WSL2-Linux-Kernel/drivers/gpio/gpio-mlxbf2.c

463 строки
11 KiB
C
Исходник Обычный вид История

// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
/*
* Copyright (C) 2020-2021 NVIDIA CORPORATION & AFFILIATES
*/
#include <linux/bitfield.h>
#include <linux/bitops.h>
#include <linux/device.h>
#include <linux/gpio/driver.h>
#include <linux/interrupt.h>
#include <linux/io.h>
#include <linux/ioport.h>
#include <linux/kernel.h>
#include <linux/mod_devicetable.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/platform_device.h>
#include <linux/pm.h>
#include <linux/resource.h>
#include <linux/spinlock.h>
#include <linux/types.h>
/*
* There are 3 YU GPIO blocks:
* gpio[0]: HOST_GPIO0->HOST_GPIO31
* gpio[1]: HOST_GPIO32->HOST_GPIO63
* gpio[2]: HOST_GPIO64->HOST_GPIO69
*/
#define MLXBF2_GPIO_MAX_PINS_PER_BLOCK 32
/*
* arm_gpio_lock register:
* bit[31] lock status: active if set
* bit[15:0] set lock
* The lock is enabled only if 0xd42f is written to this field
*/
#define YU_ARM_GPIO_LOCK_ADDR 0x2801088
#define YU_ARM_GPIO_LOCK_SIZE 0x8
#define YU_LOCK_ACTIVE_BIT(val) (val >> 31)
#define YU_ARM_GPIO_LOCK_ACQUIRE 0xd42f
#define YU_ARM_GPIO_LOCK_RELEASE 0x0
/*
* gpio[x] block registers and their offset
*/
#define YU_GPIO_DATAIN 0x04
#define YU_GPIO_MODE1 0x08
#define YU_GPIO_MODE0 0x0c
#define YU_GPIO_DATASET 0x14
#define YU_GPIO_DATACLEAR 0x18
#define YU_GPIO_CAUSE_RISE_EN 0x44
#define YU_GPIO_CAUSE_FALL_EN 0x48
#define YU_GPIO_MODE1_CLEAR 0x50
#define YU_GPIO_MODE0_SET 0x54
#define YU_GPIO_MODE0_CLEAR 0x58
#define YU_GPIO_CAUSE_OR_CAUSE_EVTEN0 0x80
#define YU_GPIO_CAUSE_OR_EVTEN0 0x94
#define YU_GPIO_CAUSE_OR_CLRCAUSE 0x98
struct mlxbf2_gpio_context_save_regs {
u32 gpio_mode0;
u32 gpio_mode1;
};
/* BlueField-2 gpio block context structure. */
struct mlxbf2_gpio_context {
struct gpio_chip gc;
struct irq_chip irq_chip;
/* YU GPIO blocks address */
void __iomem *gpio_io;
struct mlxbf2_gpio_context_save_regs *csave_regs;
};
/* BlueField-2 gpio shared structure. */
struct mlxbf2_gpio_param {
void __iomem *io;
struct resource *res;
struct mutex *lock;
};
static struct resource yu_arm_gpio_lock_res =
DEFINE_RES_MEM_NAMED(YU_ARM_GPIO_LOCK_ADDR, YU_ARM_GPIO_LOCK_SIZE, "YU_ARM_GPIO_LOCK");
static DEFINE_MUTEX(yu_arm_gpio_lock_mutex);
static struct mlxbf2_gpio_param yu_arm_gpio_lock_param = {
.res = &yu_arm_gpio_lock_res,
.lock = &yu_arm_gpio_lock_mutex,
};
/* Request memory region and map yu_arm_gpio_lock resource */
static int mlxbf2_gpio_get_lock_res(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
struct resource *res;
resource_size_t size;
int ret = 0;
mutex_lock(yu_arm_gpio_lock_param.lock);
/* Check if the memory map already exists */
if (yu_arm_gpio_lock_param.io)
goto exit;
res = yu_arm_gpio_lock_param.res;
size = resource_size(res);
if (!devm_request_mem_region(dev, res->start, size, res->name)) {
ret = -EFAULT;
goto exit;
}
yu_arm_gpio_lock_param.io = devm_ioremap(dev, res->start, size);
if (!yu_arm_gpio_lock_param.io)
ret = -ENOMEM;
exit:
mutex_unlock(yu_arm_gpio_lock_param.lock);
return ret;
}
/*
* Acquire the YU arm_gpio_lock to be able to change the direction
* mode. If the lock_active bit is already set, return an error.
*/
static int mlxbf2_gpio_lock_acquire(struct mlxbf2_gpio_context *gs)
{
u32 arm_gpio_lock_val;
mutex_lock(yu_arm_gpio_lock_param.lock);
gpio: use raw spinlock for gpio chip shadowed data In case of PREEMPT_RT, there is a raw_spinlock -> spinlock dependency as the lockdep report shows. __irq_set_handler irq_get_desc_buslock __irq_get_desc_lock raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&desc->lock, *flags); // raw spinlock get here __irq_do_set_handler mask_ack_irq dwapb_irq_ack spin_lock_irqsave(&gc->bgpio_lock, flags); // sleep able spinlock irq_put_desc_busunlock Replace with a raw lock to avoid BUGs. This lock is only used to access registers, and It's safe to replace with the raw lock without bad influence. [ 15.090359][ T1] ============================= [ 15.090365][ T1] [ BUG: Invalid wait context ] [ 15.090373][ T1] 5.10.59-rt52-00983-g186a6841c682-dirty #3 Not tainted [ 15.090386][ T1] ----------------------------- [ 15.090392][ T1] swapper/0/1 is trying to lock: [ 15.090402][ T1] 70ff00018507c188 (&gc->bgpio_lock){....}-{3:3}, at: _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x1c/0x28 [ 15.090470][ T1] other info that might help us debug this: [ 15.090477][ T1] context-{5:5} [ 15.090485][ T1] 3 locks held by swapper/0/1: [ 15.090497][ T1] #0: c2ff0001816de1a0 (&dev->mutex){....}-{4:4}, at: __device_driver_lock+0x98/0x104 [ 15.090553][ T1] #1: ffff90001485b4b8 (irq_domain_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: irq_domain_associate+0xbc/0x6d4 [ 15.090606][ T1] #2: 4bff000185d7a8e0 (lock_class){....}-{2:2}, at: _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x1c/0x28 [ 15.090654][ T1] stack backtrace: [ 15.090661][ T1] CPU: 4 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.10.59-rt52-00983-g186a6841c682-dirty #3 [ 15.090682][ T1] Hardware name: Horizon Robotics Journey 5 DVB (DT) [ 15.090692][ T1] Call trace: ...... [ 15.090811][ T1] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x1c/0x28 [ 15.090828][ T1] dwapb_irq_ack+0xb4/0x300 [ 15.090846][ T1] __irq_do_set_handler+0x494/0xb2c [ 15.090864][ T1] __irq_set_handler+0x74/0x114 [ 15.090881][ T1] irq_set_chip_and_handler_name+0x44/0x58 [ 15.090900][ T1] gpiochip_irq_map+0x210/0x644 Signed-off-by: Schspa Shi <schspa@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Acked-by: Doug Berger <opendmb@gmail.com> Acked-by: Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>
2022-04-19 04:28:10 +03:00
raw_spin_lock(&gs->gc.bgpio_lock);
arm_gpio_lock_val = readl(yu_arm_gpio_lock_param.io);
/*
* When lock active bit[31] is set, ModeX is write enabled
*/
if (YU_LOCK_ACTIVE_BIT(arm_gpio_lock_val)) {
gpio: use raw spinlock for gpio chip shadowed data In case of PREEMPT_RT, there is a raw_spinlock -> spinlock dependency as the lockdep report shows. __irq_set_handler irq_get_desc_buslock __irq_get_desc_lock raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&desc->lock, *flags); // raw spinlock get here __irq_do_set_handler mask_ack_irq dwapb_irq_ack spin_lock_irqsave(&gc->bgpio_lock, flags); // sleep able spinlock irq_put_desc_busunlock Replace with a raw lock to avoid BUGs. This lock is only used to access registers, and It's safe to replace with the raw lock without bad influence. [ 15.090359][ T1] ============================= [ 15.090365][ T1] [ BUG: Invalid wait context ] [ 15.090373][ T1] 5.10.59-rt52-00983-g186a6841c682-dirty #3 Not tainted [ 15.090386][ T1] ----------------------------- [ 15.090392][ T1] swapper/0/1 is trying to lock: [ 15.090402][ T1] 70ff00018507c188 (&gc->bgpio_lock){....}-{3:3}, at: _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x1c/0x28 [ 15.090470][ T1] other info that might help us debug this: [ 15.090477][ T1] context-{5:5} [ 15.090485][ T1] 3 locks held by swapper/0/1: [ 15.090497][ T1] #0: c2ff0001816de1a0 (&dev->mutex){....}-{4:4}, at: __device_driver_lock+0x98/0x104 [ 15.090553][ T1] #1: ffff90001485b4b8 (irq_domain_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: irq_domain_associate+0xbc/0x6d4 [ 15.090606][ T1] #2: 4bff000185d7a8e0 (lock_class){....}-{2:2}, at: _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x1c/0x28 [ 15.090654][ T1] stack backtrace: [ 15.090661][ T1] CPU: 4 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.10.59-rt52-00983-g186a6841c682-dirty #3 [ 15.090682][ T1] Hardware name: Horizon Robotics Journey 5 DVB (DT) [ 15.090692][ T1] Call trace: ...... [ 15.090811][ T1] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x1c/0x28 [ 15.090828][ T1] dwapb_irq_ack+0xb4/0x300 [ 15.090846][ T1] __irq_do_set_handler+0x494/0xb2c [ 15.090864][ T1] __irq_set_handler+0x74/0x114 [ 15.090881][ T1] irq_set_chip_and_handler_name+0x44/0x58 [ 15.090900][ T1] gpiochip_irq_map+0x210/0x644 Signed-off-by: Schspa Shi <schspa@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Acked-by: Doug Berger <opendmb@gmail.com> Acked-by: Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>
2022-04-19 04:28:10 +03:00
raw_spin_unlock(&gs->gc.bgpio_lock);
mutex_unlock(yu_arm_gpio_lock_param.lock);
return -EINVAL;
}
writel(YU_ARM_GPIO_LOCK_ACQUIRE, yu_arm_gpio_lock_param.io);
return 0;
}
/*
* Release the YU arm_gpio_lock after changing the direction mode.
*/
static void mlxbf2_gpio_lock_release(struct mlxbf2_gpio_context *gs)
__releases(&gs->gc.bgpio_lock)
__releases(yu_arm_gpio_lock_param.lock)
{
writel(YU_ARM_GPIO_LOCK_RELEASE, yu_arm_gpio_lock_param.io);
gpio: use raw spinlock for gpio chip shadowed data In case of PREEMPT_RT, there is a raw_spinlock -> spinlock dependency as the lockdep report shows. __irq_set_handler irq_get_desc_buslock __irq_get_desc_lock raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&desc->lock, *flags); // raw spinlock get here __irq_do_set_handler mask_ack_irq dwapb_irq_ack spin_lock_irqsave(&gc->bgpio_lock, flags); // sleep able spinlock irq_put_desc_busunlock Replace with a raw lock to avoid BUGs. This lock is only used to access registers, and It's safe to replace with the raw lock without bad influence. [ 15.090359][ T1] ============================= [ 15.090365][ T1] [ BUG: Invalid wait context ] [ 15.090373][ T1] 5.10.59-rt52-00983-g186a6841c682-dirty #3 Not tainted [ 15.090386][ T1] ----------------------------- [ 15.090392][ T1] swapper/0/1 is trying to lock: [ 15.090402][ T1] 70ff00018507c188 (&gc->bgpio_lock){....}-{3:3}, at: _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x1c/0x28 [ 15.090470][ T1] other info that might help us debug this: [ 15.090477][ T1] context-{5:5} [ 15.090485][ T1] 3 locks held by swapper/0/1: [ 15.090497][ T1] #0: c2ff0001816de1a0 (&dev->mutex){....}-{4:4}, at: __device_driver_lock+0x98/0x104 [ 15.090553][ T1] #1: ffff90001485b4b8 (irq_domain_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: irq_domain_associate+0xbc/0x6d4 [ 15.090606][ T1] #2: 4bff000185d7a8e0 (lock_class){....}-{2:2}, at: _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x1c/0x28 [ 15.090654][ T1] stack backtrace: [ 15.090661][ T1] CPU: 4 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.10.59-rt52-00983-g186a6841c682-dirty #3 [ 15.090682][ T1] Hardware name: Horizon Robotics Journey 5 DVB (DT) [ 15.090692][ T1] Call trace: ...... [ 15.090811][ T1] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x1c/0x28 [ 15.090828][ T1] dwapb_irq_ack+0xb4/0x300 [ 15.090846][ T1] __irq_do_set_handler+0x494/0xb2c [ 15.090864][ T1] __irq_set_handler+0x74/0x114 [ 15.090881][ T1] irq_set_chip_and_handler_name+0x44/0x58 [ 15.090900][ T1] gpiochip_irq_map+0x210/0x644 Signed-off-by: Schspa Shi <schspa@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Acked-by: Doug Berger <opendmb@gmail.com> Acked-by: Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>
2022-04-19 04:28:10 +03:00
raw_spin_unlock(&gs->gc.bgpio_lock);
mutex_unlock(yu_arm_gpio_lock_param.lock);
}
/*
* mode0 and mode1 are both locked by the gpio_lock field.
*
* Together, mode0 and mode1 define the gpio Mode dependeing also
* on Reg_DataOut.
*
* {mode1,mode0}:{Reg_DataOut=0,Reg_DataOut=1}->{DataOut=0,DataOut=1}
*
* {0,0}:Reg_DataOut{0,1}->{Z,Z} Input PAD
* {0,1}:Reg_DataOut{0,1}->{0,1} Full drive Output PAD
* {1,0}:Reg_DataOut{0,1}->{0,Z} 0-set PAD to low, 1-float
* {1,1}:Reg_DataOut{0,1}->{Z,1} 0-float, 1-set PAD to high
*/
/*
* Set input direction:
* {mode1,mode0} = {0,0}
*/
static int mlxbf2_gpio_direction_input(struct gpio_chip *chip,
unsigned int offset)
{
struct mlxbf2_gpio_context *gs = gpiochip_get_data(chip);
int ret;
/*
* Although the arm_gpio_lock was set in the probe function, check again
* if it is still enabled to be able to write to the ModeX registers.
*/
ret = mlxbf2_gpio_lock_acquire(gs);
if (ret < 0)
return ret;
writel(BIT(offset), gs->gpio_io + YU_GPIO_MODE0_CLEAR);
writel(BIT(offset), gs->gpio_io + YU_GPIO_MODE1_CLEAR);
mlxbf2_gpio_lock_release(gs);
return ret;
}
/*
* Set output direction:
* {mode1,mode0} = {0,1}
*/
static int mlxbf2_gpio_direction_output(struct gpio_chip *chip,
unsigned int offset,
int value)
{
struct mlxbf2_gpio_context *gs = gpiochip_get_data(chip);
int ret = 0;
/*
* Although the arm_gpio_lock was set in the probe function,
* check again it is still enabled to be able to write to the
* ModeX registers.
*/
ret = mlxbf2_gpio_lock_acquire(gs);
if (ret < 0)
return ret;
writel(BIT(offset), gs->gpio_io + YU_GPIO_MODE1_CLEAR);
writel(BIT(offset), gs->gpio_io + YU_GPIO_MODE0_SET);
mlxbf2_gpio_lock_release(gs);
return ret;
}
static void mlxbf2_gpio_irq_enable(struct irq_data *irqd)
{
struct gpio_chip *gc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(irqd);
struct mlxbf2_gpio_context *gs = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
int offset = irqd_to_hwirq(irqd);
unsigned long flags;
u32 val;
gpio: use raw spinlock for gpio chip shadowed data In case of PREEMPT_RT, there is a raw_spinlock -> spinlock dependency as the lockdep report shows. __irq_set_handler irq_get_desc_buslock __irq_get_desc_lock raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&desc->lock, *flags); // raw spinlock get here __irq_do_set_handler mask_ack_irq dwapb_irq_ack spin_lock_irqsave(&gc->bgpio_lock, flags); // sleep able spinlock irq_put_desc_busunlock Replace with a raw lock to avoid BUGs. This lock is only used to access registers, and It's safe to replace with the raw lock without bad influence. [ 15.090359][ T1] ============================= [ 15.090365][ T1] [ BUG: Invalid wait context ] [ 15.090373][ T1] 5.10.59-rt52-00983-g186a6841c682-dirty #3 Not tainted [ 15.090386][ T1] ----------------------------- [ 15.090392][ T1] swapper/0/1 is trying to lock: [ 15.090402][ T1] 70ff00018507c188 (&gc->bgpio_lock){....}-{3:3}, at: _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x1c/0x28 [ 15.090470][ T1] other info that might help us debug this: [ 15.090477][ T1] context-{5:5} [ 15.090485][ T1] 3 locks held by swapper/0/1: [ 15.090497][ T1] #0: c2ff0001816de1a0 (&dev->mutex){....}-{4:4}, at: __device_driver_lock+0x98/0x104 [ 15.090553][ T1] #1: ffff90001485b4b8 (irq_domain_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: irq_domain_associate+0xbc/0x6d4 [ 15.090606][ T1] #2: 4bff000185d7a8e0 (lock_class){....}-{2:2}, at: _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x1c/0x28 [ 15.090654][ T1] stack backtrace: [ 15.090661][ T1] CPU: 4 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.10.59-rt52-00983-g186a6841c682-dirty #3 [ 15.090682][ T1] Hardware name: Horizon Robotics Journey 5 DVB (DT) [ 15.090692][ T1] Call trace: ...... [ 15.090811][ T1] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x1c/0x28 [ 15.090828][ T1] dwapb_irq_ack+0xb4/0x300 [ 15.090846][ T1] __irq_do_set_handler+0x494/0xb2c [ 15.090864][ T1] __irq_set_handler+0x74/0x114 [ 15.090881][ T1] irq_set_chip_and_handler_name+0x44/0x58 [ 15.090900][ T1] gpiochip_irq_map+0x210/0x644 Signed-off-by: Schspa Shi <schspa@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Acked-by: Doug Berger <opendmb@gmail.com> Acked-by: Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>
2022-04-19 04:28:10 +03:00
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&gs->gc.bgpio_lock, flags);
val = readl(gs->gpio_io + YU_GPIO_CAUSE_OR_CLRCAUSE);
val |= BIT(offset);
writel(val, gs->gpio_io + YU_GPIO_CAUSE_OR_CLRCAUSE);
val = readl(gs->gpio_io + YU_GPIO_CAUSE_OR_EVTEN0);
val |= BIT(offset);
writel(val, gs->gpio_io + YU_GPIO_CAUSE_OR_EVTEN0);
gpio: use raw spinlock for gpio chip shadowed data In case of PREEMPT_RT, there is a raw_spinlock -> spinlock dependency as the lockdep report shows. __irq_set_handler irq_get_desc_buslock __irq_get_desc_lock raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&desc->lock, *flags); // raw spinlock get here __irq_do_set_handler mask_ack_irq dwapb_irq_ack spin_lock_irqsave(&gc->bgpio_lock, flags); // sleep able spinlock irq_put_desc_busunlock Replace with a raw lock to avoid BUGs. This lock is only used to access registers, and It's safe to replace with the raw lock without bad influence. [ 15.090359][ T1] ============================= [ 15.090365][ T1] [ BUG: Invalid wait context ] [ 15.090373][ T1] 5.10.59-rt52-00983-g186a6841c682-dirty #3 Not tainted [ 15.090386][ T1] ----------------------------- [ 15.090392][ T1] swapper/0/1 is trying to lock: [ 15.090402][ T1] 70ff00018507c188 (&gc->bgpio_lock){....}-{3:3}, at: _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x1c/0x28 [ 15.090470][ T1] other info that might help us debug this: [ 15.090477][ T1] context-{5:5} [ 15.090485][ T1] 3 locks held by swapper/0/1: [ 15.090497][ T1] #0: c2ff0001816de1a0 (&dev->mutex){....}-{4:4}, at: __device_driver_lock+0x98/0x104 [ 15.090553][ T1] #1: ffff90001485b4b8 (irq_domain_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: irq_domain_associate+0xbc/0x6d4 [ 15.090606][ T1] #2: 4bff000185d7a8e0 (lock_class){....}-{2:2}, at: _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x1c/0x28 [ 15.090654][ T1] stack backtrace: [ 15.090661][ T1] CPU: 4 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.10.59-rt52-00983-g186a6841c682-dirty #3 [ 15.090682][ T1] Hardware name: Horizon Robotics Journey 5 DVB (DT) [ 15.090692][ T1] Call trace: ...... [ 15.090811][ T1] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x1c/0x28 [ 15.090828][ T1] dwapb_irq_ack+0xb4/0x300 [ 15.090846][ T1] __irq_do_set_handler+0x494/0xb2c [ 15.090864][ T1] __irq_set_handler+0x74/0x114 [ 15.090881][ T1] irq_set_chip_and_handler_name+0x44/0x58 [ 15.090900][ T1] gpiochip_irq_map+0x210/0x644 Signed-off-by: Schspa Shi <schspa@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Acked-by: Doug Berger <opendmb@gmail.com> Acked-by: Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>
2022-04-19 04:28:10 +03:00
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&gs->gc.bgpio_lock, flags);
}
static void mlxbf2_gpio_irq_disable(struct irq_data *irqd)
{
struct gpio_chip *gc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(irqd);
struct mlxbf2_gpio_context *gs = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
int offset = irqd_to_hwirq(irqd);
unsigned long flags;
u32 val;
gpio: use raw spinlock for gpio chip shadowed data In case of PREEMPT_RT, there is a raw_spinlock -> spinlock dependency as the lockdep report shows. __irq_set_handler irq_get_desc_buslock __irq_get_desc_lock raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&desc->lock, *flags); // raw spinlock get here __irq_do_set_handler mask_ack_irq dwapb_irq_ack spin_lock_irqsave(&gc->bgpio_lock, flags); // sleep able spinlock irq_put_desc_busunlock Replace with a raw lock to avoid BUGs. This lock is only used to access registers, and It's safe to replace with the raw lock without bad influence. [ 15.090359][ T1] ============================= [ 15.090365][ T1] [ BUG: Invalid wait context ] [ 15.090373][ T1] 5.10.59-rt52-00983-g186a6841c682-dirty #3 Not tainted [ 15.090386][ T1] ----------------------------- [ 15.090392][ T1] swapper/0/1 is trying to lock: [ 15.090402][ T1] 70ff00018507c188 (&gc->bgpio_lock){....}-{3:3}, at: _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x1c/0x28 [ 15.090470][ T1] other info that might help us debug this: [ 15.090477][ T1] context-{5:5} [ 15.090485][ T1] 3 locks held by swapper/0/1: [ 15.090497][ T1] #0: c2ff0001816de1a0 (&dev->mutex){....}-{4:4}, at: __device_driver_lock+0x98/0x104 [ 15.090553][ T1] #1: ffff90001485b4b8 (irq_domain_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: irq_domain_associate+0xbc/0x6d4 [ 15.090606][ T1] #2: 4bff000185d7a8e0 (lock_class){....}-{2:2}, at: _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x1c/0x28 [ 15.090654][ T1] stack backtrace: [ 15.090661][ T1] CPU: 4 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.10.59-rt52-00983-g186a6841c682-dirty #3 [ 15.090682][ T1] Hardware name: Horizon Robotics Journey 5 DVB (DT) [ 15.090692][ T1] Call trace: ...... [ 15.090811][ T1] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x1c/0x28 [ 15.090828][ T1] dwapb_irq_ack+0xb4/0x300 [ 15.090846][ T1] __irq_do_set_handler+0x494/0xb2c [ 15.090864][ T1] __irq_set_handler+0x74/0x114 [ 15.090881][ T1] irq_set_chip_and_handler_name+0x44/0x58 [ 15.090900][ T1] gpiochip_irq_map+0x210/0x644 Signed-off-by: Schspa Shi <schspa@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Acked-by: Doug Berger <opendmb@gmail.com> Acked-by: Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>
2022-04-19 04:28:10 +03:00
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&gs->gc.bgpio_lock, flags);
val = readl(gs->gpio_io + YU_GPIO_CAUSE_OR_EVTEN0);
val &= ~BIT(offset);
writel(val, gs->gpio_io + YU_GPIO_CAUSE_OR_EVTEN0);
gpio: use raw spinlock for gpio chip shadowed data In case of PREEMPT_RT, there is a raw_spinlock -> spinlock dependency as the lockdep report shows. __irq_set_handler irq_get_desc_buslock __irq_get_desc_lock raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&desc->lock, *flags); // raw spinlock get here __irq_do_set_handler mask_ack_irq dwapb_irq_ack spin_lock_irqsave(&gc->bgpio_lock, flags); // sleep able spinlock irq_put_desc_busunlock Replace with a raw lock to avoid BUGs. This lock is only used to access registers, and It's safe to replace with the raw lock without bad influence. [ 15.090359][ T1] ============================= [ 15.090365][ T1] [ BUG: Invalid wait context ] [ 15.090373][ T1] 5.10.59-rt52-00983-g186a6841c682-dirty #3 Not tainted [ 15.090386][ T1] ----------------------------- [ 15.090392][ T1] swapper/0/1 is trying to lock: [ 15.090402][ T1] 70ff00018507c188 (&gc->bgpio_lock){....}-{3:3}, at: _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x1c/0x28 [ 15.090470][ T1] other info that might help us debug this: [ 15.090477][ T1] context-{5:5} [ 15.090485][ T1] 3 locks held by swapper/0/1: [ 15.090497][ T1] #0: c2ff0001816de1a0 (&dev->mutex){....}-{4:4}, at: __device_driver_lock+0x98/0x104 [ 15.090553][ T1] #1: ffff90001485b4b8 (irq_domain_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: irq_domain_associate+0xbc/0x6d4 [ 15.090606][ T1] #2: 4bff000185d7a8e0 (lock_class){....}-{2:2}, at: _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x1c/0x28 [ 15.090654][ T1] stack backtrace: [ 15.090661][ T1] CPU: 4 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.10.59-rt52-00983-g186a6841c682-dirty #3 [ 15.090682][ T1] Hardware name: Horizon Robotics Journey 5 DVB (DT) [ 15.090692][ T1] Call trace: ...... [ 15.090811][ T1] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x1c/0x28 [ 15.090828][ T1] dwapb_irq_ack+0xb4/0x300 [ 15.090846][ T1] __irq_do_set_handler+0x494/0xb2c [ 15.090864][ T1] __irq_set_handler+0x74/0x114 [ 15.090881][ T1] irq_set_chip_and_handler_name+0x44/0x58 [ 15.090900][ T1] gpiochip_irq_map+0x210/0x644 Signed-off-by: Schspa Shi <schspa@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Acked-by: Doug Berger <opendmb@gmail.com> Acked-by: Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>
2022-04-19 04:28:10 +03:00
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&gs->gc.bgpio_lock, flags);
}
static irqreturn_t mlxbf2_gpio_irq_handler(int irq, void *ptr)
{
struct mlxbf2_gpio_context *gs = ptr;
struct gpio_chip *gc = &gs->gc;
unsigned long pending;
u32 level;
pending = readl(gs->gpio_io + YU_GPIO_CAUSE_OR_CAUSE_EVTEN0);
writel(pending, gs->gpio_io + YU_GPIO_CAUSE_OR_CLRCAUSE);
for_each_set_bit(level, &pending, gc->ngpio) {
int gpio_irq = irq_find_mapping(gc->irq.domain, level);
generic_handle_irq(gpio_irq);
}
return IRQ_RETVAL(pending);
}
static int
mlxbf2_gpio_irq_set_type(struct irq_data *irqd, unsigned int type)
{
struct gpio_chip *gc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(irqd);
struct mlxbf2_gpio_context *gs = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
int offset = irqd_to_hwirq(irqd);
unsigned long flags;
bool fall = false;
bool rise = false;
u32 val;
switch (type & IRQ_TYPE_SENSE_MASK) {
case IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH:
fall = true;
rise = true;
break;
case IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING:
rise = true;
break;
case IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING:
fall = true;
break;
default:
return -EINVAL;
}
gpio: use raw spinlock for gpio chip shadowed data In case of PREEMPT_RT, there is a raw_spinlock -> spinlock dependency as the lockdep report shows. __irq_set_handler irq_get_desc_buslock __irq_get_desc_lock raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&desc->lock, *flags); // raw spinlock get here __irq_do_set_handler mask_ack_irq dwapb_irq_ack spin_lock_irqsave(&gc->bgpio_lock, flags); // sleep able spinlock irq_put_desc_busunlock Replace with a raw lock to avoid BUGs. This lock is only used to access registers, and It's safe to replace with the raw lock without bad influence. [ 15.090359][ T1] ============================= [ 15.090365][ T1] [ BUG: Invalid wait context ] [ 15.090373][ T1] 5.10.59-rt52-00983-g186a6841c682-dirty #3 Not tainted [ 15.090386][ T1] ----------------------------- [ 15.090392][ T1] swapper/0/1 is trying to lock: [ 15.090402][ T1] 70ff00018507c188 (&gc->bgpio_lock){....}-{3:3}, at: _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x1c/0x28 [ 15.090470][ T1] other info that might help us debug this: [ 15.090477][ T1] context-{5:5} [ 15.090485][ T1] 3 locks held by swapper/0/1: [ 15.090497][ T1] #0: c2ff0001816de1a0 (&dev->mutex){....}-{4:4}, at: __device_driver_lock+0x98/0x104 [ 15.090553][ T1] #1: ffff90001485b4b8 (irq_domain_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: irq_domain_associate+0xbc/0x6d4 [ 15.090606][ T1] #2: 4bff000185d7a8e0 (lock_class){....}-{2:2}, at: _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x1c/0x28 [ 15.090654][ T1] stack backtrace: [ 15.090661][ T1] CPU: 4 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.10.59-rt52-00983-g186a6841c682-dirty #3 [ 15.090682][ T1] Hardware name: Horizon Robotics Journey 5 DVB (DT) [ 15.090692][ T1] Call trace: ...... [ 15.090811][ T1] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x1c/0x28 [ 15.090828][ T1] dwapb_irq_ack+0xb4/0x300 [ 15.090846][ T1] __irq_do_set_handler+0x494/0xb2c [ 15.090864][ T1] __irq_set_handler+0x74/0x114 [ 15.090881][ T1] irq_set_chip_and_handler_name+0x44/0x58 [ 15.090900][ T1] gpiochip_irq_map+0x210/0x644 Signed-off-by: Schspa Shi <schspa@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Acked-by: Doug Berger <opendmb@gmail.com> Acked-by: Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>
2022-04-19 04:28:10 +03:00
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&gs->gc.bgpio_lock, flags);
if (fall) {
val = readl(gs->gpio_io + YU_GPIO_CAUSE_FALL_EN);
val |= BIT(offset);
writel(val, gs->gpio_io + YU_GPIO_CAUSE_FALL_EN);
}
if (rise) {
val = readl(gs->gpio_io + YU_GPIO_CAUSE_RISE_EN);
val |= BIT(offset);
writel(val, gs->gpio_io + YU_GPIO_CAUSE_RISE_EN);
}
gpio: use raw spinlock for gpio chip shadowed data In case of PREEMPT_RT, there is a raw_spinlock -> spinlock dependency as the lockdep report shows. __irq_set_handler irq_get_desc_buslock __irq_get_desc_lock raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&desc->lock, *flags); // raw spinlock get here __irq_do_set_handler mask_ack_irq dwapb_irq_ack spin_lock_irqsave(&gc->bgpio_lock, flags); // sleep able spinlock irq_put_desc_busunlock Replace with a raw lock to avoid BUGs. This lock is only used to access registers, and It's safe to replace with the raw lock without bad influence. [ 15.090359][ T1] ============================= [ 15.090365][ T1] [ BUG: Invalid wait context ] [ 15.090373][ T1] 5.10.59-rt52-00983-g186a6841c682-dirty #3 Not tainted [ 15.090386][ T1] ----------------------------- [ 15.090392][ T1] swapper/0/1 is trying to lock: [ 15.090402][ T1] 70ff00018507c188 (&gc->bgpio_lock){....}-{3:3}, at: _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x1c/0x28 [ 15.090470][ T1] other info that might help us debug this: [ 15.090477][ T1] context-{5:5} [ 15.090485][ T1] 3 locks held by swapper/0/1: [ 15.090497][ T1] #0: c2ff0001816de1a0 (&dev->mutex){....}-{4:4}, at: __device_driver_lock+0x98/0x104 [ 15.090553][ T1] #1: ffff90001485b4b8 (irq_domain_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: irq_domain_associate+0xbc/0x6d4 [ 15.090606][ T1] #2: 4bff000185d7a8e0 (lock_class){....}-{2:2}, at: _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x1c/0x28 [ 15.090654][ T1] stack backtrace: [ 15.090661][ T1] CPU: 4 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.10.59-rt52-00983-g186a6841c682-dirty #3 [ 15.090682][ T1] Hardware name: Horizon Robotics Journey 5 DVB (DT) [ 15.090692][ T1] Call trace: ...... [ 15.090811][ T1] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x1c/0x28 [ 15.090828][ T1] dwapb_irq_ack+0xb4/0x300 [ 15.090846][ T1] __irq_do_set_handler+0x494/0xb2c [ 15.090864][ T1] __irq_set_handler+0x74/0x114 [ 15.090881][ T1] irq_set_chip_and_handler_name+0x44/0x58 [ 15.090900][ T1] gpiochip_irq_map+0x210/0x644 Signed-off-by: Schspa Shi <schspa@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Acked-by: Doug Berger <opendmb@gmail.com> Acked-by: Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>
2022-04-19 04:28:10 +03:00
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&gs->gc.bgpio_lock, flags);
return 0;
}
/* BlueField-2 GPIO driver initialization routine. */
static int
mlxbf2_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
struct mlxbf2_gpio_context *gs;
struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
struct gpio_irq_chip *girq;
struct gpio_chip *gc;
unsigned int npins;
const char *name;
int ret, irq;
name = dev_name(dev);
gs = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*gs), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!gs)
return -ENOMEM;
/* YU GPIO block address */
gs->gpio_io = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0);
if (IS_ERR(gs->gpio_io))
return PTR_ERR(gs->gpio_io);
ret = mlxbf2_gpio_get_lock_res(pdev);
if (ret) {
dev_err(dev, "Failed to get yu_arm_gpio_lock resource\n");
return ret;
}
if (device_property_read_u32(dev, "npins", &npins))
npins = MLXBF2_GPIO_MAX_PINS_PER_BLOCK;
gc = &gs->gc;
ret = bgpio_init(gc, dev, 4,
gs->gpio_io + YU_GPIO_DATAIN,
gs->gpio_io + YU_GPIO_DATASET,
gs->gpio_io + YU_GPIO_DATACLEAR,
NULL,
NULL,
0);
if (ret) {
dev_err(dev, "bgpio_init failed\n");
return ret;
}
gc->direction_input = mlxbf2_gpio_direction_input;
gc->direction_output = mlxbf2_gpio_direction_output;
gc->ngpio = npins;
gc->owner = THIS_MODULE;
irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
if (irq >= 0) {
gs->irq_chip.name = name;
gs->irq_chip.irq_set_type = mlxbf2_gpio_irq_set_type;
gs->irq_chip.irq_enable = mlxbf2_gpio_irq_enable;
gs->irq_chip.irq_disable = mlxbf2_gpio_irq_disable;
girq = &gs->gc.irq;
girq->chip = &gs->irq_chip;
girq->handler = handle_simple_irq;
girq->default_type = IRQ_TYPE_NONE;
/* This will let us handle the parent IRQ in the driver */
girq->num_parents = 0;
girq->parents = NULL;
girq->parent_handler = NULL;
/*
* Directly request the irq here instead of passing
* a flow-handler because the irq is shared.
*/
ret = devm_request_irq(dev, irq, mlxbf2_gpio_irq_handler,
IRQF_SHARED, name, gs);
if (ret) {
dev_err(dev, "failed to request IRQ");
return ret;
}
}
platform_set_drvdata(pdev, gs);
ret = devm_gpiochip_add_data(dev, &gs->gc, gs);
if (ret) {
dev_err(dev, "Failed adding memory mapped gpiochip\n");
return ret;
}
return 0;
}
static int __maybe_unused mlxbf2_gpio_suspend(struct device *dev)
{
struct mlxbf2_gpio_context *gs = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
gs->csave_regs->gpio_mode0 = readl(gs->gpio_io +
YU_GPIO_MODE0);
gs->csave_regs->gpio_mode1 = readl(gs->gpio_io +
YU_GPIO_MODE1);
return 0;
}
static int __maybe_unused mlxbf2_gpio_resume(struct device *dev)
{
struct mlxbf2_gpio_context *gs = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
writel(gs->csave_regs->gpio_mode0, gs->gpio_io +
YU_GPIO_MODE0);
writel(gs->csave_regs->gpio_mode1, gs->gpio_io +
YU_GPIO_MODE1);
return 0;
}
static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(mlxbf2_pm_ops, mlxbf2_gpio_suspend, mlxbf2_gpio_resume);
static const struct acpi_device_id __maybe_unused mlxbf2_gpio_acpi_match[] = {
{ "MLNXBF22", 0 },
{},
};
MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, mlxbf2_gpio_acpi_match);
static struct platform_driver mlxbf2_gpio_driver = {
.driver = {
.name = "mlxbf2_gpio",
.acpi_match_table = mlxbf2_gpio_acpi_match,
.pm = &mlxbf2_pm_ops,
},
.probe = mlxbf2_gpio_probe,
};
module_platform_driver(mlxbf2_gpio_driver);
MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Mellanox BlueField-2 GPIO Driver");
MODULE_AUTHOR("Asmaa Mnebhi <asmaa@nvidia.com>");
MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");