WSL2-Linux-Kernel/drivers/net/dsa/vitesse-vsc73xx-spi.c

224 строки
4.9 KiB
C
Исходник Обычный вид История

// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
/* DSA driver for:
* Vitesse VSC7385 SparX-G5 5+1-port Integrated Gigabit Ethernet Switch
* Vitesse VSC7388 SparX-G8 8-port Integrated Gigabit Ethernet Switch
* Vitesse VSC7395 SparX-G5e 5+1-port Integrated Gigabit Ethernet Switch
* Vitesse VSC7398 SparX-G8e 8-port Integrated Gigabit Ethernet Switch
*
* This driver takes control of the switch chip over SPI and
* configures it to route packages around when connected to a CPU port.
*
* Copyright (C) 2018 Linus Wallej <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
* Includes portions of code from the firmware uploader by:
* Copyright (C) 2009 Gabor Juhos <juhosg@openwrt.org>
*/
#include <linux/kernel.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/of.h>
#include <linux/spi/spi.h>
#include "vitesse-vsc73xx.h"
#define VSC73XX_CMD_SPI_MODE_READ 0
#define VSC73XX_CMD_SPI_MODE_WRITE 1
#define VSC73XX_CMD_SPI_MODE_SHIFT 4
#define VSC73XX_CMD_SPI_BLOCK_SHIFT 5
#define VSC73XX_CMD_SPI_BLOCK_MASK 0x7
#define VSC73XX_CMD_SPI_SUBBLOCK_MASK 0xf
/*
* struct vsc73xx_spi - VSC73xx SPI state container
*/
struct vsc73xx_spi {
struct spi_device *spi;
struct mutex lock; /* Protects SPI traffic */
struct vsc73xx vsc;
};
static const struct vsc73xx_ops vsc73xx_spi_ops;
static u8 vsc73xx_make_addr(u8 mode, u8 block, u8 subblock)
{
u8 ret;
ret =
(block & VSC73XX_CMD_SPI_BLOCK_MASK) << VSC73XX_CMD_SPI_BLOCK_SHIFT;
ret |= (mode & 1) << VSC73XX_CMD_SPI_MODE_SHIFT;
ret |= subblock & VSC73XX_CMD_SPI_SUBBLOCK_MASK;
return ret;
}
static int vsc73xx_spi_read(struct vsc73xx *vsc, u8 block, u8 subblock, u8 reg,
u32 *val)
{
struct vsc73xx_spi *vsc_spi = vsc->priv;
struct spi_transfer t[2];
struct spi_message m;
u8 cmd[4];
u8 buf[4];
int ret;
if (!vsc73xx_is_addr_valid(block, subblock))
return -EINVAL;
spi_message_init(&m);
memset(&t, 0, sizeof(t));
t[0].tx_buf = cmd;
t[0].len = sizeof(cmd);
spi_message_add_tail(&t[0], &m);
t[1].rx_buf = buf;
t[1].len = sizeof(buf);
spi_message_add_tail(&t[1], &m);
cmd[0] = vsc73xx_make_addr(VSC73XX_CMD_SPI_MODE_READ, block, subblock);
cmd[1] = reg;
cmd[2] = 0;
cmd[3] = 0;
mutex_lock(&vsc_spi->lock);
ret = spi_sync(vsc_spi->spi, &m);
mutex_unlock(&vsc_spi->lock);
if (ret)
return ret;
*val = (buf[0] << 24) | (buf[1] << 16) | (buf[2] << 8) | buf[3];
return 0;
}
static int vsc73xx_spi_write(struct vsc73xx *vsc, u8 block, u8 subblock, u8 reg,
u32 val)
{
struct vsc73xx_spi *vsc_spi = vsc->priv;
struct spi_transfer t[2];
struct spi_message m;
u8 cmd[2];
u8 buf[4];
int ret;
if (!vsc73xx_is_addr_valid(block, subblock))
return -EINVAL;
spi_message_init(&m);
memset(&t, 0, sizeof(t));
t[0].tx_buf = cmd;
t[0].len = sizeof(cmd);
spi_message_add_tail(&t[0], &m);
t[1].tx_buf = buf;
t[1].len = sizeof(buf);
spi_message_add_tail(&t[1], &m);
cmd[0] = vsc73xx_make_addr(VSC73XX_CMD_SPI_MODE_WRITE, block, subblock);
cmd[1] = reg;
buf[0] = (val >> 24) & 0xff;
buf[1] = (val >> 16) & 0xff;
buf[2] = (val >> 8) & 0xff;
buf[3] = val & 0xff;
mutex_lock(&vsc_spi->lock);
ret = spi_sync(vsc_spi->spi, &m);
mutex_unlock(&vsc_spi->lock);
return ret;
}
static int vsc73xx_spi_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
{
struct device *dev = &spi->dev;
struct vsc73xx_spi *vsc_spi;
int ret;
vsc_spi = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*vsc_spi), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!vsc_spi)
return -ENOMEM;
spi_set_drvdata(spi, vsc_spi);
vsc_spi->spi = spi_dev_get(spi);
vsc_spi->vsc.dev = dev;
vsc_spi->vsc.priv = vsc_spi;
vsc_spi->vsc.ops = &vsc73xx_spi_ops;
mutex_init(&vsc_spi->lock);
spi->mode = SPI_MODE_0;
spi->bits_per_word = 8;
ret = spi_setup(spi);
if (ret < 0) {
dev_err(dev, "spi setup failed.\n");
return ret;
}
return vsc73xx_probe(&vsc_spi->vsc);
}
static int vsc73xx_spi_remove(struct spi_device *spi)
{
struct vsc73xx_spi *vsc_spi = spi_get_drvdata(spi);
net: dsa: be compatible with masters which unregister on shutdown Lino reports that on his system with bcmgenet as DSA master and KSZ9897 as a switch, rebooting or shutting down never works properly. What does the bcmgenet driver have special to trigger this, that other DSA masters do not? It has an implementation of ->shutdown which simply calls its ->remove implementation. Otherwise said, it unregisters its network interface on shutdown. This message can be seen in a loop, and it hangs the reboot process there: unregister_netdevice: waiting for eth0 to become free. Usage count = 3 So why 3? A usage count of 1 is normal for a registered network interface, and any virtual interface which links itself as an upper of that will increment it via dev_hold. In the case of DSA, this is the call path: dsa_slave_create -> netdev_upper_dev_link -> __netdev_upper_dev_link -> __netdev_adjacent_dev_insert -> dev_hold So a DSA switch with 3 interfaces will result in a usage count elevated by two, and netdev_wait_allrefs will wait until they have gone away. Other stacked interfaces, like VLAN, watch NETDEV_UNREGISTER events and delete themselves, but DSA cannot just vanish and go poof, at most it can unbind itself from the switch devices, but that must happen strictly earlier compared to when the DSA master unregisters its net_device, so reacting on the NETDEV_UNREGISTER event is way too late. It seems that it is a pretty established pattern to have a driver's ->shutdown hook redirect to its ->remove hook, so the same code is executed regardless of whether the driver is unbound from the device, or the system is just shutting down. As Florian puts it, it is quite a big hammer for bcmgenet to unregister its net_device during shutdown, but having a common code path with the driver unbind helps ensure it is well tested. So DSA, for better or for worse, has to live with that and engage in an arms race of implementing the ->shutdown hook too, from all individual drivers, and do something sane when paired with masters that unregister their net_device there. The only sane thing to do, of course, is to unlink from the master. However, complications arise really quickly. The pattern of redirecting ->shutdown to ->remove is not unique to bcmgenet or even to net_device drivers. In fact, SPI controllers do it too (see dspi_shutdown -> dspi_remove), and presumably, I2C controllers and MDIO controllers do it too (this is something I have not researched too deeply, but even if this is not the case today, it is certainly plausible to happen in the future, and must be taken into consideration). Since DSA switches might be SPI devices, I2C devices, MDIO devices, the insane implication is that for the exact same DSA switch device, we might have both ->shutdown and ->remove getting called. So we need to do something with that insane environment. The pattern I've come up with is "if this, then not that", so if either ->shutdown or ->remove gets called, we set the device's drvdata to NULL, and in the other hook, we check whether the drvdata is NULL and just do nothing. This is probably not necessary for platform devices, just for devices on buses, but I would really insist for consistency among drivers, because when code is copy-pasted, it is not always copy-pasted from the best sources. So depending on whether the DSA switch's ->remove or ->shutdown will get called first, we cannot really guarantee even for the same driver if rebooting will result in the same code path on all platforms. But nonetheless, we need to do something minimally reasonable on ->shutdown too to fix the bug. Of course, the ->remove will do more (a full teardown of the tree, with all data structures freed, and this is why the bug was not caught for so long). The new ->shutdown method is kept separate from dsa_unregister_switch not because we couldn't have unregistered the switch, but simply in the interest of doing something quick and to the point. The big question is: does the DSA switch's ->shutdown get called earlier than the DSA master's ->shutdown? If not, there is still a risk that we might still trigger the WARN_ON in unregister_netdevice that says we are attempting to unregister a net_device which has uppers. That's no good. Although the reference to the master net_device won't physically go away even if DSA's ->shutdown comes afterwards, remember we have a dev_hold on it. The answer to that question lies in this comment above device_link_add: * A side effect of the link creation is re-ordering of dpm_list and the * devices_kset list by moving the consumer device and all devices depending * on it to the ends of these lists (that does not happen to devices that have * not been registered when this function is called). so the fact that DSA uses device_link_add towards its master is not exactly for nothing. device_shutdown() walks devices_kset from the back, so this is our guarantee that DSA's shutdown happens before the master's shutdown. Fixes: 2f1e8ea726e9 ("net: dsa: link interfaces with the DSA master to get rid of lockdep warnings") Link: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20210909095324.12978-1-LinoSanfilippo@gmx.de/ Reported-by: Lino Sanfilippo <LinoSanfilippo@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Tested-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-09-17 16:34:33 +03:00
if (!vsc_spi)
return 0;
vsc73xx_remove(&vsc_spi->vsc);
spi_set_drvdata(spi, NULL);
return 0;
}
static void vsc73xx_spi_shutdown(struct spi_device *spi)
{
struct vsc73xx_spi *vsc_spi = spi_get_drvdata(spi);
if (!vsc_spi)
return;
vsc73xx_shutdown(&vsc_spi->vsc);
spi_set_drvdata(spi, NULL);
}
static const struct vsc73xx_ops vsc73xx_spi_ops = {
.read = vsc73xx_spi_read,
.write = vsc73xx_spi_write,
};
static const struct of_device_id vsc73xx_of_match[] = {
{
.compatible = "vitesse,vsc7385",
},
{
.compatible = "vitesse,vsc7388",
},
{
.compatible = "vitesse,vsc7395",
},
{
.compatible = "vitesse,vsc7398",
},
{ },
};
MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, vsc73xx_of_match);
static struct spi_driver vsc73xx_spi_driver = {
.probe = vsc73xx_spi_probe,
.remove = vsc73xx_spi_remove,
net: dsa: be compatible with masters which unregister on shutdown Lino reports that on his system with bcmgenet as DSA master and KSZ9897 as a switch, rebooting or shutting down never works properly. What does the bcmgenet driver have special to trigger this, that other DSA masters do not? It has an implementation of ->shutdown which simply calls its ->remove implementation. Otherwise said, it unregisters its network interface on shutdown. This message can be seen in a loop, and it hangs the reboot process there: unregister_netdevice: waiting for eth0 to become free. Usage count = 3 So why 3? A usage count of 1 is normal for a registered network interface, and any virtual interface which links itself as an upper of that will increment it via dev_hold. In the case of DSA, this is the call path: dsa_slave_create -> netdev_upper_dev_link -> __netdev_upper_dev_link -> __netdev_adjacent_dev_insert -> dev_hold So a DSA switch with 3 interfaces will result in a usage count elevated by two, and netdev_wait_allrefs will wait until they have gone away. Other stacked interfaces, like VLAN, watch NETDEV_UNREGISTER events and delete themselves, but DSA cannot just vanish and go poof, at most it can unbind itself from the switch devices, but that must happen strictly earlier compared to when the DSA master unregisters its net_device, so reacting on the NETDEV_UNREGISTER event is way too late. It seems that it is a pretty established pattern to have a driver's ->shutdown hook redirect to its ->remove hook, so the same code is executed regardless of whether the driver is unbound from the device, or the system is just shutting down. As Florian puts it, it is quite a big hammer for bcmgenet to unregister its net_device during shutdown, but having a common code path with the driver unbind helps ensure it is well tested. So DSA, for better or for worse, has to live with that and engage in an arms race of implementing the ->shutdown hook too, from all individual drivers, and do something sane when paired with masters that unregister their net_device there. The only sane thing to do, of course, is to unlink from the master. However, complications arise really quickly. The pattern of redirecting ->shutdown to ->remove is not unique to bcmgenet or even to net_device drivers. In fact, SPI controllers do it too (see dspi_shutdown -> dspi_remove), and presumably, I2C controllers and MDIO controllers do it too (this is something I have not researched too deeply, but even if this is not the case today, it is certainly plausible to happen in the future, and must be taken into consideration). Since DSA switches might be SPI devices, I2C devices, MDIO devices, the insane implication is that for the exact same DSA switch device, we might have both ->shutdown and ->remove getting called. So we need to do something with that insane environment. The pattern I've come up with is "if this, then not that", so if either ->shutdown or ->remove gets called, we set the device's drvdata to NULL, and in the other hook, we check whether the drvdata is NULL and just do nothing. This is probably not necessary for platform devices, just for devices on buses, but I would really insist for consistency among drivers, because when code is copy-pasted, it is not always copy-pasted from the best sources. So depending on whether the DSA switch's ->remove or ->shutdown will get called first, we cannot really guarantee even for the same driver if rebooting will result in the same code path on all platforms. But nonetheless, we need to do something minimally reasonable on ->shutdown too to fix the bug. Of course, the ->remove will do more (a full teardown of the tree, with all data structures freed, and this is why the bug was not caught for so long). The new ->shutdown method is kept separate from dsa_unregister_switch not because we couldn't have unregistered the switch, but simply in the interest of doing something quick and to the point. The big question is: does the DSA switch's ->shutdown get called earlier than the DSA master's ->shutdown? If not, there is still a risk that we might still trigger the WARN_ON in unregister_netdevice that says we are attempting to unregister a net_device which has uppers. That's no good. Although the reference to the master net_device won't physically go away even if DSA's ->shutdown comes afterwards, remember we have a dev_hold on it. The answer to that question lies in this comment above device_link_add: * A side effect of the link creation is re-ordering of dpm_list and the * devices_kset list by moving the consumer device and all devices depending * on it to the ends of these lists (that does not happen to devices that have * not been registered when this function is called). so the fact that DSA uses device_link_add towards its master is not exactly for nothing. device_shutdown() walks devices_kset from the back, so this is our guarantee that DSA's shutdown happens before the master's shutdown. Fixes: 2f1e8ea726e9 ("net: dsa: link interfaces with the DSA master to get rid of lockdep warnings") Link: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20210909095324.12978-1-LinoSanfilippo@gmx.de/ Reported-by: Lino Sanfilippo <LinoSanfilippo@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Tested-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-09-17 16:34:33 +03:00
.shutdown = vsc73xx_spi_shutdown,
.driver = {
.name = "vsc73xx-spi",
.of_match_table = vsc73xx_of_match,
},
};
module_spi_driver(vsc73xx_spi_driver);
MODULE_AUTHOR("Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>");
MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Vitesse VSC7385/7388/7395/7398 SPI driver");
MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");