License cleanup: add SPDX GPL-2.0 license identifier to files with no license
Many source files in the tree are missing licensing information, which
makes it harder for compliance tools to determine the correct license.
By default all files without license information are under the default
license of the kernel, which is GPL version 2.
Update the files which contain no license information with the 'GPL-2.0'
SPDX license identifier. The SPDX identifier is a legally binding
shorthand, which can be used instead of the full boiler plate text.
This patch is based on work done by Thomas Gleixner and Kate Stewart and
Philippe Ombredanne.
How this work was done:
Patches were generated and checked against linux-4.14-rc6 for a subset of
the use cases:
- file had no licensing information it it.
- file was a */uapi/* one with no licensing information in it,
- file was a */uapi/* one with existing licensing information,
Further patches will be generated in subsequent months to fix up cases
where non-standard license headers were used, and references to license
had to be inferred by heuristics based on keywords.
The analysis to determine which SPDX License Identifier to be applied to
a file was done in a spreadsheet of side by side results from of the
output of two independent scanners (ScanCode & Windriver) producing SPDX
tag:value files created by Philippe Ombredanne. Philippe prepared the
base worksheet, and did an initial spot review of a few 1000 files.
The 4.13 kernel was the starting point of the analysis with 60,537 files
assessed. Kate Stewart did a file by file comparison of the scanner
results in the spreadsheet to determine which SPDX license identifier(s)
to be applied to the file. She confirmed any determination that was not
immediately clear with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation.
Criteria used to select files for SPDX license identifier tagging was:
- Files considered eligible had to be source code files.
- Make and config files were included as candidates if they contained >5
lines of source
- File already had some variant of a license header in it (even if <5
lines).
All documentation files were explicitly excluded.
The following heuristics were used to determine which SPDX license
identifiers to apply.
- when both scanners couldn't find any license traces, file was
considered to have no license information in it, and the top level
COPYING file license applied.
For non */uapi/* files that summary was:
SPDX license identifier # files
---------------------------------------------------|-------
GPL-2.0 11139
and resulted in the first patch in this series.
If that file was a */uapi/* path one, it was "GPL-2.0 WITH
Linux-syscall-note" otherwise it was "GPL-2.0". Results of that was:
SPDX license identifier # files
---------------------------------------------------|-------
GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note 930
and resulted in the second patch in this series.
- if a file had some form of licensing information in it, and was one
of the */uapi/* ones, it was denoted with the Linux-syscall-note if
any GPL family license was found in the file or had no licensing in
it (per prior point). Results summary:
SPDX license identifier # files
---------------------------------------------------|------
GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note 270
GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 169
((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-2-Clause) 21
((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause) 17
LGPL-2.1+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 15
GPL-1.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 14
((GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause) 5
LGPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 4
LGPL-2.1 WITH Linux-syscall-note 3
((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR MIT) 3
((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) AND MIT) 1
and that resulted in the third patch in this series.
- when the two scanners agreed on the detected license(s), that became
the concluded license(s).
- when there was disagreement between the two scanners (one detected a
license but the other didn't, or they both detected different
licenses) a manual inspection of the file occurred.
- In most cases a manual inspection of the information in the file
resulted in a clear resolution of the license that should apply (and
which scanner probably needed to revisit its heuristics).
- When it was not immediately clear, the license identifier was
confirmed with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation.
- If there was any question as to the appropriate license identifier,
the file was flagged for further research and to be revisited later
in time.
In total, over 70 hours of logged manual review was done on the
spreadsheet to determine the SPDX license identifiers to apply to the
source files by Kate, Philippe, Thomas and, in some cases, confirmation
by lawyers working with the Linux Foundation.
Kate also obtained a third independent scan of the 4.13 code base from
FOSSology, and compared selected files where the other two scanners
disagreed against that SPDX file, to see if there was new insights. The
Windriver scanner is based on an older version of FOSSology in part, so
they are related.
Thomas did random spot checks in about 500 files from the spreadsheets
for the uapi headers and agreed with SPDX license identifier in the
files he inspected. For the non-uapi files Thomas did random spot checks
in about 15000 files.
In initial set of patches against 4.14-rc6, 3 files were found to have
copy/paste license identifier errors, and have been fixed to reflect the
correct identifier.
Additionally Philippe spent 10 hours this week doing a detailed manual
inspection and review of the 12,461 patched files from the initial patch
version early this week with:
- a full scancode scan run, collecting the matched texts, detected
license ids and scores
- reviewing anything where there was a license detected (about 500+
files) to ensure that the applied SPDX license was correct
- reviewing anything where there was no detection but the patch license
was not GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note to ensure that the applied
SPDX license was correct
This produced a worksheet with 20 files needing minor correction. This
worksheet was then exported into 3 different .csv files for the
different types of files to be modified.
These .csv files were then reviewed by Greg. Thomas wrote a script to
parse the csv files and add the proper SPDX tag to the file, in the
format that the file expected. This script was further refined by Greg
based on the output to detect more types of files automatically and to
distinguish between header and source .c files (which need different
comment types.) Finally Greg ran the script using the .csv files to
generate the patches.
Reviewed-by: Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@nexb.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2017-11-01 17:07:57 +03:00
|
|
|
# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
|
2018-03-09 01:00:36 +03:00
|
|
|
include ../scripts/Makefile.include
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018-03-09 01:00:37 +03:00
|
|
|
prefix ?= /usr/local
|
filter: add minimal BPF JIT image disassembler
This is a minimal stand-alone user space helper, that allows for debugging or
verification of emitted BPF JIT images. This is in particular useful for
emitted opcode debugging, since minor bugs in the JIT compiler can be fatal.
The disassembler is architecture generic and uses libopcodes and libbfd.
How to get to the disassembly, example:
1) `echo 2 > /proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable`
2) Load a BPF filter (e.g. `tcpdump -p -n -s 0 -i eth1 host 192.168.20.0/24`)
3) Run e.g. `bpf_jit_disasm -o` to disassemble the most recent JIT code output
`bpf_jit_disasm -o` will display the related opcodes to a particular instruction
as well. Example for x86_64:
$ ./bpf_jit_disasm
94 bytes emitted from JIT compiler (pass:3, flen:9)
ffffffffa0356000 + <x>:
0: push %rbp
1: mov %rsp,%rbp
4: sub $0x60,%rsp
8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp)
c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d
10: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d
14: mov 0xe0(%rdi),%r8
1b: mov $0xc,%esi
20: callq 0xffffffffe0d01b71
25: cmp $0x86dd,%eax
2a: jne 0x000000000000003d
2c: mov $0x14,%esi
31: callq 0xffffffffe0d01b8d
36: cmp $0x6,%eax
[...]
5c: leaveq
5d: retq
$ ./bpf_jit_disasm -o
94 bytes emitted from JIT compiler (pass:3, flen:9)
ffffffffa0356000 + <x>:
0: push %rbp
55
1: mov %rsp,%rbp
48 89 e5
4: sub $0x60,%rsp
48 83 ec 60
8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp)
48 89 5d f8
c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d
44 8b 4f 68
10: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d
44 2b 4f 6c
[...]
5c: leaveq
c9
5d: retq
c3
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2013-03-20 16:11:47 +04:00
|
|
|
|
filter: bpf_asm: add minimal bpf asm tool
There are a couple of valid use cases for a minimal low-level bpf asm
like tool, for example, using/linking to libpcap is not an option, the
required BPF filters use Linux extensions that are not supported by
libpcap's compiler, a filter might be more complex and not cleanly
implementable with libpcap's compiler, particular filter codes should
be optimized differently than libpcap's internal BPF compiler does,
or for security audits of emitted BPF JIT code for prepared set of BPF
instructions resp. BPF JIT compiler development in general.
Then, in such cases writing such a filter in low-level syntax can be
an good alternative, for example, xt_bpf and cls_bpf users might have
requirements that could result in more complex filter code, or one that
cannot be expressed with libpcap (e.g. different return codes in
cls_bpf for flowids on various BPF code paths).
Moreover, BPF JIT implementors may wish to manually write test cases
in order to verify the resulting JIT image, and thus need low-level
access to BPF code generation as well. Therefore, complete the available
toolchain for BPF with this small bpf_asm helper tool for the tools/net/
directory. These 3 complementary minimal helper tools round up and
facilitate BPF development.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2013-12-12 02:43:44 +04:00
|
|
|
LEX = flex
|
|
|
|
|
YACC = bison
|
2017-10-05 06:10:04 +03:00
|
|
|
MAKE = make
|
2018-03-09 01:00:37 +03:00
|
|
|
INSTALL ?= install
|
filter: add minimal BPF JIT image disassembler
This is a minimal stand-alone user space helper, that allows for debugging or
verification of emitted BPF JIT images. This is in particular useful for
emitted opcode debugging, since minor bugs in the JIT compiler can be fatal.
The disassembler is architecture generic and uses libopcodes and libbfd.
How to get to the disassembly, example:
1) `echo 2 > /proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable`
2) Load a BPF filter (e.g. `tcpdump -p -n -s 0 -i eth1 host 192.168.20.0/24`)
3) Run e.g. `bpf_jit_disasm -o` to disassemble the most recent JIT code output
`bpf_jit_disasm -o` will display the related opcodes to a particular instruction
as well. Example for x86_64:
$ ./bpf_jit_disasm
94 bytes emitted from JIT compiler (pass:3, flen:9)
ffffffffa0356000 + <x>:
0: push %rbp
1: mov %rsp,%rbp
4: sub $0x60,%rsp
8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp)
c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d
10: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d
14: mov 0xe0(%rdi),%r8
1b: mov $0xc,%esi
20: callq 0xffffffffe0d01b71
25: cmp $0x86dd,%eax
2a: jne 0x000000000000003d
2c: mov $0x14,%esi
31: callq 0xffffffffe0d01b8d
36: cmp $0x6,%eax
[...]
5c: leaveq
5d: retq
$ ./bpf_jit_disasm -o
94 bytes emitted from JIT compiler (pass:3, flen:9)
ffffffffa0356000 + <x>:
0: push %rbp
55
1: mov %rsp,%rbp
48 89 e5
4: sub $0x60,%rsp
48 83 ec 60
8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp)
48 89 5d f8
c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d
44 8b 4f 68
10: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d
44 2b 4f 6c
[...]
5c: leaveq
c9
5d: retq
c3
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2013-03-20 16:11:47 +04:00
|
|
|
|
2015-11-12 01:24:27 +03:00
|
|
|
CFLAGS += -Wall -O2
|
2019-11-21 15:41:40 +03:00
|
|
|
CFLAGS += -D__EXPORTED_HEADERS__ -I$(srctree)/tools/include/uapi \
|
|
|
|
|
-I$(srctree)/tools/include
|
2015-11-12 01:24:27 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2019-09-27 04:13:44 +03:00
|
|
|
# This will work when bpf is built in tools env. where srctree
|
|
|
|
|
# isn't set and when invoked from selftests build, where srctree
|
|
|
|
|
# is set to ".". building_out_of_srctree is undefined for in srctree
|
|
|
|
|
# builds
|
2019-11-19 13:56:26 +03:00
|
|
|
ifeq ($(srctree),)
|
|
|
|
|
update_srctree := 1
|
|
|
|
|
endif
|
2019-09-27 04:13:44 +03:00
|
|
|
ifndef building_out_of_srctree
|
2019-11-19 13:56:26 +03:00
|
|
|
update_srctree := 1
|
|
|
|
|
endif
|
|
|
|
|
ifeq ($(update_srctree),1)
|
2017-12-27 22:16:29 +03:00
|
|
|
srctree := $(patsubst %/,%,$(dir $(CURDIR)))
|
|
|
|
|
srctree := $(patsubst %/,%,$(dir $(srctree)))
|
|
|
|
|
endif
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018-03-09 01:00:40 +03:00
|
|
|
ifeq ($(V),1)
|
|
|
|
|
Q =
|
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
|
Q = @
|
|
|
|
|
endif
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-12-27 22:16:29 +03:00
|
|
|
FEATURE_USER = .bpf
|
|
|
|
|
FEATURE_TESTS = libbfd disassembler-four-args
|
|
|
|
|
FEATURE_DISPLAY = libbfd disassembler-four-args
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
check_feat := 1
|
2020-09-01 17:43:43 +03:00
|
|
|
NON_CHECK_FEAT_TARGETS := clean bpftool_clean runqslower_clean resolve_btfids_clean
|
2017-12-27 22:16:29 +03:00
|
|
|
ifdef MAKECMDGOALS
|
|
|
|
|
ifeq ($(filter-out $(NON_CHECK_FEAT_TARGETS),$(MAKECMDGOALS)),)
|
|
|
|
|
check_feat := 0
|
|
|
|
|
endif
|
|
|
|
|
endif
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ifeq ($(check_feat),1)
|
|
|
|
|
ifeq ($(FEATURES_DUMP),)
|
|
|
|
|
include $(srctree)/tools/build/Makefile.feature
|
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
|
include $(FEATURES_DUMP)
|
|
|
|
|
endif
|
|
|
|
|
endif
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ifeq ($(feature-disassembler-four-args), 1)
|
|
|
|
|
CFLAGS += -DDISASM_FOUR_ARGS_SIGNATURE
|
|
|
|
|
endif
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018-03-09 01:00:36 +03:00
|
|
|
$(OUTPUT)%.yacc.c: $(srctree)/tools/bpf/%.y
|
2018-03-09 01:00:40 +03:00
|
|
|
$(QUIET_BISON)$(YACC) -o $@ -d $<
|
filter: bpf_asm: add minimal bpf asm tool
There are a couple of valid use cases for a minimal low-level bpf asm
like tool, for example, using/linking to libpcap is not an option, the
required BPF filters use Linux extensions that are not supported by
libpcap's compiler, a filter might be more complex and not cleanly
implementable with libpcap's compiler, particular filter codes should
be optimized differently than libpcap's internal BPF compiler does,
or for security audits of emitted BPF JIT code for prepared set of BPF
instructions resp. BPF JIT compiler development in general.
Then, in such cases writing such a filter in low-level syntax can be
an good alternative, for example, xt_bpf and cls_bpf users might have
requirements that could result in more complex filter code, or one that
cannot be expressed with libpcap (e.g. different return codes in
cls_bpf for flowids on various BPF code paths).
Moreover, BPF JIT implementors may wish to manually write test cases
in order to verify the resulting JIT image, and thus need low-level
access to BPF code generation as well. Therefore, complete the available
toolchain for BPF with this small bpf_asm helper tool for the tools/net/
directory. These 3 complementary minimal helper tools round up and
facilitate BPF development.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2013-12-12 02:43:44 +04:00
|
|
|
|
2018-03-09 01:00:36 +03:00
|
|
|
$(OUTPUT)%.lex.c: $(srctree)/tools/bpf/%.l
|
2018-03-09 01:00:40 +03:00
|
|
|
$(QUIET_FLEX)$(LEX) -o $@ $<
|
filter: bpf_asm: add minimal bpf asm tool
There are a couple of valid use cases for a minimal low-level bpf asm
like tool, for example, using/linking to libpcap is not an option, the
required BPF filters use Linux extensions that are not supported by
libpcap's compiler, a filter might be more complex and not cleanly
implementable with libpcap's compiler, particular filter codes should
be optimized differently than libpcap's internal BPF compiler does,
or for security audits of emitted BPF JIT code for prepared set of BPF
instructions resp. BPF JIT compiler development in general.
Then, in such cases writing such a filter in low-level syntax can be
an good alternative, for example, xt_bpf and cls_bpf users might have
requirements that could result in more complex filter code, or one that
cannot be expressed with libpcap (e.g. different return codes in
cls_bpf for flowids on various BPF code paths).
Moreover, BPF JIT implementors may wish to manually write test cases
in order to verify the resulting JIT image, and thus need low-level
access to BPF code generation as well. Therefore, complete the available
toolchain for BPF with this small bpf_asm helper tool for the tools/net/
directory. These 3 complementary minimal helper tools round up and
facilitate BPF development.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2013-12-12 02:43:44 +04:00
|
|
|
|
2018-03-09 01:00:36 +03:00
|
|
|
$(OUTPUT)%.o: $(srctree)/tools/bpf/%.c
|
2020-06-02 20:56:48 +03:00
|
|
|
$(QUIET_CC)$(CC) $(CFLAGS) -c -o $@ $<
|
2018-03-09 01:00:40 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$(OUTPUT)%.yacc.o: $(OUTPUT)%.yacc.c
|
2020-06-02 20:56:48 +03:00
|
|
|
$(QUIET_CC)$(CC) $(CFLAGS) -c -o $@ $<
|
2018-03-09 01:00:40 +03:00
|
|
|
$(OUTPUT)%.lex.o: $(OUTPUT)%.lex.c
|
2020-06-02 20:56:48 +03:00
|
|
|
$(QUIET_CC)$(CC) $(CFLAGS) -c -o $@ $<
|
2018-03-09 01:00:36 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2018-03-09 01:00:38 +03:00
|
|
|
PROGS = $(OUTPUT)bpf_jit_disasm $(OUTPUT)bpf_dbg $(OUTPUT)bpf_asm
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-01-13 10:31:42 +03:00
|
|
|
all: $(PROGS) bpftool runqslower
|
filter: add minimal BPF JIT image disassembler
This is a minimal stand-alone user space helper, that allows for debugging or
verification of emitted BPF JIT images. This is in particular useful for
emitted opcode debugging, since minor bugs in the JIT compiler can be fatal.
The disassembler is architecture generic and uses libopcodes and libbfd.
How to get to the disassembly, example:
1) `echo 2 > /proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable`
2) Load a BPF filter (e.g. `tcpdump -p -n -s 0 -i eth1 host 192.168.20.0/24`)
3) Run e.g. `bpf_jit_disasm -o` to disassemble the most recent JIT code output
`bpf_jit_disasm -o` will display the related opcodes to a particular instruction
as well. Example for x86_64:
$ ./bpf_jit_disasm
94 bytes emitted from JIT compiler (pass:3, flen:9)
ffffffffa0356000 + <x>:
0: push %rbp
1: mov %rsp,%rbp
4: sub $0x60,%rsp
8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp)
c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d
10: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d
14: mov 0xe0(%rdi),%r8
1b: mov $0xc,%esi
20: callq 0xffffffffe0d01b71
25: cmp $0x86dd,%eax
2a: jne 0x000000000000003d
2c: mov $0x14,%esi
31: callq 0xffffffffe0d01b8d
36: cmp $0x6,%eax
[...]
5c: leaveq
5d: retq
$ ./bpf_jit_disasm -o
94 bytes emitted from JIT compiler (pass:3, flen:9)
ffffffffa0356000 + <x>:
0: push %rbp
55
1: mov %rsp,%rbp
48 89 e5
4: sub $0x60,%rsp
48 83 ec 60
8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp)
48 89 5d f8
c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d
44 8b 4f 68
10: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d
44 2b 4f 6c
[...]
5c: leaveq
c9
5d: retq
c3
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2013-03-20 16:11:47 +04:00
|
|
|
|
2018-03-09 01:00:36 +03:00
|
|
|
$(OUTPUT)bpf_jit_disasm: CFLAGS += -DPACKAGE='bpf_jit_disasm'
|
|
|
|
|
$(OUTPUT)bpf_jit_disasm: $(OUTPUT)bpf_jit_disasm.o
|
2018-03-09 01:00:40 +03:00
|
|
|
$(QUIET_LINK)$(CC) $(CFLAGS) -o $@ $^ -lopcodes -lbfd -ldl
|
filter: add minimal BPF JIT image disassembler
This is a minimal stand-alone user space helper, that allows for debugging or
verification of emitted BPF JIT images. This is in particular useful for
emitted opcode debugging, since minor bugs in the JIT compiler can be fatal.
The disassembler is architecture generic and uses libopcodes and libbfd.
How to get to the disassembly, example:
1) `echo 2 > /proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable`
2) Load a BPF filter (e.g. `tcpdump -p -n -s 0 -i eth1 host 192.168.20.0/24`)
3) Run e.g. `bpf_jit_disasm -o` to disassemble the most recent JIT code output
`bpf_jit_disasm -o` will display the related opcodes to a particular instruction
as well. Example for x86_64:
$ ./bpf_jit_disasm
94 bytes emitted from JIT compiler (pass:3, flen:9)
ffffffffa0356000 + <x>:
0: push %rbp
1: mov %rsp,%rbp
4: sub $0x60,%rsp
8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp)
c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d
10: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d
14: mov 0xe0(%rdi),%r8
1b: mov $0xc,%esi
20: callq 0xffffffffe0d01b71
25: cmp $0x86dd,%eax
2a: jne 0x000000000000003d
2c: mov $0x14,%esi
31: callq 0xffffffffe0d01b8d
36: cmp $0x6,%eax
[...]
5c: leaveq
5d: retq
$ ./bpf_jit_disasm -o
94 bytes emitted from JIT compiler (pass:3, flen:9)
ffffffffa0356000 + <x>:
0: push %rbp
55
1: mov %rsp,%rbp
48 89 e5
4: sub $0x60,%rsp
48 83 ec 60
8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp)
48 89 5d f8
c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d
44 8b 4f 68
10: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d
44 2b 4f 6c
[...]
5c: leaveq
c9
5d: retq
c3
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2013-03-20 16:11:47 +04:00
|
|
|
|
2018-03-09 01:00:36 +03:00
|
|
|
$(OUTPUT)bpf_dbg: $(OUTPUT)bpf_dbg.o
|
2018-03-09 01:00:40 +03:00
|
|
|
$(QUIET_LINK)$(CC) $(CFLAGS) -o $@ $^ -lreadline
|
filter: bpf_dbg: add minimal bpf debugger
This patch adds a minimal BPF debugger that "emulates" the kernel's
BPF engine (w/o extensions) and allows for single stepping (forwards
and backwards through BPF code) or running with >=1 breakpoints through
selected or all packets from a pcap file with a provided user filter
in order to facilitate verification of a BPF program. When a breakpoint
is being hit, it dumps all register contents, decoded instructions and
in case of branches both decoded branch targets as well as other useful
information.
Having this facility is in particular useful to verify BPF programs
against given test traffic *before* attaching to a live system.
With the general availability of cls_bpf, xt_bpf, socket filters,
team driver and e.g. PTP code, all BPF users, quite often a single
more complex BPF program is being used. Reasons for a more complex
BPF program are primarily to optimize execution time for making a
verdict when multiple simple BPF programs are combined into one in
order to prevent parsing same headers multiple times. In particular,
for cls_bpf that can have various return paths for encoding flowids,
and xt_bpf to come to a fw verdict this can be the case.
Therefore, as this can result in more complex and harder to debug
code, it would be very useful to have this minimal tool for testing
purposes. It can also be of help for BPF JIT developers as filters
are "test attached" to the kernel on a temporary socket thus
triggering a JIT image dump when enabled. The tool uses an interactive
libreadline shell with auto-completion and history support.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2013-12-12 02:43:43 +04:00
|
|
|
|
2018-03-09 01:00:36 +03:00
|
|
|
$(OUTPUT)bpf_asm: $(OUTPUT)bpf_asm.o $(OUTPUT)bpf_exp.yacc.o $(OUTPUT)bpf_exp.lex.o
|
2018-03-09 01:00:40 +03:00
|
|
|
$(QUIET_LINK)$(CC) $(CFLAGS) -o $@ $^
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018-03-09 01:00:41 +03:00
|
|
|
$(OUTPUT)bpf_exp.lex.c: $(OUTPUT)bpf_exp.yacc.c
|
2018-04-26 00:22:45 +03:00
|
|
|
$(OUTPUT)bpf_exp.yacc.o: $(OUTPUT)bpf_exp.yacc.c
|
|
|
|
|
$(OUTPUT)bpf_exp.lex.o: $(OUTPUT)bpf_exp.lex.c
|
filter: bpf_asm: add minimal bpf asm tool
There are a couple of valid use cases for a minimal low-level bpf asm
like tool, for example, using/linking to libpcap is not an option, the
required BPF filters use Linux extensions that are not supported by
libpcap's compiler, a filter might be more complex and not cleanly
implementable with libpcap's compiler, particular filter codes should
be optimized differently than libpcap's internal BPF compiler does,
or for security audits of emitted BPF JIT code for prepared set of BPF
instructions resp. BPF JIT compiler development in general.
Then, in such cases writing such a filter in low-level syntax can be
an good alternative, for example, xt_bpf and cls_bpf users might have
requirements that could result in more complex filter code, or one that
cannot be expressed with libpcap (e.g. different return codes in
cls_bpf for flowids on various BPF code paths).
Moreover, BPF JIT implementors may wish to manually write test cases
in order to verify the resulting JIT image, and thus need low-level
access to BPF code generation as well. Therefore, complete the available
toolchain for BPF with this small bpf_asm helper tool for the tools/net/
directory. These 3 complementary minimal helper tools round up and
facilitate BPF development.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2013-12-12 02:43:44 +04:00
|
|
|
|
2020-09-01 17:43:43 +03:00
|
|
|
clean: bpftool_clean runqslower_clean resolve_btfids_clean
|
2018-03-09 01:00:40 +03:00
|
|
|
$(call QUIET_CLEAN, bpf-progs)
|
2019-08-30 14:00:39 +03:00
|
|
|
$(Q)$(RM) -r -- $(OUTPUT)*.o $(OUTPUT)bpf_jit_disasm $(OUTPUT)bpf_dbg \
|
2018-03-09 01:00:36 +03:00
|
|
|
$(OUTPUT)bpf_asm $(OUTPUT)bpf_exp.yacc.* $(OUTPUT)bpf_exp.lex.*
|
2018-03-16 09:26:17 +03:00
|
|
|
$(call QUIET_CLEAN, core-gen)
|
2019-08-30 14:00:39 +03:00
|
|
|
$(Q)$(RM) -- $(OUTPUT)FEATURE-DUMP.bpf
|
|
|
|
|
$(Q)$(RM) -r -- $(OUTPUT)feature
|
filter: add minimal BPF JIT image disassembler
This is a minimal stand-alone user space helper, that allows for debugging or
verification of emitted BPF JIT images. This is in particular useful for
emitted opcode debugging, since minor bugs in the JIT compiler can be fatal.
The disassembler is architecture generic and uses libopcodes and libbfd.
How to get to the disassembly, example:
1) `echo 2 > /proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable`
2) Load a BPF filter (e.g. `tcpdump -p -n -s 0 -i eth1 host 192.168.20.0/24`)
3) Run e.g. `bpf_jit_disasm -o` to disassemble the most recent JIT code output
`bpf_jit_disasm -o` will display the related opcodes to a particular instruction
as well. Example for x86_64:
$ ./bpf_jit_disasm
94 bytes emitted from JIT compiler (pass:3, flen:9)
ffffffffa0356000 + <x>:
0: push %rbp
1: mov %rsp,%rbp
4: sub $0x60,%rsp
8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp)
c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d
10: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d
14: mov 0xe0(%rdi),%r8
1b: mov $0xc,%esi
20: callq 0xffffffffe0d01b71
25: cmp $0x86dd,%eax
2a: jne 0x000000000000003d
2c: mov $0x14,%esi
31: callq 0xffffffffe0d01b8d
36: cmp $0x6,%eax
[...]
5c: leaveq
5d: retq
$ ./bpf_jit_disasm -o
94 bytes emitted from JIT compiler (pass:3, flen:9)
ffffffffa0356000 + <x>:
0: push %rbp
55
1: mov %rsp,%rbp
48 89 e5
4: sub $0x60,%rsp
48 83 ec 60
8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp)
48 89 5d f8
c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d
44 8b 4f 68
10: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d
44 2b 4f 6c
[...]
5c: leaveq
c9
5d: retq
c3
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2013-03-20 16:11:47 +04:00
|
|
|
|
2020-01-13 10:31:42 +03:00
|
|
|
install: $(PROGS) bpftool_install runqslower_install
|
2018-03-09 01:00:40 +03:00
|
|
|
$(call QUIET_INSTALL, bpf_jit_disasm)
|
|
|
|
|
$(Q)$(INSTALL) -m 0755 -d $(DESTDIR)$(prefix)/bin
|
|
|
|
|
$(Q)$(INSTALL) $(OUTPUT)bpf_jit_disasm $(DESTDIR)$(prefix)/bin/bpf_jit_disasm
|
|
|
|
|
$(call QUIET_INSTALL, bpf_dbg)
|
|
|
|
|
$(Q)$(INSTALL) $(OUTPUT)bpf_dbg $(DESTDIR)$(prefix)/bin/bpf_dbg
|
|
|
|
|
$(call QUIET_INSTALL, bpf_asm)
|
|
|
|
|
$(Q)$(INSTALL) $(OUTPUT)bpf_asm $(DESTDIR)$(prefix)/bin/bpf_asm
|
2017-10-05 06:10:04 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
bpftool:
|
2018-03-09 01:00:39 +03:00
|
|
|
$(call descend,bpftool)
|
2017-10-05 06:10:04 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
bpftool_install:
|
2018-03-09 01:00:39 +03:00
|
|
|
$(call descend,bpftool,install)
|
2017-10-05 06:10:04 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
bpftool_clean:
|
2018-03-09 01:00:39 +03:00
|
|
|
$(call descend,bpftool,clean)
|
2017-10-05 06:10:04 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2020-01-13 10:31:42 +03:00
|
|
|
runqslower:
|
|
|
|
|
$(call descend,runqslower)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
runqslower_install:
|
|
|
|
|
$(call descend,runqslower,install)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
runqslower_clean:
|
|
|
|
|
$(call descend,runqslower,clean)
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-07-12 00:53:22 +03:00
|
|
|
resolve_btfids:
|
|
|
|
|
$(call descend,resolve_btfids)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
resolve_btfids_clean:
|
|
|
|
|
$(call descend,resolve_btfids,clean)
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-01-13 10:31:42 +03:00
|
|
|
.PHONY: all install clean bpftool bpftool_install bpftool_clean \
|
2020-07-12 00:53:22 +03:00
|
|
|
runqslower runqslower_install runqslower_clean \
|
|
|
|
|
resolve_btfids resolve_btfids_clean
|
