microsoft
/
WSL2-Linux-Kernel
зеркало из https://github.com/microsoft/WSL2-Linux-Kernel.git
1
0
Форкнуть 0
Код Задачи Пакеты Проекты Релизы Вики Активность
WSL2-Linux-Kernel/fs/crypto/hooks.c

387 строки
12 KiB
C
Исходник Обычный вид История

treewide: Add SPDX license identifier for missed files Add SPDX license identifiers to all files which: - Have no license information of any form - Have EXPORT_.*_SYMBOL_GPL inside which was used in the initial scan/conversion to ignore the file These files fall under the project license, GPL v2 only. The resulting SPDX license identifier is: GPL-2.0-only Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2019-05-19 15:08:55 +03:00
// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
fscrypt: new helper function - fscrypt_file_open() Add a helper function which prepares to open a regular file which may be encrypted. It handles setting up the file's encryption key, then checking that the file's encryption policy matches that of its parent directory (if the parent directory is encrypted). It may be set as the ->open() method or it can be called from another ->open() method. Acked-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2017-10-09 22:15:40 +03:00
/*
* fs/crypto/hooks.c
*
* Encryption hooks for higher-level filesystem operations.
*/
fscrypt: derive dirhash key for casefolded directories When we allow indexed directories to use both encryption and casefolding, for the dirhash we can't just hash the ciphertext filenames that are stored on-disk (as is done currently) because the dirhash must be case insensitive, but the stored names are case-preserving. Nor can we hash the plaintext names with an unkeyed hash (or a hash keyed with a value stored on-disk like ext4's s_hash_seed), since that would leak information about the names that encryption is meant to protect. Instead, if we can accept a dirhash that's only computable when the fscrypt key is available, we can hash the plaintext names with a keyed hash using a secret key derived from the directory's fscrypt master key. We'll use SipHash-2-4 for this purpose. Prepare for this by deriving a SipHash key for each casefolded encrypted directory. Make sure to handle deriving the key not only when setting up the directory's fscrypt_info, but also in the case where the casefold flag is enabled after the fscrypt_info was already set up. (We could just always derive the key regardless of casefolding, but that would introduce unnecessary overhead for people not using casefolding.) Signed-off-by: Daniel Rosenberg <drosen@google.com> [EB: improved commit message, updated fscrypt.rst, squashed with change that avoids unnecessarily deriving the key, and many other cleanups] Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200120223201.241390-3-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
2020-01-21 01:31:57 +03:00
#include <linux/key.h>
fscrypt: new helper function - fscrypt_file_open() Add a helper function which prepares to open a regular file which may be encrypted. It handles setting up the file's encryption key, then checking that the file's encryption policy matches that of its parent directory (if the parent directory is encrypted). It may be set as the ->open() method or it can be called from another ->open() method. Acked-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2017-10-09 22:15:40 +03:00
#include "fscrypt_private.h"
/**
fscrypt: fix all kerneldoc warnings Fix all kerneldoc warnings in fs/crypto/ and include/linux/fscrypt.h. Most of these were due to missing documentation for function parameters. Detected with: scripts/kernel-doc -v -none fs/crypto/*.{c,h} include/linux/fscrypt.h This cleanup makes it possible to check new patches for kerneldoc warnings without having to filter out all the existing ones. For consistency, also adjust some function "brief descriptions" to include the parentheses and to wrap at 80 characters. (The latter matches the checkpatch expectation.) Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200511191358.53096-2-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
2020-05-11 22:13:56 +03:00
* fscrypt_file_open() - prepare to open a possibly-encrypted regular file
fscrypt: new helper function - fscrypt_file_open() Add a helper function which prepares to open a regular file which may be encrypted. It handles setting up the file's encryption key, then checking that the file's encryption policy matches that of its parent directory (if the parent directory is encrypted). It may be set as the ->open() method or it can be called from another ->open() method. Acked-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2017-10-09 22:15:40 +03:00
* @inode: the inode being opened
* @filp: the struct file being set up
*
* Currently, an encrypted regular file can only be opened if its encryption key
* is available; access to the raw encrypted contents is not supported.
* Therefore, we first set up the inode's encryption key (if not already done)
* and return an error if it's unavailable.
*
* We also verify that if the parent directory (from the path via which the file
* is being opened) is encrypted, then the inode being opened uses the same
* encryption policy. This is needed as part of the enforcement that all files
* in an encrypted directory tree use the same encryption policy, as a
* protection against certain types of offline attacks. Note that this check is
* needed even when opening an *unencrypted* file, since it's forbidden to have
* an unencrypted file in an encrypted directory.
*
* Return: 0 on success, -ENOKEY if the key is missing, or another -errno code
*/
int fscrypt_file_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
{
int err;
struct dentry *dir;
err = fscrypt_require_key(inode);
if (err)
return err;
dir = dget_parent(file_dentry(filp));
if (IS_ENCRYPTED(d_inode(dir)) &&
!fscrypt_has_permitted_context(d_inode(dir), inode)) {
fscrypt: make fscrypt_msg() take inode instead of super_block Most of the warning and error messages in fs/crypto/ are for situations related to a specific inode, not merely to a super_block. So to make things easier, make fscrypt_msg() take an inode rather than a super_block, and make it print the inode number. Note: This is the same approach I'm taking for fsverity_msg(). Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
2019-07-24 21:07:58 +03:00
fscrypt_warn(inode,
"Inconsistent encryption context (parent directory: %lu)",
d_inode(dir)->i_ino);
fscrypt: new helper function - fscrypt_file_open() Add a helper function which prepares to open a regular file which may be encrypted. It handles setting up the file's encryption key, then checking that the file's encryption policy matches that of its parent directory (if the parent directory is encrypted). It may be set as the ->open() method or it can be called from another ->open() method. Acked-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2017-10-09 22:15:40 +03:00
err = -EPERM;
}
dput(dir);
return err;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(fscrypt_file_open);
fscrypt: new helper function - fscrypt_prepare_link() Introduce a helper function which prepares to link an inode into a possibly-encrypted directory. It handles setting up the target directory's encryption key, then verifying that the link won't violate the constraint that all files in an encrypted directory tree use the same encryption policy. Acked-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2017-10-09 22:15:41 +03:00
fscrypt: fix race allowing rename() and link() of ciphertext dentries Close some race conditions where fscrypt allowed rename() and link() on ciphertext dentries that had been looked up just prior to the key being concurrently added. It's better to return -ENOKEY in this case. This avoids doing the nonsensical thing of encrypting the names a second time when searching for the actual on-disk dir entries. It also guarantees that DCACHE_ENCRYPTED_NAME dentries are never rename()d, so the dcache won't have support all possible combinations of moving DCACHE_ENCRYPTED_NAME around during __d_move(). Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2019-03-20 21:39:10 +03:00
int __fscrypt_prepare_link(struct inode *inode, struct inode *dir,
struct dentry *dentry)
fscrypt: new helper function - fscrypt_prepare_link() Introduce a helper function which prepares to link an inode into a possibly-encrypted directory. It handles setting up the target directory's encryption key, then verifying that the link won't violate the constraint that all files in an encrypted directory tree use the same encryption policy. Acked-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2017-10-09 22:15:41 +03:00
{
fscrypt: add fscrypt_is_nokey_name() It's possible to create a duplicate filename in an encrypted directory by creating a file concurrently with adding the encryption key. Specifically, sys_open(O_CREAT) (or sys_mkdir(), sys_mknod(), or sys_symlink()) can lookup the target filename while the directory's encryption key hasn't been added yet, resulting in a negative no-key dentry. The VFS then calls ->create() (or ->mkdir(), ->mknod(), or ->symlink()) because the dentry is negative. Normally, ->create() would return -ENOKEY due to the directory's key being unavailable. However, if the key was added between the dentry lookup and ->create(), then the filesystem will go ahead and try to create the file. If the target filename happens to already exist as a normal name (not a no-key name), a duplicate filename may be added to the directory. In order to fix this, we need to fix the filesystems to prevent ->create(), ->mkdir(), ->mknod(), and ->symlink() on no-key names. (->rename() and ->link() need it too, but those are already handled correctly by fscrypt_prepare_rename() and fscrypt_prepare_link().) In preparation for this, add a helper function fscrypt_is_nokey_name() that filesystems can use to do this check. Use this helper function for the existing checks that fs/crypto/ does for rename and link. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201118075609.120337-2-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
2020-11-18 10:56:05 +03:00
if (fscrypt_is_nokey_name(dentry))
fscrypt: fix race allowing rename() and link() of ciphertext dentries Close some race conditions where fscrypt allowed rename() and link() on ciphertext dentries that had been looked up just prior to the key being concurrently added. It's better to return -ENOKEY in this case. This avoids doing the nonsensical thing of encrypting the names a second time when searching for the actual on-disk dir entries. It also guarantees that DCACHE_ENCRYPTED_NAME dentries are never rename()d, so the dcache won't have support all possible combinations of moving DCACHE_ENCRYPTED_NAME around during __d_move(). Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2019-03-20 21:39:10 +03:00
return -ENOKEY;
fscrypt: remove unnecessary calls to fscrypt_require_key() In an encrypted directory, a regular dentry (one that doesn't have the no-key name flag) can only be created if the directory's encryption key is available. Therefore the calls to fscrypt_require_key() in __fscrypt_prepare_link() and __fscrypt_prepare_rename() are unnecessary, as these functions already check that the dentries they're given aren't no-key names. Remove these unnecessary calls to fscrypt_require_key(). Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201118075609.120337-6-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
2020-11-18 10:56:09 +03:00
/*
* We don't need to separately check that the directory inode's key is
* available, as it's implied by the dentry not being a no-key name.
*/
fscrypt: fix race allowing rename() and link() of ciphertext dentries Close some race conditions where fscrypt allowed rename() and link() on ciphertext dentries that had been looked up just prior to the key being concurrently added. It's better to return -ENOKEY in this case. This avoids doing the nonsensical thing of encrypting the names a second time when searching for the actual on-disk dir entries. It also guarantees that DCACHE_ENCRYPTED_NAME dentries are never rename()d, so the dcache won't have support all possible combinations of moving DCACHE_ENCRYPTED_NAME around during __d_move(). Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2019-03-20 21:39:10 +03:00
fscrypt: new helper function - fscrypt_prepare_link() Introduce a helper function which prepares to link an inode into a possibly-encrypted directory. It handles setting up the target directory's encryption key, then verifying that the link won't violate the constraint that all files in an encrypted directory tree use the same encryption policy. Acked-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2017-10-09 22:15:41 +03:00
if (!fscrypt_has_permitted_context(dir, inode))
fscrypt: return -EXDEV for incompatible rename or link into encrypted dir Currently, trying to rename or link a regular file, directory, or symlink into an encrypted directory fails with EPERM when the source file is unencrypted or is encrypted with a different encryption policy, and is on the same mountpoint. It is correct for the operation to fail, but the choice of EPERM breaks tools like 'mv' that know to copy rather than rename if they see EXDEV, but don't know what to do with EPERM. Our original motivation for EPERM was to encourage users to securely handle their data. Encrypting files by "moving" them into an encrypted directory can be insecure because the unencrypted data may remain in free space on disk, where it can later be recovered by an attacker. It's much better to encrypt the data from the start, or at least try to securely delete the source data e.g. using the 'shred' program. However, the current behavior hasn't been effective at achieving its goal because users tend to be confused, hack around it, and complain; see e.g. https://github.com/google/fscrypt/issues/76. And in some cases it's actually inconsistent or unnecessary. For example, 'mv'-ing files between differently encrypted directories doesn't work even in cases where it can be secure, such as when in userspace the same passphrase protects both directories. Yet, you *can* already 'mv' unencrypted files into an encrypted directory if the source files are on a different mountpoint, even though doing so is often insecure. There are probably better ways to teach users to securely handle their files. For example, the 'fscrypt' userspace tool could provide a command that migrates unencrypted files into an encrypted directory, acting like 'shred' on the source files and providing appropriate warnings depending on the type of the source filesystem and disk. Receiving errors on unimportant files might also force some users to disable encryption, thus making the behavior counterproductive. It's desirable to make encryption as unobtrusive as possible. Therefore, change the error code from EPERM to EXDEV so that tools looking for EXDEV will fall back to a copy. This, of course, doesn't prevent users from still doing the right things to securely manage their files. Note that this also matches the behavior when a file is renamed between two project quota hierarchies; so there's precedent for using EXDEV for things other than mountpoints. xfstests generic/398 will require an update with this change. [Rewritten from an earlier patch series by Michael Halcrow.] Cc: Michael Halcrow <mhalcrow@google.com> Cc: Joe Richey <joerichey@google.com> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
2019-01-23 03:20:21 +03:00
return -EXDEV;
fscrypt: new helper function - fscrypt_prepare_link() Introduce a helper function which prepares to link an inode into a possibly-encrypted directory. It handles setting up the target directory's encryption key, then verifying that the link won't violate the constraint that all files in an encrypted directory tree use the same encryption policy. Acked-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2017-10-09 22:15:41 +03:00
return 0;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__fscrypt_prepare_link);
fscrypt: new helper function - fscrypt_prepare_rename() Introduce a helper function which prepares to rename a file into a possibly encrypted directory. It handles loading the encryption keys for the source and target directories if needed, and it handles enforcing that if the target directory (and the source directory for a cross-rename) is encrypted, then the file being moved into the directory has the same encryption policy as its containing directory. Acked-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2017-10-09 22:15:42 +03:00
int __fscrypt_prepare_rename(struct inode *old_dir, struct dentry *old_dentry,
struct inode *new_dir, struct dentry *new_dentry,
unsigned int flags)
{
fscrypt: add fscrypt_is_nokey_name() It's possible to create a duplicate filename in an encrypted directory by creating a file concurrently with adding the encryption key. Specifically, sys_open(O_CREAT) (or sys_mkdir(), sys_mknod(), or sys_symlink()) can lookup the target filename while the directory's encryption key hasn't been added yet, resulting in a negative no-key dentry. The VFS then calls ->create() (or ->mkdir(), ->mknod(), or ->symlink()) because the dentry is negative. Normally, ->create() would return -ENOKEY due to the directory's key being unavailable. However, if the key was added between the dentry lookup and ->create(), then the filesystem will go ahead and try to create the file. If the target filename happens to already exist as a normal name (not a no-key name), a duplicate filename may be added to the directory. In order to fix this, we need to fix the filesystems to prevent ->create(), ->mkdir(), ->mknod(), and ->symlink() on no-key names. (->rename() and ->link() need it too, but those are already handled correctly by fscrypt_prepare_rename() and fscrypt_prepare_link().) In preparation for this, add a helper function fscrypt_is_nokey_name() that filesystems can use to do this check. Use this helper function for the existing checks that fs/crypto/ does for rename and link. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201118075609.120337-2-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
2020-11-18 10:56:05 +03:00
if (fscrypt_is_nokey_name(old_dentry) ||
fscrypt_is_nokey_name(new_dentry))
fscrypt: fix race allowing rename() and link() of ciphertext dentries Close some race conditions where fscrypt allowed rename() and link() on ciphertext dentries that had been looked up just prior to the key being concurrently added. It's better to return -ENOKEY in this case. This avoids doing the nonsensical thing of encrypting the names a second time when searching for the actual on-disk dir entries. It also guarantees that DCACHE_ENCRYPTED_NAME dentries are never rename()d, so the dcache won't have support all possible combinations of moving DCACHE_ENCRYPTED_NAME around during __d_move(). Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2019-03-20 21:39:10 +03:00
return -ENOKEY;
fscrypt: remove unnecessary calls to fscrypt_require_key() In an encrypted directory, a regular dentry (one that doesn't have the no-key name flag) can only be created if the directory's encryption key is available. Therefore the calls to fscrypt_require_key() in __fscrypt_prepare_link() and __fscrypt_prepare_rename() are unnecessary, as these functions already check that the dentries they're given aren't no-key names. Remove these unnecessary calls to fscrypt_require_key(). Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201118075609.120337-6-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
2020-11-18 10:56:09 +03:00
/*
* We don't need to separately check that the directory inodes' keys are
* available, as it's implied by the dentries not being no-key names.
*/
fscrypt: fix race allowing rename() and link() of ciphertext dentries Close some race conditions where fscrypt allowed rename() and link() on ciphertext dentries that had been looked up just prior to the key being concurrently added. It's better to return -ENOKEY in this case. This avoids doing the nonsensical thing of encrypting the names a second time when searching for the actual on-disk dir entries. It also guarantees that DCACHE_ENCRYPTED_NAME dentries are never rename()d, so the dcache won't have support all possible combinations of moving DCACHE_ENCRYPTED_NAME around during __d_move(). Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2019-03-20 21:39:10 +03:00
fscrypt: new helper function - fscrypt_prepare_rename() Introduce a helper function which prepares to rename a file into a possibly encrypted directory. It handles loading the encryption keys for the source and target directories if needed, and it handles enforcing that if the target directory (and the source directory for a cross-rename) is encrypted, then the file being moved into the directory has the same encryption policy as its containing directory. Acked-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2017-10-09 22:15:42 +03:00
if (old_dir != new_dir) {
if (IS_ENCRYPTED(new_dir) &&
!fscrypt_has_permitted_context(new_dir,
d_inode(old_dentry)))
fscrypt: return -EXDEV for incompatible rename or link into encrypted dir Currently, trying to rename or link a regular file, directory, or symlink into an encrypted directory fails with EPERM when the source file is unencrypted or is encrypted with a different encryption policy, and is on the same mountpoint. It is correct for the operation to fail, but the choice of EPERM breaks tools like 'mv' that know to copy rather than rename if they see EXDEV, but don't know what to do with EPERM. Our original motivation for EPERM was to encourage users to securely handle their data. Encrypting files by "moving" them into an encrypted directory can be insecure because the unencrypted data may remain in free space on disk, where it can later be recovered by an attacker. It's much better to encrypt the data from the start, or at least try to securely delete the source data e.g. using the 'shred' program. However, the current behavior hasn't been effective at achieving its goal because users tend to be confused, hack around it, and complain; see e.g. https://github.com/google/fscrypt/issues/76. And in some cases it's actually inconsistent or unnecessary. For example, 'mv'-ing files between differently encrypted directories doesn't work even in cases where it can be secure, such as when in userspace the same passphrase protects both directories. Yet, you *can* already 'mv' unencrypted files into an encrypted directory if the source files are on a different mountpoint, even though doing so is often insecure. There are probably better ways to teach users to securely handle their files. For example, the 'fscrypt' userspace tool could provide a command that migrates unencrypted files into an encrypted directory, acting like 'shred' on the source files and providing appropriate warnings depending on the type of the source filesystem and disk. Receiving errors on unimportant files might also force some users to disable encryption, thus making the behavior counterproductive. It's desirable to make encryption as unobtrusive as possible. Therefore, change the error code from EPERM to EXDEV so that tools looking for EXDEV will fall back to a copy. This, of course, doesn't prevent users from still doing the right things to securely manage their files. Note that this also matches the behavior when a file is renamed between two project quota hierarchies; so there's precedent for using EXDEV for things other than mountpoints. xfstests generic/398 will require an update with this change. [Rewritten from an earlier patch series by Michael Halcrow.] Cc: Michael Halcrow <mhalcrow@google.com> Cc: Joe Richey <joerichey@google.com> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
2019-01-23 03:20:21 +03:00
return -EXDEV;
fscrypt: new helper function - fscrypt_prepare_rename() Introduce a helper function which prepares to rename a file into a possibly encrypted directory. It handles loading the encryption keys for the source and target directories if needed, and it handles enforcing that if the target directory (and the source directory for a cross-rename) is encrypted, then the file being moved into the directory has the same encryption policy as its containing directory. Acked-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2017-10-09 22:15:42 +03:00
if ((flags & RENAME_EXCHANGE) &&
IS_ENCRYPTED(old_dir) &&
!fscrypt_has_permitted_context(old_dir,
d_inode(new_dentry)))
fscrypt: return -EXDEV for incompatible rename or link into encrypted dir Currently, trying to rename or link a regular file, directory, or symlink into an encrypted directory fails with EPERM when the source file is unencrypted or is encrypted with a different encryption policy, and is on the same mountpoint. It is correct for the operation to fail, but the choice of EPERM breaks tools like 'mv' that know to copy rather than rename if they see EXDEV, but don't know what to do with EPERM. Our original motivation for EPERM was to encourage users to securely handle their data. Encrypting files by "moving" them into an encrypted directory can be insecure because the unencrypted data may remain in free space on disk, where it can later be recovered by an attacker. It's much better to encrypt the data from the start, or at least try to securely delete the source data e.g. using the 'shred' program. However, the current behavior hasn't been effective at achieving its goal because users tend to be confused, hack around it, and complain; see e.g. https://github.com/google/fscrypt/issues/76. And in some cases it's actually inconsistent or unnecessary. For example, 'mv'-ing files between differently encrypted directories doesn't work even in cases where it can be secure, such as when in userspace the same passphrase protects both directories. Yet, you *can* already 'mv' unencrypted files into an encrypted directory if the source files are on a different mountpoint, even though doing so is often insecure. There are probably better ways to teach users to securely handle their files. For example, the 'fscrypt' userspace tool could provide a command that migrates unencrypted files into an encrypted directory, acting like 'shred' on the source files and providing appropriate warnings depending on the type of the source filesystem and disk. Receiving errors on unimportant files might also force some users to disable encryption, thus making the behavior counterproductive. It's desirable to make encryption as unobtrusive as possible. Therefore, change the error code from EPERM to EXDEV so that tools looking for EXDEV will fall back to a copy. This, of course, doesn't prevent users from still doing the right things to securely manage their files. Note that this also matches the behavior when a file is renamed between two project quota hierarchies; so there's precedent for using EXDEV for things other than mountpoints. xfstests generic/398 will require an update with this change. [Rewritten from an earlier patch series by Michael Halcrow.] Cc: Michael Halcrow <mhalcrow@google.com> Cc: Joe Richey <joerichey@google.com> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
2019-01-23 03:20:21 +03:00
return -EXDEV;
fscrypt: new helper function - fscrypt_prepare_rename() Introduce a helper function which prepares to rename a file into a possibly encrypted directory. It handles loading the encryption keys for the source and target directories if needed, and it handles enforcing that if the target directory (and the source directory for a cross-rename) is encrypted, then the file being moved into the directory has the same encryption policy as its containing directory. Acked-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2017-10-09 22:15:42 +03:00
}
return 0;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__fscrypt_prepare_rename);
fscrypt: new helper function - fscrypt_prepare_lookup() Introduce a helper function which prepares to look up the given dentry in the given directory. If the directory is encrypted, it handles loading the directory's encryption key, setting the dentry's ->d_op to fscrypt_d_ops, and setting DCACHE_ENCRYPTED_WITH_KEY if the directory's encryption key is available. Note: once all filesystems switch over to this, we'll be able to move fscrypt_d_ops and fscrypt_set_encrypted_dentry() to fscrypt_private.h. Acked-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2017-10-09 22:15:43 +03:00
fscrypt: fix race where ->lookup() marks plaintext dentry as ciphertext ->lookup() in an encrypted directory begins as follows: 1. fscrypt_prepare_lookup(): a. Try to load the directory's encryption key. b. If the key is unavailable, mark the dentry as a ciphertext name via d_flags. 2. fscrypt_setup_filename(): a. Try to load the directory's encryption key. b. If the key is available, encrypt the name (treated as a plaintext name) to get the on-disk name. Otherwise decode the name (treated as a ciphertext name) to get the on-disk name. But if the key is concurrently added, it may be found at (2a) but not at (1a). In this case, the dentry will be wrongly marked as a ciphertext name even though it was actually treated as plaintext. This will cause the dentry to be wrongly invalidated on the next lookup, potentially causing problems. For example, if the racy ->lookup() was part of sys_mount(), then the new mount will be detached when anything tries to access it. This is despite the mountpoint having a plaintext path, which should remain valid now that the key was added. Of course, this is only possible if there's a userspace race. Still, the additional kernel-side race is confusing and unexpected. Close the kernel-side race by changing fscrypt_prepare_lookup() to also set the on-disk filename (step 2b), consistent with the d_flags update. Fixes: 28b4c263961c ("ext4 crypto: revalidate dentry after adding or removing the key") Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2019-03-20 21:39:13 +03:00
int __fscrypt_prepare_lookup(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry,
struct fscrypt_name *fname)
fscrypt: new helper function - fscrypt_prepare_lookup() Introduce a helper function which prepares to look up the given dentry in the given directory. If the directory is encrypted, it handles loading the directory's encryption key, setting the dentry's ->d_op to fscrypt_d_ops, and setting DCACHE_ENCRYPTED_WITH_KEY if the directory's encryption key is available. Note: once all filesystems switch over to this, we'll be able to move fscrypt_d_ops and fscrypt_set_encrypted_dentry() to fscrypt_private.h. Acked-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2017-10-09 22:15:43 +03:00
{
fscrypt: fix race where ->lookup() marks plaintext dentry as ciphertext ->lookup() in an encrypted directory begins as follows: 1. fscrypt_prepare_lookup(): a. Try to load the directory's encryption key. b. If the key is unavailable, mark the dentry as a ciphertext name via d_flags. 2. fscrypt_setup_filename(): a. Try to load the directory's encryption key. b. If the key is available, encrypt the name (treated as a plaintext name) to get the on-disk name. Otherwise decode the name (treated as a ciphertext name) to get the on-disk name. But if the key is concurrently added, it may be found at (2a) but not at (1a). In this case, the dentry will be wrongly marked as a ciphertext name even though it was actually treated as plaintext. This will cause the dentry to be wrongly invalidated on the next lookup, potentially causing problems. For example, if the racy ->lookup() was part of sys_mount(), then the new mount will be detached when anything tries to access it. This is despite the mountpoint having a plaintext path, which should remain valid now that the key was added. Of course, this is only possible if there's a userspace race. Still, the additional kernel-side race is confusing and unexpected. Close the kernel-side race by changing fscrypt_prepare_lookup() to also set the on-disk filename (step 2b), consistent with the d_flags update. Fixes: 28b4c263961c ("ext4 crypto: revalidate dentry after adding or removing the key") Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2019-03-20 21:39:13 +03:00
int err = fscrypt_setup_filename(dir, &dentry->d_name, 1, fname);
fscrypt: new helper function - fscrypt_prepare_lookup() Introduce a helper function which prepares to look up the given dentry in the given directory. If the directory is encrypted, it handles loading the directory's encryption key, setting the dentry's ->d_op to fscrypt_d_ops, and setting DCACHE_ENCRYPTED_WITH_KEY if the directory's encryption key is available. Note: once all filesystems switch over to this, we'll be able to move fscrypt_d_ops and fscrypt_set_encrypted_dentry() to fscrypt_private.h. Acked-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2017-10-09 22:15:43 +03:00
fscrypt: fix race where ->lookup() marks plaintext dentry as ciphertext ->lookup() in an encrypted directory begins as follows: 1. fscrypt_prepare_lookup(): a. Try to load the directory's encryption key. b. If the key is unavailable, mark the dentry as a ciphertext name via d_flags. 2. fscrypt_setup_filename(): a. Try to load the directory's encryption key. b. If the key is available, encrypt the name (treated as a plaintext name) to get the on-disk name. Otherwise decode the name (treated as a ciphertext name) to get the on-disk name. But if the key is concurrently added, it may be found at (2a) but not at (1a). In this case, the dentry will be wrongly marked as a ciphertext name even though it was actually treated as plaintext. This will cause the dentry to be wrongly invalidated on the next lookup, potentially causing problems. For example, if the racy ->lookup() was part of sys_mount(), then the new mount will be detached when anything tries to access it. This is despite the mountpoint having a plaintext path, which should remain valid now that the key was added. Of course, this is only possible if there's a userspace race. Still, the additional kernel-side race is confusing and unexpected. Close the kernel-side race by changing fscrypt_prepare_lookup() to also set the on-disk filename (step 2b), consistent with the d_flags update. Fixes: 28b4c263961c ("ext4 crypto: revalidate dentry after adding or removing the key") Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2019-03-20 21:39:13 +03:00
if (err && err != -ENOENT)
fscrypt: new helper function - fscrypt_prepare_lookup() Introduce a helper function which prepares to look up the given dentry in the given directory. If the directory is encrypted, it handles loading the directory's encryption key, setting the dentry's ->d_op to fscrypt_d_ops, and setting DCACHE_ENCRYPTED_WITH_KEY if the directory's encryption key is available. Note: once all filesystems switch over to this, we'll be able to move fscrypt_d_ops and fscrypt_set_encrypted_dentry() to fscrypt_private.h. Acked-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2017-10-09 22:15:43 +03:00
return err;
fscrypt: don't call no-key names "ciphertext names" Currently we're using the term "ciphertext name" ambiguously because it can mean either the actual ciphertext filename, or the encoded filename that is shown when an encrypted directory is listed without its key. The latter we're now usually calling the "no-key name"; and while it's derived from the ciphertext name, it's not the same thing. To avoid this ambiguity, rename fscrypt_name::is_ciphertext_name to fscrypt_name::is_nokey_name, and update comments that say "ciphertext name" (or "encrypted name") to say "no-key name" instead when warranted. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200924042624.98439-2-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
2020-09-24 07:26:23 +03:00
if (fname->is_nokey_name) {
fscrypt: new helper function - fscrypt_prepare_lookup() Introduce a helper function which prepares to look up the given dentry in the given directory. If the directory is encrypted, it handles loading the directory's encryption key, setting the dentry's ->d_op to fscrypt_d_ops, and setting DCACHE_ENCRYPTED_WITH_KEY if the directory's encryption key is available. Note: once all filesystems switch over to this, we'll be able to move fscrypt_d_ops and fscrypt_set_encrypted_dentry() to fscrypt_private.h. Acked-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2017-10-09 22:15:43 +03:00
spin_lock(&dentry->d_lock);
fscrypt: rename DCACHE_ENCRYPTED_NAME to DCACHE_NOKEY_NAME Originally we used the term "encrypted name" or "ciphertext name" to mean the encoded filename that is shown when an encrypted directory is listed without its key. But these terms are ambiguous since they also mean the filename stored on-disk. "Encrypted name" is especially ambiguous since it could also be understood to mean "this filename is encrypted on-disk", similar to "encrypted file". So we've started calling these encoded names "no-key names" instead. Therefore, rename DCACHE_ENCRYPTED_NAME to DCACHE_NOKEY_NAME to avoid confusion about what this flag means. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200924042624.98439-3-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
2020-09-24 07:26:24 +03:00
dentry->d_flags |= DCACHE_NOKEY_NAME;
fscrypt: new helper function - fscrypt_prepare_lookup() Introduce a helper function which prepares to look up the given dentry in the given directory. If the directory is encrypted, it handles loading the directory's encryption key, setting the dentry's ->d_op to fscrypt_d_ops, and setting DCACHE_ENCRYPTED_WITH_KEY if the directory's encryption key is available. Note: once all filesystems switch over to this, we'll be able to move fscrypt_d_ops and fscrypt_set_encrypted_dentry() to fscrypt_private.h. Acked-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2017-10-09 22:15:43 +03:00
spin_unlock(&dentry->d_lock);
}
fscrypt: fix race where ->lookup() marks plaintext dentry as ciphertext ->lookup() in an encrypted directory begins as follows: 1. fscrypt_prepare_lookup(): a. Try to load the directory's encryption key. b. If the key is unavailable, mark the dentry as a ciphertext name via d_flags. 2. fscrypt_setup_filename(): a. Try to load the directory's encryption key. b. If the key is available, encrypt the name (treated as a plaintext name) to get the on-disk name. Otherwise decode the name (treated as a ciphertext name) to get the on-disk name. But if the key is concurrently added, it may be found at (2a) but not at (1a). In this case, the dentry will be wrongly marked as a ciphertext name even though it was actually treated as plaintext. This will cause the dentry to be wrongly invalidated on the next lookup, potentially causing problems. For example, if the racy ->lookup() was part of sys_mount(), then the new mount will be detached when anything tries to access it. This is despite the mountpoint having a plaintext path, which should remain valid now that the key was added. Of course, this is only possible if there's a userspace race. Still, the additional kernel-side race is confusing and unexpected. Close the kernel-side race by changing fscrypt_prepare_lookup() to also set the on-disk filename (step 2b), consistent with the d_flags update. Fixes: 28b4c263961c ("ext4 crypto: revalidate dentry after adding or removing the key") Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2019-03-20 21:39:13 +03:00
return err;
fscrypt: new helper function - fscrypt_prepare_lookup() Introduce a helper function which prepares to look up the given dentry in the given directory. If the directory is encrypted, it handles loading the directory's encryption key, setting the dentry's ->d_op to fscrypt_d_ops, and setting DCACHE_ENCRYPTED_WITH_KEY if the directory's encryption key is available. Note: once all filesystems switch over to this, we'll be able to move fscrypt_d_ops and fscrypt_set_encrypted_dentry() to fscrypt_private.h. Acked-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2017-10-09 22:15:43 +03:00
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__fscrypt_prepare_lookup);
fscrypt: new helper functions for ->symlink() Currently, filesystems supporting fscrypt need to implement some tricky logic when creating encrypted symlinks, including handling a peculiar on-disk format (struct fscrypt_symlink_data) and correctly calculating the size of the encrypted symlink. Introduce helper functions to make things a bit easier: - fscrypt_prepare_symlink() computes and validates the size the symlink target will require on-disk. - fscrypt_encrypt_symlink() creates the encrypted target if needed. The new helpers actually fix some subtle bugs. First, when checking whether the symlink target was too long, filesystems didn't account for the fact that the NUL padding is meant to be truncated if it would cause the maximum length to be exceeded, as is done for filenames in directories. Consequently users would receive ENAMETOOLONG when creating symlinks close to what is supposed to be the maximum length. For example, with EXT4 with a 4K block size, the maximum symlink target length in an encrypted directory is supposed to be 4093 bytes (in comparison to 4095 in an unencrypted directory), but in FS_POLICY_FLAGS_PAD_32-mode only up to 4064 bytes were accepted. Second, symlink targets of "." and ".." were not being encrypted, even though they should be, as these names are special in *directory entries* but not in symlink targets. Fortunately, we can fix this simply by starting to encrypt them, as old kernels already accept them in encrypted form. Third, the output string length the filesystems were providing when doing the actual encryption was incorrect, as it was forgotten to exclude 'sizeof(struct fscrypt_symlink_data)'. Fortunately though, this bug didn't make a difference. Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2018-01-05 21:45:01 +03:00
fscrypt: introduce fscrypt_prepare_readdir() The last remaining use of fscrypt_get_encryption_info() from filesystems is for readdir (->iterate_shared()). Every other call is now in fs/crypto/ as part of some other higher-level operation. We need to add a new argument to fscrypt_get_encryption_info() to indicate whether the encryption policy is allowed to be unrecognized or not. Doing this is easier if we can work with high-level operations rather than direct filesystem use of fscrypt_get_encryption_info(). So add a function fscrypt_prepare_readdir() which wraps the call to fscrypt_get_encryption_info() for the readdir use case. Reviewed-by: Andreas Dilger <adilger@dilger.ca> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201203022041.230976-6-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
2020-12-03 05:20:37 +03:00
int __fscrypt_prepare_readdir(struct inode *dir)
{
fscrypt: allow deleting files with unsupported encryption policy Currently it's impossible to delete files that use an unsupported encryption policy, as the kernel will just return an error when performing any operation on the top-level encrypted directory, even just a path lookup into the directory or opening the directory for readdir. More specifically, this occurs in any of the following cases: - The encryption context has an unrecognized version number. Current kernels know about v1 and v2, but there could be more versions in the future. - The encryption context has unrecognized encryption modes (FSCRYPT_MODE_*) or flags (FSCRYPT_POLICY_FLAG_*), an unrecognized combination of modes, or reserved bits set. - The encryption key has been added and the encryption modes are recognized but aren't available in the crypto API -- for example, a directory is encrypted with FSCRYPT_MODE_ADIANTUM but the kernel doesn't have CONFIG_CRYPTO_ADIANTUM enabled. It's desirable to return errors for most operations on files that use an unsupported encryption policy, but the current behavior is too strict. We need to allow enough to delete files, so that people can't be stuck with undeletable files when downgrading kernel versions. That includes allowing directories to be listed and allowing dentries to be looked up. Fix this by modifying the key setup logic to treat an unsupported encryption policy in the same way as "key unavailable" in the cases that are required for a recursive delete to work: preparing for a readdir or a dentry lookup, revalidating a dentry, or checking whether an inode has the same encryption policy as its parent directory. Reviewed-by: Andreas Dilger <adilger@dilger.ca> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201203022041.230976-10-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
2020-12-03 05:20:41 +03:00
return fscrypt_get_encryption_info(dir, true);
fscrypt: introduce fscrypt_prepare_readdir() The last remaining use of fscrypt_get_encryption_info() from filesystems is for readdir (->iterate_shared()). Every other call is now in fs/crypto/ as part of some other higher-level operation. We need to add a new argument to fscrypt_get_encryption_info() to indicate whether the encryption policy is allowed to be unrecognized or not. Doing this is easier if we can work with high-level operations rather than direct filesystem use of fscrypt_get_encryption_info(). So add a function fscrypt_prepare_readdir() which wraps the call to fscrypt_get_encryption_info() for the readdir use case. Reviewed-by: Andreas Dilger <adilger@dilger.ca> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201203022041.230976-6-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
2020-12-03 05:20:37 +03:00
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__fscrypt_prepare_readdir);
fscrypt: move body of fscrypt_prepare_setattr() out-of-line In preparation for reducing the visibility of fscrypt_require_key() by moving it to fscrypt_private.h, move the call to it from fscrypt_prepare_setattr() to an out-of-line function. Reviewed-by: Andreas Dilger <adilger@dilger.ca> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201203022041.230976-7-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
2020-12-03 05:20:38 +03:00
int __fscrypt_prepare_setattr(struct dentry *dentry, struct iattr *attr)
{
if (attr->ia_valid & ATTR_SIZE)
return fscrypt_require_key(d_inode(dentry));
return 0;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__fscrypt_prepare_setattr);
fscrypt: don't allow v1 policies with casefolding Casefolded encrypted directories will use a new dirhash method that requires a secret key. If the directory uses a v2 encryption policy, it's easy to derive this key from the master key using HKDF. However, v1 encryption policies don't provide a way to derive additional keys. Therefore, don't allow casefolding on directories that use a v1 policy. Specifically, make it so that trying to enable casefolding on a directory that has a v1 policy fails, trying to set a v1 policy on a casefolded directory fails, and trying to open a casefolded directory that has a v1 policy (if one somehow exists on-disk) fails. Signed-off-by: Daniel Rosenberg <drosen@google.com> [EB: improved commit message, updated fscrypt.rst, and other cleanups] Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200120223201.241390-2-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
2020-01-21 01:31:56 +03:00
/**
* fscrypt_prepare_setflags() - prepare to change flags with FS_IOC_SETFLAGS
* @inode: the inode on which flags are being changed
* @oldflags: the old flags
* @flags: the new flags
*
* The caller should be holding i_rwsem for write.
*
* Return: 0 on success; -errno if the flags change isn't allowed or if
* another error occurs.
*/
int fscrypt_prepare_setflags(struct inode *inode,
unsigned int oldflags, unsigned int flags)
{
struct fscrypt_info *ci;
fscrypt: simplify master key locking The stated reasons for separating fscrypt_master_key::mk_secret_sem from the standard semaphore contained in every 'struct key' no longer apply. First, due to commit a992b20cd4ee ("fscrypt: add fscrypt_prepare_new_inode() and fscrypt_set_context()"), fscrypt_get_encryption_info() is no longer called from within a filesystem transaction. Second, due to commit d3ec10aa9581 ("KEYS: Don't write out to userspace while holding key semaphore"), the semaphore for the "keyring" key type no longer ranks above page faults. That leaves performance as the only possible reason to keep the separate mk_secret_sem. Specifically, having mk_secret_sem reduces the contention between setup_file_encryption_key() and FS_IOC_{ADD,REMOVE}_ENCRYPTION_KEY. However, these ioctls aren't executed often, so this doesn't seem to be worth the extra complexity. Therefore, simplify the locking design by just using key->sem instead of mk_secret_sem. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201117032626.320275-1-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
2020-11-17 06:26:26 +03:00
struct key *key;
fscrypt: derive dirhash key for casefolded directories When we allow indexed directories to use both encryption and casefolding, for the dirhash we can't just hash the ciphertext filenames that are stored on-disk (as is done currently) because the dirhash must be case insensitive, but the stored names are case-preserving. Nor can we hash the plaintext names with an unkeyed hash (or a hash keyed with a value stored on-disk like ext4's s_hash_seed), since that would leak information about the names that encryption is meant to protect. Instead, if we can accept a dirhash that's only computable when the fscrypt key is available, we can hash the plaintext names with a keyed hash using a secret key derived from the directory's fscrypt master key. We'll use SipHash-2-4 for this purpose. Prepare for this by deriving a SipHash key for each casefolded encrypted directory. Make sure to handle deriving the key not only when setting up the directory's fscrypt_info, but also in the case where the casefold flag is enabled after the fscrypt_info was already set up. (We could just always derive the key regardless of casefolding, but that would introduce unnecessary overhead for people not using casefolding.) Signed-off-by: Daniel Rosenberg <drosen@google.com> [EB: improved commit message, updated fscrypt.rst, squashed with change that avoids unnecessarily deriving the key, and many other cleanups] Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200120223201.241390-3-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
2020-01-21 01:31:57 +03:00
struct fscrypt_master_key *mk;
fscrypt: don't allow v1 policies with casefolding Casefolded encrypted directories will use a new dirhash method that requires a secret key. If the directory uses a v2 encryption policy, it's easy to derive this key from the master key using HKDF. However, v1 encryption policies don't provide a way to derive additional keys. Therefore, don't allow casefolding on directories that use a v1 policy. Specifically, make it so that trying to enable casefolding on a directory that has a v1 policy fails, trying to set a v1 policy on a casefolded directory fails, and trying to open a casefolded directory that has a v1 policy (if one somehow exists on-disk) fails. Signed-off-by: Daniel Rosenberg <drosen@google.com> [EB: improved commit message, updated fscrypt.rst, and other cleanups] Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200120223201.241390-2-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
2020-01-21 01:31:56 +03:00
int err;
fscrypt: derive dirhash key for casefolded directories When we allow indexed directories to use both encryption and casefolding, for the dirhash we can't just hash the ciphertext filenames that are stored on-disk (as is done currently) because the dirhash must be case insensitive, but the stored names are case-preserving. Nor can we hash the plaintext names with an unkeyed hash (or a hash keyed with a value stored on-disk like ext4's s_hash_seed), since that would leak information about the names that encryption is meant to protect. Instead, if we can accept a dirhash that's only computable when the fscrypt key is available, we can hash the plaintext names with a keyed hash using a secret key derived from the directory's fscrypt master key. We'll use SipHash-2-4 for this purpose. Prepare for this by deriving a SipHash key for each casefolded encrypted directory. Make sure to handle deriving the key not only when setting up the directory's fscrypt_info, but also in the case where the casefold flag is enabled after the fscrypt_info was already set up. (We could just always derive the key regardless of casefolding, but that would introduce unnecessary overhead for people not using casefolding.) Signed-off-by: Daniel Rosenberg <drosen@google.com> [EB: improved commit message, updated fscrypt.rst, squashed with change that avoids unnecessarily deriving the key, and many other cleanups] Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200120223201.241390-3-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
2020-01-21 01:31:57 +03:00
/*
* When the CASEFOLD flag is set on an encrypted directory, we must
* derive the secret key needed for the dirhash. This is only possible
* if the directory uses a v2 encryption policy.
*/
fscrypt: don't allow v1 policies with casefolding Casefolded encrypted directories will use a new dirhash method that requires a secret key. If the directory uses a v2 encryption policy, it's easy to derive this key from the master key using HKDF. However, v1 encryption policies don't provide a way to derive additional keys. Therefore, don't allow casefolding on directories that use a v1 policy. Specifically, make it so that trying to enable casefolding on a directory that has a v1 policy fails, trying to set a v1 policy on a casefolded directory fails, and trying to open a casefolded directory that has a v1 policy (if one somehow exists on-disk) fails. Signed-off-by: Daniel Rosenberg <drosen@google.com> [EB: improved commit message, updated fscrypt.rst, and other cleanups] Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200120223201.241390-2-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
2020-01-21 01:31:56 +03:00
if (IS_ENCRYPTED(inode) && (flags & ~oldflags & FS_CASEFOLD_FL)) {
err = fscrypt_require_key(inode);
if (err)
return err;
ci = inode->i_crypt_info;
if (ci->ci_policy.version != FSCRYPT_POLICY_V2)
return -EINVAL;
fscrypt: simplify master key locking The stated reasons for separating fscrypt_master_key::mk_secret_sem from the standard semaphore contained in every 'struct key' no longer apply. First, due to commit a992b20cd4ee ("fscrypt: add fscrypt_prepare_new_inode() and fscrypt_set_context()"), fscrypt_get_encryption_info() is no longer called from within a filesystem transaction. Second, due to commit d3ec10aa9581 ("KEYS: Don't write out to userspace while holding key semaphore"), the semaphore for the "keyring" key type no longer ranks above page faults. That leaves performance as the only possible reason to keep the separate mk_secret_sem. Specifically, having mk_secret_sem reduces the contention between setup_file_encryption_key() and FS_IOC_{ADD,REMOVE}_ENCRYPTION_KEY. However, these ioctls aren't executed often, so this doesn't seem to be worth the extra complexity. Therefore, simplify the locking design by just using key->sem instead of mk_secret_sem. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201117032626.320275-1-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
2020-11-17 06:26:26 +03:00
key = ci->ci_master_key;
mk = key->payload.data[0];
down_read(&key->sem);
fscrypt: derive dirhash key for casefolded directories When we allow indexed directories to use both encryption and casefolding, for the dirhash we can't just hash the ciphertext filenames that are stored on-disk (as is done currently) because the dirhash must be case insensitive, but the stored names are case-preserving. Nor can we hash the plaintext names with an unkeyed hash (or a hash keyed with a value stored on-disk like ext4's s_hash_seed), since that would leak information about the names that encryption is meant to protect. Instead, if we can accept a dirhash that's only computable when the fscrypt key is available, we can hash the plaintext names with a keyed hash using a secret key derived from the directory's fscrypt master key. We'll use SipHash-2-4 for this purpose. Prepare for this by deriving a SipHash key for each casefolded encrypted directory. Make sure to handle deriving the key not only when setting up the directory's fscrypt_info, but also in the case where the casefold flag is enabled after the fscrypt_info was already set up. (We could just always derive the key regardless of casefolding, but that would introduce unnecessary overhead for people not using casefolding.) Signed-off-by: Daniel Rosenberg <drosen@google.com> [EB: improved commit message, updated fscrypt.rst, squashed with change that avoids unnecessarily deriving the key, and many other cleanups] Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200120223201.241390-3-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
2020-01-21 01:31:57 +03:00
if (is_master_key_secret_present(&mk->mk_secret))
err = fscrypt_derive_dirhash_key(ci, mk);
else
err = -ENOKEY;
fscrypt: simplify master key locking The stated reasons for separating fscrypt_master_key::mk_secret_sem from the standard semaphore contained in every 'struct key' no longer apply. First, due to commit a992b20cd4ee ("fscrypt: add fscrypt_prepare_new_inode() and fscrypt_set_context()"), fscrypt_get_encryption_info() is no longer called from within a filesystem transaction. Second, due to commit d3ec10aa9581 ("KEYS: Don't write out to userspace while holding key semaphore"), the semaphore for the "keyring" key type no longer ranks above page faults. That leaves performance as the only possible reason to keep the separate mk_secret_sem. Specifically, having mk_secret_sem reduces the contention between setup_file_encryption_key() and FS_IOC_{ADD,REMOVE}_ENCRYPTION_KEY. However, these ioctls aren't executed often, so this doesn't seem to be worth the extra complexity. Therefore, simplify the locking design by just using key->sem instead of mk_secret_sem. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201117032626.320275-1-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
2020-11-17 06:26:26 +03:00
up_read(&key->sem);
fscrypt: derive dirhash key for casefolded directories When we allow indexed directories to use both encryption and casefolding, for the dirhash we can't just hash the ciphertext filenames that are stored on-disk (as is done currently) because the dirhash must be case insensitive, but the stored names are case-preserving. Nor can we hash the plaintext names with an unkeyed hash (or a hash keyed with a value stored on-disk like ext4's s_hash_seed), since that would leak information about the names that encryption is meant to protect. Instead, if we can accept a dirhash that's only computable when the fscrypt key is available, we can hash the plaintext names with a keyed hash using a secret key derived from the directory's fscrypt master key. We'll use SipHash-2-4 for this purpose. Prepare for this by deriving a SipHash key for each casefolded encrypted directory. Make sure to handle deriving the key not only when setting up the directory's fscrypt_info, but also in the case where the casefold flag is enabled after the fscrypt_info was already set up. (We could just always derive the key regardless of casefolding, but that would introduce unnecessary overhead for people not using casefolding.) Signed-off-by: Daniel Rosenberg <drosen@google.com> [EB: improved commit message, updated fscrypt.rst, squashed with change that avoids unnecessarily deriving the key, and many other cleanups] Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200120223201.241390-3-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
2020-01-21 01:31:57 +03:00
return err;
fscrypt: don't allow v1 policies with casefolding Casefolded encrypted directories will use a new dirhash method that requires a secret key. If the directory uses a v2 encryption policy, it's easy to derive this key from the master key using HKDF. However, v1 encryption policies don't provide a way to derive additional keys. Therefore, don't allow casefolding on directories that use a v1 policy. Specifically, make it so that trying to enable casefolding on a directory that has a v1 policy fails, trying to set a v1 policy on a casefolded directory fails, and trying to open a casefolded directory that has a v1 policy (if one somehow exists on-disk) fails. Signed-off-by: Daniel Rosenberg <drosen@google.com> [EB: improved commit message, updated fscrypt.rst, and other cleanups] Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200120223201.241390-2-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
2020-01-21 01:31:56 +03:00
}
return 0;
}
fscrypt: move fscrypt_prepare_symlink() out-of-line In preparation for moving the logic for "get the encryption policy inherited by new files in this directory" to a single place, make fscrypt_prepare_symlink() a regular function rather than an inline function that wraps __fscrypt_prepare_symlink(). This way, the new function fscrypt_policy_to_inherit() won't need to be exported to filesystems. Acked-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200917041136.178600-12-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
2020-09-17 07:11:34 +03:00
/**
* fscrypt_prepare_symlink() - prepare to create a possibly-encrypted symlink
* @dir: directory in which the symlink is being created
* @target: plaintext symlink target
* @len: length of @target excluding null terminator
* @max_len: space the filesystem has available to store the symlink target
* @disk_link: (out) the on-disk symlink target being prepared
*
* This function computes the size the symlink target will require on-disk,
* stores it in @disk_link->len, and validates it against @max_len. An
* encrypted symlink may be longer than the original.
*
* Additionally, @disk_link->name is set to @target if the symlink will be
* unencrypted, but left NULL if the symlink will be encrypted. For encrypted
* symlinks, the filesystem must call fscrypt_encrypt_symlink() to create the
* on-disk target later. (The reason for the two-step process is that some
* filesystems need to know the size of the symlink target before creating the
* inode, e.g. to determine whether it will be a "fast" or "slow" symlink.)
*
* Return: 0 on success, -ENAMETOOLONG if the symlink target is too long,
* -ENOKEY if the encryption key is missing, or another -errno code if a problem
* occurred while setting up the encryption key.
*/
int fscrypt_prepare_symlink(struct inode *dir, const char *target,
unsigned int len, unsigned int max_len,
struct fscrypt_str *disk_link)
fscrypt: new helper functions for ->symlink() Currently, filesystems supporting fscrypt need to implement some tricky logic when creating encrypted symlinks, including handling a peculiar on-disk format (struct fscrypt_symlink_data) and correctly calculating the size of the encrypted symlink. Introduce helper functions to make things a bit easier: - fscrypt_prepare_symlink() computes and validates the size the symlink target will require on-disk. - fscrypt_encrypt_symlink() creates the encrypted target if needed. The new helpers actually fix some subtle bugs. First, when checking whether the symlink target was too long, filesystems didn't account for the fact that the NUL padding is meant to be truncated if it would cause the maximum length to be exceeded, as is done for filenames in directories. Consequently users would receive ENAMETOOLONG when creating symlinks close to what is supposed to be the maximum length. For example, with EXT4 with a 4K block size, the maximum symlink target length in an encrypted directory is supposed to be 4093 bytes (in comparison to 4095 in an unencrypted directory), but in FS_POLICY_FLAGS_PAD_32-mode only up to 4064 bytes were accepted. Second, symlink targets of "." and ".." were not being encrypted, even though they should be, as these names are special in *directory entries* but not in symlink targets. Fortunately, we can fix this simply by starting to encrypt them, as old kernels already accept them in encrypted form. Third, the output string length the filesystems were providing when doing the actual encryption was incorrect, as it was forgotten to exclude 'sizeof(struct fscrypt_symlink_data)'. Fortunately though, this bug didn't make a difference. Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2018-01-05 21:45:01 +03:00
{
fscrypt: handle test_dummy_encryption in more logical way The behavior of the test_dummy_encryption mount option is that when a new file (or directory or symlink) is created in an unencrypted directory, it's automatically encrypted using a dummy encryption policy. That's it; in particular, the encryption (or lack thereof) of existing files (or directories or symlinks) doesn't change. Unfortunately the implementation of test_dummy_encryption is a bit weird and confusing. When test_dummy_encryption is enabled and a file is being created in an unencrypted directory, we set up an encryption key (->i_crypt_info) for the directory. This isn't actually used to do any encryption, however, since the directory is still unencrypted! Instead, ->i_crypt_info is only used for inheriting the encryption policy. One consequence of this is that the filesystem ends up providing a "dummy context" (policy + nonce) instead of a "dummy policy". In commit ed318a6cc0b6 ("fscrypt: support test_dummy_encryption=v2"), I mistakenly thought this was required. However, actually the nonce only ends up being used to derive a key that is never used. Another consequence of this implementation is that it allows for 'inode->i_crypt_info != NULL && !IS_ENCRYPTED(inode)', which is an edge case that can be forgotten about. For example, currently FS_IOC_GET_ENCRYPTION_POLICY on an unencrypted directory may return the dummy encryption policy when the filesystem is mounted with test_dummy_encryption. That seems like the wrong thing to do, since again, the directory itself is not actually encrypted. Therefore, switch to a more logical and maintainable implementation where the dummy encryption policy inheritance is done without setting up keys for unencrypted directories. This involves: - Adding a function fscrypt_policy_to_inherit() which returns the encryption policy to inherit from a directory. This can be a real policy, a dummy policy, or no policy. - Replacing struct fscrypt_dummy_context, ->get_dummy_context(), etc. with struct fscrypt_dummy_policy, ->get_dummy_policy(), etc. - Making fscrypt_fname_encrypted_size() take an fscrypt_policy instead of an inode. Acked-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> Acked-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200917041136.178600-13-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
2020-09-17 07:11:35 +03:00
const union fscrypt_policy *policy;
fscrypt: new helper functions for ->symlink() Currently, filesystems supporting fscrypt need to implement some tricky logic when creating encrypted symlinks, including handling a peculiar on-disk format (struct fscrypt_symlink_data) and correctly calculating the size of the encrypted symlink. Introduce helper functions to make things a bit easier: - fscrypt_prepare_symlink() computes and validates the size the symlink target will require on-disk. - fscrypt_encrypt_symlink() creates the encrypted target if needed. The new helpers actually fix some subtle bugs. First, when checking whether the symlink target was too long, filesystems didn't account for the fact that the NUL padding is meant to be truncated if it would cause the maximum length to be exceeded, as is done for filenames in directories. Consequently users would receive ENAMETOOLONG when creating symlinks close to what is supposed to be the maximum length. For example, with EXT4 with a 4K block size, the maximum symlink target length in an encrypted directory is supposed to be 4093 bytes (in comparison to 4095 in an unencrypted directory), but in FS_POLICY_FLAGS_PAD_32-mode only up to 4064 bytes were accepted. Second, symlink targets of "." and ".." were not being encrypted, even though they should be, as these names are special in *directory entries* but not in symlink targets. Fortunately, we can fix this simply by starting to encrypt them, as old kernels already accept them in encrypted form. Third, the output string length the filesystems were providing when doing the actual encryption was incorrect, as it was forgotten to exclude 'sizeof(struct fscrypt_symlink_data)'. Fortunately though, this bug didn't make a difference. Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2018-01-05 21:45:01 +03:00
fscrypt: handle test_dummy_encryption in more logical way The behavior of the test_dummy_encryption mount option is that when a new file (or directory or symlink) is created in an unencrypted directory, it's automatically encrypted using a dummy encryption policy. That's it; in particular, the encryption (or lack thereof) of existing files (or directories or symlinks) doesn't change. Unfortunately the implementation of test_dummy_encryption is a bit weird and confusing. When test_dummy_encryption is enabled and a file is being created in an unencrypted directory, we set up an encryption key (->i_crypt_info) for the directory. This isn't actually used to do any encryption, however, since the directory is still unencrypted! Instead, ->i_crypt_info is only used for inheriting the encryption policy. One consequence of this is that the filesystem ends up providing a "dummy context" (policy + nonce) instead of a "dummy policy". In commit ed318a6cc0b6 ("fscrypt: support test_dummy_encryption=v2"), I mistakenly thought this was required. However, actually the nonce only ends up being used to derive a key that is never used. Another consequence of this implementation is that it allows for 'inode->i_crypt_info != NULL && !IS_ENCRYPTED(inode)', which is an edge case that can be forgotten about. For example, currently FS_IOC_GET_ENCRYPTION_POLICY on an unencrypted directory may return the dummy encryption policy when the filesystem is mounted with test_dummy_encryption. That seems like the wrong thing to do, since again, the directory itself is not actually encrypted. Therefore, switch to a more logical and maintainable implementation where the dummy encryption policy inheritance is done without setting up keys for unencrypted directories. This involves: - Adding a function fscrypt_policy_to_inherit() which returns the encryption policy to inherit from a directory. This can be a real policy, a dummy policy, or no policy. - Replacing struct fscrypt_dummy_context, ->get_dummy_context(), etc. with struct fscrypt_dummy_policy, ->get_dummy_policy(), etc. - Making fscrypt_fname_encrypted_size() take an fscrypt_policy instead of an inode. Acked-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> Acked-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200917041136.178600-13-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
2020-09-17 07:11:35 +03:00
/*
* To calculate the size of the encrypted symlink target we need to know
* the amount of NUL padding, which is determined by the flags set in
* the encryption policy which will be inherited from the directory.
*/
policy = fscrypt_policy_to_inherit(dir);
if (policy == NULL) {
/* Not encrypted */
fscrypt: move fscrypt_prepare_symlink() out-of-line In preparation for moving the logic for "get the encryption policy inherited by new files in this directory" to a single place, make fscrypt_prepare_symlink() a regular function rather than an inline function that wraps __fscrypt_prepare_symlink(). This way, the new function fscrypt_policy_to_inherit() won't need to be exported to filesystems. Acked-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200917041136.178600-12-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
2020-09-17 07:11:34 +03:00
disk_link->name = (unsigned char *)target;
disk_link->len = len + 1;
if (disk_link->len > max_len)
return -ENAMETOOLONG;
return 0;
}
fscrypt: handle test_dummy_encryption in more logical way The behavior of the test_dummy_encryption mount option is that when a new file (or directory or symlink) is created in an unencrypted directory, it's automatically encrypted using a dummy encryption policy. That's it; in particular, the encryption (or lack thereof) of existing files (or directories or symlinks) doesn't change. Unfortunately the implementation of test_dummy_encryption is a bit weird and confusing. When test_dummy_encryption is enabled and a file is being created in an unencrypted directory, we set up an encryption key (->i_crypt_info) for the directory. This isn't actually used to do any encryption, however, since the directory is still unencrypted! Instead, ->i_crypt_info is only used for inheriting the encryption policy. One consequence of this is that the filesystem ends up providing a "dummy context" (policy + nonce) instead of a "dummy policy". In commit ed318a6cc0b6 ("fscrypt: support test_dummy_encryption=v2"), I mistakenly thought this was required. However, actually the nonce only ends up being used to derive a key that is never used. Another consequence of this implementation is that it allows for 'inode->i_crypt_info != NULL && !IS_ENCRYPTED(inode)', which is an edge case that can be forgotten about. For example, currently FS_IOC_GET_ENCRYPTION_POLICY on an unencrypted directory may return the dummy encryption policy when the filesystem is mounted with test_dummy_encryption. That seems like the wrong thing to do, since again, the directory itself is not actually encrypted. Therefore, switch to a more logical and maintainable implementation where the dummy encryption policy inheritance is done without setting up keys for unencrypted directories. This involves: - Adding a function fscrypt_policy_to_inherit() which returns the encryption policy to inherit from a directory. This can be a real policy, a dummy policy, or no policy. - Replacing struct fscrypt_dummy_context, ->get_dummy_context(), etc. with struct fscrypt_dummy_policy, ->get_dummy_policy(), etc. - Making fscrypt_fname_encrypted_size() take an fscrypt_policy instead of an inode. Acked-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> Acked-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200917041136.178600-13-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
2020-09-17 07:11:35 +03:00
if (IS_ERR(policy))
return PTR_ERR(policy);
fscrypt: new helper functions for ->symlink() Currently, filesystems supporting fscrypt need to implement some tricky logic when creating encrypted symlinks, including handling a peculiar on-disk format (struct fscrypt_symlink_data) and correctly calculating the size of the encrypted symlink. Introduce helper functions to make things a bit easier: - fscrypt_prepare_symlink() computes and validates the size the symlink target will require on-disk. - fscrypt_encrypt_symlink() creates the encrypted target if needed. The new helpers actually fix some subtle bugs. First, when checking whether the symlink target was too long, filesystems didn't account for the fact that the NUL padding is meant to be truncated if it would cause the maximum length to be exceeded, as is done for filenames in directories. Consequently users would receive ENAMETOOLONG when creating symlinks close to what is supposed to be the maximum length. For example, with EXT4 with a 4K block size, the maximum symlink target length in an encrypted directory is supposed to be 4093 bytes (in comparison to 4095 in an unencrypted directory), but in FS_POLICY_FLAGS_PAD_32-mode only up to 4064 bytes were accepted. Second, symlink targets of "." and ".." were not being encrypted, even though they should be, as these names are special in *directory entries* but not in symlink targets. Fortunately, we can fix this simply by starting to encrypt them, as old kernels already accept them in encrypted form. Third, the output string length the filesystems were providing when doing the actual encryption was incorrect, as it was forgotten to exclude 'sizeof(struct fscrypt_symlink_data)'. Fortunately though, this bug didn't make a difference. Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2018-01-05 21:45:01 +03:00
/*
* Calculate the size of the encrypted symlink and verify it won't
* exceed max_len. Note that for historical reasons, encrypted symlink
* targets are prefixed with the ciphertext length, despite this
* actually being redundant with i_size. This decreases by 2 bytes the
* longest symlink target we can accept.
*
* We could recover 1 byte by not counting a null terminator, but
* counting it (even though it is meaningless for ciphertext) is simpler
* for now since filesystems will assume it is there and subtract it.
*/
fscrypt: handle test_dummy_encryption in more logical way The behavior of the test_dummy_encryption mount option is that when a new file (or directory or symlink) is created in an unencrypted directory, it's automatically encrypted using a dummy encryption policy. That's it; in particular, the encryption (or lack thereof) of existing files (or directories or symlinks) doesn't change. Unfortunately the implementation of test_dummy_encryption is a bit weird and confusing. When test_dummy_encryption is enabled and a file is being created in an unencrypted directory, we set up an encryption key (->i_crypt_info) for the directory. This isn't actually used to do any encryption, however, since the directory is still unencrypted! Instead, ->i_crypt_info is only used for inheriting the encryption policy. One consequence of this is that the filesystem ends up providing a "dummy context" (policy + nonce) instead of a "dummy policy". In commit ed318a6cc0b6 ("fscrypt: support test_dummy_encryption=v2"), I mistakenly thought this was required. However, actually the nonce only ends up being used to derive a key that is never used. Another consequence of this implementation is that it allows for 'inode->i_crypt_info != NULL && !IS_ENCRYPTED(inode)', which is an edge case that can be forgotten about. For example, currently FS_IOC_GET_ENCRYPTION_POLICY on an unencrypted directory may return the dummy encryption policy when the filesystem is mounted with test_dummy_encryption. That seems like the wrong thing to do, since again, the directory itself is not actually encrypted. Therefore, switch to a more logical and maintainable implementation where the dummy encryption policy inheritance is done without setting up keys for unencrypted directories. This involves: - Adding a function fscrypt_policy_to_inherit() which returns the encryption policy to inherit from a directory. This can be a real policy, a dummy policy, or no policy. - Replacing struct fscrypt_dummy_context, ->get_dummy_context(), etc. with struct fscrypt_dummy_policy, ->get_dummy_policy(), etc. - Making fscrypt_fname_encrypted_size() take an fscrypt_policy instead of an inode. Acked-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> Acked-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200917041136.178600-13-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
2020-09-17 07:11:35 +03:00
if (!fscrypt_fname_encrypted_size(policy, len,
fscrypt: fix up fscrypt_fname_encrypted_size() for internal use Filesystems don't need fscrypt_fname_encrypted_size() anymore, so unexport it and move it to fscrypt_private.h. We also never calculate the encrypted size of a filename without having the fscrypt_info present since it is needed to know the amount of NUL-padding which is determined by the encryption policy, and also we will always truncate the NUL-padding to the maximum filename length. Therefore, also make fscrypt_fname_encrypted_size() assume that the fscrypt_info is present, and make it truncate the returned length to the specified max_len. Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2018-01-12 07:30:08 +03:00
max_len - sizeof(struct fscrypt_symlink_data),
&disk_link->len))
fscrypt: new helper functions for ->symlink() Currently, filesystems supporting fscrypt need to implement some tricky logic when creating encrypted symlinks, including handling a peculiar on-disk format (struct fscrypt_symlink_data) and correctly calculating the size of the encrypted symlink. Introduce helper functions to make things a bit easier: - fscrypt_prepare_symlink() computes and validates the size the symlink target will require on-disk. - fscrypt_encrypt_symlink() creates the encrypted target if needed. The new helpers actually fix some subtle bugs. First, when checking whether the symlink target was too long, filesystems didn't account for the fact that the NUL padding is meant to be truncated if it would cause the maximum length to be exceeded, as is done for filenames in directories. Consequently users would receive ENAMETOOLONG when creating symlinks close to what is supposed to be the maximum length. For example, with EXT4 with a 4K block size, the maximum symlink target length in an encrypted directory is supposed to be 4093 bytes (in comparison to 4095 in an unencrypted directory), but in FS_POLICY_FLAGS_PAD_32-mode only up to 4064 bytes were accepted. Second, symlink targets of "." and ".." were not being encrypted, even though they should be, as these names are special in *directory entries* but not in symlink targets. Fortunately, we can fix this simply by starting to encrypt them, as old kernels already accept them in encrypted form. Third, the output string length the filesystems were providing when doing the actual encryption was incorrect, as it was forgotten to exclude 'sizeof(struct fscrypt_symlink_data)'. Fortunately though, this bug didn't make a difference. Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2018-01-05 21:45:01 +03:00
return -ENAMETOOLONG;
fscrypt: fix up fscrypt_fname_encrypted_size() for internal use Filesystems don't need fscrypt_fname_encrypted_size() anymore, so unexport it and move it to fscrypt_private.h. We also never calculate the encrypted size of a filename without having the fscrypt_info present since it is needed to know the amount of NUL-padding which is determined by the encryption policy, and also we will always truncate the NUL-padding to the maximum filename length. Therefore, also make fscrypt_fname_encrypted_size() assume that the fscrypt_info is present, and make it truncate the returned length to the specified max_len. Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2018-01-12 07:30:08 +03:00
disk_link->len += sizeof(struct fscrypt_symlink_data);
fscrypt: new helper functions for ->symlink() Currently, filesystems supporting fscrypt need to implement some tricky logic when creating encrypted symlinks, including handling a peculiar on-disk format (struct fscrypt_symlink_data) and correctly calculating the size of the encrypted symlink. Introduce helper functions to make things a bit easier: - fscrypt_prepare_symlink() computes and validates the size the symlink target will require on-disk. - fscrypt_encrypt_symlink() creates the encrypted target if needed. The new helpers actually fix some subtle bugs. First, when checking whether the symlink target was too long, filesystems didn't account for the fact that the NUL padding is meant to be truncated if it would cause the maximum length to be exceeded, as is done for filenames in directories. Consequently users would receive ENAMETOOLONG when creating symlinks close to what is supposed to be the maximum length. For example, with EXT4 with a 4K block size, the maximum symlink target length in an encrypted directory is supposed to be 4093 bytes (in comparison to 4095 in an unencrypted directory), but in FS_POLICY_FLAGS_PAD_32-mode only up to 4064 bytes were accepted. Second, symlink targets of "." and ".." were not being encrypted, even though they should be, as these names are special in *directory entries* but not in symlink targets. Fortunately, we can fix this simply by starting to encrypt them, as old kernels already accept them in encrypted form. Third, the output string length the filesystems were providing when doing the actual encryption was incorrect, as it was forgotten to exclude 'sizeof(struct fscrypt_symlink_data)'. Fortunately though, this bug didn't make a difference. Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2018-01-05 21:45:01 +03:00
disk_link->name = NULL;
return 0;
}
fscrypt: move fscrypt_prepare_symlink() out-of-line In preparation for moving the logic for "get the encryption policy inherited by new files in this directory" to a single place, make fscrypt_prepare_symlink() a regular function rather than an inline function that wraps __fscrypt_prepare_symlink(). This way, the new function fscrypt_policy_to_inherit() won't need to be exported to filesystems. Acked-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200917041136.178600-12-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
2020-09-17 07:11:34 +03:00
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(fscrypt_prepare_symlink);
fscrypt: new helper functions for ->symlink() Currently, filesystems supporting fscrypt need to implement some tricky logic when creating encrypted symlinks, including handling a peculiar on-disk format (struct fscrypt_symlink_data) and correctly calculating the size of the encrypted symlink. Introduce helper functions to make things a bit easier: - fscrypt_prepare_symlink() computes and validates the size the symlink target will require on-disk. - fscrypt_encrypt_symlink() creates the encrypted target if needed. The new helpers actually fix some subtle bugs. First, when checking whether the symlink target was too long, filesystems didn't account for the fact that the NUL padding is meant to be truncated if it would cause the maximum length to be exceeded, as is done for filenames in directories. Consequently users would receive ENAMETOOLONG when creating symlinks close to what is supposed to be the maximum length. For example, with EXT4 with a 4K block size, the maximum symlink target length in an encrypted directory is supposed to be 4093 bytes (in comparison to 4095 in an unencrypted directory), but in FS_POLICY_FLAGS_PAD_32-mode only up to 4064 bytes were accepted. Second, symlink targets of "." and ".." were not being encrypted, even though they should be, as these names are special in *directory entries* but not in symlink targets. Fortunately, we can fix this simply by starting to encrypt them, as old kernels already accept them in encrypted form. Third, the output string length the filesystems were providing when doing the actual encryption was incorrect, as it was forgotten to exclude 'sizeof(struct fscrypt_symlink_data)'. Fortunately though, this bug didn't make a difference. Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2018-01-05 21:45:01 +03:00
int __fscrypt_encrypt_symlink(struct inode *inode, const char *target,
unsigned int len, struct fscrypt_str *disk_link)
{
int err;
fscrypt: fix build with pre-4.6 gcc versions gcc versions prior to 4.6 require an extra level of braces when using a designated initializer for a member in an anonymous struct or union. This caused a compile error with the 'struct qstr' initialization in __fscrypt_encrypt_symlink(). Fix it by using QSTR_INIT(). Reported-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Fixes: 76e81d6d5048 ("fscrypt: new helper functions for ->symlink()") Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2018-01-20 00:45:24 +03:00
struct qstr iname = QSTR_INIT(target, len);
fscrypt: new helper functions for ->symlink() Currently, filesystems supporting fscrypt need to implement some tricky logic when creating encrypted symlinks, including handling a peculiar on-disk format (struct fscrypt_symlink_data) and correctly calculating the size of the encrypted symlink. Introduce helper functions to make things a bit easier: - fscrypt_prepare_symlink() computes and validates the size the symlink target will require on-disk. - fscrypt_encrypt_symlink() creates the encrypted target if needed. The new helpers actually fix some subtle bugs. First, when checking whether the symlink target was too long, filesystems didn't account for the fact that the NUL padding is meant to be truncated if it would cause the maximum length to be exceeded, as is done for filenames in directories. Consequently users would receive ENAMETOOLONG when creating symlinks close to what is supposed to be the maximum length. For example, with EXT4 with a 4K block size, the maximum symlink target length in an encrypted directory is supposed to be 4093 bytes (in comparison to 4095 in an unencrypted directory), but in FS_POLICY_FLAGS_PAD_32-mode only up to 4064 bytes were accepted. Second, symlink targets of "." and ".." were not being encrypted, even though they should be, as these names are special in *directory entries* but not in symlink targets. Fortunately, we can fix this simply by starting to encrypt them, as old kernels already accept them in encrypted form. Third, the output string length the filesystems were providing when doing the actual encryption was incorrect, as it was forgotten to exclude 'sizeof(struct fscrypt_symlink_data)'. Fortunately though, this bug didn't make a difference. Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2018-01-05 21:45:01 +03:00
struct fscrypt_symlink_data *sd;
unsigned int ciphertext_len;
fscrypt: require that fscrypt_encrypt_symlink() already has key Now that all filesystems have been converted to use fscrypt_prepare_new_inode(), the encryption key for new symlink inodes is now already set up whenever we try to encrypt the symlink target. Enforce this rather than try to set up the key again when it may be too late to do so safely. Acked-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200917041136.178600-9-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
2020-09-17 07:11:31 +03:00
/*
* fscrypt_prepare_new_inode() should have already set up the new
* symlink inode's encryption key. We don't wait until now to do it,
* since we may be in a filesystem transaction now.
*/
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!fscrypt_has_encryption_key(inode)))
return -ENOKEY;
fscrypt: new helper functions for ->symlink() Currently, filesystems supporting fscrypt need to implement some tricky logic when creating encrypted symlinks, including handling a peculiar on-disk format (struct fscrypt_symlink_data) and correctly calculating the size of the encrypted symlink. Introduce helper functions to make things a bit easier: - fscrypt_prepare_symlink() computes and validates the size the symlink target will require on-disk. - fscrypt_encrypt_symlink() creates the encrypted target if needed. The new helpers actually fix some subtle bugs. First, when checking whether the symlink target was too long, filesystems didn't account for the fact that the NUL padding is meant to be truncated if it would cause the maximum length to be exceeded, as is done for filenames in directories. Consequently users would receive ENAMETOOLONG when creating symlinks close to what is supposed to be the maximum length. For example, with EXT4 with a 4K block size, the maximum symlink target length in an encrypted directory is supposed to be 4093 bytes (in comparison to 4095 in an unencrypted directory), but in FS_POLICY_FLAGS_PAD_32-mode only up to 4064 bytes were accepted. Second, symlink targets of "." and ".." were not being encrypted, even though they should be, as these names are special in *directory entries* but not in symlink targets. Fortunately, we can fix this simply by starting to encrypt them, as old kernels already accept them in encrypted form. Third, the output string length the filesystems were providing when doing the actual encryption was incorrect, as it was forgotten to exclude 'sizeof(struct fscrypt_symlink_data)'. Fortunately though, this bug didn't make a difference. Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2018-01-05 21:45:01 +03:00
if (disk_link->name) {
/* filesystem-provided buffer */
sd = (struct fscrypt_symlink_data *)disk_link->name;
} else {
sd = kmalloc(disk_link->len, GFP_NOFS);
if (!sd)
return -ENOMEM;
}
ciphertext_len = disk_link->len - sizeof(*sd);
sd->len = cpu_to_le16(ciphertext_len);
fscrypt: add "fscrypt_" prefix to fname_encrypt() fname_encrypt() is a global function, due to being used in both fname.c and hooks.c. So it should be prefixed with "fscrypt_", like all the other global functions in fs/crypto/. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200120071736.45915-1-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
2020-01-20 10:17:36 +03:00
err = fscrypt_fname_encrypt(inode, &iname, sd->encrypted_path,
ciphertext_len);
fscrypt: cache decrypted symlink target in ->i_link Path lookups that traverse encrypted symlink(s) are very slow because each encrypted symlink needs to be decrypted each time it's followed. This also involves dropping out of rcu-walk mode. Make encrypted symlinks faster by caching the decrypted symlink target in ->i_link. The first call to fscrypt_get_symlink() sets it. Then, the existing VFS path lookup code uses the non-NULL ->i_link to take the fast path where ->get_link() isn't called, and lookups in rcu-walk mode remain in rcu-walk mode. Also set ->i_link immediately when a new encrypted symlink is created. To safely free the symlink target after an RCU grace period has elapsed, introduce a new function fscrypt_free_inode(), and make the relevant filesystems call it just before actually freeing the inode. Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2019-04-10 23:21:15 +03:00
if (err)
goto err_free_sd;
fscrypt: new helper functions for ->symlink() Currently, filesystems supporting fscrypt need to implement some tricky logic when creating encrypted symlinks, including handling a peculiar on-disk format (struct fscrypt_symlink_data) and correctly calculating the size of the encrypted symlink. Introduce helper functions to make things a bit easier: - fscrypt_prepare_symlink() computes and validates the size the symlink target will require on-disk. - fscrypt_encrypt_symlink() creates the encrypted target if needed. The new helpers actually fix some subtle bugs. First, when checking whether the symlink target was too long, filesystems didn't account for the fact that the NUL padding is meant to be truncated if it would cause the maximum length to be exceeded, as is done for filenames in directories. Consequently users would receive ENAMETOOLONG when creating symlinks close to what is supposed to be the maximum length. For example, with EXT4 with a 4K block size, the maximum symlink target length in an encrypted directory is supposed to be 4093 bytes (in comparison to 4095 in an unencrypted directory), but in FS_POLICY_FLAGS_PAD_32-mode only up to 4064 bytes were accepted. Second, symlink targets of "." and ".." were not being encrypted, even though they should be, as these names are special in *directory entries* but not in symlink targets. Fortunately, we can fix this simply by starting to encrypt them, as old kernels already accept them in encrypted form. Third, the output string length the filesystems were providing when doing the actual encryption was incorrect, as it was forgotten to exclude 'sizeof(struct fscrypt_symlink_data)'. Fortunately though, this bug didn't make a difference. Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2018-01-05 21:45:01 +03:00
/*
* Null-terminating the ciphertext doesn't make sense, but we still
* count the null terminator in the length, so we might as well
* initialize it just in case the filesystem writes it out.
*/
sd->encrypted_path[ciphertext_len] = '\0';
fscrypt: cache decrypted symlink target in ->i_link Path lookups that traverse encrypted symlink(s) are very slow because each encrypted symlink needs to be decrypted each time it's followed. This also involves dropping out of rcu-walk mode. Make encrypted symlinks faster by caching the decrypted symlink target in ->i_link. The first call to fscrypt_get_symlink() sets it. Then, the existing VFS path lookup code uses the non-NULL ->i_link to take the fast path where ->get_link() isn't called, and lookups in rcu-walk mode remain in rcu-walk mode. Also set ->i_link immediately when a new encrypted symlink is created. To safely free the symlink target after an RCU grace period has elapsed, introduce a new function fscrypt_free_inode(), and make the relevant filesystems call it just before actually freeing the inode. Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2019-04-10 23:21:15 +03:00
/* Cache the plaintext symlink target for later use by get_link() */
err = -ENOMEM;
inode->i_link = kmemdup(target, len + 1, GFP_NOFS);
if (!inode->i_link)
goto err_free_sd;
fscrypt: new helper functions for ->symlink() Currently, filesystems supporting fscrypt need to implement some tricky logic when creating encrypted symlinks, including handling a peculiar on-disk format (struct fscrypt_symlink_data) and correctly calculating the size of the encrypted symlink. Introduce helper functions to make things a bit easier: - fscrypt_prepare_symlink() computes and validates the size the symlink target will require on-disk. - fscrypt_encrypt_symlink() creates the encrypted target if needed. The new helpers actually fix some subtle bugs. First, when checking whether the symlink target was too long, filesystems didn't account for the fact that the NUL padding is meant to be truncated if it would cause the maximum length to be exceeded, as is done for filenames in directories. Consequently users would receive ENAMETOOLONG when creating symlinks close to what is supposed to be the maximum length. For example, with EXT4 with a 4K block size, the maximum symlink target length in an encrypted directory is supposed to be 4093 bytes (in comparison to 4095 in an unencrypted directory), but in FS_POLICY_FLAGS_PAD_32-mode only up to 4064 bytes were accepted. Second, symlink targets of "." and ".." were not being encrypted, even though they should be, as these names are special in *directory entries* but not in symlink targets. Fortunately, we can fix this simply by starting to encrypt them, as old kernels already accept them in encrypted form. Third, the output string length the filesystems were providing when doing the actual encryption was incorrect, as it was forgotten to exclude 'sizeof(struct fscrypt_symlink_data)'. Fortunately though, this bug didn't make a difference. Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2018-01-05 21:45:01 +03:00
if (!disk_link->name)
disk_link->name = (unsigned char *)sd;
return 0;
fscrypt: cache decrypted symlink target in ->i_link Path lookups that traverse encrypted symlink(s) are very slow because each encrypted symlink needs to be decrypted each time it's followed. This also involves dropping out of rcu-walk mode. Make encrypted symlinks faster by caching the decrypted symlink target in ->i_link. The first call to fscrypt_get_symlink() sets it. Then, the existing VFS path lookup code uses the non-NULL ->i_link to take the fast path where ->get_link() isn't called, and lookups in rcu-walk mode remain in rcu-walk mode. Also set ->i_link immediately when a new encrypted symlink is created. To safely free the symlink target after an RCU grace period has elapsed, introduce a new function fscrypt_free_inode(), and make the relevant filesystems call it just before actually freeing the inode. Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2019-04-10 23:21:15 +03:00
err_free_sd:
if (!disk_link->name)
kfree(sd);
return err;
fscrypt: new helper functions for ->symlink() Currently, filesystems supporting fscrypt need to implement some tricky logic when creating encrypted symlinks, including handling a peculiar on-disk format (struct fscrypt_symlink_data) and correctly calculating the size of the encrypted symlink. Introduce helper functions to make things a bit easier: - fscrypt_prepare_symlink() computes and validates the size the symlink target will require on-disk. - fscrypt_encrypt_symlink() creates the encrypted target if needed. The new helpers actually fix some subtle bugs. First, when checking whether the symlink target was too long, filesystems didn't account for the fact that the NUL padding is meant to be truncated if it would cause the maximum length to be exceeded, as is done for filenames in directories. Consequently users would receive ENAMETOOLONG when creating symlinks close to what is supposed to be the maximum length. For example, with EXT4 with a 4K block size, the maximum symlink target length in an encrypted directory is supposed to be 4093 bytes (in comparison to 4095 in an unencrypted directory), but in FS_POLICY_FLAGS_PAD_32-mode only up to 4064 bytes were accepted. Second, symlink targets of "." and ".." were not being encrypted, even though they should be, as these names are special in *directory entries* but not in symlink targets. Fortunately, we can fix this simply by starting to encrypt them, as old kernels already accept them in encrypted form. Third, the output string length the filesystems were providing when doing the actual encryption was incorrect, as it was forgotten to exclude 'sizeof(struct fscrypt_symlink_data)'. Fortunately though, this bug didn't make a difference. Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2018-01-05 21:45:01 +03:00
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__fscrypt_encrypt_symlink);
fscrypt: new helper function - fscrypt_get_symlink() Filesystems also have duplicate code to support ->get_link() on encrypted symlinks. Factor it out into a new function fscrypt_get_symlink(). It takes in the contents of the encrypted symlink on-disk and provides the target (decrypted or encoded) that should be returned from ->get_link(). Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2018-01-05 21:45:02 +03:00
/**
fscrypt: fix all kerneldoc warnings Fix all kerneldoc warnings in fs/crypto/ and include/linux/fscrypt.h. Most of these were due to missing documentation for function parameters. Detected with: scripts/kernel-doc -v -none fs/crypto/*.{c,h} include/linux/fscrypt.h This cleanup makes it possible to check new patches for kerneldoc warnings without having to filter out all the existing ones. For consistency, also adjust some function "brief descriptions" to include the parentheses and to wrap at 80 characters. (The latter matches the checkpatch expectation.) Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200511191358.53096-2-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
2020-05-11 22:13:56 +03:00
* fscrypt_get_symlink() - get the target of an encrypted symlink
fscrypt: new helper function - fscrypt_get_symlink() Filesystems also have duplicate code to support ->get_link() on encrypted symlinks. Factor it out into a new function fscrypt_get_symlink(). It takes in the contents of the encrypted symlink on-disk and provides the target (decrypted or encoded) that should be returned from ->get_link(). Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2018-01-05 21:45:02 +03:00
* @inode: the symlink inode
* @caddr: the on-disk contents of the symlink
* @max_size: size of @caddr buffer
fscrypt: cache decrypted symlink target in ->i_link Path lookups that traverse encrypted symlink(s) are very slow because each encrypted symlink needs to be decrypted each time it's followed. This also involves dropping out of rcu-walk mode. Make encrypted symlinks faster by caching the decrypted symlink target in ->i_link. The first call to fscrypt_get_symlink() sets it. Then, the existing VFS path lookup code uses the non-NULL ->i_link to take the fast path where ->get_link() isn't called, and lookups in rcu-walk mode remain in rcu-walk mode. Also set ->i_link immediately when a new encrypted symlink is created. To safely free the symlink target after an RCU grace period has elapsed, introduce a new function fscrypt_free_inode(), and make the relevant filesystems call it just before actually freeing the inode. Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2019-04-10 23:21:15 +03:00
* @done: if successful, will be set up to free the returned target if needed
fscrypt: new helper function - fscrypt_get_symlink() Filesystems also have duplicate code to support ->get_link() on encrypted symlinks. Factor it out into a new function fscrypt_get_symlink(). It takes in the contents of the encrypted symlink on-disk and provides the target (decrypted or encoded) that should be returned from ->get_link(). Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2018-01-05 21:45:02 +03:00
*
* If the symlink's encryption key is available, we decrypt its target.
* Otherwise, we encode its target for presentation.
*
* This may sleep, so the filesystem must have dropped out of RCU mode already.
*
* Return: the presentable symlink target or an ERR_PTR()
*/
const char *fscrypt_get_symlink(struct inode *inode, const void *caddr,
unsigned int max_size,
struct delayed_call *done)
{
const struct fscrypt_symlink_data *sd;
struct fscrypt_str cstr, pstr;
fscrypt: cache decrypted symlink target in ->i_link Path lookups that traverse encrypted symlink(s) are very slow because each encrypted symlink needs to be decrypted each time it's followed. This also involves dropping out of rcu-walk mode. Make encrypted symlinks faster by caching the decrypted symlink target in ->i_link. The first call to fscrypt_get_symlink() sets it. Then, the existing VFS path lookup code uses the non-NULL ->i_link to take the fast path where ->get_link() isn't called, and lookups in rcu-walk mode remain in rcu-walk mode. Also set ->i_link immediately when a new encrypted symlink is created. To safely free the symlink target after an RCU grace period has elapsed, introduce a new function fscrypt_free_inode(), and make the relevant filesystems call it just before actually freeing the inode. Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2019-04-10 23:21:15 +03:00
bool has_key;
fscrypt: new helper function - fscrypt_get_symlink() Filesystems also have duplicate code to support ->get_link() on encrypted symlinks. Factor it out into a new function fscrypt_get_symlink(). It takes in the contents of the encrypted symlink on-disk and provides the target (decrypted or encoded) that should be returned from ->get_link(). Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2018-01-05 21:45:02 +03:00
int err;
/* This is for encrypted symlinks only */
if (WARN_ON(!IS_ENCRYPTED(inode)))
return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
fscrypt: cache decrypted symlink target in ->i_link Path lookups that traverse encrypted symlink(s) are very slow because each encrypted symlink needs to be decrypted each time it's followed. This also involves dropping out of rcu-walk mode. Make encrypted symlinks faster by caching the decrypted symlink target in ->i_link. The first call to fscrypt_get_symlink() sets it. Then, the existing VFS path lookup code uses the non-NULL ->i_link to take the fast path where ->get_link() isn't called, and lookups in rcu-walk mode remain in rcu-walk mode. Also set ->i_link immediately when a new encrypted symlink is created. To safely free the symlink target after an RCU grace period has elapsed, introduce a new function fscrypt_free_inode(), and make the relevant filesystems call it just before actually freeing the inode. Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2019-04-10 23:21:15 +03:00
/* If the decrypted target is already cached, just return it. */
pstr.name = READ_ONCE(inode->i_link);
if (pstr.name)
return pstr.name;
fscrypt: new helper function - fscrypt_get_symlink() Filesystems also have duplicate code to support ->get_link() on encrypted symlinks. Factor it out into a new function fscrypt_get_symlink(). It takes in the contents of the encrypted symlink on-disk and provides the target (decrypted or encoded) that should be returned from ->get_link(). Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2018-01-05 21:45:02 +03:00
/*
* Try to set up the symlink's encryption key, but we can continue
* regardless of whether the key is available or not.
*/
fscrypt: allow deleting files with unsupported encryption policy Currently it's impossible to delete files that use an unsupported encryption policy, as the kernel will just return an error when performing any operation on the top-level encrypted directory, even just a path lookup into the directory or opening the directory for readdir. More specifically, this occurs in any of the following cases: - The encryption context has an unrecognized version number. Current kernels know about v1 and v2, but there could be more versions in the future. - The encryption context has unrecognized encryption modes (FSCRYPT_MODE_*) or flags (FSCRYPT_POLICY_FLAG_*), an unrecognized combination of modes, or reserved bits set. - The encryption key has been added and the encryption modes are recognized but aren't available in the crypto API -- for example, a directory is encrypted with FSCRYPT_MODE_ADIANTUM but the kernel doesn't have CONFIG_CRYPTO_ADIANTUM enabled. It's desirable to return errors for most operations on files that use an unsupported encryption policy, but the current behavior is too strict. We need to allow enough to delete files, so that people can't be stuck with undeletable files when downgrading kernel versions. That includes allowing directories to be listed and allowing dentries to be looked up. Fix this by modifying the key setup logic to treat an unsupported encryption policy in the same way as "key unavailable" in the cases that are required for a recursive delete to work: preparing for a readdir or a dentry lookup, revalidating a dentry, or checking whether an inode has the same encryption policy as its parent directory. Reviewed-by: Andreas Dilger <adilger@dilger.ca> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201203022041.230976-10-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
2020-12-03 05:20:41 +03:00
err = fscrypt_get_encryption_info(inode, false);
fscrypt: new helper function - fscrypt_get_symlink() Filesystems also have duplicate code to support ->get_link() on encrypted symlinks. Factor it out into a new function fscrypt_get_symlink(). It takes in the contents of the encrypted symlink on-disk and provides the target (decrypted or encoded) that should be returned from ->get_link(). Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2018-01-05 21:45:02 +03:00
if (err)
return ERR_PTR(err);
fscrypt: cache decrypted symlink target in ->i_link Path lookups that traverse encrypted symlink(s) are very slow because each encrypted symlink needs to be decrypted each time it's followed. This also involves dropping out of rcu-walk mode. Make encrypted symlinks faster by caching the decrypted symlink target in ->i_link. The first call to fscrypt_get_symlink() sets it. Then, the existing VFS path lookup code uses the non-NULL ->i_link to take the fast path where ->get_link() isn't called, and lookups in rcu-walk mode remain in rcu-walk mode. Also set ->i_link immediately when a new encrypted symlink is created. To safely free the symlink target after an RCU grace period has elapsed, introduce a new function fscrypt_free_inode(), and make the relevant filesystems call it just before actually freeing the inode. Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2019-04-10 23:21:15 +03:00
has_key = fscrypt_has_encryption_key(inode);
fscrypt: new helper function - fscrypt_get_symlink() Filesystems also have duplicate code to support ->get_link() on encrypted symlinks. Factor it out into a new function fscrypt_get_symlink(). It takes in the contents of the encrypted symlink on-disk and provides the target (decrypted or encoded) that should be returned from ->get_link(). Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2018-01-05 21:45:02 +03:00
/*
* For historical reasons, encrypted symlink targets are prefixed with
* the ciphertext length, even though this is redundant with i_size.
*/
if (max_size < sizeof(*sd))
return ERR_PTR(-EUCLEAN);
sd = caddr;
cstr.name = (unsigned char *)sd->encrypted_path;
cstr.len = le16_to_cpu(sd->len);
if (cstr.len == 0)
return ERR_PTR(-EUCLEAN);
if (cstr.len + sizeof(*sd) - 1 > max_size)
return ERR_PTR(-EUCLEAN);
fscrypt: drop unused inode argument from fscrypt_fname_alloc_buffer Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200810142139.487631-1-jlayton@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
2020-08-10 17:21:39 +03:00
err = fscrypt_fname_alloc_buffer(cstr.len, &pstr);
fscrypt: new helper function - fscrypt_get_symlink() Filesystems also have duplicate code to support ->get_link() on encrypted symlinks. Factor it out into a new function fscrypt_get_symlink(). It takes in the contents of the encrypted symlink on-disk and provides the target (decrypted or encoded) that should be returned from ->get_link(). Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2018-01-05 21:45:02 +03:00
if (err)
return ERR_PTR(err);
err = fscrypt_fname_disk_to_usr(inode, 0, 0, &cstr, &pstr);
if (err)
goto err_kfree;
err = -EUCLEAN;
if (pstr.name[0] == '\0')
goto err_kfree;
pstr.name[pstr.len] = '\0';
fscrypt: cache decrypted symlink target in ->i_link Path lookups that traverse encrypted symlink(s) are very slow because each encrypted symlink needs to be decrypted each time it's followed. This also involves dropping out of rcu-walk mode. Make encrypted symlinks faster by caching the decrypted symlink target in ->i_link. The first call to fscrypt_get_symlink() sets it. Then, the existing VFS path lookup code uses the non-NULL ->i_link to take the fast path where ->get_link() isn't called, and lookups in rcu-walk mode remain in rcu-walk mode. Also set ->i_link immediately when a new encrypted symlink is created. To safely free the symlink target after an RCU grace period has elapsed, introduce a new function fscrypt_free_inode(), and make the relevant filesystems call it just before actually freeing the inode. Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2019-04-10 23:21:15 +03:00
/*
* Cache decrypted symlink targets in i_link for later use. Don't cache
* symlink targets encoded without the key, since those become outdated
* once the key is added. This pairs with the READ_ONCE() above and in
* the VFS path lookup code.
*/
if (!has_key ||
cmpxchg_release(&inode->i_link, NULL, pstr.name) != NULL)
set_delayed_call(done, kfree_link, pstr.name);
fscrypt: new helper function - fscrypt_get_symlink() Filesystems also have duplicate code to support ->get_link() on encrypted symlinks. Factor it out into a new function fscrypt_get_symlink(). It takes in the contents of the encrypted symlink on-disk and provides the target (decrypted or encoded) that should be returned from ->get_link(). Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2018-01-05 21:45:02 +03:00
return pstr.name;
err_kfree:
kfree(pstr.name);
return ERR_PTR(err);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(fscrypt_get_symlink);