WSL2-Linux-Kernel/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci.c

356 строки
8.0 KiB
C
Исходник Обычный вид История

ARM: psci: cpuidle: Introduce PSCI CPUidle driver PSCI firmware is the standard power management control for all ARM64 based platforms and it is also deployed on some ARM 32 bit platforms to date. Idle state entry in PSCI is currently achieved by calling arm_cpuidle_init() and arm_cpuidle_suspend() in a generic idle driver, which in turn relies on ARM/ARM64 CPUidle back-end to relay the call into PSCI firmware if PSCI is the boot method. Given that PSCI is the standard idle entry method on ARM64 systems (which means that no other CPUidle driver are expected on ARM64 platforms - so PSCI is already a generic idle driver), in order to simplify idle entry and code maintenance, it makes sense to have a PSCI specific idle driver so that idle code that it is currently living in drivers/firmware directory can be hoisted out of it and moved where it belongs, into a full-fledged PSCI driver, leaving PSCI code in drivers/firmware as a pure firmware interface, as it should be. Implement a PSCI CPUidle driver. By default it is a silent Kconfig entry which is left unselected, since it selection would clash with the generic ARM CPUidle driver that provides a PSCI based idle driver through the arm/arm64 arches back-ends CPU operations. Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
2019-08-09 14:03:10 +03:00
// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
/*
* PSCI CPU idle driver.
*
* Copyright (C) 2019 ARM Ltd.
* Author: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
*/
#define pr_fmt(fmt) "CPUidle PSCI: " fmt
#include <linux/cpuhotplug.h>
ARM: psci: cpuidle: Introduce PSCI CPUidle driver PSCI firmware is the standard power management control for all ARM64 based platforms and it is also deployed on some ARM 32 bit platforms to date. Idle state entry in PSCI is currently achieved by calling arm_cpuidle_init() and arm_cpuidle_suspend() in a generic idle driver, which in turn relies on ARM/ARM64 CPUidle back-end to relay the call into PSCI firmware if PSCI is the boot method. Given that PSCI is the standard idle entry method on ARM64 systems (which means that no other CPUidle driver are expected on ARM64 platforms - so PSCI is already a generic idle driver), in order to simplify idle entry and code maintenance, it makes sense to have a PSCI specific idle driver so that idle code that it is currently living in drivers/firmware directory can be hoisted out of it and moved where it belongs, into a full-fledged PSCI driver, leaving PSCI code in drivers/firmware as a pure firmware interface, as it should be. Implement a PSCI CPUidle driver. By default it is a silent Kconfig entry which is left unselected, since it selection would clash with the generic ARM CPUidle driver that provides a PSCI based idle driver through the arm/arm64 arches back-ends CPU operations. Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
2019-08-09 14:03:10 +03:00
#include <linux/cpuidle.h>
#include <linux/cpumask.h>
#include <linux/cpu_pm.h>
#include <linux/kernel.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/of.h>
#include <linux/of_device.h>
#include <linux/psci.h>
#include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
ARM: psci: cpuidle: Introduce PSCI CPUidle driver PSCI firmware is the standard power management control for all ARM64 based platforms and it is also deployed on some ARM 32 bit platforms to date. Idle state entry in PSCI is currently achieved by calling arm_cpuidle_init() and arm_cpuidle_suspend() in a generic idle driver, which in turn relies on ARM/ARM64 CPUidle back-end to relay the call into PSCI firmware if PSCI is the boot method. Given that PSCI is the standard idle entry method on ARM64 systems (which means that no other CPUidle driver are expected on ARM64 platforms - so PSCI is already a generic idle driver), in order to simplify idle entry and code maintenance, it makes sense to have a PSCI specific idle driver so that idle code that it is currently living in drivers/firmware directory can be hoisted out of it and moved where it belongs, into a full-fledged PSCI driver, leaving PSCI code in drivers/firmware as a pure firmware interface, as it should be. Implement a PSCI CPUidle driver. By default it is a silent Kconfig entry which is left unselected, since it selection would clash with the generic ARM CPUidle driver that provides a PSCI based idle driver through the arm/arm64 arches back-ends CPU operations. Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
2019-08-09 14:03:10 +03:00
#include <linux/slab.h>
#include <asm/cpuidle.h>
#include "cpuidle-psci.h"
ARM: psci: cpuidle: Introduce PSCI CPUidle driver PSCI firmware is the standard power management control for all ARM64 based platforms and it is also deployed on some ARM 32 bit platforms to date. Idle state entry in PSCI is currently achieved by calling arm_cpuidle_init() and arm_cpuidle_suspend() in a generic idle driver, which in turn relies on ARM/ARM64 CPUidle back-end to relay the call into PSCI firmware if PSCI is the boot method. Given that PSCI is the standard idle entry method on ARM64 systems (which means that no other CPUidle driver are expected on ARM64 platforms - so PSCI is already a generic idle driver), in order to simplify idle entry and code maintenance, it makes sense to have a PSCI specific idle driver so that idle code that it is currently living in drivers/firmware directory can be hoisted out of it and moved where it belongs, into a full-fledged PSCI driver, leaving PSCI code in drivers/firmware as a pure firmware interface, as it should be. Implement a PSCI CPUidle driver. By default it is a silent Kconfig entry which is left unselected, since it selection would clash with the generic ARM CPUidle driver that provides a PSCI based idle driver through the arm/arm64 arches back-ends CPU operations. Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
2019-08-09 14:03:10 +03:00
#include "dt_idle_states.h"
struct psci_cpuidle_data {
u32 *psci_states;
struct device *dev;
};
static DEFINE_PER_CPU_READ_MOSTLY(struct psci_cpuidle_data, psci_cpuidle_data);
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(u32, domain_state);
static bool psci_cpuidle_use_cpuhp __initdata;
void psci_set_domain_state(u32 state)
{
__this_cpu_write(domain_state, state);
}
static inline u32 psci_get_domain_state(void)
{
return __this_cpu_read(domain_state);
}
static inline int psci_enter_state(int idx, u32 state)
{
return CPU_PM_CPU_IDLE_ENTER_PARAM(psci_cpu_suspend_enter, idx, state);
}
static int psci_enter_domain_idle_state(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
struct cpuidle_driver *drv, int idx)
{
struct psci_cpuidle_data *data = this_cpu_ptr(&psci_cpuidle_data);
u32 *states = data->psci_states;
struct device *pd_dev = data->dev;
u32 state;
int ret;
/* Do runtime PM to manage a hierarchical CPU toplogy. */
pm_runtime_put_sync_suspend(pd_dev);
state = psci_get_domain_state();
if (!state)
state = states[idx];
ret = psci_enter_state(idx, state);
pm_runtime_get_sync(pd_dev);
/* Clear the domain state to start fresh when back from idle. */
psci_set_domain_state(0);
return ret;
}
PSCI: cpuidle: Refactor CPU suspend power_state parameter handling Current PSCI code handles idle state entry through the psci_cpu_suspend_enter() API, that takes an idle state index as a parameter and convert the index into a previously initialized power_state parameter before calling the PSCI.CPU_SUSPEND() with it. This is unwieldly, since it forces the PSCI firmware layer to keep track of power_state parameter for every idle state so that the index->power_state conversion can be made in the PSCI firmware layer instead of the CPUidle driver implementations. Move the power_state handling out of drivers/firmware/psci into the respective ACPI/DT PSCI CPUidle backends and convert the psci_cpu_suspend_enter() API to get the power_state parameter as input, which makes it closer to its firmware interface PSCI.CPU_SUSPEND() API. A notable side effect is that the PSCI ACPI/DT CPUidle backends now can directly handle (and if needed update) power_state parameters before handing them over to the PSCI firmware interface to trigger PSCI.CPU_SUSPEND() calls. Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
2019-08-09 14:03:12 +03:00
static int psci_idle_cpuhp_up(unsigned int cpu)
{
struct device *pd_dev = __this_cpu_read(psci_cpuidle_data.dev);
if (pd_dev)
pm_runtime_get_sync(pd_dev);
return 0;
}
static int psci_idle_cpuhp_down(unsigned int cpu)
{
struct device *pd_dev = __this_cpu_read(psci_cpuidle_data.dev);
if (pd_dev) {
pm_runtime_put_sync(pd_dev);
/* Clear domain state to start fresh at next online. */
psci_set_domain_state(0);
}
return 0;
}
static void __init psci_idle_init_cpuhp(void)
{
int err;
if (!psci_cpuidle_use_cpuhp)
return;
err = cpuhp_setup_state_nocalls(CPUHP_AP_CPU_PM_STARTING,
"cpuidle/psci:online",
psci_idle_cpuhp_up,
psci_idle_cpuhp_down);
if (err)
pr_warn("Failed %d while setup cpuhp state\n", err);
}
ARM: psci: cpuidle: Introduce PSCI CPUidle driver PSCI firmware is the standard power management control for all ARM64 based platforms and it is also deployed on some ARM 32 bit platforms to date. Idle state entry in PSCI is currently achieved by calling arm_cpuidle_init() and arm_cpuidle_suspend() in a generic idle driver, which in turn relies on ARM/ARM64 CPUidle back-end to relay the call into PSCI firmware if PSCI is the boot method. Given that PSCI is the standard idle entry method on ARM64 systems (which means that no other CPUidle driver are expected on ARM64 platforms - so PSCI is already a generic idle driver), in order to simplify idle entry and code maintenance, it makes sense to have a PSCI specific idle driver so that idle code that it is currently living in drivers/firmware directory can be hoisted out of it and moved where it belongs, into a full-fledged PSCI driver, leaving PSCI code in drivers/firmware as a pure firmware interface, as it should be. Implement a PSCI CPUidle driver. By default it is a silent Kconfig entry which is left unselected, since it selection would clash with the generic ARM CPUidle driver that provides a PSCI based idle driver through the arm/arm64 arches back-ends CPU operations. Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
2019-08-09 14:03:10 +03:00
static int psci_enter_idle_state(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
struct cpuidle_driver *drv, int idx)
{
u32 *state = __this_cpu_read(psci_cpuidle_data.psci_states);
PSCI: cpuidle: Refactor CPU suspend power_state parameter handling Current PSCI code handles idle state entry through the psci_cpu_suspend_enter() API, that takes an idle state index as a parameter and convert the index into a previously initialized power_state parameter before calling the PSCI.CPU_SUSPEND() with it. This is unwieldly, since it forces the PSCI firmware layer to keep track of power_state parameter for every idle state so that the index->power_state conversion can be made in the PSCI firmware layer instead of the CPUidle driver implementations. Move the power_state handling out of drivers/firmware/psci into the respective ACPI/DT PSCI CPUidle backends and convert the psci_cpu_suspend_enter() API to get the power_state parameter as input, which makes it closer to its firmware interface PSCI.CPU_SUSPEND() API. A notable side effect is that the PSCI ACPI/DT CPUidle backends now can directly handle (and if needed update) power_state parameters before handing them over to the PSCI firmware interface to trigger PSCI.CPU_SUSPEND() calls. Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
2019-08-09 14:03:12 +03:00
return psci_enter_state(idx, state[idx]);
ARM: psci: cpuidle: Introduce PSCI CPUidle driver PSCI firmware is the standard power management control for all ARM64 based platforms and it is also deployed on some ARM 32 bit platforms to date. Idle state entry in PSCI is currently achieved by calling arm_cpuidle_init() and arm_cpuidle_suspend() in a generic idle driver, which in turn relies on ARM/ARM64 CPUidle back-end to relay the call into PSCI firmware if PSCI is the boot method. Given that PSCI is the standard idle entry method on ARM64 systems (which means that no other CPUidle driver are expected on ARM64 platforms - so PSCI is already a generic idle driver), in order to simplify idle entry and code maintenance, it makes sense to have a PSCI specific idle driver so that idle code that it is currently living in drivers/firmware directory can be hoisted out of it and moved where it belongs, into a full-fledged PSCI driver, leaving PSCI code in drivers/firmware as a pure firmware interface, as it should be. Implement a PSCI CPUidle driver. By default it is a silent Kconfig entry which is left unselected, since it selection would clash with the generic ARM CPUidle driver that provides a PSCI based idle driver through the arm/arm64 arches back-ends CPU operations. Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
2019-08-09 14:03:10 +03:00
}
static struct cpuidle_driver psci_idle_driver __initdata = {
.name = "psci_idle",
.owner = THIS_MODULE,
/*
* PSCI idle states relies on architectural WFI to
* be represented as state index 0.
*/
.states[0] = {
.enter = psci_enter_idle_state,
.exit_latency = 1,
.target_residency = 1,
.power_usage = UINT_MAX,
.name = "WFI",
.desc = "ARM WFI",
}
};
static const struct of_device_id psci_idle_state_match[] __initconst = {
{ .compatible = "arm,idle-state",
.data = psci_enter_idle_state },
{ },
};
int __init psci_dt_parse_state_node(struct device_node *np, u32 *state)
PSCI: cpuidle: Refactor CPU suspend power_state parameter handling Current PSCI code handles idle state entry through the psci_cpu_suspend_enter() API, that takes an idle state index as a parameter and convert the index into a previously initialized power_state parameter before calling the PSCI.CPU_SUSPEND() with it. This is unwieldly, since it forces the PSCI firmware layer to keep track of power_state parameter for every idle state so that the index->power_state conversion can be made in the PSCI firmware layer instead of the CPUidle driver implementations. Move the power_state handling out of drivers/firmware/psci into the respective ACPI/DT PSCI CPUidle backends and convert the psci_cpu_suspend_enter() API to get the power_state parameter as input, which makes it closer to its firmware interface PSCI.CPU_SUSPEND() API. A notable side effect is that the PSCI ACPI/DT CPUidle backends now can directly handle (and if needed update) power_state parameters before handing them over to the PSCI firmware interface to trigger PSCI.CPU_SUSPEND() calls. Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
2019-08-09 14:03:12 +03:00
{
int err = of_property_read_u32(np, "arm,psci-suspend-param", state);
if (err) {
pr_warn("%pOF missing arm,psci-suspend-param property\n", np);
return err;
}
if (!psci_power_state_is_valid(*state)) {
pr_warn("Invalid PSCI power state %#x\n", *state);
return -EINVAL;
}
return 0;
}
static int __init psci_dt_cpu_init_topology(struct cpuidle_driver *drv,
struct psci_cpuidle_data *data,
unsigned int state_count, int cpu)
{
/* Currently limit the hierarchical topology to be used in OSI mode. */
if (!psci_has_osi_support())
return 0;
data->dev = psci_dt_attach_cpu(cpu);
if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(data->dev))
return PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(data->dev);
/*
* Using the deepest state for the CPU to trigger a potential selection
* of a shared state for the domain, assumes the domain states are all
* deeper states.
*/
drv->states[state_count - 1].enter = psci_enter_domain_idle_state;
psci_cpuidle_use_cpuhp = true;
return 0;
}
static int __init psci_dt_cpu_init_idle(struct cpuidle_driver *drv,
struct device_node *cpu_node,
unsigned int state_count, int cpu)
PSCI: cpuidle: Refactor CPU suspend power_state parameter handling Current PSCI code handles idle state entry through the psci_cpu_suspend_enter() API, that takes an idle state index as a parameter and convert the index into a previously initialized power_state parameter before calling the PSCI.CPU_SUSPEND() with it. This is unwieldly, since it forces the PSCI firmware layer to keep track of power_state parameter for every idle state so that the index->power_state conversion can be made in the PSCI firmware layer instead of the CPUidle driver implementations. Move the power_state handling out of drivers/firmware/psci into the respective ACPI/DT PSCI CPUidle backends and convert the psci_cpu_suspend_enter() API to get the power_state parameter as input, which makes it closer to its firmware interface PSCI.CPU_SUSPEND() API. A notable side effect is that the PSCI ACPI/DT CPUidle backends now can directly handle (and if needed update) power_state parameters before handing them over to the PSCI firmware interface to trigger PSCI.CPU_SUSPEND() calls. Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
2019-08-09 14:03:12 +03:00
{
int i, ret = 0;
PSCI: cpuidle: Refactor CPU suspend power_state parameter handling Current PSCI code handles idle state entry through the psci_cpu_suspend_enter() API, that takes an idle state index as a parameter and convert the index into a previously initialized power_state parameter before calling the PSCI.CPU_SUSPEND() with it. This is unwieldly, since it forces the PSCI firmware layer to keep track of power_state parameter for every idle state so that the index->power_state conversion can be made in the PSCI firmware layer instead of the CPUidle driver implementations. Move the power_state handling out of drivers/firmware/psci into the respective ACPI/DT PSCI CPUidle backends and convert the psci_cpu_suspend_enter() API to get the power_state parameter as input, which makes it closer to its firmware interface PSCI.CPU_SUSPEND() API. A notable side effect is that the PSCI ACPI/DT CPUidle backends now can directly handle (and if needed update) power_state parameters before handing them over to the PSCI firmware interface to trigger PSCI.CPU_SUSPEND() calls. Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
2019-08-09 14:03:12 +03:00
u32 *psci_states;
struct device_node *state_node;
struct psci_cpuidle_data *data = per_cpu_ptr(&psci_cpuidle_data, cpu);
PSCI: cpuidle: Refactor CPU suspend power_state parameter handling Current PSCI code handles idle state entry through the psci_cpu_suspend_enter() API, that takes an idle state index as a parameter and convert the index into a previously initialized power_state parameter before calling the PSCI.CPU_SUSPEND() with it. This is unwieldly, since it forces the PSCI firmware layer to keep track of power_state parameter for every idle state so that the index->power_state conversion can be made in the PSCI firmware layer instead of the CPUidle driver implementations. Move the power_state handling out of drivers/firmware/psci into the respective ACPI/DT PSCI CPUidle backends and convert the psci_cpu_suspend_enter() API to get the power_state parameter as input, which makes it closer to its firmware interface PSCI.CPU_SUSPEND() API. A notable side effect is that the PSCI ACPI/DT CPUidle backends now can directly handle (and if needed update) power_state parameters before handing them over to the PSCI firmware interface to trigger PSCI.CPU_SUSPEND() calls. Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
2019-08-09 14:03:12 +03:00
state_count++; /* Add WFI state too */
psci_states = kcalloc(state_count, sizeof(*psci_states), GFP_KERNEL);
PSCI: cpuidle: Refactor CPU suspend power_state parameter handling Current PSCI code handles idle state entry through the psci_cpu_suspend_enter() API, that takes an idle state index as a parameter and convert the index into a previously initialized power_state parameter before calling the PSCI.CPU_SUSPEND() with it. This is unwieldly, since it forces the PSCI firmware layer to keep track of power_state parameter for every idle state so that the index->power_state conversion can be made in the PSCI firmware layer instead of the CPUidle driver implementations. Move the power_state handling out of drivers/firmware/psci into the respective ACPI/DT PSCI CPUidle backends and convert the psci_cpu_suspend_enter() API to get the power_state parameter as input, which makes it closer to its firmware interface PSCI.CPU_SUSPEND() API. A notable side effect is that the PSCI ACPI/DT CPUidle backends now can directly handle (and if needed update) power_state parameters before handing them over to the PSCI firmware interface to trigger PSCI.CPU_SUSPEND() calls. Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
2019-08-09 14:03:12 +03:00
if (!psci_states)
return -ENOMEM;
for (i = 1; i < state_count; i++) {
state_node = of_get_cpu_state_node(cpu_node, i - 1);
if (!state_node)
break;
PSCI: cpuidle: Refactor CPU suspend power_state parameter handling Current PSCI code handles idle state entry through the psci_cpu_suspend_enter() API, that takes an idle state index as a parameter and convert the index into a previously initialized power_state parameter before calling the PSCI.CPU_SUSPEND() with it. This is unwieldly, since it forces the PSCI firmware layer to keep track of power_state parameter for every idle state so that the index->power_state conversion can be made in the PSCI firmware layer instead of the CPUidle driver implementations. Move the power_state handling out of drivers/firmware/psci into the respective ACPI/DT PSCI CPUidle backends and convert the psci_cpu_suspend_enter() API to get the power_state parameter as input, which makes it closer to its firmware interface PSCI.CPU_SUSPEND() API. A notable side effect is that the PSCI ACPI/DT CPUidle backends now can directly handle (and if needed update) power_state parameters before handing them over to the PSCI firmware interface to trigger PSCI.CPU_SUSPEND() calls. Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
2019-08-09 14:03:12 +03:00
ret = psci_dt_parse_state_node(state_node, &psci_states[i]);
of_node_put(state_node);
if (ret)
goto free_mem;
pr_debug("psci-power-state %#x index %d\n", psci_states[i], i);
}
if (i != state_count) {
ret = -ENODEV;
goto free_mem;
}
/* Initialize optional data, used for the hierarchical topology. */
ret = psci_dt_cpu_init_topology(drv, data, state_count, cpu);
if (ret < 0)
goto free_mem;
/* Idle states parsed correctly, store them in the per-cpu struct. */
data->psci_states = psci_states;
PSCI: cpuidle: Refactor CPU suspend power_state parameter handling Current PSCI code handles idle state entry through the psci_cpu_suspend_enter() API, that takes an idle state index as a parameter and convert the index into a previously initialized power_state parameter before calling the PSCI.CPU_SUSPEND() with it. This is unwieldly, since it forces the PSCI firmware layer to keep track of power_state parameter for every idle state so that the index->power_state conversion can be made in the PSCI firmware layer instead of the CPUidle driver implementations. Move the power_state handling out of drivers/firmware/psci into the respective ACPI/DT PSCI CPUidle backends and convert the psci_cpu_suspend_enter() API to get the power_state parameter as input, which makes it closer to its firmware interface PSCI.CPU_SUSPEND() API. A notable side effect is that the PSCI ACPI/DT CPUidle backends now can directly handle (and if needed update) power_state parameters before handing them over to the PSCI firmware interface to trigger PSCI.CPU_SUSPEND() calls. Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
2019-08-09 14:03:12 +03:00
return 0;
free_mem:
kfree(psci_states);
return ret;
}
static __init int psci_cpu_init_idle(struct cpuidle_driver *drv,
unsigned int cpu, unsigned int state_count)
PSCI: cpuidle: Refactor CPU suspend power_state parameter handling Current PSCI code handles idle state entry through the psci_cpu_suspend_enter() API, that takes an idle state index as a parameter and convert the index into a previously initialized power_state parameter before calling the PSCI.CPU_SUSPEND() with it. This is unwieldly, since it forces the PSCI firmware layer to keep track of power_state parameter for every idle state so that the index->power_state conversion can be made in the PSCI firmware layer instead of the CPUidle driver implementations. Move the power_state handling out of drivers/firmware/psci into the respective ACPI/DT PSCI CPUidle backends and convert the psci_cpu_suspend_enter() API to get the power_state parameter as input, which makes it closer to its firmware interface PSCI.CPU_SUSPEND() API. A notable side effect is that the PSCI ACPI/DT CPUidle backends now can directly handle (and if needed update) power_state parameters before handing them over to the PSCI firmware interface to trigger PSCI.CPU_SUSPEND() calls. Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
2019-08-09 14:03:12 +03:00
{
struct device_node *cpu_node;
int ret;
/*
* If the PSCI cpu_suspend function hook has not been initialized
* idle states must not be enabled, so bail out
*/
if (!psci_ops.cpu_suspend)
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
cpu_node = of_cpu_device_node_get(cpu);
if (!cpu_node)
return -ENODEV;
ret = psci_dt_cpu_init_idle(drv, cpu_node, state_count, cpu);
PSCI: cpuidle: Refactor CPU suspend power_state parameter handling Current PSCI code handles idle state entry through the psci_cpu_suspend_enter() API, that takes an idle state index as a parameter and convert the index into a previously initialized power_state parameter before calling the PSCI.CPU_SUSPEND() with it. This is unwieldly, since it forces the PSCI firmware layer to keep track of power_state parameter for every idle state so that the index->power_state conversion can be made in the PSCI firmware layer instead of the CPUidle driver implementations. Move the power_state handling out of drivers/firmware/psci into the respective ACPI/DT PSCI CPUidle backends and convert the psci_cpu_suspend_enter() API to get the power_state parameter as input, which makes it closer to its firmware interface PSCI.CPU_SUSPEND() API. A notable side effect is that the PSCI ACPI/DT CPUidle backends now can directly handle (and if needed update) power_state parameters before handing them over to the PSCI firmware interface to trigger PSCI.CPU_SUSPEND() calls. Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
2019-08-09 14:03:12 +03:00
of_node_put(cpu_node);
return ret;
}
ARM: psci: cpuidle: Introduce PSCI CPUidle driver PSCI firmware is the standard power management control for all ARM64 based platforms and it is also deployed on some ARM 32 bit platforms to date. Idle state entry in PSCI is currently achieved by calling arm_cpuidle_init() and arm_cpuidle_suspend() in a generic idle driver, which in turn relies on ARM/ARM64 CPUidle back-end to relay the call into PSCI firmware if PSCI is the boot method. Given that PSCI is the standard idle entry method on ARM64 systems (which means that no other CPUidle driver are expected on ARM64 platforms - so PSCI is already a generic idle driver), in order to simplify idle entry and code maintenance, it makes sense to have a PSCI specific idle driver so that idle code that it is currently living in drivers/firmware directory can be hoisted out of it and moved where it belongs, into a full-fledged PSCI driver, leaving PSCI code in drivers/firmware as a pure firmware interface, as it should be. Implement a PSCI CPUidle driver. By default it is a silent Kconfig entry which is left unselected, since it selection would clash with the generic ARM CPUidle driver that provides a PSCI based idle driver through the arm/arm64 arches back-ends CPU operations. Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
2019-08-09 14:03:10 +03:00
static int __init psci_idle_init_cpu(int cpu)
{
struct cpuidle_driver *drv;
struct device_node *cpu_node;
const char *enable_method;
int ret = 0;
cpu_node = of_cpu_device_node_get(cpu);
if (!cpu_node)
return -ENODEV;
/*
* Check whether the enable-method for the cpu is PSCI, fail
* if it is not.
*/
enable_method = of_get_property(cpu_node, "enable-method", NULL);
if (!enable_method || (strcmp(enable_method, "psci")))
ret = -ENODEV;
of_node_put(cpu_node);
if (ret)
return ret;
drv = kmemdup(&psci_idle_driver, sizeof(*drv), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!drv)
return -ENOMEM;
drv->cpumask = (struct cpumask *)cpumask_of(cpu);
/*
* Initialize idle states data, starting at index 1, since
* by default idle state 0 is the quiescent state reached
* by the cpu by executing the wfi instruction.
*
* If no DT idle states are detected (ret == 0) let the driver
* initialization fail accordingly since there is no reason to
* initialize the idle driver if only wfi is supported, the
* default archictectural back-end already executes wfi
* on idle entry.
*/
ret = dt_init_idle_driver(drv, psci_idle_state_match, 1);
if (ret <= 0) {
ret = ret ? : -ENODEV;
goto out_kfree_drv;
}
/*
* Initialize PSCI idle states.
*/
ret = psci_cpu_init_idle(drv, cpu, ret);
ARM: psci: cpuidle: Introduce PSCI CPUidle driver PSCI firmware is the standard power management control for all ARM64 based platforms and it is also deployed on some ARM 32 bit platforms to date. Idle state entry in PSCI is currently achieved by calling arm_cpuidle_init() and arm_cpuidle_suspend() in a generic idle driver, which in turn relies on ARM/ARM64 CPUidle back-end to relay the call into PSCI firmware if PSCI is the boot method. Given that PSCI is the standard idle entry method on ARM64 systems (which means that no other CPUidle driver are expected on ARM64 platforms - so PSCI is already a generic idle driver), in order to simplify idle entry and code maintenance, it makes sense to have a PSCI specific idle driver so that idle code that it is currently living in drivers/firmware directory can be hoisted out of it and moved where it belongs, into a full-fledged PSCI driver, leaving PSCI code in drivers/firmware as a pure firmware interface, as it should be. Implement a PSCI CPUidle driver. By default it is a silent Kconfig entry which is left unselected, since it selection would clash with the generic ARM CPUidle driver that provides a PSCI based idle driver through the arm/arm64 arches back-ends CPU operations. Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
2019-08-09 14:03:10 +03:00
if (ret) {
pr_err("CPU %d failed to PSCI idle\n", cpu);
goto out_kfree_drv;
}
ret = cpuidle_register(drv, NULL);
if (ret)
goto out_kfree_drv;
return 0;
out_kfree_drv:
kfree(drv);
return ret;
}
/*
* psci_idle_init - Initializes PSCI cpuidle driver
*
* Initializes PSCI cpuidle driver for all CPUs, if any CPU fails
* to register cpuidle driver then rollback to cancel all CPUs
* registration.
*/
static int __init psci_idle_init(void)
{
int cpu, ret;
struct cpuidle_driver *drv;
struct cpuidle_device *dev;
for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
ret = psci_idle_init_cpu(cpu);
if (ret)
goto out_fail;
}
psci_idle_init_cpuhp();
ARM: psci: cpuidle: Introduce PSCI CPUidle driver PSCI firmware is the standard power management control for all ARM64 based platforms and it is also deployed on some ARM 32 bit platforms to date. Idle state entry in PSCI is currently achieved by calling arm_cpuidle_init() and arm_cpuidle_suspend() in a generic idle driver, which in turn relies on ARM/ARM64 CPUidle back-end to relay the call into PSCI firmware if PSCI is the boot method. Given that PSCI is the standard idle entry method on ARM64 systems (which means that no other CPUidle driver are expected on ARM64 platforms - so PSCI is already a generic idle driver), in order to simplify idle entry and code maintenance, it makes sense to have a PSCI specific idle driver so that idle code that it is currently living in drivers/firmware directory can be hoisted out of it and moved where it belongs, into a full-fledged PSCI driver, leaving PSCI code in drivers/firmware as a pure firmware interface, as it should be. Implement a PSCI CPUidle driver. By default it is a silent Kconfig entry which is left unselected, since it selection would clash with the generic ARM CPUidle driver that provides a PSCI based idle driver through the arm/arm64 arches back-ends CPU operations. Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
2019-08-09 14:03:10 +03:00
return 0;
out_fail:
while (--cpu >= 0) {
dev = per_cpu(cpuidle_devices, cpu);
drv = cpuidle_get_cpu_driver(dev);
cpuidle_unregister(drv);
kfree(drv);
}
return ret;
}
device_initcall(psci_idle_init);