
required to manually distribute the available 4128 KiB between the
|
|
|
|
monitoring processes, for example, using the --mmap-pages Perf record
|
|
|
|
mode option. Otherwise, the first started performance monitoring process
|
|
|
|
allocates all available 4128 KiB and the other processes will fail to
|
|
|
|
proceed due to the lack of memory.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RLIMIT_MEMLOCK and perf_event_mlock_kb resource constraints are ignored
|
|
|
|
for processes with the CAP_IPC_LOCK capability. Thus, perf_events/Perf
|
|
|
|
privileged users can be provided with memory above the constraints for
|
|
|
|
perf_events/Perf performance monitoring purpose by providing the Perf
|
|
|
|
executable with CAP_IPC_LOCK capability.
|
2019-02-11 16:42:58 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2018-11-27 11:15:37 +03:00
|
|
|
Bibliography
|
|
|
|
------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. [1] `<https://lwn.net/Articles/337493/>`_
|
|
|
|
.. [2] `<http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/perf_event_open.2.html>`_
|
|
|
|
.. [3] `<http://web.eece.maine.edu/~vweaver/projects/perf_events/>`_
|
|
|
|
.. [4] `<https://perf.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Main_Page>`_
|
|
|
|
.. [5] `<https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/security/credentials.html>`_
|
|
|
|
.. [6] `<http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/capabilities.7.html>`_
|
|
|
|
.. [7] `<http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/ptrace.2.html>`_
|
2019-02-11 16:43:54 +03:00
|
|
|
.. [8] `<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hardware_performance_counter>`_
|
|
|
|
.. [9] `<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Model-specific_register>`_
|
2019-02-11 16:44:55 +03:00
|
|
|
.. [10] `<http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man5/acl.5.html>`_
|
2019-02-11 16:42:58 +03:00
|
|
|
.. [11] `<http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/getrlimit.2.html>`_
|
|
|
|
.. [12] `<http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man5/limits.conf.5.html>`_
|
doc/admin-guide: Update perf-security.rst with CAP_PERFMON information
Update perf-security.rst documentation file with the information
related to usage of CAP_PERFMON capability to secure performance
monitoring and observability operations in system.
Committer notes:
While testing 'perf top' under cap_perfmon I noticed that it needs
some more capability and Alexey pointed out cap_ipc_lock, as needed by
this kernel chunk:
kernel/events/core.c: 6101
if ((locked > lock_limit) && perf_is_paranoid() &&
!capable(CAP_IPC_LOCK)) {
ret = -EPERM;
goto unlock;
}
So I added it to the documentation, and also mentioned that if the
libcap version doesn't yet supports 'cap_perfmon', its numeric value can
be used instead, i.e. if:
# setcap "cap_perfmon,cap_ipc_lock,cap_sys_ptrace,cap_syslog=ep" perf
Fails, try:
# setcap "38,cap_ipc_lock,cap_sys_ptrace,cap_syslog=ep" perf
I also added a paragraph stating that using an unpatched libcap will
fail the check for CAP_PERFMON, as it checks the cap number against a
maximum to see if it is valid, which makes it use as the default the
'cycles:u' event, even tho a cap_perfmon capable perf binary can get
kernel samples, to workaround that just use, e.g.:
# perf top -e cycles
# perf record -e cycles
And it will sample kernel and user modes.
Signed-off-by: Alexey Budankov <alexey.budankov@linux.intel.com>
Tested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Igor Lubashev <ilubashe@akamai.com>
Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com>
Cc: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-man@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
Cc: selinux@vger.kernel.org
Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/17278551-9399-9ebe-d665-8827016a217d@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2020-04-02 11:54:01 +03:00
|
|
|
.. [13] `<https://sites.google.com/site/fullycapable>`_
|
|
|
|
.. [14] `<http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man8/auditd.8.html>`_
|
2020-10-19 20:18:12 +03:00
|
|
|
.. [15] `<https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man8/sudo.8.html>`_
|
|
|
|
.. [16] `<https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/libs/libcap/libcap.git/>`_
|