WSL2-Linux-Kernel/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c

2428 строки
55 KiB
C
Исходник Обычный вид История

/* xfrm_user.c: User interface to configure xfrm engine.
*
* Copyright (C) 2002 David S. Miller (davem@redhat.com)
*
* Changes:
* Mitsuru KANDA @USAGI
* Kazunori MIYAZAWA @USAGI
* Kunihiro Ishiguro <kunihiro@ipinfusion.com>
* IPv6 support
[LSM-IPSec]: Security association restriction. This patch series implements per packet access control via the extension of the Linux Security Modules (LSM) interface by hooks in the XFRM and pfkey subsystems that leverage IPSec security associations to label packets. Extensions to the SELinux LSM are included that leverage the patch for this purpose. This patch implements the changes necessary to the XFRM subsystem, pfkey interface, ipv4/ipv6, and xfrm_user interface to restrict a socket to use only authorized security associations (or no security association) to send/receive network packets. Patch purpose: The patch is designed to enable access control per packets based on the strongly authenticated IPSec security association. Such access controls augment the existing ones based on network interface and IP address. The former are very coarse-grained, and the latter can be spoofed. By using IPSec, the system can control access to remote hosts based on cryptographic keys generated using the IPSec mechanism. This enables access control on a per-machine basis or per-application if the remote machine is running the same mechanism and trusted to enforce the access control policy. Patch design approach: The overall approach is that policy (xfrm_policy) entries set by user-level programs (e.g., setkey for ipsec-tools) are extended with a security context that is used at policy selection time in the XFRM subsystem to restrict the sockets that can send/receive packets via security associations (xfrm_states) that are built from those policies. A presentation available at www.selinux-symposium.org/2005/presentations/session2/2-3-jaeger.pdf from the SELinux symposium describes the overall approach. Patch implementation details: On output, the policy retrieved (via xfrm_policy_lookup or xfrm_sk_policy_lookup) must be authorized for the security context of the socket and the same security context is required for resultant security association (retrieved or negotiated via racoon in ipsec-tools). This is enforced in xfrm_state_find. On input, the policy retrieved must also be authorized for the socket (at __xfrm_policy_check), and the security context of the policy must also match the security association being used. The patch has virtually no impact on packets that do not use IPSec. The existing Netfilter (outgoing) and LSM rcv_skb hooks are used as before. Also, if IPSec is used without security contexts, the impact is minimal. The LSM must allow such policies to be selected for the combination of socket and remote machine, but subsequent IPSec processing proceeds as in the original case. Testing: The pfkey interface is tested using the ipsec-tools. ipsec-tools have been modified (a separate ipsec-tools patch is available for version 0.5) that supports assignment of xfrm_policy entries and security associations with security contexts via setkey and the negotiation using the security contexts via racoon. The xfrm_user interface is tested via ad hoc programs that set security contexts. These programs are also available from me, and contain programs for setting, getting, and deleting policy for testing this interface. Testing of sa functions was done by tracing kernel behavior. Signed-off-by: Trent Jaeger <tjaeger@cse.psu.edu> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2005-12-14 10:12:27 +03:00
*
*/
#include <linux/crypto.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/kernel.h>
#include <linux/types.h>
#include <linux/slab.h>
#include <linux/socket.h>
#include <linux/string.h>
#include <linux/net.h>
#include <linux/skbuff.h>
#include <linux/pfkeyv2.h>
#include <linux/ipsec.h>
#include <linux/init.h>
#include <linux/security.h>
#include <net/sock.h>
#include <net/xfrm.h>
#include <net/netlink.h>
#include <asm/uaccess.h>
#if defined(CONFIG_IPV6) || defined(CONFIG_IPV6_MODULE)
#include <linux/in6.h>
#endif
static inline int alg_len(struct xfrm_algo *alg)
{
return sizeof(*alg) + ((alg->alg_key_len + 7) / 8);
}
static int verify_one_alg(struct nlattr **attrs, enum xfrm_attr_type_t type)
{
struct nlattr *rt = attrs[type];
struct xfrm_algo *algp;
if (!rt)
return 0;
algp = nla_data(rt);
if (nla_len(rt) < alg_len(algp))
return -EINVAL;
switch (type) {
case XFRMA_ALG_AUTH:
if (!algp->alg_key_len &&
strcmp(algp->alg_name, "digest_null") != 0)
return -EINVAL;
break;
case XFRMA_ALG_CRYPT:
if (!algp->alg_key_len &&
strcmp(algp->alg_name, "cipher_null") != 0)
return -EINVAL;
break;
case XFRMA_ALG_COMP:
/* Zero length keys are legal. */
break;
default:
return -EINVAL;
}
algp->alg_name[CRYPTO_MAX_ALG_NAME - 1] = '\0';
return 0;
}
static void verify_one_addr(struct nlattr **attrs, enum xfrm_attr_type_t type,
xfrm_address_t **addrp)
{
struct nlattr *rt = attrs[type];
if (rt && addrp)
*addrp = nla_data(rt);
}
[LSM-IPSec]: Security association restriction. This patch series implements per packet access control via the extension of the Linux Security Modules (LSM) interface by hooks in the XFRM and pfkey subsystems that leverage IPSec security associations to label packets. Extensions to the SELinux LSM are included that leverage the patch for this purpose. This patch implements the changes necessary to the XFRM subsystem, pfkey interface, ipv4/ipv6, and xfrm_user interface to restrict a socket to use only authorized security associations (or no security association) to send/receive network packets. Patch purpose: The patch is designed to enable access control per packets based on the strongly authenticated IPSec security association. Such access controls augment the existing ones based on network interface and IP address. The former are very coarse-grained, and the latter can be spoofed. By using IPSec, the system can control access to remote hosts based on cryptographic keys generated using the IPSec mechanism. This enables access control on a per-machine basis or per-application if the remote machine is running the same mechanism and trusted to enforce the access control policy. Patch design approach: The overall approach is that policy (xfrm_policy) entries set by user-level programs (e.g., setkey for ipsec-tools) are extended with a security context that is used at policy selection time in the XFRM subsystem to restrict the sockets that can send/receive packets via security associations (xfrm_states) that are built from those policies. A presentation available at www.selinux-symposium.org/2005/presentations/session2/2-3-jaeger.pdf from the SELinux symposium describes the overall approach. Patch implementation details: On output, the policy retrieved (via xfrm_policy_lookup or xfrm_sk_policy_lookup) must be authorized for the security context of the socket and the same security context is required for resultant security association (retrieved or negotiated via racoon in ipsec-tools). This is enforced in xfrm_state_find. On input, the policy retrieved must also be authorized for the socket (at __xfrm_policy_check), and the security context of the policy must also match the security association being used. The patch has virtually no impact on packets that do not use IPSec. The existing Netfilter (outgoing) and LSM rcv_skb hooks are used as before. Also, if IPSec is used without security contexts, the impact is minimal. The LSM must allow such policies to be selected for the combination of socket and remote machine, but subsequent IPSec processing proceeds as in the original case. Testing: The pfkey interface is tested using the ipsec-tools. ipsec-tools have been modified (a separate ipsec-tools patch is available for version 0.5) that supports assignment of xfrm_policy entries and security associations with security contexts via setkey and the negotiation using the security contexts via racoon. The xfrm_user interface is tested via ad hoc programs that set security contexts. These programs are also available from me, and contain programs for setting, getting, and deleting policy for testing this interface. Testing of sa functions was done by tracing kernel behavior. Signed-off-by: Trent Jaeger <tjaeger@cse.psu.edu> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2005-12-14 10:12:27 +03:00
static inline int verify_sec_ctx_len(struct nlattr **attrs)
[LSM-IPSec]: Security association restriction. This patch series implements per packet access control via the extension of the Linux Security Modules (LSM) interface by hooks in the XFRM and pfkey subsystems that leverage IPSec security associations to label packets. Extensions to the SELinux LSM are included that leverage the patch for this purpose. This patch implements the changes necessary to the XFRM subsystem, pfkey interface, ipv4/ipv6, and xfrm_user interface to restrict a socket to use only authorized security associations (or no security association) to send/receive network packets. Patch purpose: The patch is designed to enable access control per packets based on the strongly authenticated IPSec security association. Such access controls augment the existing ones based on network interface and IP address. The former are very coarse-grained, and the latter can be spoofed. By using IPSec, the system can control access to remote hosts based on cryptographic keys generated using the IPSec mechanism. This enables access control on a per-machine basis or per-application if the remote machine is running the same mechanism and trusted to enforce the access control policy. Patch design approach: The overall approach is that policy (xfrm_policy) entries set by user-level programs (e.g., setkey for ipsec-tools) are extended with a security context that is used at policy selection time in the XFRM subsystem to restrict the sockets that can send/receive packets via security associations (xfrm_states) that are built from those policies. A presentation available at www.selinux-symposium.org/2005/presentations/session2/2-3-jaeger.pdf from the SELinux symposium describes the overall approach. Patch implementation details: On output, the policy retrieved (via xfrm_policy_lookup or xfrm_sk_policy_lookup) must be authorized for the security context of the socket and the same security context is required for resultant security association (retrieved or negotiated via racoon in ipsec-tools). This is enforced in xfrm_state_find. On input, the policy retrieved must also be authorized for the socket (at __xfrm_policy_check), and the security context of the policy must also match the security association being used. The patch has virtually no impact on packets that do not use IPSec. The existing Netfilter (outgoing) and LSM rcv_skb hooks are used as before. Also, if IPSec is used without security contexts, the impact is minimal. The LSM must allow such policies to be selected for the combination of socket and remote machine, but subsequent IPSec processing proceeds as in the original case. Testing: The pfkey interface is tested using the ipsec-tools. ipsec-tools have been modified (a separate ipsec-tools patch is available for version 0.5) that supports assignment of xfrm_policy entries and security associations with security contexts via setkey and the negotiation using the security contexts via racoon. The xfrm_user interface is tested via ad hoc programs that set security contexts. These programs are also available from me, and contain programs for setting, getting, and deleting policy for testing this interface. Testing of sa functions was done by tracing kernel behavior. Signed-off-by: Trent Jaeger <tjaeger@cse.psu.edu> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2005-12-14 10:12:27 +03:00
{
struct nlattr *rt = attrs[XFRMA_SEC_CTX];
[LSM-IPSec]: Security association restriction. This patch series implements per packet access control via the extension of the Linux Security Modules (LSM) interface by hooks in the XFRM and pfkey subsystems that leverage IPSec security associations to label packets. Extensions to the SELinux LSM are included that leverage the patch for this purpose. This patch implements the changes necessary to the XFRM subsystem, pfkey interface, ipv4/ipv6, and xfrm_user interface to restrict a socket to use only authorized security associations (or no security association) to send/receive network packets. Patch purpose: The patch is designed to enable access control per packets based on the strongly authenticated IPSec security association. Such access controls augment the existing ones based on network interface and IP address. The former are very coarse-grained, and the latter can be spoofed. By using IPSec, the system can control access to remote hosts based on cryptographic keys generated using the IPSec mechanism. This enables access control on a per-machine basis or per-application if the remote machine is running the same mechanism and trusted to enforce the access control policy. Patch design approach: The overall approach is that policy (xfrm_policy) entries set by user-level programs (e.g., setkey for ipsec-tools) are extended with a security context that is used at policy selection time in the XFRM subsystem to restrict the sockets that can send/receive packets via security associations (xfrm_states) that are built from those policies. A presentation available at www.selinux-symposium.org/2005/presentations/session2/2-3-jaeger.pdf from the SELinux symposium describes the overall approach. Patch implementation details: On output, the policy retrieved (via xfrm_policy_lookup or xfrm_sk_policy_lookup) must be authorized for the security context of the socket and the same security context is required for resultant security association (retrieved or negotiated via racoon in ipsec-tools). This is enforced in xfrm_state_find. On input, the policy retrieved must also be authorized for the socket (at __xfrm_policy_check), and the security context of the policy must also match the security association being used. The patch has virtually no impact on packets that do not use IPSec. The existing Netfilter (outgoing) and LSM rcv_skb hooks are used as before. Also, if IPSec is used without security contexts, the impact is minimal. The LSM must allow such policies to be selected for the combination of socket and remote machine, but subsequent IPSec processing proceeds as in the original case. Testing: The pfkey interface is tested using the ipsec-tools. ipsec-tools have been modified (a separate ipsec-tools patch is available for version 0.5) that supports assignment of xfrm_policy entries and security associations with security contexts via setkey and the negotiation using the security contexts via racoon. The xfrm_user interface is tested via ad hoc programs that set security contexts. These programs are also available from me, and contain programs for setting, getting, and deleting policy for testing this interface. Testing of sa functions was done by tracing kernel behavior. Signed-off-by: Trent Jaeger <tjaeger@cse.psu.edu> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2005-12-14 10:12:27 +03:00
struct xfrm_user_sec_ctx *uctx;
if (!rt)
return 0;
uctx = nla_data(rt);
if (uctx->len != (sizeof(struct xfrm_user_sec_ctx) + uctx->ctx_len))
[LSM-IPSec]: Security association restriction. This patch series implements per packet access control via the extension of the Linux Security Modules (LSM) interface by hooks in the XFRM and pfkey subsystems that leverage IPSec security associations to label packets. Extensions to the SELinux LSM are included that leverage the patch for this purpose. This patch implements the changes necessary to the XFRM subsystem, pfkey interface, ipv4/ipv6, and xfrm_user interface to restrict a socket to use only authorized security associations (or no security association) to send/receive network packets. Patch purpose: The patch is designed to enable access control per packets based on the strongly authenticated IPSec security association. Such access controls augment the existing ones based on network interface and IP address. The former are very coarse-grained, and the latter can be spoofed. By using IPSec, the system can control access to remote hosts based on cryptographic keys generated using the IPSec mechanism. This enables access control on a per-machine basis or per-application if the remote machine is running the same mechanism and trusted to enforce the access control policy. Patch design approach: The overall approach is that policy (xfrm_policy) entries set by user-level programs (e.g., setkey for ipsec-tools) are extended with a security context that is used at policy selection time in the XFRM subsystem to restrict the sockets that can send/receive packets via security associations (xfrm_states) that are built from those policies. A presentation available at www.selinux-symposium.org/2005/presentations/session2/2-3-jaeger.pdf from the SELinux symposium describes the overall approach. Patch implementation details: On output, the policy retrieved (via xfrm_policy_lookup or xfrm_sk_policy_lookup) must be authorized for the security context of the socket and the same security context is required for resultant security association (retrieved or negotiated via racoon in ipsec-tools). This is enforced in xfrm_state_find. On input, the policy retrieved must also be authorized for the socket (at __xfrm_policy_check), and the security context of the policy must also match the security association being used. The patch has virtually no impact on packets that do not use IPSec. The existing Netfilter (outgoing) and LSM rcv_skb hooks are used as before. Also, if IPSec is used without security contexts, the impact is minimal. The LSM must allow such policies to be selected for the combination of socket and remote machine, but subsequent IPSec processing proceeds as in the original case. Testing: The pfkey interface is tested using the ipsec-tools. ipsec-tools have been modified (a separate ipsec-tools patch is available for version 0.5) that supports assignment of xfrm_policy entries and security associations with security contexts via setkey and the negotiation using the security contexts via racoon. The xfrm_user interface is tested via ad hoc programs that set security contexts. These programs are also available from me, and contain programs for setting, getting, and deleting policy for testing this interface. Testing of sa functions was done by tracing kernel behavior. Signed-off-by: Trent Jaeger <tjaeger@cse.psu.edu> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2005-12-14 10:12:27 +03:00
return -EINVAL;
return 0;
}
static int verify_newsa_info(struct xfrm_usersa_info *p,
struct nlattr **attrs)
{
int err;
err = -EINVAL;
switch (p->family) {
case AF_INET:
break;
case AF_INET6:
#if defined(CONFIG_IPV6) || defined(CONFIG_IPV6_MODULE)
break;
#else
err = -EAFNOSUPPORT;
goto out;
#endif
default:
goto out;
}
err = -EINVAL;
switch (p->id.proto) {
case IPPROTO_AH:
if (!attrs[XFRMA_ALG_AUTH] ||
attrs[XFRMA_ALG_CRYPT] ||
attrs[XFRMA_ALG_COMP])
goto out;
break;
case IPPROTO_ESP:
if ((!attrs[XFRMA_ALG_AUTH] &&
!attrs[XFRMA_ALG_CRYPT]) ||
attrs[XFRMA_ALG_COMP])
goto out;
break;
case IPPROTO_COMP:
if (!attrs[XFRMA_ALG_COMP] ||
attrs[XFRMA_ALG_AUTH] ||
attrs[XFRMA_ALG_CRYPT])
goto out;
break;
#if defined(CONFIG_IPV6) || defined(CONFIG_IPV6_MODULE)
case IPPROTO_DSTOPTS:
case IPPROTO_ROUTING:
if (attrs[XFRMA_ALG_COMP] ||
attrs[XFRMA_ALG_AUTH] ||
attrs[XFRMA_ALG_CRYPT] ||
attrs[XFRMA_ENCAP] ||
attrs[XFRMA_SEC_CTX] ||
!attrs[XFRMA_COADDR])
goto out;
break;
#endif
default:
goto out;
}
if ((err = verify_one_alg(attrs, XFRMA_ALG_AUTH)))
goto out;
if ((err = verify_one_alg(attrs, XFRMA_ALG_CRYPT)))
goto out;
if ((err = verify_one_alg(attrs, XFRMA_ALG_COMP)))
goto out;
if ((err = verify_sec_ctx_len(attrs)))
[LSM-IPSec]: Security association restriction. This patch series implements per packet access control via the extension of the Linux Security Modules (LSM) interface by hooks in the XFRM and pfkey subsystems that leverage IPSec security associations to label packets. Extensions to the SELinux LSM are included that leverage the patch for this purpose. This patch implements the changes necessary to the XFRM subsystem, pfkey interface, ipv4/ipv6, and xfrm_user interface to restrict a socket to use only authorized security associations (or no security association) to send/receive network packets. Patch purpose: The patch is designed to enable access control per packets based on the strongly authenticated IPSec security association. Such access controls augment the existing ones based on network interface and IP address. The former are very coarse-grained, and the latter can be spoofed. By using IPSec, the system can control access to remote hosts based on cryptographic keys generated using the IPSec mechanism. This enables access control on a per-machine basis or per-application if the remote machine is running the same mechanism and trusted to enforce the access control policy. Patch design approach: The overall approach is that policy (xfrm_policy) entries set by user-level programs (e.g., setkey for ipsec-tools) are extended with a security context that is used at policy selection time in the XFRM subsystem to restrict the sockets that can send/receive packets via security associations (xfrm_states) that are built from those policies. A presentation available at www.selinux-symposium.org/2005/presentations/session2/2-3-jaeger.pdf from the SELinux symposium describes the overall approach. Patch implementation details: On output, the policy retrieved (via xfrm_policy_lookup or xfrm_sk_policy_lookup) must be authorized for the security context of the socket and the same security context is required for resultant security association (retrieved or negotiated via racoon in ipsec-tools). This is enforced in xfrm_state_find. On input, the policy retrieved must also be authorized for the socket (at __xfrm_policy_check), and the security context of the policy must also match the security association being used. The patch has virtually no impact on packets that do not use IPSec. The existing Netfilter (outgoing) and LSM rcv_skb hooks are used as before. Also, if IPSec is used without security contexts, the impact is minimal. The LSM must allow such policies to be selected for the combination of socket and remote machine, but subsequent IPSec processing proceeds as in the original case. Testing: The pfkey interface is tested using the ipsec-tools. ipsec-tools have been modified (a separate ipsec-tools patch is available for version 0.5) that supports assignment of xfrm_policy entries and security associations with security contexts via setkey and the negotiation using the security contexts via racoon. The xfrm_user interface is tested via ad hoc programs that set security contexts. These programs are also available from me, and contain programs for setting, getting, and deleting policy for testing this interface. Testing of sa functions was done by tracing kernel behavior. Signed-off-by: Trent Jaeger <tjaeger@cse.psu.edu> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2005-12-14 10:12:27 +03:00
goto out;
err = -EINVAL;
switch (p->mode) {
case XFRM_MODE_TRANSPORT:
case XFRM_MODE_TUNNEL:
case XFRM_MODE_ROUTEOPTIMIZATION:
case XFRM_MODE_BEET:
break;
default:
goto out;
}
err = 0;
out:
return err;
}
static int attach_one_algo(struct xfrm_algo **algpp, u8 *props,
struct xfrm_algo_desc *(*get_byname)(char *, int),
struct nlattr *rta)
{
struct xfrm_algo *p, *ualg;
struct xfrm_algo_desc *algo;
if (!rta)
return 0;
ualg = nla_data(rta);
algo = get_byname(ualg->alg_name, 1);
if (!algo)
return -ENOSYS;
*props = algo->desc.sadb_alg_id;
p = kmemdup(ualg, alg_len(ualg), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!p)
return -ENOMEM;
strcpy(p->alg_name, algo->name);
*algpp = p;
return 0;
}
[IPSEC] XFRM_USER: kernel panic when large security contexts in ACQUIRE When sending a security context of 50+ characters in an ACQUIRE message, following kernel panic occurred. kernel BUG in xfrm_send_acquire at net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c:1781! cpu 0x3: Vector: 700 (Program Check) at [c0000000421bb2e0] pc: c00000000033b074: .xfrm_send_acquire+0x240/0x2c8 lr: c00000000033b014: .xfrm_send_acquire+0x1e0/0x2c8 sp: c0000000421bb560 msr: 8000000000029032 current = 0xc00000000fce8f00 paca = 0xc000000000464b00 pid = 2303, comm = ping kernel BUG in xfrm_send_acquire at net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c:1781! enter ? for help 3:mon> t [c0000000421bb650] c00000000033538c .km_query+0x6c/0xec [c0000000421bb6f0] c000000000337374 .xfrm_state_find+0x7f4/0xb88 [c0000000421bb7f0] c000000000332350 .xfrm_tmpl_resolve+0xc4/0x21c [c0000000421bb8d0] c0000000003326e8 .xfrm_lookup+0x1a0/0x5b0 [c0000000421bba00] c0000000002e6ea0 .ip_route_output_flow+0x88/0xb4 [c0000000421bbaa0] c0000000003106d8 .ip4_datagram_connect+0x218/0x374 [c0000000421bbbd0] c00000000031bc00 .inet_dgram_connect+0xac/0xd4 [c0000000421bbc60] c0000000002b11ac .sys_connect+0xd8/0x120 [c0000000421bbd90] c0000000002d38d0 .compat_sys_socketcall+0xdc/0x214 [c0000000421bbe30] c00000000000869c syscall_exit+0x0/0x40 --- Exception: c00 (System Call) at 0000000007f0ca9c SP (fc0ef8f0) is in userspace We are using size of security context from xfrm_policy to determine how much space to alloc skb and then putting security context from xfrm_state into skb. Should have been using size of security context from xfrm_state to alloc skb. Following fix does that Signed-off-by: Joy Latten <latten@austin.ibm.com> Acked-by: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2007-04-14 03:14:35 +04:00
static inline int xfrm_user_sec_ctx_size(struct xfrm_sec_ctx *xfrm_ctx)
[LSM-IPSec]: Security association restriction. This patch series implements per packet access control via the extension of the Linux Security Modules (LSM) interface by hooks in the XFRM and pfkey subsystems that leverage IPSec security associations to label packets. Extensions to the SELinux LSM are included that leverage the patch for this purpose. This patch implements the changes necessary to the XFRM subsystem, pfkey interface, ipv4/ipv6, and xfrm_user interface to restrict a socket to use only authorized security associations (or no security association) to send/receive network packets. Patch purpose: The patch is designed to enable access control per packets based on the strongly authenticated IPSec security association. Such access controls augment the existing ones based on network interface and IP address. The former are very coarse-grained, and the latter can be spoofed. By using IPSec, the system can control access to remote hosts based on cryptographic keys generated using the IPSec mechanism. This enables access control on a per-machine basis or per-application if the remote machine is running the same mechanism and trusted to enforce the access control policy. Patch design approach: The overall approach is that policy (xfrm_policy) entries set by user-level programs (e.g., setkey for ipsec-tools) are extended with a security context that is used at policy selection time in the XFRM subsystem to restrict the sockets that can send/receive packets via security associations (xfrm_states) that are built from those policies. A presentation available at www.selinux-symposium.org/2005/presentations/session2/2-3-jaeger.pdf from the SELinux symposium describes the overall approach. Patch implementation details: On output, the policy retrieved (via xfrm_policy_lookup or xfrm_sk_policy_lookup) must be authorized for the security context of the socket and the same security context is required for resultant security association (retrieved or negotiated via racoon in ipsec-tools). This is enforced in xfrm_state_find. On input, the policy retrieved must also be authorized for the socket (at __xfrm_policy_check), and the security context of the policy must also match the security association being used. The patch has virtually no impact on packets that do not use IPSec. The existing Netfilter (outgoing) and LSM rcv_skb hooks are used as before. Also, if IPSec is used without security contexts, the impact is minimal. The LSM must allow such policies to be selected for the combination of socket and remote machine, but subsequent IPSec processing proceeds as in the original case. Testing: The pfkey interface is tested using the ipsec-tools. ipsec-tools have been modified (a separate ipsec-tools patch is available for version 0.5) that supports assignment of xfrm_policy entries and security associations with security contexts via setkey and the negotiation using the security contexts via racoon. The xfrm_user interface is tested via ad hoc programs that set security contexts. These programs are also available from me, and contain programs for setting, getting, and deleting policy for testing this interface. Testing of sa functions was done by tracing kernel behavior. Signed-off-by: Trent Jaeger <tjaeger@cse.psu.edu> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2005-12-14 10:12:27 +03:00
{
int len = 0;
if (xfrm_ctx) {
len += sizeof(struct xfrm_user_sec_ctx);
len += xfrm_ctx->ctx_len;
}
return len;
}
static void copy_from_user_state(struct xfrm_state *x, struct xfrm_usersa_info *p)
{
memcpy(&x->id, &p->id, sizeof(x->id));
memcpy(&x->sel, &p->sel, sizeof(x->sel));
memcpy(&x->lft, &p->lft, sizeof(x->lft));
x->props.mode = p->mode;
x->props.replay_window = p->replay_window;
x->props.reqid = p->reqid;
x->props.family = p->family;
memcpy(&x->props.saddr, &p->saddr, sizeof(x->props.saddr));
x->props.flags = p->flags;
/*
* Set inner address family if the KM left it as zero.
* See comment in validate_tmpl.
*/
if (!x->sel.family)
x->sel.family = p->family;
}
/*
* someday when pfkey also has support, we could have the code
* somehow made shareable and move it to xfrm_state.c - JHS
*
*/
static void xfrm_update_ae_params(struct xfrm_state *x, struct nlattr **attrs)
{
struct nlattr *rp = attrs[XFRMA_REPLAY_VAL];
struct nlattr *lt = attrs[XFRMA_LTIME_VAL];
struct nlattr *et = attrs[XFRMA_ETIMER_THRESH];
struct nlattr *rt = attrs[XFRMA_REPLAY_THRESH];
if (rp) {
struct xfrm_replay_state *replay;
replay = nla_data(rp);
memcpy(&x->replay, replay, sizeof(*replay));
memcpy(&x->preplay, replay, sizeof(*replay));
}
if (lt) {
struct xfrm_lifetime_cur *ltime;
ltime = nla_data(lt);
x->curlft.bytes = ltime->bytes;
x->curlft.packets = ltime->packets;
x->curlft.add_time = ltime->add_time;
x->curlft.use_time = ltime->use_time;
}
if (et)
x->replay_maxage = nla_get_u32(et);
if (rt)
x->replay_maxdiff = nla_get_u32(rt);
}
static struct xfrm_state *xfrm_state_construct(struct xfrm_usersa_info *p,
struct nlattr **attrs,
int *errp)
{
struct xfrm_state *x = xfrm_state_alloc();
int err = -ENOMEM;
if (!x)
goto error_no_put;
copy_from_user_state(x, p);
if ((err = attach_one_algo(&x->aalg, &x->props.aalgo,
xfrm_aalg_get_byname,
attrs[XFRMA_ALG_AUTH])))
goto error;
if ((err = attach_one_algo(&x->ealg, &x->props.ealgo,
xfrm_ealg_get_byname,
attrs[XFRMA_ALG_CRYPT])))
goto error;
if ((err = attach_one_algo(&x->calg, &x->props.calgo,
xfrm_calg_get_byname,
attrs[XFRMA_ALG_COMP])))
goto error;
if (attrs[XFRMA_ENCAP]) {
x->encap = kmemdup(nla_data(attrs[XFRMA_ENCAP]),
sizeof(*x->encap), GFP_KERNEL);
if (x->encap == NULL)
goto error;
}
if (attrs[XFRMA_COADDR]) {
x->coaddr = kmemdup(nla_data(attrs[XFRMA_COADDR]),
sizeof(*x->coaddr), GFP_KERNEL);
if (x->coaddr == NULL)
goto error;
}
err = xfrm_init_state(x);
if (err)
goto error;
if (attrs[XFRMA_SEC_CTX] &&
security_xfrm_state_alloc(x, nla_data(attrs[XFRMA_SEC_CTX])))
[LSM-IPSec]: Security association restriction. This patch series implements per packet access control via the extension of the Linux Security Modules (LSM) interface by hooks in the XFRM and pfkey subsystems that leverage IPSec security associations to label packets. Extensions to the SELinux LSM are included that leverage the patch for this purpose. This patch implements the changes necessary to the XFRM subsystem, pfkey interface, ipv4/ipv6, and xfrm_user interface to restrict a socket to use only authorized security associations (or no security association) to send/receive network packets. Patch purpose: The patch is designed to enable access control per packets based on the strongly authenticated IPSec security association. Such access controls augment the existing ones based on network interface and IP address. The former are very coarse-grained, and the latter can be spoofed. By using IPSec, the system can control access to remote hosts based on cryptographic keys generated using the IPSec mechanism. This enables access control on a per-machine basis or per-application if the remote machine is running the same mechanism and trusted to enforce the access control policy. Patch design approach: The overall approach is that policy (xfrm_policy) entries set by user-level programs (e.g., setkey for ipsec-tools) are extended with a security context that is used at policy selection time in the XFRM subsystem to restrict the sockets that can send/receive packets via security associations (xfrm_states) that are built from those policies. A presentation available at www.selinux-symposium.org/2005/presentations/session2/2-3-jaeger.pdf from the SELinux symposium describes the overall approach. Patch implementation details: On output, the policy retrieved (via xfrm_policy_lookup or xfrm_sk_policy_lookup) must be authorized for the security context of the socket and the same security context is required for resultant security association (retrieved or negotiated via racoon in ipsec-tools). This is enforced in xfrm_state_find. On input, the policy retrieved must also be authorized for the socket (at __xfrm_policy_check), and the security context of the policy must also match the security association being used. The patch has virtually no impact on packets that do not use IPSec. The existing Netfilter (outgoing) and LSM rcv_skb hooks are used as before. Also, if IPSec is used without security contexts, the impact is minimal. The LSM must allow such policies to be selected for the combination of socket and remote machine, but subsequent IPSec processing proceeds as in the original case. Testing: The pfkey interface is tested using the ipsec-tools. ipsec-tools have been modified (a separate ipsec-tools patch is available for version 0.5) that supports assignment of xfrm_policy entries and security associations with security contexts via setkey and the negotiation using the security contexts via racoon. The xfrm_user interface is tested via ad hoc programs that set security contexts. These programs are also available from me, and contain programs for setting, getting, and deleting policy for testing this interface. Testing of sa functions was done by tracing kernel behavior. Signed-off-by: Trent Jaeger <tjaeger@cse.psu.edu> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2005-12-14 10:12:27 +03:00
goto error;
x->km.seq = p->seq;
x->replay_maxdiff = sysctl_xfrm_aevent_rseqth;
/* sysctl_xfrm_aevent_etime is in 100ms units */
x->replay_maxage = (sysctl_xfrm_aevent_etime*HZ)/XFRM_AE_ETH_M;
x->preplay.bitmap = 0;
x->preplay.seq = x->replay.seq+x->replay_maxdiff;
x->preplay.oseq = x->replay.oseq +x->replay_maxdiff;
/* override default values from above */
xfrm_update_ae_params(x, attrs);
return x;
error:
x->km.state = XFRM_STATE_DEAD;
xfrm_state_put(x);
error_no_put:
*errp = err;
return NULL;
}
static int xfrm_add_sa(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
struct nlattr **attrs)
{
struct xfrm_usersa_info *p = nlmsg_data(nlh);
struct xfrm_state *x;
int err;
struct km_event c;
err = verify_newsa_info(p, attrs);
if (err)
return err;
x = xfrm_state_construct(p, attrs, &err);
if (!x)
return err;
xfrm_state_hold(x);
if (nlh->nlmsg_type == XFRM_MSG_NEWSA)
err = xfrm_state_add(x);
else
err = xfrm_state_update(x);
xfrm_audit_state_add(x, err ? 0 : 1, NETLINK_CB(skb).loginuid,
NETLINK_CB(skb).sid);
if (err < 0) {
x->km.state = XFRM_STATE_DEAD;
__xfrm_state_put(x);
goto out;
}
c.seq = nlh->nlmsg_seq;
c.pid = nlh->nlmsg_pid;
c.event = nlh->nlmsg_type;
km_state_notify(x, &c);
out:
xfrm_state_put(x);
return err;
}
static struct xfrm_state *xfrm_user_state_lookup(struct xfrm_usersa_id *p,
struct nlattr **attrs,
int *errp)
{
struct xfrm_state *x = NULL;
int err;
if (xfrm_id_proto_match(p->proto, IPSEC_PROTO_ANY)) {
err = -ESRCH;
x = xfrm_state_lookup(&p->daddr, p->spi, p->proto, p->family);
} else {
xfrm_address_t *saddr = NULL;
verify_one_addr(attrs, XFRMA_SRCADDR, &saddr);
if (!saddr) {
err = -EINVAL;
goto out;
}
err = -ESRCH;
x = xfrm_state_lookup_byaddr(&p->daddr, saddr, p->proto,
p->family);
}
out:
if (!x && errp)
*errp = err;
return x;
}
static int xfrm_del_sa(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
struct nlattr **attrs)
{
struct xfrm_state *x;
int err = -ESRCH;
struct km_event c;
struct xfrm_usersa_id *p = nlmsg_data(nlh);
x = xfrm_user_state_lookup(p, attrs, &err);
if (x == NULL)
return err;
if ((err = security_xfrm_state_delete(x)) != 0)
[LSM-IPsec]: SELinux Authorize This patch contains a fix for the previous patch that adds security contexts to IPsec policies and security associations. In the previous patch, no authorization (besides the check for write permissions to SAD and SPD) is required to delete IPsec policies and security assocations with security contexts. Thus a user authorized to change SAD and SPD can bypass the IPsec policy authorization by simply deleteing policies with security contexts. To fix this security hole, an additional authorization check is added for removing security policies and security associations with security contexts. Note that if no security context is supplied on add or present on policy to be deleted, the SELinux module allows the change unconditionally. The hook is called on deletion when no context is present, which we may want to change. At present, I left it up to the module. LSM changes: The patch adds two new LSM hooks: xfrm_policy_delete and xfrm_state_delete. The new hooks are necessary to authorize deletion of IPsec policies that have security contexts. The existing hooks xfrm_policy_free and xfrm_state_free lack the context to do the authorization, so I decided to split authorization of deletion and memory management of security data, as is typical in the LSM interface. Use: The new delete hooks are checked when xfrm_policy or xfrm_state are deleted by either the xfrm_user interface (xfrm_get_policy, xfrm_del_sa) or the pfkey interface (pfkey_spddelete, pfkey_delete). SELinux changes: The new policy_delete and state_delete functions are added. Signed-off-by: Catherine Zhang <cxzhang@watson.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Trent Jaeger <tjaeger@cse.psu.edu> Acked-by: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2006-06-09 10:39:49 +04:00
goto out;
if (xfrm_state_kern(x)) {
[LSM-IPsec]: SELinux Authorize This patch contains a fix for the previous patch that adds security contexts to IPsec policies and security associations. In the previous patch, no authorization (besides the check for write permissions to SAD and SPD) is required to delete IPsec policies and security assocations with security contexts. Thus a user authorized to change SAD and SPD can bypass the IPsec policy authorization by simply deleteing policies with security contexts. To fix this security hole, an additional authorization check is added for removing security policies and security associations with security contexts. Note that if no security context is supplied on add or present on policy to be deleted, the SELinux module allows the change unconditionally. The hook is called on deletion when no context is present, which we may want to change. At present, I left it up to the module. LSM changes: The patch adds two new LSM hooks: xfrm_policy_delete and xfrm_state_delete. The new hooks are necessary to authorize deletion of IPsec policies that have security contexts. The existing hooks xfrm_policy_free and xfrm_state_free lack the context to do the authorization, so I decided to split authorization of deletion and memory management of security data, as is typical in the LSM interface. Use: The new delete hooks are checked when xfrm_policy or xfrm_state are deleted by either the xfrm_user interface (xfrm_get_policy, xfrm_del_sa) or the pfkey interface (pfkey_spddelete, pfkey_delete). SELinux changes: The new policy_delete and state_delete functions are added. Signed-off-by: Catherine Zhang <cxzhang@watson.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Trent Jaeger <tjaeger@cse.psu.edu> Acked-by: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2006-06-09 10:39:49 +04:00
err = -EPERM;
goto out;
}
err = xfrm_state_delete(x);
[LSM-IPsec]: SELinux Authorize This patch contains a fix for the previous patch that adds security contexts to IPsec policies and security associations. In the previous patch, no authorization (besides the check for write permissions to SAD and SPD) is required to delete IPsec policies and security assocations with security contexts. Thus a user authorized to change SAD and SPD can bypass the IPsec policy authorization by simply deleteing policies with security contexts. To fix this security hole, an additional authorization check is added for removing security policies and security associations with security contexts. Note that if no security context is supplied on add or present on policy to be deleted, the SELinux module allows the change unconditionally. The hook is called on deletion when no context is present, which we may want to change. At present, I left it up to the module. LSM changes: The patch adds two new LSM hooks: xfrm_policy_delete and xfrm_state_delete. The new hooks are necessary to authorize deletion of IPsec policies that have security contexts. The existing hooks xfrm_policy_free and xfrm_state_free lack the context to do the authorization, so I decided to split authorization of deletion and memory management of security data, as is typical in the LSM interface. Use: The new delete hooks are checked when xfrm_policy or xfrm_state are deleted by either the xfrm_user interface (xfrm_get_policy, xfrm_del_sa) or the pfkey interface (pfkey_spddelete, pfkey_delete). SELinux changes: The new policy_delete and state_delete functions are added. Signed-off-by: Catherine Zhang <cxzhang@watson.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Trent Jaeger <tjaeger@cse.psu.edu> Acked-by: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2006-06-09 10:39:49 +04:00
if (err < 0)
goto out;
c.seq = nlh->nlmsg_seq;
c.pid = nlh->nlmsg_pid;
c.event = nlh->nlmsg_type;
km_state_notify(x, &c);
[LSM-IPsec]: SELinux Authorize This patch contains a fix for the previous patch that adds security contexts to IPsec policies and security associations. In the previous patch, no authorization (besides the check for write permissions to SAD and SPD) is required to delete IPsec policies and security assocations with security contexts. Thus a user authorized to change SAD and SPD can bypass the IPsec policy authorization by simply deleteing policies with security contexts. To fix this security hole, an additional authorization check is added for removing security policies and security associations with security contexts. Note that if no security context is supplied on add or present on policy to be deleted, the SELinux module allows the change unconditionally. The hook is called on deletion when no context is present, which we may want to change. At present, I left it up to the module. LSM changes: The patch adds two new LSM hooks: xfrm_policy_delete and xfrm_state_delete. The new hooks are necessary to authorize deletion of IPsec policies that have security contexts. The existing hooks xfrm_policy_free and xfrm_state_free lack the context to do the authorization, so I decided to split authorization of deletion and memory management of security data, as is typical in the LSM interface. Use: The new delete hooks are checked when xfrm_policy or xfrm_state are deleted by either the xfrm_user interface (xfrm_get_policy, xfrm_del_sa) or the pfkey interface (pfkey_spddelete, pfkey_delete). SELinux changes: The new policy_delete and state_delete functions are added. Signed-off-by: Catherine Zhang <cxzhang@watson.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Trent Jaeger <tjaeger@cse.psu.edu> Acked-by: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2006-06-09 10:39:49 +04:00
out:
xfrm_audit_state_delete(x, err ? 0 : 1, NETLINK_CB(skb).loginuid,
NETLINK_CB(skb).sid);
[LSM-IPsec]: SELinux Authorize This patch contains a fix for the previous patch that adds security contexts to IPsec policies and security associations. In the previous patch, no authorization (besides the check for write permissions to SAD and SPD) is required to delete IPsec policies and security assocations with security contexts. Thus a user authorized to change SAD and SPD can bypass the IPsec policy authorization by simply deleteing policies with security contexts. To fix this security hole, an additional authorization check is added for removing security policies and security associations with security contexts. Note that if no security context is supplied on add or present on policy to be deleted, the SELinux module allows the change unconditionally. The hook is called on deletion when no context is present, which we may want to change. At present, I left it up to the module. LSM changes: The patch adds two new LSM hooks: xfrm_policy_delete and xfrm_state_delete. The new hooks are necessary to authorize deletion of IPsec policies that have security contexts. The existing hooks xfrm_policy_free and xfrm_state_free lack the context to do the authorization, so I decided to split authorization of deletion and memory management of security data, as is typical in the LSM interface. Use: The new delete hooks are checked when xfrm_policy or xfrm_state are deleted by either the xfrm_user interface (xfrm_get_policy, xfrm_del_sa) or the pfkey interface (pfkey_spddelete, pfkey_delete). SELinux changes: The new policy_delete and state_delete functions are added. Signed-off-by: Catherine Zhang <cxzhang@watson.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Trent Jaeger <tjaeger@cse.psu.edu> Acked-by: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2006-06-09 10:39:49 +04:00
xfrm_state_put(x);
return err;
}
static void copy_to_user_state(struct xfrm_state *x, struct xfrm_usersa_info *p)
{
memcpy(&p->id, &x->id, sizeof(p->id));
memcpy(&p->sel, &x->sel, sizeof(p->sel));
memcpy(&p->lft, &x->lft, sizeof(p->lft));
memcpy(&p->curlft, &x->curlft, sizeof(p->curlft));
memcpy(&p->stats, &x->stats, sizeof(p->stats));
memcpy(&p->saddr, &x->props.saddr, sizeof(p->saddr));
p->mode = x->props.mode;
p->replay_window = x->props.replay_window;
p->reqid = x->props.reqid;
p->family = x->props.family;
p->flags = x->props.flags;
p->seq = x->km.seq;
}
struct xfrm_dump_info {
struct sk_buff *in_skb;
struct sk_buff *out_skb;
u32 nlmsg_seq;
u16 nlmsg_flags;
int start_idx;
int this_idx;
};
static int copy_sec_ctx(struct xfrm_sec_ctx *s, struct sk_buff *skb)
{
int ctx_size = sizeof(struct xfrm_sec_ctx) + s->ctx_len;
struct xfrm_user_sec_ctx *uctx;
struct nlattr *attr;
attr = nla_reserve(skb, XFRMA_SEC_CTX, ctx_size);
if (attr == NULL)
return -EMSGSIZE;
uctx = nla_data(attr);
uctx->exttype = XFRMA_SEC_CTX;
uctx->len = ctx_size;
uctx->ctx_doi = s->ctx_doi;
uctx->ctx_alg = s->ctx_alg;
uctx->ctx_len = s->ctx_len;
memcpy(uctx + 1, s->ctx_str, s->ctx_len);
return 0;
}
static int dump_one_state(struct xfrm_state *x, int count, void *ptr)
{
struct xfrm_dump_info *sp = ptr;
struct sk_buff *in_skb = sp->in_skb;
struct sk_buff *skb = sp->out_skb;
struct xfrm_usersa_info *p;
struct nlmsghdr *nlh;
if (sp->this_idx < sp->start_idx)
goto out;
nlh = nlmsg_put(skb, NETLINK_CB(in_skb).pid, sp->nlmsg_seq,
XFRM_MSG_NEWSA, sizeof(*p), sp->nlmsg_flags);
if (nlh == NULL)
return -EMSGSIZE;
p = nlmsg_data(nlh);
copy_to_user_state(x, p);
if (x->aalg)
NLA_PUT(skb, XFRMA_ALG_AUTH, alg_len(x->aalg), x->aalg);
if (x->ealg)
NLA_PUT(skb, XFRMA_ALG_CRYPT, alg_len(x->ealg), x->ealg);
if (x->calg)
NLA_PUT(skb, XFRMA_ALG_COMP, sizeof(*(x->calg)), x->calg);
if (x->encap)
NLA_PUT(skb, XFRMA_ENCAP, sizeof(*x->encap), x->encap);
if (x->security && copy_sec_ctx(x->security, skb) < 0)
goto nla_put_failure;
if (x->coaddr)
NLA_PUT(skb, XFRMA_COADDR, sizeof(*x->coaddr), x->coaddr);
if (x->lastused)
NLA_PUT_U64(skb, XFRMA_LASTUSED, x->lastused);
nlmsg_end(skb, nlh);
out:
sp->this_idx++;
return 0;
nla_put_failure:
nlmsg_cancel(skb, nlh);
return -EMSGSIZE;
}
static int xfrm_dump_sa(struct sk_buff *skb, struct netlink_callback *cb)
{
struct xfrm_dump_info info;
info.in_skb = cb->skb;
info.out_skb = skb;
info.nlmsg_seq = cb->nlh->nlmsg_seq;
info.nlmsg_flags = NLM_F_MULTI;
info.this_idx = 0;
info.start_idx = cb->args[0];
(void) xfrm_state_walk(0, dump_one_state, &info);
cb->args[0] = info.this_idx;
return skb->len;
}
static struct sk_buff *xfrm_state_netlink(struct sk_buff *in_skb,
struct xfrm_state *x, u32 seq)
{
struct xfrm_dump_info info;
struct sk_buff *skb;
skb = nlmsg_new(NLMSG_DEFAULT_SIZE, GFP_ATOMIC);
if (!skb)
return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
info.in_skb = in_skb;
info.out_skb = skb;
info.nlmsg_seq = seq;
info.nlmsg_flags = 0;
info.this_idx = info.start_idx = 0;
if (dump_one_state(x, 0, &info)) {
kfree_skb(skb);
return NULL;
}
return skb;
}
static inline size_t xfrm_spdinfo_msgsize(void)
{
return NLMSG_ALIGN(4)
+ nla_total_size(sizeof(struct xfrmu_spdinfo))
+ nla_total_size(sizeof(struct xfrmu_spdhinfo));
}
static int build_spdinfo(struct sk_buff *skb, u32 pid, u32 seq, u32 flags)
{
struct xfrmk_spdinfo si;
struct xfrmu_spdinfo spc;
struct xfrmu_spdhinfo sph;
struct nlmsghdr *nlh;
u32 *f;
nlh = nlmsg_put(skb, pid, seq, XFRM_MSG_NEWSPDINFO, sizeof(u32), 0);
if (nlh == NULL) /* shouldnt really happen ... */
return -EMSGSIZE;
f = nlmsg_data(nlh);
*f = flags;
xfrm_spd_getinfo(&si);
spc.incnt = si.incnt;
spc.outcnt = si.outcnt;
spc.fwdcnt = si.fwdcnt;
spc.inscnt = si.inscnt;
spc.outscnt = si.outscnt;
spc.fwdscnt = si.fwdscnt;
sph.spdhcnt = si.spdhcnt;
sph.spdhmcnt = si.spdhmcnt;
NLA_PUT(skb, XFRMA_SPD_INFO, sizeof(spc), &spc);
NLA_PUT(skb, XFRMA_SPD_HINFO, sizeof(sph), &sph);
return nlmsg_end(skb, nlh);
nla_put_failure:
nlmsg_cancel(skb, nlh);
return -EMSGSIZE;
}
static int xfrm_get_spdinfo(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
struct nlattr **attrs)
{
struct sk_buff *r_skb;
u32 *flags = nlmsg_data(nlh);
u32 spid = NETLINK_CB(skb).pid;
u32 seq = nlh->nlmsg_seq;
r_skb = nlmsg_new(xfrm_spdinfo_msgsize(), GFP_ATOMIC);
if (r_skb == NULL)
return -ENOMEM;
if (build_spdinfo(r_skb, spid, seq, *flags) < 0)
BUG();
return nlmsg_unicast(xfrm_nl, r_skb, spid);
}
static inline size_t xfrm_sadinfo_msgsize(void)
{
return NLMSG_ALIGN(4)
+ nla_total_size(sizeof(struct xfrmu_sadhinfo))
+ nla_total_size(4); /* XFRMA_SAD_CNT */
}
static int build_sadinfo(struct sk_buff *skb, u32 pid, u32 seq, u32 flags)
{
struct xfrmk_sadinfo si;
struct xfrmu_sadhinfo sh;
struct nlmsghdr *nlh;
u32 *f;
nlh = nlmsg_put(skb, pid, seq, XFRM_MSG_NEWSADINFO, sizeof(u32), 0);
if (nlh == NULL) /* shouldnt really happen ... */
return -EMSGSIZE;
f = nlmsg_data(nlh);
*f = flags;
xfrm_sad_getinfo(&si);
sh.sadhmcnt = si.sadhmcnt;
sh.sadhcnt = si.sadhcnt;
NLA_PUT_U32(skb, XFRMA_SAD_CNT, si.sadcnt);
NLA_PUT(skb, XFRMA_SAD_HINFO, sizeof(sh), &sh);
return nlmsg_end(skb, nlh);
nla_put_failure:
nlmsg_cancel(skb, nlh);
return -EMSGSIZE;
}
static int xfrm_get_sadinfo(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
struct nlattr **attrs)
{
struct sk_buff *r_skb;
u32 *flags = nlmsg_data(nlh);
u32 spid = NETLINK_CB(skb).pid;
u32 seq = nlh->nlmsg_seq;
r_skb = nlmsg_new(xfrm_sadinfo_msgsize(), GFP_ATOMIC);
if (r_skb == NULL)
return -ENOMEM;
if (build_sadinfo(r_skb, spid, seq, *flags) < 0)
BUG();
return nlmsg_unicast(xfrm_nl, r_skb, spid);
}
static int xfrm_get_sa(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
struct nlattr **attrs)
{
struct xfrm_usersa_id *p = nlmsg_data(nlh);
struct xfrm_state *x;
struct sk_buff *resp_skb;
int err = -ESRCH;
x = xfrm_user_state_lookup(p, attrs, &err);
if (x == NULL)
goto out_noput;
resp_skb = xfrm_state_netlink(skb, x, nlh->nlmsg_seq);
if (IS_ERR(resp_skb)) {
err = PTR_ERR(resp_skb);
} else {
err = nlmsg_unicast(xfrm_nl, resp_skb, NETLINK_CB(skb).pid);
}
xfrm_state_put(x);
out_noput:
return err;
}
static int verify_userspi_info(struct xfrm_userspi_info *p)
{
switch (p->info.id.proto) {
case IPPROTO_AH:
case IPPROTO_ESP:
break;
case IPPROTO_COMP:
/* IPCOMP spi is 16-bits. */
if (p->max >= 0x10000)
return -EINVAL;
break;
default:
return -EINVAL;
}
if (p->min > p->max)
return -EINVAL;
return 0;
}
static int xfrm_alloc_userspi(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
struct nlattr **attrs)
{
struct xfrm_state *x;
struct xfrm_userspi_info *p;
struct sk_buff *resp_skb;
xfrm_address_t *daddr;
int family;
int err;
p = nlmsg_data(nlh);
err = verify_userspi_info(p);
if (err)
goto out_noput;
family = p->info.family;
daddr = &p->info.id.daddr;
x = NULL;
if (p->info.seq) {
x = xfrm_find_acq_byseq(p->info.seq);
if (x && xfrm_addr_cmp(&x->id.daddr, daddr, family)) {
xfrm_state_put(x);
x = NULL;
}
}
if (!x)
x = xfrm_find_acq(p->info.mode, p->info.reqid,
p->info.id.proto, daddr,
&p->info.saddr, 1,
family);
err = -ENOENT;
if (x == NULL)
goto out_noput;
resp_skb = ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);
spin_lock_bh(&x->lock);
if (x->km.state != XFRM_STATE_DEAD) {
xfrm_alloc_spi(x, htonl(p->min), htonl(p->max));
if (x->id.spi)
resp_skb = xfrm_state_netlink(skb, x, nlh->nlmsg_seq);
}
spin_unlock_bh(&x->lock);
if (IS_ERR(resp_skb)) {
err = PTR_ERR(resp_skb);
goto out;
}
err = nlmsg_unicast(xfrm_nl, resp_skb, NETLINK_CB(skb).pid);
out:
xfrm_state_put(x);
out_noput:
return err;
}
static int verify_policy_dir(u8 dir)
{
switch (dir) {
case XFRM_POLICY_IN:
case XFRM_POLICY_OUT:
case XFRM_POLICY_FWD:
break;
default:
return -EINVAL;
}
return 0;
}
static int verify_policy_type(u8 type)
{
switch (type) {
case XFRM_POLICY_TYPE_MAIN:
#ifdef CONFIG_XFRM_SUB_POLICY
case XFRM_POLICY_TYPE_SUB:
#endif
break;
default:
return -EINVAL;
}
return 0;
}
static int verify_newpolicy_info(struct xfrm_userpolicy_info *p)
{
switch (p->share) {
case XFRM_SHARE_ANY:
case XFRM_SHARE_SESSION:
case XFRM_SHARE_USER:
case XFRM_SHARE_UNIQUE:
break;
default:
return -EINVAL;
}
switch (p->action) {
case XFRM_POLICY_ALLOW:
case XFRM_POLICY_BLOCK:
break;
default:
return -EINVAL;
}
switch (p->sel.family) {
case AF_INET:
break;
case AF_INET6:
#if defined(CONFIG_IPV6) || defined(CONFIG_IPV6_MODULE)
break;
#else
return -EAFNOSUPPORT;
#endif
default:
return -EINVAL;
}
return verify_policy_dir(p->dir);
}
static int copy_from_user_sec_ctx(struct xfrm_policy *pol, struct nlattr **attrs)
[LSM-IPSec]: Security association restriction. This patch series implements per packet access control via the extension of the Linux Security Modules (LSM) interface by hooks in the XFRM and pfkey subsystems that leverage IPSec security associations to label packets. Extensions to the SELinux LSM are included that leverage the patch for this purpose. This patch implements the changes necessary to the XFRM subsystem, pfkey interface, ipv4/ipv6, and xfrm_user interface to restrict a socket to use only authorized security associations (or no security association) to send/receive network packets. Patch purpose: The patch is designed to enable access control per packets based on the strongly authenticated IPSec security association. Such access controls augment the existing ones based on network interface and IP address. The former are very coarse-grained, and the latter can be spoofed. By using IPSec, the system can control access to remote hosts based on cryptographic keys generated using the IPSec mechanism. This enables access control on a per-machine basis or per-application if the remote machine is running the same mechanism and trusted to enforce the access control policy. Patch design approach: The overall approach is that policy (xfrm_policy) entries set by user-level programs (e.g., setkey for ipsec-tools) are extended with a security context that is used at policy selection time in the XFRM subsystem to restrict the sockets that can send/receive packets via security associations (xfrm_states) that are built from those policies. A presentation available at www.selinux-symposium.org/2005/presentations/session2/2-3-jaeger.pdf from the SELinux symposium describes the overall approach. Patch implementation details: On output, the policy retrieved (via xfrm_policy_lookup or xfrm_sk_policy_lookup) must be authorized for the security context of the socket and the same security context is required for resultant security association (retrieved or negotiated via racoon in ipsec-tools). This is enforced in xfrm_state_find. On input, the policy retrieved must also be authorized for the socket (at __xfrm_policy_check), and the security context of the policy must also match the security association being used. The patch has virtually no impact on packets that do not use IPSec. The existing Netfilter (outgoing) and LSM rcv_skb hooks are used as before. Also, if IPSec is used without security contexts, the impact is minimal. The LSM must allow such policies to be selected for the combination of socket and remote machine, but subsequent IPSec processing proceeds as in the original case. Testing: The pfkey interface is tested using the ipsec-tools. ipsec-tools have been modified (a separate ipsec-tools patch is available for version 0.5) that supports assignment of xfrm_policy entries and security associations with security contexts via setkey and the negotiation using the security contexts via racoon. The xfrm_user interface is tested via ad hoc programs that set security contexts. These programs are also available from me, and contain programs for setting, getting, and deleting policy for testing this interface. Testing of sa functions was done by tracing kernel behavior. Signed-off-by: Trent Jaeger <tjaeger@cse.psu.edu> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2005-12-14 10:12:27 +03:00
{
struct nlattr *rt = attrs[XFRMA_SEC_CTX];
[LSM-IPSec]: Security association restriction. This patch series implements per packet access control via the extension of the Linux Security Modules (LSM) interface by hooks in the XFRM and pfkey subsystems that leverage IPSec security associations to label packets. Extensions to the SELinux LSM are included that leverage the patch for this purpose. This patch implements the changes necessary to the XFRM subsystem, pfkey interface, ipv4/ipv6, and xfrm_user interface to restrict a socket to use only authorized security associations (or no security association) to send/receive network packets. Patch purpose: The patch is designed to enable access control per packets based on the strongly authenticated IPSec security association. Such access controls augment the existing ones based on network interface and IP address. The former are very coarse-grained, and the latter can be spoofed. By using IPSec, the system can control access to remote hosts based on cryptographic keys generated using the IPSec mechanism. This enables access control on a per-machine basis or per-application if the remote machine is running the same mechanism and trusted to enforce the access control policy. Patch design approach: The overall approach is that policy (xfrm_policy) entries set by user-level programs (e.g., setkey for ipsec-tools) are extended with a security context that is used at policy selection time in the XFRM subsystem to restrict the sockets that can send/receive packets via security associations (xfrm_states) that are built from those policies. A presentation available at www.selinux-symposium.org/2005/presentations/session2/2-3-jaeger.pdf from the SELinux symposium describes the overall approach. Patch implementation details: On output, the policy retrieved (via xfrm_policy_lookup or xfrm_sk_policy_lookup) must be authorized for the security context of the socket and the same security context is required for resultant security association (retrieved or negotiated via racoon in ipsec-tools). This is enforced in xfrm_state_find. On input, the policy retrieved must also be authorized for the socket (at __xfrm_policy_check), and the security context of the policy must also match the security association being used. The patch has virtually no impact on packets that do not use IPSec. The existing Netfilter (outgoing) and LSM rcv_skb hooks are used as before. Also, if IPSec is used without security contexts, the impact is minimal. The LSM must allow such policies to be selected for the combination of socket and remote machine, but subsequent IPSec processing proceeds as in the original case. Testing: The pfkey interface is tested using the ipsec-tools. ipsec-tools have been modified (a separate ipsec-tools patch is available for version 0.5) that supports assignment of xfrm_policy entries and security associations with security contexts via setkey and the negotiation using the security contexts via racoon. The xfrm_user interface is tested via ad hoc programs that set security contexts. These programs are also available from me, and contain programs for setting, getting, and deleting policy for testing this interface. Testing of sa functions was done by tracing kernel behavior. Signed-off-by: Trent Jaeger <tjaeger@cse.psu.edu> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2005-12-14 10:12:27 +03:00
struct xfrm_user_sec_ctx *uctx;
if (!rt)
return 0;
uctx = nla_data(rt);
[LSM-IPSec]: Security association restriction. This patch series implements per packet access control via the extension of the Linux Security Modules (LSM) interface by hooks in the XFRM and pfkey subsystems that leverage IPSec security associations to label packets. Extensions to the SELinux LSM are included that leverage the patch for this purpose. This patch implements the changes necessary to the XFRM subsystem, pfkey interface, ipv4/ipv6, and xfrm_user interface to restrict a socket to use only authorized security associations (or no security association) to send/receive network packets. Patch purpose: The patch is designed to enable access control per packets based on the strongly authenticated IPSec security association. Such access controls augment the existing ones based on network interface and IP address. The former are very coarse-grained, and the latter can be spoofed. By using IPSec, the system can control access to remote hosts based on cryptographic keys generated using the IPSec mechanism. This enables access control on a per-machine basis or per-application if the remote machine is running the same mechanism and trusted to enforce the access control policy. Patch design approach: The overall approach is that policy (xfrm_policy) entries set by user-level programs (e.g., setkey for ipsec-tools) are extended with a security context that is used at policy selection time in the XFRM subsystem to restrict the sockets that can send/receive packets via security associations (xfrm_states) that are built from those policies. A presentation available at www.selinux-symposium.org/2005/presentations/session2/2-3-jaeger.pdf from the SELinux symposium describes the overall approach. Patch implementation details: On output, the policy retrieved (via xfrm_policy_lookup or xfrm_sk_policy_lookup) must be authorized for the security context of the socket and the same security context is required for resultant security association (retrieved or negotiated via racoon in ipsec-tools). This is enforced in xfrm_state_find. On input, the policy retrieved must also be authorized for the socket (at __xfrm_policy_check), and the security context of the policy must also match the security association being used. The patch has virtually no impact on packets that do not use IPSec. The existing Netfilter (outgoing) and LSM rcv_skb hooks are used as before. Also, if IPSec is used without security contexts, the impact is minimal. The LSM must allow such policies to be selected for the combination of socket and remote machine, but subsequent IPSec processing proceeds as in the original case. Testing: The pfkey interface is tested using the ipsec-tools. ipsec-tools have been modified (a separate ipsec-tools patch is available for version 0.5) that supports assignment of xfrm_policy entries and security associations with security contexts via setkey and the negotiation using the security contexts via racoon. The xfrm_user interface is tested via ad hoc programs that set security contexts. These programs are also available from me, and contain programs for setting, getting, and deleting policy for testing this interface. Testing of sa functions was done by tracing kernel behavior. Signed-off-by: Trent Jaeger <tjaeger@cse.psu.edu> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2005-12-14 10:12:27 +03:00
return security_xfrm_policy_alloc(pol, uctx);
}
static void copy_templates(struct xfrm_policy *xp, struct xfrm_user_tmpl *ut,
int nr)
{
int i;
xp->xfrm_nr = nr;
for (i = 0; i < nr; i++, ut++) {
struct xfrm_tmpl *t = &xp->xfrm_vec[i];
memcpy(&t->id, &ut->id, sizeof(struct xfrm_id));
memcpy(&t->saddr, &ut->saddr,
sizeof(xfrm_address_t));
t->reqid = ut->reqid;
t->mode = ut->mode;
t->share = ut->share;
t->optional = ut->optional;
t->aalgos = ut->aalgos;
t->ealgos = ut->ealgos;
t->calgos = ut->calgos;
t->encap_family = ut->family;
}
}
static int validate_tmpl(int nr, struct xfrm_user_tmpl *ut, u16 family)
{
int i;
if (nr > XFRM_MAX_DEPTH)
return -EINVAL;
for (i = 0; i < nr; i++) {
/* We never validated the ut->family value, so many
* applications simply leave it at zero. The check was
* never made and ut->family was ignored because all
* templates could be assumed to have the same family as
* the policy itself. Now that we will have ipv4-in-ipv6
* and ipv6-in-ipv4 tunnels, this is no longer true.
*/
if (!ut[i].family)
ut[i].family = family;
switch (ut[i].family) {
case AF_INET:
break;
#if defined(CONFIG_IPV6) || defined(CONFIG_IPV6_MODULE)
case AF_INET6:
break;
#endif
default:
return -EINVAL;
}
}
return 0;
}
static int copy_from_user_tmpl(struct xfrm_policy *pol, struct nlattr **attrs)
{
struct nlattr *rt = attrs[XFRMA_TMPL];
if (!rt) {
pol->xfrm_nr = 0;
} else {
struct xfrm_user_tmpl *utmpl = nla_data(rt);
int nr = nla_len(rt) / sizeof(*utmpl);
int err;
err = validate_tmpl(nr, utmpl, pol->family);
if (err)
return err;
copy_templates(pol, utmpl, nr);
}
return 0;
}
static int copy_from_user_policy_type(u8 *tp, struct nlattr **attrs)
{
struct nlattr *rt = attrs[XFRMA_POLICY_TYPE];
struct xfrm_userpolicy_type *upt;
u8 type = XFRM_POLICY_TYPE_MAIN;
int err;
if (rt) {
upt = nla_data(rt);
type = upt->type;
}
err = verify_policy_type(type);
if (err)
return err;
*tp = type;
return 0;
}
static void copy_from_user_policy(struct xfrm_policy *xp, struct xfrm_userpolicy_info *p)
{
xp->priority = p->priority;
xp->index = p->index;
memcpy(&xp->selector, &p->sel, sizeof(xp->selector));
memcpy(&xp->lft, &p->lft, sizeof(xp->lft));
xp->action = p->action;
xp->flags = p->flags;
xp->family = p->sel.family;
/* XXX xp->share = p->share; */
}
static void copy_to_user_policy(struct xfrm_policy *xp, struct xfrm_userpolicy_info *p, int dir)
{
memcpy(&p->sel, &xp->selector, sizeof(p->sel));
memcpy(&p->lft, &xp->lft, sizeof(p->lft));
memcpy(&p->curlft, &xp->curlft, sizeof(p->curlft));
p->priority = xp->priority;
p->index = xp->index;
p->sel.family = xp->family;
p->dir = dir;
p->action = xp->action;
p->flags = xp->flags;
p->share = XFRM_SHARE_ANY; /* XXX xp->share */
}
static struct xfrm_policy *xfrm_policy_construct(struct xfrm_userpolicy_info *p, struct nlattr **attrs, int *errp)
{
struct xfrm_policy *xp = xfrm_policy_alloc(GFP_KERNEL);
int err;
if (!xp) {
*errp = -ENOMEM;
return NULL;
}
copy_from_user_policy(xp, p);
[LSM-IPSec]: Security association restriction. This patch series implements per packet access control via the extension of the Linux Security Modules (LSM) interface by hooks in the XFRM and pfkey subsystems that leverage IPSec security associations to label packets. Extensions to the SELinux LSM are included that leverage the patch for this purpose. This patch implements the changes necessary to the XFRM subsystem, pfkey interface, ipv4/ipv6, and xfrm_user interface to restrict a socket to use only authorized security associations (or no security association) to send/receive network packets. Patch purpose: The patch is designed to enable access control per packets based on the strongly authenticated IPSec security association. Such access controls augment the existing ones based on network interface and IP address. The former are very coarse-grained, and the latter can be spoofed. By using IPSec, the system can control access to remote hosts based on cryptographic keys generated using the IPSec mechanism. This enables access control on a per-machine basis or per-application if the remote machine is running the same mechanism and trusted to enforce the access control policy. Patch design approach: The overall approach is that policy (xfrm_policy) entries set by user-level programs (e.g., setkey for ipsec-tools) are extended with a security context that is used at policy selection time in the XFRM subsystem to restrict the sockets that can send/receive packets via security associations (xfrm_states) that are built from those policies. A presentation available at www.selinux-symposium.org/2005/presentations/session2/2-3-jaeger.pdf from the SELinux symposium describes the overall approach. Patch implementation details: On output, the policy retrieved (via xfrm_policy_lookup or xfrm_sk_policy_lookup) must be authorized for the security context of the socket and the same security context is required for resultant security association (retrieved or negotiated via racoon in ipsec-tools). This is enforced in xfrm_state_find. On input, the policy retrieved must also be authorized for the socket (at __xfrm_policy_check), and the security context of the policy must also match the security association being used. The patch has virtually no impact on packets that do not use IPSec. The existing Netfilter (outgoing) and LSM rcv_skb hooks are used as before. Also, if IPSec is used without security contexts, the impact is minimal. The LSM must allow such policies to be selected for the combination of socket and remote machine, but subsequent IPSec processing proceeds as in the original case. Testing: The pfkey interface is tested using the ipsec-tools. ipsec-tools have been modified (a separate ipsec-tools patch is available for version 0.5) that supports assignment of xfrm_policy entries and security associations with security contexts via setkey and the negotiation using the security contexts via racoon. The xfrm_user interface is tested via ad hoc programs that set security contexts. These programs are also available from me, and contain programs for setting, getting, and deleting policy for testing this interface. Testing of sa functions was done by tracing kernel behavior. Signed-off-by: Trent Jaeger <tjaeger@cse.psu.edu> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2005-12-14 10:12:27 +03:00
err = copy_from_user_policy_type(&xp->type, attrs);
if (err)
goto error;
if (!(err = copy_from_user_tmpl(xp, attrs)))
err = copy_from_user_sec_ctx(xp, attrs);
if (err)
goto error;
return xp;
error:
*errp = err;
kfree(xp);
return NULL;
}
static int xfrm_add_policy(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
struct nlattr **attrs)
{
struct xfrm_userpolicy_info *p = nlmsg_data(nlh);
struct xfrm_policy *xp;
struct km_event c;
int err;
int excl;
err = verify_newpolicy_info(p);
[LSM-IPSec]: Security association restriction. This patch series implements per packet access control via the extension of the Linux Security Modules (LSM) interface by hooks in the XFRM and pfkey subsystems that leverage IPSec security associations to label packets. Extensions to the SELinux LSM are included that leverage the patch for this purpose. This patch implements the changes necessary to the XFRM subsystem, pfkey interface, ipv4/ipv6, and xfrm_user interface to restrict a socket to use only authorized security associations (or no security association) to send/receive network packets. Patch purpose: The patch is designed to enable access control per packets based on the strongly authenticated IPSec security association. Such access controls augment the existing ones based on network interface and IP address. The former are very coarse-grained, and the latter can be spoofed. By using IPSec, the system can control access to remote hosts based on cryptographic keys generated using the IPSec mechanism. This enables access control on a per-machine basis or per-application if the remote machine is running the same mechanism and trusted to enforce the access control policy. Patch design approach: The overall approach is that policy (xfrm_policy) entries set by user-level programs (e.g., setkey for ipsec-tools) are extended with a security context that is used at policy selection time in the XFRM subsystem to restrict the sockets that can send/receive packets via security associations (xfrm_states) that are built from those policies. A presentation available at www.selinux-symposium.org/2005/presentations/session2/2-3-jaeger.pdf from the SELinux symposium describes the overall approach. Patch implementation details: On output, the policy retrieved (via xfrm_policy_lookup or xfrm_sk_policy_lookup) must be authorized for the security context of the socket and the same security context is required for resultant security association (retrieved or negotiated via racoon in ipsec-tools). This is enforced in xfrm_state_find. On input, the policy retrieved must also be authorized for the socket (at __xfrm_policy_check), and the security context of the policy must also match the security association being used. The patch has virtually no impact on packets that do not use IPSec. The existing Netfilter (outgoing) and LSM rcv_skb hooks are used as before. Also, if IPSec is used without security contexts, the impact is minimal. The LSM must allow such policies to be selected for the combination of socket and remote machine, but subsequent IPSec processing proceeds as in the original case. Testing: The pfkey interface is tested using the ipsec-tools. ipsec-tools have been modified (a separate ipsec-tools patch is available for version 0.5) that supports assignment of xfrm_policy entries and security associations with security contexts via setkey and the negotiation using the security contexts via racoon. The xfrm_user interface is tested via ad hoc programs that set security contexts. These programs are also available from me, and contain programs for setting, getting, and deleting policy for testing this interface. Testing of sa functions was done by tracing kernel behavior. Signed-off-by: Trent Jaeger <tjaeger@cse.psu.edu> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2005-12-14 10:12:27 +03:00
if (err)
return err;
err = verify_sec_ctx_len(attrs);
if (err)
return err;
xp = xfrm_policy_construct(p, attrs, &err);
if (!xp)
return err;
/* shouldnt excl be based on nlh flags??
* Aha! this is anti-netlink really i.e more pfkey derived
* in netlink excl is a flag and you wouldnt need
* a type XFRM_MSG_UPDPOLICY - JHS */
excl = nlh->nlmsg_type == XFRM_MSG_NEWPOLICY;
err = xfrm_policy_insert(p->dir, xp, excl);
xfrm_audit_policy_add(xp, err ? 0 : 1, NETLINK_CB(skb).loginuid,
NETLINK_CB(skb).sid);
if (err) {
security_xfrm_policy_free(xp);
kfree(xp);
return err;
}
c.event = nlh->nlmsg_type;
c.seq = nlh->nlmsg_seq;
c.pid = nlh->nlmsg_pid;
km_policy_notify(xp, p->dir, &c);
xfrm_pol_put(xp);
return 0;
}
static int copy_to_user_tmpl(struct xfrm_policy *xp, struct sk_buff *skb)
{
struct xfrm_user_tmpl vec[XFRM_MAX_DEPTH];
int i;
if (xp->xfrm_nr == 0)
return 0;
for (i = 0; i < xp->xfrm_nr; i++) {
struct xfrm_user_tmpl *up = &vec[i];
struct xfrm_tmpl *kp = &xp->xfrm_vec[i];
memcpy(&up->id, &kp->id, sizeof(up->id));
up->family = kp->encap_family;
memcpy(&up->saddr, &kp->saddr, sizeof(up->saddr));
up->reqid = kp->reqid;
up->mode = kp->mode;
up->share = kp->share;
up->optional = kp->optional;
up->aalgos = kp->aalgos;
up->ealgos = kp->ealgos;
up->calgos = kp->calgos;
}
[LSM-IPSec]: Security association restriction. This patch series implements per packet access control via the extension of the Linux Security Modules (LSM) interface by hooks in the XFRM and pfkey subsystems that leverage IPSec security associations to label packets. Extensions to the SELinux LSM are included that leverage the patch for this purpose. This patch implements the changes necessary to the XFRM subsystem, pfkey interface, ipv4/ipv6, and xfrm_user interface to restrict a socket to use only authorized security associations (or no security association) to send/receive network packets. Patch purpose: The patch is designed to enable access control per packets based on the strongly authenticated IPSec security association. Such access controls augment the existing ones based on network interface and IP address. The former are very coarse-grained, and the latter can be spoofed. By using IPSec, the system can control access to remote hosts based on cryptographic keys generated using the IPSec mechanism. This enables access control on a per-machine basis or per-application if the remote machine is running the same mechanism and trusted to enforce the access control policy. Patch design approach: The overall approach is that policy (xfrm_policy) entries set by user-level programs (e.g., setkey for ipsec-tools) are extended with a security context that is used at policy selection time in the XFRM subsystem to restrict the sockets that can send/receive packets via security associations (xfrm_states) that are built from those policies. A presentation available at www.selinux-symposium.org/2005/presentations/session2/2-3-jaeger.pdf from the SELinux symposium describes the overall approach. Patch implementation details: On output, the policy retrieved (via xfrm_policy_lookup or xfrm_sk_policy_lookup) must be authorized for the security context of the socket and the same security context is required for resultant security association (retrieved or negotiated via racoon in ipsec-tools). This is enforced in xfrm_state_find. On input, the policy retrieved must also be authorized for the socket (at __xfrm_policy_check), and the security context of the policy must also match the security association being used. The patch has virtually no impact on packets that do not use IPSec. The existing Netfilter (outgoing) and LSM rcv_skb hooks are used as before. Also, if IPSec is used without security contexts, the impact is minimal. The LSM must allow such policies to be selected for the combination of socket and remote machine, but subsequent IPSec processing proceeds as in the original case. Testing: The pfkey interface is tested using the ipsec-tools. ipsec-tools have been modified (a separate ipsec-tools patch is available for version 0.5) that supports assignment of xfrm_policy entries and security associations with security contexts via setkey and the negotiation using the security contexts via racoon. The xfrm_user interface is tested via ad hoc programs that set security contexts. These programs are also available from me, and contain programs for setting, getting, and deleting policy for testing this interface. Testing of sa functions was done by tracing kernel behavior. Signed-off-by: Trent Jaeger <tjaeger@cse.psu.edu> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2005-12-14 10:12:27 +03:00
return nla_put(skb, XFRMA_TMPL,
sizeof(struct xfrm_user_tmpl) * xp->xfrm_nr, vec);
}
static inline int copy_to_user_state_sec_ctx(struct xfrm_state *x, struct sk_buff *skb)
{
if (x->security) {
return copy_sec_ctx(x->security, skb);
[LSM-IPSec]: Security association restriction. This patch series implements per packet access control via the extension of the Linux Security Modules (LSM) interface by hooks in the XFRM and pfkey subsystems that leverage IPSec security associations to label packets. Extensions to the SELinux LSM are included that leverage the patch for this purpose. This patch implements the changes necessary to the XFRM subsystem, pfkey interface, ipv4/ipv6, and xfrm_user interface to restrict a socket to use only authorized security associations (or no security association) to send/receive network packets. Patch purpose: The patch is designed to enable access control per packets based on the strongly authenticated IPSec security association. Such access controls augment the existing ones based on network interface and IP address. The former are very coarse-grained, and the latter can be spoofed. By using IPSec, the system can control access to remote hosts based on cryptographic keys generated using the IPSec mechanism. This enables access control on a per-machine basis or per-application if the remote machine is running the same mechanism and trusted to enforce the access control policy. Patch design approach: The overall approach is that policy (xfrm_policy) entries set by user-level programs (e.g., setkey for ipsec-tools) are extended with a security context that is used at policy selection time in the XFRM subsystem to restrict the sockets that can send/receive packets via security associations (xfrm_states) that are built from those policies. A presentation available at www.selinux-symposium.org/2005/presentations/session2/2-3-jaeger.pdf from the SELinux symposium describes the overall approach. Patch implementation details: On output, the policy retrieved (via xfrm_policy_lookup or xfrm_sk_policy_lookup) must be authorized for the security context of the socket and the same security context is required for resultant security association (retrieved or negotiated via racoon in ipsec-tools). This is enforced in xfrm_state_find. On input, the policy retrieved must also be authorized for the socket (at __xfrm_policy_check), and the security context of the policy must also match the security association being used. The patch has virtually no impact on packets that do not use IPSec. The existing Netfilter (outgoing) and LSM rcv_skb hooks are used as before. Also, if IPSec is used without security contexts, the impact is minimal. The LSM must allow such policies to be selected for the combination of socket and remote machine, but subsequent IPSec processing proceeds as in the original case. Testing: The pfkey interface is tested using the ipsec-tools. ipsec-tools have been modified (a separate ipsec-tools patch is available for version 0.5) that supports assignment of xfrm_policy entries and security associations with security contexts via setkey and the negotiation using the security contexts via racoon. The xfrm_user interface is tested via ad hoc programs that set security contexts. These programs are also available from me, and contain programs for setting, getting, and deleting policy for testing this interface. Testing of sa functions was done by tracing kernel behavior. Signed-off-by: Trent Jaeger <tjaeger@cse.psu.edu> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2005-12-14 10:12:27 +03:00
}
return 0;
}
[LSM-IPSec]: Security association restriction. This patch series implements per packet access control via the extension of the Linux Security Modules (LSM) interface by hooks in the XFRM and pfkey subsystems that leverage IPSec security associations to label packets. Extensions to the SELinux LSM are included that leverage the patch for this purpose. This patch implements the changes necessary to the XFRM subsystem, pfkey interface, ipv4/ipv6, and xfrm_user interface to restrict a socket to use only authorized security associations (or no security association) to send/receive network packets. Patch purpose: The patch is designed to enable access control per packets based on the strongly authenticated IPSec security association. Such access controls augment the existing ones based on network interface and IP address. The former are very coarse-grained, and the latter can be spoofed. By using IPSec, the system can control access to remote hosts based on cryptographic keys generated using the IPSec mechanism. This enables access control on a per-machine basis or per-application if the remote machine is running the same mechanism and trusted to enforce the access control policy. Patch design approach: The overall approach is that policy (xfrm_policy) entries set by user-level programs (e.g., setkey for ipsec-tools) are extended with a security context that is used at policy selection time in the XFRM subsystem to restrict the sockets that can send/receive packets via security associations (xfrm_states) that are built from those policies. A presentation available at www.selinux-symposium.org/2005/presentations/session2/2-3-jaeger.pdf from the SELinux symposium describes the overall approach. Patch implementation details: On output, the policy retrieved (via xfrm_policy_lookup or xfrm_sk_policy_lookup) must be authorized for the security context of the socket and the same security context is required for resultant security association (retrieved or negotiated via racoon in ipsec-tools). This is enforced in xfrm_state_find. On input, the policy retrieved must also be authorized for the socket (at __xfrm_policy_check), and the security context of the policy must also match the security association being used. The patch has virtually no impact on packets that do not use IPSec. The existing Netfilter (outgoing) and LSM rcv_skb hooks are used as before. Also, if IPSec is used without security contexts, the impact is minimal. The LSM must allow such policies to be selected for the combination of socket and remote machine, but subsequent IPSec processing proceeds as in the original case. Testing: The pfkey interface is tested using the ipsec-tools. ipsec-tools have been modified (a separate ipsec-tools patch is available for version 0.5) that supports assignment of xfrm_policy entries and security associations with security contexts via setkey and the negotiation using the security contexts via racoon. The xfrm_user interface is tested via ad hoc programs that set security contexts. These programs are also available from me, and contain programs for setting, getting, and deleting policy for testing this interface. Testing of sa functions was done by tracing kernel behavior. Signed-off-by: Trent Jaeger <tjaeger@cse.psu.edu> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2005-12-14 10:12:27 +03:00
static inline int copy_to_user_sec_ctx(struct xfrm_policy *xp, struct sk_buff *skb)
{
if (xp->security) {
return copy_sec_ctx(xp->security, skb);
}
return 0;
[LSM-IPSec]: Security association restriction. This patch series implements per packet access control via the extension of the Linux Security Modules (LSM) interface by hooks in the XFRM and pfkey subsystems that leverage IPSec security associations to label packets. Extensions to the SELinux LSM are included that leverage the patch for this purpose. This patch implements the changes necessary to the XFRM subsystem, pfkey interface, ipv4/ipv6, and xfrm_user interface to restrict a socket to use only authorized security associations (or no security association) to send/receive network packets. Patch purpose: The patch is designed to enable access control per packets based on the strongly authenticated IPSec security association. Such access controls augment the existing ones based on network interface and IP address. The former are very coarse-grained, and the latter can be spoofed. By using IPSec, the system can control access to remote hosts based on cryptographic keys generated using the IPSec mechanism. This enables access control on a per-machine basis or per-application if the remote machine is running the same mechanism and trusted to enforce the access control policy. Patch design approach: The overall approach is that policy (xfrm_policy) entries set by user-level programs (e.g., setkey for ipsec-tools) are extended with a security context that is used at policy selection time in the XFRM subsystem to restrict the sockets that can send/receive packets via security associations (xfrm_states) that are built from those policies. A presentation available at www.selinux-symposium.org/2005/presentations/session2/2-3-jaeger.pdf from the SELinux symposium describes the overall approach. Patch implementation details: On output, the policy retrieved (via xfrm_policy_lookup or xfrm_sk_policy_lookup) must be authorized for the security context of the socket and the same security context is required for resultant security association (retrieved or negotiated via racoon in ipsec-tools). This is enforced in xfrm_state_find. On input, the policy retrieved must also be authorized for the socket (at __xfrm_policy_check), and the security context of the policy must also match the security association being used. The patch has virtually no impact on packets that do not use IPSec. The existing Netfilter (outgoing) and LSM rcv_skb hooks are used as before. Also, if IPSec is used without security contexts, the impact is minimal. The LSM must allow such policies to be selected for the combination of socket and remote machine, but subsequent IPSec processing proceeds as in the original case. Testing: The pfkey interface is tested using the ipsec-tools. ipsec-tools have been modified (a separate ipsec-tools patch is available for version 0.5) that supports assignment of xfrm_policy entries and security associations with security contexts via setkey and the negotiation using the security contexts via racoon. The xfrm_user interface is tested via ad hoc programs that set security contexts. These programs are also available from me, and contain programs for setting, getting, and deleting policy for testing this interface. Testing of sa functions was done by tracing kernel behavior. Signed-off-by: Trent Jaeger <tjaeger@cse.psu.edu> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2005-12-14 10:12:27 +03:00
}
static inline size_t userpolicy_type_attrsize(void)
{
#ifdef CONFIG_XFRM_SUB_POLICY
return nla_total_size(sizeof(struct xfrm_userpolicy_type));
#else
return 0;
#endif
}
[LSM-IPSec]: Security association restriction. This patch series implements per packet access control via the extension of the Linux Security Modules (LSM) interface by hooks in the XFRM and pfkey subsystems that leverage IPSec security associations to label packets. Extensions to the SELinux LSM are included that leverage the patch for this purpose. This patch implements the changes necessary to the XFRM subsystem, pfkey interface, ipv4/ipv6, and xfrm_user interface to restrict a socket to use only authorized security associations (or no security association) to send/receive network packets. Patch purpose: The patch is designed to enable access control per packets based on the strongly authenticated IPSec security association. Such access controls augment the existing ones based on network interface and IP address. The former are very coarse-grained, and the latter can be spoofed. By using IPSec, the system can control access to remote hosts based on cryptographic keys generated using the IPSec mechanism. This enables access control on a per-machine basis or per-application if the remote machine is running the same mechanism and trusted to enforce the access control policy. Patch design approach: The overall approach is that policy (xfrm_policy) entries set by user-level programs (e.g., setkey for ipsec-tools) are extended with a security context that is used at policy selection time in the XFRM subsystem to restrict the sockets that can send/receive packets via security associations (xfrm_states) that are built from those policies. A presentation available at www.selinux-symposium.org/2005/presentations/session2/2-3-jaeger.pdf from the SELinux symposium describes the overall approach. Patch implementation details: On output, the policy retrieved (via xfrm_policy_lookup or xfrm_sk_policy_lookup) must be authorized for the security context of the socket and the same security context is required for resultant security association (retrieved or negotiated via racoon in ipsec-tools). This is enforced in xfrm_state_find. On input, the policy retrieved must also be authorized for the socket (at __xfrm_policy_check), and the security context of the policy must also match the security association being used. The patch has virtually no impact on packets that do not use IPSec. The existing Netfilter (outgoing) and LSM rcv_skb hooks are used as before. Also, if IPSec is used without security contexts, the impact is minimal. The LSM must allow such policies to be selected for the combination of socket and remote machine, but subsequent IPSec processing proceeds as in the original case. Testing: The pfkey interface is tested using the ipsec-tools. ipsec-tools have been modified (a separate ipsec-tools patch is available for version 0.5) that supports assignment of xfrm_policy entries and security associations with security contexts via setkey and the negotiation using the security contexts via racoon. The xfrm_user interface is tested via ad hoc programs that set security contexts. These programs are also available from me, and contain programs for setting, getting, and deleting policy for testing this interface. Testing of sa functions was done by tracing kernel behavior. Signed-off-by: Trent Jaeger <tjaeger@cse.psu.edu> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2005-12-14 10:12:27 +03:00
#ifdef CONFIG_XFRM_SUB_POLICY
static int copy_to_user_policy_type(u8 type, struct sk_buff *skb)
{
struct xfrm_userpolicy_type upt = {
.type = type,
};
return nla_put(skb, XFRMA_POLICY_TYPE, sizeof(upt), &upt);
}
#else
static inline int copy_to_user_policy_type(u8 type, struct sk_buff *skb)
{
return 0;
}
#endif
static int dump_one_policy(struct xfrm_policy *xp, int dir, int count, void *ptr)
{
struct xfrm_dump_info *sp = ptr;
struct xfrm_userpolicy_info *p;
struct sk_buff *in_skb = sp->in_skb;
struct sk_buff *skb = sp->out_skb;
struct nlmsghdr *nlh;
if (sp->this_idx < sp->start_idx)
goto out;
nlh = nlmsg_put(skb, NETLINK_CB(in_skb).pid, sp->nlmsg_seq,
XFRM_MSG_NEWPOLICY, sizeof(*p), sp->nlmsg_flags);
if (nlh == NULL)
return -EMSGSIZE;
p = nlmsg_data(nlh);
copy_to_user_policy(xp, p, dir);
if (copy_to_user_tmpl(xp, skb) < 0)
goto nlmsg_failure;
[LSM-IPSec]: Security association restriction. This patch series implements per packet access control via the extension of the Linux Security Modules (LSM) interface by hooks in the XFRM and pfkey subsystems that leverage IPSec security associations to label packets. Extensions to the SELinux LSM are included that leverage the patch for this purpose. This patch implements the changes necessary to the XFRM subsystem, pfkey interface, ipv4/ipv6, and xfrm_user interface to restrict a socket to use only authorized security associations (or no security association) to send/receive network packets. Patch purpose: The patch is designed to enable access control per packets based on the strongly authenticated IPSec security association. Such access controls augment the existing ones based on network interface and IP address. The former are very coarse-grained, and the latter can be spoofed. By using IPSec, the system can control access to remote hosts based on cryptographic keys generated using the IPSec mechanism. This enables access control on a per-machine basis or per-application if the remote machine is running the same mechanism and trusted to enforce the access control policy. Patch design approach: The overall approach is that policy (xfrm_policy) entries set by user-level programs (e.g., setkey for ipsec-tools) are extended with a security context that is used at policy selection time in the XFRM subsystem to restrict the sockets that can send/receive packets via security associations (xfrm_states) that are built from those policies. A presentation available at www.selinux-symposium.org/2005/presentations/session2/2-3-jaeger.pdf from the SELinux symposium describes the overall approach. Patch implementation details: On output, the policy retrieved (via xfrm_policy_lookup or xfrm_sk_policy_lookup) must be authorized for the security context of the socket and the same security context is required for resultant security association (retrieved or negotiated via racoon in ipsec-tools). This is enforced in xfrm_state_find. On input, the policy retrieved must also be authorized for the socket (at __xfrm_policy_check), and the security context of the policy must also match the security association being used. The patch has virtually no impact on packets that do not use IPSec. The existing Netfilter (outgoing) and LSM rcv_skb hooks are used as before. Also, if IPSec is used without security contexts, the impact is minimal. The LSM must allow such policies to be selected for the combination of socket and remote machine, but subsequent IPSec processing proceeds as in the original case. Testing: The pfkey interface is tested using the ipsec-tools. ipsec-tools have been modified (a separate ipsec-tools patch is available for version 0.5) that supports assignment of xfrm_policy entries and security associations with security contexts via setkey and the negotiation using the security contexts via racoon. The xfrm_user interface is tested via ad hoc programs that set security contexts. These programs are also available from me, and contain programs for setting, getting, and deleting policy for testing this interface. Testing of sa functions was done by tracing kernel behavior. Signed-off-by: Trent Jaeger <tjaeger@cse.psu.edu> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2005-12-14 10:12:27 +03:00
if (copy_to_user_sec_ctx(xp, skb))
goto nlmsg_failure;
if (copy_to_user_policy_type(xp->type, skb) < 0)
goto nlmsg_failure;
nlmsg_end(skb, nlh);
out:
sp->this_idx++;
return 0;
nlmsg_failure:
nlmsg_cancel(skb, nlh);
return -EMSGSIZE;
}
static int xfrm_dump_policy(struct sk_buff *skb, struct netlink_callback *cb)
{
struct xfrm_dump_info info;
info.in_skb = cb->skb;
info.out_skb = skb;
info.nlmsg_seq = cb->nlh->nlmsg_seq;
info.nlmsg_flags = NLM_F_MULTI;
info.this_idx = 0;
info.start_idx = cb->args[0];
(void) xfrm_policy_walk(XFRM_POLICY_TYPE_MAIN, dump_one_policy, &info);
#ifdef CONFIG_XFRM_SUB_POLICY
(void) xfrm_policy_walk(XFRM_POLICY_TYPE_SUB, dump_one_policy, &info);
#endif
cb->args[0] = info.this_idx;
return skb->len;
}
static struct sk_buff *xfrm_policy_netlink(struct sk_buff *in_skb,
struct xfrm_policy *xp,
int dir, u32 seq)
{
struct xfrm_dump_info info;
struct sk_buff *skb;
skb = nlmsg_new(NLMSG_DEFAULT_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
if (!skb)
return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
info.in_skb = in_skb;
info.out_skb = skb;
info.nlmsg_seq = seq;
info.nlmsg_flags = 0;
info.this_idx = info.start_idx = 0;
if (dump_one_policy(xp, dir, 0, &info) < 0) {
kfree_skb(skb);
return NULL;
}
return skb;
}
static int xfrm_get_policy(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
struct nlattr **attrs)
{
struct xfrm_policy *xp;
struct xfrm_userpolicy_id *p;
u8 type = XFRM_POLICY_TYPE_MAIN;
int err;
struct km_event c;
int delete;
p = nlmsg_data(nlh);
delete = nlh->nlmsg_type == XFRM_MSG_DELPOLICY;
err = copy_from_user_policy_type(&type, attrs);
if (err)
return err;
err = verify_policy_dir(p->dir);
if (err)
return err;
if (p->index)
xp = xfrm_policy_byid(type, p->dir, p->index, delete, &err);
[LSM-IPSec]: Security association restriction. This patch series implements per packet access control via the extension of the Linux Security Modules (LSM) interface by hooks in the XFRM and pfkey subsystems that leverage IPSec security associations to label packets. Extensions to the SELinux LSM are included that leverage the patch for this purpose. This patch implements the changes necessary to the XFRM subsystem, pfkey interface, ipv4/ipv6, and xfrm_user interface to restrict a socket to use only authorized security associations (or no security association) to send/receive network packets. Patch purpose: The patch is designed to enable access control per packets based on the strongly authenticated IPSec security association. Such access controls augment the existing ones based on network interface and IP address. The former are very coarse-grained, and the latter can be spoofed. By using IPSec, the system can control access to remote hosts based on cryptographic keys generated using the IPSec mechanism. This enables access control on a per-machine basis or per-application if the remote machine is running the same mechanism and trusted to enforce the access control policy. Patch design approach: The overall approach is that policy (xfrm_policy) entries set by user-level programs (e.g., setkey for ipsec-tools) are extended with a security context that is used at policy selection time in the XFRM subsystem to restrict the sockets that can send/receive packets via security associations (xfrm_states) that are built from those policies. A presentation available at www.selinux-symposium.org/2005/presentations/session2/2-3-jaeger.pdf from the SELinux symposium describes the overall approach. Patch implementation details: On output, the policy retrieved (via xfrm_policy_lookup or xfrm_sk_policy_lookup) must be authorized for the security context of the socket and the same security context is required for resultant security association (retrieved or negotiated via racoon in ipsec-tools). This is enforced in xfrm_state_find. On input, the policy retrieved must also be authorized for the socket (at __xfrm_policy_check), and the security context of the policy must also match the security association being used. The patch has virtually no impact on packets that do not use IPSec. The existing Netfilter (outgoing) and LSM rcv_skb hooks are used as before. Also, if IPSec is used without security contexts, the impact is minimal. The LSM must allow such policies to be selected for the combination of socket and remote machine, but subsequent IPSec processing proceeds as in the original case. Testing: The pfkey interface is tested using the ipsec-tools. ipsec-tools have been modified (a separate ipsec-tools patch is available for version 0.5) that supports assignment of xfrm_policy entries and security associations with security contexts via setkey and the negotiation using the security contexts via racoon. The xfrm_user interface is tested via ad hoc programs that set security contexts. These programs are also available from me, and contain programs for setting, getting, and deleting policy for testing this interface. Testing of sa functions was done by tracing kernel behavior. Signed-off-by: Trent Jaeger <tjaeger@cse.psu.edu> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2005-12-14 10:12:27 +03:00
else {
struct nlattr *rt = attrs[XFRMA_SEC_CTX];
[LSM-IPSec]: Security association restriction. This patch series implements per packet access control via the extension of the Linux Security Modules (LSM) interface by hooks in the XFRM and pfkey subsystems that leverage IPSec security associations to label packets. Extensions to the SELinux LSM are included that leverage the patch for this purpose. This patch implements the changes necessary to the XFRM subsystem, pfkey interface, ipv4/ipv6, and xfrm_user interface to restrict a socket to use only authorized security associations (or no security association) to send/receive network packets. Patch purpose: The patch is designed to enable access control per packets based on the strongly authenticated IPSec security association. Such access controls augment the existing ones based on network interface and IP address. The former are very coarse-grained, and the latter can be spoofed. By using IPSec, the system can control access to remote hosts based on cryptographic keys generated using the IPSec mechanism. This enables access control on a per-machine basis or per-application if the remote machine is running the same mechanism and trusted to enforce the access control policy. Patch design approach: The overall approach is that policy (xfrm_policy) entries set by user-level programs (e.g., setkey for ipsec-tools) are extended with a security context that is used at policy selection time in the XFRM subsystem to restrict the sockets that can send/receive packets via security associations (xfrm_states) that are built from those policies. A presentation available at www.selinux-symposium.org/2005/presentations/session2/2-3-jaeger.pdf from the SELinux symposium describes the overall approach. Patch implementation details: On output, the policy retrieved (via xfrm_policy_lookup or xfrm_sk_policy_lookup) must be authorized for the security context of the socket and the same security context is required for resultant security association (retrieved or negotiated via racoon in ipsec-tools). This is enforced in xfrm_state_find. On input, the policy retrieved must also be authorized for the socket (at __xfrm_policy_check), and the security context of the policy must also match the security association being used. The patch has virtually no impact on packets that do not use IPSec. The existing Netfilter (outgoing) and LSM rcv_skb hooks are used as before. Also, if IPSec is used without security contexts, the impact is minimal. The LSM must allow such policies to be selected for the combination of socket and remote machine, but subsequent IPSec processing proceeds as in the original case. Testing: The pfkey interface is tested using the ipsec-tools. ipsec-tools have been modified (a separate ipsec-tools patch is available for version 0.5) that supports assignment of xfrm_policy entries and security associations with security contexts via setkey and the negotiation using the security contexts via racoon. The xfrm_user interface is tested via ad hoc programs that set security contexts. These programs are also available from me, and contain programs for setting, getting, and deleting policy for testing this interface. Testing of sa functions was done by tracing kernel behavior. Signed-off-by: Trent Jaeger <tjaeger@cse.psu.edu> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2005-12-14 10:12:27 +03:00
struct xfrm_policy tmp;
err = verify_sec_ctx_len(attrs);
[LSM-IPSec]: Security association restriction. This patch series implements per packet access control via the extension of the Linux Security Modules (LSM) interface by hooks in the XFRM and pfkey subsystems that leverage IPSec security associations to label packets. Extensions to the SELinux LSM are included that leverage the patch for this purpose. This patch implements the changes necessary to the XFRM subsystem, pfkey interface, ipv4/ipv6, and xfrm_user interface to restrict a socket to use only authorized security associations (or no security association) to send/receive network packets. Patch purpose: The patch is designed to enable access control per packets based on the strongly authenticated IPSec security association. Such access controls augment the existing ones based on network interface and IP address. The former are very coarse-grained, and the latter can be spoofed. By using IPSec, the system can control access to remote hosts based on cryptographic keys generated using the IPSec mechanism. This enables access control on a per-machine basis or per-application if the remote machine is running the same mechanism and trusted to enforce the access control policy. Patch design approach: The overall approach is that policy (xfrm_policy) entries set by user-level programs (e.g., setkey for ipsec-tools) are extended with a security context that is used at policy selection time in the XFRM subsystem to restrict the sockets that can send/receive packets via security associations (xfrm_states) that are built from those policies. A presentation available at www.selinux-symposium.org/2005/presentations/session2/2-3-jaeger.pdf from the SELinux symposium describes the overall approach. Patch implementation details: On output, the policy retrieved (via xfrm_policy_lookup or xfrm_sk_policy_lookup) must be authorized for the security context of the socket and the same security context is required for resultant security association (retrieved or negotiated via racoon in ipsec-tools). This is enforced in xfrm_state_find. On input, the policy retrieved must also be authorized for the socket (at __xfrm_policy_check), and the security context of the policy must also match the security association being used. The patch has virtually no impact on packets that do not use IPSec. The existing Netfilter (outgoing) and LSM rcv_skb hooks are used as before. Also, if IPSec is used without security contexts, the impact is minimal. The LSM must allow such policies to be selected for the combination of socket and remote machine, but subsequent IPSec processing proceeds as in the original case. Testing: The pfkey interface is tested using the ipsec-tools. ipsec-tools have been modified (a separate ipsec-tools patch is available for version 0.5) that supports assignment of xfrm_policy entries and security associations with security contexts via setkey and the negotiation using the security contexts via racoon. The xfrm_user interface is tested via ad hoc programs that set security contexts. These programs are also available from me, and contain programs for setting, getting, and deleting policy for testing this interface. Testing of sa functions was done by tracing kernel behavior. Signed-off-by: Trent Jaeger <tjaeger@cse.psu.edu> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2005-12-14 10:12:27 +03:00
if (err)
return err;
memset(&tmp, 0, sizeof(struct xfrm_policy));
if (rt) {
struct xfrm_user_sec_ctx *uctx = nla_data(rt);
[LSM-IPSec]: Security association restriction. This patch series implements per packet access control via the extension of the Linux Security Modules (LSM) interface by hooks in the XFRM and pfkey subsystems that leverage IPSec security associations to label packets. Extensions to the SELinux LSM are included that leverage the patch for this purpose. This patch implements the changes necessary to the XFRM subsystem, pfkey interface, ipv4/ipv6, and xfrm_user interface to restrict a socket to use only authorized security associations (or no security association) to send/receive network packets. Patch purpose: The patch is designed to enable access control per packets based on the strongly authenticated IPSec security association. Such access controls augment the existing ones based on network interface and IP address. The former are very coarse-grained, and the latter can be spoofed. By using IPSec, the system can control access to remote hosts based on cryptographic keys generated using the IPSec mechanism. This enables access control on a per-machine basis or per-application if the remote machine is running the same mechanism and trusted to enforce the access control policy. Patch design approach: The overall approach is that policy (xfrm_policy) entries set by user-level programs (e.g., setkey for ipsec-tools) are extended with a security context that is used at policy selection time in the XFRM subsystem to restrict the sockets that can send/receive packets via security associations (xfrm_states) that are built from those policies. A presentation available at www.selinux-symposium.org/2005/presentations/session2/2-3-jaeger.pdf from the SELinux symposium describes the overall approach. Patch implementation details: On output, the policy retrieved (via xfrm_policy_lookup or xfrm_sk_policy_lookup) must be authorized for the security context of the socket and the same security context is required for resultant security association (retrieved or negotiated via racoon in ipsec-tools). This is enforced in xfrm_state_find. On input, the policy retrieved must also be authorized for the socket (at __xfrm_policy_check), and the security context of the policy must also match the security association being used. The patch has virtually no impact on packets that do not use IPSec. The existing Netfilter (outgoing) and LSM rcv_skb hooks are used as before. Also, if IPSec is used without security contexts, the impact is minimal. The LSM must allow such policies to be selected for the combination of socket and remote machine, but subsequent IPSec processing proceeds as in the original case. Testing: The pfkey interface is tested using the ipsec-tools. ipsec-tools have been modified (a separate ipsec-tools patch is available for version 0.5) that supports assignment of xfrm_policy entries and security associations with security contexts via setkey and the negotiation using the security contexts via racoon. The xfrm_user interface is tested via ad hoc programs that set security contexts. These programs are also available from me, and contain programs for setting, getting, and deleting policy for testing this interface. Testing of sa functions was done by tracing kernel behavior. Signed-off-by: Trent Jaeger <tjaeger@cse.psu.edu> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2005-12-14 10:12:27 +03:00
if ((err = security_xfrm_policy_alloc(&tmp, uctx)))
return err;
}
xp = xfrm_policy_bysel_ctx(type, p->dir, &p->sel, tmp.security,
delete, &err);
[LSM-IPSec]: Security association restriction. This patch series implements per packet access control via the extension of the Linux Security Modules (LSM) interface by hooks in the XFRM and pfkey subsystems that leverage IPSec security associations to label packets. Extensions to the SELinux LSM are included that leverage the patch for this purpose. This patch implements the changes necessary to the XFRM subsystem, pfkey interface, ipv4/ipv6, and xfrm_user interface to restrict a socket to use only authorized security associations (or no security association) to send/receive network packets. Patch purpose: The patch is designed to enable access control per packets based on the strongly authenticated IPSec security association. Such access controls augment the existing ones based on network interface and IP address. The former are very coarse-grained, and the latter can be spoofed. By using IPSec, the system can control access to remote hosts based on cryptographic keys generated using the IPSec mechanism. This enables access control on a per-machine basis or per-application if the remote machine is running the same mechanism and trusted to enforce the access control policy. Patch design approach: The overall approach is that policy (xfrm_policy) entries set by user-level programs (e.g., setkey for ipsec-tools) are extended with a security context that is used at policy selection time in the XFRM subsystem to restrict the sockets that can send/receive packets via security associations (xfrm_states) that are built from those policies. A presentation available at www.selinux-symposium.org/2005/presentations/session2/2-3-jaeger.pdf from the SELinux symposium describes the overall approach. Patch implementation details: On output, the policy retrieved (via xfrm_policy_lookup or xfrm_sk_policy_lookup) must be authorized for the security context of the socket and the same security context is required for resultant security association (retrieved or negotiated via racoon in ipsec-tools). This is enforced in xfrm_state_find. On input, the policy retrieved must also be authorized for the socket (at __xfrm_policy_check), and the security context of the policy must also match the security association being used. The patch has virtually no impact on packets that do not use IPSec. The existing Netfilter (outgoing) and LSM rcv_skb hooks are used as before. Also, if IPSec is used without security contexts, the impact is minimal. The LSM must allow such policies to be selected for the combination of socket and remote machine, but subsequent IPSec processing proceeds as in the original case. Testing: The pfkey interface is tested using the ipsec-tools. ipsec-tools have been modified (a separate ipsec-tools patch is available for version 0.5) that supports assignment of xfrm_policy entries and security associations with security contexts via setkey and the negotiation using the security contexts via racoon. The xfrm_user interface is tested via ad hoc programs that set security contexts. These programs are also available from me, and contain programs for setting, getting, and deleting policy for testing this interface. Testing of sa functions was done by tracing kernel behavior. Signed-off-by: Trent Jaeger <tjaeger@cse.psu.edu> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2005-12-14 10:12:27 +03:00
security_xfrm_policy_free(&tmp);
}
if (xp == NULL)
return -ENOENT;
if (!delete) {
struct sk_buff *resp_skb;
resp_skb = xfrm_policy_netlink(skb, xp, p->dir, nlh->nlmsg_seq);
if (IS_ERR(resp_skb)) {
err = PTR_ERR(resp_skb);
} else {
err = nlmsg_unicast(xfrm_nl, resp_skb,
NETLINK_CB(skb).pid);
}
} else {
xfrm_audit_policy_delete(xp, err ? 0 : 1,
NETLINK_CB(skb).loginuid,
NETLINK_CB(skb).sid);
if (err != 0)
[LSM-IPsec]: SELinux Authorize This patch contains a fix for the previous patch that adds security contexts to IPsec policies and security associations. In the previous patch, no authorization (besides the check for write permissions to SAD and SPD) is required to delete IPsec policies and security assocations with security contexts. Thus a user authorized to change SAD and SPD can bypass the IPsec policy authorization by simply deleteing policies with security contexts. To fix this security hole, an additional authorization check is added for removing security policies and security associations with security contexts. Note that if no security context is supplied on add or present on policy to be deleted, the SELinux module allows the change unconditionally. The hook is called on deletion when no context is present, which we may want to change. At present, I left it up to the module. LSM changes: The patch adds two new LSM hooks: xfrm_policy_delete and xfrm_state_delete. The new hooks are necessary to authorize deletion of IPsec policies that have security contexts. The existing hooks xfrm_policy_free and xfrm_state_free lack the context to do the authorization, so I decided to split authorization of deletion and memory management of security data, as is typical in the LSM interface. Use: The new delete hooks are checked when xfrm_policy or xfrm_state are deleted by either the xfrm_user interface (xfrm_get_policy, xfrm_del_sa) or the pfkey interface (pfkey_spddelete, pfkey_delete). SELinux changes: The new policy_delete and state_delete functions are added. Signed-off-by: Catherine Zhang <cxzhang@watson.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Trent Jaeger <tjaeger@cse.psu.edu> Acked-by: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2006-06-09 10:39:49 +04:00
goto out;
c.data.byid = p->index;
c.event = nlh->nlmsg_type;
c.seq = nlh->nlmsg_seq;
c.pid = nlh->nlmsg_pid;
km_policy_notify(xp, p->dir, &c);
}
[LSM-IPsec]: SELinux Authorize This patch contains a fix for the previous patch that adds security contexts to IPsec policies and security associations. In the previous patch, no authorization (besides the check for write permissions to SAD and SPD) is required to delete IPsec policies and security assocations with security contexts. Thus a user authorized to change SAD and SPD can bypass the IPsec policy authorization by simply deleteing policies with security contexts. To fix this security hole, an additional authorization check is added for removing security policies and security associations with security contexts. Note that if no security context is supplied on add or present on policy to be deleted, the SELinux module allows the change unconditionally. The hook is called on deletion when no context is present, which we may want to change. At present, I left it up to the module. LSM changes: The patch adds two new LSM hooks: xfrm_policy_delete and xfrm_state_delete. The new hooks are necessary to authorize deletion of IPsec policies that have security contexts. The existing hooks xfrm_policy_free and xfrm_state_free lack the context to do the authorization, so I decided to split authorization of deletion and memory management of security data, as is typical in the LSM interface. Use: The new delete hooks are checked when xfrm_policy or xfrm_state are deleted by either the xfrm_user interface (xfrm_get_policy, xfrm_del_sa) or the pfkey interface (pfkey_spddelete, pfkey_delete). SELinux changes: The new policy_delete and state_delete functions are added. Signed-off-by: Catherine Zhang <cxzhang@watson.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Trent Jaeger <tjaeger@cse.psu.edu> Acked-by: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2006-06-09 10:39:49 +04:00
out:
xfrm_pol_put(xp);
return err;
}
static int xfrm_flush_sa(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
struct nlattr **attrs)
{
struct km_event c;
struct xfrm_usersa_flush *p = nlmsg_data(nlh);
struct xfrm_audit audit_info;
int err;
audit_info.loginuid = NETLINK_CB(skb).loginuid;
audit_info.secid = NETLINK_CB(skb).sid;
err = xfrm_state_flush(p->proto, &audit_info);
if (err)
return err;
c.data.proto = p->proto;
c.event = nlh->nlmsg_type;
c.seq = nlh->nlmsg_seq;
c.pid = nlh->nlmsg_pid;
km_state_notify(NULL, &c);
return 0;
}
static inline size_t xfrm_aevent_msgsize(void)
{
return NLMSG_ALIGN(sizeof(struct xfrm_aevent_id))
+ nla_total_size(sizeof(struct xfrm_replay_state))
+ nla_total_size(sizeof(struct xfrm_lifetime_cur))
+ nla_total_size(4) /* XFRM_AE_RTHR */
+ nla_total_size(4); /* XFRM_AE_ETHR */
}
static int build_aevent(struct sk_buff *skb, struct xfrm_state *x, struct km_event *c)
{
struct xfrm_aevent_id *id;
struct nlmsghdr *nlh;
nlh = nlmsg_put(skb, c->pid, c->seq, XFRM_MSG_NEWAE, sizeof(*id), 0);
if (nlh == NULL)
return -EMSGSIZE;
id = nlmsg_data(nlh);
memcpy(&id->sa_id.daddr, &x->id.daddr,sizeof(x->id.daddr));
id->sa_id.spi = x->id.spi;
id->sa_id.family = x->props.family;
id->sa_id.proto = x->id.proto;
memcpy(&id->saddr, &x->props.saddr,sizeof(x->props.saddr));
id->reqid = x->props.reqid;
id->flags = c->data.aevent;
NLA_PUT(skb, XFRMA_REPLAY_VAL, sizeof(x->replay), &x->replay);
NLA_PUT(skb, XFRMA_LTIME_VAL, sizeof(x->curlft), &x->curlft);
if (id->flags & XFRM_AE_RTHR)
NLA_PUT_U32(skb, XFRMA_REPLAY_THRESH, x->replay_maxdiff);
if (id->flags & XFRM_AE_ETHR)
NLA_PUT_U32(skb, XFRMA_ETIMER_THRESH,
x->replay_maxage * 10 / HZ);
return nlmsg_end(skb, nlh);
nla_put_failure:
nlmsg_cancel(skb, nlh);
return -EMSGSIZE;
}
static int xfrm_get_ae(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
struct nlattr **attrs)
{
struct xfrm_state *x;
struct sk_buff *r_skb;
int err;
struct km_event c;
struct xfrm_aevent_id *p = nlmsg_data(nlh);
struct xfrm_usersa_id *id = &p->sa_id;
r_skb = nlmsg_new(xfrm_aevent_msgsize(), GFP_ATOMIC);
if (r_skb == NULL)
return -ENOMEM;
x = xfrm_state_lookup(&id->daddr, id->spi, id->proto, id->family);
if (x == NULL) {
kfree_skb(r_skb);
return -ESRCH;
}
/*
* XXX: is this lock really needed - none of the other
* gets lock (the concern is things getting updated
* while we are still reading) - jhs
*/
spin_lock_bh(&x->lock);
c.data.aevent = p->flags;
c.seq = nlh->nlmsg_seq;
c.pid = nlh->nlmsg_pid;
if (build_aevent(r_skb, x, &c) < 0)
BUG();
err = nlmsg_unicast(xfrm_nl, r_skb, NETLINK_CB(skb).pid);
spin_unlock_bh(&x->lock);
xfrm_state_put(x);
return err;
}
static int xfrm_new_ae(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
struct nlattr **attrs)
{
struct xfrm_state *x;
struct km_event c;
int err = - EINVAL;
struct xfrm_aevent_id *p = nlmsg_data(nlh);
struct nlattr *rp = attrs[XFRMA_REPLAY_VAL];
struct nlattr *lt = attrs[XFRMA_LTIME_VAL];
if (!lt && !rp)
return err;
/* pedantic mode - thou shalt sayeth replaceth */
if (!(nlh->nlmsg_flags&NLM_F_REPLACE))
return err;
x = xfrm_state_lookup(&p->sa_id.daddr, p->sa_id.spi, p->sa_id.proto, p->sa_id.family);
if (x == NULL)
return -ESRCH;
if (x->km.state != XFRM_STATE_VALID)
goto out;
spin_lock_bh(&x->lock);
xfrm_update_ae_params(x, attrs);
spin_unlock_bh(&x->lock);
c.event = nlh->nlmsg_type;
c.seq = nlh->nlmsg_seq;
c.pid = nlh->nlmsg_pid;
c.data.aevent = XFRM_AE_CU;
km_state_notify(x, &c);
err = 0;
out:
xfrm_state_put(x);
return err;
}
static int xfrm_flush_policy(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
struct nlattr **attrs)
{
struct km_event c;
u8 type = XFRM_POLICY_TYPE_MAIN;
int err;
struct xfrm_audit audit_info;
err = copy_from_user_policy_type(&type, attrs);
if (err)
return err;
audit_info.loginuid = NETLINK_CB(skb).loginuid;
audit_info.secid = NETLINK_CB(skb).sid;
err = xfrm_policy_flush(type, &audit_info);
if (err)
return err;
c.data.type = type;
c.event = nlh->nlmsg_type;
c.seq = nlh->nlmsg_seq;
c.pid = nlh->nlmsg_pid;
km_policy_notify(NULL, 0, &c);
return 0;
}
static int xfrm_add_pol_expire(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
struct nlattr **attrs)
{
struct xfrm_policy *xp;
struct xfrm_user_polexpire *up = nlmsg_data(nlh);
struct xfrm_userpolicy_info *p = &up->pol;
u8 type = XFRM_POLICY_TYPE_MAIN;
int err = -ENOENT;
err = copy_from_user_policy_type(&type, attrs);
if (err)
return err;
if (p->index)
xp = xfrm_policy_byid(type, p->dir, p->index, 0, &err);
else {
struct nlattr *rt = attrs[XFRMA_SEC_CTX];
struct xfrm_policy tmp;
err = verify_sec_ctx_len(attrs);
if (err)
return err;
memset(&tmp, 0, sizeof(struct xfrm_policy));
if (rt) {
struct xfrm_user_sec_ctx *uctx = nla_data(rt);
if ((err = security_xfrm_policy_alloc(&tmp, uctx)))
return err;
}
xp = xfrm_policy_bysel_ctx(type, p->dir, &p->sel, tmp.security,
0, &err);
security_xfrm_policy_free(&tmp);
}
if (xp == NULL)
return -ENOENT;
read_lock(&xp->lock);
if (xp->dead) {
read_unlock(&xp->lock);
goto out;
}
read_unlock(&xp->lock);
err = 0;
if (up->hard) {
xfrm_policy_delete(xp, p->dir);
xfrm_audit_policy_delete(xp, 1, NETLINK_CB(skb).loginuid,
NETLINK_CB(skb).sid);
} else {
// reset the timers here?
printk("Dont know what to do with soft policy expire\n");
}
km_policy_expired(xp, p->dir, up->hard, current->pid);
out:
xfrm_pol_put(xp);
return err;
}
static int xfrm_add_sa_expire(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
struct nlattr **attrs)
{
struct xfrm_state *x;
int err;
struct xfrm_user_expire *ue = nlmsg_data(nlh);
struct xfrm_usersa_info *p = &ue->state;
x = xfrm_state_lookup(&p->id.daddr, p->id.spi, p->id.proto, p->family);
err = -ENOENT;
if (x == NULL)
return err;
spin_lock_bh(&x->lock);
err = -EINVAL;
if (x->km.state != XFRM_STATE_VALID)
goto out;
km_state_expired(x, ue->hard, current->pid);
if (ue->hard) {
__xfrm_state_delete(x);
xfrm_audit_state_delete(x, 1, NETLINK_CB(skb).loginuid,
NETLINK_CB(skb).sid);
}
err = 0;
out:
spin_unlock_bh(&x->lock);
xfrm_state_put(x);
return err;
}
static int xfrm_add_acquire(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
struct nlattr **attrs)
{
struct xfrm_policy *xp;
struct xfrm_user_tmpl *ut;
int i;
struct nlattr *rt = attrs[XFRMA_TMPL];
struct xfrm_user_acquire *ua = nlmsg_data(nlh);
struct xfrm_state *x = xfrm_state_alloc();
int err = -ENOMEM;
if (!x)
return err;
err = verify_newpolicy_info(&ua->policy);
if (err) {
printk("BAD policy passed\n");
kfree(x);
return err;
}
/* build an XP */
xp = xfrm_policy_construct(&ua->policy, attrs, &err);
if (!xp) {
kfree(x);
return err;
}
memcpy(&x->id, &ua->id, sizeof(ua->id));
memcpy(&x->props.saddr, &ua->saddr, sizeof(ua->saddr));
memcpy(&x->sel, &ua->sel, sizeof(ua->sel));
ut = nla_data(rt);
/* extract the templates and for each call km_key */
for (i = 0; i < xp->xfrm_nr; i++, ut++) {
struct xfrm_tmpl *t = &xp->xfrm_vec[i];
memcpy(&x->id, &t->id, sizeof(x->id));
x->props.mode = t->mode;
x->props.reqid = t->reqid;
x->props.family = ut->family;
t->aalgos = ua->aalgos;
t->ealgos = ua->ealgos;
t->calgos = ua->calgos;
err = km_query(x, t, xp);
}
kfree(x);
kfree(xp);
return 0;
}
#ifdef CONFIG_XFRM_MIGRATE
static int copy_from_user_migrate(struct xfrm_migrate *ma,
struct nlattr **attrs, int *num)
{
struct nlattr *rt = attrs[XFRMA_MIGRATE];
struct xfrm_user_migrate *um;
int i, num_migrate;
um = nla_data(rt);
num_migrate = nla_len(rt) / sizeof(*um);
if (num_migrate <= 0 || num_migrate > XFRM_MAX_DEPTH)
return -EINVAL;
for (i = 0; i < num_migrate; i++, um++, ma++) {
memcpy(&ma->old_daddr, &um->old_daddr, sizeof(ma->old_daddr));
memcpy(&ma->old_saddr, &um->old_saddr, sizeof(ma->old_saddr));
memcpy(&ma->new_daddr, &um->new_daddr, sizeof(ma->new_daddr));
memcpy(&ma->new_saddr, &um->new_saddr, sizeof(ma->new_saddr));
ma->proto = um->proto;
ma->mode = um->mode;
ma->reqid = um->reqid;
ma->old_family = um->old_family;
ma->new_family = um->new_family;
}
*num = i;
return 0;
}
static int xfrm_do_migrate(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
struct nlattr **attrs)
{
struct xfrm_userpolicy_id *pi = nlmsg_data(nlh);
struct xfrm_migrate m[XFRM_MAX_DEPTH];
u8 type;
int err;
int n = 0;
if (attrs[XFRMA_MIGRATE] == NULL)
return -EINVAL;
err = copy_from_user_policy_type(&type, attrs);
if (err)
return err;
err = copy_from_user_migrate((struct xfrm_migrate *)m,
attrs, &n);
if (err)
return err;
if (!n)
return 0;
xfrm_migrate(&pi->sel, pi->dir, type, m, n);
return 0;
}
#else
static int xfrm_do_migrate(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
struct nlattr **attrs)
{
return -ENOPROTOOPT;
}
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_XFRM_MIGRATE
static int copy_to_user_migrate(struct xfrm_migrate *m, struct sk_buff *skb)
{
struct xfrm_user_migrate um;
memset(&um, 0, sizeof(um));
um.proto = m->proto;
um.mode = m->mode;
um.reqid = m->reqid;
um.old_family = m->old_family;
memcpy(&um.old_daddr, &m->old_daddr, sizeof(um.old_daddr));
memcpy(&um.old_saddr, &m->old_saddr, sizeof(um.old_saddr));
um.new_family = m->new_family;
memcpy(&um.new_daddr, &m->new_daddr, sizeof(um.new_daddr));
memcpy(&um.new_saddr, &m->new_saddr, sizeof(um.new_saddr));
return nla_put(skb, XFRMA_MIGRATE, sizeof(um), &um);
}
static inline size_t xfrm_migrate_msgsize(int num_migrate)
{
return NLMSG_ALIGN(sizeof(struct xfrm_userpolicy_id))
+ nla_total_size(sizeof(struct xfrm_user_migrate) * num_migrate)
+ userpolicy_type_attrsize();
}
static int build_migrate(struct sk_buff *skb, struct xfrm_migrate *m,
int num_migrate, struct xfrm_selector *sel,
u8 dir, u8 type)
{
struct xfrm_migrate *mp;
struct xfrm_userpolicy_id *pol_id;
struct nlmsghdr *nlh;
int i;
nlh = nlmsg_put(skb, 0, 0, XFRM_MSG_MIGRATE, sizeof(*pol_id), 0);
if (nlh == NULL)
return -EMSGSIZE;
pol_id = nlmsg_data(nlh);
/* copy data from selector, dir, and type to the pol_id */
memset(pol_id, 0, sizeof(*pol_id));
memcpy(&pol_id->sel, sel, sizeof(pol_id->sel));
pol_id->dir = dir;
if (copy_to_user_policy_type(type, skb) < 0)
goto nlmsg_failure;
for (i = 0, mp = m ; i < num_migrate; i++, mp++) {
if (copy_to_user_migrate(mp, skb) < 0)
goto nlmsg_failure;
}
return nlmsg_end(skb, nlh);
nlmsg_failure:
nlmsg_cancel(skb, nlh);
return -EMSGSIZE;
}
static int xfrm_send_migrate(struct xfrm_selector *sel, u8 dir, u8 type,
struct xfrm_migrate *m, int num_migrate)
{
struct sk_buff *skb;
skb = nlmsg_new(xfrm_migrate_msgsize(num_migrate), GFP_ATOMIC);
if (skb == NULL)
return -ENOMEM;
/* build migrate */
if (build_migrate(skb, m, num_migrate, sel, dir, type) < 0)
BUG();
return nlmsg_multicast(xfrm_nl, skb, 0, XFRMNLGRP_MIGRATE, GFP_ATOMIC);
}
#else
static int xfrm_send_migrate(struct xfrm_selector *sel, u8 dir, u8 type,
struct xfrm_migrate *m, int num_migrate)
{
return -ENOPROTOOPT;
}
#endif
#define XMSGSIZE(type) sizeof(struct type)
static const int xfrm_msg_min[XFRM_NR_MSGTYPES] = {
[XFRM_MSG_NEWSA - XFRM_MSG_BASE] = XMSGSIZE(xfrm_usersa_info),
[XFRM_MSG_DELSA - XFRM_MSG_BASE] = XMSGSIZE(xfrm_usersa_id),
[XFRM_MSG_GETSA - XFRM_MSG_BASE] = XMSGSIZE(xfrm_usersa_id),
[XFRM_MSG_NEWPOLICY - XFRM_MSG_BASE] = XMSGSIZE(xfrm_userpolicy_info),
[XFRM_MSG_DELPOLICY - XFRM_MSG_BASE] = XMSGSIZE(xfrm_userpolicy_id),
[XFRM_MSG_GETPOLICY - XFRM_MSG_BASE] = XMSGSIZE(xfrm_userpolicy_id),
[XFRM_MSG_ALLOCSPI - XFRM_MSG_BASE] = XMSGSIZE(xfrm_userspi_info),
[XFRM_MSG_ACQUIRE - XFRM_MSG_BASE] = XMSGSIZE(xfrm_user_acquire),
[XFRM_MSG_EXPIRE - XFRM_MSG_BASE] = XMSGSIZE(xfrm_user_expire),
[XFRM_MSG_UPDPOLICY - XFRM_MSG_BASE] = XMSGSIZE(xfrm_userpolicy_info),
[XFRM_MSG_UPDSA - XFRM_MSG_BASE] = XMSGSIZE(xfrm_usersa_info),
[XFRM_MSG_POLEXPIRE - XFRM_MSG_BASE] = XMSGSIZE(xfrm_user_polexpire),
[XFRM_MSG_FLUSHSA - XFRM_MSG_BASE] = XMSGSIZE(xfrm_usersa_flush),
[XFRM_MSG_FLUSHPOLICY - XFRM_MSG_BASE] = 0,
[XFRM_MSG_NEWAE - XFRM_MSG_BASE] = XMSGSIZE(xfrm_aevent_id),
[XFRM_MSG_GETAE - XFRM_MSG_BASE] = XMSGSIZE(xfrm_aevent_id),
[XFRM_MSG_REPORT - XFRM_MSG_BASE] = XMSGSIZE(xfrm_user_report),
[XFRM_MSG_MIGRATE - XFRM_MSG_BASE] = XMSGSIZE(xfrm_userpolicy_id),
[XFRM_MSG_GETSADINFO - XFRM_MSG_BASE] = sizeof(u32),
[XFRM_MSG_GETSPDINFO - XFRM_MSG_BASE] = sizeof(u32),
};
#undef XMSGSIZE
static const struct nla_policy xfrma_policy[XFRMA_MAX+1] = {
[XFRMA_ALG_AUTH] = { .len = sizeof(struct xfrm_algo) },
[XFRMA_ALG_CRYPT] = { .len = sizeof(struct xfrm_algo) },
[XFRMA_ALG_COMP] = { .len = sizeof(struct xfrm_algo) },
[XFRMA_ENCAP] = { .len = sizeof(struct xfrm_encap_tmpl) },
[XFRMA_TMPL] = { .len = sizeof(struct xfrm_user_tmpl) },
[XFRMA_SEC_CTX] = { .len = sizeof(struct xfrm_sec_ctx) },
[XFRMA_LTIME_VAL] = { .len = sizeof(struct xfrm_lifetime_cur) },
[XFRMA_REPLAY_VAL] = { .len = sizeof(struct xfrm_replay_state) },
[XFRMA_REPLAY_THRESH] = { .type = NLA_U32 },
[XFRMA_ETIMER_THRESH] = { .type = NLA_U32 },
[XFRMA_SRCADDR] = { .len = sizeof(xfrm_address_t) },
[XFRMA_COADDR] = { .len = sizeof(xfrm_address_t) },
[XFRMA_POLICY_TYPE] = { .len = sizeof(struct xfrm_userpolicy_type)},
[XFRMA_MIGRATE] = { .len = sizeof(struct xfrm_user_migrate) },
};
static struct xfrm_link {
int (*doit)(struct sk_buff *, struct nlmsghdr *, struct nlattr **);
int (*dump)(struct sk_buff *, struct netlink_callback *);
} xfrm_dispatch[XFRM_NR_MSGTYPES] = {
[XFRM_MSG_NEWSA - XFRM_MSG_BASE] = { .doit = xfrm_add_sa },
[XFRM_MSG_DELSA - XFRM_MSG_BASE] = { .doit = xfrm_del_sa },
[XFRM_MSG_GETSA - XFRM_MSG_BASE] = { .doit = xfrm_get_sa,
.dump = xfrm_dump_sa },
[XFRM_MSG_NEWPOLICY - XFRM_MSG_BASE] = { .doit = xfrm_add_policy },
[XFRM_MSG_DELPOLICY - XFRM_MSG_BASE] = { .doit = xfrm_get_policy },
[XFRM_MSG_GETPOLICY - XFRM_MSG_BASE] = { .doit = xfrm_get_policy,
.dump = xfrm_dump_policy },
[XFRM_MSG_ALLOCSPI - XFRM_MSG_BASE] = { .doit = xfrm_alloc_userspi },
[XFRM_MSG_ACQUIRE - XFRM_MSG_BASE] = { .doit = xfrm_add_acquire },
[XFRM_MSG_EXPIRE - XFRM_MSG_BASE] = { .doit = xfrm_add_sa_expire },
[XFRM_MSG_UPDPOLICY - XFRM_MSG_BASE] = { .doit = xfrm_add_policy },
[XFRM_MSG_UPDSA - XFRM_MSG_BASE] = { .doit = xfrm_add_sa },
[XFRM_MSG_POLEXPIRE - XFRM_MSG_BASE] = { .doit = xfrm_add_pol_expire},
[XFRM_MSG_FLUSHSA - XFRM_MSG_BASE] = { .doit = xfrm_flush_sa },
[XFRM_MSG_FLUSHPOLICY - XFRM_MSG_BASE] = { .doit = xfrm_flush_policy },
[XFRM_MSG_NEWAE - XFRM_MSG_BASE] = { .doit = xfrm_new_ae },
[XFRM_MSG_GETAE - XFRM_MSG_BASE] = { .doit = xfrm_get_ae },
[XFRM_MSG_MIGRATE - XFRM_MSG_BASE] = { .doit = xfrm_do_migrate },
[XFRM_MSG_GETSADINFO - XFRM_MSG_BASE] = { .doit = xfrm_get_sadinfo },
[XFRM_MSG_GETSPDINFO - XFRM_MSG_BASE] = { .doit = xfrm_get_spdinfo },
};
static int xfrm_user_rcv_msg(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh)
{
struct nlattr *attrs[XFRMA_MAX+1];
struct xfrm_link *link;
int type, err;
type = nlh->nlmsg_type;
if (type > XFRM_MSG_MAX)
return -EINVAL;
type -= XFRM_MSG_BASE;
link = &xfrm_dispatch[type];
/* All operations require privileges, even GET */
if (security_netlink_recv(skb, CAP_NET_ADMIN))
return -EPERM;
if ((type == (XFRM_MSG_GETSA - XFRM_MSG_BASE) ||
type == (XFRM_MSG_GETPOLICY - XFRM_MSG_BASE)) &&
(nlh->nlmsg_flags & NLM_F_DUMP)) {
if (link->dump == NULL)
return -EINVAL;
return netlink_dump_start(xfrm_nl, skb, nlh, link->dump, NULL);
}
err = nlmsg_parse(nlh, xfrm_msg_min[type], attrs, XFRMA_MAX,
xfrma_policy);
if (err < 0)
return err;
if (link->doit == NULL)
return -EINVAL;
return link->doit(skb, nlh, attrs);
}
static void xfrm_netlink_rcv(struct sock *sk, int len)
{
unsigned int qlen = 0;
[NETLINK]: Synchronous message processing. Let's recap the problem. The current asynchronous netlink kernel message processing is vulnerable to these attacks: 1) Hit and run: Attacker sends one or more messages and then exits before they're processed. This may confuse/disable the next netlink user that gets the netlink address of the attacker since it may receive the responses to the attacker's messages. Proposed solutions: a) Synchronous processing. b) Stream mode socket. c) Restrict/prohibit binding. 2) Starvation: Because various netlink rcv functions were written to not return until all messages have been processed on a socket, it is possible for these functions to execute for an arbitrarily long period of time. If this is successfully exploited it could also be used to hold rtnl forever. Proposed solutions: a) Synchronous processing. b) Stream mode socket. Firstly let's cross off solution c). It only solves the first problem and it has user-visible impacts. In particular, it'll break user space applications that expect to bind or communicate with specific netlink addresses (pid's). So we're left with a choice of synchronous processing versus SOCK_STREAM for netlink. For the moment I'm sticking with the synchronous approach as suggested by Alexey since it's simpler and I'd rather spend my time working on other things. However, it does have a number of deficiencies compared to the stream mode solution: 1) User-space to user-space netlink communication is still vulnerable. 2) Inefficient use of resources. This is especially true for rtnetlink since the lock is shared with other users such as networking drivers. The latter could hold the rtnl while communicating with hardware which causes the rtnetlink user to wait when it could be doing other things. 3) It is still possible to DoS all netlink users by flooding the kernel netlink receive queue. The attacker simply fills the receive socket with a single netlink message that fills up the entire queue. The attacker then continues to call sendmsg with the same message in a loop. Point 3) can be countered by retransmissions in user-space code, however it is pretty messy. In light of these problems (in particular, point 3), we should implement stream mode netlink at some point. In the mean time, here is a patch that implements synchronous processing. Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2005-05-04 01:55:09 +04:00
do {
mutex_lock(&xfrm_cfg_mutex);
netlink_run_queue(sk, &qlen, &xfrm_user_rcv_msg);
mutex_unlock(&xfrm_cfg_mutex);
[NETLINK]: Synchronous message processing. Let's recap the problem. The current asynchronous netlink kernel message processing is vulnerable to these attacks: 1) Hit and run: Attacker sends one or more messages and then exits before they're processed. This may confuse/disable the next netlink user that gets the netlink address of the attacker since it may receive the responses to the attacker's messages. Proposed solutions: a) Synchronous processing. b) Stream mode socket. c) Restrict/prohibit binding. 2) Starvation: Because various netlink rcv functions were written to not return until all messages have been processed on a socket, it is possible for these functions to execute for an arbitrarily long period of time. If this is successfully exploited it could also be used to hold rtnl forever. Proposed solutions: a) Synchronous processing. b) Stream mode socket. Firstly let's cross off solution c). It only solves the first problem and it has user-visible impacts. In particular, it'll break user space applications that expect to bind or communicate with specific netlink addresses (pid's). So we're left with a choice of synchronous processing versus SOCK_STREAM for netlink. For the moment I'm sticking with the synchronous approach as suggested by Alexey since it's simpler and I'd rather spend my time working on other things. However, it does have a number of deficiencies compared to the stream mode solution: 1) User-space to user-space netlink communication is still vulnerable. 2) Inefficient use of resources. This is especially true for rtnetlink since the lock is shared with other users such as networking drivers. The latter could hold the rtnl while communicating with hardware which causes the rtnetlink user to wait when it could be doing other things. 3) It is still possible to DoS all netlink users by flooding the kernel netlink receive queue. The attacker simply fills the receive socket with a single netlink message that fills up the entire queue. The attacker then continues to call sendmsg with the same message in a loop. Point 3) can be countered by retransmissions in user-space code, however it is pretty messy. In light of these problems (in particular, point 3), we should implement stream mode netlink at some point. In the mean time, here is a patch that implements synchronous processing. Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2005-05-04 01:55:09 +04:00
} while (qlen);
}
static inline size_t xfrm_expire_msgsize(void)
{
return NLMSG_ALIGN(sizeof(struct xfrm_user_expire));
}
static int build_expire(struct sk_buff *skb, struct xfrm_state *x, struct km_event *c)
{
struct xfrm_user_expire *ue;
struct nlmsghdr *nlh;
nlh = nlmsg_put(skb, c->pid, 0, XFRM_MSG_EXPIRE, sizeof(*ue), 0);
if (nlh == NULL)
return -EMSGSIZE;
ue = nlmsg_data(nlh);
copy_to_user_state(x, &ue->state);
ue->hard = (c->data.hard != 0) ? 1 : 0;
return nlmsg_end(skb, nlh);
}
static int xfrm_exp_state_notify(struct xfrm_state *x, struct km_event *c)
{
struct sk_buff *skb;
skb = nlmsg_new(xfrm_expire_msgsize(), GFP_ATOMIC);
if (skb == NULL)
return -ENOMEM;
if (build_expire(skb, x, c) < 0)
BUG();
return nlmsg_multicast(xfrm_nl, skb, 0, XFRMNLGRP_EXPIRE, GFP_ATOMIC);
}
static int xfrm_aevent_state_notify(struct xfrm_state *x, struct km_event *c)
{
struct sk_buff *skb;
skb = nlmsg_new(xfrm_aevent_msgsize(), GFP_ATOMIC);
if (skb == NULL)
return -ENOMEM;
if (build_aevent(skb, x, c) < 0)
BUG();
return nlmsg_multicast(xfrm_nl, skb, 0, XFRMNLGRP_AEVENTS, GFP_ATOMIC);
}
static int xfrm_notify_sa_flush(struct km_event *c)
{
struct xfrm_usersa_flush *p;
struct nlmsghdr *nlh;
struct sk_buff *skb;
int len = NLMSG_ALIGN(sizeof(struct xfrm_usersa_flush));
skb = nlmsg_new(len, GFP_ATOMIC);
if (skb == NULL)
return -ENOMEM;
nlh = nlmsg_put(skb, c->pid, c->seq, XFRM_MSG_FLUSHSA, sizeof(*p), 0);
if (nlh == NULL) {
kfree_skb(skb);
return -EMSGSIZE;
}
p = nlmsg_data(nlh);
p->proto = c->data.proto;
nlmsg_end(skb, nlh);
return nlmsg_multicast(xfrm_nl, skb, 0, XFRMNLGRP_SA, GFP_ATOMIC);
}
static inline size_t xfrm_sa_len(struct xfrm_state *x)
{
size_t l = 0;
if (x->aalg)
l += nla_total_size(alg_len(x->aalg));
if (x->ealg)
l += nla_total_size(alg_len(x->ealg));
if (x->calg)
l += nla_total_size(sizeof(*x->calg));
if (x->encap)
l += nla_total_size(sizeof(*x->encap));
return l;
}
static int xfrm_notify_sa(struct xfrm_state *x, struct km_event *c)
{
struct xfrm_usersa_info *p;
struct xfrm_usersa_id *id;
struct nlmsghdr *nlh;
struct sk_buff *skb;
int len = xfrm_sa_len(x);
int headlen;
headlen = sizeof(*p);
if (c->event == XFRM_MSG_DELSA) {
len += nla_total_size(headlen);
headlen = sizeof(*id);
}
len += NLMSG_ALIGN(headlen);
skb = nlmsg_new(len, GFP_ATOMIC);
if (skb == NULL)
return -ENOMEM;
nlh = nlmsg_put(skb, c->pid, c->seq, c->event, headlen, 0);
if (nlh == NULL)
goto nla_put_failure;
p = nlmsg_data(nlh);
if (c->event == XFRM_MSG_DELSA) {
struct nlattr *attr;
id = nlmsg_data(nlh);
memcpy(&id->daddr, &x->id.daddr, sizeof(id->daddr));
id->spi = x->id.spi;
id->family = x->props.family;
id->proto = x->id.proto;
attr = nla_reserve(skb, XFRMA_SA, sizeof(*p));
if (attr == NULL)
goto nla_put_failure;
p = nla_data(attr);
}
copy_to_user_state(x, p);
if (x->aalg)
NLA_PUT(skb, XFRMA_ALG_AUTH, alg_len(x->aalg), x->aalg);
if (x->ealg)
NLA_PUT(skb, XFRMA_ALG_CRYPT, alg_len(x->ealg), x->ealg);
if (x->calg)
NLA_PUT(skb, XFRMA_ALG_COMP, sizeof(*(x->calg)), x->calg);
if (x->encap)
NLA_PUT(skb, XFRMA_ENCAP, sizeof(*x->encap), x->encap);
nlmsg_end(skb, nlh);
return nlmsg_multicast(xfrm_nl, skb, 0, XFRMNLGRP_SA, GFP_ATOMIC);
nla_put_failure:
kfree_skb(skb);
return -1;
}
static int xfrm_send_state_notify(struct xfrm_state *x, struct km_event *c)
{
switch (c->event) {
case XFRM_MSG_EXPIRE:
return xfrm_exp_state_notify(x, c);
case XFRM_MSG_NEWAE:
return xfrm_aevent_state_notify(x, c);
case XFRM_MSG_DELSA:
case XFRM_MSG_UPDSA:
case XFRM_MSG_NEWSA:
return xfrm_notify_sa(x, c);
case XFRM_MSG_FLUSHSA:
return xfrm_notify_sa_flush(c);
default:
printk("xfrm_user: Unknown SA event %d\n", c->event);
break;
}
return 0;
}
static inline size_t xfrm_acquire_msgsize(struct xfrm_state *x,
struct xfrm_policy *xp)
{
return NLMSG_ALIGN(sizeof(struct xfrm_user_acquire))
+ nla_total_size(sizeof(struct xfrm_user_tmpl) * xp->xfrm_nr)
+ nla_total_size(xfrm_user_sec_ctx_size(x->security))
+ userpolicy_type_attrsize();
}
static int build_acquire(struct sk_buff *skb, struct xfrm_state *x,
struct xfrm_tmpl *xt, struct xfrm_policy *xp,
int dir)
{
struct xfrm_user_acquire *ua;
struct nlmsghdr *nlh;
__u32 seq = xfrm_get_acqseq();
nlh = nlmsg_put(skb, 0, 0, XFRM_MSG_ACQUIRE, sizeof(*ua), 0);
if (nlh == NULL)
return -EMSGSIZE;
ua = nlmsg_data(nlh);
memcpy(&ua->id, &x->id, sizeof(ua->id));
memcpy(&ua->saddr, &x->props.saddr, sizeof(ua->saddr));
memcpy(&ua->sel, &x->sel, sizeof(ua->sel));
copy_to_user_policy(xp, &ua->policy, dir);
ua->aalgos = xt->aalgos;
ua->ealgos = xt->ealgos;
ua->calgos = xt->calgos;
ua->seq = x->km.seq = seq;
if (copy_to_user_tmpl(xp, skb) < 0)
goto nlmsg_failure;
if (copy_to_user_state_sec_ctx(x, skb))
[LSM-IPSec]: Security association restriction. This patch series implements per packet access control via the extension of the Linux Security Modules (LSM) interface by hooks in the XFRM and pfkey subsystems that leverage IPSec security associations to label packets. Extensions to the SELinux LSM are included that leverage the patch for this purpose. This patch implements the changes necessary to the XFRM subsystem, pfkey interface, ipv4/ipv6, and xfrm_user interface to restrict a socket to use only authorized security associations (or no security association) to send/receive network packets. Patch purpose: The patch is designed to enable access control per packets based on the strongly authenticated IPSec security association. Such access controls augment the existing ones based on network interface and IP address. The former are very coarse-grained, and the latter can be spoofed. By using IPSec, the system can control access to remote hosts based on cryptographic keys generated using the IPSec mechanism. This enables access control on a per-machine basis or per-application if the remote machine is running the same mechanism and trusted to enforce the access control policy. Patch design approach: The overall approach is that policy (xfrm_policy) entries set by user-level programs (e.g., setkey for ipsec-tools) are extended with a security context that is used at policy selection time in the XFRM subsystem to restrict the sockets that can send/receive packets via security associations (xfrm_states) that are built from those policies. A presentation available at www.selinux-symposium.org/2005/presentations/session2/2-3-jaeger.pdf from the SELinux symposium describes the overall approach. Patch implementation details: On output, the policy retrieved (via xfrm_policy_lookup or xfrm_sk_policy_lookup) must be authorized for the security context of the socket and the same security context is required for resultant security association (retrieved or negotiated via racoon in ipsec-tools). This is enforced in xfrm_state_find. On input, the policy retrieved must also be authorized for the socket (at __xfrm_policy_check), and the security context of the policy must also match the security association being used. The patch has virtually no impact on packets that do not use IPSec. The existing Netfilter (outgoing) and LSM rcv_skb hooks are used as before. Also, if IPSec is used without security contexts, the impact is minimal. The LSM must allow such policies to be selected for the combination of socket and remote machine, but subsequent IPSec processing proceeds as in the original case. Testing: The pfkey interface is tested using the ipsec-tools. ipsec-tools have been modified (a separate ipsec-tools patch is available for version 0.5) that supports assignment of xfrm_policy entries and security associations with security contexts via setkey and the negotiation using the security contexts via racoon. The xfrm_user interface is tested via ad hoc programs that set security contexts. These programs are also available from me, and contain programs for setting, getting, and deleting policy for testing this interface. Testing of sa functions was done by tracing kernel behavior. Signed-off-by: Trent Jaeger <tjaeger@cse.psu.edu> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2005-12-14 10:12:27 +03:00
goto nlmsg_failure;
if (copy_to_user_policy_type(xp->type, skb) < 0)
goto nlmsg_failure;
return nlmsg_end(skb, nlh);
nlmsg_failure:
nlmsg_cancel(skb, nlh);
return -EMSGSIZE;
}
static int xfrm_send_acquire(struct xfrm_state *x, struct xfrm_tmpl *xt,
struct xfrm_policy *xp, int dir)
{
struct sk_buff *skb;
skb = nlmsg_new(xfrm_acquire_msgsize(x, xp), GFP_ATOMIC);
if (skb == NULL)
return -ENOMEM;
if (build_acquire(skb, x, xt, xp, dir) < 0)
BUG();
return nlmsg_multicast(xfrm_nl, skb, 0, XFRMNLGRP_ACQUIRE, GFP_ATOMIC);
}
/* User gives us xfrm_user_policy_info followed by an array of 0
* or more templates.
*/
static struct xfrm_policy *xfrm_compile_policy(struct sock *sk, int opt,
u8 *data, int len, int *dir)
{
struct xfrm_userpolicy_info *p = (struct xfrm_userpolicy_info *)data;
struct xfrm_user_tmpl *ut = (struct xfrm_user_tmpl *) (p + 1);
struct xfrm_policy *xp;
int nr;
switch (sk->sk_family) {
case AF_INET:
if (opt != IP_XFRM_POLICY) {
*dir = -EOPNOTSUPP;
return NULL;
}
break;
#if defined(CONFIG_IPV6) || defined(CONFIG_IPV6_MODULE)
case AF_INET6:
if (opt != IPV6_XFRM_POLICY) {
*dir = -EOPNOTSUPP;
return NULL;
}
break;
#endif
default:
*dir = -EINVAL;
return NULL;
}
*dir = -EINVAL;
if (len < sizeof(*p) ||
verify_newpolicy_info(p))
return NULL;
nr = ((len - sizeof(*p)) / sizeof(*ut));
if (validate_tmpl(nr, ut, p->sel.family))
return NULL;
if (p->dir > XFRM_POLICY_OUT)
return NULL;
xp = xfrm_policy_alloc(GFP_KERNEL);
if (xp == NULL) {
*dir = -ENOBUFS;
return NULL;
}
copy_from_user_policy(xp, p);
xp->type = XFRM_POLICY_TYPE_MAIN;
copy_templates(xp, ut, nr);
*dir = p->dir;
return xp;
}
static inline size_t xfrm_polexpire_msgsize(struct xfrm_policy *xp)
{
return NLMSG_ALIGN(sizeof(struct xfrm_user_polexpire))
+ nla_total_size(sizeof(struct xfrm_user_tmpl) * xp->xfrm_nr)
+ nla_total_size(xfrm_user_sec_ctx_size(xp->security))
+ userpolicy_type_attrsize();
}
static int build_polexpire(struct sk_buff *skb, struct xfrm_policy *xp,
int dir, struct km_event *c)
{
struct xfrm_user_polexpire *upe;
struct nlmsghdr *nlh;
int hard = c->data.hard;
nlh = nlmsg_put(skb, c->pid, 0, XFRM_MSG_POLEXPIRE, sizeof(*upe), 0);
if (nlh == NULL)
return -EMSGSIZE;
upe = nlmsg_data(nlh);
copy_to_user_policy(xp, &upe->pol, dir);
if (copy_to_user_tmpl(xp, skb) < 0)
goto nlmsg_failure;
[LSM-IPSec]: Security association restriction. This patch series implements per packet access control via the extension of the Linux Security Modules (LSM) interface by hooks in the XFRM and pfkey subsystems that leverage IPSec security associations to label packets. Extensions to the SELinux LSM are included that leverage the patch for this purpose. This patch implements the changes necessary to the XFRM subsystem, pfkey interface, ipv4/ipv6, and xfrm_user interface to restrict a socket to use only authorized security associations (or no security association) to send/receive network packets. Patch purpose: The patch is designed to enable access control per packets based on the strongly authenticated IPSec security association. Such access controls augment the existing ones based on network interface and IP address. The former are very coarse-grained, and the latter can be spoofed. By using IPSec, the system can control access to remote hosts based on cryptographic keys generated using the IPSec mechanism. This enables access control on a per-machine basis or per-application if the remote machine is running the same mechanism and trusted to enforce the access control policy. Patch design approach: The overall approach is that policy (xfrm_policy) entries set by user-level programs (e.g., setkey for ipsec-tools) are extended with a security context that is used at policy selection time in the XFRM subsystem to restrict the sockets that can send/receive packets via security associations (xfrm_states) that are built from those policies. A presentation available at www.selinux-symposium.org/2005/presentations/session2/2-3-jaeger.pdf from the SELinux symposium describes the overall approach. Patch implementation details: On output, the policy retrieved (via xfrm_policy_lookup or xfrm_sk_policy_lookup) must be authorized for the security context of the socket and the same security context is required for resultant security association (retrieved or negotiated via racoon in ipsec-tools). This is enforced in xfrm_state_find. On input, the policy retrieved must also be authorized for the socket (at __xfrm_policy_check), and the security context of the policy must also match the security association being used. The patch has virtually no impact on packets that do not use IPSec. The existing Netfilter (outgoing) and LSM rcv_skb hooks are used as before. Also, if IPSec is used without security contexts, the impact is minimal. The LSM must allow such policies to be selected for the combination of socket and remote machine, but subsequent IPSec processing proceeds as in the original case. Testing: The pfkey interface is tested using the ipsec-tools. ipsec-tools have been modified (a separate ipsec-tools patch is available for version 0.5) that supports assignment of xfrm_policy entries and security associations with security contexts via setkey and the negotiation using the security contexts via racoon. The xfrm_user interface is tested via ad hoc programs that set security contexts. These programs are also available from me, and contain programs for setting, getting, and deleting policy for testing this interface. Testing of sa functions was done by tracing kernel behavior. Signed-off-by: Trent Jaeger <tjaeger@cse.psu.edu> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2005-12-14 10:12:27 +03:00
if (copy_to_user_sec_ctx(xp, skb))
goto nlmsg_failure;
if (copy_to_user_policy_type(xp->type, skb) < 0)
goto nlmsg_failure;
upe->hard = !!hard;
return nlmsg_end(skb, nlh);
nlmsg_failure:
nlmsg_cancel(skb, nlh);
return -EMSGSIZE;
}
static int xfrm_exp_policy_notify(struct xfrm_policy *xp, int dir, struct km_event *c)
{
struct sk_buff *skb;
skb = nlmsg_new(xfrm_polexpire_msgsize(xp), GFP_ATOMIC);
if (skb == NULL)
return -ENOMEM;
if (build_polexpire(skb, xp, dir, c) < 0)
BUG();
return nlmsg_multicast(xfrm_nl, skb, 0, XFRMNLGRP_EXPIRE, GFP_ATOMIC);
}
static int xfrm_notify_policy(struct xfrm_policy *xp, int dir, struct km_event *c)
{
struct xfrm_userpolicy_info *p;
struct xfrm_userpolicy_id *id;
struct nlmsghdr *nlh;
struct sk_buff *skb;
int len = nla_total_size(sizeof(struct xfrm_user_tmpl) * xp->xfrm_nr);
int headlen;
headlen = sizeof(*p);
if (c->event == XFRM_MSG_DELPOLICY) {
len += nla_total_size(headlen);
headlen = sizeof(*id);
}
len += userpolicy_type_attrsize();
len += NLMSG_ALIGN(headlen);
skb = nlmsg_new(len, GFP_ATOMIC);
if (skb == NULL)
return -ENOMEM;
nlh = nlmsg_put(skb, c->pid, c->seq, c->event, headlen, 0);
if (nlh == NULL)
goto nlmsg_failure;
p = nlmsg_data(nlh);
if (c->event == XFRM_MSG_DELPOLICY) {
struct nlattr *attr;
id = nlmsg_data(nlh);
memset(id, 0, sizeof(*id));
id->dir = dir;
if (c->data.byid)
id->index = xp->index;
else
memcpy(&id->sel, &xp->selector, sizeof(id->sel));
attr = nla_reserve(skb, XFRMA_POLICY, sizeof(*p));
if (attr == NULL)
goto nlmsg_failure;
p = nla_data(attr);
}
copy_to_user_policy(xp, p, dir);
if (copy_to_user_tmpl(xp, skb) < 0)
goto nlmsg_failure;
if (copy_to_user_policy_type(xp->type, skb) < 0)
goto nlmsg_failure;
nlmsg_end(skb, nlh);
return nlmsg_multicast(xfrm_nl, skb, 0, XFRMNLGRP_POLICY, GFP_ATOMIC);
nlmsg_failure:
kfree_skb(skb);
return -1;
}
static int xfrm_notify_policy_flush(struct km_event *c)
{
struct nlmsghdr *nlh;
struct sk_buff *skb;
skb = nlmsg_new(userpolicy_type_attrsize(), GFP_ATOMIC);
if (skb == NULL)
return -ENOMEM;
nlh = nlmsg_put(skb, c->pid, c->seq, XFRM_MSG_FLUSHPOLICY, 0, 0);
if (nlh == NULL)
goto nlmsg_failure;
if (copy_to_user_policy_type(c->data.type, skb) < 0)
goto nlmsg_failure;
nlmsg_end(skb, nlh);
return nlmsg_multicast(xfrm_nl, skb, 0, XFRMNLGRP_POLICY, GFP_ATOMIC);
nlmsg_failure:
kfree_skb(skb);
return -1;
}
static int xfrm_send_policy_notify(struct xfrm_policy *xp, int dir, struct km_event *c)
{
switch (c->event) {
case XFRM_MSG_NEWPOLICY:
case XFRM_MSG_UPDPOLICY:
case XFRM_MSG_DELPOLICY:
return xfrm_notify_policy(xp, dir, c);
case XFRM_MSG_FLUSHPOLICY:
return xfrm_notify_policy_flush(c);
case XFRM_MSG_POLEXPIRE:
return xfrm_exp_policy_notify(xp, dir, c);
default:
printk("xfrm_user: Unknown Policy event %d\n", c->event);
}
return 0;
}
static inline size_t xfrm_report_msgsize(void)
{
return NLMSG_ALIGN(sizeof(struct xfrm_user_report));
}
static int build_report(struct sk_buff *skb, u8 proto,
struct xfrm_selector *sel, xfrm_address_t *addr)
{
struct xfrm_user_report *ur;
struct nlmsghdr *nlh;
nlh = nlmsg_put(skb, 0, 0, XFRM_MSG_REPORT, sizeof(*ur), 0);
if (nlh == NULL)
return -EMSGSIZE;
ur = nlmsg_data(nlh);
ur->proto = proto;
memcpy(&ur->sel, sel, sizeof(ur->sel));
if (addr)
NLA_PUT(skb, XFRMA_COADDR, sizeof(*addr), addr);
return nlmsg_end(skb, nlh);
nla_put_failure:
nlmsg_cancel(skb, nlh);
return -EMSGSIZE;
}
static int xfrm_send_report(u8 proto, struct xfrm_selector *sel,
xfrm_address_t *addr)
{
struct sk_buff *skb;
skb = nlmsg_new(xfrm_report_msgsize(), GFP_ATOMIC);
if (skb == NULL)
return -ENOMEM;
if (build_report(skb, proto, sel, addr) < 0)
BUG();
return nlmsg_multicast(xfrm_nl, skb, 0, XFRMNLGRP_REPORT, GFP_ATOMIC);
}
static struct xfrm_mgr netlink_mgr = {
.id = "netlink",
.notify = xfrm_send_state_notify,
.acquire = xfrm_send_acquire,
.compile_policy = xfrm_compile_policy,
.notify_policy = xfrm_send_policy_notify,
.report = xfrm_send_report,
.migrate = xfrm_send_migrate,
};
static int __init xfrm_user_init(void)
{
struct sock *nlsk;
printk(KERN_INFO "Initializing XFRM netlink socket\n");
nlsk = netlink_kernel_create(NETLINK_XFRM, XFRMNLGRP_MAX,
xfrm_netlink_rcv, NULL, THIS_MODULE);
if (nlsk == NULL)
return -ENOMEM;
rcu_assign_pointer(xfrm_nl, nlsk);
xfrm_register_km(&netlink_mgr);
return 0;
}
static void __exit xfrm_user_exit(void)
{
struct sock *nlsk = xfrm_nl;
xfrm_unregister_km(&netlink_mgr);
rcu_assign_pointer(xfrm_nl, NULL);
synchronize_rcu();
sock_release(nlsk->sk_socket);
}
module_init(xfrm_user_init);
module_exit(xfrm_user_exit);
MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
MODULE_ALIAS_NET_PF_PROTO(PF_NETLINK, NETLINK_XFRM);