microsoft
/
WSL2-Linux-Kernel
зеркало из https://github.com/microsoft/WSL2-Linux-Kernel.git
1
0
Форкнуть 0
Код Задачи Пакеты Проекты Релизы Вики Активность
WSL2-Linux-Kernel/fs/btrfs/free-space-tree.h

54 строки
2.1 KiB
C
Исходник Обычный вид История

btrfs: replace GPL boilerplate by SPDX -- headers Remove GPL boilerplate text (long, short, one-line) and keep the rest, ie. personal, company or original source copyright statements. Add the SPDX header. Unify the include protection macros to match the file names. Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-04-03 20:16:55 +03:00
/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
Btrfs: implement the free space B-tree The free space cache has turned out to be a scalability bottleneck on large, busy filesystems. When the cache for a lot of block groups needs to be written out, we can get extremely long commit times; if this happens in the critical section, things are especially bad because we block new transactions from happening. The main problem with the free space cache is that it has to be written out in its entirety and is managed in an ad hoc fashion. Using a B-tree to store free space fixes this: updates can be done as needed and we get all of the benefits of using a B-tree: checksumming, RAID handling, well-understood behavior. With the free space tree, we get commit times that are about the same as the no cache case with load times slower than the free space cache case but still much faster than the no cache case. Free space is represented with extents until it becomes more space-efficient to use bitmaps, giving us similar space overhead to the free space cache. The operations on the free space tree are: adding and removing free space, handling the creation and deletion of block groups, and loading the free space for a block group. We can also create the free space tree by walking the extent tree and clear the free space tree. Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2015-09-30 06:50:35 +03:00
/*
* Copyright (C) 2015 Facebook. All rights reserved.
*/
btrfs: replace GPL boilerplate by SPDX -- headers Remove GPL boilerplate text (long, short, one-line) and keep the rest, ie. personal, company or original source copyright statements. Add the SPDX header. Unify the include protection macros to match the file names. Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-04-03 20:16:55 +03:00
#ifndef BTRFS_FREE_SPACE_TREE_H
#define BTRFS_FREE_SPACE_TREE_H
Btrfs: implement the free space B-tree The free space cache has turned out to be a scalability bottleneck on large, busy filesystems. When the cache for a lot of block groups needs to be written out, we can get extremely long commit times; if this happens in the critical section, things are especially bad because we block new transactions from happening. The main problem with the free space cache is that it has to be written out in its entirety and is managed in an ad hoc fashion. Using a B-tree to store free space fixes this: updates can be done as needed and we get all of the benefits of using a B-tree: checksumming, RAID handling, well-understood behavior. With the free space tree, we get commit times that are about the same as the no cache case with load times slower than the free space cache case but still much faster than the no cache case. Free space is represented with extents until it becomes more space-efficient to use bitmaps, giving us similar space overhead to the free space cache. The operations on the free space tree are: adding and removing free space, handling the creation and deletion of block groups, and loading the free space for a block group. We can also create the free space tree by walking the extent tree and clear the free space tree. Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2015-09-30 06:50:35 +03:00
btrfs: move basic block_group definitions to their own header This is prep work for moving all of the block group cache code into its own file. Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> [ minor comment updates ] Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-06-20 22:37:44 +03:00
struct btrfs_caching_control;
Btrfs: implement the free space B-tree The free space cache has turned out to be a scalability bottleneck on large, busy filesystems. When the cache for a lot of block groups needs to be written out, we can get extremely long commit times; if this happens in the critical section, things are especially bad because we block new transactions from happening. The main problem with the free space cache is that it has to be written out in its entirety and is managed in an ad hoc fashion. Using a B-tree to store free space fixes this: updates can be done as needed and we get all of the benefits of using a B-tree: checksumming, RAID handling, well-understood behavior. With the free space tree, we get commit times that are about the same as the no cache case with load times slower than the free space cache case but still much faster than the no cache case. Free space is represented with extents until it becomes more space-efficient to use bitmaps, giving us similar space overhead to the free space cache. The operations on the free space tree are: adding and removing free space, handling the creation and deletion of block groups, and loading the free space for a block group. We can also create the free space tree by walking the extent tree and clear the free space tree. Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2015-09-30 06:50:35 +03:00
/*
* The default size for new free space bitmap items. The last bitmap in a block
* group may be truncated, and none of the free space tree code assumes that
* existing bitmaps are this size.
*/
#define BTRFS_FREE_SPACE_BITMAP_SIZE 256
#define BTRFS_FREE_SPACE_BITMAP_BITS (BTRFS_FREE_SPACE_BITMAP_SIZE * BITS_PER_BYTE)
btrfs: rename btrfs_block_group_cache The type name is misleading, a single entry is named 'cache' while this normally means a collection of objects. Rename that everywhere. Also the identifier was quite long, making function prototypes harder to format. Suggested-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-10-29 21:20:18 +03:00
void set_free_space_tree_thresholds(struct btrfs_block_group *block_group);
Btrfs: implement the free space B-tree The free space cache has turned out to be a scalability bottleneck on large, busy filesystems. When the cache for a lot of block groups needs to be written out, we can get extremely long commit times; if this happens in the critical section, things are especially bad because we block new transactions from happening. The main problem with the free space cache is that it has to be written out in its entirety and is managed in an ad hoc fashion. Using a B-tree to store free space fixes this: updates can be done as needed and we get all of the benefits of using a B-tree: checksumming, RAID handling, well-understood behavior. With the free space tree, we get commit times that are about the same as the no cache case with load times slower than the free space cache case but still much faster than the no cache case. Free space is represented with extents until it becomes more space-efficient to use bitmaps, giving us similar space overhead to the free space cache. The operations on the free space tree are: adding and removing free space, handling the creation and deletion of block groups, and loading the free space for a block group. We can also create the free space tree by walking the extent tree and clear the free space tree. Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2015-09-30 06:50:35 +03:00
int btrfs_create_free_space_tree(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info);
int btrfs_clear_free_space_tree(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info);
int load_free_space_tree(struct btrfs_caching_control *caching_ctl);
int add_block_group_free_space(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
btrfs: rename btrfs_block_group_cache The type name is misleading, a single entry is named 'cache' while this normally means a collection of objects. Rename that everywhere. Also the identifier was quite long, making function prototypes harder to format. Suggested-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-10-29 21:20:18 +03:00
struct btrfs_block_group *block_group);
Btrfs: implement the free space B-tree The free space cache has turned out to be a scalability bottleneck on large, busy filesystems. When the cache for a lot of block groups needs to be written out, we can get extremely long commit times; if this happens in the critical section, things are especially bad because we block new transactions from happening. The main problem with the free space cache is that it has to be written out in its entirety and is managed in an ad hoc fashion. Using a B-tree to store free space fixes this: updates can be done as needed and we get all of the benefits of using a B-tree: checksumming, RAID handling, well-understood behavior. With the free space tree, we get commit times that are about the same as the no cache case with load times slower than the free space cache case but still much faster than the no cache case. Free space is represented with extents until it becomes more space-efficient to use bitmaps, giving us similar space overhead to the free space cache. The operations on the free space tree are: adding and removing free space, handling the creation and deletion of block groups, and loading the free space for a block group. We can also create the free space tree by walking the extent tree and clear the free space tree. Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2015-09-30 06:50:35 +03:00
int remove_block_group_free_space(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
btrfs: rename btrfs_block_group_cache The type name is misleading, a single entry is named 'cache' while this normally means a collection of objects. Rename that everywhere. Also the identifier was quite long, making function prototypes harder to format. Suggested-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-10-29 21:20:18 +03:00
struct btrfs_block_group *block_group);
Btrfs: implement the free space B-tree The free space cache has turned out to be a scalability bottleneck on large, busy filesystems. When the cache for a lot of block groups needs to be written out, we can get extremely long commit times; if this happens in the critical section, things are especially bad because we block new transactions from happening. The main problem with the free space cache is that it has to be written out in its entirety and is managed in an ad hoc fashion. Using a B-tree to store free space fixes this: updates can be done as needed and we get all of the benefits of using a B-tree: checksumming, RAID handling, well-understood behavior. With the free space tree, we get commit times that are about the same as the no cache case with load times slower than the free space cache case but still much faster than the no cache case. Free space is represented with extents until it becomes more space-efficient to use bitmaps, giving us similar space overhead to the free space cache. The operations on the free space tree are: adding and removing free space, handling the creation and deletion of block groups, and loading the free space for a block group. We can also create the free space tree by walking the extent tree and clear the free space tree. Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2015-09-30 06:50:35 +03:00
int add_to_free_space_tree(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
u64 start, u64 size);
int remove_from_free_space_tree(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
u64 start, u64 size);
btrfs: expose internal free space tree routine only if sanity tests are enabled The internal free space tree management routines are always exposed for testing purposes. Make them dependent on SANITY_TESTS being on so that they are exposed only when they really have to. Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2017-08-16 18:15:23 +03:00
#ifdef CONFIG_BTRFS_FS_RUN_SANITY_TESTS
Btrfs: implement the free space B-tree The free space cache has turned out to be a scalability bottleneck on large, busy filesystems. When the cache for a lot of block groups needs to be written out, we can get extremely long commit times; if this happens in the critical section, things are especially bad because we block new transactions from happening. The main problem with the free space cache is that it has to be written out in its entirety and is managed in an ad hoc fashion. Using a B-tree to store free space fixes this: updates can be done as needed and we get all of the benefits of using a B-tree: checksumming, RAID handling, well-understood behavior. With the free space tree, we get commit times that are about the same as the no cache case with load times slower than the free space cache case but still much faster than the no cache case. Free space is represented with extents until it becomes more space-efficient to use bitmaps, giving us similar space overhead to the free space cache. The operations on the free space tree are: adding and removing free space, handling the creation and deletion of block groups, and loading the free space for a block group. We can also create the free space tree by walking the extent tree and clear the free space tree. Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2015-09-30 06:50:35 +03:00
struct btrfs_free_space_info *
search_free_space_info(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
btrfs: rename btrfs_block_group_cache The type name is misleading, a single entry is named 'cache' while this normally means a collection of objects. Rename that everywhere. Also the identifier was quite long, making function prototypes harder to format. Suggested-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-10-29 21:20:18 +03:00
struct btrfs_block_group *block_group,
Btrfs: implement the free space B-tree The free space cache has turned out to be a scalability bottleneck on large, busy filesystems. When the cache for a lot of block groups needs to be written out, we can get extremely long commit times; if this happens in the critical section, things are especially bad because we block new transactions from happening. The main problem with the free space cache is that it has to be written out in its entirety and is managed in an ad hoc fashion. Using a B-tree to store free space fixes this: updates can be done as needed and we get all of the benefits of using a B-tree: checksumming, RAID handling, well-understood behavior. With the free space tree, we get commit times that are about the same as the no cache case with load times slower than the free space cache case but still much faster than the no cache case. Free space is represented with extents until it becomes more space-efficient to use bitmaps, giving us similar space overhead to the free space cache. The operations on the free space tree are: adding and removing free space, handling the creation and deletion of block groups, and loading the free space for a block group. We can also create the free space tree by walking the extent tree and clear the free space tree. Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2015-09-30 06:50:35 +03:00
struct btrfs_path *path, int cow);
int __add_to_free_space_tree(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
btrfs: rename btrfs_block_group_cache The type name is misleading, a single entry is named 'cache' while this normally means a collection of objects. Rename that everywhere. Also the identifier was quite long, making function prototypes harder to format. Suggested-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-10-29 21:20:18 +03:00
struct btrfs_block_group *block_group,
Btrfs: implement the free space B-tree The free space cache has turned out to be a scalability bottleneck on large, busy filesystems. When the cache for a lot of block groups needs to be written out, we can get extremely long commit times; if this happens in the critical section, things are especially bad because we block new transactions from happening. The main problem with the free space cache is that it has to be written out in its entirety and is managed in an ad hoc fashion. Using a B-tree to store free space fixes this: updates can be done as needed and we get all of the benefits of using a B-tree: checksumming, RAID handling, well-understood behavior. With the free space tree, we get commit times that are about the same as the no cache case with load times slower than the free space cache case but still much faster than the no cache case. Free space is represented with extents until it becomes more space-efficient to use bitmaps, giving us similar space overhead to the free space cache. The operations on the free space tree are: adding and removing free space, handling the creation and deletion of block groups, and loading the free space for a block group. We can also create the free space tree by walking the extent tree and clear the free space tree. Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2015-09-30 06:50:35 +03:00
struct btrfs_path *path, u64 start, u64 size);
int __remove_from_free_space_tree(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
btrfs: rename btrfs_block_group_cache The type name is misleading, a single entry is named 'cache' while this normally means a collection of objects. Rename that everywhere. Also the identifier was quite long, making function prototypes harder to format. Suggested-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-10-29 21:20:18 +03:00
struct btrfs_block_group *block_group,
Btrfs: implement the free space B-tree The free space cache has turned out to be a scalability bottleneck on large, busy filesystems. When the cache for a lot of block groups needs to be written out, we can get extremely long commit times; if this happens in the critical section, things are especially bad because we block new transactions from happening. The main problem with the free space cache is that it has to be written out in its entirety and is managed in an ad hoc fashion. Using a B-tree to store free space fixes this: updates can be done as needed and we get all of the benefits of using a B-tree: checksumming, RAID handling, well-understood behavior. With the free space tree, we get commit times that are about the same as the no cache case with load times slower than the free space cache case but still much faster than the no cache case. Free space is represented with extents until it becomes more space-efficient to use bitmaps, giving us similar space overhead to the free space cache. The operations on the free space tree are: adding and removing free space, handling the creation and deletion of block groups, and loading the free space for a block group. We can also create the free space tree by walking the extent tree and clear the free space tree. Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2015-09-30 06:50:35 +03:00
struct btrfs_path *path, u64 start, u64 size);
int convert_free_space_to_bitmaps(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
btrfs: rename btrfs_block_group_cache The type name is misleading, a single entry is named 'cache' while this normally means a collection of objects. Rename that everywhere. Also the identifier was quite long, making function prototypes harder to format. Suggested-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-10-29 21:20:18 +03:00
struct btrfs_block_group *block_group,
Btrfs: implement the free space B-tree The free space cache has turned out to be a scalability bottleneck on large, busy filesystems. When the cache for a lot of block groups needs to be written out, we can get extremely long commit times; if this happens in the critical section, things are especially bad because we block new transactions from happening. The main problem with the free space cache is that it has to be written out in its entirety and is managed in an ad hoc fashion. Using a B-tree to store free space fixes this: updates can be done as needed and we get all of the benefits of using a B-tree: checksumming, RAID handling, well-understood behavior. With the free space tree, we get commit times that are about the same as the no cache case with load times slower than the free space cache case but still much faster than the no cache case. Free space is represented with extents until it becomes more space-efficient to use bitmaps, giving us similar space overhead to the free space cache. The operations on the free space tree are: adding and removing free space, handling the creation and deletion of block groups, and loading the free space for a block group. We can also create the free space tree by walking the extent tree and clear the free space tree. Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2015-09-30 06:50:35 +03:00
struct btrfs_path *path);
int convert_free_space_to_extents(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
btrfs: rename btrfs_block_group_cache The type name is misleading, a single entry is named 'cache' while this normally means a collection of objects. Rename that everywhere. Also the identifier was quite long, making function prototypes harder to format. Suggested-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-10-29 21:20:18 +03:00
struct btrfs_block_group *block_group,
Btrfs: implement the free space B-tree The free space cache has turned out to be a scalability bottleneck on large, busy filesystems. When the cache for a lot of block groups needs to be written out, we can get extremely long commit times; if this happens in the critical section, things are especially bad because we block new transactions from happening. The main problem with the free space cache is that it has to be written out in its entirety and is managed in an ad hoc fashion. Using a B-tree to store free space fixes this: updates can be done as needed and we get all of the benefits of using a B-tree: checksumming, RAID handling, well-understood behavior. With the free space tree, we get commit times that are about the same as the no cache case with load times slower than the free space cache case but still much faster than the no cache case. Free space is represented with extents until it becomes more space-efficient to use bitmaps, giving us similar space overhead to the free space cache. The operations on the free space tree are: adding and removing free space, handling the creation and deletion of block groups, and loading the free space for a block group. We can also create the free space tree by walking the extent tree and clear the free space tree. Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2015-09-30 06:50:35 +03:00
struct btrfs_path *path);
btrfs: rename btrfs_block_group_cache The type name is misleading, a single entry is named 'cache' while this normally means a collection of objects. Rename that everywhere. Also the identifier was quite long, making function prototypes harder to format. Suggested-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-10-29 21:20:18 +03:00
int free_space_test_bit(struct btrfs_block_group *block_group,
Btrfs: implement the free space B-tree The free space cache has turned out to be a scalability bottleneck on large, busy filesystems. When the cache for a lot of block groups needs to be written out, we can get extremely long commit times; if this happens in the critical section, things are especially bad because we block new transactions from happening. The main problem with the free space cache is that it has to be written out in its entirety and is managed in an ad hoc fashion. Using a B-tree to store free space fixes this: updates can be done as needed and we get all of the benefits of using a B-tree: checksumming, RAID handling, well-understood behavior. With the free space tree, we get commit times that are about the same as the no cache case with load times slower than the free space cache case but still much faster than the no cache case. Free space is represented with extents until it becomes more space-efficient to use bitmaps, giving us similar space overhead to the free space cache. The operations on the free space tree are: adding and removing free space, handling the creation and deletion of block groups, and loading the free space for a block group. We can also create the free space tree by walking the extent tree and clear the free space tree. Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2015-09-30 06:50:35 +03:00
struct btrfs_path *path, u64 offset);
btrfs: expose internal free space tree routine only if sanity tests are enabled The internal free space tree management routines are always exposed for testing purposes. Make them dependent on SANITY_TESTS being on so that they are exposed only when they really have to. Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2017-08-16 18:15:23 +03:00
#endif
Btrfs: implement the free space B-tree The free space cache has turned out to be a scalability bottleneck on large, busy filesystems. When the cache for a lot of block groups needs to be written out, we can get extremely long commit times; if this happens in the critical section, things are especially bad because we block new transactions from happening. The main problem with the free space cache is that it has to be written out in its entirety and is managed in an ad hoc fashion. Using a B-tree to store free space fixes this: updates can be done as needed and we get all of the benefits of using a B-tree: checksumming, RAID handling, well-understood behavior. With the free space tree, we get commit times that are about the same as the no cache case with load times slower than the free space cache case but still much faster than the no cache case. Free space is represented with extents until it becomes more space-efficient to use bitmaps, giving us similar space overhead to the free space cache. The operations on the free space tree are: adding and removing free space, handling the creation and deletion of block groups, and loading the free space for a block group. We can also create the free space tree by walking the extent tree and clear the free space tree. Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2015-09-30 06:50:35 +03:00
#endif